Bug#777382: O: dogtail
Ulrike Uhlig, le mer. 31 juil. 2019 11:26:11 +0200, a ecrit: > Pushed my modifications to salsa.d.o:debian/dogtail → branch debian/sid. > > I let you judge what you can reuse and what stinks → please remove it, > as said previously, I did not manage to build, because patches need updates. Ok, I had a look, and it seems we had just done the same :) I have thus removed the branch. Thanks for creating the repo etc. anyway! I'll wait a bit in case somebody sees a red flag concerning migrating to python3-dogtail directly, and upload. Samuel
Bug#777382: O: dogtail
Hi! On 31.07.19 11:30, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Ulrike Uhlig, le mer. 31 juil. 2019 11:20:38 +0200, a ecrit: >> On 30.07.19 18:07, Samuel Thibault wrote: >>> Since python2 packages are being phased out, perhaps we can simply >>> directly move to python3-dogtail, or do some people still need a >>> python-dogtail package? (there are no rdeps in Debian itself). >> >> I think this is indeed desirable. > > Which one do you think is desirable? :) > > - directly move to python3-dogtail, or > - have a python-dogtail for some time. Sorry if my reply was unclear: I think it's fine to move to python3-dogtail directly. Cheers! Ulrike
Bug#777382: O: dogtail
Ulrike Uhlig, le mer. 31 juil. 2019 11:20:38 +0200, a ecrit: > On 30.07.19 18:07, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Since python2 packages are being phased out, perhaps we can simply > > directly move to python3-dogtail, or do some people still need a > > python-dogtail package? (there are no rdeps in Debian itself). > > I think this is indeed desirable. Which one do you think is desirable? :) - directly move to python3-dogtail, or - have a python-dogtail for some time. Samuel
Bug#777382: O: dogtail
Hi Samuel, On 30.07.19 18:07, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Control: retitle -1 ITA: dogtail > Control: owner -1 sthiba...@debian.org > Control: tags -1 + pending > > Hello, > > intrigeri, le sam. 30 juil. 2016 14:14:16 +0200, a ecrit: >> Maybe start by pushing to a Vcs-Git in collab-maint? > > A repository was created by Ulrike Uhlig in January. I have now > populated it a bit more, notably with the packaging history, and added > the repo URL in its contrib. Great, thank you! I have done some work on the packaging locally, but I haven't pushed it to the repository because I did not have time to test what I did and if I remember correctly, after merging the new upstream version, patches needed updates and the package did not build correctly anymore. (January?! Wow, that was a long time ago and this feels really stupid to not have finished this work). I'll send you my modifications and you can use whatever you need and what makes sense to you (I updated some patches, added gbp.conf, updated from upstream). > Since python2 packages are being phased out, perhaps we can simply > directly move to python3-dogtail, or do some people still need a > python-dogtail package? (there are no rdeps in Debian itself). I think this is indeed desirable. > At any rate, I can adopt this package. Yay! Cheers, Ulrike
Bug#777382: O: dogtail
Hi again! Pushed my modifications to salsa.d.o:debian/dogtail → branch debian/sid. I let you judge what you can reuse and what stinks → please remove it, as said previously, I did not manage to build, because patches need updates. Cheers Ulrike
Bug#777382: O: dogtail
Control: retitle -1 ITA: dogtail Control: owner -1 sthiba...@debian.org Control: tags -1 + pending Hello, intrigeri, le sam. 30 juil. 2016 14:14:16 +0200, a ecrit: > Maybe start by pushing to a Vcs-Git in collab-maint? A repository was created by Ulrike Uhlig in January. I have now populated it a bit more, notably with the packaging history, and added the repo URL in its contrib. Since python2 packages are being phased out, perhaps we can simply directly move to python3-dogtail, or do some people still need a python-dogtail package? (there are no rdeps in Debian itself). At any rate, I can adopt this package. Samuel
Bug#777382: O: dogtail
Hi, (Cc-ing anonym, who's our dogtail specialist at Tails.) Michael Prokop: > I just took care of the upload of a new upstream version of dogtail. Great, thank you :) > @intrigeri: IIRC Tails uses dogtail too, so maybe you're interested > in helping the dogtail maintence? :) I had totally missed the fact that the dogtail package was orphaned, when we started using it at Tails a few months ago. Oops :) I'd rather not commit to any new thing right now, but I've just subscribed to the package tracker so it's now on my radar, and I _might_ find time to give a hand from time to time ⇒ feel free to ask whenever help is needed. Maybe start by pushing to a Vcs-Git in collab-maint? Cheers, -- intrigeri
Bug#777382: O: dogtail
Cc-ing intrigeri from Tails project * Alessio Treglia [Sat Feb 07, 2015 at 08:29:14PM +]: > Due to the lack of time and interest, I ask for someone > else to maintain dogtail. > The packaging is in good shape and upstream is active > and responsive. I just took care of the upload of a new upstream version of dogtail. (We started using dogtail for automated testing but ran into too many issues back then, so we need to re-evaluate current state, if it turns out to be useful for us then I'd be happy to assist in package maintance.) @intrigeri: IIRC Tails uses dogtail too, so maybe you're interested in helping the dogtail maintence? :) FTR: upstream added python3 support, so it might be interesting to switch the packaging from binary package python-dogtail into dogtail, python-dogtail + python3-dogtail? regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#777382: O: dogtail
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I ask for someone else to maintain dogtail. The packaging is in good shape and upstream is active and responsive. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
