I feel that the answer is both yes and no. The *packaging* is trivial in my
experience - the dependencies of firewalld are fairly small/manageable, and
0.7.2 *seems* to work fine with everything in stable-bpo. However, I have
no experience with running Debian test suites and ensuring that all the
details are taken care of.
Colm
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:36 PM Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 20.11.19 um 19:24 schrieb Colm Buckley:
> > @biebl - looks as though stable-bpo's nftables package tracks upstream
> > pretty closely; if https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/540 is
> > resolved, would you consider looking at packaging 0.8.0 for backports?
>
> I'm not really sure if I can commit to that. I would need help with
> packaging and testing.
>
> Would you be willing to help here?
>
>
> --
> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
> universe are pointed away from Earth?
>
>
--
Colm Buckley / c...@tuatha.org / +353 87 2469146
