Bug#334193: xscreensaver: users unlocked by package upgrade

[Yann Dirson]

Package: xscreensaver
Version: 4.21-7
Severity: grave
Tags: security

When the xscreensaver package is upgraded, all running instances get a
SIGHUP, then restart, but in non-locked state, even when the instance
was locking a screen.

-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
|  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334194: glade_2.12.1-1(experimental/mips/sigrun): FTBFS, should b-depend on Gtk 2.8

[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]

Package: glade
Version: 2.12.1-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

glade 2.12.1-1 fails to build because a build-dep is b0rken:

Automatic build of glade_2.12.1-1 on sigrun by sbuild/mips 1.170.5
Build started at 20051015-1825
**
Checking available source versions...
Fetching source files...
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get 2707kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main glade 2.12.1-1 (dsc) 
[2012B]
Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main glade 2.12.1-1 (tar) 
[2687kB]
Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main glade 2.12.1-1 (diff) 
[17.4kB]
Fetched 2707kB in 4s (568kB/s)
Download complete and in download only mode
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.2.21), dpatch, gettext (>= 0.10.40), 
libgnomecanvas2-dev (>= 2.0.0), libgnomeui-dev (>= 2.9.0), scrollkeeper (>= 
0.1.4), libbonobo2-dev (>= 2.4), libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.1), libgnomedb2-dev (>= 
0.90.3), libgnomeprintui2.2-dev, libbonoboui2-dev (>= 2.0.0), autotools-dev, 
gnome-common (>= 2.8.0), gnome-pkg-tools, libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.6.0), libx11-dev, 
libgda2-dev (>= 0.90.0), libgail-gnome-dev
[...]
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.1 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.8.0... Requested 'gtk+-2.0 >= 
2.8.0' but version of GTK+ is 2.6.10
configure: error: Library requirements (libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.1 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.8.0) 
not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your 
libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #47:
Complete Transient Lockout



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334164: yada: Touches debian/control, first paragraph, modifies Build-Depends on the fly

[Piotr Roszatycki]

severity 334164 normal
thanks

> yada rebuilds the debian/control file when it is run, *AND* it goes and
> *modifies* data in the first paragraph of it.
>
> This is *really* broken and should never be done, except by the
> maintainer itself. The reason is simple: If its done automagically and
> noone checks it, it can produce results which may break later, for
> example in security updates.

If the security update is prapared with sane environment (in sarge system), 
there is no possibility to break the debian/control's Build-Dependencies.

Please, tell me, how yada can break the package? I'm using this tool for years 
and it happened *never*.

In fact, the Build-Depends are changed only for yada itself. If security 
update is prepared with wrong tool, the result will be also wrong. If updated 
is prepared with the proper environment, the result will be OK.

My example - the phpmyadmin 2.6.2-3:

autogenerated debian/control in original package:

Build-Depends-Indep: yada (>= 0.34), po-debconf

autoregenerated debian/control in sid environment:

Build-Depends-Indep: yada (>= 0.48), po-debconf

autogenerated debian/control in sarge environment (i.e. for security update)

Build-Depends-Indep: yada (>= 0.34), po-debconf

So, it is the same version as in original package. Everything is all right.

-- 
 .''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird

[Sven Luther]

On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:59:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I had a look at the patch by Erik, and ended up doing the following
> improvements:
> 
>   * Use GNU getopt to properly handle long-opts
>   * Quote echo'ed strings
>   * Redirect error messages to stderr
>   * Use test -n
>   * Emit error when failing version tests
> 
> 
> Attached is both a diff and - due to the many changes - the complete
> script after my messing with it. How do you like the changes?
> 
> Also, I wonder if the strings in the lines below should better be quoted
> too?
> 
> 
> host_upstream_version=${supported_host_version%%-*}
> 
> target_upstream_version=${supported_target_version%%-*}
> 
> VERSION=$1
> 
> 
> 
>  - Jonas
> 
> 
> P.S.
> 
> I will fix this bug but not use time on switching to SVN this weekend.

I commited the package to svn, added the patch, fixed the manpage
accordyingly, and added the provides, so from me, the packages is ready to be
uploaded. The svn repo is currently at : 

  (alioth svn+ssh checkouts)
  svn+ssh://@svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird
  (anonymous checkouts)
  svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird

Hope this is helpful and i didn't do something stupid.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 334179 is normal

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 334179 normal
Bug#334179: udev 0.070-1 breaks dvb when /bin/sh != bash
Severity set to `normal'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#334164: yada: Touches debian/control, first paragraph, modifies Build-Depends on the fly

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 334164 normal
Bug#334164: yada: Touches debian/control, first paragraph, modifies 
Build-Depends on the fly
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:30:41 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:59:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

> > -while getopts "d:km:o:r:" flag; do
> > -   case $flag in
> > -   d)
> > -   echo "$PROG: $flag unsupported"
> > +TEMP=`getopt -o d:km:o:r: --long
> > supported-host-version:,supported-target-version: -n "$prg" -- "$@"`
> 
> Neat, but i guess that this syntax was not included in the getopt
> documentation i found, or i would have used it.

Beware of the difference between getopts (bash builtin)
and /usr/bin/getopt

See /usr/share/doc/util-linux/examples/getopt-parse.bash.gz (I pretty
much just did a copy'n'paste from there) and getopt(1).


> > +# Check for non-GNU getopt
> > +if [ $? != 0 ] ; then echo "Terminating..." >&2 ; exit 1 ; fi
> 
> Is --long a NGNU getopt feature, and are we always guaranteed to have
> such a thing ? 

Yes, GNU getopt is part of util-linux so I believe it is safe to rely
on, yes.


 - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUiVon7DbMsAkQLgRAkjJAJ9lV0X7ARfWD+r785zaGpQ5tTaJeACfUlZW
C4yjMG9IdKAfDOZmbHDMHfk=
=P7zF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#334201: gosa: samba.schema and samba3.schema not copied

[Thorsten Sandfuchs]

Package: gosa
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,
samba.schema and samba3.scheama weren't copied to /etc/ldap/schema,
therefore the setup process couldn't find the corresponding
schema-definition, and no gosa.conf could be created.

Fix: I found them in /usr/share/doc/gosa/contrib/openldap

thx for fixing

/fux

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.9-050512a
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gosa depends on:
ii  apache  1.3.33-6sarge1   versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  apache2-mpm-worker  2.0.54-5 high speed threaded model for Apac
ii  exim4-daemon-heavy [mai 4.52-1   exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended
ii  fping   2.4b2-to-ipv6-10 sends ICMP ECHO_REQUEST packets to
ii  imagemagick 6:6.0.6.2-2.4Image manipulation programs
ii  libcrypt-smbhash-perl   0.02-6   generate LM/NT hash of a password 
ii  php44:4.3.10-16  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-cgi4:4.3.10-16  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-gd 4:4.3.10-16  GD module for php4
ii  php4-imap   4:4.3.10-16  IMAP module for php4
ii  php4-ldap   4:4.3.10-16  LDAP module for php4
ii  php4-mcrypt 3:4.3.10-1   MCrypt module for php4
ii  php4-mhash  4:4.3.10-16  MHASH module for php4
ii  php4-mysql  4:4.3.10-16  MySQL module for php4

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334206: mozilla-enigmail not decrypting messages

[Caspar Bothmer]

Package: mozilla-enigmail
Version: 2:0.91.4
Severity: grave


Encrypted mails get displayed as attachment which one has to save and 
decrypt on the commandline.  Signed mails get checked normally.


To check just send a mail to yourself using mozilla-enigmail itself.

This behaviour shows up since the last update of mozilla.  I am using 
the official mozilla packages coming with sarge.



caspar


ii  mozilla-browser 1.7.8-1sarge2
ii  mozilla-enigmail0.91-4
ii  mozilla-mailnews1.7.8-1sarge2
ii  mozilla-psm 1.7.8-1sarge2


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#333349: Bug#334180: dovecot-imapd does not load shared libraries or ssl certs

[Elimar Riesebieter]

On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Jaldhar H. Vyas told:

> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Michael Perry wrote:
> 
> >Package: dovecot-imapd
> >Version: 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1
> >
> >On a dist-upgrade this evening this package will not load my ssl certs with 
> >the following error:
> >
> >Oct 15 16:53:44 orion dovecot: imap-login: Can't load certificate file 
> >/etc/ssl/dovecotcert.pem: error:25066067:DSO support 
> >routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could 
> >not load the shared library
> >
> 
> Apparently someone did a non-maintainer upload and botched something in the 
> process.

Same here. IMHO this is relatet to the dependency to openssl 0.9.8
in 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1 ans aparently corresponds to Bug#334180?

Elimar

-- 
  Numeric stability is probably not all that 
  important when you're guessing;-)


pgp7bmDDLpRJC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#334201: gosa: samba.schema and samba3.schema not copied

[Cajus Pollmeier]

Am 16.10.2005 um 12:21 schrieb Thorsten Sandfuchs:


Package: gosa
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,
samba.schema and samba3.scheama weren't copied to /etc/ldap/schema,
therefore the setup process couldn't find the corresponding
schema-definition, and no gosa.conf could be created.

Fix: I found them in /usr/share/doc/gosa/contrib/openldap


The gosa package is not responsible for installing samba related  
schema files. Please refere to your samba documentation.


Greetings,
Cajus


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334201: marked as done (gosa: samba.schema and samba3.schema not copied)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:51:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334201: gosa: samba.schema and samba3.schema not copied
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 10:21:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 03:21:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER5e5-00071s-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 03:21:37 -0700
Received: from svr01.com (p15181179.pureserver.info) [212.227.49.163] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ER5e3-0002HX-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:21:36 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thorsten Sandfuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gosa: samba.schema and samba3.schema not copied
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:21:43 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gosa
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,
samba.schema and samba3.scheama weren't copied to /etc/ldap/schema,
therefore the setup process couldn't find the corresponding
schema-definition, and no gosa.conf could be created.

Fix: I found them in /usr/share/doc/gosa/contrib/openldap

thx for fixing

/fux

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.9-050512a
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gosa depends on:
ii  apache  1.3.33-6sarge1   versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  apache2-mpm-worker  2.0.54-5 high speed threaded model for Apac
ii  exim4-daemon-heavy [mai 4.52-1   exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended
ii  fping   2.4b2-to-ipv6-10 sends ICMP ECHO_REQUEST packets to
ii  imagemagick 6:6.0.6.2-2.4Image manipulation programs
ii  libcrypt-smbhash-perl   0.02-6   generate LM/NT hash of a password 
ii  php44:4.3.10-16  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-cgi4:4.3.10-16  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-gd 4:4.3.10-16  GD module for php4
ii  php4-imap   4:4.3.10-16  IMAP module for php4
ii  php4-ldap   4:4.3.10-16  LDAP module for php4
ii  php4-mcrypt 3:4.3.10-1   MCrypt module for php4
ii  php4-mhash  4:4.3.10-16  MHASH module for php4
ii  php4-mysql  4:4.3.10-16  MySQL module for php4

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 334201-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 10:51:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 03:51:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rosi.naasa.net [212.8.0.13] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER67C-0001g5-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 03:51:43 -0700
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (p54963DC7.dip.t-dialin.net [84.150.61.199])
by rosi.naasa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F4A22AEB5;
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:51:40 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#334201: gosa: samba.schema and samba3.schema not copied
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:51:39 +0200
To: Thorsten Sandfuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Am 16.10.2005 um 12:21 schrieb 

Bug#331634: Intention to NMU

[Luk Claes]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi

Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.

Note that this also resolves the build error and fixes the clean target.

Cheers

Luk


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUjbS5UTeB5t8Mo0RAlQsAKCM4CiZvNPhqLHMSAqLoC1mb4DNiwCeMb3s
3+2JPg6FFlpgAIbW/SE70IE=
=05wm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u pwlib-1.8.7/debian/control pwlib-1.8.7/debian/control
--- pwlib-1.8.7/debian/control
+++ pwlib-1.8.7/debian/control
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 Section: libdevel
 Architecture: any
 Depends: libpt-1.8.3c2 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, libssl-dev, 
libldap2-dev, libsdl1.2-dev, libexpat1-dev, libsasl2-dev
+Replaces: libpt-1.8.3c2 (<< 1.8.4-3)
 Description: Portable Windows Library development files
  This package contains the headers and a static version of the library
  PWLib, which is a moderately large class library that has its genesis
diff -u pwlib-1.8.7/debian/changelog pwlib-1.8.7/debian/changelog
--- pwlib-1.8.7/debian/changelog
+++ pwlib-1.8.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+pwlib (1.8.7-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Replace libpt-1.8.3c2 (<< 1.8.4-3). (Closes: #331634)
+
+ -- Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:58:55 +0200
+
 pwlib (1.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Mimas_patch2 is 1.8.7. And shlibdeps imposes this as version.
diff -u pwlib-1.8.7/debian/rules pwlib-1.8.7/debian/rules
--- pwlib-1.8.7/debian/rules
+++ pwlib-1.8.7/debian/rules
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
$(checkdir)
-rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp patch-stamp
if [ -f Makefile ];then \
-   -$(MAKE) PWLIBDIR=$(PWD) clean;\
+   $(MAKE) PWLIBDIR=$(PWD) clean;\
fi
-rm -f include/ptbuildopts.h
-rm -f Makefile config.log config.status autotools
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- pwlib-1.8.7.orig/src/ptclib/pssl.cxx
+++ pwlib-1.8.7/src/ptclib/pssl.cxx
@@ -297,14 +297,14 @@
 
 PSSLPrivateKey::PSSLPrivateKey(const BYTE * keyData, PINDEX keySize)
 {
-  key = d2i_AutoPrivateKey(NULL, (BYTE **)&keyData, keySize);
+  key = d2i_AutoPrivateKey(NULL, (const unsigned char **)&keyData, keySize);
 }
 
 
 PSSLPrivateKey::PSSLPrivateKey(const PBYTEArray & keyData)
 {
   const BYTE * keyPtr = keyData;
-  key = d2i_AutoPrivateKey(NULL, (BYTE **)&keyPtr, keyData.GetSize());
+  key = d2i_AutoPrivateKey(NULL, (const unsigned char **)&keyPtr, 
keyData.GetSize());
 }
 
 
@@ -472,14 +472,14 @@
 
 PSSLCertificate::PSSLCertificate(const BYTE * certData, PINDEX certSize)
 {
-  certificate = d2i_X509(NULL, (unsigned char **)&certData, certSize);
+  certificate = d2i_X509(NULL, (const unsigned char **)&certData, certSize);
 }
 
 
 PSSLCertificate::PSSLCertificate(const PBYTEArray & certData)
 {
   const BYTE * certPtr = certData;
-  certificate = d2i_X509(NULL, (unsigned char **)&certPtr, certData.GetSize());
+  certificate = d2i_X509(NULL, (const unsigned char **)&certPtr, 
certData.GetSize());
 }
 
 
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@
   PBase64::Decode(certStr, certData);
   if (certData.GetSize() > 0) {
 const BYTE * certPtr = certData;
-certificate = d2i_X509(NULL, (unsigned char **)&certPtr, 
certData.GetSize());
+certificate = d2i_X509(NULL, (const unsigned char **)&certPtr, 
certData.GetSize());
   }
   else
 certificate = NULL;
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- pwlib-1.8.7.orig/plugins/vidinput_dc/Makefile
+++ pwlib-1.8.7/plugins/vidinput_dc/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+ifndef PWLIBDIR
+PWLIBDIR = $(HOME)/pwlib
+endif
+
+PLUGIN_NAME= dc
+PLUGIN_FAMILY  = device/videoinput
+PLUGIN_LIBS= -lraw1394 -ldv -ldc1394_control
+PLUGIN_SOURCES = video4dc1394.cxx
+
+CFLAGS = 
+
+include ../../make/plugins.mak

Bug#334215: crack-attack: Function called without first calling 'glutInit'.

[Samuel Mimram]

Package: crack-attack
Version: 1.1.14-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

Crack-attack won't launch anymore:

% crack-attack --solo
Crack Attack! v1.1.14
freeglut  ERROR:  Function  called without first
calling 'glutInit'.

The attached patch seems to fix the issue.

Thanks,

Samuel.

BTW: the package is not lintian clean!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages crack-attack depends on:
ii  freeglut3 2.4.0-2OpenGL Utility Toolkit
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.3-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-2  GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.3-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libglu1-xorg [libglu1]6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Mesa OpenGL utility library [X.Org
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.10-1   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-3Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1]  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Mesa 3D graphics library [X.Org]
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m

crack-attack recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- crack-attack-1.1.14.orig/src/Attack.cxx
+++ crack-attack-1.1.14/src/Attack.cxx
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
 int main ( int argc, char **argv )
 {
   setupLocalDataDirectory();
+  glutInit(&argc, argv);
 #ifdef WANT_GTK
   if (argc <= 1) return gui_main(argc, argv);
 #endif

Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:43:10 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> > I will fix this bug but not use time on switching to SVN this
> > weekend.
> 
> I commited the package to svn, added the patch, fixed the manpage
> accordyingly, and added the provides, so from me, the packages is
> ready to be uploaded. The svn repo is currently at : 
> 
>   (alioth svn+ssh checkouts)
>   svn+ssh://@svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird
>   (anonymous checkouts)
>   svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird
> 
> Hope this is helpful and i didn't do something stupid.

Hm. I think you did, actually: The reason I hesitated adding yaird to
SVN is that it is not a Debian-native package, so I believe it makes
better sense only to maintain the debian subdir here and use a virgin
tarball from upstream.

I am relatively new to that approach and had help making awstats
group-maintained that way. So I wanted to make an excercise out of
this, figuring out exactly how to set it up, also for setting up
group-maintainance of the remaining 40 packages of "mine".

And also, I suggested an improved patch, and wanted to hold my breath
until later today for comments from Erik before deciding if I want to
take my chances and use that or the earlier one from him.


 - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUj8bn7DbMsAkQLgRAiP2AJ4lksJ2TLdU1/h7yEQnWpgzw17FJACdGuND
WW6HYuLgQx9X6emiXaEEjIw=
=LA3Q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Processed: Confirmed, already forwarded

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 326714 confirmed
Bug#326714: kbear crashes at every file transfer
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed

> forwarded 326714 http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1179759
Bug#326714: kbear crashes at every file transfer
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to 
http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1179759.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#331634: Intention to NMU

[Kilian Krause]

Hi Luk,

Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
> 
> Note that this also resolves the build error and fixes the clean target.

no need to NMU, I'll include most of your patch and do the upload for
libssl later today. N.b. your clean-target-fix does break with
svn-buildpackage and is therefore unlikely to be included.

Apart from that, The rest looks nicely and I'll feed the missing bits
into upstream CVS to make sure subsequent releases have that fixed code.
Thanks!

-- 
Best regards,
 Kilian


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#334221: gbib: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: Old gettext macro.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: gbib
Version: 0.1.2-7
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches.  During
configure we see:
checking for gettext in libc... no

Which later results in:
c++ -o gbib -g bibentry.o bibfiles.o bibrc.o gui.o lyxsup.o entrydialog.o lyxco
nnect.o entrydef.o entrylist.o recent.o command_dlg.o   -rdynamic -L/usr/lib -L
/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnomeui -lart_lgpl -lgdk_imlib -lSM -lICE -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodul
e -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lgnome -lgnomesupport -lesd -laudiofile -lm -ldb-3 -l
glib /intl/libintl.a
c++: /intl/libintl.a: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [gbib] Error 1

What you should do is recreate your auto* files.  It should have a new
version of the macro that fixes the problem.  It looks
like you only need to run aclocal-1.4 and autoconf to fix it.

It seems that aclocal-1.4 now requires autoconf2.50
instead of 2.13, and using autoconf2.50 seems to give
various problems.  It might be handier if you just copied
the requires parts from /usr/share/aclocal/gettext.m4

Please also take a look at
/usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz on how to
avoid timestamp skew issues that might result from
updating those files.i


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird

[Sven Luther]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 12:03:20PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:30:41 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:59:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> 
> > > -while getopts "d:km:o:r:" flag; do
> > > - case $flag in
> > > - d)
> > > - echo "$PROG: $flag unsupported"
> > > +TEMP=`getopt -o d:km:o:r: --long
> > > supported-host-version:,supported-target-version: -n "$prg" -- "$@"`
> > 
> > Neat, but i guess that this syntax was not included in the getopt
> > documentation i found, or i would have used it.
> 
> Beware of the difference between getopts (bash builtin)
> and /usr/bin/getopt
> 
> See /usr/share/doc/util-linux/examples/getopt-parse.bash.gz (I pretty
> much just did a copy'n'paste from there) and getopt(1).

Ah, ... I looked at the bash-builtin one inded.

> > > +# Check for non-GNU getopt
> > > +if [ $? != 0 ] ; then echo "Terminating..." >&2 ; exit 1 ; fi
> > 
> > Is --long a NGNU getopt feature, and are we always guaranteed to have
> > such a thing ? 
> 
> Yes, GNU getopt is part of util-linux so I believe it is safe to rely
> on, yes.

Cool.

BTW, i uploadeda patched yaird to http://people.debian.org/~luther/ramdisk
too, so the set is complete, provided my kernel-package patch is not broken.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[stripping implied recipients...]

On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:52:59 +0200
Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Hope this is helpful and i didn't do something stupid.
> 
> Hm. I think you did, actually

Sorry - here it was again: Outright "stupid" would only be if you could
read my mind. But yes, I did have a reason to postpone.

Do what you like: "We're all in it together"[1] :-)


 - Jonas


[1] Harry Tuttle, Heating Engineer - in the movie "Brazil".

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUkevn7DbMsAkQLgRAo9LAJ46ld3piIMUdjjyBPm1k+BIqXrLegCdFXRW
szcuK6D0Hxaf+g4x6FlIWVU=
=JCru
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird

[Sven Luther]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:52:59PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:43:10 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> > > I will fix this bug but not use time on switching to SVN this
> > > weekend.
> > 
> > I commited the package to svn, added the patch, fixed the manpage
> > accordyingly, and added the provides, so from me, the packages is
> > ready to be uploaded. The svn repo is currently at : 
> > 
> >   (alioth svn+ssh checkouts)
> >   svn+ssh://@svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird
> >   (anonymous checkouts)
> >   svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird
> > 
> > Hope this is helpful and i didn't do something stupid.
> 
> Hm. I think you did, actually: The reason I hesitated adding yaird to
> SVN is that it is not a Debian-native package, so I believe it makes
> better sense only to maintain the debian subdir here and use a virgin
> tarball from upstream.

Well, this is nothing problematic, it can be changed still, that said, Erik
seemed interested in maintaining it inside svn on alioth, but maybe he meant a
separate repo ? 

> I am relatively new to that approach and had help making awstats
> group-maintained that way. So I wanted to make an excercise out of
> this, figuring out exactly how to set it up, also for setting up
> group-maintainance of the remaining 40 packages of "mine".

Hehe, well, you can still ignore what i did (or move it aside or something)
and do it like you intented :)

> And also, I suggested an improved patch, and wanted to hold my breath
> until later today for comments from Erik before deciding if I want to
> take my chances and use that or the earlier one from him.

Well, revision control system are for holding most of the changes, it is not
as if i NMUed the package or somethign :)

I just needed something to test the kernel-package changes, so ...

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334228: renders network unusable

[Robert Millan]

Package: kfreebsd-5
Severity: critical

There's a critical usability problem with version 5.4-2.  See:

  
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/glibc-bsd-devel/2005-October/000563.html

I have verified that 5.4-1 is not affected.  Since the differences between these
versions are minimal:

   * Enabled 586 and 686 CPUs support on the 486 flavour and 686 CPUs
 support on the 586 flavour (closes: bug#332836).
   * Use --march to optimize flavours (closes: bug#332897).

It's almost 1:1 sure caused by -march flag (sorry, my fault :(()

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to C)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334230: libgpcl-dev: headers in wrong directory on alpha, ia64

[Steve Langasek]

Package: libgpcl-dev
Version: 2.32-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable or mostly so

The libgpcl-dev package has its header file in the wrong place on alpha and
ia64:

$ dpkg -c ../non-free/g/gpcl/libgpcl-dev_2.32-1_alpha.deb |grep '\.h$'
-rw-r--r-- root/root  4921 2005-05-01 14:38:15 ./usr/include/gpc.h
$

On all other architectures this header is installed as
/usr/include/gpcl/gpc.h, which is where octave-gpc, its one
reverse-dependency, looks for it.  As a result, octave-gpc now fails to
build on alpha and ia64.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#328846: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#328846: xfce4-systray: Cannot use the Systray plugin

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hi,

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:25:57 +0300
Jani Monoses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I remember having something similar, and it turned out that a system
> tray was already added in the taskbar so it would not create
> another.But the error message is misleading indeed if it's your case
> too.So if you have little icons in the upper right corner chances are
> you already have the systray running.

After a contact with a XFCE developer, it turned out that you were
right: the systray was already in the taskbar, while I was trying to
add it to the panel. However, as you said, I found the error message
quite misleading, since it doesn't allow to understand why it doesn't
want to add the systray to the panel.

So, I think this bug per-se can be closed, however it would be nice if
upstream could change the error message to something more meaningful.

Sincerly,

Thomas
-- 
PETAZZONI Thomas - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://{thomas,sos,kos}.enix.org - Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://{agenda,livret}dulibre.org
Fingerprint : 0BE1 4CF3 CEA4 AC9D CC6E  1624 F653 CB30 98D3 F7A7


pgpmWfg7QhL96.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird

[Sven Luther]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:52:59PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:43:10 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> > > I will fix this bug but not use time on switching to SVN this
> > > weekend.
> > 
> > I commited the package to svn, added the patch, fixed the manpage
> > accordyingly, and added the provides, so from me, the packages is
> > ready to be uploaded. The svn repo is currently at : 
> > 
> >   (alioth svn+ssh checkouts)
> >   svn+ssh://@svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird
> >   (anonymous checkouts)
> >   svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird
> > 
> > Hope this is helpful and i didn't do something stupid.
> 
> Hm. I think you did, actually: The reason I hesitated adding yaird to
> SVN is that it is not a Debian-native package, so I believe it makes
> better sense only to maintain the debian subdir here and use a virgin
> tarball from upstream.

Oh, BTW, it would be nice to not output the following message :

   mkinitrd.yaird: host version too old

when calling the --supported-(host|target)-version options :)

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird

[Sven Luther]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 02:29:35PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> [stripping implied recipients...]
> 
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:52:59 +0200
> Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > > Hope this is helpful and i didn't do something stupid.
> > 
> > Hm. I think you did, actually
> 
> Sorry - here it was again: Outright "stupid" would only be if you could
> read my mind. But yes, I did have a reason to postpone.

Well as said, i did not upload the package, only put it in the repo while i am
working on stuff, nothing permanent, so at worse it can be erased :)

> Do what you like: "We're all in it together"[1] :-)

Hehe, ...

In the meantime, i am refining the kernel-package patch, but am i right in
thinking there is no way to use yaird in a chroot ? It complained about no
root in /etc/fstab :)

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#315120: marked as done (apt-spy: segfault with updated mirror list)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315120: fixed in apt-spy 3.1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2005 17:36:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 20 10:36:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-066-026-083-113.nc.res.rr.com (max.bungled.net) 
[66.26.83.113] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DkQC1-0001NV-00; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:36:17 -0700
Received: by max.bungled.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 33398900CF; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:36:16 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathan Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-spy: segfault with updated mirror list
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:36:15 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apt-spy
Version: 3.1-13
Severity: important

Apt-spy segfaults when searching for a fast mirror.

Reproducable on both i386 and PPC:

1) Install apt-spy
2) apt-spy update
3) apt-spy -d testing -o /tmp/test.out
4) apt-spy segfaults
-Nathan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-ben1
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages apt-spy depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcurl37.13.2-2 Multi-protocol file transfer libra

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 315120-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 13:08:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 06:08:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER89P-0005lM-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:02:07 -0700
From: Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#315120: fixed in apt-spy 3.1-14
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:02:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: apt-spy
Source-Version: 3.1-14

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-spy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-spy_3.1-14.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/apt-spy/apt-spy_3.1-14.diff.gz
apt-spy_3.1-14.dsc
  to pool/main/a/apt-spy/apt-spy_3.1-14.dsc
apt-spy_3.1-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt-spy/apt-spy_3.1-14_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated apt-spy package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:42:22 +
Source: apt-spy
Binary: apt-spy
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.1-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 apt-spy- writes a sources.list file based on bandwidth tests
Closes: 315120 317585 317586 317588 317589 317593
Changes: 
 apt-spy (3.1-14) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ ssta ]
   * Change build-depends on libcurl3-dev to libcurl3-openssl-dev
   * Apply some patches from J

Bug#334235: visualboyadvance: FTBFS: g++ needs lots of RAM.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: visualboyadvance
Version: 1.7.2-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build on some arches because g++ seems
to need lots of RAM.  On arm and mipsel it failed with a message
like:
cc1plus: out of memory allocating 616522820 bytes after a total of 47400632 byt 
es
make[3]: *** [GBA.o] Error 1

While on amd64, it gets OOM killed (after using more than 1 GB of
RAM) and you get:
g++: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#334170: lirc-modules-source: modifies conffiles in postinst

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 334170 + patch
Bug#334170: lirc-modules-source: modifies conffiles in postinst
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334170: lirc-modules-source: modifies conffiles in postinst

[Nicolas Boullis]

tags 334170 + patch
thanks

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 05:04:09AM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > (I might write the corresponding patch if you wish.)
> 
> Please! :)

Here it is.


Cheers,

Nicolas
--- lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/rules
+++ lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/rules
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
install --mode=644 debian/conf.placeholder \
debian/tmp/etc/lirc/lircmd.conf
install --mode=644 debian/hardware.conf debian/tmp/etc/lirc/
-   install --mode=644 debian/lirc-modules-source.conf debian/tmp/etc/lirc/
+   install --mode=644 debian/lirc-modules-source.conf 
debian/tmp/usr/share/lirc-modules-source.conf.tpl
#rm debian/lirc/usr/lib/liblirc_client.la
mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/src/modules/lirc
cp -dpR drivers debian/tmp/usr/src/modules/lirc/
--- lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/lirc-modules-source.postinst
+++ lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/lirc-modules-source.postinst
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
LIRC_SIR_PORT LIRC_SIR_IRQ LIRC_SIR_CFLAGS \
LIRC_PARALLEL_PORT LIRC_PARALLEL_IRQ LIRC_PARALLEL_TIMER
   do
-if ! grep -q "^$VAR\>" /etc/lirc/$package.conf; then
-  echo "$VAR=\"UNCONFIGURED\"" >> /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+if ! grep -q "^$VAR\>" "$1"; then
+  echo "$VAR=\"UNCONFIGURED\"" >> "$1"
 fi
   done
 
@@ -35,12 +35,13 @@
db_get $package/serial_port
LIRC_SERIAL_PORT="$RET"
 
+   tmpfile=`tempfile`
sed \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SERIAL_IRQ\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SERIAL_IRQ\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SERIAL_PORT\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SERIAL_PORT\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SERIAL_CFLAGS\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SERIAL_CFLAGS\"/" \
-   /etc/lirc/$package.conf > /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp
-   mv /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+   "$1" > "$tmpfile"
+   mv "$tmpfile" "$1"
 }
 save_sir_conf ()
 {
@@ -53,12 +54,13 @@
db_get $package/sir_port
LIRC_SIR_PORT="$RET"
 
+   tmpfile=`tempfile`
sed \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SIR_IRQ\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SIR_IRQ\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SIR_PORT\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SIR_PORT\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SIR_CFLAGS\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SIR_CFLAGS\"/" \
-   /etc/lirc/$package.conf > /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp
-   mv /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+   "$1" > "$tmpfile"
+   mv "$tmpfile" "$1"
 }
 save_parallel_conf ()
 {
@@ -69,12 +71,13 @@
db_get $package/parallel_timer
LIRC_PARALLEL_TIMER="$RET"
 
+   tmpfile=`tempfile`
sed \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_PARALLEL_IRQ\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_PARALLEL_IRQ\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_PARALLEL_PORT\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_PARALLEL_PORT\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_PARALLEL_TIMER\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_PARALLEL_TIMER\"/" \
-   /etc/lirc/$package.conf > /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp
-   mv /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+   "$1" > "$tmpfile"
+   mv "$tmpfile" "$1"
 }
 
 . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
@@ -84,33 +87,40 @@
 
 if [ "$1" = "configure" ] && [ -f /etc/lirc/$package.conf ]; then
 
-  check_config_file
+  newfile=`tempfile`
+  cat /usr/share/lirc-modules-source.conf.tpl > "$newfile"
+
+  check_config_file "$newfile"
 
   db_get $package/drivers
   DRIVERS=$RET
 
+  tmpfile=`tempfile`
   sed \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_MODULES\)=.*/\1=\"$DRIVERS\"/" \
-   /etc/lirc/$package.conf > /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp
-  mv /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+   "$newfile" > "$tmpfile"
+  mv "$tmpfile" "$newfile"
 
   #Serial configuration
   if expr "$DRIVERS" : '.*\' > /dev/null
   then
-   save_serial_conf
+   save_serial_conf "$newfile"
   fi
 
   #SIR configuration
   if expr "$DRIVERS" : '.*\' > /dev/null
   then
-   save_sir_conf
+   save_sir_conf "$newfile"
   fi
 
   #Parallel configuration
   if expr "$DRIVERS" : '.*\' > /dev/null
   then
-   save_parallel_conf
+   save_parallel_conf "$newfile"
   fi
+
+  /usr/bin/ucf --debconf-ok --three-way "$newfile" 
/etc/lirc/lirc-modules-source.conf
+  rm "$newfile"
 fi
 
 
--- lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/lirc-modules-source.install
+++ lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/lirc-modules-source.install
@@ -2 +2 @@
-etc/lirc/lirc-modules-source.conf
+usr/share/lirc-modules-source.conf.tpl

Bug#272006: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:56:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2004 19:44:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 16 12:44:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C82Au-0004KF-00; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:44:12 -0700
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr14.m-online.net [192.168.3.144])
by svr8.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A706850C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:44:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-7-60.mnet-online.de [82.135.7.60])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF93B128702
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:44:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) 
[+prerelease])
id 1C82Ap-0003VK-OX
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:44:07 +0200
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:44:07 +0200
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS in experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: etw
Version: 3.0.0beta2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Automatic build of etw_3.0.0beta2-1 on freyja by sbuild/alpha 1.170.5
Build started at 20040916-0045
**
Checking available source versions...
Fetching source files...
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get 8361kB of source archives.
Get:1 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main etw 3.0.0beta2-1 
(dsc) [616B]
Get:2 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main etw 3.0.0beta2-1 
(tar) [8360kB]
Get:3 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main etw 3.0.0beta2-1 
(diff) [398B]
Fetched 8361kB in 1s (6747kB/s)
Download complete and in download only mode
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libgtk1.2-dev, libsdl1.2-dev
Checking for already installed source dependencies...
debhelper: missing
libgtk1.2-dev: missing
libsdl1.2-dev: missing
Checking for source dependency conflicts...
  /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install 
debhelper libgtk1.2-dev libsdl1.2-dev
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following extra packages will be installed:
  aalib1 aalib1-dev alsa-headers debconf debconf-i18n debconf-utils file
  gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libasound2 libasound2-dev
  libglib1.2 libglib1.2-dev libglib2.0-0 libgpmg1 libgtk1.2 libgtk1.2-common
  liblocale-gettext-perl libmagic1 libncurses5-dev libsdl1.2debian
  libsdl1.2debian-oss libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl
  libtext-wrapi18n-perl libx11-6 libx11-dev libxext-dev libxext6 libxi-dev
  libxi6 libxv-dev libxv1 pkg-config po-debconf slang1 slang1-dev x-dev
  xfree86-common xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu xlibmesa-glu-dev
  xlibs-data xlibs-static-dev zlib1g-dev 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  aalib1 aalib1-dev alsa-headers debconf debconf-i18n debconf-utils debhelper
  file gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libasound2 libasound2-dev
  libglib1.2 libglib1.2-dev libglib2.0-0 libgpmg1 libgtk1.2 libgtk1.2-common
  libgtk1.2-dev liblocale-gettext-perl libmagic1 libncurses5-dev libsdl1.2-dev
  libsdl1.2debian libsdl1.2debian-oss libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl
  libtext-wrapi18n-perl libx11-6 libx11-dev libxext-dev libxext6 libxi-dev
  libxi6 libxv-dev libxv1 pkg-config po-debconf slang1 slang1-dev x-dev
  xfree86-common xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu xlibmesa-glu-dev
  xlibs-data xlibs-static-dev zlib1g-dev 
0 packages upgraded, 51 newly installed, 0 to remove and 9  not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/19.8MB of archives. After unpacking 77.9MB will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package liblocale-gettext-perl.
(Rea

Bug#317177: marked as done (libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317177: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2005 20:28:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 06 13:28:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wiggis.ethz.ch [129.132.86.197] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DqGVp-0004ZL-00; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:28:53 -0700
Received: from wiggis3.ethz.ch (wiggis3.ethz.ch [192.168.127.4])
by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52FF423A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 22:28:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from kermit (adsl-62-167-188-151.adslplus.ch [62.167.188.151])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6E64067
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 22:28:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by kermit (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9D16B8242; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 22:28:50 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From: Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:21:07 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at phys.ethz.ch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Package: allegro4.1
Version: unknown
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: uninstallable in unstable (policy 5.3)

Hi!

A new release of jack-audio-connection-kit (0.100.0-2) has been uploaded
to Debian unstable. The old library libjack0.80.0-0 (and
libjack0.80.0-dev) have been removed and replaced with libjack0.100.0-0
and libjack0.100.0-dev since the API changed in some parts. For most
packages that means a simple rebuild.

Since libjack0.80.0 has been removed from unstable, this is a
release-critical issue.

A few notes about how to resolve this bug:

   1.   Please Build-Depend only on libjack0.100.0-dev. Build-Depending
   on libjack-dev as a virtual alternative allows the autobuilders to
   build against the old libjack0.80.0 if they find it. (Versioned
   virtual dependencies probably don't work.)

   2.   There are some packages (like for example xmms-jackasyn) which
   "accidently" obtain a dependency on libjack0.80.0-0 but do not
   Build-Depend on it. In my opinion this is incorrect. But if you want
   to maintain that indirect dependency, you will have to coordinate
   with the package's maintainer whose package you are build-depending
   on (libjackasyn-dev in the case of xmms-jackasyn) and and only upload
   your package (xmms-jackasyn; with a suitable _versioned_
   build-dependency on the other package, libjackasy-dev) iff the other
   package has already been uploaded (and built on as many architectures
   as possible to lighten the pressure of failed builds). =20
  =20
   3.   If this transition collides with the C++ transition for your
   package (because it may be/contain a C++ library), then please follow
   the timeline of the C++ transition instead of this one.

(Thanks to Adeodato Sim=C3=B3 for these hints).

A list of the packages for each maintainer and a list of the affected
source packages has been attached.

Robert.



Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hydrogen
ladcca-bin
ladccad
libjackasyn0
meterbridge
puredata
qjackctl
rezound
seq24
snd-gtk
sooperlooper
stk

Enrique Robledo Arnuncio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
freqtweak
rosegarden4
tapiir

Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
supercollider
xmms-jackasyn

Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
konq-plugins
kpresenter
kscreensaver
noatun-plugins

Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spiralsynthmodular

Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers 
akode
artsbuilder
juk
kaboodle
kdelibs4
krec
kwifimanager
libarts1-audiofile
libarts1-mpeglib
libkonq4
noatun

Free Ekana

Bug#281550: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:56:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2004 16:27:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 16 08:27:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CU6At-pk-00; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:27:23 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr8.m-online.net [192.168.3.138])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889933303
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:27:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-62-245-160-155.mnet-online.de 
[62.245.160.155])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:27:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) 
[+prerelease])
id 1CU6Ao-0002Sr-TB
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:27:18 +0100
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:27:18 +0100
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS in experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: etw
Version: 3.0.0beta2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

is there a dependency missing?

Cheers,
Andi

Automatic build of etw_3.0.0beta2-1 on swawa by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5
Build started at 20041116-1711
**
Checking available source versions...
Fetching source files...
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get 8361kB of source archives.
Get:1 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main etw 3.0.0beta2-1 
(dsc) [616B]
Get:2 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main etw 3.0.0beta2-1 
(tar) [8360kB]
Get:3 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main etw 3.0.0beta2-1 
(diff) [398B]
Fetched 8361kB in 7s (1140kB/s)
Download complete and in download only mode
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libgtk1.2-dev, libsdl1.2-dev
Checking for already installed source dependencies...
debhelper: missing
libgtk1.2-dev: missing
libsdl1.2-dev: missing
Checking for source dependency conflicts...
  /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install 
debhelper libgtk1.2-dev libsdl1.2-dev
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following extra packages will be installed:
  aalib1 aalib1-dev debconf-utils file gettext gettext-base html2text
  intltool-debian libasound2 libasound2-dev libglib1.2 libglib1.2-dev
  libglib2.0-0 libgpmg1 libgtk1.2 libgtk1.2-common libmagic1 libncurses5-dev
  libsdl1.2debian libsdl1.2debian-oss libx11-6 libx11-dev libxext-dev libxext6
  libxi-dev libxi6 libxv-dev libxv1 pkg-config po-debconf slang1 slang1-dev
  x-dev xfree86-common xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu
  xlibmesa-glu-dev xlibs-data xlibs-static-dev zlib1g-dev 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  aalib1 aalib1-dev debconf-utils debhelper file gettext gettext-base html2text
  intltool-debian libasound2 libasound2-dev libglib1.2 libglib1.2-dev
  libglib2.0-0 libgpmg1 libgtk1.2 libgtk1.2-common libgtk1.2-dev libmagic1
  libncurses5-dev libsdl1.2-dev libsdl1.2debian libsdl1.2debian-oss libx11-6
  libx11-dev libxext-dev libxext6 libxi-dev libxi6 libxv-dev libxv1 pkg-config
  po-debconf slang1 slang1-dev x-dev xfree86-common xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-gl-dev
  xlibmesa-glu xlibmesa-glu-dev xlibs-data xlibs-static-dev zlib1g-dev 
0 packages upgraded, 44 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/18.7MB of archives. After unpacking 63.8MB will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package libgtk1.2-common.
(Reading database ... 7963 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libgtk1.2-common (from .../libgtk1.2-common_1.2.10-17_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libglib1.2.
Unpacking libglib1.2

Bug#320258: marked as done (atanks: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lXxf86dga)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318363: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2005 21:49:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 27 14:49:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DxtmC-0003LX-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:49:20 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id ED6B83BC0AE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:49:19 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93613BC051
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:49:19 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 9BB5A26136; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:49:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:49:19 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: atanks: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lXxf86dga
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: atanks
Version: 1.1.0-4
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
g++ globaldata.o environment.o player.o virtobj.o floattext.o teleport.o physob
j.o decor.o explosion.o missile.o beam.o tank.o atanks.o fade.o perlin.o sky.o
-o ../atanks -DLINUX -DVERSION=\"1.1.0\"
-DDATA_DIR=\"/usr/share/games/atanks\"
  `allegro-config --libs`
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXxf86dga
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [../atanks] Error 1

I guess this is a missing build depedency caused by the x.org
transition.  It looks like you need a build depedency on
libxxf86dga-dev.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 318363-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 13:48:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 06:48:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER8qx-0005dq-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318363: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: allegro4.1
Source-Version: 2:4.1.15-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
allegro4.1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro-doc_4.1.15-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro-doc_4.1.15-6_all.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-arts_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-arts_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-esd_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-esd_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-jack_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-jack_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-svgalib_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-svgalib_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1_4.1.15-6_i386.deb

Bug#318363: marked as done (allegro-config --libs lists -lXxf86dga)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318363: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2005 03:08:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 20:08:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DtGYx-0007RA-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:08:31 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6F38UE2092098
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dt5g2-t5-Iq
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:31:06 -0700
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:31:06 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: allegro-config --libs lists -lXxf86dga
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: liballegro-dev
Version: 2:4.1.15-5
Severity: serious

The output of "allegro-config --libs" contains -lXxf86dga, but
libXxf86dga is no longer available.  This prevents alogg from
building.

--=20
Matt

--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1oU5fNdgYxVXvBARAmN9AJ44c+ImMkPH0mein/6FTds6eD20GwCeM8KT
mQybEO++CM2D4ZaYmrt/vS4=
=vnp3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--ibTvN161/egqYuK8--

---
Received: (at 318363-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 13:48:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 06:48:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER8qx-0005dq-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318363: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: allegro4.1
Source-Version: 2:4.1.15-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
allegro4.1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro-doc_4.1.15-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro-doc_4.1.15-6_all.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-arts_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-arts_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-esd_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-esd_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-jack_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to 

Bug#318363: marked as done (allegro-config --libs lists -lXxf86dga)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320258: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2005 03:08:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 20:08:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DtGYx-0007RA-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:08:31 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6F38UE2092098
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dt5g2-t5-Iq
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:31:06 -0700
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:31:06 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: allegro-config --libs lists -lXxf86dga
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: liballegro-dev
Version: 2:4.1.15-5
Severity: serious

The output of "allegro-config --libs" contains -lXxf86dga, but
libXxf86dga is no longer available.  This prevents alogg from
building.

--=20
Matt

--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1oU5fNdgYxVXvBARAmN9AJ44c+ImMkPH0mein/6FTds6eD20GwCeM8KT
mQybEO++CM2D4ZaYmrt/vS4=
=vnp3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--ibTvN161/egqYuK8--

---
Received: (at 320258-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 13:48:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 06:48:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER8qx-0005ds-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#320258: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: allegro4.1
Source-Version: 2:4.1.15-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
allegro4.1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro-doc_4.1.15-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro-doc_4.1.15-6_all.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-arts_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-arts_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-esd_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-esd_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-jack_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to 

Bug#320258: marked as done (atanks: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lXxf86dga)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320258: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2005 21:49:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 27 14:49:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DxtmC-0003LX-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:49:20 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id ED6B83BC0AE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:49:19 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93613BC051
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:49:19 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 9BB5A26136; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:49:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:49:19 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: atanks: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lXxf86dga
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: atanks
Version: 1.1.0-4
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
g++ globaldata.o environment.o player.o virtobj.o floattext.o teleport.o physob
j.o decor.o explosion.o missile.o beam.o tank.o atanks.o fade.o perlin.o sky.o
-o ../atanks -DLINUX -DVERSION=\"1.1.0\"
-DDATA_DIR=\"/usr/share/games/atanks\"
  `allegro-config --libs`
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXxf86dga
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [../atanks] Error 1

I guess this is a missing build depedency caused by the x.org
transition.  It looks like you need a build depedency on
libxxf86dga-dev.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 320258-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 13:48:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 06:48:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER8qx-0005ds-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#320258: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: allegro4.1
Source-Version: 2:4.1.15-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
allegro4.1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro-doc_4.1.15-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro-doc_4.1.15-6_all.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-arts_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-arts_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-esd_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-esd_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-jack_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-jack_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1-plugin-svgalib_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1-plugin-svgalib_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro4.1_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro4.1_4.1.15-6_i386.deb

Bug#285080: marked as done (allegro4.1: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 'shutdown_single_menu')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285080: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2004 14:59:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 10 06:59:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c158155.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.158.155] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CcmEZ-000410-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 06:59:03 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CcmIb-00034e-RA; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:03:13 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: allegro4.1: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 
'shutdown_single_menu'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:03:13 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: allegro4.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'allegro4.1' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Iinclude -Iinclude/allegro -I./include 
-I./include/allegro  -I/usr/include/kde/artsc -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   -DALLEGRO_USE_C -DALLEGRO_LIB_BUILD   -O2 
-funroll-loops -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -Wno-unused   -fPIC 
-DALLEGRO_SHARED -c ./src/gui.c -o obj/unix/alleg/gui.o
./src/gui.c: In function 'update_menu':
./src/gui.c:1787: error: invalid storage class for function 
'shutdown_single_menu'
make[1]: *** [obj/unix/alleg/gui.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/allegro4.1-4.1.15'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

With the attached patch 'allegro4.1' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/allegro4.1-4.1.15/src/gui.c ./src/gui.c
--- ../tmp-orig/allegro4.1-4.1.15/src/gui.c 2004-07-30 15:36:24.0 
+0200
+++ ./src/gui.c 2004-12-10 15:19:27.955732008 +0100
@@ -1771,6 +1771,7 @@
 }
 
 
+static int shutdown_single_menu(MENU_PLAYER *, int *);
 
 /* update_menu:
  *  Updates the status of a menu player object returned by init_menu(),
@@ -1784,7 +1785,6 @@
  */
 int update_menu(MENU_PLAYER *player)
 {
-   static int shutdown_single_menu(MENU_PLAYER *, int *);
 
MENU_PLAYER *i;
int c, c2;
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/allegro4.1-4.1.15/src/sound.c ./src/sound.c
--- ../tmp-orig/allegro4.1-4.1.15/src/sound.c   2004-07-30 15:36:24.0 
+0200
+++ ./src/sound.c   2004-12-10 15:21:48.622347432 +0100
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 
 
 
-extern DIGI_DRIVER digi_none;
+static DIGI_DRIVER digi_none;
 
 
 

---
Received: (at 285080-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 13:48:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 06:48:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER8qx-0005dj-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#285080: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: allegro4.1
Source-Version: 2:4.1.15-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
allegro4.1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-demo_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro-examples_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.diff.gz
allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/allegro4.1_4.1.15-6.dsc
liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/allegro4.1/liballegro-dev_4.1.15-6_i386.deb
liballegro-doc_4.1.15-6_all.deb
  to po

Bug#331083: marked as done (FTBFS: Suffix or operands invalid for mov)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331083: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 14:24:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 07:24:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ELiI3-0006lo-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:24:39 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j91EOcNc076075
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 07:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ELMqY-00015F-7P
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:30:50 -0700
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:30:50 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Suffix or operands invalid for mov
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1106/Fri Sep 30 10:17:17 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: allegro4.1
Version: 4.1.15-5.1
Severity: serious

allegro4.1 fails to build because the suffix or operands are invalid
for mov:

> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Iinclude -Iinclude/allegro -I./include -I./inclu=
de/allegro  -I/usr/include/kde/artsc -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/us=
r/lib/glib-2.0/include   -DALLEGRO_LIB_BUILD  -mtune=3Dpentium -O2 -funroll=
-loops -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -Wno-unused  -x assembler-wit=
h-cpp -fPIC -DALLEGRO_SHARED -c ./src/i386/iblit16.s -o obj/unix/alleg/ibli=
t16.o
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s: Assembler messages:
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:46: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:314: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:345: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:362: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:378: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:393: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:403: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:410: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:427: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:435: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:441: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:487: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:504: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:554: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
> ./src/i386/iblit16.s:715: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'

--=20
Matt

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDPVopfNdgYxVXvBARAqRjAKCUY+VYfMoiP+UDyW0FVTvHyE6+VwCcCmcG
2+QgyQhh42G/MTq5SaOwJ7Q=
=pY1B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--

---
Received: (at 331083-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 13:47:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 06:47:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER8qx-0005e0-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#331083: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6

Bug#334139: marked as done (Needs update for mozilla 1.7.12)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334139: fixed in enigmail 2:0.93-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 19:42:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 12:42:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQrvd-00054U-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:42:50 -0700
Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1EQrvr-0002Dh-9X; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:43:03 +0200
Received: from p54a3e21b.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.226.27] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1EQrwg-0002dn-IT; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:43:54 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EQrve-00030D-25; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:42:50 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Needs update for mozilla 1.7.12
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:42:50 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: enigmail
Severity: serious

I guess you are aware of it since you uploaded mozilla 1.7.12 yourself
but lets note it in the BTS, too: enigmail is currently neither buildable nor
installable in sid and needs to be updated for 1.7.12

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 334139-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 13:48:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 06:48:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER8r0-0005ep-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:10 -0700
From: Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334139: fixed in enigmail 2:0.93-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: enigmail
Source-Version: 2:0.93-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
enigmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

enigmail_0.93-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/enigmail_0.93-1.diff.gz
enigmail_0.93-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/enigmail_0.93-1.dsc
enigmail_0.93.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/enigmail_0.93.orig.tar.gz
mozilla-enigmail_0.93-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/mozilla-enigmail_0.93-1_i386.deb
mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail_0.93-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail_0.93-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated enigmail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Ha

Bug#334239: koffice_1:1.3.5-5(m68k/unstable):

[wouter]

Package: koffice
Version: 1:1.3.5-5
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of koffice_1:1.3.5-5 on ska by sbuild/m68k 69
> Build started at 20051014-1604

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: g++-3.4 [arm hppa m68k], automake1.7, debhelper (>= 4.0.0), 
> flex, kdelibs4-dev (>= 4:3.2.0), libaspell-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, 
> libmagick++9-dev, libpaper-dev, libtiff4-dev, libwv2-dev (>= 0.1.9-0), 
> libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev, postgresql-dev, python2.3-dev, sharutils

[...]

>  The following central src deps are (probably) missing:
>   libtiff3g-dev

[...]

> ../../../karbon/core/vcolor.cc:294: internal compiler error: in 
> verify_initial_elim_offsets, at reload1.c:3297
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
> see .
> make[4]: *** [vcolor.lo] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/koffice-1.3.5/obj-m68k-linux-gnu/karbon/core'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/koffice-1.3.5/obj-m68k-linux-gnu/karbon'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/koffice-1.3.5/obj-m68k-linux-gnu'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/koffice-1.3.5/obj-m68k-linux-gnu'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=koffice&ver=1:1.3.5-5

I tried to build the offending file with gcc-4.0, and that succeeded;
if koffice is built with g++-3.4 because it failed previously, you may
want to try reverting that change on your next upload.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

[Mark Hymers]

On Thu, 13, Oct, 2005 at 04:05:11PM -0700, Ted Kisner spoke thus..
> Mark- have you had any more luck diagnosing this?  It seems very strange that 
> other software in the unstable archive are not seeing these things.
> 
> In the mean time, let me know if I can do anything to help out, and it looks 
> like I'll be using my debian-stable chroot for kst development ;-)

Hi,

I'm CCing this to the debian bug report so there is a record of what is
going on.


I've been through the following procedure:

Install sarge chroot
Build kst-1.1.0-2: kst works
apt-get install -t testing xserver-xorg
kst works
Switch apt.conf to default to testing
apt-get dist-upgrade
kst works
apt-get install -t unstable kdelibs kdelibs4-dev
  kst gets removed at this point due to dependency issues
Rebuild kst - no source changes
kst FAILS

The update which causes the problem is this one (note I also updated
kdelibs4-dev but it isn't included in this paste):

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/kst# apt-get install -t unstable kdelibs
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  comerr-dev kdelibs-bin kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2 libarts1-dev libarts1c2
  libartsc0 libartsc0-dev libaspell-dev libbz2-dev libjack0.100.0-0
  libjack0.100.0-dev libjasper-1.701-dev libkadm55 libkrb5-dev libkrb53
  libopenexr-dev libopenexr2c2 libqt3-headers libqt3-mt libqt3-mt-dev
  libsasl2 libsasl2-dev libtiff4 libtiff4-dev libtiffxx0c2
  libxinerama-dev libxinerama1 libxml2-dev libxslt1-dev qt3-dev-tools
Suggested packages:
  doc-base aspell-doc krb5-doc krb5-user libqt3-mt-psql libqt3-mt-mysql
  libqt3-mt-odbc libqt3-i18n qt3-doc
Recommended packages:
  perl-suid akode jackd libqt3-compat-headers libsasl2-modules
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  kdelibs4 kdelibs4-dev kst kst-bin kst-plugins libarts1
  libjack0.80.0-dev libkst1-dev libkst1c2 libopenexr2 libqt3c102-mt
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  comerr-dev kdelibs kdelibs4c2 libarts1c2 libaspell-dev libbz2-dev
  libjack0.100.0-0 libjack0.100.0-dev libjasper-1.701-dev libkadm55
  libkrb5-dev libkrb53 libopenexr-dev libopenexr2c2 libqt3-mt libsasl2
  libsasl2-dev libtiff4-dev libtiffxx0c2 libxinerama-dev libxml2-dev
  libxslt1-dev
The following packages will be upgraded:
  kdelibs-bin kdelibs-data libarts1-dev libartsc0 libartsc0-dev
  libqt3-headers libqt3-mt-dev libtiff4 libxinerama1 qt3-dev-tools


So it looks like some sort of KDE-3.4, Qt-3.3.5 interaction.  It is
highly unlikely to be a g++ transition issue as that side is pretty much
finished in Debian now and I'm sure that kst's dependencies have been
transitioned as has kst.

Ted, you mentioned some sort of Qt-3.3.5 / KDE-3.4 interaction;
unfortunately I don't know much about this; can you point me in the
right direction?

I've compiled kst with debugging symbols and am now attempting to obtain
some useful backtraces; if anyone has any ideas I'd be happy to hear
them!

Cheers,

Mark

-- 
Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the Lawyers"
 Henry VI Part II, Shakespeare


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324803: #324803 cdw Segmentation fault

[Stefan Fritsch]

package cdw
tags 324803 patch
thanks

The buffer used in sscanf is just a bit too small (typo?). The 
attached patch fixes the bug.
--- cdw-0.2.3/src/options.c	2004-03-07 11:12:00.0 +0100
+++ cdw-0.2.3patch/src/options.c	2005-10-16 16:26:23.0 +0200
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
 struct conf read_conf()
 {
 FILE *conffile;
-char home[256], confhome[256], opt[20], prop[256];
+char home[256], confhome[256], opt[31], prop[256];
 int line=0;
 
 sprintf(home,"%s", getenv("HOME"));


pgp1f4wmiywEM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: #324803 cdw Segmentation fault

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package cdw
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cdw

> tags 324803 patch
Bug#324803: cdw Segmentation fault
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

[George Staikos]

On Sunday 16 October 2005 10:38, Mark Hymers wrote:

>   comerr-dev kdelibs-bin kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2 libarts1-dev libarts1c2

  kdelibs4?  Is that KDE *4*, or in other words, "trunk"?  That could be the 
problem..

-- 
George Staikos
KDE Developer   http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323928: #323928 egroupware-fudforum: Incomplete check of user rights gaining access to all messages (CAN-2005-2600)

[Stefan Fritsch]

package egroupware-fudforum
tags 323928 patch
thanks

The page given above contains a patch (also included in this mail in 
dpatch form) that should fix the issue. Why have you tagged the bug 
"help"?



09-egw-fudforum-CAN-2005-2600.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript


pgpACXoNgOR5P.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#334030: fix up SNAFU

[Wouter Verhelst]

submitter 334030 !
retitle 334030 perl_5.8.7-6(m68k/unstable): FTBFS: failed test suite t/op/rand.t
thanks

I seriously fucked up with this one.

LaMon gave me his scripts that he uses to handle bug reports, and this
was the first time I tried the 'bug' feature of those things. When I
found that a) it still said "lamont" rather than "wouter", and b) it did
not include the test at all, I wanted to abort -- which failed
miserably.

Sorry 'bout that.

Anyway; the 'make test' is now running -- I'll let you know what happens
after that.

-- 
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: #323928 egroupware-fudforum: Incomplete check of user rights gaining access to all messages (CAN-2005-2600)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package egroupware-fudforum
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: egroupware-fudforum

> tags 323928 patch
Bug#323928: egroupware-fudforum: Incomplete check of user rights gaining access 
to all messages (CAN-2005-2600)
Tags were: help upstream security
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: fix up SNAFU

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> submitter 334030 !
Bug#334030: perl_5.8.7-6(m68k/unstable):
Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> retitle 334030 perl_5.8.7-6(m68k/unstable): FTBFS: failed test suite 
> t/op/rand.t
Bug#334030: perl_5.8.7-6(m68k/unstable):
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324032: packagesearch: FTBFS: Links a shared lib against a static non-PIC lib.

[Benjamin Mesing]

Version: 2.0.2

Thanks for the report. This issue is fixed in 2.0.2 which depends on
libapt-front now. libaot-front provides PIC compatability by default
(and so does libtagcoll now).

Best regards 

Benjamin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

[Mark Hymers]

On Sun, 16, Oct, 2005 at 10:48:16AM -0400, George Staikos spoke thus..
> On Sunday 16 October 2005 10:38, Mark Hymers wrote:
> 
> >   comerr-dev kdelibs-bin kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2 libarts1-dev libarts1c2
> 
>   kdelibs4?  Is that KDE *4*, or in other words, "trunk"?  That could be the 
> problem..

No, it's 3.4; the SONAME is 4 for historical reasons.  The c2 is for the
Debian C++ ABI transition.

Mark

-- 
Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"I never make predictions.  I never have and I never will."
 Tony Blair


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334005: builds libkpathsea3 which is also built by libkpathsea3

[Frank Küster]

Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.0.2-31
> Severity: serious
>
> libkpathsea3 is now built by libkpathsea3 -- tetex-bin needs to be updated
> to not build libkpathsea3 packages anymore.

How grave is this problem for the autobuilders?  I plan to upload
tetex-bin_3.0-x to unstable in a couple of days, which would fix this,
anyway.  Is it necessary to upload a tetex-bin_2.0.2-32 which has only
the change of not building libkpathsea3(-dev)?  Are there any problems
in connection with the libpng problems on powerpc, s390 and perhaps
other arches?

TIA, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Bug#333902: marked as done (libdebtags1-dev is not available anymore in unstable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:36:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333902: libdebtags1-dev is not available anymore in 
unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 11:22:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 04:22:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from outmx021.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.202] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQNdi-0005Ds-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 04:22:18 -0700
Received: from outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with 
ESMTP id j9EBMCUx011801
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:22:12 +0200
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (157.187-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.187.157])
by outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with 
ESMTP id j9EBM96i011774
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:22:09 +0200
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:20:38 +0200
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051010)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libdebtags1-dev is not available anymore in unstable
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: packagesearch
Severity: serious
Version: 2.0.1

Hi

Your package is unbuildable as the build dependency on libdebtags1-dev
is not fulfillable in unstable.

Cheers

Luk

- --
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDT5SG5UTeB5t8Mo0RApmJAJ41ErPxB4sdG32Z17RR8n2LNMbglQCeLxWy
wN4BdkNrcyj7UEDXVXR8ezs=
=viq6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 333902-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 15:39:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 08:39:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERAbF-0007X0-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:39:01 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2005 15:38:29 -
Received: from dyn-wireless-155-203.Concordia.CA (EHLO 
dyn-wireless-155-203.Concordia.CA) [132.205.155.203]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 16 Oct 2005 17:38:29 +0200
X-Authenticated: #834378
Subject: Re: Bug#333902: libdebtags1-dev is not available anymore in
unstable
From: Benjamin Mesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:36:44 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Version: 2.0.2

Thanks for the report, this issue is fixed in 2.0.2 which does no longer
depend on libdebtags, but on libtagcoll instead.

Best regards 

Benjamin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334215: marked as done (crack-attack: Function called without first calling 'glutInit'.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334215: fixed in crack-attack 1.1.14-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 11:34:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 04:34:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 209.235.97-84.rev.gaoland.net (babasse.is-a-geek.org) 
[84.97.235.209] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER6mh-0005tx-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 04:34:35 -0700
Received: from smimram by babasse.is-a-geek.org with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1ER6mC-0005lc-Fh; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:34:04 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1450487114=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: crack-attack: Function  called without first calling
 'glutInit'.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:34:04 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1450487114==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: crack-attack
Version: 1.1.14-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

Crack-attack won't launch anymore:

% crack-attack --solo
Crack Attack! v1.1.14
freeglut  ERROR:  Function  called without first
calling 'glutInit'.

The attached patch seems to fix the issue.

Thanks,

Samuel.

BTW: the package is not lintian clean!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages crack-attack depends on:
ii  freeglut3 2.4.0-2OpenGL Utility Toolkit
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.3-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-2  GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.3-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libglu1-xorg [libglu1]6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Mesa OpenGL utility library [X.Org
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.10-1   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-3Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1]  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Mesa 3D graphics library [X.Org]
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m

crack-attack recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--===1450487114==
Content-Type: text/x-c; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="glut_init.diff"

--- crack-attack-1.1.14.orig/src/Attack.cxx
+++ crack-attack-1.1.14/src/Attack.cxx
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
 int main ( int argc, char **argv )
 {
   setupLocalDataDirectory();
+  glutInit(&argc, argv);
 #ifdef WANT_GTK
   if (argc <= 1) return gui_main(argc, argv);
 #endif

--===1450487114==--

---
Received: (at 334215-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 15:39:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 08:39:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERAUZ-0006UM-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:32:07 -0700
From: Chris Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334215: fixed in

Bug#334252: animals: Uninstallable on sid; needs rebuild

[Yavor Doganov]

Package: animals
Version: 20031130-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

The package needs to be rebuilt, as due to the C++ ABI transition
libdb4.2++ was renamed to libdb4.2++c2.

-- 
Yavor Doganov


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324032: marked as done (packagesearch: FTBFS: Links a shared lib against a static non-PIC lib.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:50:59 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324032: packagesearch: FTBFS: Links a shared lib against a 
static non-PIC lib.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 21:52:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 14:52:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6Emf-0006k2-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:52:17 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id B86473BC09D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:52:16 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F053BC082
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:52:16 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 2DF3D26136; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:52:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:52:16 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packagesearch: FTBFS: Links a shared lib against a static non-PIC lib.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: packagesearch
Version: 1.3
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is creating a shared lib and is linking that to a
static lib.  This is not portable and fails on some arches with
the following error:
g++ -shared -o libdebtagsplugin.so .obj/debtagsplugin.o 
.obj/debtagsplugincontainer.o .obj/relatedplugin.o .obj/stringtagcollbuilder.o 
.obj/tagitem.o .obj/taglistviewitem.o .obj/tagselectionlistview.o 
.obj/tagselectionview.o .obj/tagselectionwidget.o 
.obj/selectioninputanddisplay.o .obj/selectedfacetsmatcher.o 
.obj/instantiations.o .obj/debtagspluginfactory.o .obj/singlesimpledebtags.o 
.obj/debtagssettingswidget.o .obj/choosentagsdisplay.o 
.obj/relatedfeedbackwidget.o .obj/relatedinput.o .obj/tagchooserwidget.o 
.obj/moc_debtagsplugin.o .obj/moc_debtagsplugincontainer.o 
.obj/moc_relatedplugin.o .obj/moc_taglistviewitem.o 
.obj/moc_tagselectionlistview.o .obj/moc_tagselectionwidget.o 
.obj/moc_selectioninputanddisplay.o .obj/moc_debtagssettingswidget.o 
.obj/moc_choosentagsdisplay.o .obj/moc_relatedfeedbackwidget.o 
.obj/moc_relatedinput.o .obj/moc_tagchooserwidget.o  -L/usr/share/qt3/lib 
-ldebtags1 -ltagcoll1 -lkdecore -lqt-mt -lpthread
/usr/bin/ld: 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib64/libdebtags1.a(Tag.o): 
relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a 
shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib64/libdebtags1.a: could not 
read symbols: Bad value

debtags is not making a shared library because it's API is
not stable yet.  Either you will have to ask a pic version
of the static library, wait until they make a shared
library, or don't make a shared library yourself.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 324032-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 15:53:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 08:53:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERAp2-00026o-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:53:16 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2005 15:52:44 -
Received: from dyn-wireless-155-203.Concordia.CA (EHLO 
dyn-wireless-155-203.Concordia.CA) [132.205.155.203]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 16 Oct 2005 17:52:44 +0200
X-Authenticated: #834378
Subject: Re: Bug#324032: packagesearch: FTBFS: Links a shared lib against a
static non-PIC lib.
From: Benjamin Mesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:50:59 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTE

Bug#334261: apt-spy - fails to build

[Bastian Blank]

Package: apt-spy
Version: 3.1-14
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of apt-spy_3.1-14 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1'
> cc -o apt-spy -lcurl -Wall -pedantic-errors -g benchmark.c  file.c  
> protocol.c  main.c  parse.c  update.c
> protocol.c: In function 'get_file':
> protocol.c:83: warning: format '%i' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has 
> type 'long unsigned int'
> /tmp/ccfB9bfr.o: In function `benchmark':
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/benchmark.c:73: undefined reference to 
> `curl_easy_cleanup'
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/benchmark.c:73: undefined reference to 
> `curl_easy_setopt'
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/benchmark.c:73: undefined reference to 
> `curl_easy_init'
> /tmp/ccPSZjgd.o: In function `get_file':
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/protocol.c:97: undefined reference to 
> `curl_easy_getinfo'
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/protocol.c:97: undefined reference to 
> `curl_easy_perform'
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/protocol.c:97: undefined reference to 
> `curl_easy_setopt'
> /tmp/ccyyREZj.o: In function `update':
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/update.c:59: undefined reference to 
> `curl_easy_cleanup'
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/update.c:59: undefined reference to 
> `curl_easy_perform'
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/update.c:59: undefined reference to 
> `curl_easy_setopt'
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/update.c:59: undefined reference to `curl_easy_init'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [apt-spy] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20051016-0909
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

Bastian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334201: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#334201: gosa: samba.schema and samba3.schema not copied)

[Cajus Pollmeier]

Am Sonntag 16 Oktober 2005 17:59 schrieb Thorsten Sandfuchs:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 04:03:09AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > samba.schema and samba3.scheama weren't copied to /etc/ldap/schema,
> > > therefore the setup process couldn't find the corresponding
> > > schema-definition, and no gosa.conf could be created.
> > > Fix: I found them in /usr/share/doc/gosa/contrib/openldap
> >
> > The gosa package is not responsible for installing samba related
> > schema files. Please refere to your samba documentation.
>
> well it is deranged by the missing of the file, though.
>
> Withouth the samba.schema, there will be no known lmPasswd and no ntPasswd
> at least, and therefore, the corresponding goas-schema won't work. (And
> slapd won't start, as it has inconsistent schema definitions)
>
> And this renders the package not installable.
>
> I don't know, and neighter found a suitable samba-package, which would
> provide the missing schema, either.
>
> Subsuming, without changing the package, it won't be installable, will it?

It is installable - maybe it is not usable in a proper way. But I'm not 
responsible for your LDAP service, which _may_ be on the same server gosa is 
installed to. So - go ahead and configure the LDAP properly. That's all what 
the gosa setup is telling you.

You wouldn't assign bugs to the pam guys for not installing the posix.schema 
to your LDAP, or would you?

Cheers,
Cajus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: pending solution did not work

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 329884 -pending
Bug#329884: packagesearch_2.0.1 (arm,hppa,m68k): FTBFS: internal compiler 
error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending

> # removing tag pending, because my pending solution did not solve this
> # issue
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328418: running it

[jerome lacoste]

Hi.

just to say that I managed to get evo 2.4 running on evol by tweaking
and using ubuntu libgal packages.
That was just before I found out that my home sarge server got hacked :(

For those who want to perform the operation, here's a short and long
description:

- download ubuntu's packages for libgal-2.4
- unpackage
- tweak control file
- repackage
- install

If you screw up, you can downgrade doing

apt-get install libgal2.4-common=2.4.3-1.1 libgal2.4-0=2.4.3-1.1

Detailed install:

wget  ubuntu_mirror_repos//libgal2.4-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
wget  ubuntu_mirror_repos//libgal2.4-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb

Then

mkdir -p libgal-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386/DEBIAN
dpkg-deb -x libgal2.4-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb libgal-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386
dpkg-deb -e libgal2.4-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
libgal-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386/DEBIAN/
vi libgal-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386/DEBIAN/control
// change names and references from libgal2.4 to libgal
// add a Replaces: libgal2.4-0
dpkg -b libgal-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386/ libgal-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb

mkdir -p libgal-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386/DEBIAN
dpkg-deb -x libgal2.4-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
libgal-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386
dpkg-deb -e libgal2.4-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
libgal-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386/DEBIAN/
vi libgal-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386/DEBIAN/control
// change names and references from libgal2.4 to libgal
// add a Replaces: libgal2.4-common
dpkg -b libgal-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386/ libgal-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb

dpkg -i libgal-common_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb libgal-0_2.5.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb

install the experimental packages.

Voila. Hope that helped. Now I've got to check my server.

Jerome

Bug#334239: koffice_1:1.3.5-5(m68k/unstable):

[Josh Metzler]

On Sunday 16 October 2005 10:23 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: koffice
> Version: 1:1.3.5-5
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > Automatic build of koffice_1:1.3.5-5 on ska by sbuild/m68k 69
> > Build started at 20051014-1604
>
> [...]
>
> > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > Build-Depends: g++-3.4 [arm hppa m68k], automake1.7, debhelper (>=
> > 4.0.0), flex, kdelibs4-dev (>= 4:3.2.0), libaspell-dev,
> > libfontconfig1-dev, libmagick++9-dev, libpaper-dev, libtiff4-dev,
> > libwv2-dev (>= 0.1.9-0), libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev, postgresql-dev,
> > python2.3-dev, sharutils
>
> [...]
>
> >  The following central src deps are (probably) missing:
> >   libtiff3g-dev

I don't think this is needed - koffice build-depends on libtiff4-dev.

> > ../../../karbon/core/vcolor.cc:294: internal compiler error: in
> > verify_initial_elim_offsets, at reload1.c:3297 Please submit a full bug
> > report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> > For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
> > see .
> > make[4]: *** [vcolor.lo] Error 1
> > make[4]: Leaving directory
> > `/build/buildd/koffice-1.3.5/obj-m68k-linux-gnu/karbon/core' make[3]:
> > *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[3]: Leaving directory
> > `/build/buildd/koffice-1.3.5/obj-m68k-linux-gnu/karbon' make[2]: ***
> > [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory
> > `/build/buildd/koffice-1.3.5/obj-m68k-linux-gnu' make[1]: *** [all]
> > Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory
> > `/build/buildd/koffice-1.3.5/obj-m68k-linux-gnu' make: ***
> > [build-stamp] Error 2
>
> A full build log can be found at:
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=koffice&ver=1:1.3.5-5
>
> I tried to build the offending file with gcc-4.0, and that succeeded;
> if koffice is built with g++-3.4 because it failed previously, you may
> want to try reverting that change on your next upload.

I believe this file builds with g++-4.0.  Unfortunately, koffice ICEd on arm 
when built with g++-4.0 with the following error:

./koDocument.moc: In member function 'QDomDocument 
KoDocument::_ZTv0_n28_NK10KoDocument11domDocumentEv() const':
./koDocument.moc:217: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at 
cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101

This ICE has turned up in numerous kde packages.  g++-4.0 always ICEs while 
compiling this file on arm, hppa, and m68k, so as soon as this ICE was seen 
on arm, a new version using g++-3.4 for arm, hppa, and m68k was uploaded.

This ICE is fixed in gcc 4.1, but as far as I know has not been backported 
to 4.0.  See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323133 for 
more details.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334170: lirc-modules-source: modifies conffiles in postinst

[Nicolas Boullis]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:48:15PM +0200, I wrote:
> 
> Here it is.

But I had forgotten to deal with the configuration file in postrm. Here 
is an updated patch.


Cheers,

Nicolas
--- lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/rules
+++ lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/rules
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
install --mode=644 debian/conf.placeholder \
debian/tmp/etc/lirc/lircmd.conf
install --mode=644 debian/hardware.conf debian/tmp/etc/lirc/
-   install --mode=644 debian/lirc-modules-source.conf debian/tmp/etc/lirc/
+   install --mode=644 debian/lirc-modules-source.conf 
debian/tmp/usr/share/lirc-modules-source.conf.tpl
#rm debian/lirc/usr/lib/liblirc_client.la
mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/src/modules/lirc
cp -dpR drivers debian/tmp/usr/src/modules/lirc/
--- lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/lirc-modules-source.postinst
+++ lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/lirc-modules-source.postinst
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
LIRC_SIR_PORT LIRC_SIR_IRQ LIRC_SIR_CFLAGS \
LIRC_PARALLEL_PORT LIRC_PARALLEL_IRQ LIRC_PARALLEL_TIMER
   do
-if ! grep -q "^$VAR\>" /etc/lirc/$package.conf; then
-  echo "$VAR=\"UNCONFIGURED\"" >> /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+if ! grep -q "^$VAR\>" "$1"; then
+  echo "$VAR=\"UNCONFIGURED\"" >> "$1"
 fi
   done
 
@@ -35,12 +35,13 @@
db_get $package/serial_port
LIRC_SERIAL_PORT="$RET"
 
+   tmpfile=`tempfile`
sed \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SERIAL_IRQ\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SERIAL_IRQ\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SERIAL_PORT\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SERIAL_PORT\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SERIAL_CFLAGS\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SERIAL_CFLAGS\"/" \
-   /etc/lirc/$package.conf > /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp
-   mv /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+   "$1" > "$tmpfile"
+   mv "$tmpfile" "$1"
 }
 save_sir_conf ()
 {
@@ -53,12 +54,13 @@
db_get $package/sir_port
LIRC_SIR_PORT="$RET"
 
+   tmpfile=`tempfile`
sed \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SIR_IRQ\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SIR_IRQ\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SIR_PORT\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SIR_PORT\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_SIR_CFLAGS\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_SIR_CFLAGS\"/" \
-   /etc/lirc/$package.conf > /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp
-   mv /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+   "$1" > "$tmpfile"
+   mv "$tmpfile" "$1"
 }
 save_parallel_conf ()
 {
@@ -69,12 +71,13 @@
db_get $package/parallel_timer
LIRC_PARALLEL_TIMER="$RET"
 
+   tmpfile=`tempfile`
sed \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_PARALLEL_IRQ\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_PARALLEL_IRQ\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_PARALLEL_PORT\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_PARALLEL_PORT\"/" \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_PARALLEL_TIMER\)=.*/\1=\"$LIRC_PARALLEL_TIMER\"/" \
-   /etc/lirc/$package.conf > /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp
-   mv /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+   "$1" > "$tmpfile"
+   mv "$tmpfile" "$1"
 }
 
 . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
@@ -84,33 +87,40 @@
 
 if [ "$1" = "configure" ] && [ -f /etc/lirc/$package.conf ]; then
 
-  check_config_file
+  newfile=`tempfile`
+  cat /usr/share/lirc-modules-source.conf.tpl > "$newfile"
+
+  check_config_file "$newfile"
 
   db_get $package/drivers
   DRIVERS=$RET
 
+  tmpfile=`tempfile`
   sed \
-e "s/^\(LIRC_MODULES\)=.*/\1=\"$DRIVERS\"/" \
-   /etc/lirc/$package.conf > /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp
-  mv /etc/lirc/$package.conf.tmp /etc/lirc/$package.conf
+   "$newfile" > "$tmpfile"
+  mv "$tmpfile" "$newfile"
 
   #Serial configuration
   if expr "$DRIVERS" : '.*\' > /dev/null
   then
-   save_serial_conf
+   save_serial_conf "$newfile"
   fi
 
   #SIR configuration
   if expr "$DRIVERS" : '.*\' > /dev/null
   then
-   save_sir_conf
+   save_sir_conf "$newfile"
   fi
 
   #Parallel configuration
   if expr "$DRIVERS" : '.*\' > /dev/null
   then
-   save_parallel_conf
+   save_parallel_conf "$newfile"
   fi
+
+  /usr/bin/ucf --debconf-ok --three-way "$newfile" 
/etc/lirc/lirc-modules-source.conf
+  rm "$newfile"
 fi
 
 
--- lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/lirc-modules-source.install
+++ lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/lirc-modules-source.install
@@ -2 +2 @@
-etc/lirc/lirc-modules-source.conf
+usr/share/lirc-modules-source.conf.tpl
--- lirc-0.7.1pre2.orig/debian/lirc-modules-source.postrm
+++ lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/lirc-modules-source.postrm
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+case "$1" in
+purge)
+   rm /etc/lirc/lirc-modules-source.conf
+   if [ -x /usr/bin/ucf ]; then
+   /usr/bin/ucf --purge /etc/lirc/lirc-modules-source.conf
+   fi
+   ;;
+esac
+
+exit 0

Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?

[Tommi Vainikainen]

Hello members of debian-legal,

It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open
Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and
therefore needs to be changed.

Currently web pages are "Copyright © 1997-2005 SPI" and license terms
linking to Open Publication license are available at
http://www.de.debian.org/license >. However SPI has not been
collecting any paper work to transfer copyrights like FSF does, and
probably many contributors do not even know about that their work is
automatically copyrighted by SPI.

So basically there is two questions:

Does missing paperwork create a problem?

And what would be good license for Debians web pages? (This is about
content, the scripts used in generation are GNU GPL or otherwise
freely licensed.)

Because copyright is currently claimed by SPI Inc, and SPI's board
meeting is coming rather soon, I brought this issue to SPI's
secretarys attention, but SPI board would appreciate some suggestion
what they should decide about license change.

I've Cc'ed the bug report about the issue, but Mail-followups does not
contain bug report. Add it if needed, please.

-- 
Tommi Vainikainen

Bug#334079: marked as done (asmail - fails to build)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334079: fixed in asmail 1.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 12:45:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 05:45:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQlQD-92-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:45:58 -0700
Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E55E8184E6; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:44:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:44:48 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: asmail - fails to build
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: asmail
Version: 1.7-2
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of asmail_1.7-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>=4), libx11-dev, libxpm-dev
[...]
> gcc -O2  -D_REENTRANT -c x_color.c
> gcc -O2  -D_REENTRANT -c md5c.c
> gcc asmail.o gui.o mbox.o maildir.o mh.o pop3.o imap.o socklib.o globals.o 
> x_color.o md5c.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXext-lXt -lpthread -lrt   -o 
> asmail
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXt
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [asmail] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/asmail-1.7'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20051015-0755
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

Bastian

---
Received: (at 334079-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 17:17:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 10:17:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERC89-0005L9-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:17:05 -0700
From: Fredrik Hallenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334079: fixed in asmail 1.8-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:17:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: asmail
Source-Version: 1.8-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
asmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

asmail_1.8-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/asmail/asmail_1.8-1.diff.gz
asmail_1.8-1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/asmail/asmail_1.8-1.dsc
asmail_1.8-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/asmail/asmail_1.8-1_i386.deb
asmail_1.8.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/asmail/asmail_1.8.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Fredrik Hallenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated asmail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:48:42 +0200
Source: asmail
Binary: asmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fredrik Hallenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Fredrik Hallenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 asmail - AfterStep mail monitor
Closes: 334079
Changes: 
 asmail (1.8-1) unstable; urgency=

Processed: Closing nufw bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> close 307210
Bug#307210: nufw_1.0-2(alpha/unstable): assumes sa_restorer is part of sigaction
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> close 300427
Bug#300427: nufw: FTBFS: implicit declaration of function `mysql_ssl_set'
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333609: marked as done (/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgssapi_krb5)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333609: fixed in curl 7.15.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2005 22:36:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 12 15:36:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EPpCZ-0001md-00; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:36:00 -0700
Received: from aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35])
  by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:35:27 +0100
Received: from mayhq.zapto.org ([82.2.192.87])
  by aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with SMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:35:27 +0100
Received: (qmail 3346 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2005 22:35:25 -
Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.zoo.mayhq.org) (10.0.0.3)
  by tiger.zoo.mayhq.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2005 22:35:25 -
Received: (qmail 24000 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Oct 2005 22:35:24 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgssapi_krb5
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:35:24 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libcurl3-openssl-dev
Version: 7.14.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

/usr/bin/ld failed to find -lgssapi_krb5, which is mentioned in
/usr/lib/libcurl.la.

Thanks,

Qingning


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libcurl3-openssl-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]  2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libcurl3  7.14.1-5   Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libidn11-dev  0.5.18-1   Development files GNU libidn, impl
ii  libssl-dev0.9.8-2SSL development libraries, header 
ii  zlib1g-dev1:1.2.3-4  compression library - development

libcurl3-openssl-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 333609-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 17:38:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 10:38:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERCMg-00027X-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
From: Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#333609: fixed in curl 7.15.0-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: curl
Source-Version: 7.15.0-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
curl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

curl_7.15.0-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/curl/curl_7.15.0-2.diff.gz
curl_7.15.0-2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/curl/curl_7.15.0-2.dsc
curl_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/curl_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3-dbg_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/libcurl3-dbg_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3-gnutls-dev_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/libcurl3-gnutls-dev_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3-gnutls_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/libcurl3-gnutls_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3-openssl-dev_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/libcurl3-openssl-dev_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c

Bug#334021: marked as done (libcurl3-*-dev: architecture-specific dependencies misspecified)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334021: fixed in curl 7.15.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 03:31:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 20:31:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQclI-0002Bf-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 20:31:08 -0700
Received: from 208-58-77-33.c3-0.grg-ubr3.lnh-grg.md.cable.rcn.com (HELO 
tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net) ([208.58.77.33])
  by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2005 23:31:07 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,216,1125892800"; 
   d="scan'208"; a="132322458:sNHT21997656"
Received: from amu by tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EQclH-0007Ep-Kb
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 23:31:07 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libcurl3-*-dev: architecture-specific dependencies misspecified
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 23:31:07 -0400
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libcurl3-gnutls-dev, libcurl3-openssl-dev
Version: 7.15.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5

Your fix for #333609 appears to have backfired dramatically: because
bracketed architecture lists are legal only in *build*-depends,
dpkg-dev kindly swallowed the entire Depends: field. :-/ (See
#228125.)

I think you'll have to arrange for debian/rules to calculate and
supply an appropriate substvar, though there also appears to be
precedent (in the form of gnupg) for dependencies of the form
xyz | hurd if you just want a quick kludge.

Thanks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.3
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 334021-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 17:38:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 10:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERCMg-00027Z-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
From: Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334021: fixed in curl 7.15.0-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: curl
Source-Version: 7.15.0-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
curl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

curl_7.15.0-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/curl/curl_7.15.0-2.diff.gz
curl_7.15.0-2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/curl/curl_7.15.0-2.dsc
curl_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/curl_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3-dbg_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/libcurl3-dbg_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3-gnutls-dev_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/libcurl3-gnutls-dev_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3-gnutls_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/libcurl3-gnutls_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3-openssl-dev_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/libcurl3-openssl-dev_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
libcurl3_7.15.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/curl/libcurl3_7.15.0-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EM

Bug#334048: marked as done (cannot find -lidn)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334048: fixed in curl 7.15.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 08:40:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 01:40:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQhaS-000365-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 01:40:16 -0700
Received: from aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35])
  by mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:39:42 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (really [81.96.64.169])
  by aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:39:41 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:39:39 +0100
From: Daniel Glassey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051010)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cannot find -lidn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libcurl3-openssl-dev
Version: 7.15.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

trying to rebuild libsword using the new curl dev package using pbuilder
to make sure the dependencies are right.

/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -ftemplate-depth-25
-DCURLAVAILABLE -g -Wall -O2   -o libsword.la -rpath /usr/lib
-version-info 5 swkey.lo listkey.lo strkey.lo treekey.lo treekeyidx.lo
versekey.lo swobject.lo Greek2Greek.lo utilstr.lo utilxml.lo swunicod.lo
swversion.lo swbuf.lo ftpparse.lo url.lo untgz.lo   roman.lo curlftpt.lo
swconfig.lo swmgr.lo swfiltermgr.lo encfiltmgr.lo markupfiltmgr.lo
filemgr.lo ftptrans.lo swlocale.lo localemgr.lo swcacher.lo
swsearchable.lo installmgr.lo stringmgr.lo swdisp.lo swlog.lo
swmodule.lo rawstr.lo rawstr4.lo swcomprs.lo lzsscomprs.lo zipcomprs.lo
rawverse.lo swcipher.lo zverse.lo zstr.lo entriesblk.lo sapphire.lo
swbasicfilter.lo swoptfilter.lo latin1utf8.lo latin1utf16.lo
utf8utf16.lo utf16utf8.lo scsuutf8.lo utf8html.lo utf8latin1.lo
utf8cantillation.lo utf8hebrewpoints.lo utf8greekaccents.lo cipherfil.lo
 osisheadings.lo osisfootnotes.lo osishtmlhref.lo osiswebif.lo
osismorph.lo osisstrongs.lo osisplain.lo osisrtf.lo osislemma.lo
osisredletterwords.lo osisscripref.lo osiswordjs.lo gbfhtml.lo
gbfhtmlhref.lo gbfwebif.lo gbfplain.lo gbfrtf.lo gbfstrongs.lo
gbffootnotes.lo gbfheadings.lo gbfredletterwords.lo gbfmorph.lo
thmlstrongs.lo thmlfootnotes.lo thmlheadings.lo thmlmorph.lo
thmllemma.lo thmlscripref.lo thmlvariants.lo thmlgbf.lo thmlrtf.lo
thmlhtml.lo thmlhtmlhref.lo thmlwebif.lo thmlwordjs.lo gbfthml.lo
gbfosis.lo thmlosis.lo thmlplain.lo osisosis.lo rtfhtml.lo
plainfootnotes.lo plainhtml.lo greeklexattribs.lo unicodertf.lo
swgenbook.lo rawgenbook.lo swtext.lo rawtext.lo ztext.lo swcom.lo
rawcom.lo rawfiles.lo zcom.lo hrefcom.lo swld.lo rawld.lo rawld4.lo
zld.lo flatapi.lo -lcurl -L/usr/lib -lcurl -L/usr/lib -lgssapi_krb5
-lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err -lresolv -lresolv -lidn -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
-lssl -lcrypto -ldl -lz  -lz
grep: /usr/lib/libidn.la: No such file or directory
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libidn.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libidn.la' is not a valid libtool archive

It needs a dependency on libidn11-dev

curl-config --libs
-L/usr/lib -lcurl -L/usr/lib -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err
-lresolv -lresolv -lidn -lssl -lcrypto -ldl -lssl -lcrypto -ldl -lz

Please make sure the depends are for all of these dev libs.

TIA,
Daniel

---
Received: (at 334048-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 17:38:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 10:38:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERCMg-00027b-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
From: Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#33

Processed: Patch for #333999

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 333999 patch
Bug#333999: librpm4: breaks rpm due to missing binary files in the package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333999: Patch for #333999

[Artur R. Czechowski]

tags 333999 patch
thanks

Hello,
As far as we do not support bi-arch/multi-arch configuration following patch
should solve the problem. At least it works for me.

Regards
Artur
-- 
Nie taki daemon straszny jak go killują
/z pamiętnika administratora/
diff -Naru rpm-4.4.1.orig/configure.ac rpm-4.4.1/configure.ac
--- rpm-4.4.1.orig/configure.ac 2005-02-13 20:50:02.0 +
+++ rpm-4.4.1/configure.ac  2005-10-16 17:40:02.049787601 +
@@ -1180,9 +1180,9 @@
 
 dnl XXX Choose /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 for library installs.
 MARK64=
-case "${target_cpu}" in
-x86_64*|ppc64*|powerpc64*|sparc64*|s390x*) MARK64=64 ;;
-esac
+dnl case "${target_cpu}" in
+dnl x86_64*|ppc64*|powerpc64*|sparc64*|s390x*) MARK64=64 ;;
+dnl esac
 AC_SUBST(MARK64)
 
 dnl Determine the canonical arch-vendor-os for the build machine
diff -Naru rpm-4.4.1.orig/popt/configure.ac rpm-4.4.1/popt/configure.ac
--- rpm-4.4.1.orig/popt/configure.ac2004-12-05 21:41:40.0 +
+++ rpm-4.4.1/popt/configure.ac 2005-10-16 17:40:10.725667121 +
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@
 
 dnl XXX Choose /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 for library installs.
 MARK64=
-case "${target_cpu}" in
-x86_64*|powerpc64*|ppc64*|sparc64*|s390x*)MARK64=64 ;;
-esac
+dnl case "${target_cpu}" in
+dnl x86_64*|powerpc64*|ppc64*|sparc64*|s390x*)MARK64=64 ;;
+dnl esac
 AC_SUBST(MARK64)
 
 AC_CHECK_HEADERS(alloca.h float.h libintl.h mcheck.h unistd.h)

Processed: bts cleaning

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 333760 patch
Bug#333760: rpm: please suppress lib64 ("MARK64") nonsense
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> severity 333760 grave
Bug#333760: rpm: please suppress lib64 ("MARK64") nonsense
Severity set to `grave'.

> merge 333760 333999
Bug#333760: rpm: please suppress lib64 ("MARK64") nonsense
Bug#333999: librpm4: breaks rpm due to missing binary files in the package
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `package' don't match:
 #333760 has `rpm';
 #333999 has `librpm4'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: bts cleaning

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 333295 serious
Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl
Severity set to `serious'.

> reassign 333295 rpm,manpages-pl
Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl
Bug reassigned from package `rpm' to `rpm,manpages-pl'.

> merge 333295 334146
Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl
Bug#334146: rpm and manpages-pl contain the same files
Merged 333295 334146.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: bts cleaning

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 333760 librpm4
Bug#333760: rpm: please suppress lib64 ("MARK64") nonsense
Bug reassigned from package `rpm' to `librpm4'.

> merge 333760 333999
Bug#333760: rpm: please suppress lib64 ("MARK64") nonsense
Bug#333999: librpm4: breaks rpm due to missing binary files in the package
Merged 333760 333999.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325564:

[Duck]

0.10.1-3 built with gcc 4.0.2 fixed the problem (see [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

-- 
Marc Dequènes (Duck)


pgp5WBtvZ7Ly9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#334158: marked as done (FTBFS: dh_install cannot copy debian/tmp/usr/lib/monodoc/sources)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334158: fixed in gtksourceview-sharp 0.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 21:44:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 14:44:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQtpO-0004Ax-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:44:30 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9FLiS0G095250
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EQsGo-xU-Vz
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:04:43 -0700
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:04:42 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: dh_install cannot copy debian/tmp/usr/lib/monodoc/sources
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1134/Fri Oct 14 01:07:44 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gtksourceview-sharp
Version: 0.5-6
Severity: serious

gtksourceview-sharp fails to build because dh_install cannot copy
debian/tmp/usr/lib/monodoc/sources:

> dh_install --sourcedir=3Ddebian/tmp
> cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//usr/lib/monodoc/sources/': No such file or d=
irectory
> dh_install: command returned error code 256

--=20
Matt

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUWDafNdgYxVXvBARAoqVAKCbN/83+QR+caxy1OSRuApz4km2ZwCfUYWq
ArQvsOpoTVbYl+GHgnQHmfo=
=0Zhm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--

---
Received: (at 334158-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 18:48:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 11:48:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERDXH-0003sw-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:47:07 -0700
From: Debian Mono Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334158: fixed in gtksourceview-sharp 0.5-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gtksourceview-sharp
Source-Version: 0.5-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtksourceview-sharp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gtksourceview-sharp_0.5-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtksourceview-sharp/gtksourceview-sharp_0.5-7.diff.gz
gtksourceview-sharp_0.5-7.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtksourceview-sharp/gtksourceview-sharp_0.5-7.dsc
libgtksourceview-cil_0.5-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtksourceview-sharp/libgtksourceview-cil_0.5-7_all.deb
monodoc-gtksourceview-manual_0.5-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtksourceview-sharp/monodoc-gtksourceview-manual_0.5-7_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug repor

Bug#331634: Intention to NMU

[Kilian Krause]

Hi Luk,

Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
> 
> Note that this also resolves the build error and fixes the clean target.

well, regarding the libssl transition, I have just checked the available
version and found that for now libssl0.9.8 is still the current Sid
version. Thus following the announcement that this transition is called
off for now, we should wait till the 0.9.7 is back in the archive, so
that we get these fixes into Etch. I'll nevertheless add your patch to
the SVN so it'll be included as soon as the upload is ready to be
uploaded.

-- 
Best regards,
 Kilian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

[Ted Kisner]

On Sunday 16 October 2005 07:38, Mark Hymers wrote:
> So it looks like some sort of KDE-3.4, Qt-3.3.5 interaction.  It is
> highly unlikely to be a g++ transition issue as that side is pretty much
> finished in Debian now and I'm sure that kst's dependencies have been
> transitioned as has kst.

I agree- I have rebuilt all of Xorg + Qt + KDE from source packages using the 
gcc 4.0.2 toolchain in unstable.  The resulting packages exhibit the same 
problem.

> Ted, you mentioned some sort of Qt-3.3.5 / KDE-3.4 interaction;
> unfortunately I don't know much about this; can you point me in the
> right direction?

I had thought this might have been a problem.  See this bug report:

http://bugs.kde.org/112500

I'm not sure if KDE 3.4.2 included in debian unstable has been patched.  
However, I think the fact that we can compile kdelibs and kst means that this 
is not an issue (i.e, it dealt with ui files during compile time).

The KDE website explicitly says to *NOT* use Qt 3.3.5 with KDE 3.4/3.5, but I 
don't know if this ui issues is the only reason...  I'm assuming that the 
debian-kde people know what they are doing in choosing to use Qt 3.3.5 ;-)  
Hopefully any necessary patches have been applied...

> I've compiled kst with debugging symbols and am now attempting to obtain
> some useful backtraces; if anyone has any ideas I'd be happy to hear
> them!

I've tried this as well, along with using the xserver-xorg-dbg libraries.  
Unfortunately I'm not too familiar with debuggers, and kst actually doesn't 
"crash", it just generates X errors.  How does one generate a backtrace 
without a crash point?  It seems like we need to actually set breakpoints at 
various places and see which KDE/Qt/X function call is causing the error.

I'll try to look at this more soon.

-Ted




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#231314: marked as done (nxml-mode: conflicts with mule-ucs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316130: fixed in nxml-mode 20041004-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2004 19:27:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 05 11:27:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nic.lp.se [213.212.3.208] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aop9o-0002Ux-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 11:27:25 -0800
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by nic.lp.se (MX V5.3 VnHj) with ESMTP for
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:27:17 +0100
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 20:27:11 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Why on earth is nxml-mode conflicting with mule-ucs?
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-URL: http://www.lp.se/
X-Waved: dead chicken, GNU emacs 21.3.1, Mew version 4.0.63
X-Mew: See http://www.mew.org/
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.63 on Emacs 21.3.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: nxml-mode
Version: 20031031-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software

The nxml-mode has the following conflict spec:

  Conflicts: mule-ucs

This means that installing nxml-mode removes mule-ucs and vice versa.
Trouble is, they solve entirely different problems, and I have a
really hard time seeing them conflicting with each other, unless they
do something *really* weird in emacs lisp.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-1-686
Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE

Versions of packages nxml-mode depends on:
ii  emacs21   21.3+1-4   The GNU Emacs editor

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 316130-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 20:41:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 13:41:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERFBS-0002Y6-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:42 -0700
From: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#316130: fixed in nxml-mode 20041004-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:42 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: nxml-mode
Source-Version: 20041004-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nxml-mode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

nxml-mode_20041004-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/nxml-mode/nxml-mode_20041004-5.diff.gz
nxml-mode_20041004-5.dsc
  to pool/main/n/nxml-mode/nxml-mode_20041004-5.dsc
nxml-mode_20041004-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/n/nxml-mode/nxml-mode_20041004-5_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nxml-mode package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:28:44 -0400
Source: nxml-mode
Binary: nxml-mode
Architecture: source all
Version: 20041004-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 nxml-mode  - Emacs mode for editing XML docu

Bug#331449: marked as done (libminpack1: empty package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331449: fixed in minpack 19961126-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 15:27:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 08:27:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMSDy-0001iO-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 08:27:30 -0700
Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:211:9ff:feed:c498])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EMSDx-0005BE-GV; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:27:29 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EMSDx-00032L-4i; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:27:29 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libminpack1: empty package
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:27:29 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libminpack1
Version: 19961126-6
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

After building libminpack1 is an empty package. It is due to the fact
the name of the files in the debian/ directory have not been changed,
whereas the package name has changed.

Quick fix:

cd debian/ && for i in minpack1* ; do mv $i lib$i ; done

Bye,
Aurelien

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc7-amd64
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 331449-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 20:41:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 13:41:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERFBP-0002WN-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:39 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James R. Van Zandt)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#331449: fixed in minpack 19961126-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:39 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: minpack
Source-Version: 19961126-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
minpack, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libminpack1_19961126-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/minpack/libminpack1_19961126-7_i386.deb
minpack-dev_19961126-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/minpack/minpack-dev_19961126-7_i386.deb
minpack_19961126-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/minpack/minpack_19961126-7.diff.gz
minpack_19961126-7.dsc
  to pool/main/m/minpack/minpack_19961126-7.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated minpack package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:20:26 -0400
Source: minpack
Binary: minpack-dev libminpack1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 19961126-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-

Bug#316130: marked as done (nxml-mode: nxml-mode conflicts with mule-ucs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316130: fixed in nxml-mode 20041004-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 18:40:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 11:40:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay.uran.ru [195.19.137.68] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DnL0f-0006Cx-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:40:38 -0700
Received: from ait.home-net (dialup45.uran.ru [195.19.137.235])
by relay.uran.ru (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j5SIfHav007927
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:41:17 +0600 (YEKST)
Received: from dima by ait.home-net with local (Exim 4.51)
id 1DnKy3-00039e-23
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:37:55 +0600
From: Dmitriyi Paduchikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nxml-mode: nxml-mode conflicts with mule-ucs
X-Debbugs-CC: Dmitriyi Paduchikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:37:55 +0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 195.19.137.68
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: nxml-mode
Version: 20041004-4
Severity: normal

Hello,

It appears that nxml-mode isn't compatible with mule-ucs package (I
have version 0.84.999+0.20030620-9 of mule-ucs installed). At
installation of nxml-mode I get the error messages shown below. I
beleave this conflict must be in the package dependencies.

~# apt-get install trang libxml2-utils nxml-mode
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libgcj-common libgcj4
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libgcj-common libgcj4 libxml2-utils nxml-mode trang
0 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 340 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/3532kB of archives.
After unpacking 11,9MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 

[...]

Loading 60nxml-mode (source)...
Loading rng-auto.el (source)...
Error while loading 60nxml-mode
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-enc.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-glyph.elc
While compiling toplevel forms in file 
/usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-maint.el:
  !! error (("nxml-mode is not compatible with Mule-UCS"))
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-mode.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-ns.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-outln.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-parse.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-rap.elc
While compiling toplevel forms in file 
/usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-uchnm.el:
  !! error (("nxml-mode is not compatible with Mule-UCS"))
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/nxml-util.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-auto.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-cmpct.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-dt.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-loc.elc
While compiling toplevel forms in file 
/usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-maint.el:
  !! error (("nxml-mode is not compatible with Mule-UCS"))
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-match.elc
While compiling toplevel forms in file 
/usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-nxml.el:
  !! error (("nxml-mode is not compatible with Mule-UCS"))
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-parse.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-pttrn.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-uri.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-util.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-valid.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/rng-xsd.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/xmltok.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nxml-mode/xsd-regexp.elc
Done
emacs-package-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/nxml-mode 
emacs21 emacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install li

Bug#333858: marked as done (initrd/initramfs: Step 2 ongoing, ramdisk-tools needs fixing)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333858: fixed in yaird 0.0.11-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 06:44:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 23:44:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.24] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQJJ5-00022j-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:44:43 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0706.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EF0121C000BF
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:44:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-25-57.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr 
[82.126.215.57])
by mwinf0706.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CC9311C0004B;
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:44:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EQJ87-Ao-FL; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:33:23 +0200
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:33:18 +0200
To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: initrd/initramfs: Step 2 ongoing, ramdisk-tools needs fixing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: yaird
Severity: Serious

Hello, ...

This is the second step in the linux-2.6 >=2.6.13 ramdisk-tool resolution
process. As you well know, 2.6.13 dropped devfs, whcih means initrd-tool
cannot be used anymore, and we now have a choice of yaird or initramfs-tools,
to make things nice and all, a proposal was sent to all of you and on
debian-kernel, but only Simon Horman commented :

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/10/msg00232.html

So, i am now asking that all ramdisk-tool packages which the kernel team will
support implement the two following things :

  1) Provide the linux-ramdisk-tool virtual package.

  2) implement in their mkinitrd-compatible wrapper the two following options :

--supported-host-version : will return 0 if the version passed as argument
(for example 2.6.12-1-powerpc) can be used to generate a ramdisk, and 1
otherwise. This will mostly generally be 1 always for initramfs and
initrd -tools, not sure about the 2.2 kernel case and such though, and
some kind of 2.6 version for yaird.

--supported-target-version : will return 0 if the tool know how to generate
a ramdisk for the version passed as argument (for example 2.6.13-1-powerpc),
and 1 otherwise. This will be >=2.6.8 for yaird, >=2.6.12 for
initramfs-tools, and <2.6.13 for initrd-tools.

Note, i mark those bugs as RC, since this is of primordial importance to get
implemented quickly so that we may move 2.6.13 and beyond to sid in a timely
fashion.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


---
Received: (at 333858-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 20:38:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 13:38:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERFBe-0002cv-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:54 -0700
From: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#333858: fixed in yaird 0.0.11-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:54 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: yaird
Source-Version: 0.0.11-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
yaird, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

yaird_0.0.11-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-5.diff.gz
yaird_0.0.11-5.dsc
  to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-5.dsc
yaird_0.0.11-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/y/ya

Bug#334228: marked as done (renders network unusable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334228: fixed in kfreebsd-5 5.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 12:34:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 05:34:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 216.red-62-57-140.user.auna.net (khazad.dyndns.org) 
[62.57.140.216] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ER7iN-0008B8-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:34:12 -0700
Received: from rmh by khazad.dyndns.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ER7iK-00056O-P8; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:34:08 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: renders network unusable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:34:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: kfreebsd-5
Severity: critical

There's a critical usability problem with version 5.4-2.  See:

  
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/glibc-bsd-devel/2005-October/000563.html

I have verified that 5.4-1 is not affected.  Since the differences between these
versions are minimal:

   * Enabled 586 and 686 CPUs support on the 486 flavour and 686 CPUs
 support on the 586 flavour (closes: bug#332836).
   * Use --march to optimize flavours (closes: bug#332897).

It's almost 1:1 sure caused by -march flag (sorry, my fault :(()

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to C)

---
Received: (at 334228-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 20:39:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 13:39:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERFBA-0002Rg-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:24 -0700
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334228: fixed in kfreebsd-5 5.4-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:24 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: kfreebsd-5
Source-Version: 5.4-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kfreebsd-5, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kfreebsd-5/kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.diff.gz
kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kfreebsd-5/kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.dsc
kfreebsd-source-5.4_5.4-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kfreebsd-5/kfreebsd-source-5.4_5.4-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kfreebsd-5 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:21:56 +0200
Source: kfreebsd-5
Binary: kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-686 kfreebsd-headers-5-686 
kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-686 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-586 
kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-486 kfreebsd-headers-5-686-smp 
kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-5-586 kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-486 
kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-686-smp kfreebsd-image-5-686-smp kfreebsd-image-5-486 
kfreebsd-image-5-586 

Bug#334150: This bug is probably fixed together with #333999.

[Artur R. Czechowski]

Hi,
I noticed that after rebuilding the rpm package with patch for #333999
there are all required dependencies.

Regards
Artur
-- 
Na twardzielu dioda gore
/z pamiętnika administratora/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#259671: marked as done (Missing dependency on libsm-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259671: fixed in vte 1:0.11.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2004 00:48:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 15 17:48:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoon.lafn.org [206.117.18.9] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BlGu7-0003oH-00; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:48:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (host-66-81-27-3.rev.o1.com [66.81.27.3])
by zoon.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i6G0lWpR071194
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1Bl9X8-FI-E7
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:56:34 -0700
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:56:34 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Missing dependency on libsm-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libvte-dev
Version: 1:0.11.11-4
Severity: important

gtkterm fails to build because it links against libSM which isn't
installed.  It does so because libvte-dev includes it in its
libtool information file, so libvte-dev should depend on
libsm-dev.

-- 
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/

---
Received: (at 259671-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 21:10:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 14:10:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERFdv-0005z7-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#259671: fixed in vte 1:0.11.15-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: vte
Source-Version: 1:0.11.15-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vte, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libvte-common_0.11.15-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/v/vte/libvte-common_0.11.15-2_all.deb
libvte-dev_0.11.15-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vte/libvte-dev_0.11.15-2_i386.deb
libvte-doc_0.11.15-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/v/vte/libvte-doc_0.11.15-2_all.deb
libvte4_0.11.15-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vte/libvte4_0.11.15-2_i386.deb
python-vte_0.11.15-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vte/python-vte_0.11.15-2_i386.deb
vte_0.11.15-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/v/vte/vte_0.11.15-2.diff.gz
vte_0.11.15-2.dsc
  to pool/main/v/vte/vte_0.11.15-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated vte package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 22:21:33 +0200
Source: vte
Binary: python-vte libvte4 libvte-doc libvte-common libvte-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.11.15-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libvte-common - Terminal emul

Bug#332828: marked as done (libhal-storage-dev: Missing Depends on libhal-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332828: fixed in hal 0.4.8-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 20:28:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 13:28:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.72] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOLJF-0007Qb-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:28:45 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 63EBF38388
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,  8 Oct 2005 22:28:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AB038387
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,  8 Oct 2005 22:28:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 9988326136; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 22:28:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 22:28:43 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libhal-storage-dev: Missing Depends on libhal-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: hal
Version: 0.4.8-7
Severity: serious

Hi,

When building pmount (from experimental) I get the following
error:
Package hal was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `hal.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'hal', required by 'hal-storage', not found
cc -c -g -Wall -O2  pmount-hal.c
pmount-hal.c:20:28: error: libhal-storage.h: No such file or directory

libhal-storage-dev should have a Depends on libhal-dev.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 332828-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 21:18:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 14:18:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERFsR-0004OF-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:17:07 -0700
From: Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#332828: fixed in hal 0.4.8-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: hal
Source-Version: 0.4.8-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
hal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

hal-device-manager_0.4.8-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal-device-manager_0.4.8-8_all.deb
hal-doc_0.4.8-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal-doc_0.4.8-8_all.deb
hal_0.4.8-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.4.8-8.diff.gz
hal_0.4.8-8.dsc
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.4.8-8.dsc
hal_0.4.8-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.4.8-8_i386.deb
libhal-dev_0.4.8-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-dev_0.4.8-8_i386.deb
libhal-storage-dev_0.4.8-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-storage-dev_0.4.8-8_i386.deb
libhal-storage0_0.4.8-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-storage0_0.4.8-8_i386.deb
libhal0_0.4.8-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal0_0.4.8-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated hal package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MES

Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free detected

[Filippo Giunchedi]

Package: lftp
Version: 3.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,
consider this sample output

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lftp mysite 
Password:
cd ok, cwd=/
lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/> cd www
cd ok, cwd=/www
lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/www> put ~/tmp/subscribe.php
801 bytes transferred
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x10139df8 ***
Aborted
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

note that the file got actually transferred successfully!

filippo

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (550, 'experimental'), (450, 'breezy')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages lftp depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-2  GCC support library
ii  libgcrypt11   1.2.1-4LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libgnutls12   1.2.6-1the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii  libgpg-error0 1.1-4  library for common error values an
ii  libncurses5   5.5-1  Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libreadline5  5.0-11 GNU readline and history libraries
ii  libtasn1-20.2.13-1   Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii  netbase   4.22   Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-4  compression library - runtime

lftp recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?

[Francesco Poli]

On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:17:35 +0300 Tommi Vainikainen wrote:

> Hello members of debian-legal,

Hi!

> 
> It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open
> Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and
> therefore needs to be changed.

Indeed.

> 
> Currently web pages are "Copyright © 1997-2005 SPI" and license terms
> linking to Open Publication license are available at
> http://www.de.debian.org/license >. However SPI has not been
> collecting any paper work to transfer copyrights like FSF does, and
> probably many contributors do not even know about that their work is
> automatically copyrighted by SPI.
> 
> So basically there is two questions:
> 
> Does missing paperwork create a problem?

I think it does, unfortunately.

Each copyright holder should be tracked, contacted and asked for a
signed copyright assignment paper.
Then SPI will be able to relicense the website.

A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and simply
asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be tracked,
contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing.

The latter solution is (relatively) easier, since contributors must be
tracked and contacted anyway, but a permission to relicense can be
obtained via e-mail, while a copyright assignment must be done in a
written and signed (deadtree) paper, AFAIK.

> 
> And what would be good license for Debians web pages? (This is about
> content, the scripts used in generation are GNU GPL or otherwise
> freely licensed.)

My recommendations are:


 GNU GPL v2
 --
 (http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.txt)
 if copyleft is desired


 Expat a.k.a. MIT
 
 (http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt)
 if copyleft is not perceived as important and/or maximum license
 compatibility is desired


> 
> Because copyright is currently claimed by SPI Inc, and SPI's board
> meeting is coming rather soon, I brought this issue to SPI's
> secretarys attention, but SPI board would appreciate some suggestion
> what they should decide about license change.

Good, thanks for working on this issue!

> 
> I've Cc'ed the bug report about the issue, but Mail-followups does not
> contain bug report. Add it if needed, please.

Added.

-- 
:-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
..
  Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


pgpxYvJMHIBcZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#331634: Intention to NMU

[Luk Claes]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Luk,

Hi

> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> 
>>Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
>>you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
>>patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
>>
>>Note that this also resolves the build error and fixes the clean target.
> 
> 
> well, regarding the libssl transition, I have just checked the available
> version and found that for now libssl0.9.8 is still the current Sid
> version. Thus following the announcement that this transition is called
> off for now, we should wait till the 0.9.7 is back in the archive, so
> that we get these fixes into Etch. I'll nevertheless add your patch to
> the SVN so it'll be included as soon as the upload is ready to be
> uploaded.

What announcement are you talking about? AFAIK people should just upload
their packages for fixing (RC) bugs and the packages will be binNMUed
(rebuilt against the versioned libssl0.9.8) if and when necessary.

Cheers

Luk

- --
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUs4t5UTeB5t8Mo0RAmQTAKDPMpOX/VeFWzs7ZAxQygvhg9l/wwCfZIWa
khl2xiWdLjt82aK3yDMnHQI=
=A3UT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?

[Bas Zoetekouw]

Hi Francesco!

You wrote:

> A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and simply
> asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be tracked,
> contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing.

I'm afraid that this will turn out to be infeasable.  Lots and lots of
people have contributed to the webpages.  To make it even worse, a lots
of translators used to work though general cvs accounts (like "dutch" or
"french"), making it even harder to find out who did what.

-- 
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw  | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] |  a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++ 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of initrd-tools 0.1.83

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 324351 + fixed
Bug#324351: initrd-tools: /etc/mkinitrd/scripts files not executed if files 
contain a "."
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> tag 329614 + fixed
Bug#329614: -o relative-file puts it inside the build directory, which gets 
deleted
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> tag 330446 + fixed
Bug#330446: fails to purge if module utilities are not installed
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> tag 333857 + fixed
Bug#333857: initrd/initramfs: Step 2 ongoing, ramdisk-tools needs fixing
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Bug#225750: discus: Very Broken

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 225750 grave
Bug#225750: discus: Very Broken
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334295: slow syslogd makes system unusable

[Kai Henningsen]

Package: sysklogd
Version: 1.4.1-16
Severity: critical

I've seen this cause a boot take hours. The system looks like it's
mostly idle, but everything which uses syslog is excruciatingly slow.

It is possible that this is the same which is mentioned in bug 273269,
as both systems I've seen this on run with -r and -l, but the
explanation looks suspicious, as I believe the last time I saw it DNS
was actually working.  In that case, -l wasn't working, but reverse
resolution was - every host was logged with the full reverse name
instead of the short name. In another case, the slowdown kept openvpn
from starting, and thus all actual log messages were from localhost.

/etc/init.d/sysklogd restart solved the problem in both situations.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (995, 'testing'), (550, 'experimental'), (550, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2+kai.20050930
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages sysklogd depends on:
ii  klogd [linux-kernel-log-dae 1.4.1-16 Kernel Logging Daemon
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325155: etc

[Dale E. Martin]

> Any news on fixing this bug?  It's making at least one other package
> (tyvis) FTBFS, too (though that package has other bugs, anyway).

I recently did the ABI transition for the library this package depends on -
clutils.  I'm working on the ABI transition for this package as well as
part of this upload.  I've fixed the mpich-dev issue and that will be part
of the next upload.

Thanks,
  Dale
-- 
Dale E. Martin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://the-martins.org/~dmartin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#331634: Intention to NMU

[Steve Langasek]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:06:40PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Luk,

> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> > Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> > you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> > patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.

> > Note that this also resolves the build error and fixes the clean target.

> well, regarding the libssl transition, I have just checked the available
> version and found that for now libssl0.9.8 is still the current Sid
> version. Thus following the announcement that this transition is called
> off for now, we should wait till the 0.9.7 is back in the archive, so
> that we get these fixes into Etch. I'll nevertheless add your patch to
> the SVN so it'll be included as soon as the upload is ready to be
> uploaded.

The libssl transition should not be a priority, but this is not the same
thing as it being "called off".  You should still upload to fix RC bugs as
usual, and not worry about whether this means libssl0.9.7 or libssl0.9.8. 
(It will mean libssl0.9.8 in any case, because this is the only version that
libssl-dev will point to going forward.)

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gst-plugins0.8 0.8.11-1.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 329759 + fixed
Bug#329759: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0: prerm failure: gconftool-2: command not 
found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

[Ted Kisner]

On Sunday 16 October 2005 13:37, Ted Kisner wrote:
> I'm not sure if KDE 3.4.2 included in debian unstable has been patched.
> However, I think the fact that we can compile kdelibs and kst means that
> this is not an issue (i.e, it dealt with ui files during compile time).

I looked through the changelog for the qt-x11-free source.  Version 3.3.5 does 
have a patch that disables the "includehints" in Qt.  Based on the changelog, 
a lot of things have changed between the version in stable (3.3.4-3) and the 
one in unstable (3.3.5-1).

I am currently trying to build the Qt packages from stable on my sid machine 
with gcc 4.0.2.  I'm not sure it will even compile properly, but will be 
interesting to see if the older version of Qt will prevent these X errors.

> The KDE website explicitly says to *NOT* use Qt 3.3.5 with KDE 3.4/3.5, but
> I don't know if this ui issues is the only reason...  I'm assuming that the
> debian-kde people know what they are doing in choosing to use Qt 3.3.5 ;-)
> Hopefully any necessary patches have been applied...

Looks like some kind of patch has been applied, but not sure if this makes Qt 
3.3.5 "ok" for use with KDE 3.4/3.5.

-Ted




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334304: cfengine2: buffer overflow somewhere with rebuild against libssl0.9.8

[Steinar H. Gunderson]

Package: cfengine2
Version: 2.1.15-1.0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

We're using cfengine2 over IPv6, and since 2.1.15-1.0.1 (which was
rebuilt against libssl 0.9.7; 2.1.15-1.0 works), we've had odd problems
with authentication. More specifically, the machine identifies itself
with the wrong IPv6 address; some nibbles are switched with 1c00:.
Note the following behaviour from strace of cfagent:

  socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
  connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(5308), inet_pton(AF_INET6, 
"2001:700:300:dc0f::1919", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) 
= 0
  getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(32770), 
inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2001:700:300:dc0f:213:d4ff:fe9c:7d3d", &sin6_addr), 
sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, [28]) = 0

At this point, getsockname() returns the correct IPv6 address. Then,
time passes, but nothing is done with fd 3, until:

  getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(58321), 
inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2001:700:300:dc0f:1c00:0:fe9c:7d3d", &sin6_addr), 
sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, [28]) = 0

Note that the middle part of the address suddenly is mangled, and this
breaks authentication, so cfengine becomes completely useless (since
authentication fails). My guess here is that something overwrites random
memory, causing corruption to something internal to glibc.

Switching kernels (2.6.8 / 2.6.12 / 2.6.13) doesn't help, and
downgrading libc6 to the version in etch doesn't either. nscd is off.

This is broken in exactly the same way on multiple machines, although a
few seem to survive... in any case, downgrading cfengine to the version
in etch (2.1.15-1) solves the problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages cfengine2 depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils   2.15   Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.2  4.2.52-20  Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libssl0.9.8   0.9.8-3SSL shared libraries
ii  perl  5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

cfengine2 recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334157: marked as done (Missing dependency on mozilla-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334157: fixed in openvrml 0.15.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 21:44:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 14:44:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQtpH-00049R-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:44:23 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9FLiM3R095247
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EQsPy-y3-4f
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:14:10 -0700
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:14:10 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Missing dependency on mozilla-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1134/Fri Oct 14 01:07:44 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libopenvrml4-dev
Version: 0.15.10-1
Severity: serious

/usr/lib/pkgconfig/openvrml.pc requires mozilla-js, but
libopenvrml4-dev does not depend on mozilla-dev so mozilla-js.pc is
not installed.

This is serious because it prevents gtklookat from building.

--=20
Matt

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUWMRfNdgYxVXvBARAgwYAKCZrmEPe0diba2Xono6B5D9GPrl8ACgpwfv
6QWckKDjZI8CvsC9Oy2TfGs=
=K8RW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--

---
Received: (at 334157-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 00:39:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 17:39:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERIv8-0007JW-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:32:06 -0700
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334157: fixed in openvrml 0.15.10-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:32:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: openvrml
Source-Version: 0.15.10-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openvrml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libopenvrml4-dev_0.15.10-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openvrml/libopenvrml4-dev_0.15.10-2_i386.deb
libopenvrml4-doc_0.15.10-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openvrml/libopenvrml4-doc_0.15.10-2_all.deb
libopenvrml4c2_0.15.10-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openvrml/libopenvrml4c2_0.15.10-2_i386.deb
openvrml-lookat_0.15.10-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openvrml/openvrml-lookat_0.15.10-2_i386.deb
openvrml_0.15.10-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openvrml/openvrml_0.15.10-2.diff.gz
openvrml_0.15.10-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openvrml/openvrml_0.15.10-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bu

Bug#334122: Receive an "Segmentation fault" when launching gramps

[James A. Treacy]

On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 11:09:25AM -0700, Jim Woodruff wrote:
> Cannot launch gramps as it exits with an "Segmentation fault" error.

This is almost certainly a problem with python or the gtk/gnome bindings.
Try starting python and importing modules:
$ python
>>> import gtk
>>> import gnome
>>> import gconf
>>> import gtkspell

If the modules all imported without problems, run gdb on python and
then run gramps:
$ gdb /usr/bin/python
(gdb) run /usr/share/gramps/gramps.py

If, as I suspect, this is a problem with gtkspell, you can still use
gramps by uninstalling gtkspell.

-- 
James Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#330446: Fixed in NMU of initrd-tools 0.1.83

[Horms]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:17:06PM -0700, Sven Luther wrote:
> tag 324351 + fixed
> tag 329614 + fixed
> tag 330446 + fixed
> tag 333857 + fixed
> 
> quit
> 
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.

For anyone who cares, this was not really an NMU, other
than in the technical sense. It was made by Sven, who
is a member of the Kernel Team, who maintains initrd-tools.

I have added him and myself as uploaders to avoid any future
confusion regarding uploads of initrd-tools made by Sven
(or myself).

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:50:57 +
> Source: initrd-tools
> Binary: initrd-tools
> Architecture: source all
> Version: 0.1.83
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Debian kernel team 
> Changed-By: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description: 
>  initrd-tools - tools to create initrd image for prepackaged Linux kernel
> Closes: 324351 329614 330446 333857
> Changes: 
>  initrd-tools (0.1.83) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>[ Simon Horman ]
>* Clarify naming of scripts that will be run.
>  Thanks to Simon Schoar. (Closes: #324351)
>* Make sure that path to output image is always fully qualified,
>  else an image with a relative will not end up where requested
>  (closes: #329614)
>  .
>[ dann frazier ]
>* Don't assume update-modules is available during postrm (closes: #330446)
>  .
>[ Sven Luther ]
>* Added --supported-(host|target)-version support for the new post-2.6.13
>  ramdisk-tool policy. Added linux-ramdisk-tool virtual package too.
>  (Closes: #333857)
> Files: 
>  bb2f5ea3f208f972649dfb5d1cac123e 644 utils optional initrd-tools_0.1.83.dsc
>  eff2ad61dc7e18f607d541bd71a53dac 28815 utils optional 
> initrd-tools_0.1.83.tar.gz
>  dc7b11f6eb3cc3cf934c6639f1a1db3d 31728 utils optional 
> initrd-tools_0.1.83_all.deb
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFDUs2o2WTeT3CRQaQRAhifAJ9jQVG+GwyAs7lGMD/dwllcAN/GmACfSEAA
> igkOcTRK7n9s9dQdA/xC2ew=
> =7/gM
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Horms


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]