Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
Santiago,
I'm not able to package new releases of mpop and msmtp . They are built
against a recent snapshot of gnulib which depends on gettext 0.20+
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 07:14:49PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
[...]
> I could try to switch to DEP5-style copyright file, but that would be a
> huge waste of time in my opinion. So for now, it would help if
> somebody could do a copyright and license review that could help to
> improve the current copyright file, but without going full DEP-5.
I'd like to take a look. Could you please add your code in a VCS (salsa
for example) so that it will be easier to contribute and create merge
requests?
Have a nice day.
M.
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
mail: kolter@{openics,debian}.orggpg: 4096R/0x929D42C3
xmpp: kol...@im.openics.org irc: kolter@{freenode,oftc}
Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
> It's been another 4 months and seems and seems that the package still saw no > activity. Is there anything I could do to help with the packaging for new > version? Sorry for the late reply. I was asked to write a more detailed copyright notice because the current one is considered not to be "good enough" by one of the FTP masters. I could try to switch to DEP5-style copyright file, but that would be a huge waste of time in my opinion. So for now, it would help if somebody could do a copyright and license review that could help to improve the current copyright file, but without going full DEP-5. Thanks.
Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
Hi Santiago, 在 2020-01-07星期二的 12:33 -0500，Boyuan Yang写道： > Hi, > > 在 2019-11-20三的 14:40 -0500，Boyuan Yang写道： > > Hi Vila, > > > > 在 2019-11-20三的 20:37 +0100，Santiago Vila写道： > > > Hi. > > > > > > I've just uploaded gettext 0.20.1-1 for unstable. It may take manual > > > processing frpm ftpmasters because there are two new binary packages. > > > > Thanks so much for your work! I will be testing the new version soon and > > let > > you know if I find any issues. > > I saw that gettext 0.20.1 disappeared from the NEW queue ( > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html) and that it did not appear in Sid. > Is > there any issue raised by the FTP Master for rejection? What can be done to > fix that issue? It's been another 4 months and seems and seems that the package still saw no activity. Is there anything I could do to help with the packaging for new version? -- Thanks, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
Hi, 在 2019-11-20三的 14:40 -0500，Boyuan Yang写道： > Hi Vila, > > 在 2019-11-20三的 20:37 +0100，Santiago Vila写道： > > Hi. > > > > I've just uploaded gettext 0.20.1-1 for unstable. It may take manual > > processing frpm ftpmasters because there are two new binary packages. > > Thanks so much for your work! I will be testing the new version soon and let > you know if I find any issues. I saw that gettext 0.20.1 disappeared from the NEW queue ( https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html) and that it did not appear in Sid. Is there any issue raised by the FTP Master for rejection? What can be done to fix that issue? Thanks, Boyuan Yang
Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
Hi Vila, 在 2019-11-20三的 20:37 +0100，Santiago Vila写道： > Hi. > > I've just uploaded gettext 0.20.1-1 for unstable. It may take manual > processing frpm ftpmasters because there are two new binary packages. Thanks so much for your work! I will be testing the new version soon and let you know if I find any issues. -- Cheers, Boyuan Yang
Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
Hi. I've just uploaded gettext 0.20.1-1 for unstable. It may take manual processing frpm ftpmasters because there are two new binary packages. Thanks.
Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 02:44:05PM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Is there any progress on packaging v0.20.1 for gettext? It would really be > great if we could have it in Debian sooner. Please let me know if there's any > blockers and I would be glad to help. Sorry for the late reply. Working on this now. I have a preliminary package almost ready and I'm now working on the more "bureaucratic" issues, like ensuring that upstream signing keys are not expired and stuff like that (I'm postponing any packaging changes for now). If you are willing to help, I'd like to have a list of open bugs reported to Debian which are fixed by this release. Other than this one, I think there is really none, because almost every time I cherry-picked from upstream git and closed the bug. Thanks.
Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
Hi Santiago, Is there any progress on packaging v0.20.1 for gettext? It would really be great if we could have it in Debian sooner. Please let me know if there's any blockers and I would be glad to help. -- Best, Boyuan Yang On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 16:47:21 -0400 Boyuan Yang wrote: > Control: affect -1 + gnulib > X-Debbugs-CC: sanv...@debian.org > > Dear gettext maintainer, > > The new snapshot of gnulib (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gnulib ) includes > some modules that need gettext 0.20+ to work properly. Please do consider > packaging the new version. It would be very useful even if the new version is > only pushed onto Experimental for now. > > Thanks, > Boyuan Yang > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:55:38 +0200 Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Package: gettext > > Version: 0.19.8.1-9 > > > > There is a new 0.20 version available, it would be nice to get it > > uploaded to Debian > > https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=9430 > > > > (in fact a .1 on https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.20.1.tar.xz ) > > > > Thanks, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
Control: affect -1 + gnulib X-Debbugs-CC: sanv...@debian.org Dear gettext maintainer, The new snapshot of gnulib (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gnulib ) includes some modules that need gettext 0.20+ to work properly. Please do consider packaging the new version. It would be very useful even if the new version is only pushed onto Experimental for now. Thanks, Boyuan Yang On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:55:38 +0200 Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Package: gettext > Version: 0.19.8.1-9 > > There is a new 0.20 version available, it would be nice to get it > uploaded to Debian > https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=9430 > > (in fact a .1 on https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.20.1.tar.xz) > > Thanks, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#934738: gettext 0.20.1 available
Package: gettext Version: 0.19.8.1-9 There is a new 0.20 version available, it would be nice to get it uploaded to Debian https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=9430 (in fact a .1 on https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.20.1.tar.xz) Thanks,
