Bug#323815: problem still exists

2005-11-05 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks,

The problem still exists on amd64. Would you mind to check?


Many thanx

Harri


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#330191: klibc 1.1.1-4 FTBFS on sparc

2005-11-05 Thread Jurij Smakov

Hi,

The latest and greates klibc version fails to build on sparc. Due to some 
reason buildd overrides the CFLAGS set and uses -m32 (instead of -m64) flag to 
gcc, causing the failure. It builds fine on my up-to-date sid system. It also 
boot 2.6.14-2 fine, if I increase the timeout after udevsynthesize in 
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/init.


Best regards,

Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/   KeyID: C99E03CC



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#333052: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd

2005-11-05 Thread Harald Dunkel
Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:31:04PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> 
> 
> With my patch, modprobe waits until the needed modules come out of the 
> "Loading" or "Unloading" state.
> 
> 

For testing I have added it to Debian's
module-init-tools 3.2-pre9. Works for me.


Regards

Harri


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#335279: spamassassin: also seeing the same problem

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 335279 normal
Bug#335279: Missing dependency on libnet-dns-perl
Severity set to `normal'.

> merge 335279 332906
Bug#332906: spamassassing needs DNS.pm but doesn't depend on libnet-dns-perl
Bug#335279: Missing dependency on libnet-dns-perl
Merged 332906 335279.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#335279: spamassassin: also seeing the same problem

2005-11-05 Thread Duncan Findlay
severity 335279 normal
merge 335279 332906
thanks

On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 07:18:16PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > I'm also seeing the same problem reported by the original poster,
> > but, in my case, I had to install more packages to make the daemon
> > start. If I remember correctly, I had to install:
> > 
> > libnet-dns-perl
> > libmail-spf-query-perl
> > libsys-hostname-long-perl
> > libsocket6-perl
> 
> libnet-dns-perl is now required by M::SA::Dns

If it's not installed, a warning message is issued, spamassassin still
runs. (If it's not, something wierd is happening -- it should issue an
error, but keep going.)
 
> From what I can tell, libsocket6-perl isn't strictly required unless
> you have a IPv6 nameserver. [use constant HAS_SOCKET_INET6 => eval {
> require IO::Socket::INET6 }; in M::SA::DnsResolver]

This is a bug in SpamAssassin -- if you use an IPv6 nameserver, it'll
refuse to start up if you have libnet-dns-perl, but not
libsocket6-perl. I'd rather fix the bug than raise the dependency.

> libmail-spf-query-perl should only be required if you're using the SPF
> plugin.

Right. Again, there's a warning message issued if you don't have it,
but it is not fatal.

> I don't know why you'd need libsys-hostname-long-perl, as the only
> thing that appears to be used is Sys::Hostname, not
> Sys::Hostname::Long (unless one of the above modules has a dependency
> on it that isn't declared.)

That's a bug in libmail-spf-query-perl. I believe that the latest
version of that package now has libsys-hostname-long-perl as
Suggests. I suspect this means it should be at least a Suggests: for
spamassassin.

> I'll make an NMU into the delayed queue sometime tomorrow to fix this
> problem unless someone has some corrections to make to it.

Please don't.

I'll admit I'm a little short on time, and so I haven't appropriately
responded to these reports but these are not bugs, strictly speaking.

As far as I can tell, there is no module that needs to be added to
spamassassin's Depends: or Recommends:.

The bug is that the error messages for "missing" perl modules is too
"loud". SpamAssassin does run just fine without libnet-dns-perl
(unless you use an ipv6 nameserver and don't have libsocket6-perl),
and without libmail-spf-query-perl. The error messages even go away if
you set "dns_available no" in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf and comment
out "loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF" in
/etc/spamassassin/init.pre


-- 
Duncan Findlay


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#330606: mozilla-firefox does not start up

2005-11-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:06:49PM +0200, Torsten Zirzlaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi.
> 
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
> 
> >* Torsten Zirzlaff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [...]
> >
> >Can you move your ~/.mozilla directory out of the way and try again?
> 
>   Done, but the situation is the same, except it creates the nescessary 
> files and waits then.

Could you run strace -f firefox > /tmp/strace 2>&1 and send the
/tmp/strace file here ?

Cheers

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337547: marked as done (slib: 3a2-1 fails to install, Unbound variable: with-load-pathname)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337513: slib not installable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 22:32:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 14:32:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-24-10-232-189.hsd1.ut.comcast.net (dusty.savageroad.com) 
[24.10.232.189] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYA6q-0001MX-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:32:32 -0800
Received: from bertbob by dusty.savageroad.com with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EYA6M-0004QI-AI; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:32:02 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: slib: 3a2-1 fails to install, Unbound variable: with-load-pathname
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:32:02 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: slib
Version: 3a1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Upgrade from 3a1-5 to 3a2-1 fails with

Errors were encountered while processing:
 slib
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Ack!  Something bad happened while installing packages.  Trying to recover:
Setting up slib (3a2-1) ...
ERROR: Unbound variable: with-load-pathname
dpkg: error processing slib (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Packages which depend on slib (such as gnucash) fail to start with
same "Unbound variable: with-load-pathname" error.  Reversion to
previous version restores function of scheme and dependent programs.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 337513-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2005 05:22:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 21:22:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYczX-0005wC-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:55 -0800
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EYczW-0004I4-DJ; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#337513: slib not installable
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Zippy-Says: 
   TAPPING?  You POLITICIANS!  Don't you realize that the END of the
   ``Wash Cycle'' is a TREASURED MOMENT for most people?!
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Vincent Danjean's
message of "Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: slib
> Version: 3a2-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I cannot install slib. I do not know anything about guile. I think I
> have the slib due to dependencies. Trying to install the last version
> (3a2-1) fails.

Thank you for your bug report.  Please see bugs.debian.org/337359.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337513: marked as done (slib not installable)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337513: slib not installable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 16:52:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 08:52:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from iona.labri.fr [147.210.8.143] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EY4oA-0003eT-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:52:54 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by iona.labri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28631017A9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  4 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from iona.labri.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (iona.labri.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 04935-08 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Fri,  4 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from galadriel.labri.fr (ram94-1-81-57-199-184.fbx.proxad.net 
[81.57.199.184])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by iona.labri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC81101765
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  4 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: by galadriel.labri.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3A85FEAB66; Fri,  4 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: slib not installable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at labri.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: slib
Version: 3a2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I cannot install slib. I do not know anything about guile. I think I
have the slib due to dependencies. Trying to install the last version
(3a2-1) fails.
I added 'set -x' in the postinst file, so I get :

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LC_ALL=C sudo dpkg -a --configure
Setting up slib (3a2-1) ...
+ install-info --quiet --section 'The Algorithmic Language Scheme' 'The
Algorithmic Language Scheme' '--description=The SLIB portable Scheme
library' /usr/share/info/slib.info.gz
+ '[' -x /usr/sbin/guile1.4-slibconfig ']'
+ '[' -x /usr/bin/guile-1.6 -a -e /usr/share/guile/1.6/slib ']'
+ rm -f /usr/share/guile/1.6/slibcat
+ /usr/bin/guile-1.6 -c '(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require
'\''new-catalog)'
ERROR: Unbound variable: with-load-pathname
dpkg: error processing slib (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 slib
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ 

  Ask me other information if you need it.

  Best regards,
 Vincent

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 337513-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2005 05:22:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 21:22:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYczX-0005wC-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:55 -0800
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EYczW-0004I4-DJ; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#337513: slib not installable
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Zippy-Says: 
   TAPPING?  You POLITICIANS!  Don't you realize that the END of the
   ``Wash Cycle'' is a TREASURED MOMENT for most people?!
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800

Bug#328534: Adaptec 2005S Hangs with current experiemental 2.6.13-686-smp kernel

2005-11-05 Thread Jurij Smakov

Hi,

Could you please check whether 2.6.14-2, which is currently in unstable, 
still oopses/hangs with your controllers?


Best regards,

Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/   KeyID: C99E03CC


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337547: slib: 3a2-1 fails to install, Unbound variable: with-load-pathname

2005-11-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Version: 3a2-2

Bert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: slib
> Version: 3a1-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Upgrade from 3a1-5 to 3a2-1 fails with
>
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  slib
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> Ack!  Something bad happened while installing packages.  Trying to recover:
> Setting up slib (3a2-1) ...
> ERROR: Unbound variable: with-load-pathname
> dpkg: error processing slib (--configure):
>  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Thank you for your bug report.  Please see
http://bugs.debian.org/337359.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#335402: penguin-command: shouldn't this bug be closed?

2005-11-05 Thread Itai Seggev
Package: penguin-command
Version: 1.6.7-2
Followup-For: Bug #335402

shouldn't this bug be closed? It would seems that this was fixed with
1.6.9-2. Right now this bug is the only thing preventing 1.6.10-1 
from entering etch.  


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (750, 'testing'), (10, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13cavybook1
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages penguin-command depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libjpeg62 6b-10  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng2   1.0.18-1   PNG library, older version - runti
ii  libsdl-mixer1 1.2.6-1.1  mixer library for Simple DirectMed
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-4  compression library - runtime

penguin-command recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#333052: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd

2005-11-05 Thread Rusty Russell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 19:48 +0100, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:31:04PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > I've got these messages several times on the experimental SUSE too,
> > but can't reproduce it so far, even without Rusty's patch to modprobe
> > they have disappeared. See here for the details:
> >   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333052
> 
> 
> Just to let you know, I've also met this problem (on another distro), 
> and did not know about this bugreport until now.
> So I've done another workaround: modprobe already parses /proc/modules 
> to check whether the modules needed are already loaded, and this file 
> also shows us the state of the modules, being "Loading", "Live" or 
> "Unloading".
> 
> With my patch, modprobe waits until the needed modules come out of the 
> "Loading" or "Unloading" state.

Yes, this was going to be my solution.  However, we only need to resort
to this is locking fails (read-only root filesystem).

Rusty.
-- 
A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#335279: spamassassin: also seeing the same problem

2005-11-05 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Rogério Brito wrote:
> I'm also seeing the same problem reported by the original poster,
> but, in my case, I had to install more packages to make the daemon
> start. If I remember correctly, I had to install:
> 
> libnet-dns-perl
> libmail-spf-query-perl
> libsys-hostname-long-perl
> libsocket6-perl

libnet-dns-perl is now required by M::SA::Dns

From what I can tell, libsocket6-perl isn't strictly required unless
you have a IPv6 nameserver. [use constant HAS_SOCKET_INET6 => eval {
require IO::Socket::INET6 }; in M::SA::DnsResolver]

libmail-spf-query-perl should only be required if you're using the SPF
plugin.

I don't know why you'd need libsys-hostname-long-perl, as the only
thing that appears to be used is Sys::Hostname, not
Sys::Hostname::Long (unless one of the above modules has a dependency
on it that isn't declared.)

I'll make an NMU into the delayed queue sometime tomorrow to fix this
problem unless someone has some corrections to make to it.


Don Armstrong

-- 
"Ban cryptography! Yes. Let's also ban pencils, pens and paper, since
criminals can use them to draw plans of the joint they are casing or
even, god forbid, create one time pads to pass uncrackable codes to
each other. Ban open spaces since criminals could use them to converse
with each other out of earshot of the police. Let's ban flags since
they could be used to pass secret messages in semaphore. In fact let's
just ban all forms of verbal and non-verbal communication -- let's see
those criminals make plans now!"

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#337740: libwnn6-1: Missing conflicts with libwnn6

2005-11-05 Thread Bryan Donlan
Package: libwnn6-1
Version: 1.0.0-12.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

When performing an automatic upgrade from libwnn6 to libwnn6-1, the
following error occurs:

Selecting previously deselected package libwnn6-1.
(Reading database ... 144951 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libwnn6-1 (from .../libwnn6-1_1.0.0-12.1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libwnn6-1_1.0.0-12.1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libwnn6.so.1.0.0', which is also in
 package libwnn6
 
This is most likely due to a missing conflicts relationship with libwnn6

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337668: FTBFS: broken build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev

2005-11-05 Thread Lawrence Williams
This bug will be fixed in the next libsdl1.2 package release (currently 
available on mentors.debian.net) if i can ever get a sponser :)


Lawrence

Original Message Follows
From: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#337668: FTBFS:  broken build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 18:46:21 +0100

Package: libsdl1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch


Hi!

libsdl1.2_1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 fails to build in a clean sid 
environment.


Fromm my pbuilder-log:

=
[..]
 -> Considering  xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev
   -> Trying xlibmesa-dev
   -> Cannot install xlibmesa-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
dpkg is already the newest version.
Package xlibmesa-dev is not available, but is referred to by another 
package.

This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
  xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev
E: Package xlibmesa-dev has no installation candidate
   -> Trying libgl-dev
   -> Cannot install libgl-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
dpkg is already the newest version.
Package libgl-dev is a virtual package provided by:
  xlibmesa-gl-dev 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10
  mesag-dev 6.3.2-2
  libgl1-mesa-dri-dev 6.3.2-2
  libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev 6.3.2-2
You should explicitly select one to install.
E: Package libgl-dev has no installation candidate
 -> Considering libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev to satisfy the dependency
   -> Cannot install libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
dpkg is already the newest version.
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev: Depends: mesa-common-dev (= 6.3.2-2) but it is 
not going to be installed
Depends: libgl1-mesa-directfb (= 6.3.2-2) but 
it is not going to be installed

E: Broken packages
E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.
=

Changing the Build-Depends from "xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev" to 
"xlibmesa-gl-dev

| libgl-dev" solved the problem for me.  Patch atteched.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)


<< libsdl1.2-1.2.7_1.2.8cvs20041007-ftbfs-xlibmesa-gl-dev.patch >>




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Ownership problem appears to be unreproduceable; downgrading and tagging

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 316241 important
Bug#316241: bind9: can not write into cache directory
Severity set to `important'.

> tag 316241 unreproducible
Bug#316241: bind9: can not write into cache directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#316241: Ownership problem appears to be unreproduceable; downgrading and tagging

2005-11-05 Thread Don Armstrong
severity 316241 important
tag 316241 unreproducible
thanks

As:

uid=$(ls -ln /etc/bind/rndc.key | awk '{print $3}')
if [ "$uid" = "0" ]; then
[ -n "$localconf" ] || chown bind /etc/bind/rndc.key
chgrp bind /etc/bind
chmod g+s /etc/bind
chgrp bind /etc/bind/rndc.key /var/run/bind/run /var/cache/bind
chgrp bind /etc/bind/named.conf*
chmod g+r /etc/bind/rndc.key /etc/bind/named.conf*
chmod g+rwx /var/run/bind/run /var/cache/bind
fi

should be taking care of this problem, I'm downgrading and tagging
unreproducible.


Don Armstrong

-- 
Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy.
 -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p251

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: still fails to build on sparc

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 330191 - fixed
Bug#330191: klibc: ftbfs [sparc] redefinition of 'struct __new_sigaction'
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags removed: fixed

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#330191: still fails to build on sparc

2005-11-05 Thread Blars Blarson
tags 330191 - fixed
thanks

klibc 1.1.1-4 failed to build on a sparc buildd the same way, so this
problem is not fixed.  However it did build on my sparc pbuilder.


gcc -Wp,-MT,fork.o,-MD,./.fork.o.d -Os -m32 -mptr32  -D__KLIBC__=1 
-D__KLIBC_MINOR__=1 -nostdlib -nostdinc -iwithprefix include 
-I../include/arch/sparc -I../include/bits32 -I../include -I../linux/include 
-I../linux/include2 -I../linux/include -I./zlib -I./zlib -DWITH_ERRLIST -W 
-Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline 
-DDYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE -c -o fork.o fork.c
In file included from ../include/signal.h:15,
 from fork.c:9:
../include/arch/sparc/klibc/archsignal.h:13: error: redefinition of 'struct 
__new_sigaction'
../include/arch/sparc/klibc/archsignal.h:25: error: redefinition of 'struct 
sigaction'
../include/arch/sparc/klibc/archsignal.h:32: error: redefinition of 'struct 
sigaltstack'
../include/arch/sparc/klibc/archsignal.h:36: error: redefinition of typedef 
'stack_t'
../linux/include/asm/signal.h:230: error: previous declaration of 'stack_t' was 
here
make[2]: *** [fork.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/klibc-1.1.1/klibc'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#336036: dovecot-imapd: user's inbox corruption

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 336036 normal
Bug#336036: dovecot-imapd: user's inbox corruption
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336036: dovecot-imapd: user's inbox corruption

2005-11-05 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas

severity 336036 normal
thanks

On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Al Nikolov wrote:


Package: dovecot-imapd
Version: 0.99.14-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss

Hopefully, this was happen with only one user's inbox. I'm not sure
about where to look for true cause if this effect.



My guess is the mbox is indeed corrupt.  Can you check for e.g. double 
from (minus the colon) header lines?


--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337702: openoffice.org 2.0 won't start since upgrade, libc problem?

2005-11-05 Thread Jeff Davis
Steve Langasek wrote:
> That sounds like a broken libc.
> 
> $ objdump -T /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno
>   D  *UND*  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE errno
>   D  *UND*  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno
> $ objdump -T /lib/tls/libc.so.6 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno
> 0008 gD  .tbss  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE errno
> 001c gD  .tbss  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno
> $
> 
> These two libraries are supposed to be used together.  The openoffice
> packages would have to be doing something *very* perverse to break that;
> it's much more likely that you've managed to somehow screw up
> /lib/tls/libc.so.6 or /lib/ld-linux.so.2 locally.  Check the output of ldd
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx for junk in /usr/local, use "debsums -s
> libc6" to verify that none of your libraries have been modified.
> 


# objdump -T /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno
  D  *UND*  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE errno
  D  *UND*  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno
# objdump -T /lib/tls/libc.so.6 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno
0008 gD  .tbss  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE errno
001c gD  .tbss  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno
# ldd /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx
linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xe000)
libuno_sal.so.3 => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3
(0xb7d53000)
libuno_cppu.so.3 => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppu.so.3
(0xb7d27000)
libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 =>
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 (0xb7ce4000)
libjvmfwk.so.3 => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libjvmfwk.so.3
(0xb7ccf000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7caa000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7c98000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7bbe000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7b99000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7b8e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7a56000)
libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0xb7a4d000)
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0xb7a1f000)
libstlport_gcc.so.4.6 => /usr/lib/libstlport_gcc.so.4.6 (0xb7954000)
libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 =>
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 (0xb795)
libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0xb7842000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb782d000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f04000)
# debsums -s libc6
#

(There was no output for "debsums -s libc6")

Is there a way that I can fix that? Can I remove the libraries and
reinstall them?





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337735: oooqs-kde: fails to install

2005-11-05 Thread Slaanesh
Package: oooqs-kde
Version: 2.0.3-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

oooqs-kde can not be installed with openoffice.org 2.
Here is the result of an apt-get call:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  oooqs-kde: Depends: openoffice.org (> 1.0.99+1.1rc) but it is not
  going to be installed
E: Broken packages  
  


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages oooqs-kde depends on:
ii  kdelibs4c2   4:3.4.2-4   core libraries for all KDE applica
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio21.7-3   The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc62.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.2-1.1   generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0.2-3   GCC support library
ii  libice6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11 0.5.18-1GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-5  PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3-mt3:3.3.5-1   Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++6   4.0.2-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1  1.1.3-1 X cursor management library
ii  libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxrandr2   6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1  1:0.9.0-2   X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  openoffice.org   2.0.0-2 OpenOffice.org Office suite versio
ii  xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-6   compression library - runtime

Versions of packages oooqs-kde recommends:
ii  kicker4:3.4.2-4  desktop panel for KDE


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337702: openoffice.org 2.0 won't start since upgrade, libc problem?

2005-11-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:48:22PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 2.0.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> When I run any openoffice command I get an error and it exits.

> Example:

> $ ooffice
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: relocation error:
> /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0: symbol errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not
> defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: relocation error:
> /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0: symbol errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not
> defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

That sounds like a broken libc.

$ objdump -T /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno
  D  *UND*  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE errno
  D  *UND*  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno
$ objdump -T /lib/tls/libc.so.6 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno
0008 gD  .tbss  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE errno
001c gD  .tbss  0004  GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno
$

These two libraries are supposed to be used together.  The openoffice
packages would have to be doing something *very* perverse to break that;
it's much more likely that you've managed to somehow screw up
/lib/tls/libc.so.6 or /lib/ld-linux.so.2 locally.  Check the output of ldd
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx for junk in /usr/local, use "debsums -s
libc6" to verify that none of your libraries have been modified.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#337728: gkrellm is linked with libssl

2005-11-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: gkrellm
Version: 2.2.7-3
Severity: serious


At least on i386, gkrellm is linked with libsl0.9.8
effectively reopening archived bug #309089.

The cause of this problem is described in #322211.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336098: considering the removal of saods9

2005-11-05 Thread Justin Pryzby
I'm considering having saods9 removed.

The FTBFS bugs aren't a problem; the original one is fixed upstream,
in 4.0b7, and the others are easy to fix by adding lines like
"class matrix;".

Also, I can either link against tcl8.3 (after applying a patch) or
statically link against a specially-compiled tcl8.4 to solve the
reported crash on "Horizontal cut graph".

But, ./saods9/sla/ contains obscured C code.

slalib is written by Patrick Wallace, and a Fortran copy is
distributed under the GPL by Starlink.  A proprietary C copy is
commercially available from Wallace.  ./sla/ is an obscured C copy,
with a GPL header.  I'm not sure whether the GPL header was added by
Wallace or by Bill Joye upstream, but it doesn't really matter WRT to
the DFSG.

Bill Joye just got back to me after conversation with Pat Wallace,
Doug Mink, and John Roll.  I guess the v4 release isn't planned to fix
this problem, so its apparently up to me to fix.  I'm going to fool
around with the GPL fortran implementation, and see if I can come up
with anything useful.  First, I'll have to reread about C, Fortran,
and f2c calling conventions.

I've filed an RC removal bug, against saods9 only, and given myself a
deadline of 2006-01-01 to have a new package uploaded, otherwise I
will give up.

FYI, the upstream websever hea-www.harvard.edu has been down for a few
days now (again).

Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> block 337690 by 336114
Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 336114

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup

2005-11-05 Thread Steve Langasek
block 337690 by 336114
thanks

On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 04:29:35PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote:
> On Saturday 05 November 2005 02:50 pm, Ronny Standtke wrote:
> > Package: ksayit
> > Version: 4:3.4.2-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> >
> > KSayit crashes on startup. Here is the backtrace:
> ...
> > #3  0xb799bb6e in __gnu_cxx::__pool::_M_reclaim_block ()
> >from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
> > #4  0xb7c2b632 in __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc >__gnu_cxx::__common_pool_policy<__gnu_cxx::__pool, true>
> >>::deallocate () from /usr/lib/libartskde.so.1
> ...

> This is a result of a toolchain bug #336114, and unfortunately there is not 
> much that the debian-qt-kde maintainers until they are told how it will be 
> solved.  If you really need ksayit working, recompiling kdelibs with the 
> current g++ should work around this problem.

Which would then break again when the toolchain is fixed; the ABI change
needs to be reverted, so anything built with the current g++ will have to be
rebuilt again.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: severity of 337674 is normal

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> severity 337674 normal
Bug#337674: vgrabbj testing migration
Severity set to `normal'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 337665 is important

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
>  # this is a policy "should"
> severity 337665 important
Bug#337665: no upstream changelog
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336527: bootchart-view: /usr/bin/bootchart does not start (prints stack trace)

2005-11-05 Thread Nicolas Chauvat
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:02:57PM +0100, Ziga Mahkovec wrote:
> This exception indicates that the bootchart classes have been compiled
> for JDK 1.4 while you are running an older VM.  Indeed, it looks like
> you're running j2re1.3.

Ok. It now works properly with sablevm. Updating the
dependencies/requierements in the package would be nice.
> 
> > I also get a stack trace when trying to use the web interface at
> > bootchart.org btw...
> 
> I assume that's a different error.  Could you post that as well?

Nope. Got it severall times in a row the day I posted. But can not
reproduce it now.


-- 
Nicolas Chauvat

logilab.fr - services en informatique avancée et gestion de connaissances  



Bug#337674: vgrabbj testing migration

2005-11-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:58:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:

> vgrabbj is only installed for i386 because it is mentioned as
> packages-arch-specific for i386 only. Though there were mips binaries
> uploaded. So either ask for the removal of the old binaries or ask to
> change Packages-arch-specific so vgrabbj can migrate to testing.

This last part probably needs more explanation.

http://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff/Packages-arch-specific

vgrabbj is listed on that page as i386-specific because of "i386 assembler".
If this is no longer applicable (well, it sure managed to build on mips
*somehow* when it wasn't supposed to be, so I guess no i386 assembler was
involved), please contact the people listed at the top of that file to have
the entry removed.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#322239: mozilla-firefox: [patch] incorrectly set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in /usr/bin/firefox wrapper

2005-11-05 Thread Vincent . McIntyre

I think I am seeing this too. It was reported in #316824 (for 'mozilla')
but I did not cross-report to 'mozilla-firefox'.
The patch below should fix the issue, see #316824 for why I think
it fixes it.


I don't see why the firefox script should circumvent YOUR broken
LD_LIBRARY_PATH. If your LD_LIBRARY_PATH is b0rked in the first place,
change it.


Well, that's a helpful response! I need to have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to
run particular software that I need to run to do my work.

In particular, we use Debian 'stable' because we need that stability
when writing programs to swing 1,000 tonnes of metal around the sky
(www.parkes.atnf.csiro.au). However for some other parts of our work
we need to install a more recent GCC than stable provides into
/usr/local/gnu. This is what is biting us here.

The fix is only 4 bytes, and since the shell execs into the binary,
who cares what mangling of LD_LIBRARY_PATH goes on inside the wrapper?
I thought that was the whole point of the wrapper.

And it means an important debian package runs nicely in a wider range
of environments.

Kind regards
Vince


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign #337625 yaird
Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not 
loaded in initrd
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `yaird'.

> stop no thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd

2005-11-05 Thread maximilian attems
reassign #337625 yaird
stop no thanks

On Sat, 05 Nov 2005, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

> Sounds like you had initramfs-tools and not yaird installed at the time
> of initially installing the kernel.
> 
> Reassigning to initramfs-tools.

no mention of initramfs-tools in initial report.

> > Regenerating initrd with yaird solved the problem.
> 
> Yes, this has been fixed with most recent version of yaird.

then mark it fixed with the new nice Version header.
 
--
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336280: marked as done (XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336280: fixed in logidee-tools 1.2.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2005 05:48:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 22:48:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EVja0-0005Ie-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:48:36 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9T5mZY4075569
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EVVoS-vz-9W
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:06:36 -0700
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:06:36 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1149/Thu Oct 27 13:20:09 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: logidee-tools
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: serious

pbuilder fails to build logidee-tools in an unstable chroot on i386:

> xsltproc --xinclude --stringparam selection "none" --stringparam cycle "f=
alse" --stringparam charte "gfdl" --stringparam trainer "false" --stringpar=
am lang "en" --stringparam dir "/tmp/buildd/logidee-tools-1.2.4/doc/tools.h=
tml"  ../xsl/module-html.xsl  tools.xml > tools.html/index.html
> XPath error : Undefined variable
> not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' =
',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or  $selection=3D'all')
> ^
> compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template
> Failed to compile predicate
> XPath error : Undefined variable
> not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' =
',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all')
> ^
> compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template
> Failed to compile predicate
> XPath error : Undefined variable
> not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' =
',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all')
> ^
> compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template
> Failed to compile predicate
> XPath error : Undefined variable
> not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' =
',@restriction,' '))   or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all')
> ^
> compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template
> Failed to compile predicate
> XPath error : Undefined variable
> not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' =
',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all')
> ^
> compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template
> Failed to compile predicate
> XPath error : Undefined variable
> not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' =
',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all')
> ^
> compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 33 element template
> Failed to compile predicate
> XPath error : Undefined variable
> not(@trainer=3D$

Bug#337712: sysklogd: Puts link in /usr/doc

2005-11-05 Thread Stephen Quinney
Package: sysklogd
Version: 1.4.1-17
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.3

Section 12.3 of Debian policy "Additional documentation" says:

"Former Debian releases placed all additional documentation in
/usr/doc/package. This has been changed to /usr/share/doc/package, and
packages must not put documentation in the directory
/usr/doc/package."

I believe this package violates this rule by installing a symlink in
/usr/doc/. It is the aim that etch will not have any packages
installing things into the directory /usr/doc/.

I believe this can be rectified by removing the relevant bits in the
postinst and prerm files for sysklogd and klogd.

Thanks,

Stephen Quinney

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages sysklogd depends on:
ii  klogd [linux-kernel-log-daemo 1.4.1-17   Kernel Logging Daemon
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

sysklogd recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337711: dlocate: Puts link in /usr/doc

2005-11-05 Thread Stephen Quinney
Package: dlocate
Version: 0.5-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.3

Section 12.3 of Debian policy "Additional documentation" says:

"Former Debian releases placed all additional documentation in
/usr/doc/package. This has been changed to /usr/share/doc/package, and
packages must not put documentation in the directory
/usr/doc/package."

I believe this package violates this rule by installing a symlink in
/usr/doc/. It is the aim that etch will not have any packages
installing things into the directory /usr/doc/.

I believe this bug can be rectified by simply building and uploading a
new Debian version of this package.

Stephen Quinney


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages dlocate depends on:
ii  dpkg 1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb
ii  grep-dctrl   2.6.7   Grep Debian package information
ii  perl 5.8.7-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

dlocate recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337708: libnet-ident-perl: Puts link in /usr/doc

2005-11-05 Thread Stephen Quinney
Package: libnet-ident-perl
Version: 1.20-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.3

Section 12.3 of Debian policy "Additional documentation" says:

"Former Debian releases placed all additional documentation in
/usr/doc/package. This has been changed to /usr/share/doc/package, and
packages must not put documentation in the directory
/usr/doc/package."

I believe this package violates this rule by installing a symlink in
/usr/doc/. It is the aim that etch will not have any packages
installing things into the directory /usr/doc/.

I believe this bug can be rectified by simply building and uploading a
new Debian version of this package.

Stephen Quinney

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libnet-ident-perl depends on:
ii  perl  5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

libnet-ident-perl recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd

2005-11-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:54:46 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Sounds like you had initramfs-tools and not yaird installed at the
> > time of initially installing the kernel.
> > 
> > Reassigning to initramfs-tools.
> 
> Jonas, i believe he had an older version of yaird without the fbcon
> fix, and rebuilt with yaird or something, not sure.

If so, this bugreport could be closed right away.

Instead, I wrote that last paragraph that you cut out in your quote
above :-P


 - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDbR2Kn7DbMsAkQLgRAlaGAJ0eWElH1VabOABNURH+1dLNvxj2zwCgozba
pDqaSXozrK+UDx3wjnd1Jrs=
=qL13
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Bug#337466: also missing libxmu-dev

2005-11-05 Thread Zsolt Rizsanyi
Hi!

It seems that libxmu-dev is also missing from the build depends. At least 
it won't compile without it in my sarge pbuilder environment.

Looking at ./configure output I found out that it has problems doing the 
test for libglut. Since freeglut3-dev was already in build depends I did 
some more searching and found that the configure check for glut adds -lXmu 
to LIBS if glut is found.
So I tried and it turned out that adding libxmu-dev to the wine build 
depends helped.

I'm not sure if this dependency is also required for sid, but I don't see 
how it could cause any problems.

Thanks,
Zsolt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#328738: proposed patch to fix this bug

2005-11-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Zack Cerza [Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:17:46 -0400]:

> Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Please, fix this bug ASAP, because it's grave, but trivial to fix (either 
> > by 
> > maintainer or NMU).

> I've had a fix for this ready for several days now, but literally as I
> switched to my IRC window to ping my sponsor, I noticed that there had
> been an NMU. I got the initial bug report mail six hours *after* the NMU
> happened, and since then I honestly have not had the time to rebase my
> changes off the NMU. I would have more than enough time to fix it this
> weekend, but in 10 hours I have to leave town for four days, away from
> all my Debian systems. I'm sorry for both my lack of time and the bad
> timing of all this, and if four days is too long to wait I suggest that
> someone NMU. Thanks in advance to anyone that has the time. If it hasn't
> been fixed by the time I get back, I will do it myself first thing.

  Is Modestas' patch OK?

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Matthew Kimball - I don't need
 
There may be no I in TEAM, but a M and an E.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337702: openoffice.org 2.0 won't start since upgrade, libc problem?

2005-11-05 Thread Jeff Davis
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


When I run any openoffice command I get an error and it exits.

Example:

$ ooffice
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: relocation error:
/lib/tls/libpthread.so.0: symbol errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not
defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: relocation error:
/lib/tls/libpthread.so.0: symbol errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not
defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

That has been happening ever since I upgraded to 2.0.0-1.
Before that, I had the openoffice.org2 packages installed from
experimental. The experimental openoffice.org2 packages are all removed.

I have libc6 version 2.3.5-7, openoffice.org version 2.0.0-2.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  openoffice.org-base   2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - data
ii  openoffice.org-calc   2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - spre
ii  openoffice.org-core   2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite archit
ii  openoffice.org-draw   2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - draw
ii  openoffice.org-impress2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - pres
ii  openoffice.org-math   2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - equa
ii  openoffice.org-writer 2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - word

openoffice.org recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336134: kernel-image-netbootable: new version currently unusable

2005-11-05 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:07:46PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> severity 335254 grave
> merge 336134 335254
> thanks
> 
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:36:26 -0600
> Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > due to debian bug:
> > 
> > #335254: initrd-netboot-tools: incompatible with
> > #linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
> > 
> > version 0.7.0b-2 of kernel-image-netbootable is unusable, as it only
> > depends on kernels that are incompatible with initrd-netboot-tools(at
> > least on i386).
> 
> Why not then simply raise the severity of that other bug? Done now,
> and merged with this one :-)

because version 0.7.0b-1 still works with the 2.4 kernels in etch, and
uses those by default, thus, a higher severity is only applicable to the
0.7.0b-2 version.  but whatever. :)

live well,
  vagrant


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html

2005-11-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:16:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so
> > > without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't
> > > know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-(
> > 
> > You can work around with xsl:choose or xsl:if clauses inside the
> > xsl:template.
> 
> Yeah I know that, but in my case it's uglier than before. I have an
> ignore stylesheet which defines high priority templates to override some
> specific templates ... but the criteria to define "the specificity"
> includes this variable.
> 
> This ignore stylesheet is used by several other stylesheet. I have to
> put dozens of xsl:if in several stylesheets when 3 generic templates did
> the work until now.

Maybe you can hack something with modes ? Well, that depends on how your
stuff is done...

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup

2005-11-05 Thread Josh Metzler
On Saturday 05 November 2005 02:50 pm, Ronny Standtke wrote:
> Package: ksayit
> Version: 4:3.4.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> KSayit crashes on startup. Here is the backtrace:
...
> #3  0xb799bb6e in __gnu_cxx::__pool::_M_reclaim_block ()
>from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
> #4  0xb7c2b632 in __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc__gnu_cxx::__common_pool_policy<__gnu_cxx::__pool, true>
>>::deallocate () from /usr/lib/libartskde.so.1
...

This is a result of a toolchain bug #336114, and unfortunately there is not 
much that the debian-qt-kde maintainers until they are told how it will be 
solved.  If you really need ksayit working, recompiling kdelibs with the 
current g++ should work around this problem.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html

2005-11-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so
> > without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't
> > know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-(
> 
> You can work around with xsl:choose or xsl:if clauses inside the
> xsl:template.

Yeah I know that, but in my case it's uglier than before. I have an
ignore stylesheet which defines high priority templates to override some
specific templates ... but the criteria to define "the specificity"
includes this variable.

This ignore stylesheet is used by several other stylesheet. I have to
put dozens of xsl:if in several stylesheets when 3 generic templates did
the work until now.

> If you can tell which files are concerned and where i can find them, i
> can help when i have some time for it (or if it's just trivial).

Thanks for the offer, but I'm the upstream of logidee-tools so I know it
well enough to be able to fix it myself ... It's just bothersome to do
when it used to work. :-)

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com

Freexian : des développeurs Debian au service des entreprises
http://www.freexian.com




Bug#337470: marked as done (xt: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 11:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337470: fixed in xt 0.9.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 13:52:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 05:52:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.36.164] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EY1zv-0004WN-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 05:52:51 -0800
Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37033.math.univ-rennes1.fr 
[129.20.37.33])
by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D0FB885
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  4 Nov 2005 14:52:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EY1zQ-00082I-RN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:52:20 +0100
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xt: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:52:20 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xt
Severity: serious
Version: 0.9.1-6

>From my pbuilder build log:

...
Installing the build-deps
 -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.20 
2005/08/17 00:46:54 dancer Exp $
 -> Considering  debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
   -> Trying debhelper
 -> Considering  gtkglarea5-dev
   -> Trying gtkglarea5-dev
 -> Considering  xlibmesa-dev
   -> Trying xlibmesa-dev
   -> Cannot install xlibmesa-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Package xlibmesa-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
  xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev
E: Package xlibmesa-dev has no installation candidate
E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.

You need to replace that with xlibmesa-gl-dev and/or xlibmesa-glu-dev.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 337470-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 19:52:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 11:52:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYU0I-0004Nj-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 11:47:06 -0800
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#337470: fixed in xt 0.9.1-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 11:47:06 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xt
Source-Version: 0.9.1-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xt_0.9.1-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xt/xt_0.9.1-7.diff.gz
xt_0.9.1-7.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xt/xt_0.9.1-7.dsc
xt_0.9.1-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xt/xt_0.9.1-7_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEG

Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup

2005-11-05 Thread Ronny Standtke
Package: ksayit
Version: 4:3.4.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


KSayit crashes on startup. Here is the backtrace:

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
`system-supplied DSO at 0xe000' has disappeared; keeping its
symbols.
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1238341024 (LWP 9489)]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[KCrash handler]
#3  0xb799bb6e in __gnu_cxx::__pool::_M_reclaim_block ()
   from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#4  0xb7c2b632 in __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc
   >::deallocate () from /usr/lib/libartskde.so.1
#5  0xb683aba1 in Arts::readTypeSeq ()
from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1
#6  0xb6805f7d in Arts::InterfaceDef::readType () from
/usr/lib/libmcop.so.1
#7  0xb68064e7 in Arts::InterfaceDef::InterfaceDef ()
from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1
#8  0xb683b603 in Arts::readTypeSeq ()
from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1
#9  0xb68068d9 in Arts::ModuleDef::readType () from
/usr/lib/libmcop.so.1
#10 0xb6806b2f in Arts::ModuleDef::ModuleDef () from
/usr/lib/libmcop.so.1
#11 0xb68077ee in Arts::IDLFileReg::startup () from
/usr/lib/libmcop.so.1
#12 0xb67d96ad in Arts::StartupManager::startup () from
/usr/lib/libmcop.so.1
#13 0xb6800088 in Arts::Dispatcher::Dispatcher () from
/usr/lib/libmcop.so.1
#14 0xb7c19e81 in KArtsDispatcher::KArtsDispatcher ()
from /usr/lib/libartskde.so.1
#15 0x0807a675 in ?? ()
#16 0xb7805ec0 in __libc_start_main () from
/lib/tls/libc.so.6
#17 0x08057de1 in ?? ()
   

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set 
to de_CH)

Versions of packages ksayit depends on:
ii  artsbuilder   4:3.4.2-2  synthesizer designer for aRts
ii  kdelibs4c24:3.4.2-4  core libraries for all KDE 
applica
ii  libarts1c21.4.2-5aRts sound system core components
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-2  GCC support library
ii  libqt3-mt 3:3.3.5-1  Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime 
v
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

ksayit recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed upstream

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 333980 +fixed-upstream
Bug#333980: [mips/mipsel] FTBFS caused by -Werror
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html

2005-11-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 07:15:27PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> reassign 336280 logidee-tools
> retitle 336280 XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern
> thanks
> 
> Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 18:06 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > Thus I'm reassigning the bug. I also attach "ignore.xsl" which can be
> > > used as a minimal test case to reproduce the bug :
> > > $ xsltproc --stringparam trainer false ignore.xsl
> > > XPath error : Undefined variable
> > > not(@trainer=$trainer or $trainer='true' or not(@trainer))
> > >   ^
> > > compilation error: file ignore.xsl line 9 element template
> > > Failed to compile predicate
> > 
> > I guess this is the same as #334784, but i don't have time to check
> > right now. If you have some time, would you test the patch and see if it
> > helps your problem ?
> 
> I tried and it doesn't help. Actually it looks like #329678 because the
> variable is in a match pattern too ... but I don't understand your
> reasoning for closing the bug.
> 
> If I check the Pattern grammar, it leads "Predicate" which is "[Expr]"
> and Expr can certainly include variables... so I checked the ChangeLog
> of libxslt and by recursion I found this :
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303289
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Defining-Template-Rules
> 
> I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so
> without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't
> know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-(

You can work around with xsl:choose or xsl:if clauses inside the
xsl:template.

If you can tell which files are concerned and where i can find them, i
can help when i have some time for it (or if it's just trivial).

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337230: marked as done (--print-debs removes current working dir)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337230: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 12:50:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 04:50:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXeXw-0006BS-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 04:50:24 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id E18E364D55; Thu,  3 Nov 2005 12:50:21 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9F59B876D; Thu,  3 Nov 2005 12:49:59 + (GMT)
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:49:59 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: --print-debs removes current working dir
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: debootstrap
Version: 0.3.2.2
Severity: critical

I just ran "debootstrap --print-debs sid" in my $HOME and while
cleaning up, debootstrap starting removing my whole $HOME directory.
Apparently it puts its file in the current working dir instead of a
tmp or sub directory and removes the whole dir.

This is not what I'd expect from an option with the following
description:

   --print-debs
  Print the packages to be installed, and exit



tbm  18219  0.0  0.8   5240  2068 pts/10   S+   12:39   0:00 /bin/sh -e 
/usr/sbin/debootstrap --print-debs sid
tbm  18566  0.9  0.1   1596   408 pts/10   R+   12:39   0:01 rm -rf 
/home/tbm/



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii  binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  wget 1.10.2-1retrieves files from the web

debootstrap recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

---
Received: (at 337230-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 18:51:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 10:51:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYT4C-0003ow-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:04 -0800
From: Anthony Towns 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#337230: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:04 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: debootstrap
Source-Version: 0.3.3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debootstrap-udeb_0.3.3_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_0.3.3_powerpc.udeb
debootstrap_0.3.3.dsc
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.3.dsc
debootstrap_0.3.3.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.3.tar.gz
debootstrap_0.3.3_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anthony Towns  (supplier of updated debootstrap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe th

Bug#333484: marked as done (filerunner fails to start after upgrade)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333484: fixed in filerunner 2.5.1-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2005 06:51:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 11 23:51:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net [68.230.241.34] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EPaSZ-00017e-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:51:31 -0700
Received: from mailhost.moonkingdom.net ([70.179.43.17])
  by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net
  (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
  Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:50:43 -0400
Received: from rei.moonkingdom.net (rei.moonkingdom.net [192.168.0.4])
by mailhost.moonkingdom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id F39D34AD0D;
Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rei.moonkingdom.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 
23:50:58 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: filerunner: Ships empty bitmaps directory making app fail to load
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:58 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: filerunner
Version: 2.5.1-15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

rei $ fr
Error in startup script: error reading bitmap file 
"/usr/lib/filerunner/bitmaps/tree.bit"
(processing "-bitmap" option)
invoked from within
"menubutton $glob(win,$inst).dirmenu_frame.dir_but -menu 
$glob(win,$inst).dirmenu_frame.dir_but.m -bitmap 
@$glob(lib_fr)/bitmaps/tree.bit"
(procedure "BuildFileListPanel" line 11)
invoked from within
"BuildFileListPanel left"
(procedure "ShowWindow" line 110)
invoked from within
"ShowWindow"
(file "/usr/bin/fr" line 3409)

The -15 filerunner package ships an empty /usr/lib/filerunner/bitmaps
directory (although it *does* ship the directory).  Since filerunner
keeps the button bitmaps here, now it can't load them, and fails.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages filerunner depends on:
ii  tk8.4 8.4.11-1   Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 -

filerunner recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 333484-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 18:51:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 10:51:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYT4E-0003pj-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:06 -0800
From: Jose Carlos Medeiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#333484: fixed in filerunner 2.5.1-16
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:06 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: filerunner
Source-Version: 2.5.1-16

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
filerunner, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

filerunner_2.5.1-16.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/filerunner/filerunner_2.5.1-16.diff.gz
filerunner_2.5.1-16.dsc
  to pool/main/f/filerunner/filerunner_2.5.1-16.dsc
filerunner_2.5.1-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/filerunner/filerunner_2.5.1-16_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [E

Processed: Re: Bug#337677: knockd: Knockd fails when using a ppp interface

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 337677 important
Bug#337677: knockd: Knockd fails when using a ppp interface
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337677: knockd: Knockd fails when using a ppp interface

2005-11-05 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes




severity 337677 important
thanks
--

Check the severities list [1], this bug is not 'grave'.

Probably upstream, will look into it.

Thanks.
Cheers

[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities

On Sáb, 2005-11-05 at 19:07 +0100, Laurent CARON wrote:


Package: knockd
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Knockd since last version is not working on ppp interfaces.

It is not 'seeing' packets that should trigger it.

Reverting back to an old version solves the problem.

Laurent


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-a7n
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages knockd depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpcap0.80.9.4-1System interface for user-level pa
ii  logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility

knockd recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information








-- 

 Leo Antunes
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>








signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#333052: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd

2005-11-05 Thread Pozsar Balazs

On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:31:04PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> I've got these messages several times on the experimental SUSE too,
> but can't reproduce it so far, even without Rusty's patch to modprobe
> they have disappeared. See here for the details:
>   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333052


Just to let you know, I've also met this problem (on another distro), 
and did not know about this bugreport until now.
So I've done another workaround: modprobe already parses /proc/modules 
to check whether the modules needed are already loaded, and this file 
also shows us the state of the modules, being "Loading", "Live" or 
"Unloading".

With my patch, modprobe waits until the needed modules come out of the 
"Loading" or "Unloading" state.


-- 
pozsy


--- module-init-tools-3.2-pre4.orig/modprobe.c  2005-05-08 09:38:52.0 
+0200
+++ module-init-tools-3.2-pre4/modprobe.c   2005-10-24 13:19:39.0 
+0200
@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@
FILE *proc_modules;
char *line;
 
+start:
/* Might not be mounted yet.  Don't fail. */
proc_modules = fopen("/proc/modules", "r");
if (!proc_modules)
@@ -373,12 +374,31 @@
 
if (entry && strcmp(entry, modname) == 0) {
/* If it exists, usecount is the third entry. */
-   if (usecount) {
-   entry = strtok(NULL, " \n");
-   if (entry
-   && (entry = strtok(NULL, " \n")) != NULL)
+   if (!(entry = strtok(NULL, " \n")))
+   goto out;
+
+   if (!(entry = strtok(NULL, " \n"))) /* usecount */
+   goto out;
+   else
+   if (usecount)
*usecount = atoi(entry);
+
+   if (!(entry = strtok(NULL, " \n"))) /* "-" */
+   goto out;
+
+   if (!(entry = strtok(NULL, " \n"))) /* status */
+   goto out;
+   else {
+   if (!strcmp(entry, "Loading") || !strcmp(entry, 
"Unloading")) {
+   usleep(10);
+   free(line);
+   fclose(proc_modules);
+   goto start;
+   }
+   goto out;
}
+
+   out:
free(line);
fclose(proc_modules);
return 1;


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of cyrus-sasl2 2.1.19-1.7

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 332703 + fixed
Bug#332703: FTBFS: Syntax error before MD5_CTX
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#337669: cyrus-sasl2_2.1.19-1.6 FTBFS

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # ok, check first if it's an duplicate ... :(
> close 337669
Bug#337669: cyrus-sasl2_2.1.19-1.6 FTBFS
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 336280 logidee-tools
Bug#336280: xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular situations
Bug reassigned from package `xsltproc' to `logidee-tools'.

> retitle 336280 XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern
Bug#336280: xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular situations
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html

2005-11-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
reassign 336280 logidee-tools
retitle 336280 XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern
thanks

Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 18:06 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > Thus I'm reassigning the bug. I also attach "ignore.xsl" which can be
> > used as a minimal test case to reproduce the bug :
> > $ xsltproc --stringparam trainer false ignore.xsl
> > XPath error : Undefined variable
> > not(@trainer=$trainer or $trainer='true' or not(@trainer))
> >   ^
> > compilation error: file ignore.xsl line 9 element template
> > Failed to compile predicate
> 
> I guess this is the same as #334784, but i don't have time to check
> right now. If you have some time, would you test the patch and see if it
> helps your problem ?

I tried and it doesn't help. Actually it looks like #329678 because the
variable is in a match pattern too ... but I don't understand your
reasoning for closing the bug.

If I check the Pattern grammar, it leads "Predicate" which is "[Expr]"
and Expr can certainly include variables... so I checked the ChangeLog
of libxslt and by recursion I found this :
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303289
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Defining-Template-Rules

I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so
without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't
know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-(

Regards,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com

Freexian : des développeurs Debian au service des entreprises
http://www.freexian.com




Bug#337677: knockd: Knockd fails when using a ppp interface

2005-11-05 Thread Laurent CARON
Package: knockd
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Knockd since last version is not working on ppp interfaces.

It is not 'seeing' packets that should trigger it.

Reverting back to an old version solves the problem.

Laurent


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-a7n
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages knockd depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpcap0.80.9.4-1System interface for user-level pa
ii  logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility

knockd recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337674: vgrabbj testing migration

2005-11-05 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: vgrabbj
Severity: serious
Version: 0.9.6-2

Hi

vgrabbj is only installed for i386 because it is mentioned as
packages-arch-specific for i386 only. Though there were mips binaries
uploaded. So either ask for the removal of the old binaries or ask to
change Packages-arch-specific so vgrabbj can migrate to testing.

Cheers

Luk

- --
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDbPLb5UTeB5t8Mo0RArrNAJ4857lfvwXvEsey/01lpL8rxAoN2ACfT7mD
ZY65H/TAmrNw6Q9zig5M60k=
=uuio
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337669: cyrus-sasl2_2.1.19-1.6 FTBFS

2005-11-05 Thread Andreas Barth
Package: cyrus-sasl2
Version: 2.1.19-1.6
Severity: serious

Hi,

cyrus-sasl2 FTBFS now (this happens with pbuilder on i386 as well as
with sbuild on armeb).
 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../lib -I../sasldb 
-I../include -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include -Wall -W -fno-strict-aliasing 
-g -O2 -MT ntlm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ntlm.Tpo -c ntlm.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o 
.libs/ntlm.o
In file included from ../include/saslplug.h:14,
 from ntlm.c:96:
../include/hmac-md5.h:11: error: syntax error before 'MD5_CTX'
../include/hmac-md5.h:11: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
../include/hmac-md5.h:12: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 
'HMAC_MD5_CTX'
../include/hmac-md5.h:12: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
../include/hmac-md5.h:36: error: syntax error before '*' token
../include/hmac-md5.h:46: error: syntax error before '*' token
../include/hmac-md5.h:53: error: syntax error before 'HMAC_MD5_CTX'
In file included from ntlm.c:96:
../include/saslplug.h:73: error: syntax error before '*' token
../include/saslplug.h:74: error: syntax error before '*' token
../include/saslplug.h:75: error: syntax error before 'MD5_CTX'
../include/saslplug.h:79: error: syntax error before '*' token
../include/saslplug.h:81: error: syntax error before 'HMAC_MD5_CTX'
../include/saslplug.h:84: error: syntax error before '*' token
ntlm.c: In function 'load_buffer':
ntlm.c:277: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'to_unicode' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c: In function 'P16_lm':
ntlm.c:375: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 
'__builtin_strncpy' differ in signedness
ntlm.c:378: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'E' differ in 
signedness
ntlm.c:367: warning: unused parameter 'utils'
ntlm.c:368: warning: unused parameter 'buf'
ntlm.c:369: warning: unused parameter 'buflen'
ntlm.c: In function 'P16_nt':
ntlm.c:392: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'to_unicode' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:392: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'to_unicode' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:393: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'MD4' differ in 
signedness
ntlm.c: In function 'V2':
ntlm.c:446: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'to_unicode' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:448: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'HMAC' differ in 
signedness
ntlm.c:448: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 7 of 'HMAC' differ in 
signedness
ntlm.c:454: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'HMAC_Final' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c: In function 'make_netbios_name':
ntlm.c:770: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 
'__builtin_strncpy' differ in signedness
ntlm.c:771: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
ntlm.c: In function 'smb_negotiate_protocol':
ntlm.c:1034: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1116: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'from_unicode' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c: In function 'smb_session_setup':
ntlm.c:1257: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
ntlm.c: In function 'create_challenge':
ntlm.c:1344: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1350: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'load_buffer' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c: In function 'ntlm_server_mech_new':
ntlm.c:1357: warning: unused parameter 'glob_context'
ntlm.c:1359: warning: unused parameter 'challenge'
ntlm.c:1360: warning: unused parameter 'challen'
ntlm.c: In function 'ntlm_server_mech_step1':
ntlm.c:1399: warning: unused parameter 'oparams'
ntlm.c: In function 'ntlm_server_mech_step2':
ntlm.c:1481: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1481: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1486: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1486: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1492: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1492: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1498: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1498: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' 
differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1561: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 
'__builtin_strncpy' differ in signedness
ntlm.c:1573: error: 'MD5_DIGEST_LENGTH' undeclared (first use in this function)
ntlm.c:1573: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ntlm.c:1573: error: for each function it appears in.)
ntlm.c:1463: warning: unused parameter 'serverout'
ntlm.c:1464: warning: unused parameter 'serveroutlen'
ntlm.c: In function 'create_request':
ntlm.c:1779: warning: pointer targets i

Bug#337668: FTBFS: broken build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev

2005-11-05 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Package: libsdl1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch


Hi!

libsdl1.2_1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 fails to build in a clean sid environment.

Fromm my pbuilder-log:

=
[..]
 -> Considering  xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev
   -> Trying xlibmesa-dev
   -> Cannot install xlibmesa-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
dpkg is already the newest version.
Package xlibmesa-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
  xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev
E: Package xlibmesa-dev has no installation candidate
   -> Trying libgl-dev
   -> Cannot install libgl-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
dpkg is already the newest version.
Package libgl-dev is a virtual package provided by:
  xlibmesa-gl-dev 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10
  mesag-dev 6.3.2-2
  libgl1-mesa-dri-dev 6.3.2-2
  libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev 6.3.2-2
You should explicitly select one to install.
E: Package libgl-dev has no installation candidate
 -> Considering libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev to satisfy the dependency 
   -> Cannot install libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
dpkg is already the newest version.
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev: Depends: mesa-common-dev (= 6.3.2-2) but it is not 
going to be installed
Depends: libgl1-mesa-directfb (= 6.3.2-2) but it is 
not going to be installed
E: Broken packages
E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.
=

Changing the Build-Depends from "xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev" to "xlibmesa-gl-dev
| libgl-dev" solved the problem for me.  Patch atteched.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
diff -Nur libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/changelog 
libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/changelog
--- libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/changelog   2005-11-05 
17:51:38.0 +0100
+++ libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/changelog   2005-11-05 
16:50:41.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libsdl1.2 (1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * changed build depends: xlibmesa-dev -> xlibmesa-gl-dev 
+
+ -- Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat,  5 Nov 2005 16:50:16 +0100
+
 libsdl1.2 (1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nur libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/control 
libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/control
--- libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/control 2005-11-05 
17:51:38.0 +0100
+++ libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/control 2005-11-05 
17:52:44.0 +0100
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Debian SDL maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Uploaders: Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.2), debhelper (>> 3.0.0), dbs, libaa1-dev, 
xlibs-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev, 
libsvga1-dev [i386], libarts1-dev, libartsc0-dev, libasound2-dev [i386 ia64 
alpha amd64 arm hppa m32r m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb 
sh4 sh4eb sparc ppc64], type-handling (>= 0.2.1), libaudio-dev, automake1.7
+Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.2), debhelper (>> 3.0.0), dbs, libaa1-dev, 
xlibs-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, 
libsvga1-dev [i386], libarts1-dev, libartsc0-dev, libasound2-dev [ ppc64], 
type-handling (>= 0.2.1), libaudio-dev, automake1.7
 
 Package: libsdl1.2debian
 Architecture: any
diff -Nur libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/control.in 
libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/control.in
--- libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/control.in  2005-11-05 
17:51:38.0 +0100
+++ libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/control.in  2005-11-05 
16:56:56.0 +0100
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Debian SDL maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Uploaders: Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.2), debhelper (>> 3.0.0), dbs, libaa1-dev, 
xlibs-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, xlibmesa

Bug#337422: marked as done (Should depend on libcamel1.2-dev too)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337422: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 11:13:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 03:13:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mf00.sitadelle.com (smtp.cegetel.net) [212.94.174.67] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXzVu-DS-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 03:13:43 -0800
Received: from vm-1.vm-dmz.bpl-group.org (mx0.bpl-group.org [195.115.71.69])
by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584981A449F;
Fri,  4 Nov 2005 12:13:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bee.dooz.org (lan-53.int.bpl-group.org [192.168.16.53])
by vm-1.vm-dmz.bpl-group.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333F3C584;
Fri,  4 Nov 2005 11:13:12 + (UTC)
Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3F2991D8049; Fri,  4 Nov 2005 12:13:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:13:12 +0100
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Should depend on libcamel1.2-dev too
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libedataserverui1.2-dev
Version: 1.2.3-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

 libedataserverui1.2-dev holds /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.la which
 lists /usr/lib/libcamel-1.2.la in its dependency_libs line, hence
 libedataserverui1.2-dev should depend on libcamel1.2-dev.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libedataserverui1.2-dev depends on:
ii  libedataserver1.2-dev 1.2.3-7Utility library for evolutio=
n data
ii  libedataserverui1.2-4 1.2.3-7GUI utily library for evolut=
ion da
ii  libgnome2-dev 2.12.0.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - develo=
pment=20

libedataserverui1.2-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"What do we want? BRAINS!When do we want it? BRAINS!"

---
Received: (at 337422-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 17:36:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 09:36:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYRtj-0005dP-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#337422: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: evolution-data-server
Source-Version: 1.2.3-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
evolution-data-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

evolution-data-server-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
  to 
pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.diff.gz
evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.dsc
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.dsc
evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
libcamel1.2-0_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/libcamel1.2-0_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
libcamel1.2-dev_1.2.3-8_i386

Bug#337421: marked as done (Should depend on libcamel1.2-dev)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337421: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 11:12:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 03:12:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mf00.sitadelle.com (smtp.cegetel.net) [212.94.174.67] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXzUp-0008Kv-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 03:12:35 -0800
Received: from vm-1.vm-dmz.bpl-group.org (mx0.bpl-group.org [195.115.71.69])
by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDD01A446A;
Fri,  4 Nov 2005 12:11:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bee.dooz.org (lan-53.int.bpl-group.org [192.168.16.53])
by vm-1.vm-dmz.bpl-group.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95575C584;
Fri,  4 Nov 2005 11:11:58 + (UTC)
Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5EB021D8049; Fri,  4 Nov 2005 12:11:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:11:58 +0100
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Should depend on libcamel1.2-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libedata-book1.2-dev
Version: 1.2.3-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

 libedata-book1.2-dev holds /usr/lib/libedata-book-1.2.la which lists
 /usr/lib/libcamel-1.2.la in its dependency_libs line, hence
 libedata-book1.2-dev should depend on libcamel1.2-dev.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libedata-book1.2-dev depends on:
ii  libebook1.2-dev   1.2.3-7Client library for evolution=
 addre
ii  libedata-book1.2-21.2.3-7Backend library for evolutio=
n addr

libedata-book1.2-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"What do we want? BRAINS!When do we want it? BRAINS!"

---
Received: (at 337421-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 17:36:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 09:36:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYRtj-0005dN-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#337421: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: evolution-data-server
Source-Version: 1.2.3-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
evolution-data-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

evolution-data-server-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
  to 
pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.diff.gz
evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.dsc
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.dsc
evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
libcamel1.2-0_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/libcamel1.2-0_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
libcamel1.2-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/libcamel1.2-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
libebook1.2-3_1.2.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolut

Processed: Fixed in the forthcoming 2.0.1-13 version

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package toshutils
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: toshutils

> tags 337461 pending
Bug#337461: toshutils: FTBFS: Unrecognized command line option 
"-fwritable-strings"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 323507 pending
Bug#323507: with slow CPU speed, portege 7020CT time goes too fast
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#337479: yaird: should use /usr/bin/perl, not /usr/local/bin/perl

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 337479 serious
Bug#337479: yaird: should use /usr/bin/perl, not /usr/local/bin/perl
Severity set to `serious'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329041: valgrind: Valgrind is being compiled with SSE instruction set

2005-11-05 Thread Philipp Hug
I just compiled valgrind on my machine, and it seems to be compiled correctly 
even though it supports sse:

checking if gcc accepts -m32... yes
checking if gcc accepts -mmmx... yes
checking if gcc accepts -msse... yes

grepping through the build logs doesn't show any occurances of  "-msse"
I did also have a look at the Makefiles and -msse seems to be only used for 
the tests...

are you sure this bug still applies to 3.0.1?

philipp


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337461: Fixed in the forthcoming 2.0.1-13 version

2005-11-05 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
package toshutils
tags 337461 pending
tags 323507 pending
thanks

I have prepared version 2.0.1-13, but am waiting for some feedback from
Toshiba users on the debian-laptop list because of the changes made to
be able to compile with gcc-4.0.  If there are no problems reported,
then I will submit the package for upload.

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto


pgpkLpEvILD4O.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#337665: no upstream changelog

2005-11-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: meld
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious

/usr/share/doc/meld/changelog.gz is missing.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html

2005-11-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 03:20:18PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> reassign xsltproc 1.1.15-1
> retitle 336280 xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular 
> situations
> thanks
> 
> Le vendredi 28 octobre 2005 à 08:06 -0700, Matt Kraai a écrit :
> > Package: logidee-tools
> > Version: 1.2.4-2
> > Severity: serious
> > 
> > pbuilder fails to build logidee-tools in an unstable chroot on i386:
> > 
> > > xsltproc --xinclude --stringparam selection "none" --stringparam cycle 
> > > "false" --stringparam charte "gfdl" --stringparam trainer "false" 
> > > --stringparam lang "en" --stringparam dir 
> > > "/tmp/buildd/logidee-tools-1.2.4/doc/tools.html"  ../xsl/module-html.xsl  
> > > tools.xml > tools.html/index.html
> > > XPath error : Undefined variable
> > > not(@restriction='all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' 
> > > ',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or  $selection='all')
> > > ^
> > > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template
> > > Failed to compile predicate
> > > XPath error : Undefined variable
> 
> This is a bug in xsltproc ... because the variable exists and is even
> defined in the command line (and also with  inside the top
> XSL stylesheet). I could reproduce the bug with xsltproc 1.1.15-1... and
> this code has been working for 4 years already with xsltproc without any
> problem.
> 
> Thus I'm reassigning the bug. I also attach "ignore.xsl" which can be
> used as a minimal test case to reproduce the bug :
> $ xsltproc --stringparam trainer false ignore.xsl
> XPath error : Undefined variable
> not(@trainer=$trainer or $trainer='true' or not(@trainer))
>   ^
> compilation error: file ignore.xsl line 9 element template
> Failed to compile predicate

I guess this is the same as #334784, but i don't have time to check
right now. If you have some time, would you test the patch and see if it
helps your problem ?

Cheers,

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0

2005-11-05 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> > tags 328749 patch
> >> > thanks
> >> >
> >> > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
> >> >> experimental installed:
> >> >
> >> > Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC.  Here is a patch, for
> >> > explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package,
> >> > or ask on debian-tetex-maint.  Will you be able to do the upload soon?
> >> 
> >> I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if
> >> you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay.  I'll use
> >> the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted
> >> and close #33, too.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'll take care of of both bugs.
> 
> That's very good.  Regarding my patch, I thought about it and there is
> one change I would rather revert: The change from calling fmtutil to
> fmtutil-sys.  We have temporarily introduced a backward-compatibility
> hack, so that fmtutil will continue to work for a while.  On the other
> hand, fmtutil-sys is not available in the teTeX version in testing.
> 
> I suggest to stay with plain fmtutil, let xmltex (and all other packages
> that needed fixes for teTeX-3.0) migrate to testing, and then I'll
> remove tetex-base's dummy bug and let itself go into testing.

Ok, I'll patch the patch.

Thanks,
Ardo
-- 
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.debian.org/~ardo/  http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304793: marked as done (junkbuster: Attacker might be able to modify settings)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:45:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line junkbuster issue was already adressed by DSA-713
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2005 14:20:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 15 07:20:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMRgX-0002GN-00; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:20:41 -0700
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.242])
by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j3FEKY9e004979
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:34 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.99])
by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4B98F1B5E2; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
id 1E5A55F48; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: junkbuster: Attacker might be able to modify settings
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:30 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2 
(mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41]); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:34 +0200 (MEST)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: junkbuster
Version: 2.0.2-0.2
Severity: grave
Tags: security, woody
Justification: user security hole

According to 
http://lwn.net/Alerts/131964/ 

JunkBuster is vulnerable to a heap corruption vulnerability, and under
certain configurations may allow an attacker to modify settings.

Impact
==

If JunkBuster has been configured to run in single-threaded mode, an
attacker can disable or modify the filtering of Referrer: HTTP
headers,
potentially compromising the privacy of users. The heap corruption
vulnerability could crash or disrupt the operation of the proxy,
potentially executing arbitrary code.


The fix can probably taken from the above Gentoo security advisory.

You might want to track http://lwn.net/Articles/131972/ for other
vendors responses.

Please also check if the successor, privoxy, is impacted as well.


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pleione 2.4.26-grsec #1 Tue Aug 10 15:42:40 CEST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US


---
Received: (at 304793-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 16:45:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 08:45:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYRB0-0008WH-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 08:45:59 -0800
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.242])
by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jA5GjqJ3013419;
Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:45:52 +0100 (MET)
Received: from zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.91])
by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7174B1B735; Sat,  5 Nov 2005 17:45:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: by zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
id 179AD1A6CC; Sat,  5 Nov 2005 17:45:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:45:37 +0100
From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: junkbuster issue was already adressed by DSA-713
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg
X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2 
(mrelay3.uni-hann

Bug#336177: marked as done (rvm_1.6-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'PFIC' undeclared)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:47:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Your experimental-chroot is outdated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 10:57:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 03:57:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EVRv7-0006RM-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:57:13 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EVRv5-0001IP-Od
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:57:11 +0200
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:57:11 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rvm_1.6-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'PFIC' undeclared
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: rvm
Version: 1.6-4
Severity: serious

Hi,

your package failed to build from source with the following error:

| Automatic build of rvm_1.6-4 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
| Build started at 20051028-0305
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading Package Lists...
| Building Dependency Tree...
| Need to get 379kB of source archives.
| Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rvm 1.6-4 (dsc) [637B]
| Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rvm 1.6-4 (tar) [375kB]
| Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rvm 1.6-4 (diff) [2769B]
| Fetched 379kB in 0s (627kB/s)
| Download complete and in download only mode
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), liblwp-dev, libtool, autotools-dev
[...]
| Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6 
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3 g++-4.0_4.0.2-3 
binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3 libstdc++6_4.0.2-3
| --
| dpkg-source: extracting rvm in rvm-1.6
| su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info.
| (Ignored)
| dpkg-buildpackage: source package is rvm
| dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.6-4
| dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture sparc
|  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
| dh_testdir
| rm -f build-stamp
| /usr/bin/make distclean
| make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/rvm-1.6'
| make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'.  Stop.
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/rvm-1.6'
| make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
| rm -f debian/dirs
| rm -f debian/docs
| rm -f debian/librvm1.postinst
| rm -f debian/librvm1.prerm
| rm -f debian/postinst
| rm -f debian/prerm
| rm -f debian/rvm-tools.files
| rm -f debian/rvm-tools.postinst
| rm -f debian/rvm-tools.prerm
| dh_clean
|  debian/rules build
| dh_testdir
| test -r /usr/share/misc/config.sub && \
|   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
| test -r /usr/share/misc/config.guess && \
|   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
| ./configure \
| --build=sparc-linux-gnu \
| --host=sparc-linux-gnu \
| --prefix=/usr \
| --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man
| creating cache ./config.cache
| checking host system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking target system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking build system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
| checking whether build environment is sane... yes
| checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
| checking for working aclocal... missing
| checking for working autoconf... missing
| checking for working automake... missing
| checking for working autoheader... missing
| checking for working makeinfo... missing
| checking for gcc... gcc
| checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 ) works... yes
| checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 ) is a cross-compiler... no
| checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
| checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
| checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
| 

Bug#336176: marked as done (rpc2_1.13-3(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'PFIC' undeclared)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:47:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Your experimental-chroot is outdated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 10:54:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 03:54:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EVRsA-0003RR-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:54:10 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EVRs8-0001G1-4i
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:54:08 +0200
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:54:08 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rpc2_1.13-3(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'PFIC' undeclared
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: rpc2
Version: 1.13-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

your package failed to build from source with the following error:

| Automatic build of rpc2_1.13-3 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
| Build started at 20051028-0304
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading Package Lists...
| Building Dependency Tree...
| Need to get 512kB of source archives.
| Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rpc2 1.13-3 (dsc) [688B]
| Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rpc2 1.13-3 (tar) 
[448kB]
| Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rpc2 1.13-3 (diff) 
[63.3kB]
| Fetched 512kB in 0s (3769kB/s)
| Download complete and in download only mode
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0.5), liblwp-dev, libreadline4-dev, 
libncurses5-dev, libtool, autotools-dev
[...]
| Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6 
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3 g++-4.0_4.0.2-3 
binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3 libstdc++6_4.0.2-3
| --
| dpkg-source: extracting rpc2 in rpc2-1.13
| su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info.
| (Ignored)
| dpkg-buildpackage: source package is rpc2
| dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.13-3
| dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture sparc
|  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
| dh_testdir
| rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
| /usr/bin/make distclean
| make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/rpc2-1.13'
| make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'.  Stop.
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/rpc2-1.13'
| make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
| /usr/bin/make -C rpc2-src distclean
| make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/rpc2-1.13/rpc2-src'
| make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'.  Stop.
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/rpc2-1.13/rpc2-src'
| make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
| rm -f config.status
| rm -f rp2gen/rp2gen_lexer.c
| rm -f rp2gen/rp2gen_parser.c
| rm -f rp2gen/rp2gen_parser.h
| rm -f debian/dirs
| rm -f debian/docs
| rm -f debian/librpc23.docs
| rm -f debian/librpc23.postinst
| rm -f debian/librpc23.prerm
| rm -f debian/postinst
| rm -f debian/prerm
| rm -f debian/rpc2-tools.files
| rm -f debian/rpc2-tools.postinst
| rm -f debian/rpc2-tools.prerm
| test -r /usr/share/misc/config.sub && \
|   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
| test -r /usr/share/misc/config.guess && \
|   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
| dh_clean
|  debian/rules build
| dh_testdir
| ./configure \
| --build=sparc-linux-gnu \
| --host=sparc-linux-gnu \
| --prefix=/usr \
| --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man
| checking build system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking host system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking target system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
| checking whether build environment is sane... yes
| checking for gawk... no
| checking for mawk... mawk
| checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
| checking for spa

Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd

2005-11-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:30:41PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> reassign 337625 initramfs-tools
> thanks
> 
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:06:58 +0100
> Pau Capdevila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Booting with original initrd gives black screen.
> 
> Sounds like you had initramfs-tools and not yaird installed at the time
> of initially installing the kernel.
> 
> Reassigning to initramfs-tools.

Jonas, i believe he had an older version of yaird without the fbcon fix, and
rebuilt with yaird or something, not sure.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#322239: mozilla-firefox: [patch] incorrectly set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in /usr/bin/firefox wrapper

2005-11-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 10:14:30PM +1100, Vincent McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.4-2sarge5
> Followup-For: Bug #322239
> 
> Hi
> 
> I think I am seeing this too. It was reported in #316824 (for 'mozilla')
> but I did not cross-report to 'mozilla-firefox'.
> The patch below should fix the issue, see #316824 for why I think
> it fixes it.

I don't see why the firefox script should circumvent YOUR broken
LD_LIBRARY_PATH. If your LD_LIBRARY_PATH is b0rked in the first place,
change it.

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319713: Are you still maintaining goobox?

2005-11-05 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Dan,
are you still maintaining goobox? If not, please put it up for
adoption, if yes please update it so it can reach testing.

Thanks!

Helge
-- 
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   gpg signed mail preferred 
64bit GNU powered  http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
  Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


pgpiGDLGoSOXP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: your mail

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 334054 +security
Bug#334054: zope: security issue with docutils wrt RestructuredText 
functionalities (Zope Hotfix 2005-10-09)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#286305: marked as done (linux-wlan-ng: modules must be recompiled against new 2.4.27 kernel)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:52:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in a really old NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2004 10:48:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 19 02:48:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cfybk-jL-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:48:12 -0800
Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1Cfybj-0007nO-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:11 +0100
Received: from [217.86.224.161] (helo=bougon.org)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1Cfybj-0008PS-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:11 +0100
Received: by bougon.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id D1FF020407; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:09 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Cheramy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux-wlan-ng: modules must be recompiled against new 2.4.27 kernel
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:09 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
auth:4787efcd892fae3836a59691305cfa00
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: linux-wlan-ng
Version: 0.2.0+0.2.1pre21-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

with the new package package kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386 version 2.4.27-6,
kernel symbols changed [1].

While our kernel packagers discuss the best way to solve this,
linux-wlan-ng does not work anymore. The modules should be recompiled.

For people who can't wait for the official package (I can imagine
Bradley wants to wait that the kernel situation is stabilised), here is
an apt-link to my personal package (recompile + correct wep key
translation). Please note I (lazily) made package version+1, so you'll
probably have to switch manually back to debian version when Bradley
produces the official modules.

deb http://robert.cheramy.net/debian linux-wlan-ng/
deb-src http://robert.cheramy.net/debian linux-wlan-ng/

Cheers,

tibob

Notes
1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284356 )


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.iso88591)

Versions of packages linux-wlan-ng depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  sysvinit2.86-5   System-V like init
ii  wireless-tools  27-1 Tools for manipulating Linux Wirel

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 286305-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 15:52:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 07:52:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host82-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it 
(host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it) [80.180.126.82] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYQLI-0007Kd-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 07:52:33 -0800
Received: from garfield.casa-tassi ([192.168.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
by host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
id 1EYQQT-0007G7-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:57:53 +0100
Received: from tassi by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EYQKn-0006CL-7k
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:52:01 +0100
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:52:01 +0100
From: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in a really old NMU
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Leve

Bug#290047: marked as done (linux-wlan-ng: insecure /tmp usage)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:50:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in NMU a million of years ago
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 15:51:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 07:51:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fabulous.u--3.com (erno.iki.fi) [213.139.167.121] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cokm7-0002F7-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:51:11 -0800
Received: by erno.iki.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A4943188728; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:51:08 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erno Kuusela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux-wlan-ng: insecure /tmp usage
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:51:08 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: linux-wlan-ng
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole


% mkdir t
% dpkg-deb -x linux-wlan-ng_0.2.0+0.2.1pre21-1_i386.deb t
% grep -r /tmp/ t/etc
t/etc/apm/resume.d/linux-wlan-ng-resume:echo down $ifcase >>/tmp/log
t/etc/wlan/shared:  cp $WLAN_SCHEMEFILE /tmp/wlan_scheme_`date 
+"%T"`.tmp
t/etc/wlan/shared:  touch /tmp/wlan_scheme_`date +"%T"`.tmp
t/etc/wlan/shared:  TMPFILE=`ls /tmp/wlan_scheme*.tmp | tail -n 1`


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-rc3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

---
Received: (at 290047-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 15:50:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 07:50:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host82-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it 
(host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it) [80.180.126.82] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYQJg-00078g-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 07:50:52 -0800
Received: from garfield.casa-tassi ([192.168.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
by host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
id 1EYQOq-0007G5-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:56:12 +0100
Received: from tassi by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EYQJ9-0006Aw-V4
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:50:19 +0100
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:50:19 +0100
From: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in NMU a million of years ago
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

nothing to say
-- 
Enrico Tassi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#337446: ppracer: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 337446 +pending
Bug#337446: ppracer: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 311154 +pending
Bug#311154: Poor german translation
Tags were: l10n
Tags added: pending

> tags 306721 +pending
Bug#306721: planetpenguin-racer: Bad norwegian translations
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Can you reproduce this on 4.5.3-4?

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> notfound 336719 4.5.3-4
Bug#336719: drupal: Users unable to log out
Bug marked as not found in version 4.5.3-4.

> thank you
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336719: Can you reproduce this on 4.5.3-4?

2005-11-05 Thread Hilko Bengen
notfound 336719 4.5.3-4
thank you

"Matthew A. Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I don't use 4.5.3, I use 4.5.5.  I can download 4.5.3 and compare the 
> source changes, but I don't use it and it's not an option for me to test 
> with it.  Give me a few hours and i'll get back to you. :)



4.5.3-4 is the current version in stable and that has a higher
priority for me right now than the version in testing/unstable.

This change got introduced to session.inc after 4.5.3:

 function sess_destroy($key) {
-  db_query("DELETE FROM {sessions} WHERE sid = '$key'");
+  db_query("DELETE FROM {sessions} WHERE sid = '%d'", $key);
 }

... and this is the last change that supposedly fixes the logout
problem.

 function sess_destroy($key) {
-  db_query("DELETE FROM {sessions} WHERE sid = '%d'", $key);
+  db_query("DELETE FROM {sessions} WHERE sid = '%s'", $key);
 }

db_query uses sprintf to replace placeholder expressions if passed
more than one argument and it seems to me that using %s does the same
thing as PHP's string expansion as in 4.5.3.

I have removed version 4.5.3-4 from this bug. If you disagree, feel
free to add it again with a "found" statement to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with a
rationale.

Cheers,
-Hilko


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337446: ppracer: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev

2005-11-05 Thread Alexander Schmehl
tags 337446 +pending
tags 311154 +pending
tags 306721 +pending
thanks

New package ready (getting final touches).  I'll send it to my sponsor
soon.  Bugs should be closed, soon.


Yours sincerely,
  Alexander


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#283483: nurbs++: FTBFS with g++-3.4: due to new template lookup rules

2005-11-05 Thread Filip Van Raemdonck
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:48:30PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> 
> Do you have any plans to fix the RC bugs in nurbs++, or should the package
> be removed from unstable?

I'm on it, will possibly upload tomorrow.


Regards,

Filip

-- 
I have not lost my mind, its backed up on tape somewhere


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reassign 336280 to xsltproc

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 336280 xsltproc
Bug#336280: xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular situations
Bug reassigned from package `logidee-tools' to `xsltproc'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign xsltproc 1.1.15-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> retitle 336280 xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular 
> situations
Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html

2005-11-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
reassign xsltproc 1.1.15-1
retitle 336280 xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular 
situations
thanks

Le vendredi 28 octobre 2005 à 08:06 -0700, Matt Kraai a écrit :
> Package: logidee-tools
> Version: 1.2.4-2
> Severity: serious
> 
> pbuilder fails to build logidee-tools in an unstable chroot on i386:
> 
> > xsltproc --xinclude --stringparam selection "none" --stringparam cycle 
> > "false" --stringparam charte "gfdl" --stringparam trainer "false" 
> > --stringparam lang "en" --stringparam dir 
> > "/tmp/buildd/logidee-tools-1.2.4/doc/tools.html"  ../xsl/module-html.xsl  
> > tools.xml > tools.html/index.html
> > XPath error : Undefined variable
> > not(@restriction='all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' 
> > ',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or  $selection='all')
> > ^
> > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template
> > Failed to compile predicate
> > XPath error : Undefined variable

This is a bug in xsltproc ... because the variable exists and is even
defined in the command line (and also with  inside the top
XSL stylesheet). I could reproduce the bug with xsltproc 1.1.15-1... and
this code has been working for 4 years already with xsltproc without any
problem.

Thus I'm reassigning the bug. I also attach "ignore.xsl" which can be
used as a minimal test case to reproduce the bug :
$ xsltproc --stringparam trainer false ignore.xsl
XPath error : Undefined variable
not(@trainer=$trainer or $trainer='true' or not(@trainer))
  ^
compilation error: file ignore.xsl line 9 element template
Failed to compile predicate

Regards,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com

Freexian : des développeurs Debian au service des entreprises
http://www.freexian.com


ignore.xsl
Description: application/xml


Bug#337594: marked as done (sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] build dependacies can not be satisfied)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:02:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337594: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 06:05:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 22:05:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYHAj-0006Kx-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 22:05:01 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
jA564txU025246
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:04:59 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
jA55tLKd015718;
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:55:22 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jA55tLNp015716;
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:55:21 -0800
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:55:21 -0800
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] build dependacies can not be satisfied
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.9.6.0-7
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

sbcl build-depends on sbcl-common (<= 1:0.9.5.50-1), and version
1:0.9.6.0-7 is in sid.


Checking correctness of source dependencies...
After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied:
sbcl-common(inst 1:0.9.6.0-7 ! <= wanted 1:0.9.5.50-1) sbcl-common(inst 
1:0.9.6.0-7 >> conflicted 1:0.9.5.50-1)
Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping sbcl

---
Received: (at 337594-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 14:06:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 06:06:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYOcQ-0006WL-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:02:06 -0800
From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#337594: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.0-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:02:06 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: sbcl
Source-Version: 1:0.9.6.0-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sbcl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

sbcl-common_0.9.6.0-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl-common_0.9.6.0-8_all.deb
sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.diff.gz
sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.dsc
sbcl_0.9.6.0-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.0-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sbcl package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  5 Nov 2005 11:25:52 +0100
Source: sbcl
Binary: sbcl sbcl-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.9.6.0-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PRO

Bug#308587: Dealing with #308587 using BTS version tracking

2005-11-05 Thread Florian Ernst
# found in Woody, fixed in DSA-743-1 available from security.d.o
found 308587 0.5.0-1
close 308587 0.5.0-1woody4
# found in Sarge, fixed in DSA-743-1 available from security.d.o
found 308587 0.8.0-1
close 308587 0.8.0-2sarge4
# found in Sid, fixed by uploading 0.8.0-3, including Joey's patch
close 308587 0.8.0-3
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed

As the original bugreport didn't have any version tracking information
included I add the respective versions at the time of reporting.
However, this bug has been dealt with for all releases of Debian, so
it can effectively be closed for certain versions. BTS version tracking
will allow to track any further progress for all distributions
separately.

Cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Dealing with #308587 using BTS version tracking

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # found in Woody, fixed in DSA-743-1 available from security.d.o
> found 308587 0.5.0-1
Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht
Bug marked as found in version 0.5.0-1.

> close 308587 0.5.0-1woody4
Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.5.0-1woody4, send any further explanations to 
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Removed pending tag.

> # found in Sarge, fixed in DSA-743-1 available from security.d.o
> found 308587 0.8.0-1
Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht
Bug marked as found in version 0.8.0-1.

> close 308587 0.8.0-2sarge4
Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.8.0-2sarge4, send any further explanations to 
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> # found in Sid, fixed by uploading 0.8.0-3, including Joey's patch
> close 308587 0.8.0-3
Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.8.0-3, send any further explanations to Moritz 
Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#334170: marked as done (lirc-modules-source: modifies conffiles in postinst)

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:29:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This never got closed by the upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 23:49:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 16:49:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQvmA-0003ux-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:49:18 -0700
Received: from tryphon (bny92-5-82-232-56-125.fbx.proxad.net [82.232.56.125])
by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39083719B;
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:49:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by tryphon with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EQvm9-00088Z-9o; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:49:17 +0200
Received: from tryphon ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (tryphon [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 31106-05; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:49:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from irma.home ([192.168.18.8])
by tryphon with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EQvm9-00088T-1s; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:49:17 +0200
Received: from nboullis by irma.home with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EQviL-0001jo-Ll; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:45:21 +0200
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:45:21 +0200
From: Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lirc-modules-source: modifies conffiles in postinst
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at home
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.7.1pre2-10
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3

Hi,

lirc-modules-source modifies its /etc/lirc/lirc-modules-source.conf 
conffile in postinst. This is a violation of policy 10.7.3. 
("[Conffiles] must not be modified by the maintainer scripts during 
installation (or at any other time).")

A possible way to solve this would be to ship the template for the 
configuration file in /usr/share/lirc-modules-source.conf (or somewhere 
else), generate the corresponding configuration according to answers to 
debconf templates in /tmp, and the merge this generated file with the 
actual configuration file with ucf.

(I might write the corresponding patch if you wish.)


Cheers,

Nicolas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4-irma
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages lirc-modules-source depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii  debhelper 4.9.12 helper programs for debian/rules
ii  debianutils   2.14.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t

Versions of packages lirc-modules-source recommends:
ii  dpkg  1.13.11package maintenance system for Deb
ii  dpkg-dev  1.13.11package building tools for Debian
ii  gcc [c-compiler]  4:4.0.1-3  The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.3 [c-compiler]  1:3.3.5-13 The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.0 [c-compiler]  4.0.2-2The GNU C compiler
ii  kernel-package9.008  A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  make  3.80-11The GNU version of the "make" util

-- debconf information:
  lirc-modules-source/use_lirc_hints: true
  lirc-modules-source/parallel_irq: 7
* lirc-modules-source/do-build: false
  lirc-modules-source/parallel_timer: 65536
  lirc-modules-source/sir_type: Other
  lirc-modules-source/serial_softcarrier: false
  lirc-modules-source/kernel-source-not-found:
  lirc-modules-source/serial_transmitter: true
  lirc-modules-source/not_needed:
  lirc-modules-source/serial_port: 0x2f8
* lirc-modules-source/drivers: i2c, gpio
  lirc-modules-source/serial_irq: 3
  lirc-modules-source/serial_type: Other
  lirc-modules-source/kernel-source: /usr/src/l

Bug#337381: gabber2: Gabber won't start because of missing glade file.

2005-11-05 Thread Goedson Teixeira Paixao
* Bas Kloet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: gabber2
> Version: 1.9.4+cvs20040709-16
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> I just installed gabber2, but when i try to run it I get the following error:
> 
> (gabber2:10937): libglade-WARNING **: could not find glade file 
> 'Login_dlg.glade'
> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Gnome::Glade::XmlError'
> 
> Because of this error, gabber won;t start and is therefor simply unusable.

This problem has been reported before[1]. But when I asked the bug
reporter to check if the file was not really present in the system, he
was not able to reproduce it anymore.

Could you please check that the package is correctly installed? I've
just checked in my machine and this file is present:

,[ shell session ]
| [11:06:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ dpkg -L gabber2|grep Login_dlg.glade
| /usr/share/Gabber/Login_dlg.glade
`

Please do this check and tell me if the file is not present or, it
being present, gabber still fails to start.

Regards,
Goedson


[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289683;archive=yes

-- 
 .''`. Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.jabber.org/
`. `'  Key fingerprint: 20FC AD60 E8C8 D2EB 064A  8F5B EED8 D4CC 1DEB 8EAE
  `-   Signed/encypted mail preferred


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#317524: infinite loop when using charset_default=iso-8859-1

2005-11-05 Thread Elmar Hoffmann
Hi David,

on Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 23:23:11 -0500, you wrote:

Thanks! :)

> Your observations about the code are very good, though not totally
> correct.  If you look at function process_config_option(), you'll see
> that the original config line is duplicated and split at the '='
> character (which has been replaced by '\0').  The "*t--" code is
> applied to the part after '=' and the loop to erase whitespace will
> never backup to the part before the '='.

I'm sorry, but apart from the fact that relying upon such
circumstances does not lead to robust code, I still beg to differ
regarding these circumstances. :)
process_config_option() indeed duplicates the original line, splits it
as you described and passes a pointer to the second part ("val") down
through process_config_option_as_arg() and process_arg() to
get_string() as the second parameter "arg".
get_string() as per your patch however then duplicates arg to s, which
thus is a new block of memory starting with the beginning of arg and,
unlike the one arg points into, the former '=' is not before it.
t gets to point to s and then is eventually decreased by one and
accessed by isspace(*t) during the first iteration as I described
previously.

elmar

-- 

 .'"`./"\
| :' :   Elmar Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ASCII Ribbon Campaign  \ /
`. `'GPG key available via pgp.netagainst HTML email   X
  `-& vCards  / \


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#337632: matchbox-panel: exits at startup with floating point exception

2005-11-05 Thread Manolo Díaz
Package: matchbox-panel
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages matchbox-panel depends on:
ii  libc62.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.2-1.1   generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libmatchbox1 1.7-2   shared library for Matchbox Projec
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-5  PNG library - runtime
ii  libstartup-notification0 0.8-1   library for program launch feedbac
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxrender1  1:0.9.0-2   X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  matchbox-common  0.9.1-1 common files for Matchbox Project 
ii  xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-6   compression library - runtime

Versions of packages matchbox-panel recommends:
ii  matchbox-panel-manager0.1-2  panel manager for matchbox-panel

-- no debconf information

Error output: "Floating point exception".


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd

2005-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 337625 initramfs-tools
Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not 
loaded in initrd
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7' to `initramfs-tools'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd

2005-11-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

reassign 337625 initramfs-tools
thanks

On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:06:58 +0100
Pau Capdevila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Booting with original initrd gives black screen.

Sounds like you had initramfs-tools and not yaird installed at the time
of initially installing the kernel.

Reassigning to initramfs-tools.



> Regenerating initrd with yaird solved the problem.

Yes, this has been fixed with most recent version of yaird.


If this is fixed in recent initramfs-tools as well, I believe this bug
can be closed.


 - Jonas


- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDbKXxn7DbMsAkQLgRAnsYAKCVQJ2MQTHPWvGmJQQpf92cqY279wCdE1xr
w1Fv9N54GX8l5PVtlh/f+oU=
=rhZP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0

2005-11-05 Thread Frank Küster
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> > tags 328749 patch
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
>> >> experimental installed:
>> >
>> > Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC.  Here is a patch, for
>> > explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package,
>> > or ask on debian-tetex-maint.  Will you be able to do the upload soon?
>> 
>> I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if
>> you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay.  I'll use
>> the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted
>> and close #33, too.
>
> Hi,
>
> I'll take care of of both bugs.

That's very good.  Regarding my patch, I thought about it and there is
one change I would rather revert: The change from calling fmtutil to
fmtutil-sys.  We have temporarily introduced a backward-compatibility
hack, so that fmtutil will continue to work for a while.  On the other
hand, fmtutil-sys is not available in the teTeX version in testing.

I suggest to stay with plain fmtutil, let xmltex (and all other packages
that needed fixes for teTeX-3.0) migrate to testing, and then I'll
remove tetex-base's dummy bug and let itself go into testing.

Regards, Frank

-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




  1   2   >