Bug#295007: NMU patch
Here's my NMU patch for the aspell-no rebuild... Your
aspell-no.postinst script scared and confused me. Hopefully I didn't
screw it up... What's wrong with just relying on LANG/LC_MESSAGES
anyway?
--
Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to
pretend to like each other.
diff -u norwegian-2.0/debian/aspell-no.postinst
norwegian-2.0/debian/aspell-no.postinst
--- norwegian-2.0/debian/aspell-no.postinst
+++ norwegian-2.0/debian/aspell-no.postinst
@@ -8,12 +8,12 @@
db_get aspell-no/whichvariant || true
if [ $RET ]; then
-cd /usr/share/aspell
+cd /usr/lib/aspell-0.60
rm -f no.dat no
ln -f -s $RET.dat no.dat
ln -f -s ${RET}_phonet.dat no_phonet.dat
-cd /usr/lib/aspell
-rm -f no norsk
+cd /usr/lib/aspell-0.60
+rm -f norsk
if [ $RET = bokmaal ]; then
ln -sf nb.multi no.multi
elif [ $RET = nynorsk ]; then
diff -u norwegian-2.0/debian/aspell-no.dirs norwegian-2.0/debian/aspell-no.dirs
--- norwegian-2.0/debian/aspell-no.dirs
+++ norwegian-2.0/debian/aspell-no.dirs
@@ -2,3 +2 @@
-usr/share/aspell
-usr/lib/aspell
-usr/share/pspell
+usr/lib/aspell-0.60
diff -u norwegian-2.0/debian/changelog norwegian-2.0/debian/changelog
--- norwegian-2.0/debian/changelog
+++ norwegian-2.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+norwegian (2.0-18.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload
+ * Transitioned the aspell-no package to Aspell 0.60 (Closes: #295007)
+- debian/control: Build-depend on aspell-bin ( 0.60)
+- debian/control: Provide aspell6-dictionary
+- debian/aspell-no.dirs: install /usr/lib/aspell-0.60 instead of
+ /usr/share/aspell and /usr/lib/aspell, removed obsolete
+ /usr/share/pspell
+- debian/rules: install aspell-no files into /usr/lib/aspell-0.60
+- debian/aspell-no.postinst: only muck around in /usr/lib/aspell-0.60
+
+ -- Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:36:08 -0800
+
norwegian (2.0-18) unstable; urgency=low
* Clarify copyright file. (closes: #290216)
diff -u norwegian-2.0/debian/control norwegian-2.0/debian/control
--- norwegian-2.0/debian/control
+++ norwegian-2.0/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: text
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), ispell, gawk, perl, aspell (= 0.50),
dictionaries-common-dev (=0.20), ssed, po-debconf, gettext (= 0.11),
libmyspell-dev (= 1:3.1-5)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), ispell, gawk, perl, aspell ( 0.60),
dictionaries-common-dev (=0.20), ssed, po-debconf, gettext (= 0.11),
libmyspell-dev (= 1:3.1-5)
Standards-Version: 3.5.6
Package: inorwegian
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
Package: aspell-no
Architecture: any
Depends: aspell, debconf
-Provides: aspell-dictionary
+Provides: aspell6-dictionary
Description: Norwegian dictionary for aspell
Those are the Norwegian dictionaries, to be used with
aspell to check and correct spelling in Norwegian texts.
diff -u norwegian-2.0/debian/rules norwegian-2.0/debian/rules
--- norwegian-2.0/debian/rules
+++ norwegian-2.0/debian/rules
@@ -72,15 +72,15 @@
# install -m0644 bokmål.alias debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell/bokmål.alias
# install -m0644 nynorsk.alias
debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell/nynorsk.alias
- install -m0644 nb.multi debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell/nb.multi
- install -m0644 nn.multi debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell/nn.multi
+ install -m0644 nb.multi debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/nb.multi
+ install -m0644 nn.multi debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/nn.multi
- install -m0644 nb.dat debian/aspell-no/usr/share/aspell/nb.dat
- install -m0644 nb.rws debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell/nb.rws
+ install -m0644 nb.dat debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/nb.dat
+ install -m0644 nb.rws debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/nb.rws
- install -m0644 nn.dat debian/aspell-no/usr/share/aspell/nn.dat
- install -m0644 nn.rws debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell/nn.rws
- echo add no.multi debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell/norwegian.alias
+ install -m0644 nn.dat debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/nn.dat
+ install -m0644 nn.rws debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/nn.rws
+ echo add no.multi
debian/aspell-no/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/norwegian.alias
# myspell
install -m644 nb_NO.mydict
debian/myspell-nb/usr/share/myspell/dicts/nb_NO.dic
Processed: Fixed in NMU of norwegian 2.0-18.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 295007 + fixed Bug#295007: aspell-no: Support for pending Aspell 0.60 Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Invalid dependency on aspell-dictionary
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 294603 serious Bug#294603: sylpheed-claws: Please remove aspell-dictionary relationship Severity set to `serious'. tags 294603 sid Bug#294603: sylpheed-claws: Please remove aspell-dictionary relationship There were no tags set. Tags added: sid severity 294604 serious Bug#294604: sylpheed: Please remove aspell-dictionary relationship Severity set to `serious'. tags 294604 sid Bug#294604: sylpheed: Please remove aspell-dictionary relationship There were no tags set. Tags added: sid severity 294608 serious Bug#294608: abiword-common: Please remove aspell-dictionary relationship Severity set to `serious'. tags 294608 sid Bug#294608: abiword-common: Please remove aspell-dictionary relationship There were no tags set. Tags added: sid stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292604: marked as done (icons should not have suddenly changed from icons to gallery-icons)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 03:47:28 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#292604: fixed in libapache-gallery-perl 0.9.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2005 07:26:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 27 23:26:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from netz.smurf.noris.de [213.95.21.43] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CuQWO-0001D3-00; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:26:24 -0800 Received: from root by netz.smurf.noris.de with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CuQWN-0004PT-F1; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:26:23 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: root [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libapache-gallery-perl: Neet SetHandler None for the images X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:26:23 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libapache-gallery-perl Version: 0.9.1-2 Severity: minor I noticed that the gallery images (folders, etc) need this to work properly: Location /gallery-icons/ SetHandler None /Location Please add to the documentation. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (601, 'unstable'), (552, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-rc3-mm1-1.10 Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libapache-gallery-perl depends on: ii libapache-request-perl1.1-0.1Generic Apache Request Library ii libapache2-mod-perl2 1.999.20-1 Integration of perl with the Apach ii libcgi-perl 2.76-23modules for perl5, for use in writ ii libimage-imlib2-perl 1.02-1 perl interface to the imlib2 imagi ii libimage-info-perl1.16-1 allows extraction of meta informat ii libimage-size-perl2.992-1determine the size of images in se ii libtemplate-perl 2.14-1 template processing system written ii libtext-template-perl 1.44-1.1 Text::Template perl module ii perl 5.8.4-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 292604-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 08:53:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 00:53:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2QMO-0008Cf-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:53:08 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2QGu-0006yI-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 03:47:28 -0500 From: Jesus Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#292604: fixed in libapache-gallery-perl 0.9.1-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 03:47:28 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: libapache-gallery-perl Source-Version: 0.9.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libapache-gallery-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libapache-gallery-perl_0.9.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libapache-gallery-perl/libapache-gallery-perl_0.9.1-3.diff.gz libapache-gallery-perl_0.9.1-3.dsc to pool/main/liba/libapache-gallery-perl/libapache-gallery-perl_0.9.1-3.dsc libapache-gallery-perl_0.9.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/liba/libapache-gallery-perl/libapache-gallery-perl_0.9.1-3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug
Processed: This problem keep the package out of debian/testing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 277169 serious Bug#277169: Need upload with support for newer mozilla Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: This problem keep the package out of debian/testing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 277170 serious Bug#277170: Need upload with support for newer mozilla Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295877: gauche-gtk: FTBFS: /bin/sh: m: command not found
Your package is failing to build on all arches. Here is an extract from the build log: cd src; /usr/bin/make install make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/gauche-gtk-0.4.1/src' m 444 -T /build/buildd/gauche-gtk-0.4.1/debian/gauche-gtk`/usr/bin/gauche- config --sysincdir` /bin/sh: m: command not found make[2]: [install] Error 127 (ignored) Thanks for the report. It is because gauche-gtk has build dependency to gauche (= 0.8.3). I forgot to add the build dependency in debian/control file, and newer gauche has not yet been uploaded (for unknown reason for me). I've asked one of gauche maintainers (Takeshi YAEGASHI) to upload new gauche-gtk package again (with correct buld dependency) after newer gauche upload. So, once newer gauche will be available on buildd, this failure will be solved. Just FYI, newer gauche is available at: deb http://people.debian.org/~yaegashi/gauche/sid ./ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~yaegashi/gauche/sid ./ -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295427: marked as done (beecrypt_2.2.0-pre1-4(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken libtool.m4)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 04:32:15 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#295427: fixed in beecrypt 2.2.0-pre1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 19:07:45 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 11:07:45 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.80.164.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D182z-0005uJ-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:07:45 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C52923F96
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:07:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 02766-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 97B9D23F94; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:07:39 -0800
From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: beecrypt_2.2.0-pre1-4(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken
libtool.m4
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: beecrypt
Version: 2.2.0-pre1-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of beecrypt_2.2.0-pre1-4 on remake by sbuild/mipsel 1.170.5
Build started at 20050215-1526
The version of libtool used to build this source package is too old to
correctly support shared libraries for the Debian mips and mipsel
architectures. Debian versions 1.5-2 and 1.4.2-7 and higher correctly
support them. You need to update all of the libtool related files by
running the following on your source tree:
autoreconf --force
You may need to use the --install option as well. You can also try the
individual commands needed yourself:
libtoolize --force --copy
aclocal
autoheader
automake -a
autoconf
autoheader may not be needed, and you may need to use versioned binaries
(autoconf2.13, automake-1.{4,6,7}, aclocal-1.{4,6,7}, etc)
The correct 'configure' script will have output that looks like this:
linux*)
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
;;
Older versions of libtool used a file_magic check for the pattern
file_magic ELF [0-9][0-9]*-bit [LM]SB (shared object|dynamic lib )
The output of file(1) on a shared library on MIPS does not match this
regular expression, however. Earlier versions of file had been
modified to match this regular expression, but the latest version uses
the same output as upstream once again. The file check often causes
problems, and results on a build-dep on file that you might not
otherwise be aware of. The new method doesn't need file(1) at all,
and is far less fragile, so it is best to upgrade the configure script
with proper mips support.
---
Received: (at 295427-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 09:39:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 01:39:07 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2R4s-0005xG-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:39:06 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2QyF-0001q5-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 04:32:15 -0500
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#295427: fixed in beecrypt 2.2.0-pre1-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 04:32:15 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source:
Bug#295817: turck-mmcache: is not loaded - config files are wrong
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 11:21 -0800, Elizabeth Fong wrote: Okay, I just looked at the docs. It's supposed to be zend_extension_ts instead of zend_extension. Not 'zend_extension_zts'? Cheers :-) Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295838: vdr: restarts itself before it can really work
Am Freitag, 18. Februar 2005 20:13 schrieb Thomas Schmidt:
* Timo Weingärtner schrieb am 18.02.05, um 14:25 Uhr:
After upgrading from 1.2.6-6 to 1.2.6-7 vdr restarts itself before it can
do its
work. The logs are full of it and if there's something to be recorded,
the directory is full of zero-byte files.
The logs are full of what?
full of restarts, see attachment
How is the exact error message?
no error message
Which directory is full of zero-byte-files?
the recording directory, e.g. /video/vdr/Stargate/2005-02-16.20.13.99.99.rec
is full of files named [0-9]{3}.vdr and vdr-[0-9]{6}
Regards,
Thomas
Regards, Timo
log-2005-02-16-20:27:35.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
pgpw8YPlCsX2N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#295971: jpilot: Hidden records can be viewed/modified without password
Package: jpilot Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre7-1 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole In the main jpilot window, if the padlock button is pressed while private records are hidden or masked, and the cancel button is pressed (or the dialog is closed by the window manager) then private records will be unhidden. This may need to be done more than once, but it will eventually happen. This problem does not affect the Show Private Records menu item. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages jpilot depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.8 Debian configuration management sy ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-02.6.1-3 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.6.0-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpisock8 0.11.8-10Library for communicating with a P -- debconf information: * shared/pilot/port: None -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295554: can't remove the package
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:29:46PM +0100, Thomas Seyrat wrote: On February 16, 18:22 (+0100), Robert Millan wrote: Removing xinetd ... Note: all inetd services have been terminated. WARNING: you don't have an init script for the original inetd anymore! You may need to reinstall the netkit-inetd package to get it back. IIUC, this means that you manually removed /etc/init.d/inetd.real right ? No. I was using inetutils-inetd, which provides netkit-inetd and installs in /etc/init.d/inetutils-inetd. This could have caused the problem. It is a separate bug, however. I can't give more details on this one currently and am more concerned about the former (failure in postrm) which is release-critical. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#287651: marked as done (grass: Multiple vulnerabilities (symlink attacks) due to improper temporary files use in scripts and source code)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:39:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#287651: fixed in grass 5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2004 11:01:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 29 03:01:19 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CjbZu-00028E-00; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 03:01:18 -0800
Received: (qmail 10639 invoked by uid 1013); 29 Dec 2004 11:01:16 -
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:01:16 +0100
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: grass: Multiple vulnerabilities (symlink attacks) due to improper
temporary files use in scripts and source code
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: grass
Version: 5.0.3-5.1
Priority: grave
Tags: security sarge sid
A lot of scripts provided withing Grass are vulnerable to race conditions
through symlink attacks in temporary files. Many of these scripts either
create temporary files in an insecure manner (shell scripts do not use 'set
-e' and 'set -C', for example) or/and are easily guessable.
Some examples include:
grass-5.0.3/src/scripts/contrib/i.oif/i.oif:
-
(...)
# save the Stddev for TM bands
echo Calculation Standarddeviations for all bands:
$GISBASE/etc/i.oif/r.stddev $1 |tail -1 /tmp/i.oif.stddev
(...)
-
grass-5.0.3/src/CMD/generic/GISGEN.sh:
case $# in
0)
tmp1=3D/tmp/GISGEN1.$$
tmp2=3D/tmp/GISGEN2.$$
tmp3=3D/tmp/GISGEN3.$$
rm -f $tmp1
touch $tmp1
(...)
rm -f $tmp2
rm -f $tmp3
echo a =3D=3D 1 { print \$0 ; next } $tmp3
echo \$0 =3D=3D \$STEP\ { a =3D 1; print \$0 } $tmp3
awk -f $tmp3 $tmp1 $tmp2
rm -f $tmp3 $tmp1
--
grass-5.0.3/src/mapdev/v.in.arc.poly/script/v.in.arc.poly
--
bindir=3D$GISBASE/etc
tempfile=3D/tmp/temp.ply
(...)
echo 'start eliminating double nodes in ' $1
$bindir/permut $GISDBASE/$LOCATION_NAME/$MAPSET/arc/temp.ply $tempfile
rm $tempfile
(...)
--
[Note: permut just opens this output file without further checks:
=2E/src/mapdev/v.in.arc.poly/permut/permut.c
(...)
if ((outfile =3D fopen (out_ply, w)) =3D=3D NULL)
{
printf (can't open tempfile %s\n, out_ply);
exit (1);
}
(...)
]
=2E/src/paint/Drivers/versatec/3236/DRIVER.sh
--
(...)
TMPDIR1=3D/tmp/versatec
TMPDIR2=3D/tmp/versatec
(...)
RASTERFILE=3D$TMPDIR1/_paint
SPRINT=3D/bin/sprint 2
SPRINT_COMMAND=3D$SPRINT $RASTERFILE -v -p 3236 -w $TMPDIR2 -x $ZOOM -y=20
$ZOOM
--
grass-5.0.3/src/scripts/contrib/i.spectral/i.spectral
--
=2Ewhere -1 |r.what input=3D$RASTERMAPS /tmp/spectr.dum1
cat /tmp/spectr.dum1 | cut -d'|' -f4,5,6,7,8,9,10| tr '|' '\012' =20
/tmp/spectr.dum2
--
Now those are just exmaples of the easily guessable temporary files used.=
=20
But a lot of scripts make use of the $$ construct (either within shell=20
scripts or C code using getpid()) that is not directly guessable but can be=
=20
infered in a system where a given user is running grass more or less=20
accurately either:
- by looking at the /tmp/ directory and detecting when a given temporary
file is created and symlink the next one. For example in
Bug#282258: marked as done (mpich: broken .so symlinks)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:47 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#282258: fixed in mpich 1.2.5.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2004 20:56:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 20 12:56:41 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CVcHh-wh-00; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:56:41 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 34A3F3BC04A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:56:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5775FD9.kabel.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F263BC007 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:56:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 064AC26136; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:56:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:56:39 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: netpipe: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lmpich Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: netpipe Version: 3.6.2-1 Severity: serious netpipe is failing to build with the following error: cc -DUSE_STDARG -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_STDARG_H=1 -DUSE_STDARG=1 -DMALLOC_RET_VOID=1 -L/usr/lib/mpich/lib/shared -lmpich -O -DMPI ./src/netpipe.c ./src/mpi.c -o NPmpi -I./src /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lmpich I assume something changed in the mpich package resulting in it failing now. Kurt --- Received: (at 282258-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 14:38:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 06:38:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2VkA-0001Qa-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 06:38:02 -0800 Received: from ajt by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2Vh1-0005ST-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:47 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C. Powell, IV) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#282258: fixed in mpich 1.2.5.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:47 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: mpich Source-Version: 1.2.5.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mpich, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmpich-mpd1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/libmpich-mpd1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb libmpich-mpd1.0_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/libmpich-mpd1.0_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb libmpich1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/libmpich1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb libmpich1.0_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/libmpich1.0_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb mpe-source_1.2.5.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/mpe-source_1.2.5.3-2_all.deb mpi-doc_1.2.5.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/mpi-doc_1.2.5.3-2_all.deb mpich-bin_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/mpich-bin_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb mpich-mpd-bin_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/mpich-mpd-bin_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb mpich-mpd_1.2.5.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/mpich-mpd_1.2.5.3-2_all.deb mpich_1.2.5.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mpich/mpich_1.2.5.3-2.diff.gz mpich_1.2.5.3-2.dsc to pool/main/m/mpich/mpich_1.2.5.3-2.dsc mpich_1.2.5.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/mpich_1.2.5.3-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be
Bug#281594: marked as done (libmpich1.0: libmpich.so.1.0 is a non-PIC library)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:47 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#281594: fixed in mpich 1.2.5.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2004 20:03:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 16 12:03:45 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CU9YG-0004B5-00; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:03:45 -0800 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6A43067C2; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:03:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7A02C80F4; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:03:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20171-05; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:03:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CCA22C80EC; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:03:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:03:07 +0100 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libmpich1.0: libmpich.so.1.0 is a non-PIC library X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:03:07 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libmpich1.0 Version: 1.2.5.3-1 Severity: normal Hi, here is what prelink complains about: /usr/sbin/prelink.bin: /usr/lib/blacs/fblacs_test_shared-mpich: Cannot prelink against non-PIC sharedlibrary /usr/lib/mpich/lib/shared/libmpich.so.1.0 /usr/sbin/prelink.bin: /usr/lib/blacs/cblacs_test_shared-mpich: Cannot prelink against non-PIC sharedlibrary /usr/lib/mpich/lib/shared/libmpich.so.1.0 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libmpich1.0 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libg2c0 1:3.4.0-4 Runtime library for GNU Fortran 77 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 281594-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 14:39:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 06:39:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2VlM-00028I-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 06:39:16 -0800 Received: from ajt by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2Vh1-0005SR-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:47 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C. Powell, IV) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#281594: fixed in mpich 1.2.5.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:47 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: mpich Source-Version: 1.2.5.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mpich, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmpich-mpd1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/libmpich-mpd1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb libmpich-mpd1.0_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to
Bug#286725: marked as done (illuminator: FTBFS: configure: error: PETSc libraries not found)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:47 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#281594: fixed in mpich 1.2.5.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2004 19:35:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 21 11:35:25 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cgpn3-0002LF-00; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:35:25 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D2AA32810F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:35:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5775FD9.kabel.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2A2328707 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:35:23 +0100 (MET) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id F32AA26136; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:35:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:35:22 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: illuminator: FTBFS: configure: error: PETSc libraries not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: illuminator Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, The package is failing to build on a few arches (ia64, alpha, hppa and amd64) with the following error: checking for PetscPrintf in -lpetsc... no configure: error: PETSc libraries not found From config.log: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libpmpich.so.1.0, needed by /usr/lib/petsc/lib/libO/linux/libpetsc.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libmpich.so.1.0, needed by /usr/lib/petsc/lib/libO/linux/libpetsc.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/../lib/libmpe.so.1.0: undefined reference to `MPI_Group_translate_ranks' /usr/bin/../lib/libmpe.so.1.0: undefined reference to `MPI_Get_processor_name' dpkg --search libfmpich.so.1.0 libmpich1.0: /usr/lib/mpich/lib/shared/libfmpich.so.1.0 libmpich1.0: /usr/lib/libfmpich.so.1.0 dpkg --search libpmpich.so.1.0 dpkg: *libpmpich.so.1.0* not found. dpkg --search libpmpich.so.1.0 dpkg: *libpmpich.so.1.0* not found. I assume this is a bug in some other package. I'm guessing it's #282258 (which says it's fixed), but I'm not convinced that it is. Kurt --- Received: (at 281594-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 14:39:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 06:39:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2VlM-00028I-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 06:39:16 -0800 Received: from ajt by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2Vh1-0005SR-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:47 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C. Powell, IV) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#281594: fixed in mpich 1.2.5.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:47 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: mpich Source-Version: 1.2.5.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mpich, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmpich-mpd1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/libmpich-mpd1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb libmpich-mpd1.0_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/libmpich-mpd1.0_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb libmpich1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/libmpich1.0-dev_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb libmpich1.0_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpich/libmpich1.0_1.2.5.3-2_i386.deb mpe-source_1.2.5.3-2_all.deb to
Bug#295838: vdr: restarts itself before it can really work
* Timo Weingärtner schrieb am 19.02.05, um 12:17 Uhr: The logs are full of what? full of restarts, see attachment Ok, i can reproduce it here too, unfortunately i forgot to test the patch for #294041 before uploading vdr 1.2.6-7, removing the patch should fix the problem, i will upload a fixed package in a few minutes. I will have to investigate the patch for #294041 before it can be added again. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#295853: reportbug: Well done!
Package: reportbug Version: 3.2 Followup-For: Bug #295853 Chris, good to hear. From the Changelog I got the impression that this issue still had not been addressed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296006: Cryptsetup not installable on sid - missing dependency
Package: cryptsetup Version: 20050111-2 Severity: serious Cryptsetup depends on libdevmapper1.00, which is no longer available in sid. Looks like cryptsetup needs to be rebuilt against libdevmapper1.01. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295894: hf: FTBFS: Old config.guess/config.sub files.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 09:49:14PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: I attached a patch with gets the latest version from the autotools-dev package at build time, so it should always have a version for the arch it's building on. I attached an updated patch which also sets the configure options correctly so it's actually build for the right arch. Kurt --- debian/control.orig 2005-02-18 21:43:40.601154195 +0100 +++ debian/control 2005-02-18 21:43:49.404534671 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: debmake, libgtk1.2-dev, libncurses5-dev, libasound2-dev +Build-Depends: debmake, libgtk1.2-dev, libncurses5-dev, libasound2-dev, autotools-dev Package: hf Architecture: any --- debian/rules.orig 2005-02-19 18:30:43.788709123 +0100 +++ debian/rules2005-02-19 18:32:28.628257084 +0100 @@ -4,15 +4,25 @@ package=hf +# FOR AUTOCONF 2.52 AND NEWER ONLY +ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE), $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)) + confflags += --build $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) +else + confflags += --build $(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --host $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) +endif + build: $(checkdir) - ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-call=N0CALL + -rm config.sub config.guess + ln -s /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub + ln -s /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess + ./configure $(confflags) --prefix=/usr --enable-call=N0CALL $(MAKE) CFLAGS=-O2 -g -Wall touch build clean: $(checkdir) - rm -f build config.log config.cache + rm -f build config.log config.cache config.sub config.guess -$(MAKE) distclean rm -f `find . -name *~` rm -rf debian/tmp debian/files* core debian/substvars
Bug#293865: marked as done (libxml2 2.6.16 does not work with DCGUI-QT)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:32:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293865: fixed in libdc0 0.3.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2005 13:02:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 06 05:02:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cxm3F-0006IY-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 05:02:09 -0800 Received: from gl177a.glassen.ac (findus.dhs.org) [82.182.223.101] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cxm3C-0004QG-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 07:02:07 -0600 Received: (qmail 6194 invoked by uid 0); 6 Feb 2005 12:51:27 - Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.164?) (81.172.181.161) by gl177a.glassen.ac with SMTP; 6 Feb 2005 12:51:27 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:02:08 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petter_Sundl=F6f?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libxml2 2.6.16 does not work with DCGUI-QT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: dcgui-qt Version: 0.3.2 After upgrading to libxml2 2.6.16, dcgui-qt looks awful; no icons or toolbar. See http://dcgui.berlios.de/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2668 --- Received: (at 293865-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 17:39:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 09:39:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2YZZ-0002fC-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:39:17 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2YSm-000164-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:32:16 -0500 From: Pasi Savilaakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#293865: fixed in libdc0 0.3.7-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:32:16 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: libdc0 Source-Version: 0.3.7-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libdc0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libdc0-dev_0.3.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libd/libdc0/libdc0-dev_0.3.7-1_i386.deb libdc0_0.3.7-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libd/libdc0/libdc0_0.3.7-1.diff.gz libdc0_0.3.7-1.dsc to pool/main/libd/libdc0/libdc0_0.3.7-1.dsc libdc0_0.3.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libd/libdc0/libdc0_0.3.7-1_i386.deb libdc0_0.3.7.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libd/libdc0/libdc0_0.3.7.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pasi Savilaakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libdc0 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:36:18 +0200 Source: libdc0 Binary: libdc0-dev libdc0 Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Pasi Savilaakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pasi Savilaakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libdc0 - Runtime libraries for Valknut libdc0-dev - Development libraries for Valknut Closes: 293865 295564 Changes: libdc0 (0.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=high . * New upstream release (Closes:
Bug#295564: marked as done (dcgui-qt: Fails to load config due to xml problem)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:32:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293865: fixed in libdc0 0.3.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 17:59:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 09:59:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp2.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D1TSu-0006WH-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:59:56 -0800 Received: from mdserver (kha525.kha.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.20.168.119]) by smtp2.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1) id 1D1TSs-0005aP-Py; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:59:54 +0100 Received: from marcel by mdserver with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1D1TSs-0001cu-Co; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:59:54 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marcel Dischinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dcgui-qt: Fails to load config due to xml problem X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:59:54 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Marcel Dischinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: dcgui-qt Version: 0.3.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading some xml packages today (as a normal sarge upgrade), dcgui-qt stopped working. This means, no config file is read, no icons are shown in the application (in fact they are replaced by a ghost icon, also the background of the splash screen). If you delete the ~/.dc folder in order to let dcgui create new config files, it works for this session. After closing dcgui-qt and restarting it, the problem returns. The Output of dcgui-qt is (also while creating new config files): CXml::xml_UTF8Toisolat1 error 4 CXml::xml_UTF8Toisolat1 error 3 CXml::xml_UTF8Toisolat1 error 1 CXml::xml_UTF8Toisolat1 error 5 (each of them several times) and QFont::fromString: invalid description '(null)' -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages dcgui-qt depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-1 A high-quality block-sorting file ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdc0 0.3.2-1 Runtime libraries for dcgui-qt ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-2SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxml2 2.6.16-2GNOME XML library ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 293865-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 17:39:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 09:39:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2YZZ-0002fC-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:39:17 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2YSm-000164-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:32:16 -0500 From: Pasi Savilaakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#293865: fixed in libdc0 0.3.7-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender:
Bug#295971: marked as done (jpilot: Hidden records can be viewed/modified without password)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:02:28 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295971: fixed in jpilot 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 12:20:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 04:20:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ns2.spitfire.net (spitfire.net) [207.250.1.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2Tb7-0005rB-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 04:20:33 -0800 Received: from pyromaniacs.hopto.org [66.90.224.235] by spitfire.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A0CA9DC900E4; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:27:54 -0500 Received: from chris by pyromaniacs.hopto.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D2TbP-0001Jk-T1; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:20:51 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Howie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jpilot: Hidden records can be viewed/modified without password X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:20:48 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Chris Howie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: jpilot Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre7-1 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole In the main jpilot window, if the padlock button is pressed while private records are hidden or masked, and the cancel button is pressed (or the dialog is closed by the window manager) then private records will be unhidden. This may need to be done more than once, but it will eventually happen. This problem does not affect the Show Private Records menu item. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages jpilot depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.8 Debian configuration management sy ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-02.6.1-3 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.6.0-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpisock8 0.11.8-10Library for communicating with a P -- debconf information: * shared/pilot/port: None --- Received: (at 295971-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 18:08:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 10:08:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2Z1k-0007z3-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:08:24 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2Yw0-0002gE-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:02:28 -0500 From: Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295971: fixed in jpilot 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:02:28 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: jpilot Source-Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jpilot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: jpilot-plugins_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jpilot/jpilot-plugins_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1_i386.deb jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jpilot/jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1.diff.gz jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1.dsc to pool/main/j/jpilot/jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1.dsc jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jpilot/jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre8-1_i386.deb
Bug#294179: marked as done (seahorse: doesn't work with gnupg 1.4)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:32:07 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294179: fixed in seahorse 0.7.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Feb 2005 10:57:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 08 02:57:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pd9500030.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (localhost.localdomain) [217.80.0.48] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CyT3h-ZK-00; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 02:57:29 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA49B1085B7; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:57:26 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: seahorse: doesn't work with gnupg 1.4 Forwarded: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161697 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:57:26 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: seahorse Version: 0.7.5-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable, FTBFS Hello, # seahorse-agent seahorse-agent: couldn't modify gpg configuration: Invalid crypto engine The reason is the new gnupg version 1.4 in sid. Additional it doesn't built from source with gnupg 1.4 Upstream has already a bugreport about this problem: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161697 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages seahorse depends on: ii gconf2 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.0-4 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.0-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libeel2-22.8.2-1 Eazel Extensions Library (for GNOM ii libgail-common 1.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgail171.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.1-3 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.0-6 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.0-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.3-11The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgpg-error01.0-1 library for common error values an ii libgpgme11 1.0.2-1 GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.1-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit21:2.10.2-1.1libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.8.0-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.11-5GNOME XML library ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 294179-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 18:38:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 10:38:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
Bug#294795: marked as done (FWD: [SECURITY] [DSA 677-1] New sympa packages fix potential arbitrary code execution)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:57:53 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Acknowledge NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 17:40:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 11 09:40:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Czeme-00059d-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:40:48 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184E51803E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:40:47 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD8296E20E; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:43:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:43:07 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FWD: [SECURITY] [DSA 677-1] New sympa packages fix potential arbitrary code execution Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: sympa Version: 4.1.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: security See DSA below. I don't see a fix in unstable yet or any other bug report. - Forwarded message from Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] - =46rom: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:38:39 +0100 (CET) To: Debian Security Announcements [EMAIL PROTECTED] g Subject: [SECURITY] [DSA 677-1] New sympa packages fix potential arbitrary = code execution User-Agent: dsa-launch $Revision: 1.17 $ Reply-To: debian-security@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -- Debian Security Advisory DSA 677-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze February 11th, 2005 http://www.debian.org/security/faq - -- Package: sympa Vulnerability : buffer overflow Problem-Type : local Debian-specific: no CVE ID : CAN-2005-0073 Erik Sj=F6lund discovered that a support script of sympa, a mailing list manager, is running setuid sympa and vulnerable to a buffer overflow. This could potentially lead to the execution of arbitrary code under the sympa user id. For the stable distribution (woody) this problem has been fixed in version 3.3.3-3woody2. For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem will be fixed soon. We recommend that you upgrade your sympa package. Upgrade Instructions - wget url will fetch the file for you dpkg -i file.deb will install the referenced file. If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for sources.list as given below: apt-get update will update the internal database apt-get upgrade will install corrected packages You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the footer to the proper configuration. Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 alias woody - Source archives: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/s/sympa/sympa_3.3.3-3woody= 2.dsc Size/MD5 checksum: 601 757b8a0b0b6dde6e1b4626768e98aaaf http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/s/sympa/sympa_3.3.3-3woody= 2.diff.gz Size/MD5 checksum:44518 1bcea87b271163637a68aae20e1e14f9 http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/s/sympa/sympa_3.3.3.orig.t= ar.gz Size/MD5 checksum: 1457710 59776560bfb6c124c5a25129127383be Architecture independent components: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/s/sympa/wwsympa_3.3.3-3woo= dy2_all.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 349648
Bug#295904: gaim: reproducing.
Package: gaim Version: 1:1.1.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #295904 I am reproducing this bug. Perhaps it's PPC specific? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gaim depends on: ii gaim-data1:1.1.3-1 multi-protocol instant messaging c ii libao2 0.8.5-1 Cross Platform Audio Output Librar ii libaspell15 0.60.2-2The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile00.2.6-5 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkspell0 2.0.8-1 a spell-checking addon for GTK's T ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpango1.0-01.8.0-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295894: marked as done (hf: FTBFS: Old config.guess/config.sub files.)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:47:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295894: fixed in hf 0.7.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 20:49:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 12:49:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2F3z-0001Hz-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:49:23 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D5503BC0BA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:49:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687EE3BC08C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:49:16 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 219B026136; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:49:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:49:14 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hf: FTBFS: Old config.guess/config.sub files. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: hf Version: 0.7.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, The new version of config.guess and config.sub you're using are rather out of date, they're from 1999. Previous version of the package just continued working after it complained that it didn't know the arch but now with the new autoconf version it just fails. I attached a patch with gets the latest version from the autotools-dev package at build time, so it should always have a version for the arch it's building on. Kurt --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=hf-0.7.1+autotools.patch --- debian/rules.orig 2005-02-18 21:43:58.937780826 +0100 +++ debian/rules2005-02-18 21:44:58.243869045 +0100 @@ -6,13 +6,16 @@ build: $(checkdir) + -rm config.sub config.guess + ln -s /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub + ln -s /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-call=N0CALL $(MAKE) CFLAGS=-O2 -g -Wall touch build clean: $(checkdir) - rm -f build config.log config.cache + rm -f build config.log config.cache config.sub config.guess -$(MAKE) distclean rm -f `find . -name *~` rm -rf debian/tmp debian/files* core debian/substvars --- debian/control.orig 2005-02-18 21:43:40.601154195 +0100 +++ debian/control 2005-02-18 21:43:49.404534671 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: debmake, libgtk1.2-dev, libncurses5-dev, libasound2-dev +Build-Depends: debmake, libgtk1.2-dev, libncurses5-dev, libasound2-dev, autotools-dev Package: hf Architecture: any --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- --- Received: (at 295894-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 19:53:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 11:53:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2afA-00049l-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:53:12 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2aZP-aE-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:47:15 -0500 From: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295894: fixed in hf 0.7.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:47:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Bug#296029: perlpanel: loops looking for icons
Package: perlpanel
Version: 1:0.9.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Perlpanel just installed, with default configuration, when run loops
using the whole CPU.
I don't really know Perl but from a quick session with the perl debugger
it looks like
my $info = $self-{icon_theme}-lookup_icon(lc($icon), 48, 'force-svg');
in PerlPanel::lookup_icon always fails to return anything useful
and the program descends into infinite recursion looking for
a 'perlpanel-applet-missing' icon.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)
Versions of packages perlpanel depends on:
ii hicolor-icon-theme0.7-1 default fallback theme for FreeDes
ii libdate-manip-perl5.42a-2a perl library for manipulating da
ii libglib-perl 1:1.062-1 Perl interface to the GLib and GOb
ii libgnome2-wnck-perl 0.09-1 Perl interface to the Window Navig
ii libgtk2-gladexml-perl 1.003-1Perl interface to use user interfa
ii libgtk2-perl 1:1.062-1 Perl interface to the 2.x series o
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-3The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii liblocale-gettext-perl1.01-17Using libc functions for internati
ii libxml-parser-perl2.34-4 Perl module for parsing XML files
ii libxml-simple-perl2.14-1 Perl module for reading and writin
ii perl 5.8.4-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
--
Micha Politowski
Talking has been known to lead to communication if practised carelessly.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#295904: gdb output
Setting up libglib2.0-0-dbg (2.6.2-1) ... Setting up libgtk2.0-0-dbg (2.6.2-3) ... localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/locale: 5680K [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/gaim-1.1.3$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug gdb gaim GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as powerpc-linux...(no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library /lib/libthread_db.so.1. (gdb) run --g-fatal-warnings Starting program: /usr/bin/gaim --g-fatal-warnings (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 16384 (LWP 5385)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 5385)] 0x0fd76ce0 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 (gdb) -- Martin-Éric Racine http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/
Bug#295411: marked as done (sympa: CERTA-2005-AVI-078 : bouncequeue and queue can execute arbitrary code because of a buffer overflow)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:32:11 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295411: fixed in sympa 4.1.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 17:31:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 09:31:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from oban.u-picardie.fr (mailx.u-picardie.fr) [193.49.184.8] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D16XY-0004VU-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:31:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailx.u-picardie.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C95F988DA; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:31:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailx.u-picardie.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (oban [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30201-01; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:31:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mailx.u-picardie.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 621F3984DB; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:31:06 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jean Charles Delepine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sympa: CERTA-2005-AVI-078 : bouncequeue and queue can execute arbitrary code because of a buffer overflow X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:31:06 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at UPJV Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: sympa Version: 4.1.2-2.1 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole - Forwarded message from Aumont - Comite Reseaux des Universites [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:09:54 +0100 From: Aumont - Comite Reseaux des Universites [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [sympa-announce] Security advisory Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] French CERT as published a security advisory (reference CERTA-2005-AVI-078) : bouncequeue and queue can execute arbitrary code because of a buffer overflow. This concern all version of Sympa (including 5.0b) except 4.1.3, 4.1.4 and 4.1.5. Please refer to http://www.sympa.org for solutions. Serge Aumont -- The patches are : http://sourcesup.cru.fr/cgi/viewcvs.cgi/sympa/src/queue.c.diff?r2=1.4.2.1cvsroot=sympar1=1.4diff_format=u http://sourcesup.cru.fr/cgi/viewcvs.cgi/sympa/src/bouncequeue.c.diff?r2=1.4.2.1cvsroot=sympar1=1.4diff_format=u -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (10, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages sympa depends on: ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.30.8 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcgi-fast-perl5.8.4-3 CGI::Fast Perl module ii libcrypt-ciphersaber-perl 0.61-4 Perl module implementing CipherSab ii libdbd-mysql-perl 2.9003-3 A Perl5 database interface to the ii libdbi-perl 1.45-1 The Perl5 Database Interface by Ti ii libfcgi-perl0.67-1 FastCGI Perl module ii libio-stringy-perl 2.109-2 Perl5 modules for IO from scalars ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs ii libmd5-perl 2.03-1 backwards-compatible wrapper for D ii libmime-perl5.415-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libmsgcat-perl 1.03-3 Locale::Msgcat perl module ii libnet-ldap-perl0.3202-2 A Client interface to LDAP servers ii mhonarc 2.6.10-1 Mail to HTML converter ii perl [libmime-base64-perl] 5.8.4-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-suid 5.8.4-6 Runs setuid Perl scripts ii postfix [mail-transport-age 2.1.4-5 A high-performance mail transport ii sysklogd [system-log-daemon 1.4.1-15 System
Bug#294163: error while sourcing test.tcl on hppa [#11954]
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:57:44PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote: The source ../test/test.tcl now works. :) It's now runinng the standard tests. Could you please send the patch to the bug tracking system? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295853: marked as done (reportbug includes sensitive information in report)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:51:23 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295853: reportbug: Well done! has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 15:59:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 07:59:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.20.157] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2AX8-00029C-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:59:10 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (G1a9b.g.pppool.de [80.185.26.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id j1IFx8NM015331; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:59:08 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rolf Leggewie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: reportbug includes sensitive information in report X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:50:14 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,BIZ_TLD,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: reportbug Version: 3.2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi Chris, as a follow-up to 295407 which you managed to fix in a whirl-wind (kudos!), I'd like to say that reportbug still includes sensitive information in a default report against reportbug (see the XXX below). There might be other things it includes from .reportbugrc which are not really meant to be stored in a publicly accessible BTS. Best regards Rolf Leggewie -- Package-specific info: ** /home/leggewie/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.2 mode standard ui text realname Rolf Leggewie email [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtphost postman.arcor.de smtpuser XXX smtppasswd XXX -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-586tsc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.4-19 An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 295853-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 21:51:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 13:51:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2cVY-0006qt-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:51:24 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b11so99876rne for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:51:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Kxwl75fLEfE3ElRchBfdt8MfgzZ4xeJPfLuTEf2aTsMaAuipgocw1MXIKJJd8a5BsZFNzhNBdqU7hOyt3eVh5x2SBXkwU3XdbgTk2nxdWxmrM2qsCFzkxpQTLI2ePJZyxQUWN51WFewfcfzEvGm58b7uj0G8AKKl25ZQC9Z9Png= Received: by 10.38.76.74 with SMTP id y74mr179663rna; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:51:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.10.67 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:51:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:51:23 -0600 From: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#295853: reportbug: Well done! In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,BIZ_TLD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:01:29 +0100, Rolf Leggewie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, good to hear. From the Changelog I got the impression that this issue still had not been addressed. 3.8 is installed in sarge as of today; closing this report. CNL -- Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ --
Bug#296052: libdoodle1: cannot install - missing conflict ?
Package: libdoodle1 Version: 0.6.2-1 Severity: serious I cannot install your package (i already have doodle and its dependencies). Unpacking libdoodle1 (from .../libdoodle1_0.6.2-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libdoodle1_0.6.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/libdoodle.3.gz', which is also in package doodle i already filled a report for a similar problems against libextractor1. Maybe it is supposed to be fixed by an upcoming new version of doodle, conflicting with older versions of those libs. in this case please close those reports. Thanks Alban -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc4 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libdoodle1 depends on: pn libextractor1Not found. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#296029: perlpanel: loops looking for icons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 296029 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#296029: perlpanel: loops looking for icons There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo severity 296029 important Bug#296029: perlpanel: loops looking for icons Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296029: perlpanel: loops looking for icons
tags 296029 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 296029 important
thanks
Michal Politowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perlpanel just installed, with default configuration, when run loops
using the whole CPU.
I don't really know Perl but from a quick session with the perl debugger
it looks like
my $info = $self-{icon_theme}-lookup_icon(lc($icon), 48, 'force-svg');
in PerlPanel::lookup_icon always fails to return anything useful
and the program descends into infinite recursion looking for
a 'perlpanel-applet-missing' icon.
I could not reproduce this in a clean chroot. As other new users haven't
experienced this problem, i'm downgrading the severity to important (for
now).
I see where this could end up in a loop, but perlpanel should find
perlpanel-applet-missing in all cases (as this in the package
itself).
I'm not sure where to start to debug this. Could you send me the output
of find /usr/share/icons/ and your ~/.gtkrc-2.0 (if you have one)?
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,u(kcapnu ,nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp8IPyLMvgk8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#296055: exim permissions screwed
Package: exim Version: 3.36-13 Severity: critical There has been an update to exim and or logrotate that screws with the log files and causes exim to get a permission denied when writing to the log files. For the 2nd day in a row I have had to chmod 666 the exim log files so exim can process email. The new log file is owned by root:adm only writeable by root.I consider this to be a critical error as email is a vital application that has to run without problems. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295350: libimlib2 breaks scrot, Eterm, Esetroot too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think it's the same bug: Eterm: relocation error: /usr/lib/libEterm-0.9.2.so: undefined symbol: imlib_context_set_display Esetroot: relocation error: Esetroot: undefined symbol: imlib_context_set_display scrot: relocation error: scrot: undefined symbol: imlib_context_set_display I'm sorry if this doesn't help in any way, I'm quite new to this bug tracking stuff. I'm using debian sid pure64, did the installation of this system a few hours ago. - -- Tjaard My computer is free, is yours? http://www.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCF8zICqxgDAdoJzURAogJAKCnYwSqNnM9Wz1UkNjSYi2bGlQrwACdGWoZ h9Dt0QF4XUSi1reqCI3Vngk= =ejvg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296061: mpich: FTBFS: rmdir: `debian/mpich-bin/usr/lib/mpich/share/upshot/sbin': No such file or directory
Package: mpich Version: 1.2.5.3-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following error: rmdir: `debian/mpich-bin/usr/lib/mpich/share/upshot/sbin': No such file or directory make: *** [install-stamp] Error 1 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#296055: exim permissions screwed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package exim Ignoring bugs not assigned to: exim # severities must match for merge to succeed severity 296055 important Bug#296055: exim permissions screwed Severity set to `important'. close 296055 Bug#296055: exim permissions screwed 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] reassign 296055 debianutils Bug#296055: exim permissions screwed Bug reassigned from package `exim' to `debianutils'. merge 296055 295850 Bug#295850: savelog: ignores the -p preserve option on new log files Bug#296055: exim permissions screwed Merged 295850 296055. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296066: source tarball includes sourceless video.x
Package: pearpc Version: 0.3.1-4.1 Severity: serious Hello, pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz contains the video.x file necessary for running Mac OS X. You noted in the default ppc.conf that indeed the package should not ship video.x because it lacks source, and in README.Debian that it could be obtained from upstream PearPC source or MOL source. Regardless, it still exists in the orig tarball. Since you have gone to great pains to detail where to obtain video.x due to it not being shipped in the package, it's probably a good idea to regenerate a new orig tarball that does not contain video.x and upload that. Thanks Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages pearpc depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-9 GCC support library ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296055: exim permissions screwed
package exim # severities must match for merge to succeed severity 296055 important close 296055 reassign 296055 debianutils merge 296055 295850 thanks On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 10:16 +1100, Paul wrote: Package: exim Version: 3.36-13 Severity: critical There has been an update to exim There hasn't been an update to the exim 3 packages since early January. and or logrotate that screws with the log files and causes exim to get a permission denied when writing to the log files. For the 2nd day in a row I have had to chmod 666 the exim log files so exim can process email. The new log file is owned by root:adm only writeable by root.I consider this to be a critical error as email is a vital application that has to run without problems. In fact, the problem was neither with exim nor logrotate (the exim 3 packages don't use logrotate, fwiw). The utility that broke was savelog, which is part of the debianutils package. An updated debianutils package (2.13.0) was uploaded on the 18th and should now be available from whichever Debian mirror you're using. Reassigning the report to debianutils, merging with the existing report, and closing. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#286636: illuminator: ftbfs: can't read /usr/lib/libltdl.la
Hi, this was caused by a bug in the implib2-dev package. See #287188. Requeuing this package should fix it. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295415: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors
I just noticed that another error was writen to the logs that i missed: amavis[20297]: AMAVIS::MTA::Courier: Could not open socket Also i poked around the initialization code of MTA::Courier and found something odd: # The fd of our perlfilter socket is passed to us on STDIN my $socket_fd = shift @ARGV; $perlfilter_socket = IO::File-new(+$socket_fd); The comment says STDIN but the code seems to use argv... -- Best regards, Black Dew. == ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ ICQ:206 ~ 2:400/567 ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296077: upgrade-reports: Upgrade from Woody to Sarge: System hosed
Package: upgrade-reports Version: woody - sarge Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, about a week ago I took the plunge and upgraded one of my machines from Woody to Sarge. Apart from the official packages I also had some packages from backports or compiled from source. After replacing woody in sources.list with sarge, I did an apt-get upgdate and after that an apt-get dist-upgrade. As expected quite a number of packages were scheduled for being upgraded. What was a bit unexpected was that there were also a large number of packages scheduled for removal. I aborted to make a backup of /etc/ and to direct the output of apt-get into a file so that I would be able to install later on the packages that had been removed. This way, I thought, everything would go smoothly. Unfortunately, that was not the case. The upgrade ended half-way through telling me that there was an undefined symbol Perl_gthr_key_ptr. Going from there I found out with Google's help that there had previously been similar bugs classified when dist-upgrading from woody to sarge (278417, 278495 and 279232, possibly others, apparently there is no way search to search for a string in bug reports present in the BTS system). These were classified as RC. Apparently the abortion of the upgrade is due to the fact that perl is in an inconsistent state out of which the system cannot free itself. And indeed 'dpkg -l perl*|grep ^i' tells me that perl, perl-modules and perl-suid are version 5.8.4 -5, installed but unconfigured (iU) and that perl-base is 5.6.1-8.8 (ii), perl-t k is 800.025-2 (iU) and perlmagick is 5.4.4.5-1woody (ii). As advised on #debian, I tried via aptitude if that was able to fix the mess, but quickly found out that it would most likely only make matters worse. Thus I backed off and have not touched the system since. I have the following information still on file and can make it available on request. I hope you understand that I do not include it yet in this bug report for reasons of privacy and so as not to flood the BTS. - tar file of /etc (and /home) before the upgrade pre-upgrade /var I have unfortunately no copy of - output of apt-get on what packages to install and which to remove - output of dpkg -l right after the failed upgrade - and of course the system itself in its current state My assumption is that from this it should be possible to somehow reconstruct what packages were installed at the time I tried the upgrade and thus analyze what triggered this failure. Best regards Rolf Leggewie -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26.desktop041204 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296079: conflict: /etc/ipsec.conf already used by openswan
Package: ipsec-tools Version: 1:0.5-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Unpacking replacement ipsec-tools ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ipsec-tools_1%3a0.5-2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/ipsec.conf', which is also in package openswan Since openswan depends on ipsec-tools, this problem renders the combination of ipsec-tools and openswan uninstallable. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-deb-25 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages ipsec-tools depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libreadline55.0-10 GNU readline and history libraries -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: new buggy version in sid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 296061 sid Bug#296061: mpich: FTBFS: rmdir: `debian/mpich-bin/usr/lib/mpich/share/upshot/sbin': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294717: gpsbabel build problems: at least partly due to rounding errors
I've had a look at the build problems for gpsbabel. It builds fine on
i386, but make check fails on many other architectures. A typical
failure is this:
/usr/bin/make check
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/gpsbabel-1.2.4'
./testo
51c51
B0421143040679S15036423EA00
---
B0421143040678S15036423EA00
ERROR comparing /tmp/gpsbabel.21922/igc_sed.out reference/igc1_igc.out
Note that there is a single character difference, the digit before the
S in the middle is either a 9 or an 8. That string is produced by
igc.c, function latlon2str. Isolating the problematic input case I have
produced the following test program:
#include stdio.h
#include math.h
int main(void)
{
double x = -30.677975;
unsigned char c = fabs(x);
printf(x = %.15f\n, x);
printf(fabs(x) = %.15f\n, fabs(x));
printf(c = %u\n, c);
printf(fabs(x) - c = %.15f\n, fabs(x) - c);
printf((fabs(x) - c) * 6 = %.15f\n, (fabs(x) - c) * 6);
printf((fabs(x) - c) * 6 + 0.5 = %.15f\n,
(fabs(x) - c) * 6 + 0.5);
printf((unsigned) ((fabs(x) - c) * 6 + 0.5) = %u\n,
(unsigned) ((fabs(x) - c) * 6 + 0.5));
return 0;
}
This gives different results on i386 (my laptop) and hppa (paer.debian.org,
unstable chroot). Here is the output on hppa:
x = -30.6779750
fabs(x) = 30.6779750
c = 30
fabs(x) - c = 0.6779750
(fabs(x) - c) * 6 = 40678.500
(fabs(x) - c) * 6 + 0.5 = 40679.000
(unsigned) ((fabs(x) - c) * 6 + 0.5) = 40679
The output on i386 is identical except for the last line, which prints out
40678 as the result. I do not understand why it does that.
I suspect the other errors are also due to similar problems. Perhaps
someone who understands floating point semantics and their differences
between platforms could take a look?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296087: IMPORTANT: Microsoft EULA is NON-FREE and give MS specific rights!!
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: grave Hello, This is a SEVERE thing. I installed Debian/Sarge's version 1.1.1 of openoffice. While doing backups I found: /home/xxx/.openoffice/1.1.1/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html which contains the full Microsoft EULA: (see clip below) As the license itself says: it is IMPORTANT. Please recall what IMPORTING something to ones conscience mind means. And I don't mind saying I'm angry that some yoohoo slipped that damned license on my system. However: I do have a rights to use it. I'm licensed to use a MS product meantioned and I paid for my copy of Solaris and StarOffice. No. My concern is the harm that can come to Debian - which is the largest and best compilation of truely clean of license linux. /// IF YOU AREN'T YET MAKING PHONE CALLS: I don't know if you europeans understand what that license means in U.S. language: it means they have rights to access all of your personal work on your computer systems and have your ass in any courtroom situation simply because their libraries are on your system - even if you infact didn't know they were there (because you negleged to look for the license). If any codes of Microsoft (including fonts or save formats) that the license referers to are in any part of any of your work: it is not your work ! until such time as you remove Microsoft's binaries (without looking at them, of course). Infact. Using Microsoft software you have no right to copyright or share the entirety of your work UNTIL IT IS PRINTED. That is, until it contains no Microsoft binaries of any form. And of COURSE: if you don't have license to use one of the meantioned products: they can sue you. And of COURSE: they can sue you for distributing anything containing the license indescriminantly. That is in fact what that license says specifically. That is how it would be treated. The President is from Texas (so gov workers now get Dell laptops). No coincidence: beleive me. Microsoft has their own judges and does an excellent job of lobbying our Congress. I feel quite confident that the double talk allowed in a case would be immense and favorative of Microsoft: If you don't know what double talk is and how it effects the reality of purpose you had best not even think of having a copy of the MS EULA anywhere on your HD. /// IF YOU AREN'T YET MAKING PHONE CALLS: Did you read that news article in the Washington Post about Sony raiding Microsoft's Japan Headquarters? Do you know why? Its all in the EULA. Read it again and again until the finality and the wideness sinks in. I keep thinking of Lindows. The Linux for compatibility Windows. Forgive and forget, he liked to say. He liked to think the days of war between microsoft and linux were over. I've know that company at the assembler level since DOS. The war was allways there. Its still here and bigger than ever. Microsoft is cheating more than ever: I've read (or reviewed) most of their Developer's kit (included all but Xp). When I saw Microsoft suing Lindows I laughed. I knew two years before it happened. And if you didn't? You had best open your eyes: Microsoft is a city in the state of Washington which has (pays) its own U.S. judges. They are sprawling and have a lust for riches. Their is no sentiment which will calm their push toward monopoly, because it in part is the primal instinct to breed if it means ruining other cities - and this instinct is encouraged there in that evil city. And if you think those bugs aren't their so they can poke into your government's offices: your just loosers, so why send your family jewels to Redmond Washington now while the contribution is still appreciable? All you have to do is read phorums that Microsoft users from the Seattle / Redmond area have left on the internet to see that they seek to actively demolish averything but their own. (saw one such message about tricking linux users just a couple weeks ago while researching) Their source has been crooked since the DOS and ASM days. They've been sued and have ignored U.S. rulings since the DOS days. They've turned on every U.S. company that once considered themselves ms insiders. And for the U.S.? MS is poision. It means more imports and less U.S. workers. Don't think we like it. No one in the U.S. likes the phone company or big government. Allthough I think the goverment worker population now outnumbers the *real* workers in the U.S. You can't fight the bitch with ideas. Only with faith, GPL code, and brotherhood to your own; unix users. And that is where the Lindows guy went wrong. He trusted to faith what is not a matter faith. And he failed to (though I would have at his age) look into the Oracle of the past still in the aged Forums on the internet. It was called war then. People took it seriously then. Incidentally: I won't let this issue rest I'm afraid. I won't rest until there is NO
Bug#295804: A fix for the dependency generation bug
This bug appears to be caused by the patch in #272307 attempting to
use the [i386 ...] syntax in the Depends field, which is invalid and
causes dpkg-gencontrol to ignore the whole line. Here's a patch to
instead pass a substitution variable to dpkg-gencontrol at build time.
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
diff -urN jack-audio-connection-kit-0.99.0.old/debian/control.in jack-audio-connection-kit-0.99.0/debian/control.in
--- jack-audio-connection-kit-0.99.0.old/debian/control.in 2005-02-20 06:38:05.694041000 +
+++ jack-audio-connection-kit-0.99.0/debian/control.in 2005-02-20 06:45:25.429870038 +
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
Cpu: any
System: any
Section: libdevel
-Depends: libjack0.80.0-0 (= ${Source-Version}), libasound2-dev [system: linux], libglib1.2-dev, pkg-config
+Depends: libjack0.80.0-0 (= ${Source-Version}), ${asound:Depends}, libglib1.2-dev, pkg-config
Provides: libjack-dev
Conflicts: libjack-dev
Replaces: libjack-dev, libjack0.71.2-0 ( 0.75.0-1)
diff -urN jack-audio-connection-kit-0.99.0.old/debian/rules jack-audio-connection-kit-0.99.0/debian/rules
--- jack-audio-connection-kit-0.99.0.old/debian/rules 2005-02-20 06:38:05.687042000 +
+++ jack-audio-connection-kit-0.99.0/debian/rules 2005-02-20 06:47:16.812109167 +
@@ -69,6 +69,12 @@
chmod u=rwxs,g=rx,o=r debian/jackd/usr/bin/jackstart
endif
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux)
+DEB_DH_GENCONTROL_ARGS := -u'-Vasound:Depends=libasound2-dev'
+else
+DEB_DH_GENCONTROL_ARGS := -u'-Vasound:Depends='
+endif
+
clean::
-rm -f debian/stamp-autotools-maintregen-arch
