Bug#733057: [dpkg] Please explain rpm verification format

2014-01-19 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 19:30:19 -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
 On 2014-01-15 14:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
 On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 13:20:38 -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
 The only currently supported output format is rpm, which consists
 of a line for every path that failed any check. The lines start
 with 9 characters to report the specific check results, a '?'
 implies the check could not be done (lack of support, file
 permissions, etc), '.' implies the check passed, and an
 alphanumeric character implies a specific check failed; the only
 functional check is an md5sum verification denoted with a '5' on
 the third character. The line is followed by a space and an
 attribute character (currently 'c' for conffiles), another space
 and the pathname.
 On my system, the rpm format gives:
 # dpkg --verify
 ??5?? c /etc/sane.d/dll.conf
 […]
 
 It would help understand what is wrong if the output explained why
 a check failed, or if the manpage documented what the third check does.
 The md5sum verification failed, so the file's contents do not match
 the recorded hash in the database.
 
 This is explained in the --verify and --verify-format options in the
 man page, I'm not sure what information you find it's missing, TBH.

 Which recorded hash? The manpage doesn't say anything about hashes.

The md5sum hash…

The man page also says:

 -V, --verify [package-name...]
   Verifies  the integrity of package-name or all packages if omit‐
   ted, by comparing information from the installed paths with  the
   database metadata.

At this point, I'm just considering closing this report.

Guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#727708: On diversity

2014-01-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
 On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 01:17:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:

 I think (a) and (b) are pretty non-controversial. (c) and (d) are
 required if we want to deal with new GNOME stuff and anything other
 than systemd probably, and don't seem very hard to either do or
 document. (e), (f) and (g) seem like a fairly straightforward of
 allowing for multiple init systems in Debian. I think something like
 (i) might be a good way of sunsetting tech ctte decisions so if there's
 an actual consensus in future, there's no need to get a pro-forma vote
 from the ctte to make changes in future. YMMV of course.

 For my part I think this is generally a good idea, but I have the
 impression that at least Russ would be strongly opposed to this because
 it's too prescriptive.  Probably not much sense in fleshing out such a
 resolution if there's not a consensus for it.

I think this is all great work to do.  I'm just dubious about enforcing it
with a technical committee decision.  This is the sort of thing that I was
expecting to need to do on the Policy front once we have a decision.  I
think that's the right forum for drilling into the details.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736133: poppler: new stable version 0.24

2014-01-19 Thread Michael Gilbert
package: src:poppler
severity: wishlist

Hi, there is a new stable version available.

Best wishes,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#735975: Dpkg::Control::Hash: would like more subtle pgp check

2014-01-19 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 11:39:50 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
 Guillem Jover writes (Re: Bug#735975: Dpkg::Control::Hash: would like more 
 subtle pgp check):
 ...
  Starting with version 1.17.0 the Dpkg::Control::Hash module records
  that fact in the is_pgp_signed option. This is not documented, so you
  might not want to rely on it, expecting to be an internal detail. But
  I can make it part of the public interface by documenting it in the
  next release, as it seems useful outside of Dpkg::Source::Package too.
 
 Great.
 
  The way to retrieve it, as of now is:
$ctrl-get_option('is_pgp_signed');
  Would that be enough for your needs?
 
 Yes, that would be exactly the kind of thing I want.

Ok, then I'm documenting that for 1.17.7.

 Since I want to make dgit easy to use even on older releases of Debian
 (and derivatives thereof), I will want to have some kind of way of
 telling whether the version of Dpkg::Control::Hash supports this
 feature.

 Experimentation with squeeze and sid[1] shows me that when the feature
 is supported but the message isn't signed, that get_option returns
 0, whereas if the feature isn't supported it returns undef.  Can I
 rely on this or is there a better way ?

Yes, you could rely on this, but there's actually another option, in
this case you could use Dpkg::Source::Package instead which has a
is_signed() method since its inception (it only got documented as a
public interface in 1.16.1, but that interface has never changed).
The drawback is that your code might need to end up parsing the .dsc
file twice, but that should not be such a performance issue.

 [1]
 perl -e 'use Data::Dumper; use Dpkg::Control::Hash; my $h = new
  Dpkg::Control::Hash; $h-load(debian/control) or die; my $y =
  $h-get_option(is_pgp_signed); print Dumper($y);'

BTW, you might want to use instead, something like:

,---
my $dsc = Dpkg::Control-new(type = CTRL_PKG_SRC);
`---

which will set a correct name for error messages and similar, and
field ordering for that type.

Thanks,
Guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736134: Remove amd64 and s390x flavours for 32-bit architectures

2014-01-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.13~rc6-1~exp1
Severity: normal

It is now possible to install linux-headers packages from a
foreign architecture (at least when the primary and foreign
architectures are both supported by a biarch/triarch compiler).

There should no longer be any need to provide the amd64 or s390x
kernel flavours on the corresponding 32-bit architectures.  (We can't
yet do this for other 64-bit mips/powerpc/sparc flavours because only
the 32-bit architectures are release architectures.)

However, it turns out there is a problem with module-assistant that
will need to be fixed first.

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#735760: handbrake: FTBFS: dvdnav.c:1230: undefined reference to `dvdnav_dup'

2014-01-19 Thread Fabian Greffrath
reassign 735760 libdvdnav-dev
found 735760 4.2.1-1
severity 735760 serious
retitle 735760 libdvdnav: removed dvdnav_dup{,_free} API
thanks

Am Sonntag, den 19.01.2014, 12:38 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: 
 Am Freitag, den 17.01.2014, 18:11 +0100 schrieb David Suárez: 
   /«BUILDDIR»/handbrake-0.9.9+dfsg/build/../libhb/dvdnav.c:1230: undefined 
   reference to `dvdnav_dup'
   /«BUILDDIR»/handbrake-0.9.9+dfsg/build/../libhb/dvdnav.c:1237: undefined 
   reference to `dvdnav_free_dup'
   collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
 
 Why have these symbols been removed again from libdvdnav? They were the
 reason we packaged the 20120524 git snapshot in the first place!

Also, ABI-incompatible changes require a SONAME bump.

- Fabian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736135: Missing multiarch support

2014-01-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: module-assistant
Version: 0.11.6
Severity: normal

module-assistant cannot install headers for a foreign-architecture
kernel:

# dpkg --print-architecture
i386
# uname -r
3.12-1-amd64
# dpkg -l linux-image-$(uname -r)
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   Version  Architecture Description
+++-==---=
ii  linux-image-3. 3.12.8-1 amd64Linux 3.12 for 64-bit PCs
# m-a --text a-i leds-alix
.
Updated infos about 1 packages
Getting source for kernel version: 3.12-1-amd64
apt-get install linux-headers-3.12-1-amd64 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libgroupsock0 libkdc2-heimdal liblivemedia7 libserf1 libusageenvironment0
  python-logilab-astng
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  linux-compiler-gcc-4.8-x86 linux-headers-3.12-1-common linux-kbuild-3.12
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  linux-compiler-gcc-4.8-x86 linux-headers-3.12-1-amd64
  linux-headers-3.12-1-common linux-kbuild-3.12
0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded.
Need to get 4,945 kB of archives.
After this operation, 31.9 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 

This sometimes works at present, because the amd64 flavour is
functionally identical and ABI-compatible on i386 and amd64, but I
actually want to get rid of the amd64 flavour on i386 as it is now
a waste of space and build time.  (Similarly for the s390x flavour
on s390.)

But even now, the resulting module packages are built for the primary
architecture, and some of them (depending on the 'source' package's
template - dahdi-source is one example) have dependencies on
linux-image-$kversion.  That makes them uninstallable when the
kernel is foreign.

So I think that module-assistant should select a target
architecture as follows:

1. Provide an option to set the target architecture explicitly.
2. If the option is not set, look for an installed linux-image or
   linux-headers package for the target kernel version.
   (a) If either or both are present then the target architecture
   is the architecture of the installed package(s).  If both
   are installed but with different architectures, you could
   report an error or pick one as the winner.
   (b) If neither is present then the target architecture is the
   primary architecture.

It should then explicitly specify that target architecture when
installing linux-headers packages and when building packages.

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages module-assistant depends on:
ii  bzip2  1.0.6-5
ii  libtext-wrapi18n-perl  0.06-7
ii  perl   5.18.1-5
ii  xz-utils   5.1.1alpha+20120614-2

Versions of packages module-assistant recommends:
ii  liblocale-gettext-perl  1.05-7+b2

Versions of packages module-assistant suggests:
ii  build-essential  11.6
ii  whiptail 0.52.15-3

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#727708: On diversity

2014-01-19 Thread Anthony Towns
On 20 January 2014 14:29, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
 Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
 On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 01:17:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
 I think (a) and (b) are pretty non-controversial. (c) and (d) are
 required if we want to deal with new GNOME stuff and anything other
 than systemd probably, and don't seem very hard to either do or
 document. (e), (f) and (g) seem like a fairly straightforward of
 allowing for multiple init systems in Debian. I think something like
 (i) might be a good way of sunsetting tech ctte decisions so if there's
 an actual consensus in future, there's no need to get a pro-forma vote
 from the ctte to make changes in future. YMMV of course.
 For my part I think this is generally a good idea, but I have the
 impression that at least Russ would be strongly opposed to this because
 it's too prescriptive.  Probably not much sense in fleshing out such a
 resolution if there's not a consensus for it.
 I think this is all great work to do.  I'm just dubious about enforcing it
 with a technical committee decision.  This is the sort of thing that I was
 expecting to need to do on the Policy front once we have a decision.  I
 think that's the right forum for drilling into the details.

Personally, I'm still not really clear on where the ctte is leaning
wrt supporting multiple init systems; if the idea is that [OpenRC]
becomes the new default, and declares itself as Essential:yes, and the
Debian maintainers of [systemd and upstart] say okay, I give up, I'm
going to work on [OpenRC] now, it doesn't seem like there'd be much
need for policy work. Obviously, switch the init systems around as
appropriate. I believe I've seen comments along those lines from both
systemd and upstart maintainers should upstart or systemd be chosen as
the default, but maybe I'm mistaken. I'm pretty sure I've seen
numerous comments that Debian should only support one init system (per
kernel, at any rate), which would make the Essential:yes part make
sense. To me that seems like it would be a bad outcome (even if we
adopted upstart everywhere and abandoned sysvrc, systemd and openrc
entirely; it would still make it unduly difficult to experiment with
the next next-generation init systems in a Debian environment). I'd
expect the tech ctte's decision to be prescriptive enough that it's
clear what non-default-init-system maintainers and users should do,
post-apocalypse, I guess.

On a practical note, having a quick look at the policy list, it seems
like that's not actually crazy active/responsive at present either
(long overdue updates to menu policy and triggers documentation are
the only topics this month?), so relying on -policy for detail work
doesn't seem like it would actually work out in a timely fashion?

Honestly, I was a bit surprised that Steve thinks the above's a good
idea, given I wrote it from the (my) perspective of wanting to support
multiple init systems within Debian; and my understanding is his
opinion is that that's kind-of nuts. I think that's pretty great
through, especially in that it affirms my naive faith that drilling
down into technical details is a good way of achieving consensus
amongst people with very different goals and political/philosophical
stances... ;)

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736123: ITP: sbbi-upnplib -- Java library for universal plug and play (upnp)

2014-01-19 Thread Eric L.
Hi,

Most java library source packages don't respect the format libXXX-java, which 
is rather meant for the binary package. 

Keeping the upstream name for the source and, as noted by Jonathan, considering 
the fact that one source might create more than a library, e.g. a javadoc 
package, that sounds right to me.

Eric

Jonathan Yu jaw...@cpan.org wrote:
Hey Scott,

It has been said that There are only two hard things in Computer
Science: cache invalidation and naming things. -- Phil Karlton :-)

The binary package was of the most concern to me, because that's what
users will look for when installing. I actually have no experience
with Java packaging, so I'm not sure what the conventions are there.
Personally, my preference would be for source + binary packages to be
the same name.

I used to work on packaging Perl libraries mainly, and in that case,
our convention was generally to stick with the lib*-perl pattern, for
both source and binary packages. Initially, we also did this for
applications (e.g. libcpanminus-perl), but later decided to go with
just application names (i.e. cpanminus) in cases where the application
is meant to be used standalone and not as a library. We codified these
conventions in the policy for the Debian Perl Group [0]. Whether
something is more appropriately a library or application requires some
discretion on the part of the packaging Debian contributor/developer,
of course. And I'm not sure what to name the source package in a case
where there is both a library and application component. I guess the
analogue with Perl modules is also different because upstream Perl
package names (Module::Name) are not valid Debian package names
anyway, so they have to be transmogrified to fit our convention, and
lib*-perl seems as fine a convention as any.

Does apt-get source expect the source package name, or will it also
work with binary package names? If I do apt-get source libupnp-java,
will it download the sbbi-upnplib package? If so, then this seems to
be an especially trivial point, and I'd be happy with either name. In
any case, since I'm not an expert here, let's see if someone on the
debian-java list chimes in :-)

Cheers,

Jonathan

[0] http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/policy.html#package_naming_policy

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi all,
 The binary package is named libupnp-java, seen here:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/sbbi-upnplib.git;a=blob;f=debian/control;h=8014fb5b4d2c3eb60968caaa6c239562002dd9f7;hb=HEAD

 I named the source package to match the name of the upstream tarball
 file (sbbi-upnplib-1.0.4.tar.gz) I struggled with either naming the
 source package the same as the binary package, or to name it like I
 suggest here. Since upstream refers to the project as sbbi-upnplib
and
 their tarball had that in it, I'm leaning toward keeping the name
what
 they call it. It will be discoverable since the binary package has
the
 proper java library package name. I was worried about it not being
 discoverable if I didn't put the sbbi-upnplib source package name.

 Given that, do you still think it should be renamed? I don't mind
either way.

 ~Scott

 On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Jonathan Yu jaw...@cpan.org wrote:
 Hey Scott,

 I don't presume to be an expert here, but I wanted to mention that
the
 package name specified in your ITP does not match the usual
 conventions for libraries in Debian, nor for Java libraries
 specifically:

 Java libraries packages must be named libXXX[version]-java (without
 the brackets) [0]

 Might you consider renaming this package to make it more easily
discoverable?

 Cheers,

 Jonathan

 [0]
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x104.html

 On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Scott Howard show...@debian.org
wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 Owner: Scott Howard show...@debian.org

 * Package name: sbbi-upnplib
   Version : 1.0.4
   Upstream Author : SuperBonBon Industries
 * URL : 
http://sourceforge.net/p/triplea/code/HEAD/tree/upnp/
 * License :  Apache-1.1
   Programming Lang: Java
   Description : Java library for universal plug and play (upnp)

 This is a dependency of the newest versions of the triplea package.
To be
 maintained under the java team umbrella.
 Initial repo:
 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/sbbi-upnplib.git


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20140119223359.15198.7602.report...@esc-303123.ee.nd.edu



 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/camdxsejlkidda__v6lfzbe+iaf0j5yocl6uoaongoq0rr3z...@mail.gmail.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? 

Bug#727708: On diversity

2014-01-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au writes:

 To me that seems like it would be a bad outcome (even if we adopted
 upstart everywhere and abandoned sysvrc, systemd and openrc entirely; it
 would still make it unduly difficult to experiment with the next
 next-generation init systems in a Debian environment). I'd expect the
 tech ctte's decision to be prescriptive enough that it's clear what
 non-default-init-system maintainers and users should do,
 post-apocalypse, I guess.

For as long as they're interested in making the effort, try to get as many
packages as possible supported under their init system, particularly in
advance of the point at which we might start dropping sysvinit scripts
that currently provide the common denominator across all the systems.
Obviously, to the extent that this can reuse work done for the default
init system, that's going to make this much easier.  That means that
implementing the key integration features of the default init system will
make things much easier (for example, things like the notification
protocol, non-forking daemon startup, and possibly socket activation).

It's going to be particularly important to have good docs for maintainers
to write configuration for the non-default init system, since a lot of
maintainers aren't going to be able to easily test, so you want people to
be able to write things that work without a lot of debugging.  Obviously,
that includes Policy.

 On a practical note, having a quick look at the policy list, it seems
 like that's not actually crazy active/responsive at present either (long
 overdue updates to menu policy and triggers documentation are the only
 topics this month?), so relying on -policy for detail work doesn't seem
 like it would actually work out in a timely fashion?

Policy is in general not horribly healthy right now, but as I mentioned in
passing earlier in this huge thread, I'm committing to shephard the Policy
work for this decision through and try to help with the documentation and
specifics.  I can't do that and participate in this discussion at the same
time, though, since this is basically eating all my Debian time at the
moment.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736136: nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_2.23.52.20130612-1+3

2014-01-19 Thread Stephen Kitt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Dear release team,

I would appreciate a binNMU of binutils-mingw-w64 so it's rebuilt with
binutils 2.24.

Thanks in advance,

Stephen


nmu binutils-mingw-w64_2.23.52.20130612-1+3 . ALL . -m Rebuild with binutils 
2.24.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#735924: closed by Changwoo Ryu cw...@debian.org (Re: Bug#735924: keyboard layout)

2014-01-19 Thread Eric Streit

hi

thanks for the report


Eric

Le 20/01/2014 02:03, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :
 This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
 which was filed against the ibus-hangul package:
 
 #735924: hangul: after lat ugdrade, it's not possible to type in Korean any 
 more
 
 It has been closed by Changwoo Ryu cw...@debian.org.
 
 Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
 If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
 better one in a separate message then please contact Changwoo Ryu 
 cw...@debian.org by
 replying to this email.
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#713501: doc-debian: FTBFS: ** WML:Error: input file `mailing-lists.wml' not found

2014-01-19 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 03:51:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 Source: doc-debian
 Version: 6.1
 Severity: serious
 Tags: jessie sid
 User: debian...@lists.debian.org
 Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
 Justification: FTBFS on amd64
 
 Hi,
 
 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
 amd64.
 
  lynx -dump -nolist constitution.1.3.html constitution.1.3.txt
  ERROR: Cannot find ~/debian/www/webwml/english to regenerate the sources. 
  Please read the TODO.
  wml -q mailing-lists.wml mailing-lists.html
  ** WML:Error: input file `mailing-lists.wml' not found
  make[1]: *** [mailing-lists.html] Error 1

I can also reproduce this in stable. Once fixed in sid, it would be nice if 
that FTBFS could also 
be fixed in wheezy.

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736137: /usr/bin/display.im6: random crash (SIGSEGV)

2014-01-19 Thread Paul Wise
Package: imagemagick
Version: 8:6.7.7.10-7
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/display.im6

I got this random crash from display.im6. I tried reporting it upstream
but didn't get a reply or any way to check if they recieved it. If the
following backtrace is not useful please close the bug.

$ gdb -batch -n -ex bt -ex 'thread apply all bt full' --core 
/var/crash/1000/4298-1000-1000-11-1390119462-chianamo--usr-bin-display.im6.core 
/usr/bin/display.im6

warning: core file may not match specified executable file.
[New LWP 4298]
[New LWP 4370]
[New LWP 4371]
[New LWP 4369]

warning: Could not load shared library symbols for linux-vdso.so.1.
Do you need set solib-search-path or set sysroot?
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1.

warning: no loadable sections found in added symbol-file system-supplied DSO at 
0x7fff469fe000
Core was generated by `display -'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x7f526e9ab0eb in raise (sig=sig@entry=11) at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pt-raise.c:38
38  ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pt-raise.c: No such file or directory.
#0  0x7f526e9ab0eb in raise (sig=sig@entry=11) at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pt-raise.c:38
#1  0x7f5270ba6872 in MagickSignalHandler (signal_number=11) at 
magick/magick.c:1151
#2  signal handler called
#3  0x7f526de57cd8 in XFreeCursor (dpy=0x23f2e80, cursor=41943052) at 
../../src/FreeCurs.c:38
#4  0x7f5270c61c59 in DestroyXResources () at magick/xwindow.c:281
#5  0x7f5270c61ec5 in XComponentTerminus () at magick/xwindow.c:1652
#6  0x7f5270ba728b in MagickCoreTerminus () at magick/magick.c:1364
#7  0x0040098e in DisplayMain (argv=optimized out, argc=2) at 
utilities/display.c:93
#8  main (argc=2, argv=optimized out) at utilities/display.c:100

Thread 4 (Thread 0x7f5268a4f700 (LWP 4369)):
#0  futex_wait (val=12, addr=0x2456cc4) at 
../../../src/libgomp/config/linux/x86/futex.h:44
r10 = 0
res = -512
#1  do_wait (val=12, addr=0x2456cc4) at 
../../../src/libgomp/config/linux/wait.h:64
val = 12
addr = 0x2456cc4
#2  gomp_barrier_wait_end (bar=0x2456cc0, state=12) at 
../../../src/libgomp/config/linux/bar.c:47
No locals.
#3  0x7f526dc2c2fe in gomp_thread_start (xdata=optimized out) at 
../../../src/libgomp/team.c:119
team = 0x246b3c0
data = optimized out
pool = 0x2456c80
local_fn = 0x7f5270c02cf0 HorizontalFilter._omp_fn.2
local_data = 0x7fff468d44d0
#4  0x7f526e9a3e0e in start_thread (arg=0x7f5268a4f700) at 
pthread_create.c:311
__res = optimized out
pd = 0x7f5268a4f700
now = optimized out
unwind_buf = {cancel_jmp_buf = {{jmp_buf = {139991919687424, 
2229628000393634533, 0, 139992007644320, 4096, 139991919687424, 
-2281658616700591387, -2281662626619186459}, mask_was_saved = 0}}, priv = {pad 
= {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, data = {prev = 0x0, cleanup = 0x0, canceltype = 0}}}
not_first_call = 0
pagesize_m1 = optimized out
sp = optimized out
freesize = optimized out
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = start_thread
#5  0x7f526d6630fd in clone () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:113
No locals.

Thread 3 (Thread 0x7f5267a4d700 (LWP 4371)):
#0  futex_wait (val=12, addr=0x2456cc4) at 
../../../src/libgomp/config/linux/x86/futex.h:44
r10 = 0
res = -512
#1  do_wait (val=12, addr=0x2456cc4) at 
../../../src/libgomp/config/linux/wait.h:64
val = 12
addr = 0x2456cc4
#2  gomp_barrier_wait_end (bar=0x2456cc0, state=12) at 
../../../src/libgomp/config/linux/bar.c:47
No locals.
#3  0x7f526dc2c2fe in gomp_thread_start (xdata=optimized out) at 
../../../src/libgomp/team.c:119
team = 0x246b3c0
data = optimized out
pool = 0x2456c80
local_fn = 0x7f5270c02cf0 HorizontalFilter._omp_fn.2
local_data = 0x7fff468d44d0
#4  0x7f526e9a3e0e in start_thread (arg=0x7f5267a4d700) at 
pthread_create.c:311
__res = optimized out
pd = 0x7f5267a4d700
now = optimized out
unwind_buf = {cancel_jmp_buf = {{jmp_buf = {139991902902016, 
2229628000393634533, 0, 139992007644320, 4096, 139991902902016, 
-2281647620510571803, -2281662626619186459}, mask_was_saved = 0}}, priv = {pad 
= {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, data = {prev = 0x0, cleanup = 0x0, canceltype = 0}}}
not_first_call = 0
pagesize_m1 = optimized out
sp = optimized out
freesize = optimized out
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = start_thread
#5  0x7f526d6630fd in clone () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:113
No locals.

Thread 2 (Thread 0x7f526824e700 (LWP 4370)):
#0  futex_wait (val=12, addr=0x2456cc4) at 
../../../src/libgomp/config/linux/x86/futex.h:44
r10 = 0
res = -512
#1  do_wait (val=12, addr=0x2456cc4) at 
../../../src/libgomp/config/linux/wait.h:64
val = 12
addr = 0x2456cc4

Bug#736138: RM: gnat-mingw-w64 [armhf] -- NVIU; Split source package, not building on armhf

2014-01-19 Thread Stephen Kitt
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear FTP team,

The gnat-mingw-w64 packages, which used to be built by gcc-mingw-w64,
now have their own source package. The latter isn't building on armhf,
but that's blocking the transition of gcc-mingw-w64...

I'd appreciate it if gnat-mingw-w64{,-i686,-x86-64} could be removed
on armhf.

Thanks,

Stephen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#727708: On diversity

2014-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:51:20PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
 Honestly, I was a bit surprised that Steve thinks the above's a good
 idea, given I wrote it from the (my) perspective of wanting to support
 multiple init systems within Debian; and my understanding is his
 opinion is that that's kind-of nuts. I think that's pretty great
 through, especially in that it affirms my naive faith that drilling
 down into technical details is a good way of achieving consensus
 amongst people with very different goals and political/philosophical
 stances... ;)

:)

So to expand on where I'm coming from:  I think that it's important to
choose a default for jessie, and that it's important that this not be
sysvinit; and I think whatever init system we choose for jessie will wind up
having a significant boost in momentum within Debian which will give it
staying power for a long time to come, and the non-default init systems will
receive little if any attention.  But I don't think the TC decision should
be a *permanent* one; as you say, there's always a next next-generation to
think about.  So I think we shouldn't have any particular init system marked
as Essential: yes.  Indeed, sysvinit being marked Essential: yes was an
obstacle for upstart in Debian for quite a while; less so for systemd
because the systemd maintainers made the expedient - but IMHO technically
undesirable - decision to split all conflicting files into a separate
package.

So that's to e).  f) is the sort of thing I think should be time limited to
jessie; g) seems obviously correct as far as it goes, but I think we might
quibble on the details of what packages are allowed to do this and why,
because one of the important features of Debian is that you can install
nearly anything from the archive together on the same system.  Having
packages with mutually incompatible dependencies on specific init systems
would undermine this badly.

And c) and d) are completely aligned with what I've been arguing (perhaps
poorly) that should be done with logind integration, because it's relevant
even if we don't adopt upstart as the default, as long as we want to have
non-Linux ports going forward.

So while I don't want to encourage the project to divide its efforts across
multiple different init systems in jessie, I think the particular points you
raise here are good ones, and I would only quibble on some of the minor
details.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#707178: Breakin - stress-test and hardware diagnostics tool - Please see if you are able to assist to an issue we are having now for more than a month on 3 servers

2014-01-19 Thread Bryan Fisher
Thank you very much Andreas!

Kind regards,

Bryan


-Original Message-
From: Andreas Cadhalpun [mailto:andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: 17 January 2014 09:51 PM
To: Bryan Fisher
Cc: 707...@bugs.debian.org; 733...@bugs.debian.org; Antoine Beaupré; 
tagg...@debian.org; d...@fifthhorseman.net; jroll...@finestructure.net
Subject: Re: Bug#707178: Breakin - stress-test and hardware diagnostics tool - 
Please see if you are able to assist to an issue we are having now for more 
than a month on 3 servers

Hi Bryan,

On 17.01.2014 10:13, Bryan Fisher wrote:
 I was hoping that maybe you could assist me in the issue that I am 
 getting with server h/w please.

 Attached is a screenshot of what happens when I insert a USB key to 
 copy the Breakin log file. It also indicates that 'Failid - Other 
 tests have errors, tuning on ID light..' would it be possible if you 
 could point me in a direction to find the fault please?

The error message (repeated 3 times) I read from the screenshot is:
kernel: [ 3009.877308] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page present
kernel: [ 3009.877311] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through

This reminds me of bug #733565 [1], which is about a request to silence these 
error messages.
I have seen similar messages and they seem to be totally harmless and have 
nothing to do with hardware failure.

Best regards,
Andreas


1: http://bugs.debian.org/733565


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736117: Perl installation on sompek (was: Re: Bug#736117: nmu: libgeo-proj4-perl_1.04-1)

2014-01-19 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi,

On the 4th of January, libgeo-proj4-perl on sparc was built in a sid
environment against perl5.14 on sompek (see link below).
  Before I schedule a binNMU for it, I would to get confirmation that
the chroot has been updated to use perl5.18.

Thanks,
~Niels


On 2014-01-19 22:14, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: binnmu
 
 nmu libgeo-proj4-perl_1.04-1 . sparc . -m Rebuild against perl 5.18
 
 The buildd chroot on sompek.debian.org that built the package on
 04 Jan 2014 21:30 
 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgeo-proj4-perlarch=sparcver=1.04-1stamp=1388871357
 still had (maybe has) perl 5.14 installed, producing a package that is
 uninstallable elsewhere.
 
 * the chroot needs to be fixed (and other similar buggy ones as well)
 * the rebuild should enforce some additional build-dependency on
   perl-base ( 5.18)
 
 Andreas
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736139: blockdiag: Fails to build from source in stable

2014-01-19 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: blockdiag
Version: 1.1.6-1.1
Severity: serious

Hi,
blockdiag fails to build from source in Wheezy (sid properly builds from 
source):

Cheers,
Moritz

--
copying src/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors/unknown_group_orientation.diag - 
_build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors
copying src/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors/unknown_group_shape.diag - 
_build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors
copying src/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors/unknown_node_attribute.diag - 
_build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors
copying src/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors/unknown_node_class.diag - 
_build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors
copying src/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors/unknown_node_shape.diag - 
_build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors
copying src/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors/unknown_node_style.diag - 
_build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors
copying src/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors/unknown_plugin.diag - 
_build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/blockdiag/tests/diagrams/errors
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_test
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jmm/scratch/wheezy/blockdiag-1.1.6'
set -e; \
PYTHONPATH=/home/jmm/scratch/wheezy/blockdiag-1.1.6/src nosetests -d 
..E
==
ERROR: 
blockdiag.tests.test_generate_diagram.test_generator_svg('node_icon.diag', 
'svg')
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/case.py, line 197, in runTest
self.test(*self.arg)
  File /home/jmm/scratch/wheezy/blockdiag-1.1.6/src/blockdiag/tests/utils.py, 
line 14, in wrap
func(*args, **kwargs)
  File /home/jmm/scratch/wheezy/blockdiag-1.1.6/src/blockdiag/tests/utils.py, 
line 29, in wrap
func(*args, **kwargs)
  File 
/home/jmm/scratch/wheezy/blockdiag-1.1.6/src/blockdiag/tests/test_generate_diagram.py,
 line 51, in __build_diagram
raise RuntimeError(sys.stderr.getvalue())
RuntimeError: ERROR: cannot identify image file

  begin captured stdout  -
('node_icon.diag', 'svg') {}
---[ stderr ] ---
ERROR: cannot identify image file


-  end captured stdout  --

--
Ran 299 tests in 4.219s

FAILED (errors=1)
make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jmm/scratch/wheezy/blockdiag-1.1.6'
make: *** [build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#735251: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#735251: lightdm: user locale tweaks are clobbered by non-default locale

2014-01-19 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 01:02:26PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
  At the very
  beginning of the /etc/X11/Xsession script LANG=C.
 
  Well, this one is a problem, it's should not be the case (and it's not
  the case for me on any of my box).
 
 C is the default locale on my system.

Ok, I don't have a default locale here (so it means it defaults to
POSIX).

 Okay, I've been looking at the source code a bit.  Turns out that
 session_set_env() does not set any environment variables directly.  It
 adds them to an internal list (session-priv-env).  This list is
 written to the session in `session_real_run()`.  I didn't find any calls
 to `session_unset_env()` for either LANG and GDM_LANG so would expect
 both to be set in the session.
 
 However, the greeter and user session inherit the system default locale
 courtesy of PAM as per comment in src/session-child.c.  This probably
 explains why I see LANG=C at the start of my Xsession.

That might make sense, although I don't think it's the correct behavior
in case an user actually choose a language in the selector.

 Anyway, I now nuke GDM_LANG in ~/.xsessionrc and have not seen any
 breakage yet.  The `locale` output is as I expect it and my input method
 editor works as it used to.  I no longer have a ~/.dmrc (and it is not
 recreated when you don't save your session).  I can pick any language I
 please from the chooser without this having *any* effect on my session.
 That is, the chooser does not interfere with my customizations which is
 what I want.
 
.dmrc has nothing to do with saving the session. And it's created (or at
least should be) *before* the session is actually started.

Regards.
- -- 
Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS3MYFAAoJEG3bU/KmdcCl/vEH/3s8idL1HPHVw+23abnGMte7
3ZefLPY4d+Mzyrd55eKmwUiU2UTO36P7uf3BhqrtmXPePdz7+jLkWHMSElly4NR4
/ucfGYD6VQyEZ4nvsJRV3a182wlhSXqDq2GXfYEFJ6DOZnUkB/sa7VfIJm9lBDH1
e4rWHpDRCbEVepvEZgQbDiJDKEXXCT/g4CzTSKsWGrMa1LRZLHUVOcI0ErN2DPGY
Iz1ep4Pq2MbAXRbN7dqkrSibIEPWhoYSEACo2TQOOgFUeG4a4sMh4y3HBlS+LooV
9i3+pfrb3pYcr/sgkXBodepQ3EkvPPNww8Ksu3y0ydQ46inCXLdK7NWOGNDyKz4=
=ap2m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736140: bash: set -v and appending to /dev/stderr in a file looses a little data

2014-01-19 Thread Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
Package: bash
Version: 4.2+dfsg-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Thank you very much for maintaining Debian's
bash package.

It's important.

People using the nicknames geirha and ormaaj
in the #bash channel at freenode's IRC network and
I happened to notice bash doing something we
didn't expect.

We found two circumstances where it appeared to
lose a little data.

I duplicated the little loss with versions
4.2.45(1)-release and 4.3.0(1)-rc1.

The later was running as a bot in freenode's
#evalbot channel.


OK, here's the first code that elicits the odd
behavior:

$ echo 'set -x; echo a  /dev/stderr ; echo b  /dev/stderr'  ./c ; 
chmod 755 ./c ; ./c  ./d 21 ; cat ./d ; rm ./c ./d

I expected the first echo statement to produce an
output line containing just an a.

However, all I got was

echo 'set -x; echo a  /dev/stderr ; echo b  /dev/stderr'  ./c ; 
chmod 755 ./c ; ./c  ./d 21 ; cat ./d ; rm ./c ./d
++ echo a
++ echo b
b


The second sample code is:

$ set -v; echo 'f() { echo a /dev/stderr ; }; f; echo b 2' ./c; chmod 
755 ./c; ./c ./d 21; cat ./d ; rm ./c ./d

Likewise, I expected its first echo statement to produce an
output line containing just an a.

However, I got only

set -v; echo 'f() { echo a /dev/stderr ; }; f; echo b 2' ./c; chmod 
755 ./c; ./c ./d 21; cat ./d
b


The a line reappears if set -x is not used ...

$ echo 'echo a  /dev/stderr ; echo b  /dev/stderr'  ./c ; chmod 
755 ./c ; ./c  ./d 21 ; cat ./d ; rm ./c ./d
a
b


It also reappears if a file is not used ...

$ { set -x; echo a  /dev/stderr ; echo b  /dev/stderr ; } 21 
+ echo a
a
+ echo b
b


I hope that helps,
Kingsley

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages bash depends on:
ii  base-files   7.2
ii  dash 0.5.7-3
ii  debianutils  4.4
ii  libc62.17-97
ii  libtinfo55.9+20130608-1

Versions of packages bash recommends:
ii  bash-completion  1:2.0-1

Versions of packages bash suggests:
ii  bash-doc  4.2+dfsg-1

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/bash.bashrc changed [not included]

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#733087: [LCFC] templates://apt-cacher-ng/{apt-cacher-ng.templates}

2014-01-19 Thread Christian PERRIER
This is the last call for comments for the review of debconf
templates for apt-cacher-ng.

The reviewed templates will be sent on Wednesday, January 22, 2014 to this bug 
report
and a mail will be sent to this list with [BTS] as a subject tag.


-- 


# These templates have been reviewed by the debian-l10n-english
# team
#
# If modifications/additions/rewording are needed, please ask
# debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org for advice.
#
# Even minor modifications require translation updates and such
# changes should be coordinated with translators and reviewers.

Template: apt-cacher-ng/gentargetmode
Type: select
__Choices: Set up once, Set up now and update later, No automated setup
Default: Set up once
_Description: Automatic remapping of client requests:
 Apt-Cacher NG can download packages from repositories other than those
 requested by the clients. This allows it to cache content effectively,
 and makes it easy for an administrator to switch to another mirror later.
 .
 This remapping of URLs can be configured now in an automated way based on the
 current state of /etc/apt/sources.list. Optionally, this process can be
 repeated on every package update (modifying the configuration files each
 time).
 .
 Selecting No automated setup will leave the existing configuration
 unchanged. It will need to be updated manually.

Template: apt-cacher-ng/bindaddress
Type: string
Default: keep
_Description: Address(es) for apt-cacher-ng to listen to:
 Please enter the addresses or hostnames which should be used by
 apt-cacher-ng (multiple entries must be separated by spaces).
 .
 Each entry must be an exact address (IP or hostname) which is
 associated with a local network interface. Generic protocol specific addresses
 are supported, such as 0.0.0.0 for listening on all IPv4 enabled interfaces.
 .
 If this field is left empty, apt-cacher-ng wille listen on all
 interfaces, with all supported protocols.
 .
 The special word keep keeps the value from the current (or default)
 configuration unchanged.

Template: apt-cacher-ng/port
Type: string
Default: keep
_Description: Listening TCP port:
 Please configure the TCP port where Apt-Cacher NG should listen for incoming 
HTTP
 (proxy) requests. The default value is port 3142, and it can be set to  to 
emulate
 apt-proxy.
 .
 If left empty, the value from the current configuration remains unchanged.

Template: apt-cacher-ng/cachedir
Type: string
Default: keep
_Description: Top level directory for packages cache:
 The main cache storage directory should be located on a file system without
 file name restrictions.
 .
 If left empty, the value from the current configuration remains unchanged or
 is set to default directory /var/cache/apt-cacher-ng.

Template: apt-cacher-ng/proxy
Type: string
Default: keep
_Description: Proxy to use for downloads:
 Please specify the proxy server to use for downloads.
 .
 Username and password for the proxy server can be included here following the
 user:pass@host:port scheme. However, please check the documentation for 
limitations.
 .
 If this field is left empty, apt-cacher NG will not use any proxy
 server.
 .
 The special word keep keeps the value from the current (or default)
 configuration unchanged.
Source: apt-cacher-ng
Section: net
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Eduard Bloch bl...@debian.org
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), cmake (= 2.6.2), libbz2-dev, zlib1g-dev, 
liblzma-dev, libfuse-dev [!hurd-i386], pkg-config, libwrap0-dev, lsb-base ( 
3.0-6), dh-systemd (= 1.5), po-debconf, libssl-dev
Standards-Version: 3.9.5
Homepage: http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~bloch/acng/

Package: apt-cacher-ng
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, adduser
Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.15.6)
Recommends: ed, avahi-daemon
Conflicts: logrotate ( 3.8.0)
Suggests: doc-base, libfuse2 (= 2.5), curl | wget
Description: caching proxy server for software repositories
 Apt-Cacher NG is a caching proxy for downloading packages from Debian-style
 software repositories (or possibly from other types).
 .
 The main principle is that a central machine hosts the proxy for a local
 network, and clients configure their APT setup to download through it.
 Apt-Cacher NG keeps a copy of all useful data that passes through it, and when
 a similar request is made, the cached copy of the data is delivered without
 being re-downloaded.
 .
 Apt-Cacher NG has been designed from scratch as a replacement for
 apt-cacher, but with a focus on maximizing throughput with low system
 resource requirements. It can also be used as replacement for apt-proxy and
 approx with no need to modify clients' sources.list files.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#736141: Support for Aladdins 72kb eToken

2014-01-19 Thread Marco Balmer
Package: libccid
Severity: normal

Hi!

I'd like to use Aladdin's eToken 72k Java on linux. Attached is an output
of ./src/parse and parse -p.

How can I help you to implement this?

Thanks a lot! Marco
Parsing USB bus/device: 05C6:9205 (bus 2, device 5)
 idVendor:  0x05C6  iManufacturer: Qualcomm Incorporated
 idProduct: 0x9205  iProduct: Qualcomm Gobi 2000
  Found a possibly CCID/ICCD device (bInterfaceClass = 0xFF). Use 
./parse -p
Parsing USB bus/device: 0529:0620 (bus 2, device 9)
 idVendor:  0x0529  iManufacturer: Aladdin
 idProduct: 0x0620  iProduct: Token JC
  Found a CCID/ICCD device at interface 0
Parsing USB bus/device: 8087:0020 (bus 2, device 2)
 idVendor:  0x8087  Can't get iManufacturer string
 idProduct: 0x0020  Can't get iProduct string
  NOT a CCID/ICCD device
Parsing USB bus/device: 1D6B:0002 (bus 2, device 1)
 idVendor:  0x1D6B  iManufacturer: Linux 3.12-1-686-pae ehci_hcd
 idProduct: 0x0002  iProduct: EHCI Host Controller
  NOT a CCID/ICCD device
Parsing USB bus/device: 17EF:480F (bus 1, device 7)
 idVendor:  0x17EF  iManufacturer: Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd.
 idProduct: 0x480F  iProduct: Integrated Camera
  NOT a CCID/ICCD device
Parsing USB bus/device: 0603:00F2 (bus 1, device 8)
 idVendor:  0x0603  iManufacturer: NOVATEK
 idProduct: 0x00F2  iProduct: USB Keyboard
  NOT a CCID/ICCD device
Parsing USB bus/device: 13FD:1840 (bus 1, device 10)
 idVendor:  0x13FD  iManufacturer: Generic 
 idProduct: 0x1840  iProduct: External
  NOT a CCID/ICCD device
Parsing USB bus/device: 17EF:100A (bus 1, device 6)
 idVendor:  0x17EF  Can't get iManufacturer string
 idProduct: 0x100A  Can't get iProduct string
  NOT a CCID/ICCD device
Parsing USB bus/device: 147E:2016 (bus 1, device 4)
 idVendor:  0x147E  iManufacturer: UPEK
 idProduct: 0x2016  iProduct: Biometric Coprocessor
  Found a possibly CCID/ICCD device (bInterfaceClass = 0xFF). Use 
./parse -p
Parsing USB bus/device: 046D:C521 (bus 1, device 3)
 idVendor:  0x046D  iManufacturer: Logitech
 idProduct: 0xC521  iProduct: USB Receiver
  NOT a CCID/ICCD device
Parsing USB bus/device: 8087:0020 (bus 1, device 2)
 idVendor:  0x8087  Can't get iManufacturer string
 idProduct: 0x0020  Can't get iProduct string
  NOT a CCID/ICCD device
Parsing USB bus/device: 1D6B:0002 (bus 1, device 1)
 idVendor:  0x1D6B  iManufacturer: Linux 3.12-1-686-pae ehci_hcd
 idProduct: 0x0002  iProduct: EHCI Host Controller
  NOT a CCID/ICCD device
 idVendor: 0x0529
  iManufacturer: Aladdin
 idProduct: 0x0620
  iProduct: Token JC
 bcdDevice: 1.00 (firmware release?)
 bLength: 9
 bDescriptorType: 4
 bInterfaceNumber: 0
 bAlternateSetting: 0
 bNumEndpoints: 3
  bulk-IN, bulk-OUT and Interrupt-IN
 bInterfaceClass: 0x0B [Chip Card Interface Device Class (CCID)]
 bInterfaceSubClass: 0
 bInterfaceProtocol: 0
  bulk transfer, optional interrupt-IN (CCID)
 iInterface: Main Interface
 CCID Class Descriptor
  bLength: 0x36
  bDescriptorType: 0x21
  bcdCCID: 1.10
  bMaxSlotIndex: 0x00
  bVoltageSupport: 0x07
   5.0V
   3.0V
   1.8V
  dwProtocols: 0x 0x0003
   T=0
   T=1
  dwDefaultClock: 4.000 MHz
  dwMaximumClock: 4.000 MHz
  bNumClockSupported: 0 (will use whatever is returned)
   IFD does not support GET CLOCK FREQUENCIES request: Resource temporarily 
unavailable
  dwDataRate: 10752 bps
  dwMaxDataRate: 10752 bps
  bNumDataRatesSupported: 0 (will use whatever is returned)
   IFD does not support GET_DATA_RATES request: Resource temporarily unavailable
  dwMaxIFSD: 49
  dwSynchProtocols: 0x
  dwMechanical: 0x
   No special characteristics
  dwFeatures: 0x0001023C
   04 Automatic activation of ICC on inserting
   08 Automatic ICC voltage selection
   10 Automatic ICC clock frequency change according to parameters
   20 Automatic baud rate change according to frequency and Fi, Di params
   ..02.. NAD value other than 00 accepted (T=1)
   01 TPDU level exchange
  dwMaxCCIDMessageLength: 271 bytes
  bClassGetResponse: 0x00
  bClassEnvelope: 0x00
  wLcdLayout: 0x
  bPINSupport: 0x00
  bMaxCCIDBusySlots: 1
Parsing USB bus/device: 05C6:9205 (bus 2, device 5)
 idVendor:  0x05C6  iManufacturer: Qualcomm Incorporated
 idProduct: 0x9205  iProduct: Qualcomm Gobi 2000
  Found a CCID/ICCD device at interface 0
Can't claim interface (bus 2, device 5): Device or resource busy
 Please, stop pcscd and retry

Parsing USB bus/device: 0529:0620 (bus 2, device 9)
 idVendor:  0x0529  iManufacturer: Aladdin
 idProduct: 0x0620  iProduct: Token JC
  Found a CCID/ICCD device at interface 0
Parsing USB bus/device: 8087:0020 (bus 2, device 2)
 idVendor:  0x8087  Can't get iManufacturer string
 idProduct: 0x0020  Can't get 

Bug#727708: On diversity

2014-01-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
Have you think in having a Systemd team in Debian taking care of
providing support for its packages? That way, people should be able to
run it in some weeks and, as soon as existing init.d files are not
dropped, people won't lose support for that (apart of the cases like
GNOME that needs systemd running to work better)

That is the way we went on Gentoo and looks to work well: we started
from openRC only setup, when we needed better systemd support along our
portage tree due Gnome 3.8 requirements, we (Gentoo systemd team)
started to work in adding systemd support and unit files to our
packages, that way, our maintainers weren't forced to run systemd to
test their unit files work fine and test both systems themselves.

We now have a working Systemd setup and, for our BSD ports, people still
have openRC support (even not being able to run all features of GNOME
but... much more cannot be done on that since
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/gnome/openrc-settingsd.xml isn't
enough to not lose any features since 3.8)

From my perspective, I would support both setups: systemd (due it being
required by more upstreams along the time, and, *in my personal
opinion*, I think it works pretty well) and another one for BSDs and
people hating so much Systemd (I would choose openRC... but since I come
from Gentoo and know about it more than about upstart... ;))


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#727708: Thoughts on Init System Debate

2014-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Don,

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:41:32PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
 Systemd's socket-based activation and cgroup based tracking are
 technically superior to upstart, even though the latter causes problems
 with portability to non-linux systems. However, if we were to decide on
 upstart, we could have just a single init system everywhere, which would
 be beneficial.[3]

snip

 I should point out that I have not extensively examined openrc, nor have
 I taken into account planned features and development in either systemd
 or upstart which could sway my opinion.

As you say that planned features or development could sway your opinion: are
there particular features that you have in mind, here?  For instance,
correcting upstart's socket-based activation interface is on the upstart
roadmap in the jessie timeframe.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#730100: autopkgtest still present [was: Bug#730100 closed by D Haley my...@gmx.com (Bug#730100: fixed in 3depict 0.0.15-1)]

2014-01-19 Thread Martin Pitt
found 730100 0.0.15-1
user autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertag 730100 autopkgtest
thanks

Debian Bug Tracking System [2013-12-13 21:21 +]:
* Remove unit tests (Closes: #730100)

I guess that was supposed to say autopkgtest? Anyway, 0.0.15-1 still
has the XS-Testsuite: header in debian/control and the
debian/tests/control script which merely checks the source tree.
Please either drop XS-Testsuite: or fix debian/tests/ to actually test
the installed package. This can be a simple smoke test that the
program works at all, to ensure it's compiled/linked alright and that
its dependencies are sufficient.

Thank you,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#727708: On diversity

2014-01-19 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Steve Langasek 

 GNOME certainly uses these interfaces already.  Whether they should be
 considered a dependency or not is probably something that should be left
 to the maintainers' discretion.  But I think they should certainly be
 handled the same way as logind, generally - with a dependency on some
 virtual package that other implementations could provide (or that can be
 provided by a binary package from systemd source that doesn't depend on pid
 1 - since these dbus services all work fine on non-systemd systems, and
 there's no technical reason that should ever change given the function of
 the services in question).

I'm willing to look at adding virtual packages for those once we
actually see alternative implementations happening.  Adding them because
somebody might, maybe, possibly add them somewhere down the line sounds
premature.

As for whether they should work with non-pid1 or not, it's also a
question about what we (the systemd maintainers) want to support.  The
daemons currently don't require systemd as pid1, but given all the flak
over maybe making logind require systemd as pid1 there is a very strong
incentive to not make those implementations work with another init.  The
CTTE here and in the past (see NM) views regressions as much more
serious than lacking implementations.

I think this is pretty sad and gives maintainers perverse incentives,
since there's not really any graceful way to say «this will no longer
be/is no longer supported» without risking being struck down.  It's a
somewhat separate discussion from the whole «what should be the default
init system» discussion, but it's one we (as a project) should be having
at some point.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#733087: [LCFC] templates://apt-cacher-ng/{apt-cacher-ng.templates}

2014-01-19 Thread victory
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:57:48 +0100
Christian PERRIER wrote:

  If this field is left empty, apt-cacher-ng wille listen on all
  interfaces, with all supported protocols.

s/wille/will/


-- 
victory
no need to CC me :-)
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/102724 0.0.1.4
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/163846 0.0.1
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/163848 0.0.1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736122: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#736122: virtinst: Installing debian fails with AttributeError: 'virStream' object has no attribute 'upload'

2014-01-19 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Sami,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:30:27AM +0200, Sami Liedes wrote:
 Package: virtinst
 Version: 0.600.4-2
 Severity: normal
 
 Installing Debian from an URL like that suggested by the man page (but
 with .us. replaced with .fi.) fails with the error mentioned in the
 subject.
 
 I also tried with virtinst from experimental (however this run is from
 the unstable version).

This seems to be caused by a change in the python bindings. The attached
patch fixes this but afterwards sending data over the stream fails for
me. I'll need to check this in more detail.
Cheers,
 -- Guido
From 4a9bdf51a99807949a52773a2c0c034187fc9955 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: 4a9bdf51a99807949a52773a2c0c034187fc9955.1390204086.git@sigxcpu.org
From: =?UTF-8?q?Guido=20G=C3=BCnther?= a...@sigxcpu.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:25:27 +0100
Subject: [virt-manager PATCH] Use vol.upload(stream, ...) instead of
 stream.upload(vol, ...)

Libvirt-python's commit 9bc81a156d281294b79192d04a5db10997566299
removed the incorrectly generated methods.
---
 virtinst/distroinstaller.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/virtinst/distroinstaller.py b/virtinst/distroinstaller.py
index 1641f15..13ceb6b 100644
--- a/virtinst/distroinstaller.py
+++ b/virtinst/distroinstaller.py
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ def _upload_file(conn, meter, destpool, src):
 offset = 0
 length = size
 flags = 0
-stream.upload(vol, offset, length, flags)
+vol.upload(stream, offset, length, flags)
 
 # Open source file
 fileobj = file(src, r)
-- 
1.8.5.2



Bug#690328: All links in documentation's index.html are broken

2014-01-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Le 12/10/2012 19:44, Ryan Kavanagh a écrit :
 All of the links (well, the dozen or so I've tried to follow, excluding
 the alphabetical ones at the very top) in
 /usr/share/doc/libssreflect-coq/html/index.html are broken.

Is that still true? I just tried with 1.5~rc1-2 and I couldn't find
broken links. Maybe it was just fixed meanwhile...


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#736130: linux-image-3.12-1-powerpc64 crashes during shutdown of PowerPC G5 Mac. But PowerPC g4 Mac (23-bit) works OK.

2014-01-19 Thread Rick Thomas

On Jan 19, 2014, at 7:41 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:

 On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 19:23 -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
 Thanks, Ben, for the very quick response!
 
 I'd love to do that.  But I don't have a serial console for this
 machine (no serial port -- it's a PowerMac MacPro G5, 64-bit CPU)
 and the messages logged at crash time scroll off the screen too fast
 for me to copy them down (or even photograph).
 
 I'll make a photograph of the last screen's worth of messages and send
 that to the bug, if you think that will help.
 
 It might do.

OK.  That's worth a try then.

 
 Do you know of any way to get more information than that?  I'd really
 like to help get this bug fixed (I've got plans for this machine but I
 can't go forward with them until I can reboot it reliably)
 
 You might also be able to use netconsole
 https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt.

I'll read up and see if I can make it work for this case.

 
 Does it help any that the G4 (32-bit CPU) sitting right beside it,
 running an identical software setup, reboots just fine?
 
 I have no idea what the differences could be.  Unfortunately there are
 no kernel maintainers for powerpc in Debian so all I can do is prompt
 for useful information and then refer you upstream.

Thanks! for helping any way you can…

 Ben.

Rick

 
 -- 
 Ben Hutchings
 One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them.

Words to live by!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



<    1   2   3   4