Bug#849136: gdk-pixbuf FTBFS on mips64el: pixbuf-randomly-modified test failures

2016-12-24 Thread James Clarke
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 08:32:26AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Adrian Bunk]
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdk-pixbuf=mips64el=2.36.2-1=1482373676
> [...]
> > ERROR: pixbuf-randomly-modified
>
> I tried reproducing this on eller.debia.org, but when I built it there the
> test was successful.  I tried again, and it built as it should now too.
>
> Is there some difference between the porterbox and the autobuilder that
> could be relevant?  If not, I guess the randomness part of the test someone
> affected the result. :(

It also FTBFS on sparc64 due to crashing in pixbuf-randomly-modified
(although with SIGSEGV instead)[0], but I couldn't reproduce it, even
using the same random seed as in the build log. I gave it back and it
rebuilt successfully (albeit on a different buildd). I suggest it is
given back on mips64el and the severity of this lowered (unless this
build also fails).

Regards,
James

[0] 
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdk-pixbuf=sparc64=2.36.2-1=1482373648



Bug#849136: gdk-pixbuf FTBFS on mips64el: pixbuf-randomly-modified test failures

2016-12-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Adrian Bunk]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdk-pixbuf=mips64el=2.36.2-1=1482373676
[...]
> ERROR: pixbuf-randomly-modified

I tried reproducing this on eller.debia.org, but when I built it there the
test was successful.  I tried again, and it built as it should now too.

Is there some difference between the porterbox and the autobuilder that
could be relevant?  If not, I guess the randomness part of the test someone
affected the result. :(

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen



Bug#849136: gdk-pixbuf FTBFS on mips64el: pixbuf-randomly-modified test failures

2016-12-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: gdk-pixbuf
Version: 2.36.2-1
Severity: serious

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdk-pixbuf=mips64el=2.36.2-1=1482373676

...
PASS: pixbuf-fail 20 /pixbuf/fail/invalid.7.ppm
PASS: pixbuf-fail 21 /pixbuf/fail/invalid.8.ppm
PASS: pixbuf-fail 22 /pixbuf/fail/overflow.tga
PASS: pixbuf-randomly-modified 1 /pixbuf/randomly-modified/bad-header.ico
ERROR: pixbuf-randomly-modified - too few tests run (expected 47, got 1)
ERROR: pixbuf-randomly-modified - exited with status 133 (terminated by signal 
5?)
PASS: cve-2015-4491 1 /pixbuf/cve-2015-4491/original
PASS: cve-2015-4491 2 /pixbuf/cve-2015-4491/scale-overflow
PASS: cve-2015-4491 3 /pixbuf/cve-2015-4491/scale-x-overflow
PASS: cve-2015-4491 4 /pixbuf/cve-2015-4491/scale-y-overflow
=
   gdk-pixbuf 2.36.2: tests/test-suite.log
=

# TOTAL: 130
# PASS:  128
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 2

.. contents:: :depth: 2

ERROR: pixbuf-randomly-modified
===


(/«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/.libs/pixbuf-randomly-modified:26503): 
GLib-GObject-WARNING **: value "-335544316" of type 'gint' is invalid or out of 
range for property 'rowstride' of type 'gint'
Trace/breakpoint trap
# random seed: R02S2e91929534496ae8bcf4f00ed89773c3
# Modified image is written to pixbuf-randomly-modified-image
1..47
# Start of pixbuf tests
# Start of randomly-modified tests
ok 1 /pixbuf/randomly-modified/bad-header.ico
PASS: pixbuf-randomly-modified 1 /pixbuf/randomly-modified/bad-header.ico
# GLib-GObject-FATAL-WARNING: value "-335544316" of type 'gint' is invalid or 
out of range for property 'rowstride' of type 'gint'
ERROR: pixbuf-randomly-modified - too few tests run (expected 47, got 1)
ERROR: pixbuf-randomly-modified - exited with status 133 (terminated by signal 
5?)


Testsuite summary for gdk-pixbuf 2.36.2

# TOTAL: 130
# PASS:  128
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 2

See tests/test-suite.log
Please report to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gdk-pixbuf

Makefile:1479: recipe for target 'test-suite.log' failed
make[5]: *** [test-suite.log] Error 1