Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

[Kurt Roeckx]

block 828618 by 828462
thanks

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> 
> I don't mind. I guess blocks might be better, to remind me to test it
> when the ocaml-ssl bug is fixed.

So I've set that.

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

[Thomas Leonard]

On 26 June 2016 at 13:15, Kurt Roeckx  wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>> On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx  wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
>> > OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
>> > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/zeroinstall-injector_2.10-2_amd64-20160530-2117
>> >
>> > On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various 
>> > of the
>> > reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
>> > https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful 
>> > information.
>> >
>> > There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a 
>> > recent
>> > snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything 
>> > works.
>> >
>> > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.
>>
>> The problem appears to be in ocaml-ssl. See:
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828462
>
> So should it just be merged, or do you want to have 1 block the
> other?

I don't mind. I guess blocks might be better, to remind me to test it
when the ocaml-ssl bug is fixed.

Thanks,


-- 
talex5 (GitHub/Twitter)http://roscidus.com/blog/
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
> > OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
> > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/zeroinstall-injector_2.10-2_amd64-20160530-2117
> >
> > On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various 
> > of the
> > reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
> > https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful 
> > information.
> >
> > There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a 
> > recent
> > snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything 
> > works.
> >
> > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.
> 
> The problem appears to be in ocaml-ssl. See:
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828462

So should it just be merged, or do you want to have 1 block the
other?


Kurt

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

[Thomas Leonard]

On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
> OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/zeroinstall-injector_2.10-2_amd64-20160530-2117
>
> On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of 
> the
> reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
> https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful 
> information.
>
> There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
> snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.
>
> If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.

The problem appears to be in ocaml-ssl. See:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828462


-- 
talex5 (GitHub/Twitter)http://roscidus.com/blog/
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

[Kurt Roeckx]

Source: zeroinstall-injector
Version: 2.10-2
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1

Hi,

OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/zeroinstall-injector_2.10-2_amd64-20160530-2117

On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.

There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.

If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.


Kurt