Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
> On 10 Jul 2016, at 01:14, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:43:15 +0200 Thibaut VARENE wrote: >> Iâm not interested in becoming a second-class DD after 12 years of >> service. If that package cannot muster the interest of an actual maintainer, >> then maybe it should indeed be removed from the archive. I will keep it >> alive on my website anyway. > > To attract interest of prospective maintainers the package should be > orphaned (or at least RFAed). Done. #830769
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:43:15 +0200 Thibaut VARENE wrote: > Iâm not interested in becoming a second-class DD after 12 years of service. > If that package cannot muster the interest of an actual maintainer, then > maybe it should indeed be removed from the archive. I will keep it alive on > my website anyway. To attract interest of prospective maintainers the package should be orphaned (or at least RFAed). Andreas
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
> Le 8 juil. 2016 à 16:03, Felipe Sateler a écrit : > > On 7 July 2016 at 19:12, Thibaut Varène wrote: >> >>> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> >>> Hi Thibaut, >>> >>> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène wrote: > On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: > > Control: tags 796612 + patch > Control: tags 796612 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. It’s ok, you do what you have to do. If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining “upstream” here now: http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. >>> >>> Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd. >> >> It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on >> Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue >> that the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a >> patch. > > Christian, you didn't attach the first nmu diff apparently, could you > please re send it? > >> >>> Why not upload >>> that version to debian? >> >> Because my upload rights have been revoked with the 1024-bit keys purge, and >> at this point I don’t care anymore. > > I'd be happy to sponsor the upload. But if you are no longer > maintaining the package in debian maybe it should be RMed instead. I’m not interested in becoming a second-class DD after 12 years of service. If that package cannot muster the interest of an actual maintainer, then maybe it should indeed be removed from the archive. I will keep it alive on my website anyway. Best, T.
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
On 7 July 2016 at 19:12, Thibaut Varène wrote: > >> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> Hi Thibaut, >> >> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène wrote: >>> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: Control: tags 796612 + patch Control: tags 796612 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. >>> >>> It’s ok, you do what you have to do. >>> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m >>> maintaining “upstream” here now: >>> >>> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ >>> >>> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. >> >> Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd. > > It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on > Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that > the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch. Christian, you didn't attach the first nmu diff apparently, could you please re send it? > >> Why not upload >> that version to debian? > > Because my upload rights have been revoked with the 1024-bit keys purge, and > at this point I don’t care anymore. I'd be happy to sponsor the upload. But if you are no longer maintaining the package in debian maybe it should be RMed instead. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:12, Thibaut Varène wrote: > > >> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> Hi Thibaut, >> >> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène wrote: >>> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: Control: tags 796612 + patch Control: tags 796612 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. >>> >>> It’s ok, you do what you have to do. >>> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m >>> maintaining “upstream” here now: >>> >>> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ >>> >>> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. >> >> Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd. > > It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on > Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that > the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch. For the record I should probably point out that the NMU is rather meaningless given that 0.18 on a systemd-enabled Jessie system will be utterly broken (as in, the system will go kaboom), precisely because 0.18 is plagued by #784890 Cheers, T.
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Hi Thibaut, > > On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène wrote: >> >>> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: >>> >>> Control: tags 796612 + patch >>> Control: tags 796612 + pending >>> >>> Dear maintainer, >>> >>> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and >>> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I >>> should delay it longer. >> >> It’s ok, you do what you have to do. >> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining >> “upstream” here now: >> >> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ >> >> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. > > Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd. It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch. > Why not upload > that version to debian? Because my upload rights have been revoked with the 1024-bit keys purge, and at this point I don’t care anymore. Cheers, T.
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
Hi Thibaut, On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène wrote: > >> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: >> >> Control: tags 796612 + patch >> Control: tags 796612 + pending >> >> Dear maintainer, >> >> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and >> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I >> should delay it longer. > > It’s ok, you do what you have to do. > If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining > “upstream” here now: > > http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ > > I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd. Why not upload that version to debian? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: > > Control: tags 796612 + patch > Control: tags 796612 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. It’s ok, you do what you have to do. If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining “upstream” here now: http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. Best, T.
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
Control: tags 796612 + patch Control: tags 796612 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. (Sorry for that.) Christian diff -Nru flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/changelog flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/changelog --- flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/changelog 2016-07-01 21:02:21.0 +0200 +++ flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/changelog 2016-07-03 21:51:31.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +flashybrid (0.18+nmu2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Actually build with dh_systemd, fixing my previous upload. + + -- Christian Hofstaedtler Sun, 03 Jul 2016 21:51:14 +0200 + flashybrid (0.18+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/control flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/control --- flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/control 2014-04-08 14:10:36.0 +0200 +++ flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/control 2016-07-03 21:53:07.0 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: admin Priority: extra Maintainer: Thibaut VARENE -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), po-debconf +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), dh-systemd, po-debconf Standards-Version: 3.9.5 Package: flashybrid diff -Nru flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/rules flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/rules --- flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/rules 2014-04-08 14:28:24.0 +0200 +++ flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/rules 2016-07-03 21:52:18.0 +0200 @@ -33,9 +33,11 @@ dh_testroot dh_installchangelogs dh_installdocs README README.old TODO + dh_systemd_enable # It's not a good idea to start flashybrid on install or upgrade. # It's an rcS script.. dh_installinit --no-start + dh_systemd_start --no-start dh_installman dh_link dh_compress