Bug#902132: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#902132: falcon: FTBFS since python-networkx version 2.1-1; fails in test suite
Hello, On September 12, 2018 5:30:59 AM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Alex, > >On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: >> Well, according upstream, current repository is not active anymore: >> >> >> Oh, sorry. We are no longer mirroring our internal FALCON repo here. >In >> fact, I think this Issues board will disappear soon too, in favor of >> pbbioconda. So I think your source-code is way out of date. >> Unfortunately, my hands are tied. >> >> https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON/issues/672 > >Thanks for your research on this issue. > >> I am not sure how to get the source from pbbioconda and if this >source >> is suitable for packaging at all. > >I added a comment to the issue above where I've found a link inside the >bioconda metadata[1] (assuming this is what upstream was refereing to). >We can surely package where those meta.yaml files are pointing to but >see my comments. > >It would be extremely helpful if we would find somebody at PacBio who >can explain the situation (Afif? I know you said you are not using the >pb* software any more, but can you possibly help out?). As I wrote on >Monday[2] I have another issue with a lib from there. > The pbbioconda being referred to looks like https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbbioconda and the README there lists all their packages and links to their main bioconda pages. Andreas, I think the pb-falcon you found is the right one as far as I can tell. regards Afif > > >[1] >https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/blob/master/recipes/pb-falcon/meta.yaml >[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2018/09/msg00152.html > >-- >http://fam-tille.de
Bug#902132: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#902132: falcon: FTBFS since python-networkx version 2.1-1; fails in test suite
Hi Alex, On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > Well, according upstream, current repository is not active anymore: > > > Oh, sorry. We are no longer mirroring our internal FALCON repo here. In > fact, I think this Issues board will disappear soon too, in favor of > pbbioconda. So I think your source-code is way out of date. > Unfortunately, my hands are tied. > > https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON/issues/672 Thanks for your research on this issue. > I am not sure how to get the source from pbbioconda and if this source > is suitable for packaging at all. I added a comment to the issue above where I've found a link inside the bioconda metadata[1] (assuming this is what upstream was refereing to). We can surely package where those meta.yaml files are pointing to but see my comments. It would be extremely helpful if we would find somebody at PacBio who can explain the situation (Afif? I know you said you are not using the pb* software any more, but can you possibly help out?). As I wrote on Monday[2] I have another issue with a lib from there. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/blob/master/recipes/pb-falcon/meta.yaml [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2018/09/msg00152.html -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#902132: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#902132: falcon: FTBFS since python-networkx version 2.1-1; fails in test suite
Well, according upstream, current repository is not active anymore: Oh, sorry. We are no longer mirroring our internal FALCON repo here. In fact, I think this Issues board will disappear soon too, in favor of pbbioconda. So I think your source-code is way out of date. Unfortunately, my hands are tied. https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON/issues/672 I am not sure how to get the source from pbbioconda and if this source is suitable for packaging at all. Best regards, Alex
