Bug#844749: Use overlayfs instead
On Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:00:05 + Lorenzo Faletra wrote: > i can confirm that overlayfs works flawlessly on both unstable and testing, > but lb-config doesn't offer an option to choose the proper union module > > if live-build doesn't properly set the LB_UNION_FILESYSTEM, i have seen that > appending the following line to auto/config is a good workaround > > sed -i "s/LB_UNION_FILESYSTEM=\"aufs\"/LB_UNION_FILESYSTEM=\"overlay\"/g" > config/chroot > > I put this line to end of my auto/config and verify that config/chroot have LB_UNION_FILESYSTEM=overlay But when i try to boot have same error. I think that are another place set the use of aufs, are you change anithing else? I use live-build 1:20180925 on buster. thanks! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#844749: Use overlayfs instead
i can confirm that overlayfs works flawlessly on both unstable and testing, but lb-config doesn't offer an option to choose the proper union module if live-build doesn't properly set the LB_UNION_FILESYSTEM, i have seen that appending the following line to auto/config is a good workaround sed -i "s/LB_UNION_FILESYSTEM=\"aufs\"/LB_UNION_FILESYSTEM=\"overlay\"/g" config/chroot On February 9, 2017 8:31:42 AM GMT+01:00, Andreas Heinlein wrote: >The kernels from jessie-backports definitely do not contain aufs >anymore. IIRC, aufs-dkms did not build against the backport kernels. >Aufs was dropped in favour of overlayfs, which should be supported in >the current unstable release of live-build.
Bug#844749: Use overlayfs instead
The kernels from jessie-backports definitely do not contain aufs anymore. IIRC, aufs-dkms did not build against the backport kernels. Aufs was dropped in favour of overlayfs, which should be supported in the current unstable release of live-build.
