Bug#306375: gnome-python/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: insufficient build-dependency on gconf
Package: gnome-python Version: 2.10.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, There was an error trying to autobuild your package. From the build log: Automatic build of gnome-python_2.10.0-1 on quickstep by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 Build started at 20050425-2025 ** [...] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.2.28), dpatch, gnome-pkg-tools, python2.3-dev, python-gtk2-dev (= 2.4), python2.3-pyorbit (= 2.0.1), libgconf2-dev (= 2.0), libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.4), libgnome2-dev (= 2.8), libgnomeui-dev (= 2.8), libgnomecanvas2-dev (= 2.0), libgnomevfs2-dev (= 2.0), libbonobo2-dev (= 2.6), libbonoboui2-dev (= 2.0), librsvg2-dev (= 2.0), libgnome-desktop-dev (= 2.0), python (= 2.3) [...] checking GNOMECANVAS_LIBS... -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgnomecanvas-2 -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 checking for gnome-vfs-2.0 = 2.9.0 pyorbit-2 = 2.0.1... checking for gconf-2.0 = 2.9.0... configure: error: gconf-2.0 is required. make: *** [build-2.3/config.status] Error 1 It would seem that you need to modify your build-dependency on libgconf2-dev to specify at least that version. -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306376: frozen-bubble-data: Can't upgrade
Package: frozen-bubble-data Version: 1.0.0-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apt-get upgrade can't work Dépaquetage de la mise à jour de frozen-bubble-data ... mv: ne peut évaluer `/usr/games/frozen-bubble.wav': Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type dpkg : avertissement - ancien script post-removal a retourné un code d'erreur de sortie 1 dpkg - tentative d'exécution du script du nouveau paquet à la place ... dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/frozen-bubble-data_1.0.0-6_all.deb (--install) : il n'y a pas de script dans cette nouvelle version du paquet - abandon preinst called with unknown argument `abort-upgrade' dpkg : erreur lors du nettoyage : le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : /var/cache/apt/archives/frozen-bubble-data_1.0.0-6_all.deb apt-get remove doesn't work -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#306376: frozen-bubble-data: Can't upgrade
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306376 important Bug#306376: frozen-bubble-data: Can't upgrade Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306376: frozen-bubble-data: Can't upgrade
severity 306376 important thanks On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:00:10AM +0200, Modesto Alexandre wrote: Package: frozen-bubble-data Version: 1.0.0-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apt-get upgrade can't work Dépaquetage de la mise à jour de frozen-bubble-data ... mv: ne peut évaluer `/usr/games/frozen-bubble.wav': Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type dpkg : avertissement - ancien script post-removal a retourné un code d'erreur de sortie 1 dpkg - tentative d'exécution du script du nouveau paquet à la place ... dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/frozen-bubble-data_1.0.0-6_all.deb (--install) : il n'y a pas de script dans cette nouvelle version du paquet - abandon preinst called with unknown argument `abort-upgrade' dpkg : erreur lors du nettoyage : le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : /var/cache/apt/archives/frozen-bubble-data_1.0.0-6_all.deb apt-get remove doesn't work However, this is an error in a version of the package that no longer exists in the Debian archive. It is therefore not release-critical. It would be reasonable for frozen-bubble-data to provide a postrm script which handles the 'failed-upgrade' case from 1.0.0-6 in order to fix this bug. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306324: Postinst never finishes in 0.98.3-2
* Christian Hammers As I'm not sure if lintian is really wrong here so I go for 1). I've just uploaded a fixed version, thanks for reporting. I'm certain that Lintian is wrong, after all you're not using Debconf in your postinst script (no call to db_* there), only in the config script. But it doesn't matter that much, using db_stop works fixes the problem just fine. Thanks for uploading a fixed package so quickly! :-) -- Tore Anderson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306128: marked as done (Build-depends on soon-to-be-removed libdbd-sqlite-perl)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:52:40 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Build-depends on soon-to-be-removed libdbd-sqlite-perl has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2005 12:34:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 24 05:34:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DPgJS-0008Ff-00; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 05:34:15 -0700 Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DPgJR-0005pt-I9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:34:13 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Build-depends on soon-to-be-removed libdbd-sqlite-perl X-Debbugs-Cc: Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:34:13 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libdbix-contextualfetch-perl Severity: serious Hi! The maintainer of libdbd-sqlite-perl asked for its removal in #305604. Your package does build-time tests using this module, so would fail to build once this removal is propagated. Two newer versions of the sqlite perl module are available, I suggest you use either of those instead. By the way, kudo's for doing build-time tests, they are IMHO an important way of doing good QA on your package. (Just curious, why are not failing the build if the tests fail?) Thanks you, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --- Received: (at 306128-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 07:52:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 00:52:41 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tx4.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.173] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQKs5-00035Z-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:52:41 -0700 Received: from scan4.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.177] helo=localhost) by tx4.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1DQKs4-0003ry-EO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:52:40 +0100 Received: from rx4.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.172]) by localhost (scan4.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.177]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 13459-08 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:52:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by rx4.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1DQKs4-0003rv-Dy for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:52:40 +0100 Received: from mizar.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.107] helo=localhost) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DQKs4-0005KH-3z for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:52:40 +0100 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:52:40 +0100 From: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Build-depends on soon-to-be-removed libdbd-sqlite-perl Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Linux mizar 2.6.10 x-gpg-fingerprint: F934 244D 4E26 DBDE C9EF BFB7 2131 9B94 4C1A 5BE5 x-gpg-key: wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libdbix-contextualfetch-perl Severity: serious Hi! The maintainer of libdbd-sqlite-perl asked for its removal in #305604. Your package does build-time tests using this module, so would fail to build once this removal is propagated. Two newer versions of the sqlite perl module are available, I suggest you use either of those instead. This has now been fixed: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:17:04 +0100 Source: libdbix-contextualfetch-perl Binary: libdbix-contextualfetch-perl Architecture: source all Version: 1.02-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high
Bug#306324: Postinst never finishes in 0.98.3-2
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:30:18AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: * Christian Hammers As I'm not sure if lintian is really wrong here so I go for 1). I've just uploaded a fixed version, thanks for reporting. I'm certain that Lintian is wrong, after all you're not using Debconf in your postinst script (no call to db_* there), only in the config script. But it doesn't matter that much, using db_stop works fixes the problem just fine. Thanks for uploading a fixed package so quickly! :-) Ugh, this comment in the bug log tipped me off that something was wrong... and sure enough, what do I find when looking at the package but debconf note abuse. Christian, please use NEWS.Debian for this, that's what it was created for -- and this is *not* what debconf notes were created for. :/ For the record, the lintian error is *not* wrong. Unless the postinst sources the debconf confmodule, a config script will never be run when installing the package using dpkg (which is still valid and expected to work, even though apt is now the norm). -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306383: synaptic/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: undeclared variable
Package: synaptic Version: 0.55+cvs20050325-1.1 Severity: serious Hi, There was an error trying to autobuild your package. From the build log: Automatic build of synaptic_0.55+cvs20050325-1.1 on quickstep by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 Build started at 20050426-0421 ** [...] if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/apt-pkg -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DSYNAPTICLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DSYNAPTICSTATEDIR=\/var/lib/synaptic\-g -O2 -MT rpackage.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/rpackage.Tpo \ -c -o rpackage.o `test -f 'rpackage.cc' || echo './'`rpackage.cc; \ then mv -f .deps/rpackage.Tpo .deps/rpackage.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/rpackage.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi rpackage.cc: In member function `bool RPackage::isTrusted()': rpackage.cc:697: error: `IsTrusted' undeclared (first use this function) rpackage.cc:697: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [rpackage.o] Error 1 [...] For your convenience, a full build log can be found through http://experimental.ftbfs.de/ -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306381: python-cherrypy/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: missing b-dep on python
Package: python-cherrypy Version: 2.0.0b-1 Severity: serious Hi, There was an error when trying to autobuild your package. From the build log: Automatic build of python-cherrypy_2.0.0b-1 on quickstep by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 Build started at 20050426-0408 ** [...] Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0) [...] python setup.py clean -a make: python: Command not found [...] cd . python setup.py build --build-base=./build /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 Looks like you're missing a build-dependency on python. -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#306368: filter rules are too modern for remote rsync (which is 2.5.6)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 306368 rsync@lists.samba.org Bug#306368: filter rules are too modern for remote rsync (which is 2.5.6) Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] severity 306368 important Bug#306368: filter rules are too modern for remote rsync (which is 2.5.6) Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 306383
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306383 experimental Bug#306383: synaptic/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: undeclared variable There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306368: filter rules are too modern for remote rsync (which is 2.5.6)
forwarded 306368 rsync@lists.samba.org severity 306368 important thanks On Tue 26 Apr 2005, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: Package: rsync Version: 2.6.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I've downgraded the severity to important, as the package isn't unusable; I use it to backup 100 servers (1 TB) every day... a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone. sounds more apropriate. I've forwarded the message to the mailing list, the upstream author is in the best position to answer this issue. Paul Slootman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306324: Postinst never finishes in 0.98.3-2
* Steve Langasek Ugh, this comment in the bug log tipped me off that something was wrong... and sure enough, what do I find when looking at the package but debconf note abuse. Christian, please use NEWS.Debian for this, that's what it was created for -- and this is *not* what debconf notes were created for. :/ Agreed. I never saw what Debconf was used for because I don't generally bother with the low-priority ones, but reading it now it seems pretty useless. NEWS.Debian would be a much better place for it, or even nowhere at all - Quagga wasn't included in Woody so it should /certainly/ not be displayed upon initial installations of Sarge. By being rather conservative about what we use Debconf for we may still be able to present Debconf to our users as something useful (as opposed to noise / superfluous chitchat). For the record, the lintian error is *not* wrong. Unless the postinst sources the debconf confmodule, a config script will never be run when installing the package using dpkg (which is still valid and expected to work, even though apt is now the norm). Oh my, and here I thought I knew everything. I was certain that dpkg itself took care of running the config script if apt-extracttemplates or whatever hadn't already. I guess I still learn something new every day. :-) By the way, Steve, I saw you add the sid tag explicitly. That puzzled me as I'm fairly sure I (tried to) add the sid tag when I submitted the bug, precisely to prevent it from bothering the probably already overworked Release Managers. Did I mess it up? Perhaps I'm overlooking something, but my report seem perfectly OK to me so I have no idea what happened. -- Tore Anderson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305411: cal3d: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//usr/share/doc/libcal3d-doc/html/functions_rela.html': No such file or directory
From what I can tell, this bug is caused by cal3d's debian/rules having way too tight bindings to the specific filenames output by one particular version of doxygen. The resulting docs/api/html directory is full of files, they just don't all match the names of those created by previous versions of doxygen. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#304634: marked as done (gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 04:47:16 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#304634: fixed in gibraltar-bootcd 0.52 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 12:38:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 05:38:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DM3cI-0007VE-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:38:42 -0700 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1DM3cH-0007t5-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:38:41 -0400 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DM3cH-0001L0-34 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:38:41 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:38:41 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gibraltar-bootcd Severity: serious Version: 0.50 Tags: patch From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... dpkg-source: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1234) dpkg-source: extracting coreutils in coreutils-5.2.1 tar: bzip2: Cannot exec: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now tar: Child returned status 2 tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors /tmp/buildd/gibraltar-bootcd-0.50/build-paste: line 11: cd: coreutils-5.2.1.tar.bz2: Not a directory /tmp/buildd/gibraltar-bootcd-0.50/build-paste: line 12: ./configure: No such file or directory make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/gibraltar-bootcd-0.50/debian/tmp-build/coreutils-5.2.1' make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gibraltar-bootcd-0.50/debian/tmp-build/coreutils-5.2.1' strip: 'src/paste': No such file install: cannot stat `src/paste': No such file or directory Extracting busybox source ... tar: bzip2: Cannot exec: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now tar: Child returned status 2 ... install /tmp/buildd/gibraltar-bootcd-0.50/debian/tmp-build/paste /tmp/buildd/gibraltar-bootcd-0.50/debian/mkinitrd-cd/usr/lib/mkinitrd-cd/ install: cannot stat `/tmp/buildd/gibraltar-bootcd-0.50/debian/tmp-build/paste': No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 1 Adding bzip2 to the Build-Depends allows the package to build. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 304634-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 08:53:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 01:53:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQLoV-0001Gh-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:53:03 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQLiu-0004mw-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 04:47:16 -0400 From: Rene Mayrhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#304634: fixed in gibraltar-bootcd 0.52 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 04:47:16 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: gibraltar-bootcd Source-Version:
Bug#306324: Postinst never finishes in 0.98.3-2
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:47:34AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: By the way, Steve, I saw you add the sid tag explicitly. That puzzled me as I'm fairly sure I (tried to) add the sid tag when I submitted the bug, precisely to prevent it from bothering the probably already overworked Release Managers. Did I mess it up? Perhaps I'm overlooking something, but my report seem perfectly OK to me so I have no idea what happened. No, you had the tags right, it's just that some mornings I don't make it all the way to the fourth line of the bug report before my brain automatically says tag it ;) Maybe I need to figure out how to add a procmail filter to send sid-tagged RC bugs to a differen folder, so that doesn't happen so much :D -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306393: logjam: segmentation fault with datesel
Subject: logjam: Segfaults on startup Package: logjam Version: 4.4.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Logjam segfaults when View-Entry Date is selected or when an entry that has a date is loaded. I had no problems during my last entry on 4-20-05 but haven't been able to use it since. The only change I am aware of is the gtk2 upgrade, but even downgrading those libraries had no effect. I removed datesel/ from the conf.xml and logjam will function, just no dates and I can't load any past entries. Please help. Logjam has become an important part of my life!! :) JackLyn -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages logjam depends on: ii libaspell15 0.60.2+20050121-2 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcurl3 7.13.2-2Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkspell0 2.0.10-1a spell-checking addon for GTK's T ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3SSL shared libraries ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.16-7GNOME XML library ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information
Processed: tagging 305504, severity of 305504 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 305504 security Bug#305504: Version 1.0.1 completely insecure, Version 1.0.4 is out There were no tags set. Tags added: security severity 305504 grave Bug#305504: Version 1.0.1 completely insecure, Version 1.0.4 is out Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 305504
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 # thomas gave me a fixed package, only one minor issue needs to be ironed out tags 305504 pending Bug#305504: Version 1.0.1 completely insecure, Version 1.0.4 is out Tags were: security Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306412: esound link problems or missing dependencies crash gnome-session
Package: esound Version: 0.2.35-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system When trying to start, esd only gives the following error: esd: relocation error: esd: undefined symbol: esd_default_options If esd was installed while running a gnome session, then gnome-session will try to restart it when you login next time and fail. Unfortunately it fails in a way that the login process completely stops so the user cant login to X any more, at least not using gnome-session. Removing esound from the system doesnt help either because gnome-session keeps trying to start esd and freeze but thtas probably more a gnome-session bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9t42p Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306411: gnome-mag: doesnt even start
Package: gnome-mag Version: 0.10.11-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tried it on the shell. This happens: home # magnifier ** ERROR **: Error registering magnifier server. aborting... zsh: abort magnifier -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages gnome-mag depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.6.1-3The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.6.2-6Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.6-2The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-mag1 0.10.11-2 screen magnification library for t ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.9-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit2 1:2.10.2-1.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.4.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-4 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System event recording an ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: mmix: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on tetex-bin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 260009 serious Bug#260009: mmix: FTBFS: missing Build-Depends on tetex-bin Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: doom-wad-shareware: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on debhelper
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 260006 serious Bug#260006: doom-wad-shareware: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on debhelper Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306414: figfonts: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper'
Package: figfonts Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'figfonts' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/figfonts-2.2.1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/figfonts-2.2.1/debian/control 2003-05-04 14:02:23.0 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2004-07-17 22:53:34.329871873 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Maintainer: Francesco Tapparo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Section: non-free Priority: optional -Build-Depends: zip +Build-Depends: debhelper, zip Standards-Version: 3.0.0.0 Package: figfonts -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306420: libpam-ccreds: fake bug to keep package out of sarge
Package: libpam-ccreds Version: 1-3 Severity: grave This package needs more testing before it can enter testing or the upcoming sarge. Cheers, -- Guido -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6-agx0 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libpam-ccreds depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.34.3.27-2 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [ ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libgpg-error0 1.0-1library for common error values an ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: cleanup
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package tqsllib0 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tqsllib0 severity 282697 normal Bug#282697: tqsllib0: tqsl_load_cert and tqslcert won't load certificate Severity set to `normal'. severity 303631 serious Bug#303631: tqsllib0: Tqsllib 1.5 generates corrupt .p12 files Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306154: *** SPAM *** Bug#306154: dependency removed: please recompile
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Sebastian Rittau wrote: Package: quark Severity: grave linc has been removed from unstable. Please recompile to get the dependency fixed. Am stranded in china with a broken laptop for another week, if it can't wait, NMU welcomed. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#212760: marked as done (tdiary-plugin is uninstallable)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:31:36 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line tdiary-plugin is uninstallable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2003 20:37:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 25 15:37:43 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.137] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A2crr-00057e-00; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:37:40 -0500 Received: from umlsmtp.wagland.net (kungfucoder.org [80.126.186.202]) by smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8PKbcXC021977 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:37:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from morsel.kungfoocoder.org (unknown [10.87.98.191]) by umlsmtp.wagland.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CD9B28C; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:37:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (nullmailer pid 8537 invoked by uid 1001); Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:37:37 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Wagland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tdiary-plugin is uninstallable X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:37:37 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: tdiary-plugin Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-25 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable tdiary-plugin depends on libuconv-ruby but this package does not exist. libuconv-ruby1.6 and libuconv-ruby1.8 do exist, and libconv-ruby1.6 replaces libuconv-ruby. tdiary-plugin should probably depend on libconv-ruby1.6 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux morsel.kungfoocoder.org 2.4.22-1-k7 #1 Sat Sep 6 02:13:04 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 212760-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 14:32:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 07:32:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ns.sgtpepper.net [219.117.193.110] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQR7E-0006zf-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:32:44 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns.sgtpepper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B913419D98E; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:30:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from ns.sgtpepper.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gaultier.sgtpepper.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32637-09; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:30:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns.sgtpepper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA8B19D989; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:30:21 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:31:36 +0900 From: Daigo Moriwaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tdiary-plugin is uninstallable X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at sgtpepper.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This was fixed 1 year and 213 days ago. - -- Daigo Moriwaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCblDINcPj+ukc0lARArnrAJ96Afa/xjXH3jCiz2yuO+vgzCVlxACePd8H xbpV07WCDnE4Rj8erXzC/lM= =uvRs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306240: qtstalker: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on virtual package 'libmysqlclient-dev'
Please change the Build-Depends to 'libmysqlclient12-dev' in debian/control. Or libmysqlclient14-dev, which is the version that upstream currently recommends. I've bumped it to 14 in qtstalker 0.29-2, which I'll upload to m.d.n in a second. I'll be very grateful to the DD who will pick it up from there and NMU / sponsor it.[2] Unfortunately, since I have no ongoing interest in this package, I'm not really willing to do the work behind sponsoring a new upstream version of it. If you could prepare a 0.26-4 version that fixes this particular bug, I'd be happy to sponsor that. Thanks Steve, I've just uploaded 0.26-5 to m.d.n.. It fixes this FTBFS and another potential build-related problem. The diff with 0.26-3 is pretty minimal, so it shouldn't be a lot of work for you. Thanks for picking this up. Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#268317: marked as done (specimen: FTBFS on amd64: cast to pointer from integer of different size)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:03:33 -0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in the current version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 06:42:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 23:42:53 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from d007195.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [80.171.7.195] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0aRp-0007cp-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:42:53 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C0aSd-0006PA-E2; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:43:43 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: specimen: FTBFS on amd64: cast to pointer from integer of different size Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:43:43 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: specimen Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'specimen' on amd64 I get the following error: Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/specimen-0.4.3/src' /usr/bin/make all-recursive make[3]: Entering directory `/specimen-0.4.3/src' Making all in gui make[4]: Entering directory `/specimen-0.4.3/src/gui' if x86_64-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I..-O3 -I/usr/include/ladcca-1.0 -I/usr/include/alsa -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/alsa -pthread -DPIXMAPSDIR=\/usr/share/specimen/pixmaps/\ -Wall -Werror -MT audio-settings.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/audio-settings.Tpo -c -o audio-settings.o audio-settings.c; \ then mv -f .deps/audio-settings.Tpo .deps/audio-settings.Po; else rm -f .deps/audio-settings.Tpo; exit 1; fi audio-settings.c: In function `audio_settings_init': audio-settings.c:110: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size audio-settings.c:123: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size make[4]: *** [audio-settings.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/specimen-0.4.3/src/gui' With the attached patch 'specimen' can be compiled on amd64. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/specimen-0.4.3/src/gui/audio-settings.c ./src/gui/audio-settings.c --- ../tmp-orig/specimen-0.4.3/src/gui/audio-settings.c 2004-06-18 20:55:05.0 +0200 +++ ./src/gui/audio-settings.c 2004-08-27 08:34:27.692384945 +0200 @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ void audio_settings_init (GtkWidget* parent) { - int i; + long i; GSList *driver_list = NULL; debug (Initializing audio settings window\n); diff -urN ../tmp-orig/specimen-0.4.3/src/gui/gui.c ./src/gui/gui.c --- ../tmp-orig/specimen-0.4.3/src/gui/gui.c2004-07-15 15:32:17.0 +0200 +++ ./src/gui/gui.c 2004-08-27 08:36:47.975058737 +0200 @@ -147,9 +147,10 @@ } item[i] = gtk_menu_item_new_with_label (name); gtk_menu_shell_append (GTK_MENU_SHELL (menu), item[i]); + long patch_i = patch[i]; g_signal_connect_swapped (G_OBJECT (item[i]), activate, G_CALLBACK (set_current_patch), - (gpointer) patch[i]); + (gpointer) patch_i); gtk_widget_show (item[i]); if (name != NULL) free (name); --- Received: (at 268317-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 15:06:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 08:06:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from itapoa.terra.com.br [200.154.55.227] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQRdd-000735-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:06:13 -0700 Received: from merida.terra.com.br (merida.terra.com.br [200.154.55.132]) by itapoa.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id
Bug#305504: marked as done (Version 1.0.1 completely insecure, Version 1.0.4 is out)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:17:24 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305504: fixed in helix-player 1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2005 11:59:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 04:59:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from panthera-systems.net [213.239.209.134] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DODrb-0007eX-00; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 04:59:27 -0700 Received: from [10.0.0.4] (84-72-171-50.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.72.171.50]) by panthera-systems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6189F2DC020 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:58:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:59:23 +0200 From: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Panthera Systems User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Version 1.0.1 completely insecure, Version 1.0.4 is out X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: helix-player Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious With 1.0.2, 1.0.3[0] and today with 1.0.4[1], grave security bugs are fixed in helix-player. I already informed Thomas about it. Though he is only reachable at weekends, we will organise who will upload a new package soon. Regards, Daniel [0] http://service.real.com/help/faq/security/050224_player [1] http://service.real.com/help/faq/security/050419_player/EN/ -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ --- Received: (at 305504-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 15:21:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 08:21:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQRsX-0003Un-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:21:37 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQRoS-0008AU-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:17:24 -0400 From: Thomas Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#305504: fixed in helix-player 1.0.4-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:17:24 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: helix-player Source-Version: 1.0.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of helix-player, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: helix-player_1.0.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/h/helix-player/helix-player_1.0.4-1.diff.gz helix-player_1.0.4-1.dsc to pool/main/h/helix-player/helix-player_1.0.4-1.dsc helix-player_1.0.4-1_i386.deb to pool/main/h/helix-player/helix-player_1.0.4-1_i386.deb helix-player_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/h/helix-player/helix-player_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thomas Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated helix-player package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:54:20 +0200 Source: helix-player Binary: helix-player
Processed: severity of 306412 is normal, merging 306412 279108
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 306412 normal Bug#306412: esound link problems or missing dependencies crash gnome-session Severity set to `normal'. merge 306412 279108 Bug#279108: esound: undefined symbol: esd_default_options Bug#306412: esound link problems or missing dependencies crash gnome-session Merged 279108 306412. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304125: marked as done (zynaddsubfx: ftbfs [sparc] PresetsUI.h:6:23: FL/fl_ask.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:20:56 -0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed by NMU upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 00:40:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 10 17:40:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DKmyv-0007d6-00; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:40:49 -0700 Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j3B0elXE031874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:40:47 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j3B0el9p031872; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:40:47 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: zynaddsubfx: ftbfs [sparc] PresetsUI.h:6:23: FL/fl_ask.h: No such file or directory X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:40:47 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: zynaddsubfx Version: 2.1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source zynaddsubfx fails to build on sparc and other buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder: gcc -O6 -ggdb -Wall -DOS_LINUX -DALSAMIDIIN -DFFTW_VERSION_3 -DASM_F2I_YES `flt k-config --cflags` -DOSSAUDIOOUT -DJACKAUDIOOUT `pkg-config --cflags jack` - c -o PresetsUI.o PresetsUI.cc In file included from PresetsUI.cc:3: PresetsUI.h:6:23: FL/fl_ask.h: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [PresetsUI.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/zynaddsubfx-2.1.1/src/UI' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/zynaddsubfx-2.1.1/src' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 --- Received: (at 303436-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 17:23:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 10:23:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from linares.terra.com.br [200.154.55.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQTmW-0005su-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:23:33 -0700 Received: from bugala.terra.com.br (bugala.terra.com.br [200.154.55.135]) by linares.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16672DDC93F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:23:31 -0300 (BRT) X-Terra-Karma: -2% X-Terra-Hash: d9050ffc3e12b1c6728f1fe4d52f0538 Received-SPF: none (bugala.terra.com.br: 200.154.55.135 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of debian.org) client-ip=200.154.55.135; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; helo=[10.1.1.3]; Received: from [10.1.1.3] (pasteur.colband.com.br [200.245.157.15]) (authenticated user emacan) by bugala.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045CEBA404A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:23:28 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:20:56 -0300 From: Eduardo Marcel Macan [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed by NMU upload Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This bug was fixed via NMU. The fix was incorporated upstream and the new version of zynaddsubfx recently packaged dos not suffer from it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303436: marked as done (zynaddsubfx: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): FL/fl_ask.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:20:56 -0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed by NMU upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2005 17:42:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 06 10:42:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from d007051.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.7.51] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DJEXQ-00064Y-00; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:42:00 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DJEXV-0007ec-2k; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:42:05 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: zynaddsubfx: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): FL/fl_ask.h: No such file or directory Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:42:05 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: zynaddsubfx Version: 2.1.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'zynaddsubfx' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: gcc -O6 -ggdb -Wall -DOS_LINUX -DALSAMIDIIN -DFFTW_VERSION_3 -DASM_F2I_YES `fltk-config --cflags` -DOSSAUDIOOUT -DJACKAUDIOOUT `pkg-config --cflags jack` -c -o PresetsUI.o PresetsUI.cc In file included from PresetsUI.cc:3: PresetsUI.h:6:23: error: FL/fl_ask.h: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [PresetsUI.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/zynaddsubfx-2.1.1/src/UI' With the attached patch 'zynaddsubfx' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/zynaddsubfx-2.1.1/src/UI/PresetsUI.fl ./src/UI/PresetsUI.fl --- ../tmp-orig/zynaddsubfx-2.1.1/src/UI/PresetsUI.fl 2004-08-22 23:11:15.0 +0200 +++ ./src/UI/PresetsUI.fl 2005-04-06 19:33:46.992091465 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ version 1.0105 header_name {.h} code_name {.cc} -decl {\#include FL/fl_ask.h} {public +decl {\#include FL/fl_ask.H} {public } decl {\#include stdio.h} {public diff -urN ../tmp-orig/zynaddsubfx-2.1.1/src/Seq/MIDIEvents.C ./src/Seq/MIDIEvents.C --- ../tmp-orig/zynaddsubfx-2.1.1/src/Seq/MIDIEvents.C 2004-07-31 02:14:57.0 +0200 +++ ./src/Seq/MIDIEvents.C 2005-04-06 19:34:58.046769078 +0200 @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ if (l-current!=NULL) l-current-next=tmp; else l-first=tmp; l-current=tmp; -printf(Wx%x ,(int) l-current); +printf(Wx%lx ,(long) l-current); printf(- %d \n,l-current-ev.deltatime); l-size++; }; @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ if (l-current!=NULL) { // ev-deltatime=1; // printf(Rx%d\n,l-current-ev.deltatime); - printf(Rx%x ,(int) l-current); - printf(- %d (next=%x) \n,(int)l-current-ev.deltatime,(int)l-current-next); + printf(Rx%lx ,(long) l-current); + printf(- %d (next=%lx) \n,(int)l-current-ev.deltatime,(long)l-current-next); }; }; --- Received: (at 303436-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 17:23:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 10:23:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from linares.terra.com.br [200.154.55.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQTmW-0005su-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:23:33 -0700 Received: from bugala.terra.com.br (bugala.terra.com.br [200.154.55.135]) by linares.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16672DDC93F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:23:31 -0300 (BRT) X-Terra-Karma: -2% X-Terra-Hash: d9050ffc3e12b1c6728f1fe4d52f0538 Received-SPF: none (bugala.terra.com.br: 200.154.55.135 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of debian.org) client-ip=200.154.55.135; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; helo=[10.1.1.3]; Received: from [10.1.1.3] (pasteur.colband.com.br [200.245.157.15]) (authenticated user emacan) by bugala.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045CEBA404A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:23:28 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:20:56 -0300 From: Eduardo Marcel Macan [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed by NMU upload Content-Type: text/plain;
Bug#306454: maxdb-7.5.00: Three remotely exploitable buffer overflows in MaxDB
Package: maxdb-7.5.00 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Three remotely exploitable buffer overflows in various parts of MaxDB have been reported by iDefense. Please see their advisories for details: http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=236type=vulnerabilities http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=234type=vulnerabilities http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=235type=vulnerabilities All issues have been fixed in 7.5.00.26 Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#269152: reduce the bug sevirity
Hi All, Since there's a workaround, what do you think on reducing the sevirity of this bug report. This will allow clumus 0.101-2 to get into sarge. Baruch - maybe a patch can be applied automatically using the postinst script? Lior Kaplan Guides.co.il -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#269152: reduce the bug sevirity
Hi All, Since there's a workaround, what do you think on reducing the sevirity of this bug report. This will allow clumus 0.101-2 to get into sarge. Baruch - maybe a patch can be applied automatically using the postinst script? Lior Kaplan Guides.co.il -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306411: gnome-mag: doesnt even start
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 07:33:45PM +0200, Fionn Behrens wrote: Package: gnome-mag Version: 0.10.11-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tried it on the shell. This happens: home # magnifier ** ERROR **: Error registering magnifier server. aborting... zsh: abort magnifier Where did you get this version of gnome-mag? You seem to be severale versions behind anything that Debian currently ships. Can you please upgrade to the current version and see if that fixes your problem? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#303073: marked as done (haskell-http: FTBFS: missing files)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:51:59 +0100 (BST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line haskell-http FTBFS fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 18:02:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 04 11:02:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIVuU-0002Rk-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:02:51 -0700 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIVuU-If-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:02:50 -0600 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8627CBF; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:41:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-68-164.mnet-online.de [82.135.68.164]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6982966D72; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:41:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7468B100442A0; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:41:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: haskell-http: FTBFS: missing files Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:41:01 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: haskell-http Version: 0.4.20041219-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package haskell-http in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] Warning: No explicit method nor default method for `*' In the instance declaration for `Num ABCD' ./Codec/MD5.lhs:86: Warning: No explicit method nor default method for `signum' In the instance declaration for `Num ABCD' ./Codec/MD5.lhs:86: Warning: No explicit method nor default method for `abs' In the instance declaration for `Num ABCD' ./Codec/MD5.lhs:86: Warning: No explicit method nor default method for `fromInteger' In the instance declaration for `Num ABCD' Compiling Network.HTTP ( ./Network/HTTP.hs, dist/build/./Network/HTTP.o ) Compiling Network.Browser ( ./Network/Browser.hs, dist/build/./Network/Browser.o ) /usr/bin/ar: creating dist/build/libHSHTTP-0.4.a Preprocessing library HTTP-0.4... Building HTTP-0.4... Running: mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/libghc6-http-dev Running: mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6 Running: ./setup copy --copy-prefix=debian/tmp/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6 Warning: The filename Setup.description is deprecated, please move to pkgname.cabal Installing: debian/tmp/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/HTTP-0.4 debian/tmp/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/bin HTTP-0.4... grep: *.cabal: No such file or directory grep: *.cabal: No such file or directory Running: cp .installed-pkg-config debian/tmp/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/-/installed-pkg-config cp: cannot create regular file `debian/tmp/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/-/installed-pkg-config': No such file or directory cp .installed-pkg-config debian/tmp/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/-/installed-pkg-config files: 256 at /usr/bin/dh_haskell line 167. make: *** [install] Error 1 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. --- Received: (at 303073-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 18:52:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 11:52:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from urchin.earth.li [193.201.200.73] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQVA8-0004QI-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:52:00 -0700 Received: from ganesh (helo=localhost) by urchin.earth.li with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DQVA7-hn-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005
Processed: Re: Bug#306435: slapd: Hidden file in /var/lib/ldap caused upgrade to fail (Directory not empty)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306435 important Bug#306435: slapd: Hidden file in /var/lib/ldap caused upgrade to fail (Directory not empty) Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306435: slapd: Hidden file in /var/lib/ldap caused upgrade to fail (Directory not empty)
severity 306435 important thanks On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 12:42:27AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software A hidden file (probably admin created) in /var/lib/ldap broke the slapd upgrade when the backed up database was restored. It appears that all VISIBLE files were removed from this directory as part of the upgrade, this procedure should be extended to ALL files. What do you mean by hidden file? Do you mean a dotfile (filename begins with .)? Removing the offending file and restarting the slapd install fixed the problem. Since there is obviously a workaround for this problem, and since the maintainer scripts handle upgrades for normal use cases of /var/lib/ldap just fine (it is not normal to create extra files in /var/lib/ldap, a directory owned by the slapd server), I don't believe this bug should be RC. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#306454: maxdb-7.5.00: Three remotely exploitable buffer overflows in MaxDB
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 306454 + pending Bug#306454: maxdb-7.5.00: Three remotely exploitable buffer overflows in MaxDB Tags were: security Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: dfg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 306380 - moreinfo unreproducible Bug#306380: leafnode: postinst adds spurious lines to /etc/inetd.conf Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo, unreproducible tag 306380 + pending Bug#306380: leafnode: postinst adds spurious lines to /etc/inetd.conf There were no tags set. Tags added: pending severity 306380 serious Bug#306380: leafnode: postinst adds spurious lines to /etc/inetd.conf Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306363: snes9express: built for all architectures, but uninstallable on most
hi, the bug is fixed and the package will be uploaded by my sponsor as soon as possible. I want to know how an if it is necessary to ask ftp-master to remove the binaries on architectures that does not have snes9x-x. thanks, The snes9express package has been built on all release architectures, and is present in testing; however, it depends on snes9x-x, which is only available on i386, m68k, mips, and powerpc. I did try to build snes9x-x on alpha, but the resulting binaries were unusable, so I won't be uploading them... Please fix the snes9express source package so that it does not get built for architectures where snes9x-x is not available; for instance, adding a (spurious) build-dependency on snes9x-x would have this effect. -- --- Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz http://agney.linuxhome.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] Duvidas sobre debian: http://rautu.cipsga.org.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#269152: reduce the bug sevirity
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 08:48:59PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since there's a workaround, what do you think on reducing the sevirity of this bug report. This will allow clumus 0.101-2 to get into sarge. Baruch - maybe a patch can be applied automatically using the postinst script? Does this bug apply to new installs of culmus, or only to upgrades? If it doesn't affect new installs, then it should not be RC since there is no previous stable version of culmus. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306363: snes9express: built for all architectures, but uninstallable on most
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:17:59PM -0300, Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz wrote: hi, the bug is fixed and the package will be uploaded by my sponsor as soon as possible. I want to know how an if it is necessary to ask ftp-master to remove the binaries on architectures that does not have snes9x-x. thanks, Yes, you will want to file a bug report against ftp.debian.org requesting removal of the binaries, once the fix is uploaded. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassign 305156 to libcurl3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 305156 libcurl3 Bug#305156: amule: linked against libssl Bug reassigned from package `amule' to `libcurl3'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: NMU of libtext-wikiformat-perl (patch)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package libtext-wikiformat-perl Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libtext-wikiformat-perl tags 304122 +patch Bug#304122: libtext-wikiformat-perl: Missing dependency on liburi-perl There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks mate Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306240: qtstalker: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on virtual package 'libmysqlclient-dev'
Hi Marco, On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 05:07:33PM +0200, Marco van Zwetselaar wrote: Please change the Build-Depends to 'libmysqlclient12-dev' in debian/control. Or libmysqlclient14-dev, which is the version that upstream currently recommends. I've bumped it to 14 in qtstalker 0.29-2, which I'll upload to m.d.n in a second. I'll be very grateful to the DD who will pick it up from there and NMU / sponsor it.[2] Unfortunately, since I have no ongoing interest in this package, I'm not really willing to do the work behind sponsoring a new upstream version of it. If you could prepare a 0.26-4 version that fixes this particular bug, I'd be happy to sponsor that. Thanks Steve, I've just uploaded 0.26-5 to m.d.n.. It fixes this FTBFS and another potential build-related problem. The diff with 0.26-3 is pretty minimal, so it shouldn't be a lot of work for you. Thanks for picking this up. I notice that you're using a versioned build-dependency on libmysqlclient14-dev (= 4.1.11). Is there a reason this build-dep needs to be versioned? A minor issue, in any case; the package is building now and should be uploaded soon. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Processed: reassign 305156 to libcurl3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 305156 amule Bug#305156: amule: linked against libssl Bug reassigned from package `libcurl3' to `amule'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305156: Processed: reassign 305156 to libcurl3
reassign 305156 amule thanks On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 12:48:30PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 305156 libcurl3 Bug#305156: amule: linked against libssl Bug reassigned from package `amule' to `libcurl3'. Eh, this bug is an RC bug about the fact that amule as currently linked in Debian is not distributable because of a GPL/OpenSSL license conflict. This is amule's bug, not libcurl's. If you want to file a wishlist bug against libcurl requesting a GPL-compatible variant, that would be a separate bug. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#305848: marked as done (webmin-sendmail: Error message : The sendmail config file /etc/sendmail.cf)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:02:37 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305848: fixed in webmin-extra 1.180-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2005 13:40:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 06:40:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lnxgw.mimizan.com [81.255.58.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DOyO2-0002ra-00; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 06:40:03 -0700 Received: from [192.168.10.206] ([192.168.10.206]) by lnxgw.mimizan.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j3MDtrfE023099 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:55:53 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:39:58 +0200 From: MEDIAFOREST Technical Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; fr; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: webmin-sendmail: Error message : The sendmail config file /etc/sendmail.cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mairie_Mimizan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Mairie_Mimizan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: webmin-sendmail Version: 1.180-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying to use the webmin-sendmail module, I get the message : The sendmail config file /etc/sendmail.cf does not exist. Maybe your module configuration is incorrect. This has a side impact on the webmin-virtual-server module which throw an error when trying to detect the system configuration : The Sendmail mail server does not appear to be installed on your system, or has not yet been set up properly in Webmin's Sendmail Configuration module. If you are running a different mail server, select it on the module configuration page. .. your system is not ready for use by Virtualmin. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages webmin-sendmail depends on: ii perl 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii sendmail 8.13.4-1 powerful, efficient, and scalable ii webmin1.180-3web-based administration toolkit -- no debconf information -- Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner --- Received: (at 305848-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 20:09:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 13:09:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQWMl-0005n9-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:09:07 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQWGT-0005LM-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:02:37 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaldhar H. Vyas) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#305848: fixed in webmin-extra 1.180-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:02:37 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: webmin-extra Source-Version: 1.180-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of webmin-extra, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: webmin-bind_1.180-4_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-extra/webmin-bind_1.180-4_all.deb webmin-extra_1.180-4.diff.gz to pool/main/w/webmin-extra/webmin-extra_1.180-4.diff.gz webmin-extra_1.180-4.dsc to pool/main/w/webmin-extra/webmin-extra_1.180-4.dsc webmin-fetchmail_1.180-4_all.deb to
Bug#260808: still experiencing problems with avifile-player?
Hi, on Jul 22 2004 you filed a bug against the avifile-player package in debian. This report can be found here: http://bugs.debian.org/260808. It would be very helpful if you could try playing your file again with a recent version of avifile-player and related programs (X, etc.). A lot has changed since you originally filed your report. However, your report is still a serious one and it would be great if the problem had been resolved. The latest version of avifile-player in debian is 1:0.7.43.20050224-1. There have been three releases since you filed the bug. Yours, -- Jon Dowland http://jon.dowland.name/ PGP fingerprint: 7032F238 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306411: gnome-mag: doesnt even start
Em Ter, 2005-04-26 s 11:08 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu: On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 07:33:45PM +0200, Fionn Behrens wrote: home # magnifier ** ERROR **: Error registering magnifier server. aborting... zsh: abort magnifier Where did you get this version of gnome-mag? You seem to be severale versions behind anything that Debian currently ships. Can you please upgrade to the current version and see if that fixes your problem? gnome-mag's mainly use is with gnopernicus; it is provided as a command-line utility to be useable otherwise, but then you need to specify some options to tell it how to work; I'd close the bug, but let's make sure: would you mind testing if the following command works?: $ magnifier -v -m Thanks, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha http://couve.no-ip.org/~kov/ Debian: http://www.debian.org/ * http://www.debian-br.org/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#306071: spfmilter: fails to start with a missing shared object error
According to upstream, spfmilter does not work with libspf2 1.2.x. I will test to see if that's out of date, but I will probably end up having to rebuild against libspf instead, which means missing functionality (--trustedforwarders and --recipientmx) -- but that's better than no functionality. -- Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306205: marked as done (changed soname without package name change?)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:28:50 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306205: fixed in libspf2 1.2.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2005 00:43:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 23 17:43:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rdu90.com (mail.rdu90.com) [69.17.21.239] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DPVDj-0007ci-00; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:43:35 -0700 Received: from skaro.rdu90.com (router.rdu90.com [192.168.1.1]) by mail.rdu90.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j3O0hReC015566 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:43:27 -0500 Received: from skaro.rdu90.com (skaro [127.0.0.1]) by skaro.rdu90.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j3O0hRq5023836; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:43:27 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by skaro.rdu90.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j3O0hQDl023833; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:43:26 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Good Times [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: spfmilter: fails to start with a missing shared object error X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:43:26 -0500 X-DCC--Metrics: skaro 32702; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84rc2, clamav-milter version 0.84e on castrovalva X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84rc2, clamav-milter version 0.84e on skaro X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: spfmilter Version: 1.99+0.95-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable when i execute /etc/init.d/spfmilter start i get the following /usr/sbin/spfmilter: error while loading shared libraries: libspf2.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory i have the following installed ii libspf00.999-1.0.0-cvs200503071135-1 the ANSI C SPF reference library (runtime library) ii libspf2-0 1.2.5-1Sender Policy Framework library, written in C ii libspf2-dev1.2.5-1Header and development libraries for libspf2 ii spfmilter 1.99+0.95-4A simple milter for performing SPF checks and my /usr/lib looks like /usr/lib/libspf-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libspf-1.0.so.0.0.19 /usr/lib/libspf2.a /usr/lib/libspf2.la /usr/lib/libspf2.so /usr/lib/libspf2.so.2 /usr/lib/libspf2.so.2.0.0 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages spfmilter depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libmilter0 8.13.4-1 Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter) ii libspf2-0 1.2.5-1 Sender Policy Framework library, w -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 306205-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 20:51:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 13:51:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQX1j-0005JL-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:51:27 -0700 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQWfq-00089G-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:28:50 -0400 From: Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#306205: fixed in libspf2 1.2.5-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:28:50 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Bug#306380: marked as done (leafnode: postinst adds spurious lines to /etc/inetd.conf)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:40 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306380: fixed in leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 08:16:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 01:16:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ajg222.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (angband) [83.16.240.222] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQLEs-0005E9-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:16:14 -0700 Received: from kilobyte by angband with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DQLEp-0002hq-Nj for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:16:11 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: leafnode: postinst adds spurious lines to /etc/inetd.conf X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:16:11 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: leafnode Version: 1.11.0.rel-1 Severity: normal Every time postinst is called (including upgrades), a new entry is added to /etc/inetd.conf. update-inetd will catch this problem, and ask the following question: ,- | Setting up leafnode (1.11.0.rel-1) ... | | WARNING!! /etc/inetd.conf contains multiple entries for | the `nntp' service. You're about to disable these entries. | Do you want to continue? [n] `- Upon answering n (default), you'll be left to deal with the problem yourself, upon answering y, update-inetd will make sure only one entry is enabled, leaving older ones disabled. This will cause cruft to accumulate. The extra configure-time question will also break hands-off installs/upgrades. Regards, 1KB -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages leafnode depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpcre34.5-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility ii netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii tcpd7.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrapper utilit -- debconf information: leafnode/expireinfo: leafnode/purge: false * leafnode/update-groups: false * leafnode/network: permanent * leafnode/server: news.tpi.pl leafnode/update-maxcount: leafnode/update-groupinfo: leafnode/tcpd: true leafnode/ppp: --- Received: (at 306380-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 21:08:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 14:08:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQXHu-zs-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:08:10 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQXCa-0001kX-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:40 -0400 From: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#306380: fixed in leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:40 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: leafnode Source-Version: 1.11.1.rel-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of leafnode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.diff.gz to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.diff.gz leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.dsc to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.dsc leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1_i386.deb to
Bug#306240: marked as done (qtstalker: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on virtual package 'libmysqlclient-dev')
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:55 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306240: fixed in qtstalker 0.26-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2005 08:13:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 01:13:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c158131.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.158.131] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DPyil-000218-00; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:13:35 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DPyil-0001cu-3O; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:13:35 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qtstalker: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on virtual package 'libmysqlclient-dev' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:13:35 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: qtstalker Version: 0.26-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch When trying to build 'qtstalker' in a clean 'testing' chroot, I get the following error: Get:3 http://127.0.0.1 testing/main zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.2-3 [504kB] Get:4 http://127.0.0.1 testing/main libmysqlclient12-dev 4.0.24-5 [3181kB] Fetched 4025kB in 0s (73.4MB/s) Selecting previously deselected package mysql-common. (Reading database ... 7684 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking mysql-common (from .../mysql-common_4.0.24-5_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libmysqlclient12. Unpacking libmysqlclient12 (from .../libmysqlclient12_4.0.24-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package zlib1g-dev. Unpacking zlib1g-dev (from .../zlib1g-dev_1%3a1.2.2-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libmysqlclient12-dev. Unpacking libmysqlclient12-dev (from .../libmysqlclient12-dev_4.0.24-5_amd64.deb) ... Setting up mysql-common (4.0.24-5) ... Setting up libmysqlclient12 (4.0.24-5) ... Setting up zlib1g-dev (1.2.2-3) ... Setting up libmysqlclient12-dev (4.0.24-5) ... Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... E: Build-Depends dependency for qtstalker cannot be satisfied because no available versions of package libmysqlclient-dev can satisfy version requirements The versioned Build-Depends on the virtual package 'libmysqlclient-dev' does not work. 'apt-get build-dep qtstalker' fails because of this. Please change the Build-Depends to 'libmysqlclient12-dev' in debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/qtstalker-0.26/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/qtstalker-0.26/debian/control 2005-04-25 07:56:48.175881782 + +++ ./debian/control2005-04-25 07:56:25.207373526 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: misc Priority: extra Maintainer: Marco van Zwetselaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.2.13), libdb2-dev (= 2:2.7.7), libqt3-mt-dev (= 3:3.2.3), libmysqlclient-dev (= 4.0.20) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.2.13), libdb2-dev (= 2:2.7.7), libqt3-mt-dev (= 3:3.2.3), libmysqlclient12-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1.1 Package: qtstalker --- Received: (at 306240-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 21:20:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 14:20:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQXTR-0004NI-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:20:05 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQXCp-0001uK-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:55 -0400 From: Marco van Zwetselaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#306240: fixed in qtstalker 0.26-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:55 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: qtstalker Source-Version: 0.26-5 We
Bug#303631: marked as done (tqsllib0: Tqsllib 1.5 generates corrupt .p12 files)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:55:53 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303631: fixed in tqsllib 2.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2005 19:19:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 07 12:19:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sense-sea-megasub-1-81.oz.net (n7xy.net) [216.39.144.81] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DJcXP-0001UE-00; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:19:35 -0700 Received: from n7xy by n7xy.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DJcWu-0007Bu-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:19:04 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bob Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tqsllib0: Tqsllib 1.5 generates corrupt .p12 files X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:19:04 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: tqsllib0 Version: 1.4-1 Severity: important tqsllib = 1.5 contains a bug that causes generation of corrupt .p12 files on systems using openssl 0.9.7 (Debian testing and unstable have version 0.9.7e-3). Source code for version 2.0, as well as the latest (1.11) version of the companion trustedqsl is available at http://www.arrl.org/lotw/#download. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-n7xy Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages tqsllib0 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 303631-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 21:22:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 14:22:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQXWB-0004zQ-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:22:55 -0700 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQX61-WQ-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:55:53 -0400 From: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#303631: fixed in tqsllib 2.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:55:53 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: tqsllib Source-Version: 2.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tqsllib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tqsllib-bin_2.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tqsllib/tqsllib-bin_2.0-1_i386.deb tqsllib-dev_2.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tqsllib/tqsllib-dev_2.0-1_i386.deb tqsllib1_2.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tqsllib/tqsllib1_2.0-1_i386.deb tqsllib_2.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tqsllib/tqsllib_2.0-1.diff.gz tqsllib_2.0-1.dsc to pool/main/t/tqsllib/tqsllib_2.0-1.dsc tqsllib_2.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tqsllib/tqsllib_2.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tqsllib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if
Processed: tagging 306454
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306454 fixed-upstream Bug#306454: maxdb-7.5.00: Three remotely exploitable buffer overflows in MaxDB Tags were: pending security Tags added: fixed-upstream End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306405: marked as done (webmin-bind 1.180-3 forget to physically rename bind8-lib.pl)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:30:58 -0400 (EDT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#306405: webmin-bind 1.180-3 forget to physically rename bind8-lib.pl has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 10:55:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 03:55:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailbox0.esomar.nl [213.201.162.197] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQNj4-0006Fa-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 03:55:34 -0700 Received: from root by mailbox0.esomar.nl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DQNj1-0003d9-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:55:31 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: webmin-bind 1.180-3 forget to physically rename bind8-lib.pl X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:55:31 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: webmin-bind Version: 1.180-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Version 1.180-3 in testing of webmin bind has not renamed the bind8-lib.pl in /usr/share/webmin/bind. It is still called as above. that means webmin returns an error message that is could not find bind-lib.pl a rename of file of symlink fixes the problem. But a file rename on a part of a package is not for the average joe. So IMO this breaks webmin bind for most users. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.18 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages webmin-bind depends on: ii perl 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii webmin1.180-3web-based administration toolkit -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 306405-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 22:31:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 15:31:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from atlmail.prod.rxgsys.com (bastet.signetmail.com) [64.74.124.160] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQYas-00069b-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:31:50 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bastet.signetmail.com (RXG Elite Mail Server) with ESMTP id 31C3AA879B; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:19:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bastet.signetmail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlmail.prod.rxgsys.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09157-05; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:19:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.braincells.com (unknown [63.115.148.100]) by bastet.signetmail.com (RXG Elite Mail Server) with ESMTP id 3E894A871D; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:19:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.braincells.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3838206; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:31:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.braincells.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (samadhi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30537-01; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:31:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [149.123.132.115] (unknown [149.123.132.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.braincells.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C07E81C2; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:31:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:30:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Debian Webmin maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#306405: webmin-bind 1.180-3 forget to physically rename bind8-lib.pl In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at braincells.com
Bug#305848: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#305848: Still Problem after config modification
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, MEDIAFOREST Technical Contact wrote: The default path for sendmail.cf file is bad : /etc/sendmail.cf instead of /etc/mail/sendmail.cf the default path for Sendmail M4 base directory is bad too. The wrong config was being installed. I fixed that in -4 (which Iuploaded earlier today.) The bind problem was fixed too. After installing -4, can you check if bug #259708 is also fixed? It's been open a long time but I don't use sendmail myself so I can't check. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304050: Patch to make multisync work with evolution 2.2
The following little patch makes the plugin work with evolution 2.2.2-2 again. At least for me it works again with my S-E K700i. Bye, Alain -- This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons. --- multisync-0.82/plugins/evolution2_sync/configure 2005-04-27 01:06:19.686073264 +0200 +++ multisync-0.82.new/plugins/evolution2_sync/configure 2005-04-27 00:33:42.050679080 +0200 @@ -20868,7 +20868,7 @@ test -n $YACC || YACC=yacc -pkg_modules=gtk+-2.0 libgnomeui-2.0 libbonoboui-2.0 glib-2.0 libbonobo-2.0 evolution-data-server-1.0 libebook-1.0 libecal-1.0 libedata-book-1.0 libedata-cal-1.0 libedataserver-1.0 +pkg_modules=gtk+-2.0 libgnomeui-2.0 libbonoboui-2.0 glib-2.0 libbonobo-2.0 evolution-data-server-1.2 libebook-1.2 libecal-1.2 libedata-book-1.2 libedata-cal-1.2 libedataserver-1.2 succeeded=no signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#306499: mesag3: missing dependency on libglide3
Package: mesag3 Version: 6.2.1-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid $ ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.5.060201 libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x4027f000) libXext.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x40346000) libglide3.so.3 = not found libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40355000) libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40377000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x403c8000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x404fb000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-k6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=français (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mesag3 depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libglu1-mesa [libglu 6.2.1-4 The OpenGL utility library (GLU) ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information -- Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux: | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check http://www.debian.org/
Bug#304050: Patch to make multisync work with evolution 2.2
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 01:12:46AM +0200, Alain Schroeder wrote: The following little patch makes the plugin work with evolution 2.2.2-2 again. At least for me it works again with my S-E K700i. --- multisync-0.82/plugins/evolution2_sync/configure 2005-04-27 01:06:19.686073264 +0200 +++ multisync-0.82.new/plugins/evolution2_sync/configure 2005-04-27 00:33:42.050679080 +0200 @@ -20868,7 +20868,7 @@ test -n $YACC || YACC=yacc -pkg_modules=gtk+-2.0 libgnomeui-2.0 libbonoboui-2.0 glib-2.0 libbonobo-2.0 evolution-data-server-1.0 libebook-1.0 libecal-1.0 libedata-book-1.0 libedata-cal-1.0 libedataserver-1.0 +pkg_modules=gtk+-2.0 libgnomeui-2.0 libbonoboui-2.0 glib-2.0 libbonobo-2.0 evolution-data-server-1.2 libebook-1.2 libecal-1.2 libedata-book-1.2 libedata-cal-1.2 libedataserver-1.2 succeeded=no FWIW, the following is in the Ubuntu package and I believe I took it from upstream's CVS: +pkg_modules_generic=gtk+-2.0 libgnomeui-2.0 libbonoboui-2.0 glib-2.0 libbonobo-2.0 +pkg_modules_eds_1_0=evolution-data-server-1.0 libebook-1.0 libecal-1.0 libedata-book-1.0 libedata-cal-1.0 libedataserver-1.0 +pkg_modules_eds_1_2=evolution-data-server-1.2 libebook-1.2 libecal-1.2 libedata-book-1.2 libedata-cal-1.2 libedataserver-1.2 +PKG_CHECK_MODULES(PACKAGE, [$pkg_modules_generic $pkg_modules_eds_1_0], version=2.0, +[PKG_CHECK_MODULES(PACKAGE, [$pkg_modules_generic $pkg_modules_eds_1_2], version=2.2)]) +AC_SUBST(PACKAGE_CFLAGS) +AC_SUBST(PACKAGE_LIBS) I have not tested this on unstable, though. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#207027: marked as done (FTBFS (unstable/all) fails to build on all architectures, missing build-dep)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:02:38 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#207027: fixed in stklos 0.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2003 17:23:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 24 12:23:21 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h68-145-107-190.cg.shawcable.net (lucifer.0c3.net) [68.145.107.190] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19qyaC-0003ex-00; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:23:16 -0500 Received: from adconrad by lucifer.0c3.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19qyaC-0005yf-00; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:23:16 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS (unstable/all) fails to build on all architectures, missing build-dep X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22 Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:23:16 -0600 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: stklos Version: 0.54-1 Severity: serious libgc6-dev no longer exists in unstable and has been replaced by libgc-dev. Your build dependencies should be updated to reflect this. ... Adam Conrad -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux lucifer 2.4.20 #1 Sat Dec 28 20:41:54 MST 2002 ppc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 207027-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 00:12:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 17:12:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQaA7-0001be-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:12:19 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQa0k-0005Uc-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:02:38 -0400 From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#207027: fixed in stklos 0.55-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:02:38 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: stklos Source-Version: 0.55-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of stklos, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: stklos_0.55-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/stklos/stklos_0.55-1.diff.gz stklos_0.55-1.dsc to pool/main/s/stklos/stklos_0.55-1.dsc stklos_0.55-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/stklos/stklos_0.55-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated stklos package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:23:57 +1000 Source: stklos Binary: stklos Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.55-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: stklos - An efficient Scheme System providing a powerful Object System Closes: 207027 215876 217308 297968 Changes: stklos (0.55-1) unstable; urgency=low . * QA Group upload orphaning this package * Incorporates previous NMUs (closes: #217308, #207027, #215876) * debian/control: build-depend on dpatch * debian/rules: add dpatch support * Incorporate patch from Andreas Jochens to fix FTBFS on amd64/with gcc-4.0 (closes: #297968) Files:
Bug#217308: marked as done (stklos includes dir.gz and dir.old.gz at /usr/share/info)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:02:38 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#217308: fixed in stklos 0.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 20:01:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 15:01:17 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from guadiana.unex.es [158.49.17.23] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACle1-0002Fw-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:01:17 -0500 Received: from guadiana.unex.es ([158.49.17.23] helo=localhost ident=sanvila) by guadiana.unex.es with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ACle0-0006ww-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:01:16 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:01:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: stklos includes dir.gz and dir.old.gz at /usr/share/info Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: stklos Version: 0.55-0.1 Severity: serious In 9 different architectures, including i386, this package contains files /usr/share/info/dir.gz and /usr/share/info/dir.old.gz. This is due to an automake bug which is now fixed (see Bug #214769). If two packages with this bug reach testing it will be a complete disaster, I'm trying to avoid that by submitting serious bugs against all of them. (I'm Cc:ing Matthias, who did this NMU, hope the X-Debian-Cc works). --- Received: (at 217308-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 00:12:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 17:12:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQaA5-0001al-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:12:17 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQa0k-0005Ul-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:02:38 -0400 From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#217308: fixed in stklos 0.55-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:02:38 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: stklos Source-Version: 0.55-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of stklos, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: stklos_0.55-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/stklos/stklos_0.55-1.diff.gz stklos_0.55-1.dsc to pool/main/s/stklos/stklos_0.55-1.dsc stklos_0.55-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/stklos/stklos_0.55-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated stklos package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:23:57 +1000 Source: stklos Binary: stklos Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.55-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: stklos - An efficient Scheme System providing a powerful Object System Closes: 207027 215876 217308 297968 Changes: stklos (0.55-1) unstable; urgency=low . * QA Group upload orphaning this package * Incorporates previous NMUs (closes: #217308, #207027, #215876) * debian/control: build-depend on dpatch * debian/rules: add
Processed: Re: libmail-box-perl: FTBFS: halts (idling) on tests
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 306002 + confirmed Bug#306002: libmail-box-perl: FTBFS: halts (idling) on tests Tags were: sid Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306002: libmail-box-perl: FTBFS: halts (idling) on tests
tags 306002 + confirmed thanks I'll take a look at this as soon as possible - That will not be, sadly, in the two next days, as I'll be away from the keyboard :-/ Thanks a lot. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302778: marked as done (mozilla-browser: JS can access any mozilla memory)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:03:46 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line mozilla-browser: JS can access any mozilla memory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 20:56:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 12:56:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 194.186.49.143.adsl-spb.net.rol.ru (serv.sanechka.spb.ru) [194.186.49.143] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHpfO-0001L5-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:56:27 -0800 Received: from sasha by serv.sanechka.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DHpfJ-0007QY-5P for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:56:21 +0400 Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:56:21 +0400 From: Alexandra N. Kossovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mozilla-browser: JS can access any mozilla memory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mozilla-browser Version: 2:1.7.6-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288688 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (999, 'testing'), (50, 'experimental'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages mozilla-browser depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libnspr4 2:1.7.6-1 Netscape Portable Runtime Library ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxp6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System printing extension ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc 21.5-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- debconf information excluded -- Regards, Sasha. Alexandra N. Kossovsky, software engineer. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 302778-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 01:03:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 18:03:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQaxv-0005yK-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:03:47 -0700 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2A0A172C21; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:03:46 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mozilla-browser: JS can access any mozilla memory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL