Bug#824591: transition: evolution-data-server 3.20
On 20/05/16 20:21, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 18.05.2016 um 16:45 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 18/05/16 15:14, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Am 17.05.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Michael Biebl: We used deb-o-matic to compile all reverse dependencies, and only syncevolution failed to build. I was told that a fix for that is in the works. >>> >>> Small update here: syncevolution currently FTBFS because of libical >>> (#824426), once that bug is fixed the package might be binNMUable. >>> >>> Besides syncevolution the only package needing a sourceful upload is >>> evolution. I've prepared that upload in experimental and the package has >>> been built everywhere successfully. >>> So we should be good to go and this looks like a rather painless transition. > > evolution-data-server was uploaded in the mean time. > I also made sourceful uploads of evolution, evolution-ews and evolution-rss. > > Due to some unfortunate timing, evolution-rss on armel did pick up a > dependency on evolution 3.18. > > Emilio, could you please schedule a binNMU for evolution-rss on armel > with a dw on evolution-dev (>= 3.20). Scheduled. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#824591: transition: evolution-data-server 3.20
Am 18.05.2016 um 16:45 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 18/05/16 15:14, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 17.05.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Michael Biebl: >>> We used deb-o-matic to compile all reverse dependencies, and only >>> syncevolution failed to build. I was told that a fix for that is in the >>> works. >> >> Small update here: syncevolution currently FTBFS because of libical >> (#824426), once that bug is fixed the package might be binNMUable. >> >> Besides syncevolution the only package needing a sourceful upload is >> evolution. I've prepared that upload in experimental and the package has >> been built everywhere successfully. >> So we should be good to go and this looks like a rather painless transition. evolution-data-server was uploaded in the mean time. I also made sourceful uploads of evolution, evolution-ews and evolution-rss. Due to some unfortunate timing, evolution-rss on armel did pick up a dependency on evolution 3.18. Emilio, could you please schedule a binNMU for evolution-rss on armel with a dw on evolution-dev (>= 3.20). Thanks, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#824591: transition: evolution-data-server 3.20
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 18/05/16 15:14, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 17.05.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Michael Biebl: >> We used deb-o-matic to compile all reverse dependencies, and only >> syncevolution failed to build. I was told that a fix for that is in the >> works. > > Small update here: syncevolution currently FTBFS because of libical > (#824426), once that bug is fixed the package might be binNMUable. > > Besides syncevolution the only package needing a sourceful upload is > evolution. I've prepared that upload in experimental and the package has > been built everywhere successfully. > So we should be good to go and this looks like a rather painless transition. Go ahead. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#824591: transition: evolution-data-server 3.20
Am 17.05.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Michael Biebl: > We used deb-o-matic to compile all reverse dependencies, and only > syncevolution failed to build. I was told that a fix for that is in the > works. Small update here: syncevolution currently FTBFS because of libical (#824426), once that bug is fixed the package might be binNMUable. Besides syncevolution the only package needing a sourceful upload is evolution. I've prepared that upload in experimental and the package has been built everywhere successfully. So we should be good to go and this looks like a rather painless transition. Regards, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#824591: transition: evolution-data-server 3.20
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, with the libical transition [1] finished, we'd like to proceed with evolution-data-server 3.20. The auto-tracker at 3.20 looks fine. We used deb-o-matic to compile all reverse dependencies, and only syncevolution failed to build. I was told that a fix for that is in the works. Please let us know when we can upload e-d-s 3.20 to unstable. Regards, Michael [1] http://bugs.debian.org/797074 [2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-evolution-data-server.html -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
