Bug#316815: there is no i386-linux-g++
Package: lam4-dev Version: 7.1.1-3.1 Severity: grave mpiCC (and mpicc) no longer works, complaining: - The LAM/MPI wrapper compiler was unable to find the specified compiler i386-linux-g++ in your PATH. Note that this compiler was either specified at configure time or in one of many possible environment variables. Please see the man page for the LAM wrapper compilers for more information. - I think it's because gcc supplies i486-linux-g++ not i386-linux-g++. mpiCC was working before the NMU 7.1.1-3.1 was made, but there have also been gcc updates in the last week. I think Debian's ia32 gcc now defaults to i486 not i386. I'm not sure if the change is in the lam NMU or in the new gcc versions, but I hope it will be easy for to fix. Drew -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages lam4-dev depends on: ii dpkg1.13.10 Package maintenance system for Deb ii lam47.1.1-3.1Shared libraries used by LAM paral ii libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Development Librari lam4-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316792: request-tracker3.4: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken
severity 316792 important severity 316796 important thanks On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:31:07PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > dselect says: > request-tracker3.4 depends on rt3.4-clients (= 3.4.1-2) > for both request-tracker3.4 and rt3.4-clients, and will not allow me > to select them together. On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:45:57PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > dselect says: > request-tracker3 depends on rt3-clients (= 3.0.12-7) > for both request-tracker3 and rt3-clients, and will not allow me > to select them together. Then something is wrong in your dselect state or your apt preferences. The current version of request-tracker3.4 in testing is 3.4.2-4, and depends on rt3.4-clients 3.4.2-4. The current version of request-tracker3 in testing is 3.0.12-8 and depends on rt3-clients 3.0.12-8. This error message indicates that dselect is trying (at least in part) to pull packages from stable, and getting confused in the process. That's not a bug in either of the packages that you filed bugs against, AFAICS. > If I then do an apt-get install request-tracker3, I get: > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > The following extra packages will be installed: > apache-common libapache-mod-perl libapache-request-perl > Suggested packages: > apache apache-ssl apache-perl apache-dev libapache-mod-perl-doc > The following NEW packages will be installed: > apache-common libapache-mod-perl libapache-request-perl request-tracker3 > 0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. > Need to get 2287kB of archives. > After unpacking 9826kB of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] > Which really sucks, a lot, because *I'm using Apache 2*. Inconvenient dependencies are not a grave bug (especially in web application packages, where they're de rigueur). It is worth a bug report, however; downgrading the bug reports accordingly. > Having installed the above, I discover that the file > /etc/request-tracker3/apache2-modperl2.conf > which was there last week is gone now! > I think something got very, very broken here. This was a conffile present in the sarge version of request-tracker3 that has been removed from the version of the package that's in etch. If this file was removed in error, then this may qualify as a release-critical bug, but the changelog strongly suggests otherwise: request-tracker3 (3.0.12-8) unstable; urgency=high * Removed all mention of modperl2 support as the latest upload of libapache2-mod-perl2 is incompatible with request-tracker3. -- Stephen Quinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 8 May 2005 19:30:17 +0100 Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#316792: request-tracker3.4: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 316792 important Bug#316792: request-tracker3.4: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken Severity set to `important'. > severity 316796 important Bug#316796: request-tracker3: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316593: rosegarden4: rosegarden uninstallable
Thanks. I'll get to this ASAP. The dependency on a specific library version is neccesary. Currently libjack is not guaranteing backwards binary compatibility. Enrique On 7/2/05, Itai Seggev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: rosegarden4 > Version: 1.0-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Rosegarden depends on libjack0.90.0-0 and jackd. However, the current > version of jackd depends on libjack0.10.0, thus making rosegarden > uninstallable. Perhaps rosegarden should depend only on jackd, thus > autmatically updating to new library versions (although I suppose this > may have its own set of issues). > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > Kernel: Linux 2.6.11cavy1 > Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > > Versions of packages rosegarden4 depends on: > hi jackd0.99.0-6JACK Audio Connection Kit (server > ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-6.1 KDE core libraries > ii khelpcenter 4:3.3.2-1 KDE Help Center > ii libasound2 1.0.9-2 ALSA library > ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries > an > ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration > library > ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared > lib > ii libgcc1 1:4.0.0-11 GCC support library > ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library > hi libjack0.80.0-0 0.99.0-6JACK Audio Connection Kit > (librari > ii liblo0 0.18-1 Lightweight OSC library > ii liblrdf0 0.4.0-1 a library to manipulate RDF files > ii libmad0 0.15.1b-2.1 MPEG audio decoder library > ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime > ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.4-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime > v > ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session > Management > ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 > ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client > li > ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous > exte > ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing > librar > ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client > libra > ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) > configu > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime > > Versions of packages rosegarden4 recommends: > ii swh-plugins [ladspa-plugin] 0.4.13-1 Steve Harris's LADSPA plugins > > -- no debconf information > >
Bug#316798: gnome-control-center: GNOME session startup is blocked
Package: gnome-control-center Version: 1:2.10.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrade, GNOME session startups are blocked by /usr/lib/control-center/gnome-settings-daemon sitting in a read() syscall and not advancing. Reproduced on two different hardware. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnome-control-center depends on: ii capplets-data1:2.10.1-4 configuration applets for GNOME 2 ii desktop-file-utils 0.10-1 Utilities for .desktop files ii gnome-desktop-data 2.10.2-1Common files for GNOME 2 desktop a ii gnome-icon-theme 2.10.1-2GNOME Desktop icon theme ii gnome-menus 2.10.2-1an implementation of the freedeskt ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0] 0.2.36-1Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgconf2-4 2.10.0-2GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11.1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-desktop-2 2.10.2-1Utility library for loading .deskt ii libgnome-keyring00.4.3-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome-menu0 2.10.2-1an implementation of the freedeskt ii libgnome2-0 2.10.0-3The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.10.2-2A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.0-2The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.10.1-5The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.1 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error01.0-1 library for common error values an ii libgstreamer-plugins0.8- 0.8.10-1Various GStreamer libraries and li ii libgstreamer0.8-00.8.10-2Core GStreamer libraries, plugins, ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libmetacity0 1:2.10.2-1 Common library of lightweight GTK2 ii liborbit21:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libtasn1-2 0.2.10-4Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxklavier102.0-0.2 X Keyboard Extension high-level AP ii libxml2 2.6.16-7GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-5 compression library - runtime Versions of packages gnome-control-center recommends: ii gnome-session 2.10.0-5 The GNOME 2 Session Manager ii gnome2-user-guide 2.8.1-2GNOME 2 User's Guide -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316796: request-tracker3: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken
Package: request-tracker3 Version: 3.0.12-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable dselect says: request-tracker3 depends on rt3-clients (= 3.0.12-7) for both request-tracker3 and rt3-clients, and will not allow me to select them together. If I force it, it says: The following NEW packages will be installed: rt3-clients Note the lack of "request-tracker3". If I then do an apt-get install request-tracker3, I get: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: apache-common libapache-mod-perl libapache-request-perl Suggested packages: apache apache-ssl apache-perl apache-dev libapache-mod-perl-doc The following NEW packages will be installed: apache-common libapache-mod-perl libapache-request-perl request-tracker3 0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. Need to get 2287kB of archives. After unpacking 9826kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Which really sucks, a lot, because *I'm using Apache 2*. Having installed the above, I discover that the file /etc/request-tracker3/apache2-modperl2.conf which was there last week is gone now! I think something got very, very broken here. I'm on testing, by the way. -Robin -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.24 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages request-tracker3 depends on: ii apache2 2.0.54-4next generation, scalable, extenda ii apache2-mpm-prefork [apache2 2.0.54-4traditional model for Apache2 ii exim44.50-8 metapackage to ease exim MTA (v4) ii exim4-daemon-heavy [mail-tra 4.50-8 exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended ii libapache-dbi-perl 0.94-2 Connect apache server to database ii libapache-mod-perl 1.29.0.3-6 integration of perl with the Apach ii libapache-request-perl 1.1-0.1 Generic Apache Request Library ii libapache-session-perl 1.60-2 Perl modules for keeping persisten ii libapache2-mod-perl2 1.999.21-1 Integration of perl with the Apach ii libcache-cache-perl 1.04-1 Managed caches of persistent infor ii libclass-returnvalue-perl0.52-1 A return-value object that lets yo ii libdbd-mysql-perl2.9006-1A Perl5 database interface to the ii libdbd-pg-perl 1.42-1 a PostgreSQL interface for Perl 5 ii libdbi-perl 1.48-1 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu ii libdbix-searchbuilder-perl 1.27-1 Encapsulate SQL queries and rows i ii libexception-class-perl 1.20-1 a module that allows you to declar ii libfcgi-perl 0.67-1 FastCGI Perl module ii libfreezethaw-perl 0.43-2 converting Perl structures to stri ii libhtml-mason-perl 1:1.28-2HTML::Mason Perl module ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.45-2 A collection of modules that parse ii liblocale-maketext-fuzzy-per 0.02-1 Maketext from already interpolated ii liblocale-maketext-lexicon-p 0.49-1 Lexicon-handling backends for "Loc ii liblog-dispatch-perl 2.10-1 Dispatches messages to multiple Lo ii libmailtools-perl1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs ii libmime-perl 5.417-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libmldbm-perl2.01-1 Store multidimensional hash struct ii libparams-validate-perl 0.76-1 validate parameters to Perl method ii libregexp-common-perl2.120-1 Provide commonly requested regular ii libterm-readkey-perl 2.21-1.3A perl module for simple terminal ii libtest-inline-perl 0.16-1 Embed tests and code examples in P ii libtext-autoformat-perl 1.12-3 Perl module for automatic text wra ii libtext-quoted-perl 1.8-2 Extract the structure of a quoted ii libtext-template-perl1.44-1.1Text::Template perl module ii libtext-wrapper-perl 1.000-2 Simple word wrapping routine ii libtime-modules-perl 2003.1126-2 Various Perl modules for time/date ii perl 5.8.7-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction pn rt3-clients Not found. ii sysklogd [system-log-daemon] 1.4.1-17System Logging Daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316792: request-tracker3.4: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken
Package: request-tracker3.4 Version: 3.4.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable dselect says: request-tracker3.4 depends on rt3.4-clients (= 3.4.1-2) for both request-tracker3.4 and rt3.4-clients, and will not allow me to select them together. If I force it, it says: The following NEW packages will be installed: rt3.4-clients Note the lack of "request-tracker3.4". If I then do an apt-get install request-tracker3.4, I get: # apt-get install request-tracker3.4 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: apache-common libapache-mod-perl libapache-request-perl libxml-libxml-common-perl libxml-libxml-perl libxml-namespacesupport-perl libxml-sax-perl libxml-simple-perl Suggested packages: apache apache-ssl apache-perl apache-dev libapache-mod-perl-doc The following NEW packages will be installed: apache-common libapache-mod-perl libapache-request-perl libxml-libxml-common-perl libxml-libxml-perl libxml-namespacesupport-perl libxml-sax-perl libxml-simple-perl request-tracker3.4 0 upgraded, 9 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. Need to get 2994kB of archives. After unpacking 13.2MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Which really sucks, a lot, because *I'm using Apache 2*. I think something got very, very broken here. -Robin -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.24 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages request-tracker3.4 depends on: ii apache2 2.0.54-4next generation, scalable, extenda ii apache2-mpm-prefork [apache2 2.0.54-4traditional model for Apache2 ii exim44.50-8 metapackage to ease exim MTA (v4) ii exim4-daemon-heavy [mail-tra 4.50-8 exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended ii libapache-dbi-perl 0.94-2 Connect apache server to database ii libapache-session-perl 1.60-2 Perl modules for keeping persisten ii libapache2-mod-perl2 1.999.21-1 Integration of perl with the Apach ii libcache-cache-perl 1.04-1 Managed caches of persistent infor ii libcache-simple-timedexpiry- 0.21-1 Perl module to cache and expire ke ii libclass-returnvalue-perl0.52-1 A return-value object that lets yo ii libdbd-mysql-perl2.9006-1A Perl5 database interface to the ii libdbd-pg-perl 1.42-1 a PostgreSQL interface for Perl 5 ii libdbi-perl 1.48-1 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu ii libdbix-searchbuilder-perl 1.27-1 Encapsulate SQL queries and rows i ii libexception-class-perl 1.20-1 a module that allows you to declar ii libfcgi-perl 0.67-1 FastCGI Perl module ii libfreezethaw-perl 0.43-2 converting Perl structures to stri ii libhtml-mason-perl 1:1.28-2HTML::Mason Perl module ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.45-2 A collection of modules that parse ii libhtml-scrubber-perl0.08-2 Perl extension for scrubbing/sanit ii liblocale-maketext-fuzzy-per 0.02-1 Maketext from already interpolated ii liblocale-maketext-lexicon-p 0.49-1 Lexicon-handling backends for "Loc ii liblog-dispatch-perl 2.10-1 Dispatches messages to multiple Lo ii libmailtools-perl1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs ii libmime-perl 5.417-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libmldbm-perl2.01-1 Store multidimensional hash struct ii libmodule-versions-report-pe 1.02-2 Report versions of all modules in ii libparams-validate-perl 0.76-1 validate parameters to Perl method ii libregexp-common-perl2.120-1 Provide commonly requested regular ii libterm-readkey-perl 2.21-1.3A perl module for simple terminal ii libtest-inline-perl 0.16-1 Embed tests and code examples in P ii libtext-autoformat-perl 1.12-3 Perl module for automatic text wra ii libtext-quoted-perl 1.8-2 Extract the structure of a quoted ii libtext-template-perl1.44-1.1Text::Template perl module ii libtext-wrapper-perl 1.000-2 Simple word wrapping routine ii libtime-modules-perl 2003.1126-2 Various Perl modules for time/date ii libtree-simple-perl 1.15-1 A simple tree object ii libxml-rss-perl 1.05-1 Perl module for managing RSS (RDF ii perl 5.8.7-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction pn rt3.4-clientsNot found. ii sysklogd [system-log-daemon] 1.4.1-17System Logging Daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312358: kdm crashes on startup
On July 3, 2005 09:27, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > The real question is why the kde packages don't conflict with earlier
> > kdm versions if they don't work with them... (not that kde had too few
> > conflicts, how about a little backwards compatibility anyway?)
>
> This situation is mostly fixed in our SVN since Jun 9, but there has
> not been another upload to experimental since then. .oO(Must implement
> that svn post-commit hook that tags pending and attachs changelog
> entry when closing a bug in SVN, like subversion (the pacakge) does.)
>
> We tightened the kdm dependency on kdebase-bin, which was the one
> causing problems. As now kdm Depends: kdebase-bin (= ${Source-Version),
> kdm will necessarily get upgraded whenever kdebase is.
>
> This, er, solves the problem after people upgrade to kdm 3.4.1. The
> possibility of remaining with an un-upgraded 3.3.2 remains, but I
> haven't decided what to do with that yet. Perhaps a one-time versioned
> conflicts (kdebase-bin Conflicts: kdm (<< 4:3.4.1-2), what do you
> think, Christopher?).
Seems fine to me!
Cheers,
Christopher Martin
pgpmUbBdEStNe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks scripts depending on libnss-db
severity 316573 normal tags 316573 moreinfo thanks On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: libnss-db > Version: 2.2-6.3 > Severity: grave > > The last NMU moved /var/lib/misc/Makefile to /var/lib/db/Makefile. > It's not mentioned in the changelog, it breaks existing scripts. > sorry, that's just bad style for a NMU. I don't think so. Are you sure? # dpkg-deb -c /var/cache/apt/archives/libnss-db_2.2-6.3_i386.deb | grep Makefile -rw-r--r-- root/root 4713 2005-05-23 16:22:13 ./var/lib/misc/Makefile -- .''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA : :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks scripts depending on libnss-db
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 316573 normal Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks scripts depending on libnss-db Severity set to `normal'. > tags 316573 moreinfo Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks scripts depending on libnss-db There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306078: marked as done (icheck: not for sarge)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:47:11 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306078: fixed in icheck 0.9.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2005 05:44:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 23 22:44:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 83-216-134-182.neilsu339.adsl.metronet.co.uk (cyclone.suffields.me.uk) [83.216.134.182] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DPZuX-0003pd-00; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 22:44:05 -0700 Received: from asuffield by cyclone.suffields.me.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DPZuV-0001ls-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 06:44:03 +0100 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 06:44:03 +0100 From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: icheck: not for sarge Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: icheck Severity: serious This one's not targetted for sarge, thanks. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | --- Received: (at 306078-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 20:51:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 13:51:50 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DpBRO-0007sR-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:51:50 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DpBMt-OG-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:47:11 -0400 From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#306078: fixed in icheck 0.9.3-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:47:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: icheck Source-Version: 0.9.3-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of icheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: icheck_0.9.3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/i/icheck/icheck_0.9.3-1.diff.gz icheck_0.9.3-1.dsc to pool/main/i/icheck/icheck_0.9.3-1.dsc icheck_0.9.3-1_i386.deb to pool/main/i/icheck/icheck_0.9.3-1_i386.deb icheck_0.9.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/i/icheck/icheck_0.9.3.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated icheck package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:28:06 +0100 Source: icheck Binary: icheck Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: icheck - C interface ABI/API checker Closes: 306078 308162 Changes: icheck (0.9.3-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release - Handles characters treated as integer values (closes: #308162) - Includes support for baseline files * On target for etch (closes: #306078) Files: 2f6bdbec255245b399ea060fec40b9a6 580 devel optional icheck_0.9.3-1.dsc a4bfe142e9e438b57de2e87e006c3857 72011 devel optional icheck_0.9.3.orig.tar.gz 715bdc9c59
Bug#313445: marked as done (gok: depends on unavailable libwnck4)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:02:26 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313445: fixed in gok 1.0.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 18:31:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 11:31:00 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl-082-083-251-090.arcor-ip.net (localhost.localdomain) [82.83.251.90] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dhti8-0004cM-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:31:00 -0700 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 548981090E7; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:31:00 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gok: depends on unavailable libwnck4 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:30:59 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gok Version: 1.0.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: uninstallable Hello, gok is not installable in sid: gok depends on libwnck4 (>= 2.7.91) libwnck4 does not appear to be available -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gok depends on: ii gconf2 2.10.0-2GNOME configuration database syste ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libatspi1.0-01.6.4-1 C binding libraries of at-spi for ii libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libesd0 0.2.35-2.1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libgail-common 1.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgail171.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgconf2-4 2.10.0-2GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-speech3 1:0.3.6-1 GNOME text-to-speech library ii libgnome2-0 2.10.0-3The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.10.2-2A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.0-2The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.10.1-4The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.7-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit21:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management pn libwnck4 Not found. ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li ii libxi6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Input extension li ii libxml2 2.6.16-7GNOME XML library ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 313445-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 20:08:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 13:08:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with
Bug#316650: ethereal: Assertion failed when starting
On Sunday 03 July 2005 04:38 am, W. Borgert wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:32:22AM -0400, Adam Aube wrote: > > I have strace output (over 4000 lines of it), but it's probably best to > > take this to debian-user, since it appears to be unreproducible. > > Check two things: > > 1. Do you have self-compiled modules for ethereal, not part of >the Debian package? The ABI may have changed and that >would certainly lead to the observed behaviour. Double checking - none found. Nothing under /usr/local/lib, and /usr/lib/etheral/plugins is from the Debian package. Also tried renaming ~/.ethereal to make it create a fresh configuration (in case anything odd was defined there). > 2. Check your hardware, RAM etc. >apt-get install hwtools memtest86 memtest86+ This is the only app that is misbehaving, and this is my primary system (desktop environment, mail client, web browser, games, etc.). I would think, if it were a hardware issue, I would see problems with more than just one program. Even programs with the same library dependencies as ethereal work. Just to be sure, though, I booted into memtest86+, and let it run five full passes of the standard tests. No errors were found. If anyone's interested, the strace output (~ 285k) is available here: http://aaube.nipl.net/ethereal.strace Unless it shows something, I say just close the bug, and I'll take the issue to debian-user (which I now sorely regret not doing in the first place). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315561: serious
I will setup a pbuilder sid environment this afternoon and rebuild sdl against slang2. Lawrence On July 3, 2005 03:59 pm, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > I am marking this bug serious as it is release-critical (FTBFS). > It is also holding up the transition of several other packages to > libslang2; please apply the patch,
Processed: tagging 316764
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 316764 sid Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2
Package: wmfire Version: 1.2.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable As above. Unstable now has libgtop2-5, which is part of the Gnome 2.10 transition, isn't it? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.8 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 315561 serious Bug#315561: libsdl1.2: please apply this patch for libslang2 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311835: haskell-cabal: FTBFS: Can't satisfly build dependency on ghc6
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Is there any progress on this? Is there a reason you didn't > switch to the new ghc6 6.4 yet? Yes, the problem is that ghc 6.4 comes with Cabal, but it needs to be removed for me to upload a new version of haskell-cabal, or libghc6-cabal-dev will still be uninstallable. Ian has indicated that he'll get around to removing cabal from ghc when the transition to the new gcc is straightened out, probably a few days. Then I can upload a new cabal, which will probably be the same (upstream) version as this one, and hopefully very soon after I'll upload an updated cabal. peace, isaac -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in upload of kionjb 0.1.6-3 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 309140 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#309140: kionjb: FTBFS: Build depends on libnjb-dev (<< 1.2) which is not available. Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308270: swt-gtk: ftbfs [sparc] error: Can't find default package `java.lang'
tag 308270 +help thanks swt-gtk 3.0+3.1M4-3 builds successfully on ia64, hppa, alpha, s390 and powerpc, but it failed to build on arm, sparc, and m68k. The package is being built using gcj-3.3. The error message is... org/eclipse/swt/internal/Platform.java:0: error: Can't find default package `java.lang'. Check the CLASSPATH environment variable and the access to the archives http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=swt-gtk Could someone give me a hint on what's gone wrong here? Thanks, Shaun
Bug#308667: License does not allow modifications, yet source code is modified
Hi Shaun Yes, Debian may redistribute binaries of glimpse built from modified source code. Let me know if you need a formal license to that effect. Thanks for bringing this up, and for maintaining a non-free archive! I have considered asking the University of Arizona (which holds the permanent license for glimpse) to GPL the software, and Udi Manber considered the same possibility - it may happen for glimpse. Right now I spend a good portion of my time developing Webglimpse, based on Glimpse, and would like to be able to make a good portion of my income from selling that software. If you have a few moments, take a look at http://webglimpse.net/dev/ppl.html my suggestion for an alternative route to open source for programmers who wish to collaborate on non-free projects, that retains some of the benefits of open source. I can't release glimpse this way either without asking the UofA's permission, but its my preference for future projects and maybe for glimpse. And will definitely take a look at the bugfixes to roll them into the main version, thanks!!Whoever contributed them can get resalable licenses in exchange if they desire. Best regards, --G On Sunday 03 July 2005 10:32, Shaun Jackman wrote: > Hello Golda, > > I maintain the Debian package of glimpse, and I've patched a few minor > bugs. Another Debian developer has raised the issue though that the > glimpse license doesn't explicitly allow distributing modified > versions of the software. May Debian redistribute binaries of glimpse > built from modified source code? > > The Debian Free Software Guidelines state that "The license must > explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source > code." It seems to me this must apply to software in the non-free > archive as well. > > The modifications are minor bug fixes and can be seen here: > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/g/glimpse/glimpse_4.18.0-3.diff.gz > > On a seperate note, have you considered licensing glimpse under an > Open Source Initiative license, such as the GPL? > > Thanks, > Shaun > > On 5/11/05, Göran Weinholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: glimpse > > Version: 4.18.0-4 > > Severity: serious > > > > This is the license of glimpse and as you can see it does not allow > > any modifications: > > > > --- > > Copyright 1997, Arizona Board of Regents. > > > > Glimpse was developed by Udi Manber, Sun Wu, and Burra Gopal > > at the University of Arizona, Department of Computer Science. > > It is currently maintained and licensed by Internet Workshop. > > Permission is granted to copy this software, to redistribute it > > on a nonprofit basis, and to use it for any purpose, subject to > > the following restrictions and understandings. > > > > 1. Any copy made of this software must include this copyright notice > > in full. > > > > 2. All materials developed as a consequence of the use of this > > software shall duly acknowledge such use, in accordance with the usual > > standards of acknowledging credit in academic research. > > In particular, if you use glimpse in any way on any WWW site, > > you should include a link to Glimpse home page at > > http://webglimpse.org > > > > 3. The authors have made no warranty or representation that the > > operation of this software will be error-free or suitable for any > > application, and they are under under no obligation to provide any > > services, by way of maintenance, update, or otherwise. The software > > is an experimental prototype offered on an as-is basis. > > > > 4. Any commercial use of this software will require a license. > > Contact Internet Workshop > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > WWW: http://webglimpse.net/licensing.html > > Fax: (520) 620-6841 > > Phone: (520) 620-6878 > > --- > > > > Yet you modify these source code files under the above license in > > glimpse_4.18.0-4.diff.gz: > > > > glimpse-4.18.0/split.c > > glimpse-4.18.0/index/glimpse.c > > > > The same license presumably applies to the manpages and the Makefile > > you've trivially modified. Unless you have obtained permission to > > modify the above files it seems Debian is in violation of the license. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Göran Weinholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Debian developer, sysadmin, netadmin > -- Golda Velez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 520-440-1420 Internet Workshop Web Hosting http://iwhome.com Webglimpse Site Search Software http://webglimpse.net ~~~ Help organize the world - index your own corner of the web!
Processed: swt-gtk: ftbfs [sparc] error: Can't find default package `java.lang'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 308270 +help Bug#308270: swt-gtk: ftbfs [sparc] error: Can't find default package `java.lang' Tags were: sid Tags added: help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308667: License does not allow modifications, yet source code is modified
Hello Golda, I maintain the Debian package of glimpse, and I've patched a few minor bugs. Another Debian developer has raised the issue though that the glimpse license doesn't explicitly allow distributing modified versions of the software. May Debian redistribute binaries of glimpse built from modified source code? The Debian Free Software Guidelines state that "The license must explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source code." It seems to me this must apply to software in the non-free archive as well. The modifications are minor bug fixes and can be seen here: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/g/glimpse/glimpse_4.18.0-3.diff.gz On a seperate note, have you considered licensing glimpse under an Open Source Initiative license, such as the GPL? Thanks, Shaun On 5/11/05, Göran Weinholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: glimpse > Version: 4.18.0-4 > Severity: serious > > This is the license of glimpse and as you can see it does not allow > any modifications: > > --- > Copyright 1997, Arizona Board of Regents. > > Glimpse was developed by Udi Manber, Sun Wu, and Burra Gopal > at the University of Arizona, Department of Computer Science. > It is currently maintained and licensed by Internet Workshop. > Permission is granted to copy this software, to redistribute it > on a nonprofit basis, and to use it for any purpose, subject to > the following restrictions and understandings. > > 1. Any copy made of this software must include this copyright notice > in full. > > 2. All materials developed as a consequence of the use of this > software shall duly acknowledge such use, in accordance with the usual > standards of acknowledging credit in academic research. > In particular, if you use glimpse in any way on any WWW site, > you should include a link to Glimpse home page at > http://webglimpse.org > > 3. The authors have made no warranty or representation that the > operation of this software will be error-free or suitable for any > application, and they are under under no obligation to provide any > services, by way of maintenance, update, or otherwise. The software > is an experimental prototype offered on an as-is basis. > > 4. Any commercial use of this software will require a license. > Contact Internet Workshop > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WWW: http://webglimpse.net/licensing.html > Fax: (520) 620-6841 > Phone: (520) 620-6878 > --- > > Yet you modify these source code files under the above license in > glimpse_4.18.0-4.diff.gz: > > glimpse-4.18.0/split.c > glimpse-4.18.0/index/glimpse.c > > The same license presumably applies to the manpages and the Makefile > you've trivially modified. Unless you have obtained permission to > modify the above files it seems Debian is in violation of the license. > > Regards, > > -- > Göran Weinholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Debian developer, sysadmin, netadmin
Bug#316542: marked as done (gimp: FTBFS: Still uses slang1-dev.)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:49:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2005 16:38:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 01 09:38:34 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DoOXB-0002fs-00; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 09:38:34 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 4016E3BC103 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:38:32 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BCE3BC0AC for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:38:32 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0644626136; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:38:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:38:31 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gimp: FTBFS: Still uses slang1-dev. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gimp Version: 2.2.8-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package currently fails to build because you have conflicting build dependencies: You build depend on slang1-dev and aalib1-dev. aalib1-dev itself has a dependency on libslang2-dev, which of course conflicts with slang1-dev. Please change your build dependency from slang1-dev to libslang2-dev. Kurt --- Received: (at 316538-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 16:53:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 09:53:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sojourner.alienhosting.com [216.40.217.206] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp7iN-0002iE-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:53:07 -0700 Received: from [0.0.0.0] (utopia.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.116.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by sojourner.alienhosting.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j63Gr5rT000963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jul 2005 12:53:06 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:49:53 -0400 From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is fixed as of gimp 2.2.8-2. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316538: marked as done (gimp FTBFS: bogus explicit build-dep on slang1-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:49:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2005 16:19:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 01 09:19:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp05.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.64] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DoOEN-0003Kz-00; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 09:19:08 -0700 Received: from 208-58-77-33.c3-0.grg-ubr3.lnh-grg.md.cable.rcn.com (HELO tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net) (208.58.77.33) by smtp05.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2005 12:19:07 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,250,1115006400"; d="scan'208"; a="57018714:sNHT19979328" Received: from amu by tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DoOEM-0003F7-Ip for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:19:06 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gimp FTBFS: bogus explicit build-dep on slang1-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:19:06 -0400 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gimp Version: 2.2.7-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source gimp explicitly build-depends on slang1-dev, even though its only use of slang is indirect, via aalib. Now that aalib has migrated to slang 2, whose development package conflicts with slang 1's, gimp can no longer simultaneously satisfy both build-dependencies. As such, please drop the build-dependency on slang1-dev, which was never necessary and is now actively problematic. Thanks. --- Received: (at 316538-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 16:53:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 09:53:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sojourner.alienhosting.com [216.40.217.206] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp7iN-0002iE-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:53:07 -0700 Received: from [0.0.0.0] (utopia.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.116.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by sojourner.alienhosting.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j63Gr5rT000963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jul 2005 12:53:06 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:49:53 -0400 From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is fixed as of gimp 2.2.8-2. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:18:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > #include > > * Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]: > > > > > >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled > > > >terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits > > > >them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to > > > >/etc/terminfo/... should be created, so the local admin still has a > > > >chance to modify the files, and on the other hands the packages can work > > > >without worrying about conffiles issues. > > You aren't supposed to put links from /etc to things, was my > understanding. It's supposed to be the other way around... That's policy 10.7.2, for "if a package creates or uses configuration files outside of /etc/, and it is not feasible to modify the package to use /etc directly". Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]: > > > >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled > > >terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits > > >them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to > > >/etc/terminfo/... should be created, so the local admin still has a > > >chance to modify the files, and on the other hands the packages can work > > >without worrying about conffiles issues. You aren't supposed to put links from /etc to things, was my understanding. It's supposed to be the other way around... > > my understanding is that they're in /etc since they're used during startup > > when /usr/share is not mounted. > > Good point, things like editors maybe essential in an environment where > /usr cannot be mounted. What about /lib/terminfo instead? That can't be right! There's a reason that the ncurses-term components /live in usr/share, not /usr/lib. If I put them in /lib someone else will file a bug report about that. The closest we have to /share is, historically, /etc. That said I don't think the library even searches in /etc/terminfo today. That's why ncurses-base includes symlinks from /usr/share/terminfo to /etc for the essential terminfo descriptions. But it would be nice if it did and ncurses nowadays has a configure option to search multiple directories. So I plan to make a future upload do this. Ideally I could ship /etc/terminfo empty, have tic default to write there, ship terminfo descriptions somewhere on /, and ncurses-term continues to live in /usr/share. Is there anything more appropriate then /lib? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314764: poldi: FTBFS in experimental: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.
tags 314764 - fixed-in-experimental thanks Hi, It looks like this hasn't been fixed yet. Now it fails with this instead: ld --shared -x \ -o pam_poldi.so pam_poldi.o \ ../common/libpoldi-common.a ../jnlib/libjnlib.a \ ../libscd/libscd.a -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -lusb -lc ld: ../jnlib/libjnlib.a(stringhelp.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used w hen making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC ../jnlib/libjnlib.a: could not read symbols: Bad value Note that all files ending up in a shared lib have to be build using -fPIC, and those ending up in a static lib should not be build with -fPIC. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: poldi: FTBFS in experimental: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 314764 - fixed-in-experimental Bug#314764: poldi: FTBFS in experimental: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib. Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314289: experiencing the same issue
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:49:42PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > I'm experiencing the same issue with this package. Here's an strace -f of > the sshd process, starting after I typed my password (password removed). Could I have that strace with '-s 1024' or similar, so that I can see what the log messages were? In the trace you sent they're all cut off at a most unhelpful point. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263359: marked as done (wap-wml-tools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' and 'libxml-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:32:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#263359: fixed in wap-wml-tools 0.0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 22:52:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 03 15:52:36 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c204114.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.204.114] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bs895-0002JE-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:52:35 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bs894-0002Um-Gr; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 00:52:34 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: wap-wml-tools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' and 'libxml-dev Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 00:52:34 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wap-wml-tools Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'wap-wml-tools' in a clean chroot I get the following error: dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' and 'libxml-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/wap-wml-tools-0.0.4/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/wap-wml-tools-0.0.4/debian/control 2004-08-04 00:48:10.455857325 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2004-08-04 00:48:06.312658971 +0200 @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ Section: non-free/web Priority: optional Maintainer: Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Build-Depends: debhelper, libxml-dev Standards-Version: 3.0.1 Package: wap-wml-tools --- Received: (at 263359-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 13:38:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 06:38:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp4fc-0008Aj-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 06:38:04 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp4Zn-BH-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:32:03 -0400 From: Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#263359: fixed in wap-wml-tools 0.0.4-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:32:03 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: wap-wml-tools Source-Version: 0.0.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wap-wml-tools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wap-wml-tools_0.0.4-2.diff.gz to pool/non-free/w/wap-wml-tools/wap-wml-tools_0.0.4-2.diff.gz wap-wml-tools_0.0.4-2.dsc to pool/non-free/w/wap-wml-tools/wap-wml-tools_0.0.4-2.dsc wap-wml-tools_0.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/non-free/w/wap-wml-tools/wap-wml-tools_0.0.4-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated wap-wml-tools package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 13:17:27 +0200 Source: wap-wml-tools Binary: wap-wml-tools Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.0.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: wap-wml-tools - Wireless Markup Language development and test tools Closes: 263359 276982 Cha
Bug#314645: moreinfo, unreproducible, downgrade
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:10:35PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I suggest tagging this moreinfo,unreproducible, and downgrading when > and if that is necessary for new packages to move to testing (which > should be deliberately prevented until #314289 is fixed). Please leave this bug in its current state. I'm sorry it's taken me so long to get round to investigating it, but from experience I have reason to suspect that it may well be valid and it certainly bears non-statistical investigation. Greg, I need to see your /etc/ssh/sshd_config in order to check this out. I would ask that the discussion about statistical analysis of login attempts please be taken to some different forum; while interesting, it merely means that I have much more information to trawl through when bringing myself up to speed on the bug, most of which is not really relevant to whether or not a timing attack on sshd is possible. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316509: marked as done (calamaris break at loading calamaris::calBars3d)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316509: fixed in calamaris 2.99.1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2005 13:10:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 01 06:10:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from colleen.colgarra.priv.at [82.150.197.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DoLHp-0002A1-00; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 06:10:29 -0700
Received: from chello080109165251.tirol.surfer.at ([80.109.165.251]
helo=guinan.comodo.priv.at)
by colleen.colgarra.priv.at with esmtpsa
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DoLHh-0007ya-6g; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:10:21 +0200
Received: from gregoa by guinan.comodo.priv.at with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DoLHX-00048v-PZ; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:10:11 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: calamaris break at loading calamaris::calBars3d
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:10:11 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: calamaris
Version: 2.99.1.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
1)
calamaris does not work any more. It ends with the message: "Couldn't load
package calamaris::calBars3d, maybe it is not installed: No such file or
directory" (invoked via /etc/cron.daily/calamaris).
/usr/share/perl5/calamaris/calBars3d.pm is in fact existing.
`bash -x /etc/cron.daily/calamaris` ends with:
+ case "$DAYDO" in
+ cat /var/log/squid/access.log
+ nice -39 /usr/bin/calamaris -a -f auto --config-file
/etc/calamaris/calamaris.conf -o forweekly.5 -F html,graph -H 'Squid on Guinan
- Daily' --output-path /var/www/calamaris --output-file daily.html
/usr/bin/calamaris: Couldn't load package calamaris::calBars3d,
maybe it is not installed: No such file or directory
$ perl -e 'foreach (@INC) {print "$_\n";}'
/etc/perl
/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7
/usr/lib/perl5
/usr/share/perl5
/usr/lib/perl/5.8
/usr/share/perl/5.8
/usr/local/lib/site_perl
.
2)
Taking out ",graph" from /etc/cron.daily/calamaris temporarily fixes the
problem.
Feel free to contact me for any other information that might be helpful.
gregor
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (10, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.1.200506242037
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages calamaris depends on:
ii bc1.06-17The GNU bc arbitrary precision cal
ii debconf 1.4.51 Debian configuration management sy
ii perl [perl5] 5.8.7-3Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- debconf information:
* calamaris/monthly/title: Squid on Guinan Monthly
* calamaris/daily/html: /var/www/calamaris/daily.html
calamaris/weekly/mail: root
* calamaris/weekly/title: Squid on Guinan - Weekly
* calamaris/weekly/html: /var/www/calamaris/weekly.html
* calamaris/daily/title: Squid on Guinan - Daily
* calamaris/daily/task: web
* calamaris/transition:
* calamaris/weekly/task: web
calamaris/monthly/mail: root
calamaris/daily/mail: root
* calamaris/monthly/task: web
* calamaris/cache_type: squid
* calamaris/monthly/html: /var/www/calamaris/monthly.html
---
Received: (at 316509-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 12:58:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 05:58:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dp43d-0004Ss-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:58:49 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dp3sG-0004CO-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:47:04 -0400
From: Philipp Frauenfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#316509: fixed in
Bug#316738: missing files (boo.pc and boo.lang)
Package: boo
Severity: serious
The 0.5.5.1651-2 version of the boo package is missing some files which
the -1 version had, and 2 of them are important for usage and linking
against boo.
boo.pc is missing in -2, thus monodevelop for example can't be build
with boo support.
boo.lang is missing in -2, means no syntax highlighting for the
gtksourceview based editors (like gedit or monodevelop).
Please include this missing files.
Here a full report of differences between -1 and -2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt/archives$ debdiff
boo_0.5.5.1651-1_all.deb boo_0.5.5.1651-2_all.deb
Files in second .deb but not in first
-
/usr/share/dotnet/bin/booc
/usr/share/dotnet/bin/booi
/usr/share/dotnet/bin/booish
Files in first .deb but not in second
-
/usr/lib/boo/Boo.NAnt.Tasks.dll
/usr/lib/boo/pt/strings.pt.resources
/usr/lib/boo/strings.resources
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/boo.pc
/usr/share/gtksourceview-1.0/language-specs/boo.lang
/usr/share/mime-info/boo.keys
/usr/share/mime-info/boo.mime
/usr/share/mime/packages/boo-mime-info.xml
The following lines in the control files differ (wdiff output format):
--
Version: [-0.5.5.1651-1-] {+0.5.5.1651-2+}
Section: [-interpreters-] {+devel+}
Depends: [-mono-] {+mono-jit (>= 1.1.6), mono-assemblies-base (>= 1.0)+}
Installed-Size: [-2792-] {+2692+}
Maintainer: [-Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-] {+Sam Clegg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>+}
Description: [-OO, statically typed programming-] {+a python-like+}
language {+and compiler+} for the CLI
Boo is [-a new-] {+an+} object oriented statically typed programming
language
for the Common Language Infrastructure {+(CLI)+} with a [-python-]
{+Python+} inspired
{+.+}
{+ This package includes the Boo libraries as well as a compiler,+}
{+ interpreter and interactive shell. The boo compiler and the+}
{+ programs it produces are 100% CIL and can be run on any compliant+}
{+ CLI virtual machine.+}
PS: do not use the /usr/share/dotnet structure, neither
the /usr/bin/cli-wrapper it's deprecated and not needed anymore.
For more details read the CLI policy draft at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com//CLIPolicy
--
Regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O M-
V? PS
PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y?
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#316691: marked as done (mono-utils should define replaces for mono-mcs)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:17:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316691: fixed in mono 1.1.8.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 03:59:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 02 20:59:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from client-121-22.kabelszatnet-2002.hu (gcs.lsc.hu) [195.38.121.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dovdl-j5-00; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 20:59:33 -0700 Received: by gcs.lsc.hu (Postfix, from userid 0) id EC15EA47850; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 06:01:24 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: mono-utils should define replaces for mono-mcs X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 06:01:24 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mono-utils Version: 1.1.8.1-1 Severity: normal Tried to upgrade my mono: Preparing to replace mono-utils 1.1.6-4 (using .../mono-utils_1.1.8.1-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement mono-utils ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/mono-utils_1.1.8.1-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/mono-find-requires.1.gz', which is also in package mono-mcs After manually purging mono-mcs, mono-utils upgraded without any problem. Please put a replaces field into mono-utils for mono-mcs. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mono-utils depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-02.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libmono0 [libmono-1.1.8.1] 1.1.8.1-1libraries for the Mono JIT ii mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.8.1-1Mono class library (1.0) ii mono-common 1.1.8.1-1common files for Mono mono-utils recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 316691-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 12:22:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 05:22:12 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp3UC-jB-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:22:12 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp3Pb-O8-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:17:27 -0400 From: Debian Mono Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#316691: fixed in mono 1.1.8.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:17:27 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: mono Source-Version: 1.1.8.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mono, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmono-dev_1.1.8.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mono/libmono-dev_1.1.8.1-2_i386.deb libmono0_1.1.8.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mono/libmono0_1.1.8.1-2_i386.deb mono-assemblies-base_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mono/mono-assemblies-base_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb mono-classlib-1.0-dbg_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mono/mono-classlib-1.0-dbg_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb mono-classlib-1.0_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mono/mono-classlib-1.0_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb mono-classlib-2.0-dbg_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mono/mono-classlib-2.0-dbg_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb mono-classlib-2.0_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mono/mono-classlib-2.0_1.1.8.1-2_all.deb mono-common_1.1.8.1-2_i386.deb
Bug#316729: bashism in the init script
On Jul 03, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice of you to check the open bugs... Actually I did, but only looked at serious bugs, which is the expected severity for a bashism which breaks dash. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#316683: dbus: ftbfs [sparc] Building python explicitly requested, but can't build python
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:33:27PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: dbus
> Version: 0.23.4-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
>
> The build attempt on the sparc buildd failed due to unavalable
> dependancies.
Looks like that's because of the jack transition, not the fault of the dbus
package.
> The builds on all other buildds also failed.
>
> Building on my sparc pbuilder I get the following error:
>
>
> checking for python script directory... ${prefix}/lib/python2.3/site-packages
> checking for python extension module directory...
> ${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.3/s
> ite-packages
> checking for pyrexc... no
> checking for headers required to compile python extensions... found
> configure: error: Building python explicitly requested, but can't build
> python b
> indings
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
Build fine on my sparc buildd before i did pbuilder update, afterward i got the
same error as the buildd's. That probably just needs some time to get resolved.
The error on your pbuilder is odd, as we depend on python2.3-pyrex. Will need
to check if that's a problem with the newer(?) python-pyrex package.
Sjoerd
--
Kleeneness is next to Godelness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316729: bashism in the init script
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 02:00:38PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Package: dhcp3-server > Version: 3.0.2-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > This breaks with dash: > > - if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t >& /dev/null; then > + if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t 2>&1 /dev/null; then > Nice of you to check the open bugs... #225893 is pending an upload once I sort out DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS support. regards Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 316729
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 316729 + pending Bug#316729: bashism in the init script Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316729: bashism in the init script
Package: dhcp3-server Version: 3.0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch This breaks with dash: - if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t >& /dev/null; then + if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t 2>&1 /dev/null; then -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: fix pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 316691 + pending Bug#316691: mono-utils should define replaces for mono-mcs There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > severity 316691 serious Bug#316691: mono-utils should define replaces for mono-mcs Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316714: marked as done (XMLRPC vulnerability)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 07:02:24 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316714: fixed in phpwiki 1.3.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 09:08:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 02:08:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sasquatch.hezmatt.org [70.85.129.92] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp0SL-00089L-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:08:05 -0700 Received: from [10.6.66.6] (helo=gryphon.hezmatt.org) by sasquatch.hezmatt.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dp0Rm-0002ZG-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:07:30 +1000 Received: from mpalmer by gryphon.hezmatt.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dp0Ro-Bs-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:07:32 +1000 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:07:32 +1000 From: Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: XMLRPC vulnerability Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: phpwiki Tags: security Severity: serious Just got this through the PHPWiki list. I'm going to pull xmlrpc.inc as suggested. I pulled the package from Sarge because I didn't think it was releasable, so there's no need to go through a full DSA cycle. Just keeping the security team in the loop. - Forwarded message from Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - =46rom: Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: phpwiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:04:06 +0200 Subject: XMLRPC vulnerability security advise The phpxmlrpc library phpwiki-1.3.x from 2002/08/30 up to today is using=20 is easily exploitable. The updated version xmlrpc-1.1 from the website=20 even contains the exploit code, so it's very likely that you webserver=20 will get "rooted" in the next week if your using phpwiki-1.3.4 or later. See http://phpxmlrpc.sourceforge.net/ and http://www.gulftech.org/?node=3Dresearch&article_id=3D00088-07022005 The updated xmlrpc-1.1 version doesn't work out of the box and will=20 require one more day to be fixed. If you are using phpwiki-1.3.11_rc1 or a newer or a CVS versions later=20 than 2005-01-05 AND you are using the native PECL xmlrpc extension by=20 Dan Libby you are on the safe side and forget this issue. Check your=20 phpinfo() if the xmlrpc extension is loaded. phpwiki from 2005-01-05 on checks the existance and does not use the=20 exploitable phpxmlrpc library which ships with phpwiki/lib/XMLRPC. If you are affected please remove lib/XMLRPC/xmlrpc.inc ASAP or rename it. Note: It's extremely unfair from the phpxmlrpc maintainers to add the exploit=20 code to the fixed library without any grace period! Usual it is one=20 week, but one ot two days would have been enough also. I'm stronlgy considering removing this horribly written library from=20 phpwiki and just rely on the stable and fast PECL extension by Dan=20 Libby, which also supports SOAP. --=20 Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies =66rom IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7477&alloc_id=3D16492&op=3Dclick --=20 Phpwiki-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk - End forwarded message - --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCx6rUBEnrTWk1E4cRAt5LAJ9Eqkt0pI/JqEkygIBMa6uT2q1t/QCfWQMW p7FRRgmikoR5xOmbQNEzBAs= =PS+h -END PGP
Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc
#include * Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]: > >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled > >terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits > >them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to > >/etc/terminfo/... should be created, so the local admin still has a > >chance to modify the files, and on the other hands the packages can work > >without worrying about conffiles issues. > > my understanding is that they're in /etc since they're used during startup > when /usr/share is not mounted. Good point, things like editors maybe essential in an environment where /usr cannot be mounted. What about /lib/terminfo instead? Regards, Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eduard Bloch wrote: Hello, I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to /etc/terminfo/... should be created, so the local admin still has a chance to modify the files, and on the other hands the packages can work without worrying about conffiles issues. my understanding is that they're in /etc since they're used during startup when /usr/share is not mounted. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316725: header file exception.h needs to include stdarg.h
Package: libmagick6-dev Version: 6:6.2.3.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: no longer builds from source Bug: #315503 against dvdauthor showed a problem with the newest libmagick package. the header file exception.h uses va_list without including stdarg.h. Including stdarg.h solves the build problem from dvdauthor and is IMHO a problem with the header of libmagick. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'hoary') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libmagick6-dev depends on: ii libbz2-dev 1.0.2-7 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6-dev2.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libdps-dev 6.8.2-10Display PostScript (DPS) client li ii libexif-dev 0.6.9-6 library to parse EXIF files (devel ii libfreetype6-dev 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, developmen ii libjasper-1.701-dev 1.701.0-2 Development files for the JasPer J ii libjpeg62-dev6b-10 Development files for the IJG JPEG ii liblcms1-dev 1.13-1 Color management library (Developm ii libltdl3-dev 1.5.6-6 A system independent dlopen wrappe ii libmagick6 6:6.2.3.1-1 Image manipulation library ii libpng12-dev 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - development ii libtiff4-dev 3.7.1-4 Tag Image File Format library (TIF ii libwmf-dev 0.2.8.3-2 Windows metafile conversion develo ii libxml2-dev 2.6.17-0ubuntu1 Development files for the GNOME XM ii xlibs-dev6.8.2-10X Window System client library dev ii zlib1g-dev [libz-dev]1:1.2.2-4 compression library - development libmagick6-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- greetz, marc Is there some kind of stupid alien quotation book you guys use? Crichton - Meltdown scorpius 2.6.12 #1 Thu Jun 23 21:32:03 CEST 2005 GNU/Linux signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#315012: marked as done (RM: nautilus-media -- RoM; superseded by totem)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:18:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315012: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2005 02:15:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 19 19:15:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl017-048-146.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net (mail.nishra.com) [69.17.48.146] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DkBoX-0004Xd-00; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:15:05 -0700 Received: by mail.nishra.com (Postfix, from userid 1005) id CCFA3EDB01; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Emil Soleyman-Zomalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ftp.debian.org: Please remove nautilus-media [Debian Unstable] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.14 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:15:04 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable merge 313557 290608 291687 308509 254750 227556 reassign 313557 ftp.debian.org reassign 290608 ftp.debian.org reassign 291687 ftp.debian.org reassign 308509 ftp.debian.org reassign 254750 ftp.debian.org reassign 227556 ftp.debian.org Please remove the nautilus-media package from Unstable due to bug 313557 which states that the needed library is no longer available in Unstable. At this time, the package is unusable in Debian. Nautilus-media has been superseded by Totem for some time now and it is Totem that provides superior features with an active upstream team. An alternatives facility was already in place before the filing of this bug report and that facility defaults to Totem in all cases. Thank you, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 315012-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 09:22:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 02:22:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp0fw-0004mX-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:22:08 -0700 Received: from jeroen by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp0c5-0002TW-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:18:09 -0400 From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $ Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#315012: fixed Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:18:09 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: nautilus-media |0.8.1-2 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. Bugs which have been reported agai
Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc
Hello, I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to /etc/terminfo/... should be created, so the local admin still has a chance to modify the files, and on the other hands the packages can work without worrying about conffiles issues. Therefore, I suggest the following transition: - install the files into /usr/share/terminfo inside of the package - in postinst, do something like... (cd /usr/share ; find terminfo -type d) | (cd /etc ; xargs mkdir -p ) for x in `cd /usr/share ; find terminfo -type f; find terminfo -type l` ; do if test -f /etc/$x ; then if cmp /usr/share/$x /etc/$x ; then ln -sf /usr/share/$x /etc/$x else echo "/etc/$x modified by local administrator, keeping as-is" fi else ln -sf /usr/share/$x /etc/$x fi done Regards, Eduard. -- OpenBSD fails miserably in this respect, and makes for an example of how NOT to work with the community on security issues. Their approach is, roughly, "we fixed this a while ago but didn't tell anyone, so you're vulnerable and we're not, ha-ha-ha". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315055: marked as done (RM: innovation3d -- RoM; orphaned upstream, broken)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:21:49 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed innovation3d, innovation3d-plugins from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2005 10:13:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 20 03:13:35 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from slider2.rack66.net (slider2.rack66.com) [212.3.252.150] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DkJHb-0001Kc-00; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:13:35 -0700 Received: by slider2.rack66.com (Postfix, from userid 1005) id C935D73CA6; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:13:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:13:32 +0200 From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: please remove innovation3d from Debian (RoM, orphaned upstream, does not build anymore) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious Regards, Filip -- If Windows is the answer, I want the problems back! --- Received: (at 315055-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 09:23:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 02:23:02 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp0go-0005P9-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:23:02 -0700 Received: from jeroen by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp0fd-0002b5-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:21:49 -0400 From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $ Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed innovation3d, innovation3d-plugins from unstable Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:21:49 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: We believe that the request you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: innovation3d | 0.66.1-1 | source, alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc innovation3d-dev | 0.66.1-1 | alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc innovation3d-plugins | 0.0.20010726-1 | arm innovation3d-plugins | 0.66.1-1 | source, alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Reason: RoM; orphaned upstream, broken Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to the just-closed bug (or by replying to this mail if there is no bug closed). This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Bug#316714: XMLRPC vulnerability
Package: phpwiki Tags: security Severity: serious Just got this through the PHPWiki list. I'm going to pull xmlrpc.inc as suggested. I pulled the package from Sarge because I didn't think it was releasable, so there's no need to go through a full DSA cycle. Just keeping the security team in the loop. - Forwarded message from Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: phpwiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:04:06 +0200 Subject: XMLRPC vulnerability security advise The phpxmlrpc library phpwiki-1.3.x from 2002/08/30 up to today is using is easily exploitable. The updated version xmlrpc-1.1 from the website even contains the exploit code, so it's very likely that you webserver will get "rooted" in the next week if your using phpwiki-1.3.4 or later. See http://phpxmlrpc.sourceforge.net/ and http://www.gulftech.org/?node=research&article_id=00088-07022005 The updated xmlrpc-1.1 version doesn't work out of the box and will require one more day to be fixed. If you are using phpwiki-1.3.11_rc1 or a newer or a CVS versions later than 2005-01-05 AND you are using the native PECL xmlrpc extension by Dan Libby you are on the safe side and forget this issue. Check your phpinfo() if the xmlrpc extension is loaded. phpwiki from 2005-01-05 on checks the existance and does not use the exploitable phpxmlrpc library which ships with phpwiki/lib/XMLRPC. If you are affected please remove lib/XMLRPC/xmlrpc.inc ASAP or rename it. Note: It's extremely unfair from the phpxmlrpc maintainers to add the exploit code to the fixed library without any grace period! Usual it is one week, but one ot two days would have been enough also. I'm stronlgy considering removing this horribly written library from phpwiki and just rely on the stable and fast PECL extension by Dan Libby, which also supports SOAP. -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click -- Phpwiki-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk - End forwarded message - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#273601: marked as done (ifrit should not go into sarge)
Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2005 10:09:39 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line allow ifrit into testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2004 09:08:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 27 02:08:11 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cheviot5.ncl.ac.uk [128.240.233.122] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CBrUQ-0003Gp-00; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 02:08:10 -0700 Received: from localhost (dynam4.ncl.ac.uk [128.240.58.147]) by cheviot5.ncl.ac.uk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8R983cp011254; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:08:03 +0100 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8495B13647; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:24:03 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ifrit should not go into sarge X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.3 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:24:03 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Newcastle-MailScanner-Information: Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more information X-Newcastle-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: ifrit Version: 2.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Bug report from maintainer. ifrit should not enter testing until sarge is released. --- Received: (at 273601-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 09:06:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 02:06:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.141] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dp0QO-0007oS-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:06:04 -0700 Received: from [62.3.98.42] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Dp0QL-0003d1-0m for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:06:01 + Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 59DE5BAC469; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 10:09:39 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 10:09:39 +0100 From: Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: allow ifrit into testing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: None at all User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [62.3.98.42] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Now that sarge has been released, ifrit can be allowed into testing. Mark --=20 Mark Hymers "Don't you hate those Claims Direct adverts? 'I slipped on a banana skin and sued the Dominican Republic!'" Linda Smith on the News Quiz talking about the Compensation Culture --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCx6tTd2rV+aBqV68RAjB4AJ9yKPJSUR2FjYsSJ6e40bvfpaVwbgCbBnLN ebQi4OXcjeT4j3GX17plOEc= =4jhQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316650: ethereal: Assertion failed when starting
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:32:22AM -0400, Adam Aube wrote: > I have strace output (over 4000 lines of it), but it's probably best to take > this to debian-user, since it appears to be unreproducible. Check two things: 1. Do you have self-compiled modules for ethereal, not part of the Debian package? The ABI may have changed and that would certainly lead to the observed behaviour. 2. Check your hardware, RAM etc. apt-get install hwtools memtest86 memtest86+ Cheers, WB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316281: marked as done (pbuilder create fails to install build-essential)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:17:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316281: fixed in pbuilder 0.128 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2005 20:21:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 29 13:21:23 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rrcs-24-123-59-149.central.biz.rr.com (galon.ev-en.org) [24.123.59.149] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dnj3j-0008KT-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:21:23 -0700 Received: by galon.ev-en.org (Postfix, from userid 105) id 26F3911A953; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:20:52 +0300 (IDT) Received: from [10.220.3.66] (hamilton.nuim.ie [149.157.192.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by galon.ev-en.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0FA11A951; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:20:48 +0300 (IDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:20:41 +0100 From: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pbuilder create fails to install build-essential X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pbuilder Version: 0.127 Severity: important When trying to create a new sid image I got the following error: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done dpkg-dev is already the newest version. apt is already the newest version. The following NEW packages will be installed: build-essential 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/6520B of archives. After unpacking 49.2kB of additional disk space will be used. WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! build-essential E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes -> Aborting with an error -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem -> unmounting proc filesystem -> cleaning the build env -> removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//12834 and its subdirectories -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6-baruch Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages pbuilder depends on: ii coreutils 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii debianutils 2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii debootstrap 0.2.45-0.2 Bootstrap a basic Debian system ii gcc 4:3.3.5-3 The GNU C compiler ii wget 1.10-1 retrieves files from the web -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 316281-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 07:23:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 00:23:02 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Doyog-0007p4-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:23:02 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Doyj9-0003l2-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:17:19 -0400 From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#316281: fixed in pbuilder 0.128 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:17:19 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8 Source: pbuilder Source-Version: 0.128 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pbuilder, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pbuilder_0.128.dsc to pool/main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.128.dsc pbuilder_
Bug#315086: marked as done (Heimdal telnetd Buffer Overflow Vulnerability)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:02:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315065: fixed in heimdal 0.6.3-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2005 14:10:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 20 07:10:38 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DkMz0-0003s4-00; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:10:38 -0700 Received: from mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com ([2001:470:1f00:907:20d:87ff:fe3c:98c8] helo=ip6-localhost) by polaris.galacticasoftware.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DkMyx-y8-Oo; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:10:35 -0500 Received: from adamm by ip6-localhost with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DkMz1-0001gN-Tj; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:10:39 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Heimdal telnetd Buffer Overflow Vulnerability X-Mailer: reportbug 3.14 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:10:39 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: heimdal-servers Severity: critical Tags: security The following is from Secunia advisory SA15718 which may be found at http://secunia.com/advisories/15718/ DESCRIPTION: A vulnerability has been reported in Heimdal, which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. The vulnerability is caused due to a boundary error in telnetd within the "getterminaltype()" function when processing the terminal type received from a telnet client. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary code. SOLUTION: Update to version 0.6.5 or 0.7. ftp://ftp.pdc.kth.se/pub/heimdal/src/ PROVIDED AND/OR DISCOVERED BY: Reported by vendor. ORIGINAL ADVISORY: http://www.pdc.kth.se/heimdal/advisory/2005-06-20/ -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 315065-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 07:08:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 00:08:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DoyaR-0001bk-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:08:19 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DoyUU-pv-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:02:10 -0400 From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#315065: fixed in heimdal 0.6.3-11 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:02:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: heimdal Source-Version: 0.6.3-11 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of heimdal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: heimdal-clients-x_0.6.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-clients-x_0.6.3-11_i386.deb heimdal-clients_0.6.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-clients_0.6.3-11_i386.deb heimdal-dev_0.6.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-dev_0.6.3-11_i386.deb heimdal-docs_0.6.3-11_all.deb to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-docs_0.6.3-11_all.deb heimdal-kdc_0.6.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-kdc_0.6.3-11_i386.deb heimdal-servers-x_0.6.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-servers-x_0.6.3-11_i386.deb heimdal-servers_0.6.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-servers_0.6.3-11_i386.deb heimdal_0.6.3-11.diff.gz to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal_0.6.3-11.diff.gz heimdal_
Bug#315065: marked as done (Remotely exploitable buffer overflow in getterminaltype function)
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:02:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315065: fixed in heimdal 0.6.3-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2005 11:26:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 20 04:26:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DkKPi-QD-00; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:26:02 -0700
Received: from bitz8.bitz.briteline.de [195.90.9.8] (helo=anton)
by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis),
id 0ML25U-1DkKPh0ClT-7E; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:26:01 +0200
Received: by anton (Postfix, from userid 2028)
id A797CB6F17; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:26:00 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1353662545=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Remotely exploitable buffer overflow in getterminaltype function
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1.1.200308291454
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:26:00 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
login:4ad79d65ac46f2345c6ef2e856c1d9ef
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===1353662545==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: heimdal
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Heimdal contains a remotely exploitable buffer overflow in the getterminaltype()
function. This has been fixed in the new upstream versions 0.6.5 and 0.7.0.
URL: http://www.pdc.kth.se/heimdal/advisory/2005-06-20/
I've extracted the security relevant fix from the 0.6.4->0.6.5 patch. If you are
planning more extensive changes for packaging 0.7 it might be a good idea to
release a fixed package for the 0.6 branch before that.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux anton 2.4.30-univention.2 #1 SMP Thu May 12 13:53:52 CEST 2005
i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--===1353662545==
Content-Type: text/x-c; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="./heimdal-getterminaltype-sarge.diff"
diff -Naur heimdal-0.6.3.orig/debian/patches/033_getterminaltype_overflow
heimdal-0.6.3/debian/patches/033_getterminaltype_overflow
--- heimdal-0.6.3.orig/debian/patches/033_getterminaltype_overflow Thu Jan
1 01:00:00 1970
+++ heimdal-0.6.3/debian/patches/033_getterminaltype_overflow Mon Jun 20
12:49:40 2005
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+--- heimdal-0.6.4/appl/telnet/telnetd/ext.hMon Apr 18 22:53:17 2005
heimdal-0.6.3/appl/telnet/telnetd/ext.hTue Jun 14 16:27:23 2005
+@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
+
+ extern slcfun slctab[NSLC + 1]; /* slc mapping table */
+
+-extern char *terminaltype;
++extern char terminaltype[41];
+
+ /*
+ * I/O data buffers, pointers, and counters.
+diff -Naur heimdal-0.6.4/appl/telnet/telnetd/global.c
heimdal-0.6.5/appl/telnet/telnetd/global.c
+--- heimdal-0.6.4/appl/telnet/telnetd/global.c Mon Apr 18 22:53:17 2005
heimdal-0.6.3/appl/telnet/telnetd/global.c Tue Jun 14 16:27:23 2005
+@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
+
+ slcfunslctab[NSLC + 1]; /* slc mapping table */
+
+-char *terminaltype;
++char terminaltype[41];
+
+ /*
+ * I/O data buffers, pointers, and counters.
+diff -Naur heimdal-0.6.4/appl/telnet/telnetd/state.c
heimdal-0.6.5/appl/telnet/telnetd/state.c
+--- heimdal-0.6.4/appl/telnet/telnetd/state.c Mon Apr 18 22:53:17 2005
heimdal-0.6.3/appl/telnet/telnetd/state.c Tue Jun 14 16:27:23 2005
+@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@
+ } /* end of case TELOPT_TSPEED */
+
+ case TELOPT_TTYPE: { /* Yy! */
+- static char terminalname[41];
++ char *p;
+
+ if (his_state_is_wont(TELOPT_TTYPE))/* Ignore if option disabled */
+ break;
+@@ -949,9 +949,9 @@
+ return; /* ??? XXX but, this is the most robust */
+ }
+
+- terminaltype = terminalname;
++
Bug#315065: Remotely exploitable buffer overflow in getterminaltype function
> "Moritz" == Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Moritz> I've extracted the security relevant fix from the Moritz> 0.6.4->0.6.5 patch. If you are planning more extensive Moritz> changes for packaging 0.7 it might be a good idea to Moritz> release a fixed package for the 0.6 branch before that. I have fixed this and uploaded to Debian unstable. To the security team (which I have hopefully CCed): This upload contains only the patch mentioned in this bug report. It has been compiled with libraries in stable (pbuilder chroot), so it should work on both stable and unstable. What do I need to do to get a security release for the stable version? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316143: subversion: libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 reproduces bug here
Package: subversion Version: 1.2.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #316143 Unfortunately, I have exactly the same dependent package versions (including libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22) as indicated in the original bug report, yet I see the same problem (tested with a freshly created, local fsfs repository). Ken -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages subversion depends on: ii db4.2-util 4.2.52-19 Berkeley v4.2 Database Utilities ii libapr02.0.54-4 the Apache Portable Runtime ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-19 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libldap2 2.1.30-10 OpenLDAP libraries ii libneon24 0.24.7.dfsg-2 An HTTP and WebDAV client library ii libssl0.9.70.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries ii libsvn01.2.0-1 shared libraries used by Subversio ii libxml22.6.16-7 GNOME XML library ii patch 2.5.9-2 Apply a diff file to an original ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime subversion recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig OSCE report on 2004 USA elections: http://www.osce.org/item/13658.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
