Bug#731147: createrepo: -s option not implemented fully
Has there been any traction on this bug? It's impacting some work I've had to do in a fairly major way. I believe this fix is already merged upstream and I can confirm that this patch resolved the problem. Ryan
Bug#731147: createrepo: -s option not implemented fully
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:25:26 -0800, Ryan McKern wrote: Has there been any traction on this bug? It's impacting some work I've had to do in a fairly major way. I believe this fix is already merged upstream and I can confirm that this patch resolved the problem. Hi Ryan, thanks for confirming that the patch resolves this bug for you. I'm working on packaging the latest upstream release which includes the fix. -- mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#731147: createrepo: -s option not implemented fully
Latest release, as in 0.10.3? I'm more concerned with keeping some degree of parity with RHEL/CentOS/Fedora releases (CentOS 6.5 RHEL7 beta are using 0.9.9, while Fedora uses 0.10.1) than I am with using the latest greatest. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Mike Miller mtmil...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:25:26 -0800, Ryan McKern wrote: Has there been any traction on this bug? It's impacting some work I've had to do in a fairly major way. I believe this fix is already merged upstream and I can confirm that this patch resolved the problem. Hi Ryan, thanks for confirming that the patch resolves this bug for you. I'm working on packaging the latest upstream release which includes the fix. -- mike
Bug#731147: createrepo: -s option not implemented fully
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:20:27 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: running “createrepo -s sha .” no longer produces repositories that can be used with production CentOS 5 instances. This has been reported upstream: Thanks for the report, I don't have a CentOS 5 instance at the moment to confirm but this looks reasonable. There is a new upstream version pending packaging with this fix included, I plan on getting to that soon and I will make sure to test with CentOS 5. -- mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#731147: createrepo: -s option not implemented fully
Package: createrepo Version: 0.9.9-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, running “createrepo -s sha .” no longer produces repositories that can be used with production CentOS 5 instances. This has been reported upstream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500364 This has been fixed upstream. The patch can be seen at: http://createrepo.baseurl.org/gitweb?p=createrepo.git;a=commitdiff;h=7c375657274617649a69c72931a433cf1a6bc505 I can confirm that hand-applying the patch to the relevant files (see “debsums errors” below) fixes the problem. (Actually, just “createrepo .” suddenly changing behaviour was very surprising, but I guess that’s upstream’s fault, not yours.) -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh Versions of packages createrepo depends on: ii deltarpm 3.6+dfsg-1 ii python 2.7.5-5 ii python-deltarpm 3.6+dfsg-1 ii python-libxml2 2.9.1+dfsg1-3 ii python-rpm 4.11.1-3 ii python-sqlitecachec 1.1.4-1 ii rpm 4.11.1-3 ii yum 3.4.3-2 createrepo recommends no packages. createrepo suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debsums errors found: debsums: changed file /usr/share/createrepo/worker.py (from createrepo package) debsums: changed file /usr/share/pyshared/createrepo/__init__.py (from createrepo package) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
