Bug#302378: bug confirmed
Hi! I have exactly the same problem on my 2 servers. After upgrading to 2.2.3a-14.2 samba crashes once a day. I have just downgraded to 2.2.3a-14.1, because it is a production envirement. -- Udv, Nandor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug still in sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 302517 Bug#302517: dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems Bug reopened, originator not changed. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301329: [Pkg-firebird-general] New version php4-interbase, fixes RC bug
On Sun, 2005-03-04 at 22:56 +0200, Remco Seesink wrote: > Hello all, > > I prepared a new version of php4-interbase. Gregorz, are you in a > position to sponsor an upload? I am afraid not. My new GPG key, singed by two DDs, is waiting since a few weeks for inclusion into the official keyring :-( Pawel, would you have a few minutes to do the upload? These guys have been doing great work ever since they took over firebird debs so I don't expect any troubles with this small FB-related package. OTOH it's important to get this RC bug closed for Sarge. Thanks & cheers, Grzegorz B. Prokopski > People on pkg-firebird-general might want to rush in for the fun early > to help testing. > > Here is the changelog. > >* New upstream release >* Acknowledging NMU. (Closes: #294000) >* Bump php4-dev build-dep to (4:4.3.10-10) to ensure building without > zts >* Remove the -zts phpapi. Urgency high as this is release critical. > (Closes: #301329) >* Updated copyright file to incorporate newer version of the license >* Incorporated Czech translation (Closes: 274066) > > The packages can be found here: > > http://www.cd-uitleen.nl/debian/ > > Cheers, > Remco -- Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SableVM - Free, LGPL'ed Java VM http://sablevm.org Why SableVM ?!? http://sablevm.org/wiki/Features Debian GNU/Linux - the Free OS http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#298475: (no subject)
diff -ur origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/changelog
webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/changelog
--- origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/changelog 2005-04-04 00:46:06.405458528
-0400
+++ webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/changelog 2005-04-04 00:54:30.071889592 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+webcalendar (0.9.45-4) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Escape values in postinst. Closes: #296935
+ * Change database password to Debconf type 'password'. Closes: #298475.
+ * Remove settings.php on purge. Closes: #298476.
+- Also move settings.php.tpl from /etc/ to /usr/share/webcalendar/install.
+ * Purge debconf data when the package is purged. Closes: #302625.
+- Also clear the password from Debconf immediately after writing
+ it to a file.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:49:50 -0400
+
webcalendar (0.9.45-3) unstable; urgency=low
* removed mysql-server or postgres requirements (closes: #291590)
diff -ur origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/install
webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/install
--- origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/install 2005-04-04 00:46:06.403458832
-0400
+++ webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/install 2005-04-04 00:53:31.295824912 -0400
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
includes/print_styles.css etc/webcalendar
includes/site_extras.php etc/webcalendar
includes/styles.php etc/webcalendar
-settings.php.tpl etc/webcalendar
+settings.php.tpl usr/share/webcalendar/install
*.php usr/share/webcalendar
*.gif usr/share/webcalendar
*.sql var/lib/webcalendar/sql
diff -ur origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/webcalendar.postinst
webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/webcalendar.postinst
--- origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/webcalendar.postinst2005-04-04
00:46:06.407458224 -0400
+++ webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/webcalendar.postinst 2005-04-04
00:53:51.342777312 -0400
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
configure () {
CONF_FILE="/etc/webcalendar/settings.php"
-CF_TEMPLATE="/etc/webcalendar/settings.php.tpl"
+CF_TEMPLATE="/usr/share/webcalendar/install/settings.php.tpl"
db_get webcalendar/status/debconf_managed
if [ "$RET" = "false" ]; then
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
db_get webcalendar/conf/db_host; DB_HOST=$RET;
db_get webcalendar/conf/db_login; DB_LOGIN=$RET;
db_get webcalendar/conf/db_password; DB_PASSWORD=$RET;
+db_set webcalendar/conf/db_password '';
db_get webcalendar/conf/db_database; DB_DATABASE=$RET;
db_get webcalendar/conf/db_persistent; DB_PERSISTENT=$RET;
db_get webcalendar/conf/use_http_auth; USE_HTTP_AUTH=$RET;
@@ -61,24 +62,32 @@
SINGLE_USER_MODE="N"
fi
+DB_TYPE=$(echo "$DB_TYPE" |sed -e "s/[\'\"]/1/g");
+DB_HOST=$(echo "$DB_HOST" |sed -e "s/[\'\"]/1/g");
+DB_LOGIN=$(echo "$DB_LOGIN" |sed -e "s/[\'\"]/1/g");
+DB_PASSWORD=$(echo "$DB_PASSWORD" |sed -e "s/[\'\"]/1/g");
+DB_DATABASE=$(echo "$DB_DATABASE" |sed -e "s/[\'\"]/1/g");
+DB_PERSISTENT=$(echo "$DB_PERSISTENT" |sed -e "s/[\'\"]/1/g");
+USE_HTTP_AUTH=$(echo "$USE_HTTP_AUTH" |sed -e "s/[\'\"]/1/g");
+SINGLE_USER_MODE=$(echo "$SINGLE_USER_MODE" |sed -e "s/[\'\"]/1/g");
+SINGLE_USER_LOGIN=$(echo "$SINGLE_USER_LOGIN" |sed -e "s/[\'\"]/1/g");
+
cat $CF_TEMPLATE | perl -e " \
my %CF_REPLACE = ( \
-'DB_TYPE' => $DB_TYPE, \
-'DB_HOST' => $DB_HOST, \
-'DB_TYPE' => $DB_TYPE, \
-'DB_HOST' => $DB_HOST, \
-'DB_LOGIN' => $DB_LOGIN, \
-'DB_PASSWORD' => $DB_PASSWORD, \
-'DB_DATABASE' => $DB_DATABASE, \
-'DB_PERSISTENT' => $DB_PERSISTENT, \
-'USE_HTTP_AUTH' => $USE_HTTP_AUTH, \
-'SINGLE_USER_MODE' => $SINGLE_USER_MODE, \
-'SINGLE_USER_LOGIN' => $SINGLE_USER_LOGIN \
+'DB_TYPE' => '$DB_TYPE', \
+'DB_HOST' => '$DB_HOST', \
+'DB_LOGIN' => '$DB_LOGIN', \
+'DB_PASSWORD' => '$DB_PASSWORD', \
+'DB_DATABASE' => '$DB_DATABASE', \
+'DB_PERSISTENT' => '$DB_PERSISTENT', \
+'USE_HTTP_AUTH' => '$USE_HTTP_AUTH', \
+'SINGLE_USER_MODE' => '$SINGLE_USER_MODE', \
+'SINGLE_USER_LOGIN' => '$SINGLE_USER_LOGIN' \
); \
while (my \$line = ) { \
foreach my \$search (keys %CF_REPLACE) { \
my \$replace = \$CF_REPLACE{\$search}; \
-\$line =~ s/DEBCONF::\$search/\$replace/g; \
+\$line =~ s/DEBCONF::\$search/\$replace/; \
} \
print \$line;
} \
diff -ur origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/webcalendar.templates
webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/webcalendar.templates
--- origi/webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/webcalendar.templates 2005-04-04
00:46:06.407458224 -0400
+++ webcalendar-0.9.45/debian/webcalendar.templates 2005-04-03
23:56:13.0 -0400
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
Processed: tagging 296935
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 296935 patch Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 298475
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 298475 patch Bug#298475: The DB password should be of debconf type "password", not "string" Tags were: security Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Debian Kerberosish: r1765 - in openafs/branches/experimental: . openafs openafs/debian openafs/src/config
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297781 pending Bug#297781: openafs: OpenAFS 1.3.79 release, supposedly fixes many Linux 2.6 bugs, 1.3.75 doesn't compile under 2.6.11 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 283488 pending Bug#283488: FTBFS in experimental Tags were: experimental Bug#283489: FTBFS in experimental Bug#296835: openafs-modules-source: Fails to build with kernel-source-2.6.10 Tags added: pending > tags 302939 pending Bug#302939: openafs-client: debconf problems There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 271460 pending Bug#271460: openafs-fileserver: bosserver complains about /etc/openafs/server access There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 262382 pending Bug#262382: please port openafs to amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302345: marked as done (libneedle-extras-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8')
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done with NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 11:34:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 03:34:56 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c129061.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.61] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGxwt-0007MP-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:34:56 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGxwv-FK-S8; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:34:57 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libneedle-extras-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:34:57 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libneedle-extras-ruby Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'libneedle-extras-ruby' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: #/usr/bin/make ruby1.8 setup.rb config --prefix=/usr --site-ruby='$prefix/lib/ruby/1.8' make: ruby1.8: Command not found make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libneedle-extras-ruby-1.0.0/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/libneedle-extras-ruby-1.0.0/debian/control 2005-03-31 13:15:55.268261027 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-31 13:15:53.032680186 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: interpreters Priority: optional Maintainer: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), ruby1.8 Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: libneedle-extras-ruby1.8 --- Received: (at 302345-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 03:55:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 20:55:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 229.9.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp (tempest.nemui.org) [219.111.9.229] (foobar) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIIgi-0003Pc-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:55:44 -0700 Received: (qmail 21901 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 12:56:11 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO tempest.nemui.org) (192.168.51.1) by tempest.private.nemui.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 12:56:11 +0900 Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: done with NMU User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.30 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Face: %#SbsX5Ajq`)JKPGXyq8Cn6"<`&M~n\?,}`vYU7[}gM!q_K=\v6[}y8&R:Dy3O0Ymmw$@>T $Ys$^Tw8ghB'uxX)I(n_x\5RQ|s'D0m$,"I^\S X-GPG-Fingerprint: C4BC EDCC 50B2 2D7B 4A85 4A13 6CAD 85CE 4502 FDC2 X-Public-Key: http://pgp.nic.ad.jp:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4502FDC2 X-GPG-KeyID: 4502FDC2 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Thanks to Taku YASUI. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302347: marked as done (libneedle-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8')
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done with NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 11:37:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 03:37:46 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c129061.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.61] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGxze-000840-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:37:46 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGxzg-0002Tk-Lu; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:37:48 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libneedle-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:37:48 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libneedle-ruby Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'libneedle-ruby' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: ruby1.8 setup.rb config --prefix=/usr --site-ruby='$prefix/lib/ruby/1.8' make: ruby1.8: Command not found make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libneedle-ruby-1.2.0/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/libneedle-ruby-1.2.0/debian/control 2005-03-31 13:35:26.733617288 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-31 13:35:25.28168 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: interpreters Priority: optional Maintainer: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), ruby1.8 Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: libneedle-ruby1.8 --- Received: (at 302347-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 03:55:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 20:55:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 229.9.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp (tempest.nemui.org) [219.111.9.229] (foobar) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIIgi-0003Pe-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:55:44 -0700 Received: (qmail 21901 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 12:56:11 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO tempest.nemui.org) (192.168.51.1) by tempest.private.nemui.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 12:56:11 +0900 Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: done with NMU User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.30 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Face: %#SbsX5Ajq`)JKPGXyq8Cn6"<`&M~n\?,}`vYU7[}gM!q_K=\v6[}y8&R:Dy3O0Ymmw$@>T $Ys$^Tw8ghB'uxX)I(n_x\5RQ|s'D0m$,"I^\S X-GPG-Fingerprint: C4BC EDCC 50B2 2D7B 4A85 4A13 6CAD 85CE 4502 FDC2 X-Public-Key: http://pgp.nic.ad.jp:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4502FDC2 X-GPG-KeyID: 4502FDC2 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8 Thanks to Taku YASUI. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302349: marked as done (libnet-ssh-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8')
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done with NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 11:46:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 03:46:55 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c129061.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.61] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGy8V-00018T-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:46:55 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGy8X-0003ng-CS; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:46:57 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libnet-ssh-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:46:57 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libnet-ssh-ruby Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'libnet-ssh-ruby' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: ruby1.8 setup.rb config --prefix=/usr --site-ruby='$prefix/lib/ruby/1.8' make: ruby1.8: Command not found make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libnet-ssh-ruby-0.9.0/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/libnet-ssh-ruby-0.9.0/debian/control2005-03-31 13:42:27.709686437 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-31 13:42:25.864032488 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: interpreters Priority: optional Maintainer: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), ruby1.8-dev +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), ruby1.8 Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: libnet-ssh-ruby1.8 --- Received: (at 302349-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 03:55:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 20:55:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 229.9.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp (tempest.nemui.org) [219.111.9.229] (foobar) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIIgi-0003PT-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:55:44 -0700 Received: (qmail 21901 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 12:56:11 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO tempest.nemui.org) (192.168.51.1) by tempest.private.nemui.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 12:56:11 +0900 Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: done with NMU User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.30 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Face: %#SbsX5Ajq`)JKPGXyq8Cn6"<`&M~n\?,}`vYU7[}gM!q_K=\v6[}y8&R:Dy3O0Ymmw$@>T $Ys$^Tw8ghB'uxX)I(n_x\5RQ|s'D0m$,"I^\S X-GPG-Fingerprint: C4BC EDCC 50B2 2D7B 4A85 4A13 6CAD 85CE 4502 FDC2 X-Public-Key: http://pgp.nic.ad.jp:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4502FDC2 X-GPG-KeyID: 4502FDC2 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9 Thanks to Taku YASUI. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302351: marked as done (libnet-sftp-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8')
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done with NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 11:48:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 03:48:53 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c129061.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.61] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGyAP-0001H8-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:48:53 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGyAR-0005Q6-7f; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:48:55 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libnet-sftp-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:48:55 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libnet-sftp-ruby Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'libnet-sftp-ruby' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: ruby1.8 setup.rb config --prefix=/usr --site-ruby='$prefix/lib/ruby/1.8' make: ruby1.8: Command not found make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libnet-sftp-ruby-0.9.0/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/libnet-sftp-ruby-0.9.0/debian/control 2005-03-31 13:36:37.795293589 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-31 13:36:35.237773111 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: interpreters Priority: optional Maintainer: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), ruby1.8-dev +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), ruby1.8 Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: libnet-sftp-ruby1.8 --- Received: (at 302351-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 03:55:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 20:55:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 229.9.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp (tempest.nemui.org) [219.111.9.229] (foobar) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIIgi-0003PU-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:55:44 -0700 Received: (qmail 21901 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 12:56:11 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO tempest.nemui.org) (192.168.51.1) by tempest.private.nemui.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 12:56:11 +0900 Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:56:10 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: done with NMU User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.30 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Face: %#SbsX5Ajq`)JKPGXyq8Cn6"<`&M~n\?,}`vYU7[}gM!q_K=\v6[}y8&R:Dy3O0Ymmw$@>T $Ys$^Tw8ghB'uxX)I(n_x\5RQ|s'D0m$,"I^\S X-GPG-Fingerprint: C4BC EDCC 50B2 2D7B 4A85 4A13 6CAD 85CE 4502 FDC2 X-Public-Key: http://pgp.nic.ad.jp:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4502FDC2 X-GPG-KeyID: 4502FDC2 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10 Thanks to Taku YASUI. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302704: CAN-2005-0750: Possible local root exploit through insufficient range checking in af_bluetooth
tag 302704 +pending thanks On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:54:52PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > CAN-2005-0750: Insufficient range checking in af_bluetooth allows local root > exploit. > > This is the full advisory: > http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/ > attachments/20050327/3f128a09/adv1.pdf > > This has been fixed in 2.4.30rc3, a fix is available in Bitkeeper: > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, I have this fix in SVN. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#302704: CAN-2005-0750: Possible local root exploit through insufficient range checking in af_bluetooth
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 302704 +pending Bug#302704: CAN-2005-0750: Possible local root exploit through insufficient range checking in af_bluetooth Tags were: patch security Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302680: zeroconf copyright
Thank you for giving us a zeroconf implementation. I read the bug report about the (C) issue but found it less important than the "upstream" url pointing to a non existant page. I was willing to learn more about this zeroconf implementation and was a bit at lost. Should i read progsoc mailing list, is debian archive the newx upstream (maybe the url should be changed to the debian archive) ? Today I have asked for the data i was interested in (if zeroconf open ports on the interfaces it uses) : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302684 Though i have other questions , is this "zeroconf" implementation described in hte ietf draft or does it go beyond it ? I feel lame as the source is available but i am working on other packages right now and would still use zeroconf even .if i won't have time to look it in depth before long. Regards Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302684: re : zeroconf links to localhost - produce some strange problems
thanks for taking care of this problem. I have not understood if a fix was found but i can confirm a bug it produce. I had this error (my proxy was unable to start): /var/log/squid/cache.log 2005/03/31 16:42:20| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 13 to *:3128: (98) Address already in use FATAL: Cannot open HTTP Port lsof -i and netstat wher unable to show anything bound to port 3128 . Out of luck i killed zeroconf and the problem disappeared. SHould i bug report (wishlist) against lsof and netstat that they don't manage multiple address per interface ? Or is this an unrelated problem ? I knew that zeroconf bound to interface but does it opens some ports on those (which may explain why lo 3128 was not free) ? I would liek to build a test case before reporting the problem further. Greetings Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302421: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#302421: not valid)
Hi, > links-ssl package was *removed* from Debian in june, 2004. Nope, links-ssl is still part of woody: http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-US/links-ssl > links and elinks (and links2 by the way) does not show any signs > of this bug. You are sure that you were looking at package version 0.96.20020409-2? Cya, Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297652: marked as done (2.2.4 is buggy)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:02:35 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297652: fixed in abiword 2.2.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2005 02:26:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 01 18:26:34 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp817.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.3] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D6JZK-0007Zj-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:26:34 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.186.117 with login) by smtp817.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2005 02:26:31 - Received: from darjeeling (unknown [192.168.0.7]) by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8E32A95F2 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 18:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from joshk by darjeeling with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D6JZI-0001Uv-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:26:32 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: 2.2.4 is buggy X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:26:32 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: abiword Version: 2.2.4-1 Severity: grave AbiWord 2.2.4 is not a particularly good release. There are some large regressions with Word importing, spellchecking, and libwpd that I think should prevent 2.2.4 from entering testing. I will close this bug when I think AbiWord in unstable is ready to hit testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages abiword depends on: ii abiword-common2.2.4-1WYSIWYG word processor based on GT ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libenchant1 1.1.4+cvs.2004.08.10-1 a wrapper library for various spel ii libfontconfig12.2.3-4generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libfribidi0 0.10.4-6 Free Implementation of the Unicode ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-9 GCC support library ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-1 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-3The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgucharmap4 1:1.4.2-1 Unicode browser widget library (sh ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.0-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libperl5.85.8.4-6Shared Perl library ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1X Window System protocol client li ii libxft2 2.1.2-6FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxml2 2.6.16-3 GNOME XML library ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 297652-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 01:16:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 18:16:49 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.de
Bug#302634: marked as done (squid: assertion failure in stmem.c results in unclean restart of squid)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:03:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302634: fixed in squid 2.5.9-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 02:07:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 01 18:07:48 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHY3A-0006Fy-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:07:48 -0800 Received: from 203-217-29-35.perm.iinet.net.au (anu.rimspace.net) [203.217.29.35] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHY39-0001Rg-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 19:07:47 -0700 Received: by anu.rimspace.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id A3153AF5A4; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 12:07:14 +1000 (EST) Received: by enki.rimspace.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 41527151109; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 12:07:07 +1000 (EST) From: Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: squid: assertion failure in stmem.c results in unclean restart of squid X-Debbugs-CC: Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:07:06 +1000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: squid Version: 2.5.9-2 Severity: grave After upgrading to 2.5.9-3, squid would routinely fail with this assertion: 2005/04/02 12:01:48| assertion failed: stmem.c:93: "current_offset == target_offset" The process seemed to restart automatically, and perform an DIRTY cache rebuild. I have, as you will note, downgraded to the previous version, which resolves the problem. I use diskd as the storage mechanism for my cache directory. Daniel -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc1-enki Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages squid depends on: ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups ii coreutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities ii debconf 1.4.47 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libldap22.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility ii netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii squid-common2.5.9-2 Internet Object Cache (WWW proxy c -- debconf information: squid/fix_cachedir_perms: false * squid/largefiles_warning: squid/anonymize_headers: squid-cgi/cachemgr: squid/old_version: false squid/http_anonymizer: squid/authenticate_program: squid/fix_lines: true -- > I have no life, and I must scream. And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } And there we have it, modern music summed up in one tidy sentence. --- Received: (at 302634-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 01:15:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 18:15:29 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIGBd-0005Nf-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:15:29 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIGBd-0002vQ-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:15:29 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIFzn-0006oy-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:03:15 -0400 From: Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302634: fixed in squid 2.5.9-4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:03:15 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_20
Bug#302200: e2fsprogs: segmentation fault on creating ext2/ext3 on IA-64
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:18:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Ok. In the meantime, I think not being able to create new filesystems is a > grave bug that makes this version of the package unreleasable given that it > would completely break the installer on ia64 if it reached sarge. Tagged > 'sid' so that it doesn't attract unnecessary attention. > E2fsprogs has been frozen for months as it is part of base, so the "if it reached sarge" is rather moot. - Ted -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302421: marked as done (links-ssl: handles line breaks in link URLs incorrectly)
Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:52:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302421: not valid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 18:30:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 10:30:47 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from odnb-d9baa508.pool.mediaways.net (rain.florz.dyndns.org) [217.186.165.8] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DH4RL-000118-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:47 -0800 Received: from florz.florz.dyndns.org ([192.168.0.121]) by rain.florz.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DH4R3-0002v1-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:30:29 +0200 Received: from florz by florz.florz.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DH4R3-yh-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:30:29 +0200 From: Florian Zumbiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: links-ssl: handles line breaks in link URLs incorrectly X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:30:29 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, HTML_MESSAGE,WEIRD_PORT autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: links-ssl Version: 0.96.20020409-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, put this into an HTML file: http://localhost:12345/blah.php Host:blurgl.tld X-Blub:";>a when using that link, links-ssl (I guess that this applies to links without ssl, too) will generate the following request to localhost, port 12345: | GET /blah.php | Host:blurgl.tld | X-Blub: HTTP/1.1 | Host: localhost:12345 | User-Agent: ELinks (0.4pre5; Linux 2.4.27 i686; 132x60) | Accept: */* | Connection: Keep-Alive Apart from the fact that this shouldn't happen, I could imagine at least this particular scenario to be used in an attack: On a sufficiently permissive HTTP server that allows the protocol version field to be missing and that accepts the first Host: header as the significant one, this could lead to cookies belonging to localhost:12345 getting into the hands of the virtual host blurgl.tld on the same server. Cya, Florian -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux florz 2.4.27 #3 Sat Aug 28 04:55:31 CEST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages links-ssl depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgpmg11.19.6-12General Purpose Mouse Library [lib ii liblua404.0-4Main interpreter library for the L ii liblualib40 4.0-4Extension library for the Lua prog ii libssl0.9.6 0.9.6c-2.woody.7 SSL shared libraries --- Received: (at 302421-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 00:52:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 17:52:55 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lifeforce.hu (narya.grin.hu) [195.38.113.134] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIFpn-0006oC-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:52:55 -0700 Received: from localhost.lifeforce.hu ([127.0.0.1] helo=narya ident=grin) by narya.grin.hu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DIFpe-0003oL-Fg for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:52:53 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 02:52:45 +0200 From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#302421: not valid Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Disorganized X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1cvs7.3 (GTK+ 2.6.2; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-) X-Scan-Signature: 30b12b17408a7bee7b88094d0fd9de6a Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: links-ssl package was *removed* from Debian in june
Bug#302421: Upstream contact?
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:08:34 +0100 Esteban Manchado Velázquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello: > >Does upstream know this? links-ssl was removed from Debian since Mon, 21 Jun 2004. >Is anyone working on this bug? Not likely. Peter ps: Neither links nor elinks seem to have this "bug", and I would guess links-ssl did not have it either. $ nc -l -p 12345 GET /blah.php%20Host:blurgl.tld%20X-Blub: HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost:12345 User-Agent: ELinks (0.10.2; Linux 2.6.10-narya i686; 103x33) Accept: */* Accept-Encoding: gzip Accept-Language: en Connection: Keep-Alive $ nc -l -p 12345 GET /blah.php%0AHost:blurgl.tld%0AX-Blub: HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost:12345 User-Agent: Links (1.00pre12; Linux 2.6.10-narya i686; 103x33) (Debian pkg 0.99+1.00pre12-1) Accept: */* Accept-Charset: us-ascii, ISO-8859-1, ISO-8859-2, ISO-8859-4, ISO-8895-5, ISO-8859-7, ISO-8895-9, ISO-8859-13, ISO-8859-15, ISO-8859-16, windows-1250, windows-1251, windows-1257, cp437, cp737, cp850, cp852, cp866, x-cp866-u, x-mac, x-mac-ce, x-kam-cs, koi8-r, koi8-u, TCVN-5712, VISCII, utf-8 Connection: Keep-Alive
Bug#302914: callgrind patch
tag 302914 patch
thanks
this patch i sent to 299498 fixes the build against the new
valgrind api. it includes a new configure.in file and a missing
build-depends on pkg-config.
cheers, piem
diff -u callgrind-0.9.10/debian/changelog callgrind-0.9.10/debian/changelog
--- callgrind-0.9.10/debian/changelog
+++ callgrind-0.9.10/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+callgrind (0.9.10-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU
+ * Patches from current CVS for new valgrind. Closes: #299498,#301970
+- update configure.in and run autoconf
+- adds new Build-Depends on pkg-config
+- adds #if VG_CORE_INTERFACE_MAJOR_VERSION < 7 to reflect valgrind
+changes since > 2.3 : src/{main,threads,command,sim,callstack}.c
+
+ -- Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:59:51 +0100
+
callgrind (0.9.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -u callgrind-0.9.10/debian/control callgrind-0.9.10/debian/control
--- callgrind-0.9.10/debian/control
+++ callgrind-0.9.10/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: devel
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Philipp Frauenfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), valgrind (>> 2.2)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), valgrind (>> 2.2), pkg-config
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: valgrind-callgrind
diff -u callgrind-0.9.10/config.sub callgrind-0.9.10/config.sub
--- callgrind-0.9.10/config.sub
+++ callgrind-0.9.10/config.sub
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
#! /bin/sh
# Configuration validation subroutine script.
# Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
-# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-timestamp='2004-03-12'
+timestamp='2004-11-30'
# This file is (in principle) common to ALL GNU software.
# The presence of a machine in this file suggests that SOME GNU software
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
version="\
GNU config.sub ($timestamp)
-Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001
+Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
-convergent* | -ncr* | -news | -32* | -3600* | -3100* | -hitachi* |\
-c[123]* | -convex* | -sun | -crds | -omron* | -dg | -ultra | -tti* | \
-harris | -dolphin | -highlevel | -gould | -cbm | -ns | -masscomp | \
- -apple | -axis)
+ -apple | -axis | -knuth | -cray)
os=
basic_machine=$1
;;
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
| tahoe | thumb | tic4x | tic80 | tron \
| v850 | v850e \
| we32k \
- | x86 | xscale | xstormy16 | xtensa \
+ | x86 | xscale | xscalee[bl] | xstormy16 | xtensa \
| z8k)
basic_machine=$basic_machine-unknown
;;
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
| avr-* \
| bs2000-* \
| c[123]* | c30-* | [cjt]90-* | c4x-* | c54x-* | c55x-* | c6x-* \
- | clipper-* | cydra-* \
+ | clipper-* | craynv-* | cydra-* \
| d10v-* | d30v-* | dlx-* \
| elxsi-* \
| f30[01]-* | f700-* | fr30-* | frv-* | fx80-* \
@@ -326,8 +326,9 @@
| mipsisa64sb1-* | mipsisa64sb1el-* \
| mipsisa64sr71k-* | mipsisa64sr71kel-* \
| mipstx39-* | mipstx39el-* \
+ | mmix-* \
| msp430-* \
- | none-* | np1-* | nv1-* | ns16k-* | ns32k-* \
+ | none-* | np1-* | ns16k-* | ns32k-* \
| orion-* \
| pdp10-* | pdp11-* | pj-* | pjl-* | pn-* | power-* \
| powerpc-* | powerpc64-* | powerpc64le-* | powerpcle-* | ppcbe-* \
@@ -342,8 +343,8 @@
| tron-* \
| v850-* | v850e-* | vax-* \
| we32k-* \
- | x86-* | x86_64-* | xps100-* | xscale-* | xstormy16-* \
- | xtensa-* \
+ | x86-* | x86_64-* | xps100-* | xscale-* | xscalee[bl]-* \
+ | xstormy16-* | xtensa-* \
| ymp-* \
| z8k-*)
;;
@@ -445,6 +446,10 @@
basic_machine=j90-cray
os=-unicos
;;
+ craynv)
+ basic_machine=craynv-cray
+ os=-unicosmp
+ ;;
cr16c)
basic_machine=cr16c-unknown
os=-elf
@@ -452,6 +457,9 @@
crds | unos)
basic_machine=m68k-crds
;;
+ crisv32 | crisv32-* | etraxfs*)
+ basic_machine=crisv32-axis
+ ;;
cris | cris-* | etrax*)
basic_machine=cris-axis
;;
@@ -481,6 +489,10 @@
basic_machine=m88k-motorola
os=-sysv3
;;
+ djgpp)
+ basic_machine=i586-pc
+ os=-msdosdjgpp
+ ;;
dpx20 | dpx20-*)
basic_machine=rs6000-bull
os=-bosx
@@ -659,10 +671,6 @@
mips3*)
basic_machine=`echo $basic_machine | s
Processed: callgrind patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 302914 patch Bug#302914: callgrind: FTBFS: vg_skin.h unreachable There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 302938 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 302938 normal Bug#302938: libjpeg-progs: "jpegtran -rotate" algorithm is wrong, puts image blocks in the wrong place in the output picture Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298963: marked as done (caudium: contains non-free fonts)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:17:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298963: fixed in caudium 2:1.2.35.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 19:56:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 11:56:45 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailhost.vub.ac.be (dorado.vub.ac.be) [134.184.129.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Tm0-0006O8-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:56:45 -0800 Received: from igwe.vub.ac.be (igwe1.vub.ac.be [134.184.49.1]) by dorado.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD3FD4 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:56:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from caladan.rave.org ([134.184.49.23]) by igwe.vub.ac.be with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.44) id 1D9Tlz-00068d-BC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:56:43 +0100 Received: from pdewacht by caladan.rave.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D9TlV-X4-RF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:56:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: caudium: contains non-free fonts X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:56:13 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: caudium Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains three non-free fonts: - fontrstc.ttf: "=C2=A9 1998 utopiafonts. [EMAIL PROTECTED]", see a= lso the readme in [1]. - lucida_unicode.ttf and verdana.ttf: two Microsoft fonts. Without a free license Debian cannot distribute these fonts, and therefore they should be removed. If replacement fonts are needed, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. [1] http://www.reflectingarea.com/styling/fonts/creators/UtopiaFonts/Fon= tRedSuit.zip -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=3Dnl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dnl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages caudium depends on: pn caudium-modules Not found. ii debconf 1.4.46 Debian configuration managem= ent sy ii logrotate 3.7-2 Log rotation utility pn pike7Not found. pn pike7-crypto | pike7-lobotomiNot found. pn pike7-gz Not found. pn pike7-image Not found. --- Received: (at 298963-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 00:30:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 17:30:53 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIFUT-0006E7-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:30:53 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIFUS-0001qt-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:30:53 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIFH9-0004av-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:17:07 -0400 From: Marek Habersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298963: fixed in caudium 2:1.2.35.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:17:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: caudium Source-Version: 2:1.2.35.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of caudium, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: caudium-dev_1.2.35.1-1_i386.deb
Processed: tagging 302903
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 302903 sid Bug#302903: libtonezone1 package is empty There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302995: gettext: ftbfs on sparc
reassign 302995 dpkg retitle 302995 dpkg: the alternatives mechanism should be more robust thanks On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Blars Blarson wrote: > Package: gettext > Version: 0.14.3-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid > Justification: fails to build from source > > gettext failed to build from source on the sparc buildd, however it > built fine on my sparc pbuilder. The buildd log lacks some things > that are in the pbuilder log "config.status: creating > intl-java/Makefile" "config.status: creating intl-csharp/Makefile" > and of course the sections that use those makefiles. > > buildd error: > > find debian/gettext-base/usr/share/locale | grep gettext-tools | xargs rm > install -d debian/gettext-base/usr/share/gettext > cp -p debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar \ > debian/gettext-base/usr/share/gettext > cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar': No such file or > directory > make[1]: *** [gettext-base] Error 1 You should not blame gettext for bugs in other packages. A diff between the build logs for 0.14.2-1 and 0.14.3-1 for sparc yields the following meaningful difference: -checking for jar... jar +checking for jar... no So there was no /usr/bin/jar in the sparc autobuilder after installing the fastjar package, but /usr/bin/jar is handled via the alternatives mechanism. Seems like a dpkg bug to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#302995: gettext: ftbfs on sparc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 302995 dpkg Bug#302995: gettext: ftbfs [sparc] `debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar': No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package `gettext' to `dpkg'. > retitle 302995 dpkg: the alternatives mechanism should be more robust Bug#302995: gettext: ftbfs [sparc] `debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar': No such file or directory Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302160: openoffice.org: crashes when trying to read a non-ascii character from afm file
Version: 1.1.3-7 Sarge system Yes, I encountered this on a system that still had some fonts in a /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/WordPerfect/ directory. (Not Debian's fault...) Got rid of those and OpenOffice.org is happy to run again. -Maitland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302871: marked as done (libshout: FTBFS: d-shlibmove reports problem with libogg0-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:47:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302871: fixed in d-shlibs 0.25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 14:21:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 07:21:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI5yn-00036b-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:21:33 -0700 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI5ym-0003Tm-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:21:33 -0600 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA657B5A; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:20:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-5-192.mnet-online.de [82.135.5.192]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF7C668B5; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:20:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678C1100442A0; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:20:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libshout: FTBFS: d-shlibmove reports problem with libogg0-dev Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:20:54 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: d-shlibmove Version: 2.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package libshout in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder :-) on i386 results in: = [...] if test -x /usr/bin/dh_installlogcheck; then dh_installlogcheck -plibshout3-dev ; fi dh_installchangelogs -plibshout3-dev dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) dh_install -plibshout3-dev dh_link -plibshout3-dev dh_installdocs -plibshout3 ./README dh_installexamples -plibshout3 dh_installman -plibshout3 dh_installinfo -plibshout3 dh_installmenu -plibshout3 dh_installcron -plibshout3 dh_installinit -plibshout3 dh_installdebconf -plibshout3 dh_installemacsen -plibshout3 dh_installpam -plibshout3 dh_installlogrotate -plibshout3 if test -x /usr/bin/dh_installlogcheck; then dh_installlogcheck -plibshout3 ; fi dh_installchangelogs -plibshout3 dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) dh_install -plibshout3 dh_link -plibshout3 d-shlibmove --commit --movedev "debian/tmp/usr/include/*" usr/include/ debian/tmp/usr/lib/libshout.so Library package automatic movement utility --> libc6-dev package exists. devlibs error: There is no package matching [libogg0-dev] and noone provides it, please report bug to d-shlibs maintainer --> libtheora-dev package exists. --> libvorbis-dev package exists. make: *** [common-binary-post-install-arch] Error 1 = (Reporting to d-shlibs as requested above.) Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. --- Received: (at 302871-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 23:58:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 16:58:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIEyo-0002nA-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:58:10 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIEyn-0002Pl-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:58:09 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIEo6-Rb-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:47:06
Bug#302995: gettext: ftbfs [sparc] `debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar': No such file or directory
Package: gettext Version: 0.14.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source gettext failed to build from source on the sparc buildd, however it built fine on my sparc pbuilder. The buildd log lacks some things that are in the pbuilder log "config.status: creating intl-java/Makefile" "config.status: creating intl-csharp/Makefile" and of course the sections that use those makefiles. buildd error: find debian/gettext-base/usr/share/locale | grep gettext-tools | xargs rm install -d debian/gettext-base/usr/share/gettext cp -p debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar \ debian/gettext-base/usr/share/gettext cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar': No such file or directory make[1]: *** [gettext-base] Error 1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301785: marked as done (quanta: Quanta (from alioth) craches after few minutes (even when it's idle))
Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:36:12 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in alioth repository has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2005 11:16:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 28 03:16:58 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from nemesis.nephthys.org (mx1.nephthys.org) [82.67.27.49] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFsEs-0004RB-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 03:16:58 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.nephthys.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCEE5676F; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.nephthys.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nemesis [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02633-74-4; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:16:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from merlin.intranet.nephthys.org (merlin.intranet.nephthys.org [192.168.0.2]) by mx1.nephthys.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6673F41C08; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:16:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Glennie Vignarajah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: quanta: Quanta (from alioth) craches after few minutes (even when it's idle) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:16:19 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: quanta Version: 4:3.4.0-0pre1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Quanta, from Alioth, crashes few minutes after it's launched (even if it's idle). It seems that the crash is due to libcvsservice0 package from Alioth. Using the /usr/lib/libcvsservice.so.0.0.1 (included in the package libcvsservice0_3.3.1-2_i386.deb, unstable release) solves the issue ! -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers experimental APT policy: (990, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11nephthys Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages quanta depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.4.0-0pre2 core libraries for all KDE applica ii kfilereplace 4:3.4.0-0pre1 batch search-and-replace component ii klinkstatus 4:3.4.0-0pre1 web link validity checker for KDE ii kommander4:3.4.0-0pre1 visual dialog builder and executor ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.4-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcvsservice0 4:3.4.0-0pre1 DCOP service for accessing CVS rep ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-6 client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0-0pre8 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpcre3 5.0-1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.4-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxml2 2.6.16-4GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxre
Processed: reassign 302871 to d-shlibs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > reassign 302871 d-shlibs Bug#302871: libshout: FTBFS: d-shlibmove reports problem with libogg0-dev Warning: Unknown package 'dshlibs' Bug reassigned from package `dshlibs' to `d-shlibs'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 302871 to dshlibs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > reassign 302871 dshlibs Bug#302871: libshout: FTBFS: d-shlibmove reports problem with libogg0-dev Warning: Unknown package 'd-shlibmove' Warning: Unknown package 'dshlibs' Bug reassigned from package `d-shlibmove' to `dshlibs'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302200: 64 bit issue
I should've included an explanation with the patch - it is correct that the pointer is being truncated. This is because the compiler uses a default return type of int when it doesn't know the return type. This is a general 64 bit issue - its not an ia64 specific issue, fwiw. -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302987: python-slides: dependency missing
Package: python-slides Version: 1.0.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dependency on python2.3-slides disappeared. -- Michał Politowski Talking has been known to lead to communication if practised carelessly. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#302938: libjpeg-progs: "jpegtran -rotate" algorithm is wrong, puts image blocks in the wrong place in the output picture
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:39:24PM -0700, Robert Fleming wrote: > Package: libjpeg-progs > Version: 6b-10 > Severity: grave > Justification: causes non-serious data loss [[This is absolutly incorrect: there is no data loss at all: if you rotate the image back, you get exactly the original jpeg file!]] > See http://home.comcast.net/~fleminra/jpegtran-bug/ > > for example input and ouput. jpegtran incorrectly moves the bottom row of > blocks to the top of the image. This bug is also present in the JPEG > source distribution at > > http://www.ijg.org/files/jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz > > This appears to happen when a dimension of the input JPEG is not a multiple > of the image block size, i.e. an image of height 256 is correctly rotated, but > an image of height 255 is not. Hello Robert, Yes, this is correct, but this is the documented behaviour. The JPEG format does not allow perfect rotation when the dimension is not a multiple of the image block size. Please read the jpegtran manual page, in particular: The transpose transformation has no restrictions regarding image dimen- sions. The other transformations operate rather oddly if the image dimensions are not a multiple of the iMCU size (usually 8 or 16 pix- els), because they can only transform complete blocks of DCT coeffi- cient data in the desired way. jpegtran's default behavior when transforming an odd-size image is designed to preserve exact reversibility and mathematical consistency of the transformation set. As stated, transpose is able to flip the entire image area. Horizontal mirroring leaves any partial iMCU column at the right edge untouched, but is able to flip all rows of the image. Similarly, vertical mirroring leaves any partial iMCU row at the bottom edge untouched, but is able to flip all columns. The other transforms can be built up as sequences of transpose and flip operations; for con- sistency, their actions on edge pixels are defined to be the same as the end result of the corresponding transpose-and-flip sequence. For practical use, you may prefer to discard any untransformable edge pixels rather than having a strange-looking strip along the right and/or bottom edges of a transformed image. To do this, add the -trim switch: -trim Drop non-transformable edge blocks. Obviously, a transformation with -trim is not reversible, so strictly speaking jpegtran with this switch is not lossless. Also, the expected mathematical equivalences between the transformations no longer hold. For example, -rot 270 -trim trims only the bottom edge, but -rot 90 -trim followed by -rot 180 -trim trims both edges. If you are only interested by perfect transformation, add the -perfect switch: -perfect Fails with an error if the transformation is not perfect. For example you may want to do (jpegtran -rot 90 -perfect foo.jpg || djpeg foo.jpg| pnmflip -r90 | cjpeg) to do a perfect rotation if available or an approximated one if not. Note: -perfect and lossless-crop are enhancements from http://syl- vana.net/jpegcrop/ that may not be available on non-Debian systems. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7, tagging 300851
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libldap-2.2-7 ldap-utils slapd openldap2.2 > tags 300851 + pending Bug#300851: libdb version check Tags were: experimental Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302421: Upstream contact?
Hello: Does upstream know this? Is there any official patch or we have to write one ourselves? Is anyone working on this bug? -- Esteban Manchado Velázquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.foton.es EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
Bug#302921: kuser: corrupts username information
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:08:36PM -0700, Aaron Johnson wrote:
>
> Package: kuser
> Version: 4:3.4.0-0pre1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> 1. Do a fresh net install of Debian Sarge RC3
> 2. Upgrade to Unstable
> 3. Add pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org to sources.list
> 4. Apt-get install x-window-system kde kdm cupsys sane
> 5. Log into KDE using the username created while installing Debian
> 6. Open Kuser, select the username, then click the edit button
> 7. Select the groups tab, then select the lpadmin, saned, and scanner
> groups
> 8. Select OK, then close Kuser (there is no save button)
> 9. Watch the problems start :{ - Konsole no longer works correctly, KDM
> does not list the username, reopening Kuser shows the username is on the
> same level number as root (0)
> 10. I have not discovered a fix. Attempting to recover the user account
> with usermod
Could you send the relevent lines of your passwd file (obscuring
anything which is irrelevent and private)?
Thanks,
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301329: New version php4-interbase, fixes RC bug
Hello all, I prepared a new version of php4-interbase. Gregorz, are you in a position to sponsor an upload? People on pkg-firebird-general might want to rush in for the fun early to help testing. Here is the changelog. * New upstream release * Acknowledging NMU. (Closes: #294000) * Bump php4-dev build-dep to (4:4.3.10-10) to ensure building without zts * Remove the -zts phpapi. Urgency high as this is release critical. (Closes: #301329) * Updated copyright file to incorporate newer version of the license * Incorporated Czech translation (Closes: 274066) The packages can be found here: http://www.cd-uitleen.nl/debian/ Cheers, Remco pgpTRB098ollJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#302938: libjpeg-progs: "jpegtran -rotate" algorithm is wrong, puts image blocks in the wrong place in the output picture
Package: libjpeg-progs Version: 6b-10 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss See http://home.comcast.net/~fleminra/jpegtran-bug/ for example input and ouput. jpegtran incorrectly moves the bottom row of blocks to the top of the image. This bug is also present in the JPEG source distribution at http://www.ijg.org/files/jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz This appears to happen when a dimension of the input JPEG is not a multiple of the image block size, i.e. an image of height 256 is correctly rotated, but an image of height 255 is not. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libjpeg-progs depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libjpeg62 6b-10The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297026: re-uploaded
With respect to my last comment (of 2005-03-05): I completely botched that upload. Mercifully, it was caught by our alert FTP team and rejected. I have just made a new upload (tested a bit more) :-/ -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302921: kuser: corrupts username information
Package: kuser
Version: 4:3.4.0-0pre1
Severity: critical
Tags: experimental
Justification: breaks unrelated software
1. Do a fresh net install of Debian Sarge RC3
2. Upgrade to Unstable
3. Add pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org to sources.list
4. Apt-get install x-window-system kde kdm cupsys sane
5. Log into KDE using the username created while installing Debian
6. Open Kuser, select the username, then click the edit button
7. Select the groups tab, then select the lpadmin, saned, and scanner
groups
8. Select OK, then close Kuser (there is no save button)
9. Watch the problems start :{ - Konsole no longer works correctly, KDM
does not list the username, reopening Kuser shows the username is on the
same level number as root (0)
10. I have not discovered a fix. Attempting to recover the user account
with usermod
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages kuser depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.4.0-0pre2 core libraries for all KDE
applica
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
an
ii libgcc11:3.4.3-12GCC support library
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.3-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded
runtime v
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302833: marked as done (zaptel: binary files missing, e.g. /sbin/ztcfg)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302833: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 08:34:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 00:34:15 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mxout.hispeed.ch (smtp.hispeed.ch) [62.2.95.247] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI0Yh-0006gD-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:34:15 -0800 Received: from big.tibi (84-72-41-217.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.72.41.217]) by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id j338YDAU004696 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:34:13 +0200 Received: from root by big.tibi with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DI0Ye-0001Xn-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:34:12 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tibor Dekany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: zaptel: binary files missing, e.g. /sbin/ztcfg X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:34:12 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on smtp-06.tornado.cablecom.ch X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: zaptel Version: 1:1.0.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading from zaptel 1.0.7-1 to 1.0.7-2 the binary files are missing, e.g. /sbin/ztcfg, which is important for loading the zaphfc kernel module. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-20050325 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 302833-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 20:05:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 13:05:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBLU-0005Kz-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:05:20 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBLT-0001eM-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:05:20 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIB7N-000500-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400 From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302833: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.7-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: zaptel Source-Version: 1:1.0.7-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zaptel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libtonezone-dev_1.0.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zaptel/libtonezone-dev_1.0.7-3_i386.deb libtonezone1_1.0.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zaptel/libtonezone1_1.0.7-3_i386.deb zaptel-source_1.0.7-3_all.deb to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel-source_1.0.7-3_all.deb zaptel_1.0.7-3.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel_1.0.7-3.diff.gz zaptel_1.0.7-3.dsc to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel_1.0.7-3.dsc zaptel_1.0.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel_1.0.7-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated zaptel package) (This message was gener
Bug#302447: marked as done (webmin-bind installs in bind subdir not in bind8)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302447: fixed in webmin-virtual-server 2.50-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 20:47:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 12:47:27 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from risp3.cwisp.com.bb (cwispsmtp3.cwisp.com.bb) [205.214.214.247] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DH6Za-0008Ns-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:47:26 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain [63.130.214.169] by cwispsmtp3.cwisp.com.bb with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.15) id A1BC6F00DC; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:46:52 -0400 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C66EA125F6; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:46:51 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: elias humbolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: webmin-bind installs in bind subdir not in bind8 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:46:51 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.130.214.169] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: webmin-bind Version: 1.180-1 Severity: serious Justification: 3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages webmin-bind depends on: ii perl 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii webmin1.180-1web-based administration toolkit -- no debconf information webmin-bind installs in a directorys named bind but modules like virtualmin require the module to be in bind8 directorys. Therefore virtualmin does not work out of the box! I guess you use the bind dir rather than a bind8 dir to not confuse people about whether or not webmin-bind works with bind9, but you could also mention that in the package description and go with, what I assume is the default dir. Or however, you take over maintainership of webmin-virtual-server and change the package to fit to your changes. --- Received: (at 302447-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 20:05:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 13:05:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBLJ-0005H5-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:05:09 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBLJ-0001bq-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:05:09 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIB6x-0004yD-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:19 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaldhar H. Vyas) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302447: fixed in webmin-virtual-server 2.50-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:19 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: webmin-virtual-server Source-Version: 2.50-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of webmin-virtual-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: webmin-virtual-server_2.50-1.diff.gz to pool/main/w/webmin-virtual-server/webmin-virtual-server_2.50-1.diff.gz webmin-virtual-server_2.50-1.dsc to pool/main/w/webmin-virtual-server/webmin-virtual-server_2.50-1.dsc webmin-virtual-server_2.50-1_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-virtual-server/webmin-virtual-server_2.50-1_all.deb webmin-virtual-server_2.50.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/w/webmin-virtual-server/webmin-virtual-server_2.50.orig.tar.gz A su
Bug#302903: marked as done (libtonezone1 package is empty)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302903: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 17:25:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 10:25:34 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.169.227] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI8qs-Xv-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:25:34 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO bigboy) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] with plain) by smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 17:25:33 - Received: from raf by bigboy with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DI8qq-00062h-Mp from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:25:32 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rafael D'Halleweyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libtonezone1 package is empty X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:25:32 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libtonezone1 Version: 1:1.0.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The libtonezone1 package, and all other packages build from zaptel, are empty: they don't contain any executables/libraries. If you use dh_install to build your packages, you need to rename the *.files to *.install. That way I was able to build the packages. Thanks, Raf. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11+bigboy Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 302903-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 20:05:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 13:05:21 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBLV-0005NS-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:05:21 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBLU-0001eT-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:05:20 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIB7N-000504-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400 From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302903: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.7-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: zaptel Source-Version: 1:1.0.7-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zaptel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libtonezone-dev_1.0.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zaptel/libtonezone-dev_1.0.7-3_i386.deb libtonezone1_1.0.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zaptel/libtonezone1_1.0.7-3_i386.deb zaptel-source_1.0.7-3_all.deb to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel-source_1.0.7-3_all.deb zaptel_1.0.7-3.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel_1.0.7-3.diff.gz zaptel_1.0.7-3.dsc to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel_1.0.7-3.dsc zaptel_1.0.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel_1.0.7-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated zaptel package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administra
Bug#302847: marked as done (zaptel command ztcfg freezes on Debian PowerPC causing boot failure.)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302847: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 11:02:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 04:02:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI2rk-0003Jg-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 04:02:04 -0700 Received: from 203-96-158-18.paradise.net.nz ([127.0.0.1]) [203.96.158.18] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI2rj-0004hM-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:02:03 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthew Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: zaptel command ztcfg freezes on Debian PowerPC causing boot failure. X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:25:42 +1200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: zaptel Version: 1:1.0.7-1 Severity: critical Tags: patch Justification: breaks the whole system When ztcfg executes due to zaptel module load during hotplug initialisation, ztcfg does not exit causing boot process to stop. Ctrl-C on console will not recover condition. Machine must be power cycled. This is specific to Debian PPC architecture. Problem due to missing "-fsigned-char" to gcc when binaries are compiled. This is due to a typo in the grep executed in the Debian patch to the zaptel Makefile. Patch is included. Matthew Grant --- zaptel-1.0.7/debian/patches/Makefile.dpatch 2005-04-03 22:13:06.0 +1200 +++ zaptel-1.0.7/debian/patches/Makefile.dpatch.orig2005-04-03 22:13:24.0 +1200 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ CFLAGS+=-I. -O4 -g -Wall -DBUILDING_TONEZONE #-DTONEZONE_DRIVER -CFLAGS+=$(shell if uname -m | grep -q ppc; then echo "-fsigned-char"; fi) -CFLAGS+=$(shell if uname -m | grep -q x86_64; then echo "-m64"; fi) -+CFLAGS+=$(shell if echo $(UNAME_M) | egrep -q "ppc|powerpc"; then echo "-fsigned-char"; fi) ++CFLAGS+=$(shell if echo $(UNAME_M) | grep -q ppc; then echo "-fsigned-char"; fi) +CFLAGS+=$(shell if echo $(UNAME_M) | grep -q x86_64; then echo "-m64"; fi) LCFLAGS=-fPIC $(CFLAGS) -DBUILDING_TONEZONE -KFLAGS+=-I/usr/src/linux-2.4/include -O6 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-pmac-2.6 Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages zaptel depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libnewt0.51 0.51.6-20Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 302847-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 19:54:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 12:54:02 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBAY-0004eS-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:54:02 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBAX-0006nw-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:54:01 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIB7N-000502-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400 From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302847: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.7-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:45 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: zaptel Source-Version: 1:1.0.7-3 We
Bug#302914: callgrind: FTBFS: vg_skin.h unreachable
Package: callgrind
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package callgrind in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
./configure --host=i386-linux --build=i386-linux --prefix=/usr
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for i386-linux-gcc... i386-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether i386-linux-gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for i386-linux-gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of i386-linux-gcc... gcc3
checking for i386-linux-g++... i386-linux-g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether i386-linux-g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of i386-linux-g++... gcc3
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for i386-linux-ranlib... no
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for valgrind installation... in /usr
checking if vg_skin.h is available... configure: error: No. Needs header files
from Valgrind (2.0.x/2.2.x).
Perhaps a valgrind-dev package is missing in your installation?
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
=
Thanks for considering.
--
DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
http://darts.alioth.debian.org/
Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically.
DARTS just helped finding the problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302684: zeroconf configuration method / option?
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:21:41PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > For the time being I think that the cleanest thing to do is to add a > zeroconf method to the inet and inet6 address families. Initially the Note that zeroconf should not be used with IPv6 - that includes its own link local allocation mechanism that's not such a bolt-on and is handled by the kernel. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h moved to /usr/include/pppd/
tags 300520 + patch thanks For what it's worth, the attached patch will make portslave build from source again. It seems harmless, but since the problem only affects sid and Russell has been active recently with the package, I won't NMU for now. I hope this has been helpful. Happy hacking. diff -ruN orig/changelog portslave-2004.03.26/changelog --- orig/changelog 2004-03-26 03:53:44.0 +0200 +++ portslave-2004.03.26/changelog 2005-04-03 21:13:46.0 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +portslave (2004.03.26-0.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Changed debian/rules EXTRA_CFLAGS to add /usr/include/pppd instead +/usr/include/net; added versioned build-dependency on ppp-dev. +Closes: #300520. + + -- Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:13:37 +0300 + portslave (2004.03.26) unstable; urgency=low * Build-depends on ppp-dev. diff -ruN orig/debian/changelog portslave-2004.03.26/debian/changelog --- orig/debian/changelog 2004-03-26 03:53:44.0 +0200 +++ portslave-2004.03.26/debian/changelog 2005-04-03 21:13:46.0 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +portslave (2004.03.26-0.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Changed debian/rules EXTRA_CFLAGS to add /usr/include/pppd instead +/usr/include/net; added versioned build-dependency on ppp-dev. +Closes: #300520. + + -- Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:13:37 +0300 + portslave (2004.03.26) unstable; urgency=low * Build-depends on ppp-dev. diff -ruN orig/debian/control portslave-2004.03.26/debian/control --- orig/debian/control 2004-03-26 03:52:33.0 +0200 +++ portslave-2004.03.26/debian/control 2005-04-03 21:11:01.0 +0300 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: comm Priority: optional Maintainer: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper, xutils, libradius1-dev, ppp-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper, xutils, libradius1-dev, ppp-dev (>= 2.4.3-20050321+1) Standards-Version: 3.5.6 Package: portslave diff -ruN orig/debian/rules portslave-2004.03.26/debian/rules --- orig/debian/rules 2004-03-21 13:02:53.0 +0200 +++ portslave-2004.03.26/debian/rules 2005-04-03 21:10:07.0 +0300 @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ dh_testdir # Add here commands to compile the package. - $(MAKE) EXTRA_CFLAGS="-DNO_CHAP -I/usr/include/net" + $(MAKE) EXTRA_CFLAGS="-DNO_CHAP -I/usr/include/pppd" #/usr/bin/docbook-to-man debian/portslave-2000-11.sgml > portslave-2000-11.1 touch build-stamp diff -ruN orig/portslave.spec portslave-2004.03.26/portslave.spec --- orig/portslave.spec 2004-03-21 13:37:35.0 +0200 +++ portslave-2004.03.26/portslave.spec 2005-04-03 21:15:16.187560752 +0300 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ summary: Terminal server that does PPP and authenticates via RADIUS name: portslave -version: 2002.10.21 +version: 2004.03.26 release: 1 copyright: GPL group: Applications/Communications
Processed: Re: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h moved to /usr/include/pppd/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 300520 + patch Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h moved to /usr/include/pppd/ Tags were: sid patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libneedle-ruby 1.2.0-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 302347 + fixed Bug#302347: libneedle-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291408: OpenLDAP 2.2 packages
Hi Gerald, On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Gerald Hochegger wrote: > I've already upgraded our production servers because I was > hoping to get rid of the database corruption problems. > > Here are my results so far: > > * ldapi:/// is not working after the upgrade > Use > --localstatedir=/var (instead of /var/run) > in debian/configure.options Checked in for 2.2.23-2. I really wonder why upstream has changed the meaning of this option. > slapd tries to create the socket in /var/run/run/ldapi - which fails. > (We are using heimdal with openldap backend and need ldapi:///) Interesting. Did not know it was really /needed/ for anything. > Furthermore the socket should be 600 - but I don't know how to set this. That should work by using slapd -h 'ldapi:///???x-mod=600' > * DB_CONFIG gets lost on upgrades > /var/lib/ldap/DB_CONFIG gets lost on upgrades, which makes > reimporting the Ldap database with slapadd very slow with big ldif files. > If possible save the DB_CONFIG on upgrades. Known issue, it's on the TODO list. > * slapd with db4.3 has indeed problems. > My database corruption problems were still present with pre4 - I upgraded > to pre6 on 2005-04-02. Let's hope db4.2 fixes the database corruption. Interesting. I really hope db4.2 fixes those problems. > * If possible upgrade to openldap 2.2.24 > I've applied your patches to 2.2.24 - no problems so far. Upgrade will be done after the packaging is stable. Greetings Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libneedle-extras-ruby 1.0.0-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 302345 + fixed Bug#302345: libneedle-extras-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libnet-sftp-ruby 0.9.0-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 302351 + fixed Bug#302351: libnet-sftp-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libnet-ssh-ruby 1.0.0-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 302349 + fixed Bug#302349: libnet-ssh-ruby: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302893: ogre: FTBFS: Missing build dependency?
Kurt Roeckx wrote: > This looks like a missing build dependency or something, > but I have no idea on what package since nothing in debian > seems to have them. It's missing a build-dep on libcegui-mk2-dev, which should hit the archive with the next dinstall run. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302827: tetex-bin: fails to install on several architectures
severity 302827 serious thanks Hi all, Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: tetex-bin > Version: 2.0.2-27 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > tetex-bin could not be installed on several architectures including: > mipsel, s390, alpha and powerpc. See for example this buildd log: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=pdns&ver=2.9.17-8&arch=powerpc&stamp=1112391358&file=log&as=raw The format that fails to build is in fact jadetex. I suspected that there is an error in the patch I provided, however things are not so easy: I have (again today) tested to install jadetex, and Okura has probably done the same. Furthermore, it fails in a very strange way: Generating /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ... Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version done Generating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ... done Running initex. This may take some time. ... kpathsea: Running mktexfmt latex.efmt running `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' ... This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.4.5) (INITEX) [...] Beginning to dump on file latex.fmt (format=latex 2005.4.1) [...] No pages of output. Transcript written on latex.log. fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt installed. Error: `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini' failed kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdflatex.efmt running `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex pdflatex.ini' ... This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159-1.10b (Web2C 7.4.5) (INITEX) First of all, it seems that the order of output is mangled (because of redirections?). But also what happens is not easy to understand. Although we are redirecting stdout to a file, we get the complete output from an attempt to create latex.efmt. However, in fact it creates latex.fmt with tex, not latex.efmt with etex. After that, we get an error that creation of jadetex.fmt failed, and once more after this we see kpathsea trying to create pdflatex.fmt. Then there's fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt installed. Error: `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex &pdflatex pdfjadetex.ini' failed I have to leave at once, not finishing my analysis. But since I won't have much time the next days, I think I should share these thoughts with others -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Processed: Re: Bug#302827: tetex-bin: fails to install on several architectures
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 302827 serious Bug#302827: tetex-bin: fails to install on several architectures Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302903: libtonezone1 package is empty
Package: libtonezone1 Version: 1:1.0.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The libtonezone1 package, and all other packages build from zaptel, are empty: they don't contain any executables/libraries. If you use dh_install to build your packages, you need to rename the *.files to *.install. That way I was able to build the packages. Thanks, Raf. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11+bigboy Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301513: marked as done (sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is needed)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:02:38 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#301513: fixed in sslwrap 2.0.6-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 13:10:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 05:10:49 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFB3x-D8-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:10:49 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id DEDD832809F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:10:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0537328044 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:10:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id A6F3326136; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:10:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:10:48 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is needed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: sslwrap Version: 2.0.6-16 Severity: important Hi, Your package is currently failing to build on amd64 because of timestamp skew issues. Those happen when you patch the configure scripts and don't take special care of it. The problem is that in the diff file the order of the files is not the same as the order in which they get generated. This causes make to think that some of those files need to be rebuild. See /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz for more information. There are a few ways to solve this: - Use AM_MAINTAINER_MODE - Build depends on the needed auto*/libtool packages and force a regeneration at build time of those files. - Touch the files in the right order to prevent make from trying to regenerate them. Kurt --- Received: (at 301513-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 17:11:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 10:11:11 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI8cx-0007HM-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:11:11 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI8cx-hE-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:11:11 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI8Ug-0008Ab-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:02:38 -0400 From: Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301513: fixed in sslwrap 2.0.6-17 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:02:38 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: sslwrap Source-Version: 2.0.6-17 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sslwrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sslwrap_2.0.6-17.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sslwrap/sslwrap_2.0.6-17.diff.gz sslwrap_2.0.6-17.dsc to pool/main/s/sslwrap/sslwrap_2.0.6-17.dsc sslwrap_2.0.6-17_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sslwrap/sslwrap_2.0.6-17_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sslwrap package) (This message was
Bug#302795: marked as done (sslwrap: please do not call update-inetd from an init script!)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:02:38 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302795: fixed in sslwrap 2.0.6-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 00:02:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 16:02:36 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (minbar.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHsZX-MN-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:02:35 -0800 Received: by minbar.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE71B1A103; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:02:34 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: sslwrap: please do not call update-inetd from an init script! X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:02:34 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: sslwrap Version: 2.0.6-16 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hi Jonathan, A combination of factors now gives me this on console every time /etc/init.d/sslwrap stop is called: # /etc/init.d/sslwrap stop Stopping sslwrap: Trying to add the following entry: ## https stream tcp nowait sslwrap:sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 80 There is already an entry for ## https in /etc/inetd.conf, but I don't recognise it. Here is what it looks like: ## https stream tcp nowait sslwrap.sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 80 Do you want to ignore this potential problem and continue, or would you rather not do so now ? Continue? (n/y) n Trying to add the following entry: ## ssmtp stream tcp nowait sslwrap:sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 25 There is already an entry for ## ssmtp in /etc/inetd.conf, but I don't recognise it. Here is what it looks like: ## ssmtp stream tcp nowait sslwrap.sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 25 Do you want to ignore this potential problem and continue, or would you rather not do so now ? Continue? (n/y) n Trying to add the following entry: ## nntps stream tcp nowait sslwrap:sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 119 There is already an entry for ## nntps in /etc/inetd.conf, but I don't recognise it. Here is what it looks like: ## nntps stream tcp nowait sslwrap.sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 119 Do you want to ignore this potential problem and continue, or would you rather not do so now ? Continue? (n/y) n Trying to add the following entry: ## telnets stream tcp nowait sslwrap:sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 23 There is already an entry for ## telnets in /etc/inetd.conf, but I don't recognise it. Here is what it looks like: ## telnets stream tcp nowait sslwrap.sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 23 Do you want to ignore this potential problem and continue, or would you rather not do so now ? Continue? (n/y) n Trying to add the following entry: ## ircs stream tcp nowait sslwrap:sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 194 There is already an entry for ## ircs in /etc/inetd.conf, but I don't recognise it. Here is what it looks like: ## ircs stream tcp nowait sslwrap.sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 194 Do you want to ignore this potential problem and continue, or would you rather not do so now ? Continue? (n/y) n Trying to add the following entry: ## ftps-data stream tcp nowait sslwrap:sslwrap /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /etc/sslwrap/server.pem -addr 127.0.0.1 -port 20 There is already an ent
Processed: Something went wrong when i reported this bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 302827 critical Bug#302827: tetex-bin: fails to install on several architectures Severity set to `critical'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294079: marked as done (python-kde3 is not buildable on kdelibs4 = 3.3.2)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:26:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294079: fixed in python-kde3 3.11.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 19:28:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 11:28:15 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CyEYQ-0003wX-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:28:15 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Feb 2005 19:27:42 - Received: from B3d56.b.pppool.de (EHLO morpheus.apaku.dnsalias.org) (213.7.61.86) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 07 Feb 2005 20:27:42 +0100 X-Authenticated: #15861332 Received: from andreas by morpheus.apaku.dnsalias.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1CyEXu-0003Wb-DP; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:27:42 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0272622525==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: python-kde3 is not buildable on kdelibs4 = 3.3.2 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:27:42 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===0272622525== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: python-kde3 Version: 3.11.3-3 Severity: important Hi, I wanted to rebuilt python-kde3 to include the changes to also build python-kde3-dev (so I get the .sip files). But unfortunately this doesn't work in current unstable - see the attached file for a transcript of the dpkg-buildpackage run. I don't think that this is related to my changes (I just copied python-qt-dev.* from python-qt's debian dir and added a Package into the control-file). Andreas -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-cherry Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages python-kde3 depends on: ii python2.3.4-6An interactive high-level object-o ii python2.3-kde33.11.3-3 KDE3 bindings for Python 2.3 -- no debconf information --===0272622525== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="output.log" dpkg-buildpackage: source package is python-kde3 dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 3.11.3-3 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386 dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f *-stamp # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. /usr/bin/make distclean make[1]: Entering directory `/home/andreas/compiling/eric3/sip/python-kde3-3.11.3' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/andreas/compiling/eric3/sip/python-kde3-3.11.3' rm -f features Makefile rm -Rf dcop kdecore kdefx kdeprint kdesu kdeui kfile khtml kio kmdi kparts kspell libs kutils dh_clean dpkg-source: building python-kde3 using existing python-kde3_3.11.3.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: building python-kde3 in python-kde3_3.11.3-3.diff.gz dpkg-source: building python-kde3 in python-kde3_3.11.3-3.dsc dh_testdir python2.3 configure.py -c -u \ -k /usr -o /usr/include/kde -n /usr/lib \ -v /usr/share/sip/kde PyKDE version 3.11.3 --- Python include directory is /usr/include/python2.3 Python version is 2.3.4 sip version is 4.1.1 (4.1.1) Qt directory is /usr/share/qt3 Qt version is 3.3.3 PyQt directory is /usr/share/sip/qt PyQt version is 3.13 (3.13.0) KDE base directory is /usr KDE include directory is /usr/include/kde KDE lib directory is /usr/lib KDE version is 3.3.2 (0x30302) PyKDE modules will be installed in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages PyKDE .sip files will be installed in /usr/share/sip/kde PyKDE modules to be built: dcop kdecore kdesu kdefx kdeui kio kutils kfile kparts khtml kspell kde
Bug#302893: ogre: FTBFS: Missing build dependency?
Package: ogre Version: 1.0.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../OgreMain/include -I../../ ../../Samples/Common/CEGUIRenderer/include -DGCC_3_1 -DEXT_HASH -g -O2 -MT Ogre CEGUIRenderer.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/OgreCEGUIRenderer.Tpo -c OgreCEGUIRenderer.c pp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/OgreCEGUIRenderer.o OgreCEGUIRenderer.cpp:27:40: CEGUI/CEGUIImagesetManager.h: No such file or dire ctory OgreCEGUIRenderer.cpp:28:33: CEGUI/CEGUIImageset.h: No such file or directory OgreCEGUIRenderer.cpp:29:30: CEGUI/CEGUIImage.h: No such file or directory OgreCEGUIRenderer.cpp:30:35: CEGUI/CEGUIExceptions.h: No such file or directory OgreCEGUIRenderer.cpp:31:31: CEGUI/CEGUISystem.h: No such file or directory In file included from OgreCEGUIRenderer.cpp:33: ../../../../Samples/Common/CEGUIRenderer/include/OgreCEGUIRenderer.h:42:29: CEG UI/CEGUIBase.h: No such file or directory ../../../../Samples/Common/CEGUIRenderer/include/OgreCEGUIRenderer.h:43:33: CEG UI/CEGUIRenderer.h: No such file or directory ../../../../Samples/Common/CEGUIRenderer/include/OgreCEGUIRenderer.h:44:32: CEG UI/CEGUITexture.h: No such file or directory This looks like a missing build dependency or something, but I have no idea on what package since nothing in debian seems to have them. Kuyrt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302874: marked as done (doesn't work with large packets)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:02:40 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302874: fixed in nstx 1.1-beta6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 14:37:16 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 07:37:16 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vavatch.codon.org.uk [213.162.118.84] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI6Dz-0008VT-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:37:16 -0700 Received: from mjg59 by vavatch.codon.org.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DI6E3-0002YW-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:37:19 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: doesn't work with large packets X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:37:19 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: nstx Version: 1.1-beta6-1 Severity: grave nstxd in sid is broken with any packets longer than 90 bytes. Fix it, you fool. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 Versions of packages nstx depends on: ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 302874-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 16:28:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 09:28:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI7xg-0001Lm-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:28:32 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI7xf-0003bf-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:28:32 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI7Ye-0002dG-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:02:40 -0400 From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302874: fixed in nstx 1.1-beta6-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:02:40 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: nstx Source-Version: 1.1-beta6-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nstx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nstx_1.1-beta6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nstx/nstx_1.1-beta6-2.diff.gz nstx_1.1-beta6-2.dsc to pool/main/n/nstx/nstx_1.1-beta6-2.dsc nstx_1.1-beta6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nstx/nstx_1.1-beta6-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nstx package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:36:20 +0100 Source: nstx Binary: nstx Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1-beta6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: nstx
Bug#291408: OpenLDAP 2.2 packages
Hi Torsten, thanks for your 2.2 packages. I've already upgraded our production servers because I was hoping to get rid of the database corruption problems. Here are my results so far: * ldapi:/// is not working after the upgrade Use --localstatedir=/var (instead of /var/run) in debian/configure.options slapd tries to create the socket in /var/run/run/ldapi - which fails. (We are using heimdal with openldap backend and need ldapi:///) Furthermore the socket should be 600 - but I don't know how to set this. * DB_CONFIG gets lost on upgrades /var/lib/ldap/DB_CONFIG gets lost on upgrades, which makes reimporting the Ldap database with slapadd very slow with big ldif files. If possible save the DB_CONFIG on upgrades. * slapd with db4.3 has indeed problems. My database corruption problems were still present with pre4 - I upgraded to pre6 on 2005-04-02. Let's hope db4.2 fixes the database corruption. * If possible upgrade to openldap 2.2.24 I've applied your patches to 2.2.24 - no problems so far. Greetings, Gerald -- --- Gerald Hochegger Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer CenterVoice :(++43 463) 2700/9613 University of Klagenfurt Fax :(++43 463) 2700/9699 Universitaetsstrasse 65-67 A-9020 Klagenfurt, Austria, Europe --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of htmldoc 1.8.23-1.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 300460 + fixed Bug#300460: htmldoc: segfault when generating ps or pdf Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299770: confirm
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:03:37PM +0200, Jean-Michel Kelbert wrote: > Le 17/03/05 à 02:08 Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait : > > I can confirm that this problem exists with a fresh install. > > Justin > > Could you tell me it it's allready present in the new package ? The new package (1.0-1) installs fine. Note that I'm not the original bug submitter. Justin
Bug#299770: confirm
Le 17/03/05 à 02:08 Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait : > I can confirm that this problem exists with a fresh install. > Justin Could you tell me it it's allready present in the new package ? In fact this should'nt happen, since there is the following test in the preinst script : test -d /var/run/nuauth || mkdir -p /var/run/nuauth If this is the case could you please run this : 1°) df 2°) ls -ld /var 3°) ls -ld /var/run 4°) mkdir -p /var/run/nuauth; echo $? Thanks -- Jean-Michel Kelbert signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#302866: qemu: FTBFS in sarge: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lartsc
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:55:25PM +0200, Elrond wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Elrond wrote: > > > > > > Check bug #298532. > > > > Oh, I didn't notice that one. I should probably have reopened > > that one and tagged it sarge instead. > > Will you close this bug, when arts has propagated to > testing? I'm sure one of the release managers will take care of that. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: zeroconf configuration method / option?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 302684 serious Bug#302684: Limit families/methods for which zeroconf is called? Severity set to `serious'. > tags 302684 sid Bug#302684: Limit families/methods for which zeroconf is called? There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299316: rsnapshot: FTBFS: aclocal-1.4 missing
Hi, On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 01:19 +0200, Christoph Wegscheider wrote: > Please check the timestamps after unpacking it, I believe that there is > a bug somewhere in your system concerning timestamps. The problem with this kind of timestamp skew is that on some systems (I'm using the Debian kernel 2.6.8) it consistently triggers and on others it doesn't. But it's no surprise it happens at all: Files are changed and the GNU auto* suite tries to rerun. (See below.) > I tested the > packages I sent to you on 3 different machines with and without a fresh > pbuilder > and with fresh I mean apt-get install pbuilder; pbuilder create sid; > pbuilder build rsnapshot_1.2.0-2.dsc it worked flawlessly. I just did exactly that on both i386 and sparc. The problem persists. > As I'm no DD > and can only upload through my sponsor he will test it also for this > bug (as he has tested the last one) and maybe he can reproduce it. I can sponsor the upload if you want. > > Adding "touch aclocal.m4 Makefile.in configure" before the ./configure > > call in debian/rules fixes the problem for me. > This supports my POV that something with your timestamps is broken. ? This is a typical procedure for working around unnecessarily triggered auto* reruns. bye, Roland -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302880: geda-gschem: FTBFS on sarge: conflicting types for `g_key_file_new'
Package: geda-gschem Version: 20040111-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge Hi, Your package is failing to build in sarge. This seems to have been fixed in the 20050313-1 version which is waiting on arm. This bug can probably be closed once that version reaches testing. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302866: qemu: FTBFS in sarge: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lartsc
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Elrond wrote: > > Check bug #298532. Oh, I didn't notice that one. I should probably have reopened that one and tagged it sarge instead. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302866: qemu: FTBFS in sarge: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lartsc
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Elrond wrote: > > > > Check bug #298532. > > Oh, I didn't notice that one. I should probably have reopened > that one and tagged it sarge instead. Will you close this bug, when arts has propagated to testing? And: Should this bug be moved over to that package? Please do as needed. Elrond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291559: marked as done (Capi4hylafax segfaults during send and receive....)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:32:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#291559: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2005 14:10:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 06:10:12 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (www.openit.it) [213.215.208.15] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CrzUK-VT-00; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:10:12 -0800 Received: (qmail 10761 invoked by uid 1011); 21 Jan 2005 14:09:19 - Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by openit by uid 64011 with qmail-scanner-1.22st (clamscan: 0.71. avp: 4.0.3.0. spamassassin: 2.63. perlscan: 1.22st. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.63 secs); 21 Jan 2005 14:09:19 - X-Antivirus-Perginese-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via openit X-Antivirus-Perginese: 1.22st (Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.63 secs Process 10755) Received: from unknown (HELO www.diaolin.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jan 2005 14:09:18 - Received: from 82.90.106.21 (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by www.diaolin.com with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:09:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:09:18 +0100 (CET) Subject: Capi4hylafax segfaults during send and receive From: "Giuliano Natali (el Diaolin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: capi4hylafax Version: 01.02.03-8 Severity: critical Debian: unstable I'm using a Fritz card and the kernel capi package Incoming: It writes only 8 bytes into hylafax dir and then segfaults. Outgoing: The other side receives only a blank page but with the correct fax headline Until the previous version it was all ok. I don't know it it's a libtiff bug or my problem but if i recompile the package myself with the official debian packare through debian/rules binary-arch the problem is only the blank page, the rest is ok. Sorry i cannot be more explicit. Ciao, DIaolin --- Received: (at 291559-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 14:21:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 07:21:37 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI5yr-0003Gs-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:21:37 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI5Ra-0003JP-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:47:14 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI5D4-HD-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:32:14 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#291559: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-10 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:32:14 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: capi4hylafax Source-Version: 1:01.02.03-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of capi4hylafax, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: capi4hylafax_01.02.03-10.diff.gz to pool/main/c/capi4hylafax/capi4hylafax_01.02.03-10.diff.gz capi4hylafax_01.02.03-10.dsc to pool/main/c/capi4hylafax/capi4hylafax_01.02.03-10.dsc capi4hylafax_01.02.03-10_i386.deb to pool/main/c/capi4hylafax/capi4hylafax_01.02.03-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address the
Bug#302866: qemu: FTBFS in sarge: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lartsc
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 03:52:50PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: qemu > Version: 0.6.1-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sarge Check bug #298532. Elrond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302874: doesn't work with large packets
Package: nstx Version: 1.1-beta6-1 Severity: grave nstxd in sid is broken with any packets longer than 90 bytes. Fix it, you fool. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 Versions of packages nstx depends on: ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302871: libshout: FTBFS: d-shlibmove reports problem with libogg0-dev
Package: d-shlibmove Version: 2.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package libshout in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder :-) on i386 results in: = [...] if test -x /usr/bin/dh_installlogcheck; then dh_installlogcheck -plibshout3-dev ; fi dh_installchangelogs -plibshout3-dev dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) dh_install -plibshout3-dev dh_link -plibshout3-dev dh_installdocs -plibshout3 ./README dh_installexamples -plibshout3 dh_installman -plibshout3 dh_installinfo -plibshout3 dh_installmenu -plibshout3 dh_installcron -plibshout3 dh_installinit -plibshout3 dh_installdebconf -plibshout3 dh_installemacsen -plibshout3 dh_installpam -plibshout3 dh_installlogrotate -plibshout3 if test -x /usr/bin/dh_installlogcheck; then dh_installlogcheck -plibshout3 ; fi dh_installchangelogs -plibshout3 dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) dh_install -plibshout3 dh_link -plibshout3 d-shlibmove --commit --movedev "debian/tmp/usr/include/*" usr/include/ debian/tmp/usr/lib/libshout.so Library package automatic movement utility --> libc6-dev package exists. devlibs error: There is no package matching [libogg0-dev] and noone provides it, please report bug to d-shlibs maintainer --> libtheora-dev package exists. --> libvorbis-dev package exists. make: *** [common-binary-post-install-arch] Error 1 = (Reporting to d-shlibs as requested above.) Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302870: octave-epstk: FTBFS: Can't satisfy build dependencies in sarge.
Package: octave-epstk Version: 2.0.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: sarge Hi, Your package currently can't be build in sarge because it has a build dependency on octave2.1-headers (>= 2.1.65). Once such a version reaches testing this bug can be closed. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302869: libgts-dev: Missing dependency on glib
Package: libgts-dev Version: 0.7.3-1 Severity: serious Hi, When building the gerris package is sarge I'm getting the following error: checking for gts-config... /usr/bin/gts-config checking for GTS - version >= 0.7.1... no *** Could not run GTS test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means GTS was incorrectly installed *** or that you have moved GTS since it was installed. In the latter case, you *** may want to edit the gts-config script: /usr/bin/gts-config configure: error: *** GTS 0.7.1 or better is required. The latest version of GTS *** is always available from http://gts.sourceforge.net. make: *** [config.status] Error 1 >From config.log: /usr/include/gts.h:24:18: glib.h: No such file or directory You should make libgts-dev depend on libglib2.0-dev. gerris should probably not have a build-dependency on libglib2.0-dev, but it seems to directly include glib.h too, so it might need it. The version in sarge now seems to need both 1.2 and 2.0 and I'm not sure that's working. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302873: r-noncran-lindsey: FTBFS: Can't satisfy build dependencies.
Package: r-noncran-lindsey Version: 1.0.20041008-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is build dependency on both libncurses5-dev and libncurses4-dev. Those conflict with each other so you can only install 1 of them. I suggest you remove the libncurses4-dev build dependency since other things in the build-dependencies also depend on libncurses5-dev. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Adjusting tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 294079 - fixed Bug#294079: python-kde3 is not buildable on kdelibs4 = 3.3.2 Tags were: pending fixed Tags removed: fixed > tags 294076 - fixed Bug#294076: python-kde3 doesn't create python-kde3-dev with the sip files Tags were: pending fixed Tags removed: fixed > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: gerris: FTBFS: implicit declaration of function `_FPU_SETCW'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 265823 serious Bug#265823: FTBFS (alpha): implicit declaration of function `_FPU_SETCW' Severity set to `serious'. > tags 265823 + sid Bug#265823: FTBFS (alpha): implicit declaration of function `_FPU_SETCW' There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302866: qemu: FTBFS in sarge: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lartsc
Package: qemu Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building qemu is sarge I get the following error: gcc -static -Wl,-T,/usr/src/qemu-0.6.1/./i386-vl.ld -o qemu-fast vl.o osdep.o block.o readline.o monitor.o pci.o console.o block-cow.o block-qcow.o aes.o block-vmdk.o block-cloop.o ide.o ne2000.o pckbd.o vga.o sb16.o dma.o audio.o noaudio.o wavaudio.o sdlaudio.o ossaudio.o fdc.o mc146818rtc.o serial.o i8259.o i8254.o pc.o cirrus_vga.o mixeng.o gdbstub.o sdl.o slirp/cksum.o slirp/if.o slirp/ip_icmp.o slirp/ip_input.o slirp/ip_output.o slirp/slirp.o slirp/mbuf.o slirp/misc.o slirp/sbuf.o slirp/socket.o slirp/tcp_input.o slirp/tcp_output.o slirp/tcp_subr.o slirp/tcp_timer.o slirp/udp.o slirp/bootp.o slirp/debug.o slirp/tftp.o libqemu.a -lm -lz -L/usr/lib -lSDL -lpthread -lm -ldl -L/usr/lib -lasound -lm -ldl -lpthread -L/usr/lib -ldl -lartsc -lpthread -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -L/usr/lib -lesd -laudiofile -lm -laudio -lXt -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXext -lvga -laa -lgpm -L/usr/lib -laa -lm -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lslang -lncurses -lutil /usr/lib/libSDL.a(SDL_x11gl.o)(.text+0x917): In function `X11_GL_LoadLibrary': : warning: Using 'dlopen' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lartsc collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [qemu-fast] Error 1 There is no static version of artsc available. This seems to have been fixed in 1.3.2-3. When that version reaches sarge this can be closed. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301994: marked as done (capi4hylafax: latest version looses faxes without warning)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:32:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#301994: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 15:01:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 07:01:01 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cust143-50.dsl.versadsl.be (swoog.lybrafox.be) [62.166.143.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGIDE-0003am-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:01:01 -0800 Received: from localhost (swoog [127.0.0.1]) by swoog.lybrafox.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2ED22CBF0 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:00:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from swoog.lybrafox.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (swoog [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 17242-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:00:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eckmul (unknown [192.168.50.5]) by swoog.lybrafox.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7D922C08D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:00:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from root by eckmul with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DGIDC-0004QN-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:00:58 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Remi Letot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: capi4hylafax: latest version looses faxes without warning X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:00:58 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at lybrafox.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: capi4hylafax Version: 1:01.02.03-9 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Hi, I have been hit by the latest problems with capi4hylafax (blank pages sent except for header line, temporarily solved by use2D: no, and endless resent of a well receptionned fax). To solve the latter, I have upgraded to the unstable version, namely 1:01.02.03-9, but with that one the faxes are not sent (not event the header line), and hylafax behaves like they are sent ok !!! This results in potential loss of information, hence the severity. Thanks for your work, -- Rémi Letot -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages capi4hylafax depends on: ii isdnactivecards 1:3.6.2005-01-03-4 Support utilities for active ISDN ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcapi20-2 1:3.6.2005-01-03-4 libraries for CAPI support ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff4 3.7.1-4Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 301994-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 13:45:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 06:45:41 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI5Q5-0006nh-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:45:41 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI5Q5-00033F-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:45:41 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI5D5-HH-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:32:15 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301994: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-10 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:32:15 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00
Bug#301836: pearpc: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03-04-2005 14:11, Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:41:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > >>Hi Robert, >> >>There are seven new RC bugs in the BTS today about packages in testing that >>have a build-dependency on the newest version of type-handling. That >>version of type-handling is being held out of sarge because of lessdisks, >>which produces a binary package that depends on things like not+alpha and >>not+i386. There doesn't seem to be any equivalent Provides: in the current >>version of type-handling. Can you offer a solution for Jonas so that >>type-handling can be updated in testing without having to drop lessdisks? >> >>Also, there are other packages in testing which have build-dependencies on >>type-handling (>= 0.2.1). Are these build-dependencies really going to be >>satisfied by type-handling 0.2.7, or has the package changed too much? > > > Fixed in 0.2.8, uploading with urgency=high. For your information (and sorry I forgot to mention earlier), lessdisks has worked around this, so currently do not rely on type-handling anymore. If what you "fixed" is actually bringing back the virtual arch-boolean packages then we might consider switching back, though, as lessdisks is a purely scriptiong package so it feels somewhat stupid being forced to make it arch: any. On the other hand, I've been on my way filing a wishlist bugreport on somehow avoiding the dependency on developer tools for type-handling: When used to fulfill binary dependencies those dependencies bloats the installation. But, in short: lessdisks should no longer be of (major) concern with regards to this bugreport. Greetings! - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nÃr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCT+54n7DbMsAkQLgRAos0AJ4nBUCgxG2EArF5fMR8uldamLwd3ACdGKEl 9h0oYF9Zkem+Vd+8LpGfOTs= =o2GD -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#300460: patches for this bug
Attached are two patches to fix this bug backported from 1.8.24.
The first one is a minimal patch which just corrects the segfault but
doesn't get the images to display properly in the PDF. The second is
more comprehensive (and includes the first) and makes PNGs appear
properly in the output.
Mark
--
Mark Hymers, University of Newcastle Medical School
Intercalating Medical Student (MBBS / PhD)
--- htmldoc/image.cxx 2005-04-03 13:43:51.0 +0100
+++ ../htmldoc-1.8.24/htmldoc/image.cxx 2004-05-09 16:04:38.0 +0100
@@ -1539,15 +1568,7 @@
return (0);
}
- img->pixels = (uchar *)malloc(img->width * img->height * info->bit_depth);
-
- if ((info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_PALETTE) || info->bit_depth < 8)
- {
-png_set_packing(pp);
-png_set_expand(pp);
- }
- else if (info->bit_depth == 16)
-png_set_strip_16(pp);
+ img->pixels = (uchar *)malloc(img->width * img->height * depth);
/*
* Allocate pointers...
--- htmldoc/image.cxx 2005-04-03 13:43:51.0 +0100
+++ ../htmldoc-1.8.24/htmldoc/image.cxx 2004-05-09 16:04:38.0 +0100
@@ -1499,6 +1506,23 @@
png_read_info(pp, info);
+ if (info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_PALETTE)
+ {
+png_set_expand(pp);
+
+// If we are writing an encrypted PDF file, bump the use count so we create
+// an image object (Acrobat 6 bug workaround)
+if (Encryption)
+ img->use ++;
+ }
+ else if (info->bit_depth < 8)
+ {
+png_set_packing(pp);
+png_set_expand(pp);
+ }
+ else if (info->bit_depth == 16)
+png_set_strip_16(pp);
+
if (info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_COLOR)
{
depth = 3;
@@ -1513,9 +1537,14 @@
img->width = info->width;
img->height = info->height;
- if (info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_ALPHA)
+ if ((info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_ALPHA) || info->num_trans)
{
-image_need_mask(img, PSLevel == 0 && PDFVersion >= 13 ? 4 : 2);
+if ((PSLevel == 0 && PDFVersion >= 14) || PSLevel == 3)
+ image_need_mask(img, 8);
+else if (PSLevel == 0 && PDFVersion == 13)
+ image_need_mask(img, 2);
+else
+ image_need_mask(img);
depth ++;
}
@@ -1527,7 +1556,7 @@
puts("COLOR");
else
puts("GRAYSCALE");
- if (info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_ALPHA)
+ if ((info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_ALPHA) || info->num_trans)
puts("ALPHA");
if (info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_PALETTE)
puts("PALETTE");
@@ -1539,15 +1568,7 @@
return (0);
}
- img->pixels = (uchar *)malloc(img->width * img->height * info->bit_depth);
-
- if ((info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_PALETTE) || info->bit_depth < 8)
- {
-png_set_packing(pp);
-png_set_expand(pp);
- }
- else if (info->bit_depth == 16)
-png_set_strip_16(pp);
+ img->pixels = (uchar *)malloc(img->width * img->height * depth);
/*
* Allocate pointers...
@@ -1569,7 +1590,7 @@
* Generate the alpha mask as necessary...
*/
- if (info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_ALPHA)
+ if ((info->color_type & PNG_COLOR_MASK_ALPHA) || info->num_trans)
{
#ifdef DEBUG
for (inptr = img->pixels, i = 0; i < img->height; i ++)
@@ -1668,9 +1689,20 @@
*/
img->maskscale = scaling;
- img->maskwidth = (img->width * scaling + 7) / 8;
- size = img->maskwidth * img->height * scaling;
-
+
+ if (scaling == 8)
+ {
+// Alpha image
+img->maskwidth = img->width;
+size = img->width * img->height;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+// Alpha mask
+img->maskwidth = (img->width * scaling + 7) / 8;
+size = img->maskwidth * img->height * scaling;
+ }
+
img->mask = (uchar *)calloc(size, 1);
}
@@ -1692,57 +1724,42 @@
0x80, 0x40, 0x20, 0x10,
0x08, 0x04, 0x02, 0x01
};
- static uchar dither[16][16] = // Simple 16x16 Floyd dither
+ static uchar dither[4][4] = // Simple 4x4 clustered-dot dither
{
-{ 0, 128, 32, 160, 8, 136, 40, 168,
- 2, 130, 34, 162, 10, 138, 42, 170 },
-{ 192, 64, 224, 96, 200, 72, 232, 104,
- 194, 66, 226, 98, 202, 74, 234, 106 },
-{ 48, 176, 16, 144, 56, 184, 24, 152,
- 50, 178, 18, 146, 58, 186, 26, 154 },
-{ 240, 112, 208, 80, 248, 120, 216, 88,
- 242, 114, 210, 82, 250, 122, 218, 90 },
-{ 12, 140, 44, 172, 4, 132, 36, 164,
- 14, 142, 46, 174, 6, 134, 38, 166 },
-{ 204, 76, 236, 108, 196, 68, 228, 100,
- 206, 78, 238, 110, 198, 70, 230, 102 },
-{ 60, 188, 28, 156, 52, 180, 20, 148,
- 62, 190, 30, 158, 54, 182, 22, 150 },
-{ 252, 124, 220, 92, 244, 116, 212, 84,
- 254, 126, 222, 94, 246, 118, 214, 86 },
-{ 3, 131, 35, 163, 11, 139, 43, 171,
- 1, 129, 33, 161, 9, 137
Processed: 300460
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 300460 +patch Bug#300460: htmldoc: segfault when generating ps or pdf Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302517: marked as done (dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302517: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2005 07:47:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 23:47:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHGso-0006ix-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:47:58 -0800
Received: from mnisek.casablanca.cz (orion.lan) [217.11.255.138]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHGsn-0008Ut-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 01:47:57 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:47:50 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,
RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: dosfstools
Version: 2.10-1
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge patch
Justification: causes serious data loss
cause: dosfsck does not recognize deleted files as deleted.
this can occur on filesystems that are NOT corrupt
if allowed to fix the filesystem (such as from the boot script)
causes DATA LOSS
Probably the same as closed #294177.
But the problem is not amd64 specific, it is triggered by current toolchain.
i386 binary package from Sep 2003 is not affected,
but after rebuild (i.e. by security team, by end user) will be.
Patch (already included in 2.11-1):
--- dosfsck.h~ 2005-04-01 09:33:50.0 +0200
+++ dosfsck.h 2005-04-01 09:33:50.0 +0200
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
};
typedef struct {
-__s8 name[8],ext[3]; /* name and extension */
+__u8 name[8],ext[3]; /* name and extension */
__u8 attr; /* attribute bits */
__u8 lcase; /* Case for base and extension */
__u8 ctime_ms; /* Creation time, milliseconds */
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-orion
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ (charmap=ISO-8859-2)
Versions of packages dosfstools depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 302517-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 12:24:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 05:24:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI49Z-0005fo-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:24:33 -0700
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI49Y-0003L7-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:24:32 -0600
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI42J-0004lX-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
From: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#302517: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/d
Bug#301254: marked as done (dosfsck: new version shows lots of errors)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 18:21:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 10:21:25 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.4.8] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEWxR-0007dP-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:21:25 -0800 Received: from gate.22.kls.lan (vpn4.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.172.4]) by piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2OILMQX028656 for finalrecipients; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from darkside.22.kls.lan ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.22.1]) by gate.22.kls.lan (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2OILM0q015193 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100 Received: from darkside.22.kls.lan ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by darkside.22.kls.lan (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2OILMoM004111 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by darkside.22.kls.lan (8.13.3/8.13.3) id j2OILMdk004109 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100 From: Mario Holbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dosfsck: new version shows lots of errors Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: dosfstools Version: 2.11-1 Severity: grave Hello, the new 2.11-1 dosfsck shows lots of errors on my filesystems (FAT32, LFN / VFAT), while the filesystem looks quite okay and neither Windows scandisk nor 2.10-1 dosfsck show any errors. The errors reported are (perhaps among others): * Start cluster beyond limit (...). Truncating file. * File size is ... bytes, cluster chain length is 0 bytes. Truncating file to 0 bytes. * Free cluster summary wrong (... vs. really ...) * Start does point to root directory. Deleting dir. As you can see in other bug reports, users seem to stumble over it already. Therefore, I consider this bug grave enough to prevent 2.11-1 from migration into testing, thus I raised the serverity appropriately. Thanks for your work & regards Mario -- There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't... --- Received: (at 300126-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 12:24:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 05:24:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI49Y-0005fc-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:24:32 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI49Y-0003Kv-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:24:32 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI42J-0004lT-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400 From: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: dosfstools Source-Version: 2.11-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb A summary of
Bug#300126: marked as done (dosfstools: mkfs.vfat is not able to create partitions > 1GB)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 20:26:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 12:26:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lindsey.linux-systeme.com (mx00.linux-systeme.com) [62.241.33.80] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DC1ZS-0002Pi-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:26:18 -0800 Received: from extern.linux-systeme.org (dsl-082-083-059-075.arcor-ip.net [82.83.59.75]) by mx00.linux-systeme.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-9) with ESMTP id j2HKQDTN008717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:26:15 +0100 Received: from intern.linux-systeme.org (intern.linux-systeme.org [10.0.90.2]) by extern.linux-systeme.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-9) with ESMTP id j2HKQ87n031762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:26:08 +0100 Posted-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:26:06 +0100 Received: from codeman.linux-systeme.org (codeman.linux-systeme.org [10.0.0.10]) by intern.linux-systeme.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-9) with ESMTP id j2HKQ624031977; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:26:07 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marc-Christian Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: dosfstools: mkfs.vfat is not able to create partitions > 1GB X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:26:12 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: dosfstools Version: 2.11-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[/] # fdisk -l /dev/sdc Disk /dev/sdc: 41.1 GB, 41174138880 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 5005 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdc1 1500540202631c W95 FAT32 (LBA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[/] # mkfs.vfat -v -F 32 /dev/sdc1 mkfs.vfat 2.11 (12 Mar 2005) /dev/sdc1 has 255 heads and 63 sectors per track, logical sector size is 512, using 0xf8 media descriptor, with 2097152 sectors; file system has 2 32-bit FATs and 8 sectors per cluster. FAT size is 2044 sectors, and provides 261629 clusters. Volume ID is 4239e1d5, no volume label. which is just plain wrong. Using mkfs.vfat from RHEL3 u4 (v2.8) gives: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[/dev/shm] # ./mkfs.vfat -v -F 32 /dev/sdc1 mkfs.vfat 2.8 (28 Feb 2001) Selecting 64 sectors per cluster /dev/sdc1 has 255 heads and 63 sectors per track, logical sector size is 512, using 0xf8 media descriptor, with 80405262 sectors; file system has 2 32-bit FATs and 64 sectors per cluster. FAT size is 9813 sectors, and provides 1256025 clusters. Volume ID is 4239e53b, no volume label. which is correct. ciao, Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.20-wolk4.18s Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages dosfstools depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 300126-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 12:24:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 05:24:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI49Y-0005fc-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:24:32 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI49Y-0003Kv-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:24:32 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI42J-0004lT-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400 From: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#301836: pearpc: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:41:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Robert, > > There are seven new RC bugs in the BTS today about packages in testing that > have a build-dependency on the newest version of type-handling. That > version of type-handling is being held out of sarge because of lessdisks, > which produces a binary package that depends on things like not+alpha and > not+i386. There doesn't seem to be any equivalent Provides: in the current > version of type-handling. Can you offer a solution for Jonas so that > type-handling can be updated in testing without having to drop lessdisks? > > Also, there are other packages in testing which have build-dependencies on > type-handling (>= 0.2.1). Are these build-dependencies really going to be > satisfied by type-handling 0.2.7, or has the package changed too much? Fixed in 0.2.8, uploading with urgency=high. Sorry for the hassle. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301333: php4-rrdtool: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Hi Artur, I'm happy to sponsor this upload for you, but I'm puzzled why you numbered this upload -10a instead of -11. Can I change that in the changelog and upload? Note that -10a is also a lower version than -10.1, which is the version number that would be used by someone NMUing based on -10 -- so their NMU would take precedence over -10a if both were uploaded to the archive. One way or another, this package needs to be uploaded soon, as it's the last one needed for the PHP ABI transition. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301566: python-4suite-doc: Actually, the html docs are missing altogether!
Package: python-4suite-doc Version: 0.99cvs20041008-5 Followup-For: Bug #301566 A second look at the package reveals that there is no html documentation in the package at all, only a few text files and a lot of regression tests. I respectfully suggest adding the docs or simply removing the package... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10jbj3.2.8 Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301841: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 16:35]: > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Package: freebsd5-buildutils > > > Version: 5.3+2-2 > > > Severity: serious > > > Tags: sarge > > > > > > > > > The build dependency on type-handling (>= 0.2.5) can't > > > be fulfilled in sarge. > > > So why did it migrate to sarge in first place? > > Because for sanity reasons, build-dependencies are not automatically > checked. If you want to keep your package out of testing, you need to > create an RC-bug for it. I don't want to keep this package out of testing, but since it currently *has* a real RC bug chances are it will be. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302573: marked as done (cnews: newsrun can overwrite already decompressed batches while using mutliple UUCP feeds)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:47:32 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302573: fixed in cnews cr.g7-38 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2005 14:25:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 01 06:25:53 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sparrow.datentrampelpfad.de [195.60.125.185] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHN5s-00049a-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:25:53 -0800 Received: from toje by sparrow.datentrampelpfad.de with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DHN5V-0005ZH-Rl; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:25:29 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Torsten Jerzembeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cnews: newsrun can overwrite already decompressed batches while using mutliple UUCP feeds X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:25:29 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cnews Version: cr.g7-37 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss I just stumbled upon this bug in newsrun, which has caused some lost newsbatches for me. Lets say you have multiple newsfeeds via UUCP, using different compression methods (e.g. compress and gzip). As incoming newsbatches are processed by rnews, they are given temporary filenames in /var/spool/news/in.coming, consisting of an timestamp and an suffix denoting the compression method. These suffixes are ".t" for "uncompressed", ".z" for "compressed using gzip", ".Z" for "compressed using compress" and so on. Two batches coming in at the same time (such as when polling multiple systems in parallel) and differing only in the compression method will thus get an filename differing only in the suffix, e.g. "12345678.z" and "12345678.Z" (note the case of the suffix). /usr/lib/news/input/newsrun is then run by cron and in a first stage decompresses all compressed newsbatches. This is done by the following lines of code (line 124 ff.): - by cutting here you might damage your screen surface - [...] # Decompress if necessary. case $f in *.Z)text=`echo $f | sed 's/Z\$/t/'` uncompress <$f >$text ;; *.z)text=`echo $f | sed 's/z\$/t/'` gzip -dc <$f >$text ;; [and so on] - by cutting here you might damage your screen surface - As one can see, an batch named "12345678.Z" is decompressed into "12345678.t". An batch named "12345678.z" is _also_ decompressed into "12345678.t". Depending on which one is picked up first, one of the two batches _will_ be lost irrevocabily. A possible solution would be to change the sed command to alter the timestamp also, amending a letter just before the suffix ".t". As no two compressed batches with the same timestamp and suffix will be created by rnews, this should be a reasonable safeguard. (This bug must have lingered in CNews for about a decade now. Is it really possible that I am the first person to stumble upon it?) Greetings from Telgte, =ToJe= -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages cnews depends on: ii cron3.0pl1-87management of regular background p ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.47 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii perl5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- debconf information: cnews/mailname: --- Received: (at 302573-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 11:53:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 04:53:11 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id
Bug#302251: marked as done (bookmarkbridge: segfaults on 'View')
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:47:16 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302251: fixed in bookmarkbridge 0.72-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 21:54:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 30 13:54:49 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail07.powweb.com [66.152.97.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGl9F-0007xI-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:54:49 -0800 Received: from localhost (mrb319.cvmbs.colostate.edu [129.82.32.97]) by mail07.powweb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7567314DA30; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:54:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:54:46 -0700 From: Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: bookmarkbridge: segfaults on 'View' Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "O. Moskalenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Followup-To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: bookmarkbridge Version: 0.72-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Clicking on the "View" button produces an immediate segfault after a fresh package installation and program startup. The only message printed to standard output is htmlParseEntityRef: expecting ';' -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-20050303-mrb319 Locale: LANG=uk_UA.KOI8-U, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages bookmarkbridge depends on: ii libaudio21.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxml2 2.6.16-6GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 302251-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 11:55:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 04:55:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI3hQ-0002sn-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 04:55:28 -0700 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI3hQ-0001PN-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:55:28 -0600 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DI3ZU-0001as-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:47:16 -0400 From: Masami Ichikawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302251: fixed in bookmarkbridge 0.72-4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administ
