Bug#900485: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#900485: python-pbcore: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14

2018-06-26 Thread Afif Elghraoui



On June 26, 2018 3:45:49 AM EDT, Andreas Tille  wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 09:52:50AM -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>> I think we can give 1.5.0 a try, but it might have the same problem.
>
>Since it builds successfully I've just uploaded.
> 

Ok

>> >  (And what do you think about watch mode=git?)
>> 
>> I don't know much about it, but I don't have any strong preference
>here.
>
>It might serve as a sensible solution for all upstreams using Git
>without proper release tagging.  I guess the pbcore example will
>explain
>what to do.
> 
>BTW, I remembered to late that you are not happy about the cme
>formatting.  I just fired up cme for Vcs-fields, Standards-Version etc.
>I hope you don't mind - feel free to revert to your prefered formatting
>and I hope I will not forget if I touch some of your packages in
>future.
>

Don't worry about this.

>
>PS: I'm currently checking pbseqlib since now upstream has tagged a
>release but there are some hdf5 issues which prevent me from
>uploading.  Please let me know if you want me to revert the cme
>formatting to its previous shape.
>

No need to revert anything.

regards
Afif



Bug#900485: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#900485: python-pbcore: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14

2018-06-26 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 09:52:50AM -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> I think we can give 1.5.0 a try, but it might have the same problem.

Since it builds successfully I've just uploaded.
 
> >  (And what do you think about watch mode=git?)
> 
> I don't know much about it, but I don't have any strong preference here.

It might serve as a sensible solution for all upstreams using Git
without proper release tagging.  I guess the pbcore example will explain
what to do.
 
BTW, I remembered to late that you are not happy about the cme
formatting.  I just fired up cme for Vcs-fields, Standards-Version etc.
I hope you don't mind - feel free to revert to your prefered formatting
and I hope I will not forget if I touch some of your packages in future.

Kind regards

Andreas.

PS: I'm currently checking pbseqlib since now upstream has tagged a
release but there are some hdf5 issues which prevent me from
uploading.  Please let me know if you want me to revert the cme
formatting to its previous shape.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#900485: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#900485: python-pbcore: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14

2018-06-25 Thread Afif Elghraoui



On June 25, 2018 5:07:48 AM EDT, Andreas Tille  wrote:
>Hi Afif,
>
>On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:41:11AM -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>> >pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>> >/tmp/tmpveTAsa.subreadset.xml
>> >
>> >Before I start diving into this:  Afif, upstream seems to have
>released
>> >1.5.0 which might be worth a try.  While I asked for creating
>according
>> >release tags[2] I remember you said that upstream does not care much
>> >about this metadata.  I wonder whether we should possibly use
>mode=git
>> >inside the watch file, inject version 1.5.0 into packaging Git,
>cross
>> >fingers that the issue might be fixed and if not report the issue
>> >upstream.
>> >
>> 
>> I believe that error had to do with the package requiring an older
>version of some dependency. At least, the error I was seeing at the
>time was for that reason, which prevented me from uploading.
>
>So we can either skip those tests (no idea how important is this for
>general functionality) or give 1.5.0 a try.  What do you think is
>the better strategy?

I think we can give 1.5.0 a try, but it might have the same problem.

>  (And what do you think about watch mode=git?)
>

I don't know much about it, but I don't have any strong preference here.

regards
Afif



Bug#900485: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#900485: python-pbcore: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14

2018-06-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Afif,

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:41:11AM -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> >pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
> >/tmp/tmpveTAsa.subreadset.xml
> >
> >Before I start diving into this:  Afif, upstream seems to have released
> >1.5.0 which might be worth a try.  While I asked for creating according
> >release tags[2] I remember you said that upstream does not care much
> >about this metadata.  I wonder whether we should possibly use mode=git
> >inside the watch file, inject version 1.5.0 into packaging Git, cross
> >fingers that the issue might be fixed and if not report the issue
> >upstream.
> >
> 
> I believe that error had to do with the package requiring an older version of 
> some dependency. At least, the error I was seeing at the time was for that 
> reason, which prevented me from uploading.

So we can either skip those tests (no idea how important is this for
general functionality) or give 1.5.0 a try.  What do you think is
the better strategy?  (And what do you think about watch mode=git?)

Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#900485: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#900485: python-pbcore: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14

2018-06-25 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Andreas

On June 25, 2018 3:32:00 AM EDT, Andreas Tille  wrote:
>Hi Graham,
>
>On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 08:48:32PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
>thanks for the patch.  Since we are targeting in Git at version 1.4.2 I
>adapted the patch to this version and it works for this.  I also fixed
>another issue in the test suite[1].  Unfortunately there are remaining
>errors in the test suite which are all connected to a possible issue
>with
>XML files:
>
>$ grep "ERROR: Invalid file produced"
>python-pbcore_1.4.2+dfsg-1_amd64.build 
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpiOHCZI.alignmentset.xml.disabled
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmplAqR2T.alignmentset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpMyWNXh.subreadset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmps4GD0E.subreadset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmp71IS22dataset-unittest/test.alignmentset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpUn37tBdataset unittest/spaced.subreadset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpMouabqdataset-unittest/tempfile.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpN0pUz2alignmentset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpeQ4v3jalignmentset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmp0Kb6RWdataset-doctest/tempfile.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpj20209.subreadset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmp2XGDAY.barcodeset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpXtaXG3.consensusreadset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpJlLjAA.contigset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpDKGXFh.contigset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmptZ4Kro.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmp6ySKmX.contigset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpvYTcX1.subreadset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpiXc1ez.subreadset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpdiSRmI.subreadset.xml
>pbcore.io.dataset.DataSetIO: ERROR: Invalid file produced:
>/tmp/tmpveTAsa.subreadset.xml
>
>
>Before I start diving into this:  Afif, upstream seems to have released
>1.5.0 which might be worth a try.  While I asked for creating according
>release tags[2] I remember you said that upstream does not care much
>about this metadata.  I wonder whether we should possibly use mode=git
>inside the watch file, inject version 1.5.0 into packaging Git, cross
>fingers that the issue might be fixed and if not report the issue
>upstream.
>

I believe that error had to do with the package requiring an older version of 
some dependency. At least, the error I was seeing at the time was for that 
reason, which prevented me from uploading.

regards
Afif
.
>
>[1]
>https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-pbcore/blob/master/debian/patches/relax_test_constraint.patch
>[2] https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbcore/issues/116
>
>-- 
>http://fam-tille.de
>
>___
>Debian-med-packaging mailing list
>debian-med-packag...@alioth-lists.debian.net
>https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging