Bug#378372: marked as done (libxmlada2 - FTBFS: cannot find -lgnat)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:32:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#378372: fixed in libxmlada2 2.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libxmlada2 Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of libxmlada2_2.2-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85 [...] gnatgcc -shared -o libxmlada.so.2.2 \ -lgnat -Wl,--soname,libxmlada.so.2 -Wl,--export-dynamic \ obj-shared/*.o /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnat collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [libxmlada.so.2] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060715-0230 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libxmlada2 Source-Version: 2.2-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libxmlada2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libxmlada2-dev_2.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libx/libxmlada2/libxmlada2-dev_2.2-5_i386.deb libxmlada2_2.2-5.dsc to pool/main/libx/libxmlada2/libxmlada2_2.2-5.dsc libxmlada2_2.2-5.tar.gz to pool/main/libx/libxmlada2/libxmlada2_2.2-5.tar.gz libxmlada2_2.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libx/libxmlada2/libxmlada2_2.2-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libxmlada2 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:20:59 +0200 Source: libxmlada2 Binary: libxmlada2 libxmlada2-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libxmlada2 - XML/Ada, a full XML suite for Ada programmers (runtime) libxmlada2-dev - XML/Ada, a full XML suite for Ada programmers Closes: 378372 Changes: libxmlada2 (2.2-5) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control (libxmlada2): remove mips, mipsel and s390, because libgnat is disabled on these architechures. Closes: #378372. Files: 0ff1fc00eddae09c2ded9a3132adbcff 618 - optional libxmlada2_2.2-5.dsc c9d2a322eb7d0877ac1920dc6b2ff864 498490 - optional libxmlada2_2.2-5.tar.gz 9b1b791c39ce1b78d95ede642840d60b 2549744 libdevel optional libxmlada2-dev_2.2-5_i386.deb 590d9f542dc423a5e16e45176a712d67 904536 libs optional libxmlada2_2.2-5_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFExwt8x9kwJZ3/qtQRAuEFAKCrroUi/Cz6cdGwbLgsdcCXLur+pgCfYqHK tLsHFjnu6HeV3OP/LGXGtYw= =5+O1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#378709: marked as done (picon-domains: icons have gone missing)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:18:35 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#378709: fixed in picon-domains 2006.07.14-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: picon-domains Version: 2006.07.14-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ dpkg --contents /var/cache/apt/archives/picon-domains_2006.07.14-1_all.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-07-15 05:34 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-07-15 05:34 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-07-15 05:34 ./usr/share/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-07-15 05:34 ./usr/share/doc/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-07-15 05:34 ./usr/share/doc/picon-domains/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 7973 2005-11-27 21:00 ./usr/share/doc/picon-domains/FAQ.gz -rw-r--r-- root/root51 2006-07-15 05:32 ./usr/share/doc/picon-domains/README.Debian -rw-r--r-- root/root 3054 2006-07-15 05:32 ./usr/share/doc/picon-domains/copyright -rw-r--r-- root/root 1460 2006-07-15 05:33 ./usr/share/doc/picon-domains/changelog.Debian.gz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.1 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: picon-domains Source-Version: 2006.07.14-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of picon-domains, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: picon-domains_2006.07.14-2.diff.gz to pool/non-free/p/picon-domains/picon-domains_2006.07.14-2.diff.gz picon-domains_2006.07.14-2.dsc to pool/non-free/p/picon-domains/picon-domains_2006.07.14-2.dsc picon-domains_2006.07.14-2_all.deb to pool/non-free/p/picon-domains/picon-domains_2006.07.14-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated picon-domains package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:46:17 +0200 Source: picon-domains Binary: picon-domains Architecture: source all Version: 2006.07.14-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: picon-domains - Picon (Personal Images) database of for Internet domain logos. Closes: 378709 Changes: picon-domains (2006.07.14-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Regenerated. Now actually includes the icons (closes: #378709) Files: f8c47bc279cd579ae1c8ea37ff27259b 593 non-free/graphics extra picon-domains_2006.07.14-2.dsc 0faeb43b47f32f9c8b3aa2e55bfb1491 4709 non-free/graphics extra picon-domains_2006.07.14-2.diff.gz 38813ad09471f7c47a0c1fdbd92131e1 3424626 non-free/graphics extra picon-domains_2006.07.14-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFExxNXAbtddT3jfcARAoMTAJ4sta4A6UKYNbhxbjXTZcakHeti6gCgmuBj egAQ+R8OY7P0f4JW453tNSU= =9D7r -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#378839: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Bug#378839: bluez-pcmcia-support: udev support broken
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 16:23, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
okay, I've updated bluetooth.sh and bluez-pcmcia-support.udev again, do you
mind trying if it works as expected?
It works as expected.
Also can you paste the relevant udev
database entry for your card?
Here you go:
P: /class/tty/ttyS2
N: ttyS2
E: MANFID=0x025e
E: CARD_ID=0x1000
E: DEVICENAME=
searching the output of udevinfo -e might
help. Only the mapping for $DEVICENAME is left to figure out.
I don't understand what you expect here. As far as I can tell $DEVICENAME
_has_ to be empty since $name is not a valid key (at least not mentioned
in 'man udev'). It is not needed or used anywhere, so I think that
ENV{DEVICENAME}=$name should be removed.
If it was meant as a reaction on Marcel's remark about the DEVICE=`echo
$DEVNAME|sed -e 's_/dev/__'` line in bluetooth.sh you can safely remove
that line and use
/usr/sbin/hciattach $DEVNAME ...
I agree with Marcel in that the script should be renamed
into bluetooth_serial (and every other point he made!).
Kind regards,
Felix
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378292: marked as done (strigiapplet: FTBFS: missing build-dep)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:27:05 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line strigiapplet: FTBFS: missing build-dep has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: strigiapplet Version: 0.3.2-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Automatic build of strigiapplet_0.3.2-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.48 Build started at 20060715-0002 ** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Need to get 27.9kB of source archives. Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main strigiapplet 0.3.2-1 (dsc) [623B] Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main strigiapplet 0.3.2-1 (tar) [24.7kB] Get:3 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main strigiapplet 0.3.2-1 (diff) [2585B] Fetched 27.9kB in 0s (57.1kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 5), cmake, kdelibs4-dev, libstrigihtmlgui-dev Checking for already installed source dependencies... cdbs: missing debhelper: missing cmake: missing kdelibs4-dev: missing libstrigihtmlgui-dev: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Couldn't find package libstrigihtmlgui-dev apt-get failed. Package installation failed Trying to reinstall removed packages: Trying to uninstall newly installed packages: Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping strigiapplet ** Finished at 20060715-0002 Build needed 00:05:22, 8768k disk space -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:21:13AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: Package: strigiapplet Version: 0.3.2-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Automatic build of strigiapplet_0.3.2-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.48 Build started at 20060715-0002 ** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Need to get 27.9kB of source archives. Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main strigiapplet 0.3.2-1 (dsc) [623B] Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main strigiapplet 0.3.2-1 (tar) [24.7kB] Get:3 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main strigiapplet 0.3.2-1 (diff) [2585B] Fetched 27.9kB in 0s (57.1kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 5), cmake, kdelibs4-dev, libstrigihtmlgui-dev Checking for already installed source dependencies... cdbs: missing debhelper: missing cmake: missing kdelibs4-dev: missing libstrigihtmlgui-dev: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Couldn't find package libstrigihtmlgui-dev apt-get failed. Package installation failed Trying to reinstall removed packages: Trying to uninstall newly installed packages: Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping strigiapplet ** Finished at 20060715-0002 Build needed 00:05:22, 8768k disk space the build-dep was uploaded at the same time, so it's not valid, it's just a 'bad' scheduling of your autobuilder, that should have seen in the wanabuild or so that the build-dep was here. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#379893: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
Package: scribus-ng Version: 1.3.3.2.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Your package fails to build from source because it doesn't recognize Autoconf 2.60. A patch similar to http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kde-common/admin/cvs.sh?rev=555946r1= 543983r2=555946 should fix this problem. For some background, please see the discussion at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00958.html Automatic build of scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg-1 on usurper by sbuild/amd64 0.46 ... /usr/bin/make -f Makefile.cvs make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/scribus-ng-1.3.3.2.dfsg' make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/scribus-ng-1.3.3.2.dfsg' *** YOU'RE USING autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60. *** Scribus requires autoconf 2.53 or newer make[2]: *** [cvs] Error 1 -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379823: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
Martin Michlmayr writes: Your package fails to build from source because it doesn't recognize Autoconf 2.60. Will switch to autoreconf. Thanks ! -- +33 1 76 60 72 81 Loic Dachary mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379895: yacas: FTBFS: tries to install under /
Package: yacas Version: 1.0.57-2.1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Automatic build of yacas_1.0.57-2.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 Build started at 20060726-0815 ** ... /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean -k dh_clean: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated. dh_installdirs dh_installdirs: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated. dh_installdocs -a dh_installdocs: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated. /usr/bin/make prefix=`pwd`/debian/yacas/usr \ sysconfdir=`pwd`/debian/yacas/etc install make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57' Making install in . make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57' make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57' /bin/bash ./mkinstalldirs /build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/debian/yacas/usr/bin mkdir /build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/debian/yacas/usr/bin /usr/bin/install -c yacas_client /build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/debian/yacas/usr/bin/yacas_client /bin/bash ./mkinstalldirs /build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/debian/yacas/usr/share/yacas/ mkdir /build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/debian/yacas/usr/share/yacas for file in yacas-gmtplot2d.sh yacas-gmtplot3d.sh; do \ /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./$file /build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/debian/yacas/usr/share/yacas/$file; \ done make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57' make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57' Making install in docs make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/docs' make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/docs' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. /bin/bash ../mkinstalldirs /yacas//documentation mkdir /yacas mkdir: cannot create directory `/yacas': Permission denied mkdir /yacas/documentation mkdir: cannot create directory `/yacas/documentation': No such file or directory make[3]: *** [install-htmlDATA] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/docs' make[2]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57/docs' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/yacas-1.0.57' make: *** [install-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20060726-0824 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#379904: heartbeat: Local DoS due to world-writable shared memory [CVE-2006-3815]
Package: heartbeat Version: 1.2.4-12 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hi! Recently, a local DoS due to world-writable/readable shared memory permissions was found and fixed in heartbeat: Upstream fix: http://cvs.linux-ha.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/linux-ha/heartbeat/heartbeat.c?r1=1.513r2=1.514 This has been assigned CVE-2006-3815. Please mention this number in the changelog when you fix this to ease tracking. Thank you! Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#379765: marked as done (weechat - FTBFSa: Broken build dependency: libgnutls13-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:17:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379765: fixed in weechat 0.1.9-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: weechat Version: 0.1.9-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of weechat_0.1.9-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 5), libncursesw5-dev, ruby, ruby1.8-dev, libperl-dev, python-dev, liblualib50-dev, libgnutls13-dev | libgnutls-dev, libtool, xsltproc, docbook-xsl, docbook-xml, dpkg-dev (= 1.13.19) [...] E: Couldn't find package libgnutls13-dev apt-get failed. Package installation failed Trying to reinstall removed packages: Trying to uninstall newly installed packages: Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping weechat ** Finished at 20060724-1319 Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space Bastian -- I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth. -- Kirk, Errand of Mercy, stardate 3198.9 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: weechat Source-Version: 0.1.9-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of weechat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: weechat-common_0.1.9-3_all.deb to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat-common_0.1.9-3_all.deb weechat-curses_0.1.9-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat-curses_0.1.9-3_amd64.deb weechat-plugins_0.1.9-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat-plugins_0.1.9-3_amd64.deb weechat_0.1.9-3.diff.gz to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat_0.1.9-3.diff.gz weechat_0.1.9-3.dsc to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat_0.1.9-3.dsc weechat_0.1.9-3_all.deb to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat_0.1.9-3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Julien Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated weechat package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:53:25 +0200 Source: weechat Binary: weechat-common weechat-plugins weechat-curses weechat Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 0.1.9-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Helleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Julien Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: weechat- Fast, light and extensible IRC client weechat-common - Common files for WeeChat weechat-curses - Fast, light and extensible IRC client weechat-plugins - Plugins for WeeChat Closes: 379765 Changes: weechat (0.1.9-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Remove gnutls Build-Depends introduced in the previous upload (closes: #379765). * Move xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl to Build-Depends-Indep. * Change icon format from png to xpm. Files: c076741421751ccde74846054052bc95 850 net optional weechat_0.1.9-3.dsc 1cdb8f3bcec23962cda8bf3b6868 20085 net optional weechat_0.1.9-3.diff.gz afcc2457d314b9b8ed09791a83b9ef40 14188 net optional weechat_0.1.9-3_all.deb a1affc8f3597889ab016f17daa4f2b07 389564 net optional weechat-common_0.1.9-3_all.deb b0680254d75c6f42d8ade03cee51ce26 182398 net optional weechat-curses_0.1.9-3_amd64.deb 7f2480ddbf951856d4d91f7991acfb6c 75850 net optional weechat-plugins_0.1.9-3_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFExzGDvGr7W6HudhwRApO8AJ9mqve0oTTNFRNL+1gkhX2ztzTEsACfSAlJ mXx8DnHSD9/y1k/xsAqbqUE= =E7wr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#284770: Bug #284770: dbmail: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Thijs, Thanks for helping out here. I've fixed the changelog and have made the init script (hopefully) lsb compliant. Francisco is around it seems (but I won't be starting tomorrow). I've uploaded the new packages to debian.nfgd.net. -- Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlandshttp://www.nfg.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378029: Sid status
Hi! These vulnerabilities have already been fixed in 1.8.4-2 in sid. Akira, can you please retroactively add the CVE number to that changelog in your next upload? This will ease tracking. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#379585: [Pkg-kde-extras] how to continue: digikam 0.9-beta1 in unstable instead of experimental
Achim, Here is my strategy for dealing with the bad uploads of 0.8.2 0.9.0-beta. Then again it is 'unstable' we are talking about... :-) I have filed a bug http://bugs.debian.org/379441 against ftp.debian.org requesting removal of 0.9 from unstable. Failing that an upload of an epoc version 1:0.8.2 would be last resort as epoc's are forever, say if there isn't any joy from ftp-master in the next week. When (if) frp-master does remove 0.9 we can then upload an incremented 0.8.2 without epoc. Meanwhile I have uploaded digikamimageplugins 0.8.2-2 to Build Depend on digikam 0.8 0.9. This has the effect that apt-get won't normally upgrade digikam to 0.9-beat if imageplugins 8.2 from unstable is present. This should prevent most people from automatically upgrading to 0.9 unless they deliberatly want to. It also stops the buildd's using mismatched packages. Not ideal. Sorry about that guys.. :-( As for svn, the top level README does have some guidance, but I am aware that you weren't totally convinced last time. I see little work on 0.8.2 in the future with the bulk of our effort getting 0.9.0 together for final. In fact when 0.8.2 final migrates to testing we could probably release 0.9 beta/ rc into unstable with a serious bug to stop it migrating to testing before 0.9 final is released upstream. Thus I think we should track 0.9.0 in trunk and either: 1. Per the README just svn copy the few additional releases of 8.2 directly in tags, or 2. Generate branches/0.8.2 and then tag as we release. In my other team (pkg-voip-maintainers) we have done 1. Comments from others in pkg-kde-extras on 0.8.2 - 0.9.0 migration or the svn structure are welcome. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#284770: Bug #284770: dbmail: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote: (cc Francisco) Julien, I've just released dbmail-2.1.7 and have uploaded i386 and amd64 packages to my deb repo. The packages are lintian clean, and I'm quite happy with their state. All that remains tbd are some debconf cleanups. I've asked my sponsor Francisco Lovergine to vet the latest package set, and upload them if he's satisfied. Personally, the only obstacle I see is their dependency on a library that's not yet in debian (libsieve.sf.net). But I've also prepared packages for those that will close the related ITP (#325086) and have approached the owner of that ticket. Do I have to wait for libsieve ack or manage to upload paul's one? Answer by libsieve original proposer is not clear... -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379921: Uninstallable due to ada package updates
Package: libaws-dev Severity: serious Heya, libaws-dev is currently uninstallable, blocking the transition of asis to testing. Please update the package in the next few days. kthxbye, Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378836: marked as done (bluez-pcmcia-support: Package uninstallable)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:17:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#378836: fixed in bluez-utils 3.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: bluez-pcmcia-support Version: 3.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Installing the package fails if /etc/pcmcia/bluetooth is missing. That's the case for a fresh install. Here's the dpkg output: Errors were encountered while processing: bluez-pcmcia-support E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up bluez-pcmcia-support (3.1-2) ... chmod: cannot access `/etc/pcmcia/bluetooth': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing bluez-pcmcia-support (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: bluez-pcmcia-support Kind regards, Felix Homann -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.4-jawaka-splash Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages bluez-pcmcia-support depends on: ii bluez-utils 3.1-2 Bluetooth tools and daemons ii pcmciautils 014-1 PCMCIA utilities for Linux 2.6 Versions of packages bluez-pcmcia-support recommends: ii setserial 2.17-43controls configuration of serial p -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: bluez-utils Source-Version: 3.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bluez-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bluetooth_3.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluetooth_3.1-3_all.deb bluez-bcm203x_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/contrib/b/bluez-utils/bluez-bcm203x_3.1-3_powerpc.deb bluez-cups_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-cups_3.1-3_powerpc.deb bluez-pcmcia-support_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-pcmcia-support_3.1-3_powerpc.deb bluez-utils_3.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-utils_3.1-3.diff.gz bluez-utils_3.1-3.dsc to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-utils_3.1-3.dsc bluez-utils_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-utils_3.1-3_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Filippo Giunchedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated bluez-utils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:05:58 +0200 Source: bluez-utils Binary: bluez-pcmcia-support bluetooth bluez-bcm203x bluez-cups bluez-utils Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 3.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Bluetooth Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Filippo Giunchedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: bluetooth - Bluetooth stack utilities bluez-bcm203x - Firmware loader for Broadcom 203x based Bluetooth devices bluez-cups - Bluetooth printer driver for CUPS bluez-pcmcia-support - PCMCIA support files for BlueZ 2.0 Bluetooth tools bluez-utils - Bluetooth tools and daemons Closes: 378446 378836 379200 Changes: bluez-utils (3.1-3) unstable; urgency=low . * s/PWD/CURDIR/ to avoid sudo FTBFSage, thanks Dato! (Closes: #379200) * new handling of outgoing PIN requests: there's a /usr/lib/bluetooth/register-passkey script that is invoked by the init script, it registers every passkey found in /etc/bluetooth/passkeys via the /usr/lib/bluetooth/add-passkey (a modified version of upstream's passkey-agent). /etc/bluetooth/pin is converted to /etc/bluetooth/passkeys/default if found. I hope this Closes: #378446 . README.Debian updated accordingly. * fix postinst for bluez-pcmcia-support as we don't ship /etc/pcmcia/bluetooth anymore (Closes: #378836) Files: 940773f42fca6dff1737775c9a3e049a 878 admin optional
Bug#379624: marked as done (FTBFS: `debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/compile': No such file or directory)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:17:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379624: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: smarteiffel Version: 1.1-9 Severity: serious Hi, smarteiffel_1.1-9 FTBFS on amd64 with the following error: mv debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/compile debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/se-compile mv: cannot stat `debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/compile': No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 1 the file actually does not exist; there's only debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/compile_to_c. As you can see in [1], there are other sparse errors here and there, like: Your choice [5]: ** Warning: Unable to compute this anchored type mark (see next message). Line 422 column 18 in TYPE_INTEGER (/build/buildd/smarteiffel-1.1/tools/e_type/type_integer.e) : integer_8(sp: like start_position) is ^ -- ** Fatal Error: Cyclic anchored definition. Line 422 column 18 in TYPE_INTEGER (/build/buildd/smarteiffel-1.1/tools/e_type/type_integer.e) : integer_8(sp: like start_position) is ^ or: gcc: compile.c: No such file or directory sh: /build/buildd/smarteiffel-1.1/bin/compile: No such file or directory Thanks, Roberto [1] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=smarteiffelver=1.1-9arch=amd64stamp=1153747410file=logas=raw -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: smarteiffel Source-Version: 1.1-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of smarteiffel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: smarteiffel_1.1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/s/smarteiffel/smarteiffel_1.1-10.diff.gz smarteiffel_1.1-10.dsc to pool/main/s/smarteiffel/smarteiffel_1.1-10.dsc smarteiffel_1.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/s/smarteiffel/smarteiffel_1.1-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated smarteiffel package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:21:00 +0200 Source: smarteiffel Binary: smarteiffel Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: smarteiffel - GNU Eiffel compiler Closes: 356702 379624 Changes: smarteiffel (1.1-10) unstable; urgency=medium . * Applying patch from Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - proper workaround for GCC enforcing (Closes: #356702), which fixes the FTBFS on AMD64 finally (Closes: #379624). - fixing wrong manpage installation. * Fixed wrong binary symlink in /usr/lib/compile. Files: 55ccf03ba0f0bab7a2c38ba01ccfd088 615 devel optional smarteiffel_1.1-10.dsc 3a7ad340b9eae2e60f3df45fadca75ab 20837 devel optional smarteiffel_1.1-10.diff.gz a56bb9674a0d4cc6c1eeea5cc17dfe1e 2249708 devel optional smarteiffel_1.1-10_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFExy4t+C5cwEsrK54RAlYDAKDh0hFDDq3e9QQVx9wDbjyzH9RJvQCggraZ wAQ3ljLZKL5YercD/cU+ZUs= =KSWd -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#379359: More information on installation failure
Em Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:50:04 +0200 David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Still the same... This is weird, did you put the print thing before the os.symlink function call last time? I'll give it another try tonight, so expect new package to test. Thanks for the help! -- Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~kov/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379359: More information on installation failure
Em Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:50:04 +0200 David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Still the same... Ok, I updated the package again, can you give it one more go? Same location. Thanks, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~kov/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379200: marked as done (bluez-utils: FTBFS because sudo clears the environment)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:17:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379200: fixed in bluez-utils 3.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: bluez-utils Version: 3.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hello. Some of our autobuilders do use sudo instead of fakeroot to build the package. For some months now, the sudo package clears the environment, so you can't use variables from the environment in debian/rules anymore. PWD is such as environment variable; the common solution to this (common ;-) problem is to use CURDIR instead, which is a make var, not an env var. I'm pretty confident the attached patch will solve the issue, but it'd be great if you can test yourself, by reproducing the problem first, and applying the patch afterwards. BTW, please use urgency=high for the following bluez-utils uploads that fix RC bugs. Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Estopa - Exiliado en el lavabo --- rules~ 2006-07-22 07:09:20.0 +0200 +++ rules 2006-07-22 07:09:13.0 +0200 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ # FIXME test --enable-alsa # removed --enable-pcmcia --enable-dbus DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --disable-initscripts --enable-obex --enable-cups --enable-hid2hci --enable-bcm203x -DEB_DESTDIR := $(PWD)/debian/tmp +DEB_DESTDIR := $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp install/bluez-utils:: # modutils config file @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ install -D -m 0644 debian/lintian-overrides \ $(DEB_DESTDIR)/usr/share/lintian/overrides/bluez-utils - install -m 0644 $(PWD)/hcid/passkey-agent $(DEB_DESTDIR)/usr/bin/passkey-agent + install -m 0644 $(CURDIR)/hcid/passkey-agent $(DEB_DESTDIR)/usr/bin/passkey-agent # have a sensible pin default, the upstream one 'BlueZ' # cannot be typed on a phone keypad! @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ binary-install/bluez-pcmcia-support:: #chmod a+x $(DEB_DESTDIR)/etc/pcmcia/bluetooth - chmod a+x $(PWD)/debian/bluez-pcmcia-support/lib/udev/bluetooth.sh + chmod a+x $(CURDIR)/debian/bluez-pcmcia-support/lib/udev/bluetooth.sh install/bluez-bcm203x:: mkdir -p $(DEB_DESTDIR)/usr/lib/bluez-bcm203x ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: bluez-utils Source-Version: 3.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bluez-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bluetooth_3.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluetooth_3.1-3_all.deb bluez-bcm203x_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/contrib/b/bluez-utils/bluez-bcm203x_3.1-3_powerpc.deb bluez-cups_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-cups_3.1-3_powerpc.deb bluez-pcmcia-support_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-pcmcia-support_3.1-3_powerpc.deb bluez-utils_3.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-utils_3.1-3.diff.gz bluez-utils_3.1-3.dsc to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-utils_3.1-3.dsc bluez-utils_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-utils_3.1-3_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Filippo Giunchedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated bluez-utils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:05:58 +0200 Source: bluez-utils Binary: bluez-pcmcia-support bluetooth bluez-bcm203x bluez-cups bluez-utils Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 3.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Bluetooth Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Filippo Giunchedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: bluetooth - Bluetooth stack utilities bluez-bcm203x - Firmware loader for Broadcom 203x based Bluetooth devices bluez-cups - Bluetooth printer driver for CUPS bluez-pcmcia-support - PCMCIA support files for BlueZ 2.0 Bluetooth tools bluez-utils - Bluetooth tools and daemons Closes: 378446 378836 379200 Changes: bluez-utils (3.1-3) unstable;
Bug#378446: marked as done (bluez-utils: Bluetooth subsystem fails to react on PIN code request for outgoing connection)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:17:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#378446: fixed in bluez-utils 3.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: bluez-utils Version: 3.1-1 Severity: important There is no way to react on PIN code requests for outgoing connetions without passkey-agent running. Binary can be built from bluez-utils source but it needs to be included in binary package and running when PIN code request is received. sudo pand --autozap --role PANU --connect 00:04:61:85:D5:F0 while passkey-agent not running: --- Jul 16 05:49:51 kiara pand[32393]: Bluetooth PAN daemon version 3.1 Jul 16 05:49:51 kiara pand[32393]: Connecting to 00:04:61:85:D5:F0 Jul 16 05:49:55 kiara hcid[32355]: pin_code_request (sba=00:0D:93:14:A3:73, dba=00:04:61:85:D5:F0) Jul 16 05:49:55 kiara hcid[32355]: call_passkey_agent(): no agent registered Jul 16 05:49:55 kiara pand[32393]: Connect to 00:04:61:85:D5:F0 failed. Permission denied(13) --- sudo pand --autozap --role PANU --connect 00:04:61:85:D5:F0 while passkey-agent running: --- Jul 16 05:50:13 kiara pand[32396]: Bluetooth PAN daemon version 3.1 Jul 16 05:50:13 kiara pand[32396]: Connecting to 00:04:61:85:D5:F0 Jul 16 05:50:17 kiara hcid[32355]: pin_code_request (sba=00:0D:93:14:A3:73, dba=00:04:61:85:D5:F0) Jul 16 05:50:17 kiara hcid[32355]: Calling PasskeyAgent.Request: name=:1.24, path=/org/bluez/passkey_agent_32394 Jul 16 05:50:17 kiara hcid[32355]: link_key_notify (sba=00:0D:93:14:A3:73, dba=00:04:61:85:D5:F0) Jul 16 05:50:18 kiara pand[32396]: bnep0 connected --- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (1001, 'stable'), (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages bluez-utils depends on: ii libbluetooth2 3.1-1 Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdbus-1-20.62-4simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.62-4simple interprocess messaging syst ii libglib2.0-0 2.10.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-2userspace USB programming library ii lsb-base 3.1-10Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii makedev2.3.1-81 creates device files in /dev ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-3 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii modutils 2.4.26-1.2Linux module utilities ii sysvinit 2.86.ds1-14.1 System-V-like init utilities ii udev 0.093-1 /dev/ and hotplug management daemo bluez-utils recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: bluez-utils Source-Version: 3.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bluez-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bluetooth_3.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluetooth_3.1-3_all.deb bluez-bcm203x_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/contrib/b/bluez-utils/bluez-bcm203x_3.1-3_powerpc.deb bluez-cups_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-cups_3.1-3_powerpc.deb bluez-pcmcia-support_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-pcmcia-support_3.1-3_powerpc.deb bluez-utils_3.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-utils_3.1-3.diff.gz bluez-utils_3.1-3.dsc to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-utils_3.1-3.dsc bluez-utils_3.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/b/bluez-utils/bluez-utils_3.1-3_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Filippo Giunchedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated bluez-utils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:05:58 +0200 Source: bluez-utils Binary: bluez-pcmcia-support bluetooth
Bug#379585: Bug#379441: [Pkg-kde-extras] how to continue: digikam 0.9-beta1 in unstable instead of experimental
Le mer 26 juillet 2006 12:17, Mark Purcell a écrit : Achim, Here is my strategy for dealing with the bad uploads of 0.8.2 0.9.0-beta. Then again it is 'unstable' we are talking about... :-) I have filed a bug http://bugs.debian.org/379441 against ftp.debian.org requesting removal of 0.9 from unstable. Failing that an upload of an epoc version 1:0.8.2 would be last resort as epoc's are forever, say if there isn't any joy from ftp-master in the next week. When (if) frp-master does remove 0.9 we can then upload an incremented 0.8.2 without epoc. you will need an epoch, because people will have the 0.9 version installed. your fight is over, you lost already. let it go, shit happens, epoch is indeed designed for such situations. so it's your epoch-able problem number 1, too bad ;) -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpmBgUS2oSnw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#379859: rxvt-unicode: depends on libgcc1 (= 1:4.2-20060707) from experimental, uninstallable in Sid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 379859 pending Bug#379859: rxvt-unicode: depends on libgcc1 (= 1:4.2-20060707) from experimental, uninstallable in Sid There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379859: rxvt-unicode: depends on libgcc1 (= 1:4.2-20060707) from experimental, uninstallable in Sid
tag 379859 pending thanks * Sven Hartge [Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:39:27 +0200]: Package: rxvt-unicode Version: 7.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package is build with gcc4.2 from experimental and thus depends on libgcc1 from experimental which causes it to be uninstallable in Sid: rxvt-unicode: Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.2-20060707) but 1:4.1.1-9 is installed. I have asked for a binNMU to fix this. Unless stated otherwise, please consider for now that no maintainer upload is needed. Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Placebo - Haemoglobin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379585: [Pkg-kde-extras] how to continue: digikam 0.9-beta1 in unstable instead of experimental
* Mark Purcell [Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:17:08 +0100]: Achim, Hi, Here is my strategy for dealing with the bad uploads of 0.8.2 0.9.0-beta. Then again it is 'unstable' we are talking about... :-) I have filed a bug http://bugs.debian.org/379441 against ftp.debian.org requesting removal of 0.9 from unstable. I'm closing that bug, since what you are asking for is not ever done on the archive, sorry. Failing that an upload of an epoc version 1:0.8.2 would be last resort as epoc's are forever, say if there isn't any joy from ftp-master in the next week. When (if) frp-master does remove 0.9 we can then upload an incremented 0.8.2 without epoc. Epoch are ugly, so I can suggest that you upload to unstable: - digikam_0.9-really.0.8.2-1.changes, containing: digikam_0.9-really.0.8.2.orig.tar.gz, which is a copy of digikam_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz digikam_0.9-really.0.8.2-1.dsc digikam_0.9-really.0.8.2-1.diff.gz (You want 0.9-really.0.8, _NOT_ 0.9.really.0.8.) When 0.9, upload it as 0.9.0-1 (_NOT_ 0.9-1): % dpkg --compare-versions 0.9-beta1-1 lt 0.9-really.0.8.2-1 echo ok ok % dpkg --compare-versions 0.9-really.0.8.2-1 lt 0.9.0-1 echo ok ok % dpkg --compare-versions 0.9-really.0.8.2-1 lt 0.9-1 || echo not-ok not-ok I'm availabe on irc as dato if you have any doubts about the above. As for svn, the top level README does have some guidance, but I am aware that you weren't totally convinced last time. This is up to you. Having trunk/ always be the latest version is a good alternative, indeed. HTH, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Placebo - Blue American -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379722: bobcat: FTBFS: INSTALL.cf: not found
Hello Julien, Could you please elaborate on that FTBFS, since debian/rules build target passes just fine here, clean target is also fine. Perhaps if I know how you invoked the sbuild on bobcat package I can reproduce that ftbfs. Hm, did you run into free space shortage when the source package got uncompressed so that INSTALL.cf file was not there for you ? Thanks for your assistance. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bobcat: FTBFS: bashisms
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 379722 bobcat: FTBFS: bashisms Bug#379722: bobcat: FTBFS: INSTALL.cf: not found Changed Bug title. severity 379722 important Bug#379722: bobcat: FTBFS: bashisms Severity set to `important' from `serious' thanks teletubby Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379722: bobcat: FTBFS: bashisms
retitle 379722 bobcat: FTBFS: bashisms
severity 379722 important
thanks teletubby
Hello,
After further investigation wearing my Batman cape, I found several
bashisms:
Automatic build of bobcat_1.10.0-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
Build started at 20060725-0858
**
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
dpatch deapply-all
01_fix_yodl_macro not applied to ./ .
rm -rf patch-stamp patch-stampT debian/patched
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
./make/clean
rm -rf debian/bobcat debian/bobcat-dev build-stamp configure-stamp
debian/substvars
here
[: 19: ==: unexpected operator
rm -rf tmp release.yo o */o
cd documentation
rm -rf man/*html man/*{3,7}* bobcat man/man-stamp
here
dh_clean
debian/rules build
test -d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched
dpatch apply-all
applying patch 01_fix_yodl_macro to ./ ... ok.
dpatch cat-all patch-stampT
mv -f patch-stampT patch-stamp
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
./make/man
.: 3: INSTALL.cf: not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20060725-0859
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
This fails because my buildd has /bin/sh linked to dash.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#379930: gaphor: not installable in sid
Package: gaphor Version: 0.8.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install gaphor Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gaphor: Depends: python2.4-diacanvas2 (= 0.14.4) E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gaphor depends on: ii python-diacanvas2 [python2.4- 0.14.4-3 DiaCanvas2 library support for Pyt ii python-zopeinterface [python2 3.2.1-4The implementation of interface de ii python2.4 2.4.3-7An interactive high-level object-o gaphor recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379800: diff for 0.9.12-4.4 NMU
tags 379800 patch kthxbye Hi, I intend to NMU silc-toolkit with the attached patch, to fix the bug introduced by the -4.3 NMU. Cheers, Julien diff -u silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/libsilc-1.0-2.install silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/libsilc-1.0-2.install --- silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/libsilc-1.0-2.install +++ silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/libsilc-1.0-2.install @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -usr/lib/*.so* +usr/lib/*.so.* usr/lib/silc/*.so* diff -u silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/libsilc-1.0-2-dev.install silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/libsilc-1.0-2-dev.install --- silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/libsilc-1.0-2-dev.install +++ silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/libsilc-1.0-2-dev.install @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ usr/include/silc/*.h +usr/lib/lib*.so usr/lib/*.a usr/lib/*.la usr/lib/pkgconfig/*.pc diff -u silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/changelog silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/changelog --- silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/changelog +++ silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +silc-toolkit (0.9.12-4.4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Move libsilc.so and libsilcclient.so to the -dev package (Closes: +#379800). + + -- Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:42:57 +0200 + silc-toolkit (0.9.12-4.3) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#376863: brltty: needs NMU
Package: brltty Followup-For: Bug #376863 Hi, I think maybe it's better to depend on the generic libbluetooth-dev, so it'll avoid the same problem in the future, provide that the library package still provides it. By the way this will need NMU since Mario is on VAC till september. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-k7 Locale: LANG=es_PE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_PE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379585: Bug#379441: [Pkg-kde-extras] how to continue: digikam 0.9-beta1 in unstable instead of experimental
Le mer 26 juillet 2006 12:17, Mark Purcell a écrit : [...] you will need an epoch, because people will have the 0.9 version installed. your fight is over, you lost already. let it go, shit happens, epoch is indeed designed for such situations. so it's your epoch-able problem number 1, too bad ;) Thanks Pierre, I think you are right, an epoc won't hurt us... :-) Despite the suggestion from Adeodato I think we should just go with: 1:0.8.2-1 into unstable, and 1:0.9-beta1-1 into experimental 1:0.9-beta1-2 1:0.9-beta2-1 Which can then grow into: 1:0.9-rc1-1 1:0.9-rc1-2 1:0.9-rc2-1 ... and 1:0.9.0-1 when we getto final upstream Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379624: closed by Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#379624: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-10)
reopen 379624 thanks Same issue, you can check: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=smarteiffelver=1.1-10arch=amd64stamp=1153913092file=logas=raw Roberto Debian Bug Tracking System ha scritto: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #379624: FTBFS: `debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/compile': No such file or directory, which was filed against the smarteiffel package. It has been closed by Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] by replying to this email. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Oggetto: Bug#379624: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-10 Da: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:17:15 -0700 A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: smarteiffel Source-Version: 1.1-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of smarteiffel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: smarteiffel_1.1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/s/smarteiffel/smarteiffel_1.1-10.diff.gz smarteiffel_1.1-10.dsc to pool/main/s/smarteiffel/smarteiffel_1.1-10.dsc smarteiffel_1.1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/s/smarteiffel/smarteiffel_1.1-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated smarteiffel package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:21:00 +0200 Source: smarteiffel Binary: smarteiffel Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: smarteiffel - GNU Eiffel compiler Closes: 356702 379624 Changes: smarteiffel (1.1-10) unstable; urgency=medium . * Applying patch from Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - proper workaround for GCC enforcing (Closes: #356702), which fixes the FTBFS on AMD64 finally (Closes: #379624). - fixing wrong manpage installation. * Fixed wrong binary symlink in /usr/lib/compile. Files: 55ccf03ba0f0bab7a2c38ba01ccfd088 615 devel optional smarteiffel_1.1-10.dsc 3a7ad340b9eae2e60f3df45fadca75ab 20837 devel optional smarteiffel_1.1-10.diff.gz a56bb9674a0d4cc6c1eeea5cc17dfe1e 2249708 devel optional smarteiffel_1.1-10_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFExy4t+C5cwEsrK54RAlYDAKDh0hFDDq3e9QQVx9wDbjyzH9RJvQCggraZ wAQ3ljLZKL5YercD/cU+ZUs= =KSWd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#379624 closed by Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#379624: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-10)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 379624 Bug#379624: FTBFS: `debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/compile': No such file or directory 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: diff for 0.9.12-4.4 NMU
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 379800 patch Bug#379800: silc-toolkit: libsilc.so and libsilcclient.so should be in the -dev package There were no tags set. Tags added: patch kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: fixing FTBFS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 379266 + patch Bug#379266: FTBFS: needs an update for new libxclass0-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379266: fixing FTBFS
tags 379266 + patch thanks Hi, the FTBFS can be avoided just relaxing the build-dep (libxclass0-dev 0.9.0). I really think it can be avoided, as it compile and build even with newer libraries. So I've removed it, and the build goes fine. Attached is the patch to fix this. Cheers, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno : :' : The Universal O.S.| luca.br(AT)uno.it `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Proud Debian GNU/Linux User rfb.patch Description: Binary data pgpoPU6ez5emS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#357231: Dupe of #340590 ?
I think that this bug is a dupe of bug #340590 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=340590. Am I right or wrong ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to zope-plonearticle, tagging 379177
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 package zope-plonearticle Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zope-plonearticle tags 379177 + pending Bug#379177: zope-plonearticle: Site error when adding or editing There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to zope-plonearticle, tagging 379177
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 package zope-plonearticle Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zope-plonearticle tags 379177 + pending Bug#379177: zope-plonearticle: Site error when adding or editing Tags were: pending Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#284770: Bug #284770: dbmail: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
I dont know. José claims he has uploaded packages six weeks ago, but there's nothing to be found online. I've checked packages.qa.d.o and bugs.d.o... But the ITP hasn't been closed, so I suppose it never made it. Also, the dbmail packages depend on libsieve =2.1.12, which was only released last weekend. José, any news wrt #325086? If not, would you mind if Francisco uploads my packages? Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote: (cc Francisco) Julien, I've just released dbmail-2.1.7 and have uploaded i386 and amd64 packages to my deb repo. The packages are lintian clean, and I'm quite happy with their state. All that remains tbd are some debconf cleanups. I've asked my sponsor Francisco Lovergine to vet the latest package set, and upload them if he's satisfied. Personally, the only obstacle I see is their dependency on a library that's not yet in debian (libsieve.sf.net). But I've also prepared packages for those that will close the related ITP (#325086) and have approached the owner of that ticket. Do I have to wait for libsieve ack or manage to upload paul's one? Answer by libsieve original proposer is not clear... -- Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlandshttp://www.nfg.nl
Bug#379648: csound: There are some files with a license not DFSG compatible
close 379648 stop On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 at 19:37 +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote: Files are not there, so please, consider removing the notice from copyright file. It does remain another strange thing, though. Now, paying more attention to the output of grep, I see that scansyn and scansynx files does not appear, but the notice is contained in two other files instead: grain4.c and grain4.h. They contain both licenses, the LGPL and the other non DFSG one (Why?) Good idea. Upstream has traditionally been sloppy with their licenses, I had to encourage them to add or change many licenses when originally packaging. I haven't looked closely yet, but I think csound5 does a better job of this. In only a couple of weeks I'll have the time to package csound5. I'm not sure if that will be in time for etch or not, but I'm crossing my fingers. -- Hans Fugal ; http://hans.fugal.net There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself. -- Johann Sebastian Bach signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#379177: marked as done (zope-plonearticle: Site error when adding or editing)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:18:20 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379177: fixed in zope-plonearticle 1:3.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: zope-plonearticle Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This is for v3.2.0-2 on a testing (etch) box. I have an out-of-the-box plone-site. When I install plone article (with help from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339049), and add an article to my folder, I get: Site error This site encountered an error trying to fulfill your request. The errors were: Error Type TypeError Error Value iteration over non-sequence Request made at 2006/07/22 00:59:42.888 GMT+1 If I go up a level, then down into the article, then click edit, the same occurs. Please advise if you need any more info. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.1.20060102 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: zope-plonearticle Source-Version: 1:3.2.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zope-plonearticle, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: zope-plonearticle_3.2.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zope-plonearticle/zope-plonearticle_3.2.2-1.diff.gz zope-plonearticle_3.2.2-1.dsc to pool/main/z/zope-plonearticle/zope-plonearticle_3.2.2-1.dsc zope-plonearticle_3.2.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/z/zope-plonearticle/zope-plonearticle_3.2.2-1_all.deb zope-plonearticle_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/z/zope-plonearticle/zope-plonearticle_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated zope-plonearticle package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:31:30 +0200 Source: zope-plonearticle Binary: zope-plonearticle Architecture: source all Version: 1:3.2.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Zope Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: zope-plonearticle - plone document that can incorporate images and attachment Closes: 379177 Changes: zope-plonearticle (1:3.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release: - enhance Plone 2.1.3 compatibility. (Closes: #379177) * Remove .cvsignore files from package. Files: d1c19bffea4a05cd6745761c65b7d238 777 web optional zope-plonearticle_3.2.2-1.dsc a13e2ea5bcfaa374a19339cbc1f9d4f8 1102546 web optional zope-plonearticle_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz 4e30532a11c486ab2747098740389fef 2342 web optional zope-plonearticle_3.2.2-1.diff.gz 41f7e895a55af229c1c325b81cf5730d 159776 web optional zope-plonearticle_3.2.2-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEx3ZWK/juK3+WFWQRAnnEAJ451gLedUqMzhLsii3W4tJlgjplgACeIWsk 6loRXGbdCrTZHbPDQ5dZkzs= =22dg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#379202: half-fixed
hi, I fixed the afile missing FTBFS with a simple patch (attached) like: ** -afile=afile +afile=bglafile ** to etc/bigloo/configure, but then it fail with other errors which i can't understand: ** touch configure-stamp dh_testdir # Add here commands to compile the package. /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/luca/mionm/skribe-1.2d' (cd src/bigloo /usr/bin/make) make[2]: Entering directory `/home/luca/mionm/skribe-1.2d/src/bigloo' mkdir -p o bigloo -copt -fPIC -I ../bigloo -no-hello -fno-reflection -O3 -c \ ../bigloo/param.bgl ../common/param.scm -o o/param.o bigloo -copt -fPIC -I ../bigloo -no-hello -fno-reflection -O3 -c \ ../bigloo/api.bgl ../common/api.scm -o o/api.o *** WARNING:bigloo:(@ list-split __r4_pairs_and_lists_6_3) Variable overridden by -- (@ list-split skribe_lib) File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval # Wrong number of argument -- make-dsssl-function-prelude 0.cons* File ../bigloo/api.sch, line 42, character 2010: #,(make-dsssl-function-prelude proto # ^ # *** ERROR:eval
Bug#379624: closed by Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#379624: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-10)
Roberto Pariset wrote: Same issue, you can check: ok. consider amd64 as dropped now as I don't have one myself, and pergolesi is locked. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369860: NMU diff
tag 369860 - fixed found 369860 0.16.1-3.1 thanks Le samedi 10 juin 2006 à 14:47 +0200, Clément Stenac a écrit : Hello, Please find attached the NMU diff Regards, Looking at it (yes, very late), I don't think it fixes the problem at all. The schemas should be *removed* from /etc, not added to /etc. This means all versions including 0.16.1-3.1 will pollute /etc. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Processed: tagging 369860, found 369860 in 0.16.1-3.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 369860 - fixed Bug#369860: calls gconftool-2 on old schemas file Tags were: fixed patch Tags removed: fixed found 369860 0.16.1-3.1 Bug#369860: calls gconftool-2 on old schemas file Bug marked as found in version 0.16.1-3.1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376777: apt-utils: apt-ftparchive fails to generate Contents files
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 07:59:45PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:31:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: package apt-utils tag 376777 - help tag 376777 + patch thanks I'm pretty sure this bug is simply due to misuse of auto_ptr in writer.cc Okay, I've no idea if this is right or not now; but it's not the real bug; and if it were, there's more to it than just that one assignment. The real bug is in tagfile.cc, in particular the patch fixing Bug#350025 -- using MMap doesn't work if your Fd is a pipe, which it is if you point apt-ftparchive at a suite that doesn't have an uncompressed Packages file, and ask it to generate Contents. Fix is reverting the patch, at least for the case where your input file size is empty. I put a branch that should fix the issue up at http://people.ubuntu.com/~mvo/bzr/apt/tagfile-mmap-fix/ I send a patch to James asking for testing and will upload it to experimental (along with some other fixes there). Once I got positive feedback on the patch I will merge it into the sid version of apt and upload. The new version will use MMap if possible in tagfile and if not fall back to the old implementation. Thanks, Michael -- Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: fixing patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 379479 + patch Bug#379479: statdataml: FTBFS: Error: package 'XML' could not be loaded There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379479: fixing patch
tags 379479 + patch thanks Hi, the attached patch adds r-cran-xml as build-dep and so let it build fine (tested in a pbuilder). Please apply it. Cheers, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno : :' : The Universal O.S.| luca.br(AT)uno.it `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Proud Debian GNU/Linux User statdataml.patch Description: Binary data pgpKIOlLr8kbh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#376863: brltty: needs NMU
Hi, Rudy Godoy, le Wed 26 Jul 2006 07:56:06 -0500, a écrit : Hi, I think maybe it's better to depend on the generic libbluetooth-dev, so it'll avoid the same problem in the future, provide that the library package still provides it. It seems to. Samuel
Bug#375601: pending upload
tag 375601 pending thanks this is fixed in our bzr branch, and should be fixed with the next upload. live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363061: seminar is not DFSG-free, needs relicensing
On 22.07.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hilmar Preuße [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21.07.06 Frank K?ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, - non-commercial - renamed copies may not be distributed at all, only fragments, whatever that is. There is already a bug open. The author stated, that the non-free license statement is obsolete. He agreed, that anybody can upload an updated version to CTAN and about a year ago I promised to do so. Yes, it is still on my list. Any idea when you will manage to to the upload (days, weeks, months, before the freeze date?). Do you know whether teTeX 3.0 has the current version (I guess so)? I had a look at that and could wipe out the non-free license statements. However there are a lot of files (3-4 liners and lousy hacks), which do not contain any lic statement. Sould I insert the statement too? H. -- sigmentation fault
Bug#379837: postinst does not respect existence of file-rc (using rm -f /etc/rc0.d/K88pcmciautils)
severity 379837 normal thanks On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:58:27PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: Package: pcmciautils Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.3.1 # cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/pcmciautils.postinst [...] # Remove shutdown and reboot links; # this init script does not need them. if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 014-2; then rm -f /etc/rc0.d/K88pcmciautils \ /etc/rc6.d/K88pcmciautils My system (using file-rc) does not know anything about /etc/rc*.d. Please read the policy and use update-rc.d instead. I would welcome your suggestion as to a way to perform the function above (i.e. remove the script from just two runlevels) using update-rc.d, without entirely removing and reinstating the links. To the best of my knowledge, there is no way to do this. Also, the usual consequences of failing to use update-rc.d don't apply here, so I don't think this bug needs to be release-critical and I'm downgrading it to normal. The only consequence of this bug is that upgraded systems using file-rc have a slightly less efficient shutdown/reboot process. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379982: Misuse of alternatives
Package: git Version: 4.3.20-8 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.1 10.1 Binaries Two different packages must not install programs with different functionality but with the same filenames. (The case of two programs having the same functionality but different implementations is handled via alternatives or the Conflicts mechanism. See Maintainer Scripts, Section 3.9 and Conflicting binary packages - Conflicts, Section 7.3 respectively.) If this case happens, one of the programs must be renamed. The maintainers should report this to the debian-devel mailing list and try to find a consensus about which program will have to be renamed. If a consensus cannot be reached, both programs must be renamed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263783: marked as done (Do not include it on testing)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:39:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line debpartial-mirror: allow to propegate to testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: debpartial-mirror Version: 0.2.8 Severity: critical This package is not ready for a stable release yet so this bug will keep it out of Sarge. Thanks, Otavio Salvador -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR Versions of packages debpartial-mirror depends on: ii python2.3.4-1An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.2.92 after testing debpartial-mirror in etch and sid, and talking with otavio, we believe that debpartial-mirror is ok to allow to propegate to testing, now. live well, vagrant ---End Message---
Processed: pending upload
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 375601 pending Bug#375601: ltsp-server: ltsp-build-client using gettext without load gettext.sh There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#379837: postinst does not respect existence of file-rc (using rm -f /etc/rc0.d/K88pcmciautils)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 379837 normal Bug#379837: postinst does not respect existence of file-rc (using rm -f /etc/rc0.d/K88pcmciautils) Severity set to `normal' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363061: seminar is not DFSG-free, needs relicensing
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22.07.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hilmar Preuße [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21.07.06 Frank K?ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, - non-commercial - renamed copies may not be distributed at all, only fragments, whatever that is. There is already a bug open. The author stated, that the non-free license statement is obsolete. He agreed, that anybody can upload an updated version to CTAN and about a year ago I promised to do so. Yes, it is still on my list. Any idea when you will manage to to the upload (days, weeks, months, before the freeze date?). Do you know whether teTeX 3.0 has the current version (I guess so)? I had a look at that and could wipe out the non-free license statements. However there are a lot of files (3-4 liners and lousy hacks), which do not contain any lic statement. Sould I insert the statement too? Can you send the author's complete mail to you to the bug report? I think he's the one to know - whether he has the copyright for all parts - whether everything should be under the new license. So I'd need the author's statement to be able to answer your question. Except if you think that the files are so short that there's nothing copyrightable in them (note that integration of two things by one short file might be more creative work than a couple of lines seem). Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#379988: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libyaz
Package: libnet-z3950-perl Severity: serious Version: 0.51-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on libyaz which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to update that dependency to libyaz2 (build depending on libyaz2-dev). Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#379986: conflicts with current xfce
Package: xfdesktop4 Version: 4.3.90.1-2 Severity: grave xfdesktop4 depends on libxfce4util2. Most other xfce stuff depends on libxfce4util4 which conflicts with libxfce4util2. So one has to choose... I guess xfdesktop4 just needs a recompile with the new lib. -- Robbe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379987: Can not start squid after recent update (July 26,2006)
Package: squid Version: 2.6.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After Squid update on Etch I can not start the program any longer with the following settings in my config file: httpd_accel_host virtual httpd_accel_port 80 httpd_accel_with_proxy on httpd_accel_uses_host_header on I get the following errors: Restarting Squid HTTP proxy: squid2006/07/26 13:24:19| parseConfigFile: line 2186 unrecognized: 'httpd_accel_host virtual' 2006/07/26 13:24:19| parseConfigFile: line 2187 unrecognized: 'httpd_accel_port 80' 2006/07/26 13:24:19| parseConfigFile: line 2216 unrecognized: 'httpd_accel_with_proxy on' 2006/07/26 13:24:19| parseConfigFile: line 2236 unrecognized: 'httpd_accel_uses_host_header on' Please resolve. ~Andrew. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages squid depends on: ii adduser 3.87 Add and remove users and groups ii coreutils 5.96-5 The GNU core utilities ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.2Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdb4.34.3.29-4.1 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [ ii libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam0g0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii logrotate 3.7.1-3 Log rotation utility ii lsb-base3.1-10 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii netbase 4.25 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii squid-common2.6.1-3 Internet Object Cache (WWW proxy c squid recommends no packages. -- debconf information: squid/fix_cachedir_perms: false squid/largefiles_warning: squid/anonymize_headers: squid/authenticate_program: squid-cgi/cachemgr: squid/fix_lines: true squid/old_version: false squid/http_anonymizer: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 379930
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 379930 + confirmed pending Bug#379930: gaphor: not installable in sid There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378183: apt: All SHA256 hashes generated/used by APT are wrong
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:01:46AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote: Package: apt Version: 0.6.44.2 Severity: critical Tags: security patch Justification: breaks the whole system Thanks for your bugreport and your patch. I applied the patch and I added a test in tests/hashes.cc for the sha256 code. The SHA256 checksums recently added to Packages files are wrong due to a porting error when the sha256 implementation code was imported from the Linux kernel sources to the apt source tree. Specifically, the broken sha256 code checksums only 19 out of every 64 bytes of input and otherwise computes a result which is neither sha256(input) nor sha256(mangled input). According to the changelog, the broken code was added to non-experimental apt in version 0.6.44 uploaded 8 May 2006 . This has the following severe consequences: - The broken hash values obviously do not provide anything resembling the security needed by secure apt, a problem compounded by the broken status of the other two hash algorithms used (MD5 and SHA1). Thus the security tag. The current version of apt is not yet fully converted to use sha256. Currently we generate them in apt-ftparchive but they are not yet checked when the files are downloaded (only sha1/md5 is right now). There is a branch to fully do sha256 at http://people.ubuntu.com/~mvo/bzr/apt/sha256/ but it is not finished and there are several issues that needs to be resolved first. - When the code is fixed to produce and check correct SHA256 hashes, the fact that these values are different from the broken values means that a correct apt will reject all Packages files produced by a broken apt and a broken apt will reject all Packages files produced by a correct apt. This means that when such a new apt implementation is placed in the debian archive, the whole system becomes impossible to install or upgrade: [..] See above, this is not a issue right now. Cheers, Michael -- Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in upload of apt 0.6.45exp1 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 296103 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#296103: APT 0.6 sometimes fails with gpgv Tags were: patch Bug#376227: Inappropriately suggests running apt-get update Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 368038 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#368038: INTL:vi Vietnamese translation for apt Tags were: pending patch l10n Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 370551 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#370551: apt: %s in traditional Chinese translation Tags were: pending l10n Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 373729 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#373729: [INTL:ne] Nepali apt translation Tags were: pending l10n patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 373864 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#373864: gzip-name gets mangled if apt-ftparchive is run via cron-job There were no tags set. Bug#341326: apt-utils: Memory corruption or string bug running apt-ftparchive via cron Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 375068 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#375068: [INTL:km] apt translation Tags were: pending l10n patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 375640 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#375640: [doc] man pages refer to guide in /usr/share/doc/apt/ not apt-doc/ There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 376330 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#376330: [INTL:hu] Updated Hungarian apt translation Tags were: pending l10n patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 376408 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#376408: apt: s/advoid/avoid/ apt-cache.8 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 377391 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#377391: Extremely irritating libparted error message during LVM on RAID setup Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 378183 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#378183: apt: All SHA256 hashes generated/used by APT are wrong Tags were: patch security Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 378901 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#378901: [INTL:ko] apt Korean translation update Tags were: pending l10n patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 379576 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#379576: apt-utils: apt-ftparchive clean doesn't work due to cachedb format change Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368804: Bug#375453: bugs 368804 and 375453 present in 0.4.9-2 in sarge?
Hi Stefan, Stefan Fritsch schrieb: Just for the record, has anyone of you checked whether these bugs are present in sarge? no, the invalid password option was introduced with LAM 0.5. Sarge has 0.4.9. Greetings Roland -- LDAP Account Manager http://lam.sourceforge.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#377449: swapspace: still does fail to parse /proc/meminfo here
Hi! [..] I've just committed a patch to make the care a bit less extreme. Could you test this? [..] Thank you very much for the patch. I am neither a developer nor a debian package maintainer, but I tried my luck with apt-get source, patch -p 0, apt-get -b source and dpkg -i. And now it runs: Starting dynamic swap manager: swapspaceInitial memory status: 1079393600 bytes to spare . So at least for vanilla 2.6.17.4 I can report that the patch works, eventually I will upgrade to 2.6.17.7 before 2.6.18 is out, but here in Germany we currently experience a hot spell so running a Personal Computer in ones overheated home is difficult enough, let alone putting it to work at the moment ;). Regards Sebastian pgp1XmdIMbhug.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: found bug #376979
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 376979 0.8.5-1 Bug#376979: democracyplayer: Segmentation fault on start Bug marked as found in version 0.8.5-1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379359: More information on installation failure
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:11:53AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: Em Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:50:04 +0200 David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Still the same... Ok, I updated the package again, can you give it one more go? Same location. This is with the extra print statement in update-python-modules added. smyslov:~/deb# dpkg -i python-kiwi_1.9.8-6_all.deb (Reading database ... 191149 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace python-kiwi 1.9.8-6 (using python-kiwi_1.9.8-6_all.deb) ...Unpacking replacement python-kiwi ... Setting up python-kiwi (1.9.8-6) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/sbin/update-python-modules, line 269, in ? process(basedir,install_modules(py_installed)) File /usr/sbin/update-python-modules, line 151, in process func(basedir, dir, file) File /usr/sbin/update-python-modules, line 123, in install_modules_func os.symlink(fullpath,destpath) OSError: [Errno 17] File exists dpkg: error processing python-kiwi (--install): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: python-kiwi smyslov:~/deb# /usr/sbin/update-python-modules -i /usr/share/python-support/python-kiwi /usr/share/python-support/python-kiwi/kiwi-1.9.8.egg-info/top_level.txt /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/kiwi-1.9.8.egg-info/top_level.txt /usr/share/python-support/python-kiwi/kiwi-1.9.8.egg-info/PKG-INFO /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/kiwi-1.9.8.egg-info/PKG-INFO /usr/share/python-support/python-kiwi/kiwi-1.9.8.egg-info/SOURCES.txt /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/kiwi-1.9.8.egg-info/SOURCES.txt Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/sbin/update-python-modules, line 269, in ? process(basedir,install_modules(py_installed)) File /usr/sbin/update-python-modules, line 151, in process func(basedir, dir, file) File /usr/sbin/update-python-modules, line 123, in install_modules_func os.symlink(fullpath,destpath) OSError: [Errno 17] File exists Regards: David -- /) David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /) Rime on my window (\ // ~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/(/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379987: This is a feature, not a bug
I ran into the same problem a couple of days ago. Have a look at /usr/share/doc/squid/RELEASENOTES.html.gz (Lynx will view gzipped HTML, so I've just learned) The method of configuring acceleration has changed. The documentation hasn't been updated, and I consider that a bug. Here's my new configuration: http port 3128 defaultsite=localhost:80 cache_peer localhost parent 80 0 no-query originserver If you google for terms like cache_peer and originserver you will likely find some additional configuration examples. -- graham -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380006: gal0.x: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on automake1.4
Package: gal0.x
Version: 0.24-7
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log (on i386, with an up-to-date sid chroot):
...
- Installing flex libgnome-dev gnome-common gettext libxml-dev
libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev libgnomeprint-dev libgnome-vfs-dev libglade-gnome0-dev
debhelper intltool libgtkxmhtml-dev libzvt-dev dbs
...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
autoconf automake1.9 autotools-dev bzip2 dbs debhelper defoma esound-common
file flex gconf gdk-imlib11 gdk-imlib11-dev gettext gettext-base gnome-bin
gnome-common gnome-libs-data gnome-mime-data gs gs-common gs-gpl gsfonts
html2text imlib-base indent intltool intltool-debian libart-dev libart2
libaudiofile-dev libaudiofile0 libbz2-1.0 libcdparanoia0 libdb3-dev libesd0
libesd0-dev libexpat1 libfreetype6 libfreetype6-dev libgconf-dev libgconf11
libgdk-pixbuf-dev libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2
libgdk-pixbuf2 libglade-gnome0 libglade-gnome0-dev libglade0 libglade0-dev
libglib1.2 libglib1.2-dev libgnome-dev libgnome-vfs-common libgnome-vfs-dev
libgnome-vfs0 libgnome32 libgnomeprint-bin libgnomeprint-data
libgnomeprint-dev libgnomeprint15 libgnomesupport0 libgnomeui32
libgnorba-dev libgnorba27 libgnorbagtk0 libgtk1.2 libgtk1.2-common
libgtk1.2-dev libgtkxmhtml-dev libgtkxmhtml1 libhtml-parser-perl
libhtml-tagset-perl libhtml-tree-perl libice-dev libice6 libjpeg62
libjpeg62-dev libmagic1 libnewt0.52 liboaf-dev liboaf0 liborbit-dev
liborbit0 libpaper1 libpng12-0 libpng12-dev libpopt-dev libpopt0 libsm-dev
libsm6 libtiff4 libtool libungif4g liburi-perl libwrap0 libwrap0-dev
libwww-perl libx11-6 libx11-data libx11-dev libxau-dev libxau6 libxdmcp-dev
libxdmcp6 libxext-dev libxext6 libxi-dev libxi6 libxml-dev
libxml-parser-perl libxml1 libxpm-dev libxpm4 libxt-dev libxt6 libzvt-dev
libzvt2 m4 oaf pkg-config po-debconf ucf whiptail x-dev x11-common
x11proto-core-dev x11proto-input-dev x11proto-kb-dev x11proto-xext-dev
xtrans-dev zlib1g-dev
...
cd build-tree/gal-0.24 \
NOCONFIGURE=1 srcdir=. ACLOCAL_FLAGS=-I macros gnome-autogen.sh \
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man \
--infodir=\${prefix}/share/info \
--enable-shared --disable-gtk-doc --disable-gtktest
checking for autoconf = 2.53...
testing autoconf2.50... not found.
testing autoconf... found 2.60
checking for automake = 1.4...
testing automake-1.4... not found.
***Error***: You must have automake = 1.4 installed
to build Package. Download the appropriate package for
from your distribution or get the source tarball at
http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/automake/automake-1.4.tar.gz
checking for libtool = 1.5...
testing libtoolize... found 1.5.22
/usr/bin/gnome-autogen.sh: line 149: --print-ac-dir: command not found
...
Checking for required M4 macros...
gnome-compiler-flags.m4 not found
libtool.m4 not found
Checking for forbidden M4 macros...
***Error***: some autoconf macros required to build Package
were not found in your aclocal path, or some forbidden
macros were found. Perhaps you need to adjust your
ACLOCAL_FLAGS?
make: *** [stampdir/configure] Error 1
If I add automake1.4 to the Build-Depends, the package builds successfully.
I've attached the full pbuilder build log.
--
Daniel Schepler
W: /root/.pbuilderrc does not exist
I: using fakeroot in build.
pbuilder-buildpackage/i386 $Id: pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs,v 1.31 2006/05/30
23:45:45 dancer Exp $
$Id: pbuilder-buildpackage,v 1.126 2006/06/10 15:09:52 dancer Exp $
Current time: Wed Jul 26 15:39:49 EDT 2006
pbuilder-time-stamp: 1153942789
Building the build Environment
- extracting base tarball [/var/cache/pbuilder/base.tgz]
- creating local configuration
- copying local configuration
- mounting /proc filesystem
- mounting /dev/pts filesystem
- policy-rc.d already exists
Obtaining the cached apt archive contents
Installing the build-deps
- Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.28
2006/05/30 23:45:45 dancer Exp $
- Considering flex
- Trying flex
- Considering libgnome-dev (= 1.4.2-4)
- Trying libgnome-dev
- Considering gnome-common
- Trying gnome-common
- Considering gettext ( 0.14.5)
- Trying gettext
- Considering libxml-dev (= 1.8.5)
- Trying libxml-dev
- Considering libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev (= 0.22.0-9)
- Trying libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev
- Considering libgnomeprint-dev (= 0.37-10)
- Trying libgnomeprint-dev
- Considering libgnome-vfs-dev (= 1.0.3)
- Trying libgnome-vfs-dev
- Considering libglade-gnome0-dev (= 1:0.17-4)
- Trying libglade-gnome0-dev
- Considering debhelper ( 3.0.0)
- Trying debhelper
- Considering intltool
- Trying intltool
- Considering libgtkxmhtml-dev
- Trying libgtkxmhtml-dev
- Considering libzvt-dev
- Trying libzvt-dev
- Considering dbs
- Trying dbs
- Considering binutils (= 2.13.90.0.18-1.6) [alpha]
- This package is not for this architecture
-
Bug#357231: Dupe of #340590 ?
YL wrote: I think that this bug is a dupe of bug #340590 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=340590. Am I right or wrong ? I don't think you're right. #340590 was about an improper version of libcln and was fixed Fri, 25 Nov 2005. #357231 was about improper versions of libs from GCC and was fixed Thu, 16 Mar 2006. Anyway, both bugs are archived. Why should anyone care? -richy. -- .''`. Richard B. Kreckel : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380014: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libyaz
Package: tellico Severity: serious Version: 1.1.6-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on libyaz which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to update that dependency to libyaz2 (by changing the build-dep to libyaz2-dev for a start). Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#377986: marked as done (FTBFS: b-d cannot be fulfiled, gnat version too high)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#377986: fixed in adasockets 1.8.4.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: adasockets Version: 1.8.4.7-2 Severity: serious This package needs an update for the new gnats: Automatic build of adasockets_1.8.4.7-2 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by sbuild/powerpc 0.47 ... Setting up libgnatprj4.1 (4.1.1-8) ... Setting up gnat-4.1 (4.1.1-8) ... Setting up gnat (4.1.1-3) ... Checking correctness of source dependencies... After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: gnat(inst 4.1.1-3 ! wanted 3.16) Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping adasockets (Reading database ... 12611 files and directories currently installed.) Removing gnat ... Removing debhelper ... -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: adasockets Source-Version: 1.8.4.7-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of adasockets, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: adasockets_1.8.4.7-3.diff.gz to pool/main/a/adasockets/adasockets_1.8.4.7-3.diff.gz adasockets_1.8.4.7-3.dsc to pool/main/a/adasockets/adasockets_1.8.4.7-3.dsc libadasockets0-dev_1.8.4.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/a/adasockets/libadasockets0-dev_1.8.4.7-3_i386.deb libadasockets0_1.8.4.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/a/adasockets/libadasockets0_1.8.4.7-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated adasockets package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:58:59 + Source: adasockets Binary: libadasockets0-dev libadasockets0 Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.8.4.7-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libadasockets0 - bindings for socket services in Ada libadasockets0-dev - bindings for socket services in Ada Closes: 377986 Changes: adasockets (1.8.4.7-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * Fixed FTBFS by changing (build-)depends to gnat (closes: #377986). * Change to newer gnat means that architecture can be `any'. * Bumped standards-version to 3.7.2. Files: 7bd2f7504fe3a30736848ceeacbc 615 devel extra adasockets_1.8.4.7-3.dsc 5c7c96c458d3198abe673f0fb7552050 148075 devel extra adasockets_1.8.4.7-3.diff.gz e454ecc51d4f6abdc3161e058b483682 219592 libdevel extra libadasockets0-dev_1.8.4.7-3_i386.deb b15ca1e30c6d33f4282404a70d95f5de 44816 libs extra libadasockets0_1.8.4.7-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEx70nHb8HEVCXO5ERAiyhAJ95jjDUX1Vyy8ZiAo73lYo4XHV0RACfQ2/6 abf3okXwei+qMqjmA+D7PGI= =ulxX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: found 379390 in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 found 379390 Bug#379390: libxmlsec1-gnutls: Dependency information incorrect. Links agains libgutls13, depends on libgnutls11 Bug reopened. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378962: konqueror: CVE-2006-3672: remote denial of service (crash)
Alec Berryman wrote: CVE-2006-3672: KDE Konqueror 3.5.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) by calling the replaceChild method on a DOM object, which triggers a null dereference, as demonstrated by calling document.replaceChild with a 0 (zero) argument. I have reproduced this with 4:3.5.3-2 using [1]. A backtrace is attached. I have not yet confirmed if this issue affects sarge. Thanks, this doesn't affect stable, at least not with the reproducer above. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374209: python-parted NMU.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:58:01PM +, Gustavo Franco wrote: python-parted (0.11.3) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/control: - Build-Depends on libparted1.7. (Closes: #374209) * Merge new parted API patch by Colin Watson. (Closes: #284081, #377262) [debian/patches/01_newapi.dpatch] -- Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:01:35 -0300 I understand there were a few API changes in libparted 1.7 as well. Have you looked at wrapping these at all? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370114: marked as done (FTBFS with new xfce4-panel pending new upstream version)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:19:56 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#370114: fixed in xfce4-cpufreq-plugin 0.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin Version: 0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream This plugin no longer builds against the new 4.4 panel. At some point we hope upstream will port it to the new panel or an enthusiastic user might but until then this bug is here to record this and make sure we don't release etch with it. -- Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ Zelfs een blinde kip vindt wel eens \** ** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\een korrel \* ** [ Htag.pl 0.0.22 ] ***\\ ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin Source-Version: 0.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfce4-cpufreq-plugin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2-1.diff.gz xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2-1.dsc to pool/main/x/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2-1.dsc xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/x/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2-1_amd64.deb xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/x/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xfce4-cpufreq-plugin package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:28:02 +0100 Source: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin Binary: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin - cpufreq information plugin for the Xfce4 panel Closes: 370114 Changes: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * (Yves-Alexis Perez) - New upstream release, ported to 4.4 panel closes:#370114 - Switch from dpatch to simple-patchsys in debian/rules * (Stefan Ott) - Updated URL in copyright file Files: 83e040d2682424409d839c59af9f22ac 946 x11 optional xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2-1.dsc 13d09c72b3b47a0463e2be134b5e1b89 7038 x11 optional xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2.orig.tar.gz ca0183af784523a3aaeb59d4ba132362 1446 x11 optional xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2-1.diff.gz 5be3b50888a76889c7dcd01c9f8f6adf 11296 x11 optional xfce4-cpufreq-plugin_0.2-1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEx7xgMQdl+99c4rQRAiXLAJ9ffcQpodp7Um9KwJWjrw8SbAjoGwCfY+n+ epsV7WzEAUbHSQsJCpxHd3M= =AiUZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#369052: marked as done (binutils: ld doesn't search libraries in (/usr)/lib32 on amd64)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:46 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#369052: fixed in binutils 2.17-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: binutils Version: 2.16.1cvs20060413-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, For a some times, a few packages now provide 32-bit libraries on amd64. They are installed in /lib32 and /usr/lib32. However, ld does not search libraries in these directories, whereas it searches in /lib64 and /usr/lib64 for 64-bit libraries on a bi-arch system (i386, sparc, powerpc, s390). Note having libraries in /lib32 and /usr/lib32 on amd64 is Debian specific (however Gentoo does the same). Please find attached a patch (122_x86_64_i386_biarch.dpatch) to fix that. I have also attached a patch for the unofficial ppc64 architecture (123_ppc64_powerpc_biarch.dpatch), but I have not tested it. Thanks, Aurelien -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) Versions of packages binutils depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries binutils recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded 122_x86_64_i386_biarch.dpatch Description: application/shellscript 123_ppc64_powerpc_biarch.dpatch Description: application/shellscript ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: binutils Source-Version: 2.17-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of binutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: binutils-dev_2.17-2_i386.deb to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils-dev_2.17-2_i386.deb binutils-doc_2.17-2_all.deb to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils-doc_2.17-2_all.deb binutils-multiarch_2.17-2_i386.deb to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils-multiarch_2.17-2_i386.deb binutils_2.17-2.diff.gz to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.17-2.diff.gz binutils_2.17-2.dsc to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.17-2.dsc binutils_2.17-2_i386.deb to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.17-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated binutils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:33:13 +0100 Source: binutils Binary: binutils-dev binutils-hppa64 binutils-multiarch binutils binutils-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.17-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: binutils - The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities binutils-dev - The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files) binutils-doc - Documentation for the GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities binutils-multiarch - Binary utilities that support multi-arch targets Closes: 315306 369052 Changes: binutils (2.17-2) unstable; urgency=low . * The Laisse le Wookie gagner release. . * 127_x86_64_i386_biarch.dpatch: new patch from Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] to add (/usr)/lib32 to the search paths on amd64. Closes: #369052 . * debian/rules (configure-multi-stamp): add i486-kfreebsd-gnu at request of Aurelien Jarno. Closes: #315306 Files: 129a3bddfb42860c31412d4a816d23e4 1474 devel standard binutils_2.17-2.dsc 0967e457603f91f74915018e4a6df7e7 42336 devel standard binutils_2.17-2.diff.gz 2bcd5d7d521fc8fc1e5ced460809193a 483030 doc optional binutils-doc_2.17-2_all.deb 3865e636c216ab93a7c9622c252e8354 2605890 devel standard binutils_2.17-2_i386.deb 5009d4dd858329d80e527a265c5bdaac 2496006 devel extra binutils-dev_2.17-2_i386.deb 9d5e50b151d202eeff21dfe68d15787e 7812240 devel extra binutils-multiarch_2.17-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBRMfWNtfD8TGrKpH1AQKDJw/+L2rhODJGpc+5lyQRPqkbP6KA/eea4YhU
Bug#379930: marked as done (gaphor: not installable in sid)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:19:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379930: fixed in gaphor 0.8.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gaphor Version: 0.8.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install gaphor Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gaphor: Depends: python2.4-diacanvas2 (= 0.14.4) E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gaphor depends on: ii python-diacanvas2 [python2.4- 0.14.4-3 DiaCanvas2 library support for Pyt ii python-zopeinterface [python2 3.2.1-4The implementation of interface de ii python2.4 2.4.3-7An interactive high-level object-o gaphor recommends no packages. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: gaphor Source-Version: 0.8.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gaphor, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gaphor_0.8.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gaphor/gaphor_0.8.1-3.diff.gz gaphor_0.8.1-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gaphor/gaphor_0.8.1-3.dsc gaphor_0.8.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gaphor/gaphor_0.8.1-3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gaphor package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:38:41 +0200 Source: gaphor Binary: gaphor Architecture: source all Version: 0.8.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gaphor - UML modeling tool Closes: 379930 Changes: gaphor (0.8.1-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Set debhelper compat to 5 * Use python-support * Set pycompat to 2 * Conflicts with the zope3 and python-zopeinterface package. But will try to find a better solution. * Update Depends (Closes: Bug#379930) Files: bbbc3bbafa413c78df2df773ed9aa8d8 772 devel optional gaphor_0.8.1-3.dsc d4cdf300f7a8ed841438ea9f20a157b5 6891 devel optional gaphor_0.8.1-3.diff.gz eafc38fd5316ff33cf0c8150ca916740 317184 devel optional gaphor_0.8.1-3_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEx9PzbmmXPPfovGMRAua4AJsHPAuxi6vCerZDmcW4eY2BXfeH0gCeOpdm c/jnldfJj6LmOyrwqqOQ0h8= =oF3B -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#379557: marked as done (asis-doc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper, texinfo')
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379557: fixed in asis-doc 2005-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: asis-doc Version: 2005-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'asis-doc' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 Later in the build process there is another problem because 'makeinfo' is used but the texinfo package in not installed. Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper, texinfo' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/asis-doc-2005/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/asis-doc-2005/debian/control2006-07-24 09:37:35.0 + +++ ./debian/control2006-07-24 09:37:33.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: non-free/doc Priority: optional Standards-Version: 3.7.2 -Build-Depends: tetex-extra (= 3.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper, texinfo, tetex-extra (= 3.0) Package: asis-doc Architecture: all ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: asis-doc Source-Version: 2005-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of asis-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: asis-doc_2005-2.diff.gz to pool/non-free/a/asis-doc/asis-doc_2005-2.diff.gz asis-doc_2005-2.dsc to pool/non-free/a/asis-doc/asis-doc_2005-2.dsc asis-doc_2005-2_all.deb to pool/non-free/a/asis-doc/asis-doc_2005-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated asis-doc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:08:01 +0200 Source: asis-doc Binary: asis-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2005-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: asis-doc - Ada Semantic Interface Specification (ASIS) documentation Closes: 379557 Changes: asis-doc (2005-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * debian/control: build-depend on debhelper, texinfo. Closes: #379557. Files: 23535cbb7b6fdff429da6982cd9f0e9b 592 non-free/doc optional asis-doc_2005-2.dsc e01a8c8358f2da53fd85f58d2411cfdb 2067 non-free/doc optional asis-doc_2005-2.diff.gz 8562641494e4b407a444255cf810de74 583134 non-free/doc optional asis-doc_2005-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFExbfzx9kwJZ3/qtQRAs2yAJ4pIermYf98vDgsti7hcda9cGwukgCfbGno TEtrTZPS8XH//yrBxg4jMTI= =MFLM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#377985: marked as done (FTBFS: b-d cannot be fulfiled, gnat version too high)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:00 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#377985: fixed in adacgi 1.6-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: adacgi Version: 1.6-7 Severity: serious This package needs an update for the new gnats: Automatic build of adacgi_1.6-7 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by sbuild/powerpc 0.47 ... Setting up libgnat-4.1 (4.1.1-8) ... Setting up libgnatvsn4.1 (4.1.1-8) ... Setting up libgnatprj4.1 (4.1.1-8) ... Setting up gnat-4.1 (4.1.1-8) ... Setting up gnat (4.1.1-3) ... Checking correctness of source dependencies... After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: gnat(inst 4.1.1-3 ! wanted 3.16) Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping adacgi (Reading database ... 12541 files and directories currently installed.) Removing gnat ... -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: adacgi Source-Version: 1.6-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of adacgi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: adacgi_1.6-8.diff.gz to pool/main/a/adacgi/adacgi_1.6-8.diff.gz adacgi_1.6-8.dsc to pool/main/a/adacgi/adacgi_1.6-8.dsc adacgi_1.6-8_i386.deb to pool/main/a/adacgi/adacgi_1.6-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated adacgi package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:29:20 + Source: adacgi Binary: adacgi Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.6-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: adacgi - Ada CGI interface Closes: 376492 377985 Changes: adacgi (1.6-8) unstable; urgency=medium . * Fixed FTBFS by changing (build-)depends to gnat (closes: #377985). * Change to newer gnat means that architecture can be `any'. * Removed bashisms in debian/rules (closes: #376492). * Bumped standards-version to 3.7.2. Files: badeb0eaeefac8dc897e4b08d48b4dc8 551 devel optional adacgi_1.6-8.dsc c15d173d2aa86a9aa53a0174ce3382a2 4313 devel optional adacgi_1.6-8.diff.gz 71024efb1e2fd61e4cf205a1ed7d0e45 71240 web optional adacgi_1.6-8_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEx7oBHb8HEVCXO5ERAgWCAKCigHv+A1L+J6Bz8orrlKZdXqBTegCgmNME W1dHW/2r1WGAKR9QKH3Mu3w= =d74w -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#353564: patch
tag 353564 patch thanks Clint's patch works fine for me. Tagging +patch Cheers, Christian Aichinger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#379662: postinst: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'byte_compile'
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:34:43AM +0200, Le Boulanger Yann wrote: Do you have python2.4 installed ? Gajim should depend on it (it's a problem) but wil that fix your bug ? No, I have no python2.4 installed. I am installing it now and... well, it looks somewhat better. The gajim has been configured correctly but there was a message: Setting up gajim (0.10.1-4) ... 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback Regards Artur -- [17:14] Sirocco_ Usilowalam przejrzec lastloga ale pogubilam sie w dlugosciach penisa dobrze odzywionych szacunkow... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 353564 patch Bug#353564: mova does not work without less There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379662: postinst: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'byte_compile'
Artur R. Czechowski wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:34:43AM +0200, Le Boulanger Yann wrote: Do you have python2.4 installed ? Gajim should depend on it (it's a problem) but wil that fix your bug ? No, I have no python2.4 installed. I am installing it now and... well, it looks somewhat better. The gajim has been configured correctly but there was a message: Setting up gajim (0.10.1-4) ... 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback Regards Artur indeed you need to install python2.4-minimal. I'll build a new package if you tell me that fix the bug Yann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#379732: popularity-contest: Fails to upload using http
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 379732 normal Bug#379732: popularity-contest: Fails to upload using http Severity set to `normal' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379732: popularity-contest: Fails to upload using http
severity 379732 normal thanks [Richard Antony Burton] Can no longer upload popcon result by http (which as the default method probably means few other people are able to either). I added the -d option to the uploader and ran it a few times (with several different results): I am unable to reproduce this. When I visit the HTTP submit URL, it seem to work as it should (this is the expected output when not using the popcon script to submit reports): % HEAD http://popcon.debian.org/cgi-bin/popcon.cgi 200 OK Connection: close Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:40:28 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Debian GNU/Linux) PHP/4.3.10-16 DAV/1.0.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Client-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:40:28 GMT Client-Peer: 192.25.206.10:80 Client-Response-Num: 1 % GEThttp://popcon.debian.org/cgi-bin/popcon.cgi Debian Popularity-Contest HTTP-POST submission URL Visit http://popcon.debian.org/ for more info. % I also tried to submit a new report from my laptop, and this did not give any errors to syslog, which it should if it failed to get the proper reply from the HTTP server. # /etc/cron.weekly/popularity-contest # grep popularity-contest /var/log/messages # Are you still seeing the problem? If so, I suggest checking for HTTP proxies between your machine and popcon.debian.org. Redusing severity to normal, as this do not affect all users. Friendly, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380024: needs to Replaces: lyx-common
Package: lyx Version: 1.4.1-2 Severity: serious Preparing to replace lyx 1.4.1-2 (using .../archives/lyx_1.4.2-1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement lyx ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lyx_1.4.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/tex2lyx', which is also in package lyx-common dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) lyx should Replace: lyx-common. -Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages lyx depends on: ii groff1.18.1.1-12 GNU troff text-formatting system ii imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-0.9 Image manipulation programs ii libtiff-tools3.8.2-5 TIFF manipulation and conversion t ii lyx-common 1.4.1-2 High Level Word Processor - common ii lyx-qt 1.4.1-2 High Level Word Processor - Qt fro ii mime-support 3.37-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii preview-latex-style 11.83-2 LaTeX style files for editor embed ii tetex-bin3.0-18 The teTeX binary files ii tetex-extra 3.0-20 Additional library files of teTeX Versions of packages lyx recommends: ii cupsys-bsd [lpr] 1.2.1-4 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - pn dvipostnone(no description available) ii elinks [www-browser] 0.11.1-1 advanced text-mode WWW browser pn gnuhtml2latex none(no description available) ii gs-esp [postscript-vie 8.15.1.dfsg.1-2.1 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr ii gs-gpl [postscript-vie 8.50-1.1 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int ii gv [pdf-viewer]1:3.6.1-13PostScript and PDF viewer for X pn linuxdoc-tools none(no description available) ii rcs5.7-18The GNU Revision Control System pn sgmltools-lite none(no description available) pn tex4ht | hevea | tth | none(no description available) ii w3m [www-browser] 0.5.1-4 WWW browsable pager with excellent pn wv none(no description available) ii xpdf-reader [pdf-viewe 3.01-9Portable Document Format (PDF) sui ii xpdf-utils [pdf-viewer 3.01-9Portable Document Format (PDF) sui -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379377: marked as done (ivtv-source: missing depends on dpatch)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:02:23 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379377: fixed in ivtv 0.6.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: ivtv-source Version: 0.6.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Building ivtv-source via module-assistant failed with: debian/rules:10: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'. Stop. Builds OK after installing dpatch -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages ivtv-source depends on: ii bzip2 1.0.3-3high-quality block- sorting file co ii debhelper 5.0.37.2 helper programs for debian/rules ii module-assistant 0.10.4 tool to make module package creati ivtv-source recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ivtv Source-Version: 0.6.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ivtv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ivtv-source_0.6.3-2_all.deb to pool/contrib/i/ivtv/ivtv-source_0.6.3-2_all.deb ivtv-utils_0.6.3-2_i386.deb to pool/contrib/i/ivtv/ivtv-utils_0.6.3-2_i386.deb ivtv_0.6.3-2.diff.gz to pool/contrib/i/ivtv/ivtv_0.6.3-2.diff.gz ivtv_0.6.3-2.dsc to pool/contrib/i/ivtv/ivtv_0.6.3-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ivtv package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:19:18 +0100 Source: ivtv Binary: ivtv-utils ivtv-source Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.6.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian MythTV Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: ivtv-source - source for ivtv drivers (0.6 branch) ivtv-utils - utilities for use with the ivtv kernel driver Closes: 379377 Changes: ivtv (0.6.3-2) unstable; urgency=low . [ Ian Campbell ] * ivtv-source should depend on dpatch. (Closes: #379377) Files: f3856b392d9c0471d92f79d3d8d2cf40 695 contrib/x11 extra ivtv_0.6.3-2.dsc ee8effad0b91eee0b5add40acb36e980 10601 contrib/x11 extra ivtv_0.6.3-2.diff.gz df7e84f5c37d716df19fedcf50718f83 160666 contrib/x11 extra ivtv-utils_0.6.3-2_i386.deb 9c7c1b2b15f706e40f8d14b9507ed401 140116 contrib/x11 extra ivtv-source_0.6.3-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEx/BSoCzanz0IthIRAq8KAJwK5cvRnm++AJSwrfvWQZl2bTpFywCcDxm7 dYfFUfyTzvDe06cQ1p40JtY= =x6Gk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#378183: marked as done (apt: All SHA256 hashes generated/used by APT are wrong)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:17:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#378183: fixed in apt 0.6.45
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.44.2
Severity: critical
Tags: security patch
Justification: breaks the whole system
The SHA256 checksums recently added to Packages files are wrong
due to a porting error when the sha256 implementation code was
imported from the Linux kernel sources to the apt source tree.
Specifically, the broken sha256 code checksums only 19 out of
every 64 bytes of input and otherwise computes a result which is
neither sha256(input) nor sha256(mangled input).
According to the changelog, the broken code was added to
non-experimental apt in version 0.6.44 uploaded 8 May 2006 .
This has the following severe consequences:
- The broken hash values obviously do not provide anything
resembling the security needed by secure apt, a problem
compounded by the broken status of the other two hash
algorithms used (MD5 and SHA1). Thus the security tag.
- When the code is fixed to produce and check correct SHA256
hashes, the fact that these values are different from the
broken values means that a correct apt will reject all Packages
files produced by a broken apt and a broken apt will reject all
Packages files produced by a correct apt. This means that
when such a new apt implementation is placed in the debian
archive, the whole system becomes impossible to install or
upgrade:
If the Packages file has bad SHA256 values, the broken apt
versions already installed by testers/users will allow
installation of the new apt, but once it has been installed,
the new apt will reject all packages and stop all further
installs.
If the Packages file has good SHA256 values, the broken apt
versions already deployed will refuse their contents, thus
preventing users from upgrading to a good apt.
This I believe justifies the breaks whole system, critical
tag.
To work around the breaks whole system issue, the following
transition plan is proposed:
1. Before uploading the fixed apt, temporarily reconfigure
darcs etc. to NOT include SHA256 values in Packages files at
all (apt-ftparchive has an option to do that).
2. Upload the fixed apt as a minimal change from the apt
version in testing, and coordinate with ftpadmin to push it
quickly through to testing. Yes, this means holding back
other bug fixes until the change has propagated.
3. Allow 1-3 weeks for users to upgrade to the fixed apt. Use
the various announce mailing lists to alert users to the
urgency of getting rid of apt versions 0.6.44 to 0.6.44.?
inclusive before the grace period ends!
4. Turn SHA256 back on in darcs etc. this makes the SHA256
security available for real. But it also means that the
archive can no longer be used by the broken 0.6.44 versions
of apt. So leave behind (on the ftp server, www server etc.)
a message explaining how users can manually upgrade to a new
apt version by downloading a .tar file and a detached .gpg
signature from ftp.debian.org/debian/tools/something . (This
would be a hand-built tar file containing replacement .so
files for each of the bad 0.6.44 apt versions and platforms).
For the security breakage, patching apt is the obvious fix.
Steps to reproduce:
$ apt-ftparchive packages somedirwithdebs
.
Filename: somedirwithdebs/something_xyz_all.deb
SHA256: 64 wrong hex digits here
.
$ gpg --pring-md sha256 somedirwithdebs/something_xyz_all.deb
somedirwithdebs/something_xyz_all.deb: 64 right hex digits
$ shasum -a 256 somedirwithdebs/something_xyz_all.deb
64 right hex digits somedirwithdebs/something_xyz_all.deb
$ openssl dgst -sha256 -hex somedirwithdebs/something_xyz_all.deb
SHA256(somedirwithdebs/something_xyz_all.deb)= 64 right hex
digits
$
Thus at least 3 independent SHA256 implementations agree on the
correct value, as will apt once corrected.
[Patch begin, apply to apt-0.6.44.x with patch -Np1]
diff -Naur apt-0.6.44.2.old/apt-pkg/contrib/sha256.cc
apt-0.6.44.2.new/apt-pkg/contrib/sha256.cc
--- apt-0.6.44.2.orig/apt-pkg/contrib/sha256.cc 2006-05-16 19:31:39.0
+
+++ apt-0.6.44.2.new/apt-pkg/contrib/sha256.cc 2006-07-14 00:50:49.0
+
@@ -61,10 +61,10 @@
static inline void LOAD_OP(int I, u32 *W, const u8 *input)
{
- W[I] = ( ((u32) input[I + 0] 24)
- | ((u32) input[I + 1] 16)
- | ((u32) input[I + 2] 8)
-
Processed: Re: xracer: FTBFS: GL library was not found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 378296 patch Bug#378296: xracer: FTBFS: GL library was not found There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378296: xracer: FTBFS: GL library was not found
tag 378296 patch thanks On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:31:35AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: Package: xracer Version: 0.96.9-12 [...] There was a problem while autobuilding your package: checking for glNewList in -lGL... no checking for glNewList in -lMesaGL... no configure: error: GL library was not found The problem is a missing build-dependency on libxi-dev (as can be seen from config.log). I've attached a patch that fixes this. The resulting package works just as fine as the previous version (i.e. it looks absolutely terrible by today's standards). Cheers, Christian Aichinger --- a/debian/control2006-07-26 22:33:12.0 + +++ b/debian/control2006-07-26 22:46:00.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: games Priority: optional Maintainer: Filip Van Raemdonck [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: libjpeg62-dev, debhelper (= 3.0.18), freeglut3-dev, gettext, html2text, libxmu-dev +Build-Depends: libjpeg62-dev, debhelper (= 3.0.18), freeglut3-dev, gettext, html2text, libxmu-dev, libxi-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: xracer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#380031: libggi2: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ggi/input/x.so', which is also in package libgii0-target-x
Package: libggi2 Version: 1:2.0.5-1.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable # apt-get install libggi2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libgii1 libgii1-target-x Suggested packages: libggi-target-emu libggi-target-monotext libggimisc2 Recommended packages: libggi-target-x libggi-target The following packages will be REMOVED: libgii0 libgii0-target-x The following NEW packages will be installed: libgii1 libgii1-target-x The following packages will be upgraded: libggi2 1 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 2 to remove and 2 not upgraded. [...] Selecting previously deselected package libgii1-target-x. (Reading database ... 130503 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libgii1-target-x (from .../libgii1-target-x_1%3a1.0.1-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgii1-target-x_1%3a1.0.1-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ggi/input/x.so', which is also in package libgii0-target-x Preparing to replace libggi2 1:2.0.5-1.2 (using .../libggi2_1%3a2.2.1-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libggi2 ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libgii1-target-x_1%3a1.0.1-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) regards, -mika- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380028: mkvmlinuz requires -fno-stack-protector with gcc-4.1
Subject: mkvmlinuz requires -fno-stack-protector with gcc-4.1 Package: mkvmlinuz Version: 23ubuntu1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system mkvmlinuz requires0 to be compiled with the -fno-stack-protector flags with gcc-4.1 since it seems gcc-4.1 enables -fstack-protector by default. mkvmlinuz fails to create the kernel otherwise. Output from running mkvmlinuz on my machine: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 mkvmlinuz -v === Building for sub-architecture chrp. === Using kernel image file /boot/vmlinux-2.6.17-4-powerpc. === Using initrd image file /boot/initrd.img-2.6.17-4-powerpc. === Release version seems to be 2.6.17-4-powerpc. === Using object files from /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz. === Building a bootable compressed kernel image in /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.17-4-powerpc. === Doing build in /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568. === Creating compressed initrd image initrd.gz... cp -p /boot/initrd.img-2.6.17-4-powerpc /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/initrd.gz === Creating compressed kernel image vmlinux.gz... strip -s -R .comment /boot/vmlinux-2.6.17-4-powerpc -o /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/vmlinux gzip --force --best /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/vmlinux === Putting everything into ELF image file image.o... objcopy /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz-kernel-vmlinux.strip.o /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/dummy_kernel.o --add-section=.kernel:vmlinux.strip=/tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/vmlinux.gz --set-section-flags=.kernel:vmlinux.strip=contents,alloc,load,readonly,data objcopy /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz-kernel-initrd.o /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/dummy_initrd.o --add-section=.kernel:initrd=/tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/initrd.gz --set-section-flags=.kernel:initrd=contents,alloc,load,readonly,data === Creating bootable kernel image file vmlinuz.chrp... ld -m elf32ppc -T /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/zImage.lds -o /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/vmlinuz.chrp /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/crt0.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/string.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/prom.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/stdio.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/main.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/div64.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/infblock.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/infcodes.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/inffast.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/inflate.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/inftrees.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/infutil.o /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/dummy_kernel.o /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/dummy_initrd.o /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/prom.o: In function `claim': prom.c:(.text+0x764): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/stdio.o: In function `number': stdio.c:(.text+0x480): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' /usr/lib/mkvmlinuz/addnote /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/vmlinuz.chrp /tmp/tmp.XaoBL10568/vmlinuz.chrp: No such file or directory === Cleaning up... I then tried to compile mkvmlinuz with the -fno-stack-protector flag and it worked just fine to create the new kernel. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers edgy-updates APT policy: (500, 'edgy-updates'), (500, 'edgy-security'), (500, 'edgy-backports'), (500, 'edgy') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-4-powerpc Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages mkvmlinuz depends on: ii bash 3.1-5ubuntu1 The GNU Bourne Again SHell ii binutils 2.17-1ubuntu1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.2ubuntu2 Debian configuration management sy mkvmlinuz recommends no packages. -- debconf information: mkvmlinuz/bootloaders: mkvmlinuz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376777: marked as done (apt-utils: apt-ftparchive fails to generate Contents files)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:17:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#376777: fixed in apt 0.6.45
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-utils
Version: 0.6.44.2
Severity: serious
Tags: help
(Backported) apt-ftparchive on ftp-master currently fails to generate
Contents files. I've reproduced this locally on sid with vanilla
apt-utils and a trivial apt.conf file.
| Done Packages, Starting contents.
| unstable/Contents-i386:
| E: Sub-process decompressor exited unexpectedly
| E: Error processing contents unstable/Contents-i386
| Done. 588MB in 335 archives. Took 1m49s
Michael's looked into this today but was unable to find the problem
and unfortunately he's now away for a while. (Thus the 'help' tag)
strace shows that one of the gzip -d processes is throwing SIGPIPE but
nothing else particularly useful. I've put one up at
http://people.debian.org/~troup/misc/strace.txt anyway.
Interestingly while trying to reproduce this I discovered that if I
limited the number of debs I was feeding apt-ftparchive, I could make
the problem go away. 63 or less files worked, = 64 doesn't.
I've attached the local apt.conf too (but it's obviously not useful
unmodified).
--
James
Dir
{
ArchiveDir /home/james/scratch/apt/;
OverrideDir /home/james/scratch/apt/;
CacheDir /home/james/scratch/apt/;
};
Default
{
Packages::Compress gzip;
Contents::Compress gzip;
}
tree unstable
{
FileList /home/james/scratch/apt/filelist;
Sections main;
Architectures i386;
BinOverride override;
};
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: apt
Source-Version: 0.6.45
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
apt-doc_0.6.45_all.deb
to pool/main/a/apt/apt-doc_0.6.45_all.deb
apt-utils_0.6.45_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apt/apt-utils_0.6.45_i386.deb
apt_0.6.45.dsc
to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.45.dsc
apt_0.6.45.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.45.tar.gz
apt_0.6.45_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.45_i386.deb
libapt-pkg-dev_0.6.45_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apt/libapt-pkg-dev_0.6.45_i386.deb
libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.45_all.deb
to pool/main/a/apt/libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.45_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:52:05 +0200
Source: apt
Binary: apt-utils libapt-pkg-doc libapt-pkg-dev apt-doc apt
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.6.45
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: APT Development Team deity@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
apt- Advanced front-end for dpkg
apt-doc- Documentation for APT
apt-utils - APT utility programs
libapt-pkg-dev - Development files for APT's libapt-pkg and libapt-inst
libapt-pkg-doc - Documentation for APT development
Closes: 296103 368038 370551 373729 373864 375068 375640 376330 376408 376777
377391 378183 378901 379576
Changes:
apt (0.6.45) unstable; urgency=low
.
* apt-pkg/contrib/sha256.cc:
- fixed the sha256 generation (closes: #378183)
* ftparchive/cachedb.cc:
- applied patch from Anthony Towns to fix Clean() function
(closes: #379576)
* doc/apt-get.8.xml:
- fix path to the apt user build (Closes: #375640)
* doc/apt-cache.8.xml:
- typo (Closes: #376408)
* apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc:
- make progress reporting more robust against multiline error
messages (first half of a fix for #374195)
* doc/examples/configure-index:
- document Debug::pkgAcquire::Auth
* methods/gpgv.cc:
- deal with gpg error NODATA. Closes: #296103, Thanks to
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz for the patch
* apt-inst/contrib/extracttar.cc:
- fix for string mangling, closes: #373864
* apt-pkg/acquire-item.cc:
- check for bzip2 in /bin (closes: #377391)
* apt-pkg/tagfile.cc:
- make it work on non-mapable files again, thanks
Processed: Redundant bug reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 379987 important Bug#379987: Can not start squid after recent update (July 26,2006) Severity set to `important' from `grave' severity 379873 important Bug#379873: no transparent proxy support in newest squid package Severity set to `important' from `important' merge 379987 379873 Bug#379873: no transparent proxy support in newest squid package Bug#379987: Can not start squid after recent update (July 26,2006) Merged 379873 379987. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379662: postinst: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'byte_compile'
Artur R. Czechowski wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:34:43AM +0200, Le Boulanger Yann wrote: Do you have python2.4 installed ? Gajim should depend on it (it's a problem) but wil that fix your bug ? No, I have no python2.4 installed. I am installing it now and... well, it looks somewhat better. The gajim has been configured correctly but there was a message: Setting up gajim (0.10.1-4) ... 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback Regards Artur in fact python2.4 depends on python2.4-minimal. So if python2.4 is correctly installed, it should be ok. what python2.4 version do you have ? Yann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379982: Misuse of alternatives
Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoted from policy: Two different packages must not install programs with different functionality but with the same filenames. (The case of two programs having the same functionality but different implementations is handled via alternatives or [...] I think that policy is not violated: The git installed by cogito*deb is a version control system. The git installed by git*deb is a shell script which calls the same version control system if called non-interactively. The two programs have the same functionality, but git*deb's offers more functionality if called interactively. I'm sure most people can think of alternatives where one implementation offers a superset of the other. The maintainers should report this to the debian-devel mailing list and try to find a consensus about which program will have to be renamed. If a consensus cannot be reached, both programs must be renamed. This was reported to debian-devel by Sebastian Kuzminsky on 2005-08-11. Consensus seemed to be for the package maintainers to work it out and this is what they chose. If you want to reopen that discussion, please raise it on debian-devel again and cc this bug and the cogito package maintainer. As I understand it, git*deb's git will be renamed upstream to gitfm, matching git*deb, but it is desirable to provide a nice transition for sarge users, so git*deb's git inherits cogito*deb's git's functionality for now if available. What better solution do you suggest? -- MJR/slef Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Bv sekvu http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379720: vdr-plugin-bitstreamout: FTBFS: error: 'fls' was not declared in this scope
$ gcc -x c -c -o test.o /usr/include/asm/bitops.h $ gcc -x c++ -c -o test.o /usr/include/asm/bitops.h /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h: In function 'int fls64(__u64)': /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h:10: error: 'fls' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h:11: error: 'fls' was not declared in this scope Firstly, why is this package using a C++ compiler for what on the face of it looks like C code? Secondly, asm-i486/bitops.h defines fls() only if __KERNEL__ is defined but always includes asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h, which defines fls64() in terms of fls(). A C compiler will accept this use of fls() as an implicit declaration - though the function is never defined - but a C++ compiler will not. This seems like a bug in linux-kernel-headers. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] shortened to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you've signed my GPG key, please send a signature on and to the new uid. Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#380031: libggi2: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ggi/input/x.so', which is also in package libgii0-target-x
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 380031 libgii1-target-x Bug#380031: libggi2: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ggi/input/x.so', which is also in package libgii0-target-x Bug reassigned from package `libggi2' to `libgii1-target-x'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
