Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
Hi Hilmar, hi Adrian, On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I would suggest to upload 20210308-2 to unstable and try to > get an unblock for that on the basis of "only documentation". I agree with that, better no strange version numbers. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Fujitsu Research + IFMGA Guide + TU Wien + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 09:39:05AM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 14.07.2021 um 00:50 teilte Norbert Preining mit: >... > I understand this as: we branch from 20200329-1 and go with > "20200329-1bullseye1". 20200329-1+deb11u1 would be the normal versioning for that, but see below. > In this case we have a rather small debdiff. > I could use "20200329-2", but this version will never appear in the > changelog of the master. Note sure if this would be OK. The release team wants changes to go through unstable, I would suggest to upload 20210308-2 to unstable and try to get an unblock for that on the basis of "only documentation". Otherwise you end up with 20210308+really20200329-1. > > Please: > > - prepare a debdiff (even if it is long) >... If requesting an unblock for 20210308-2, a debdiff of debian/ contains the relevant changes. Something like debdiff texworks-manual_20200329-1.dsc texworks-manual_20210308-2.dsc | filterdiff -p1 -i debian\* cu Adrian
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
Am 14.07.2021 um 00:50 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi Norbert, @Norbert: do you have an opinion. Should be rather branch from 20200329-1, which is currently in testing? Seems to be ok. Documentation fixes are explicitly included in the freeze exception list. I understand this as: we branch from 20200329-1 and go with "20200329-1bullseye1". In this case we have a rather small debdiff. I could use "20200329-2", but this version will never appear in the changelog of the master. Note sure if this would be OK. Please: - prepare a debdiff (even if it is long) - file a freeze exception bug report - include the *code* (debian/control) changes in the main email and state that the rest of the debdiff is documentation only changes - state that *no* functional changes are there, only ensuring that there is no FTBFS - after the ok, upload I guess that should do it Thanks a lot Norbert -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
Hi Hilmar, > > @Norbert: do you have an opinion. Should be rather branch from 20200329-1, > > which is currently in testing? Seems to be ok. Documentation fixes are explicitly included in the freeze exception list. Please: - prepare a debdiff (even if it is long) - file a freeze exception bug report - include the *code* (debian/control) changes in the main email and state that the rest of the debdiff is documentation only changes - state that *no* functional changes are there, only ensuring that there is no FTBFS - after the ok, upload I guess that should do it Thanks a lot Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Fujitsu Research + IFMGA Guide + TU Wien + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > @Norbert: do you have an opinion. Should be rather branch from 20200329-1, > which is currently in testing? I asked on the IRC channel #debian-release. But I am not sure what the answer will be. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Fujitsu Research + IFMGA Guide + TU Wien + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
Am 13.07.2021 um 23:27 teilte Adrian Bunk mit: On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:13:20PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, I am not a member of the release team. "It is just documentation" has a point, suggesting d85a1829 plus UNRELEASED -> unstable would sound reasonable to me. You could ask the release team by submitting an unblock request with reportbug release.debian.org containing a diff of debian/ between the version currently in testing and what you'd like to upload. Yes, yes. The debdiff has a size of 270KB and I don't even intend to read it. @Norbert: do you have an opinion. Should be rather branch from 20200329-1, which is currently in testing? Hilmar -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:13:20PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 13.07.2021 um 16:13 teilte Adrian Bunk mit: >... > Hi Adrian, Hi Hilmar, > > > > > The Makefile has a fallback to netpbm, but this does not work as > > > > > we do not declare a B-D on netpbm. We could simply add it. > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > yes, that would be nice. Afaics, Ubuntu disabled that explicitly in > > > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3 > > > > > > > Patch tested and committed to github, tag pending. > > > > Please upload, since this is now also a FTBFS in Debian: > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/texworks-manual.html > > > > See #987504 for background. > > > Will you accept a new upstream snapshot to fix the issue? > > In this case I'd branch from our commit > d85a18296e529ed7ba4af1945fab8c90670835a6 and use that one as starter. It is > just documentation so it should not break other packages. I am not a member of the release team. "It is just documentation" has a point, suggesting d85a1829 plus UNRELEASED -> unstable would sound reasonable to me. You could ask the release team by submitting an unblock request with reportbug release.debian.org containing a diff of debian/ between the version currently in testing and what you'd like to upload. > Hilmar cu Adrian
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
Am 13.07.2021 um 16:13 teilte Adrian Bunk mit: Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 ftbfs Control: found -1 20150506-2 On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 07:05:05PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Control: tags -1 + pending Am 10.04.2021 um 11:59 teilte Matthias Klose mit: On 4/9/21 11:14 PM, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Adrian, The Makefile has a fallback to netpbm, but this does not work as we do not declare a B-D on netpbm. We could simply add it. What do you think? yes, that would be nice. Afaics, Ubuntu disabled that explicitly in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3 Patch tested and committed to github, tag pending. Please upload, since this is now also a FTBFS in Debian: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/texworks-manual.html See #987504 for background. Will you accept a new upstream snapshot to fix the issue? In this case I'd branch from our commit d85a18296e529ed7ba4af1945fab8c90670835a6 and use that one as starter. It is just documentation so it should not break other packages. Hilmar -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 ftbfs Control: found -1 20150506-2 On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 07:05:05PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Control: tags -1 + pending > > Am 10.04.2021 um 11:59 teilte Matthias Klose mit: > > On 4/9/21 11:14 PM, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The Makefile has a fallback to netpbm, but this does not work as > > > we do not declare a B-D on netpbm. We could simply add it. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > yes, that would be nice. Afaics, Ubuntu disabled that explicitly in > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3 > > > Patch tested and committed to github, tag pending. Please upload, since this is now also a FTBFS in Debian: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/texworks-manual.html See #987504 for background. > Hilmar cu Adrian
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
Control: tags -1 + pending Am 10.04.2021 um 11:59 teilte Matthias Klose mit: On 4/9/21 11:14 PM, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, The Makefile has a fallback to netpbm, but this does not work as we do not declare a B-D on netpbm. We could simply add it. What do you think? yes, that would be nice. Afaics, Ubuntu disabled that explicitly in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3 Patch tested and committed to github, tag pending. Hilmar -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
On 4/9/21 11:14 PM, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 09.04.2021 um 15:57 teilte Matthias Klose mit: > > Hi Matthias, > >> On the Ubuntu buildd, the package ftbfs with a missing b-d. Adding netpbm >> fixes this, although I don't yet see why it doesn't fail on the Debian >> buildds. netpbm only shows as a Recommends in the Debian >> build log. >> >> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texworks-manual/20210308-1/+build/21339493 >> > On Debian I can convert png to eps files using convert: > > hille@debian-amd64-sid:~$ ls -l replaceDialog.* > -rw-rw-r-- 1 hille hille 26755 May 7 2015 replaceDialog.png > hille@debian-amd64-sid:~$ convert replaceDialog.png replaceDialog.eps > hille@debian-amd64-sid:~$ ls -l replaceDialog.* > -rw-r--r-- 1 hille hille 774464 Apr 9 23:04 replaceDialog.eps > -rw-rw-r-- 1 hille hille 26755 May 7 2015 replaceDialog.png > > Doing the same on Ubuntu 20.10 fails: > > ubuntu@ubuntu2010:~$ convert replaceDialog.png replaceDialog.eps > convert-im6.q16: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security > policy `EPS' @ error/constitute.c/IsCoderAuthorized/408. > > b/c the /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml differs between Debian & Ubuntu. > > The Makefile has a fallback to netpbm, but this does not work as we do not > declare a B-D on netpbm. We could simply add it. > > What do you think? yes, that would be nice. Afaics, Ubuntu disabled that explicitly in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3 diff at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/429710949/imagemagick_8%3A6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu2_8%3A6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3.diff.gz Matthias
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
Am 09.04.2021 um 15:57 teilte Matthias Klose mit: Hi Matthias, On the Ubuntu buildd, the package ftbfs with a missing b-d. Adding netpbm fixes this, although I don't yet see why it doesn't fail on the Debian buildds. netpbm only shows as a Recommends in the Debian build log. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texworks-manual/20210308-1/+build/21339493 On Debian I can convert png to eps files using convert: hille@debian-amd64-sid:~$ ls -l replaceDialog.* -rw-rw-r-- 1 hille hille 26755 May 7 2015 replaceDialog.png hille@debian-amd64-sid:~$ convert replaceDialog.png replaceDialog.eps hille@debian-amd64-sid:~$ ls -l replaceDialog.* -rw-r--r-- 1 hille hille 774464 Apr 9 23:04 replaceDialog.eps -rw-rw-r-- 1 hille hille 26755 May 7 2015 replaceDialog.png Doing the same on Ubuntu 20.10 fails: ubuntu@ubuntu2010:~$ convert replaceDialog.png replaceDialog.eps convert-im6.q16: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `EPS' @ error/constitute.c/IsCoderAuthorized/408. b/c the /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml differs between Debian & Ubuntu. The Makefile has a fallback to netpbm, but this does not work as we do not declare a B-D on netpbm. We could simply add it. What do you think? Hilmar -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
Package: src:texworks-manual
Version: 20210308-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
On the Ubuntu buildd, the package ftbfs with a missing b-d. Adding netpbm fixes
this, although I don't yet see why it doesn't fail on the Debian buildds.
netpbm only shows as a Recommends in the Debian build log.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texworks-manual/20210308-1/+build/21339493
make[4]: Entering directory '/packages/tmp/texworks-manual-20210308/src/en/html'
Creating image images/MacCmdKey.eps (from ../images/MacCmdKey.pdf)
Creating image images/MacOptKey.eps (from ../images/MacOptKey.pdf)
Creating image images/interface-summary.eps (from
../images/interface-summary.pdf)
Creating image images/consoleOutput.eps (from ../images/consoleOutput.pdf)
Creating image images/errorParsingScript.eps (from
../images/errorParsingScript.pdf)
Creating image images/LMB.eps (from ../images/LMB.pdf)
Creating image images/RMB.eps (from ../images/RMB.pdf)
Creating image images/toolbar1.eps (from ../images/toolbar1.png)
# Some versions of convert refuse to produce .eps files due to security concerns
/bin/sh: 1: pnmtops: not found
Creating image images/toolbar2.eps (from ../images/toolbar2.png)
# Some versions of convert refuse to produce .eps files due to security concerns
/bin/sh: 1: pnmtops: not found
Creating image images/iconTypeset.eps (from ../images/iconTypeset.png)
# Some versions of convert refuse to produce .eps files due to security concerns
/bin/sh: 1: pnmtops: not found
Creating image images/iconAbortTypesetting.eps (from
../images/iconAbortTypesetting.png)
# Some versions of convert refuse to produce .eps files due to security concerns
/bin/sh: 1: pnmtops: not found
Creating image images/replaceDialog.eps (from ../images/replaceDialog.png)
# Some versions of convert refuse to produce .eps files due to security concerns
/bin/sh: 1: pnmtops: not found
Creating image images/screenshotHardWrapDlg.eps (from
../images/screenshotHardWrapDlg.png)
# Some versions of convert refuse to produce .eps files due to security concerns
/bin/sh: 1: pnmtops: not found
Creating image images/TeXworks.eps (from ../images/TeXworks.png)
# Some versions of convert refuse to produce .eps files due to security concerns
/bin/sh: 1: pnmtops: not found
Creating image images/Linux.eps (from ../images/Linux.pdf)
Creating image images/Mac.eps (from ../images/Mac.pdf)
Creating image images/Windows.eps (from ../images/Windows.pdf)
[...]
[13]) [14] [15] [16] (./firststeps.tex [17] [18]
Chapter 3.
(./index.tmp) (./index.tmp)
! Dimension too large.
\relax
l.13 ...egraphics[scale=.6]{toolbar1}\hspace{1em}}
?
! Emergency stop.
\relax
l.13 ...egraphics[scale=.6]{toolbar1}\hspace{1em}}
Output written on index.dvi (25 pages, 57568 bytes).
Transcript written on index.log.
make[4]: *** [Makefile:66: index.ind] Error 1
patch to add the b-d:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/532676391/texworks-manual_20210308-1_20210308-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
