Bug#366852: marked as done (phpldapadmin: PHP segfault on tree.php)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 08:40:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366852: phpldapadmin: PHP segfault on tree.php
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: phpldapadmin
Version: 0.9.8.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


The left HTML pane, tree.php returns "500 - Internal Server Error" in Lighty, 
and running
on the command line I see the following:

...
"server_info.php?server_id=0">info | import | <
a href="export_form.php?server_id=0" target="right_frame">export )Segmentation fault

General LDAP code in PHP works fine though, something unique in phpldapadmin?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.6-xen
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages phpldapadmin depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.72 Debian configuration management sy
ii  lighttpd [httpd]  1.4.11-3   A fast webserver with minimal memo
ii  php5-cgi  5.1.2-1+b1 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php5-ldap 5.1.2-1+b1 LDAP module for php5

phpldapadmin recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  phpldapadmin/ldap-bindpw: secret
* phpldapadmin/ldap-tls: false
* phpldapadmin/ldap-binddn: cn=admin,dc=yorkion,dc=com
* phpldapadmin/reconfigure-webserver:
  phpldapadmin/restart-webserver: true
* phpldapadmin/ldap-basedn: dc=yorkion,dc=com
* phpldapadmin/ldap-server: ldap.yorkion.com
* phpldapadmin/ldap-authtype: session

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.3-1

Il giorno mer, 31/05/2006 alle 10.08 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha
scritto:
> > Il giorno ven, 12/05/2006 alle 00.25 +0800, Steven McCoy ha scritto:
> >> Package: phpldapadmin
> >> Version: 0.9.8.2-1
> >> Severity: grave
> >> Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I can't reproduce the bug on my sid machines.
> 
> I updated the case previously, the segfault no longer occurs with the new
> 0.9.8.3 release in testing.

Quite strange, I saw no changes in tree.php between these two (minor)
releases. Anyway, I'm closing the bug report: if you'll be able to
reproduce the segfault, please re-open it.

Thanks,

-- 
Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it
Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it
_
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564


signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio	firmata digitalmente
--- End Message ---

Bug#369448: linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc: package fails to install

[Sven Luther]

clone 369448 -1
reassign 369448 linux-2.6
reassign -1 kernel-package
retitle 369448 [powerpc] failure in pre-inst script, package fails to install
retitle -1 [powerpc] failure in pre-inst script, package fails to install
thanks

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:47:55AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 30 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:50:41AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >   dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc
> > > Well, running -reconfigure just complains its not installed... Trying to
> > dpkg-reconfigure is a separate package that you need to install.
> Sorry, I didn't say that very well.  I have dpkg-reconfigure installed, it
> complained that linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc wasn't installed.

Ok, can you give the output of dpkg -l | grep linux-image ? I wonder what
version of the kernel you have installed right now. I guess it is related to
that, and will give the answer to our problem, which is not an mkvmlinuz
problem, but see below.

> > > reinstall from aptitude with the added set -x yields exactly as you say:
> > > [...]
> > > + bootloader=yaboot
> > > + '[' yaboot = mkvmlinuz ']'
> >
> > So, where is the failure ?  Can you give me the complete log ?
> I have no idea where the failure is... its obviously not in that
> particular script.  The only thing I see of (minute) interest is "Ok,
> Aborting".  Here is the complete log of running 'aptitude install
> linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc' with the extra set -x you mentioned before.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude install linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done
> Reading task descriptions... Done
> Building tag database... Done
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc
> 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0B/15.7MB of archives. After unpacking 48.7MB will be used.
> Writing extended state information... Done
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> (Reading database ... 95047 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc (from
> .../linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc_2.
> 6.16-14_powerpc.deb) ...
> Ok, Aborting
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc_2.6.
> 16-14_powerpc.deb (--unpack):
>  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

This is a pre-installation script which is failing, and which comes from
kernel-package and the kernel package itself, it has nothing to do with
mkvmlinuz, which is run afterward. I am thus reassigning this package to both
of linux-2.6 and kernel-package for further processing.

Since the pre-inst fails, the package doesn't get installed, and you have your
older package around, which is why dpkg-reconfigure doesn't find it.

Manoj, bastian, i think this is in your camp, can you have a look at this
problem ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#313605: marked as done (dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315784: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.9
Severity: serious

dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary
unavailable in its original path. A package must not remove files from
another package. dpkg did this by placing a local diversion. This local
diversion does not (by definition) have an association with a debian
package, so it is indistinguishable from an actual local diverison
(created by the local administrator). 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils [textutils]   5.2.1-2  The GNU core utilities
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  textutils   5.2.1-2  The GNU text file processing utili

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpkg
Source-Version: 1.13.20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:43:16 +0300
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.13.20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dpkg   - package maintenance system for Debian
 dpkg-dev   - package building tools for Debian
 dselect- user tool to manage Debian packages
Closes: 35573 36586 54529 57104 58106 65839 81171 165843 169125 174180 198128 
198522 208532 230610 237622 237626 281562 313605 315784 316551 318825 349120 
349442 361171 361671 364726 366178 366185 366187 366351 366353 366587 366659 
366985 367329 368874 368875 369177 369205
Changes: 
 dpkg (1.13.20) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Frank Lichtenheld ]
   * Add gettext support for the Perl scripts. Based on a patch by
 Nicolas François. Closes: #165843
   * Only print usage information of dpkg-scanpackages on stdout
 if requested explicetly. Use stderr in case of error.
 Closes: #366659
   * Add remarks to dpkg-scansources and dpkg-scanpackages
 man pages about the need to compress the generated files
 to be able to access them via apt. Closes: #65839
   * Allow '+' and '.' in distribution names in Debian changelogs.
 Based on a patch by John Wright.
 Closes: #361171
   * Use the Debian keyring in dpkg-source when checking signatures
 of .dsc files, if available. Closes: #364726
   * Let dpkg-buildpackage pass through all remotely sensible
 -sX options to dpkg-source (-s[nsAkurKUR] currently).
 Closes: #36586
   * Improve the description of --showformat in dpkg-deb
 man page and add a pointer to the complete description
 of the option in dpkg-query.
   * Don't spew out garbage from dpkg-deb, if the second argument
 to -I is a absolute filename. Based on a patch by Ian Eure.
 Closes: #35573
   * Fix --ignore-depends argument value parsing. Closes: #169125
   * Completely remove md5sum diversion madness.  Instead, we Pre-Depend
 on a version of textutils which provides /usr/bin/md5sum.  We rely on
 the logic in coreutils to remove our diversions. Patc

Bug#315784: marked as done (dependencies should ensure md5sum is present)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313605: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
X-debbugs-cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: base-files
Version: 3.1.5
Severity: minor

Odd, worrisome messages seen,
# dpkg -i *
Setting up base-files (3.1.5) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/debian_version ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/issue ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/issue.net ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base-files.postinst: line 120: md5sum: command not found
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base-files.postinst: line 121: md5sum: command not found

But then not on second time:
# dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_3.1.5_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 167757 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace base-files 3.1.5 (using .../base-files_3.1.5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement base-files ...
Setting up base-files (3.1.5) ...

$ dlocate `which md5sum`
dpkg: /usr/bin/md5sum
coreutils: /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils

$ dpkg -S `which md5sum`
local diversion from: /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils
local diversion to: /usr/bin/md5sum

# apt-cache showpkg dpkg|grep base-files

Well, maybe you should depend on it, as lots of others do.

I'm not sure if it would solve the occasional problem that I
experienced though.  Maybe if I was using apt it would.

Anyways, I seemed to have uncovered a rare case where things will go
wrong, when one does dpkg -i * on several files at once.

If I'm correct, then gnus should depend on dpkg too, as it also uses md5sum

Setting up gnus (5.10.6-0.CVS.20050610-1) ...
install/gnus: Ignoring emacs.
install/gnus: Byte-compiling for emacs21...found emacs21
../usr/bin/ucf: line 554: md5sum: command not found
/usr/bin/ucf: line 566: md5sum: command not found
/usr/bin/ucf: line 242: md5sum: command not found
done.
[On 2nd try, worked]

Or maybe dpkg should notice it is also upgrading itself, and thus
upgrade and configure itself all in one step before configuring other
files from the dpkg -i * command line.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpkg
Source-Version: 1.13.20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:43:16 +0300
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.13.20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dpkg   - package maintenance system for Debian
 dpkg-dev   - package building tools for Debian
 dselect- user tool to manage Debian packages
Closes: 35573 36586 54529 57104 58106 65839 81171 165843 169125 174180 198128 
198522 208532 230610 237622 237626 281562 313605 315784 316551 318825 349120 
349442 361171 361671 364726 366178 366185 366187 366351 366353 366587 366659 
366985 367329 368874 368875 369177 369205
Changes: 
 dpkg (1.13.20) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Frank Lichtenheld ]
   * Add gettext support for the Perl scripts. Based on a patch by
 Nicolas François. Closes: #165843
   * Only print usage information of dpkg-scanpackages on stdout
 if requested explicetly. Use stderr in case of error.
 Closes: #366659
   * Add remarks to dpkg-scansources and dpkg-scanpackages
 man pages about the need to compress the generated files
 to be able to access them via apt. Closes: #65839
   * Allow '+' and '.' in 

Bug#349120: marked as done (dpkg: assertion failure after failing to configure a package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349120: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11
Severity: important

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

A bug in linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc appears to have left me without a
ramdisk creator which would not be much of an issue were it not for

Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc (2.6.15-3) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Failed to find suitable ramdisk generation tool for kernel version 
2.6.15-1-powerpc on running kernel 2.6.15-1-powerpc in mkinitramfs 
mkinitrd.yaird
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-2.6-powerpc:
 linux-image-2.6-powerpc depends on linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc (= 2.6.15-3); 
however:
  Package linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6-powerpc (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-powerpc:
 linux-image-powerpc depends on linux-image-2.6-powerpc (= 2.6.15-3); however:
  Package linux-image-2.6-powerpc is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-powerpc (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' 
failed.

At this time, dpkg exits with SIGABRT and leaves the database in a
broken state so apt refuses to do anything before "dpkg --configure -a"
is run, which again leads to the above problem.

Please let me know what additional information is required.

   Simon

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-powerpc
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils [textutils] 5.93-5 The GNU core utilities
ii  libc6 2.3.5-12   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

dpkg recommends no packages.

- -- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpkg
Source-Version: 1.13.20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:43:16 +0300
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.13.20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dpkg   - package maintenance system for Debian
 dpkg-dev   - package building tools for Debian
 dselect- user tool to manage Debian packages
Closes: 35573 36586 54529 57104 58106 65839 81171 165843 169125 174180 198128 
198522 208532 230610 237622 237626 281562 313605 315784 316551 318825 349120 
349442 361171 361671 364726 366178 366185 366187 366351 366353 366587 366659 
366985 367329 368874 368875 369177 369205
Changes: 
 dpkg (1.13.20) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Frank Lichtenheld ]
   * Add gettext support for the Perl scripts. Based on a patch by
 Nicolas François. Closes: #165843
   * Only print usage information of dpkg-scanpackages on stdout
 if requested explicetly. Use stderr in case o

Bug#349120: marked as done (dpkg: assertion failure after failing to configure a package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349442: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11
Severity: important

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

A bug in linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc appears to have left me without a
ramdisk creator which would not be much of an issue were it not for

Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc (2.6.15-3) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Failed to find suitable ramdisk generation tool for kernel version 
2.6.15-1-powerpc on running kernel 2.6.15-1-powerpc in mkinitramfs 
mkinitrd.yaird
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-2.6-powerpc:
 linux-image-2.6-powerpc depends on linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc (= 2.6.15-3); 
however:
  Package linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6-powerpc (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-powerpc:
 linux-image-powerpc depends on linux-image-2.6-powerpc (= 2.6.15-3); however:
  Package linux-image-2.6-powerpc is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-powerpc (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' 
failed.

At this time, dpkg exits with SIGABRT and leaves the database in a
broken state so apt refuses to do anything before "dpkg --configure -a"
is run, which again leads to the above problem.

Please let me know what additional information is required.

   Simon

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-powerpc
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils [textutils] 5.93-5 The GNU core utilities
ii  libc6 2.3.5-12   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

dpkg recommends no packages.

- -- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpkg
Source-Version: 1.13.20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:43:16 +0300
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.13.20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dpkg   - package maintenance system for Debian
 dpkg-dev   - package building tools for Debian
 dselect- user tool to manage Debian packages
Closes: 35573 36586 54529 57104 58106 65839 81171 165843 169125 174180 198128 
198522 208532 230610 237622 237626 281562 313605 315784 316551 318825 349120 
349442 361171 361671 364726 366178 366185 366187 366351 366353 366587 366659 
366985 367329 368874 368875 369177 369205
Changes: 
 dpkg (1.13.20) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Frank Lichtenheld ]
   * Add gettext support for the Perl scripts. Based on a patch by
 Nicolas François. Closes: #165843
   * Only print usage information of dpkg-scanpackages on stdout
 if requested explicetly. Use stderr in case o

Bug#349442: marked as done (dpkg: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed (abort).)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349442: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I get the following error:

ay:/home/lefevre# dpkg --configure -a
dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' 
failed.
Aborted (core dumped)

As a consequence, I can no longer upgrade the system.

The backtrace doesn't seem to give anything useful:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x0fed1610 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0x0fed300c in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2  0x0fec9ec4 in __assert_fail () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#3  0x1000dff4 in ?? ()
#4  0x1000e188 in ?? ()
#5  0x1000d960 in ?? ()
#6  0x0febb8ac in __libc_init_first () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#7  0x0febb8ac in __libc_init_first () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#8  0x0febb8ac in __libc_init_first () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (900, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-20050829
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils [textutils] 5.93-5 The GNU core utilities
ii  libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

dpkg recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpkg
Source-Version: 1.13.20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:43:16 +0300
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.13.20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dpkg   - package maintenance system for Debian
 dpkg-dev   - package building tools for Debian
 dselect- user tool to manage Debian packages
Closes: 35573 36586 54529 57104 58106 65839 81171 165843 169125 174180 198128 
198522 208532 230610 237622 237626 281562 313605 315784 316551 318825 349120 
349442 361171 361671 364726 366178 366185 366187 366351 366353 366587 366659 
366985 367329 368874 368875 369177 369205
Changes: 
 dpkg (1.13.20) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Frank Lichtenheld ]
   * Add gettext support for the Perl scripts. Based on a patch by
 Nicolas François. Closes: #165843
   * Only print usage information of dpkg-scanpackages on stdout
 if requested explicetly. Use stderr in case of error.
 Closes: #366659
   * Add remarks to dpkg-scansources and dpkg-scanpackages
 man pages about the need to compress the generated files
 to be able to access them via apt. Closes: #65839
   * Allow '+' and '.' in distribution names in Debian changelogs.
 Based on a patch by John Wright.
 Closes: #361171
   * Use the Debian keyring in dpkg-source when checking signatures
 of .dsc files, if available. Closes: #364726
   * Let dpkg-buildpackage pass through all remotely sensible
 -sX options to dpkg-source (-s[nsAkurKUR] currently).
 Closes: #36586
   * Improve the description of --showformat in dpkg-deb
 man page and add a pointer to the complete description
 of the option in dpkg-query.
   * Don't spe

Bug#349442: marked as done (dpkg: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed (abort).)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349120: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I get the following error:

ay:/home/lefevre# dpkg --configure -a
dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' 
failed.
Aborted (core dumped)

As a consequence, I can no longer upgrade the system.

The backtrace doesn't seem to give anything useful:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x0fed1610 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0x0fed300c in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2  0x0fec9ec4 in __assert_fail () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#3  0x1000dff4 in ?? ()
#4  0x1000e188 in ?? ()
#5  0x1000d960 in ?? ()
#6  0x0febb8ac in __libc_init_first () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#7  0x0febb8ac in __libc_init_first () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#8  0x0febb8ac in __libc_init_first () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (900, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-20050829
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils [textutils] 5.93-5 The GNU core utilities
ii  libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

dpkg recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpkg
Source-Version: 1.13.20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:43:16 +0300
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.13.20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dpkg   - package maintenance system for Debian
 dpkg-dev   - package building tools for Debian
 dselect- user tool to manage Debian packages
Closes: 35573 36586 54529 57104 58106 65839 81171 165843 169125 174180 198128 
198522 208532 230610 237622 237626 281562 313605 315784 316551 318825 349120 
349442 361171 361671 364726 366178 366185 366187 366351 366353 366587 366659 
366985 367329 368874 368875 369177 369205
Changes: 
 dpkg (1.13.20) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Frank Lichtenheld ]
   * Add gettext support for the Perl scripts. Based on a patch by
 Nicolas François. Closes: #165843
   * Only print usage information of dpkg-scanpackages on stdout
 if requested explicetly. Use stderr in case of error.
 Closes: #366659
   * Add remarks to dpkg-scansources and dpkg-scanpackages
 man pages about the need to compress the generated files
 to be able to access them via apt. Closes: #65839
   * Allow '+' and '.' in distribution names in Debian changelogs.
 Based on a patch by John Wright.
 Closes: #361171
   * Use the Debian keyring in dpkg-source when checking signatures
 of .dsc files, if available. Closes: #364726
   * Let dpkg-buildpackage pass through all remotely sensible
 -sX options to dpkg-source (-s[nsAkurKUR] currently).
 Closes: #36586
   * Improve the description of --showformat in dpkg-deb
 man page and add a pointer to the complete description
 of the option in dpkg-query.
   * Don't spe

Bug#315784: marked as done (dependencies should ensure md5sum is present)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315784: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
X-debbugs-cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: base-files
Version: 3.1.5
Severity: minor

Odd, worrisome messages seen,
# dpkg -i *
Setting up base-files (3.1.5) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/debian_version ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/issue ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/issue.net ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base-files.postinst: line 120: md5sum: command not found
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base-files.postinst: line 121: md5sum: command not found

But then not on second time:
# dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_3.1.5_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 167757 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace base-files 3.1.5 (using .../base-files_3.1.5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement base-files ...
Setting up base-files (3.1.5) ...

$ dlocate `which md5sum`
dpkg: /usr/bin/md5sum
coreutils: /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils

$ dpkg -S `which md5sum`
local diversion from: /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils
local diversion to: /usr/bin/md5sum

# apt-cache showpkg dpkg|grep base-files

Well, maybe you should depend on it, as lots of others do.

I'm not sure if it would solve the occasional problem that I
experienced though.  Maybe if I was using apt it would.

Anyways, I seemed to have uncovered a rare case where things will go
wrong, when one does dpkg -i * on several files at once.

If I'm correct, then gnus should depend on dpkg too, as it also uses md5sum

Setting up gnus (5.10.6-0.CVS.20050610-1) ...
install/gnus: Ignoring emacs.
install/gnus: Byte-compiling for emacs21...found emacs21
../usr/bin/ucf: line 554: md5sum: command not found
/usr/bin/ucf: line 566: md5sum: command not found
/usr/bin/ucf: line 242: md5sum: command not found
done.
[On 2nd try, worked]

Or maybe dpkg should notice it is also upgrading itself, and thus
upgrade and configure itself all in one step before configuring other
files from the dpkg -i * command line.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpkg
Source-Version: 1.13.20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:43:16 +0300
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.13.20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dpkg   - package maintenance system for Debian
 dpkg-dev   - package building tools for Debian
 dselect- user tool to manage Debian packages
Closes: 35573 36586 54529 57104 58106 65839 81171 165843 169125 174180 198128 
198522 208532 230610 237622 237626 281562 313605 315784 316551 318825 349120 
349442 361171 361671 364726 366178 366185 366187 366351 366353 366587 366659 
366985 367329 368874 368875 369177 369205
Changes: 
 dpkg (1.13.20) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Frank Lichtenheld ]
   * Add gettext support for the Perl scripts. Based on a patch by
 Nicolas François. Closes: #165843
   * Only print usage information of dpkg-scanpackages on stdout
 if requested explicetly. Use stderr in case of error.
 Closes: #366659
   * Add remarks to dpkg-scansources and dpkg-scanpackages
 man pages about the need to compress the generated files
 to be able to access them via apt. Closes: #65839
   * Allow '+' and '.' in 

Bug#313605: marked as done (dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313605: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.9
Severity: serious

dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary
unavailable in its original path. A package must not remove files from
another package. dpkg did this by placing a local diversion. This local
diversion does not (by definition) have an association with a debian
package, so it is indistinguishable from an actual local diverison
(created by the local administrator). 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils [textutils]   5.2.1-2  The GNU core utilities
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  textutils   5.2.1-2  The GNU text file processing utili

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpkg
Source-Version: 1.13.20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.20_all.deb
dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.dsc
dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20.tar.gz
dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.20_i386.deb
dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.13.20_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:43:16 +0300
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.13.20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dpkg   - package maintenance system for Debian
 dpkg-dev   - package building tools for Debian
 dselect- user tool to manage Debian packages
Closes: 35573 36586 54529 57104 58106 65839 81171 165843 169125 174180 198128 
198522 208532 230610 237622 237626 281562 313605 315784 316551 318825 349120 
349442 361171 361671 364726 366178 366185 366187 366351 366353 366587 366659 
366985 367329 368874 368875 369177 369205
Changes: 
 dpkg (1.13.20) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Frank Lichtenheld ]
   * Add gettext support for the Perl scripts. Based on a patch by
 Nicolas François. Closes: #165843
   * Only print usage information of dpkg-scanpackages on stdout
 if requested explicetly. Use stderr in case of error.
 Closes: #366659
   * Add remarks to dpkg-scansources and dpkg-scanpackages
 man pages about the need to compress the generated files
 to be able to access them via apt. Closes: #65839
   * Allow '+' and '.' in distribution names in Debian changelogs.
 Based on a patch by John Wright.
 Closes: #361171
   * Use the Debian keyring in dpkg-source when checking signatures
 of .dsc files, if available. Closes: #364726
   * Let dpkg-buildpackage pass through all remotely sensible
 -sX options to dpkg-source (-s[nsAkurKUR] currently).
 Closes: #36586
   * Improve the description of --showformat in dpkg-deb
 man page and add a pointer to the complete description
 of the option in dpkg-query.
   * Don't spew out garbage from dpkg-deb, if the second argument
 to -I is a absolute filename. Based on a patch by Ian Eure.
 Closes: #35573
   * Fix --ignore-depends argument value parsing. Closes: #169125
   * Completely remove md5sum diversion madness.  Instead, we Pre-Depend
 on a version of textutils which provides /usr/bin/md5sum.  We rely on
 the logic in coreutils to remove our diversions. Patc

Bug#369448: linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc: package fails to install

[Michael Furr]

On Tue, 30 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:

> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:50:41AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >   dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc
> > Well, running -reconfigure just complains its not installed... Trying to
> dpkg-reconfigure is a separate package that you need to install.
Sorry, I didn't say that very well.  I have dpkg-reconfigure installed, it
complained that linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc wasn't installed.

> > reinstall from aptitude with the added set -x yields exactly as you say:
> > [...]
> > + bootloader=yaboot
> > + '[' yaboot = mkvmlinuz ']'
>
> So, where is the failure ?  Can you give me the complete log ?
I have no idea where the failure is... its obviously not in that
particular script.  The only thing I see of (minute) interest is "Ok,
Aborting".  Here is the complete log of running 'aptitude install
linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc' with the extra set -x you mentioned before.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude install linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/15.7MB of archives. After unpacking 48.7MB will be used.
Writing extended state information... Done
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 95047 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc (from
.../linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc_2.
6.16-14_powerpc.deb) ...
Ok, Aborting
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc_2.6.
16-14_powerpc.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d .
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/mkvmlinuz
+ set -e
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' 1 ']'
++ '[' -z '' ']'
++ exec
++ '[' '' ']'
++ exec
++ DEBCONF_REDIR=1
++ export DEBCONF_REDIR
+ db_get mkvmlinuz/bootloaders
+ _db_cmd 'GET mkvmlinuz/bootloaders'
+ echo 'GET mkvmlinuz/bootloaders'
+ IFS='
'
+ read -r _db_internal_line
+ RET=yaboot
+ case ${_db_internal_line%%[   ]*} in
+ return 0
+ bootloader=yaboot
+ '[' yaboot = mkvmlinuz ']'
Errors were encountered while processing:

/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc_2.6.16-14_powerpc.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#368972: libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev: missing GL/glx.h

[Marcelo E. Magallon]

On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:32:11PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:

 >  > > The package conflicts with libgl1-mesa-dev but does not provide
 >  > > 
 >  > > /usr/include/GL/glx.h
 >  > > /usr/include/GL/glxext.h
 >  > > /usr/include/GL/glx_mangle.h
 >  > 
 >  > Yeah, these are all specific to GLX, which is specific to X...
 > 
 > Now that you mention it :-) I'll have to figure out how
 > one is supposed to declare that glx.h is needed (libgl1-dev is not
 > appropriate...)

 The bug is actually libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev providing libgl-dev.

 libgl-dev should provide these files (because I say so) since the GLX
 binding is the most common one (probably the expected one) in Unix.

 In fact the GL spec for Linux calls for GLX.

 If you need an specific target you must build-depend on it (like
 libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev or libgl1-mesa-glide3-dev).  You can't just
 depend on libgl-dev.

 Marcelo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: synfig: 367048: 3 separate bugs in one

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 367048 -1 -2
Bug#367048: synfig: crashes on alpha, m68k, mipsel, powerpc
Bug 367048 cloned as bugs 369646-369647.

> retitle 367048 synfig: floating point exception on alpha
Bug#367048: synfig: crashes on alpha, m68k, mipsel, powerpc
Changed Bug title.

> retitle -1 synfig: uses lots of memory, triggering the OOM killer
Bug#369646: synfig: crashes on alpha, m68k, mipsel, powerpc
Changed Bug title.

> severity -1 serious
Bug#369646: synfig: uses lots of memory, triggering the OOM killer
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'

> forwarded -1 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1497893&group_id=144022&atid=757416
Bug#369646: synfig: uses lots of memory, triggering the OOM killer
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1497893&group_id=144022&atid=757416.

> tags -1 + upstream
Bug#369646: synfig: uses lots of memory, triggering the OOM killer
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> retitle -2 synfig: m68k segfault
Bug#369647: synfig: crashes on alpha, m68k, mipsel, powerpc
Changed Bug title.

> severity -2 serious
Bug#369647: synfig: m68k segfault
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#367048: synfig: 367048: 3 separate bugs in one

[Paul Wise]

clone 367048 -1 -2
retitle 367048 synfig: floating point exception on alpha
retitle -1 synfig: uses lots of memory, triggering the OOM killer
severity -1 serious
forwarded -1 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1497893&group_id=144022&atid=757416
tags -1 + upstream
retitle -2 synfig: m68k segfault
severity -2 serious
thanks

Got a similar report upstream, now I understand that this is 3 separate
issues - using lots of memory (causing the OOM killer to kick in), a
floating point exception on alpha and a really weird segfault on m68k,
which looks similar to what some users have reported upstream before
with a broken C++ compiler.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#367502: cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on amd64: undeclared functions

[Steve Langasek]

retitle 367502 cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: undeclared functions
thanks

I've confirmed that this bug is also reproducible on i386 where the package
has previously built, not just on amd64.  So this is indeed an RC bug.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on amd64: undeclared functions

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 367502 cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: undeclared functions
Bug#367502: cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on amd64: undeclared functions
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339085: coreutils and posix compliance changes

[Michael Stone]

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:50:29AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:

* Michael Stone [Sat, 27 May 2006 13:19:29 -0400]:

See 5.96-3 for my current strategy for dealing with these changes.


Can this bug be closed, then?


No. I'd like to see how it goes before the package migrates to testing.

Mike Stone

Bug#368310: upstream; to be fixed in 4.2.1

[Steve M. Robbins]

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:00:52AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 21:00 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Unfortunately, release 4.2.1 has the same library version bug
> > for libgmpxx.  So we'll have to wait for 4.2.2.
> 
> Ew, I tend to disagree. The changelog on their web page lists a "shared
> library version correct" as a bugfix and indeed the top-level
> Makefile.am contains the following:
> 
> LIBGMPXX_LT_CURRENT =  4
> LIBGMPXX_LT_REVISION = 1
> LIBGMPXX_LT_AGE =  1
>
> 
> Considering that libgmpxx*3* is currently in the archives it looks to me
> as if they have bumped the SONAME.

Nope -- Libtool computes the SOVERSION as CURRENT - AGE, which is 3.
Build it and see!

Apparently Torbjorn didn't realize that an ABI change had taken place
with libgmpxx, and he didn't change the -version-info appropriately.
He's acknowledged this to me in private email.  

I just sent another message to him tonight to see what he plans
to do in the near term.

-Steve


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 368883 -1
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Bug 368883 cloned as bug 369642.

> reassign -1 g++-4.0
Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Bug reassigned from package `qt4-x11' to `g++-4.0'.

> severity -1 important
Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tag java-gcj-compat report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 367038 etch
Bug#367038: every upload of gcc breaks links in include directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

[Steve Langasek]

clone 368883 -1
reassign -1 g++-4.0
severity -1 important
thanks

This ICE also happens with g++-4.1 and gcc-snapshot.

Working on a minimal test case.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#368310: upstream; to be fixed in 4.2.1

[Philipp Kern]

On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 21:00 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Unfortunately, release 4.2.1 has the same library version bug
> for libgmpxx.  So we'll have to wait for 4.2.2.

Ew, I tend to disagree. The changelog on their web page lists a "shared
library version correct" as a bugfix and indeed the top-level
Makefile.am contains the following:

LIBGMPXX_LT_CURRENT =  4
LIBGMPXX_LT_REVISION = 1
LIBGMPXX_LT_AGE =  1

Considering that libgmpxx*3* is currently in the archives it looks to me
as if they have bumped the SONAME.

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#364791: marked as done (printconf reports a glibc related error message)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364791: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: printconf
Version: 0.7.4.18
Severity: normal


printconf reports the following error:

*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08178868 ***
Unable to read printer database.  Please ensure the "foomatic-db" package is 
installed properly.

The system is updated. apg-get -f install does not report any problems.
Something may be wrong with my system, but I found another reports on
the Internet with the same message.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-sirius-20051219-0354
Locale: LANG=hu, LC_CTYPE=hu (charmap=locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default 
locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages printconf depends on:
ii  cupsys   1.1.23-15   Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  cupsys-clien 1.1.23-15   Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  debconf [deb 1.5.0   Debian configuration management sy
ii  foomatic-db  20060408-1  linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 4.3.99+cvs20060121.dfsg.1-1 linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 4.3.99+cvs20060121.dfsg.1-1 linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 1.5-20060318-1  linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  gs   8.50-1.1Transitional package
ii  gs-esp [gs]  8.15.1.dfsg.1-2 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr
ii  gs-gpl [gs]  8.50-1.1The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int
ii  python   2.3.5-5 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-fooma 0.7.4.18Python interface to the Foomatic p

printconf recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = (unset),
LANG = "hu"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
* printconf/setup_printers: true
  printconf/printconf_run: false

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Source-Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
foomatic-db-engine, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated foomatic-db-engine 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:44:51 -0400
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Binary: foomatic-db-engine
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PR

Bug#366254: marked as done (printconf: fails to start (*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366254: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: printconf
Version: 0.7.4.18
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Just after installing: 
 * CUPS (cupsys)
 * cupsys-bsd
 * cupsys-client
 * cupsys-driver-gutenprint
 * foomatic-gui 
 * foomatic-db
 * foomatic-db-engine
 * foomatic-db-gutenprint
 * foomatic-db-hpijs
 * foomatic-filters
 * and all the dependent libraries
I tried to install printconf and then to start it, but I get the following 
message:

*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x081795c8 ***
Unable to read printer database.  Please ensure the "foomatic-db"
package is installed properly.

 and foomatic-db is installed properly.

Patrick


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages printconf depends on:
ii  cupsys   1.1.23-12   Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  cupsys-clien 1.1.23-12   Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  debconf [deb 1.5.0   Debian configuration management sy
ii  foomatic-db  20060408-1  linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 4.3.99+cvs20060121.dfsg.1-1 linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 1.5-20060318-1  linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  gs-esp [gs]  8.15.1.dfsg.1-2 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr
ii  gs-gpl [gs]  8.50-1.1The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int
ii  python   2.3.5-5 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-fooma 0.7.4.18Python interface to the Foomatic p

printconf recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
* printconf/setup_printers: true
  printconf/printconf_run: false

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Source-Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
foomatic-db-engine, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated foomatic-db-engine 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:44:51 -0400
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Binary: foomatic-db-engine
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 foomatic-db-engine - linuxprinting.org printer support - programs
Closes: 362586 364791 366254
Changes: 
 foomatic-db-engine (3.0.2-20060530-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Patch to avoid double-free abort.  (Closes: #362586, #364791, #366254)
 Thanks to Luco Bruno for the patch.
Files: 
 6d4f2b234817a2d8de4e4fe34fbcb145 650 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
 7097595a3ec8d16dd47d02fe372f55ae 312444 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz
 56b3bebb5546466eb6e19cade7cc936f 4095 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
 276ed06a83f1fe168ee881adf4b05c7e 263812 text optional 
f

Bug#364791: marked as done (printconf reports a glibc related error message)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366254: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: printconf
Version: 0.7.4.18
Severity: normal


printconf reports the following error:

*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08178868 ***
Unable to read printer database.  Please ensure the "foomatic-db" package is 
installed properly.

The system is updated. apg-get -f install does not report any problems.
Something may be wrong with my system, but I found another reports on
the Internet with the same message.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-sirius-20051219-0354
Locale: LANG=hu, LC_CTYPE=hu (charmap=locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default 
locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages printconf depends on:
ii  cupsys   1.1.23-15   Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  cupsys-clien 1.1.23-15   Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  debconf [deb 1.5.0   Debian configuration management sy
ii  foomatic-db  20060408-1  linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 4.3.99+cvs20060121.dfsg.1-1 linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 4.3.99+cvs20060121.dfsg.1-1 linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 1.5-20060318-1  linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  gs   8.50-1.1Transitional package
ii  gs-esp [gs]  8.15.1.dfsg.1-2 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr
ii  gs-gpl [gs]  8.50-1.1The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int
ii  python   2.3.5-5 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-fooma 0.7.4.18Python interface to the Foomatic p

printconf recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = (unset),
LANG = "hu"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
* printconf/setup_printers: true
  printconf/printconf_run: false

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Source-Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
foomatic-db-engine, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated foomatic-db-engine 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:44:51 -0400
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Binary: foomatic-db-engine
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PR

Bug#362586: marked as done (foomatic-db-engine: foomatic-combo-xml -O -l /usr/share/foomatic aborts)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362586: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: foomatic-db-engine
Version: 3.0.2-20060318-1
Severity: important

The printconf package is unusable because foomatic-combo-xml does not
work.

# foomatic-combo-xml -O -l /usr/share/foomatic >/dev/null
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x006474a0 
***Aborted
#

Other packages installed that might be of interest are the dependencies
of printconf and cupsys.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages foomatic-db-engine depends on:
ii  bash3.1-4The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  foomatic-db 20060408-1   linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-filters3.0.2-20060318-2 linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  libc6   2.3.6-6  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libxml2 2.6.23.dfsg.2-3  GNOME XML library
ii  perl5.8.8-4  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  wget1.10.2-1 retrieves files from the web
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.3-11   compression library - runtime

Versions of packages foomatic-db-engine recommends:
ii  netcat1.10-32TCP/IP swiss army knife

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Source-Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
foomatic-db-engine, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated foomatic-db-engine 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:44:51 -0400
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Binary: foomatic-db-engine
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 foomatic-db-engine - linuxprinting.org printer support - programs
Closes: 362586 364791 366254
Changes: 
 foomatic-db-engine (3.0.2-20060530-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Patch to avoid double-free abort.  (Closes: #362586, #364791, #366254)
 Thanks to Luco Bruno for the patch.
Files: 
 6d4f2b234817a2d8de4e4fe34fbcb145 650 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
 7097595a3ec8d16dd47d02fe372f55ae 312444 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz
 56b3bebb5546466eb6e19cade7cc936f 4095 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
 276ed06a83f1fe168ee881adf4b05c7e 263812 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEfNqK2wQKE6PXubwRAuSVAJ9TY1J8GEShXPjSCEbLJhxjHf9hsQCfQEEX
m0THnfdSXOhMhEj3iJyUq4c=
=pjLF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#369636: more info

[Joey Hess]

I can reproduce this, with both 2.3.6-11 and 2.3.6-12, on i386.

Apparently, libc.so.6 is now linked with libgcc_s.so.1 on i386, which was
not previously the case with version -9.

Version -9:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>ldd /lib/libc.so.6 
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xa7feb000)
linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xe000)

Version -11:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/installer/build/tmp/netboot_2.6/tree>ldd 
/lib/libc.so.6
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x40029000)

Version -12 udeb, manually unpacked into a d-i tree:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/installer/build/tmp/netboot_2.6/tree>ldd 
lib/libc.so.6 
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xa7feb000)
linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xe000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xa7fc9000)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/installer/build/tmp/netboot_2.6/tree>sudo chroot . 
bin/sh
bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory

(Version -11 udeb behaves the same as this.)

 there should be no libgcc dependency in glibc in the first place
 doko: Well, this had also occurred to me.
 I'm not sure where it came from all of a sudden.
 did it get built with a new gcc in -11?
 Maybe it was a side effect of building with -Os.
 Which has been reverted in -12
 -12 also has the problem

We can work around this by upgrading all the d-i build systems to use
the new libc so that library reduction pulls in libgcc, but if this
dependency was only added by accident, I hope it can be removed (40k
more in the d-i image size *hurts*, so do all the daily builds breaking,
so does glibc being blocked from testing until the next d-i beta release
(since this incompatability would break d-i beta 2 if it got in)).

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#366254: marked as done (printconf: fails to start (*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364791: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: printconf
Version: 0.7.4.18
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Just after installing: 
 * CUPS (cupsys)
 * cupsys-bsd
 * cupsys-client
 * cupsys-driver-gutenprint
 * foomatic-gui 
 * foomatic-db
 * foomatic-db-engine
 * foomatic-db-gutenprint
 * foomatic-db-hpijs
 * foomatic-filters
 * and all the dependent libraries
I tried to install printconf and then to start it, but I get the following 
message:

*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x081795c8 ***
Unable to read printer database.  Please ensure the "foomatic-db"
package is installed properly.

 and foomatic-db is installed properly.

Patrick


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages printconf depends on:
ii  cupsys   1.1.23-12   Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  cupsys-clien 1.1.23-12   Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  debconf [deb 1.5.0   Debian configuration management sy
ii  foomatic-db  20060408-1  linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 4.3.99+cvs20060121.dfsg.1-1 linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  foomatic-db- 1.5-20060318-1  linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  gs-esp [gs]  8.15.1.dfsg.1-2 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr
ii  gs-gpl [gs]  8.50-1.1The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int
ii  python   2.3.5-5 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-fooma 0.7.4.18Python interface to the Foomatic p

printconf recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
* printconf/setup_printers: true
  printconf/printconf_run: false

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Source-Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
foomatic-db-engine, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1_amd64.deb
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz
  to 
pool/main/f/foomatic-db-engine/foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated foomatic-db-engine 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:44:51 -0400
Source: foomatic-db-engine
Binary: foomatic-db-engine
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.2-20060530-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 foomatic-db-engine - linuxprinting.org printer support - programs
Closes: 362586 364791 366254
Changes: 
 foomatic-db-engine (3.0.2-20060530-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Patch to avoid double-free abort.  (Closes: #362586, #364791, #366254)
 Thanks to Luco Bruno for the patch.
Files: 
 6d4f2b234817a2d8de4e4fe34fbcb145 650 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.dsc
 7097595a3ec8d16dd47d02fe372f55ae 312444 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530.orig.tar.gz
 56b3bebb5546466eb6e19cade7cc936f 4095 text optional 
foomatic-db-engine_3.0.2-20060530-1.diff.gz
 276ed06a83f1fe168ee881adf4b05c7e 263812 text optional 
f

Bug#368310: upstream; to be fixed in 4.2.1

[Steve M. Robbins]

Hi all,

You're right: 4.2.1 has been released.  I didn't realize that because
only a "release candidate" has been announced on the email list

  http://swox.com/list-archives/gmp-announce/2006-April/14.html

Unfortunately, release 4.2.1 has the same library version bug
for libgmpxx.  So we'll have to wait for 4.2.2.



On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:09:19PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 09:54 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > The SOVERSION will change.  So, yes, I'm afraid it will require another
> > recompilation.
> 
> Is there a chance to see an interim fix applied to the package until the
> new gmp upstream revision is released. (Like upload of the RC version
> with the SOVERSION fix applied.)

I'll email upstream and ask what version he will ship with.
Then, sure, I can make the changes for Debian.

Cheers,
-Steve


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#367038: every upload of gcc breaks links in include directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 364959 +testing
Unknown tag/s: testing.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid 
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed 
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore.

Bug#364959: libkjsembed1: FTBFS in pbuilder - cannot find jni.h
There were no tags set.
Tags added: 

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#368917: lbdb: does not work with coreutils 5.96-1 (sort: open failed: +1: No such file or directory)

[Adeodato Simó]

severity 368917 important
thanks

* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 26 May 2006 00:05:12 +0200]:

> Package: lbdb
> Version: 0.31.1
> Severity: serious

The POSIX compatibility change was reverted in coreutils 5.96-3, and it
seems it'll stay like that for etch. Now the following warning is
emitted:

% lbdbq foo
Warning: "+number" syntax is deprecated, please use "-k number"lbdbq: 4 matches

So I think 'important' is the correct severity for this bug now.

> Hello,

> lbdb is broken with coreutils 5.96-1 (works fine with 5.94-1):

>   % lbdbq foo
>   sort: open failed: +1: No such file or directory
>   lbdbq: no matches

> I'm don't know why the +1 was accepted in previous sort versions, and
> whether this bug belongs to coreutils instead.

> Thanks,


-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
 
  Listening to: Javier Álvarez - Goodbye

Processed: Re: lbdb: does not work with coreutils 5.96-1 (sort: open failed: +1: No such file or directory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 368917 important
Bug#368917: lbdb: does not work with coreutils 5.96-1 (sort: open failed: +1: 
No such file or directory)
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339085: coreutils and posix compliance changes

[Adeodato Simó]

* Michael Stone [Sat, 27 May 2006 13:19:29 -0400]:

> See 5.96-3 for my current strategy for dealing with these changes.

Can this bug be closed, then?

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
 
  Listening to: Javier Álvarez - Goodbye

Processed: Re: Bug#369547: This bug seems to be fixed in gfortran 4.1.x

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 369547 gfortran-4.0
Bug#369547: gfortran: strange behaviour in unformatted writing
Bug reassigned from package `gfortran' to `gfortran-4.0'.

> tags 369547 + fixed-upstream
Bug#369547: gfortran: strange behaviour in unformatted writing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> tags 369547 + upstream
Bug#369547: gfortran: strange behaviour in unformatted writing
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: upstream

> severity 369547 important
Bug#369547: gfortran: strange behaviour in unformatted writing
Severity set to `important' from `grave'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369547: This bug seems to be fixed in gfortran 4.1.x

[Matthias Klose]

reassign 369547 gfortran-4.0
tags 369547 + fixed-upstream
tags 369547 + upstream
severity 369547 important
thanks

gfortran-4.0 is not generally unusable.

Francesco Poli writes:
> Hi!
> 
> The issue you are experiencing seems to be due to record-marker length
> lack of interoperability.
> 
> In brief, AIUI, the problem is that Fortran standard specifications do
> not mandate any low level form for unformatted file I/O.
> Hence every compiler adopts its own form and *no* unformatted file
> interoperability is guaranteed between different Fortran compilers.
> 
> Many compilers (including g77 <= 3.3 and ifort) have adopted the
> following low level structure for an unformatted record:
> 
>   START_MARK  DATA   END_MARK
> 
> where START_MARK and END_MARK are two identical 32 bit signed integers
> that represent the record length (in bytes) and DATA is the actual
> record payload.
> In your case, START_MARK and END_MARK are the 32 bit signed integer
> representation of 12 (since your three integers make 12 bytes).
> This approach sets the maximum length of writeable/readable unformatted
> records to (2^31 - 1) bytes. To go beyond this limit some compilers
> exploit various backward-compatible techniques (based on the
> record-marker sign bit).
> Another way to go beyond this limit is using 64 bit signed integers as
> record-markers.
> This sets the limit to (2^63 - 1) bytes, which is fairly much more...
> This is the strategy adopted by g77 >= 3.4 and gfortran, which is
> unfortunately not backward-compatible, though...
> In your case, START_MARK and END_MARK are the 64 bit signed integer
> representation of 12, which is a 32 bit signed representation of 12
> followed by a 32 bit signed representation of zero (remember that you
> are on i386, which is a little-endian architecture).
> When you read the file with a program which thinks that record-markers
> are 32 bit long, the second half of START_MARK is interpreted as if it
> were the first integer (hence i=0), then the first two actual integers
> are read (j=1 k=2) and the rest is ignored.
> 
> 
> OK, this should explain what happened (at least I hope so...).
> Now some news:
> 
> This bug (lack of interoperability) seems to be fixed by upstream in
> gfortran 4.1.x (see  http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19303 
> for details).
> 
> I began to write a little C++ program to convert between different
> Fortran unformatted record-markers.
> I have a preliminary version that seems to work on little-endian
> machines (with little endian Fortran unformatted files): I can attach it
> if someone is interested.
> License is GNU GPL v2 only (the project got rejected by Savannah since I
> don't want to license it under any later version of the GNU GPL: see
> http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=5204  if you're
> interested in all the gory licensing details).
> 
> 
> HTH.
> 
> -- 
> :-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
> ..
>   Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
>  Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362586: printconf: fails to start (*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption)

[Eric Sharkey]

Luca Bruno writes:
  Runnnig `foomatic-db-engine -O` in gdb says that the bug is at line
  1840:

Running it under valgrind is more telling.  It's a buffer overflow.

I get this first:

==8614== Source and destination overlap in strcpy(0xBEEED388, 0xBEEED388)
==8614==at 0x401E83B: strcpy (mac_replace_strmem.c:107)
==8614==by 0x804AAB2: parse (foomatic-combo-xml.c:1203)
==8614==by 0x804D2F2: main (foomatic-combo-xml.c:1782)

which may be harmless, depending on the implementation of strcpy, but
the buffer overflow happens here:

==8614== 
==8614== Invalid write of size 4
==8614==at 0x804AFAE: parse (foomatic-combo-xml.c:1434)
==8614==by 0x804D462: main (foomatic-combo-xml.c:1834)
==8614==  Address 0x4257755 is 981 bytes inside a block of size 984 alloc'd
==8614==at 0x401D98D: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:306)
==8614==by 0x8048A10: loadfile (foomatic-combo-xml.c:105)
==8614==by 0x804D3EF: main (foomatic-combo-xml.c:1825)

It's doing a whole bunch of strcat'ing without checking the buffer
length, and it eventually overflows.

If I change the final realloc on line 105 from:

  /* Make space for an additional line, needed for the default value in an
 option file */
  data = (char *)realloc(data, size + 128);

to:
  data = (char *)realloc(data, size + 128 * 1024);

Then everything works for me, although obviously that's not a real patch
either.

Eric


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369503: samhain_2.0.10a-4(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: configure.ac:44: error: m4_defn: undefined macro: _AC_LANG

[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:58:36AM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

Yes, no arch seemed to build it, however:

> > configure.ac:44: error: m4_defn: undefined macro: _AC_LANG
> > autoconf/lang.m4:157: AC_LANG_POP is expanded from...
> > autoconf/c.m4:556: AC_PROG_CC is expanded from...
> > configure.ac:44: the top level

From this it looks like AC_PROG_CC -> AC_LANG_POP -> _AC_LANG and
for some reason that macro is undefined. But samhain does not use that at
all, that's autoheader working here.

Now, in my build it does not try to regenerate the headers at all.

I'm going to package the latest upstream version and see if the error goes
away...

Javier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: reassign 362318 to ftp.debian.org, retitle 362318 to RM: linux-kernel-di-powerpc

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 362318 ftp.debian.org
Bug#362318: FTBFS: build-dependencies cannot be fulfiled
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-di-powerpc' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> retitle 362318 RM: linux-kernel-di-powerpc
Bug#362318: FTBFS: build-dependencies cannot be fulfiled
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: closing 254785

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> close 254785 3.0+3.0.1rc11-1
Bug#254785: dhcp3-server: purging fails on woody
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 3.0+3.0.1rc11-1, send any further explanations 
to Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369636: seems to be missing libgcc_s.so.1, totally breaks d-i

[Joey Hess]

Package: libc6-udeb
Version: 2.3.6-11
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i

 It seems that libc6-udeb breaks d-i since the last hour or so: 
"Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting." (in syslog: 
annash: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open 
shared object file: No such file or directory)
 is that using version -1 or the new -11?
 er, -10
 I dunnoits preseeded to fetch sid packages from ftp.debian.org...
 how do I check which version it fetched?
 should be able to see in the logs
 bah...cant start a console either due to the libc breakage
 can't find it in the logstoo much crap in them due to the 
breakage...I'll check the mirror instead
 -11
 and what architecture is this?
 i386
 hmm, I don't know why /bin/sh would be linking in libgcc on i386

(Have not verified this myself.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#369624: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-mga: uninstallable on etch - depends on unavailable version of xserver-xorg-core)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:26:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369624: xserver-xorg-video-mga: uninstallable on etch - 
depends on unavailable version of xserver-xorg-core
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I can't install xserver-xorg-video-mga on my etch system, which I just
upgraded from sarge.  Dselect reports:

  xserver-xorg-video-mga depends on xserver-xorg-core (>= 0.99.0-1)
  xserver-xorg-core does not appear to be available

Similarly, apt-get reports:

  # apt-get install xserver-xorg-video-mga/testing
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Selected version 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2 (Debian:testing) for 
xserver-xorg-video-mga
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.

  Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
  the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
  that package should be filed.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:

  The following packages have unmet dependencies.
xserver-xorg-video-mga: Depends: xserver-xorg-core (>= 1:0.99.0-1) but it 
is not installable
  E: Broken packages

So, I can't run X.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:00:00PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
> Version: 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> I can't install xserver-xorg-video-mga on my etch system, which I just
> upgraded from sarge.

Completely as expected.  You shouldn't be trying to install this package
yet, it's not useful to you until the rest of xorg7 transitions into
testing.

> So, I can't run X.

No, you're just installing the wrong package.  Install xserver-xorg instead.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#350344: downgrade

[Joey Hess]

severity 350344 important
thanks

> I'm upgrading the severity as well as this causes serious problems when
> evaluating logs using logcheck or the like.

That does not conform to the definition of a "critical" severity bug,
downgrading back to important.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: downgrade

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 350344 important
Bug#350344: syslog-ng: Filter rule and level(debug) problem
Bug#350120: syslog-ng: certain facilities are completely ignored in the conf; 
goes into syslog as a result
Severity set to `important' from `critical'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369547: This bug seems to be fixed in gfortran 4.1.x

[Francesco Poli]

Hi!

The issue you are experiencing seems to be due to record-marker length
lack of interoperability.

In brief, AIUI, the problem is that Fortran standard specifications do
not mandate any low level form for unformatted file I/O.
Hence every compiler adopts its own form and *no* unformatted file
interoperability is guaranteed between different Fortran compilers.

Many compilers (including g77 <= 3.3 and ifort) have adopted the
following low level structure for an unformatted record:

  START_MARK  DATA   END_MARK

where START_MARK and END_MARK are two identical 32 bit signed integers
that represent the record length (in bytes) and DATA is the actual
record payload.
In your case, START_MARK and END_MARK are the 32 bit signed integer
representation of 12 (since your three integers make 12 bytes).
This approach sets the maximum length of writeable/readable unformatted
records to (2^31 - 1) bytes. To go beyond this limit some compilers
exploit various backward-compatible techniques (based on the
record-marker sign bit).
Another way to go beyond this limit is using 64 bit signed integers as
record-markers.
This sets the limit to (2^63 - 1) bytes, which is fairly much more...
This is the strategy adopted by g77 >= 3.4 and gfortran, which is
unfortunately not backward-compatible, though...
In your case, START_MARK and END_MARK are the 64 bit signed integer
representation of 12, which is a 32 bit signed representation of 12
followed by a 32 bit signed representation of zero (remember that you
are on i386, which is a little-endian architecture).
When you read the file with a program which thinks that record-markers
are 32 bit long, the second half of START_MARK is interpreted as if it
were the first integer (hence i=0), then the first two actual integers
are read (j=1 k=2) and the rest is ignored.


OK, this should explain what happened (at least I hope so...).
Now some news:

This bug (lack of interoperability) seems to be fixed by upstream in
gfortran 4.1.x (see  http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19303 
for details).

I began to write a little C++ program to convert between different
Fortran unformatted record-markers.
I have a preliminary version that seems to work on little-endian
machines (with little endian Fortran unformatted files): I can attach it
if someone is interested.
License is GNU GPL v2 only (the project got rejected by Savannah since I
don't want to license it under any later version of the GNU GPL: see
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=5204  if you're
interested in all the gory licensing details).


HTH.

-- 
:-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
..
  Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


pgpsmQOTwhMg3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: bug also is on other pike7.6-* packages

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 369611 -1 -2
Bug#369611: uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new)
Bug 369611 cloned as bugs 369628-369629.

> reassign -1 pike7.6-public.network.pcap
Bug#369628: uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new)
Bug reassigned from package `pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles' to 
`pike7.6-public.network.pcap'.

> reassign -2 pike7.6-public.protocols.syslog
Bug#369629: uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new)
Bug reassigned from package `pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles' to 
`pike7.6-public.protocols.syslog'.

> thankskbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369624: xserver-xorg-video-mga: uninstallable on etch - depends on unavailable version of xserver-xorg-core

[Chip Salzenberg]

Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I can't install xserver-xorg-video-mga on my etch system, which I just
upgraded from sarge.  Dselect reports:

  xserver-xorg-video-mga depends on xserver-xorg-core (>= 0.99.0-1)
  xserver-xorg-core does not appear to be available

Similarly, apt-get reports:

  # apt-get install xserver-xorg-video-mga/testing
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Selected version 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2 (Debian:testing) for 
xserver-xorg-video-mga
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.

  Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
  the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
  that package should be filed.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:

  The following packages have unmet dependencies.
xserver-xorg-video-mga: Depends: xserver-xorg-core (>= 1:0.99.0-1) but it 
is not installable
  E: Broken packages

So, I can't run X.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369621: Doesn't use shlib mechanism, missing depends

[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]

Package: ysm
Severity: grave

Hi,

Your package build system is severly broken, leading to a broken Depends
field. In its current state, it is missing some dependencies and is
uninstallable on those archs which don't provide a libc6 package.

This patch fixes the problem:

--- debian/control.orig 2006-05-31 00:51:17.0 +0200
+++ debian/control  2006-05-31 00:49:07.0 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 Package: ysm
 Architecture: any
-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21)
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
 Description: A powerful ICQ console client
  A Free, open source (GPL license) console based ICQ client.  
  Full of humor and interesting features, ysm has an easy to use command line 

Please read some documentation before packaging any other packages, this bug is
a sign that you've missed to do that until now...

Marc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369626: schroot: rm -rf in file chroot cleanup destroys real /home if umount fails

[Andreas Bombe]

Package: schroot
Version: 0.2.10-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss

The session cleanup in 10mount ignores failures of umount invocations
and cleanup continues.  In the case of file chroots with a /home bind
mount that failed to umount, the rm -rf in 05file blindly descends into
the system /home with obvious unpretty results.

The bind mount may fail to umount whenever something gets mounted under
the bind.  In my case I was foolishly trying to rbind instead of bind
/home in 10mount because my $HOME is a separate mount, and I wanted to
have it available in the chroot.


Apart from making a failed umount abort the session cleanup, I see as
another possible solution to rm -rf only a bind mount of the chroot to
be sure there are no sub mounts, then umount this and only rmdir the
actual chroot.  This would fail harmlessly if umounts failed (results
only in a leftover session to be manually cleaned up).


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages schroot depends on:
ii  libboost-prog 1.33.1-4   program options library for C++
ii  libc6 2.3.6-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1   1:4.1.0-4  GCC support library
ii  liblockdev1   1.0.3-1Run-time shared library for lockin
ii  libpam0g  0.79-3.1   Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libstdc++64.1.0-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libuuid1  1.38+1.39-WIP-2006.04.09-2 universally unique id library

schroot recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369492: marked as done (glibc - FTBFS: error: syntax error before 'CFI_STARTPROC')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 15:17:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369492: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.6-11
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of glibc_2.3.6-11 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> gcc-4.0 dl-error.c -c -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Winline -Wstrict-prototypes 
> -Wwrite-strings -fstrict-aliasing -g -pipe  -I../include -I. 
> -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/s390-udeb/elf -I.. -I../libio  
> -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/s390-udeb 
> -I../sysdeps/s390/s390-32/elf -I../libidn/sysdeps/unix 
> -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32 
> -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390 
> -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread 
> -I../sysdeps/pthread -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv 
> -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/s390/s390-32 
> -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/s390 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32 
> -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux 
> -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../sysdeps/unix/mman 
> -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix 
> -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/s390/s390-32 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-32 
> -I../sysdeps/s390/fpu -I../sysdeps/s390 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 
> -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generic/elf 
> -I../sysdeps/generic -nostdinc -isystem 
> /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.4/include -isystem 
> /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/debian/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include 
> ../include/libc-symbols.h   -o 
> /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/s390-udeb/elf/dl-error.o -MD -MP -MF 
> /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/s390-udeb/elf/dl-error.o.dt -MT 
> /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/s390-udeb/elf/dl-error.o
> dl-runtime.c:222: error: syntax error before 'CFI_STARTPROC'
> make[3]: *** 
> [/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/s390-udeb/elf/dl-runtime.o] Error 1
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> make[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/glibc-2.3.6/elf'
> make[2]: *** [elf/subdir_lib] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/glibc-2.3.6'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/s390-udeb'
> make: *** [/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/stamp-dir/build_udeb] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060530-0803
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

Bastian

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.6-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.6-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.6-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.6-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.6-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6-12.dsc
libc6-amd64_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-amd64_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
libc6-dbg_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev-amd64_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev-amd64_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.6-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.6-12_i386.udeb
libc6-xen_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-xen_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
libc6_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.6-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.6-12_i386.udeb
libnss-files-udeb_2.3.6-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-files-udeb_2.3.6-12_i386.udeb
locales-all_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales-all_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
locales_2.3.6-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.6-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.6-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.6-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between thi

Bug#369611: uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new)

[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]

Package: pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles
Severity: grave

Heya,

This package isn't installable, as pike7.6 seems to be too new. Either
update the package or ask for removal, please.

Thanks,
Marc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369607: is uninstallable (cl-flexi-streams doesn't exist)

[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]

Package: cl-irc
Severity: grave

Heya,

You're depending on a non-existant package (and I don't see something
fitting waiting in NEW).

Marc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 366370 important
Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup
Severity set to `important' from `grave'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

[Steve Langasek]

severity 366370 important
thanks

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:05:44AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 03:02:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Is there any progress on this bug?  This is currently among the issues
> > blocking us from having an installable desktop task for amd64 in sarge,
> > since there are currently no hal binaries at all in testing for this
> > architecture.

> Unfortunately not as far as i know. Haven't had the time to track it down
> further, sorry... 

> Imho the report can be downgraded to important (only one person seems to get
> the crash). 

> Note that the area where the crash seems to occur hasn't changed between
> the unstable and testing version. So it won't introduce breackage in testing
> that isn't already there.  

> What do you think ?

Yeah, I've confirmed that hal runs fine on amd64 for me, so I agree it
should be downgraded.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#361365: Your xfce4-mixer bug

[Simon Huggins]

Firstly, I'm really sorry that you filed this bug 52 days ago.  One of
the problems with using a list as a Maintainer is that this got held for
moderation (I assume or rejected out right) because of the size of the
attachments.  And the list admin is AWOL and hasn't been doing work on
xfce for a while.  Sorry, we'll get this sorted out.

None of us have seen this behaviour in 4.2.3.2 though and we've not seen
other reports.

Does alsa work correctly on your system?  e.g. can you try alsamixer?

Simon.

-- 
UK based domain, email and web hosting ***/"To infinity and beyond!" /*
http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ **/  /**
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   */  /***
Black Cat Networks /  /


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328244: Updated patch

[Michael Tautschnig]

Please find attached an updated version of the patch suggested by Andreas
Jochens.

diff -urN gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1.old/debian/compat 
gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/compat
--- gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1.old/debian/compat  1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
+++ gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/compat  2006-05-30 22:18:18.0 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+4
diff -urN gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1.old/debian/rules 
gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/rules
--- gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1.old/debian/rules   2001-01-28 08:51:17.0 
+0100
+++ gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/rules   2006-05-30 22:19:01.0 
+0200
@@ -9,9 +9,6 @@
 # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. 
 export DH_VERBOSE=1
 
-# This is the debhelper compatability version to use.
-export DH_COMPAT=2
-
 # This has to be exported to make some magic below work.
 export DH_OPTIONS
 
@@ -27,7 +24,13 @@
 
 CROSS_TOOL   := h8300-hitachi-hms
 #  attempt at being platform independent...
-CONFIG_HOST  := ${DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU}-pc-${DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM}-gnu
+CONFIG_HOST  := ${DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU}-pc-${DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM}
+ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU),powerpc64)
+CONFIG_HOST  := powerpc-pc-${DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM}
+endif
+ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU),x86_64)
+CONFIG_HOST  := i486-pc-${DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM}
+endif
 
 srcdir := $(pwd)/src
 stampdir   := stamps
diff -urN gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1.old/debian/rules.unpack 
gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/rules.unpack
--- gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1.old/debian/rules.unpack2001-01-06 
08:55:01.0 +0100
+++ gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/rules.unpack2006-05-30 
22:10:05.0 +0200
@@ -38,4 +38,4 @@
rmdir $(gcc_srcdir)
echo "$(gcc_tarball) unpacked." > $@
 
-.PHONEY: unpack
+.PHONY: unpack


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: every upload of gcc breaks links in include directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 367038 grave
Bug#367038: every upload of gcc breaks links in include directory
Severity set to `grave' from `important'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300421: CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow

[Pierre HABOUZIT]

reopen 300421
close 300421 1:0.93.94-11.1
thanks

  sorry for the previous wrong closing message. this bug has in fact
been fixed in 1:0.93.94-11.1 upload by [EMAIL PROTECTED], that was
in the changelog. Sorry I've missed something that obvious.

  that mail will reopen and use the nice BTS versionning feature.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 300421
Bug#300421: CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> close 300421 1:0.93.94-11.1
Bug#300421: CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1:0.93.94-11.1, send any further explanations to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326246: marked as done (evolution-sharp: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libgnomeprintui2.2-dev')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 13:06:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326246: due to removal of libtool .la files in Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: evolution-sharp
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'evolution-sharp' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DORBIT2=1 -pthread 
-I/usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.2 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 
-I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 
-I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include 
-I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DORBIT2=1 -pthread 
-I/usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.2 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 
-I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include 
-I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 
-I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DORBIT2=1 -pthread 
-DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/evolution-2.2 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 
-I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 
-I/usr/include/gal-2.4 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include 
-I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 
-I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include 
-I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 
-I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include 
-I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 
-I/usr/include/libgnomeprint-2.2 -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations -g -O2 -MT e-mail-remote-glue-utils.lo -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/e-mail-remote-glue-utils.Tpo -c ./mail/e-mail-remote-glue-utils.c -o 
e-mail-remote-glue-utils.o >/dev/null 2>&1
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations -g -O2   -o libevolutionglue.la -rpath /usr/lib -module 
-avoid-version -no-undefined e-cal-glue.lo e-cal-glue-comp.lo 
e-cal-glue-recur.lo e-cal-glue-recur-util.lo e-book-glue.lo 
Evolution-DataServer-Mail-common.lo Evolution-DataServer-Mail-skels.lo 
Evolution-DataServer-Mail-stubs.lo  e-mail-remote-glue-marshal.lo  
evolution-mail-sessionlistener.lo evolution-mail-storelistener.lo 
evolution-mail-folderlistener.lo e-mail-remote-glue.lo 
e-mail-remote-glue-storeinfo.lo e-mail-remote-glue-folderinfo.lo 
e-mail-remote-glue-messageinfo.lo e-mail-remote-glue-sessionchange.lo 
e-mail-remote-glue-storechange.lo e-mail-remote-glue-folderchange.lo 
e-mail-remote-glue-msgiter.lo e-mail-remote-glue-msgstream.lo 
e-mail-remote-glue-utils.lo -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -lecal-1.2 
-ledataserver-1.2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-2 
-lgconf-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 
-lglib-2.0   -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -lebook-1.2 -ledataserver-1.2 
-lgnome-2 -lpopt -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 
-lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0   
-Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -L/usr/lib/evolution/2.2 -L/usr/X11R6/lib 
-leshell -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lgal-2.4 -lgal-a11y-2.4 -lbonoboui-2 -lgnome-2 
-lpopt -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 
-lgthread-2.0 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lglade-2.0 -lgnomeprint-2-2 -lgtk-x11-2.0 
-lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 
-lpangoft2-1.0 -lart_lgpl_2 -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lm -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 
-lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0   
grep: /usr/lib/libgnomeprintui-2-2.la: No such file or directory
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libgnomeprintui-2-2.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libgnomeprintui-2-2.la' is not a valid libtool archive
make[4]: *** [libevolutionglue.la] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/evolution-sharp-0.8/glue'

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libgnomeprintui2.2-dev'
to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/evolution-sharp-0.8/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/evolution-sharp-0.8/debian/control  2005-09-02 
17:22:35.0 +
+++ ./debian/control2005-09-02 17:22:30.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: libs
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Jose Carl

Bug#369455: marked as done (alsa-base: Wrong path to alsa.conf causes mplayer, xmms to fail)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:06:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libasound2 counterstrike
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: alsa-base
Version: 1.0.11-2
Severity: normal


Hi,

after this week's upgrade of packages on Unstable, sound in XMMS,
mplayer stopped to work. In mpg321 it works, because it fallbacks to
/dev/dsp, which seems not to be affected.

It seems like some wrong hardoded path to alsa.conf. Here is strace
output from failed mplayer. Look at the stat64("/home/jordi... line:

write(1, "AF_pre: af format: 2 bps, 1 ch, "..., 68) = 68
write(1, "AF_pre: 32000Hz 1ch Signed 16-bi"..., 50) = 50
open("/dev/snd/controlC0", O_RDONLY)= 9
close(9)= 0
write(1, "alsa-init: got device=0, subdevi"..., 37) = 37
write(1, "alsa-init: 1 soundcard found, us"..., 45) = 45
stat64("/home/jordi/svn/pkg-alsa/trunk/build-area/alsa-lib-1.0.11//share/alsa/alsa.conf",
 0xbfffdecc) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
write(2, "ALSA lib pcm.c:2146:(snd_pcm_ope"..., 44) = 44
write(2, "Unknown PCM default", 19) = 19
write(2, "\n", 1)   = 1
write(2, "alsa-init: playback open error: "..., 58) = 58
write(2, "Could not open/initialize audio "..., 52) = 52
munmap(0xb602c000, 200704)  = 0
write(1, "Audio: no sound\n", 16)   = 16

Regards,
Lada Dobias
-- Package-specific info:
--- Begin additional package status ---
Požadované=Neznámé/Instalovat/Odinstalovat/Odstranit/Nechat
| Stav=Ne/Instalován/Konfigurační soubory/Rozbalen/Nezkonfigurován/Nekompletní
| instalace
|/ Chyba?=(nic)/Nechat/Nutná přeinstalace/X=oba problémy (Stav,Chyba: velké 
písmeno=chyba)
||/ Název   Verze   Popis
+++-===-===-==
ii  libasound2  1.0.11-6ALSA library
--- End additional package status ---
--- Begin /proc/asound/version ---
Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.8 (Thu Jan 13 09:39:32 
2005 UTC).
--- End /proc/asound/version ---
--- Begin /proc/asound/cards ---
0 [CMI8738]: CMI8738 - C-Media PCI CMI8738
 C-Media PCI CMI8738 (model 37) at 0xd400, irq 5
--- End /proc/asound/cards ---
--- Begin /dev/snd/ listing ---
celkem 0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,   0 2005-05-31 18:53 controlC0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  32 2005-05-31 18:53 controlC1
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  64 2005-05-31 18:53 controlC2
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  96 2005-05-31 18:53 controlC3
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,   4 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC0D0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,   5 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC0D1
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,   6 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC0D2
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,   7 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC0D3
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  36 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC1D0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  37 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC1D1
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  38 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC1D2
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  39 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC1D3
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  68 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC2D0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  69 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC2D1
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  70 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC2D2
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  71 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC2D3
crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 100 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC3D0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 101 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC3D1
crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 102 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC3D2
crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 103 2005-05-31 18:53 hwC3D3
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,   8 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC0D0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,   9 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC0D1
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  10 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC0D2
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  11 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC0D3
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  12 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC0D4
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  13 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC0D5
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  14 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC0D6
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  15 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC0D7
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  40 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC1D0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  41 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC1D1
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  42 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC1D2
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  43 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC1D3
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  44 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC1D4
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  45 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC1D5
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  46 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC1D6
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  47 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC1D7
crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  72 2005-05-31 18:53 midiC2D0
crw-rw 

Bug#369469: marked as done (libasound2: invalid datadir path - alsa.conf not found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:06:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libasound2 counterstrike
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libasound2
Version: 1.0.11-6
Severity: important


/usr/lib/libasound.so.2.0.0  is compiled with 
datadir=/home/jordi/svn/pkg-alsa/trunk/build-area/alsa-lib-1.0.11/${prefix}/share/alsa
 

libasound2 searches for alsa.conf in the build-dir rather than /usr/share/alsa/ 
- thus alsa apps fail to work until I create /usr/share/alsa as /home/jordi/... 
 or set the ALSA_CONFIG_PATH enviroment variable.

adding  --datadir=/usr/share  to the configure lines in debian/rules and 
rebuilding libasound2 helped me out.

-robin






alsa-lib-1.0.11/configure.in:65 says:

eval dir="$datadir"
case "$dir" in
/*) ;;
*) dir="$PWD/$dir"
esac


 \${prefix} is not replaced (maybe due to 40_relibtoolise.dpatch ??).
 datadir starts with '$' instead of '/' -> pwd is prepended and 
 '..${prefix}..' ends up in include/config.h and bibuild/include/config.h




$ strace alsamixer
...
stat64("/home/jordi/svn/pkg-alsa/trunk/build-area/alsa-lib-1.0.11//share/alsa/alsa.conf",
 0xaf951b1c) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
write(2, "ALSA lib control.c:816:(snd_ctl_"..., 47ALSA lib 
control.c:816:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) ) = 47
write(2, "Invalid CTL default", 19Invalid CTL default) = 19
write(2, "\n", 1
)   = 1
fstat64(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 9), ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0xa7f3d000
write(1, "\n", 1
)   = 1
write(2, "alsamixer: function snd_ctl_open"..., 79alsamixer: function 
snd_ctl_open failed for default: No such file or directory
) = 79
munmap(0xa7f3d000, 4096)= 0
exit_group(1)   = ?
...


$ strings /usr/lib/libasound.so.2.0.0 | grep share
...
/home/jordi/svn/pkg-alsa/trunk/build-area/alsa-lib-1.0.11/${prefix}/share/alsa/%s
/home/jordi/svn/pkg-alsa/trunk/build-area/alsa-lib-1.0.11/${prefix}/share/alsa/alsa.conf
/home/jordi/svn/pkg-alsa/trunk/build-area/alsa-lib-1.0.11/${prefix}/share/alsa/smixer.conf
/home/jordi/svn/pkg-alsa/trunk/build-area/alsa-lib-1.0.11/${prefix}/share
...


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libasound2 depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries

libasound2 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
alsa-lib (1.0.11-7) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Elimar Riesebieter ]
  * Introduced --datadir=\$${prefix}/share in debian/rules. Otherwise soundapps
are looking in $BUILDDIR/${prefix}/share.

 -- Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sun, 28 May 2006 22:02:37 +0200


-- 
  We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.
-- Linus Torvalds
--- End Message ---

Bug#369449: marked as done (alsamixer cannot find alsa.conf)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:06:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libasound2 counterstrike
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: alsa-utils
Version: 1.0.11-4

When I invoke alsamixer from a terminal it exits with the error message:
# alsamixer
ALSA lib control.c:816:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL default
alsamixer: function snd_ctl_open failed for default: No such file or directory


Strace showed the following line:

stat64("/home/jordi/svn/pkg-alsa/trunk/build-area/alsa-lib-1.0.11//share/alsa/alsa.conf",
0xaf93f7cc) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

Creating the directory
/home/jordi/svn/pkg-alsa/trunk/build-area/alsa-lib-1.0.11//share/alsa/
and linking /usr/share/alsa/alsa.conf solved the problem temporarily
and alsamixer started just fine.


/Ralph Hinterleitner

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
alsa-lib (1.0.11-7) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Elimar Riesebieter ]
  * Introduced --datadir=\$${prefix}/share in debian/rules. Otherwise soundapps
are looking in $BUILDDIR/${prefix}/share.

 -- Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sun, 28 May 2006 22:02:37 +0200


-- 
  We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.
-- Linus Torvalds
--- End Message ---

Bug#366852: phpldapadmin: PHP segfault on tree.php

[Fabio Tranchitella]

Il giorno ven, 12/05/2006 alle 00.25 +0800, Steven McCoy ha scritto:
> Package: phpldapadmin
> Version: 0.9.8.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

I'm sorry, but I can't reproduce the bug on my sid machines.
Is the bug still present or have you found a fix for it? Could you
please list check if the bug disappears using a plain new LDAP
directory? And, could you please test phpldapadmin with another
webserver (eg. apache)?

Thanks,

-- 
Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it
Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it
_
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300421: CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow

[Pierre HABOUZIT]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Package: lesstif1
> Version: 1:0.93.18-5
> Severity: grave, woody
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
> 
> I am not sure if lesstif1 is affected of CAN-2005-0605. If it is not,
> then please add an entry to 
> 
> http://www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-woody


  this CAN is related to libXPM. this bug report is INVALID.
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#300421: marked as done (CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 21:42:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: lesstif1
Version: 1:0.93.18-5
Severity: grave, woody
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

I am not sure if lesstif1 is affected of CAN-2005-0605. If it is not,
then please add an entry to 

http://www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-woody

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pleione 2.4.26-grsec #1 Tue Aug 10 15:42:40 CEST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages lesstif1 depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Package: lesstif1
> Version: 1:0.93.18-5
> Severity: grave, woody
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
> 
> I am not sure if lesstif1 is affected of CAN-2005-0605. If it is not,
> then please add an entry to 
> 
> http://www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-woody


  this CAN is related to libXPM. this bug report is INVALID.
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#326246: due to removal of libtool .la files in Debian

[Jerome Warnier]

I think this bug it due to ongoing removal of evil libtool .la files in
Debian since the last month.
It is probably already solved with the latest packages in Sid.

Hope it helps.
-- 
Jérôme Warnier
FLOSS Consultant
http://beeznest.net

Bug#369518:

[Steve Langasek]

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Fabio Marzocca wrote:
> I am strictly compliant with Gnome Policy about AppIcons:
> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AppIcon

> It is hard to follow 2 diverging policies

So follow the Debian policy, which is the controlling one for Debian
packages?

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Another merge

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 369469 serious
Bug#369469: libasound2: invalid datadir path - alsa.conf not found
Severity set to `serious' from `important'

> severity 369455 serious
Bug#369455: alsa-base: Wrong path to alsa.conf causes mplayer, xmms to fail
Severity set to `serious' from `important'

> severity 369449 serious
Bug#369449: alsamixer cannot find alsa.conf
Severity set to `serious' from `important'

> merge 369299 369469 369455 369449
Bug#369299: libasound2: pcm.c:2146:(snd_pcm_open_noupdate) Unknown PCM default
Bug#369449: alsamixer cannot find alsa.conf
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `done mark' don't match:
 #369299 has `done';
 #369449 has `open'

> Thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#368310: upstream; to be fixed in 4.2.1

[allomber]

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:26:21AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just to note: a new upstream version 4.2.1 is at "release candidate"
> status.  I have alerted upstream about this problem and expect that it
> will be addressed in the next upstream release.  I'll leave it until
> then.

Hello Steve,

according to , version 4.2.1 was released on
2006-05-04.  In any case, 4.2.1 is available now and seems to fix this
bug.

Any ETA for an upload ?

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369003: fmultivar_221.10065-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: Error: Label at (1) is not in the same block as the GOTO statement at (2)

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

Replying to two emails at once here:

On 30 May 2006 at 10:37, Camm Maguire wrote:
| Greetings!
| 
| Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 
| > On 26 May 2006 at 22:45, Frederik Schueler wrote:
| > | Hi,
| > | 
| > | On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:18:35PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | > All fine, but who depends on g77?  For R, I make'em build-depend on
| > | > r-base-dev, and that now has
| > |  
| > | refblas3-dev depends on it, which is a dependency of r-base-dev. Looking
| > | closer, r-base-dev depends on 
| > | 
| > | refblas3-dev | atlas3-base-dev | libblas-3.so
| > | 
| > | and the buildds use to pick the first one by default. But atlas3-base-dev 
| > | depends on g77 too...
| > 
| > Good work, thanks! Had forgotten about that one.
| > 
| > Camm:  Would it make sense and/or be possible to 'roll' atlas and blas
| > forward to gfortran?  I recently did that with R and it seems to work fine.
| > 
| 
| Sure, but 
| 
| 1) is this 'recommended' -- i.e. is one of these options
|temporary or less 'official' than the other?
| 2) what differences do you observe that are required?  I.e. is
|this simply a binary abi issue?

I am not sure what changed between g77 and gfortran, but I believe g77 will
go the way of the dinosaur as gcc 4.* only produces only gfortran.

On 30 May 2006 at 10:39, Camm Maguire wrote:
| Greetings!
| 
| Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 
| > On 26 May 2006 at 22:45, Frederik Schueler wrote:
| > | Hi,
| > | 
| > | On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:18:35PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | > All fine, but who depends on g77?  For R, I make'em build-depend on
| > | > r-base-dev, and that now has
| > |  
| > | refblas3-dev depends on it, which is a dependency of r-base-dev. Looking
| > | closer, r-base-dev depends on 
| > | 
| > | refblas3-dev | atlas3-base-dev | libblas-3.so
| > | 
| > | and the buildds use to pick the first one by default. But atlas3-base-dev 
| > | depends on g77 too...
| > 
| > I realized that we were looking in the wrong corner. (Indirect) 
Build-Depend:
| > on gcc et 3.4 are irrelevant as the default gcc et al are alread 4.0.* in
| > testing and unstable.
| > 
| > So the bug really is that gfortran is stricter on the code and fails.
| > 
| 
| blas/lapack/atlas code, or R code?
| 

An R add-on package from the CRAN archive fails under gfortran.

AFAICT blas/atlas/lapack should Build-Depends: and Depends: on gcc which
these days is version 4.0.  Unless, of course, you have reasons to depend on
the older 3.4 release.  But even if you have reasons, maybe these shouldn't
get exported to users of these packages now that Debian made 4.* the default
version of gcc et al.   

Thoughts?

Dirk


-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
  -- Thomas A. Edison


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#368310: it seems that 4.2.1 has long been released

[Thomas Viehmann]

Hi Steve,

it seems that gmp 4.2.1 has been released 2006-05-04 and is readily
available for download. I'm not sure why there hasn't been an
announcement, but the known issues list indicates that this should be fixed.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#357301: eclipse randomly crashes, usually at startup

[Kevin Dalley]

Suggestions on how to make eclipse work under Debian should be
included under /usr/share/doc/eclipse.  This should include suggested
vm, and how to start eclipse with that vm.  Please be very specific.

If eclipse crashes, then the bug should stay open, even if the eclipse
developer can't do anything about.  This is really a serious problem.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 369299 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 369299 serious
Bug#369299: libasound2: pcm.c:2146:(snd_pcm_open_noupdate) Unknown PCM default
Bug#369302: ALSA lib control.c:816:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL default
Bug#369309: libasound2: alsa fails to configure, mixer doesn't work, etc
Bug#369353: No sound with libasound 1.0.11-6 
Bug#369364: Alsa doesn't start, ALSA lib control.c:816:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) 
Invalid CTL hw:0
Bug#369392: alsa-utils: ALSA lib control.c:816:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid 
CTL hw:0
Bug#369412: libasound2: 1.0.11-5, 1.0.11-6 Broken, disables alsa
Bug#369435: libasound2: wrong path to config compiled in
Bug#369478: libasound2: Looking for non-existing files/dirs
Severity set to `serious' from `important'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: typo in bts-commmand

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 350344 critical
Bug#350344: syslog-ng: Filter rule and level(debug) problem
Bug#350120: syslog-ng: certain facilities are completely ignored in the conf; 
goes into syslog as a result
Severity set to `critical' from `important'

> thanks.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365533: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#365533: CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:14:11PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:55:16AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 22:11 +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > > >   Uploaded.
> > > 
> > > Thanks! But... can't find the upload anywhere? Maybe something went
> > > wrong or am I looking the wrong way?
> > 
> > I got a 'upload removed due to not being signed by gnupg/gpg' mail. So,
> > it looks like something went wrong. 
> 
>   Strange.  I don't remember noticing an upload error, or a signing
>  error.
> 
>   I've resigned + reuploaded for you.  If it works great, if not
>  I guess test that network access ;)

Just ACCEPTED indeed.

Must've been a magnetic sunstorm or so.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347540: marked as done (GPG error on update: public key not available)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 13:38:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org

As of Wed Jan 11 12:58:48 CET 2006, I get the following error messages
on aptutude update:

W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.it.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: GPG error: http://ftp.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: You may want to update the package lists to correct these missing
files

I was also getting the same errors yesterday. My sources.list contains:

deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib
deb ftp://ftp.it.debian.org/debian testing main contrib
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian testing main contrib
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free

I failed to found a contemporary report on this subject in BTS, so post
a new one.

apt0.6.42.1
aptitude   0.2.15.9-7
gnupg  1.4.2-2 



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.43.1

I don't think this bug needs to remain open, like I said before. If you
disagree, feel free to reopen it.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#345956: marked as done (misleading apt-get warning message from apt-key)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 13:38:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Severity: minor

when running apt-get update
I have the following warning/error message:
"W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.debian.org unstable Release: The following signatures 
couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 
010908312D230C5F
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems"

This suggestion, about running apt-get update is misleading, because it
doesn't fix anything. There should be some message, about apt-key or about
keyring some link to manual.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-5  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

apt recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.43.1

I don't think this bug needs to remain open, like I said before. If you
disagree, feel free to reopen it.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#346002: marked as done (apt: GPG error when updating)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 13:38:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Severity: normal


I got an unusal GPG error when updating with apt-get update:

# apt-get update
Letöltés:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [378B]
Találat http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable Release
Mellőz http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable Release
Találat ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at unstable Release.gpg
Találat http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
Találat ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at unstable Release
Találat ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at unstable/main Packages
Találat ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at unstable/contrib Packages
Találat ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at unstable/non-free Packages
Találat http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/contrib Packages
Találat http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/non-free Packages
Találat http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Sources
Találat http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources
Találat http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources
Találat ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at unstable/main Sources
Találat ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at unstable/contrib Sources
Találat ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at unstable/non-free Sources
Letöltve 378B 2s alatt (138B/s)
Csomaglisták olvasása... Kész
W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable Release: The following 
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: 
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: Próbáld futtatni az apt-get update -et, hogy javítsd ezeket a problémákat

Last message (in Hungarian): "Try to rerun apt-get update to resolve problems"

-- Package-specific info:

-- apt-config dump --

APT "";
APT::Architecture "i386";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential";
APT::Default-Release "unstable";
Dir "/";
Dir::State "var/lib/apt/";
Dir::State::lists "lists/";
Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list";
Dir::State::userstatus "status.user";
Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status";
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/";
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
Dir::Etc "etc/apt/";
Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list";
Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";
Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d";
Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf";
Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d";
Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences";
Dir::Bin "";
Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods";
Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg";
DPkg "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";

-- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) --


-- /etc/apt/sources.list --

# Local
#deb file:/var/local/dpkg unstable main

# Debian on s1 + security update
#deb http://192.168.0.1/debian1/ sarge main contrib
#deb http://192.168.0.1/debian2/ sarge main contrib
#deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib

# Hungary
#deb ftp://ftp.hu.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src ftp://ftp.hu.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free

# Austria

# Mostanában nem megy:
#deb ftp://debian.inode.at/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src ftp://debian.inode.at/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free

# Ez meg tetü lassú:
#deb ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/debian/ unstable main contrib 
non-free

# Viszonylag lassú, de működik:
#deb ftp://ftp.at.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src ftp://ftp.at.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free

deb ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at/mirror/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src ftp://ftp.tu-graz.ac.at/mirror/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free

# Global
#deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free

# Non-US
#deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free

#deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free

#deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free

#deb http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free

deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.us.debi

Bug#365533: marked as done (CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 10:32:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365533: fixed in phpbb2 2.0.18-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: phpbb2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

CVE-2006-1896:
Unspecified vulnerability in phpBB allows remote authenticated users
with Administration Panel access to execute arbitrary PHP code via
crafted Font Colour 3 ($theme[fontcolor3] variable) and/or signature
values, possibly involving the highlight functionality.  NOTE: the
original report does not clarigy whether this issue is static code
injection, eval injection, or another type of vulnerability.

See
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/431015/100/0/threaded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: phpbb2
Source-Version: 2.0.18-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
phpbb2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

phpbb2-conf-mysql_2.0.18-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/phpbb2/phpbb2-conf-mysql_2.0.18-3_all.deb
phpbb2-languages_2.0.18-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/phpbb2/phpbb2-languages_2.0.18-3_all.deb
phpbb2_2.0.18-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/phpbb2/phpbb2_2.0.18-3.diff.gz
phpbb2_2.0.18-3.dsc
  to pool/main/p/phpbb2/phpbb2_2.0.18-3.dsc
phpbb2_2.0.18-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/phpbb2/phpbb2_2.0.18-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated phpbb2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:23:54 +0200
Source: phpbb2
Binary: phpbb2-languages phpbb2-conf-mysql phpbb2
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.18-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 phpbb2 - A fully featured and skinnable flat (non-threaded) webforum
 phpbb2-conf-mysql - Automatic configurator for phpbb2 on MySQL database
 phpbb2-languages - phpBB2 additional languages
Closes: 365533 367155
Changes: 
 phpbb2 (2.0.18-3) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * High urgency because of a release critical security bug.
 .
   * Fix missing sanitizing of the Font Colour 3 variable in viewtopic.php,
 which allowed for PHP code execution by board admins. Found by "noch22".
 (Closes: #365533, CVE-2006-1896)
 .
   * Add Russian debconf translation, thanks Yuriy Talakan' (Closes: #367155).
Files: 
 dac4f786734d2737ddfd07b07f25087d 696 web optional phpbb2_2.0.18-3.dsc
 4eaa17edfe2995276c53737829680e88 73896 web optional phpbb2_2.0.18-3.diff.gz
 21aea71d242555761210c90c748fc49d 535246 web optional phpbb2_2.0.18-3_all.deb
 e9d1b63623aae434174fcf53e8d4a120 47932 web extra 
phpbb2-conf-mysql_2.0.18-3_all.deb
 9ebe18b97ddf2e8217816f8dc430868a 2725332 web optional 
phpbb2-languages_2.0.18-3_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEfH5iwM/Gs81MDZ0RAs00AKC3v7qxuzTdMZUbwdkvAlUYFXfDlACbBudt
4UeKqvMVFAuVenK2WI4Cvss=
=PXs6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#365147: marked as done (xbubble: FTBFS with new X packages: Bad link line)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 10:32:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365147: fixed in xbubble 0.5.11.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xbubble
Version: 0.5.11.1-1
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
checking for X... libraries , headers in standard search path
checking for XOpenDisplay in -lX11... yes
checking whether NLS is requested... yes
...
cc -g -O3 -finline-functions -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fno-strict-aliasing 
-Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wshadow 
-Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wcomment -Wformat -Wwrite-strings 
-Wno-unused-variable -Wno-unused-function -Wno-unused-label -Werror -g   -o 
xbubble  utils.o rectangle.o cell.o loadpng.o rgba.o init.o sprite.o bubble.o 
opponent.o board.o timer.o game.o dialog.o screens.o xbubble.o path_generated.o 
-lX11 -L -lpng -lz -lm
loadpng.o: In function `load_png_file':
/tmp/buildd/xbubble-0.5.11.1/src/loadpng.c:59: undefined reference to 
`png_check_sig'
...
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [xbubble] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xbubble-0.5.11.1/src'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xbubble-0.5.11.1/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xbubble-0.5.11.1'
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
-- 
Daniel Schepler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xbubble
Source-Version: 0.5.11.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xbubble, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xbubble-data_0.5.11.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xbubble/xbubble-data_0.5.11.2-1_all.deb
xbubble_0.5.11.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xbubble/xbubble_0.5.11.2-1.diff.gz
xbubble_0.5.11.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xbubble/xbubble_0.5.11.2-1.dsc
xbubble_0.5.11.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xbubble/xbubble_0.5.11.2-1_i386.deb
xbubble_0.5.11.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/x/xbubble/xbubble_0.5.11.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xbubble package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:23:57 +0200
Source: xbubble
Binary: xbubble-data xbubble
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.5.11.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 xbubble- A nice Puzzle Bubble clone
 xbubble-data - Data files for XBubble, a nice Puzzle Bubble clone
Closes: 365147
Changes: 
 xbubble (0.5.11.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #365147).
   * Switched to debhelper 5 (+ cdbs).
   * Standards-Version: 3.7.2 (no changes).
   * Mention the license (LGPL) of src/gettext.h in debian/copyright.
Files: 
 75b22890f264fe44cf8275edbb974afe 639 games optional xbubble_0.5.11.2-1.dsc
 75526154fb392dbaf5b24c7327ea0489 5581431 games optional 
xbubble_0.5.11.2.orig.tar.gz
 055dbd3338260b568269924607d12cce 3271 games optional xbubble_0.5.11.2-1.diff.gz
 f3b85f31059cacd5d364a7b8978ac251 5352246 games optional 
xbubble-data_0.5.11.2-1_all.deb
 7535c2a8299bab18d1ebb15e25c6719e 146308 games optional 
xbubble_0.5.11.2-1_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEfHpMXdVoV3jWIbQRAvrSAJ9kHXv5EyjpmO4IgpWQKxLDtcle+wCeI2ua
CQe9pJeKnZ48adA5/ri7XUs=
=9eld
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#345823: marked as done (apt: Key error at year turnover resembles security problem, and may represent one)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 13:38:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Severity: normal


Since the year has turned over, apt-get update now produces the error: 
[...]
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The following 
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: 
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org unstable Release: The following 
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: 
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F

Because the release key is not provided via an automated mechanism.
Leaveing aside that the means for getting a new key are not documented
in /usr/share/doc/apt or apt-doc, there is the additional issue that
undocumented, this looks like the debian servers may be compromised.

Secondarily, the recipes I can find for updating to the new release key
do not make clear whether the new release key is verifiable in any way.
I am worried that debian may be violating its trust model once a year.

-- Package-specific info:

-- apt-config dump --

APT "";
APT::Architecture "i386";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential";
APT::Default-Release "testing";
APT::Cache-Limit "1000";
Dir "/";
Dir::State "var/lib/apt/";
Dir::State::lists "lists/";
Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list";
Dir::State::userstatus "status.user";
Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status";
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/";
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
Dir::Etc "etc/apt/";
Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list";
Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";
Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d";
Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf";
Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d";
Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences";
Dir::Bin "";
Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods";
Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg";
DPkg "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";
DPkg::Post-Invoke "";
DPkg::Post-Invoke:: "if [ -x /usr/bin/debsums ]; then /usr/bin/debsums 
--generate=nocheck -sp /var/cache/apt/archives; fi";
DPkg::Post-Invoke:: "if [ -x /usr/sbin/localepurge ] && [ $(ps w -p $PPID | 
grep -c remove) != 1 ]; then /usr/sbin/localepurge; else exit 0; fi";
Acquire "";
Acquire::http "";
Acquire::http::Pipeline-Depth "3";

-- /etc/apt/preferences --

Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 900

Package: *
Pin: release a=etch
Pin-Priority: 900

Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian
Pin-Priority: -10


-- /etc/apt/sources.list --

deb file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build main
# Testing sources
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
# sonic mirrors binaries (slowly!!!)
#deb ftp://ftp.sonic.net/mirrors/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free


#deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib 
non-free

# Unstable sources
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
#deb ftp://ftp.sonic.net/mirrors/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib


#deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib 
non-free
#deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib 
non-free

# Stable sources
#deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
#deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
#deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib


# Special sources

# java ?
# broke one day
#deb ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian unstable main non-free
#deb ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian testing main non-free

#experimental UAE
deb http://www.rcdrummond.net/uae sid main

# various contraband
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ etch main
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ sid main


# dotgnu
# not using anymore
#deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
#deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main

# cross compilers
#deb http://debian.speedblue.org ./
# down

# mrxvt, (some other stuff like

Processed: tagging 369491

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 369491 fixed
Bug#369491: parted - FTBFS: Error 1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369493: guile-1.6 - FTBFS: The Debian autofiles patch is not available.

[Rob Browning]

Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: guile-1.6
> Version: 1.6.8-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

Thanks.  I've fixed this problem, but now there's a different problem,
though only on ia64.  So far, I don't know what's causing that
failure.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328188: license bug open for 8 months w/o reply

[Joey Hess]

This licencing bug has been open for 8 months now w/o a maintainer
reply. Should it be reassigned to ftp.debian.org to get this package
removed from Debian?

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#340538: followup on this bug?

[Joey Hess]

This RC bug has been open since November with no maintainer followup
that I can see. Is anything being done to remove the problimatic files
and/or get them properly licensed upstream?

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#345891: marked as done (needs update for new archive key)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 13:38:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i

apt needs to be updated for this year's archive key which is apparently
the one at http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2006.asc

I'm tagging this bug d-i because not having the key up-to-date in apt
breaks new installations since apt doesn't work, and will begin breaking
d-i even worse once the old archive key expires.

FWIW, I think that the archive key should be split out into a new
package that can be updated more easily than apt, but for now a quick
fix is called for.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.43.1

I don't think this bug needs to remain open, like I said before. If you
disagree, feel free to reopen it.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#369523: FTBFS: 'quicktime_set_window' was not declared in this scope'

[Helge Kreutzmann]

tags 369523 + patch
thanks

Hello Martin,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:48:13PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: xmovie
> Version: 1.9.12-1
> Severity: serious
> 
> xmovie now fails to build on unstable:

> Helge, maybe you have some idea how to fix this?

Ok, I do.

A while ago I tried building xmovie, but it was version 1.9.13, not
1.9.12 as in unstable right now. I downloaded the unstable version
from the archive (it is not in amd64), added amd64 in debian/control
and got the same build error. I looked at the differences between -12
and -13, and by adding the attached file from -13 in the subdirectory
xmovie in -12, the build error vanished.

I currently "watch" a movie with this xmovie, though it shows the same
distortion as -13, I think this bug can be either closed by going to
-13 or adding the attached file in the build.

Greetings

 Helge

-- 
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   gpg signed mail preferred 
64bit GNU powered  http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
  Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
#include_next "quicktime.h"

extern "C"
void quicktime_set_window(quicktime_t *file, int in_x, int in_y, int in_w, int 
in_h, int out_w, int out_h);



pgpEtLAMGAJVv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#369523: FTBFS: 'quicktime_set_window' was not declared in this scope'

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 369523 + patch
Bug#369523: FTBFS: 'quicktime_set_window' was not declared in this scope'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365533: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#365533: CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution

[Steve Kemp]

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:14:11PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:55:16AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 22:11 +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > >   Uploaded.
> > 
> > Thanks! But... can't find the upload anywhere? Maybe something went
> > wrong or am I looking the wrong way?
> 
> I got a 'upload removed due to not being signed by gnupg/gpg' mail. So,
> it looks like something went wrong. 

  Strange.  I don't remember noticing an upload error, or a signing
 error.

  I've resigned + reuploaded for you.  If it works great, if not
 I guess test that network access ;)

Steve
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365533: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#365533: CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:55:16AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 22:11 +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> >   Uploaded.
> 
> Thanks! But... can't find the upload anywhere? Maybe something went
> wrong or am I looking the wrong way?

I got a 'upload removed due to not being signed by gnupg/gpg' mail. So,
it looks like something went wrong. Since I have internet again here in
Mexico, I'll see whether I can do it tonight (but otoh... so much to do
tonight in Mex. City). So Steve (or anyone), if you can sponsor, that's
very much appreciated.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#358124: marked as done (etherboot: FTBFS: newer mtools version not recognized)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 10:02:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358124: fixed in etherboot 5.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: etherboot
Version: 5.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi,

building the package etherboot in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:

=
[...]
Path table size(bytes): 10
Max brk space used 0
195 extents written (0 MB)
ld -melf_i386  -N -T arch/i386/core/etherboot.lds -o bin/wd.lilo.rt bin/wd.rt.o 
bin/liloprefix.exit.o
objcopy -O binary -j .text.nocompress bin/wd.lilo.rt bin/wd.lilo.rt1.bin
ld -melf_i386 -T arch/i386/core/prefixudata.lds -b binary bin/wd.lilo.rt1.bin 
-o bin/wd.lilo.rt1.uo
objcopy -O binary -R .prefix -R .text.nocompress bin/wd.lilo.rt 
bin/wd.lilo.rt2.bin
bin/nrv2b e bin/wd.lilo.rt2.bin bin/wd.lilo.rt2.zbin
input/output = 32332/20660 = 1.565
ld -melf_i386 -T arch/i386/core/prefixzdata.lds -b binary bin/wd.lilo.rt2.zbin 
-o bin/wd.lilo.rt2.zo
/usr/bin/make bin/liloprefix.entry.o
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/etherboot-5.4.1/src'
make[2]: `bin/liloprefix.entry.o' is up to date.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/etherboot-5.4.1/src'
ld -melf_i386  -N -T arch/i386/core/etherboot.prefix.lds bin/liloprefix.entry.o 
-R bin/wd.lilo.rt bin/init.o bin/unnrv2b.o bin/wd.lilo.rt1.uo 
bin/wd.lilo.rt2.zo  -o bin/wd.lilo.zprf 
objcopy -O binary bin/wd.lilo.zprf bin/wd.zlilo
ISOLINUX_BIN=/usr/lib/syslinux/isolinux.bin bash util/geniso bin/wd.iso 
bin/wd.zlilo
Size of boot image is 4 sectors -> No emulation
Total translation table size: 2048
Total rockridge attributes bytes: 0
Total directory bytes: 0
Path table size(bytes): 10
Max brk space used 0
195 extents written (0 MB)
bash util/genliso bin/undi.liso bin/undi.zlilo
Mtools version 3.9.9 or later is required
make[1]: *** [bin/undi.liso] Error 1
rm bin/sk_g16.dsk.rt2.zbin bin/prism2_pci.rom.rt1.bin bin/undi.lilo.rt2.zbin 
bin/tg3.dsk.rt1.bin bin/tlan.rt.o bin/dmfe.rom bin/sk_g16.dsk.zprf 
bin/3c90x.dsk.rt2.zbin bin/eepro100.dsk.zprf bin/via-rhine.zrom 
bin/mtd80x.lilo.rt2.bin bin/cs89x0.rom.prf bin/smc9000.rom.prf 
bin/pnic.dsk.rt2.bin bin/pnic.dsk.prf bin/tulip.lilo.rt2.zo 
bin/pc_floppy.rom.rt2.bin bin/eepro100.dsk.rt2.zbin bin/natsemi.lilo.zprf 
bin/ns83820.dsk.rt2.zo bin/e1000.dsk.zprf bin/depca.rt.o bin/rtl8139.rom.rt2.uo 
bin/pc_floppy.dsk.rt2.zo bin/sundance.dsk.zprf bin/3c509.dsk.rt2.zo 
bin/r8169.rom.rt2.uo bin/3c595.dsk.rt1.bin bin/3c509.dsk.prf 
bin/epic100.rom.rt1.uo bin/tlan.rom.rt2.zbin bin/3c529.rt.o 
bin/pnic.dsk.rt1.bin bin/3c509.dsk.rt1.uo bin/w89c840.dsk.zprf 
bin/undi.rom.zprf bin/r8169.rom.rt1.bin bin/3c529.rom.zprf 
bin/prism2_pci.rom.zprf bin/tulip.rom.rt2.zo bin/eepro100.lilo.rt2.bin 
bin/undi.rom.rt2.bin bin/davicom.rom.rt2.bin bin/eepro100.rom.rt2.zo 
bin/wd.dsk.rt2.uo bin/3c515.lilo.rt2.bin bin/pc_flopp!
 y.rom.rt2.zo bin/eepro100.lilo.rt1.uo bin/skel.dsk.rt2.zbin 
bin/pc_floppy.rom.rt2.uo bin/skel-isa.rom.zprf bin/3c515.lilo.rt1.uo 
bin/3c509.dsk.rt1.bin bin/ns83820.dsk.prf bin/epic100.lilo.rt1.uo 
bin/tg3.dsk.rt2.bin bin/tg3.dsk.prf bin/3c503.lilo.rt1.bin bin/undi.rom.prf 
bin/undi.rt.o bin/epic100.dsk.rt2.zo bin/sis900.dsk.rt1.bin 
bin/r8169.lilo.rt1.bin bin/sis900.dsk.rt1.uo bin/ns8390.lilo.zprf 
bin/pcnet32.dsk.rt2.bin bin/sis900.rt.o bin/sundance.lilo.rt1.bin 
bin/natsemi.zrom bin/cs89x0.rom.rt2.uo bin/3c503.dsk.rt1.bin bin/skel-isa.rt.o 
bin/pnic.dsk.rt2.uo bin/pc_floppy.lilo.rt1.uo bin/tulip.lilo.rt2.bin 
bin/dmfe.rom.rt2.zbin bin/rtl8139.lilo.rt2.zo bin/3c509.rom.zprf 
bin/depca.lilo.zprf bin/3c509.dsk.rt2.uo bin/prism2_pci.rom.rt2.zbin 
bin/ns8390.rom.rt2.bin bin/epic100.rom.rt2.zo bin/w89c840.rom.rt2.uo 
bin/3c503.lilo.rt2.bin bin/ne.lilo.rt2.bin bin/prism2_pci.lilo.rt1.uo 
bin/skel-isa.dsk.rt2.bin bin/3c595.lilo.rt2.zbin bin/3c90x.rom.zprf 
bin/wd.dsk.rt2.bin bin/epic100.dsk.z!
 prf bin/3c515.rom.zprf bin/w89c840.lilo.rt2.zo bin/3c595.rom.rt2.bin b
in/eepro100.rom.zprf bin/tlan.rom bin/dmfe.rom.rt2.zo bin/e1000.lilo.rt2.zbin 
bin/liloprefix.exit.o bin/rtl8139.rom.rt2.zbin bin/w89c840.lilo.rt2.bin 
bin/3c90x.lilo.rt2.zbin bin/w89c840.rom.zprf bin/tulip.rom.rt2.uo 
bin/skel.rom.prf bin/cs89x0.dsk.rt2.bin bin/epic100.dsk.prf bin/cs89x0.dsk.prf 
bin/3c595.rt.o bin/davicom.rom.rt2.zo bin/3c503.dsk.rt2.bin 
bin/sundance.dsk.rt2.zbin bin/cs89x0.dsk.rt1.uo bin/3c515.dsk.zprf 
bin/sis900.dsk.prf bin/smc9000.rom.rt1.bin bin/3c595.dsk.rt1.u

Bug#358124: marked as done (etherboot: FTBFS: newer mtools version not recognized)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 10:02:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361230: fixed in etherboot 5.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: etherboot
Version: 5.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi,

building the package etherboot in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:

=
[...]
Path table size(bytes): 10
Max brk space used 0
195 extents written (0 MB)
ld -melf_i386  -N -T arch/i386/core/etherboot.lds -o bin/wd.lilo.rt bin/wd.rt.o 
bin/liloprefix.exit.o
objcopy -O binary -j .text.nocompress bin/wd.lilo.rt bin/wd.lilo.rt1.bin
ld -melf_i386 -T arch/i386/core/prefixudata.lds -b binary bin/wd.lilo.rt1.bin 
-o bin/wd.lilo.rt1.uo
objcopy -O binary -R .prefix -R .text.nocompress bin/wd.lilo.rt 
bin/wd.lilo.rt2.bin
bin/nrv2b e bin/wd.lilo.rt2.bin bin/wd.lilo.rt2.zbin
input/output = 32332/20660 = 1.565
ld -melf_i386 -T arch/i386/core/prefixzdata.lds -b binary bin/wd.lilo.rt2.zbin 
-o bin/wd.lilo.rt2.zo
/usr/bin/make bin/liloprefix.entry.o
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/etherboot-5.4.1/src'
make[2]: `bin/liloprefix.entry.o' is up to date.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/etherboot-5.4.1/src'
ld -melf_i386  -N -T arch/i386/core/etherboot.prefix.lds bin/liloprefix.entry.o 
-R bin/wd.lilo.rt bin/init.o bin/unnrv2b.o bin/wd.lilo.rt1.uo 
bin/wd.lilo.rt2.zo  -o bin/wd.lilo.zprf 
objcopy -O binary bin/wd.lilo.zprf bin/wd.zlilo
ISOLINUX_BIN=/usr/lib/syslinux/isolinux.bin bash util/geniso bin/wd.iso 
bin/wd.zlilo
Size of boot image is 4 sectors -> No emulation
Total translation table size: 2048
Total rockridge attributes bytes: 0
Total directory bytes: 0
Path table size(bytes): 10
Max brk space used 0
195 extents written (0 MB)
bash util/genliso bin/undi.liso bin/undi.zlilo
Mtools version 3.9.9 or later is required
make[1]: *** [bin/undi.liso] Error 1
rm bin/sk_g16.dsk.rt2.zbin bin/prism2_pci.rom.rt1.bin bin/undi.lilo.rt2.zbin 
bin/tg3.dsk.rt1.bin bin/tlan.rt.o bin/dmfe.rom bin/sk_g16.dsk.zprf 
bin/3c90x.dsk.rt2.zbin bin/eepro100.dsk.zprf bin/via-rhine.zrom 
bin/mtd80x.lilo.rt2.bin bin/cs89x0.rom.prf bin/smc9000.rom.prf 
bin/pnic.dsk.rt2.bin bin/pnic.dsk.prf bin/tulip.lilo.rt2.zo 
bin/pc_floppy.rom.rt2.bin bin/eepro100.dsk.rt2.zbin bin/natsemi.lilo.zprf 
bin/ns83820.dsk.rt2.zo bin/e1000.dsk.zprf bin/depca.rt.o bin/rtl8139.rom.rt2.uo 
bin/pc_floppy.dsk.rt2.zo bin/sundance.dsk.zprf bin/3c509.dsk.rt2.zo 
bin/r8169.rom.rt2.uo bin/3c595.dsk.rt1.bin bin/3c509.dsk.prf 
bin/epic100.rom.rt1.uo bin/tlan.rom.rt2.zbin bin/3c529.rt.o 
bin/pnic.dsk.rt1.bin bin/3c509.dsk.rt1.uo bin/w89c840.dsk.zprf 
bin/undi.rom.zprf bin/r8169.rom.rt1.bin bin/3c529.rom.zprf 
bin/prism2_pci.rom.zprf bin/tulip.rom.rt2.zo bin/eepro100.lilo.rt2.bin 
bin/undi.rom.rt2.bin bin/davicom.rom.rt2.bin bin/eepro100.rom.rt2.zo 
bin/wd.dsk.rt2.uo bin/3c515.lilo.rt2.bin bin/pc_flopp!
 y.rom.rt2.zo bin/eepro100.lilo.rt1.uo bin/skel.dsk.rt2.zbin 
bin/pc_floppy.rom.rt2.uo bin/skel-isa.rom.zprf bin/3c515.lilo.rt1.uo 
bin/3c509.dsk.rt1.bin bin/ns83820.dsk.prf bin/epic100.lilo.rt1.uo 
bin/tg3.dsk.rt2.bin bin/tg3.dsk.prf bin/3c503.lilo.rt1.bin bin/undi.rom.prf 
bin/undi.rt.o bin/epic100.dsk.rt2.zo bin/sis900.dsk.rt1.bin 
bin/r8169.lilo.rt1.bin bin/sis900.dsk.rt1.uo bin/ns8390.lilo.zprf 
bin/pcnet32.dsk.rt2.bin bin/sis900.rt.o bin/sundance.lilo.rt1.bin 
bin/natsemi.zrom bin/cs89x0.rom.rt2.uo bin/3c503.dsk.rt1.bin bin/skel-isa.rt.o 
bin/pnic.dsk.rt2.uo bin/pc_floppy.lilo.rt1.uo bin/tulip.lilo.rt2.bin 
bin/dmfe.rom.rt2.zbin bin/rtl8139.lilo.rt2.zo bin/3c509.rom.zprf 
bin/depca.lilo.zprf bin/3c509.dsk.rt2.uo bin/prism2_pci.rom.rt2.zbin 
bin/ns8390.rom.rt2.bin bin/epic100.rom.rt2.zo bin/w89c840.rom.rt2.uo 
bin/3c503.lilo.rt2.bin bin/ne.lilo.rt2.bin bin/prism2_pci.lilo.rt1.uo 
bin/skel-isa.dsk.rt2.bin bin/3c595.lilo.rt2.zbin bin/3c90x.rom.zprf 
bin/wd.dsk.rt2.bin bin/epic100.dsk.z!
 prf bin/3c515.rom.zprf bin/w89c840.lilo.rt2.zo bin/3c595.rom.rt2.bin b
in/eepro100.rom.zprf bin/tlan.rom bin/dmfe.rom.rt2.zo bin/e1000.lilo.rt2.zbin 
bin/liloprefix.exit.o bin/rtl8139.rom.rt2.zbin bin/w89c840.lilo.rt2.bin 
bin/3c90x.lilo.rt2.zbin bin/w89c840.rom.zprf bin/tulip.rom.rt2.uo 
bin/skel.rom.prf bin/cs89x0.dsk.rt2.bin bin/epic100.dsk.prf bin/cs89x0.dsk.prf 
bin/3c595.rt.o bin/davicom.rom.rt2.zo bin/3c503.dsk.rt2.bin 
bin/sundance.dsk.rt2.zbin bin/cs89x0.dsk.rt1.uo bin/3c515.dsk.zprf 
bin/sis900.dsk.prf bin/smc9000.rom.rt1.bin bin/3c595.dsk.rt1.u

Bug#361541: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#361541: monodoc-dbus-1-manual: package empty

[Pierre Habouzit]

Le Mar 30 Mai 2006 18:53, Sjoerd Simons a écrit :
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:26:59PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > according to the description "This packages contains the compiled
> > > XML documentation for the D-BUS CLI bindings". Unfortunately it
> > > doesn't contain anything useful, only[1]:
> >
> >   actually, those docs do not exists anymore upstream.
> >   the monodoc-dbus-1-manual package just should be dropped.
> >
> >   I intend to NMU dbus if noone takes care of that in the coming
> > days.
>
> I will be uploading a new dbus RSN to fix #368894. So no need to NMU.
> Otoh patches for the packaging are always welcomed (Preferably
> against the version in the pkg-utopa svn repo).
>
>   Sjoerd

actually, I can provide a patch here, but it would be trivial: you just 
have to remove the monodoc-dbus-1-manual package from debian/control as 
well as the debian/monodoc-dbus-1-manual.* files

the files it used to hold are not shipped upstream, the package is just 
useless.
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


pgpXGCD6RXson.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#361230: marked as done (etherboot: FTBFS: Mtools version detection problem/Wrong Build-Depends on amd64)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 10:02:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358124: fixed in etherboot 5.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: etherboot
Version: 5.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'etherboot' on unstable, I get the following error:

96 extents written (0 MB)
bash util/genliso bin/undi.liso bin/undi.zlilo
Mtools version 3.9.9 or later is required
make[1]: *** [bin/undi.liso] Error 1


On amd64/unstable, I there is also the following problem:

Building etherboot unstable main amd64...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Package ia32-libs-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
  lib32z1-dev ia32-libs
E: Package ia32-libs-dev has no installation candidate
E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for etherboot: ia32-libs-dev


The attached patch fixes both problems.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/etherboot-5.4.1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/etherboot-5.4.1/debian/control  2006-04-07 09:01:40.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2006-04-07 08:46:52.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: admin
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: RISKO Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), mkisofs, mtools, syslinux, ia32-libs-dev 
[amd64]
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), mkisofs, mtools, syslinux, libc6-dev-i386 
[amd64]
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1
 
 Package: etherboot
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/etherboot-5.4.1/src/util/genliso ./src/util/genliso
--- ../tmp-orig/etherboot-5.4.1/src/util/genliso2005-04-02 
10:48:35.0 +
+++ ./src/util/genliso  2006-04-07 09:01:28.0 +
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
;;
 esac
 case "`mtools -V`" in
-Mtools\ version\ 3.9.9*|Mtools\ version\ 4.*)
+Mtools\ version\ 3.9.9*|Mtools\ version\ 3.9.10*|Mtools\ version\ 4.*)
;;
 *)
echo Mtools version 3.9.9 or later is required

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: etherboot
Source-Version: 5.4.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
etherboot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

etherboot-doc_5.4.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot-doc_5.4.2-1_all.deb
etherboot_5.4.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot_5.4.2-1.diff.gz
etherboot_5.4.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot_5.4.2-1.dsc
etherboot_5.4.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot_5.4.2-1_i386.deb
etherboot_5.4.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot_5.4.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
RISKO Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated etherboot package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 17:38:24 +0200
Source: etherboot
Binary: etherboot etherboot-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 5.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: RISKO Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: RISKO Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 etherboot  - Bootstrapping for various network adapters
 etherboot-doc - Bootstrapping for various network adapters (documentation)
Closes: 290521 344856 358124 361230
Changes: 
 etherboot (5.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream version
   * mtools version & amd64 dependency fix (closes: #358124, #361230)
   * added contrib/ dir to usr/share/doc (closes: #344856)
   * added grub hack from Robert Millan, thanks (closes: #290521)
Files: 
 92f06a44f0d96ebb592fe86302b43b2c 643 admin optional etherboot_5.4.2-1.dsc
 48b45dbfbad5e87d8f046a6091125ad3 2049276 admin optional 
etherboot_5.4.2.orig.tar.gz
 d35043b2c2519502df019fdb23eb137e 3600 admin optional etherboot_5.4.2-1.diff.gz
 b2a3ccd6ebd1f803db0283c4f571ef2e 26384660 admin optional 
etherboot_5.4.2-1_i386.deb
 516dd7b9b9832d00e1d98232c3dc93fa 713844 doc optional 
etherboot-doc_5.4.2-1_all.deb

-BEGIN P

Bug#361230: marked as done (etherboot: FTBFS: Mtools version detection problem/Wrong Build-Depends on amd64)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 10:02:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361230: fixed in etherboot 5.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: etherboot
Version: 5.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'etherboot' on unstable, I get the following error:

96 extents written (0 MB)
bash util/genliso bin/undi.liso bin/undi.zlilo
Mtools version 3.9.9 or later is required
make[1]: *** [bin/undi.liso] Error 1


On amd64/unstable, I there is also the following problem:

Building etherboot unstable main amd64...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Package ia32-libs-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
  lib32z1-dev ia32-libs
E: Package ia32-libs-dev has no installation candidate
E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for etherboot: ia32-libs-dev


The attached patch fixes both problems.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/etherboot-5.4.1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/etherboot-5.4.1/debian/control  2006-04-07 09:01:40.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2006-04-07 08:46:52.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: admin
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: RISKO Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), mkisofs, mtools, syslinux, ia32-libs-dev 
[amd64]
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), mkisofs, mtools, syslinux, libc6-dev-i386 
[amd64]
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1
 
 Package: etherboot
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/etherboot-5.4.1/src/util/genliso ./src/util/genliso
--- ../tmp-orig/etherboot-5.4.1/src/util/genliso2005-04-02 
10:48:35.0 +
+++ ./src/util/genliso  2006-04-07 09:01:28.0 +
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
;;
 esac
 case "`mtools -V`" in
-Mtools\ version\ 3.9.9*|Mtools\ version\ 4.*)
+Mtools\ version\ 3.9.9*|Mtools\ version\ 3.9.10*|Mtools\ version\ 4.*)
;;
 *)
echo Mtools version 3.9.9 or later is required

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: etherboot
Source-Version: 5.4.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
etherboot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

etherboot-doc_5.4.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot-doc_5.4.2-1_all.deb
etherboot_5.4.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot_5.4.2-1.diff.gz
etherboot_5.4.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot_5.4.2-1.dsc
etherboot_5.4.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot_5.4.2-1_i386.deb
etherboot_5.4.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/etherboot/etherboot_5.4.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
RISKO Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated etherboot package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 17:38:24 +0200
Source: etherboot
Binary: etherboot etherboot-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 5.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: RISKO Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: RISKO Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 etherboot  - Bootstrapping for various network adapters
 etherboot-doc - Bootstrapping for various network adapters (documentation)
Closes: 290521 344856 358124 361230
Changes: 
 etherboot (5.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream version
   * mtools version & amd64 dependency fix (closes: #358124, #361230)
   * added contrib/ dir to usr/share/doc (closes: #344856)
   * added grub hack from Robert Millan, thanks (closes: #290521)
Files: 
 92f06a44f0d96ebb592fe86302b43b2c 643 admin optional etherboot_5.4.2-1.dsc
 48b45dbfbad5e87d8f046a6091125ad3 2049276 admin optional 
etherboot_5.4.2.orig.tar.gz
 d35043b2c2519502df019fdb23eb137e 3600 admin optional etherboot_5.4.2-1.diff.gz
 b2a3ccd6ebd1f803db0283c4f571ef2e 26384660 admin optional 
etherboot_5.4.2-1_i386.deb
 516dd7b9b9832d00e1d98232c3dc93fa 713844 doc optional 
etherboot-doc_5.4.2-1_all.deb

-BEGIN P

Bug#361541: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#361541: monodoc-dbus-1-manual: package empty

[Sjoerd Simons]

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:26:59PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > according to the description "This packages contains the compiled XML
> > documentation for the D-BUS CLI bindings". Unfortunately it doesn't
> > contain anything useful, only[1]:
> 
>   actually, those docs do not exists anymore upstream.
>   the monodoc-dbus-1-manual package just should be dropped.
> 
>   I intend to NMU dbus if noone takes care of that in the coming days.

I will be uploading a new dbus RSN to fix #368894. So no need to NMU. Otoh
patches for the packaging are always welcomed (Preferably against the version
in the pkg-utopa svn repo).

  Sjoerd
-- 
Anyone who understands everything that comes out of fortune probably
has a problem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#369513: gnucash: does not start

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 369513 - unreproducible, moreinfo
Bug#369513: gnucash: does not start
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: unreproducible, moreinfo

> severity 369513 minor
Bug#369513: gnucash: does not start
Severity set to `minor' from `grave'

> title 369513 gnucash: remembers even impossible window positions
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#369513: gnucash: does not start

[Thomas Bushnell BSG]

tags 369513 - unreproducible, moreinfo
severity 369513 minor
title 369513 gnucash: remembers even impossible window positions
thanks

Alberto Maurizi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>   OK, following your suggestions I managed to "solve" de bug.
>   I try to explain the problem because it can be really related to
>   a (minor) bug.
>
>   When I'm at work I use a dual-head monitor system (TwinView). In
>   other words I have a "duuble" size desktop.
>   Last time I used gnucash I probably moved to the "external"
>   space. 
>
>   Now that I'm using only my laptop monitor, gnucash rememberea a
>   position which was outside the visible space.
>
>   However this problem seems related to gnicash only: other sw the
>   remember its position, readily appear in the visible space.

Yes, this is a real bug, and I'll report it upstream.  Thanks for the
bug report, and you should not apologize for bothering me; it's a real
bug!

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 368937, merging 368937 368544

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 368937 + experimental
Bug#368937: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental

> merge 368937 368544
Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-existant package 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#368937: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: fails to install
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `package' don't match:
 #368544 has `linux-2.6';
 #368937 has `linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320656: marked as done (evince: libdjvulibre.so.14 has gone)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 09:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321509: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: evince
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: important

I ran evince and got following error, libdjvulibre was updated.

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% evince
  evince: error while loading shared libraries: libdjvulibre.so.14: cannot open 
shared object file: No such file or directory

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -L libdjvulibre1 | grep .so.
  /usr/lib/libdjvulibre.so.15.0.0
  /usr/lib/libdjvulibre.so.15

Please rebuild the package. And I think the package should
depend on libdjvulibre1.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to ja_JP.UTF-8)

Versions of packages evince depends on:
ii  gconf22.10.1-1   GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libart-2.0-2  2.3.17-1   Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.1-2   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-0  2.10.0-1   Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-02.10.0-1   The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcairo1 0.4.0-1Multi-platform 2D graphics library
ii  libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6   Runtime support for the DjVu image
ii  libesd0   0.2.36-1   Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-3  GCC support library
ii  libgconf2-4   2.10.1-1   GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libgcrypt11   1.2.1-4LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglade2-0   1:2.5.1-2  library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.6.5-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-keyring0 0.4.3-1GNOME keyring services library
ii  libgnome2-0   2.10.1-1   The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-0 2.10.2-2   A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-02.10.3-2   The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii  libgnomeprintui2.2-0  2.10.2-2   GNOME 2.2 print architecture User 
ii  libgnomeui-0  2.10.1-1   The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5   The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgnutls11   1.0.16-13.1GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libgpg-error0 1.1-3  library for common error values an
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.8-1The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg62 6b-10  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libkpathsea3  2.0.2-31   path search library for teTeX (run
ii  liborbit2 1:2.12.2-3 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpixman10.1.6-1Cairo pixel manipulation library
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libpoppler0   0.3.1-1PDF rendering library
ii  libpoppler0-glib  0.3.1-1PDF rendering library (GLib-based 
ii  libpopt0  1.7-5  lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.6-7  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtasn1-20.2.13-1   Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxml2   2.6.20-1   GNOME XML library
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.0-2  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-1