Processed: reopening 307183, tagging 307183

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reopen 307183
Bug#307183: linda: can't build as root
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> tags 307183 sarge
Bug#307183: linda: can't build as root
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: owner 308783, owner 309143

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> owner 308783 David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#308783: libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Owner recorded as David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

>  # David Nusinow is working on this.
> owner 309143 David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#309143: xlibs: libxpm4's new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Owner recorded as David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 308783, tagging 309143

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 308783 + fixed-upstream
Bug#308783: libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed-upstream

>  # X.Org X11R6.8.2 has code that fixes this.
> tags 309143 + fixed-upstream
Bug#309143: xlibs: libxpm4's new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Tags were: woody security
Tags added: fixed-upstream

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307183: marked as done (linda: can't build as root)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 22:47:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307183: fixed in linda 0.3.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2005 12:41:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 01 05:41:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c203005.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.5] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DSDl1-0002lW-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 05:41:12 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DSDlL-0001NG-MU; Sun, 01 May 2005 14:41:31 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linda: FTBFS: test.test_support.TestFailed: errors occurred 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 14:41:31 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: linda
Version: 0.3.13
Severity: serious

When building 'linda' in a clean chroot on i386/testing,
I get the following error:

self.assertEqual(expected.intersection(output), expected)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/unittest.py", line 302, in failUnlessEqual
raise self.failureException, \
AssertionError: Set([]) != Set([' removed within the clean target.', 'E: 
testunpacked; Package contains debian/files.', ' This package contains 
debian/files, which should not be installed, and'])

--
Ran 187 tests in 4.879s

FAILED (failures=4, errors=2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "tests/run_tests.py", line 84, in ?
UnpackerBaseTest, EndToEndTest, KeysTest)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/test/test_support.py", line 262, in run_unittest
run_suite(suite, testclass)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/test/test_support.py", line 246, in run_suite
raise TestFailed(msg)
test.test_support.TestFailed: errors occurred; run in verbose mode for details
make[1]: *** [test] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/linda-0.3.13'
make: *** [test-stamp] Error 2


Regards
Andreas Jochens

---
Received: (at 307183-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 02:53:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 19:53:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX9FW-0005pr-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 19:53:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX99y-KR-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 22:47:18 -0400
From: Steve Kowalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307183: fixed in linda 0.3.14
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 22:47:18 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

Source: linda
Source-Version: 0.3.14

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linda, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linda_0.3.14.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linda/linda_0.3.14.dsc
linda_0.3.14.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linda/linda_0.3.14.tar.gz
linda_0.3.14_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/linda/linda_0.3.14_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Steve Kowalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linda package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:31:24 +1000
Source: l

Processed: tagging 306884, severity of 306884 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 306884 unreproducible
Bug#306884: modutils update conflicts with module-init-tools
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

>  # not reproducable and not heard back from the submitter
> severity 306884 important
Bug#306884: modutils update conflicts with module-init-tools
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309113: beneath-a-steel-sky: not DFSG compliant

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:29:27PM -0400, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
> The DFSG requires the availability of the source code for such a program.
> And I could not find it anywhere. The only 2 files available in the source
> archive are sky.dnr and sky.dsk.
> 
> For the first one: 

For reference and the usual RC bug surfers ;) this is probably a
duplicate of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241431&archive=yes

Leaving further comments to the maintainer.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308390: marked as done (protocol error)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 02:21:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Reached sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 22:55:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 15:55:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVHAF-0001bY-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 15:55:51 -0700
Received: from clipper.ens.fr (clipper-gw.ens.fr [129.199.1.22])
  by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.2/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id j49MtJL9020878
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 May 2005 00:55:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by clipper.ens.fr (8.13.1/jb-1.1)
id j49MtJ2j007649 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 May 2005 00:55:19 
+0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: clipper.ens.fr: glisse owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:55:19 +0200 (MEST)
From: Marc Glisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: protocol error
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.10 
(nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 10 May 2005 00:55:20 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgimp-perl
Version: 2.0.dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable


any example using libgimp-perl fails with a "protocol error" message, as
shown in 2 other bug reports.

Gimp/Config.pm contains a line:
   GIMP => q[],

Net/Net.pm contains:
 exec $Gimp::Config{GIMP},

Both do not go well together apparently. Either the GIMP line should be
fixed, or the environment should be querried at some point to look for
gimp. The easiest way around I have found is this:

--- debian/rules.orig   2005-05-10 00:18:00.481533507 +0200
+++ debian/rules2005-05-10 00:07:30.315113340 +0200
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
dh_testdir

# Add here commands to compile the package.
-   $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor PREFIX=/usr
+   $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor PREFIX=/usr GIMP=/usr/bin/gimp
$(MAKE) OPTIMIZE="$(CFLAGS)"

touch build-stamp


I must however warn you that I know nothing about either perl or gimp, so
you might want to check it. For me it seems to allow the examples in
/usr/share/doc/libgimp-perl/examples to work properly again (by the way,
these examples should look for perl in /usr/bin and not /opt/bin).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (70, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libgimp-perl depends on:
ii  gimp2.2.6-1  The GNU Image Manipulation Program
ii  libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4  The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgimp2.0  2.2.6-1  Libraries necessary to run the GIM
ii  libglib2.0-02.6.4-1  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2-perl1:1.081-1Perl interface to the 2.x series o
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1  The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.8.1-1  Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  pdl 1:2.4.2-2perl data language: Perl extension
ii  perl5.8.4-8  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii  perl-base [perlapi-5.8.4]   5.8.4-8  The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis

-- no debconf information



---
Received: (at 302734-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 00:21:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 17:21:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX6sp-0006W3-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 17:21:27 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de 

Bug#302734: marked as done (libgimp-perl: protocol error (1))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 02:21:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Reached sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 17:45:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 09:45:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sklave3.rackland.de [213.133.101.23] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHmh4-0003Ru-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 09:45:58 -0800
Received: from andromeda ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by sklave3.rackland.de (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with BSMTP id 
j32Hjswc022386;
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:45:54 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by andromeda.dresden.danisch.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-15) id 
j32HjoK8007058;
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:45:50 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Hadmut Danisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgimp-perl: protocol error (1)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.1
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:45:50 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgimp-perl
Version: 2.0.dfsg-4
Severity: important


Hi,

when I run a simple program like 

#!/usr/bin/perl
use Gimp;

Gimp::init();



(or Gimp::main() ) I just get the error message

protocol error (1) at /usr/lib/perl5/Gimp/Net.pm line 67.


regards
Hadmut


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-danisch-p4-intel
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libgimp-perl depends on:
ii  gimp2.2.4-2  The GNU Image Manipulation Program
ii  libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4  The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgimp2.0  2.2.4-2  Libraries necessary to run the GIM
ii  libglib2.0-02.6.3-1  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2-perl1:1.061-1Perl interface to the 2.x series o
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4  The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.8.1-1  Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  pdl 1:2.4.1-1The perl data language: Perl exten
ii  perl5.8.4-8  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  perl-base [perlapi-5.8.4]   5.8.4-8  The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 302734-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 00:21:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 17:21:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX6sp-0006W3-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 17:21:27 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DX6sk-0007Or-Fr; Sun, 15 May 2005 02:21:22 +0200
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 02:21:22 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reached sarge
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

tags 302734 - sarge
thanks

Fixed package has reached testing

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307856: marked as done (libgimp-perl won't init: "protocol error")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 02:21:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Reached sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 21:24:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 14:24:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTnpA-0006b8-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 14:24:00 -0700
Received: from clipper.ens.fr (clipper-gw.ens.fr [129.199.1.22])
  by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.2/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id j45LNSWE004964
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 May 2005 23:23:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by clipper.ens.fr (8.13.1/jb-1.1)
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 23:23:28 +0200
From: David Madore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgimp-perl won't init: "protocol error"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.10 
(nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Thu, 05 May 2005 23:23:29 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgimp-perl
Version: 2.0.dfsg-4

It seems that libgimp-perl refuses to start even with the most trivial
program:

machine madore ~ $ cat /tmp/test.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use Gimp;
Gimp::init;
machine madore ~ $ /tmp/test.pl
test.pl: protocol error (1) at /usr/lib/perl5/Gimp/Net.pm line 67. (ERROR)
protocol error (1) at /usr/lib/perl5/Gimp/Net.pm line 67.
machine madore ~ $ gimp --version
GIMP version 2.2.6

Gimp version is 2.2.6-1, the most recent packaged in Debian Sarge, and
libgimp-perl is 2.0.dfsg-4, ditto.

-- 
 David A. Madore
([EMAIL PROTECTED],
 http://www.madore.org/~david/ )

---
Received: (at 302734-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 00:21:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 17:21:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX6sp-0006W3-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 17:21:27 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DX6sk-0007Or-Fr; Sun, 15 May 2005 02:21:22 +0200
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 02:21:22 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reached sarge
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

tags 302734 - sarge
thanks

Fixed package has reached testing

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Reached sarge

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 302734 - sarge
Bug#302734: libgimp-perl: protocol error (1)
Tags were: sarge patch confirmed
Bug#307856: libgimp-perl won't init: "protocol error"
Bug#308390: protocol error
Tags removed: sarge

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309152: tipa: upgrade problems related to tetex-bin

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: tipa,tetex-bin
Severity: serious

If tipa and tetex-bin from woody are installed and I upgrade to
sarge the upgrade fails, if the new tetex-bin is configured after
the new tipa:

Setting up tipa (1.2-1) ...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating /var/spool/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
updmap: config file updmap.cfg not found.
dpkg: error processing tipa (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

This is probably because /usr/bin/updmap already exists but
updmap.cfg not yet.

There are usually several solutions to this:
1) tipa could check both for the executable and the config file before
   calling updmap
2) updmap could fail gracefully if tetex-bin isn't configured yet.
3) tipa could depend on tetex-bin

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309146: install: upgrading from stable to unstable loose pcmcia pakage - problem with network on pcmcia

[Sylwester Mikulski]

Package: install
Severity: critical
Tags: experimental
Justification: breaks the whole system

when upgrade from stable to unstable, and network card is pcmcia card,
after near upgrade is complete, pcmcia-cs package is not installed. it's
mean installation loose connection to internet and there is no way to
finish rest of instalation - like 'module-init-tools', 'debconf',
'debconf-i18n'.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309014: Subject: Unprivileged users may crash atd

[Roger Leigh]

I can't repoduce this on a uniprocessor 1.4 GHz powerpc G4.

Regards,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of zopectl 0.3.4.3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 309001 + fixed
Bug#309001: file conflict with zope from woody
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 309111

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 309111 security
Bug#309111: [GNUTLS-SA-2005-1] DoS security problem in gnutls <=1.0.24 (and 
 <=1.2.3)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309145: libxfcegui4-dev: Should depend on libstartup-notification0-dev.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: libxfcegui4-dev
Version: 4.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.la references the
/usr/lib/libstartup-notification-1.la file (atleast on i386) and
libxfcegui4-dev does not have a dependency on
libstartup-notification0-dev which provides it.  This means that
packages using libtool linking against libxfcegui4 will try to
use that file and fail to build.  You should add a dependency on
libstartup-notification0-dev.

PS: It doesn't seem to be linked against libstartup-notification
on atleast amd64, didn't check the other arches.  Maybe it should
instead be rebuild without it.  Or maybe it's a missing build
dependency for libxfcegui4 too?


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309144: libxfcegui4-dev: undefined references

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: libxfcegui4-dev
Version: 4.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

When building xfce-mcs-manager 4.2.1-1, I'm
getting the following error:
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link --tag=CC i386-linux-gcc  -g -O2  -Wl,-O1 -o 
xfce-setting-show  xfce_setting_show-xfce-setting-show.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib 
-lxfce4mcs-client -lxfce4util -lglib-2.0 -Wl,--export-dynamic -L/usr/X11R6/lib 
-lxfcegui4 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lxfce4util -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 
-lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl 
-lglib-2.0
mkdir .libs
i386-linux-gcc -g -O2 -Wl,-O1 -o xfce-setting-show 
xfce_setting_show-xfce-setting-show.o -Wl,--export-dynamic  -L/usr/X11R6/lib 
/usr/lib/libxfce4mcs-client.so /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so 
/usr/lib/libstartup-notification-1.so -lSM -lICE -lX11 
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libxfce4util.so /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so 
/usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so 
/usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so 
-lm /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so
/usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_rc_set_group'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_rc_simple_open'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_resource_lookup_all'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_rc_read_list_entry'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_version_string'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_desktop_entry_get_int'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_utf8_remove_controls'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_rc_read_int_entry'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_rc_read_entry'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_gethostname'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_setenv'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_rc_has_group'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_desktop_entry_get_string'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_expand_variables'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_rc_close'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_desktop_entry_get_type'
/usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so: undefined reference to `xfce_desktop_entry_get_file'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


This looks like libxfcegui4 was not properly linked to 1
or more libraries.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308783: libxpm4: problems with s_popen (CAN-2004-0914)

[Branden Robinson]

# This doesn't actually have much to do with CAN-2004-0914.
retitle 308783 libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
# X.Org X11R6.8.2 has code that fixes this.
tag 30783 fixed-upstream
# David Nusinow is working on this.
owne 308783 David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# XFree86 4.1.0 in woody, which ships the Xpm library in a different
# package, has this flaw as well.
clone 308783 -1
retitle -1 xlibs: libxpm4's new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
reassign -1 xlibs
tag -1 woody
thanks

Matej,

If there is a security problem here, and I suppose there is given the
failure of s_open() to properly scrutinize its arguments as you indicate,
then please contact MITRE and ask for a CAN number, and/or ask
freedesktop.org to do so.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|   If atheism is a religion, then
Debian GNU/Linux   |   health is a disease.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   -- Clark Adams
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#307711: marked as done (g++-3.3: cc1plus can't be executed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 23:16:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307711: g++-3.3: cc1plus can't be executed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 21:40:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 04 14:40:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe000f6690d4e4-cm3965a061.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (vertex) 
[69.193.74.134] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTRbP-0001YH-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 14:40:20 -0700
Received: from ttb by vertex with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DTRbe-Eo-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 17:40:34 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John McCutchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: g++-3.3: cc1plus can't be executed
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 17:40:34 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software


cc1plus can't be executed

no c++ software can be compiled

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on:
ii  gcc-3.3 1:3.3.6-2The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.3-base1:3.3.6-2The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pn  libstdc++5-3.3-dev   Not found.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 307711-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 21:16:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 14:16:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX3zY-0002FS-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 14:16:12 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22693;
Sat, 14 May 2005 23:16:10 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E135FB7B;
Sat, 14 May 2005 23:16:09 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 09324-26; Sat, 14 May 2005 23:16:08 +0200 (MEST) 11338
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Sat, 14 May 2005 23:16:07 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j4ELG7Uc000538;
Sat, 14 May 2005 23:16:07 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 23:16:07 +0200
To: John McCutchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#307711: g++-3.3: cc1plus can't be executed
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

John McCutchan writes:
> Package: g++-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.6-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
> 
> 
> cc1plus can't be executed
> 
> no c++ software can be compiled

no further information has been received, this behaviour is
unreproducible.

Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of 

Bug#309140: kionjb: FTBFS: Build depends on libnjb-dev (<< 1.2) which is not available.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: kionjb
Version: 0.1.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

Your package currently can't be build because it's build depends
on libnjb-dev (<< 1.2) and that version isn't available anymore.
Even sarge currently has 1.2-2.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307750: marked as done (gcc-3.3: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault ./binobj --help 2>/dev/null)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 23:19:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 3.3.6-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 07:43:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 00:43:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTb0h-pt-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 00:43:03 -0700
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j457gqXE004121
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 5 May 2005 00:42:52 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j457gqFC004118;
Thu, 5 May 2005 00:42:52 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-3.3: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault  ./binobj --help 
2>/dev/null
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 00:42:51 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
SUBJ_HAS_SPACES autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

gcc-3.3 fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder.  (With the segmenetation fault line having 16604 rather than
23793 on it.)


if grep '^[^-]' "needed-options" > /dev/null; then echo "needed-options: `cat 
"needed-options"`" >&2; rm -f "needed-options"; false; else true; fi
../.././xgpc -B../.././ -L../..  -I../rts --automake --executable-file-name -W 
-Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -O2  --executable-path=. 
--unit-path=/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/rts 
--unit-path=/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/units `cat needed-options` 
"/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/utils/binobj.pas"
"/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/utils/mk-t-inc" 
"/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc" "tree.inc"
../.././xgpc -B../.././ -L../..  -I../rts --automake --executable-file-name -W 
-Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -O2  --executable-path=. 
--unit-path=/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/rts 
--unit-path=/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/units `cat needed-options` 
-I. -I "/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p" 
"/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/utils/gpidump.pas"
[ -r no-man ] || if [ x"sparc-unknown-linux-gnu" != x"sparc-unknown-linux-gnu" 
]; then \
  echo "*** cross-compiling; man pages for the GPC utilities will not be built" 
>&2; \
  echo cross-compile > no-man; \
elif help2man --version > /dev/null 2>&1; then \
  help2man -N ./"binobj" > "binobj.1" || { rm -f "binobj.1"; false; } \
else \
  echo "*** help2man not found; man pages for the GPC utilities will not be 
built" >&2; \
  echo no-help2man > no-man; \
fi
sh: line 1: 23793 Killed  ./binobj --help 2>/dev/null
help2man: can't get `--help' info from ./binobj
make[5]: *** [binobj.1] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build/gcc/p/utils'
make[4]: *** [pascal.utils] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build/gcc'
make[3]: *** [stage1_build] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build/gcc'
make[2]: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build'
s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0
make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6'
make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2


---
Received: (at 307750-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 21:19:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 14:19:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX42u-0003gB-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 14:19:40 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23153

Processed: Re: Bug#308783: libxpm4: problems with s_popen (CAN-2004-0914)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # This doesn't actually have much to do with CAN-2004-0914.
> retitle 308783 libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Bug#308783: libxpm4: problems with s_popen (CAN-2004-0914)
Changed Bug title.

> # X.Org X11R6.8.2 has code that fixes this.
> tag 30783 fixed-upstream
Bug number 30783 not found.

> # David Nusinow is working on this.
> owne 308783 David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> # XFree86 4.1.0 in woody, which ships the Xpm library in a different
> # package, has this flaw as well.
> clone 308783 -1
Bug#308783: libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Bug 308783 cloned as bug 309143.

> retitle -1 xlibs: libxpm4's new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Bug#309143: libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Changed Bug title.

> reassign -1 xlibs
Bug#309143: xlibs: libxpm4's new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Bug reassigned from package `libxpm4' to `xlibs'.

> tag -1 woody
Bug#309143: xlibs: libxpm4's new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Tags were: security
Tags added: woody

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in upload of aptitude 0.3.2-4 to experimental

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 309105 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#309105: aptitude: FTBFS in experimental: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not 
defined
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309135: john: FTBFS in experimental: undefined reference to `options'

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: john
Version: 1.6.36-4
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

Your package is failing to build in experimental with the
following error:
gcc -s DES_fmt.o DES_std.o DES_bs.o DES_bs_b.o MD5_fmt.o MD5_std.o BF_fmt.o 
BF_std.o bench.o best.o common.o config.o formats.o memory.o miscnl.o params.o 
path.o signals.o tty.o -o bench
path.o(.text+0xb0): In function `path_init':
: undefined reference to `options'
path.o(.text+0xba): In function `path_init':
: undefined reference to `options'
path.o(.text+0x275): In function `private_path':
: undefined reference to `options'
path.o(.text+0x2d3): In function `private_path':
: undefined reference to `options'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [bench] Error 1


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309124: policy violation of 12.5

[Mirco Bauer]

Package: mozilla
Severity: serious

Mozilla violates against 12.5 of the Debian Policy.

The package does not include the license (NPL and MPL in this case) in
the debian/copyright file. Only standard licenses which are defined in
the section 12.5 are allowed to be "linked" instead of quoted.

"Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright
and distribution license in the file /usr/share/doc/package/copyright."
...
"Packages distributed under the UCB BSD license, the Artistic license,
the GNU GPL, and the GNU LGPL should refer to the
files /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD, /usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic, 
/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL, and /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL 
respectively, rather than quoting them in the copyright file."

-- 
Regards,

Mirco 'meebey' Bauer

PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8

-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O M-
V? PS
PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y?
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#309119: rhythmbox: fails to check return value when writing playlists to disk

[Robert McQueen]

Package: rhythmbox
Version: 0.8.8-11
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

I just ran out of disk space in ~, and rhythmbox just destroyed my
playlist file. In the function rb_playlist_manager_save_thread_main in
shell/rb-playlist-manager.c, it calls xmlSaveFormatFile to write the
playlist to a temporary file, but does not check the return value of
this function before renaming the temporary file to playlists.xml,
clobbering the original and losing my playlists in the process. As
detailed in http://xmlsoft.org/html/libxml-tree.html#xmlSaveFormatFile,
the function returns -1 if an error was encountered. Rhythmbox should
only rename the temporary file to the original name if this was not the
case.

Regards,
Rob

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-alpha2
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages rhythmbox depends on:
ii  gconf2   2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  gstreamer0.8-alsa [g 0.8.8-3 ALSA plugin for GStreamer
ii  gstreamer0.8-esd [gs 0.8.8-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon plugin fo
ii  gstreamer0.8-flac0.8.8-3 FLAC plugin for GStreamer
ii  gstreamer0.8-gnomevf 0.8.8-3 Gnome VFS plugin for GStreamer
ii  gstreamer0.8-mad 0.8.8-3 MAD MPEG audio decoder plugin for 
ii  gstreamer0.8-misc0.8.8-3 Collection of various GStreamer pl
ii  gstreamer0.8-oss [gs 0.8.8-3 OSS plugin for GStreamer
ii  gstreamer0.8-vorbis  0.8.8-3 Vorbis plugin for GStreamer
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libesd0  0.2.35-2.1  Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libgconf2-4  2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libgcrypt11  1.2.0-11LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.4.2-2   library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-keyring00.4.2-1 GNOME keyring services library
ii  libgnome2-0  2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.8.4-3 The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgnutls11  1.0.16-13   GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libgpg-error01.0-1   library for common error values an
ii  libgstreamer-gconf0. 0.8.8-3 GConf support for GStreamer
ii  libgstreamer0.8-00.8.9-2 Core GStreamer libraries, plugins,
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  liborbit21:2.12.2-1  libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libtasn1-2   0.2.10-4Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2-10X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxml2  2.6.16-7GNOME XML library
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308878: kernel-image-2.6.10+11-1-686-smp fails to boot

[maximilian attems]

tags 308878 moreinfo
thanks

On Fri, 13 May 2005, Svante Signell wrote:

> Package: kernel-image
> Version: 2.6.10-1-686-smp and 2.6.11-1-686-smp
> Severity: Grave
> 
> The latest smp kernels fails to boot due to the root partiton is not
> found, resulting in a kernel panic. Kernels 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 boot OK.
> Hardware is dual Celerons.
> 
> When installing these kernels I get an error not seen before:
> #> apt-get install --reinstall kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686-smp
> Unpacking replacement kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686-smp ...
> Setting up kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686-smp (2.6.10-6) ...
> cpio:   /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fea000): No such file or directory
> cpio: (0xe000): No such file or directory
> Not touching initrd symlinks since we are being reinstalled (2.6.10-6)
> Not updating image symbolic links since we are being updated (2.6.10-6)
> ...
> 
> Attached is a diff between the configurations files of 2.6.9 and 2.6.10.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

please send in working dmesg of 2.6.8 or 2.6.9.

are you using scsi root?
if yes it's a initrd bug, you might want to look at #298736


--
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#308878: kernel-image-2.6.10+11-1-686-smp fails to boot

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 308878 moreinfo
Bug#308878: kernel-image-2.6.10+11-1-686-smp fails to boot
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309105: aptitude: FTBFS in experimental: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined

[Daniel Burrows]

On Saturday 14 May 2005 12:31 pm, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Also not that you're building the arch indep things in
> binary-arch target instead of the binary-indep.  May I
> suggest you split it up?

  I've looked at that in the past.  The problem is that it would be a nuisance 
(albiet not impossible) to disconnect the generation of manpages from the 
generation of HTML documentation, and the manpage really ought to go in the 
binary-dependent package (with the main program).  Since problems in the main 
documentation are generally either shared with the manpage or bad enough to 
cause failures on my computer, the only thing that's lost is a little CPU 
time to do the redundant builds.

  Daniel

-- 
/--- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --\
|   "But what the eagle does not realize is that it is  |
|participating in a crude form of natural selection.|
|One day, a tortoise will learn to fly."|
| -- Terry Pratchett, _Small Gods_  |
\-- Listener-supported public radio -- NPR -- http://www.npr.org ---/


pgpaI0kulRJLI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#309113: beneath-a-steel-sky: not DFSG compliant

[Wolfgang Sourdeau]

Package: beneath-a-steel-sky
Version: 0.0368-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1

The DFSG requires the availability of the source code for such a program.
And I could not find it anywhere. The only 2 files available in the source
archive are sky.dnr and sky.dsk.

For the first one: 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.1Wolfgang
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
fr_CA.ISO8859-1)

Versions of packages beneath-a-steel-sky depends on:
ii  scummvm   0.7.1-1free implementation of LucasArts' 

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309111: [GNUTLS-SA-2005-1] DoS security problem in gnutls <=1.0.24 (and <=1.2.3)

[Vincent Deffontaines]

Package: libgnutls11
Version: 1.0.16-9
Severity: serious

The current libgnutls11 ships with a major bug, which improperly checks
user provided data, and can easily lead to denial of service attacks.

The bug was discovered by INL during a security audit of NuFW, and
reported to the gnutls development team, who released a new version
(1.0.25 and 1.2.3) correcting the bug.

More details about this issue can be found at this URL :
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/security.html

The bug was also reported to Debian's security team during the 2nd half of
April, with no feedback at this time.

I am marking the severity as serious, as this actually makes other
software installed on the system potentially unusable by easily allowing a
Denial of Service attack on other packages such as OpenLDAP. Maybe this
should be marked a higher severity?

I suggest the package be upgraded to 1.0.25, or the bugfix be backported
to debian's 1.0.16.

Regards,

Vincent Deffontaines



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309105: aptitude: FTBFS in experimental: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: aptitude
Version: 0.3.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

Your package is failing to build in experimental with the
following error:
make[5]: Entering directory `/usr/src/aptitude-0.3.2/doc/fr'
rm -fr output-man
xsltproc -o output-man/aptitude.8 ./../aptitude-man.xsl ./aptitude.xml
./aptitude.xml:64: warning: failed to load external entity 
"file:///usr/share/xml/docbook/schema/dtd/4.2/docbookx.dtd"
]>
  ^
./aptitude.xml:114: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined
  \xc2\xab Ma\xc3\xaetre, est-ce qu'Emacs connais la nature du 
Bouddha ? 
  ^
./aptitude.xml:114: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined
  \xc2\xab Ma\xc3\xaetre, est-ce qu'Emacs connais la nature du 
Bouddha ? 
[...]
./aptitude.xml:7581: parser error : Entity 'manpage' not defined
&manpage;
 ^
unable to parse ./aptitude.xml
make[5]: *** [aptitude.fr.8] Error 6


This looks like a missing build dependency on docbook-xml.
Installing that fixes it.

Also not that you're building the arch indep things in
binary-arch target instead of the binary-indep.  May I
suggest you split it up?


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#302771: Bug unreproducible

[Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias]

El sÃb, 14-05-2005 a las 11:34 +0200, Christian Perrier escribiÃ:
> Against a Win XP Pro with SP2 and a local libsmbclient 3.0.14a-1
> package, both konqueror and smbclient give a proper file listing of a
> directory with 47 files in it.
> 
> Could you please give details about the target OS and confirm if you
> can STILL reproduce this bug.

Hello!,

Yes, effectively this bug is fixed in the 3.0.14a-1, I can reproduce it
anymore. 

I thougth you had closed the bug in the package's changelog, sorry. 

I think I can close the bug now because I've tested the new packages in
various machines and they work OK.

> Anyway, I hardly see why it should be considered as RC. It maybe
> deserves an important severity, but certainly not serious, given the
> description.
> 
> In short : we won't throw away samba from sarge for that, will we?

Regards,

Emilio

Bug#302771: marked as done (libsmbclient: File listings against WinXP servers still broken)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 17:24:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug unreproducible
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 20:05:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 12:05:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHosL-0001Oy-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:05:45 -0800
Received: from mail.wnec.edu [141.154.140.20] 
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHosF-00060S-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:05:40 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (r081107.rnet.wnec.edu [10.250.81.107])
by mail.wnec.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j32K4V6t003683;
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 15:04:32 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Adam R. Skutt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libsmbclient: File listings against WinXP servers still broken
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:01:04 -0500
X-Virus: clean
X-Spam-Filter: not spam
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libsmbclient
Version: 3.0.11-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

First off, I believe this maybe related to to the patch to fix #29771, 
but I'm not certain.

Anyway, connecting using smbclient on the command line or libsmclient 
apps (e.g., konqeuror) results in incomplete directory listings against 
at least WinXP servers.  I haven't tried any others (save for Samba 
3.0.11), as I don't have any other Windows servers to test against.

Downgrading to Samba 3.0.10-1 fixes this.

Adam

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libsmbclient depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcomerr2 1.37-1common error description library
ii  libkrb53   1.3.6-1   MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap2   2.1.30-3  OpenLDAP libraries

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 302771-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 15:24:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 08:24:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from stress.telefonica.net (tnetsmtp1.mail.isp) [213.4.129.135] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWyUf-00017T-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 08:23:57 -0700
Received: from iluvatar ([217.172.66.230]) by tnetsmtp1.mail.isp
  (terra.es) with ESMTP id IGHK3K01.R2Y; Sat, 14 May 2005 17:23:44 
+0200 
Subject: Re: Bug unreproducible
From: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:24:30 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

El s=C3=A1b, 14-05-2005 a las 11:34 +0200, Christian Perrier escribi=C3=B3:
> Against a Win XP Pro with SP2 and a local libsmbclient 3.0.14a-1
> package, both konqueror and smbclient give a proper file listing of a
> directory with 47 files in it.
>=20
> Could you please give details about the target OS and confirm if you
> can STILL reproduce this bug.

Hello!,

Yes, effectively this bug is fixed in the 3.0.14a-1, I can reproduce it
anymore.=20

I thougth you had closed the bug in the package's changelog, sorry.=20

I think I can close the bug now because I've tested the new packages in
various m

Bug#309097: bacula-director-sqlite: Restart failed : Old style Include/Exclude not supported

[Nicolas Raspail]

Package: bacula-director-sqlite
Version: 1.36.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

I've just upgraded my bacula system to the new version and whre Bacula
Director (sqlite) wants to restart, I get the following error message :

/etc/init.d/bacula-director restart
Restarting Bacula Director: 14-May 17:14 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION
at inc_conf.c:290
Config error: Old style Include/Exclude not supported

: line 80, col 11 of file /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf
  Include = signature=MD5 {

I've to check the documentation to see what I've changed, but a debconf
message warning that some changes in config files are needed may be
welcome :)

Nicolas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30-grsec-evms-ipv6
Locale: LANG=en_IE, LC_CTYPE=en_IE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages bacula-director-sqlite depends on:
ii  bacula-common   1.36.3-1 Network backup, recovery and verif
ii  bacula-director-common  1.36.3-1 Network backup, recovery and verif
ii  debconf 1.4.49   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12.1 GCC support library
ii  libsqlite0  2.8.16-1 SQLite shared library
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.5-12   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  sqlite  2.8.16-1 command line interface for SQLite

-- debconf information:
* bacula-director-sqlite/remove_catalog_on_purge: false
* bacula-director-sqlite/create_tables: true


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304467: marked as done (libgnome2.0-cil: dependency problem with libgda2-1 and libgnomedb2-3)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 17:26:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.3-1 debian/experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2005 11:31:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 13 04:31:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cicero2.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.53] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLg5U-MB-00; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 04:31:16 -0700
Received: from user4.cybercity.dk (user4.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.50])
by cicero2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CDF18FB4C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (port986.ds1-od.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.241.207])
by user4.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408EC5012F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [130.226.91.97] (helo=[127.0.0.1])
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DLf9Z-0005XY-00; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:31:26 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Morten Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgnome2.0-cil: dependency problem with libgda2-1 and libgnomedb2-3
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:30:35 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgnome2.0-cil
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable


When installing libgnome2.0-cil with apt-get after a dist-upgrade to
unstable, it fails to install.

# apt-get install libgnome2.0-cil libgtksourceview2.0-cil
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libgnome2.0-cil: Depends: libgda2-1 (>= 1.0.4) but it is not going to
  be installed
Depends: libgnomedb2-3 (>= 1.0.4) but it is not
going to be installed
E: Broken packages

In unstable libgda2-1 is replaced by libgda2-3.

I found the bug, when trying to in stal monodevelop from www.meebey.com

 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=da_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 304467-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 15:26:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 08:26:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from booster.qnetp.net [213.239.220.50] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWyXW-0002C4-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 08:26:55 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4671A2DA1F3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 May 2005 17:26:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c196089.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.196.89])
by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAF92DA1F2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 May 2005 17:26:18 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: fixed in 1.9.3-1 debian/experimental
From: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qnDnkXWy2Rpqr/EmdHFl"
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:26:17 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at qnetp.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DSBL 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-qnDnkXWy2Rpqr/EmdHFl
Content-Type: t

Bug#293130: aptitude: [arm] FTBFS in experimental

[Kurt Roeckx]

Hi,

Since this bug only affected the version in experimental and is
fixed, can't this bug be closed?


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#226751: marked as done (phpqladmin: PhPqlAdmin won't purge / uninstall)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 10:47:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226751: fixed in phpqladmin 2.2.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2004 04:55:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 07 22:55:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.adonisys.com (myrrha.adonisys.com) [206.145.80.232] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AeLCw-00033b-00; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 15:27:18 -0600
Received: (qmail 9091 invoked by uid 1009); 7 Jan 2004 21:27:17 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ryan Sinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: phpqladmin: PhPqlAdmin won't purge / uninstall
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 15:27:17 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: phpqladmin
Version: 2.0.17-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

When attempting to purge unused packages from the system, I attempted to
purge phpqladmin.  During the configuration removal the process hangs.

Removing phpqladmin ...
Purging configuration files for phpqladmin ...

I checked and there is no /etc/phpqladmin directory in existence, so I'm
assuming it's waiting for something that was already removed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux myrrha.adonisys.com 2.2.19 #1 Sat Sep 22 22:08:47 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages phpqladmin depends on:
ii  apache [httpd] 1.3.29.0.1-3  Versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  apache-ssl [httpd] 1.3.29.0.1-3  Versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd 2.0.48-4  Traditional model for Apache2
ii  debconf1.4.3 Debian configuration management sy
ii  php4   4:4.3.3-4 A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip
ii  php4-cgi   4:4.3.3-4 A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip
ii  php4-gd2 [php4-gd] 3:4.3.2+rc3-2 GD module (with GD2) for php4
ii  php4-ldap  4:4.3.3-4 LDAP module for php4
pn  php4-mhash | php4-mhash-cg   Not found.
ii  wwwconfig-common   0.0.33Debian web auto configuration


---
Received: (at 226751-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 14:57:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 07:57:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWy4j-0008U6-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 07:57:09 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWxvR-0004Xk-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 10:47:33 -0400
From: Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#226751: fixed in phpqladmin 2.2.4-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 10:47:33 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: phpqladmin
Source-Version: 2.2.4-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
phpqladmin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

phpqladmin_2.2.4-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/phpqladmin/phpqladmin_2.2.4-1.dsc
phpqladmin_2.2.4-1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/phpqladmin/phpqladmin_2.2.4-1.tar.gz
phpqladmin_2.2.4-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/phpqladmin/phpqladmin_2.2.4-1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Bug#84981: Processed: Patch included

[Jerome Warnier]

Le samedi 14 mai 2005 à 04:12 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:33:50AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > severity 84981 grave
> > > > Bug#84981: /var/www/search.php use /etc/udmsearch-php but should use 
> > > > mnogosearch-php
> > > > Severity set to `grave'.
> 
> > > Please explain.
> > As the original bug report says, mnogosearch-php does not work at all if
> > this bug is not fixed. So, it's severity "grave".
> 
> Er, the original report didn't say that at all; indeed, the original report
> didn't say much of anything.
That's probably why Craig never dared asking more information about it,
nor answering to e-mails from the original bug reporter?

> It's obviously fixable by creating a file under /etc/udmsearch-php.  Doing
> so doesn't seem to conflict with anything else in Debian.  Arguably, this
> indicates that the package simply doesn't work out-of-the-box (it requires
> configuration), not that it doesn't work at all.
The directory /etc/mnogosearch-php/ already exists and has two valid
files in it.
To me, if you need to do patching by hand after installation, it's no
longer "requiring configuration". Especially if the fix is so simple and
is always applicable.

> > Please note that it still won't work at all in Debian if #222307 is not
> > fixed either, because the current version of mnogosearch-php in
> > Sarge/Sid does not work with the current version of mnogosearch.
> 
> Hmm, then I think *that* bug ought to be RC, whether or not this one is; it
> seems that this package is rather obsolete and shouldn't be included in a
> stable release.  Craig, do you agree?
As-is, yes, it should. But what about uploading a newer version? The
update seems straight-forward at first glance (doing a diff between
versions).

> Cheers,
-- 
Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BeezNest



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309089: gkrellm is under GPL and is linked with openssl

[Samuel Mimram]

Package: gkrellm
Version: 2.2.5-1
Severity: serious


Hi,

Gkrellm is under the GPL license which is considered not compatible with
openssl's license (see [1], [2], [3]). Therefore it should not be linked with
this library.

However I have recently sent a patch upstream which was integrated in
the 2.2.6 version for gkrellm to be able to be linked with gnutls
(attaced to this mail). So, could you please use this version and link with
gnutls?

Thanks.

Regards,

Samuel.

[1] http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/04/msg00072.html
[3] http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages gkrellm depends on:
ii  gkrellm-common   2.2.5-1 multiple stacked system monitors: 
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System Session Management
ii  libssl0.9.7  0.9.7g-1SSL shared libraries
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System protocol client li
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

-- no debconf information
diff -ru ../gkrellm-2.2.5.orig/src/configure ./src/configure
--- ../gkrellm-2.2.5.orig/src/configure	2005-05-06 22:57:44.0 +0200
+++ ./src/configure	2005-05-06 23:39:38.0 +0200
@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
 
 for i
 do
+	if [ "$i" = "--without-gnutls" ]
+	then
+		without_gnutls=yes
+	fi
 	if [ "$i" = "--without-ssl" ]
 	then
 		without_ssl=yes
@@ -24,6 +28,46 @@
 
 exec 5>./configure.log
 
+if [ "$without_gnutls" != "yes" ]
+then
+# echo "Checking for gnutls... " 1>& 2
+echo "Checking for gnutls... " 1>& 5
+
+cat << EOF > test.c
+#include 
+
+int main()
+	{
+	SSL_METHOD	*ssl_method  = NULL;
+
+	SSLeay_add_ssl_algorithms();
+	SSL_load_error_strings();
+	if ((ssl_method = SSLv23_client_method()) == NULL)
+		return 1;
+	return 0;
+	}
+EOF
+
+$CC ${PKG_INCLUDE} -c test.c -o test.o 2>& 5
+$CC test.o -o test ${PKG_LIBS} -lgnutls-openssl 2>& 5
+
+if [ -e ./test ] && ./test
+then
+#	echo 'Defining HAVE_GNUTLS' 1>& 2
+	echo 'Defining HAVE_GNUTLS' 1>& 5
+	echo '#define HAVE_GNUTLS 1' >> configure.h
+	echo '#define HAVE_SSL 1' >> configure.h
+	without_ssl=yes
+else
+#	echo "Not found, mail check will not have gnutls support..." 1>& 2
+	echo "Not found, mail check will not have gnutls support..." 1>& 5
+fi
+fi
+# end of gnutls check
+
+rm -f test test.o test.c
+
+
 if [ "$without_ssl" != "yes" ]
 then
 # echo "Checking for ssl... " 1>& 2
diff -ru ../gkrellm-2.2.5.orig/src/mail.c ./src/mail.c
--- ../gkrellm-2.2.5.orig/src/mail.c	2005-05-06 22:57:44.0 +0200
+++ ./src/mail.c	2005-05-06 23:57:59.0 +0200
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
 #define HAVE_MD5_H
 #endif
 
+#if defined(HAVE_GNUTLS)
+#include 
+#define MD5Init		MD5_Init
+#define MD5Update	MD5_Update
+#define MD5Final	MD5_Final
+#else
 #if defined(HAVE_SSL)
 #include 
 #include 
@@ -50,6 +56,7 @@
 #include "md5.h"
 #endif
 #endif
+#endif
 
 #include "ntlm.h"
 
@@ -641,8 +648,10 @@
 tcp_close(ConnInfo *conn)
 	{
 #ifdef HAVE_SSL
+#ifndef HAVE_GNUTLS
 	SSL_SESSION *session;
 #endif
+#endif
 
 	if (conn->fd != -1)
 		{
@@ -656,9 +665,11 @@
 #ifdef HAVE_SSL
 	if (conn->ssl)
 		{
+#ifndef HAVE_GNUTLS
 		session = SSL_get_session(conn->ssl);
 		if (session)
 			SSL_CTX_remove_session(conn->ssl_ctx, session);
+#endif
 		SSL_free(conn->ssl);
 		conn->ssl = NULL;
 		}
@@ -707,7 +718,7 @@
 	SSL_load_error_strings();
 
 	if (mbox->account->use_ssl == SSL_TRANSPORT)
-		ssl_method = SSLv2_client_method();
+		ssl_method = SSLv23_client_method();
 	else
 		ssl_method = TLSv1_client_method();
 	if (ssl_method == NULL)
@@ -724,7 +735,9 @@
 		return tcp_shutdown(conn, mbox,
 N_("Cannot initialize SSL handler."),
 FALSE);
+#ifndef HAVE_GNUTLS
 	SSL_clear(conn->ssl);
+#endif
 
 	SSL_set_fd(conn->ssl, conn->fd);
 	SSL_set_connect_state(conn->ssl);
diff -ru ../gkrellm-2.2.5.orig/src/Makefile ./src/Makefile
--- ../gkrellm-2.2.5.orig/src/Makefile	2005-05-06 22:57:44.0 +0200
+++ ./src/Makefile	2005-05-06 23:42:45.0 +0200
@@ -19,6 +19,12 @@
 LINK_FLAGS ?= -Wl,-E
 SMC_LIBS ?= -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lSM -lICE
 
+ifeq ($(without-gnutls),1)
+	CONFIGURE_ARGS += --without-gnutls
+endif
+ifeq ($(without-gnutls),yes)
+	CONFIGURE_ARGS += --without-gnutls
+end

Bug#306765: marked as done (inn2 - fails to upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 09:32:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306765: fixed in inn2 2.4.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 11:43:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 04:43:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DR7Qk-0002cv-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 04:43:42 -0700
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BB59E3C02A; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:43:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:43:39 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: inn2 - fails to upgrade
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: inn2
Version: 2.4.2-2
Severity: grave

inn2 fails to upgrade if pathdb in inn.conf is not /var/lib/news.

| Preparing to replace inn2 2.4.2-1 (using .../archives/inn2_2.4.2-2_i386.deb) 
...
| Stopping news server: done.
| Unpacking replacement inn2 ...
| Setting up inn2 (2.4.2-2) ...
| Installing new version of config file /etc/news/buffindexed.conf ...
| Installing new version of config file /etc/news/radius.conf ...
| Installing initial content for /var/lib/news/active
| Installing initial content for /var/lib/news/newsgroups
| Building history database in /var/lib/news... chown: cannot access 
`history*': No such file or directory
| dpkg: error processing inn2 (--configure):
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Errors were encountered while processing:
|  inn2
| E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

| # grep path /etc/news/inn.conf
| pathhost:   XXX
| pathnews:   /usr/lib/news
| #pathalias:
| patharchive:/srv/news/archive
| patharticles:   /srv/news/articles
| pathbin:/usr/lib/news/bin
| pathcontrol:/usr/lib/news/bin/control
| pathdb: /srv/news/db
| pathetc:/etc/news
| pathfilter: /etc/news/filter
| pathhttp:   /var/log/news
| pathincoming:   /srv/news/incoming
| pathlog:/var/log/news
| pathoutgoing:   /srv/news/outgoing
| pathoverview:   /srv/news/overview
| pathrun:/var/run/news
| pathspool:  /srv/news
| pathtmp:/srv/news/incoming/tmp

Bastian

--
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
-- Kirk, "Mirror, Mirror", stardate unknown

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkJwzGsACgkQnw66O/MvCNHGhgCcCsKTXP0EHCyvbY0nH5Wmp+L2
A5AAn2nmfS9cKixsCh/3LGumH6AKwlBO
=BZLm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--

---
Received: (at 306765-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 13:40:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 06:40:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWwso-X6-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 06:40:46 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWwkO-0008Mp-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 09:32:04 -0400
From: Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306765: fixed in inn2 2.4.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 09:32:04 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_

Processed: Fixed in NMU of webmagick 2.02-7.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 308755 + fixed
Bug#308755: Build-Depends on dropped perl-transitional package
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306990: marked as done (lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 09:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306990: fixed in devfsd 1.3.25-23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2005 21:33:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 29 14:33:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com 
(gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com) [68.99.114.105] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRd7A-0006f4-00; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:33:36 -0700
Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (unknown 
[192.168.0.12])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client CN "chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com", Issuer 
"excelhustler.com" (not verified))
by gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id DC7A91751E8; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:33:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 
B222D1751EA;
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:33:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.0.12])
by localhost (chatterbox [192.168.0.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
with ESMTP id 02675-09; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:33:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com (wile.internal.excelhustler.com 
[192.168.1.34])
by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 
1A64A1751B1;
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:33:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7A95D310BF; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:33:03 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:33:03 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at excelhustler.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: lvm2
Version: 2.01.04-5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to install

Setting up lvm-common (1.5.17) ...
find: /etc/devfs/symlinks.d: No such file or directory
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/devfsd not found.
dpkg: error processing lvm-common (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 100
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of lvm2:
 lvm2 depends on lvm-common (>> 1.5.8); however:
  Package lvm-common is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing lvm2 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages lvm2 depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.48   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdevmapper1.012:1.01.00-4  The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use
ii  lvm-common  1.5.17   The Logical Volume Manager for Lin

-- debconf information excluded

---
Received: (at 306990-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 13:11:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 06:11:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWwQN-mh-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 06:11:23 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWwHN-0005HG-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 09:02:05 -0400
From: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306990: fixed in devfsd 1.3.25-23
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 09:02:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debia

Bug#306990: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:10:44PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
> > How does this patch look?

> Ahrg, I just notice I introduced a similar check (in the
> findfiles function though) in my local version but forgot to
> update the changelog or upload it. This is in 1.3.25-23 now.

> Fixing this there remains the problem of invoke-rc.d failing.
> I'm still confident that conffiles are actually unpacked with
> everything else on first installation of the package. But since
> it does not really matter wheter devfsd is restarted if it isn't
> already running, I'll ignore errors of invoke-rc.d in
> update-devfsd. This is in 1.3.25-23 too. Notice that any config
> files added by maintainers of other packages to devfsd and
> committed with update-devfsd are no more garanteed to take
> effect immediately unless update-devfsd -f is used. (which in
> turn still fails if devfsd can't be restarted for some reason).

Ok.  I reasoned that my fix had the least number of side-effects, because it
didn't make any sense at all to restart devfsd while the package was in an
unconfigured state.  If you think that a missing symlinks.d directory isn't
a good indicator of the package being unconfigured, then that's fine too.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#306990: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install

[Arthur Korn]

Hi

Steve Langasek schrieb:
> How does this patch look?

Ahrg, I just notice I introduced a similar check (in the
findfiles function though) in my local version but forgot to
update the changelog or upload it. This is in 1.3.25-23 now.

Fixing this there remains the problem of invoke-rc.d failing.
I'm still confident that conffiles are actually unpacked with
everything else on first installation of the package. But since
it does not really matter wheter devfsd is restarted if it isn't
already running, I'll ignore errors of invoke-rc.d in
update-devfsd. This is in 1.3.25-23 too. Notice that any config
files added by maintainers of other packages to devfsd and
committed with update-devfsd are no more garanteed to take
effect immediately unless update-devfsd -f is used. (which in
turn still fails if devfsd can't be restarted for some reason).

regards, 2ri
-- 
Secure email, spread GPG, clearsign all mail. http://www.gnupg.org
.
Tomorrow will be canceled due to lack of interest.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#273338: lost some mails

[Bernd Eckenfels]

Re NMU of symlinks: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=273338

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:49:24AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > if anybody send me mails in the last two month to ecki at debian.org the
> > chances are high I havent received it due to some missconfig on my site.
> > Please resend.
> 
> Hello Bernd,
> That might explain we got no answer from you about the package
> 'symlinks'... 
> 
> In any event, I have NMUed this package. Please find more information
> in the bug log for #273338.

thanks for the pointer, yes indeed, i was totally unaware of that :)

I will not  upload a  maintainer version before the release (unless somebody
asks me to)

Thans Mark for your Help, also.

Greetings
Bernd
-- 
  (OO)  -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
 ( .. )  [EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.de,debian.org}  http://www.eckes.org/
  o--o 1024D/E383CD7E  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  v:+497211603874  f:+49721151516129
(OO)  When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308398: irmp3: missing dependency on adduser and wrong assumptions in postrm

[Lars Wirzenius]

pe, 2005-05-13 kello 11:42 -0600, Roberto Mello kirjoitti:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:52:26PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Unless there are objections, I will NMU irmp3 using Russ's patch (full
> > diff with changelog entry attached) tomorrow, with an upload to unstable
> > and a request to debian-release@lists.debian.org for the release
> > managers to consider letting the new version into testing.
> 
> Yes, please do (and thanks!).
> 
> My irmp3 package is fairly out-of-synch with upstream. I'll try to remedy
> that in the near future.
> 
> Sorry about the bug in the package.

The release managers decided that it is better to remove the package
from sarge, so I'll refrain from doing the NMU, since there is much less
hurry to fix the problem in sid.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306990: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install

[Arthur Korn]

John Goerzen schrieb:
> Well, like I said, devfs was unpacked but not configured.  Init
> scripts are conffiles, and so they aren't created until the
> configuration stage.

They are unpacked just as every other file, except that the
backup file is kept.

-- 
Secure email, spread GPG, clearsign all mail. http://www.gnupg.org
.
if (argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "-advice") == 0) {
  printf("Don't Panic!\n"); exit(42);
}
 -- Arnold Robbins in the LJ of February '95, describing RCS


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#308534: marked as done (wordpress: upstream security fix available)

[Kai Hendry]

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:23:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> We still have to figure out what to do with wordpress for sarge.

I have contacted upstream again about this. Personally I think it is a
waste of time and effort to backport this security fix.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309075: kernel-patch-usagi: Does not work with any current kernel in debian.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: kernel-patch-usagi
Version: 0.0.20030929.SNAP-2.1
Severity: grave

Hi,

This package does not work with any kernel currently in Debian.
It has a patch for kernel 2.4.22, which does not apply at all to
the current kernel.  The major problem is that the Debian 2.4
kernel's ipsec patch conflicts with the usagi patch.  The ipsec
patch is a backport from 2.6.

I suggest that you remove the packages as it is now from sarge.

Note that I have an ITA on it, and still plan to adopt it.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#84981: Processed: Patch included

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:33:50AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > > severity 84981 grave
> > > Bug#84981: /var/www/search.php use /etc/udmsearch-php but should use 
> > > mnogosearch-php
> > > Severity set to `grave'.

> > Please explain.
> As the original bug report says, mnogosearch-php does not work at all if
> this bug is not fixed. So, it's severity "grave".

Er, the original report didn't say that at all; indeed, the original report
didn't say much of anything.

It's obviously fixable by creating a file under /etc/udmsearch-php.  Doing
so doesn't seem to conflict with anything else in Debian.  Arguably, this
indicates that the package simply doesn't work out-of-the-box (it requires
configuration), not that it doesn't work at all.

> Please note that it still won't work at all in Debian if #222307 is not
> fixed either, because the current version of mnogosearch-php in
> Sarge/Sid does not work with the current version of mnogosearch.

Hmm, then I think *that* bug ought to be RC, whether or not this one is; it
seems that this package is rather obsolete and shouldn't be included in a
stable release.  Craig, do you agree?

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#84981: Processed: Patch included

[Jerome Warnier]

Le samedi 14 mai 2005 à 02:48 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Jerome,
> 
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:33:50AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > severity 84981 grave
> > Bug#84981: /var/www/search.php use /etc/udmsearch-php but should use 
> > mnogosearch-php
> > Severity set to `grave'.
> 
> Please explain.
As the original bug report says, mnogosearch-php does not work at all if
this bug is not fixed. So, it's severity "grave".

Please note that it still won't work at all in Debian if #222307 is not
fixed either, because the current version of mnogosearch-php in
Sarge/Sid does not work with the current version of mnogosearch.

Hope it helps.
-- 
Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BeezNest



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306990: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install

[Steve Langasek]

tags 306990 patch
thanks

Hi folks,

How does this patch look?

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog
--- devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog
+++ devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+devfsd (1.3.25-22.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * High-urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix
+  * Make sure update-devfsd fails if called when the package is
+obviously not yet configured.  Closes: #306990.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 May 2005 03:17:41 -0700
+
 devfsd (1.3.25-22) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * templates localisations:
diff -u devfsd-1.3.25/debian/update-devfsd devfsd-1.3.25/debian/update-devfsd
--- devfsd-1.3.25/debian/update-devfsd
+++ devfsd-1.3.25/debian/update-devfsd
@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
 fi
 }
 
+# if the directory doesn't exist, the package is probably not yet
+# configured; exit gracefully so packages calling this script 
+# opportunistically don't fail.
+[ -d /etc/devfs/symlinks.d ] || exit 0
+
 findfiles /etc/devfs/symlinks.d /etc/devfs/symlinks /etc/devfs/symlinks.list
 findfiles /etc/devfs/devices.d /etc/devfs/devices /etc/devfs/devices.list
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 306990 patch
Bug#306990: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305835: kdevelop/kdesdk conflicts

[Ben Burton]

Hi,

Currently there is a conflict with the subversion kioslave appearing in
both kdevelop3-plugins in sid and kdesdk-misc 3.4.x.

My understanding is that kdevelop has actually copied the svn kioslave
from KDE 3.4 into its own source tree so that the svn kioslave is
available from kdevelop + kde 3.3/3.2.

I presume this means that the svn kioslave won't go away of its own
accord in the near future, and that you'll need to actively remove it
from the kdevelop3-plugins package so that both can be installed together.

I'd like to add a replaces: for kdesdk-misc so that everything installs
cleanly; however, for that I will need to know when you plan to remove
the kioslave from kdevelop3-plugins (so that I can version the replaces:
accordingly).

Do you have an idea of what kdevelop3-plugins version will _not_ contain
the svn kioslave, so that I can upload a new kdesdk-misc 3.4 to alioth
with the correct replaces line?

Thanks - Ben.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309026: produce hang in cron

[Klaus Ethgen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hoi,

Am Sa den 14. Mai 2005 um 11:19 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> Ok.  Are you using pam_ldap on this system?  I have heard a report of

Yes I do. All my normal users are in ldap.

> pam_ldap causing performance problems against slapd 2.2.23 because of
> unnecessarily complex queries that don't match the schema in use and miss
> the indexing.

That might match. When I have a user crontab the daemon freeze faster.
But it also freeze (on the same position) when I have no user crontabs.

> Ok.  I don't think there have been any improvements between 2.2.23-1 and
> 2.2.23-5 that will help you directly, now that you've upgraded; however,

Well I did check. And the bug was also with 2.2.23-1. I did not go
further back but the bug only happens few weeks now.

> there are a few more things to check.  Do you have a /var/lib/ldap/DB_CONFIG

No.

> file on this system?  If not, I recommend that you read
> 
> about BDB tuning with OpenLDAP, and create this file.  As I understand it,
> you will need to dump and reload your directory in order for this file to
> take effect if it was not already present.

So this is server tuning as I understand.

> If none of that helps, you may want to turn on debugging on the server, to
> see what queries are being sent that take this long to return.

As this might go longer I have to move it to monday evening.

> You probably want to add some other indices here for performance reasons and
> re-run slapindex.  The ones I've used for nss_ldap systems are:
> 
> index uid pres,eq
> index cn,sn pres,eq,sub
> index objectClass eq
> index uidNumber pres,eq
> index gidNumber pres,eq

I'l try...

> How many entries do you have in this directory, btw?

Only 9 users so this shouldn't be a performance problem for the server.

> the slapd package.  (And I am still hoping that this is just a tuning
> problem for you.)  2.2.23-5 is better than 2.2.23-1, but still not perfect;
> I hope we can make -6 better still for sarge.

Me too. But I wonder because the computers are only one switch from each
other and there are few users only. What me makes confuse is that it
start some weeks ago. Unfortunality I do not exactely know when. I only
notice it as the backup was not startet nightly.

Many thanks for the help. I hope fixing this problem right fast. I did
wrote a small perl daemon now which will restart cron in the case it is
not reacting. But this is only a bad hack to minimal doing the necesary
work.

Gruß
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgenhttp://www.ethgen.de/
pub  2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE  EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBQoXJO5+OKpjRpO3lAQIDOQgAnYjw/VNrwypN78/sWnPGByvKWRrP+DHL
AnlNkcMX73GmItBvg3u4YYzw+b4bBx0MaAGeUwNHY2lTUa0rOlmPxkCzyJrmutjQ
wgSuL7RuZqb1IPmMW9yKB21/q/q4keG5jJLOjZigHY1gd3fWBAXmXNbAJAEYM5JU
M1SbxClaOg4elTWXOhC7ubwS9geg/lKrrkZ5zf670DL6a9BjNM8vFQIH5aLdkgqQ
qRNVoW6juKB+u9vwQTDDTOxFAWN/5gYUd/D8ZYp82/lsmoATYrPbbVmucXTLJsKA
uBiOzMcVhWbVWskqKoIyexeNhgI3loic8oeDYCNtf9l5uGjWFgu6JA==
=1ZQA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#294404: udev does not create /dev/md* devices at boot-up

[Phil Dibowitz]

I had the same problem, but the driver will automatically create it for
you if you do these:

  1. Compile raid autodetection in your kernel
  2. Set the partition types that are used in the raid volumes to 'fd'
(raid autodetect) instead of 83 (Linux)

This will cause the kernel autodetection to tell udev to create the
/dev/md* devices for you.

Alternatively, a line in /etc/udev/links.conf to tell udev to create it
for you will also work, but it's the hack way. The above is the accepted
way.

-- 
Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freeware and Technical Pages  Insanity Palace of Metallica
http://www.phildev.net/   http://www.ipom.com/

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
 - Benjamin Franklin, 1759



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#84981: Processed: Patch included

[Steve Langasek]

Jerome,

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:33:50AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > severity 84981 grave
> Bug#84981: /var/www/search.php use /etc/udmsearch-php but should use 
> mnogosearch-php
> Severity set to `grave'.

Please explain.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#309026: produce hang in cron

[Steve Langasek]

reassign 309026 slapd
thanks

Hi again,

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:56:45AM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Am Sa den 14. Mai 2005 um 10:07 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > I'm not sure what you mean by this bug.  Are you reporting a bug against the
> > software running on your client system, or on your server system?

> Well, the problem is on the client. But I'm not completely sure if this
> bug is a client or a server bug.

Ok, sure.

> > But your strace shows that all the time is spent waiting for data from the
> > server, which sounds like a server bug.  While cron is hanging, do other
> > queries (using ldapsearch, for example) still work from this system?  Can

> Yes, no problem. only cron is hanging and all other applications
> including nss and pam is working well.

Ok.  Are you using pam_ldap on this system?  I have heard a report of
pam_ldap causing performance problems against slapd 2.2.23 because of
unnecessarily complex queries that don't match the schema in use and miss
the indexing.

> > you forward us a copy of your /etc/ldap/slapd.conf?
-
> I attache one to this mail.

Thanks.

> > What is the exact version of slapd running on your sarge system?

> 2.2.23-1

Ok.  I don't think there have been any improvements between 2.2.23-1 and
2.2.23-5 that will help you directly, now that you've upgraded; however,
there are a few more things to check.  Do you have a /var/lib/ldap/DB_CONFIG
file on this system?  If not, I recommend that you read

about BDB tuning with OpenLDAP, and create this file.  As I understand it,
you will need to dump and reload your directory in order for this file to
take effect if it was not already present.

If you do have a DB_CONFIG file, you should not need to dump and reload the
directory, but there may still be some tuning that needs to be done on the
server.

If none of that helps, you may want to turn on debugging on the server, to
see what queries are being sent that take this long to return.

> ###
> # Specific Directives for database #1, of type bdb:
> # Database specific directives apply to this databasse until another
> # 'database' directive occurs
> databasebdb
> 
> # The base of your directory in database #1
> suffix  "dc=xx,dc=de"

> # Where the database file are physically stored for database #1
> directory   "/var/lib/ldap"

> # Indexing options for database #1
> index   objectClass eq

You probably want to add some other indices here for performance reasons and
re-run slapindex.  The ones I've used for nss_ldap systems are:

index uid pres,eq
index cn,sn pres,eq,sub
index objectClass eq
index uidNumber pres,eq
index gidNumber pres,eq

How many entries do you have in this directory, btw?

Unfortunately, there are limits to how automatic we can make the tuning of
the slapd package.  (And I am still hoping that this is just a tuning
problem for you.)  2.2.23-5 is better than 2.2.23-1, but still not perfect;
I hope we can make -6 better still for sarge.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Patch included

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 84981 + patch
Bug#84981: /var/www/search.php use /etc/udmsearch-php but should use 
mnogosearch-php
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> severity 84981 grave
Bug#84981: /var/www/search.php use /etc/udmsearch-php but should use 
mnogosearch-php
Severity set to `grave'.

> thank
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#309026: produce hang in cron

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 309026 slapd
Bug#309026: produce hang in cron
Bug reassigned from package `libldap-2.2-7' to `slapd'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309026: produce hang in cron

[Klaus Ethgen]

Hello,

Am Sa den 14. Mai 2005 um 10:07 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> I'm not sure what you mean by this bug.  Are you reporting a bug against the
> software running on your client system, or on your server system?

Well, the problem is on the client. But I'm not completely sure if this
bug is a client or a server bug.

> But your strace shows that all the time is spent waiting for data from the
> server, which sounds like a server bug.  While cron is hanging, do other
> queries (using ldapsearch, for example) still work from this system?  Can

Yes, no problem. only cron is hanging and all other applications
including nss and pam is working well.

> you forward us a copy of your /etc/ldap/slapd.conf?

I attache one to this mail.

> What is the exact version of slapd running on your sarge system?

2.2.23-1

> Your client's /etc/libnss-ldap.conf (and /etc/libpam-ldap.conf, if you use
> libpam-ldap) may also help.  Please be sure to remove any passwords from
> these files before sending them to the BTS, of course.

Clear.

There is no /etc/libpam-ldap.conf. And the /etc/libnss-ldap.conf I have
attached to this mail.

Gruß
   Klaus
-- 
Klaus Ethgenhttp://www.ethgen.de/
pub  2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE  EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B
###DEBCONF###
# the configuration of this file will be done by debconf as long as the
# first line of the file says '###DEBCONF###'
#
# you should use dpkg-reconfigure libnss-ldap to configure this file.
#
# @(#)$Id: ldap.conf,v 2.31 2002/05/09 06:40:43 lukeh Exp $
#
# This is the configuration file for the LDAP nameservice
# switch library and the LDAP PAM module.
#
# PADL Software
# http://www.padl.com
#

# Your LDAP server. Must be resolvable without using LDAP.
host x.xxx

# The distinguished name of the search base.
base dc=xx,dc=de

# Another way to specify your LDAP server is to provide an
# uri with the server name. This allows to use
# Unix Domain Sockets to connect to a local LDAP Server.
#uri ldap://127.0.0.1/
#uri ldaps://127.0.0.1/   
#uri ldapi://%2fvar%2frun%2fldapi_sock/
# Note: %2f encodes the '/' used as directory separator

# The LDAP version to use (defaults to 3
# if supported by client library)
ldap_version 3

# The distinguished name to bind to the server with.
# Optional: default is to bind anonymously.
#binddn cn=proxyuser,dc=padl,dc=com

# The credentials to bind with. 
# Optional: default is no credential.
#bindpw secret

# The distinguished name to bind to the server with
# if the effective user ID is root. Password is
# stored in /etc/ldap.secret (mode 600)
#rootbinddn cn=manager,dc=padl,dc=com

# The port.
# Optional: default is 389.
#port 389

# The search scope.
#scope sub
#scope one
#scope base

# Search timelimit
#timelimit 30

# Bind/connect timelimit
#bind_timelimit 30

# Reconnect policy: hard (default) will retry connecting to
# the software with exponential backoff, soft will fail
# immediately.
#bind_policy hard

# Idle timelimit; client will close connections
# (nss_ldap only) if the server has not been contacted
# for the number of seconds specified below.
#idle_timelimit 3600

# RFC2307bis naming contexts
# Syntax:
# nss_base_XXX  base?scope?filter
# where scope is {base,one,sub}
# and filter is a filter to be &'d with the
# default filter.
# You can omit the suffix eg:
# nss_base_passwd   ou=People,
# to append the default base DN but this
# may incur a small performance impact.
#nss_base_passwdou=People,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_shadowou=People,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_group ou=Group,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_hosts ou=Hosts,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_services  ou=Services,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_networks  ou=Networks,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_protocols ou=Protocols,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_rpc   ou=Rpc,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_ethersou=Ethers,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_netmasks  ou=Networks,dc=padl,dc=com?ne
#nss_base_bootparamsou=Ethers,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_aliases   ou=Aliases,dc=padl,dc=com?one
#nss_base_netgroup  ou=Netgroup,dc=padl,dc=com?one

# attribute/objectclass mapping
# Syntax:
#nss_map_attribute  rfc2307attributemapped_attribute
#nss_map_objectclassrfc2307objectclass  mapped_objectclass

# configure --enable-nds is no longer supported.
# For NDS now do:
#nss_map_attribute uniqueMember member

# configure --enable-mssfu-schema is no longer supported.
# For MSSFU now do:
#nss_map_objectclass posixAccount User
#nss_map_attribute uid msSFUName
#nss_map_attribute uniqueMember posixMember
#nss_map_attribute userPassword msSFUPassword
#nss_map_attribute homeDirectory msSFUHomeDirectory
#nss_map_objectclass posixGroup Group
#nss_map_attribute cn msSFUName

# Alternatively, if you wish to equivalence W2K and POSIX
# groups, change the uniqueMember mapping line to:
#nss_map_attribute uniqueMember mem

Bug#309026: produce hang in cron

[Steve Langasek]

Klaus,

On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:48:43PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Package: libldap-2.2-7
> Version: 2.2.23-5
> Severity: critical

I'm not sure what you mean by this bug.  Are you reporting a bug against the
software running on your client system, or on your server system?

The libldap-2.2-7 library is not directly the cause of any hanging on the
client; it is only used by the slapd server and by the ldap client
applications (ldapadd, ldapmodify) that come with OpenLDAP.

> There is a havy to debugging bug whith the newest libldap. After update
> cron stops executing jobs on a random time. When stracing the binary the
> bug is not happen. But with some effort I got the following:
> 22:17:36 select(1024, [5], [], NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [5])
> 22:18:01 read(5, "0>\2\1\4d9\4", 8) = 8
> 22:18:01 read(5, "01\2\1\4e\7\n\1\0\4\0\4\0\240#0!\4\0261.2.840.1135"..., 56) 
> = 51
> 22:18:01 select(1024, [5], [], NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [5])
> 22:19:01 read(5, "=de0\202", 5) = 5
> 22:19:01 select(1024, [5], [], NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [5])
> 22:19:01 read(5, "\2\2650\24\4\2cn", 8) = 8
> 22:19:01 write(5, "0\5\2\1\4B\0", 7)= 7
> 22:19:01 shutdown(5, 2 /* send and receive */) = 0
> 22:19:01 close(5)   = 0

> This fd 5 is the connection to the ldap server. In this case it was
> hanging for several minutes and then got finaly data and exists. But
> sometimes the hang will be endles. (It will be endles if I do not
> stracing the process)

> To my environment:
> The ldap server is a sarge system without the problem. The client with
> the problem is a sid system.

But your strace shows that all the time is spent waiting for data from the
server, which sounds like a server bug.  While cron is hanging, do other
queries (using ldapsearch, for example) still work from this system?  Can
you forward us a copy of your /etc/ldap/slapd.conf?

What is the exact version of slapd running on your sarge system?

Your client's /etc/libnss-ldap.conf (and /etc/libpam-ldap.conf, if you use
libpam-ldap) may also help.  Please be sure to remove any passwords from
these files before sending them to the BTS, of course.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: severity of 309026 is grave

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 309026 grave
Bug#309026: produce hang in cron
Severity set to `grave'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#303991: Huh?

[Adam M.]

Why are you uploading dbmail2? Why not just upload dbmail 2.x as dbmail?

I mean, you are uploading dbmail2 and having dbmail removed? This
doesn't make any sense.. sorry.

- Adam



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308534: marked as done (wordpress: upstream security fix available)

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:41:37AM +0300, Kai Hendry wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:27:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Wordpress developers are not telling anyone what security hole 1.5.1
> > > fixes. :/
> > Uh, that doesn't suddenly make this a non-bug...

> Sorry, I thought if 1.5.1 has been uploaded I could close this bug.

We still have to figure out what to do with wordpress for sarge.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature