Bug#304975: marked as done (opensc build-depends on libsasl-dev, without a runtime dependency)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 17 Apr 2005 01:17:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304975: fixed in opensc 0.9.4-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 21:51:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 14:51:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.38] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMvC0-0005TA-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:51:08 -0700
Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7131A3AE0; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: opensc build-depends on libsasl-dev, without a runtime dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:51:08 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: opensc
Version: 0.9.4-8
Severity: grave

Hi Eric,

The opensc package has a build-dependency on libsasl-dev, but none of
the resulting binaries have a dependency on libsasl7.  Either the
package builds against libsasl-dev but the binary dependency is missing,
or the build dependency should be dropped because it's unused; in either
case, I'm filing this bug as "grave" because cyrus-sasl is RC-buggy and
should most likely be dropped for sarge.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-generic
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages opensc depends on:
ii  libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pn  libopenct0   Not found.
pn  libopensc0   Not found.
pn  libpcsclite1 Not found.
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries

---
Received: (at 304975-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 05:30:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 22:30:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DN2Mf-0006CC-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 22:30:37 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DN29e-000891-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 01:17:10 -0400
From: Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#304975: fixed in opensc 0.9.4-9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 01:17:10 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: opensc
Source-Version: 0.9.4-9

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
opensc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libopensc-openssl_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/opensc/libopensc-openssl_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
libopensc1-dev_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/opensc/libopensc1-dev_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
libopensc1_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/opensc/libopensc1_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
libpam-opensc_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/opensc/libpam-opensc_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
libscam1_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/opensc/libscam1_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
mozilla-opensc_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/opensc/mozilla-opensc_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
opensc_0.9.4-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/opensc/opensc_0.9.4-9.diff.gz
opensc_0.9.4-9.dsc
  to pool/main/o/opensc/opensc_0.9.4-9.dsc
opensc_0.9.4-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/opensc/opensc_0.9.4-9_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have furt

Bug#301751: marked as done (libxml-atom-perl: unsatisfiable dependency on liblwp-authen-wsse-perl)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line liblwp-authen-wsse-perl is out of NEW
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2005 03:46:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 19:46:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (minbar.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFlCT-0006Z9-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:46:01 -0800
Received: by minbar.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0840F1A103; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libxml-atom-perl: unsatisfiable dependency on liblwp-authen-wsse-perl
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:45:59 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libxml-atom-perl
Version: 0.09-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

The version of libxml-atom-perl in unstable has a dependency on
liblwp-authen-wsse-perl, which is nowhere to be found.  This makes the
package unusable and is a grave bug.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 301751-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 03:20:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 20:20:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lobefin.net [216.158.52.98] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DN0Kr-00084l-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:20:37 -0700
Received: from lobefin.net
([216.158.52.108] helo=www.lobefin.net ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lobefin.net with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1DN0Kq-0006Lw-CT
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:20:36 -0400
Received: from steve by www.lobefin.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1DN0Kp-0006cd-Tu
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400
From: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: liblwp-authen-wsse-perl is out of NEW
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.1 
X-OS: Linux hadrian 2.4.26-2-686-smp i686
X-Uptime: 185 days
X-Latin: Hodie decimo sexto Kalendas Maias MMDCCLVIII ab urbe condita est
X-Date: Today is Sweetmorn, the 33rd day of Discord in the YOLD 3171
X-DDate: Only 2431135 Shopping =?iso-8859-1?Q?Days_?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Left_Before_X-Day=2E_Umlaut_Zebra_=FCber?= alles! 
X-Motto: debian/rules
X-Authenticated-Sender: steve
X-Scanned-By: ClamAV at mail.lobefin.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The dependant library is finaly out of new, so this bug is closed.
--=20
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -

--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (G

Processed: tagging 304549

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 304549 pending
Bug#304549: libldap-2.2-7: libldap_r is not correctly linked against libpthread
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: changed my e-mail address from miernik@ctnet.pl to miernik@ffii.org

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> submitter #229509 !
Bug#229509: mergeant: crashed when trying to exit & save
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #176834 !
Bug#176834: xserver-xfree86: [s3virge] system locks when rapidly switching 
between X and text VCs on ViRGE/DX or /GX rev 1
Changed Bug submitter from Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #202816 !
Bug#202816: mozilla-firebird: sometimes starting will not show any window, only 
create a mozilla process with 99% CPU usage
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #203844 !
Bug#203844: gasql: Database Manager freezes, trying to connect - segfaults
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #224983 !
Bug#224983: xbase-clients: [xvidtune] crashes with SIGFPE
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #261992 !
Bug#261992: imcom: crashes very often randomly on sending messages
Changed Bug submitter from Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #275991 !
Bug#275991: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386: upgrade 2.6.8-3 -> 2.6.8-4 broke 800x600 
vesa mode on neofb
Changed Bug submitter from Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #176202 !
Bug#176202: ickle: hangs if internet connection down for a long time (eg. 30 
min)
Changed Bug submitter from Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #186844 !
Bug#186844: gabber: segfault while selecting which group should be a contact in 
while adding new contact
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #193694 !
Bug#193694: stdin not released after debconf db_stop
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #193893 !
Bug#193893: sweep: Segmentation fault when "short fwrite in 
sweep_large_alloc_data: No space left on device"
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #194254 !
Bug#194254: ../../gdb/lin-lwp.c:489: gdb-internal-error: lin_lwp_detach: 
Assertion `num_lwps == 1' failed.
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #196545 !
Bug#196545: mutt: sorting methods broken
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #196729 !
Bug#196729: gaim: segfaults randomly in GG transport -- gg_recv_packet failed. 
errno = 0 (1080851092)
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #199032 !
Bug#199032: xterm: sometimes stops accepting keyboard input when tethereal is 
running for a long time over ssh
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #204708 !
Bug#204708: aptitude: an installed package (but pinned to stable in an unstable 
system) appears in Not Installed group
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #229514 !
Bug#229514: ./Configure: line 935: [: 131413: unary operator expected
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #250426 !
Bug#250426: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-k7: caused several files corrupted, probably 
bug in ext3 code
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #252142 !
Bug#252142: screen: random lockups every hour or two, fixes itself after 
several minutes, hex 0x92 character inserted
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #254045 !
Bug#254045: date expressions does not work at all, grepmail confused
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #269886 !
Bug#269886: gcjwebplugin: train route applet on http://reiseauskunft.bahn.de/ 
doesn't work
Changed Bug submitter from Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #273897 !
Bug#273897: tethereal: Segmentation fault (core dumped) in mallopt () from 
/lib/tls/libc.so.6
Changed Bug submitter from Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #283081 !
Bug#283081: libswfdec0.3: doesn't work on 
http://www.skyscanner.net/includes/dynamic_map.swf
Changed Bug submitter from Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter #283082 !
Bug#283082: libflash0: new version 0.4.12 available
Changed Bug submitter from Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Mi

Bug#304991: mozilla-thunderbird systematic segfault

[Mathieu Perona]

Package: mozilla-thunderbird
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


mozilla-thunderbird always segfaults when launched. Removing it, removing
the .mozilla-thunderbird and starting the installation form scratch doen't
help. 

The error log :
asuka ~ $ mozilla-thunderbird 
selected locale: fr-FR
observe: 
nothing here: null
observe called
FILE: [xpconnect wrapped nsIFile]DOUBLE-CLICK: 300 --> -1 THRESHOLD: 8 -->
-1 /usr/lib/mozilla-thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh: line 451: 3592 Erreur de
segmentation "$prog" ${1+"$@"}

strace -f shows : 
5850  tgkill(5850, 5850, SIGSEGV 

Complete strace available upon request.

Worse, if launched with strace, thunderbird gets hanged in D state :
mathieu   5850  0.7  5.6 108004 27188 pts/3  D+   18:38   0:02
/usr/lib/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-bin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages mozilla-thunderbird depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-12  GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-8   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxp6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxrender1  0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-3   compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
* mozilla-thunderbird/browser: Debian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#240941: Alternatives for xzx

[Philip Kendall]

[ Apologies if this is now the wrong place to be adding this comment;
  Fuse people see http://bugs.debian.org/240941 for context ]

Disclaimer: I'm the primary author of Fuse.

As previously noted in this bug report, the only other currently
available ZX Spectrum emulator in Debian is spectemu, which is not as
feature-rich as xzx. If there is a desire to have an emulator which
has vaguely equivalent features in Debian, one could consider Fuse:

http://fuse-emulator.sourceforge.net/

which emulates all the "normal" Spectrum models as well as some other
clones. There are already unofficial Debian packages available from

http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/progs.linux.html#debian

I believe it would be possible to persuade Darren Salt (who produces the
above packages) to become a Debian maintainer for these packages.

Cheers,

Phil

-- 
DK: "Launch conditions are optimal as of oh five thirty."
 [ ... ]
Crichton: "This is your playground."
Farscape: 1999 - 2005


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 303337

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 303337 sid
Bug#303337: xball_3.0-15(mipsel/unstable): fails to build when using sudo
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] Bug#304968: gnustep-base should not enter in sarge now

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 304968 serious
Bug#304968: gnustep-base should not enter in sarge now
Severity set to `serious'.

> thank
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 303929 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 303929 important
Bug#303929: mailscanner should support queues on different file systems
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304524: libxerces2-java: FTBFS: Semantic Errors

[Michael Koch]

On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 07:40:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Roland Stigge wrote:
> >Package: libxerces2-java
> >Version: 2.6.2-1
> >Severity: serious
> >Hi,
> >building the package libxerces2-java in a clean sid build environment
> >(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >   [xjavac] Found 13 semantic errors and issued 5 warnings compiling 
> >"/tmp/buildd/libxerces2-java-2.6.2/build/src/org/apache/xerces/dom/NodeImpl.java":
> >   [xjavac]   <---
> >   [xjavac]118. public abstract class NodeImpl
> >   [xjavac]119. implements Node, NodeList, EventTarget, Cloneable, 
> > Serializable{
> >   [xjavac] 
> > -->
> >   [xjavac] *** Semantic Error: The return type of method 
> > "org.apache.xerces.dom3.TypeInfo 
> >getSchemaTypeInfo();" does not match the return type of the accessible 
> >method "org.w3c.dom.TypeInfo 
> >getSchemaTypeInfo();" declared in type "org.w3c.dom.Element".
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> after some investigation this error is caused by the update of the
> org.w3c.* classes in the free runtimes to DOM Level 3.
> 
> Its basically the same problem I struggled with during the process
> of moving libxalan2-java and libpgjava to main.
> 
> There are two possiblities:
> 
> (1) Use JDK 1.4 to build as it has DOM Level 2
> 
> I think we all agree that this is NO option !
> 
> (2) Include DOM Level 2 source classes in the debian directory
> and use the trick that source takes precedence over binary classes
> from the runtime during compilation.
>
> If no one has objections or another working approach I will prepare
> a new upload for possibility 2. 

In order not to incluce DOM Level 2 compatible classes in several
packages we should either create a package for them and make packages
depend on it or use patches (writing them if needed) to make the
software build with DOM level 3. That isnt too hard either.


Michael
-- 
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304976: xfmail: spurious build-dependency on libsasl-dev

[Steve Langasek]

Package: xfmail
Version: 1.5.5-2
Severity: grave

Hi Florian,

The xfmail package has a build-dependency on libsasl-dev, but none of
the resulting binaries have a dependency on libsasl7.  Either the
package builds against libsasl-dev but the binary dependency is missing,
or the build dependency should be dropped because it's unused; in either
case, I'm filing this bug as "grave" because cyrus-sasl is RC-buggy and
should most likely be dropped for sarge.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-generic
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xfmail depends on:
ii  libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libc6.1  2.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libesd0  0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
pn  libforms1Not found.
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-12  GCC support library
ii  libgdbm3 1.8.3-2 GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii  libglib1.2   1.2.10-9The GLib library of C routines
ii  libldap2 2.1.30-3OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libltdl3 1.5.6-6 A system independent dlopen wrappe
pn  libmcrypt4   Not found.
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304975: opensc build-depends on libsasl-dev, without a runtime dependency

[Steve Langasek]

Package: opensc
Version: 0.9.4-8
Severity: grave

Hi Eric,

The opensc package has a build-dependency on libsasl-dev, but none of
the resulting binaries have a dependency on libsasl7.  Either the
package builds against libsasl-dev but the binary dependency is missing,
or the build dependency should be dropped because it's unused; in either
case, I'm filing this bug as "grave" because cyrus-sasl is RC-buggy and
should most likely be dropped for sarge.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-generic
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages opensc depends on:
ii  libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pn  libopenct0   Not found.
pn  libopensc0   Not found.
pn  libpcsclite1 Not found.
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304952: marked as done (evolution dies with a floating point exception after update to version 2.2.2-2 coming from 2.0.4-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:27:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304952: ***SOLVED*** evolution dies with a floating point 
exception after update to version 2.2.2-2 coming from 2.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 18:34:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 11:34:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMs6j-0001hO-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:33:29 -0700
Received: from p5495f7aa.dip.t-dialin.net (athlon64.bh.local) [84.149.247.170] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMs6a-0007Gf-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:33:20 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bernd Hanisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: evolution dies with a floating point exception after update to version
 2.2.2-2 coming from 2.0.4-1
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:33:19 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: evolution
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

after update evolution search for the lib "libgtkhtml-3.6.so.18" who only exist 
under the name "libgtkhtml-3.6.so.18.0.2". 
After fixing this by creating a symlink evolution crash with a floating point 
exception.

Thx for checking.

Greetings Bernd

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages evolution depends on:
ii  evolution-data-server1.2 1.2.2-1 evolution database backend server
ii  gconf2   2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  gnome-icon-theme 2.8.0-4 GNOME Desktop icon theme
ii  gtkhtml3.6   3.6.2-1 HTML rendering/editing library - b
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcamel1.2-01.2.2-1 The Evolution MIME message handlin
ii  libcompfaceg11989.11.11-24   Compress/decompress images for mai
ii  libebook1.2-31.2.2-1 Client library for evolution addre
ii  libecal1.2-2 1.2.2-1 Client library for evolution calen
ii  libedataserver1.2-4  1.2.2-1 Utily library for evolution data s
ii  libedataserverui1.2-41.2.2-1 GUI utily library for evolution da
ii  libesd0  0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgail-common   1.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation
ii  libgail171.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation
ii  libgal2.4-0  2.4.2-1 G App Libs (run time library)
ii  libgal2.4-common 2.4.2-1 G App Libs (common files)
ii  libgconf2-4  2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libgcrypt11  1.2.0-11LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.4.2-2   library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-keyring00.4.2-1 GNOME keyring services library
ii  libgnome-pilot2  2.0.12-1.2  Support libraries for gnome-pilot
ii  libgnome2-0  2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.8

Processed: tagging 304933

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 304933 sid
Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to 
function `afsconf_AddKey'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304952: ***SOLVED*** evolution dies with a floating point exception after update to version 2.2.2-2 coming from 2.0.4-1

[Bernd Hanisch]

hi,

i worked down the problem. The problem was the broken package
libgtkhtml3.6-18_3.6.2-1_amd64.deb on my computer. After downloading
this package again the problem is fixed.

Sorry for spaming your mailbox and thx for u great work.

Greetings Bernd




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304955: avr-libc: FTBFS on sarge: Can't satisfy build dependency.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.2.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge

Hi,

Your package is failing to build in sarge because it build
dependes on gcc-avr (>=1:3.4.3-2) which didn't make it to sarge
yet because it's missing a build on arm.

This bug can be closed when the version of gcc-avr reaches
testing.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304953: blitz++: FTBFS on sarge: Missing build dependency.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: blitz++
Version: 1:0.8-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge

Hi,

Your package is failing to build in sarge.  This seems to be
caused by a missing build dependency on g77.  This seems to be
added in a later version but that version didn't make it in sarge
yet.

This is the error I get:
checking for g77... no
checking for pgf77... no
checking for fort77... no
checking for Fortran 77 compiler default output file name...  configure: error: 
Fortran 77 compiler cannot create executables


This bug can be closed when the new version reaches sarge.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304952: evolution dies with a floating point exception after update to version 2.2.2-2 coming from 2.0.4-1

[Bernd Hanisch]

Package: evolution
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

after update evolution search for the lib "libgtkhtml-3.6.so.18" who only exist 
under the name "libgtkhtml-3.6.so.18.0.2". 
After fixing this by creating a symlink evolution crash with a floating point 
exception.

Thx for checking.

Greetings Bernd

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages evolution depends on:
ii  evolution-data-server1.2 1.2.2-1 evolution database backend server
ii  gconf2   2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  gnome-icon-theme 2.8.0-4 GNOME Desktop icon theme
ii  gtkhtml3.6   3.6.2-1 HTML rendering/editing library - b
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcamel1.2-01.2.2-1 The Evolution MIME message handlin
ii  libcompfaceg11989.11.11-24   Compress/decompress images for mai
ii  libebook1.2-31.2.2-1 Client library for evolution addre
ii  libecal1.2-2 1.2.2-1 Client library for evolution calen
ii  libedataserver1.2-4  1.2.2-1 Utily library for evolution data s
ii  libedataserverui1.2-41.2.2-1 GUI utily library for evolution da
ii  libesd0  0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgail-common   1.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation
ii  libgail171.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation
ii  libgal2.4-0  2.4.2-1 G App Libs (run time library)
ii  libgal2.4-common 2.4.2-1 G App Libs (common files)
ii  libgconf2-4  2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libgcrypt11  1.2.0-11LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.4.2-2   library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-keyring00.4.2-1 GNOME keyring services library
ii  libgnome-pilot2  2.0.12-1.2  Support libraries for gnome-pilot
ii  libgnome2-0  2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-0   2.8.2-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii  libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.8.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User 
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.8.4-2 The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgnutls11  1.0.16-13   GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libgpg-error01.0-1   library for common error values an
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libgtkhtml3.6-18 3.6.2-1 HTML rendering/editing library - r
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libldap2 2.1.30-6OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libnspr4 2:1.7.6-1   Netscape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libnss3  2:1.7.6-1   Network Security Service Libraries
ii  liborbit21:2.12.1-1  libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpisock8   0.11.8-10   Library for communicating with a P
ii  libpisync0   0.11.8-10   Synchronization library for PalmOS
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System Session Management
ii  libsoup2.2-7 2.2.3-2 an HTTP library implementation in 
ii  libtasn1-2   0.2.10-4Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxml2  2.6.16-7GNOME XML library
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Bug#304951: ruby-gnome2: FTBFS on sarge: configure error.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: ruby-gnome2
Version: 0.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge

Hi,

The version in sarge is failing to build with the following
error:
checking for gtkglext-1.0... yes
checking for G_PLATFORM_WIN32... no
creating Makefile
extconf.rb: Leaving directory 'gtkglext'

-
Target libraries: glib, gdkpixbuf, pango, atk, gtk, gnomeprintui, gconf, 
gnomevfs, libgda, gstreamer, gtkhtml2, gtksourceview, gnomeprint, panel-applet, 
gnome, libglade, rsvg, gnomecanvas, libart, gtkglext
-
Done.
*** extconf.rb failed ***
Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of
necessary libraries and/or headers.  Check the mkmf.log file for more
details.  You may need configuration options.

Provided configuration options:
--with-opt-dir
--with-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include
--with-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib
--with-make-prog=make
--srcdir=.
--curdir=/usr/src/ruby-gnome2-0.11.0
--ruby=/usr/bin/ruby1.8
--ruby=/usr/bin/ruby1.8
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1



Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304524: libxerces2-java: FTBFS: Semantic Errors

[Wolfgang Baer]

Roland Stigge wrote:
Package: libxerces2-java
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libxerces2-java in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
[...]
   [xjavac] Found 13 semantic errors and issued 5 warnings compiling 
"/tmp/buildd/libxerces2-java-2.6.2/build/src/org/apache/xerces/dom/NodeImpl.java":
   [xjavac]   <---
   [xjavac]118. public abstract class NodeImpl
   [xjavac]119. implements Node, NodeList, EventTarget, Cloneable, 
Serializable{
   [xjavac] 
-->
   [xjavac] *** Semantic Error: The return type of method "org.apache.xerces.dom3.TypeInfo 
getSchemaTypeInfo();" does not match the return type of the accessible method "org.w3c.dom.TypeInfo 
getSchemaTypeInfo();" declared in type "org.w3c.dom.Element".
Hi all,
after some investigation this error is caused by the update of the
org.w3c.* classes in the free runtimes to DOM Level 3.
Its basically the same problem I struggled with during the process
of moving libxalan2-java and libpgjava to main.
There are two possiblities:
(1) Use JDK 1.4 to build as it has DOM Level 2
I think we all agree that this is NO option !
(2) Include DOM Level 2 source classes in the debian directory
and use the trick that source takes precedence over binary classes
from the runtime during compilation.
If no one has objections or another working approach I will prepare
a new upload for possibility 2.
Wolfgang

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to function `afsconf_AddKey'

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: openafs-krb5
Version: 1.3-10
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/openafs-krb5-1.3/src'
gcc -g -O2 -I/usr/include -DAFS=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H=1 -DHAVE_MALLOC_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DRETSIGTYPE=void  -DALLOW_REGISTER   -c -o asetkey.o 
asetkey.c
asetkey.c: In function `main':
asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to function `afsconf_AddKey'
make[1]: *** [asetkey.o] Error 1

The same version builds in sarge.  Note that in sarge
openafs is still version 1.2.13-1 while in sid it's
1.3.81-3.  I suspect this is an API change.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304931: polyxmass-doc: Fails to install

[Lionel Elie Mamane]

Package: polyxmass-doc
Version: 0.8.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Setting up polyxmass-doc (0.8.5-1) ...
error in control file: `Section' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs 
line 606,  line 7.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_LU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_LU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#275668: Suggest to remove from Sarge

[Emanuele Rocca]

Hello Adam,

* Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2005-02-16 21:33 -0500]:
>  I'll see if I have time to upload a fix in the next week or two, and if
>  not, will concur with your recommendation to remove these packages.

Any news? 
If not, I think we can ask for removal.

Thanks.
ciao,   
ema


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304885: marked as done (FTBFS on ia64)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:02:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304885: fixed in ocamlcreal 0.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 08:43:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 01:43:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms005msg.fastwebnet.it [213.140.2.50] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMitj-6I-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:43:27 -0700
Received: from fistandantilus.takhisis.org (37.10.140.106) by 
ms005msg.fastwebnet.it (7.2.052.3)
id 425D38BB00089C65 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:42:56 
+0200
Received: by fistandantilus.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148)
id 85BB527456F; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:42:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:42:54 +0200
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS on ia64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.9
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: ocamlcreal
Severity: grave

ocamlcreal failed to build from sources on ia64:

  http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=3Docamlcreal&ver=3D0.4-6&arch=3Di=
a64&stamp=3D1113341294&file=3Dlog&as=3Draw

at a first look it did not run configure before building the package and
thus did not discover that ocamlc.opt was not available. I have no idea
on why this happened only on ia64, maybe there is some issues with the
toolchain.

Still, the problem has to be faced since ocamlcreal is blocking the
3.08.3 transition. Could you please have a look at it? If the solution
requires a new upload please upload with urgency (at least) medium.

TIA,
Cheers.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)

--=20
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCYNAO1cqbBPLEI7wRAo+nAJ4gy+I2OxEzTFiTf7bjVxWq7yo31gCfe8hX
8hCsMudpyO7mn4AbBC886Hc=
=Um7i
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--

---
Received: (at 304885-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 16:13:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 09:13:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMpv1-00077a-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 09:13:15 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMpkW-0002xL-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:02:24 -0400
From: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#304885: fixed in ocamlcreal 0.4-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:02:24 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: ocamlcreal
Source-Version: 0.4-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ocamlcreal, which is due to be in

Bug#297269: type-handling build-depends on itself

[Kurt Roeckx]

reopen 297269
thanks

Hi,

The package is now failing to build because it doesn't
build-depend on itself while it currently needs that.

When it's not installed, I get:
dh_clean
 debian/rules build
make: type-handling: Command not found
make: Nothing to be done for `build'.
 debian/rules binary
make: type-handling: Command not found
make: Nothing to be done for `binary'.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304922: mozilla-browser: Multiple Security Issues

[Juergen Kreileder]

Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:1.7.6-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Mozilla 1.7.7 fixes seven security issues, according to
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html#Mozilla
two have critical severity and one has high severity:

MFSA 2005-33 Javascript "lambda" replace exposes memory contents
MFSA 2005-35 Showing blocked javascript: popup uses wrong privilege context
MFSA 2005-36 Cross-site scripting through global scope pollution
MFSA 2005-37 Code execution through javascript: favicons
MFSA 2005-38 Search plugin cross-site scripting
MFSA 2005-40 Missing Install object instance checks
MFSA 2005-41 Privilege escalation via DOM property overrides


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc2-mm3
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages mozilla-browser depends on:
ii  debconf  1.4.48  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-12  GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libkrb53 1.3.6-2 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libnspr4 2:1.7.6-1   Netscape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxp6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxrender1  0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  psmisc   21.6-1  Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
* mozilla/dsp: esddsp
* mozilla/locale_auto: true
* mozilla/prefs_note:


Juergen

-- 
Juergen Kreileder, Blackdown Java-Linux Team
http://blog.blackdown.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#303057: slapd goes into endless sched_yield() loop

[Sven Hartge]

Um 02:29 Uhr am 16.04.05 schrieb Steve Langasek:

>> #txn_checkpoint 128 15  1
>> set_cachesize   0   2524288000
>> set_lk_max_objects  10
>> set_lk_max_locks10
>> #
>> set_lk_max_lockers  10
>> #
>> set_lg_regionmax1048576
>> set_lg_max  8388608
>> set_lg_bsize2097152
>> set_lg_dir  /var/lib/ldap/logs/
>> #set_lk_detect DB_LOCK_DEFAULT
>> set_tmp_dir /tmp/
>> #set_flags DB_TXN_NOSYNC
>> #set_flags DB_TXN_NOT_DURABLE
 
>> Note the enormous amount of possible locks, lockers and lockable objects. 
>> So far, only increasing this amount seems to be the way to circumvent the 
>> dreaded sched_yield()-loop.

>> http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=2030;selectid=2030;usearchives=1
>> (Note how old this bug report to the OpenLDAP ITS is.)
 
> The last follow-up in that ITS points to 
> , which gives 
> guidelines about how to tune the number of available locks and lockers.  
> Is this what you did?

Correct. But since I desperately needed the databases (after all, this are 
my production LDAP servers), I upped the number to this very high value, 
so they would hold up in an case, without me manualle rebuilding the 
database every 6 to 12 hours.

I am about to lower this to 1, since 10 is just to high for my 
workload, consuming to much memory.

> Has the database held up under stress after making these changes?

Yes, after the changes, I experienced no more lookups or database 
corruptions.
 
> I'm not sure how useful it is to set a fixed number of lockers by 
> default, since the optimal value depends on usage statistics; but 
> bumping from 1000 to 5000 doesn't seem like it can hurt much.

1000 seems to low in most cases, at least my experience show this.

But: I still consider it a grave bug for db4.2, if running out of lockers 
corrupts the database. And I consider it a bug in slapd, if it runs into a 
busy-waiting loop, if something inside the database went wrong.

Grüße,
Sven.

-- 
Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek und alltime Nerd
Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://sven.formvision.de/blog/

Bug#304916: [FTBFS] schedutils need to be updated with the recent glibc change

[Guus Sliepen]

tags 304916 + pending
thanks

On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:37:53PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:

> In the recent up coming glibc-2.3.2.ds1-21, two system call,
> sched_setaffinity and sched_getaffinity, are changed.  New interface
> needs three argument (OTOH, glibc 2.3.2.ds1-20 has only two
> arguments).  The new upstream schedutils 1.4.0 is already released and
> it uses new three-argument style system calls.
> 
> If you plan to dupload schedutils 1.4.0, you rebuild package with
> glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 and dupload it.  Don't forget to update
> Build-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21) in debian/control.  If you plan
> to change for the current 1.3.4 and dupload it, please apply my
> attached patch, and dupload it.

Actually I was waiting for a new glibc to come out so I could start
uploading 1.4.0 :) I have a 1.4.0 package already prepared so I just
need to compile it with the new glibc and I'll upload it soon.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#298010: marked as done (monodoc-browser: fails to depend on any Gtk#/etc bindings necessary to function)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:02:39 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298010: fixed in monodoc 1.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2005 00:23:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 03 16:23:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D70bc-0005K0-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:23:49 -0800
Received: from quadrant.corpus.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.235.202]:33427 
helo=alpha.mcnet)
by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135]:25)
with esmtp id 1D70ba-0005Xm-GM (Exim 4.44) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(return-path <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:23:46 +
Received: by alpha.mcnet (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2BBF7302B4A5; Fri,  4 Mar 2005 00:25:05 + (GMT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: monodoc-browser: fails to depend on any Gtk#/etc bindings necessary to
 function
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:25:05 +
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: monodoc-browser
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2

This package claims to be a Gtk+ browser for documentation, but depends
on none of the CIL bindings to Gtk+/etc that are necessary to make it
work, and there is nothing else in the package which could be conceived
of as useful by itself.

Obviously this is horribly broken according to Policy 7.2:
  "The Depends field should be used if the depended-on package is
   required for the depending package to provide a significant amount
   of functionality."

As far as I can tell, these dependencies should include libgtk-cil,
libglade-cil, and libgnome-cil. Viz:

$ sudo apt-get install monodoc-browser
...
Setting up monodoc-browser (1.0.4-1) ...
generating monodoc search index...

** (browser.exe:9864): WARNING **: Could not find assembly gtk-sharp, 
references from /usr/share/dotnet/monodoc/browser.exe (assemblyref_index=2)
 Major/Minor: 1,0
 Build:   0,0
 Token:   35e10195dab3c99f
System error: No such file or directory

cannot open assembly browser.exe

$ sudo apt-get install libgtk-cil
...
$ monodoc
** (browser.exe:9917): WARNING **: Could not find assembly glade-sharp, 
references from /usr/share/dotnet/monodoc/browser.exe (assemblyref_index=3)
...
cannot open assembly browser.exe

$ sudo apt-get install libglade-cil
...
$ monodoc
** (browser.exe:9946): WARNING **: Could not find assembly gtkhtml-sharp, 
references from /usr/share/dotnet/monodoc/browser.exe (assemblyref_index=6)
...
cannot open assembly browser.exe

$ sudo apt-get install libgnome-cil
...
$ monodoc

Finally! Except the search doesn't work, because even though the postinst
failed to generate a search index due to the missing dependencies, the
script didn't return an error, so I have the package installed with no
index. Heinous missing dependencies aside, errors in this process should
also be caught and flagged up appropriately by making the postinst
script fail.

Regards,
Rob

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-alpha2
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages monodoc-browser depends on:
ii  mono-jit  1.0.5-2fast CLI/.NET JIT compiler for Mon
ii  monodoc-base  1.0.4-1shared MonoDoc binaries
ii  monodoc-manual1.0.4-1compiled XML documentation from th

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 298010-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 14:08:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 07:08:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [20

Processed: type-handling build-depends on itself

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 297269 sid
Bug#297269: type-handling build-depends on itself
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: type-handling build-depends on itself

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 297269
Bug#297269: type-handling build-depends on itself
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#304916: [FTBFS] schedutils need to be updated with the recent glibc change

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 304916 + pending
Bug#304916: [FTBFS] schedutils need to be updated with the recent glibc change
Tags were: patch sarge sid
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304843: hostap-modules-i386: FTBFS: undeclared symbols

[Andres Salomon]

On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 09:09 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 19:39 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > I can't reproduce this at all.  Can you please provide the full build
> > log?
> 
> See attachment.
> 
> Roland

Thanks.  I suspect the reason why I'm not seeing this is because I use
sudo for pbuilding, while you're using fakeroot.  How are you calling
pbuilder?  I'm unable to use fakeroot with it (although I'd love to..).


-- 
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#304885: FTBFS on ia64

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:42:54AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Package: ocamlcreal
> Severity: grave
> 
> at a first look it did not run configure before building the package and
> thus did not discover that ocamlc.opt was not available. I have no idea
> on why this happened only on ia64, maybe there is some issues with the
> toolchain.

We got the same problem on amd64.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304916: [FTBFS] schedutils need to be updated with the recent glibc change

[GOTO Masanori]

Package: schedutils
Version: 1.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch, sid, sarge

In the recent up coming glibc-2.3.2.ds1-21, two system call,
sched_setaffinity and sched_getaffinity, are changed.  New interface
needs three argument (OTOH, glibc 2.3.2.ds1-20 has only two
arguments).  The new upstream schedutils 1.4.0 is already released and
it uses new three-argument style system calls.

If you plan to dupload schedutils 1.4.0, you rebuild package with
glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 and dupload it.  Don't forget to update
Build-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21) in debian/control.  If you plan
to change for the current 1.3.4 and dupload it, please apply my
attached patch, and dupload it.

Regards,
-- gotom

diff -Nuar schedutils-1.3.4/debian/changelog 
schedutils-1.3.4-new/debian/changelog
--- schedutils-1.3.4/debian/changelog   2005-04-16 22:17:01.0 +0900
+++ schedutils-1.3.4-new/debian/changelog   2005-04-16 22:12:42.0 
+0900
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+schedutils (1.3.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Update for the recent glibc interface change.
+
+ -- GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 16 Apr 2005 22:12:09 +0900
+
 schedutils (1.3.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nuar schedutils-1.3.4/debian/control schedutils-1.3.4-new/debian/control
--- schedutils-1.3.4/debian/control 2005-04-16 22:17:01.0 +0900
+++ schedutils-1.3.4-new/debian/control 2005-04-16 22:12:03.0 +0900
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libc6-dev (>= 2.3) [!ia64 !alpha], 
libc6.1-dev (>= 2.3) [ia64 alpha]
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libc6-dev (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21) [!ia64 
!alpha], libc6.1-dev (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21) [ia64 alpha]
 Standards-Version: 3.6.0
 
 Package: schedutils
diff -Nuar schedutils-1.3.4/taskset.c schedutils-1.3.4-new/taskset.c
--- schedutils-1.3.4/taskset.c  2004-03-24 05:58:03.0 +0900
+++ schedutils-1.3.4-new/taskset.c  2005-04-12 09:42:43.0 +0900
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
if (pid) {
unsigned long mask = 0;
 
-   if (sched_getaffinity(pid, &cur_mask) < 0) {
+   if (sched_getaffinity(pid, sizeof (cur_mask), &cur_mask) < 0) {
perror("sched_getaffinity");
fprintf(stderr, "failed to get pid %d's affinity\n",
pid);
@@ -152,13 +152,13 @@
 
ulong_to_cpu_set(the_mask, &new_mask);
 
-   if (sched_setaffinity(pid, &new_mask)) {
+   if (sched_setaffinity(pid, sizeof (new_mask), &new_mask)) {
perror("sched_setaffinity");
fprintf(stderr, "failed to set pid %d's affinity.\n", pid);
return 1;
}
 
-   if (sched_getaffinity(pid, &cur_mask) < 0) {
+   if (sched_getaffinity(pid, sizeof (cur_mask), &cur_mask) < 0) {
perror("sched_setaffinity");
fprintf(stderr, "failed to get pid %d's affinity.\n", pid);
return 1;


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304915: libsary-ruby1.8: Uninstallable.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: libsary-ruby1.8
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

Hi,

libsary-ruby1.8 is currently uninstallable because it depends on
libsary9 which is not in the archive.  libsary10 seems to be the
current version.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297769: marked as done (glibc: sched_setaffinity() provides obsolete interface)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 09:17:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297769: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2005 19:28:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 02 11:28:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from palrel13.hp.com [156.153.255.238] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6ZWO-0002oI-00; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 11:28:36 -0800
Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by palrel13.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DB01C0554D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,  2 Mar 2005 11:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123])
by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id 
j22JSYNS021702
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1])
by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id 
j22JSWmI002193
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:28:32 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.13.2/8.13.2/Submit) id j22JSWZK002190;
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:28:32 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:28:32 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc: sched_setaffinity() provides obsolete interface
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: glibc
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


The current Sarge glibc still provides the obsolete 2-argument
interface for sched_setaffinity().  As more software is starting to
use this system call, this is becoming a real issue because developers
will have to create a special version just for Debian.

Specifically,  in libc6{,.1} currently declares:

 extern int sched_setaffinity (__pid_t __pid, __const cpu_set_t *__mask)
 __THROW;

whereas the proper interface has 3 arguments:

 extern int sched_setaffinity (__pid_t __pid, size_t __cpusetsize,
   __const cpu_set_t *__cpuset) __THROW;

(likewise for sched_getaffinity()).

Please fix this problem before Sarge goes out the door.

--david

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---
Received: (at 297769-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 13:25:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 06:25:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMnIq-0003PS-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:25:41 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMnAq-0002VU-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 09:17:24 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#297769: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 09:17:24 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-21

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-21_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-21_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-21.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-21.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-21.dsc
  to pool/main

Bug#292673: marked as done (NPTL vs. LinuxThread sizeof(struct pthread) conflict causes memory corruption)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 09:17:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292673: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2005 18:12:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 10:12:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel7.hp.com [156.153.255.213] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cuabr-0007Rn-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:12:43 -0800
Received: from smtp2.fc.hp.com (smtp.fc.hp.com [15.15.136.253])
by atlrel7.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5F25A5D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:12:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com (ldl.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.30])
by smtp2.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0957D41EA96; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:12:37 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9D01341F2;
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:12:36 -0700 (MST)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (ldl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 16696-03; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:12:36 -0700 (MST)
Received: from krebs.dannf (lart.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.31])
by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152061341EB;
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:12:36 -0700 (MST)
Subject: NPTL vs. LinuxThread sizeof(struct pthread) conflict causes memory
corruption
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:14:11 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ldl.fc.hp.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: glibc
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge

On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 09:48 -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> Hi Dann,
> 
> I don't seem to be getting much traction in getting the NPTL ld.so bug
> resolved.  I posted a glibc bug-report:
> 
>  http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=685



Several of us noticed that evolution on Debian/unstable sometimes
crashes early
during program startup.  It turns out that the crash is due to memory
corruption.  In one particular case, the memory that got corrupted was in the
address range:

 0x22daff10-0x22daff1f

which happened to hold the function descriptors for shared library linkage stubs
("jump slots").  Of relevance was that the thread-pointer (r13) had the value:

 0x22db0500

The corruption was caused by any NPTL routine trying to access the
thread-descriptor, since NPTL uses a "struct pthread" of size 1680 bytes 
(0x690).

I believe the problem is due to the fact that /lib/ld-linux-ia64.so.2 was built
for Linux Threads, which uses a thread descriptor size of 0x500.  Note that
sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c has several references to TLS_PRE_TCB_SIZE for the case
where TLS_DTV_AT_TP is defined.  In other words, ld.so ends up having a
dependency on the size of the thread-descriptor.  Sure enough, if I invoke
evolution like this:

  /lib/tls/ld-linux-ia64.so.2 evolution

it works just fine.

My understanding is that /lib/ld-linux-ia64.so.2 should work for both NPTL and
LinuxThreads libraries and the dependency on the size of the thread-descriptor
is accidental.

I believe this same bug may affect Alpha, PowerPC, and SH.

For Alpha, I found this bug report, which sounds potentially related:

  http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299

> 
> and sent a mail to libc-hacker:
> 
>  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-01/msg00071.html
> 
> and there has been no response whatsoever so far.  I'm not sure what
> the original authors had in mind here, so I'm not sure what the proper
> way is to fix this problem.
> 
> A stop-gap solution might be to just do:
> 
>   # mv /lib/tls/ld-2.3.2.so /lib/
> 
> I did this on my Debian/unstable system and it seems to work just
> fine.  I did verify beforehand that the two versions of ld-2.3.2 do
> export the exact same set of symbols, so this ought to

Bug#304914: libaqbanking: FTBFS: undefined reference to `GWEN_PluginManager_AddPathFromWinReg'

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: libaqbanking
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error on some
arches:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc  -g -Wall -O2 -g -Wall  -g -o abt
est  abtest.o -L../../src/libs/aqbanking -laqbanking -L/usr/lib -lgwenhywfar -l
ofx -lktoblzcheck
mkdir .libs
cc -g -Wall -O2 -g -Wall -g -o .libs/abtest abtest.o  -L/build/buildd/libaqbank
ing-1.0.8/src/libs/aqbanking /build/buildd/libaqbanking-1.0.8/src/libs/aqbankin
g/.libs/libaqbanking.so -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libgwenhywfar.so /usr/lib/libofx.so
 /usr/lib/libktoblzcheck.so
/build/buildd/libaqbanking-1.0.8/src/libs/aqbanking/.libs/libaqbanking.so: unde
fined reference to `GWEN_PluginManager_AddPathFromWinReg'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [abtest] Error 1

I have no idea why it works on some and fails on others.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304382: marked as done (ocamldbi: please rebuild with ocaml 3.08.3)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:38:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304382: ocamldbi: please rebuild with ocaml 3.08.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2005 19:28:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 12 12:28:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bernache.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.167.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLR3b-0007XJ-00; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:28:19 -0700
Received: by bernache.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix, from userid 103)
id 7AFA17ABD4C; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:28:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bryan.is-a-geek.org (173.241.97-84.rev.gaoland.net 
[84.97.241.173])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by bernache.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78FD7ABD4B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:28:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bryan.is-a-geek.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D5C6593314; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:28:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:28:16 +0200
From: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ocamldbi: please rebuild with ocaml 3.08.3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.10 i686
Organization: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9cole_Normale_Sup=E9rieur?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?e?= de Lyon
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: ocamldbi
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable

ocamldbi needs to be rebuilt with ocaml 3.08.3, and its dependencies
updated to ocaml{,-base}-nox-3.08.3.

Thanks,
Julien Cristau

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCXCFNmEvTgKxfcAwRAgLnAKCKmB6Cu6INTa6g9ha906XtKJxW2gCgkHc5
VzS8YWA/BZxE1fiuJedbHFw=
=Fd9K
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--

---
Received: (at 304382-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 12:39:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 05:39:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bernache.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.167.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMmZj-0007S3-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:39:03 -0700
Received: by bernache.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix, from userid 103)
id B61657ABD4A; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:39:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bryan.is-a-geek.org (248.241.97-84.rev.gaoland.net 
[84.97.241.248])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by bernache.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 299917ABD45; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:39:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bryan.is-a-geek.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B787F93388; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:38:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:38:59 +0200
From: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Cc: Richard Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#304382: ocamldbi: please rebuild with ocaml 3.08.3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org,
Richard Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ"
Content-Dispos

Processed: tagging 303672

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 303672 - sarge
Bug#303672: orca: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 303674 is minor

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 303674 minor
Bug#303674: libgtkmm-2.4-1 must conflict with packages built with 2.6.0-1
Severity set to `minor'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304810: marked as done (php4-interbase: ibase_connect doesn't work)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:15:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304810: php4-interbase: ibase_connect doesn't work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2005 15:57:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 15 08:57:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (net2004.pronet.com.pl) [195.117.154.69] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMTCN-0003hA-00; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:57:39 -0700
Received: from kupson by net2004.pronet.com.pl with local (Exim)
id 1DMTCP-0001eo-F2 by hashed authid <8fc0f35ec922c26c5ffeed2ab3aa1e89>
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:57:41 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rafal Kupka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: php4-interbase: ibase_connect doesn't work
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:57:41 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Rafal Kupka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: php4-interbase
Version: 4.3.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


ibase_connect doesn't work in php scripts.
I found that the problem is missing configuration file for firebird.
Syslog information:
Apr 15 17:25:14 net2004 php4: Missing configuration file:
/usr/lib/firebird2/firebird.conf, exiting (No such file or directory)

After creating that file (even empty) everything works OK.

I do not know is this problem php4-interbase specific, or whole library 
(libfirebird2-classic) bug.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-net2004-3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages php4-interbase depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.4.30.11Debian configuration management sy
ii  libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi- 4:4.3.10-10  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfirebird2-classic [libfi 1.5.1-4  Library files for Firebird Classic
ii  php4-cli [phpapi-20020918]  4:4.3.10-10  command-line interpreter for the p

-- debconf information:
* php4/extension_interbase_apache: true
* php4/extension_interbase_cli: true
  php4/add_extension: true
  php4/remove_extension: true

---
Received: (at 304810-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 12:16:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 05:16:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-out.hotpop.com [38.113.3.61] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMmDY-0006FW-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:16:08 -0700
Received: from hotpop.com (kubrick.hotpop.com [38.113.3.103])
by smtp-out.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A263D1023CC8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:15:32 + (UTC)
Received: from seesink (meshuggah.kabel.utwente.nl [130.89.196.41])
by smtp-3.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E0D31150E90D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:15:30 + (UTC)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:15:25 +0200
From: Remco Seesink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#304810: php4-interbase: ibase_connect doesn't work
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="PGP-SHA1";
 boundary="Signature=_Sat__16_Apr_2005_14_15_25_+0200_ZOyM3C8UsbWB.Wh+"
X-HotPOP: ---
   Sent By HotPOP.com FREE Email
 Get your FREE POP email at www.HotPOP.com
  ---
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 

Bug#304749: marked as done (postgrey: remotely exploitable DoS vulnerability)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 07:17:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304749: fixed in postgrey 1.21-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2005 07:41:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 15 00:41:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.charite.de [160.45.207.131] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMLSD-0005FR-00; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:41:29 -0700
Received: from mail.charite.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A434216D605;
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:41:33 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: postgrey: remotely exploitable DoS vulnerability
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:41:33 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at charite.de
X-purgate-ID: 149814::050415094134-5C79-244AFCC3 0
X-purgate-Ad: Checked for SPAM by eleven - eXpurgate www.eXpurgate.net
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-size: 1508/1272
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: postgrey
Version: 1.18-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


Postgrey 1.21 was release due to a remotely exploitable DoS
vulnerability:

Changes
---

* 2005-04-14: version 1.21

   Security: this release fixes a remotely exploitable DoS
   vulnerability.

  - fix crash with '%' in sender addresses (Stefan Schmidt)
  - fix other users of unchecked strings with syslog/printf
(Peter Bieringer)
  - run in tainted mode -T (Peter Bieringer)
(version 1.19 and 1.20 were released on the same day
with the above fixes)
   

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11ac6
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages postgrey depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.30.11  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libberkeleydb-perl0.26-3 use Berkeley DB 4 databases from P
ii  libnet-dns-perl   0.48-1 Perform DNS queries from a Perl sc
ii  libnet-server-perl0.87-3 An extensible, general perl server
ii  perl  5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  ucf   1.17   Update Configuration File: preserv

-- debconf information:
  postgrey/1.13-5_move-db:
  postgrey/1.14-1_lookup-by-subnet:
* postgrey/1.13-5_old-config:

---
Received: (at 304749-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 11:23:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 04:23:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMlOZ-0003B6-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 04:23:27 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMlIa-0003CU-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 07:17:16 -0400
From: Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#304749: fixed in postgrey 1.21-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 07:17:16 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: postgrey
Source-Version: 1.21-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
postgrey, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

postgrey_1.21-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/postgrey/postgrey_1.21-1.diff.gz
postgrey_1.21-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/postgrey/postgrey_1.21-1.dsc
postgrey_1.21-1_all.deb
  to po

Bug#304646: marked as done (libgnome-java: FTBFS: Cannot find gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:12:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in libgnome-java 2.8.3.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 13:19:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 06:19:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DM4G8-0005nn-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:19:52 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1DM4G7-00010p-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:19:51 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DM4G7-0007jW-7x
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:19:51 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgnome-java: FTBFS: Cannot find gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:19:50 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgnome-java
Severity: serious
Version: 2.8.3.1-1

>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:

...
make  all-am
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libgnome-java-2.8.3.1'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/java/gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar', needed 
by `src/java/org/gnu/gnome/libgnomejava_la-About.lo'.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libgnome-java-2.8.3.1'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libgnome-java-2.8.3.1'
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2

This is probably due to .deps directories referring to the old jar
file cluttering up the source package.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 304646-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 11:12:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 04:12:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sv15.dfsv15.com [64.246.0.30] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMlDc-0002e4-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 04:12:08 -0700
Received: from host86-132-242-28.range86-132.btcentralplus.com ([86.132.242.28] 
helo=tildemh)
by sv15.dfsv15.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.43)
id 1DMlDa-0004PW-GN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:11:44 +0100
Received: from mh by tildemh with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DMlDY-0003io-Vv
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:12:05 +0100
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:12:03 +0100
From: Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in libgnome-java 2.8.3.1-2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any 
abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sv15.dfsv15.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tildemh.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Typo in the changelog, sorry:

 libgnome-java (2.8.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Use distclean as clean target, patch scripts to ensure *.ac and *.am
 aren't deleted. Closes: #303646
   * Build-depend on libgcj-dev instead of libgcj4-dev
   * Clean up *.Plo files


-- 
  .''`. Mark Howar

Bug#286910: marked as done (java-gnome: ftbfs [sparc] aclocal: command not found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:14:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Thanks for the NMUs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2004 22:22:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 22 14:22:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ChEs4-00058E-00; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:22:16 -0800
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
iBMMMEXE026464
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:22:14 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id iBMMMEcc026462;
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:22:14 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: java-gnome: ftbfs [sparc] aclocal: command not found
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:22:14 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: java-gnome
Version: 2.8.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

java-gnome fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on sparc
pbuilder.  Appears to be a missing build dependacy.


DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp NOCONFIGURE=yes ./autogen.sh  --libdir=/usr/lib/jni/ --
prefix=/usr/
mkdir: cannot create directory `pkgconfig-tmp': File exists


-- Running ./autogen.sh in libgtk-java

./autogen.sh: line 5: aclocal: command not found
./autogen.sh: line 8: ./configure: Permission denied
make: *** [pre-build] Error 126

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux renig 2.4.18r11 #1 Mon Dec 1 17:22:24 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 286910-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 11:14:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 04:14:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sv15.dfsv15.com [64.246.0.30] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMlFs-0002i6-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 04:14:28 -0700
Received: from host86-132-242-28.range86-132.btcentralplus.com ([86.132.242.28] 
helo=tildemh)
by sv15.dfsv15.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.43)
id 1DMlFp-0004TR-Ve; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:14:04 +0100
Received: from mh by tildemh with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DMlFp-0003mt-Cr; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:14:25 +0100
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:14:25 +0100
From: Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Thanks for the NMUs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any 
abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sv15.dfsv15.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tildemh.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

My recent uploads have completely reorganised the java-gnome packages and I
accidentally forgot to acknowlege them in the changelogs. 

Thanks for NMUing java-gnome when I was busy. 

-- 
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
   `-   [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#290030: marked as done (java-gnome: FTBFS on ia64, alpha, powerpc, hppa, arm, sparc, m68k)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:14:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Thanks for the NMUs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 13:51:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 05:51:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from serv54.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.99] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CoiuI-0004BU-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 05:51:30 -0800
Received: (qmail 29209 invoked by uid 510); 12 Jan 2005 14:50:58 +0100
Received: from 139.165.77.198 by serv54.segi.ulg.ac.be (envelope-from <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, uid 501) with qmail-scanner-1.23 
 (drweb: 4. spamassassin: 2.64.  
 Clear:RC:1(139.165.77.198):. 
 Processed in 0.09312 secs); 12 Jan 2005 13:50:58 -
Received: from vbstefi118.fapse.ulg.ac.be (HELO edev.localhost) 
([139.165.77.198])
  (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
  by serv54.segi.ulg.ac.be (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 12 Jan 2005 14:50:58 +0100
Received: from arnaud by edev.localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Coiti-0005mh-H7
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:50:54 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: java-gnome: FTBFS on ia64, alpha, powerpc, hppa, arm, sparc, m68k
X-Debbugs-CC: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:50:54 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: java-gnome
Severity: serious
Version: 2.8.3-2

Hi Mark,

I tried to build java-gnome on powerpc and it fails. So I went to
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=java-gnome and it FTBFS on
a lot of arches :(

# 2.8.3-2 (ia64) (latest build at Dec 21 04:34: maybe-failed)
# 2.8.3-2 (alpha) (latest build at Dec 21 06:06: maybe-failed)
# 2.8.3-2 (powerpc) (latest build at Dec 21 05:10: maybe-failed)
# 2.8.3-2 (hppa) (latest build at Jan 7 22:55: maybe-failed)
# 2.8.3-2 (arm) (latest build at Jan 3 12:40: maybe-failed)
# 2.8.3-2 (sparc) (latest build at Dec 24 15:57: maybe-failed)
# 2.8.3-2 (m68k) (latest build at Dec 24 12:12: maybe-failed)

only s390 (and I suppose x86) success.

here are the urls:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=java-gnome&ver=2.8.3-2&arch=ia64&stamp=1103621692&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=java-gnome&ver=2.8.3-2&arch=alpha&stamp=1103627164&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=java-gnome&ver=2.8.3-2&arch=powerpc&stamp=1103623810&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=java-gnome&ver=2.8.3-2&arch=hppa&stamp=1105156511&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=java-gnome&ver=2.8.3-2&arch=arm&stamp=1104774059&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=java-gnome&ver=2.8.3-2&arch=sparc&stamp=1103921837&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=java-gnome&ver=2.8.3-2&arch=m68k&stamp=1103908336&file=log&as=raw

Thanks for considering

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (1001, 'unstable'), (100, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-ppc-sleep7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)

-- 
Arnaud Vandyck
http://fosdem.org/ Free and Open Source Developers' European Meeting
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  February 26-27 2005, Bruxelles, Belgium

---
Received: (at 286910-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 11:14:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 04:14:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sv15.dfsv15.com [64.246.0.30] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMlFs-0002i6-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 04:14:28 -0700
Received: from host86-132-242-28.range86-132.btcentralplus.com ([86.132.242.28] 
helo=tildemh)
by sv15.dfsv15.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.43)
id 1DMlFp-0004TR-Ve; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:14:04 +0100
Received: from mh by tildemh with local (Exim 4.50)
 

Bug#304862: marked as done (migrationtools: migrate_passwd.pl create a wrong kerberosSecurityObject objectClass line in output)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304862: migrationtools: migrate_passwd.pl create a wrong 
kerberosSecurityObject objectClass line in output
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 00:00:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 15 17:00:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it [212.216.176.224] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMajX-0002B7-00; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:00:23 -0700
Received: from fidokaos.dyndns.org (80.180.15.73) by vsmtp4.tin.it (7.0.027)
id 425386DA0044CD8F; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:59:50 +0200
Received: by fidokaos.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E2FE4502A370; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:59:49 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0656334825=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Luca Villani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: migrationtools: migrate_passwd.pl create a wrong kerberosSecurityObject
 objectClass line in output
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:59:49 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===0656334825==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: migrationtools
Version: 46-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Debian Woody's schema files for openldap do not provide the objectClass
"kerberosSecurityObject", but migrationtool's migrate_passwd.pl script
create an ldif file containing

objectClass: kerberosSecurityObject
krbName: ...

This at all prevents ldif import:

fidokaos:/usr/share/migrationtools# slapadd -v -d 10 -l users.ldif
bdb_back_initialize: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.2.52: (December
3, 2003)
bdb_db_init: Initializing BDB database
str2entry: invalid value for attributeType objectClass #5 (syntax
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38)
slapadd: could not parse entry (line=24)
fidokaos:/usr/share/migrationtools#



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages migrationtools depends on:
ii  ldap-utils [openldap-utils]   2.2.23-1   OpenLDAP utilities
ii  perl  5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information

--===0656334825==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="migrationtools_patch.diff"

--- migrate_passwd.pl   2004-11-03 22:43:15.0 +0100
+++ my_migrate_passwd.pl2005-04-16 01:48:31.719587732 +0200
@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@
print $HANDLE "objectClass: posixAccount\n";
print $HANDLE "objectClass: top\n";
 
-   if ($DEFAULT_REALM) {
-   print $HANDLE "objectClass: kerberosSecurityObject\n";
-   }
+#  if ($DEFAULT_REALM) {
+#  print $HANDLE "objectClass: kerberosSecurityObject\n";
+#  }
 
if ($shadowUsers{$user} ne "") {
&dump_shadow_attributes($HANDLE, split(/:/, 
$shadowUsers{$user}));
@@ -131,9 +131,9 @@
print $HANDLE "userPassword: {crypt}$pwd\n";
}
 
-   if ($DEFAULT_REALM) {
-   print $HANDLE "krbName: [EMAIL PROTECTED]";
-   }
+#  if ($DEFAULT_REALM) {
+#  print $HANDLE "krbName: [EMAIL PROTECTED]";
+#  }
 
if ($shell) {
print $HANDLE "loginShell: $shell\n";

--===0656334825==--

---
Received: (at 304862-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 10:39:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 03:39:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 0x3ef3a55b.virnxx2.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk (xayide.jones.dk) 
[62.243.165.91] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMki3-000132-

Bug#304643: marked as done (libgconf-java: FTBFS: Cannot find gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:32:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304643: fixed in libgconf-java 2.8.3.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 13:14:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 06:14:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DM4Ak-0004tk-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:14:18 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1DM4Aj-0006Cn-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:14:18 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DM4Aj-0004XY-0m
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:14:17 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgconf-java: FTBFS: Cannot find gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:14:16 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgconf-java
Severity: serious
Version: 2.8.3.1-1

>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:

...
make  all-am
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libgconf-java-2.8.3.1'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/java/gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar', needed 
by `src/java/org/gnu/gconf/libgconfjava_la-ConfClient.lo'.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libgconf-java-2.8.3.1'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libgconf-java-2.8.3.1'
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2

This is probably due to the clean target running "make clean" instead
of "make distclean", which leaves behind .deps directories referring
to the old jar file in the source package.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 304643-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 10:38:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 03:38:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMkgn-zI-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:38:13 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMkb9-00081P-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:32:23 -0400
From: Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#304643: fixed in libgconf-java 2.8.3.1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:32:23 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: libgconf-java
Source-Version: 2.8.3.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgconf-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libgconf-java_2.8.3.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libg/libgconf-java/libgconf-java_2.8.3.1-2.diff.gz
libgconf-java_2.8.3.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/libg/libgconf-java/libgconf-java_2.8.3.1-2.dsc
libgconf-java_2.8.3.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgconf-java/libgconf-java_2.8.3.1-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mark Howard 

Bug#301607: cdbs: control auto-build messes with long descriptions

[Steve Langasek]

clone 301607 -1
reassign -1 cstream
severity -1 serious
retitle -1 cstream: debian/rules clean modifies the source package
severity 301607 important
thanks

I don't consider this a release-critical bug in cdbs because packages
shouldn't be using DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL *anyway*: packages that do
so are in violation of policy section 4.8, because it means
./debian/rules build clean is no longer idempotent when run using differing
versions of cdbs.

As a result, while I consider DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL a gross
misfeature of cdbs that ought to be removed, it is the responsibility of
other package maintainers to not use it for packages uploaded to Debian --
it is not the fault of the cdbs maintainers that you're using an optional
feature of cdbs that violates policy.

Regards,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#304862: migrationtools: migrate_passwd.pl create a wrong kerberosSecurityObject objectClass line in output

[Luca Villani]

Alle 11:44, sabato 16 aprile 2005, Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:


> Why don't you just avoid defining DEFAULT_REALM?

Because in Italy was 01:59:49 AM, and i was sleeping! :-D

Sincerely, I had not see this solution... :-(


-- 
Ciao da Villo  -  GPG public key available
Protect your Freedom: http://www.againsttcpa.com/index.shtml

Ogni resistenza à inutile, sarete assimilati (Debian user).

Processed: Re: cdbs: control auto-build messes with long descriptions

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 301607 -1
Bug#301607: cdbs: control auto-build messes with long descriptions
Bug 301607 cloned as bug 304896.

> reassign -1 cstream
Bug#304896: cdbs: control auto-build messes with long descriptions
Bug reassigned from package `cdbs' to `cstream'.

> severity -1 serious
Bug#304896: cdbs: control auto-build messes with long descriptions
Severity set to `serious'.

> retitle -1 cstream: debian/rules clean modifies the source package
Bug#304896: cdbs: control auto-build messes with long descriptions
Changed Bug title.

> severity 301607 important
Bug#301607: cdbs: control auto-build messes with long descriptions
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 304549

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 304549 pending
Bug#304549: libldap-2.2-7: libldap_r is not correctly linked against libpthread
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#291408: marked as done ([fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:00:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2005 16:16:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 20 08:16:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from openbsd.xs4all.nl (router.cacholong.nl) [80.126.240.96] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CrezN-0004Lh-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:16:53 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by router.cacholong.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B942952
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:16:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from router.cacholong.nl ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (jgc.homeip.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 16508-04; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:16:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from monster.cacholong.nl (unknown [192.168.20.6])
by router.cacholong.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FD47AD;
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:16:55 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: slapd: Index and Data corruption with openldap2 2.1.30
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:16:48 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at jgc.homeip.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: slapd
Version: 2.1.30-3
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

We are running debian sarge on some of our servers now and are getting
data and index corruption (every few weeks). On different servers
(configured the same) we experience those problems. I think it is
openldap that causes this problem because openldap 2.2 doesn't have this
problems with the same bdb backend. (db4.2)

We only use this option in DB_CONFIG but i think it doesn't have
anything to do with the problem:
set_cachesize   0   524288000

I've searched the logs for any inconsistency but i couldn't find anything
in the logs.

Another little problem i experienced is the bad performance with 2.1.30
i've benched 2.1.30 and 2.2.20 a little bit and i got this:
On the server (openldap 2.1.30):
IBM eServer series: 1 Ghz with 1.5 Gb RAM (Kernel: 2.6.8)
www0:~# time id user_from_ldap
uid=1003(user_from_ldap) gid=1003(user_from_ldap) groups=1003(user_from_ldap)

real0m1.588s
user0m0.059s
sys 0m0.017s

the real is between the 1.4 to 1.8 seconds.

Desktop system (openldap 2.2.20)
Pentium 2 350Mhz with 192Mb RAM (Kernel: 2.6.8)
desktop:~# time id user_from_ldap

real0m0.388s
user0m0.059s
sys 0m0.017s

The real on this one is between 0.2 and 0.4 seconds.

On both machines ldap is running on localhost.

I've now a few weeks openldap 2.2 running on my desktop system and i
didn't get any data or index corruption and it's fast as hell.

I've seen that the main blocker is the gnutls patch. Well i ported the
patch almost to 2.2.20. There are a few things i have to look for. And
then i hope it will work. I don't know how far you are with that patch
but i hope, really hope that 2.2.20 can make it into Sarge.

If you need more information please mail me.

Regards,

Matthijs Mohlmann


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB79lw2n1ROIkXqbARAnC9AJ9t2O8g+r4l6NAxLYXAnSKgTTy8OQCgsdPd
e4hE3GCHUOI+QWxD6aU8FGc=
=FRFn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 291408-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 10:00:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 03:00:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMk5x-0004Kj-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:00:09 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 42F3E171D59; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:00:09 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMA

Bug#304862: migrationtools: migrate_passwd.pl create a wrong kerberosSecurityObject objectClass line in output

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 16-04-2005 01:59, Luca Villani wrote:

> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> Debian Woody's schema files for openldap do not provide the objectClass
> "kerberosSecurityObject", but migrationtool's migrate_passwd.pl script
> create an ldif file containing
> 
>   objectClass: kerberosSecurityObject
>   krbName: ...

> - if ($DEFAULT_REALM) {
> - print $HANDLE "objectClass: kerberosSecurityObject\n";
> - }
> +#if ($DEFAULT_REALM) {
> +#print $HANDLE "objectClass: kerberosSecurityObject\n";
> +#}

Why don't you just avoid defining DEFAULT_REALM?


 - Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nÃr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCYN52n7DbMsAkQLgRAstlAJ4pqyt2S+XBqCpw4k9CvSHlYu/X9ACeMsQT
W06vii3TSUTWhmmnT8vfr4E=
=E8fl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#303057: slapd goes into endless sched_yield() loop

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Sven,

On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:56:23PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:

> After the last episode of "killall slapd; db4.2_recover; /etc/init.d/slapd 
> start"
> my DB_CONFIG looks like this:

> #txn_checkpoint 128 15  1
> set_cachesize   0   2524288000
> set_lk_max_objects  10
> set_lk_max_locks10
> #
> set_lk_max_lockers  10
> #
> set_lg_regionmax1048576
> set_lg_max  8388608
> set_lg_bsize2097152
> set_lg_dir  /var/lib/ldap/logs/
> #set_lk_detect DB_LOCK_DEFAULT
> set_tmp_dir /tmp/
> #set_flags DB_TXN_NOSYNC
> #set_flags DB_TXN_NOT_DURABLE

> Note the enormous amount of possible locks, lockers and lockable objects. 
> So far, only increasing this amount seems to be the way to circumvent the 
> dreaded sched_yield()-loop.

> My last change is

>   set_lk_max_lockers  10

> which was still default and seems to be to _real_ culprit, as per 
> ITS#2030:

> http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=2030;selectid=2030;usearchives=1
> (Note how old this bug report to the OpenLDAP ITS is.)

The last follow-up in that ITS points to
, which gives guidelines
about how to tune the number of available locks and lockers.  Is this what
you did?  Has the database held up under stress after making these changes?

I'm not sure how useful it is to set a fixed number of lockers by default,
since the optimal value depends on usage statistics; but bumping from 1000
to 5000 doesn't seem like it can hurt much.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#297769: patch

[GOTO Masanori]

At Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:19:57 -0700,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Given that other packages may in the future begin to depend on this
> interface, I think this should really just be done as a shlibdeps bump.

I investigated this problem, and finally I decided to bump up shlib
vers because (1) it seems it's harmless with my some tests, (2) we
can't anticipate which packages use sched_{set,get}affinity, even if
we have lintian labs (ex: fakeroot does not sched_*).

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304559: More info

[C.Y.M]

C.Y.M wrote:
> The problem appears to be that the links are created incorrectly when the
> package is built (they are pointing to a non existing directory):
> 
> dpkg --contents postfix*
> 
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-04-14 05:50:50 
> ./usr/lib/libpostfix-dns.so.1
> -> debian/postfix/usr/lib/libpostfix-dns.so.1.0.1
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-04-14 05:50:50
> ./usr/lib/libpostfix-global.so.1 ->
> debian/postfix/usr/lib/libpostfix-global.so.1.0.1
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-04-14 05:50:50
> ./usr/lib/libpostfix-master.so.1 ->
> debian/postfix/usr/lib/libpostfix-master.so.1.0.1
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-04-14 05:50:50 
> ./usr/lib/libpostfix-tls.so.1
> -> debian/postfix/usr/lib/libpostfix-tls.so.1.0.1
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-04-14 05:50:50
> ./usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1 -> 
> debian/postfix/usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1.0.1
> 
> This causes this message:
> 
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/lib:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} dh_shlibdeps -a
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libpostfix-tls.so.1
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libpostfix-tls.so.1
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libpostfix-tls.so.1
> 
> These same links also appear in postfix-dev.
> 
> Also, the rules file is creating a broken link:
> 
> libdb.so -> /usr/lib/libdb3.so
> 
> And, libmysqlclient10-dev is a dependency where it should be bumped to
> libmysqlclient12-dev.
> 

The following patches to the debian build rules and the master.cf correct my
problems..

Best Regards,
--- master.cf.orig  2005-04-16 01:53:13.0 -0700
+++ master.cf   2005-04-16 01:47:50.0 -0700
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
 #  flags=R user=scalemail argv=/usr/lib/scalemail/bin/scalemail-store 
${nexthop} ${user} ${extension}
 
 # only used by postfix-tls
-tlsmgr   fifo  -   -   n   300 1   tlsmgr
+tlsmgr   unix  -   -   n   300 1   tlsmgr
 smtpsinet  n   -   n   -   -   smtpd -o 
smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
 587  inet  n   -   n   -   -   smtpd -o 
smtpd_enforce_tls=yes -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
 
diff -ruN postfix-2.2.2-orig/debian/control postfix-2.2.2/debian/control
--- postfix-2.2.2-orig/debian/control   2005-04-16 01:11:14.0 -0700
+++ postfix-2.2.2/debian/control2005-04-16 01:07:26.0 -0700
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.5.2.0
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libdb4.2-dev, libgdbm-dev, libldap2-dev 
(>=2.1), libpcre3-dev, libmysqlclient10-dev, patch, libssl-dev (>=0.9.7-1), 
libsasl2-dev, postgresql-dev, po-debconf (>= 0.5.0), groff-base, dpatch
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libdb4.2-dev, libgdbm-dev, libldap2-dev 
(>=2.1), libpcre3-dev, libmysqlclient12-dev, patch, libssl-dev (>=0.9.7-1), 
libsasl2-dev, postgresql-dev, po-debconf (>= 0.5.0), groff-base, dpatch
 
 Package: postfix
 Architecture: any
diff -ruN postfix-2.2.2-orig/debian/rules postfix-2.2.2/debian/rules
--- postfix-2.2.2-orig/debian/rules 2005-04-16 01:11:14.0 -0700
+++ postfix-2.2.2/debian/rules  2005-04-16 01:07:32.0 -0700
@@ -99,7 +99,12 @@
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs -a
install lib/*.1 $(libdir)
-   for i in $(libdir)/*.1; do ln -fs $${i}.so.1.0.1 $${i%.*.*}; done
+   cd $(libdir) && \
+   ln -fs libpostfix-dns.so.1.0.1 libpostfix-dns.so.1 && \
+   ln -fs libpostfix-global.so.1.0.1 libpostfix-global.so.1 && \
+   ln -fs libpostfix-master.so.1.0.1 libpostfix-master.so.1 && \
+   ln -fs libpostfix-tls.so.1.0.1 libpostfix-tls.so.1 && \
+   ln -fs libpostfix-util.so.1.0.1 libpostfix-util.so.1
install lib/dict_ldap.so ${base}-ldap/${plibdir}
install lib/dict_pcre.so ${base}-pcre/${plibdir}
install lib/dict_mysql.so ${base}-mysql/${plibdir}

Bug#304885: FTBFS on ia64

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

Package: ocamlcreal
Severity: grave

ocamlcreal failed to build from sources on ia64:

  
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ocamlcreal&ver=0.4-6&arch=ia64&stamp=1113341294&file=log&as=raw

at a first look it did not run configure before building the package and
thus did not discover that ocamlc.opt was not available. I have no idea
on why this happened only on ia64, maybe there is some issues with the
toolchain.

Still, the problem has to be faced since ocamlcreal is blocking the
3.08.3 transition. Could you please have a look at it? If the solution
requires a new upload please upload with urgency (at least) medium.

TIA,
Cheers.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#304549: LinuxThreads thread stack sizes don't stay set on alpha

[Steve Langasek]

reassign 304549 libldap-2.2-7
retitle 304549 libldap-2.2-7: libldap_r is not correctly linked against 
libpthread
thanks

Ok folks, sorry for the noise; I've found the bug, and it *is* related to
thread stack handling, but it is *not* a glibc bug: the problem is that
libldap_r is not linked with -pthread as it should be, so the resulting lib
has an unversioned reference to pthread_create() which ends up resolving to
an old implementation that assumes the provided struct is garbage and
overrides it.  Thus the problem most likely affects all 64-bit
architectures, being influenced only by sizeof(long) and the resulting large
array on the stack.

Torsten, I'm looking over the libldap_r Makefile to confirm what the right
way is to get it linked with -pthread.  This stuff really shouldn't be in
the library at all AFAICT, and is merely a symptom of upstream's habit of
shoving server stuff into libldap_r; that ought to be fixed, but in the
meantime I'll work up a patch for the immediate problem and possibly throw a
check in debian/rules that will catch mis-linked libraries for us in the
future.  Expect a commit soon.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: LinuxThreads thread stack sizes don't stay set on alpha

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 304549 libldap-2.2-7
Bug#304549: LinuxThreads thread stack sizes don't stay set on alpha
Bug reassigned from package `libc6.1' to `libldap-2.2-7'.

> retitle 304549 libldap-2.2-7: libldap_r is not correctly linked against 
> libpthread
Bug#304549: LinuxThreads thread stack sizes don't stay set on alpha
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]