Bug#346002: apt: GPG error when updating
Michael Vogt wrote: You can run apt-get with --allow-unauthenticated or APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated=true in apt.conf Thanx for the hint, but this option just changed the error message. Now I get: W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs: 010908312D230C5F W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#344254: libfwbuilder6c2a: Fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2 [u]
Steve, Thank you, I've been swamped with work, consulting and newly re-married life so I've not had time to get to it. Thank you for doing this. I'll just incorporate them into the new upstream release packaging before I upload it. Regards, Jeremy Steve Langasek wrote: tags 344254 patch thanks Hi Jeremy, I've prepared an NMU for this bug, which will be uploaded shortly so that we can get a non-RC-buggy (i.e., c2a instead of c2) libfwbuilder into etch. The trivial patch against -3.1 is attached. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346352: texinfo: same problem reproduced/resolved
Package: texinfo Version: 4.8-3 Followup-For: Bug #346352 Had the same issue on my system, reporting just the for record. ## Error ## Setting up texinfo (4.8-3) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/texinfo.postinst: line 56: update_ls_files: command not found dpkg: error processing texinfo (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Setting up at (3.1.10) ... Starting deferred execution scheduler: atd. Errors were encountered while processing: texinfo E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ##End Error ## After changing 'update_ls_files' to 'update_lsr_files'. ## Fixed ## $ apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up texinfo (4.8-3) ... Running mktexlsr. This may take some time. ... done. ## End Fixed ## Thank you Giuseppe Sacco and Philipp Meier. --arky -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) Versions of packages texinfo depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii tetex-bin 3.0-13 The teTeX binary files ii tex-common0.14 Common infrastructure for using an texinfo recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333380: udev: Still broken
On Jan 08, M Jared Finder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With kernel 2.6.14, the nvidiafb was loaded, which screwed up on my GeForce 4 MX. nvidiafb should be blacklisted by default. It is supposed to be. Feel free to investigate why it's being loaded (I do not own any nvidia hardware). Also, please double check that you do not have an empty /etc/modprobe.conf file. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#346473: php5-clamavlib: not installable in sid
Package: php5-clamavlib Version: 0.12a-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, php5-clamavlib needs to be rebuilt with the current php5 version: # apt-get install php5-clamavlib Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: php5-clamavlib: Depends: phpapi-20041030 but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages php5-clamavlib depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.67 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libclamav10.87.1-1 virus scanner library ii php5-cgi 5.1.1-1server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php5-cli 5.1.1-1command-line interpreter for the p pn phpapi-20041030 none (no description available) php5-clamavlib recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346436: [DPKG] Fails to install package with UTF-8 filenames on any UTF-8 locale
severity important 346436 thanks On Κυριακή 08 Ιανουάριος 2006 08:34, Christian Perrier wrote: When using a UTF-8 locale, dpkg falls into some kind of endless loop and fails with a 'Cannot allocate memory' error (debug log of dpkg with when run thus: If the problem only happens with a package containing UTF-8 filenames, I'm not sure this deserves a serious severity but rather important. Hm, you're right, I somehow pressed '3' instead of '4' in reportbug :-) Of course, I'm not minimizing the problem I believe it would appear sooner or later anyway, regardless of the particular problem with my package. With UTF-8 gaining acceptance and being the default in etch, it's only a matter of time before other packages with more localized elements and UTF-8 filenames appearing. Let's say I acted as a lightning rod :-)
Bug#346474: libxml-sax-writer-perl: Dropped output when encoding to non utf8
Package: libxml-sax-writer-perl Version: 0.44-7 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss XML::SAX::Writer has an encoding feature which uses Text::Iconv to encode characters when writing them out to files. This is enabled by using the EncodeFrom/EncodeTo arguments to new(). Unfortunately it doesn't check the return code from the Text::Iconv::convert function, which can be undef. The result is that if Text::Iconv can't encode a character, this character (and potentially some characters around it) are dropped on the floor without an error message. An error can occur for instance if you have UTF8 input data and specify conversion to iso-8859-1, because not all UTF8 characters can be encoded in iso-8859-1. This is a serious bug because it can cause unnoticed data loss. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10n Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libxml-sax-writer-perl depends on: ii libtext-iconv-perl1.4-2 converts between character sets in ii libxml-filter-buffertext-perl 1.01-4 Perl module for putting all charac ii libxml-namespacesupport-perl 1.09-2 Perl module for supporting simple ii libxml-sax-perl 0.12-5 Perl module for using and building ii perl 5.8.7-9Larry Wall's Practical Extraction libxml-sax-writer-perl recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346485: freetype1: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `ftstring': No such file or directory
Package: freetype1
Version: 1.4pre.20050518-0.2
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package is failing to bulid with the following error:
cd debian/libttf2/usr/bin \
for i in ftdump ftlint ftstring fttimer ftview; do \
mv -f $i ${i}1; \
done
mv: cannot stat `ftstring': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat `fttimer': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat `ftview': No such file or directory
make: *** [install] Error 1
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346452: gajim: Log migration failed; Gajim won't start
At Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:39:38 +, Sam Morris wrote: Package: gajim Version: 0.9.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When launching Gajim after the upgrade to 0.9, I get a dialog saying that the log migration process failed, and that I should wait a few minutes for Gajim to start. FWIW, same thing happened to me, but after I started Gajim for a second time everything seemed fine. -- Yavor Doganov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346488: Unsatisfiable dependencies on release candidate architecture
Package: libxine-dev Version: 1.0.1-1.4 Severity: grave Tags: patch libxine-dev currently has Depends: libxine1 (= 1.0.1-1.4), libc6-dev, xlibs-dev, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libslang2-dev, libfreetype6-dev but there is no xlibs-dev package in sid anymore. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html for details. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (750, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- Obsig: developing a new sig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346490: bittornado-gui: btdownloadgui.bittornado causes Gdk-ERROR
Package: bittornado-gui Version: 0.3.11-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable this happens when trying to start btdownloadgui [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ btdownloadgui Gdk-ERROR **: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) serial 254 error_code 2 request_code 45 minor_code 0 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6 Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages bittornado-gui depends on: ii bittornado0.3.11-4 bittorrent client with enhanced cu ii libwxgtk2.4-python2.4.3.1wxWindows Cross-platform C++ GUI t ii python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346491: python2.3-dbus: Should be updated to work with dbus 0.60
Package: python2.3-dbus Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Since dbus 0.60 is now the default in unstable, it is impossible to use the python bindings. Please could this be fixed by an update? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-ck1 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298152: #298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64
[Martin Samuelsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 14:16PM Sunday Nov 6]: Would this patch do the trick? diff -ur checkinstall-1.5.3/checkinstall checkinstall-patched-1.5.3/checkinstall --- checkinstall-1.5.3/checkinstall 2005-11-06 14:03:59.302390154 +0100 +++ checkinstall-patched-1.5.3/checkinstall 2005-11-06 14:10:20.886160966 +0100 @@ -1146,8 +1146,8 @@ # Fix the PowerPC architecture description if we're on Debian - if [ $CK_DEBIAN = 1 ] [ $ARCHITECTURE = ppc ]; then - ARCHITECTURE=powerpc + if [ $CK_DEBIAN = 1 ] then + ARCHITECTURE=`dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH` fi That looks sane at first pass (although I dont have any amd64 to test on) However, I'm going to look over checkinstall 1.6.0. -- dopey!debian.org http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320363: Tagging/Merging
[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 23:11PM Saturday Aug 6]: Compatibility with Apache2 is sommething that upstream should fix, so I'm tagging the bug. Anyway, you might want to consider to fix this bug by conflicting with Apache2, if there's really no easy way to solve the problems with the new mod_perl. Right now, I'm thinking of uploading with a new description, stating that it doesn't work with Apache2. I welcome better suggestions, though. I think having a 'conflicts' wouldn't really work, and would just cause problems. -- dopey!debian.org http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346229: raggle exits with an undefined method error in draw_items
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi again, On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:03:36PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: I got this error in raggle : /usr/bin/raggle:2937:in `draw_items': undefined method `' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from /usr/bin/raggle:2933:in `draw_items' from /usr/bin/raggle:3526:in `populate_feed_win' from /usr/bin/raggle:4268:in `init' from /usr/bin/raggle:5611:in `main' from /usr/bin/raggle:6654 im still unable to reproduce this bug. Can you please send me the list of feeds youre reading (or even better, your ~/.raggle), this would help alot. Thanks. bye, - michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwRnkEFV7g4B8rCURAs5hAJ43qlIXABvt+TDxse5J+ItUz1rafwCeI7iL cLI/9duATFV18YpkjH6HOI4= =oS3L -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318808: A solution for isdnutils bug #318808
I found out that re-running aclocal/automake-1.8 in the directory capi20/ was enough to solve this bug. (Maybe it should happen in debian/rules like for the other directories?) -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337708: NMU to fix these bugs made to the 7 day delay queue
[Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 01:41AM Tuesday Jan 3]: I have just made an upload to the 7 day delay queue to fix these two bugs. This NMU can be overridden by a maintainer upload between now and then. The interdiff of the NMU is attached. Thanks Don! -- dopey!debian.org http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345914: xserver-xorg: Freeze on 82855PM, too
Package: xserver-xorg Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #345914 I'm using a IBM Thinkpad R50p and X freezes after the upgrade. It was not possible for me to track down this error, KDE starts normal and after some time the whole system hangs. I just had to start an application (mozilla or evolution) and it took 2 seconds to 2 minutes to freeze the system. There were no entries in the logfiles. $ lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82855PM Processor to I/O Controller (rev 03) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82855PM Processor to AGP Controller (rev 03) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 01) :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 01) :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 01) :00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-M) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 01) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev 81) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801DBM (ICH4-M) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 01) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801DBM (ICH4-M) IDE Controller (rev 01) :00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) SMBus Controller (rev 01) :00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01) :00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 01) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc M10 NT [FireGL Mobility T2] (rev 80) :02:00.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI4520 PC card Cardbus Controller (rev 01) :02:00.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI4520 PC card Cardbus Controller (rev 01) :02:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82540EP Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Mobile) (rev 03) :02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC (rev 01) Greetz, Andre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344401: a4 dimensions are wrong
Hi I'm also suffering with CUPS printing from Deer Park (1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-2) not working, with a paper size not supported error. It looks to me as if the dimensions for a4 are wrong. In the File - Print - Printer - Properties - Paper Size menu it lists iso-a4 (209x296 mm). Although the A paper sizes are not really exact numbers of milimetres (the ratio of their sides is sqrt(2)) the dimensions for a4 are normally rounded differently, to 210x297. I'm guessing that some other bit of the system is rejecting the 209x296 as not close enough. Where does the list of sizes in that menu come from? XPrint (I think that's what it is; the PrinterName@:64 entries in the Printer menu) has the same list of paper sizes, but they do work in this case. Unfortunately I get the wrong fonts when I use this, even when I print-to-file and view with ghostview. This is a pretty serious regression; I can't print web pages. Let me know if there is any further information I can provide. --Phil. p.s. Sorry for not checking the newest version; I wanted to browse the changelog, but packages.debian.org is down. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346352: texinfo: post installation script calls wrong function: update_ls_files
Package: texinfo Version: 4.8-3 Followup-For: Bug #346352 Should call update_lsr_functions in line 56 instead. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc7 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages texinfo depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 The teTeX binary files texinfo recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346506: libvtk4-dev: Should not depend on xlibs-dev
Package: libvtk4-dev Version: 4.4.2-8 Severity: serious The package wrongly depends on xlibs-dev, which has been removed, cf: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html Packages depending on libvtk4-dev are now FTBFS, like octaviz: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=octaviz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libvtk4-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev2.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libvtk4c24.4.2-8 Visualization Toolkit - A high lev ii xlibmesa-gl-dev [libgl-d 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 Mesa 3D graphics library developme ii xlibmesa-glu-dev [libglu 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Mesa OpenGL utility library develo ii xlibs-dev4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System client library dev libvtk4-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346508: ktimetrace: missing dependency
Package: ktimetrace Version: 0.2.36-4.1+b1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 0.0 dependencies must be listed Hi, here is the problem: $ /usr/bin/ktimetrace /usr/bin/ktimetrace: error while loading shared libraries: libcomedi-0.7.22.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Installing libcomedi0 fixes the problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages ktimetrace depends on: ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.0-3 core libraries for all KDE applica ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio2 1.7-3 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.1-0exp6GCC support library ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg62 6b-11 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.5-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++64.1-0exp6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi66.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System Input extension li ii libxinerama1 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System multi-head display ii libxrandr26.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0.2-1X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt66.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime ktimetrace recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170795: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:05:59PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: I have no idea what the resolution would be, but this should IMHO be fixed in stable; onsgmls is rather broken as long as it can't read properly from a line-buffered pipe. :-) I've debugged this a bit, even though I have a hard time grokking opensp's insanely complex input layer (stdio or iostreams was obviously too standard). The bug seems to manifest itself if and only if a tag spans two read() buffers, like this imaginary strace fragment: read(0, (data here)span, 4096) = 4096 read(0, /span(more data), 4096) = 512 This explains the different behaviour with regard to stdin redirection, pipes etc. -- opensp simply uses different block sizes in those cases (4kB vs. 8kB vs. 32kB, AFAICS). You're right in that 1.5.2 fixes the problem, but it might be by accident -- if I compile it on sarge it works, but if I drop --disable-dtddecl the bug is back again. FWIW, I've run it through valgrind, but can't find any errors. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333380: udev: Still broken
Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jan 08, M Jared Finder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With kernel 2.6.14, the nvidiafb was loaded, which screwed up on my GeForce 4 MX. nvidiafb should be blacklisted by default. It is supposed to be. Feel free to investigate why it's being loaded (I do not own any nvidia hardware). Also, please double check that you do not have an empty /etc/modprobe.conf file. Ah, I didn't realize that was a problem (it wasn't mentioned anywhere /usr/share/doc/). After removing /etc/modprobe.conf, everything works fine. Shouldn't the effects of having an empty modprobe.conf be documented *somewhere*? -- MJF The following is the search I did: -*- mode: grep; default-directory: /usr/share/doc/ -*- Grep started at Sun Jan 8 07:26:27 find . -path '*/CVS' -prune -o -type f -name '*' -print0 | xargs -0 -e grep -i -nH -e modprobe ./bash/examples/complete/complete.ianmac:212:complete -F _insmod insmod depmod modprobe ./klogd/modutils.patch:1:diff -u --new-file --recursive base/modules-2.0.0/depmod/modprobe.c ./modules-2.0.0/depmod/modprobe.c ./klogd/modutils.patch:2:--- base/modules-2.0.0/depmod/modprobe.c Mon Jun 10 05:29:08 1996 ./klogd/modutils.patch:3:+++ ./modules-2.0.0/depmod/modprobe.c Thu Aug 29 09:58:01 1996 ./iptables/html/packet-filtering-HOWTO-7.html:749:# modprobe iptable_filter ./iptables/html/packet-filtering-HOWTO-7.html:750:# modprobe ip_queue ./iptables/html/NAT-HOWTO-4.html:74:modprobe iptable_nat ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:1:# /etc/modprobe.devfs: ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:52:install /dev/cdroms /sbin/modprobe scsi_hostadapter; /sbin/modprobe sr_mod; /sbin/modprobe ide-probe-mod; /sbin/modprobe ide-cd; /sbin/modprobe cdrom; /bin/true ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:53:install /dev/discs /sbin/modprobe scsi_hostadapter; /sbin/modprobe sd_mod; /sbin/modprobe ide-probe-mod; /sbin/modprobe ide-disk; /sbin/modprobe ide-floppy; /sbin/modprobe DAC960; /bin/true ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:54:install /dev/ide /sbin/modprobe ide-probe-mod; /sbin/modprobe ide-disk; /sbin/modprobe ide-cd; /sbin/modprobe ide-tape; /sbin/modprobe ide-floppy; /bin/true ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:55:install /dev/scsi /sbin/modprobe scsi_hostadapter; /sbin/modprobe sd_mod; /sbin/modprobe sr_mod; /sbin/modprobe st; /sbin/modprobe sg; /bin/true ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:56:install /dev/sd /sbin/modprobe scsi_hostadapter; /sbin/modprobe sd_mod; /bin/true ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:57:install /dev/sg /sbin/modprobe scsi_hostadapter; /sbin/modprobe sg; /bin/true ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:58:install /dev/sr /sbin/modprobe scsi_hostadapter; /sbin/modprobe sr_mod; /bin/true ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:59:install /dev/st /sbin/modprobe scsi_hostadapter; /sbin/modprobe st; /bin/true ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:60:install /dev/tapes /sbin/modprobe scsi_hostadapter; /sbin/modprobe st; /sbin/modprobe ide-probe-mod; /sbin/modprobe ide-tape; /bin/true ./module-init-tools/examples/modprobe.devfs:62:include /etc/modprobe.conf Binary file ./module-init-tools/examples/generate-modprobe.conf.gz matches ./module-init-tools/TODO:7:DONE: Modprobe0) Implement modprobe -c (for RH install scripts). ./module-init-tools/TODO:8:DONE: Modprobe5) Implement modules.conf - modprobe.conf translator ./module-init-tools/TODO:12:DONE: Modprobe1) Release 0.8 ./module-init-tools/TODO:13:Requires Andi1, oprofile1, depmod1, depmod2, Modprobe0, Petr1, Petr2 ./module-init-tools/TODO:32:Modprobe2) Implement options in modprobe.conf ./module-init-tools/TODO:33:Modprobe3) Implement install in modprobe.conf ./module-init-tools/TODO:34:Modprobe4) Release 0.9 ./module-init-tools/TODO:35:Requires Modprobe2 and Modprobe3 ./module-init-tools/TODO:49:Modprobe6) Release 0.10 ./module-init-tools/TODO:53:Requires Modprobe1 ./module-init-tools/TODO:55:Modprobe7) Restore symbol: support. ./module-init-tools/TODO:57:Modprobe8) Restore .modalias support ./module-init-tools/TODO:65:Requires Rth0, Rth1, Rth2, Rth3, Rth4, Modprobe6 ./module-init-tools/FAQ:17:A) Do you have an /etc/modprobe.conf? If not, use ./module-init-tools/FAQ:18: generate-modprobe.conf to generate an /etc/modprobe.conf from your ./module-init-tools/FAQ:23: /etc/modprobe.conf: the ALSA sound system seems to want this. ./NVIDIA_GLX-1.0/README.txt:787: explicitly with `modprobe nvidia`. If unresolved symbols are reported, then ./NVIDIA_GLX-1.0/README.txt:797: Old versions of the module-init-tools include `modprobe` binaries that ./NVIDIA_GLX-1.0/README.txt:802: The X server reads '/proc/sys/kernel/modprobe' to determine the path to the ./NVIDIA_GLX-1.0/README.txt:803: `modprobe` utility and falls back to '/sbin/modprobe' if the file doesn't ./NVIDIA_GLX-1.0/README.txt:804: exist. Please make sure that this path is valid and refers to a `modprobe`
Bug#346509: moodle: AdoDB security bug, as distributed with Moodle
Package: moodle Version: 1.5.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole There is a know security bug in the AdoDB libraries distributed as part of Moodle, in the 1.5.x series at least. This has been fixed in the 1.5.3+ release as of 2006.01.06, as can be seen here: http://security.moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=210 Saludos. Iñaki. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages moodle depends on: ii apache [httpd]1.3.33-6sarge1 versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii mimetex 1.50-1 LaTeX math expressions to anti-ali ii php4 4:4.3.10-16server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-gd 4:4.3.10-16GD module for php4 ii php4-mysql4:4.3.10-16MySQL module for php4 ii wget 1.9.1-12 retrieves files from the web ii wwwconfig-common 0.0.43 Debian web auto configuration -- debconf information excluded
Bug#333380: udev: Still broken
On Jan 08, M Jared Finder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shouldn't the effects of having an empty modprobe.conf be documented *somewhere*? Like in the man page and in the warning you get at every boot from the init script? -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#346509: moodle: AdoDB security bug, as distributed with Moodle
On Sunday, 8 January 2006 16:44, Inaki Arenaza wrote: Package: moodle Version: 1.5.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole There is a know security bug in the AdoDB libraries distributed as part of Moodle, in the 1.5.x series at least. This has been fixed in the 1.5.3+ release as of 2006.01.06, as can be seen here: http://security.moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=210 Thank you, Iñaki. I'll fix it ASAP. Best regards -- Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpHIQqHHEH9v.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#345244: new packages
The bugs have been solved for some time now (since debconf-es 2), but they are waiting for a sponsor to look at them and upload them. They will probably be uploaded when sometime has time for them. Meantime, I have put them temporarily available at: http://baby.yi.org/packages/kronos/ Greetings, Miry __ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y moviles desde 1 centimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 346118 serious Bug#346118: glabels crashes when print is pressed Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346522: Does not recognize AM_CONDITIONALs in auxiliary file
Package: automake1.9 Version: 1.9.6-1 Severity: serious When I run Automake in the autogen package, it complains that DO_SHELL_CMDS and HAVE_XML_LIB do not appear in AM_CONDITIONALs. They do, but in config/ag_macros.m4, which is included by Autoconf because configure.in invokes AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(config). Automake should check for AM_CONDITIONALs in the auxiliary file. This bug is serious because it prevents the autogen package from building. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#333380: udev: Still broken
Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jan 08, M Jared Finder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shouldn't the effects of having an empty modprobe.conf be documented *somewhere*? Like in the man page and in the warning you get at every boot from the init script? Boy, am I embaressed. Yeah, that seems like a good place. Smart people would notice it. -- MJF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344400: marked as done (cinepaint: uninstallable due to non-binNMU-safe dependency on cinepaint-data)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:02:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344400: fixed in cinepaint 0.20-1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 13:43:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 05:43:24 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62]
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpQj5-0003nh-Vo
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:43:24 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1EpQj3-0003X9-46
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:43:21 +0100
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:43:21 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cinepaint: uninstallable due to non-binNMU-safe dependency on
cinepaint-data
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: cinepaint
Version: 0.19-1-2
Severity: grave
Hello,
0.19-1-2 was binNMUed for some library transition transition, but this
resulted in uninstallables packages due to the package Depending:
cinepaint-data (= ${Source-Version}).
A no source-changes upload should be enough to fix this bug, thanks in
advance.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Military justice is to justice what military music is to music.
-- Groucho Marx
---
Received: (at 344400-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 17:10:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 09:10:54 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evdvp-00037n-1j; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:02:13 -0800
From: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#344400: fixed in cinepaint 0.20-1-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:02:13 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: cinepaint
Source-Version: 0.20-1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cinepaint, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cinepaint-data_0.20-1-1_all.deb
to pool/main/c/cinepaint/cinepaint-data_0.20-1-1_all.deb
cinepaint_0.20-1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/cinepaint/cinepaint_0.20-1-1.diff.gz
cinepaint_0.20-1-1.dsc
to pool/main/c/cinepaint/cinepaint_0.20-1-1.dsc
cinepaint_0.20-1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/cinepaint/cinepaint_0.20-1-1_i386.deb
cinepaint_0.20-1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cinepaint/cinepaint_0.20-1.orig.tar.gz
libcinepaint-dev_0.20-1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/cinepaint/libcinepaint-dev_0.20-1-1_i386.deb
libcinepaint0_0.20-1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/cinepaint/libcinepaint0_0.20-1-1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cinepaint package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:27:10 +1100
Source: cinepaint
Binary: libcinepaint-dev libcinepaint0 cinepaint-data cinepaint
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.20-1-1
Distribution:
Bug#346526: FTBFS: undefined reference to `png_write_finish_row'
Package: povray-3.5 Version: 3.5.0c-10 Severity: serious Justification: package must BFS Hi, the current Debian binaty has this problem: $ ldd -r /usr/bin/povray-3.5 linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000) libpvm3.so.3 = /usr/lib/libpvm3.so.3 (0x41fcf000) libvgagl.so.1 = /usr/lib/libvgagl.so.1 (0x41ffa000) libvga.so.1 = /usr/lib/libvga.so.1 (0x43f81000) libtiff.so.4 = /usr/lib/libtiff.so.4 (0x4331c000) libjpeg.so.62 = /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x421d4000) symbol png_write_finish_row, version PNG12_0 not defined in file libpng12.so.0 with link time reference (/usr/bin/povray-3.5) libpng12.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x420d6000) libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x41eb9000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7df4000) libstdc++.so.5 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x43377000) libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0x41e8b000) libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7de9000) libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x41d53000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0x41eb3000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x41d3a000) So I tried to rebuild povray-3.5 from source: $ fakeroot apt-get -b source povray-3.5 [...] i486-linux-gnu-g++ -g -Wall -Wno-multichar -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i486 -mcpu=i686 -minline-all-stringops -malign-double -o povray atmosph.o bbox.o bcyl.o benchmark.o bezier.o blob.o boxes.o bsphere.o camera.o chi2.o colour.o colutils.o cones.o csg.o discs.o express.o file_pov.o fncode.o fnintern.o fnpovfpu.o fnsyntax.o fpmetric.o fractal.o function.o gif.o gifdecod.o hcmplx.o hfield.o histogra.o iff.o image.o interior.o isosurf.o jpeg_pov.o lathe.o lbuffer.o lightgrp.o lighting.o matrices.o media.o mesh.o normal.o objects.o octree.o optin.o optout.o parse.o parsestr.o parstxtr.o pattern.o pgm.o photons.o pigment.o planes.o png_pov.o point.o poly.o polygon.o polysolv.o pov_mem.o povms.o povmscpp.o povmsend.o povmsrec.o povray.o pov_util.o ppm.o prism.o pvm.o quadrics.o quatern.o rad_data.o radiosit.o ray.o render.o renderio.o sor.o spheres.o sphsweep.o splines.o statspov.o super.o targa.o texture.o tiff_pov.o tokenize.o torus.o triangle.o truetype.o txttest.o userdisp.o userio.o vbuffer.o vlbuffer.o warps.o unix.o povxlib.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lpvm3 -lvgagl -lvga -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lm -lX11 png_pov.o: In function `~PNG_Image':/home/bonnaud/povray-3.5-3.5.0c/src/png_pov.cpp:999: undefined reference to `png_write_finish_row' :/home/bonnaud/povray-3.5-3.5.0c/src/png_pov.cpp:999: undefined reference to `png_write_finish_row' :/home/bonnaud/povray-3.5-3.5.0c/src/png_pov.cpp:999: undefined reference to `png_write_finish_row' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [povray] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/bonnaud/povray-3.5-3.5.0c/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bonnaud/povray-3.5-3.5.0c/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bonnaud/povray-3.5-3.5.0c' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Build command 'cd povray-3.5-3.5.0c dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc' failed. E: Child process failed BTW, version 3.6 is out. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages povray-3.5 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.1-0exp6GCC support library ii libjpeg62 6b-11 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libpvm3 3.4.5-5Parallel Virtual Machine - shared ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libsvga1 1:1.4.3-22 console SVGA display libraries ii libtiff4 3.7.4-1Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System protocol client li ii xlibs 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime Versions of packages povray-3.5 recommends: ii povray-3.5-includes 3.5.0c-10 Persistance of vision raytracer (3 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345868: Build-depends on package not in testing
First off, I have no interest in freecdb. I am not actively using software that uses it, and have no time to improve it. Feel free to do what you want. If you are too stuck with bureaucracy not to do that until I've formally orphaned the package, please hold your breath and wait. Gerrit Pape wrote: The real author (not the current maintainer) doesn't consider this cdb implementation (the first and original one) dead AFAICS. This tiny library is excellent software from the public domain, rock-solid and bug-free for years. Hah. freecdb is not the same as djb's cdb. I am (/was) the upstream for freecdb. Freecdb is a fork. djb's cdb package is non-free, with parts of it public domain -- or atleast they used to be, don't know what has happened since. Freecdb is those public domain bits and then some. djb's cdb package has evolved since then, it even changed API. Freecdb has not had any new development happen on it since it was initially created. It is stuck with cdb-0.55 API, while djb's cdb is at 0.75 with a totally different API. Any program written to the API in freecdb won't even work with latest cdb. Freecdb is dead. The old cdb API is dead. Dead dead dead. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346118: marked as done (glabels crashes when print is pressed)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:17:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346118: fixed in glabels 2.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2006 19:13:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 05 11:13:52 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [129.130.40.15] (helo=minion.eece.ksu.edu) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EuaYa-0001Is-FP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:13:52 -0800 Received: from elmo.eece.ksu.edu ([129.130.40.208]) by minion.eece.ksu.edu (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k05JBxw3008583; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 13:11:59 -0600 Received: from khc by elmo.eece.ksu.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EuaZu-0005OX-00; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:15:14 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kenneth H. Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: glabels crashes when print is pressed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:15:13 -0600 Sender: Kenneth H. Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on minion.eece.ksu.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: glabels Version: 2.1.1-3 Severity: important Whenever print is selected, glabels crashes, and opens a pop-up window asking if you want to close or restart. This makes it impossible to print any labels, although I can save the glabels file and copy it to a computer running a year-old debian setup, load it into glabels there and print. Here is the set of error messages printed on the controlling console: glabels ** (glabels:20725): WARNING **: Owner of /tmp/orbit-khcnet is not the current user ** (glabels:20725): CRITICAL **: file gtk-combo-box.c: line 759 (gtk_combo_box_new): assertion `display_widget != NULL' failed (glabels:20725): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_box_pack_start: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (child)' failed ** (gnome_segv:20733): WARNING **: Owner of /tmp/orbit-khcnet is not the current user -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages glabels depends on: ii glabels-data 2.1.1-3data files for gLabels ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.10.2-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-02.10.3-3 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.10.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libxml2 2.6.22-2 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime glabels recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 346118-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 17:20:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 09:20:45 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EveAH-0008FT-1y; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:17:09 -0800 From: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346118: fixed in glabels
Bug#346533: abiword is unistallable in testing
Package: abiword Version: 2.4.1-2.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** abiword is not installable because it depends on libenchant1c2 which is no longer in testing. Please recompile it with libenchant1c2a. Thank you. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170795: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1
On Jan 8, Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:05:59PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: I have no idea what the resolution would be, but this should IMHO be fixed in stable; onsgmls is rather broken as long as it can't read properly from a line-buffered pipe. :-) I've debugged this a bit, even though I have a hard time grokking opensp's insanely complex input layer (stdio or iostreams was obviously too standard). The bug seems to manifest itself if and only if a tag spans two read() buffers, like this imaginary strace fragment: read(0, (data here)span, 4096) = 4096 read(0, /span(more data), 4096) = 512 This explains the different behaviour with regard to stdin redirection, pipes etc. -- opensp simply uses different block sizes in those cases (4kB vs. 8kB vs. 32kB, AFAICS). You're right in that 1.5.2 fixes the problem, but it might be by accident -- if I compile it on sarge it works, but if I drop --disable-dtddecl the bug is back again. FWIW, I've run it through valgrind, but can't find any errors. Thanks for digging into this and finding that the bug still exists if --disable-dtddecl is dropped. I'll also keep looking into it and see what I can find. As for the insanely complex input layer and standard - this code was probably written a decade ago, so my guess is that what is standard now might not even have existed in most C++ compilers back then. :-) -- Neil Roeth -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 336194 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 336194 grave Bug#336194: inetutils-ftp: ftp segfaults every time Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346509: marked as done (moodle: AdoDB security bug, as distributed with Moodle)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:33:31 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346509: fixed in moodle 1.5.3+20060108-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 15:44:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 07:44:48 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx.eteo.mondragon.edu ([193.146.78.131]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evciu-sq-Ia for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:44:48 -0800 Received: by mx.eteo.mondragon.edu (Postfix, from userid 0) id 080BCB6A3; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:44:43 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Inaki Arenaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: moodle: AdoDB security bug, as distributed with Moodle X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:44:43 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: moodle Version: 1.5.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole There is a know security bug in the AdoDB libraries distributed as part of Moodle, in the 1.5.x series at least. This has been fixed in the 1.5.3+ release as of 2006.01.06, as can be seen here: http://security.moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=3D210 Saludos. I=F1aki. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.10 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages moodle depends on: ii apache [httpd]1.3.33-6sarge1 versatile, high-performance = HTTP s ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration managem= ent sy ii mimetex 1.50-1 LaTeX math expressions to an= ti-ali ii php4 4:4.3.10-16server-side, HTML-embedded s= cripti ii php4-gd 4:4.3.10-16GD module for php4 ii php4-mysql4:4.3.10-16MySQL module for php4 ii wget 1.9.1-12 retrieves files from the web ii wwwconfig-common 0.0.43 Debian web auto configuratio= n -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 346509-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 17:41:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 09:41:16 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EveQ7-0001Bv-Id; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:33:31 -0800 From: Isaac Clerencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346509: fixed in moodle 1.5.3+20060108-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:33:31 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: moodle Source-Version: 1.5.3+20060108-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of moodle, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: moodle_1.5.3+20060108-1.diff.gz to pool/main/m/moodle/moodle_1.5.3+20060108-1.diff.gz moodle_1.5.3+20060108-1.dsc to pool/main/m/moodle/moodle_1.5.3+20060108-1.dsc moodle_1.5.3+20060108-1_all.deb to pool/main/m/moodle/moodle_1.5.3+20060108-1_all.deb moodle_1.5.3+20060108.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/m/moodle/moodle_1.5.3+20060108.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Isaac Clerencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated moodle package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bug#319713: Broken build, needs gtk+ 2.6 AND libglade 2.5
Hello Steve, On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:07:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Does this bug actually apply to unstable or testing, where we do have both gtk+ 2.6 and libglade 2.5? Is anything required here other than a rebuild against current unstable? (Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation and just returned) I definitly applies to stable and it probably applies to unstable as well. According to upstream[1], a rebuild (against current unstable) should be sufficient. If you want, I can check this in the next days. Its a pitty that the prospective maintainer for this nice programm went MIA. Greetings A happy new year Helge [1] Who was very responive, so if there should be any (additional) trouble, I think this can be worked out with him quickly. -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ pgp96nIZZT2n7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#345914: xserver-xorg: Freeze on 82855PM, too
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 the mental interface of Andre Timmermann told: Package: xserver-xorg Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 Followup-For: Bug #345914 Starting X freezes my PowerBook5,6 (radeon) completely. No net, no console. So I had to hard reset the machine. I tried the following: Recreating a xorg.conf by dpkg-reconfigure - no success Switching from ati(radeon) driver to fbdev - no success, but no freeze. Switching from 24 to 16 DefaultDepth + fbdev - no success, X shows the wm splashscreen with an cross cursor similar to the twm one but shuts down after a while. This might be considerable with a broken libpango at ppc, I am not sure yet. Installing libgl1-mesa-dri in the hope r300 is used with radeon driver - frozen machine. Elimar -- Talking much about oneself can also be a means to conceal oneself. -Friedrich Nietzsche pgpOH4Con7Nup.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of zipios++ 0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07-3.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 339280 + fixed Bug#339280: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of unicon 3.0.4-9.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 335955 + fixed Bug#335955: unicon: Please undergo g++-4.0 'c2' C++ ABI transition Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: libvtk4-dev: Should not depend on xlibs-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 346506 vtk Bug#346506: libvtk4-dev: Should not depend on xlibs-dev Bug reassigned from package `libvtk4-dev' to `vtk'. merge 346505 346506 Bug#346505: vtk FTBFS due to dependency on xlibs-dev Bug#346506: libvtk4-dev: Should not depend on xlibs-dev Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `severity' don't match: #346505 has `important'; #346506 has `serious' stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of sp-gxmlcpp 1.0.20040603-1.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 346172 + fixed Bug#346172: Package needs rename for C++ transition! Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170795: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:46:37PM -0500, Neil Roeth wrote: Thanks for digging into this and finding that the bug still exists if --disable-dtddecl is dropped. I'll also keep looking into it and see what I can find. I looked a bit further into it before I had to let it go due to lack of time; the damage (whatever it is) happens when the very first DTD is attempted parsed, in the init phase, in doInit() very early on (in the error-checking if, it seems). HTH :-) As for the insanely complex input layer and standard - this code was probably written a decade ago, so my guess is that what is standard now might not even have existed in most C++ compilers back then. :-) Yes, I saw that -- but they're still using templates for their own string class, so they can't have been _that_ much pre-STL :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: libvtk4-dev: Should not depend on xlibs-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 346505 serious Bug#346505: vtk FTBFS due to dependency on xlibs-dev Severity set to `serious'. merge 346505 346506 Bug#346505: vtk FTBFS due to dependency on xlibs-dev Bug#346506: libvtk4-dev: Should not depend on xlibs-dev Merged 346505 346506. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339259: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:01:52 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339259: fixed in rlog 1.3.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:57:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:57:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ebukk-0007Bl-MU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:57:15 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25627 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95858F212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 29883-27 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:12 +0100 (MET) 13925 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:12 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6vCgU009280 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:12 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:12 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: rlog Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339259-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 18:11:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 10:11:13 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EverY-00054H-Lg; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:01:52 -0800 From: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#339259: fixed in rlog 1.3.7-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:01:52 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: rlog Source-Version: 1.3.7-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rlog, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: librlog-dev_1.3.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rlog/librlog-dev_1.3.7-1_i386.deb librlog1c2a_1.3.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rlog/librlog1c2a_1.3.7-1_i386.deb rlog_1.3.7-1.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rlog/rlog_1.3.7-1.diff.gz rlog_1.3.7-1.dsc to pool/main/r/rlog/rlog_1.3.7-1.dsc rlog_1.3.7.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/r/rlog/rlog_1.3.7.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Eduard Bloch
Bug#339279: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:05:38 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339279: fixed in xalan 1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:57:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:57:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ebul4-0007Gn-Qj for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:57:35 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25737 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9FDF212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 29850-29 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:32 +0100 (MET) 13923 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:32 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6vWUi009359 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:32 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:32 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xalan Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339279-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 18:11:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 10:11:08 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvevC-0007Wu-Fv; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:05:38 -0800 From: Berin Lautenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#339279: fixed in xalan 1.10-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:05:38 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: xalan Source-Version: 1.10-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xalan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libapache-mod-xslt_1.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/libapache-mod-xslt_1.10-1_i386.deb libxalan110-dev_1.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/libxalan110-dev_1.10-1_i386.deb libxalan110-doc_1.10-1_all.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/libxalan110-doc_1.10-1_all.deb libxalan110_1.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/libxalan110_1.10-1_i386.deb xalan_1.10-1.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xalan/xalan_1.10-1.diff.gz xalan_1.10-1.dsc to pool/main/x/xalan/xalan_1.10-1.dsc xalan_1.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/xalan_1.10-1_i386.deb xalan_1.10.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/x/xalan/xalan_1.10.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and
Bug#339396: marked as done (please package xalan 1.10 depending upon xerces27)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:05:38 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339396: fixed in xalan 1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 00:30:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 15 16:30:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from eastrmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.240.37]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcBCF-0005ed-Uo for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:30:44 -0800 Received: from glerbl ([70.174.166.65]) by eastrmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:29:16 -0500 Received: from soup ([10.160.59.17]) by glerbl with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcBBk-000244-7B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:30:12 -0500 Received: from ejb by soup with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EcBBk-00033P-6w; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:30:12 -0500 From: Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: please package xalan 1.10 depending upon xerces27 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:30:12 -0500 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xalan Severity: important Hello again. xerces27 is now in the archive and built on all architectures except arm (which should be done momentarily as status is Building as I write this). It is therefore time to take care of packaging the current version of xalan, which is known to work with xerces 2.7.0. You may as well wait to do this until the C++ ABI change is ready so you can just upload a new ABI version and not have to bother with c2 or c2a. Sometime after that issue is resolved, you can upload the new xalan, and I will request removal of xerces25. I won't request removal of xerces25 until the C++ ABI version is resolved so you don't have to upload that library twice and go through a needless name change. Thanks! --Jay --- Received: (at 339396-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 18:10:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 10:10:55 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvevC-0007Wx-Gv; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:05:38 -0800 From: Berin Lautenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#339396: fixed in xalan 1.10-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:05:38 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xalan Source-Version: 1.10-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xalan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libapache-mod-xslt_1.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/libapache-mod-xslt_1.10-1_i386.deb libxalan110-dev_1.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/libxalan110-dev_1.10-1_i386.deb libxalan110-doc_1.10-1_all.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/libxalan110-doc_1.10-1_all.deb libxalan110_1.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/libxalan110_1.10-1_i386.deb xalan_1.10-1.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xalan/xalan_1.10-1.diff.gz xalan_1.10-1.dsc to pool/main/x/xalan/xalan_1.10-1.dsc xalan_1.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xalan/xalan_1.10-1_i386.deb xalan_1.10.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/x/xalan/xalan_1.10.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Berin Lautenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xalan package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that
Processed: severity of 340862 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 severity 340862 grave Bug#340862: anjuta segfault Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merging 340862 343998
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 merge 340862 343998 Bug#340862: anjuta segfault Bug#343998: Anjuta 1.2.4-1+b1 crashes when anjuta is launched Merged 340862 343998. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344089: marked as done (initscripts postinst calls mountvirtfs unconditionally)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:58:55 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug in experimental fixed in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 23:02:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 15:02:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 219-75-232-131.eonet.ne.jp ([219.75.232.131] helo=viper2.netfort.gr.jp) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EoU1i-00012l-Iq for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:42 -0800 Received: (qmail 4826 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2005 23:02:41 - Received: from unknown (HELO dancer64.netfort.gr.jp.netfort.gr.jp) (127.0.0.1) by viper2.netfort.gr.jp with SMTP; 19 Dec 2005 23:02:41 - Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:02:41 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: testsuite failure with experimental upgrade X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - Maruoka) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pbuilder Version: 0.142 pbuilder-update-sarge-etch-sid-experimental.log failed because /var/cache/pbuilder/build/19262/proc/bus/usb was mounted. Upgrading to experimental fails apparently because upgrade seems to mount /proc/bus/usb, unconditionally. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project --- Received: (at 344089-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 18:58:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 10:58:59 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-out1.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.176]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evfko-00078p-RX; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:58:59 -0800 Received: from [82.171.132.56] (helo=82-171-132-56.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl) by smtp-out1.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl) id 1Evfko-0007HS-7N; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:58:58 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 82-171-132-56.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D99BFEA6; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:58:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:58:55 +0100 From: Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug in experimental fixed in experimental X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 This bug reported as occurring in an experimental version of sysvinit and as fixed in a later experimental version of sysvinit is closed with this message. sysvinit (2.86.ds1-9) experimental; urgency=low [ Thomas Hood ] * Split mountdevsubfs out of mountvirtfs and run it at S04 and S37. This should not behave any differently, but the split will allow packages that futz with /dev to do this at S03. * mountnfs.sh: Eliminate unnecessary use of subshell * umountfs: Only run umount if there is something to unmount (Closes: #345272) * urandom: Set PATH so that find can be found (Closes: #345273) * bootclean.sh: Improve, homogenize file deletion code * init: 64_init_set_PATH.dpatch: Set PATH if it's unset on re-exec (Closes: #345370) * init: 65_init_u_in_06.dpatch: Allow 'telinit u' in runlevels 0, 6 (Closes: #345719) * umountroot: Remount ro with -f on GNU/kFreeBSD (Closes: #344547) * checkroot.sh, checkfs.sh: Pause for five seconds if sulogin fails (Partially addresses: #337444) * Include /var/log/fsck/
Processed: severity of 340862 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 340862 grave Bug#340862: anjuta segfault Bug#343998: Anjuta 1.2.4-1+b1 crashes when anjuta is launched Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merging 343998 340862
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 merge 343998 340862 Bug#340862: anjuta segfault Bug#343998: Anjuta 1.2.4-1+b1 crashes when anjuta is launched Merged 340862 343998. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#346452: gajim: Log migration failed; Gajim won't start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 346452 important Bug#346452: gajim: Log migration failed; Gajim won't start Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346452: gajim: Log migration failed; Gajim won't start
severity 346452 important thanks Excellent observation, this bug doesn't make Gajim unusable so downgrading. -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/ PGP key id 5EA01078 3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328037: FTBFS: No rule to make target linux-gnu-i386
Hi, thanks for maintaining this package. The FTBFS is due to changed behavior of dpkg-architecture. I've attached a patch against debian/rules which changes DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM to DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS and DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU to DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU. However 5.0.1 will still FTBFS, but the newer upstream version (5.3.0) [1] will compile (with the patched rules). Please also note that new version suggests g++-3.4 or later compared to current version. Cheers, Stefan. [1]: http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~usystem/pub/uSystem/u++-5.3.0.tar.gz --- debian/rules.orig 2006-01-08 20:25:28.0 +0100 +++ debian/rules 2006-01-08 20:25:53.0 +0100 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ export DH_COMPAT=4 -export DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM) -export DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU) +export DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS) +export DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU) INSTALLATION_DIRS = INSTALLBINDIR=/usr/bin \ INSTALLLIBDIR=/usr/lib/u++ \ @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ binary: binary-arch binary-indep -ifeq ($(findstring $(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU),$(BINARY_ARCHES)),) +ifeq ($(findstring $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU),$(BINARY_ARCHES)),) install-arch: @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ build-arch-stamp: dh_testdir - $(MAKE) $(INSTALLATION_DIRS) $(DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM)-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU) + $(MAKE) $(INSTALLATION_DIRS) $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS)-$(DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU) $(MAKE) $(MAKE) -C doc/man @@ -108,12 +108,7 @@ build-indep-stamp: dh_testdir -ifeq ($(findstring $(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU),$(BINARY_ARCHES)),) - # choice of cpu is unimportant, but it must be a cpu that u++ supports - $(MAKE) $(INSTALLATION_DIRS) $(DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM)-i386 -else - $(MAKE) $(INSTALLATION_DIRS) $(DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM)-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU) -endif + $(MAKE) $(INSTALLATION_DIRS) $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS)-$(DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU) $(MAKE) -C doc/refman touch build-indep-stamp pgpRyoCKkqAs3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#346352: marked as done (texinfo: cannot install: update_ls_files not found)
Your message dated Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:09:11 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346352: texinfo: cannot install: update_ls_files not found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2006 10:07:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 07 02:07:23 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it ([212.216.176.118]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvAyo-0005op-Qs for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 02:07:23 -0800 Received: from casa (87.0.208.45) by vsmtp14.tin.it (7.2.060.1) (authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 43B2697C0053965A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 11:06:55 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=eppesuigoccas.homedns.org) by casa with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvAyH-00023z-0L; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 11:06:49 +0100 Received: from 192.168.2.51 (SquirrelMail authenticated user giuseppe) by eppesuigoccas.homedns.org with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 11:06:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 11:06:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: texinfo: cannot install: update_ls_files not found From: Giuseppe Sacco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: texinfo Version: 4.8-3 Severity: important Today I updated my sid box, as I do every week, and got this problem configuring the package: eppesuig3:~# dpkg --configure --pending Configuro texinfo (4.8-3) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/texinfo.postinst: line 56: update_ls_files: command not founddpkg: errore processando texinfo (--configure): il sottoprocesso post-installation script ha restituito un codice di errore 127Sono occorsi degli errori processando: texinfo eppesuig3:~# -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT) Versions of packages texinfo depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii tetex-bin 3.0-13 The teTeX binary files ii tex-common0.14 Common infrastructure for using an texinfo recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 346352-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 20:09:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 12:09:13 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.175.20]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evgqn-0004IR-2y for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:09:13 -0800 Received: from gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.175.3]) by alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Evgql-0005cU-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:09:11 +0100 Received: from preining by gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Evgql-00076u-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:09:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:09:11 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#346352: texinfo: cannot install: update_ls_files not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On Sam, 07 Jan 2006, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: /var/lib/dpkg/info/texinfo.postinst: line
Bug#295595: Don't ship in sarge - what about etch?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hello Mike, Hello! After discussing the situation with upstream, we agreed that vegastrike would better serve our users if it was not shipped in sarge. Sarge has been released, will vegastrike be ready at the time of etch? The vegastrike developers are currently doing a fairly large amount of changes to the internals of vegastrike to use a new graphics backend... Once this is finished, there will likely be several versions released as the bugs are worked out. Therefore due to its massive size, I don't think its practical for Debian to ship VS until it has become a bit more stable (a 1.0 kind of release) I had planned to support a version of vegastrike from backports.org, but it took a while for that site to be updated to sarge itself. I still plan on doing that and should get to it soon. As of now, that is also my plan for etch. Cheers, - -Mike -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwXMF7ZPKKRJLJvMRAgjrAKCSRqCCsOacgmj8+gBIZ8hlho9aDgCgsMTH pcs1rgW8VoiSfA5qoXB1EIE= =iEHC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328037: FTBFS: No rule to make target linux-gnu-i386
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 8 14:48:04 2006 Subject: Bug#328037: FTBFS: No rule to make target linux-gnu-i386 From: Stefan Potyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks for maintaining this package. The FTBFS is due to changed behavior of dpkg-architecture. I've attached a= =20 patch against debian/rules which changes DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM to=20 DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS and DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU to DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU. However 5.0.1 will still FTBFS, but the newer upstream version (5.3.0) [1]= =20 will compile (with the patched rules).=20 Please also note that new version suggests g++-3.4 or later compared to=20 current version. Thanks for your help. We actually have a new version prepared that deals with this problem and others, but unfortunately we have to wait for our uploader to get around to it. Hopefully next week. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: BTS Cleanup
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 345914 important Bug#345914: xserver-xorg: Xorg 6.9.0 freeze with i810 module Bug#345958: xserver-xorg: X on Intel 915GM chipset exits with signal 11 Fatal error after upgrade to 6.9.0 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346572: [mipsel] Depends on ocaml-nox-3.08.3 which cannot be installed.
Package: ocaml Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to install 'ocaml' on current debian stable fails due to broken packages. The related package 'cameleon' also fails, perhaps due to the same problem. Below is the output from apt-get when I attempt to install ocaml: qube:~# apt-get install ocaml Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ocaml: Depends: ocaml-nox-3.08.3 E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: mipsel (mips) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-r5k-cobalt Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Bug#339845: any update on this bug?
hi there, I tried that patch, and it works for me. Could you please give a status update on this bug? Do you intend to fix this somewhen soon? Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346574: k3b uninstallable because of hal/dbus transition
Package: k3b Version: 0.12.10-1 Severity: grave Hi, uptodate versions of hal/dbus have just entered unstable. This makes k3b uninstallable as it still depends on the old and outdated versions of hal/dbus. Please rebuild k3b. Thanks, Michael -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages k3b depends on: ii cdparanoia3a9.8-11 An audio extraction tool for sampl ii cdrecord 4:2.01+01a03-4 command line CD writing tool ii kcontrol 4:3.5.0-3 control center for KDE ii kdebase-bin 4:3.5.0-3 core binaries for the KDE base mod ii kdelibs-data 4:3.5.0-3 core shared data for all KDE appli ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.0-3 core libraries for all KDE applica ii libacl1 2.2.34-1 Access control list shared library ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libattr1 2.4.25-1 Extended attribute shared library ii libaudio2 1.7-3 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdbus-1-2 0.60-4 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-qt-1-1c2 0.60-4 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgamin0 0.1.7-2Client library for the gamin file ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-6 GCC support library ii libhal1 0.5.5.1-4 Hardware Abstraction Layer - share ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg62 6b-11 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libk3b2 0.12.10-1.1The KDE cd burning application lib ii libmusicbrainz4c2a2.1.2-2Second generation incarnation of t ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.5-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libresmgr11.0-3 resource manager library ii libsamplerate00.1.2-2audio rate conversion library ii libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++64.0.2-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi66.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System Input extension li ii libxinerama1 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System multi-head display ii libxrandr26.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0.2-1X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt66.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii mkisofs 4:2.01+01a03-4 Creates ISO-9660 CD-ROM filesystem ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime Versions of packages k3b recommends: ii cdrdao 1:1.2.1-2 Disk-At-Once (DAO) recording of au ii dvd+rw-tools 5.21.4.10.8-4 DVD+-RW/R tools ii kdebase-kio-plugins4:3.5.0-3 core I/O slaves for KDE ii vcdimager 0.7.23-1 A VideoCD (VCD) image mastering an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341677: marked as done (anjuta: bogus dependency on libfreetype6)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:24 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341677: fixed in anjuta 1.2.4a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 05:49:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 01 21:49:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ei3nE-0007Q3-DC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:49:12 -0800 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-106-110.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.106.110]) by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jB25n8Fe029751; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:49:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ei3nA-000588-RZ; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:49:08 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: anjuta: bogus dependency on libfreetype6 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:49:08 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: anjuta Severity: grave Please note that anjuta is one of the packages with an apparently spurious dependency on libfreetype6. This should probably be fixed at the same time as #339146. You should be able to lose quite a lot of dependencies actually, as this looks like it's suffering rather badly from recursive library dependency disease. Please see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00016.html for some information on the library dependency problem. This bug is 'preemptively grave' because it will become grave if there is a freetype6 transition, and there probably will be. --- Received: (at 341677-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 22:33:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 14:33:27 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evj5M-0007vw-TD; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:24 -0800 From: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#341677: fixed in anjuta 1.2.4a-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:24 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: anjuta Source-Version: 1.2.4a-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of anjuta, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: anjuta-common_1.2.4a-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta-common_1.2.4a-1_all.deb anjuta_1.2.4a-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-1.diff.gz anjuta_1.2.4a-1.dsc to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-1.dsc anjuta_1.2.4a-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-1_i386.deb anjuta_1.2.4a.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated anjuta package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:51:10 + Source: anjuta Binary: anjuta anjuta-common Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.2.4a-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE, for C/C++ anjuta-common -
Bug#341677: marked as done (anjuta: bogus dependency on libfreetype6)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:31 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341677: fixed in anjuta 1.2.4a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 05:49:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 01 21:49:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ei3nE-0007Q3-DC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:49:12 -0800 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-106-110.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.106.110]) by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jB25n8Fe029751; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:49:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ei3nA-000588-RZ; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:49:08 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: anjuta: bogus dependency on libfreetype6 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:49:08 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: anjuta Severity: grave Please note that anjuta is one of the packages with an apparently spurious dependency on libfreetype6. This should probably be fixed at the same time as #339146. You should be able to lose quite a lot of dependencies actually, as this looks like it's suffering rather badly from recursive library dependency disease. Please see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00016.html for some information on the library dependency problem. This bug is 'preemptively grave' because it will become grave if there is a freetype6 transition, and there probably will be. --- Received: (at 341677-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 22:41:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 14:41:55 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evj5T-00080o-1r; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:31 -0800 From: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#341677: fixed in anjuta 1.2.4a-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:31 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: anjuta Source-Version: 1.2.4a-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of anjuta, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: anjuta-common_1.2.4a-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta-common_1.2.4a-2_all.deb anjuta_1.2.4a-2.diff.gz to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-2.diff.gz anjuta_1.2.4a-2.dsc to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-2.dsc anjuta_1.2.4a-2_i386.deb to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated anjuta package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:05:26 + Source: anjuta Binary: anjuta anjuta-common Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.2.4a-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE, for C/C++ anjuta-common - Data files for Anjuta Closes: 341677 342486 343998 Changes: anjuta
Bug#340862: marked as done (anjuta segfault)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:31 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343998: fixed in anjuta 1.2.4a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 13:24:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 05:24:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eg02C-000164-En for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:24:08 -0800 Received: from [194.77.152.226] (helo=[192.168.1.68]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2Dk-1Eg0292509-0002kn; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:24:05 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:24:04 +0100 From: Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: anjuta segfault X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] login:69aec7263999a7b7d9800f1e5ea05378 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: anjuta Version: 1.2.4-1+b1 The anjuta version in unstable segfaults upon startup on my system. The version previously in unstable worked. I use Debian unstable with a few packages from experimental (firefox gtk, pango). My libstdc++6 version is 4.0.2-4, my libc6 version is 2.3.5-8, both from unstable. gdb anjuta says: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1226172736 (LWP 10915)] 0xb7108c01 in __gnu_cxx::__pooltrue::_M_reclaim_block () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 --- Received: (at 343998-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 22:41:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 14:41:58 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evj5T-000811-58; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:31 -0800 From: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343998: fixed in anjuta 1.2.4a-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:31 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: anjuta Source-Version: 1.2.4a-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of anjuta, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: anjuta-common_1.2.4a-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta-common_1.2.4a-2_all.deb anjuta_1.2.4a-2.diff.gz to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-2.diff.gz anjuta_1.2.4a-2.dsc to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-2.dsc anjuta_1.2.4a-2_i386.deb to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated anjuta package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:05:26 + Source: anjuta Binary: anjuta anjuta-common Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.2.4a-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE, for C/C++ anjuta-common - Data files for Anjuta Closes: 341677 342486 343998 Changes: anjuta (1.2.4a-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Patched so that *.ph is recognised as Perl. (closes: #342486) .
Bug#343998: marked as done (Anjuta 1.2.4-1+b1 crashes when anjuta is launched)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:31 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343998: fixed in anjuta 1.2.4a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 10:32:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 02:32:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from host61-149.pool8253.interbusiness.it ([82.53.149.61] helo=localhost.localdomain) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EoIJp-0003Ya-Gp for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:32:38 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: antongiulio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Anjuta 1.2.4-1+b1 crashes when anjuta is launched Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:32:11 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: anjuta Version: 1.2.4-1+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When Anjuta is launched, it crashes. This is a 'backtracing' via gdb: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 46912586773776 (LWP 13238)] 0x0045ccbf in anjuta_encoding_get_encodings () (gdb) bt #0 0x0045ccbf in anjuta_encoding_get_encodings () #1 0x2e985480 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #2 0x2e994022 in g_signal_stop_emission () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #3 0x2e9954fc in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #4 0x2e9958b3 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #5 0x2d50f5e3 in gtk_tree_view_set_model () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #6 0x0045d22a in anjuta_encodings_init () #7 0x004ba177 in anjuta_new () #8 0x0047b65f in main () -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages anjuta depends on: ii anjuta-common1.2.4-1 Data files for Anjuta ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.10.1-1The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libesd0 0.2.36-1Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-6GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.2-1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring00.4.5-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.10.2-2A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.10.3-3The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.10.2-2GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.10.1-5The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-14 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error01.1-4 library for common error values an ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6
Processed: Setting severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 346486 important Bug#346486: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 results in blank screen and 99% CPU for Xorg. Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346574: marked as done (k3b uninstallable because of hal/dbus transition)
Your message dated Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:59:36 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346574: k3b uninstallable because of hal/dbus transition has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 22:31:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 14:31:25 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de ([129.13.185.217]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eviy8-0002wI-CP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:24:56 -0800 Received: from teco141pc.teco.edu (teco141pc.teco.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.170.141]) by smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1) id 1Eviy5-i1-SV; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:24:53 +0100 Received: from dslb-084-057-232-215.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.57.232.215] helo=pluto.milchstrasse.xx) by teco141pc.teco.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1Evixt-dV-Mf; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:24:42 +0100 Received: from michael by pluto.milchstrasse.xx with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1Evixn-0007y5-GN; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:24:36 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: k3b uninstallable because of hal/dbus transition Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:24:32 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: k3b Version: 0.12.10-1 Severity: grave Hi, uptodate versions of hal/dbus have just entered unstable. This makes k3b uninstallable as it still depends on the old and outdated versions of hal/dbus. Please rebuild k3b. Thanks, Michael -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages k3b depends on: ii cdparanoia3a9.8-11 An audio extraction tool for sampl ii cdrecord 4:2.01+01a03-4 command line CD writing tool ii kcontrol 4:3.5.0-3 control center for KDE ii kdebase-bin 4:3.5.0-3 core binaries for the KDE base mod ii kdelibs-data 4:3.5.0-3 core shared data for all KDE appli ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.0-3 core libraries for all KDE applica ii libacl1 2.2.34-1 Access control list shared library ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libattr1 2.4.25-1 Extended attribute shared library ii libaudio2 1.7-3 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdbus-1-2 0.60-4 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-qt-1-1c2 0.60-4 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgamin0 0.1.7-2Client library for the gamin file ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-6 GCC support library ii libhal1 0.5.5.1-4 Hardware Abstraction Layer - share ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg62 6b-11 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libk3b2 0.12.10-1.1The KDE cd burning application lib ii libmusicbrainz4c2a2.1.2-2Second generation incarnation of t ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.5-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libresmgr11.0-3 resource manager library ii libsamplerate00.1.2-2audio rate conversion library ii libsm6
Bug#346572: [mipsel] Depends on ocaml-nox-3.08.3 which cannot be installed.
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:07:03PM +, Paul Richards wrote: Package: ocaml Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to install 'ocaml' on current debian stable fails due to broken packages. The related package 'cameleon' also fails, perhaps due to the same problem. Below is the output from apt-get when I attempt to install ocaml: qube:~# apt-get install ocaml Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ocaml: Depends: ocaml-nox-3.08.3 E: Broken packages Well, ocaml 3.09.0-4 entered testing on january 4, and ocaml 3.09.1-1 was uploaded to unstable right after that, and built on mipsel on : 3.09.1-1 (mipsel) (latest build at Jan 5 18:23: maybe-successful) So unless the mipsel buildd maintainer didn't upload the packages yet, and since ocaml and ocaml-nox where build from the same source package, and have correct dependencies, i can only suppose that your mirror is hosed, or that you somehow suffered a time squeeze, while the old 3.08.3 ocaml got downloaded to your box, but the mirror had a more recent ocaml-nox. ... Mmm, this is stable you are trying to install, ... Are you sure you don't have some none stable apt sources or something ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 332424 + fixed Bug#332424: CAN-2005-3150: Format string vulnerability in log_flush function Tags were: security Tags added: fixed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332424: tagging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 332424 + fixed thanks This bug is fixed by NMU. Regards, - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDwaPTeBwlBDLsbz4RAr7RAKCYSxVha08IWLan0jeyrNb4twmABQCdG0rc rLisWf6wrO+u28U68/uHh9c= =N+/F -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346590: gifsicle: FTBFS: build-depends on about-to-be-removed x-window-system-dev
Package: gifsicle Version: 1.44-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on x-window-system-dev which, similarly to xlibs-dev, is about to be removed from sid. (To read about xlibs-dev's removal, see [1]; x-window-system-dev's is similar, but had been undetected in the first pass.) [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute x-window-system-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the x-d/x-w-s-d transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346591: links2: FTBFS: build-depends on about-to-be-removed x-window-system-dev
Package: links2 Version: 2.1pre20-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on x-window-system-dev which, similarly to xlibs-dev, is about to be removed from sid. (To read about xlibs-dev's removal, see [1]; x-window-system-dev's is similar, but had been undetected in the first pass.) [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute x-window-system-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the x-d/x-w-s-d transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346592: ocp: FTBFS: build-depends on about-to-be-removed x-window-system-dev
Package: ocp Version: 0.1.9-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on x-window-system-dev which, similarly to xlibs-dev, is about to be removed from sid. (To read about xlibs-dev's removal, see [1]; x-window-system-dev's is similar, but had been undetected in the first pass.) [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute x-window-system-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the x-d/x-w-s-d transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346594: libxml2: 2.6.23-1 breaks xsltproc
Package: libxml2 Version: 2.6.23-1 Severity: grave Justification: breaks related software Hi, the new version 2.6.23-1 makes xsltproc (1.1.15-2) bail out on the attached simple stylesheet and test XML file: $ xsltproc test.xsl test.xml Entity: line 1: parser error : internal error ^ test.xsl:20: parser error : internal error xsl:textnewl;/xsl:text ^ test.xsl:20: parser error : internal error xsl:textnewl;/xsl:text ^ Entity: line 1: ^ test.xsl:20: parser error : Extra content at the end of the document xsl:textnewl;/xsl:text ^ cannot parse test.xsl Downgrading libxml2 to 2.6.22-2 got rid of the error. Regards, Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-treasure2 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libxml2 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime Versions of packages libxml2 recommends: ii xml-core 0.09 XML infrastructure and XML catalog -- no debconf information test.xml Description: application/xml test.xsl Description: application/xml
Bug#338327: Patch for several xmltex bugs
Hi Frank! On Fre, 30 Dez 2005, Frank Küster wrote: One thing is missing in the patch, and that is to remove the files from /etc/texmf that are now in /usr/share/texmf; this must either be done unconditionally (in this case don't remove them, but move them to /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused (creating it if it doesn't exist)), or by checking with known md5sums whether they have changed. Note that the ini files won't be found at their old places in /etc/texmf/xmltex. There is one problem with the upload you did, or it was intended: dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/etc/texmf/xmltex': Directory not empty The new .ini files which have been in /etc/texmf/xmltex should now be in /usr/share/texmf/xmltex/config. But in an older version of xmltex they have been there TOO as LINKS to /etc/texmf/xmltex/. So with the new NMU package NOT the links are replaced by the proper files, but the files in /etc/texmf/xmltex are overwritten by themselves, more or less. So we still have the very same problems now. Or was the current situation intended? Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining preining AT logic DOT at Università di Siena gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- TOTTERIDGE (n.) The ridiculous two-inch hunch that people adopt when arriving late for the theatre in the vain and futile hope that it will minimise either the embarrassment of the lack of visibility for the rest of the audience. c.f. hickling. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344747: marked as done (lsh-utils: FTBFS: debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lshc.1: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:17:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344747: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1cdbs-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2005 14:04:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 25 06:04:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.56]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqWTx-0005JN-4Y for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:04:17 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A998396EF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:04:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56058382C3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:04:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1F80826136; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:04:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:04:16 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lsh-utils: FTBFS: debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lshc.1: No such file or directory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: lsh-utils Version: 2.0.1-5 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: #mv debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lsh.1 \ debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lshc.1 /bin/sh: line 1: debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lshc.1: No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 127 You should also comment out the second line. Kurt --- Received: (at 344747-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 00:20:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 16:20:37 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evkik-0006AP-3z; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:17:10 -0800 From: Stefan Pfetzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344747: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1cdbs-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:17:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: lsh-utils Source-Version: 2.0.1cdbs-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lsh-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lsh-client_2.0.1cdbs-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-client_2.0.1cdbs-1_i386.deb lsh-server_2.0.1cdbs-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-server_2.0.1cdbs-1_i386.deb lsh-utils-doc_2.0.1cdbs-1_all.deb to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils-doc_2.0.1cdbs-1_all.deb lsh-utils_2.0.1cdbs-1.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1cdbs-1.diff.gz lsh-utils_2.0.1cdbs-1.dsc to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1cdbs-1.dsc lsh-utils_2.0.1cdbs-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1cdbs-1_i386.deb lsh-utils_2.0.1cdbs.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1cdbs.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Stefan Pfetzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lsh-utils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:36:44 +0100 Source: lsh-utils Binary: lsh-utils lsh-client
Processed: tagging 343946
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 tags 343946 + patch Bug#343946: rdesktop: xlibs-dev transition patch There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 337997 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 severity 337997 serious Bug#337997: Xine depends/build-depends on xlibs-dev, which is deprecated Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338327: Bug#340076: Patch for several xmltex bugs
ma, 2006-01-09 kello 01:07 +0100, Norbert Preining kirjoitti: Hi Frank! On Fre, 30 Dez 2005, Frank Küster wrote: One thing is missing in the patch, and that is to remove the files from /etc/texmf that are now in /usr/share/texmf; this must either be done unconditionally (in this case don't remove them, but move them to /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused (creating it if it doesn't exist)), or by checking with known md5sums whether they have changed. Note that the ini files won't be found at their old places in /etc/texmf/xmltex. There is one problem with the upload you did, or it was intended: dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/etc/texmf/xmltex': Directory not empty Actually, I did the upload, as an NMU. See changelog. For some reason, when I tested the package, I did not run into this problem. Oops. And sorry. I'll have a look at this after I've slept, unless someone beats me to it.
Bug#346608: advi: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: advi Version: 1.6.0-6 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346609: 3dchess: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: 3dchess Version: 0.8.1-11 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346607: ace: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: ace Version: 5.4.7-7 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346610: 9menu: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: 9menu Version: 1.8-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346611: aewm++: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: aewm++ Version: 1.1.2-3 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346612: aee: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: aee Version: 2.2.15b-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346613: canna: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: canna Version: 3.7p3-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346614: egoboo: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: egoboo Version: 2.22-24 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346615: gcrontab: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: gcrontab Version: 0.8.0-3 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346616: grabc: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: grabc Version: 1.1-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346617: jester: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: jester Version: 1.0-7 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346618: jnethack: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: jnethack Version: 1.1.5-18 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346619: gretl: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: gretl Version: 1.5.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346620: jove: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: jove Version: 4.16.0.69-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346621: aewm++-goodies: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: aewm++-goodies Version: 1.0-7 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346622: cheops: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: cheops Version: 0.61-12.1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346624: grig: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Package: grig Version: 0.4.2-4 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
