Bug#336582: phpbb2: New round of security issues
You didn't mention CVE-2005-3417. Is the version in sarge not vulnerable to it? Or did you miss it? Or did you just didn't document this? Regards, Joey -- Open source is important from a technical angle. -- Linus Torvalds -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package
Patricio Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsane_1.0.17-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/hotplug', which is also in package kcontrol dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Is /etc/hotplug a directory ? JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package
Hi, Nop, there is /etc/hotplug.d/ directory but /etc/hotplug is actually an empty file! Maybe this bug should be forwarded to kcontrol so that they remove it from their package? Pato On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:50 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: Patricio Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsane_1.0.17-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/hotplug', which is also in package kcontrol dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Is /etc/hotplug a directory ? JB. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336582: phpbb2: New round of security issues
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:49 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
You didn't mention CVE-2005-3417. Is the version in sarge not vulnerable
to it? Or did you miss it? Or did you just didn't document this?
This has been fixed but indeed isn't documented in the changelog. The
fact is that CVE-2005-341{5,6,7} are all concentrated in one function,
that function has been fixed. Should we add that CVE id aswell and
rebuild or is that not necessary?
bye,
Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package
All solved... upon reinstallation of kcontrol, /etc/hotplug became a directory, and now there is no conflict with libsane. Probably it was left there from some old and faulty upgrade or something... Thanks! On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:13 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: Patricio Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nop, there is /etc/hotplug.d/ directory but /etc/hotplug is actually an empty file! Maybe this bug should be forwarded to kcontrol so that they remove it from their package? OK, please : - remove the file - apt-get install --reinstall kcontrol If an empty file reappears, I'll reassign to kcontrol. JB. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337870: FTBFS (alpha): conflicting types for 'strlen'
Hi, On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Attached please find two patches. [...] Thanks for the patches. Hopefully, I should have my computers out of storage (following a job and house move) in the next few weeks, so I'll be able to clear this (and other) bugs then. Cheers, Phil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343981: marked as done (libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:41:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 06:43:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 22:43:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-24-58-13-176.twcny.res.rr.com ([24.58.13.176] helo=localhost.localdomain) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EoEkT-0001UZ-4m for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:43:53 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBJ6jTEL015299; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:45:29 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBJ6jTVs015298; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:45:29 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: pato set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Patricio Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:45:29 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libsane Version: 1.0.16-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying to upgrade to the latest version I got dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsane_1.0.17-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/hotplug', which is also in package kcontrol dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libsane depends on: ii adduser 3.80 Add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgphoto2-22.1.6-6 gphoto2 digital camera library ii libgphoto2-port02.1.6-6 gphoto2 digital camera port librar ii libieee1284-3 0.2.10-1 cross-platform library for paralle ii libjpeg62 6b-10The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libusb-0.1-42:0.1.10a-22 userspace USB programming library ii makedev 2.3.1-79 creates device files in /dev Versions of packages libsane recommends: pn sane-utilsnone (no description available) ii udev [hotplug]0.076-6/dev/ and hotplug management daemo -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 343981-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 08:41:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 00:41:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EoGa0-00080Y-3e for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:41:12 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 36F6A7002; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:41:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:41:11 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Patricio Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ZYOWEO2dMm2Af3e3 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#343989: tcl8.4: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure
Package: tcl8.4
Version: 8.4.11-1
Severity: serious
From my build log:
...
checking for connect... yes
checking for gethostbyname... yes
checking how to build libraries... shared
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking if 64bit support is requested... yes
checking if 64bit Sparc VIS support is requested... no
checking system version (for dynamic loading)... ./configure: line 7646: syntax
error near unexpected token `)'
./configure: line 7646: ` OSF*)'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
This is being caused by the following code in configure:
...
if test -r /etc/.relid -a X`uname -n` = X`uname -s` ; then
system=MP-RAS-`awk '{print }' /etc/.relid'`
fi
...
The problem is the extraneous apostrophe after relid on the middle
line. If I remove this apostrophe, and another one in identical code
later, then the package build completes successfully.
Note that this same thing also happens in tcl8.0, tcl8.3, tk8.3, and
tk8.4 (but not tk8.0). It doesn't hit blt, but it does affect tix
(which I know has a different maintainer, so I'll file a separate bug
report for that one).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages tcl8.4 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
tcl8.4 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343990: tix: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure
Package: tix
Severity: serious
Version: 8.4-2
From my build log:
...
checking for building with threads... yes
checking how to build libraries... static
checking if 64bit support is enabled... no
checking if 64bit Sparc VIS support is requested... no
checking system version (for dynamic loading)... ../configure: line 10786:
syntax error near unexpected token `('
../configure: line 10786: `case `(ac_space=' '; set | grep ac_space) 21`
in'
make: *** [build-static-stamp] Error 2
This is caused by the following code in configure:
...
if test -r /etc/.relid -a X`uname -n` = X`uname -s` ; then
system=MP-RAS-`awk '{print }' /etc/.relid'`
fi
...
The problem is the extraneous apostrophe after relid on the middle
line. If I remove this apostrophe, the package build completes
successfully.
(Note that the same faulty code is also causing problems in tcl8.* and
tk8.*.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: qt-x11-free build fails
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 341675 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 Bug#341675: cppunit: FTBFS on hppa Bug reassigned from package `cppunit' to `libgcc2'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails
reassign 341675 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 thanks On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug #326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7. (And it really was fixed, otherwise kdelibs4c2 wouldn't be in testing right now for hppa.) But it's back in 2.3.5-8; could this have to do with the fact that 2.3.5-7 was built (wrongly) with gcc-4.0, and 2.3.5-8 is the first version to build with gcc-3.4? I confirm. Bug #333766 was causing a SIGBUS in uic, when calling feholdexcept. This has been fixed, and now the problem is a SIGILL that occurs a few instructions later when calling __umoddi3 from libgcc_s.so.2. I have tried other version of libgcc2, from version 4.0.1-7 to version 4.1-0exp4, and the problem is always there. So it does not seems related to a recent change in gcc. Maybe this part of code was never called before for some strange reasons. It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if fldw -10(,sp),fr23 is a valid instruction or not. If not, that's probably a miscompilation in gcc, as this code is generated from C code. Ok; reassigning to libgcc2 then. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#343991: python2.3-utidylib: not installable in sid
Package: python2.3-utidylib Version: 0.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, python2.3-utidylib needs to be updated to depend on a newer libtidy version: # apt-get install python2.3-utidylib Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: python2.3-utidylib: Depends: libtidy0 (= 20040811) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343992: rapple: not installable in sid
Package: rapple Version: 1.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, rapple needs to be updated to depend on a newer libtidy version: # apt-get install rapple Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: rapple: Depends: libtidy0 but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package
Patricio Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All solved... upon reinstallation of kcontrol, /etc/hotplug became a directory, and now there is no conflict with libsane. Probably it was left there from some old and faulty upgrade or something... Good. I have a machine here with KDE installed, and never encountered this problem, so this must have been some faulty script at some point in time :) JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 341675 to cppunit, reassign 342545 to 4.0.2-5, reassign 2 to 4.0.2-5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 # whoops, reassign the right one reassign 341675 cppunit 1.10.2-5 Bug#341675: cppunit: FTBFS on hppa Bug reassigned from package `libgcc2' to `cppunit'. reassign 342545 4.0.2-5 Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails Warning: Unknown package '4.0.2-5' Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `4.0.2-5'. reassign 2 4.0.2-5 Bug number 2 not found. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Correct submitter address
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 343989 Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#343989: tcl8.4: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure Changed Bug submitter from Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340851: autogen also FTBFS on i386 now
Just a quick note that I've been able to reproduce the failure on the license.test test on an i386 system as well, so it's apparently not alpha-specific. I just ran pbuilder on the 1:5.7.3-1 source package twice in a row, and it failed both times. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Wow, that was retarded of bts
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # I swear, I typed it right on my end. :P reassign 342545 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails Warning: Unknown package '4.0.2-5' Bug reassigned from package `4.0.2-5' to `libgcc2'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343996: phat - FTBFS: missing build dependencies
Package: phat Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of phat_0.3.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev [...] checking for gtk+-2.0 = 2.4.0... yes checking GTK_CFLAGS... -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include checking GTK_LIBS... -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lXrandr -lXi -lXinerama -lXext -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lfontconfig -lXcursor -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lXrender -lX11 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 checking gtk-doc version = 1.0... no checking for libgnomecanvas-2.0... Package libgnomecanvas-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libgnomecanvas-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'libgnomecanvas-2.0' found configure: error: Library requirements (libgnomecanvas-2.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051218-1119 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306184: aegis - FTBFS
reopen 306184
found 306184 4.21-1
thanks
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of aegis_4.21-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79
[...]
CXX=g++ /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
test/00/t0095a.sh test/00/t0095a.ES
aedist: aegis --new-change 4 --project=foo --file=/tmp/aedist-20accd7c-6fa7-
4f66-8e21-e4f3313d614f --verbose
aegis: project foo: change 4: new change complete
aedist: aegis --develop-begin 4 --project foo --verbose
aegis: warning: test mode
aegis: pathconf(/home/buildd, {NAME_MAX}): No such file or directory
aedist: command aegis --develop-begin 4 --project... exit status 1
FAILED test of aedist -send -entire-source functionality (receive the archive
764)
CXX=g++ /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
test/00/t0096a.sh test/00/t0096a.ES
PASSED
[...]
CXX=g++ /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
test/02/t0232a-walt.sh test/02/t0232a-walt.ES
PASSED
Passed 225 of 226 tests.
Failed 1 of 226 tests.
make[1]: *** [sure] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/aegis-4.21'
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: aegis - FTBFS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 306184 Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test Bug reopened, originator not changed. found 306184 4.21-1 Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test Bug marked as found in version 4.21-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343533: marked as done (pyrex generates invalid code (gcc-4.0))
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:17:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343533: fixed in pyrex 0.9.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2005 21:57:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 15 13:57:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1En16G-0006gj-TB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:57:21 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07251 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:18 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AB9F2B2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:18 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 02801-28 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:18 +0100 (MET) 13874 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:14 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBFLvEoc005093; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:14 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:14 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pyrex generates invalid code (gcc-4.0) X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) Jumbo Shrimp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pyrex Version: 0.9.3.1-1 Severity: serious creating build/temp.linux-i686-2.3/src/lxml gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fPIC -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/python2.3 -c src/lxml/etree.c -o build/temp.linux-i686-2.3/src/lxml/etree.o -w src/lxml/etree.c: In function '__pyx_f_5etree__elementFactory': src/lxml/etree.c:3878: error: invalid lvalue in assignment src/lxml/etree.c: In function '__pyx_f_5etree__commentFactory': src/lxml/etree.c:4255: error: invalid lvalue in assignment src/lxml/etree.c: In function '__pyx_f_5etree__attribFactory': src/lxml/etree.c:5253: error: invalid lvalue in assignment src/lxml/etree.c: In function '__pyx_f_5etree__attribIteratorFactory': src/lxml/etree.c:5390: error: invalid lvalue in assignment src/lxml/etree.c: In function '__pyx_f_5etree__elementIteratorFactory': src/lxml/etree.c:5584: error: invalid lvalue in assignment src/lxml/etree.c: In function '__pyx_f_5etree_22XPathDocumentEvaluator___init__': src/lxml/etree.c:6782: error: invalid lvalue in assignment src/lxml/etree.c: In function '__pyx_f_5etree_21XPathElementEvaluator___init__':src/lxml/etree.c:7560: error: invalid lvalue in assignment src/lxml/etree.c: In function '__pyx_f_5etree_changeDocumentBelowHelper': src/lxml/etree.c:11067: error: invalid lvalue in assignment error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 make: *** [build-python2.3] Error 1 sources at http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/ --- Received: (at 343533-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 10:21:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 02:21:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoI4z-0002db-Mu; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:17:17 -0800 From: Paul Brossier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343533: fixed in pyrex 0.9.3.1-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:17:17 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Bug#343992: marked as done (rapple: not installable in sid)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:24:15 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343992: rapple: not installable in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 09:26:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 01:26:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EoHHb-00072Y-Rk for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:26:16 -0800 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B94E3067D2; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179832C811D; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26284-06; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id BD38D2C80DA; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:27 +0100 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rapple: not installable in sid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:27 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: rapple Version: 1.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, rapple needs to be updated to depend on a newer libtidy version: # apt-get install rapple Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: rapple: Depends: libtidy0 but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 343992-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 10:24:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 02:24:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EoIBk-00035P-8n for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:24:16 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6D4BC7002; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:24:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:24:15 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#343992: rapple: not installable in sid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ai3I8gwHc37+ASRI Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --ai3I8gwHc37+ASRI Content-Type:
Bug#343998: Anjuta 1.2.4-1+b1 crashes when anjuta is launched
Package: anjuta Version: 1.2.4-1+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When Anjuta is launched, it crashes. This is a 'backtracing' via gdb: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 46912586773776 (LWP 13238)] 0x0045ccbf in anjuta_encoding_get_encodings () (gdb) bt #0 0x0045ccbf in anjuta_encoding_get_encodings () #1 0x2e985480 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #2 0x2e994022 in g_signal_stop_emission () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #3 0x2e9954fc in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #4 0x2e9958b3 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #5 0x2d50f5e3 in gtk_tree_view_set_model () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #6 0x0045d22a in anjuta_encodings_init () #7 0x004ba177 in anjuta_new () #8 0x0047b65f in main () -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages anjuta depends on: ii anjuta-common1.2.4-1 Data files for Anjuta ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.10.1-1The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libesd0 0.2.36-1Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-6GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.2-1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring00.4.5-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.10.2-2A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.10.3-3The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.10.2-2GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.10.1-5The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-14 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error01.1-4 library for common error values an ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liborbit21:2.12.4-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.10.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpcre3 6.4-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtasn1-2 0.2.17-1Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libvte4 1:0.11.15-4 Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxml2 2.6.22-2GNOME XML library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 A free electronic cataloging syste ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime Versions of packages anjuta recommends: ii autoconf 2.59a-7 automatic configure script builder pn autogennone(no description available) ii automake1.4 [automake] 1:1.4-p6-9A tool for generating GNU Standard pn ctags none(no description available) ii cvs1:1.12.9-17 Concurrent Versions System ii devhelp0.10-6A GNOME developers help program ii g++4:4.0.2-2 The GNU C++ compiler ii
Bug#342931: marked as done (doesn't work on alpha)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:17:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342931: fixed in klibc 1.1.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 18:37:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 10:37:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rollcage.inittab.de ([194.150.191.146]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ElW4R-0004KR-Ac for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:37:15 -0800 Received: from magellan.home.inittab.de (unknown [62.91.23.197]) by rollcage.inittab.de (Postfix) with SMTP id AFC6ECE04E; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:37:13 +0100 (CET) Received: (nullmailer pid 21579 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:36:58 - Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:36:58 +0100 From: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: doesn't work on alpha Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.42 Severity: normal I gave initramfs-tools a new try on my alpha, but it failed to create a working initrd: SCSI subsystem initialized qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8 scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Firmware version: 7.65.06, Driver version 3.25 Vendor: MICROPModel: 3391WSRev: X502 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Wide SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! The qla1280 module is the right one for my rootfilesystem, the ext3 module is also loaded. Using break=mount: SCSI subsystem initialized qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8 scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Firmware version: 7.65.06, Driver version 3.25 Vendor: MICROPModel: 3391WSRev: X502 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Wide SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 system hangs Using break=init: SCSI subsystem initialized qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8 scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Firmware version: 7.65.06, Driver version 3.25 Vendor: MICROPModel: 3391WSRev: X502 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Wide SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. system hangs Please ask if you need more informations. I'm really interested to get initramfs-tools working on alpha, because it's not possible to upgrade from a running 2.4 kernel to a 2.6 kernel with yaird. Regards, Norbert --- Received: (at 342931-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 11:20:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 03:20:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoJ0v-0004Zo-JZ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:17:09 -0800 From:
Bug#338435: status of the ocaml 3.09.0 migration ...
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: 04:24 vorlon hey all. Where are we on being able to close bug #338435? 04:25 vorlon it turns out KDE needs ocaml to be pushed first, because abiword-plugins uses gtkmathview and abiword and koffice both depend on libwpd. 04:26 vorlon (so, in fact, they need to be pushed in at the same time, hurrah.) Well, i guess this is good, as it seems ocaml is being used in more outside projects, there is also the other package of Jeffries which is linked to KDE. For info, 338435 is the blocker bug i put to avoid ocaml 3.09.0 entering testing without us noticing. From discussions on IRC, there are three outstanding issues for ocaml: - FTBFS on hppa. This is already a separate RC bug against ocaml (342704). - the ABI-breaking fix for cduce; it's my understanding that this patch has not yet been included in the ocaml package in unstable, and including it would require rebuilding all of the ocaml packages, but that this doesn't necessarily have to wait for ocaml 3.09.1. - a handful of packages that still build-depend on ocaml-3.08.3 or similar, and require sourceful uploads for the ocaml transition. These packages are advi, approx, camlrpc, cduce, cryptokit, lablgtk, missinglib, mlgtk, ocamldsort, pycaml, spamoracle, syslog-ocaml. Each of these packages should have a separate RC bug filed against it if there are no immediate plans to upload them. Of these packages, only ocamldsort has significant reverse-dependencies; so if the maintainers are not reactive, the other packages ought to be removed from testing to allow this transition to complete, and catch up again on their own time. None of the above issues should be particularly difficult to resolve, and none warrant keeping a dummy bug open against ocaml (except that the bugs from point 3 should probably be filed before closing this, I guess). Also, if cduce is the only package broken by issue #2, I'm not sure we should hold up the transition for it either at this point. What is needed to get an ocaml upload to fix #1, and possibly #2 as well? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: found 343861 in 0.2.36-1, notfound 343861 in 0.2.36-1ubuntu5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 found 343861 0.2.36-1 Bug#343861: esound: breaks since ALSA 1.0.10 transition; fixed by Ubuntu patches Bug marked as found in version 0.2.36-1. # version numbers are not decorative mmkay notfound 343861 0.2.36-1ubuntu5 Bug#343861: esound: breaks since ALSA 1.0.10 transition; fixed by Ubuntu patches Bug marked as not found in version 0.2.36-1ubuntu5. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343833: marked as done (Uploaders: field broken)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:32:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343833: fixed in xfce4-icon-theme 4.2.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2005 02:36:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 18:36:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl ([131.211.39.72]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EnoP4-0001Vc-Td for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:36:03 -0800 Received: from 22pc220.sshunet.nl ([145.97.220.22] helo=bla.wolffelaar.nl) by a-eskwadraat.nl with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EnoP4-0003C8-7J for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:36:02 +0100 Received: from jeroen by bla.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EnoP3-0001yN-I8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:36:01 +0100 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:36:01 +0100 From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Uploaders: field broken Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xfce4-icon-theme Severity: serious The Uploaders field of this package is broken, as detected by lintian: E: xfce4-icon-theme source: uploader-address-missing Yves-Alexis Perez This causes several QA scripts, such as the PTS, to choke on this package. Could you please fix this in the next upload, meanwhile, also paying attention to other lintian warnings and errors? (policy 5.6.2 is defining syntax for Maintainer Uploaders, and lists email as mandatory) Thanks, --Jeroen -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --- Received: (at 343833-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 11:42:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 03:42:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoJFT-0005vB-BH; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:32:11 -0800 From: Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343833: fixed in xfce4-icon-theme 4.2.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:32:11 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xfce4-icon-theme Source-Version: 4.2.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfce4-icon-theme, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xfce4-icon-theme_4.2.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xfce4-icon-theme/xfce4-icon-theme_4.2.3-2.diff.gz xfce4-icon-theme_4.2.3-2.dsc to pool/main/x/xfce4-icon-theme/xfce4-icon-theme_4.2.3-2.dsc xfce4-icon-theme_4.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/x/xfce4-icon-theme/xfce4-icon-theme_4.2.3-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xfce4-icon-theme package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:10:37 + Source: xfce4-icon-theme Binary: xfce4-icon-theme Architecture: source all Version: 4.2.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers
Bug#338435: status of the ocaml 3.09.0 migration ...
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:32:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: 04:24 vorlon hey all. Where are we on being able to close bug #338435? 04:25 vorlon it turns out KDE needs ocaml to be pushed first, because abiword-plugins uses gtkmathview and abiword and koffice both depend on libwpd. 04:26 vorlon (so, in fact, they need to be pushed in at the same time, hurrah.) Well, i guess this is good, as it seems ocaml is being used in more outside projects, there is also the other package of Jeffries which is linked to KDE. For info, 338435 is the blocker bug i put to avoid ocaml 3.09.0 entering testing without us noticing. From discussions on IRC, there are three outstanding issues for ocaml: - FTBFS on hppa. This is already a separate RC bug against ocaml (342704). - the ABI-breaking fix for cduce; it's my understanding that this patch has not yet been included in the ocaml package in unstable, and including it would require rebuilding all of the ocaml packages, but that this doesn't necessarily have to wait for ocaml 3.09.1. - a handful of packages that still build-depend on ocaml-3.08.3 or similar, and require sourceful uploads for the ocaml transition. These packages are advi, approx, camlrpc, cduce, cryptokit, lablgtk, missinglib, mlgtk, Fixed approx has been uploaded, mlgtk and lablgtk should go. For the rest, i would just quick them out of testing right now and be done with it, they can reenter when they are ready. ocamldsort, pycaml, spamoracle, syslog-ocaml. Each of these packages should have a separate RC bug filed against it if there are no immediate plans to upload them. Of these packages, only ocamldsort has significant reverse-dependencies; so if the maintainers are not reactive, the other packages ought to be removed from testing to allow this transition to complete, and catch up again on their own time. Indeed. None of the above issues should be particularly difficult to resolve, and none warrant keeping a dummy bug open against ocaml (except that the bugs from point 3 should probably be filed before closing this, I guess). Also, if cduce is the only package broken by issue #2, I'm not sure we should hold up the transition for it either at this point. The dummy bug is there also for documentation purpose to lessen the guys filling bugs because of the transition. What is needed to get an ocaml upload to fix #1, and possibly #2 as well? #1 will be solved by dropping native support for hppa, #2, i guess we kick cduce out of testing and wait for ocaml 3.09.1, easiest that way. Both can happen fairly quickly. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342545: Processed: Wow, that was retarded of bts
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:46:09PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote: reassign 342545 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails Warning: Unknown package '4.0.2-5' Bug reassigned from package `4.0.2-5' to `libgcc2'. Could you maybe summarize what the actual bug is and why it's libgcc2's fault? The BTS trail is pretty convoluted. Yes, sorry. Let me quote Aurelien's last mail to 341675, which really should have been sent to 342545: On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug #326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7. (And it really was fixed, otherwise kdelibs4c2 wouldn't be in testing right now for hppa.) But it's back in 2.3.5-8; could this have to do with the fact that 2.3.5-7 was built (wrongly) with gcc-4.0, and 2.3.5-8 is the first version to build with gcc-3.4? I confirm. Bug #333766 was causing a SIGBUS in uic, when calling feholdexcept. This has been fixed, and now the problem is a SIGILL that occurs a few instructions later when calling __umoddi3 from libgcc_s.so.2. I have tried other version of libgcc2, from version 4.0.1-7 to version 4.1-0exp4, and the problem is always there. So it does not seems related to a recent change in gcc. Maybe this part of code was never called before for some strange reasons. It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if fldw -10(,sp),fr23 is a valid instruction or not. If not, that's probably a miscompilation in gcc, as this code is generated from C code. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
close 335997 0.9.8-4
tags 335997 patch
thanks
Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in
Flyspray. Have a look at
http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multiple-variable.html
for more details. This has been assigned CVE-2005-3334, please mention so in
the changelog when fixing this.
This RC bug has been open for 50 days without response from the
maintainer, so I've taken the liberty to work towards a fix.
For unstable:
This has already been addressed in the current unstable version by an
update from the upstream repository in version 0.9.8-4, uploaded by the
maintainer on 2005-10-26. I'm marking the bug as fixed in that version
with this mail.
For testing:
The current unstable version just has to migrate to testing, and that
will happen soon because I'm now marking the RC bug as fixed in 0.9.8-4.
For stable:
I've extracted the right patch from the unstable version (which has been
present without any bugreports since the end of October), and that is
attached. I've also prepared updated packages here:
http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~kink/flyspray/
For oldstable:
Does not contain flyspray.
Bye,
Thijs
diff -ur flyspray-0.9.7.orig/debian/changelog flyspray-0.9.7/debian/changelog
--- flyspray-0.9.7.orig/debian/changelog 2005-12-19 13:20:01.858900424 +0100
+++ flyspray-0.9.7/debian/changelog 2005-12-19 13:17:44.847729288 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+flyspray (0.9.7-2.1) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+ * NMU for security bug
+ * CVE-2005-3334: Sanitize incoming GET parameters in index.php.
+Patch from unstable package (Closes: #335997).
+
+ -- Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:15:26 +0100
+
flyspray (0.9.7-2) unstable; urgency=high
* Let the user know how to perform database upgrade when mysql is down.
diff -ur flyspray-0.9.7.orig/index.php flyspray-0.9.7/index.php
--- flyspray-0.9.7.orig/index.php 2005-01-17 11:57:24.0 +0100
+++ flyspray-0.9.7/index.php 2005-12-19 13:22:13.374906952 +0100
@@ -20,6 +20,18 @@
$lang = $flyspray_prefs['lang_code'];
get_language_pack($lang, 'main');
+// Run all user-submitted variables through a filter
+if (isset($_GET))
+{
+ foreach ($_GET as $key = $val)
+ $_GET[$key] = htmlspecialchars($val);
+}
+if (isset($_POST))
+{
+ foreach ($_POST as $key = $val)
+ $_POST[$key] = htmlspecialchars($val);
+}
+
// Set the page to include
if (isset($_REQUEST['do'])) {
$do = $_REQUEST['do'];
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 335997 0.9.8-4 Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.9.8-4, send any further explanations to Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] tags 335997 patch Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities Tags were: security Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 13:41 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: For stable: I've extracted the right patch from the unstable version (which has been present without any bugreports since the end of October), and that is attached. I've also prepared updated packages here: http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~kink/flyspray/ Here's some more information for a possible advisory: Package: flyspray Vulnerability : missing input sanitising Problem-Type : remote Debian-specific: no CVE ID : CVE-2005-3334 Debian Bug : 335997 Lostmon has discovered cross site scripting vulnerabilities in multiple parameters of flyspray, a lightweight bug tracking system, which allows attackers to insert arbitary script code into the index.php page. The old stable distribution (woody) does not contain flyspray. For the stable distribution (sarge) this problem has been fixed in version 0.9.7-2.1. For the testing (etch) and unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in version 0.9.8-5. bye, Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 342583, tagging 342740
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 tags 342583 pending Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific. Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: pending tags 342740 pending Bug#342740: missing dependencies on alternative gcc versions There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341773: marked as done (segfaults (!) when processing previously valid group files)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:47:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#341773: fixed in libnss-db 2.2.3pre1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 22:46:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 14:46:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from loki.0c3.net ([69.0.240.48])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiJgA-0005fN-N6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:46:58 -0800
Received: from [203.49.196.168] (helo=brainfreeze.fooishbar.org)
by loki.0c3.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1EiJfe-0002Dg-N9
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:46:28 -0700
Received: from ephemera.fooishbar.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by brainfreeze.fooishbar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C48B6B725
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:47:14 +1100 (EST)
Received: by ephemera.fooishbar.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 867D627C3BB; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:50:04 +1100 (EST)
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:50:04 +1100
From: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: segfaults (!) when processing previously valid group files
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: libnss-db
Version: 2.2.3pre1-1
Severity: critical
Justification: smashes entire system with WORLD-ENDING levels of breakage
Hi,
Using libnss-db from sid results in some rather, er, unpleasant
behaviour. With the group files below, and 'group: compat db' in
nsswitch.conf, anything that attempts to deal with groups, segfaults.
This includes OpenSSH (so not even root can log in), and su. The end
result is that you better well have rockin' remote management so you can
reboot your machine and boot with init=/bin/sh.
Downgrading to libnss-db 2.2-6.3 works just fine.
This is the backtrace generated with libc6-dbg:
(gdb) bt f
#0 *__GI__nss_files_parse_grent (
line=0x7fb3f6
jrfonseca,kaleb,ago,stukreit,cworth,keithp,clee,kem,branden,jkolb,doursse,jkj,bogdand,sndirsch,jbarnes,mhopf,spyderous,aplattner,benh,philipl,
result=0x7fb6b0, data=0x7fb260, datalen=1024,
errnop=0x622c72656e747461) at files-parse.c:208
list = (char **) 0x7fb660
p = Variable p is not available.
(gdb) print *data
$7 = {linebuffer = 0x7fb260 xorg}
(gdb) print *result
$8 = {gr_name = 0x7fb260 xorg, gr_passwd = 0x7fb265 x,
gr_gid = 801, gr_mem = 0x7fb290}
(gdb) print **list
$9 = 0 '\0'
(gdb) print *errnop
Cannot access memory at address 0x622c72656e747461
Notice how errnop in particular seems to be wildly off.
Also, I don't claim to know the internals of exactly how it works, but
line is badly truncated; this is the original:
xorg:x:801:daniels,gisburn,eich,jg,pma,pascal,twini,jacotton,unichrome,alanh,alanc,amirbukhari,hyu,ldelgass,fabbione,brianp,nakee,mharris,deronj,daenzer,keithw,kendallb,harold,torrey,zack,ewalsh,earle,wt,bastian,faith,idr,krh,nolan,jdennis,ajax,josh,takuma,mark,volodya,adg,anderson,sandmann,vektor,syrjala,fxkuehl,zakki,anholt,alan,libv,sroland,erdi,viewtouch,agd5f,kuhn,jhobson,herrb,davidr,lars,airlied,jrfonseca,kaleb,ago,stukreit,cworth,keithp,clee,kem,branden,jkolb,doursse,jkj,bogdand,sndirsch,jbarnes,mhopf,spyderous,aplattner,benh,philipl
This is an amd64 system.
Original TDB file:
http://annarchy.freedesktop.org/~daniels/group.tdb
Processed DB file:
http://annarchy.freedesktop.org/~daniels/group.db
Cheers,
Daniel
--XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDkM+cRkzMgPKxYGwRAtRSAJ9vkQrta+E3bT1tJ2moYGIBoTh0dACdEnup
W20X2XJMQWIzPJAdNDBQP5w=
=gdj2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00--
---
Received: (at 341773-close) by
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
* Thijs Kinkhorst: For the testing (etch) and unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in version 0.9.8-5. close 335997 0.9.8-4 -4 or -5? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329197: marked as done (postgresql-7.4: fails with SIGBUS on mips)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:02:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329197: fixed in postgresql-7.4 1:7.4.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2005 11:06:59 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 04:06:59 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from rimmer.farnz.org.uk [81.187.250.195]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHfxj-0001MH-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 04:06:59 -0700
Received: by rimmer.farnz.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7DAFD59C014; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:06:55 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Simon Farnsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: postgresql-7.4: Fails to start with a Bus Error
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:06:54 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: postgresql-7.4
Version: 1:7.4.8-17
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The init script cannot start postgresql-7.4 (/etc/init.d/postgresql-7.4 start).
If I attempt to start it by hand with:
sudo -u postgres /usr/lib/postgresql/7.4/bin/pg_ctl start -w -D
/var/lib/postgresql/7.4/main/ -l /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-7.4-main.log
I get:
waiting for postmaster to start/usr/lib/postgresql/7.4/bin/pg_ctl: line
417: 31939 Bus error $po_path ${1+$@}
${PGDATAOPTS+$PGDATAOPTS} /dev/null $logfile 21
.
This suggests that the postmaster process is getting a SIGBUS.
I was successfully running postgresql before the shift to the new layout,
so this is a recent regression on mips. If I have to upgrade postgresql
to recover, I'd like advice on how to get my data out of the database
and into the new version, although I can cope with having to restore
from backup and reenter anything that's been changed since.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: mips
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages postgresql-7.4 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcomerr21.38-2 common error description library
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2 GCC support library
ii libkrb53 1.3.6-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii libpam0g 0.76-23Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libpq31:7.4.8-17 PostgreSQL C client library
ii libreadline5 5.0-10 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii postgresql-client-7.4 1:7.4.8-17 front-end programs for PostgreSQL
ii postgresql-common 25 manager for PostgreSQL database cl
ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
postgresql-7.4 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 329197-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 14:11:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 06:11:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoLac-0003lC-CT; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:02:10 -0800
From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#329197: fixed in postgresql-7.4 1:7.4.10-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:02:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: postgresql-7.4
Source-Version: 1:7.4.10-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
postgresql-7.4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 15:04 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Thijs Kinkhorst: For the testing (etch) and unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in version 0.9.8-5. close 335997 0.9.8-4 -4 or -5? The changelog for -4 lists the fix (* Branch pull from upstream (closes: #335596).), but the -5 changelog consists of a vague message from which I conclude that -4 was in some way a broken upload (The [ I'm ashamed ] release ... * Put the patches in the right directory..). Since -4 isn't available from the Debian servers anymore, I can't check whether that package actually fixed the bug or that it tried but failed. In any case, -5 seems to be the right version. If you want to adjust the bug version tags for that, go ahead. Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#344029: libmail-audit-perl: insecure /tmp handling
Package: libmail-audit-perl
Version: 2.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Etch RC policy
The Mail::Audit module logs by default to
my $logfile = /tmp/.getpwuid($).-audit.log;
if logging is turned on (the loglevel parameter to new()) and
no logfile is explicitly specified.
The module will follow any symlinks and append to the corresponding file:
if ($logging) { open LOG, $logfile or open LOG, /dev/null;
This is RC according to the Etch release policy [1]:
(h) Temporary files
Any programs and scripts that create files in /tmp or other
world writable directories must use a mechanism which fails if
the file already exists.
An obvious workaround would be to log into eg. $HOME/mail-audit.log.
(I'm not sure if this should be tagged security and fixed for sarge too,
so I'm leaving that for others to judge.)
[1] http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
Cheers,
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344032: bbdb: File error: Cannot open load file, bbdb-autoloads
Package: bbdb Version: 2.35.cvs20040528-1 Severity: grave Hello! Since the latest emacs-snapshot upgrade, I cannot use bbdb anymore: = gismo:~# emacs21 -nw Loading 20apel (source)...done Loading 20gnus-init (source)...done Loading 50auctex (source)...done Loading 50autoconf (source)...done Loading 50bbdb (source)... Error while loading 50bbdb Loading 50dictionaries-common (source)... Loading debian-ispell... Loading /var/cache/dictionaries-common/emacsen-ispell-default.el (source)...done Loading debian-ispell...done Loading /var/cache/dictionaries-common/emacsen-ispell-dicts.el (source)...done Loading 50dictionaries-common (source)...done Loading 50dictionary-el (source)... Loading dictionary-init...done Loading 50dictionary-el (source)...done Loading 50dpkg-dev-el (source)...done Loading 50emacs-goodies-el (source)...done Loading 50emacs-wiki (source)...done Loading 50emms (source)...done Loading 50erc (source)... Loading erc-auto...done Loading 50erc (source)...done Loading 50flim (source)...done Loading 50gcl (source)...done Loading 50gnus-bonus-el (source)...done Loading 50mmm-mode (source)...done Loading 50php-elisp (source)...done Loading 50preview-latex (source)...done Loading 50psvn (source)...done Loading 50slime (source)...done Loading 50vc-svn (source)...done Loading 50w3m-el (source)...done Loading 51debian-el (source)...done Loading 51planner-el (source)... Loading /usr/lib/emacs/21.4/i486-linux-gnu/fns-21.4.1-x.el (source)...done Loading 51planner-el (source)...done Loading 52remember-el (source)...done Loading 60hyperspec (source)...done An error has occurred while loading `/root/.emacs': File error: Cannot open load file, bbdb-autoloads To ensure normal operation, you should investigate the cause of the error in your initialization file and remove it. Start Emacs with the `--debug-init' option to view a complete error backtrace gismo:~# emacs21 --debug-init -nw Debugger entered--Lisp error: (file-error Cannot open load file bbdb-autoloads) require(bbdb-autoloads) bbdb-initialize(gnus) eval-buffer(#buffer *load* nil ~/.emacs nil t) load-with-code-conversion(/root/.emacs ~/.emacs t t) load(~/.emacs t t) #[nil ^H\205\227^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ �\203'[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] command-line() normal-top-level() gismo:~# = The problem is present in both emacs21 and emacs-snapshot and it worked before (I use the Gnus bbdb-fancy-split and BBDB whenever is possible, like in Planner/Diary). Reconfiguring or purging/installing bbdb doesn't change anything :-( Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc5 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages bbdb depends on: ii emacs-snapshot-nox [emacs 1:20051215-1 The GNU Emacs editor (without X su pi emacs21 [emacsen] 21.4a-3The GNU Emacs editor ii make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 The GNU version of the make util bbdb recommends no packages. -- no debconf information pgpsgThQFYCsi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#340079: insecure tempfiles
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 03:01:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:13:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: However I am not sure this is a security bug: The original script create a file named tempfile in the current directory, not int /tmp. Would you consider this script to have a security hole? #!/bin/sh cat $1 tempfile mv tempfile $2 Yes, because the tool may be run in an untrusted directory that can be written to by an attacker. Hello Steve, I have not received any answer from the security team. should I upload the package to unstable in the mean time ? (the unstable version is identical to the sarge version, so in principle a DSA address sarge, etch and sid at once). Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344034: sudo stopped being able to authenticate after upgrade
Package: sudo Version: 1.6.8p9-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrade, sudo fails to authenticate in the same setup where it had being working before. sudo logs this to syslog: Dec 19 11:50:01 localhost sudo: maxy : pam_authenticate: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info. ; TTY=pts/5 ; PWD=/home/maxy ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/aptitude Doing a downgrade makes it to work again. I use ldap for authentication. I'm sending the sudo pam config files as an attachment. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=es_AR, LC_CTYPE=es_AR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages sudo depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libldap2 2.1.30-12 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam-modules0.79-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam0g 0.79-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules l sudo recommends no packages. -- no debconf information # # /etc/pam.d/common-auth - authentication settings common to all services # # This file is included from other service-specific PAM config files, # and should contain a list of the authentication modules that define # the central authentication scheme for use on the system # (e.g., /etc/shadow, LDAP, Kerberos, etc.). The default is to use the # traditional Unix authentication mechanisms. # auth [success=1 default=ignore] pam_unix.so nullok_secure auth required pam_ldap.so use_first_pass auth required pam_permit.so # # /etc/pam.d/common-account - authorization settings common to all services # # This file is included from other service-specific PAM config files, # and should contain a list of the authorization modules that define # the central access policy for use on the system. The default is to # only deny service to users whose accounts are expired in /etc/shadow. # account [success=1 default=ignore] pam_unix.so account required pam_ldap.so account required pam_permit.so #%PAM-1.0 @include common-auth @include common-account No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: 16/12/05
Bug#340851: autogen also FTBFS on i386 now
Daniel Schepler wrote: Just a quick note that I've been able to reproduce the failure on the license.test test on an i386 system as well, so it's apparently not alpha-specific. I just ran pbuilder on the 1:5.7.3-1 source package twice in a row, and it failed both times. Another quick note: the cause is due to use of a deprecated Guile interface. By not using scm_makstr() the problem goes away. That problem is bypassed in 5.8, but the libtool used is broken. The libtool released last night fixes that issue, but I haven't rolled a new release yet. 5.8.1 will be the one you want (in a day or two). It will be just 5.8 with a new libtool. Regards, Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 13:41, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : close 335997 0.9.8-4 tags 335997 patch thanks Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in Flyspray. Have a look at http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multiple-va riable.html for more details. This has been assigned CVE-2005-3334, please mention so in the changelog when fixing this. This RC bug has been open for 50 days without response from the maintainer, so I've taken the liberty to work towards a fix. For unstable: This has already been addressed in the current unstable version by an update from the upstream repository in version 0.9.8-4, uploaded by the maintainer on 2005-10-26. I'm marking the bug as fixed in that version with this mail. For testing: The current unstable version just has to migrate to testing, and that will happen soon because I'm now marking the RC bug as fixed in 0.9.8-4. For stable: I've extracted the right patch from the unstable version (which has been present without any bugreports since the end of October), and that is attached. I've also prepared updated packages here: http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~kink/flyspray/ For oldstable: Does not contain flyspray. Bye, Thijs afaict the unstable version was not upstream's and was not touched by the vulnerability. I've not had the time to check it though. Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not like to see enter testing at all. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpxAfSqEbBzj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:26 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in Flyspray. Have a look at http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multiple-va riable.html for more details. This has been assigned CVE-2005-3334, please mention so in the changelog when fixing this. afaict the unstable version was not upstream's and was not touched by the vulnerability. I've not had the time to check it though. Since no information was added to this bug report since it was opened, I have only the changelog, advisory and upstream code to go by. From the changelog I read that you pulled the fix in question from the upstream repo. I've tested this code against the vulnerability and it indeed fixes it. If you believe another fix to be better, please supply a patch. Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not like to see enter testing at all. Current testing has an RC security bug. If those issues you mention are also RC, I suggest you document them in the BTS, since I didn't find any other RC issues in the tracker. If they are not, this version should progress in order to fix the RC security bug in testing that's absent in unstable. Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 16:42, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:26 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in Flyspray. Have a look at http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multipl e-va riable.html for more details. This has been assigned CVE-2005-3334, please mention so in the changelog when fixing this. afaict the unstable version was not upstream's and was not touched by the vulnerability. I've not had the time to check it though. Since no information was added to this bug report since it was opened, I have only the changelog, advisory and upstream code to go by. From the changelog I read that you pulled the fix in question from the upstream repo. I've tested this code against the vulnerability and it indeed fixes it. If you believe another fix to be better, please supply a patch. Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not like to see enter testing at all. Current testing has an RC security bug. If those issues you mention are also RC, I suggest you document them in the BTS, since I didn't find any other RC issues in the tracker. If they are not, this version should progress in order to fix the RC security bug in testing that's absent in unstable. you are right on the full line, and I just did an upload of what I should have done way earlier and that was almost ready on my computer. thise one fixes a lot of bugs and use the update that upstream released a few day after I fixed the RC bug in a hurry. -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter etch in 10 days from now. thanks for the other valuable patch you sent btw. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpTuoV4iId2h.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k
Package: make Version: 3.80+3.81.b4-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Recent versions of make fail to build from source on m68k. This is due to a gcc-4.0 bug (debian #344041). As a workaround variable.c can be compiled with -O1. Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log. [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: gettext, texinfo, tetex-bin, texi2html (= 1.76-1) | Build-Depends-Indep: tetex-bin, texi2html (= 1.76-1) [...] | Checking correctness of source dependencies... | Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-8 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4 g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 binutils_2.16.1cvs20051117-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-4 libstdc++6_4.0.2-4 [...] | if cc -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBDIR=\/usr/lib\ -DINCLUDEDIR=\/usr/include\ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -O2 -g -MT variable.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/variable.Tpo -c -o variable.o variable.c; \ | then mv -f .deps/variable.Tpo .deps/variable.Po; else rm -f .deps/variable.Tpo; exit 1; fi | variable.c: In function 'pop_variable_scope': | variable.c:627: fatal error: internal consistency failure | compilation terminated. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=makever=3.80+3.81.b3-1arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=make -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:47 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter etch in 10 days from now. Great, my interest is that the problem is addressed in the best way possible :) What about stable, do you want to prepare new updated packages or is the current fix ok? Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 16:54, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:47 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter etch in 10 days from now. Great, my interest is that the problem is addressed in the best way possible :) What about stable, do you want to prepare new updated packages or is the current fix ok? the current fix has a nasty side effect, it leads to 342544 a solution has to be brewed from the 001_update1.patch (IIRC) that performs checks in the regexp.php file IIRC. I should say I've not the time atm to extract it myself. Though, please note that this XSS vulneratibility IS really minor : it has to be created from a user that stole you a PHPSESSID, and made a treacheous search, and force the user to use 'last search result' *BEFORE* you do a new search yourself, which is *REALLY* unlikely. that is not doable for anonymous users. I'll try to have a minimalist patch ASAP, but stable version is not really based on the same code (I mean the version in unstable is quite bigger) and I'm not sure a patch is that simple to transpose (you must have seen that my patch was quite brutal : I escaped any POST-ed or GET-et variable, which is most of the time OK, but which is not really nice not the right way since it results in some entities showing up in mails). -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpxFggkwCA1R.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#321207: [trang ftbfs] Re: now builds on my sparc pbuilder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:36:43 -0700 trang now builds on my sparc pbuilder. This implies that either the build dependancies are insufficiently versioned, or that a bug in one or more of the build dependancies has been fixed. Can this bug be closed or do you need more testing? Cheers, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDptyr4vzFZu62tMIRAhoTAKCkqgnkU7jAi+vVrFdDI/U2Zc53SACgmWPo Hc2L4rduBEUpTv6m4dc/c+o= =h+Ji -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335997: marked as done (flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:02:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335997: fixed in flyspray 0.9.8-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 09:31:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 02:31:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EV46S-0006By-00; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 02:31:20 -0700 Received: from wlan-client-066.informatik.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.116.67] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EV46Q-00066D-Sj for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:31:18 +0200 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EV475-0002av-QQ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:31:59 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:31:59 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 134.102.116.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: flyspray Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in Flyspray. Have a look at http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multiple-variable.html for more details. This has been assigned CVE-2005-3334, please mention so in the changelog when fixing this. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc1 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 335997-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 16:10:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 08:10:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoNSh-Lh-BE; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:02:07 -0800 From: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#335997: fixed in flyspray 0.9.8-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:02:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: flyspray Source-Version: 0.9.8-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of flyspray, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: flyspray_0.9.8-6.diff.gz to pool/main/f/flyspray/flyspray_0.9.8-6.diff.gz flyspray_0.9.8-6.dsc to pool/main/f/flyspray/flyspray_0.9.8-6.dsc flyspray_0.9.8-6_all.deb to pool/main/f/flyspray/flyspray_0.9.8-6_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated flyspray package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:41:05 +0100 Source: flyspray Binary: flyspray Architecture: source all Version:
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 17:02, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 16:54, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:47 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter etch in 10 days from now. Great, my interest is that the problem is addressed in the best way possible :) What about stable, do you want to prepare new updated packages or is the current fix ok? the current fix has a nasty side effect, it leads to 342544 a solution has to be brewed from the 001_update1.patch (IIRC) that performs checks in the regexp.php file IIRC. I should say I've not the time atm to extract it myself. Though, please note that this XSS vulneratibility IS really minor : it has to be created from a user that stole you a PHPSESSID, and made a treacheous search, and force the user to use 'last search result' *BEFORE* you do a new search yourself, which is *REALLY* unlikely. that is not doable for anonymous users. I'll try to have a minimalist patch ASAP, but stable version is not really based on the same code (I mean the version in unstable is quite bigger) and I'm not sure a patch is that simple to transpose (you must have seen that my patch was quite brutal : I escaped any POST-ed or GET-et variable, which is most of the time OK, but which is not really nice not the right way since it results in some entities showing up in mails). In fact, I'm just not sure that stable is concerned, as the 'last search' link does not exists in it as far as I remember. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpiwLZgeCI8V.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of teg 0.11.1-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 313853 + fixed Bug#313853: teg: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: fixed tag 326290 + fixed Bug#326290: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 332812 + fixed Bug#332812: remove libbonobo-activation-dev as build dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343998: Patch
I found that anjuta Version: 2.0.1-2 has the same bug because both anjuta-encodings.c are basically the same. I notice this bug when libgtk was updated to version 2.8.9-2 I think this is because in version 2.8 gtk triggers a changed signal on the selection object of the treeview when setting the model (gtk_tree_view_set_model) So when on_stock_selection_changed() try to access anjuta_encodings_dialogadd_button (which is not set until the end of anjuta_encodings_init) gives the segfault. greets Juan Pablo --- src/anjuta-encodings.c 2005-12-19 13:59:47.0 -0300 +++ src/anjuta-encodings_jp.c 2005-12-19 14:00:52.0 -0300 @@ -697,6 +697,15 @@ up_button = glade_xml_get_widget (gxml, up_button); down_button = glade_xml_get_widget (gxml, down_button); + anjuta_encodings_dialog = g_new0 (AnjutaEncodingsDialog, 1); + anjuta_encodings_dialog-pref = pref; + anjuta_encodings_dialog-add_button = add_button; + anjuta_encodings_dialog-remove_button = remove_button; + anjuta_encodings_dialog-up_button = up_button; + anjuta_encodings_dialog-down_button = down_button; + anjuta_encodings_dialog-supported_treeview = supported_treeview; + anjuta_encodings_dialog-stock_treeview = stock_treeview; + /* Add the encoding column for stock treeview*/ cell = gtk_cell_renderer_text_new (); column = gtk_tree_view_column_new_with_attributes (_(Stock Encodings), @@ -757,13 +766,4 @@ gtk_widget_set_sensitive (remove_button, FALSE); gtk_widget_set_sensitive (up_button, FALSE); gtk_widget_set_sensitive (down_button, FALSE); - - anjuta_encodings_dialog = g_new0 (AnjutaEncodingsDialog, 1); - anjuta_encodings_dialog-pref = pref; - anjuta_encodings_dialog-add_button = add_button; - anjuta_encodings_dialog-remove_button = remove_button; - anjuta_encodings_dialog-up_button = up_button; - anjuta_encodings_dialog-down_button = down_button; - anjuta_encodings_dialog-supported_treeview = supported_treeview; - anjuta_encodings_dialog-stock_treeview = stock_treeview; }
Bug#343872: marked as done (gcl - FTBFS. error: '_mcount' undeclared here (not in a function))
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:59:34 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed with gcl_2.6.7-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2005 11:45:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 03:45:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx03.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.3.13]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EnwyZ-00059c-FY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:45:15 -0800 Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (vpn0255.extern.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.165.5]) by mx03.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id jBIBjDBm007732 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:45:13 +0100 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 632331839F; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:45:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:45:04 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcl - FTBFS. error: '_mcount' undeclared here (not in a function) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.33.0.11; VDF: 6.33.0.35; host: mx03) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-13 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of gcl_2.6.7-13 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 gcc -c -Wall -DVOL=volatile -fsigned-char -pipe -pg -O3 -I/build/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/o -I../h -I../gcl-tk plt.c In file included from plt.c:47: plt.h:1: error: '_mcount' undeclared here (not in a function) make[2]: *** [plt.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/o' make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcl-2.6.7' make: *** [build-gprof-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051217-2048 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 343872-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 18:00:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 10:00:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h-67-101-227-59.phlapafg.covad.net ([67.101.227.59] helo=intech19.enhanced.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EoPIr-0005pg-Do; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:00:05 -0800 Received: from camm by intech19.enhanced.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EoPIM-0005Jf-00; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:59:34 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed with gcl_2.6.7-14 User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory?= =?ISO-8859-4?Q?=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:59:34 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens. -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343712: marked as done (gcl: FTBFS: ./configure: line 2413: syntax error near unexpected token `(')
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:59:34 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed with gcl_2.6.7-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 14:00:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 06:00:02 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.75])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EncbS-0007SM-C1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:00:02 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id EBED4387AF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:00:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B276E38301
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:00:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 7E4F326136; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:00:00 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:00:00 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcl: FTBFS: ./configure: line 2413: syntax error near unexpected token
`('
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gcl
Version: 2.6.7-12
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on most arches with the
following error:
checking for text start... _start
checking system version (for dynamic loading)... checking for makeinfo...
makeinfo
./configure: line 2413: syntax error near unexpected token `('
Kurt
---
Received: (at 343712-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 18:00:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 10:00:05 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from h-67-101-227-59.phlapafg.covad.net ([67.101.227.59]
helo=intech19.enhanced.com)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoPIr-0005pg-Do; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:00:05 -0800
Received: from camm by intech19.enhanced.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1EoPIM-0005Jf-00; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:59:34 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed with gcl_2.6.7-14
User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory?=
=?ISO-8859-4?Q?=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)
MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:59:34 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Take care,
--
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens. -- Baha'u'llah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344067: libsysfs-dev: static library in /lib
Package: libsysfs-dev Version: 1.3.0-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 libsysfs.a is in /lib; static libraries belong in /usr/lib, as they're not needed to boot the system. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libsysfs-dev depends on: ii libsysfs1 1.3.0-5interface library to sysfs -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344068: lacks dependency on ucf
Package: mambo Version: 4.5.1.3-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package uninstallable Mambo's postinst uses ucf, but mambo does not depend on ucf. This makes the postinst fail if ucf is not installed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-amd64 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343921: bandwidthd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed package libgd2-dev
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:23:28PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Package: bandwidthd Version: 2.0.1+cvs20050208-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source This package fails to build from source on the autobuilders because it build-depends as a first alternative to libgd2-dev, which has been removed. Please remove this first alternative. Thanks, will do! (The build dependencies has already been adjusted according to bug #335661 in the prepared work for next upload, but I'll doublecheck that they are correct.) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: sparc (sparc64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-sparc64 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k
reassign 344046 gcc-4.0 severity 344046 grave severity 344041 grave merge 344041 344046 thanks Hi, If this is a bug in gcc-4.0, and it causes other packages to have FTBS bugs, then we should fix gcc. manoj -- Newton's Little-Known Seventh Law: A bird in the hand is safer than one overhead. Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/ 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 344046 gcc-4.0 Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Bug reassigned from package `make' to `gcc-4.0'. severity 344046 grave Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Severity set to `grave'. severity 344041 grave Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure Severity set to `grave'. merge 344041 344046 Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Merged 344041 344046. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343978: vlc: segfault on launch/fopen
Hello, Could you please launch vlc with -vvv and give the log output so we can get an idea where it crashes ? Did you install a custom VLC ? If you did, please uninstall and remove its modules. Thanks, -- Clément Stenac
Processed: downgrade
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity #330191 important Bug#330191: klibc: ftbfs [sparc] redefinition of 'struct __new_sigaction' Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307299: Perl taint problem confirmed here too
Hi,
I have the same exact problem reported originally by Tristan back in
May. I have done some tests with Perl on this machine and have found
that Perl _always_ runs in taint mode no matter who is the owner and
regardless if the -T is explicit or not. Here are the sample programs
and results:
Test program:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use CGI;
my $q = CGI-new();
print $q-header();
#my $user = `whoami` ; # this throws unsecure under _any_ circumstance
my $user = $user = $ENV{'USER'};
print EUID: , scalar getpwuid($) , ($)\n;
print UID: , scalar getpwuid($) , ($)\n;
print Taint: ${^TAINT}\n;
print PERL5OPT=, $ENV{PERL5OPT}, \n;
print Usr is: $user;
This is the result running in a shell owner/group aimass.aimass:
EUID: root (0)
UID: aimass (1000)
Taint: 1
PERL5OPT=
Why root???
This is the result running from Apache owner/group www-data.www-data:
EUID: www-data (33)
UID: www-data (33)
Taint: 1
PERL5OPT=
Usr is:
As you can see taint is _always_ on, which seems a bit strange to me.
IMHO it should only be on in one of three circumstances: (a) if -T is explicit
in the command line, (b) if running setuid, (c) if PELR5OPT contains -T
This led me to believe that there is something wrong with Perl in my new
machine. But
If you look at the error with Twiki it seems that is ci that is complaining,
not Perl! Which leads me to believe that for some reason every program on this
machine seems to be running setuid and this is what may be trigering taint in
Perl.
Anyway these are just my $0.02 since I'm not that great of a sysadmin, but a
mere mortal Perl hacker. I can also say I am having trouble with Kwiki on this
machine with similar problems. This also points in the direction that is not
just Twiki or Perl but something else.
In the hope that all this helps solve this problem, here are my versions:
This is perl, v5.8.7 built for i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi
Linux version 2.6.12-1-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
version 4.0.2 20050917 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-8)) #1 Tue Sep 27
13:22:07 JST 2005
Best regards,
Alejandro Imass
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not like to see enter testing at all. Current testing has an RC security bug. If those issues you mention are also RC, I suggest you document them in the BTS, since I didn't find any other RC issues in the tracker. If they are not, this version should progress in order to fix the RC security bug in testing that's absent in unstable. you are right on the full line, and I just did an upload of what I should have done way earlier and that was almost ready on my computer. thise one fixes a lot of bugs and use the update that upstream released a few day after I fixed the RC bug in a hurry. -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter etch in 10 days from now. If this fixes a release critical security bug, *why* are we treating it with urgency=low? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: fix severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 344041 normal Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343978: vlc: segfault on launch/fopen
I installed vlc 0.8.4 from source, but I was receiving the following errors, which I was unable to resolve: [0286] main video output warning: late picture skipped (4094055) [0285] main audio output warning: PTS is out of range (646837), dropping buffer [0285] main audio output warning: output PTS is out of range (128216), clearing out [0285] main audio output warning: input PTS is out of range (149752), trashing [0285] main audio output warning: computed PTS is out of range (102063), clearing out [0285] main audio output warning: timing screwed, stopping resampling This is why I eventually decided to install vlc with dpkg. The source installation files have been removed. # vlc -vvv VLC media player 0.8.4 Janus [0001] main vlc debug: opening config file /home/bathat/.vlc/vlcrc [0001] main vlc debug: checking builtin modules [0001] main vlc debug: checking plugin modules [0001] main vlc debug: loading plugins cache file /home/bathat/.vlc/cache/plugins-04041e.dat [0001] main vlc debug: recursively browsing `modules' [0001] main vlc debug: recursively browsing `/usr/lib/vlc' [0001] main vlc debug: recursively browsing `plugins' [0001] main vlc debug: module bank initialized, found 202 modules libhal.c 767 : org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceDoesNotExist raised Service org.freedesktop.Hal does not exist [0001] main vlc debug: opening config file /home/bathat/.vlc/vlcrc [0001] main vlc debug: CPU has capabilities 486 586 MMX MMXEXT SSE FPU [0001] main vlc debug: looking for memcpy module: 1 candidate [0401] main module debug: using memcpy module memcpy [0480] main playlist debug: waiting for thread completion [0480] main playlist debug: thread 16386 (playlist) created at priority 0 (src/playlist/playlist.c:183) [0481] main private debug: waiting for thread completion [0481] main private debug: thread 32771 (preparser) created at priority 0 (src/playlist/playlist.c:205) [0482] main interface debug: looking for interface module: 1 candidate [0341] main module debug: using interface module hotkeys [0482] main interface debug: interface initialized [0482] main interface debug: thread 49156 (interface) created at priority 0 (src/interface/interface.c:211) [0483] main interface debug: looking for interface module: 6 candidates [0392] main module debug: using interface module screensaver [0483] main interface debug: interface initialized [0483] main interface debug: thread 65541 (interface) created at priority 0 (src/interface/interface.c:211) [0484] main interface debug: looking for interface module: 5 candidates [0390] main module debug: using interface module wxwidgets [0484] main interface debug: interface initialized [0484] main interface debug: thread 81926 (manager) created at priority 0 (src/interface/interface.c:196) Segmentation fault On 12/19/05, Clément Stenac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Could you please launch vlc with -vvv and give the log output so we can get an idea where it crashes ? Did you install a custom VLC ? If you did, please uninstall and remove its modules. Thanks, -- Clément Stenac
Bug#341606: cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, if there are no objections, I will upload an NMU tomorrow for this bug (just a recompile, no changes). Regards, Bastian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDpyx1eBwlBDLsbz4RAsgIAKC33chv5TW1XkkgavUgeYSh4wHw6ACgy6c/ qL+HhE08XOBxLmxLnhlH0Z8= =1OcA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of apt-move 4.2.24-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 339024 + fixed Bug#339024: apt-move: complains about EOF on /tmp/MOVE_xxx/movefiles-fifo1 Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 341234 + fixed Bug#341234: New dash 0.5.3-1 breaks apt-move Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324271: marked as done (ace: FTBFS: undefined reference to `std::basic_ofstreamchar, std::char_traitschar ::basic_ofstream(char const*, std::_Ios_Openmode)@@GLIBCXX_3.4')
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#324271: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2005 11:34:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 21 04:34:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.60] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E6o5w-0007yX-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 04:34:32 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E064198162 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:34:31 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744D8198082 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:34:31 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 880CE26136; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:34:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:34:28 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ace: FTBFS: undefined reference to `std::basic_ofstreamchar, std::char_traitschar ::basic_ofstream(char const*, std::_Ios_Openmode)@@GLIBCXX_3.4' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ace Version: 5.4.7-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on a few arches with different but simular error messages. They happen with linking libACE.so.5.4.7 On amd64 I see: /usr/bin/ld: .shobj/Logging_Strategy.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `std::basic_ofstreamchar, std::char_traitschar ::basic_ofstream(char const*, std::_Ios_Openmode)@@GLIBCXX_3.4' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [libACE.so.5.4.7] Error 1 On powerpc: .shobj/Logging_Strategy.o: In function `ACE_Logging_Strategy::init(int, char**) ': Logging_Strategy.cpp:(.text+0xf30): undefined reference to `std::basic_ofstreamchar, std::char_traitschar ::basic_ofstream(char const*, std::_Ios_Openmode)@@GLIBCXX_3.4' Logging_Strategy.cpp:(.text+0x1014): undefined reference to `std::basic_ofstreamchar, std::char_traitschar ::basic_ofstream(char const*, std::_Ios_Openmode)@@GLIBCXX_3.4' Since .shobj/Logging_Strategy.o actually is compiled using -fPIC, that probably isn't the problem. My first guess was that it was missing a -DPIC, but that wasn't it either. It seems that this is caused by the -fvisibility-inlines-hidden option, but only on that file. I'm guessing this is a g++ error, and will file a bug against g++ about this too. Kurt --- Received: (at 324271-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 22:22:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 14:22:41 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoTJn-0006SY-6j; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 From: Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#324271: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: ace Source-Version: 5.4.7-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ace, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ace_5.4.7-7.diff.gz to pool/main/a/ace/ace_5.4.7-7.diff.gz ace_5.4.7-7.dsc to pool/main/a/ace/ace_5.4.7-7.dsc gperf-ace_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/gperf-ace_5.4.7-7_i386.deb libace-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb libace-doc_5.4.7-7_all.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-doc_5.4.7-7_all.deb
Bug#334944: marked as done (liboil: FTBFS on powerpc)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:20 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334944: fixed in liboil 0.3.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 02:26:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 19:26:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ESmbb-0003d9-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:26:03 -0700 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-102-147.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.102.147]) by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9L2Q0DK005476; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:26:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ESmbY-JR-E4; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:26:00 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: liboil: FTBFS on powerpc X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:26:00 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: liboil Severity: serious See http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=liboilver=0.3.3-1arch=powerpcstamp=1128679718file=logas=raw make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/liboil-0.3.3/liboil/powerpc' if /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../..-Wall -Wa,-mregnames -Wa,-maltivec -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -O2 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -fasm-blocks -g -Wall -O2 -MT libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.Tpo -c -o libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.lo `test -f 'recon8x8_ppc.c' || echo './'`recon8x8_ppc.c; \ then mv -f .deps/libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.Tpo .deps/libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.Plo; else rm -f .deps/libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.Tpo; exit 1; fi mkdir .libs cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -Wall -Wa,-mregnames -Wa,-maltivec -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -O2 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -fasm-blocks -g -Wall -O2 -MT libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.Tpo -c recon8x8_ppc.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.o cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -fasm-blocks make[4]: *** [libpowerpc_la-recon8x8_ppc.lo] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/liboil-0.3.3/liboil/powerpc' --- Received: (at 334944-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 22:21:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 14:21:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoTKm-0006dX-OD; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:20 -0800 From: David Schleef [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#334944: fixed in liboil 0.3.6-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:20 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: liboil Source-Version: 0.3.6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of liboil, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: liboil0.3-dev_0.3.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libo/liboil/liboil0.3-dev_0.3.6-1_i386.deb liboil0.3_0.3.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libo/liboil/liboil0.3_0.3.6-1_i386.deb liboil_0.3.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libo/liboil/liboil_0.3.6-1.diff.gz liboil_0.3.6-1.dsc to pool/main/libo/liboil/liboil_0.3.6-1.dsc liboil_0.3.6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libo/liboil/liboil_0.3.6.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Schleef
Bug#336020: marked as done (ace - FTBFS: error: request for member `hash' in `t', which is of non-class type `const long unsigned int')
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#336020: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 12:47:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 05:47:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx01.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.11] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EV7AH-00087N-00; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:47:29 -0700 Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (vpn0253.extern.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.165.3]) by mx01.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j9RClRBi017259 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:47:27 +0200 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2214F1865F; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:47:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:47:05 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ace - FTBFS: error: request for member `hash' in `t', which is of non-class type `const long unsigned int' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.32.0.8; VDF: 6.32.0.119; host: mx01) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ace Version: 5.4.7-5 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of ace_5.4.7-5 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] g++-3.4 -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -O3 -pipe -D_REENTRANT -DACE_HAS_AIO_CALLS -D_GNU_SOURCE -DACE_HAS_SYS_SIGLIST=1 -DACE_GPERF=\gperf-ace\ -I/build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers -I/build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/TAO -DACE_NDEBUG -DACE_USE_RCSID=0 -I/usr/kerberos/include -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -DACE_COMPILE_TIMEPROBES -I../../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../orbsvcs -I../../DAnCE -I../../DAnCE/ciao -I/include -I../../DAnCE/Config_Handlers -DXML_USE_PTHREADS -DCONFIG_HANDLERS_BUILD_DLL -c -fPIC -o .shobj/IDREF_Base.o IDREF_Base.cpp /build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ace/Functor_T.inl: In member function `long unsigned int ACE_HashTYPE::operator()(const TYPE) const [with TYPE = size_t]': /build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ace/Hash_Map_Manager_T.inl:73: instantiated from `u_long ACE_Hash_Map_Manager_ExEXT_ID, INT_ID, HASH_KEY, COMPARE_KEYS, ACE_LOCK::hash(const EXT_ID) [with EXT_ID = size_t, INT_ID = ACE_CString, HASH_KEY = ACE_Hashsize_t, COMPARE_KEYS = ACE_Equal_Tosize_t, ACE_LOCK = ACE_Null_Mutex]' /build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ace/Hash_Map_Manager_T.cpp:300: instantiated from `int ACE_Hash_Map_Manager_ExEXT_ID, INT_ID, HASH_KEY, COMPARE_KEYS, ACE_LOCK::shared_find(const EXT_ID, ACE_Hash_Map_EntryEXT_ID, INT_ID*, size_t) [with EXT_ID = size_t, INT_ID = ACE_CString, HASH_KEY = ACE_Hashsize_t, COMPARE_KEYS = ACE_Equal_Tosize_t, ACE_LOCK = ACE_Null_Mutex]' /build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ace/Hash_Map_Manager_T.inl:182: instantiated from `int ACE_Hash_Map_Manager_ExEXT_ID, INT_ID, HASH_KEY, COMPARE_KEYS, ACE_LOCK::find_i(const EXT_ID, INT_ID) [with EXT_ID = size_t, INT_ID = ACE_CString, HASH_KEY = ACE_Hashsize_t, COMPARE_KEYS = ACE_Equal_Tosize_t, ACE_LOCK = ACE_Null_Mutex]' /build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ace/Hash_Map_Manager_T.inl:210: instantiated from `int ACE_Hash_Map_Manager_ExEXT_ID, INT_ID, HASH_KEY, COMPARE_KEYS, ACE_LOCK::find(const EXT_ID, INT_ID) const [with EXT_ID = size_t, INT_ID = ACE_CString, HASH_KEY = ACE_Hashsize_t, COMPARE_KEYS = ACE_Equal_Tosize_t, ACE_LOCK = ACE_Null_Mutex]' IDREF_Base.cpp:47: instantiated from here /build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ace/Functor_T.inl:8: error: request for member `hash' in `t', which is of non-class type `const long unsigned int' make[4]: *** [.shobj/IDREF_Base.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/DAnCE/Config_Handlers' make[3]: *** [XSC_Config_Handlers] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/DAnCE/Config_Handlers' make[2]: ***
Bug#339142: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339142: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:55:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:55:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ebuir-0006hu-DY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:55:17 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA24961 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920B0F212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 26075-19 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:14 +0100 (MET) 13916 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:14 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6tEoL008636 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:14 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:14 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ace Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339142-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 22:22:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 14:22:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoTJn-0006Sc-8T; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 From: Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#339142: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ace Source-Version: 5.4.7-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ace, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ace_5.4.7-7.diff.gz to pool/main/a/ace/ace_5.4.7-7.diff.gz ace_5.4.7-7.dsc to pool/main/a/ace/ace_5.4.7-7.dsc gperf-ace_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/gperf-ace_5.4.7-7_i386.deb libace-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb libace-doc_5.4.7-7_all.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-doc_5.4.7-7_all.deb libace-flreactor-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-flreactor-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb libace-flreactor5.4.7c2a_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-flreactor5.4.7c2a_5.4.7-7_i386.deb libace-qtreactor-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-qtreactor-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb
Bug#342328: marked as done (ace: ftbfs [sparc] error: 'struct termios' has no member named 'c_ispeed')
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342328: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 08:25:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 07 00:25:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ejuc4-0004Fj-13 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:25:20 -0800 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jB78PH2g000472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:25:17 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jB78UVRZ030654; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:30:31 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jB78UV9M030652; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:30:31 -0800 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:30:31 -0800 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ace: ftbfs [sparc] error: 'struct termios' has no member named 'c_ispeed' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ace Version: 5.4.7-6 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ace failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. g++ -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -O3 -pipe -D_REENTRANT -DACE_HAS_AIO_CALLS -D_GNU_SOURCE -DACE_HAS_CUSTOM_EXPORT_MACROS=0 -DACE_HAS_SYS_SIGLIST=1 -DACE_GPERF=\gperf-ace\ -I/build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers -DACE_NDEBUG -DACE_USE_RCSID=0 -I/usr/kerberos/include -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -DACE_COMPILE_TIMEPROBES -I.. -DACE_HAS_ACE_TOKEN -DACE_HAS_ACE_SVCCONF -DACE_BUILD_DLL -c -fPIC -o .shobj/TTY_IO.o TTY_IO.cpp TTY_IO.cpp: In member function 'int ACE_TTY_IO::control(ACE_TTY_IO::Control_Mode, ACE_TTY_IO::Serial_Params*) const': TTY_IO.cpp:184: error: 'struct termios' has no member named 'c_ispeed' TTY_IO.cpp:185: error: 'struct termios' has no member named 'c_ospeed' make[2]: *** [.shobj/TTY_IO.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ace' make[1]: *** [ACE] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ace' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 --- Received: (at 342328-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 22:22:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 14:22:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoTJn-0006Sg-A0; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 From: Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#342328: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: ace Source-Version: 5.4.7-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ace, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ace_5.4.7-7.diff.gz to pool/main/a/ace/ace_5.4.7-7.diff.gz ace_5.4.7-7.dsc to pool/main/a/ace/ace_5.4.7-7.dsc gperf-ace_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/gperf-ace_5.4.7-7_i386.deb libace-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb libace-doc_5.4.7-7_all.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-doc_5.4.7-7_all.deb libace-flreactor-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-flreactor-dev_5.4.7-7_i386.deb libace-flreactor5.4.7c2a_5.4.7-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-flreactor5.4.7c2a_5.4.7-7_i386.deb
Bug#338435: marked as done (ocaml 3.09.0 should not enter testing without our consent)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:46 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338435: fixed in ocaml 3.09.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2005 09:14:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 10 01:14:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.23]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ea8Vg-00026O-KA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:14:20 -0800 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0807.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CDA201C00168 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:13:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-43-198.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.216.198]) by mwinf0807.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F270F1C001E2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:13:45 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ea8QU-0007Rr-UC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:08:58 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ocaml 3.09.0 should not enter testing without our consent X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:08:52 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ocaml Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Well, this is just a safeguard to make sure that ocaml 3.09.0 will not enter testing without us knowing it should be ready for that. This will also block all dependent packages we are now rebuilding. Friendly, Sven Luther -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 338435-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 22:24:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 14:24:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoTLC-0006hC-3X; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:46 -0800 From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#338435: fixed in ocaml 3.09.0-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:46 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ocaml Source-Version: 3.09.0-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ocaml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ocaml-base-nox_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-base-nox_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb ocaml-base_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-base_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb ocaml-compiler-libs_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-compiler-libs_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb ocaml-interp_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-interp_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb ocaml-mode_3.09.0-4_all.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-mode_3.09.0-4_all.deb ocaml-native-compilers_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-native-compilers_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb ocaml-nox_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-nox_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb ocaml-source_3.09.0-4_all.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-source_3.09.0-4_all.deb ocaml_3.09.0-4.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml_3.09.0-4.diff.gz ocaml_3.09.0-4.dsc to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml_3.09.0-4.dsc ocaml_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml_3.09.0-4_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian
Bug#340103: marked as done (ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:50 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#340103: fixed in ocamlodbc 2.10-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2005 23:13:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 15:13:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org ([82.139.201.22]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdyN6-kn-QB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:13:21 -0800 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2F1BA18118; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:13:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:13:21 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ocamlodbc Version: 2.10-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of ocamlodbc_2.10-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] mkdir -p unixodbc cp -f libocamlodbc.a ocamlodbc.cmi ocamlodbc.cma META unixodbc/ cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory make[1]: *** [unixodbc] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051120-1230 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 340103-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 22:20:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 14:20:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoTLG-0006hk-2o; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:50 -0800 From: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#340103: fixed in ocamlodbc 2.10-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:50 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ocamlodbc Source-Version: 2.10-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ocamlodbc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin_2.10-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin_2.10-2_i386.deb libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev_2.10-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev_2.10-2_i386.deb ocamlodbc_2.10-2.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/ocamlodbc_2.10-2.diff.gz ocamlodbc_2.10-2.dsc to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/ocamlodbc_2.10-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ocamlodbc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:40:27 +0100 Source: ocamlodbc Binary: libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.10-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin - UnixODBC database bindings for OCaml, Biniki libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev - UnixODBC database bindings for OCaml, Development Files Closes: 340103 Changes: ocamlodbc (2.10-2)
Processed: inetd hangs pbuilder update
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 262627 grave Bug#262627: invoke-rc.d should be used Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343360: marked as done (cameleon: missing build-dep on imagemagick)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:47:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343360: fixed in cameleon 1.9.9.cvs20051129-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 17:57:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 14 09:57:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.61]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Emast-Z3-Ok for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:57:47 -0800 Received: from 208-58-77-33.c3-0.grg-ubr3.lnh-grg.md.cable.rcn.com (HELO tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net) ([208.58.77.33]) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2005 12:57:45 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i=3.99,252,1131339600; d=scan'208; a=142017452:sNHT30877040 Received: from amu by tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1Emasr-0003pw-9A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:57:45 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cameleon: missing build-dep on imagemagick Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:57:45 -0500 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: locally generated X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cameleon Version: 1.9.9.cvs20051129-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source The latest cameleon package FTBFS on most architectures (except for arm, where it evidently got lucky) because it tries to run convert without a build dependency on imagemagick. Could you please add one? Thanks! BTW, you can close #181127 now. ;-) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.2 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages cameleon depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcameleon-ocaml-de 1.9.9.cvs20051129-1 OCaml library to display LablGTK d ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-01.8.2-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libxml2 2.6.22-2GNOME XML library ii ocaml-base-nox [ocam 3.09.0-3Runtime system for ocaml bytecode ii ocaml-dbforge1.9.9.cvs20051129-1 graphical tool for generating OCam ii ocaml-report 1.9.9.cvs20051129-1 XML report tool for documenting OC ii ocamlcvs 1.9.9.cvs20051129-1 graphical frontend for accessing C ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime cameleon recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 343360-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 22:52:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 14:52:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoTmd-Fs-VO; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:47:07 -0800 From: Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343360: fixed in cameleon 1.9.9.cvs20051129-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:47:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: cameleon Source-Version: 1.9.9.cvs20051129-2 We believe that the bug you reported is
Bug#343873: marked as done (cameleon - FTBFS: /bin/sh: no: command not found)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:47:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343873: fixed in cameleon 1.9.9.cvs20051129-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2005 11:48:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 03:48:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx03.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.3.13]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Enx1Y-0005K3-LZ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:48:21 -0800 Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (vpn0255.extern.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.165.5]) by mx03.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id jBIBmIBm008522 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:48:18 +0100 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4CF81839F; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:48:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:48:09 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cameleon - FTBFS: /bin/sh: no: command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.33.0.11; VDF: 6.33.0.35; host: mx03) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cameleon Version: 1.9.9.cvs20051129-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of cameleon_1.9.9.cvs20051129-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 /usr/bin/ocamlc -warn-error FSP -a -custom -o dbforge/dbforge_gui.cma -I +lablgtk2 -I +ocamldoc -I +xml-light -I ocaml/parsing -I ocaml/typing -I ocaml/driver -I ocaml/utils -I okey -I utils -I tmpl-engine -I config_file -I configwin -I report -I dbforge -I ocamlcvs -I cameleon -I camtop -I plugins dbforge/dbf_installation.cmo dbforge/dbf_misc.cmo dbforge/dbf_sql.cmo dbforge/dbf_sql_gen.cmo dbforge/dbf_sql_vgen.cmo dbforge/dbf_sql_io.cmo dbforge/dbf_gtk2Misc.cmo dbforge/dbf_gladeWidgets.cmo dbforge/dbf_dbStores.cmo dbforge/dbf_selectWidget.cmo dbforge/dbf_dbWidget.cmo dbforge/dbf_columnGUI.cmo dbforge/dbf_indexGUI.cmo dbforge/dbf_virtualTableGUI.cmo dbforge/dbf_tableGUI.cmo dbforge/dbf_gui.cmo dbforge/dbforge_gui.cmo no -warn-error FSP -pp camlp4o -rectypes -I +lablgtk2 -I +ocamldoc -I +xml-light -I ocaml/parsing -I ocaml/typing -I ocaml/driver -I ocaml/utils -I okey -I utils -I tmpl-engine -I config_file -I configwin -I report -I dbforge -I ocamlcvs -I cameleon -I camtop -I plugins -c ocamlcvs/ocvs_messages.ml /bin/sh: no: command not found make[2]: *** [ocamlcvs/ocvs_messages.cmx] Error 127 rm tmpl-engine/tmplLexer.ml make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cameleon-1.9.9.cvs20051129/src' make[1]: *** [src] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cameleon-1.9.9.cvs20051129' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051214-0127 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 343873-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 22:52:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 14:52:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoTmd-Fu-WC; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:47:08 -0800 From: Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343873: fixed in cameleon 1.9.9.cvs20051129-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:47:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: cameleon Source-Version: 1.9.9.cvs20051129-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cameleon, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
Bug#343408: marked as done (ocaml-benchmark: ftbfs [sparc] ocamlfind: command not found)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:23 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343408: fixed in ocaml-benchmark 0.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2005 00:55:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 14 16:55:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmhOs-0003ba-V6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:55:15 -0800 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBF0tC3l032041 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:55:12 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBF0wljR005279; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:58:47 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBF0wlaB005277; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:58:47 -0800 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:58:47 -0800 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ocaml-benchmark: ftbfs [sparc] ocamlfind: command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ocaml-benchmark Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ocaml-benchmark failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc buildd. It also failed on all other buildds, and almost certainly would fail on i386 if only the build dependancies were installed. ocamlc -a -o benchmark.cma benchmark.cmo ocamlfind remove benchmark; \ [ -f benchmark.cmxa ] \ extra=benchmark.cmxa benchmark.a; \ ocamlfind install -destdir /build/buildd/ocaml-benchmark-0.6/debian/libbenchmark-ocaml-dev///usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0 benchmark \ benchmark.mli benchmark.cmi benchmark.cma META $extra /bin/sh: ocamlfind: command not found /bin/sh: ocamlfind: command not found make[1]: *** [install] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocaml-benchmark-0.6' make: *** [install] Error 2 --- Received: (at 343408-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 23:12:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 15:12:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoU1P-00010L-MF; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:23 -0800 From: Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343408: fixed in ocaml-benchmark 0.6-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:23 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ocaml-benchmark Source-Version: 0.6-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ocaml-benchmark, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libbenchmark-ocaml-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml-benchmark/libbenchmark-ocaml-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ocaml-benchmark/ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.diff.gz ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.dsc to pool/main/o/ocaml-benchmark/ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ocaml-benchmark package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
Bug#343874: marked as done (camomile - FTBFS: no: Command not found)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343874: fixed in camomile 0.6.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2005 11:55:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 03:55:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx01.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.3.11]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Enx8O-0005gh-Qt for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:55:25 -0800 Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (vpn0255.extern.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.165.5]) by mx01.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id jBIBtMjG003396 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:55:23 +0100 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8DE61839F; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:55:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:55:13 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: camomile - FTBFS: no: Command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.33.0.11; VDF: 6.33.0.35; host: mx01) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: camomile Version: 0.6.3-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of camomile_0.6.3-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 ocamlc -a -o camomile.cma camomile.cmo no -c -for-pack Camomile -I internal -I public -I toolslib -I . -impl public/unicodeString.mli make[1]: no: Command not found make[1]: *** [public/unicodeString.cmx] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/camomile-0.6.3' make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051211-1819 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 343874-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 23:11:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 15:11:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoU1J-zR-Va; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:17 -0800 From: Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343874: fixed in camomile 0.6.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:17 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: camomile Source-Version: 0.6.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of camomile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: camomile_0.6.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/camomile/camomile_0.6.3-2.diff.gz camomile_0.6.3-2.dsc to pool/main/c/camomile/camomile_0.6.3-2.dsc libcamomile-ocaml-data_0.6.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/c/camomile/libcamomile-ocaml-data_0.6.3-2_all.deb libcamomile-ocaml-dev_0.6.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/camomile/libcamomile-ocaml-dev_0.6.3-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated camomile package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:45:08 +0100 Source: camomile Binary: libcamomile-ocaml-data libcamomile-ocaml-dev Architecture: source all i386 Version: 0.6.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 22:15, Steve Langasek a écrit : On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not like to see enter testing at all. Current testing has an RC security bug. If those issues you mention are also RC, I suggest you document them in the BTS, since I didn't find any other RC issues in the tracker. If they are not, this version should progress in order to fix the RC security bug in testing that's absent in unstable. you are right on the full line, and I just did an upload of what I should have done way earlier and that was almost ready on my computer. thise one fixes a lot of bugs and use the update that upstream released a few day after I fixed the RC bug in a hurry. -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter etch in 10 days from now. If this fixes a release critical security bug, *why* are we treating it with urgency=low? I already did an upload with urgency low, either you can force it to be high, or I can reupload, as you want. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpG2JeIVPRpO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#262627: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#344089: testsuite failure with experimental upgrade
another failure happens with 262627 where inetd is started within chroot. It should be fixed on inetd side. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343914: marked as done (mldonkey: FTBFS: build-depends on removed package libgd2-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:47:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343914: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2005 19:14:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 11:14:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from farad.aurel32.net ([82.232.2.251]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eo3zN-0006O0-Hn for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:14:33 -0800 Received: from thevenin.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:a00:20ff:fea5:159b]) by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1Eo3zM-00062O-NH; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:14:32 +0100 Received: from aurel32 by thevenin.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Eo3zM-0005ef-DZ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:14:32 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mldonkey: FTBFS: build-depends on removed package libgd2-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:14:32 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mldonkey Version: 2.7.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source This package fails to build from source because it build-depends on libgd2-dev, which has been removed. Please build-depends on libgd2-xpm-dev or libgd2-noxpm-dev instead. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: sparc (sparc64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-sparc64 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 343914-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 23:56:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 15:56:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EoUil-0006LB-Ik; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:47:11 -0800 From: Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343914: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.1-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:47:11 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: mldonkey Source-Version: 2.7.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mldonkey, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mldonkey-gui_2.7.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey-gui_2.7.1-2_i386.deb mldonkey-server_2.7.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey-server_2.7.1-2_i386.deb mldonkey_2.7.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey_2.7.1-2.diff.gz mldonkey_2.7.1-2.dsc to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey_2.7.1-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mldonkey package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:03:13 +0100 Source: mldonkey Binary: mldonkey-gui mldonkey-server Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.7.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: mldonkey-gui - Graphical frontend for mldonkey based on GTK
Bug#336710: 336710 patch
Tags 336710 patch thank Here's the patch implementing the proposed solution, Regards, diff -Nru procps-3.2.6/debian/patches/00list procps-3.2.6.patched/debian/patches/00list --- procps-3.2.6/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-20 03:00:14.0 +0100 +++ procps-3.2.6.patched/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-20 03:01:17.0 +0100 @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ 30_w-columns 40_gnu-kbsd 40_pgrep-coption +50_dev_null_makefile_fix.dpatch diff -Nru procps-3.2.6/debian/patches/50_dev_null_makefile_fix.dpatch procps-3.2.6.patched/debian/patches/50_dev_null_makefile_fix.dpatch --- procps-3.2.6/debian/patches/50_dev_null_makefile_fix.dpatch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ procps-3.2.6.patched/debian/patches/50_dev_null_makefile_fix.dpatch 2005-12-20 02:57:47.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run +## dev_null_makefile_fix.dpatch by [EMAIL PROTECTED] +## +## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. +## DP: No description. + [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ +diff -urNad procps-3.2.6~/Makefile procps-3.2.6/Makefile +--- procps-3.2.6~/Makefile 2005-10-30 07:27:04.0 +0100 procps-3.2.6/Makefile 2005-12-20 02:57:41.0 +0100 +@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ + # Unlike the kernel one, this check_gcc goes all the way to + # producing an executable. There might be a -m64 that works + # until you go looking for a 64-bit curses library. +-check_gcc = $(shell if $(CC) $(ALL_CPPFLAGS) $(ALL_CFLAGS) dummy.c $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(1) -o /dev/null $(CURSES) /dev/null 21; then echo $(1); else echo $(2); fi ;) ++check_gcc = $(shell if $(CC) $(ALL_CPPFLAGS) $(ALL_CFLAGS) dummy.c $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(1) -o will_this_file_really_exist.tmp $(CURSES) /dev/null 21; then echo $(1); else echo $(2); fi ; rm -f will_this_file_really_exist.tmp) + + # Be 64-bit if at all possible. In a cross-compiling situation, one may + # do make m64=-m32 lib64=lib to produce 32-bit executables. DO NOT -- Niv Sardi-Altivanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian::GNU/Linux::Addict, Wannabe Debian Developper, please test my packages: http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian Random Fortune (To make your day better if not wiser) You will pioneer the first Martian colony. pgp1h7U2u5VUF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: 336710 patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tags 336710 patch Bug#336710: Removes /dev/null if build with root privileges There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thank Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug is not grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 262627 normal Bug#262627: invoke-rc.d should be used Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294520: QTParted 0.4.5-1 still does it!
I just noticed that QTParted 0.4.5-1 (listed as v0.4.5-cvs in the program) still does it. I've attached a screenshot of QTParted, and the output of fdisk and partman on the same disk. I also attached a screenshot of QTParted 0.4.4 from Knoppix 3.7; you can see a lot of extraneous stuff, but the real partitions are also displayed the same as in 0.4.5: completely wrong. Notice that partitions are mixed up, and QTParted doesn't even show there being two ext partitions. It's been 318 days since I submitted this bug, and nothing has been done. This is a CRITICAL DATA LOSS BUG. It makes QTParted completely useless and untrustworthy. Something has got to be done! qtparted-bug.png Description: PNG image $ sudo fdisk -l /dev/hdb Disk /dev/hdb: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 232581 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdb1 * 1 20799104823817 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hdb2 20800 232576 106735608f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hdb5 47845 68643104823817 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hdb6 68643 9984915727603+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hdb7 99849 120647104823817 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hdb8 162260 22467131455238+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hdb9 224672 232576 3984088+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hdb10 20800 4784413630617 83 Linux /dev/hdb11 120648 16225920972416+ 83 Linux Partition table entries are not in disk order(parted) print Disk geometry for /dev/hdb: 0kB - 120GB Disk label type: msdos Number Start End SizeType File system Flags 1 32kB11GB11GBprimary ntfs boot 2 11GB120GB 109GB extended lba 10 11GB25GB14GBlogical fat32 5 25GB35GB11GBlogical ntfs 6 35GB52GB16GBlogical ntfs 7 52GB62GB11GBlogical ntfs 11 62GB84GB21GBlogical ext3 8 84GB116GB 32GBlogical ntfs 9 116GB 120GB 4080MB logical ntfs qtparted-knoppix.png Description: PNG image pgpJ0Hd7f8jkY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of icon 9.4.2-2.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 322972 + fixed Bug#322972: icon: ftbfs [sparc] Tests failed: ilib sorting table Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336582: phpbb2: New round of security issues
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:49 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
You didn't mention CVE-2005-3417. Is the version in sarge not vulnerable
to it? Or did you miss it? Or did you just didn't document this?
This has been fixed but indeed isn't documented in the changelog. The
fact is that CVE-2005-341{5,6,7} are all concentrated in one function,
that function has been fixed. Should we add that CVE id aswell and
rebuild or is that not necessary?
Since I've already moved the package into the security queue, we'll
only mention this cve name in the advisory. In the sid version, however,
please add the missing id to the changelog when you're doing the next
upload.
Regards,
Joey
--
A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems. Paul Erdös
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:42:40AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 22:15, Steve Langasek a écrit : On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not like to see enter testing at all. Current testing has an RC security bug. If those issues you mention are also RC, I suggest you document them in the BTS, since I didn't find any other RC issues in the tracker. If they are not, this version should progress in order to fix the RC security bug in testing that's absent in unstable. you are right on the full line, and I just did an upload of what I should have done way earlier and that was almost ready on my computer. thise one fixes a lot of bugs and use the update that upstream released a few day after I fixed the RC bug in a hurry. -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter etch in 10 days from now. If this fixes a release critical security bug, *why* are we treating it with urgency=low? I already did an upload with urgency low, either you can force it to be high, or I can reupload, as you want. Ok, urgency bumped. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#339263: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:47:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339263: fixed in sigcperl 0.2.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:57:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:57:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ebuko-0007Cb-Lk for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:57:19 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25651 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47E8F212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 29960-27 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:16 +0100 (MET) 13925 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:16 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6vGJP009294 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:16 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:16 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sigcperl Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339263-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 06:50:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 22:50:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EobH8-00078Q-6E; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:47:06 -0800 From: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#339263: fixed in sigcperl 0.2.0-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:47:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sigcperl Source-Version: 0.2.0-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sigcperl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsigcperl-dev_0.2.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sigcperl/libsigcperl-dev_0.2.0-4_i386.deb libsigcperl1c2a_0.2.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sigcperl/libsigcperl1c2a_0.2.0-4_i386.deb sigcperl_0.2.0-4.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sigcperl/sigcperl_0.2.0-4.diff.gz sigcperl_0.2.0-4.dsc to pool/main/s/sigcperl/sigcperl_0.2.0-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Koch
Processed: Re: Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unmerge 344046 Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure Disconnected #344046 from all other report(s). reassign 344046 make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `make'. severity 344046 serious Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Severity set to `serious'. block 344046 by 344041 Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 344041 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340079: insecure tempfiles
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:01:32PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 03:01:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:13:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: However I am not sure this is a security bug: The original script create a file named tempfile in the current directory, not int /tmp. Would you consider this script to have a security hole? #!/bin/sh cat $1 tempfile mv tempfile $2 Yes, because the tool may be run in an untrusted directory that can be written to by an attacker. Hello Steve, I have not received any answer from the security team. should I upload the package to unstable in the mean time ? (the unstable version is identical to the sarge version, so in principle a DSA address sarge, etch and sid at once). Under the circumstances, uploading a fix to unstable seems sensible. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#328170: Does --nowrapper help?
I'm having similar problems with apt-build from unstable. If I do not use
--nowrapper, I get segfaults in make like this:
checking dependency style of i486-linux-gnu-g++... ./configure: line 4135:
19100 Segmentation fault ${MAKE-make} -s -f confmf /dev/null 21
In this case, line 4135 looks like this, probably typical of a configure file:
for depmode in $am_compiler_list; do
As a result, when make tries to actually compile it, it segfaults too:
make all-recursive
make[1]: *** [all] Segmentation fault
But if I run apt-build with --nowrapper, it works fine.
There seem to be similar bugs in here, but I'm getting different errors.
Should I file a new bug, or is this it?
pgpyXNuEhOOXm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#341606: marked as done (cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:37:31 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341606: cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2005 17:05:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 01 09:05:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from p50896812.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.137.104.18] helo=localhost.localdomain) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhrsR-0004v7-N9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:05:48 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1BE1097A7; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:05:15 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:05:15 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cryptsetup Version: 20050111-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, cryptsetup depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01. It should be rebuild against libdevmapper1.02 (libdevmapper-dev (=1.02.00-1)). Thank you. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages cryptsetup depends on: ii dmsetup 2:1.02.00-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use ii libc62.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdevmapper1.01 2:1.01.05-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use ii libgcrypt11 1.2.2-1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libgpg-error01.1-4 library for common error values an ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters cryptsetup recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 341606-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 07:37:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 23:37:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eoc3w-0006SE-2L for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:37:32 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C1EE7002; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:37:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:37:31 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#341606: cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:56:05PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: if there are no objections, I will upload an NMU tomorrow for this bug (just a recompile, no changes). If it only requires a recompile, then this is better handled by the buildds with binNMUs; queued. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
