Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

[Thibaut Varène]

> On 10 Jul 2016, at 01:14, Andreas Beckmann  wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:43:15 +0200 Thibaut VARENE  wrote:
>> I’m not interested in becoming a second-class DD after 12 years of 
>> service. If that package cannot muster the interest of an actual maintainer, 
>> then maybe it should indeed be removed from the archive. I will keep it 
>> alive on my website anyway.
> 
> To attract interest of prospective maintainers the package should be
> orphaned (or at least RFAed).

Done.
#830769

Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

[Andreas Beckmann]

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:43:15 +0200 Thibaut VARENE  wrote:
> I’m not interested in becoming a second-class DD after 12 years of service. 
> If that package cannot muster the interest of an actual maintainer, then 
> maybe it should indeed be removed from the archive. I will keep it alive on 
> my website anyway.

To attract interest of prospective maintainers the package should be
orphaned (or at least RFAed).


Andreas

Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

[Thibaut VARENE]

> Le 8 juil. 2016 à 16:03, Felipe Sateler  a écrit :
> 
> On 7 July 2016 at 19:12, Thibaut Varène  wrote:
>> 
>>> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Thibaut,
>>> 
>>> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène  wrote:
 
> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote:
> 
> Control: tags 796612 + patch
> Control: tags 796612 + pending
> 
> Dear maintainer,
> 
> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
 
 It’s ok, you do what you have to do.
 If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m 
 maintaining “upstream” here now:
 
 http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/
 
 I’d welcome a patch to merge btw.
>>> 
>>> Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd.
>> 
>> It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on 
>> Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue 
>> that the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a 
>> patch.
> 
> Christian, you didn't attach the first nmu diff apparently, could you
> please re send it?
> 
>> 
>>> Why not upload
>>> that version to debian?
>> 
>> Because my upload rights have been revoked with the 1024-bit keys purge, and 
>> at this point I don’t care anymore.
> 
> I'd be happy to sponsor the upload. But if you are no longer
> maintaining the package in debian maybe it should be RMed instead.

I’m not interested in becoming a second-class DD after 12 years of service. If 
that package cannot muster the interest of an actual maintainer, then maybe it 
should indeed be removed from the archive. I will keep it alive on my website 
anyway.

Best,
T.

Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

[Felipe Sateler]

On 7 July 2016 at 19:12, Thibaut Varène  wrote:
>
>> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Thibaut,
>>
>> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène  wrote:
>>>
 On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote:

 Control: tags 796612 + patch
 Control: tags 796612 + pending

 Dear maintainer,

 I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and
 uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
 should delay it longer.
>>>
>>> It’s ok, you do what you have to do.
>>> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m 
>>> maintaining “upstream” here now:
>>>
>>> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/
>>>
>>> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw.
>>
>> Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd.
>
> It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on 
> Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that 
> the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch.

Christian, you didn't attach the first nmu diff apparently, could you
please re send it?

>
>> Why not upload
>> that version to debian?
>
> Because my upload rights have been revoked with the 1024-bit keys purge, and 
> at this point I don’t care anymore.

I'd be happy to sponsor the upload. But if you are no longer
maintaining the package in debian maybe it should be RMed instead.



-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

[Thibaut Varène]

> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:12, Thibaut Varène  wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Thibaut,
>> 
>> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène  wrote:
>>> 
 On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote:
 
 Control: tags 796612 + patch
 Control: tags 796612 + pending
 
 Dear maintainer,
 
 I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and
 uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
 should delay it longer.
>>> 
>>> It’s ok, you do what you have to do.
>>> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m 
>>> maintaining “upstream” here now:
>>> 
>>> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/
>>> 
>>> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw.
>> 
>> Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd.
> 
> It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on 
> Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that 
> the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch.

For the record I should probably point out that the NMU is rather meaningless 
given that 0.18 on a systemd-enabled Jessie system will be utterly broken (as 
in, the system will go kaboom), precisely because 0.18 is plagued by #784890

Cheers,
T.

Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

[Thibaut Varène]

> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler  wrote:
> 
> Hi Thibaut,
> 
> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène  wrote:
>> 
>>> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> Control: tags 796612 + patch
>>> Control: tags 796612 + pending
>>> 
>>> Dear maintainer,
>>> 
>>> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and
>>> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
>>> should delay it longer.
>> 
>> It’s ok, you do what you have to do.
>> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining 
>> “upstream” here now:
>> 
>> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/
>> 
>> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw.
> 
> Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd.

It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on 
Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that 
the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch.

> Why not upload
> that version to debian?

Because my upload rights have been revoked with the 1024-bit keys purge, and at 
this point I don’t care anymore.

Cheers,
T.

Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

[Felipe Sateler]

Hi Thibaut,

On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène  wrote:
>
>> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote:
>>
>> Control: tags 796612 + patch
>> Control: tags 796612 + pending
>>
>> Dear maintainer,
>>
>> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and
>> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
>> should delay it longer.
>
> It’s ok, you do what you have to do.
> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining 
> “upstream” here now:
>
> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/
>
> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw.

Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd. Why not upload
that version to debian?

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

[Thibaut Varène]

> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote:
> 
> Control: tags 796612 + patch
> Control: tags 796612 + pending
> 
> Dear maintainer,
> 
> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.

It’s ok, you do what you have to do.
If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining 
“upstream” here now:

http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/

I’d welcome a patch to merge btw.

Best,
T.

Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

[zeha]

Control: tags 796612 + patch
Control: tags 796612 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

(Sorry for that.)

Christian

diff -Nru flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/changelog 
flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/changelog
--- flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/changelog   2016-07-01 21:02:21.0 
+0200
+++ flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/changelog   2016-07-03 21:51:31.0 
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+flashybrid (0.18+nmu2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Actually build with dh_systemd, fixing my previous upload.
+
+ -- Christian Hofstaedtler   Sun, 03 Jul 2016 21:51:14 +0200
+
 flashybrid (0.18+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/control 
flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/control
--- flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/control 2014-04-08 14:10:36.0 +0200
+++ flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/control 2016-07-03 21:53:07.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: admin
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Thibaut VARENE 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), po-debconf
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), dh-systemd, po-debconf
 Standards-Version: 3.9.5
 
 Package: flashybrid
diff -Nru flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/rules flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/rules
--- flashybrid-0.18+nmu1/debian/rules   2014-04-08 14:28:24.0 +0200
+++ flashybrid-0.18+nmu2/debian/rules   2016-07-03 21:52:18.0 +0200
@@ -33,9 +33,11 @@
dh_testroot
dh_installchangelogs
dh_installdocs README README.old TODO
+   dh_systemd_enable
 #  It's not a good idea to start flashybrid on install or upgrade.
 #  It's an rcS script..
dh_installinit --no-start
+   dh_systemd_start --no-start
dh_installman
dh_link
dh_compress