Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error
Package: cowdancer Version: 0.4 Severity: grave Here is what I get: $ cp -al src test $ cd test $ cow-shell Invoking bash cow-shell: exec: No such file or directory $ type cow-shell cow-shell is hashed (/usr/bin/cow-shell) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30-pre2-pr-hrt-1kHz-1 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages cowdancer depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an cowdancer recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start
Package: gnumeric Version: 1.5.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable In debian testing, after a libgoffice-1 upgrade, gnumeric does not start. It crashes with the following error message: gnumeric: symbol lookup error: gnumeric: undefined symbol: cell_formats and return 127. It is easy to reproduce the bug: just try and start gnumeric. Regards, SF -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages gnumeric depends on: ii gconf22.10.1-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii gnumeric-common 1.5.1-1common files for Gnumeric, the GNO ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.0-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.10.0-1 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.10.2-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-02.10.3-2 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.10.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgoffice-1 0.0.4-1Document centric objects library - ii libgsf-1 1.12.2-1 Structured File Library - runtime ii libgsf-gnome-11.12.2-1 Structured File Library - runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit2 1:2.12.2-3 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libxml2 2.6.21-1 GNOME XML library ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime gnumeric recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327994: The package FTBFS anyway
salut Christian so you've not yet upgraded to kdelibs4c2? Well, this didn't seem to be mandatory but I'm pretty ignorant of this issue. Remember that I just wanted to have a look at this software ..:-) Or have I missed something on the road? I've 2 problems to solve: the kde/qt transition, and the FTBTS above. For the 2nd, the upstream author mailed me back that he will release a new version soon... Well, as long as the maintainer obviously takes care of the problem, I'm anyway safe...and I know I'll be able to test the thing when this bug will be closed. I finally found a bit of time. The upstream author has done his part, so I can now do mine. The package is now in the incoming queue. See you, Arnaud Quette -- Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - RD Dpt Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ OpenSource Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329212: fisg: Fisg segfault
Sythos schrieb am Dienstag, den 20. September 2005: Package: fisg Version: 0.3.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable fisg segfault while parsing file, strace output attached Are you able to give me the correspondending logfile that has segfaultet? Thanks for your report Alex signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329212: fisg: Fisg segfault
Sythos schrieb am Mittwoch, den 21. September 2005: On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:35:06AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: Package: fisg Version: 0.3.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable fisg segfault while parsing file, strace output attached Are you able to give me the correspondending logfile that has segfaultet? Thanks for your report sure (it is about 5min log from eggdrop test) Thanks. It looks like that the logfile parsing code is bad. If I add the --format eggdrop switch it parses (it still has some problems because no configfile is used, but it outputs an html site...). I should check the status of the actual cvs version, but I have to talk to the author first it its useable. PS: I've tried an apt-get -b source fisg and local compiled fisg work ? How is that possible... Maybe due to gcc4.0 or something like that. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fisg-0.3.8/debian/fisg/usr/bin/fisg ./legra.log FISG: No configuration file(s) specified. FISG: Parsing 1 sources. Please wait... FISG: Processed 100% FISG: Computing statistics... FISG: 0 users (0 ignored), sorting... FISG: Computing more statistics... Segmentation fault I'm not able to conform that a local compiled fisg works... I'm working on the problem. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328674: very old package, should this be removed?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:05:13PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Package: slsc Version: 0.2.3-8 Severity: serious I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose to remove it. There are not many users, upstream development seems to be stalled and the package is FTBFS at the moment. I agree that the package doesn't get used very much, and I was considering removing it myself. On the other hand I do hear from users (in fact I got an email the same day from a user that was very happy the package was in debian) I think, given that it is a fairly small package, that it would be useful to have it in debian. I will (unless there is an objection) do an upload to updates the standards, etc. Jim -- Jim Mintha Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Administrator Work: +31 20 525-4919 Informatiseringscentrum Home: +31 20 662-3892 University of Amsterdam Debian GNU/Linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _There are always Possibilities_ http://www.mintha.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329343: lincity-ng: Saved game can't be pause after loaded. When save my game is on accelerate mode.
Welly Hartanto wrote: Package: lincity-ng Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: 4 I'm new to lincity-ng nad found the game exciting. After playing a while I save my game. While saving, my game was on accelerate mode ( by clicking the yellow arrow ). I opened the saved game this morning and found that I can't pause it or change the acceleration. Could you send this save game to me? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: fixed in sffview-0.3-5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 293420 0.3-5 Bug#293420: sffview: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'errno' was not declared in this scope 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.3-5, send any further explanations to Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 329345 + testing pending Unknown tag/s: testing. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start There were no tags set. Tags added: pending close 329345 1.5.90-1 Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5.90-1, send any further explanations to Sylvain FORET [EMAIL PROTECTED] Removed pending tag. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327998: marked as done (qsynaptics: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327998: fixed in qsynaptics 0.22.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy2A-0003TY-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:22 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1d-0002Th-Hp for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:50 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qsynaptics: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: qsynaptics Version: 0.22.0-2 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327998-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 09:21:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 02:21:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI0iw-0006kj-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:17:06 -0700 From: Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327998: fixed in qsynaptics 0.22.0-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:17:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: qsynaptics Source-Version: 0.22.0-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qsynaptics, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qsynaptics_0.22.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qsynaptics/qsynaptics_0.22.0-3.diff.gz qsynaptics_0.22.0-3.dsc to pool/main/q/qsynaptics/qsynaptics_0.22.0-3.dsc qsynaptics_0.22.0-3_i386.deb
Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed.
severity 329335 important tags 329335 moreinfo thanks On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:17:18AM +0200, hr wrote: Package: samba Version: 3.0.14a-6 Severity: critical Tags: experimental Justification: breaks unrelated software Re: Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed. You'll need to give us a *lot* more information than that in order for us to help you. Does the smbd process die when killed with -9? Is this triggered by any particular type of usage? Can you send a copy of your configuration file to the BTS? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: tags 329345 + testing pending close 329345 1.5.90-1 thanks On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 19:07:02 +1000, Sylvain FORET wrote: In debian testing, after a libgoffice-1 upgrade, gnumeric does not start. As goffice's API has not stabilised yet, gnumeric and goffice need to be upgraded in lock-step. The dependencies in testing do not reflect that which causes this problem. goffice's shlibs file in unstable has been updated to ensure lock-step updates to prevent this type of problem in the future. Ray Thanks for the quick reply. I installed gnumeric from unstable 'cause I really need it *now*. Works just fine. Cheers, SF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329335 important Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed. Severity set to `important'. tags 329335 moreinfo Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed. Tags were: experimental Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329286: wterm: workaround patch
Package: wterm
Version: 6.2.9-6.2
Followup-For: Bug #329286
Hello,
wterm is currently compiled using the -O3 switch. I've tested
compiling wterm with -O2 on m68k and it worked. (Thanks to Ingo
Juergensmann for providing me a test account)
Because -O2 is the recommended optimisation level according to Debian
Policy anyway, the attached patch takes the easy way and builds on all
architectures using -O2, rather than setting the optimization level
down for m68k only.
However: http://www.grep.be/blog/2005/09/19/#two_characters might
probably make this patch redundant in the future -- well, at least for
this bugreport. It claims to fix some GCC 4.0 segmentation faults
related to -O3 optimization.
René
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages wterm depends on:
ii base-passwd 3.5.10 Debian base system master password
ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Session Management
ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxpm4 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X pixmap library
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m
wterm recommends no packages.
diff -u wterm-6.2.9/debian/rules wterm-6.2.9/debian/rules
--- wterm-6.2.9/debian/rules
+++ wterm-6.2.9/debian/rules
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
--x-includes=/usr/$(xvers)/include \
--enable-xgetdefault\
--with-term=rxvt
- $(MAKE) CFLAGS='-O3 -g -Wall' all
+ $(MAKE) CFLAGS='-O2 -g -Wall' all
mv src/wterm src/wterm-std
touch build-std
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
--enable-xgetdefault\
--with-term=rxvt\
--enable-kanji
- $(MAKE) CFLAGS='-O3 -g -Wall' all
+ $(MAKE) CFLAGS='-O2 -g -Wall' all
mv src/wterm src/kwterm
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--mandir='$${prefix}/share/man' \
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
--enable-xgetdefault\
--with-term=rxvt\
--enable-big5
- $(MAKE) CFLAGS='-O3 -g -Wall' all
+ $(MAKE) CFLAGS='-O2 -g -Wall' all
mv src/wterm src/cwterm
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--mandir='$${prefix}/share/man' \
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
--enable-xgetdefault\
--with-term=rxvt\
--enable-greek
- $(MAKE) CFLAGS='-O3 -g -Wall' all
+ $(MAKE) CFLAGS='-O2 -g -Wall' all
mv src/wterm src/gwterm
touch build-ml
Processed: tagging 329286
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 329286 patch Bug#329286: wterm_6.2.9-6.3: FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Tags were: sid Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326007: marked as done (imapfilter: Immediately aborts with *** glibc detected *** corrupted double-linked list: 0xb7d84218 ***)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#326007: fixed in imapfilter 1:1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 07:35:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 00:35:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.icem.de [158.225.1.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EAjbf-0007Fw-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:35:31 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icem.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EBA125B59; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:35:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.icem.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melpumpe [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14696-06; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:35:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ilsor.hnv.icem.de (ilsor.icemnet.de [192.168.3.86]) by mail.icem.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA04125CD7; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:35:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ilsor.hnv.icem.de (Postfix, from userid 15125) id F2AC6570694; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:35:24 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ulf Rompe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: imapfilter: Immediately aborts with *** glibc detected *** corrupted double-linked list: 0xb7d84218 *** X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:35:24 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at icem.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: imapfilter Version: 1:1.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable imapfilter dies after setting up an imap connection: LANG=C imapfilter -v S (3): * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE ACL ACL2=UNION STARTTLS] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2004 Double Precision, Inc. See COPYING for distribution information. C (3): 1000 CAPABILITY S (3): 1000 OK CAPABILITY completed C (3): 1001 STARTTLS S (3): 1001 OK Begin SSL/TLS negotiation now. C (3): 1002 CAPABILITY S (3): 1002 OK CAPABILITY completed *** glibc detected *** corrupted double-linked list: 0xb7df1218 *** Aborted -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages imapfilter depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii liblua50 5.0.2-5Main interpreter library for the L ii liblualib50 5.0.2-5Extension library for the Lua 5.0 ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries imapfilter recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 326007-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 11:38:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 04:38:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI2pZ-0006jG-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700 From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#326007: fixed in imapfilter 1:1.1-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: imapfilter Source-Version: 1:1.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of imapfilter, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: imapfilter_1.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_1.1-2.diff.gz imapfilter_1.1-2.dsc to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_1.1-2.dsc
Bug#329364: ruby1.8_1.8.3-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
Package: ruby1.8
Version: 1.8.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
ruby1.8 fails to build from source on m68k. This is might well be a
gcc-4.0 toolchain problem, but I'm not really sure so I'm passing this
along so you're aware of it. Feel free to do whatever you want with this
bug.
Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log.
| Automatic build of ruby1.8_1.8.3-1 on poseidon by sbuild/m68k 42
| Build started at 20050921-
| **
[...]
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (= 3.0), dbs, patch, autoconf, m4, bison,
libgdbm-dev, libncurses5-dev, libreadline5-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev,
zlib1g-dev, libssl-dev (= 0.9.6b)
| Build-Conflicts: gcc-3.3 ( 1:3.3.2-0pre1)
[...]
| Checking correctness of source dependencies...
| Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1 gcc-4.0_4.0.1-7 g++-4.0_4.0.1-7
binutils_2.16.1-2 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.1-7 libstdc++6_4.0.1-7
[...]
| gcc -Wall -g -O2 -fPIC -I. -I. -c object.c
| gcc -Wall -g -O2 -fPIC -I. -I. -c pack.c
| pack.c: In function 'pack_unpack':
| pack.c:1988: error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'ADDR_REGS'
| pack.c:1988: error: this is the insn:
| (insn 2713 2712 2714 406 pack.c:1762 (set (reg:SI 8 ?a0 [609])
| (plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg:QI 133 [ temp.1416 ]) 0)
| (const_int 32 [0x20]))) 95 {*addsi3_internal} (nil)
| (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:QI 133 [ temp.1416 ])
| (nil)))
| pack.c:1988: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
| make[1]: *** [pack.o] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ruby1.8-1.8.3/build-tree/ruby-1.8.3'
| make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2
| **
| Build finished at 20050921-0157
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
A full buildd log is available at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=ruby1.8ver=1.8.3-1arch=m68k
Other buildd logs may be available at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=ruby1.8
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329304: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path
nope -- I do use original script, thus I have -b as well (although it is not necessary, fail2ban detaches anyway (background config parameter in fail2ban.conf) If it's not needed, don't use it! The background option suppresses most error diagnostics you could want to look at. It's a last-ditch measure only. indeed... although I don't see it making any difference for fail2ban (that one suppresses all output if ran in background), I should've removed -b. thanx -- it will be fixed -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User^^-^^[17] pgp4cp5KwxsFd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#329373: xen.postinst contains illegal sed command
Package: kernel-package Version: 9.007 Severity: Grave Justification: renders package unusable As of 9.007 xen.postinst contains the following line: realimageloc=$(echo $realimageloc | sed -e 's|^/*|/|o' -e 's|/+|/|o') Yet, there is no such option as o to sed's s command. Thus any customly built xen-package fails to install. The modification must be part of patch-37: Revision: kernel-package--devel--9.0--patch-37 Archive: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Creator: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed Aug 31 09:42:06 CDT 2005 Standard-date: 2005-08-31 14:42:06 GMT Modified-files: ChangeLog _make-kpkg kernel/ChangeLog kernel/rules kernel/xen.postinst New-patches: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/kernel-package--devel--9.0--patch-37 Summary: Update for mips Keywords: * _make-kpkg: Added new option stem to the completion Pared down the config options Completed the list of available targets * kernel/rules (loaderdoc): Fixed the name of the mips image * kernel/xen.postinst (realimageloc): Start working on an initrd creation on install Thanks, Michael signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error
Hi, Here is what I get: $ cp -al src test $ cd test $ cow-shell Invoking bash cow-shell: exec: No such file or directory $ type cow-shell cow-shell is hashed (/usr/bin/cow-shell) What's your '$SHELL' ? regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 329345 + etch Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start There were no tags set. Tags added: etch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329201: ion3-mod-ionflux: and the second part of the fix
Package: ion3-mod-ionflux
Version: 20050428-7
Followup-For: Bug #329201
Okay, seems as I forgot half of the thing. The attached patch fully
eliminates inherited sockets. The two patches have been sent to the
upstream repository and a new package will be uploaded upon their
inclusion (should not take long)
Demonstrative output:
~ ls -l /proc/self/fd
insgesamt 4
lrwx-- 1 rvb rvb 64 2005-09-21 15:18 0 - /dev/pts/7
lrwx-- 1 rvb rvb 64 2005-09-21 15:18 1 - /dev/pts/7
lrwx-- 1 rvb rvb 64 2005-09-21 15:18 2 - /dev/pts/7
No sockets anymore.
René
Wed Sep 21 15:14:17 CEST 2005 René van Bevern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* set close-on-exec for listening socket also.
This now _really_ prevents executed applications from inheriting both,
the connection file descriptor and the listening socket file
descriptor.
diff -rN -u old-ion3-mod-ionflux/mod_ionflux/mod_ionflux.c
new-ion3-mod-ionflux/mod_ionflux/mod_ionflux.c
--- old-ion3-mod-ionflux/mod_ionflux/mod_ionflux.c 2005-09-21
15:16:04.0 +0200
+++ new-ion3-mod-ionflux/mod_ionflux/mod_ionflux.c 2005-09-21
15:11:16.0 +0200
@@ -230,6 +230,14 @@
addr.sun_family=AF_UNIX;
strcpy(addr.sun_path, listenfile);
+{
+ int fl=fcntl(listenfd, F_GETFD);
+ if(fl!=-1)
+ fl=fcntl(listenfd, F_SETFD, fl|FD_CLOEXEC);
+ if(fl==-1)
+ goto errwarn;
+}
+
if(bind(listenfd, (struct sockaddr*) addr,
strlen(addr.sun_path)+sizeof(addr.sun_family))0){
goto errwarn;
Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error
$ cp -al src test $ cd test $ cow-shell Invoking bash cow-shell: exec: No such file or directory $ type cow-shell cow-shell is hashed (/usr/bin/cow-shell) What's your '$SHELL' ? $ echo $SHELL bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error
Hi, $ cow-shell Invoking bash cow-shell: exec: No such file or directory What's wrong with your configuration is that you have 'bash' as SHELL, and not a full path. Where is the environment variable set on your system? A workaround would be the following patch: --- cow-shell.c.~1.5.~ 2005-08-17 08:53:34.0 +0900 +++ cow-shell.c 2005-09-21 22:15:29.0 +0900 @@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ const char* myshell=getenv(SHELL)?:/bin/sh; fprintf(stderr, Invoking %s\n, myshell); - execl(myshell, - myshell, - NULL); + execlp(myshell, +myshell, +NULL); } perror(cow-shell: exec); return 1; regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug 329201 is forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 forwarded 329201 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#329201: ion3-mod-ionflux: The listening UNIX socket is inherited by processes spawned by ion Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329175: marked as done (lowmem: Low memory mode stills goes through the language selection screen)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:58:47 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2005 06:08:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 23:08:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHbJ0-NA-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:08:39 -0700 Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by onera.onera.fr with ESMTP id j8K68Zhe002696; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:08:36 +0200 (MEST) Received: by cc-mykerinos.onera (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC3E840A72B; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:23:17 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lowmem: Low memory mode stills goes through the language selection screen X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:23:17 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: lowmem Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable After the initial lowmem screen warning about the low memory mode, the language selection screen is still showed, allowing the user to choose another language. Then, later in the install, the system loops and becomes unable to load modules early in the process while no swap space can be setup. This was tested in a 32Mb VmWare virtual machine. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) --- Received: (at 329175-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 13:58:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 06:58:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI57I-IY-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:58:32 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dhcp-sn38-07.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.38.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EA917DEE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:58:31 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65078BF852; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:58:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:58:47 +0200 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Not an NMU --=20 see shy jo --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDMWcXd8HHehbQuO8RAt6AAKCMtaWviYWA7wTvogYZkW7HozTyzQCgg8FI UEeBlAxvBmoq6lJvus0d4/4= =GXLE -END PGP SIGNATURE- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328483: marked as done (gcl: Depends on binutils-dev (= 2.16.1-999), so uninstallable in sid)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:46:36 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed with gcl-2.6.7-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 15:44:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 08:44:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from harif.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.81] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFvul-Mp-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:44:43 -0700 Received: from lionelm by harif.cs.kun.nl with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EFvuk-5E-Ld; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:44:42 +0200 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:44:42 +0200 From: Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcl: Depends on binutils-dev (= 2.16.1-999), so uninstallable in sid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/dh4096.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The gcl binary package depends on binutils-dev (= 2.16.1-999), and as a result is now uninstallable in unstable where binutils is at version 2.16.1cvs20050902-1. Please fix gcl so that it's compatible with the current version of binutils. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-3-32bit Locale: LANG=fr_LU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_LU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 328483-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 13:47:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 06:47:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h-67-101-227-59.phlapafg.covad.net (intech19.enhanced.com) [67.101.227.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI4wI-0002zL-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 Received: from camm by intech19.enhanced.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EI4vk-0005tn-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:46:36 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Closed with gcl-2.6.7-6 User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory?= =?ISO-8859-4?Q?=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:46:36 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Greetings! The GCL package now builds its own binutils snapshot and has removed any package dependency on binutils. -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens. -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329274: marked as done (dhis-tools-genkeys: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available in sid anymore.)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329274: fixed in dhis-tools-dns 5.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2005 21:06:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 14:06:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHpKJ-Oi-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:06:55 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 50B8B3809A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D47380A4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 232D126136; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:06:54 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dhis-tools-genkeys: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available in sid anymore. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: dhis-tools-genkeys Version: 5.0-3 Severity: grave Hi, Your package has a dependency on libgmp3, but that is no longer available because it was renamed to libgmp3c2 due to the C++ ABI transition. Rebuilding against the current version of gmp in sid should fix this. Kurt --- Received: (at 329274-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 13:48:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 06:48:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI4wF-000353-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:47:07 -0700 From: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329274: fixed in dhis-tools-dns 5.0-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:47:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: dhis-tools-dns Source-Version: 5.0-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dhis-tools-dns, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dhis-tools-dns_5.0-4.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dhis-tools-dns/dhis-tools-dns_5.0-4.diff.gz dhis-tools-dns_5.0-4.dsc to pool/main/d/dhis-tools-dns/dhis-tools-dns_5.0-4.dsc dhis-tools-dns_5.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dhis-tools-dns/dhis-tools-dns_5.0-4_i386.deb dhis-tools-genkeys_5.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dhis-tools-dns/dhis-tools-genkeys_5.0-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dhis-tools-dns package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:27:47 +0200 Source: dhis-tools-dns Binary: dhis-tools-dns dhis-tools-genkeys Architecture: source i386 Version: 5.0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dhis-tools-dns - Dynamic Host Information System - DNS configuration tools dhis-tools-genkeys - Dynamic Host Information System - key generation tools Closes: 329274 Changes:
Bug#329272: marked as done (dhis-server: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available anymore.)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:47:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329272: fixed in dhis-server 5.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2005 21:03:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 14:03:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.75] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHpHM-0007so-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:03:52 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id EA266380D3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:03:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24E738032 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:03:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4E41D26136; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:03:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:03:50 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dhis-server: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available anymore. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: dhis-server Version: 5.1-4 Severity: serious Hi, Your package has a dependency on libgmp3, but that is no longer available because it was renamed to libgmp3c2 due to the C++ ABI transition. Rebuilding against the current version of gmp in sid should fix this. Kurt --- Received: (at 329272-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 13:48:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 06:48:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI4wD-00034a-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:47:05 -0700 From: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329272: fixed in dhis-server 5.1-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:47:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: dhis-server Source-Version: 5.1-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dhis-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dhis-server_5.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dhis-server/dhis-server_5.1-5.diff.gz dhis-server_5.1-5.dsc to pool/main/d/dhis-server/dhis-server_5.1-5.dsc dhis-server_5.1-5_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dhis-server/dhis-server_5.1-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dhis-server package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:24:08 +0200 Source: dhis-server Binary: dhis-server Architecture: source i386 Version: 5.1-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dhis-server - Dynamic Host Information System - server Closes: 329272 Changes: dhis-server (5.1-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Link against libgmp3c2. Closes: #329272 * Add missing .El tag in manpage. Files: d1a9667b4dee77a4d0029f367c221e02 580 net optional dhis-server_5.1-5.dsc b21eb4b534bf52805ebeee7cb5d734fb 4566 net optional dhis-server_5.1-5.diff.gz
Bug#329389: ipw2200-source: fails at compiling kernel module
Package: ipw2200-source
Version: 1.0.6-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
6 versions have passed, but the kernel module still doesn't compile:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp
rm -rf modules
/usr/bin/make clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
/usr/bin/make -C driver clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
rm -f *.mod.c *.mod *.o *.ko .*.cmd .*.flags .lst *.lst
rm -rf /usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp
for file in *.{c,h}; do \
sed -i -e s:\ *$::g -e s:\t*$::g $file; \
done
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
dh_clean
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules kdist_clean kdist_config binary-modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp
rm -rf modules
/usr/bin/make clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `clean'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
make[1]: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
/usr/bin/make -C driver clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
rm -f *.mod.c *.mod *.o *.ko .*.cmd .*.flags .lst *.lst
rm -rf /usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp
for file in *.{c,h}; do \
sed -i -e s:\ *$::g -e s:\t*$::g $file; \
done
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
dh_clean
for templ in ; do \
cp $templ `echo $templ | sed -e 's/_KVERS_/2.6.13n/g'` ; \
done
for templ in `ls debian/*.modules.in` ; do \
test -e ${templ%.modules.in}.backup || cp ${templ%.modules.in}
${templ%.modules.in}.backup 2/dev/null || true; \
sed -e 's/##KVERS##/2.6.13n/g ;s/#KVERS#/2.6.13n/g ; s/_KVERS_/2.6.13n/g ;
s/##KDREV##/atto.1/g ; s/#KDREV#/atto.1/g ; s/_KDREV_/atto.1/g' $templ
${templ%.modules.in}; \
done
if ! `dpkg --compare-versions 2.6.13n ge 2.6.4`; then \
echo **; \
echo Can't build with a kernel version lower than 2.6.4; \
echo **; \
exit 1; \
fi
export DH_OPTIONS='-pipw2200-modules-2.6.13n'
sed s/_UPSTREAM_VERSION_/1.0.6/ debian/config debian/config.new
mv debian/config.new debian/config
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
# Build the module
/usr/bin/make -C driver KSRC=/usr/src/linux KVER=2.6.13n
IEEE80211_INC=/usr/include/ieee80211
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
mkdir -p /usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp/.tmp_versions
cp /usr/include/ieee80211/*.mod
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp/.tmp_versions
cp: cannot stat `/usr/include/ieee80211/*.mod': No such file or directory
make[2]: [modules] Error 1 (ignored)
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux M=/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver
MODVERDIR=/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/tmp/.tmp_versions CC=gcc-3.3
-I/usr/include/ieee80211 modules
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.13'
CC [M] /usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.o
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c:10150:55: macro create_workqueue
passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c: In function
`ipw_setup_deferred_work':
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c:10150: error: `create_workqueue'
undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c:10150: error: (Each undeclared
identifier is reported only once
/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.c:10150: error: for each function it
appears in.)
make[4]: *** [/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver/ipw2200.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.13'
make[2]: *** [modules] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200/driver'
make[1]: *** [binary-modules] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200'
make: *** [kdist_build] Error 2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13n
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Versions of packages ipw2200-source depends on:
ii debhelper 4.9.5 helper programs for debian/rules
ii ieee80211-source 1.0.3-2Source for the 802.11 (wireless) n
ii module-assistant 0.9.4 tool to make module package creati
ipw2200-source recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error
Hi, I think it is okay, unless you decide that having a relative path for the shell is a security risk and you don't want to support this. But yours would be the only program (as far as I am aware) that chuckles on this problem. As I said, before correcting it now, I had this mistake working for years (since 2001 at least). I'm a bit uneasy; but anyway I'll search the path. The main problem with 'SHELL' is that it's so used in many programs and it's not clearly defined... regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329344: marked as done (cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:02:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329344: fixed in cowdancer 0.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 09:06:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 02:06:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pot.isti.cnr.it [146.48.83.182] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI0YG-0001g8-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:06:04 -0700 Received: from pot by pot.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EI0YD-0003lE-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:06:01 +0200 From: Francesco Potorti` [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error X-Debbugs-CC: Francesco Potorti` [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: ISTI-CNR, via Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, +39-0503153058 X-fingerprint: 4B02 6187 5C03 D6B1 2E31 7666 09DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:06:01 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cowdancer Version: 0.4 Severity: grave Here is what I get: $ cp -al src test $ cd test $ cow-shell Invoking bash cow-shell: exec: No such file or directory $ type cow-shell cow-shell is hashed (/usr/bin/cow-shell) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30-pre2-pr-hrt-1kHz-1 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages cowdancer depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an cowdancer recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 329344-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 14:08:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 07:08:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI5Ah-0001pi-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:02:03 -0700 From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329344: fixed in cowdancer 0.5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:02:03 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: cowdancer Source-Version: 0.5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cowdancer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cowdancer_0.5.dsc to pool/main/c/cowdancer/cowdancer_0.5.dsc cowdancer_0.5.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cowdancer/cowdancer_0.5.tar.gz cowdancer_0.5_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cowdancer/cowdancer_0.5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cowdancer package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:54:34 +0900 Source: cowdancer Binary: cowdancer Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: cowdancer - Copy-on-write directory tree utility. Closes: 329344 Changes: cowdancer (0.5) unstable; urgency=low . * cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error (closes: #329344) Files:
Bug#328141: marked as done (mount: umount -r drops nosuid flag (CAN-2005-2876))
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328141: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 20:22:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 13:22:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from talus.maths.usyd.edu.au [129.78.68.1] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFHIC-0007CC-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:22:13 -0700 Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by talus.maths.usyd.edu.au (8.12.3/8.1) id j8DKM0CD002464 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:22:00 +1000 Received: from pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [129.78.69.136] by siv.maths.usyd.edu.au via smtpdoor V18.6 id 2463 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:22:00 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au (8.12.3/8.2/Submit) id j8DKM03Q019153; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:22:00 +1000 From: Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mount: umount -r drops nosuid flag X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:22:00 +1000 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mount Version: 2.11n-7 Severity: critical File: /bin/umount Tags: security Justification: root security hole Please see http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/410333 for details. Verified (that noexec flag is gone) as follows: psz:~$ id uid=1001(psz) gid=1001(amstaff) groups=1001(amstaff),24(cdrom),25(floppy) psz:~$ grep cdrom /etc/fstab /dev/cdrom /cdrom iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0 psz:~$ /bin/mount /cdrom psz:~$ /bin/mount | grep cdrom /dev/cdrom on /cdrom type iso9660 (ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev,user=psz) psz:~$ /cdrom/ML3/ML_30_013_Linuxi.bin bash: /cdrom/ML3/ML_30_013_Linuxi.bin: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied psz:~$ cd /cdrom psz:/cdrom$ /bin/umount -r /cdrom umount: /dev/cdrom busy - remounted read-only psz:/cdrom$ cd psz:~$ /bin/mount | grep cdrom /dev/cdrom on /cdrom type iso9660 (ro) psz:~$ /cdrom/ML3/ML_30_013_Linuxi.bin Unpacking to /tmp/ML.tar... [ctrl-C] psz:~$ /bin/umount -r /cdrom psz:~$ -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au 2.4.27-smssvr1.6 #1 SMP Wed Aug 24 12:16:31 EST 2005 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages mount depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an --- Received: (at 328141-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 14:48:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 07:48:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI5sI-0001db-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 From: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328141: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: util-linux Source-Version: 2.12p-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of util-linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bsdutils_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/bsdutils_2.12p-8_i386.deb fdisk-udeb_2.12p-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/u/util-linux/fdisk-udeb_2.12p-8_i386.udeb mount_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/mount_2.12p-8_i386.deb util-linux-locales_2.12p-8_all.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux-locales_2.12p-8_all.deb util-linux_2.12p-8.diff.gz to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8.diff.gz util-linux_2.12p-8.dsc to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8.dsc util-linux_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8_i386.deb A summary of
Bug#329063: marked as done (mount: [CAN-2005-2876] umount -r privilege escalation)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328141: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 08:08:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 01:08:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from box79162.elkhouse.de [213.9.79.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHGhH-0003k9-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:08:19 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [195.227.105.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Martin Pitt (workstation), Issuer piware CA (verified OK)) by box79162.elkhouse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDFA1F9CCA; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:07:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAE7A613; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:00:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:00:25 +0200 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian BTS Submit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mount: [CAN-2005-2876] umount -r privilege escalation Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: util-linux Version: 2.12p-7 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hi Lamont, Hi security team! umount -r allows normal users to remove flags like nosuid or noexec from user-mountable volumes, which could be exploited to privilege escalation. Details are at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dbugtraqm=3D112656096125857w=3D2 Ubuntu patch: http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/util-linux.CAN-2005-2876.diff CAN-2005-2876 Martin --=20 Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDLnAZDecnbV4Fd/IRAhkFAKCNltnohh+JEXT6S4MH34VNoPnVWwCfWgh7 mCEfHyhKUivqBX8Ul5jklKA= =rwQ6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG-- --- Received: (at 328141-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 14:48:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 07:48:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI5sI-0001db-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 From: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328141: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: util-linux Source-Version: 2.12p-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of util-linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bsdutils_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/bsdutils_2.12p-8_i386.deb fdisk-udeb_2.12p-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/u/util-linux/fdisk-udeb_2.12p-8_i386.udeb mount_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/mount_2.12p-8_i386.deb util-linux-locales_2.12p-8_all.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux-locales_2.12p-8_all.deb util-linux_2.12p-8.diff.gz to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8.diff.gz util-linux_2.12p-8.dsc to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8.dsc util-linux_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for
Bug#328141: marked as done (mount: umount -r drops nosuid flag (CAN-2005-2876))
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329063: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 20:22:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 13:22:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from talus.maths.usyd.edu.au [129.78.68.1] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFHIC-0007CC-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:22:13 -0700 Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by talus.maths.usyd.edu.au (8.12.3/8.1) id j8DKM0CD002464 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:22:00 +1000 Received: from pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [129.78.69.136] by siv.maths.usyd.edu.au via smtpdoor V18.6 id 2463 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:22:00 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au (8.12.3/8.2/Submit) id j8DKM03Q019153; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:22:00 +1000 From: Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mount: umount -r drops nosuid flag X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:22:00 +1000 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mount Version: 2.11n-7 Severity: critical File: /bin/umount Tags: security Justification: root security hole Please see http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/410333 for details. Verified (that noexec flag is gone) as follows: psz:~$ id uid=1001(psz) gid=1001(amstaff) groups=1001(amstaff),24(cdrom),25(floppy) psz:~$ grep cdrom /etc/fstab /dev/cdrom /cdrom iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0 psz:~$ /bin/mount /cdrom psz:~$ /bin/mount | grep cdrom /dev/cdrom on /cdrom type iso9660 (ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev,user=psz) psz:~$ /cdrom/ML3/ML_30_013_Linuxi.bin bash: /cdrom/ML3/ML_30_013_Linuxi.bin: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied psz:~$ cd /cdrom psz:/cdrom$ /bin/umount -r /cdrom umount: /dev/cdrom busy - remounted read-only psz:/cdrom$ cd psz:~$ /bin/mount | grep cdrom /dev/cdrom on /cdrom type iso9660 (ro) psz:~$ /cdrom/ML3/ML_30_013_Linuxi.bin Unpacking to /tmp/ML.tar... [ctrl-C] psz:~$ /bin/umount -r /cdrom psz:~$ -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au 2.4.27-smssvr1.6 #1 SMP Wed Aug 24 12:16:31 EST 2005 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages mount depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an --- Received: (at 329063-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 14:48:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 07:48:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI5sI-0001dd-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 From: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329063: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: util-linux Source-Version: 2.12p-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of util-linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bsdutils_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/bsdutils_2.12p-8_i386.deb fdisk-udeb_2.12p-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/u/util-linux/fdisk-udeb_2.12p-8_i386.udeb mount_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/mount_2.12p-8_i386.deb util-linux-locales_2.12p-8_all.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux-locales_2.12p-8_all.deb util-linux_2.12p-8.diff.gz to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8.diff.gz util-linux_2.12p-8.dsc to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8.dsc util-linux_2.12p-8_i386.deb to
Bug#329063: marked as done (mount: [CAN-2005-2876] umount -r privilege escalation)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329063: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 08:08:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 01:08:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from box79162.elkhouse.de [213.9.79.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHGhH-0003k9-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:08:19 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [195.227.105.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Martin Pitt (workstation), Issuer piware CA (verified OK)) by box79162.elkhouse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDFA1F9CCA; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:07:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAE7A613; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:00:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:00:25 +0200 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian BTS Submit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mount: [CAN-2005-2876] umount -r privilege escalation Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: util-linux Version: 2.12p-7 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hi Lamont, Hi security team! umount -r allows normal users to remove flags like nosuid or noexec from user-mountable volumes, which could be exploited to privilege escalation. Details are at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dbugtraqm=3D112656096125857w=3D2 Ubuntu patch: http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/util-linux.CAN-2005-2876.diff CAN-2005-2876 Martin --=20 Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDLnAZDecnbV4Fd/IRAhkFAKCNltnohh+JEXT6S4MH34VNoPnVWwCfWgh7 mCEfHyhKUivqBX8Ul5jklKA= =rwQ6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG-- --- Received: (at 329063-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 14:48:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 07:48:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI5sI-0001dd-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 From: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329063: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: util-linux Source-Version: 2.12p-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of util-linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bsdutils_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/bsdutils_2.12p-8_i386.deb fdisk-udeb_2.12p-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/u/util-linux/fdisk-udeb_2.12p-8_i386.udeb mount_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/mount_2.12p-8_i386.deb util-linux-locales_2.12p-8_all.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux-locales_2.12p-8_all.deb util-linux_2.12p-8.diff.gz to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8.diff.gz util-linux_2.12p-8.dsc to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8.dsc util-linux_2.12p-8_i386.deb to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12p-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
Bug#329391: no longer seems to work
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:36:44PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: Package: palo-installer Version: 0.0.7 Severity: grave Tags: d-i palo-installer seems to fail when installing etch. Selections from the logs: + ls -l vmlinux ls: vmlinux: No such file or directory + chroot /target /sbin/palo read: Is a directory read: Is a directory Apparently the kernels have stopped providing the vmlinux file that it expected. The system has these files in /target/boot: /target/boot # ls System.map-2.6.8-2-64-smp lost+found config-2.6.8-2-64-smp patches-2.6.8-2-64-smp initrd.img-2.6.8-2-64-smp vmlinux-2.6.8-2-64-smp Why do you still have those 2.6.8 kernels ? Are we not trying to move to 2.6.12 ? This is hppa, right, so the right kernels to include are the 2.6.12-1-hppa(32|64)[-smp] ones. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327917: marked as done (Wrong permission for /usr/bin/gopherweblink)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:26:37 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 22:59:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 15:59:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EExGS-0002P8-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:59:04 -0700 Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.50) with esmtp id 1EExGR-0005xD-61; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:59:03 +0200 Received: from pd9533ada.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.83.58.218] helo=cantsin.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.50) with esmtpsa id 1EExGQ-0001DW-2k; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:59:03 +0200 Received: by cantsin.dyndns.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:59:04 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Florian Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Wrong permission for /usr/bin/gopherweblink X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:59:04 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gopherweblink Version: 1.04 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package installs /usr/bin/gopherweblink without execute permissions. Florian -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13alu Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages gopherweblink depends on: ii m41.4.3-2a macro processing language ii make 3.80-11The GNU version of the make util gopherweblink recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 327917-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 15:27:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 08:27:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com (excelhustler.com) [68.99.114.105] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI6VG-0002vl-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:27:22 -0700 Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.1.34] ident=postfix) by excelhustler.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EI6UY-0003xn-GV; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:26:48 -0500 Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D9D69C3AB7; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:26:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:26:37 -0500 From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Closing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on excelhustler.com at Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:26:48 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This package has been removed from Debian, since UMN gopherd (the package it was designed to work with) is no longer present in a stable release. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329275: marked as done (haskelldb-bin: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available in sid anymore.)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329275: fixed in haskelldb 0.9.cvs.601-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2005 21:18:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 14:18:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.73] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHpVi-0003cs-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:18:42 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id C731738100; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:18:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAA4380B0; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:18:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0E74126136; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:18:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:18:40 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: haskelldb-bin: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available in sid anymore. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: haskelldb-bin Version: 0.9.cvs.601-6 Severity: grave Hi, This package is currently uninstallable in sid because it still depends on libgmp3 which has been replaced by libgmp3c2 because of the C++ ABI transition. Since ghc6 is installable again, I think a simple rebuid should take care of this. haskell-hsql still doesn't seem to have build on hppa, and you probably want to wait for that or maybe changed the version of the build dependency. Kurt --- Received: (at 329275-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 15:48:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 08:48:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI6oM-hI-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:47:06 -0700 From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329275: fixed in haskelldb 0.9.cvs.601-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:47:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: haskelldb Source-Version: 0.9.cvs.601-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of haskelldb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: haskelldb-bin_0.9.cvs.601-7_i386.deb to pool/main/h/haskelldb/haskelldb-bin_0.9.cvs.601-7_i386.deb haskelldb_0.9.cvs.601-7.diff.gz to pool/main/h/haskelldb/haskelldb_0.9.cvs.601-7.diff.gz haskelldb_0.9.cvs.601-7.dsc to pool/main/h/haskelldb/haskelldb_0.9.cvs.601-7.dsc libghc6-haskelldb-dev_0.9.cvs.601-7_i386.deb to pool/main/h/haskelldb/libghc6-haskelldb-dev_0.9.cvs.601-7_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated haskelldb package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:38:29 -0500 Source: haskelldb Binary: haskelldb-bin libghc6-haskelldb-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.cvs.601-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: John Goerzen [EMAIL
Bug#329276: marked as done (lhs2tex: Uninstallable, depends on libgmp3)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329276: fixed in lhs2tex 1.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2005 21:24:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 14:24:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHpar-0004nH-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:24:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id B9A57380AC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:24:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905E43800A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:24:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 631A126136; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:24:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:24:00 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lhs2tex: Uninstallable, depends on libgmp3 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: lhs2tex Version: 1.9-1 Severity: grave Hi, Your package is currently uninstallable because it still depends on libgmp3 which has been renamed to libgmp3c3 because of the C++ ABI change. Since ghc6 is available on all arches again, a simple rebuild should fiix this. Kurt --- Received: (at 329276-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 15:48:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 08:48:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI6oN-i8-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:47:07 -0700 From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329276: fixed in lhs2tex 1.9-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:47:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: lhs2tex Source-Version: 1.9-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lhs2tex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lhs2tex_1.9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lhs2tex/lhs2tex_1.9-2.diff.gz lhs2tex_1.9-2.dsc to pool/main/l/lhs2tex/lhs2tex_1.9-2.dsc lhs2tex_1.9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lhs2tex/lhs2tex_1.9-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lhs2tex package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:32:01 -0500 Source: lhs2tex Binary: lhs2tex Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.9-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: lhs2tex- Generates LaTeX code from literate Haskell sources Closes: 329276 Changes: lhs2tex (1.9-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Rebuilt to get dep on correct new libgmp3 in sid. Closes: #329276. Files: 0123a18edff2916e57b084af5853d2a6 597 text optional lhs2tex_1.9-2.dsc eb8a8a315ffb2fa8d89d9a9ee4f99fcd 25376 text optional lhs2tex_1.9-2.diff.gz 2c44916bb57479a540753017f144b5aa 506704 text optional lhs2tex_1.9-2_i386.deb -BEGIN
Bug#327962: marked as done (fireflier: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:20:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Upload of 1.1.6 fixes this problem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy25-0003Qv-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:17 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1a-0002Rb-2A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fireflier: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: fireflier Version: 1.1.5-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327962-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 16:19:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 09:19:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI7Jg-DF-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:19:28 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2005 16:18:56 - Received: from cm56-138-46.liwest.at (EHLO [192.168.1.101]) [86.56.138.46] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 21 Sep 2005 18:18:56 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3439220 From: Martin Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Upload of 1.1.6 fixes this problem Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:20:20 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1452444.JWH0VChZjm; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
Bug#323563: marked as done (maxima: uninstallable)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323563: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 09:59:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 02:59:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from miserv1.mathematik.uni-leipzig.de [139.18.10.1] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E5KhO-00012c-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:59:06 -0700 Received: from [139.18.10.32] (helo=minb32.mathematik.uni-leipzig.de) by miserv1.mathematik.uni-leipzig.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1E5KhM-0002a7-Ts; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:59:04 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Meik Hellmund [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: maxima: uninstallable X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:59:04 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: maxima Severity: normal # apt-get install maxima Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: maxima: Depends: libgmp3 but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 323563-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 16:48:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 09:48:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI7kU-0001Cq-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#323563: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: maxima Source-Version: 5.9.1-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of maxima, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: maxima-doc_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-doc_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-emacs_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-emacs_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-share_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-share_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-src_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-src_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-test_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-test_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima_5.9.1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10.diff.gz maxima_5.9.1-10.dsc to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10.dsc maxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb xmaxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/xmaxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated maxima package) (This message was generated
Bug#323563: marked as done (maxima: uninstallable)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325852: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 09:59:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 02:59:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from miserv1.mathematik.uni-leipzig.de [139.18.10.1] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E5KhO-00012c-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:59:06 -0700 Received: from [139.18.10.32] (helo=minb32.mathematik.uni-leipzig.de) by miserv1.mathematik.uni-leipzig.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1E5KhM-0002a7-Ts; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:59:04 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Meik Hellmund [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: maxima: uninstallable X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:59:04 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: maxima Severity: normal # apt-get install maxima Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: maxima: Depends: libgmp3 but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 325852-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 16:48:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 09:48:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI7kU-0001Cs-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#325852: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: maxima Source-Version: 5.9.1-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of maxima, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: maxima-doc_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-doc_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-emacs_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-emacs_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-share_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-share_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-src_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-src_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-test_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-test_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima_5.9.1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10.diff.gz maxima_5.9.1-10.dsc to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10.dsc maxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb xmaxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/xmaxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated maxima package) (This message was generated
Bug#325852: marked as done (maxima: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325852: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2005 10:30:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 03:30:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EAPrK-00041k-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:30:22 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 8EF957049; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:30:22 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: maxima: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=8/pVXlBMPtxfSuJG Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --8/pVXlBMPtxfSuJG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: maxima Version: 5.9.1-9 Severity: grave The current version of maxima is not installable in unstable, because it still depends on libgmp3. The libgmp3 package has been renamed to libgmp3c2 due to the C++ ABI transition; even if your package does not use the C++ bindings, it will need to be rebuilt so that it is installable again. Since updating glibc in testing is now held up by the libgmp3 transition, maxima/5.9.1-9 will be removed from testing so that it doesn't block the rest of the archive from being updated. It can get back into testing as soon as this bug is fixed. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --8/pVXlBMPtxfSuJG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDFYa+KN6ufymYLloRApV5AKC6GWe/8Ave9dFxoDTUExxuhhB7KwCgh5fH gs6oqrQaXI4rV3RMleXQZo0= =77vl -END PGP SIGNATURE- --8/pVXlBMPtxfSuJG-- --- Received: (at 325852-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 16:48:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 09:48:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI7kU-0001Cs-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#325852: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: maxima Source-Version: 5.9.1-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of maxima, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: maxima-doc_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-doc_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-emacs_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-emacs_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-share_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-share_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-src_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-src_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-test_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-test_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima_5.9.1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10.diff.gz maxima_5.9.1-10.dsc to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10.dsc maxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb xmaxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/xmaxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes
Bug#325852: marked as done (maxima: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323563: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2005 10:30:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 03:30:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EAPrK-00041k-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:30:22 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 8EF957049; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:30:22 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: maxima: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=8/pVXlBMPtxfSuJG Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --8/pVXlBMPtxfSuJG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: maxima Version: 5.9.1-9 Severity: grave The current version of maxima is not installable in unstable, because it still depends on libgmp3. The libgmp3 package has been renamed to libgmp3c2 due to the C++ ABI transition; even if your package does not use the C++ bindings, it will need to be rebuilt so that it is installable again. Since updating glibc in testing is now held up by the libgmp3 transition, maxima/5.9.1-9 will be removed from testing so that it doesn't block the rest of the archive from being updated. It can get back into testing as soon as this bug is fixed. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --8/pVXlBMPtxfSuJG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDFYa+KN6ufymYLloRApV5AKC6GWe/8Ave9dFxoDTUExxuhhB7KwCgh5fH gs6oqrQaXI4rV3RMleXQZo0= =77vl -END PGP SIGNATURE- --8/pVXlBMPtxfSuJG-- --- Received: (at 323563-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 16:48:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 09:48:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI7kU-0001Cq-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#323563: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: maxima Source-Version: 5.9.1-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of maxima, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: maxima-doc_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-doc_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-emacs_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-emacs_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-share_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-share_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-src_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-src_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima-test_5.9.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima-test_5.9.1-10_all.deb maxima_5.9.1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10.diff.gz maxima_5.9.1-10.dsc to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10.dsc maxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb xmaxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/m/maxima/xmaxima_5.9.1-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes
Bug#329053: marked as done (arc: Insecure temporary file handling)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:02:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329053: fixed in arc 5.21m-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 06:30:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 23:30:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from box79162.elkhouse.de [213.9.79.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHFAZ-00039T-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 23:30:27 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [195.227.105.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Martin Pitt (workstation), Issuer piware CA (verified OK)) by box79162.elkhouse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1F21F8FA9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:29:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ACE0313DA0; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:37:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:37:01 +0200 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian BTS Submit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: arc: Insecure temporary file handling Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: arc Version: 5.21l-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Hi! There is a recent report about insecure temporary files in ncompress, similar to the recent advisories about gzip: http://www.zataz.net/adviso/arc-09052005.txt Can you please check this? There is no CAN number yet. If this is a real issue, you can ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get one. Thanks! Martin --=20 Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDLlyNDecnbV4Fd/IRApNMAJ9kxDGPbJXdNbdnYh809NZ4LRgA/gCfaY72 Ws5KQ3n54azqeNabu8vvLZU= =xsZL -END PGP SIGNATURE- --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM-- --- Received: (at 329053-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 17:08:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 10:08:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI7yw-0006z0-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:02:06 -0700 From: Klaus Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329053: fixed in arc 5.21m-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:02:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: arc Source-Version: 5.21m-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of arc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: arc_5.21m-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/arc/arc_5.21m-1.diff.gz arc_5.21m-1.dsc to pool/main/a/arc/arc_5.21m-1.dsc arc_5.21m-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/arc/arc_5.21m-1_i386.deb arc_5.21m.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/arc/arc_5.21m.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Klaus Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated arc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
Bug#329391: marked as done (no longer seems to work)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:02:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329391: fixed in base-installer 1.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 14:36:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 07:36:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI5hz-0006w6-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dhcp-sn38-07.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.38.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9AA17DC7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:36:26 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB6DCBF822; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:36:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:36:44 +0200 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: no longer seems to work Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: palo-installer Version: 0.0.7 Severity: grave Tags: d-i palo-installer seems to fail when installing etch. Selections from the logs: + ls -l vmlinux ls: vmlinux: No such file or directory + chroot /target /sbin/palo read: Is a directory read: Is a directory Apparently the kernels have stopped providing the vmlinux file that it expected. The system has these files in /target/boot: /target/boot # ls System.map-2.6.8-2-64-smp lost+found config-2.6.8-2-64-smp patches-2.6.8-2-64-smp initrd.img-2.6.8-2-64-smp vmlinux-2.6.8-2-64-smp And this leads to it creating a bad palo.conf: /target/boot # cat ../etc/palo.conf=20 --commandline=3D2/vmlinux root=3D/dev/sda5 HOME=3D/ --recoverykernel=3D/boot/ --init-partitioned=3D/dev/sda -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) --=20 see shy jo --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDMW/8d8HHehbQuO8RAjoLAKDmdEC3kOMwrQdqVlROyLneKD+G5wCgh40z /+lq6+YLr5toPv8PXU7gkT8= =NlMT -END PGP SIGNATURE- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- --- Received: (at 329391-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 17:10:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 10:10:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI7yx-0006zx-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:02:07 -0700 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329391: fixed in base-installer 1.30 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:02:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: base-installer Source-Version: 1.30 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of base-installer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: base-installer_1.30.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.30.dsc base-installer_1.30.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.30.tar.gz base-installer_1.30_i386.udeb
Bug#329413: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper: postinst is broken (update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found)
Package: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper Version: 0.9.3-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable During aptitude upgrade: Setting up mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper (0.9.3-4) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper.postinst: line 8: update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found dpkg: error processing mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying to recover: Setting up mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper (0.9.3-4) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper.postinst: line 8: update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found dpkg: error processing mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Suggested solutions: 1) Depend on mozilla-firefox ( 1.4.99) 2) Find out how Deer Park wants to update the chrome and fix postinst. 3) Forward this bug to mozilla-firefox and make them put them install some shell script for update-mozilla-firefox-chrome. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper depends on: ii mozilla-firefox1.4.99+1.5beta1-1 lightweight web browser based on M mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper recommends no packages. -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#328981: udev: dependencie loop when upgrading kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.12
Marco d'Itri wrote: On Sep 18, Ashar Voultoiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be possible to make the udev package aware that a kernel 2.6.12 is being installed ? Then one can use: No. But try harder, everybody else has been able to install udev. (dpkg -i may help. If it does not, ask on debian-user@) Not everybody else, many friends using debian have the same trouble and I received private emails asking what was wrong. What's wrong in expecting apt-get upgrade to just upgrade the system without relying on dpkg --something ? I dont think package manager like synaptic can handle that. -- Ashar Voultoiz pgp keyid: 0x63B820D1 IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 15325080 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of bogl 0.1.18-1.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 284741 + fixed Bug#284741: bogl: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 'smalloc' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329422: No warnings when uninstalling kernel package
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 Version: 2.6.8-16 Severity: critical Most of the time when I try to uninstall a package that's critical to system functionality, it tells me I'm about to uninstall a core component and asks me to type, Yes I know what I'm doing or similar to continue. $ sudo apt-get remove bash Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: bash hal hotplug udev WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing! bash 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 4 to remove and 123 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 3523kB disk space will be freed. You are about to do something potentially harmful To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!' ?] n Abort. Imagine my surprise, then, when I did this: $ sudo apt-get remove dash Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: dash initrd-tools kernel-image-2.6-686 kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 4 to remove and 121 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 45.6MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n Abort. Now, I haven't actually verified that removing kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 (which does contain the running kernel, yes) will break my system, but I'd be astonished if it didn't. (To be more precise, while removing vmlinuz shouldn't matter until I try to run lilo again, it also contains the /lib/modules directory.) I think a kernel image should be treated like a core package, requiring extra confirmation to uninstall. (Maybe it's more complicated, since a given kernel may not actually be the one that's running, but the user can always just type the full confirmation phrase to get around this, so if it's easier to implement I think it should just default to requiring extra confirmation.) I've classed this critical since it has the potential to make the system unusable if the user is not paying attention and hits Y (which would have been easy in this case, since dash seems like it would be just another shell). Probably the maintainers would class it less serious since the situation wouldn't come up very often, but I'll let them downgrade it if they feel its appropriate. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.81.1 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre8-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328981: udev: dependencie loop when upgrading kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.12
Ashar Voultoiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marco d'Itri wrote: On Sep 18, Ashar Voultoiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be possible to make the udev package aware that a kernel 2.6.12 is being installed ? Then one can use: No. But try harder, everybody else has been able to install udev. (dpkg -i may help. If it does not, ask on debian-user@) Not everybody else, many friends using debian have the same trouble and I received private emails asking what was wrong. Two of my friends also had trouble with this bug. -- The road to hell is paved with convenient shortcuts. --Peter da Silva -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327492: zinc-compiler: Depends on unavailable library libgmp3
Hi, I did an NMU of your package to fix this. I've attached the diff. Kurt diff -u zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog --- zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog +++ zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +zinc-compiler (1.0.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Relink against libgmp3c2, no source changes. (Closes: #327492) + + -- Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:25:40 +0200 + zinc-compiler (1.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fixed gcc-4.0 and amd64 compilation problem (closes: Bug#300515).
Bug#320510: marked as done (axiom depends on libgmp3)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320510: fixed in axiom 20050901-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 22:48:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 15:48:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from web51303.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.169] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DydeV-00076k-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:48:27 -0700 Received: (qmail 4652 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jul 2005 22:47:56 - DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2IXwS8mVtrXdFHWN6hMuu83tMd7SlyaMU3ZJLJ+XXywwKd/hwD3AisDr6FDn78y4SKYkpgv2yTvC/CA7AXVGqSjyRLsBnCN4lQMsxXv8mUt5D4o/QCVan0R07enxXn/DVCLxtwYY9Die9td3owt4CKncZ/hb6ldASgZWyWj7dCQ= ; Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [72.224.91.190] by web51303.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:47:56 PDT Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Tommy McCabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: axiom depends on libgmp3 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: axiom Version: 20050201-1 axiom still depends on libgmp3, which has been replaced with libgimp3c2 (gcc 4.0?). This makes it and any packages dependent on it unupgradeable and uninstallable. Kernel 2.6.12 Debian Sid Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs --- Received: (at 320510-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 18:39:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 11:39:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI9O8-rs-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700 From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#320510: fixed in axiom 20050901-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: axiom Source-Version: 20050901-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of axiom, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: axiom-databases_20050901-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom-databases_20050901-1_all.deb axiom-doc_20050901-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom-doc_20050901-1_all.deb axiom-graphics-data_20050901-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom-graphics-data_20050901-1_all.deb axiom-graphics_20050901-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom-graphics_20050901-1_i386.deb axiom-hypertex-data_20050901-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom-hypertex-data_20050901-1_all.deb axiom-hypertex_20050901-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom-hypertex_20050901-1_i386.deb axiom-source_20050901-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom-source_20050901-1_all.deb axiom-test_20050901-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom-test_20050901-1_all.deb axiom-tex_20050901-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom-tex_20050901-1_all.deb axiom_20050901-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom_20050901-1.diff.gz axiom_20050901-1.dsc to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom_20050901-1.dsc axiom_20050901-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom_20050901-1_i386.deb axiom_20050901.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/axiom/axiom_20050901.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 328975 + patch Bug#328975: libcrypto++: FTBFS on arm, m68k, hppa; use g++-3.4 there Tags were: patch Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of zinc-compiler 1.0.2-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327492 + fixed Bug#327492: Depends on unavailable library libgmp3 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of c2hs 0.13.6-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328910 + fixed Bug#328910: c2hs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base' Tags were: patch Bug#328954: c2hs: FTBFS: Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text Conversion Tags added: fixed tag 328954 + fixed Bug#328954: c2hs: FTBFS: Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text Conversion Tags were: fixed patch Bug#328910: c2hs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base' Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329239: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Arias told: Package: mutt-ng Version: 0.0+20050916-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Could you please test http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/binary-i386/mutt-ng/mutt-ng_0.0+20050920-1_i386.deb Let us know wether it helps. And please no new bugreport, as this package isn't released yet ;-) Elimar -- You cannot propel yourself forward by patting yourself on the back. pgpGUJKOgGvwi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#327722: Gopher bug
Joey and security folks,
I think that the attached patch will fix the problem. It seems a little
too simple, though, so I'd appreciate it if any of you would glance an
eye at it and make sure it looks good.
If so, I'll upload it as 3.0.10 to sid and you can do the appropriate
thing with the other dists.
Thanks,
-- John
Wed Sep 21 14:23:14 CDT 2005 John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Part 2 of the security fix
Wed Sep 21 13:52:10 CDT 2005 John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [security] Initial code for first issue in CAN-2005-2772
debian #327722
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraqm=112559902931614w=2
Sat Jul 30 16:18:38 CDT 2005 John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tagged DEBIAN_gopher_3.0.10
diff -rN -u old-gopher/object/fileio.c new-gopher/object/fileio.c
--- old-gopher/object/fileio.c 2005-09-21 14:23:59.944644055 -0500
+++ new-gopher/object/fileio.c 2005-09-21 14:21:42.0 -0500
@@ -807,12 +807,12 @@
int inquote = 0;
int insquote = 0;
int i;
- static char *argv[128]; /* Sufficient for now.. */
+ static char *argv[256]; /* Sufficient for now.. */
int argc = 0;
char buf[256];
char *cp = buf;
- if (cmd == NULL)
+ if (cmd == NULL || strlen(cmd) = 245)
return(NULL);
for (i=0; cmd[i] != '\0'; i++) {
diff -rN -u old-gopher/object/VIews.c new-gopher/object/VIews.c
--- old-gopher/object/VIews.c 2005-09-21 14:23:59.947643656 -0500
+++ new-gopher/object/VIews.c 2005-09-21 13:51:16.0 -0500
@@ -227,6 +227,11 @@
char tmpstr[256], *cp;
int i;
+ if (strlen(line) = 200)
+ /* Security: make sure the incoming data won't exceed the buffer.
+ Pick 200 since that's already larger than any legit data. */
+ return (FALSE);
+
/** Okay, read until the next space, put the result in tmpstr **/
for (cp = line,i=0; (*cp != ' '*cp!='\0'*cp!=':'); cp++,i++)
tmpstr[i] = *cp;
Processed: FTBFS: Cannot find linux/ppp.h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 323514 +patch Bug#323514: FTBFS: Cannot find linux/ppp.h There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328789: wml: segmentation fault in pass 3
Recompiling perl and eperl did fix the segfault problem for me on powerpc (I think the perl version in unstable doesn't need the recompilation really). Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#239538: marked as done (grunch feeds bad arguments to pnmfile)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line grunch removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2004 10:45:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 23 02:45:42 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B5jPh-0002sg-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:45:41 -0800 Received: from dvdeug (136.gardena-14rh15-16rt.ca.dial-access.att.net[12.72.88.136]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with ESMTP id 2004032310451011100t93ene; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:45:10 + Received: from dvdeug by dvdeug with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1B5jJy-0001wf-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:39:46 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grunch feeds bad arguments to pnmfile X-Mailer: reportbug 2.50 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:39:46 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: grunch Version: 1.3-3 Severity: important ~/My_Gutenberg/Uncleared/Submitted/English_Dialects/grunch $ grunch henry *** Computing with rotation of 0.0 degrees *** Converting to PPM and rotating tifftopnm: writing PGM file Creating 1/9-scale subimages tifftopnm: writing PGM file Matching 1/9-scale files Looking at 0 and 0 pnmfile: EOF / read error reading magic number ~/My_Gutenberg/Uncleared/Submitted/English_Dialects/grunch $ ls henry-1.tif henry-2.tif ~/My_Gutenberg/Uncleared/Submitted/English_Dialects/grunch $ The same thing happens with pgm files. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.21dvdeug2 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages grunch depends on: ii debianutils 2.7.4Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libnetpbm9 2:10.0-3 Shared libraries for netpbm ii netpbm 2:10.0-3 Graphics conversion tools -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 161523-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 20:19:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 13:19:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIB3w-0005Bs-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:19:28 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8LKJ25I003697; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:02 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8LKJOf8014400; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:24 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8LKJO5D014398; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:24 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: diziet.irb.hr: mvela set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grunch removed from Debian Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 grunch has been removed from Debian due to long-standing
Processed: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 323733 +patch Bug#323733: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#161523: marked as done (grunch: Error in call to 'makeppm'. File names not set)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line grunch removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2002 18:58:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 19 13:58:53 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 24-205-207-61.fln-cres.charterpipeline.net (tarot.internal.aom.geek) [24.205.207.61] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17s6Vo-0001Ik-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:58:52 -0500 Received: from mnemaxa.internal.aom.geek [192.168.1.40] by tarot.internal.aom.geek with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17s6Vn-0005x4-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:58:51 -0700 Received: from idalton by mnemaxa.internal.aom.geek with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17s6Vm-0001aQ-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:58:50 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Beiad Ian Q. Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?grunch:?= Error in call to =?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?'makeppm'.?= File names not =?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?set??= X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.55 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:58:50 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: grunch Version: 1.3-3 Severity: important I've scanned in two side-by-side images with gimp and saved them as uncompressed tiff files. I include a tail of grunch running with 'set -x': + echo 'Creating 1/9-scale subimages' Creating 1/9-scale subimages + makeppm foo-1 + '[' -f foo-1 ']' + '[' -f foo-1.ppm ']' + '[' -f foo-1.pgm ']' + pnmscale .1 + '[' -f foo-1.pbm ']' + '[' -f foo-1.tif ']' + '[' -f foo-1.tiff ']' + tifftopnm foo-1.tiff tifftopnm: writing PPM file + pnmscale .1 + echo '' + echo 'Matching 1/9-scale files' Matching 1/9-scale files + echo '' + '[' '' = '' ']' + centerline=0 + matchfiles 0 0 0 20 2 + file1=0 + file2=0 + leftcenter=0 + rightcenter=20 + heightoffset=2 + windowsize= + windowstep= + echo 'Looking at 0 and 0' Looking at 0 and 0 + filesize 0 x1 y1 + echo ' -- IN filesize: 0' -- IN filesize: 0 pnmfile (makeppm $1) makeppm $1 +++ makeppm 0 +++ '[' -f 0 ']' ++ pnmfile /dev/fd/63 +++ '[' -f 0.ppm ']' +++ '[' -f 0.pgm ']' +++ '[' -f 0.pbm ']' +++ '[' -f 0.tif ']' +++ '[' -f 0.tiff ']' +++ cat /dev/null pnmfile: EOF / read error reading magic number + pnminfo=/dev/fd/63: -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mnemaxa 2.4.18 #1 Sun Aug 11 12:27:14 PDT 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE= Versions of packages grunch depends on: ii debianutils 1.16.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc6 2.2.5-14.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libnetpbm92:9.20-8 Shared libraries for netpbm. ii netpbm2:9.20-8 Graphics conversion tools. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 161523-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 20:19:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 13:19:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIB3w-0005Bs-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:19:28 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8LKJ25I003697; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:02 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8LKJOf8014400; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:24 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8LKJO5D014398; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:24 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: diziet.irb.hr: mvela set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grunch removed from Debian Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;
Bug#319488: marked as done (grunch: File conflict with star)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line grunch removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2005 14:15:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 22 07:15:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 213-84-114-29.adsl.xs4all.nl (tofu.mamane.lu) [213.84.114.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DvyIx-UO-00; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:15:11 -0700 Received: from master by tofu.mamane.lu with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DvyIw-0002dR-64 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:15:10 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:15:10 +0200 From: Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grunch: File conflict with star Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/dh4096.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: grunch Version: 1.3-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.1 Preparing to replace star 1.4a17-3 (using .../star_1.5a57-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement star ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/star_1.5a57-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/match.1.gz', which is also in package grunch -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (300, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=fr_LU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_LU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages grunch depends on: ii debianutils 2.8.4Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libnetpbm9 2:10.0-8 Shared libraries for netpbm ii netpbm 2:10.0-8 Graphics conversion tools -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 319487-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 20:19:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 13:19:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIB3w-0005Bs-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:19:28 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8LKJ25I003697; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:02 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8LKJOf8014400; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:24 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8LKJO5D014398; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:24 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: diziet.irb.hr: mvela set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grunch removed from Debian Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 grunch has been removed from Debian due to long-standing release-critical bugs. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/327636 for details. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319487: marked as done (star: file conflict with grunch)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line grunch removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2005 14:09:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 22 07:09:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 213-84-114-29.adsl.xs4all.nl (tofu.mamane.lu) [213.84.114.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DvyDM-00086a-00; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:09:24 -0700 Received: from master by tofu.mamane.lu with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DvyDK-0002aj-Cv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:09:22 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:09:22 +0200 From: Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: star: file conflict with grunch Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/dh4096.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: star Version: 1.5a57-1 Severity: serious Justification: policy 10.1 Preparing to replace star 1.4a17-3 (using .../star_1.5a57-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement star ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/star_1.5a57-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/match.1.gz', which is also in package grunch -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (300, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=fr_LU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_LU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages star depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 319487-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 20:19:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 13:19:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIB3w-0005Bs-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:19:28 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8LKJ25I003697; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:02 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8LKJOf8014400; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:24 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8LKJO5D014398; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:24 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: diziet.irb.hr: mvela set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grunch removed from Debian Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 grunch has been removed from Debian due to long-standing release-critical bugs. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/327636 for details. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328674: very old package, should this be removed?
Jim Mintha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:05:13PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose to remove it. There are not many users, upstream development seems to be stalled and the package is FTBFS at the moment. I agree that the package doesn't get used very much, and I was considering removing it myself. On the other hand I do hear from users (in fact I got an email the same day from a user that was very happy the package was in debian) I think, given that it is a fairly small package, that it would be useful to have it in debian. I will (unless there is an objection) do an upload to updates the standards, etc. OK, thanks for the info. Just fix the FTBFS bug in the next upload and close this bug. Marc -- BOFH #355: Boredom in the Kernel. pgpRMfEd6WDos.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#258944: marked as done (iterm: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:47:45 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258944: fixed in iterm 0.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2004 10:28:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 12 03:28:13 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c186225.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.186.225] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjy2f-0006Pa-00; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 03:28:13 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bjy2d-0002Ij-K4; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:28:11 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: iterm: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:28:11 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: iterm Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'iterm' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../../../lib/include -I../lib -I/usr/include -I./include -DBIDI -g -O2 -Wp,-MD,.deps/xim.pp -c xim.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/xim.lo xim.c: In function `InitIM': xim.c:67: error: label at end of compound statement make[1]: *** [xim.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/iterm-0.5/unix/Xaw/lib' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 With the attached patch 'iterm' can be compiled using gcc-3.4. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/iterm-0.5/unix/Xaw/lib/xim.c ./unix/Xaw/lib/xim.c --- ../tmp-orig/iterm-0.5/unix/Xaw/lib/xim.c2002-11-28 13:18:15.0 +0100 +++ ./unix/Xaw/lib/xim.c2004-07-12 12:18:06.591771247 +0200 @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ } } } -loop_end: } +loop_end: XFree(im_styles); if(!found) --- Received: (at 258944-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 20:51:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 13:51:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIBVJ-0007DE-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:47:45 -0700 From: Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#258944: fixed in iterm 0.5-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:47:45 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: iterm Source-Version: 0.5-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of iterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fbiterm_0.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iterm/fbiterm_0.5-4_i386.deb iterm_0.5-4.diff.gz to pool/main/i/iterm/iterm_0.5-4.diff.gz iterm_0.5-4.dsc to pool/main/i/iterm/iterm_0.5-4.dsc libiterm-dev_0.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iterm/libiterm-dev_0.5-4_i386.deb libiterm1_0.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iterm/libiterm1_0.5-4_i386.deb libxiterm-dev_0.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iterm/libxiterm-dev_0.5-4_i386.deb libxiterm1_0.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iterm/libxiterm1_0.5-4_i386.deb xiterm_0.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iterm/xiterm_0.5-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated iterm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 02:59:50 +0800 Source: iterm Binary: libxiterm-dev fbiterm libiterm1 xiterm libxiterm1 libiterm-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5-4
Processed: Fixed in upload of gconf2 2.12.0-2 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 316403 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#316403: circular dependency between libgconf2-4 and gconf2 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327159: marked as done (kdepim-dev: Missing dependency on kitchensync)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:37:19 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327159: fixed in kdepim 4:3.4.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2005 03:47:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 07 20:47:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EDDNK-0002EU-00; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 20:47:02 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j883kt0d091359 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:46:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ED9Gm-0003CW-14 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:23:56 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:23:55 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Missing dependency on kdepim Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1069/Wed Sep 7 08:08:51 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: kdepim-dev Version: 4:3.4.2-1 Severity: serious kdebluetooth fails to build because it cannot link against /usr/lib/libkonnector.so and /usr/lib/libksync2.so. These symlinks, provided by kdepim-dev, are present because kdebluetooth build-depends on kdepim-dev, but the files that they point to are not present because kdepim-dev does not depend on kdepim. --=20 Matt --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDH3aLfNdgYxVXvBARAri1AJ4iRpkjXB7oKow0PuXbA950akwH2gCbByvq 71rxx3yoJBjdqchELltfTC4= =meew -END PGP SIGNATURE- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- --- Received: (at 327159-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 21:38:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 14:38:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EICHH-0004Vf-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:37:19 -0700 From: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#327159: fixed in kdepim 4:3.4.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:37:19 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: kdepim Source-Version: 4:3.4.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: akregator_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/akregator_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kaddressbook_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kalarm_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kandy_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.4.2-2_i386.deb karm_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kdepim-dev_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-dev_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kdepim-doc-html_3.4.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-doc-html_3.4.2-2_all.deb kdepim-doc_3.4.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-doc_3.4.2-2_all.deb kdepim-kfile-plugins_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-kfile-plugins_3.4.2-2_i386.deb
Bug#327594: marked as done (kdepim FTBFS on arm, hppa, m68k. should use gcc-3.4 on these arch)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:37:19 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327594: fixed in kdepim 4:3.4.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 09:43:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 02:43:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-2.opaltelecom.net [62.24.128.69] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEOMv-0007M8-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 02:43:25 -0700 Received: from [84.13.251.28] (helo=[192.168.2.100]) by smtp-2.opaltelecom.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1EEOMq-vO-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:43:20 +0100 Subject: kdepim FTBFS on arm, hppa, m68k. should use gcc-3.4 on these arch From: Regis Boudin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:42:52 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kdepim Severity: serious Hi, kdepim FTBFS on the 3 arch with the usual internal compiler error : http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=kdepimver=4% 3A3.4.2-1arch=hppastamp=1125769502file=logas=raw http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=kdepimver=4% 3A3.4.2-1arch=armstamp=1125702059file=logas=raw http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=kdepimver=4% 3A3.4.2-1arch=m68kstamp=1125779412file=logas=raw Can you please use gcc-3.4 on these arch ? Regards, Regis -- While a monkey can be a manager, it takes a human to be an engineer Erik Zapletal --- Received: (at 327594-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 21:38:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 14:38:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EICHH-0004Vh-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:37:19 -0700 From: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#327594: fixed in kdepim 4:3.4.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:37:19 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: kdepim Source-Version: 4:3.4.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: akregator_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/akregator_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kaddressbook_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kalarm_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kandy_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.4.2-2_i386.deb karm_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kdepim-dev_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-dev_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kdepim-doc-html_3.4.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-doc-html_3.4.2-2_all.deb kdepim-doc_3.4.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-doc_3.4.2-2_all.deb kdepim-kfile-plugins_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-kfile-plugins_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kdepim-kio-plugins_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-kio-plugins_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kdepim-kresources_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-kresources_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kdepim-wizards_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-wizards_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kdepim_3.4.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.4.2-2.diff.gz kdepim_3.4.2-2.dsc to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.4.2-2.dsc kdepim_3.4.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.4.2-2_all.deb kitchensync_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kitchensync_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kleopatra_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kleopatra_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kmail_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kmail_3.4.2-2_i386.deb kmailcvt_3.4.2-2_i386.deb to
Bug#329454: broken symlinks /usr/bin/boo*
Package: boo Version: 0.6.0.1858-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing boo with apt-get -t unstable install boo the expected executables booi and booc in /usr/bin are just broken symlinks to cli-wrapper which seems to be a file in package mono-common. mono-common isn't listed as a dependency of boo. Installing mono-common didn't seem to render the package useful. booi somefilefrom/usr/share/doc/examples.boo didn't do anything. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages boo depends on: ii mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.8.3-1 Mono class library (1.0) boo recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#327380: marked as done (libpq-dev: missing depends on libssl-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327380: fixed in postgresql-8.0 8.0.3-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 17:49:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 10:49:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EDn0h-0005ts-00; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:49:59 -0700 Received: from port-212-202-192-15.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.192.15] helo=treasure.calvinsplayground.de) by mx01.qsc.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1EDn0C-0008De-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 19:49:28 +0200 Received: (qmail 3804 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Sep 2005 17:50:29 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libpq-dev: missing depends on libssl-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 19:50:29 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libpq-dev Version: 8.0.3-15 Severity: serious Justification: missing depends Hi, the file /usr/include/postgresql/libpq-fe.h includes openssl/ssl.h, but the package does not depend on libssl-dev. This results in FTBFS of other packages (eg. python-popy). Please add a dependency to libssl-dev in libpq-dev. Regards, Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (800, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-ck2-treasure1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libpq-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libkrb53 1.3.6-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpam0g 0.76-23Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpq48.0.3-15 PostgreSQL C client library ii libreadline5 5.0-10 GNU readline and history libraries ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-2 SSL shared libraries ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime libpq-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 327380-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 21:49:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 14:49:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EICQp-0008OA-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:47:11 -0700 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327380: fixed in postgresql-8.0 8.0.3-16 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:47:11 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: postgresql-8.0 Source-Version: 8.0.3-16 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of postgresql-8.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libecpg-compat2_8.0.3-16_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libecpg-compat2_8.0.3-16_i386.deb libecpg-dev_8.0.3-16_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libecpg-dev_8.0.3-16_i386.deb libecpg5_8.0.3-16_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libecpg5_8.0.3-16_i386.deb libpgtypes2_8.0.3-16_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libpgtypes2_8.0.3-16_i386.deb libpq-dev_8.0.3-16_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libpq-dev_8.0.3-16_i386.deb libpq4_8.0.3-16_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libpq4_8.0.3-16_i386.deb postgresql-8.0_8.0.3-16.diff.gz to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-8.0_8.0.3-16.diff.gz postgresql-8.0_8.0.3-16.dsc to
Processed: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 323733 +fixed-upstream Bug#323733: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-upstream thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323733: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp
tags 323733 +fixed-upstream thanks Hi! The problem is fixed in new upstream version 1.4.4. Kindly regards, Erik -- www.ErikSchanze.de * Bitte keine HTML-E-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Limit: 100 kB * * Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 29. Oktober 2005 * Info: http://www.linux-info-tag.de * pgphHV5x1E9NR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#329459: emacs21: FTBFS on powerpc
Package: emacs21 Version: 21.4a-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source The build fails on powerpc: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=emacs21ver=21.4a-2arch=powerpcstamp=1127111387file=logas=raw I've also retried the build locally in a sid chroot, but the temacs segfaults in the same way. Regards, Roger -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of wnn6-sdk 1.0.0-12.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 259894 + fixed Bug#259894: wnn6-sdk: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329462: general: standard value $LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] - very tiny GTK1 font
Package: general Severity: grave Tags: l10n Justification: renders package unusable The standard value $LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] breaks fontsize for some gtk1 programs like gxedit or tipptrainer. With $LANG=de_DE they show a readable font. A normal user doesn't know that when he chooses the locale dpkg-reconfigure locales during installation. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329463: Not installable on Sid because of unmet dependencies
Package: torcs Version: 1.2.3-2 Severity: grave When I try to install torcs I get the following error message: # apt-get install torcs Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: torcs: Depends: plib1.8.4 but it is not installable E: Broken packages As advised by apt-get here comes the bug-report :-) Regards, Ole -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages torcs depends on: ii freeglut3 2.2.0-8.1 OpenGL Utility Toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-8 GCC support library ii libglu1-xorg [libglu1]6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Mesa OpenGL utility library [X.Org ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-10 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Input extension li ii libxmu6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxrandr26.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Toolkit Intrinsics pn plib1.8.4 none (no description available) ii torcs-data1.2.3-2base data files for TORCS game ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Mesa 3D graphics library [X.Org] ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime Versions of packages torcs recommends: ii menu 2.1.25 generates programs menu for all me -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320868: marked as done (asterisk: Asterisk segfaults when hangup button in linphone pressed)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:26:42 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320868: fixed in rate-engine 0.5.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2005 00:51:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 01 17:51:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from planck.derobert.net [207.188.193.88] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Dzl0B-0005Wa-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:51:27 -0700 Received: from anthony by planck.derobert.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Dzl0A-0001mP-1P for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:51:26 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: asterisk: Asterisk segfaults when hangup button in linphone pressed X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:51:25 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Running with config included in package (except a few changes for the bind address). I have no telephony cards; only IP. Editing /etc/default/asterisk, to enable the commented-out debug options gives this log on the console ... Asterisk Ready. Aug 1 20:20:18 ERROR[5594]: rate_engine.c:697 poster_worker: Failed to connect to MySQL database 'rating': Unknown MySQL Server Host 'server.sigmasoft.com' (1) Aug 1 20:20:18 ERROR[5594]: rate_engine.c:732 poster_worker: Failed to connect to MySQL database 'rating': Unknown MySQL Server Host 'server.sigmasoft.com' (1) -- Executing Goto(SIP/bohr.home-0810ef88, default|s|1) in new stack -- Goto (default,s,1) -- Executing Wait(SIP/bohr.home-0810ef88, 1) in new stack -- Executing Answer(SIP/bohr.home-0810ef88, ) in new stack -- Executing DigitTimeout(SIP/bohr.home-0810ef88, 5) in new stack -- Set Digit Timeout to 5 -- Executing ResponseTimeout(SIP/bohr.home-0810ef88, 10) in new stack -- Set Response Timeout to 10 -- Executing BackGround(SIP/bohr.home-0810ef88, demo-congrats) in new stack -- Playing 'demo-congrats' (language 'en') == Spawn extension (default, s, 5) exited non-zero on 'SIP/bohr.home-0810ef88' /etc/init.d/asterisk: line 111: 5594 Segmentation fault start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON -- $PARAMS Anytime I hit the hangup button in linphone, asterisk crashes. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages asterisk depends on: ii asterisk-config1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2 config files for asterisk ii asterisk-sounds-main 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2 sound files for asterisk ii libasound2 1.0.8-3 ALSA library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgsm11.0.10-13 Shared libraries for GSM speech co ii libncurses55.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libnewt0.510.51.6-20 Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex ii libpq3 7.4.7-6sarge1 PostgreSQL C client library ii libpri11.0.7-1 Primary Rate ISDN specification li ii libspeex1 1.1.6-2 The Speex Speech Codec ii libsqlite0 2.8.16-1 SQLite shared library ii libssl0.9.70.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii libtonezone1 1:1.0.7-4.1 tonezone library (runtime) ii unixodbc 2.2.4-11 ODBC tools libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 320868-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 22:47:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 15:47:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EID34-0007vb-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:26:42 -0700 From: Mark Purcell
Processed: severity of 329422 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 severity 329422 normal Bug#329422: No warnings when uninstalling kernel package Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328942: marked as done (orsa: FTBFS: doxygen: command not found)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:02:40 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328942: fixed in orsa 0.7.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 10:39:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 03:39:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGwZr-0006Dj-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:39:19 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EADB38195 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC8F38158 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id C61D626136; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:39:17 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: orsa: FTBFS: doxygen: command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: orsa Version: 0.7.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: touch debian/stamp-makefile-build docbook2x-man debian/manpages/xorsa.xml uudecode debian/examples/inner_solar_system.orsa.uu cd src/liborsa doxygen Doxyfile /bin/sh: doxygen: command not found make: *** [build/liborsa-doc] Error 127 You have doxygen (and graphviz) in your Build-Depends-Indep but you're also using it in the arch depended part. Kurt --- Received: (at 328942-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 23:08:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 16:08:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIDbs-00083i-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:02:40 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank S. Thomas) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328942: fixed in orsa 0.7.0-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:02:40 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: orsa Source-Version: 0.7.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of orsa, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: liborsa-doc_0.7.0-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/orsa/liborsa-doc_0.7.0-2_all.deb liborsa0-dev_0.7.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/orsa/liborsa0-dev_0.7.0-2_i386.deb liborsa0_0.7.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/orsa/liborsa0_0.7.0-2_i386.deb orsa_0.7.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/o/orsa/orsa_0.7.0-2.diff.gz orsa_0.7.0-2.dsc to pool/main/o/orsa/orsa_0.7.0-2.dsc xorsa_0.7.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/orsa/xorsa_0.7.0-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Frank S. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated orsa package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:08:17 +0200 Source: orsa Binary: liborsa0-dev liborsa0 xorsa liborsa-doc Architecture: source all i386 Version: 0.7.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Frank S. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Frank S. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:
Processed: tagging 329413
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 329413 experimental Bug#329413: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper: postinst is broken (update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found) There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329468: debootstrap: woody installation fails
Package: debootstrap Version: 0.3.1.7 Severity: serious # debootstrap woody woody I: Retrieving Release I: Retrieving Packages I: Validating Packages I: Checking component main on http://ftp.debian.org/debian... I: Extracting base-files... I: Extracting base-passwd... I: Extracting bash... I: Extracting bsdutils... I: Extracting debconf... I: Extracting debianutils... I: Extracting diff... I: Extracting dpkg... I: Extracting e2fsprogs... I: Extracting fileutils... I: Extracting findutils... I: Extracting grep... I: Extracting gzip... I: Extracting hostname... I: Extracting libc6... I: Extracting libcap1... I: Extracting libdb2... I: Extracting libdb3... I: Extracting libncurses5... I: Extracting libnewt0... I: Extracting libpam-modules... I: Extracting libpam-runtime... I: Extracting libpam0g... I: Extracting libpopt0... I: Extracting libreadline4... I: Extracting libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2... I: Extracting login... I: Extracting makedev... I: Extracting mawk... I: Extracting mbr... I: Extracting modutils... I: Extracting mount... I: Extracting ncurses-base... I: Extracting ncurses-bin... I: Extracting passwd... I: Extracting perl-base... I: Extracting procps... I: Extracting sed... I: Extracting shellutils... I: Extracting slang1... I: Extracting sysvinit... I: Extracting tar... I: Extracting textutils... I: Extracting util-linux... I: Extracting whiptail... I: Installing core packages... W: Failure trying to run: chroot /tmp/woody dpkg --force-depends --install var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_3.0.2_i386.deb var/cache/apt/archives/base-passwd_3.4.1_i386.deb # -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc2 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages debootstrap depends on: ii binutils 2.16.1-2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii wget 1.10.1-1 retrieves files from the web debootstrap recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316403: marked as done (circular dependency between libgconf2-4 and gconf2)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#316403: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2005 19:02:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 30 12:02:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lns-vlq-7-lil-82-254-201-228.adsl.proxad.net (yellowpig.yi.org) [82.254.201.228] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Do4Ib-8S-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:02:09 -0700 Received: from seventeen ([127.0.0.1] helo=yellowpig.yi.org ident=mail) by yellowpig.yi.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Do4I9-0006hf-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:01:41 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 25769 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:01:39 - Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:01:39 +0200 From: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: circular dependency between libgconf2-4 and gconf2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgconf2-4 Version: 2.10.0-2 Severity: important Hello Takuo, libgconf2-4 has a circular dependency with gconf2. This cause problems during upgrade between stable releases. We are discussing circular dependencies on debian-devel and Josselin Mouette asked me to report this bug as a reference for the discussion. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. --- Received: (at 316403-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 23:45:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 16:45:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIE4O-000242-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:32:08 -0700 From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#316403: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, REMOVE_REMOVAL_NEAR autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gconf2 Source-Version: 2.10.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gconf2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gconf2-common_2.10.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gconf2/gconf2-common_2.10.1-3_all.deb gconf2_2.10.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gconf2/gconf2_2.10.1-3.diff.gz gconf2_2.10.1-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gconf2/gconf2_2.10.1-3.dsc gconf2_2.10.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gconf2/gconf2_2.10.1-3_i386.deb libgconf2-4_2.10.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gconf2/libgconf2-4_2.10.1-3_i386.deb libgconf2-dev_2.10.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gconf2/libgconf2-dev_2.10.1-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gconf2 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:13:40 +0200 Source: gconf2 Binary: libgconf2-4 gconf2 gconf2-common libgconf2-dev Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.10.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gconf2 - GNOME configuration database system (support tools) gconf2-common - GNOME
Bug#319676: marked as done (aspell-bg: Needs repackaging for latest aspell)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#319676: fixed in bgoffice 3.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2005 22:14:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 23 15:14:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.25] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DwSGS-0003y1-00; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:14:36 -0700 Received: (qmail 20983 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2005 22:14:35 - Received: from dsl254-022-219.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO sirius.bignachos.com) ([216.254.22.219]) (envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 23 Jul 2005 22:14:35 - Received: from rubeus (unknown [192.168.1.20]) by sirius.bignachos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6F753573 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rubeus (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D28FE33BDE; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:14:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: aspell-bg: Needs repackaging for latest aspell X-URL: http://bignachos.com Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:14:32 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: aspell-bg Severity: grave Version: 3.0-4 Tags: sid As of the aspell 0.60.3-2 package, I changed the location in which aspell looks for dictionaries from /usr/lib/aspell-0.60 to /usr/lib/aspell (for support for autobuilding dictionary hashes). Obviously, this broke all existing dictionaries so I made it conflict with dictionaries providing aspell6-dictionary. Additionally, as of version 0.60.3-3 in conjunction with dictionaries-common = 0.49.2, aspell now fully supports building dictionary hashes at install time. This provides two huge advantages over packaging the hashes in the .deb: 1. The dictionary packages may be Arch: all, which for some dictionaries provides a significant relief to the mirrors. 2. The hashes will be automatically rebuilt for new aspell versions if the dictionary format changes, eliminating the need to transition all dictionary packages. Consequently, this is now the preferred method for packaging aspell dictionaries. Packaging dictionaries for aspell = 0.60.3-3 - [Old-style hashes (.rws files) in .deb] 1. Change Provides: aspell6-dictionary to Provides: aspell6a-dictionary 2. Ensure dictionary files are installed to /usr/lib/aspell 3. Remove any dependency on libaspell15 (see #310590) or aspell-bin (which no longer exists). Instead depend on aspell (= 0.60.3-2). [New-style autobuilt hashes] 1. Change Provides: aspell6-dictionary to Provides: aspell-dictionary (no version in name). 2. Remove build-dependency on aspell(-bin) 3. Change Architecture to all 4. Add binary package dependency on aspell (= 0.60.3-3) 5. Remove any relationship on libaspell15 or aspell-bin 6. Package an empty file /var/lib/aspell/$DICT_LANG.compat (where $DICT_LANG is the iso code for the dictionary, e.g. en) 7. Install the wordlists compressed as .mwl.gz, .wl.gz, or .cwl.gz to /usr/share/aspell. 8. For each of the above wordlists: a. Package an empty file /var/lib/aspell/$WORDLIST.rws (where $WORDLIST is the wordlist filename minus the .*wl.gz extension) b. Add a symlink /usr/lib/aspell/$WORDLIST.rws - /var/lib/aspell/$WORDLIST.rws c. Append the $WORDLIST to the file /usr/share/aspell/$DICT_LANG/.contents. The .contents file should contain one $WORDLIST per line. 9. Add a postinst call to /usr/sbin/update-dictcommon-aspell--the easiest way to do this is to build-depend on dictionaries-common-dev (= 0.9.1) and run installdeb-aspell from debian/rules. For some examples, see aspell-en (for dictionaries based on ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict tarballs) or aspell-es (for dictionaries based on
Bug#329481: swig is unavailable in testing
Package: swig Version: 1.3.24-1 Severity: serious Justification: swig is unavailable in testing There does not appear to be a version of swig in debian testing. In order to install swig I needed to download it and related packages from an alternate distribution. It seems to exist in oldstable, stable, and unstable. Stable and unstable use the same version. Package swig * oldstable (interpreters): Generate scripting interfaces to C/C++ code. 1.1.p883-4: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * stable (interpreters): Generate scripting interfaces to C/C++ code 1.3.24-1: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * unstable (interpreters): Generate scripting interfaces to C/C++ code 1.3.24-1: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc Thanks, Charlie -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages swig depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2 GCC support library ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 swig recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296907: marked as done (nvclock violates policy by being in Main)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296907: fixed in nvclock 0.8b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 15:08:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 07:08:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tx0.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D4h5E-0005D3-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:08:48 -0800 Received: from scan0.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.162] helo=localhost) by tx0.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D4h5C-0006vH-1o for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:08:46 + Received: from rx0.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.161]) by localhost (scan0.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 26422-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:08:45 + (GMT) Received: from mail.comlab.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.27.1]) by rx0.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D4h5B-0006uy-2a for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:08:45 + Received: from dhcpa13.comlab.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.27.100]:44113) by mail.comlab.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D4h5B-0003sY-5T for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:08:45 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:09:57 + From: Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050118) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nvclock violates policy by being in Main Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: nvclock Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 *** Please type your report below this line *** nvclock's Description states: You need to have the official nVidia drivers installed. However, the Depends on the package does not reflect this. If the package does indeed depend on nvidia-glx (non-free) then it is in violation of Debian policy for doing so whilst living in main rather than Contrib - plus, it would need an explicit Depends on the package to reflect it. If it does not rely on nvidia-glx, then the description is wrong, and needs to be addressed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 296907-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 03:38:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 20:38:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIHob-0007Ul-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:32:05 -0700 From: Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#296907: fixed in nvclock 0.8b-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: nvclock Source-Version: 0.8b-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nvclock, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nvclock-gtk_0.8b-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nvclock/nvclock-gtk_0.8b-1_i386.deb nvclock-qt_0.8b-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nvclock/nvclock-qt_0.8b-1_i386.deb nvclock_0.8b-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nvclock/nvclock_0.8b-1.diff.gz nvclock_0.8b-1.dsc to pool/main/n/nvclock/nvclock_0.8b-1.dsc nvclock_0.8b-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nvclock/nvclock_0.8b-1_i386.deb nvclock_0.8b.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nvclock/nvclock_0.8b.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the
Bug#327943: marked as done (nvclock: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327943: fixed in nvclock 0.8b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1j-0003To-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:55 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1d-0002TJ-T7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:50 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nvclock: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: nvclock Version: 0.7-2 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327943-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 03:38:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 20:38:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIHob-0007Un-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:32:05 -0700 From: Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327943: fixed in nvclock 0.8b-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: nvclock Source-Version: 0.8b-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nvclock, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nvclock-gtk_0.8b-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nvclock/nvclock-gtk_0.8b-1_i386.deb nvclock-qt_0.8b-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nvclock/nvclock-qt_0.8b-1_i386.deb nvclock_0.8b-1.diff.gz to
Bug#329486: rmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition
Package: rmpi Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing. Please upload a new version of rmpi with a versioned build-depends on: lam4-dev (= 7.1.1-3.2) This is necessary since m68k has not yet built the new lam; otherwise, the new upload may get built against the old lam libraries on that platform. If you can get to this soon, that would be best, as all of lam, hdf5, and mpich are currently caught up in a large transition. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329487: xmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition
Package: xmpi Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing. Please upload a new version of rmpi with a versioned build-depends on: lam4-dev (= 7.1.1-3.2) This is necessary since m68k has not yet built the new lam; otherwise, the new upload may get built against the old lam libraries on that platform. If you can get to this soon, that would be best, as all of lam, hdf5, and mpich are currently caught up in a large transition. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329488: clustalw-mpi: needs rebuild for lam transition
Package: clustalw-mpi Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 2.2.3 Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library package names as part of the C++ transition. clustalw-mpi now needs to be rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing. Please upload a new version of clustalw-mpi with a versioned build-depends on: lam4-dev (= 7.1.1-3.2) This is necessary since m68k has not yet built the new lam; otherwise, the new upload may get built against the old lam libraries on that platform. If you can get to this soon, that would be best, as all of lam, hdf5, and mpich are currently caught up in a large transition. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323744: netpipe: also needs rebuild for lam transition
Package: netpipe Followup-For: Bug #323744 When you do this upload to fix the mpich build dependency, please also add a versioned dependency on: lam4-dev (= 7.1.1-3.2) netpipe also depends on lam, which is also doing its own C++ transition, and m68k has not yet built the latest lam package. Without this dependency, netpipe may be built against the old lam library on m68k. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329487: xmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition
In the previous bug report, please read xmpi where I said rmpi. Sorry about that; that was a bad cut and paste. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328206: lam: patch to lower optimization level
Package: lam Followup-For: Bug #328206 Here is a patch to lower the optimization level of lam from -O3 to -O2. This will hopefully resolve the m68k build problem, and debian-devel mail seems to indicate this is a good idea for i386 as well. I've tested this patch and confirmed that lam still builds and that this eliminates any use of -O3. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) diff -ru lam-7.1.1/config/lam_cxx_bindings_setup.m4 lam-7.1.1.new/config/lam_cxx_bindings_setup.m4 --- lam-7.1.1/config/lam_cxx_bindings_setup.m4 2004-09-26 08:35:24.0 -0700 +++ lam-7.1.1.new/config/lam_cxx_bindings_setup.m4 2005-09-21 21:17:50.0 -0700 @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ ;; mips-sgi-irix*) -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 TEST_OPTFLAGS=$OPTFLAGS EXAM_OPTFLAGS=$OPTFLAGS ARCH=IRIX @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ # like port_test.cc and request_array_test.cc. Doh!! NOOPT=-O0 - OPTFLAGS=-O3 + OPTFLAGS=-O2 TEST_OPTFLAGS=$NOOPT EXAM_OPTFLAGS=$OPTFLAGS diff -ru lam-7.1.1/config/lam_setup_cc.m4 lam-7.1.1.new/config/lam_setup_cc.m4 --- lam-7.1.1/config/lam_setup_cc.m42004-09-26 08:35:24.0 -0700 +++ lam-7.1.1.new/config/lam_setup_cc.m42005-09-21 21:17:50.0 -0700 @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ # just use -O. if test $GCC = yes; then -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 else OPTFLAGS=-O fi diff -ru lam-7.1.1/config/lam_setup_cxx.m4 lam-7.1.1.new/config/lam_setup_cxx.m4 --- lam-7.1.1/config/lam_setup_cxx.m4 2004-09-26 08:35:24.0 -0700 +++ lam-7.1.1.new/config/lam_setup_cxx.m4 2005-09-21 21:17:50.0 -0700 @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ # Same rationale for g++ as with gcc, above. if test $GXX = yes; then -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 else OPTFLAGS=-O fi diff -ru lam-7.1.1/configure lam-7.1.1.new/configure --- lam-7.1.1/configure 2004-09-26 12:37:08.0 -0700 +++ lam-7.1.1.new/configure 2005-09-21 21:17:50.0 -0700 @@ -4314,7 +4314,7 @@ # just use -O. if test $GCC = yes; then -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 else OPTFLAGS=-O fi @@ -8127,7 +8127,7 @@ # Same rationale for g++ as with gcc, above. if test $GXX = yes; then -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 else OPTFLAGS=-O fi @@ -25069,7 +25069,7 @@ ;; mips-sgi-irix*) -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 TEST_OPTFLAGS=$OPTFLAGS EXAM_OPTFLAGS=$OPTFLAGS ARCH=IRIX @@ -25081,7 +25081,7 @@ # like port_test.cc and request_array_test.cc. Doh!! NOOPT=-O0 - OPTFLAGS=-O3 + OPTFLAGS=-O2 TEST_OPTFLAGS=$NOOPT EXAM_OPTFLAGS=$OPTFLAGS diff -ru lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/bproc/configure lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/bproc/configure --- lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/bproc/configure2004-09-26 12:38:29.0 -0700 +++ lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/bproc/configure2005-09-21 21:17:50.0 -0700 @@ -4168,7 +4168,7 @@ # just use -O. if test $GCC = yes; then -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 else OPTFLAGS=-O fi diff -ru lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/globus/configure lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/globus/configure --- lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/globus/configure 2004-09-26 12:38:38.0 -0700 +++ lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/globus/configure 2005-09-21 21:17:50.0 -0700 @@ -4166,7 +4166,7 @@ # just use -O. if test $GCC = yes; then -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 else OPTFLAGS=-O fi diff -ru lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/rsh/configure lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/rsh/configure --- lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/rsh/configure 2004-09-26 12:38:48.0 -0700 +++ lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/rsh/configure 2005-09-21 21:17:50.0 -0700 @@ -4165,7 +4165,7 @@ # just use -O. if test $GCC = yes; then -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 else OPTFLAGS=-O fi diff -ru lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/slurm/configure lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/slurm/configure --- lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/slurm/configure2004-09-26 12:38:58.0 -0700 +++ lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/slurm/configure2005-09-21 21:17:50.0 -0700 @@ -4166,7 +4166,7 @@ # just use -O. if test $GCC = yes; then -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 else OPTFLAGS=-O fi diff -ru lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/tm/configure lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/tm/configure --- lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/boot/tm/configure 2004-09-26 12:39:08.0 -0700 +++ lam-7.1.1.new/share/ssi/boot/tm/configure 2005-09-21 21:17:50.0 -0700 @@ -4166,7 +4166,7 @@ # just use -O. if test $GCC = yes; then -OPTFLAGS=-O3 +OPTFLAGS=-O2 else OPTFLAGS=-O fi diff -ru lam-7.1.1/share/ssi/coll/impi/configure
Processed: tagging 328206
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 328206 patch Bug#328206: lam: FTBFS on m68k due to ICE, try lower optimization? There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329499: unsatisfied build dependency: librrd0-dev
Package: ganglia-monitor-core Severity: serious Version: 2.5.7-2 needs to be changed to librrd2-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329481: marked as done (swig is unavailable in testing)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:48:43 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329481: swig is unavailable in testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 03:08:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 20:08:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rozz.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIHRk-0001iu-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:08:28 -0700 Received: from c-66-30-24-130.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([66.30.24.130] helo=[192.168.0.161]) by rozz.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1EIHRi-0007zm-Rw; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:08:26 -0400 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:08:26 -0400 From: cckemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: swig is unavailable in testing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: swig Version: 1.3.24-1 Severity: serious Justification: swig is unavailable in testing There does not appear to be a version of swig in debian testing. In order to install swig I needed to download it and related packages from an alternate distribution. It seems to exist in oldstable, stable, and unstable. Stable and unstable use the same version. Package swig * oldstable (interpreters): Generate scripting interfaces to C/C++ code. 1.1.p883-4: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * stable (interpreters): Generate scripting interfaces to C/C++ code 1.3.24-1: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * unstable (interpreters): Generate scripting interfaces to C/C++ code 1.3.24-1: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc Thanks, Charlie -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages swig depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2 GCC support library ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 swig recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 329481-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 05:48:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 22:48:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIJwY-0004KU-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:48:26 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dhcp-sn38-07.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.38.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1BF18596; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 05:48:26 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E884FBF827; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:48:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:48:43 +0200 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cckemp [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#329481: swig is unavailable in testing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Bug#329486: rmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition
On 21 September 2005 at 21:27, Russ Allbery wrote: | Package: rmpi | Severity: serious | Tags: patch | Justification: Policy 2.2.1 | | Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library | package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be | rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing. | | Please upload a new version of rmpi with a versioned build-depends on: | | lam4-dev (= 7.1.1-3.2) | | This is necessary since m68k has not yet built the new lam; otherwise, | the new upload may get built against the old lam libraries on that | platform. | | If you can get to this soon, that would be best, as all of lam, hdf5, | and mpich are currently caught up in a large transition. Done! Uploading as I type ... Thanks for the detailed report, with information that focused it is easy to respond in a timely manner. Regards, Dirk -- Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty. -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#284741: Fixed in NMU of bogl 0.1.18-1.2
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:32:06AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
tag 284741 + fixed
Thanks! Jeff Bailey is going to be adopting bogl, and hopefully he can
give it some overdue attention.
Oh yeah, here's the NMU diff, since the patch in the BTS wasn't quite
enough.
--
see shy jo
diff -ur old/bogl-0.1.18/bogl-font.c bogl-0.1.18/bogl-font.c
--- old/bogl-0.1.18/bogl-font.c 2003-03-23 20:09:18.0 +0100
+++ bogl-0.1.18/bogl-font.c 2005-09-21 19:09:01.0 +0200
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
/* Attempt to malloc NBYTES bytes. Sets a BOGL error message on
failure. Returns the result of the malloc() operation in any
case. */
- static void *
+ void *
smalloc (size_t nbytes)
{
void *p = malloc (nbytes);
diff -ur old/bogl-0.1.18/boml.c bogl-0.1.18/boml.c
--- old/bogl-0.1.18/boml.c 2001-12-01 18:04:42.0 +0100
+++ bogl-0.1.18/boml.c 2005-09-21 19:15:33.0 +0200
@@ -1316,6 +1316,7 @@
default:
/* Ignore additional extension fields. */
+ break;
}
curpos += len;
diff -ur old/bogl-0.1.18/debian/changelog bogl-0.1.18/debian/changelog
--- old/bogl-0.1.18/debian/changelog2004-07-23 17:48:56.0 +0200
+++ bogl-0.1.18/debian/changelog2005-09-21 19:09:33.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+bogl (0.1.18-1.2) unstable; urgency=HIGH
+
+ * NMU
+ * Fix FTBFS with gcc 4.0. Closes: #284741
+
+ -- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:08:20 +0200
+
bogl (0.1.18-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non maintainer upload in favour of debian-boot.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
