Bug#323815: problem still exists
Hi folks, The problem still exists on amd64. Would you mind to check? Many thanx Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#330191: klibc 1.1.1-4 FTBFS on sparc
Hi, The latest and greates klibc version fails to build on sparc. Due to some reason buildd overrides the CFLAGS set and uses -m32 (instead of -m64) flag to gcc, causing the failure. It builds fine on my up-to-date sid system. It also boot 2.6.14-2 fine, if I increase the timeout after udevsynthesize in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333052: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
Pozsar Balazs wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:31:04PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > With my patch, modprobe waits until the needed modules come out of the > "Loading" or "Unloading" state. > > For testing I have added it to Debian's module-init-tools 3.2-pre9. Works for me. Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#335279: spamassassin: also seeing the same problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 335279 normal Bug#335279: Missing dependency on libnet-dns-perl Severity set to `normal'. > merge 335279 332906 Bug#332906: spamassassing needs DNS.pm but doesn't depend on libnet-dns-perl Bug#335279: Missing dependency on libnet-dns-perl Merged 332906 335279. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335279: spamassassin: also seeing the same problem
severity 335279 normal merge 335279 332906 thanks On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 07:18:16PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Rogério Brito wrote: > > I'm also seeing the same problem reported by the original poster, > > but, in my case, I had to install more packages to make the daemon > > start. If I remember correctly, I had to install: > > > > libnet-dns-perl > > libmail-spf-query-perl > > libsys-hostname-long-perl > > libsocket6-perl > > libnet-dns-perl is now required by M::SA::Dns If it's not installed, a warning message is issued, spamassassin still runs. (If it's not, something wierd is happening -- it should issue an error, but keep going.) > From what I can tell, libsocket6-perl isn't strictly required unless > you have a IPv6 nameserver. [use constant HAS_SOCKET_INET6 => eval { > require IO::Socket::INET6 }; in M::SA::DnsResolver] This is a bug in SpamAssassin -- if you use an IPv6 nameserver, it'll refuse to start up if you have libnet-dns-perl, but not libsocket6-perl. I'd rather fix the bug than raise the dependency. > libmail-spf-query-perl should only be required if you're using the SPF > plugin. Right. Again, there's a warning message issued if you don't have it, but it is not fatal. > I don't know why you'd need libsys-hostname-long-perl, as the only > thing that appears to be used is Sys::Hostname, not > Sys::Hostname::Long (unless one of the above modules has a dependency > on it that isn't declared.) That's a bug in libmail-spf-query-perl. I believe that the latest version of that package now has libsys-hostname-long-perl as Suggests. I suspect this means it should be at least a Suggests: for spamassassin. > I'll make an NMU into the delayed queue sometime tomorrow to fix this > problem unless someone has some corrections to make to it. Please don't. I'll admit I'm a little short on time, and so I haven't appropriately responded to these reports but these are not bugs, strictly speaking. As far as I can tell, there is no module that needs to be added to spamassassin's Depends: or Recommends:. The bug is that the error messages for "missing" perl modules is too "loud". SpamAssassin does run just fine without libnet-dns-perl (unless you use an ipv6 nameserver and don't have libsocket6-perl), and without libmail-spf-query-perl. The error messages even go away if you set "dns_available no" in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf and comment out "loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF" in /etc/spamassassin/init.pre -- Duncan Findlay signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330606: mozilla-firefox does not start up
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:06:49PM +0200, Torsten Zirzlaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi. > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Eric Dorland wrote: > > >* Torsten Zirzlaff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > [...] > > > >Can you move your ~/.mozilla directory out of the way and try again? > > Done, but the situation is the same, except it creates the nescessary > files and waits then. Could you run strace -f firefox > /tmp/strace 2>&1 and send the /tmp/strace file here ? Cheers Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337547: marked as done (slib: 3a2-1 fails to install, Unbound variable: with-load-pathname)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337513: slib not installable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 22:32:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 14:32:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c-24-10-232-189.hsd1.ut.comcast.net (dusty.savageroad.com) [24.10.232.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYA6q-0001MX-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:32:32 -0800 Received: from bertbob by dusty.savageroad.com with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EYA6M-0004QI-AI; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:32:02 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: slib: 3a2-1 fails to install, Unbound variable: with-load-pathname X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:32:02 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: slib Version: 3a1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Upgrade from 3a1-5 to 3a2-1 fails with Errors were encountered while processing: slib E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying to recover: Setting up slib (3a2-1) ... ERROR: Unbound variable: with-load-pathname dpkg: error processing slib (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Packages which depend on slib (such as gnucash) fail to start with same "Unbound variable: with-load-pathname" error. Reversion to previous version restores function of scheme and dependent programs. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 337513-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2005 05:22:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 21:22:55 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYczX-0005wC-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:55 -0800 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EYczW-0004I4-DJ; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800 From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#337513: slib not installable References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Zippy-Says: TAPPING? You POLITICIANS! Don't you realize that the END of the ``Wash Cycle'' is a TREASURED MOMENT for most people?! Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Vincent Danjean's message of "Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100") Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: slib > Version: 3a2-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I cannot install slib. I do not know anything about guile. I think I > have the slib due to dependencies. Trying to install the last version > (3a2-1) fails. Thank you for your bug report. Please see bugs.debian.org/337359. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337513: marked as done (slib not installable)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337513: slib not installable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 16:52:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 08:52:54 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from iona.labri.fr [147.210.8.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EY4oA-0003eT-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:52:54 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by iona.labri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28631017A9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from iona.labri.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (iona.labri.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04935-08 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from galadriel.labri.fr (ram94-1-81-57-199-184.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.199.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by iona.labri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC81101765 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by galadriel.labri.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A85FEAB66; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: slib not installable X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:52:22 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at labri.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: slib Version: 3a2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I cannot install slib. I do not know anything about guile. I think I have the slib due to dependencies. Trying to install the last version (3a2-1) fails. I added 'set -x' in the postinst file, so I get : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LC_ALL=C sudo dpkg -a --configure Setting up slib (3a2-1) ... + install-info --quiet --section 'The Algorithmic Language Scheme' 'The Algorithmic Language Scheme' '--description=The SLIB portable Scheme library' /usr/share/info/slib.info.gz + '[' -x /usr/sbin/guile1.4-slibconfig ']' + '[' -x /usr/bin/guile-1.6 -a -e /usr/share/guile/1.6/slib ']' + rm -f /usr/share/guile/1.6/slibcat + /usr/bin/guile-1.6 -c '(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require '\''new-catalog)' ERROR: Unbound variable: with-load-pathname dpkg: error processing slib (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: slib [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Ask me other information if you need it. Best regards, Vincent -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 337513-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2005 05:22:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 21:22:55 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYczX-0005wC-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:55 -0800 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EYczW-0004I4-DJ; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800 From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#337513: slib not installable References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Zippy-Says: TAPPING? You POLITICIANS! Don't you realize that the END of the ``Wash Cycle'' is a TREASURED MOMENT for most people?! Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800
Bug#328534: Adaptec 2005S Hangs with current experiemental 2.6.13-686-smp kernel
Hi, Could you please check whether 2.6.14-2, which is currently in unstable, still oopses/hangs with your controllers? Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337547: slib: 3a2-1 fails to install, Unbound variable: with-load-pathname
Version: 3a2-2 Bert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: slib > Version: 3a1-5 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Upgrade from 3a1-5 to 3a2-1 fails with > > Errors were encountered while processing: > slib > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying to recover: > Setting up slib (3a2-1) ... > ERROR: Unbound variable: with-load-pathname > dpkg: error processing slib (--configure): > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Thank you for your bug report. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/337359. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335402: penguin-command: shouldn't this bug be closed?
Package: penguin-command Version: 1.6.7-2 Followup-For: Bug #335402 shouldn't this bug be closed? It would seems that this was fixed with 1.6.9-2. Right now this bug is the only thing preventing 1.6.10-1 from entering etch. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (750, 'testing'), (10, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13cavybook1 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages penguin-command depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng2 1.0.18-1 PNG library, older version - runti ii libsdl-mixer1 1.2.6-1.1 mixer library for Simple DirectMed ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime penguin-command recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333052: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 19:48 +0100, Pozsar Balazs wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:31:04PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > I've got these messages several times on the experimental SUSE too, > > but can't reproduce it so far, even without Rusty's patch to modprobe > > they have disappeared. See here for the details: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333052 > > > Just to let you know, I've also met this problem (on another distro), > and did not know about this bugreport until now. > So I've done another workaround: modprobe already parses /proc/modules > to check whether the modules needed are already loaded, and this file > also shows us the state of the modules, being "Loading", "Live" or > "Unloading". > > With my patch, modprobe waits until the needed modules come out of the > "Loading" or "Unloading" state. Yes, this was going to be my solution. However, we only need to resort to this is locking fails (read-only root filesystem). Rusty. -- A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335279: spamassassin: also seeing the same problem
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Rogério Brito wrote: > I'm also seeing the same problem reported by the original poster, > but, in my case, I had to install more packages to make the daemon > start. If I remember correctly, I had to install: > > libnet-dns-perl > libmail-spf-query-perl > libsys-hostname-long-perl > libsocket6-perl libnet-dns-perl is now required by M::SA::Dns From what I can tell, libsocket6-perl isn't strictly required unless you have a IPv6 nameserver. [use constant HAS_SOCKET_INET6 => eval { require IO::Socket::INET6 }; in M::SA::DnsResolver] libmail-spf-query-perl should only be required if you're using the SPF plugin. I don't know why you'd need libsys-hostname-long-perl, as the only thing that appears to be used is Sys::Hostname, not Sys::Hostname::Long (unless one of the above modules has a dependency on it that isn't declared.) I'll make an NMU into the delayed queue sometime tomorrow to fix this problem unless someone has some corrections to make to it. Don Armstrong -- "Ban cryptography! Yes. Let's also ban pencils, pens and paper, since criminals can use them to draw plans of the joint they are casing or even, god forbid, create one time pads to pass uncrackable codes to each other. Ban open spaces since criminals could use them to converse with each other out of earshot of the police. Let's ban flags since they could be used to pass secret messages in semaphore. In fact let's just ban all forms of verbal and non-verbal communication -- let's see those criminals make plans now!" http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337740: libwnn6-1: Missing conflicts with libwnn6
Package: libwnn6-1 Version: 1.0.0-12.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When performing an automatic upgrade from libwnn6 to libwnn6-1, the following error occurs: Selecting previously deselected package libwnn6-1. (Reading database ... 144951 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libwnn6-1 (from .../libwnn6-1_1.0.0-12.1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libwnn6-1_1.0.0-12.1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libwnn6.so.1.0.0', which is also in package libwnn6 This is most likely due to a missing conflicts relationship with libwnn6 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337668: FTBFS: broken build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev
This bug will be fixed in the next libsdl1.2 package release (currently available on mentors.debian.net) if i can ever get a sponser :) Lawrence Original Message Follows From: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#337668: FTBFS: broken build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 18:46:21 +0100 Package: libsdl1.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi! libsdl1.2_1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 fails to build in a clean sid environment. Fromm my pbuilder-log: = [..] -> Considering xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev -> Trying xlibmesa-dev -> Cannot install xlibmesa-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... dpkg is already the newest version. Package xlibmesa-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev E: Package xlibmesa-dev has no installation candidate -> Trying libgl-dev -> Cannot install libgl-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... dpkg is already the newest version. Package libgl-dev is a virtual package provided by: xlibmesa-gl-dev 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 mesag-dev 6.3.2-2 libgl1-mesa-dri-dev 6.3.2-2 libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev 6.3.2-2 You should explicitly select one to install. E: Package libgl-dev has no installation candidate -> Considering libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev to satisfy the dependency -> Cannot install libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... dpkg is already the newest version. Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev: Depends: mesa-common-dev (= 6.3.2-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgl1-mesa-directfb (= 6.3.2-2) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed. = Changing the Build-Depends from "xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev" to "xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev" solved the problem for me. Patch atteched. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) << libsdl1.2-1.2.7_1.2.8cvs20041007-ftbfs-xlibmesa-gl-dev.patch >> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Ownership problem appears to be unreproduceable; downgrading and tagging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 316241 important Bug#316241: bind9: can not write into cache directory Severity set to `important'. > tag 316241 unreproducible Bug#316241: bind9: can not write into cache directory There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316241: Ownership problem appears to be unreproduceable; downgrading and tagging
severity 316241 important tag 316241 unreproducible thanks As: uid=$(ls -ln /etc/bind/rndc.key | awk '{print $3}') if [ "$uid" = "0" ]; then [ -n "$localconf" ] || chown bind /etc/bind/rndc.key chgrp bind /etc/bind chmod g+s /etc/bind chgrp bind /etc/bind/rndc.key /var/run/bind/run /var/cache/bind chgrp bind /etc/bind/named.conf* chmod g+r /etc/bind/rndc.key /etc/bind/named.conf* chmod g+rwx /var/run/bind/run /var/cache/bind fi should be taking care of this problem, I'm downgrading and tagging unreproducible. Don Armstrong -- Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy. -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p251 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: still fails to build on sparc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 330191 - fixed Bug#330191: klibc: ftbfs [sparc] redefinition of 'struct __new_sigaction' Tags were: fixed patch Tags removed: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330191: still fails to build on sparc
tags 330191 - fixed thanks klibc 1.1.1-4 failed to build on a sparc buildd the same way, so this problem is not fixed. However it did build on my sparc pbuilder. gcc -Wp,-MT,fork.o,-MD,./.fork.o.d -Os -m32 -mptr32 -D__KLIBC__=1 -D__KLIBC_MINOR__=1 -nostdlib -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I../include/arch/sparc -I../include/bits32 -I../include -I../linux/include -I../linux/include2 -I../linux/include -I./zlib -I./zlib -DWITH_ERRLIST -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline -DDYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE -c -o fork.o fork.c In file included from ../include/signal.h:15, from fork.c:9: ../include/arch/sparc/klibc/archsignal.h:13: error: redefinition of 'struct __new_sigaction' ../include/arch/sparc/klibc/archsignal.h:25: error: redefinition of 'struct sigaction' ../include/arch/sparc/klibc/archsignal.h:32: error: redefinition of 'struct sigaltstack' ../include/arch/sparc/klibc/archsignal.h:36: error: redefinition of typedef 'stack_t' ../linux/include/asm/signal.h:230: error: previous declaration of 'stack_t' was here make[2]: *** [fork.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/klibc-1.1.1/klibc' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#336036: dovecot-imapd: user's inbox corruption
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 336036 normal Bug#336036: dovecot-imapd: user's inbox corruption Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336036: dovecot-imapd: user's inbox corruption
severity 336036 normal thanks On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Al Nikolov wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Hopefully, this was happen with only one user's inbox. I'm not sure about where to look for true cause if this effect. My guess is the mbox is indeed corrupt. Can you check for e.g. double from (minus the colon) header lines? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337702: openoffice.org 2.0 won't start since upgrade, libc problem?
Steve Langasek wrote: > That sounds like a broken libc. > > $ objdump -T /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno > D *UND* 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE errno > D *UND* 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno > $ objdump -T /lib/tls/libc.so.6 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno > 0008 gD .tbss 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE errno > 001c gD .tbss 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno > $ > > These two libraries are supposed to be used together. The openoffice > packages would have to be doing something *very* perverse to break that; > it's much more likely that you've managed to somehow screw up > /lib/tls/libc.so.6 or /lib/ld-linux.so.2 locally. Check the output of ldd > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx for junk in /usr/local, use "debsums -s > libc6" to verify that none of your libraries have been modified. > # objdump -T /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno D *UND* 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE errno D *UND* 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno # objdump -T /lib/tls/libc.so.6 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno 0008 gD .tbss 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE errno 001c gD .tbss 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno # ldd /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000) libuno_sal.so.3 => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3 (0xb7d53000) libuno_cppu.so.3 => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppu.so.3 (0xb7d27000) libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 (0xb7ce4000) libjvmfwk.so.3 => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libjvmfwk.so.3 (0xb7ccf000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7caa000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7c98000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7bbe000) libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7b99000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7b8e000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7a56000) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0xb7a4d000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0xb7a1f000) libstlport_gcc.so.4.6 => /usr/lib/libstlport_gcc.so.4.6 (0xb7954000) libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 (0xb795) libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0xb7842000) libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb782d000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f04000) # debsums -s libc6 # (There was no output for "debsums -s libc6") Is there a way that I can fix that? Can I remove the libraries and reinstall them? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337735: oooqs-kde: fails to install
Package: oooqs-kde Version: 2.0.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable oooqs-kde can not be installed with openoffice.org 2. Here is the result of an apt-get call: The following packages have unmet dependencies: oooqs-kde: Depends: openoffice.org (> 1.0.99+1.1rc) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages oooqs-kde depends on: ii kdelibs4c2 4:3.4.2-4 core libraries for all KDE applica ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.7-3 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-3 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt3:3.3.5-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System multi-head display ii libxrandr2 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii openoffice.org 2.0.0-2 OpenOffice.org Office suite versio ii xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime Versions of packages oooqs-kde recommends: ii kicker4:3.4.2-4 desktop panel for KDE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337702: openoffice.org 2.0 won't start since upgrade, libc problem?
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:48:22PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: > Package: openoffice.org > Version: 2.0.0-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > When I run any openoffice command I get an error and it exits. > Example: > $ ooffice > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: relocation error: > /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0: symbol errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not > defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: relocation error: > /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0: symbol errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not > defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference That sounds like a broken libc. $ objdump -T /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno D *UND* 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE errno D *UND* 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno $ objdump -T /lib/tls/libc.so.6 |grep GLIBC_PRIVATE.*errno 0008 gD .tbss 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE errno 001c gD .tbss 0004 GLIBC_PRIVATE h_errno $ These two libraries are supposed to be used together. The openoffice packages would have to be doing something *very* perverse to break that; it's much more likely that you've managed to somehow screw up /lib/tls/libc.so.6 or /lib/ld-linux.so.2 locally. Check the output of ldd /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx for junk in /usr/local, use "debsums -s libc6" to verify that none of your libraries have been modified. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337728: gkrellm is linked with libssl
Package: gkrellm Version: 2.2.7-3 Severity: serious At least on i386, gkrellm is linked with libsl0.9.8 effectively reopening archived bug #309089. The cause of this problem is described in #322211. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336098: considering the removal of saods9
I'm considering having saods9 removed. The FTBFS bugs aren't a problem; the original one is fixed upstream, in 4.0b7, and the others are easy to fix by adding lines like "class matrix;". Also, I can either link against tcl8.3 (after applying a patch) or statically link against a specially-compiled tcl8.4 to solve the reported crash on "Horizontal cut graph". But, ./saods9/sla/ contains obscured C code. slalib is written by Patrick Wallace, and a Fortran copy is distributed under the GPL by Starlink. A proprietary C copy is commercially available from Wallace. ./sla/ is an obscured C copy, with a GPL header. I'm not sure whether the GPL header was added by Wallace or by Bill Joye upstream, but it doesn't really matter WRT to the DFSG. Bill Joye just got back to me after conversation with Pat Wallace, Doug Mink, and John Roll. I guess the v4 release isn't planned to fix this problem, so its apparently up to me to fix. I'm going to fool around with the GPL fortran implementation, and see if I can come up with anything useful. First, I'll have to reread about C, Fortran, and f2c calling conventions. I've filed an RC removal bug, against saods9 only, and given myself a deadline of 2006-01-01 to have a new package uploaded, otherwise I will give up. FYI, the upstream websever hea-www.harvard.edu has been down for a few days now (again). Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 337690 by 336114 Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 336114 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup
block 337690 by 336114 thanks On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 04:29:35PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote: > On Saturday 05 November 2005 02:50 pm, Ronny Standtke wrote: > > Package: ksayit > > Version: 4:3.4.2-2 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > > > KSayit crashes on startup. Here is the backtrace: > ... > > #3 0xb799bb6e in __gnu_cxx::__pool::_M_reclaim_block () > >from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > > #4 0xb7c2b632 in __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc >__gnu_cxx::__common_pool_policy<__gnu_cxx::__pool, true> > >>::deallocate () from /usr/lib/libartskde.so.1 > ... > This is a result of a toolchain bug #336114, and unfortunately there is not > much that the debian-qt-kde maintainers until they are told how it will be > solved. If you really need ksayit working, recompiling kdelibs with the > current g++ should work around this problem. Which would then break again when the toolchain is fixed; the ABI change needs to be reverted, so anything built with the current g++ will have to be rebuilt again. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: severity of 337674 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > severity 337674 normal Bug#337674: vgrabbj testing migration Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 337665 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > # this is a policy "should" > severity 337665 important Bug#337665: no upstream changelog Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336527: bootchart-view: /usr/bin/bootchart does not start (prints stack trace)
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:02:57PM +0100, Ziga Mahkovec wrote: > This exception indicates that the bootchart classes have been compiled > for JDK 1.4 while you are running an older VM. Indeed, it looks like > you're running j2re1.3. Ok. It now works properly with sablevm. Updating the dependencies/requierements in the package would be nice. > > > I also get a stack trace when trying to use the web interface at > > bootchart.org btw... > > I assume that's a different error. Could you post that as well? Nope. Got it severall times in a row the day I posted. But can not reproduce it now. -- Nicolas Chauvat logilab.fr - services en informatique avancée et gestion de connaissances
Bug#337674: vgrabbj testing migration
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:58:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > vgrabbj is only installed for i386 because it is mentioned as > packages-arch-specific for i386 only. Though there were mips binaries > uploaded. So either ask for the removal of the old binaries or ask to > change Packages-arch-specific so vgrabbj can migrate to testing. This last part probably needs more explanation. http://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff/Packages-arch-specific vgrabbj is listed on that page as i386-specific because of "i386 assembler". If this is no longer applicable (well, it sure managed to build on mips *somehow* when it wasn't supposed to be, so I guess no i386 assembler was involved), please contact the people listed at the top of that file to have the entry removed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#322239: mozilla-firefox: [patch] incorrectly set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in /usr/bin/firefox wrapper
I think I am seeing this too. It was reported in #316824 (for 'mozilla') but I did not cross-report to 'mozilla-firefox'. The patch below should fix the issue, see #316824 for why I think it fixes it. I don't see why the firefox script should circumvent YOUR broken LD_LIBRARY_PATH. If your LD_LIBRARY_PATH is b0rked in the first place, change it. Well, that's a helpful response! I need to have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to run particular software that I need to run to do my work. In particular, we use Debian 'stable' because we need that stability when writing programs to swing 1,000 tonnes of metal around the sky (www.parkes.atnf.csiro.au). However for some other parts of our work we need to install a more recent GCC than stable provides into /usr/local/gnu. This is what is biting us here. The fix is only 4 bytes, and since the shell execs into the binary, who cares what mangling of LD_LIBRARY_PATH goes on inside the wrapper? I thought that was the whole point of the wrapper. And it means an important debian package runs nicely in a wider range of environments. Kind regards Vince -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign #337625 yaird Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `yaird'. > stop no thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd
reassign #337625 yaird stop no thanks On Sat, 05 Nov 2005, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Sounds like you had initramfs-tools and not yaird installed at the time > of initially installing the kernel. > > Reassigning to initramfs-tools. no mention of initramfs-tools in initial report. > > Regenerating initrd with yaird solved the problem. > > Yes, this has been fixed with most recent version of yaird. then mark it fixed with the new nice Version header. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336280: marked as done (XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:47:30 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336280: fixed in logidee-tools 1.2.6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2005 05:48:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 22:48:36 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EVja0-0005Ie-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:48:36 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9T5mZY4075569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:48:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EVVoS-vz-9W for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:06:36 -0700 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:06:36 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1149/Thu Oct 27 13:20:09 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: logidee-tools Version: 1.2.4-2 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build logidee-tools in an unstable chroot on i386: > xsltproc --xinclude --stringparam selection "none" --stringparam cycle "f= alse" --stringparam charte "gfdl" --stringparam trainer "false" --stringpar= am lang "en" --stringparam dir "/tmp/buildd/logidee-tools-1.2.4/doc/tools.h= tml" ../xsl/module-html.xsl tools.xml > tools.html/index.html > XPath error : Undefined variable > not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' = ',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all') > ^ > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template > Failed to compile predicate > XPath error : Undefined variable > not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' = ',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all') > ^ > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template > Failed to compile predicate > XPath error : Undefined variable > not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' = ',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all') > ^ > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template > Failed to compile predicate > XPath error : Undefined variable > not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' = ',@restriction,' ')) or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all') > ^ > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template > Failed to compile predicate > XPath error : Undefined variable > not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' = ',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all') > ^ > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template > Failed to compile predicate > XPath error : Undefined variable > not(@restriction=3D'all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' = ',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection=3D'all') > ^ > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 33 element template > Failed to compile predicate > XPath error : Undefined variable > not(@trainer=3D$
Bug#337712: sysklogd: Puts link in /usr/doc
Package: sysklogd Version: 1.4.1-17 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.3 Section 12.3 of Debian policy "Additional documentation" says: "Former Debian releases placed all additional documentation in /usr/doc/package. This has been changed to /usr/share/doc/package, and packages must not put documentation in the directory /usr/doc/package." I believe this package violates this rule by installing a symlink in /usr/doc/. It is the aim that etch will not have any packages installing things into the directory /usr/doc/. I believe this can be rectified by removing the relevant bits in the postinst and prerm files for sysklogd and klogd. Thanks, Stephen Quinney -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages sysklogd depends on: ii klogd [linux-kernel-log-daemo 1.4.1-17 Kernel Logging Daemon ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an sysklogd recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337711: dlocate: Puts link in /usr/doc
Package: dlocate Version: 0.5-0.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.3 Section 12.3 of Debian policy "Additional documentation" says: "Former Debian releases placed all additional documentation in /usr/doc/package. This has been changed to /usr/share/doc/package, and packages must not put documentation in the directory /usr/doc/package." I believe this package violates this rule by installing a symlink in /usr/doc/. It is the aim that etch will not have any packages installing things into the directory /usr/doc/. I believe this bug can be rectified by simply building and uploading a new Debian version of this package. Stephen Quinney -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages dlocate depends on: ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb ii grep-dctrl 2.6.7 Grep Debian package information ii perl 5.8.7-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction dlocate recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337708: libnet-ident-perl: Puts link in /usr/doc
Package: libnet-ident-perl Version: 1.20-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.3 Section 12.3 of Debian policy "Additional documentation" says: "Former Debian releases placed all additional documentation in /usr/doc/package. This has been changed to /usr/share/doc/package, and packages must not put documentation in the directory /usr/doc/package." I believe this package violates this rule by installing a symlink in /usr/doc/. It is the aim that etch will not have any packages installing things into the directory /usr/doc/. I believe this bug can be rectified by simply building and uploading a new Debian version of this package. Stephen Quinney -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libnet-ident-perl depends on: ii perl 5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction libnet-ident-perl recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:54:46 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds like you had initramfs-tools and not yaird installed at the > > time of initially installing the kernel. > > > > Reassigning to initramfs-tools. > > Jonas, i believe he had an older version of yaird without the fbcon > fix, and rebuilt with yaird or something, not sure. If so, this bugreport could be closed right away. Instead, I wrote that last paragraph that you cut out in your quote above :-P - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDbR2Kn7DbMsAkQLgRAlaGAJ0eWElH1VabOABNURH+1dLNvxj2zwCgozba pDqaSXozrK+UDx3wjnd1Jrs= =qL13 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#337466: also missing libxmu-dev
Hi! It seems that libxmu-dev is also missing from the build depends. At least it won't compile without it in my sarge pbuilder environment. Looking at ./configure output I found out that it has problems doing the test for libglut. Since freeglut3-dev was already in build depends I did some more searching and found that the configure check for glut adds -lXmu to LIBS if glut is found. So I tried and it turned out that adding libxmu-dev to the wine build depends helped. I'm not sure if this dependency is also required for sid, but I don't see how it could cause any problems. Thanks, Zsolt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328738: proposed patch to fix this bug
* Zack Cerza [Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:17:46 -0400]: > Modestas Vainius wrote: > > Please, fix this bug ASAP, because it's grave, but trivial to fix (either > > by > > maintainer or NMU). > I've had a fix for this ready for several days now, but literally as I > switched to my IRC window to ping my sponsor, I noticed that there had > been an NMU. I got the initial bug report mail six hours *after* the NMU > happened, and since then I honestly have not had the time to rebase my > changes off the NMU. I would have more than enough time to fix it this > weekend, but in 10 hours I have to leave town for four days, away from > all my Debian systems. I'm sorry for both my lack of time and the bad > timing of all this, and if four days is too long to wait I suggest that > someone NMU. Thanks in advance to anyone that has the time. If it hasn't > been fixed by the time I get back, I will do it myself first thing. Is Modestas' patch OK? -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Listening to: Matthew Kimball - I don't need There may be no I in TEAM, but a M and an E. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337702: openoffice.org 2.0 won't start since upgrade, libc problem?
Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I run any openoffice command I get an error and it exits. Example: $ ooffice /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: relocation error: /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0: symbol errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: relocation error: /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0: symbol errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference That has been happening ever since I upgraded to 2.0.0-1. Before that, I had the openoffice.org2 packages installed from experimental. The experimental openoffice.org2 packages are all removed. I have libc6 version 2.3.5-7, openoffice.org version 2.0.0-2. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on: ii openoffice.org-base 2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - data ii openoffice.org-calc 2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - spre ii openoffice.org-core 2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite archit ii openoffice.org-draw 2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - draw ii openoffice.org-impress2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - pres ii openoffice.org-math 2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - equa ii openoffice.org-writer 2.0.0-2OpenOffice.org office suite - word openoffice.org recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336134: kernel-image-netbootable: new version currently unusable
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:07:46PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > severity 335254 grave > merge 336134 335254 > thanks > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:36:26 -0600 > Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > due to debian bug: > > > > #335254: initrd-netboot-tools: incompatible with > > #linux-image-2.6.12-1-386 > > > > version 0.7.0b-2 of kernel-image-netbootable is unusable, as it only > > depends on kernels that are incompatible with initrd-netboot-tools(at > > least on i386). > > Why not then simply raise the severity of that other bug? Done now, > and merged with this one :-) because version 0.7.0b-1 still works with the 2.4 kernels in etch, and uses those by default, thus, a higher severity is only applicable to the 0.7.0b-2 version. but whatever. :) live well, vagrant signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:16:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > > I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so > > > without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't > > > know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-( > > > > You can work around with xsl:choose or xsl:if clauses inside the > > xsl:template. > > Yeah I know that, but in my case it's uglier than before. I have an > ignore stylesheet which defines high priority templates to override some > specific templates ... but the criteria to define "the specificity" > includes this variable. > > This ignore stylesheet is used by several other stylesheet. I have to > put dozens of xsl:if in several stylesheets when 3 generic templates did > the work until now. Maybe you can hack something with modes ? Well, that depends on how your stuff is done... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup
On Saturday 05 November 2005 02:50 pm, Ronny Standtke wrote: > Package: ksayit > Version: 4:3.4.2-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > KSayit crashes on startup. Here is the backtrace: ... > #3 0xb799bb6e in __gnu_cxx::__pool::_M_reclaim_block () >from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #4 0xb7c2b632 in __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc__gnu_cxx::__common_pool_policy<__gnu_cxx::__pool, true> >>::deallocate () from /usr/lib/libartskde.so.1 ... This is a result of a toolchain bug #336114, and unfortunately there is not much that the debian-qt-kde maintainers until they are told how it will be solved. If you really need ksayit working, recompiling kdelibs with the current g++ should work around this problem. Josh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so > > without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't > > know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-( > > You can work around with xsl:choose or xsl:if clauses inside the > xsl:template. Yeah I know that, but in my case it's uglier than before. I have an ignore stylesheet which defines high priority templates to override some specific templates ... but the criteria to define "the specificity" includes this variable. This ignore stylesheet is used by several other stylesheet. I have to put dozens of xsl:if in several stylesheets when 3 generic templates did the work until now. > If you can tell which files are concerned and where i can find them, i > can help when i have some time for it (or if it's just trivial). Thanks for the offer, but I'm the upstream of logidee-tools so I know it well enough to be able to fix it myself ... It's just bothersome to do when it used to work. :-) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Freexian : des développeurs Debian au service des entreprises http://www.freexian.com
Bug#337470: marked as done (xt: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 11:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337470: fixed in xt 0.9.1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 13:52:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 05:52:51 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.36.164] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EY1zv-0004WN-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 05:52:51 -0800 Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37033.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.37.33]) by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D0FB885 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:52:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EY1zQ-00082I-RN for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:52:20 +0100 From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xt: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:52:20 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xt Severity: serious Version: 0.9.1-6 >From my pbuilder build log: ... Installing the build-deps -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.20 2005/08/17 00:46:54 dancer Exp $ -> Considering debhelper (>> 3.0.0) -> Trying debhelper -> Considering gtkglarea5-dev -> Trying gtkglarea5-dev -> Considering xlibmesa-dev -> Trying xlibmesa-dev -> Cannot install xlibmesa-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Package xlibmesa-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev E: Package xlibmesa-dev has no installation candidate E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed. You need to replace that with xlibmesa-gl-dev and/or xlibmesa-glu-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 337470-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 19:52:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 11:52:36 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYU0I-0004Nj-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 11:47:06 -0800 From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337470: fixed in xt 0.9.1-7 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 11:47:06 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xt Source-Version: 0.9.1-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xt_0.9.1-7.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xt/xt_0.9.1-7.diff.gz xt_0.9.1-7.dsc to pool/main/x/xt/xt_0.9.1-7.dsc xt_0.9.1-7_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xt/xt_0.9.1-7_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xt package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEG
Bug#337690: ksayit: KSayit crashes on startup
Package: ksayit Version: 4:3.4.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable KSayit crashes on startup. Here is the backtrace: (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) `system-supplied DSO at 0xe000' has disappeared; keeping its symbols. (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1238341024 (LWP 9489)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [KCrash handler] #3 0xb799bb6e in __gnu_cxx::__pool::_M_reclaim_block () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #4 0xb7c2b632 in __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc >::deallocate () from /usr/lib/libartskde.so.1 #5 0xb683aba1 in Arts::readTypeSeq () from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1 #6 0xb6805f7d in Arts::InterfaceDef::readType () from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1 #7 0xb68064e7 in Arts::InterfaceDef::InterfaceDef () from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1 #8 0xb683b603 in Arts::readTypeSeq () from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1 #9 0xb68068d9 in Arts::ModuleDef::readType () from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1 #10 0xb6806b2f in Arts::ModuleDef::ModuleDef () from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1 #11 0xb68077ee in Arts::IDLFileReg::startup () from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1 #12 0xb67d96ad in Arts::StartupManager::startup () from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1 #13 0xb6800088 in Arts::Dispatcher::Dispatcher () from /usr/lib/libmcop.so.1 #14 0xb7c19e81 in KArtsDispatcher::KArtsDispatcher () from /usr/lib/libartskde.so.1 #15 0x0807a675 in ?? () #16 0xb7805ec0 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #17 0x08057de1 in ?? () -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_CH) Versions of packages ksayit depends on: ii artsbuilder 4:3.4.2-2 synthesizer designer for aRts ii kdelibs4c24:3.4.2-4 core libraries for all KDE applica ii libarts1c21.4.2-5aRts sound system core components ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.5-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ksayit recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 333980 +fixed-upstream Bug#333980: [mips/mipsel] FTBFS caused by -Werror Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 07:15:27PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reassign 336280 logidee-tools > retitle 336280 XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern > thanks > > Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 18:06 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > > Thus I'm reassigning the bug. I also attach "ignore.xsl" which can be > > > used as a minimal test case to reproduce the bug : > > > $ xsltproc --stringparam trainer false ignore.xsl > > > XPath error : Undefined variable > > > not(@trainer=$trainer or $trainer='true' or not(@trainer)) > > > ^ > > > compilation error: file ignore.xsl line 9 element template > > > Failed to compile predicate > > > > I guess this is the same as #334784, but i don't have time to check > > right now. If you have some time, would you test the patch and see if it > > helps your problem ? > > I tried and it doesn't help. Actually it looks like #329678 because the > variable is in a match pattern too ... but I don't understand your > reasoning for closing the bug. > > If I check the Pattern grammar, it leads "Predicate" which is "[Expr]" > and Expr can certainly include variables... so I checked the ChangeLog > of libxslt and by recursion I found this : > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303289 > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Defining-Template-Rules > > I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so > without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't > know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-( You can work around with xsl:choose or xsl:if clauses inside the xsl:template. If you can tell which files are concerned and where i can find them, i can help when i have some time for it (or if it's just trivial). Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337230: marked as done (--print-debs removes current working dir)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:04 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337230: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 12:50:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 04:50:24 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EXeXw-0006BS-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 04:50:24 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id E18E364D55; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:50:21 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9F59B876D; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:49:59 + (GMT) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:49:59 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: --print-debs removes current working dir Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: debootstrap Version: 0.3.2.2 Severity: critical I just ran "debootstrap --print-debs sid" in my $HOME and while cleaning up, debootstrap starting removing my whole $HOME directory. Apparently it puts its file in the current working dir instead of a tmp or sub directory and removes the whole dir. This is not what I'd expect from an option with the following description: --print-debs Print the packages to be installed, and exit tbm 18219 0.0 0.8 5240 2068 pts/10 S+ 12:39 0:00 /bin/sh -e /usr/sbin/debootstrap --print-debs sid tbm 18566 0.9 0.1 1596 408 pts/10 R+ 12:39 0:01 rm -rf /home/tbm/ -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages debootstrap depends on: ii binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii wget 1.10.2-1retrieves files from the web debootstrap recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ --- Received: (at 337230-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 18:51:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 10:51:43 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYT4C-0003ow-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:04 -0800 From: Anthony Towns To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337230: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:04 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: debootstrap Source-Version: 0.3.3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debootstrap-udeb_0.3.3_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_0.3.3_powerpc.udeb debootstrap_0.3.3.dsc to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.3.dsc debootstrap_0.3.3.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.3.tar.gz debootstrap_0.3.3_all.deb to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Anthony Towns (supplier of updated debootstrap package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe th
Bug#333484: marked as done (filerunner fails to start after upgrade)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333484: fixed in filerunner 2.5.1-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2005 06:51:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 11 23:51:31 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net [68.230.241.34] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EPaSZ-00017e-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:51:31 -0700 Received: from mailhost.moonkingdom.net ([70.179.43.17]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:50:43 -0400 Received: from rei.moonkingdom.net (rei.moonkingdom.net [192.168.0.4]) by mailhost.moonkingdom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id F39D34AD0D; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rei.moonkingdom.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:58 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: filerunner: Ships empty bitmaps directory making app fail to load X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:58 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: filerunner Version: 2.5.1-15 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable rei $ fr Error in startup script: error reading bitmap file "/usr/lib/filerunner/bitmaps/tree.bit" (processing "-bitmap" option) invoked from within "menubutton $glob(win,$inst).dirmenu_frame.dir_but -menu $glob(win,$inst).dirmenu_frame.dir_but.m -bitmap @$glob(lib_fr)/bitmaps/tree.bit" (procedure "BuildFileListPanel" line 11) invoked from within "BuildFileListPanel left" (procedure "ShowWindow" line 110) invoked from within "ShowWindow" (file "/usr/bin/fr" line 3409) The -15 filerunner package ships an empty /usr/lib/filerunner/bitmaps directory (although it *does* ship the directory). Since filerunner keeps the button bitmaps here, now it can't load them, and fails. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages filerunner depends on: ii tk8.4 8.4.11-1 Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 - filerunner recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 333484-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 18:51:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 10:51:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYT4E-0003pj-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:06 -0800 From: Jose Carlos Medeiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#333484: fixed in filerunner 2.5.1-16 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:47:06 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: filerunner Source-Version: 2.5.1-16 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of filerunner, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: filerunner_2.5.1-16.diff.gz to pool/main/f/filerunner/filerunner_2.5.1-16.diff.gz filerunner_2.5.1-16.dsc to pool/main/f/filerunner/filerunner_2.5.1-16.dsc filerunner_2.5.1-16_i386.deb to pool/main/f/filerunner/filerunner_2.5.1-16_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [E
Processed: Re: Bug#337677: knockd: Knockd fails when using a ppp interface
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 337677 important Bug#337677: knockd: Knockd fails when using a ppp interface Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337677: knockd: Knockd fails when using a ppp interface
severity 337677 important thanks -- Check the severities list [1], this bug is not 'grave'. Probably upstream, will look into it. Thanks. Cheers [1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities On Sáb, 2005-11-05 at 19:07 +0100, Laurent CARON wrote: Package: knockd Version: 0.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Knockd since last version is not working on ppp interfaces. It is not 'seeing' packets that should trigger it. Reverting back to an old version solves the problem. Laurent -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-a7n Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages knockd depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpcap0.80.9.4-1System interface for user-level pa ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility knockd recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Leo Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#333052: 2.6.14, udev: unknown symbols for ehci_hcd
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:31:04PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > I've got these messages several times on the experimental SUSE too, > but can't reproduce it so far, even without Rusty's patch to modprobe > they have disappeared. See here for the details: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333052 Just to let you know, I've also met this problem (on another distro), and did not know about this bugreport until now. So I've done another workaround: modprobe already parses /proc/modules to check whether the modules needed are already loaded, and this file also shows us the state of the modules, being "Loading", "Live" or "Unloading". With my patch, modprobe waits until the needed modules come out of the "Loading" or "Unloading" state. -- pozsy --- module-init-tools-3.2-pre4.orig/modprobe.c 2005-05-08 09:38:52.0 +0200 +++ module-init-tools-3.2-pre4/modprobe.c 2005-10-24 13:19:39.0 +0200 @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ FILE *proc_modules; char *line; +start: /* Might not be mounted yet. Don't fail. */ proc_modules = fopen("/proc/modules", "r"); if (!proc_modules) @@ -373,12 +374,31 @@ if (entry && strcmp(entry, modname) == 0) { /* If it exists, usecount is the third entry. */ - if (usecount) { - entry = strtok(NULL, " \n"); - if (entry - && (entry = strtok(NULL, " \n")) != NULL) + if (!(entry = strtok(NULL, " \n"))) + goto out; + + if (!(entry = strtok(NULL, " \n"))) /* usecount */ + goto out; + else + if (usecount) *usecount = atoi(entry); + + if (!(entry = strtok(NULL, " \n"))) /* "-" */ + goto out; + + if (!(entry = strtok(NULL, " \n"))) /* status */ + goto out; + else { + if (!strcmp(entry, "Loading") || !strcmp(entry, "Unloading")) { + usleep(10); + free(line); + fclose(proc_modules); + goto start; + } + goto out; } + + out: free(line); fclose(proc_modules); return 1; -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of cyrus-sasl2 2.1.19-1.7
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 332703 + fixed Bug#332703: FTBFS: Syntax error before MD5_CTX Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337669: cyrus-sasl2_2.1.19-1.6 FTBFS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # ok, check first if it's an duplicate ... :( > close 337669 Bug#337669: cyrus-sasl2_2.1.19-1.6 FTBFS 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 336280 logidee-tools Bug#336280: xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular situations Bug reassigned from package `xsltproc' to `logidee-tools'. > retitle 336280 XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern Bug#336280: xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular situations Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
reassign 336280 logidee-tools retitle 336280 XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern thanks Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 18:06 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > Thus I'm reassigning the bug. I also attach "ignore.xsl" which can be > > used as a minimal test case to reproduce the bug : > > $ xsltproc --stringparam trainer false ignore.xsl > > XPath error : Undefined variable > > not(@trainer=$trainer or $trainer='true' or not(@trainer)) > > ^ > > compilation error: file ignore.xsl line 9 element template > > Failed to compile predicate > > I guess this is the same as #334784, but i don't have time to check > right now. If you have some time, would you test the patch and see if it > helps your problem ? I tried and it doesn't help. Actually it looks like #329678 because the variable is in a match pattern too ... but I don't understand your reasoning for closing the bug. If I check the Pattern grammar, it leads "Predicate" which is "[Expr]" and Expr can certainly include variables... so I checked the ChangeLog of libxslt and by recursion I found this : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303289 http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Defining-Template-Rules I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-( Regards, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Freexian : des développeurs Debian au service des entreprises http://www.freexian.com
Bug#337677: knockd: Knockd fails when using a ppp interface
Package: knockd Version: 0.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Knockd since last version is not working on ppp interfaces. It is not 'seeing' packets that should trigger it. Reverting back to an old version solves the problem. Laurent -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-a7n Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages knockd depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpcap0.80.9.4-1System interface for user-level pa ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility knockd recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337674: vgrabbj testing migration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: vgrabbj Severity: serious Version: 0.9.6-2 Hi vgrabbj is only installed for i386 because it is mentioned as packages-arch-specific for i386 only. Though there were mips binaries uploaded. So either ask for the removal of the old binaries or ask to change Packages-arch-specific so vgrabbj can migrate to testing. Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDbPLb5UTeB5t8Mo0RArrNAJ4857lfvwXvEsey/01lpL8rxAoN2ACfT7mD ZY65H/TAmrNw6Q9zig5M60k= =uuio -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337669: cyrus-sasl2_2.1.19-1.6 FTBFS
Package: cyrus-sasl2 Version: 2.1.19-1.6 Severity: serious Hi, cyrus-sasl2 FTBFS now (this happens with pbuilder on i386 as well as with sbuild on armeb). gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../lib -I../sasldb -I../include -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include -Wall -W -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -MT ntlm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ntlm.Tpo -c ntlm.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ntlm.o In file included from ../include/saslplug.h:14, from ntlm.c:96: ../include/hmac-md5.h:11: error: syntax error before 'MD5_CTX' ../include/hmac-md5.h:11: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union ../include/hmac-md5.h:12: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'HMAC_MD5_CTX' ../include/hmac-md5.h:12: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../include/hmac-md5.h:36: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/hmac-md5.h:46: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/hmac-md5.h:53: error: syntax error before 'HMAC_MD5_CTX' In file included from ntlm.c:96: ../include/saslplug.h:73: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/saslplug.h:74: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/saslplug.h:75: error: syntax error before 'MD5_CTX' ../include/saslplug.h:79: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/saslplug.h:81: error: syntax error before 'HMAC_MD5_CTX' ../include/saslplug.h:84: error: syntax error before '*' token ntlm.c: In function 'load_buffer': ntlm.c:277: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'to_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'P16_lm': ntlm.c:375: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of '__builtin_strncpy' differ in signedness ntlm.c:378: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'E' differ in signedness ntlm.c:367: warning: unused parameter 'utils' ntlm.c:368: warning: unused parameter 'buf' ntlm.c:369: warning: unused parameter 'buflen' ntlm.c: In function 'P16_nt': ntlm.c:392: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'to_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c:392: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'to_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c:393: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'MD4' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'V2': ntlm.c:446: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'to_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c:448: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'HMAC' differ in signedness ntlm.c:448: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 7 of 'HMAC' differ in signedness ntlm.c:454: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'HMAC_Final' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'make_netbios_name': ntlm.c:770: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of '__builtin_strncpy' differ in signedness ntlm.c:771: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'smb_negotiate_protocol': ntlm.c:1034: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness ntlm.c:1116: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'from_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'smb_session_setup': ntlm.c:1257: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'create_challenge': ntlm.c:1344: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness ntlm.c:1350: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'load_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'ntlm_server_mech_new': ntlm.c:1357: warning: unused parameter 'glob_context' ntlm.c:1359: warning: unused parameter 'challenge' ntlm.c:1360: warning: unused parameter 'challen' ntlm.c: In function 'ntlm_server_mech_step1': ntlm.c:1399: warning: unused parameter 'oparams' ntlm.c: In function 'ntlm_server_mech_step2': ntlm.c:1481: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1481: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1486: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1486: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1492: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1492: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1498: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1498: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1561: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of '__builtin_strncpy' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1573: error: 'MD5_DIGEST_LENGTH' undeclared (first use in this function) ntlm.c:1573: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ntlm.c:1573: error: for each function it appears in.) ntlm.c:1463: warning: unused parameter 'serverout' ntlm.c:1464: warning: unused parameter 'serveroutlen' ntlm.c: In function 'create_request': ntlm.c:1779: warning: pointer targets i
Bug#337668: FTBFS: broken build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev
Package: libsdl1.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi! libsdl1.2_1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 fails to build in a clean sid environment. Fromm my pbuilder-log: = [..] -> Considering xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev -> Trying xlibmesa-dev -> Cannot install xlibmesa-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... dpkg is already the newest version. Package xlibmesa-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev E: Package xlibmesa-dev has no installation candidate -> Trying libgl-dev -> Cannot install libgl-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... dpkg is already the newest version. Package libgl-dev is a virtual package provided by: xlibmesa-gl-dev 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 mesag-dev 6.3.2-2 libgl1-mesa-dri-dev 6.3.2-2 libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev 6.3.2-2 You should explicitly select one to install. E: Package libgl-dev has no installation candidate -> Considering libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev to satisfy the dependency -> Cannot install libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... dpkg is already the newest version. Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev: Depends: mesa-common-dev (= 6.3.2-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgl1-mesa-directfb (= 6.3.2-2) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed. = Changing the Build-Depends from "xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev" to "xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev" solved the problem for me. Patch atteched. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) diff -Nur libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/changelog libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/changelog --- libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/changelog 2005-11-05 17:51:38.0 +0100 +++ libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/changelog 2005-11-05 16:50:41.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libsdl1.2 (1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.4) unstable; urgency=low + + * changed build depends: xlibmesa-dev -> xlibmesa-gl-dev + + -- Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:50:16 +0100 + libsdl1.2 (1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nur libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/control libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/control --- libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/control 2005-11-05 17:51:38.0 +0100 +++ libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/control 2005-11-05 17:52:44.0 +0100 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian SDL maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.2), debhelper (>> 3.0.0), dbs, libaa1-dev, xlibs-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev, libsvga1-dev [i386], libarts1-dev, libartsc0-dev, libasound2-dev [i386 ia64 alpha amd64 arm hppa m32r m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc ppc64], type-handling (>= 0.2.1), libaudio-dev, automake1.7 +Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.2), debhelper (>> 3.0.0), dbs, libaa1-dev, xlibs-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, libsvga1-dev [i386], libarts1-dev, libartsc0-dev, libasound2-dev [ ppc64], type-handling (>= 0.2.1), libaudio-dev, automake1.7 Package: libsdl1.2debian Architecture: any diff -Nur libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/control.in libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/control.in --- libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-old/debian/control.in 2005-11-05 17:51:38.0 +0100 +++ libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/debian/control.in 2005-11-05 16:56:56.0 +0100 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian SDL maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.2), debhelper (>> 3.0.0), dbs, libaa1-dev, xlibs-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, xlibmesa
Bug#337422: marked as done (Should depend on libcamel1.2-dev too)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337422: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 11:13:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 03:13:43 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mf00.sitadelle.com (smtp.cegetel.net) [212.94.174.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EXzVu-DS-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 03:13:43 -0800 Received: from vm-1.vm-dmz.bpl-group.org (mx0.bpl-group.org [195.115.71.69]) by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584981A449F; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:13:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from bee.dooz.org (lan-53.int.bpl-group.org [192.168.16.53]) by vm-1.vm-dmz.bpl-group.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333F3C584; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:13:12 + (UTC) Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F2991D8049; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:13:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:13:12 +0100 From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Should depend on libcamel1.2-dev too Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libedataserverui1.2-dev Version: 1.2.3-7 Severity: serious Tags: patch libedataserverui1.2-dev holds /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.la which lists /usr/lib/libcamel-1.2.la in its dependency_libs line, hence libedataserverui1.2-dev should depend on libcamel1.2-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libedataserverui1.2-dev depends on: ii libedataserver1.2-dev 1.2.3-7Utility library for evolutio= n data ii libedataserverui1.2-4 1.2.3-7GUI utily library for evolut= ion da ii libgnome2-dev 2.12.0.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - develo= pment=20 libedataserverui1.2-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --=20 Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS!When do we want it? BRAINS!" --- Received: (at 337422-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 17:36:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 09:36:53 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYRtj-0005dP-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800 From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337422: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: evolution-data-server Source-Version: 1.2.3-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of evolution-data-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: evolution-data-server-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.diff.gz to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.diff.gz evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.dsc to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.dsc evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8_i386.deb libcamel1.2-0_1.2.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/libcamel1.2-0_1.2.3-8_i386.deb libcamel1.2-dev_1.2.3-8_i386
Bug#337421: marked as done (Should depend on libcamel1.2-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337421: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 11:12:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 03:12:35 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mf00.sitadelle.com (smtp.cegetel.net) [212.94.174.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EXzUp-0008Kv-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 03:12:35 -0800 Received: from vm-1.vm-dmz.bpl-group.org (mx0.bpl-group.org [195.115.71.69]) by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDD01A446A; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:11:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from bee.dooz.org (lan-53.int.bpl-group.org [192.168.16.53]) by vm-1.vm-dmz.bpl-group.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95575C584; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:11:58 + (UTC) Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5EB021D8049; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:11:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:11:58 +0100 From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Should depend on libcamel1.2-dev Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libedata-book1.2-dev Version: 1.2.3-7 Severity: serious Tags: patch libedata-book1.2-dev holds /usr/lib/libedata-book-1.2.la which lists /usr/lib/libcamel-1.2.la in its dependency_libs line, hence libedata-book1.2-dev should depend on libcamel1.2-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libedata-book1.2-dev depends on: ii libebook1.2-dev 1.2.3-7Client library for evolution= addre ii libedata-book1.2-21.2.3-7Backend library for evolutio= n addr libedata-book1.2-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --=20 Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS!When do we want it? BRAINS!" --- Received: (at 337421-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 17:36:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 09:36:51 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYRtj-0005dN-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800 From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337421: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:32:11 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: evolution-data-server Source-Version: 1.2.3-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of evolution-data-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: evolution-data-server-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.diff.gz to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.diff.gz evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.dsc to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8.dsc evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_1.2.3-8_i386.deb libcamel1.2-0_1.2.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/libcamel1.2-0_1.2.3-8_i386.deb libcamel1.2-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/libcamel1.2-dev_1.2.3-8_i386.deb libebook1.2-3_1.2.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolut
Processed: Fixed in the forthcoming 2.0.1-13 version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package toshutils Ignoring bugs not assigned to: toshutils > tags 337461 pending Bug#337461: toshutils: FTBFS: Unrecognized command line option "-fwritable-strings" There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 323507 pending Bug#323507: with slow CPU speed, portege 7020CT time goes too fast There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337479: yaird: should use /usr/bin/perl, not /usr/local/bin/perl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 337479 serious Bug#337479: yaird: should use /usr/bin/perl, not /usr/local/bin/perl Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329041: valgrind: Valgrind is being compiled with SSE instruction set
I just compiled valgrind on my machine, and it seems to be compiled correctly even though it supports sse: checking if gcc accepts -m32... yes checking if gcc accepts -mmmx... yes checking if gcc accepts -msse... yes grepping through the build logs doesn't show any occurances of "-msse" I did also have a look at the Makefiles and -msse seems to be only used for the tests... are you sure this bug still applies to 3.0.1? philipp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337461: Fixed in the forthcoming 2.0.1-13 version
package toshutils tags 337461 pending tags 323507 pending thanks I have prepared version 2.0.1-13, but am waiting for some feedback from Toshiba users on the debian-laptop list because of the changes made to be able to compile with gcc-4.0. If there are no problems reported, then I will submit the package for upload. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpkLpEvILD4O.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#337665: no upstream changelog
Package: meld Version: 1.1.1-1 Severity: serious /usr/share/doc/meld/changelog.gz is missing. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#336280: [xml/sgml] Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 03:20:18PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reassign xsltproc 1.1.15-1 > retitle 336280 xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular > situations > thanks > > Le vendredi 28 octobre 2005 à 08:06 -0700, Matt Kraai a écrit : > > Package: logidee-tools > > Version: 1.2.4-2 > > Severity: serious > > > > pbuilder fails to build logidee-tools in an unstable chroot on i386: > > > > > xsltproc --xinclude --stringparam selection "none" --stringparam cycle > > > "false" --stringparam charte "gfdl" --stringparam trainer "false" > > > --stringparam lang "en" --stringparam dir > > > "/tmp/buildd/logidee-tools-1.2.4/doc/tools.html" ../xsl/module-html.xsl > > > tools.xml > tools.html/index.html > > > XPath error : Undefined variable > > > not(@restriction='all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' > > > ',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection='all') > > > ^ > > > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template > > > Failed to compile predicate > > > XPath error : Undefined variable > > This is a bug in xsltproc ... because the variable exists and is even > defined in the command line (and also with inside the top > XSL stylesheet). I could reproduce the bug with xsltproc 1.1.15-1... and > this code has been working for 4 years already with xsltproc without any > problem. > > Thus I'm reassigning the bug. I also attach "ignore.xsl" which can be > used as a minimal test case to reproduce the bug : > $ xsltproc --stringparam trainer false ignore.xsl > XPath error : Undefined variable > not(@trainer=$trainer or $trainer='true' or not(@trainer)) > ^ > compilation error: file ignore.xsl line 9 element template > Failed to compile predicate I guess this is the same as #334784, but i don't have time to check right now. If you have some time, would you test the patch and see if it helps your problem ? Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > tags 328749 patch > >> > thanks > >> > > >> > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from > >> >> experimental installed: > >> > > >> > Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for > >> > explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, > >> > or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? > >> > >> I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if > >> you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use > >> the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted > >> and close #33, too. > > > > Hi, > > > > I'll take care of of both bugs. > > That's very good. Regarding my patch, I thought about it and there is > one change I would rather revert: The change from calling fmtutil to > fmtutil-sys. We have temporarily introduced a backward-compatibility > hack, so that fmtutil will continue to work for a while. On the other > hand, fmtutil-sys is not available in the teTeX version in testing. > > I suggest to stay with plain fmtutil, let xmltex (and all other packages > that needed fixes for teTeX-3.0) migrate to testing, and then I'll > remove tetex-base's dummy bug and let itself go into testing. Ok, I'll patch the patch. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304793: marked as done (junkbuster: Attacker might be able to modify settings)
Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:45:37 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line junkbuster issue was already adressed by DSA-713 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2005 14:20:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 15 07:20:41 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DMRgX-0002GN-00; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:20:41 -0700 Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.242]) by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j3FEKY9e004979 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:34 +0200 (MEST) Received: from pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.99]) by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B98F1B5E2; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237) id 1E5A55F48; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: junkbuster: Attacker might be able to modify settings X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:30 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2 (mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41]); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:20:34 +0200 (MEST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: junkbuster Version: 2.0.2-0.2 Severity: grave Tags: security, woody Justification: user security hole According to http://lwn.net/Alerts/131964/ JunkBuster is vulnerable to a heap corruption vulnerability, and under certain configurations may allow an attacker to modify settings. Impact == If JunkBuster has been configured to run in single-threaded mode, an attacker can disable or modify the filtering of Referrer: HTTP headers, potentially compromising the privacy of users. The heap corruption vulnerability could crash or disrupt the operation of the proxy, potentially executing arbitrary code. The fix can probably taken from the above Gentoo security advisory. You might want to track http://lwn.net/Articles/131972/ for other vendors responses. Please also check if the successor, privoxy, is impacted as well. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pleione 2.4.26-grsec #1 Tue Aug 10 15:42:40 CEST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US --- Received: (at 304793-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 16:45:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 08:45:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYRB0-0008WH-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 08:45:59 -0800 Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.242]) by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jA5GjqJ3013419; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:45:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.91]) by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7174B1B735; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:45:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237) id 179AD1A6CC; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:45:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:45:37 +0100 From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: junkbuster issue was already adressed by DSA-713 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2 (mrelay3.uni-hann
Bug#336177: marked as done (rvm_1.6-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'PFIC' undeclared)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:47:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Your experimental-chroot is outdated has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 10:57:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 03:57:14 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EVRv7-0006RM-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:57:13 -0700 Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EVRv5-0001IP-Od for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:57:11 +0200 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:57:11 +0200 From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rvm_1.6-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'PFIC' undeclared Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: rvm Version: 1.6-4 Severity: serious Hi, your package failed to build from source with the following error: | Automatic build of rvm_1.6-4 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69 | Build started at 20051028-0305 | ** | Checking available source versions... | Fetching source files... | Reading Package Lists... | Building Dependency Tree... | Need to get 379kB of source archives. | Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rvm 1.6-4 (dsc) [637B] | Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rvm 1.6-4 (tar) [375kB] | Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rvm 1.6-4 (diff) [2769B] | Fetched 379kB in 0s (627kB/s) | Download complete and in download only mode | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), liblwp-dev, libtool, autotools-dev [...] | Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3 g++-4.0_4.0.2-3 binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3 libstdc++6_4.0.2-3 | -- | dpkg-source: extracting rvm in rvm-1.6 | su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info. | (Ignored) | dpkg-buildpackage: source package is rvm | dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.6-4 | dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture sparc | /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean | dh_testdir | rm -f build-stamp | /usr/bin/make distclean | make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/rvm-1.6' | make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/rvm-1.6' | make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored) | rm -f debian/dirs | rm -f debian/docs | rm -f debian/librvm1.postinst | rm -f debian/librvm1.prerm | rm -f debian/postinst | rm -f debian/prerm | rm -f debian/rvm-tools.files | rm -f debian/rvm-tools.postinst | rm -f debian/rvm-tools.prerm | dh_clean | debian/rules build | dh_testdir | test -r /usr/share/misc/config.sub && \ | cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub | test -r /usr/share/misc/config.guess && \ | cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess | ./configure \ | --build=sparc-linux-gnu \ | --host=sparc-linux-gnu \ | --prefix=/usr \ | --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man | creating cache ./config.cache | checking host system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu | checking target system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu | checking build system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu | checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c | checking whether build environment is sane... yes | checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes | checking for working aclocal... missing | checking for working autoconf... missing | checking for working automake... missing | checking for working autoheader... missing | checking for working makeinfo... missing | checking for gcc... gcc | checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 ) works... yes | checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 ) is a cross-compiler... no | checking whether we are using GNU C... yes | checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes | checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E |
Bug#336176: marked as done (rpc2_1.13-3(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'PFIC' undeclared)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:47:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Your experimental-chroot is outdated has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 10:54:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 03:54:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EVRsA-0003RR-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:54:10 -0700 Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EVRs8-0001G1-4i for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:54:08 +0200 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:54:08 +0200 From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rpc2_1.13-3(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'PFIC' undeclared Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: rpc2 Version: 1.13-3 Severity: serious Hi, your package failed to build from source with the following error: | Automatic build of rpc2_1.13-3 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69 | Build started at 20051028-0304 | ** | Checking available source versions... | Fetching source files... | Reading Package Lists... | Building Dependency Tree... | Need to get 512kB of source archives. | Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rpc2 1.13-3 (dsc) [688B] | Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rpc2 1.13-3 (tar) [448kB] | Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main rpc2 1.13-3 (diff) [63.3kB] | Fetched 512kB in 0s (3769kB/s) | Download complete and in download only mode | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0.5), liblwp-dev, libreadline4-dev, libncurses5-dev, libtool, autotools-dev [...] | Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3 g++-4.0_4.0.2-3 binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3 libstdc++6_4.0.2-3 | -- | dpkg-source: extracting rpc2 in rpc2-1.13 | su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info. | (Ignored) | dpkg-buildpackage: source package is rpc2 | dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.13-3 | dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture sparc | /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean | dh_testdir | rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp | /usr/bin/make distclean | make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/rpc2-1.13' | make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/rpc2-1.13' | make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored) | /usr/bin/make -C rpc2-src distclean | make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/rpc2-1.13/rpc2-src' | make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/rpc2-1.13/rpc2-src' | make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored) | rm -f config.status | rm -f rp2gen/rp2gen_lexer.c | rm -f rp2gen/rp2gen_parser.c | rm -f rp2gen/rp2gen_parser.h | rm -f debian/dirs | rm -f debian/docs | rm -f debian/librpc23.docs | rm -f debian/librpc23.postinst | rm -f debian/librpc23.prerm | rm -f debian/postinst | rm -f debian/prerm | rm -f debian/rpc2-tools.files | rm -f debian/rpc2-tools.postinst | rm -f debian/rpc2-tools.prerm | test -r /usr/share/misc/config.sub && \ | cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub | test -r /usr/share/misc/config.guess && \ | cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess | dh_clean | debian/rules build | dh_testdir | ./configure \ | --build=sparc-linux-gnu \ | --host=sparc-linux-gnu \ | --prefix=/usr \ | --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man | checking build system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu | checking host system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu | checking target system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu | checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c | checking whether build environment is sane... yes | checking for gawk... no | checking for mawk... mawk | checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes | checking for spa
Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:30:41PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > reassign 337625 initramfs-tools > thanks > > On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:06:58 +0100 > Pau Capdevila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Booting with original initrd gives black screen. > > Sounds like you had initramfs-tools and not yaird installed at the time > of initially installing the kernel. > > Reassigning to initramfs-tools. Jonas, i believe he had an older version of yaird without the fbcon fix, and rebuilt with yaird or something, not sure. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322239: mozilla-firefox: [patch] incorrectly set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in /usr/bin/firefox wrapper
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 10:14:30PM +1100, Vincent McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: mozilla-firefox > Version: 1.0.4-2sarge5 > Followup-For: Bug #322239 > > Hi > > I think I am seeing this too. It was reported in #316824 (for 'mozilla') > but I did not cross-report to 'mozilla-firefox'. > The patch below should fix the issue, see #316824 for why I think > it fixes it. I don't see why the firefox script should circumvent YOUR broken LD_LIBRARY_PATH. If your LD_LIBRARY_PATH is b0rked in the first place, change it. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319713: Are you still maintaining goobox?
Hello Dan, are you still maintaining goobox? If not, please put it up for adoption, if yes please update it so it can reach testing. Thanks! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ pgpiGDLGoSOXP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 334054 +security Bug#334054: zope: security issue with docutils wrt RestructuredText functionalities (Zope Hotfix 2005-10-09) There were no tags set. Tags added: security > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#286305: marked as done (linux-wlan-ng: modules must be recompiled against new 2.4.27 kernel)
Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:52:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in a really old NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2004 10:48:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 19 02:48:12 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cfybk-jL-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:48:12 -0800 Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Cfybj-0007nO-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:11 +0100 Received: from [217.86.224.161] (helo=bougon.org) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Cfybj-0008PS-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:11 +0100 Received: by bougon.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D1FF020407; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:09 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robert Cheramy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: linux-wlan-ng: modules must be recompiled against new 2.4.27 kernel X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:09 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] auth:4787efcd892fae3836a59691305cfa00 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: linux-wlan-ng Version: 0.2.0+0.2.1pre21-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Hi, with the new package package kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386 version 2.4.27-6, kernel symbols changed [1]. While our kernel packagers discuss the best way to solve this, linux-wlan-ng does not work anymore. The modules should be recompiled. For people who can't wait for the official package (I can imagine Bradley wants to wait that the kernel situation is stabilised), here is an apt-link to my personal package (recompile + correct wep key translation). Please note I (lazily) made package version+1, so you'll probably have to switch manually back to debian version when Bradley produces the official modules. deb http://robert.cheramy.net/debian linux-wlan-ng/ deb-src http://robert.cheramy.net/debian linux-wlan-ng/ Cheers, tibob Notes 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284356 ) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.iso88591) Versions of packages linux-wlan-ng depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii sysvinit2.86-5 System-V like init ii wireless-tools 27-1 Tools for manipulating Linux Wirel -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 286305-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 15:52:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 07:52:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from host82-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it (host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it) [80.180.126.82] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYQLI-0007Kd-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 07:52:33 -0800 Received: from garfield.casa-tassi ([192.168.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EYQQT-0007G7-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:57:53 +0100 Received: from tassi by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EYQKn-0006CL-7k for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:52:01 +0100 Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:52:01 +0100 From: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in a really old NMU Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Leve
Bug#290047: marked as done (linux-wlan-ng: insecure /tmp usage)
Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:50:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in NMU a million of years ago has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 15:51:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 07:51:11 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from fabulous.u--3.com (erno.iki.fi) [213.139.167.121] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cokm7-0002F7-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:51:11 -0800 Received: by erno.iki.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A4943188728; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:51:08 +0200 (EET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Erno Kuusela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: linux-wlan-ng: insecure /tmp usage X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:51:08 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: linux-wlan-ng Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole % mkdir t % dpkg-deb -x linux-wlan-ng_0.2.0+0.2.1pre21-1_i386.deb t % grep -r /tmp/ t/etc t/etc/apm/resume.d/linux-wlan-ng-resume:echo down $ifcase >>/tmp/log t/etc/wlan/shared: cp $WLAN_SCHEMEFILE /tmp/wlan_scheme_`date +"%T"`.tmp t/etc/wlan/shared: touch /tmp/wlan_scheme_`date +"%T"`.tmp t/etc/wlan/shared: TMPFILE=`ls /tmp/wlan_scheme*.tmp | tail -n 1` -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-rc3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 290047-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 15:50:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 07:50:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from host82-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it (host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it) [80.180.126.82] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYQJg-00078g-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 07:50:52 -0800 Received: from garfield.casa-tassi ([192.168.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EYQOq-0007G5-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:56:12 +0100 Received: from tassi by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EYQJ9-0006Aw-V4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:50:19 +0100 Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:50:19 +0100 From: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in NMU a million of years ago Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 nothing to say -- Enrico Tassi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337446: ppracer: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 337446 +pending Bug#337446: ppracer: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 311154 +pending Bug#311154: Poor german translation Tags were: l10n Tags added: pending > tags 306721 +pending Bug#306721: planetpenguin-racer: Bad norwegian translations Tags were: upstream Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Can you reproduce this on 4.5.3-4?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > notfound 336719 4.5.3-4 Bug#336719: drupal: Users unable to log out Bug marked as not found in version 4.5.3-4. > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336719: Can you reproduce this on 4.5.3-4?
notfound 336719 4.5.3-4 thank you "Matthew A. Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't use 4.5.3, I use 4.5.5. I can download 4.5.3 and compare the > source changes, but I don't use it and it's not an option for me to test > with it. Give me a few hours and i'll get back to you. :) 4.5.3-4 is the current version in stable and that has a higher priority for me right now than the version in testing/unstable. This change got introduced to session.inc after 4.5.3: function sess_destroy($key) { - db_query("DELETE FROM {sessions} WHERE sid = '$key'"); + db_query("DELETE FROM {sessions} WHERE sid = '%d'", $key); } ... and this is the last change that supposedly fixes the logout problem. function sess_destroy($key) { - db_query("DELETE FROM {sessions} WHERE sid = '%d'", $key); + db_query("DELETE FROM {sessions} WHERE sid = '%s'", $key); } db_query uses sprintf to replace placeholder expressions if passed more than one argument and it seems to me that using %s does the same thing as PHP's string expansion as in 4.5.3. I have removed version 4.5.3-4 from this bug. If you disagree, feel free to add it again with a "found" statement to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with a rationale. Cheers, -Hilko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337446: ppracer: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on xlibmesa-dev
tags 337446 +pending tags 311154 +pending tags 306721 +pending thanks New package ready (getting final touches). I'll send it to my sponsor soon. Bugs should be closed, soon. Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#283483: nurbs++: FTBFS with g++-3.4: due to new template lookup rules
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:48:30PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Do you have any plans to fix the RC bugs in nurbs++, or should the package > be removed from unstable? I'm on it, will possibly upload tomorrow. Regards, Filip -- I have not lost my mind, its backed up on tape somewhere -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 336280 to xsltproc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 336280 xsltproc Bug#336280: xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular situations Bug reassigned from package `logidee-tools' to `xsltproc'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign xsltproc 1.1.15-1 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > retitle 336280 xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular > situations Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html
reassign xsltproc 1.1.15-1 retitle 336280 xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular situations thanks Le vendredi 28 octobre 2005 à 08:06 -0700, Matt Kraai a écrit : > Package: logidee-tools > Version: 1.2.4-2 > Severity: serious > > pbuilder fails to build logidee-tools in an unstable chroot on i386: > > > xsltproc --xinclude --stringparam selection "none" --stringparam cycle > > "false" --stringparam charte "gfdl" --stringparam trainer "false" > > --stringparam lang "en" --stringparam dir > > "/tmp/buildd/logidee-tools-1.2.4/doc/tools.html" ../xsl/module-html.xsl > > tools.xml > tools.html/index.html > > XPath error : Undefined variable > > not(@restriction='all' or contains(concat(' ',$selection,' '),concat(' > > ',@restriction,' '))or not(@restriction) or $selection='all') > > ^ > > compilation error: file ../xsl/ignore.xsl line 23 element template > > Failed to compile predicate > > XPath error : Undefined variable This is a bug in xsltproc ... because the variable exists and is even defined in the command line (and also with inside the top XSL stylesheet). I could reproduce the bug with xsltproc 1.1.15-1... and this code has been working for 4 years already with xsltproc without any problem. Thus I'm reassigning the bug. I also attach "ignore.xsl" which can be used as a minimal test case to reproduce the bug : $ xsltproc --stringparam trainer false ignore.xsl XPath error : Undefined variable not(@trainer=$trainer or $trainer='true' or not(@trainer)) ^ compilation error: file ignore.xsl line 9 element template Failed to compile predicate Regards, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Freexian : des développeurs Debian au service des entreprises http://www.freexian.com ignore.xsl Description: application/xml
Bug#337594: marked as done (sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] build dependacies can not be satisfied)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:02:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337594: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 06:05:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 22:05:01 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYHAj-0006Kx-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 22:05:01 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jA564txU025246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:04:59 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jA55tLKd015718; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:55:22 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jA55tLNp015716; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:55:21 -0800 Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:55:21 -0800 From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] build dependacies can not be satisfied Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.6.0-7 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source sbcl build-depends on sbcl-common (<= 1:0.9.5.50-1), and version 1:0.9.6.0-7 is in sid. Checking correctness of source dependencies... After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: sbcl-common(inst 1:0.9.6.0-7 ! <= wanted 1:0.9.5.50-1) sbcl-common(inst 1:0.9.6.0-7 >> conflicted 1:0.9.5.50-1) Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping sbcl --- Received: (at 337594-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 14:06:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 06:06:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYOcQ-0006WL-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:02:06 -0800 From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337594: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.0-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:02:06 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sbcl Source-Version: 1:0.9.6.0-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sbcl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sbcl-common_0.9.6.0-8_all.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl-common_0.9.6.0-8_all.deb sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.diff.gz sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.dsc to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.dsc sbcl_0.9.6.0-8_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.0-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sbcl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 11:25:52 +0100 Source: sbcl Binary: sbcl sbcl-common Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:0.9.6.0-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PRO
Bug#308587: Dealing with #308587 using BTS version tracking
# found in Woody, fixed in DSA-743-1 available from security.d.o found 308587 0.5.0-1 close 308587 0.5.0-1woody4 # found in Sarge, fixed in DSA-743-1 available from security.d.o found 308587 0.8.0-1 close 308587 0.8.0-2sarge4 # found in Sid, fixed by uploading 0.8.0-3, including Joey's patch close 308587 0.8.0-3 thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed As the original bugreport didn't have any version tracking information included I add the respective versions at the time of reporting. However, this bug has been dealt with for all releases of Debian, so it can effectively be closed for certain versions. BTS version tracking will allow to track any further progress for all distributions separately. Cheers, Flo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Dealing with #308587 using BTS version tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # found in Woody, fixed in DSA-743-1 available from security.d.o > found 308587 0.5.0-1 Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht Bug marked as found in version 0.5.0-1. > close 308587 0.5.0-1woody4 Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.5.0-1woody4, send any further explanations to Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Removed pending tag. > # found in Sarge, fixed in DSA-743-1 available from security.d.o > found 308587 0.8.0-1 Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht Bug marked as found in version 0.8.0-1. > close 308587 0.8.0-2sarge4 Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.8.0-2sarge4, send any further explanations to Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > # found in Sid, fixed by uploading 0.8.0-3, including Joey's patch > close 308587 0.8.0-3 Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.8.0-3, send any further explanations to Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334170: marked as done (lirc-modules-source: modifies conffiles in postinst)
Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:29:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This never got closed by the upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 23:49:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 16:49:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQvmA-0003ux-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:49:18 -0700 Received: from tryphon (bny92-5-82-232-56-125.fbx.proxad.net [82.232.56.125]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39083719B; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:49:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by tryphon with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EQvm9-00088Z-9o; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:49:17 +0200 Received: from tryphon ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tryphon [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31106-05; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:49:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from irma.home ([192.168.18.8]) by tryphon with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EQvm9-00088T-1s; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:49:17 +0200 Received: from nboullis by irma.home with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EQviL-0001jo-Ll; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:45:21 +0200 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:45:21 +0200 From: Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: lirc-modules-source: modifies conffiles in postinst Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at home Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: lirc-modules-source Version: 0.7.1pre2-10 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 Hi, lirc-modules-source modifies its /etc/lirc/lirc-modules-source.conf conffile in postinst. This is a violation of policy 10.7.3. ("[Conffiles] must not be modified by the maintainer scripts during installation (or at any other time).") A possible way to solve this would be to ship the template for the configuration file in /usr/share/lirc-modules-source.conf (or somewhere else), generate the corresponding configuration according to answers to debconf templates in /tmp, and the merge this generated file with the actual configuration file with ucf. (I might write the corresponding patch if you wish.) Cheers, Nicolas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4-irma Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages lirc-modules-source depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii debhelper 4.9.12 helper programs for debian/rules ii debianutils 2.14.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t Versions of packages lirc-modules-source recommends: ii dpkg 1.13.11package maintenance system for Deb ii dpkg-dev 1.13.11package building tools for Debian ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.0.1-3 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.0 [c-compiler] 4.0.2-2The GNU C compiler ii kernel-package9.008 A utility for building Linux kerne ii make 3.80-11The GNU version of the "make" util -- debconf information: lirc-modules-source/use_lirc_hints: true lirc-modules-source/parallel_irq: 7 * lirc-modules-source/do-build: false lirc-modules-source/parallel_timer: 65536 lirc-modules-source/sir_type: Other lirc-modules-source/serial_softcarrier: false lirc-modules-source/kernel-source-not-found: lirc-modules-source/serial_transmitter: true lirc-modules-source/not_needed: lirc-modules-source/serial_port: 0x2f8 * lirc-modules-source/drivers: i2c, gpio lirc-modules-source/serial_irq: 3 lirc-modules-source/serial_type: Other lirc-modules-source/kernel-source: /usr/src/l
Bug#337381: gabber2: Gabber won't start because of missing glade file.
* Bas Kloet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Package: gabber2 > Version: 1.9.4+cvs20040709-16 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I just installed gabber2, but when i try to run it I get the following error: > > (gabber2:10937): libglade-WARNING **: could not find glade file > 'Login_dlg.glade' > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Gnome::Glade::XmlError' > > Because of this error, gabber won;t start and is therefor simply unusable. This problem has been reported before[1]. But when I asked the bug reporter to check if the file was not really present in the system, he was not able to reproduce it anymore. Could you please check that the package is correctly installed? I've just checked in my machine and this file is present: ,[ shell session ] | [11:06:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ dpkg -L gabber2|grep Login_dlg.glade | /usr/share/Gabber/Login_dlg.glade ` Please do this check and tell me if the file is not present or, it being present, gabber still fails to start. Regards, Goedson [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289683;archive=yes -- .''`. Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.jabber.org/ `. `' Key fingerprint: 20FC AD60 E8C8 D2EB 064A 8F5B EED8 D4CC 1DEB 8EAE `- Signed/encypted mail preferred signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#317524: infinite loop when using charset_default=iso-8859-1
Hi David, on Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 23:23:11 -0500, you wrote: Thanks! :) > Your observations about the code are very good, though not totally > correct. If you look at function process_config_option(), you'll see > that the original config line is duplicated and split at the '=' > character (which has been replaced by '\0'). The "*t--" code is > applied to the part after '=' and the loop to erase whitespace will > never backup to the part before the '='. I'm sorry, but apart from the fact that relying upon such circumstances does not lead to robust code, I still beg to differ regarding these circumstances. :) process_config_option() indeed duplicates the original line, splits it as you described and passes a pointer to the second part ("val") down through process_config_option_as_arg() and process_arg() to get_string() as the second parameter "arg". get_string() as per your patch however then duplicates arg to s, which thus is a new block of memory starting with the beginning of arg and, unlike the one arg points into, the former '=' is not before it. t gets to point to s and then is eventually decreased by one and accessed by isspace(*t) during the first iteration as I described previously. elmar -- .'"`./"\ | :' : Elmar Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / `. `'GPG key available via pgp.netagainst HTML email X `-& vCards / \ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337632: matchbox-panel: exits at startup with floating point exception
Package: matchbox-panel Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages matchbox-panel depends on: ii libc62.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libmatchbox1 1.7-2 shared library for Matchbox Projec ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii matchbox-common 0.9.1-1 common files for Matchbox Project ii xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime Versions of packages matchbox-panel recommends: ii matchbox-panel-manager0.1-2 panel manager for matchbox-panel -- no debconf information Error output: "Floating point exception". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 337625 initramfs-tools Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7' to `initramfs-tools'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 reassign 337625 initramfs-tools thanks On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:06:58 +0100 Pau Capdevila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Booting with original initrd gives black screen. Sounds like you had initramfs-tools and not yaird installed at the time of initially installing the kernel. Reassigning to initramfs-tools. > Regenerating initrd with yaird solved the problem. Yes, this has been fixed with most recent version of yaird. If this is fixed in recent initramfs-tools as well, I believe this bug can be closed. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDbKXxn7DbMsAkQLgRAnsYAKCVQJ2MQTHPWvGmJQQpf92cqY279wCdE1xr w1Fv9N54GX8l5PVtlh/f+oU= =rhZP -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > tags 328749 patch >> > thanks >> > >> > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from >> >> experimental installed: >> > >> > Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for >> > explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, >> > or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? >> >> I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if >> you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use >> the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted >> and close #33, too. > > Hi, > > I'll take care of of both bugs. That's very good. Regarding my patch, I thought about it and there is one change I would rather revert: The change from calling fmtutil to fmtutil-sys. We have temporarily introduced a backward-compatibility hack, so that fmtutil will continue to work for a while. On the other hand, fmtutil-sys is not available in the teTeX version in testing. I suggest to stay with plain fmtutil, let xmltex (and all other packages that needed fixes for teTeX-3.0) migrate to testing, and then I'll remove tetex-base's dummy bug and let itself go into testing. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer