Processed: Re: Processed (with 3 errors): Re: Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 456262 gcc-4.2 Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included Bug reassigned from package `cpp-4.2' to `gcc-4.2'. > reassign 456264 gcc-4.2 Bug#456264: gcj: non-free man page included Bug reassigned from package `gcj' to `gcc-4.2'. > reassign 456265 gcc-4.2 Bug#456265: gcj-4.2: non-free man pages included Bug reassigned from package `gcj-4.2' to `gcc-4.2'. > reassign 456266 gcc-4.2 Bug#456266: gij-4.2: non-free man pages included Bug reassigned from package `gij-4.2' to `gcc-4.2'. > forcemerge 442445 456262 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included Forcibly Merged 442445 456262. > forcemerge 442445 456264 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug#456264: gcj: non-free man page included Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included Forcibly Merged 442445 456262 456264. > forcemerge 442445 456265 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug#456265: gcj-4.2: non-free man pages included Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included Bug#456264: gcj: non-free man page included Forcibly Merged 442445 456262 456264 456265. > forcemerge 442445 456266 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug#456266: gij-4.2: non-free man pages included Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included Bug#456264: gcj: non-free man page included Bug#456265: gcj-4.2: non-free man pages included Forcibly Merged 442445 456262 456264 456265 456266. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included
reassign 442445 gcc-4.2 forcemerge 442445 456262 forcemerge 442445 456265 forcemerge 442445 456266 thanks before going wild, please check the existing bug reports. kthxbye. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456264: Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included
forcemerge 442445 456264 thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed (with 3 errors): Re: Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 442445 gcc-4.2 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.2' to `gcc-4.2'. > forcemerge 442445 456262 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged: Bug 456262 is not in the same package as 442445 > forcemerge 442445 456265 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug#456265: gcj-4.2: non-free man pages included Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged: Bug 456265 is not in the same package as 442445 > forcemerge 442445 456266 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug#456266: gij-4.2: non-free man pages included Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged: Bug 456266 is not in the same package as 442445 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#426224: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#426224: shutdown patches - the choices
Hi, On Thursday 13 December 2007 17:35:20 Artur Szymiec wrote: > Kel Modderman pisze: > > Package: sysvinit > > Version: 2.86.ds1-38.1 > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm following up on this ticket, since I've not received any response > > for the > > > best part of 6 months. > > > > The patch I proposed here is, IMHO, the most complete of the ones offered > > so far. Recently, I was made aware of someone also claiming [0] the > > patch [1] > > > from Werner Fink, discussed [2] on the novell bug tracker, would be > > great to > > > include into our own Debian version of sysvinit to fix the shutdown > > issue of > > > spinning down disks correctly (...or not). > > > > However, r1067 [3] was committed to pkg-sysvinit trunk, which merges the > > changes done in the "libata-fixes" branch which was for testing [4]. > > Tejun Heo, > > > an active libata/kernel hacker, replied [5] with information that > > Werner Fink > > > was also working on this issue. Tejun was also active in the development > > of the patch as seen on the novell bug discussion [2]. > > > > I emailed the list [6] with discussion requested at [4], created a > > patch for > > > the debian package [7], and tested the patch thoroughly on a very wide > > variety > > > of hardware from debian installed and live-cd environments over the last > > 6 months. The patch works as advertised. > > > > opensuse 10.3 also contains a sysvinit using the mentioned patch. This > > means > > > it has seen widespread testing from a variety of people on a variety of > > hardware. > > > > The patch matches the criteria set out at [8] about how hddown.c could > > best handle this (except using /proc): > > > > [quote] > > a) it uses sysfs and not /proc to locate disks, and that it locates > >all IDE and SCSI/libata disks, or maybe do both /proc and sysfs. > > b) that it verifies the state of kernel disk spindown control for > >each disk, and for the disks where it is unavailable: > >b1) issue cache sync to disk > >b2) issue spin down to disk > > c) for the disks where kernel spin down control is available, enable > >it and skip to next disk. > > [/quote] > > > > The patch does not suffer from limitation of an alternate patch offered > > to fix the situation that is discussed at [9], which seems to be similar > > in limitation to what has been merged [3]. > > > > Ok, there are too many damn numbers listed below with references. But > > you get > > > the picture I hope, that I'm concerned about the direction the > > maintainers [10] > > > intend to take in order to fix this issue, and that I've laid out as much > > information, patch and help that I can to try and convince them there is > > a better solution. > > > > Thanks, Kel. > > > > [0] > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-December/0 >02141.html > > > [1] https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=145904 > > [2] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229210 > > [3] > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-commits/2007-November >/000955.html > > > [4] > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-June/00196 >1.html > > > [5] > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-June/00196 >3.html > > > [6] > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-June/00197 >2.html > > > [7] > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-June/00197 >4.html > > > [8] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=426224#10 > > [9] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436703 > > [10] > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-December/0 >02142.html > > > ___ > > Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvinit-devel > > Greetings, > > I've sent a patch for Debian sysv init hdd down over a month ago > (4.11.2007). > Till now I haven't receive any comment regarding it. > Could you please review it too ? > Attached files (hdd.c and a patch in attachment). Why would I want to look up another patch to review it after already investing time recommending what I truly believe to be a comprehensive fix? This is surely the job of the maintainers to discuss the options and choose their choice of action. The trick is to solicit a response from them. If you really want me to, make it a bit easier by giving a unambiguous link to the content _and_ state what it does better in comparison to what we could inherit from Werner Fink that I've argued in favour of a long long time ago, and referenced again in the mail you replied to. Thanks, Kel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456266: gij-4.2: non-free man pages included
Package: gij-4.2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The man pages gcj-dbtool-4.2.1 and gij-4.2.1 are both licensed under the GNU Fre Documentation License with front- and back-cover texts. According to Debian vote 1 of 2006 this is a violation of the DFSG modifiability requirements. Both man pages are fairly short so it shouldn't be too much work writing fresh ones to comply with the DFSG. As I primarily use C++/C I'm probably not the best person for the job. I would however be willing to have a go at it, if so requested. Other non-free man pages in packages related to the GNU Compiler Collection: * cpp-4.2 (bug #456262) * gcc-4.2 (bug #442445) * gcj (bug #456264) * gij-4.2 (bug #456265) Note: In response to bug #442445 Matthias Klose said that the problem won't be fixed (for gcc) until the 4.2.3 and 4.3.0 releases. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-can-071209 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456265: gcj-4.2: non-free man pages included
Package: gcj-4.2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The man pages gc-analyze-4.2.1, gcj-4.2.1, jcf-dump-4.2.1 and jv-convert-4.2.1 are all licensed under the GNU Fre Documentation License with front- and back-cover texts. According to Debian vote 1 of 2006 this is a violation of the DFSG modifiability requirements. The man pages are fairly short (with the possible exception of gcj) which should facilitate writing fresh ones complying with the DFSG. As I primarily use C++/C I'm probably not the best person for the job. I would however be willing to have a go at it, if so requested. Other non-free man pages in packages related to the GNU Compiler Collection: * cpp-4.2 (bug #456262) * gcc-4.2 (bug #442445) * gcj (bug #456264) * gij-4.2 (bug report not yet submitted) Note: In response to bug #442445 Matthias Klose said that the problem won't be fixed (for gcc) until the 4.2.3 and 4.3.0 releases. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-can-071209 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456264: gcj: non-free man page included
Package: gcj Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The man page grmic-4.2.1 is licensed under the GNU Fre Documentation License with front- and back-cover texts. According to Debian vote 1 of 2006 this is a violation of the DFSG modifiability requirements. The text is fairly short so it shouldn't be too much work writing a fresh one. As I primarily use C++/C I'm probably not the best person for the job. I would however be willing to have a go at it, if so requested. Other non-free man pages in packages related to the GNU Compiler Collection: * cpp-4.2 (bug #456262) * gcc-4.2 (bug #442445) * gcj-4.2 (bug report not yet submitted) * gij-4.2 (bug report not yet submitted) Note: In response to bug #442445 Matthias Klose said that the problem won't be fixed (for gcc) until the 4.2.3 and 4.3.0 releases. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-can-071209 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included
Package: cpp-4.2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The man page cpp-4.2.1 is licensed under the GNU Fre Documentation License with front- and back-cover texts. According to Debian vote 1 of 2006 this is a violation of the DFSG modifiability requirements. Other non-free man pages in packages related to the GNU Compiler Collection: * gcc-4.2 (bug #442445) * gcj (bug report not yet submitted) * gcj-4.2 (bug report not yet submitted) * gij-4.2 (bug report not yet submitted) Note: In response to bug #442445 Matthias Klose said that the problem won't be fixed (for gcc) until the 4.2.3 and 4.3.0 releases. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-can-071209 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#450549: Regression?
Did 3.5.7 work? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#439567: abraca - FTBFS: IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Hello Simon, On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:40:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Michael: how would you recommend proceeding with this? Should I bother > asking for a sponsored-NMU of a known-broken package in the hope that it's > xmms2's fault, should I add the Recommends, should I file a separate bug for > the Recommends? I would be for a separate bug for the Recommends so the maintainer can add it and add some documentation in /usr/share/doc/abraca/README.Debian on this. > diff -u abraca-0.2/debian/changelog abraca-0.2/debian/changelog > --- abraca-0.2/debian/changelog > +++ abraca-0.2/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ > +abraca (0.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * Non-maintainer upload. > + * Use a temporary $HOME during build to stop waf writing outside the build > +directory (Closes: #439567). > + > + -- Simon McVittie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:47:31 + > + Is using a temporary $HOME really such a good idea? What do you thin about just disabling/removing (via patch) the stuff in ./waf that needs $HOME? I'm not a python guy, so I cant help much here. Cheers, Michael signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#451348: gnash-tools: [patch] missing library or dependency
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:40:20AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > (I'm a new maintainer doing RC bug squashing; Michael Koch, Cc'd, is my AM.) > > > > I attach a proposed NMU interdiff for this bug, and for a FTBFS with recent > > dpkg-shlibdeps which I discovered while fixing it. I haven't built the > > patched packages cleanly yet - I've built and tested them successfully > > using incremental builds with -nc, but I'm still waiting for a clean build > > to finish - so it's possible that my patch isn't quite right, but it should > > at least be close. > > The patch attached to my previous mail does indeed seem to be OK in a clean > build. Source and binaries, as I'd upload them if I was a DD, can be found > here: > > http://people.alioth.debian.org/~smcv-guest/gnash-0.81~rc070818-2.1-rfs1/ Wow, that really takes time to build. Even on my quadcore system...I will upload tomorrow morning. Cheers, Michael signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#454796: marked as done (jd: GPL incompatible with OpenSSL License)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454796: fixed in jd 1:1.9.8~beta071210-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: jd Version: 1:1.9.7-071122-2 Severity: serious This package is linked with OpenSSL and licensed under the GNU GPLv2, but the OpenSSL License is incompatible with it. Please add an OpenSSL exemption to the license if the author agreed. Thanks, -- Tatsuya Kinoshita pgpmplTLloUkp.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: jd Source-Version: 1:1.9.8~beta071210-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: jd_1.9.8~beta071210-1.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jd/jd_1.9.8~beta071210-1.diff.gz jd_1.9.8~beta071210-1.dsc to pool/main/j/jd/jd_1.9.8~beta071210-1.dsc jd_1.9.8~beta071210-1_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jd/jd_1.9.8~beta071210-1_i386.deb jd_1.9.8~beta071210.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/j/jd/jd_1.9.8~beta071210.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated jd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:42:29 +0900 Source: jd Binary: jd Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.9.8~beta071210-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: jd - GTK+ based 2ch browser for Linux Closes: 454796 Changes: jd (1:1.9.8~beta071210-1) unstable; urgency=high . * New upstream release (beta). * debian/control - set Standards-Version to 3.7.3. - move "Homepage:" field. - add "Vcs-Brower:" and "Vcs-Svn:" . - "Build-depends:" change from libssl-dev to libgnutls-dev, because of those license conflicts, so I'll set "urgency=high" (closes: #454796). Files: 002af5a93df21625b6d088209dad5a71 858 net optional jd_1.9.8~beta071210-1.dsc 4ec79f5845ab7afded1237f859e8b66b 492610 net optional jd_1.9.8~beta071210.orig.tar.gz 10b8e29b24b23f647cbaf78fd3e1ef7a 9811 net optional jd_1.9.8~beta071210-1.diff.gz 0e1db2a2dd184e35d5541b2e4aab16bf 1300960 net optional jd_1.9.8~beta071210-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHYbJugV4LPvpMUpgRArzqAJ0RQeDGR5KQPfN4vC53a1NbwTvyeQCg1c2j TiNFUOPNvbKRkqhzks+PZmU= =11NA -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Processed: fixed upstream in mono 1.2.6, not RC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 452585 important Bug#452585: mono: SIGABRT invoking GetFields on emitted type Severity set to `important' from `serious' > tags 452585 + fixed-upstream upstream pending Bug#452585: mono: SIGABRT invoking GetFields on emitted type Tags were: sid lenny Tags added: fixed-upstream, upstream, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#455017: cdrom: sound system does not work
reassign 455017 kde severity 455017 important thanks Hi, I'm reassigning this to the KDE package in the hope the maintainers can help you. This isn't a grave bug against the CD or debian-installer packages. On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:05:01PM -0500, operator wrote: > >Subject: cdrom: sound system does not work >Package: cdrom >Severity: grave >Justification: renders package unusable > >*** Please type your report below this line *** >after installing kde, the sound system does not work. > >-- System Information: >Debian Release: 4.0 >Architecture: i386 (i686) >Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash >Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-486 >Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 ($ > > > > > > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] "When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb." -- Steven M. Haflich -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#455017: cdrom: sound system does not work
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 455017 kde Bug#455017: cdrom: sound system does not work Bug reassigned from package `cdrom' to `kde'. > severity 455017 important Bug#455017: cdrom: sound system does not work Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#436140: cdrom: Most of the system's files have a future timestamp causing at least update/config problems.
reassign 436140 debian-installer thanks Hi, This bug is in the installer, most likely caused by a clock initialisation problem. I'm reassigning it to the debian-installer team for their input. On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 07:20:50PM +0200, os wrote: >Package: cdrom >Severity: grave > > >I cannot determine the exact extend of the problem, but a "ls -la" in "/" >reveals this: > >drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 2008-01-02 21:14 . >drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 2008-01-02 21:14 .. >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-01-02 21:13 bin >drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2007-06-10 13:50 boot >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root11 2008-01-02 19:57 cdrom -> media/cdrom >drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4340 2007-08-05 17:49 dev >drwxr-xr-x 108 root root 4096 2007-08-05 18:35 etc >drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 4096 2007-06-10 16:00 hdb >drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2007-06-10 17:01 home >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-01-02 19:58 initrd >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root28 2008-01-02 20:00 initrd.img -> >boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-4-486 >drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 4096 2008-01-02 21:12 lib >drwx-- 2 root root 16384 2008-01-02 19:57 lost+found >drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2007-07-17 00:55 media >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2006-10-28 16:06 mnt >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-01-02 19:58 opt >dr-xr-xr-x 111 root root 0 2007-08-05 17:48 proc >-rw--- 1 root root 1024 2008-01-02 21:14 .rnd >drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 2007-06-10 16:30 root >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-01-02 21:43 sbin >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-03-07 23:56 selinux >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-01-02 19:58 srv >drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 0 2007-08-05 17:48 sys >drwxrwxrwt 12 root root 4096 2007-08-05 18:50 tmp >drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 2008-01-02 21:08 usr >drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 4096 2008-01-02 21:41 var >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root25 2008-01-02 20:00 vmlinuz -> >boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-486 > >As you can see, for what reason ever, this installation produced future >timestamps on vital directories causing update mechanisms to fail and to >complain *all the time*. > >Installation history: > >- CD-ROM debian-40r0-i586-netinst >- Updates taken as indicated by notifier icon > >The first symptom was the notorious "ttf-opensymbol" update failure, probably >caused by various font directories tagged with future >timestamps (/usr/share/fonts, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/, ...) but this bug's >effects are obviously not restricted to these places. > >Since the update infrastructure fails, security fixes can no longer be >applied. This however makes the system unusable. > >-- System Information: >Debian Release: 4.0 > APT prefers stable > APT policy: (500, 'stable') >Architecture: i386 (i686) >Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash >Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-486 >Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441686: marked as done (f-spot: FTBFS: ./Glitz.cs(115,34): error CS0214: Pointers and fixed size buffers may only be used in an unsafe context)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#441686: fixed in f-spot 0.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: f-spot version: 0.3.5-1.2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/f-spot-0.3.5/glitz-sharp/src' gmcs -debug -target:library -out:NDesk.Glitz.dll ./Buffer.cs ./Context.cs ./Glitz.cs ./Drawable.cs ./Surface.cs ./TextureObject.cs ./Glitz.cs(115,34): error CS0214: Pointers and fixed size buffers may only be used in an unsafe context Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings make[4]: *** [NDesk.Glitz.dll] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/user/f-spot-0.3.5/glitz-sharp/src' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/user/f-spot-0.3.5/glitz-sharp' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/user/f-spot-0.3.5' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/f-spot-0.3.5' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 The full build log is available from http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/09/05 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: f-spot Source-Version: 0.4.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of f-spot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: f-spot_0.4.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/f-spot/f-spot_0.4.1-1.diff.gz f-spot_0.4.1-1.dsc to pool/main/f/f-spot/f-spot_0.4.1-1.dsc f-spot_0.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/f-spot/f-spot_0.4.1-1_i386.deb f-spot_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/f-spot/f-spot_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated f-spot package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:57:10 +0100 Source: f-spot Binary: f-spot Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.4.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian CLI Applications Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: f-spot - personal photo management application Closes: 401647 427287 435697 436298 441686 446409 447986 453474 Changes: f-spot (0.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Mirco Bauer ] * New upstream version. + Fixes NDesk.Glitz FTBFS. (Closes: #441686) + Fixes crash when double clicking an image or attaching a tag while the image is open. (Closes: #447986) * debian/control: + Added myself to Uploaders. + Updated cli-common-dev build-dependency to >= 0.4.4. + Updated Standards-Version to 3.7.3, no changes needed. + Added sqlite and sqlite3 to Suggests, needed for the f-spot-sqlite-upgrade script. + Added libflickrnet2.1.5-cil, libmono-addins0.2-cil and libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil to build-dependencies. * debian/copyright: + Rewritten, checked copyright and licenses of all source files. * debian/patches/01_build-system.dpatch: + Disabled as upstream allows to link against system ndesk-dbus now. * debian/patches/10_cs-changes.dpatch: + Disabled as PicasaWeb export, .kdc file support and sqlite3 support are already fixed upstream. * Added beagle-dev to build-dependencies for beagle support. * debian/patches/fix_libfspot_linkage.dpatch debian/patches/fix_libfspoteog_linkage.dpatch debian/patch
Bug#447986: marked as done (f-spot crashes on double-click on image, or on selecting a tag while in looking at pic.)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447986: fixed in f-spot 0.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: f-spot Version: 0.3.5-1.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable ... open uri = file:///home/sam/Photos/2005/10/16/img_1100.jpg open uri = file:///home/sam/Photos/2005/10/16/img_1100.jpg Exception in Gtk# callback delegate Note: Applications can use GLib.ExceptionManager.UnhandledException to handle the exception. System.NullReferenceException: A null value was found where an object instance was required. at FSpot.TagView.OnExposeEvent (Gdk.EventExpose args) [0x0] at Gtk.Widget.exposeevent_cb (IntPtr widget, IntPtr evnt) [0x0] at GLib.ExceptionManager.RaiseUnhandledException(System.Exception e, Boolean is_terminal) at Gtk.Widget.exposeevent_cb(IntPtr widget, IntPtr evnt) at Gtk.Widget.exposeevent_cb(IntPtr , IntPtr ) at Gtk.Application.gtk_main() at Gtk.Application.gtk_main() at Gtk.Application.Run() at Gnome.Program.Run() at FSpot.Driver.Main(System.String[] args) [5]+ Exit 1 f-spot -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages f-spot depends on: ii dbus1.1.1-3 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libart-2.0-22.3.19-3 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.20.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-02.20.0-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.20.0-1 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.6.1-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.4.10-1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libexif12 0.6.16-2 library to parse EXIF files ii libfontconfig1 2.4.2-1.4generic font configuration library ii libgconf2-4 2.20.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgconf2.0-cil 2.16.0-7 CLI binding for GConf 2.16 ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]7.0.1-2 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libglade2.0-cil 2.10.2-1 CLI binding for the Glade librarie ii libglib2.0-02.14.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libglib2.0-cil 2.10.2-1 CLI binding for the GLib utility l ii libgnome-keyring0 2.20.0-3 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome-vfs2.0-cil 2.16.0-7 CLI binding for GnomeVFS 2.16 ii libgnome2-0 2.20.1.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnome2.0-cil 2.16.0-7 CLI binding for Gnome 2.16 ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.20.1-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-02.20.1.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 1:2.20.0-3 GNOME Virtual File System (runtime ii libgphoto2-22.4.0-7 gphoto2 digital camera library ii libgphoto2-port02.4.0-7 gphoto2 digital camera port librar ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.1-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtk2.0-cil 2.10.2-1 CLI binding for the GTK+ toolkit 2 ii libgtkhtml2.0-cil 2.16.0-7 CLI binding for GtkHTML 3.8 ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-14The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liblcms11.16-6 Color management library ii libmono-corlib2.0-cil 1.2.5.1-1Mono core library (2.0) ii libmono-sharpzip2.84-cil1.2.5.1-1Mono SharpZipLib library ii libmono-sqlite2.0-cil 1.2.5.1-1Mono Sqlite library ii libmono-system-data2.0-cil 1.2.5.1-1Mono System.Data Library ii libmono-system-web2.0-cil 1.2.5.1-1Mono System.Web Library ii libmono-system2.0-cil 1.2.5.1-1Mono System libraries (2.0) ii libmono01.2.5.1-1libraries for the Mono JIT ii libmono2.0-cil 1.2.5.1-1Mono libraries (2.0) ii libndesk-dbus-glib1.0-cil 0.4.1-1 CLI implementation of D-Bus (GLib ii libndesk-dbus1.0-cil0.6.0-1 CLI implementation of D-Bus
Processed: Re: emacs22: Wrong encoding of UTF-8 characters
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456235 serious Bug#456235: emacs22: Wrong encoding of UTF-8 characters Severity set to `serious' from `important' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#436140: cdrom: Most of the system's files have a future timestamp causing at least update/config problems.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 436140 debian-installer Bug#436140: cdrom: Most of the system's files have a future timestamp causing at least update/config problems. Bug reassigned from package `cdrom' to `debian-installer'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456237: bzip2: Build from source makes uninstallable package
Package: bzip2 Version: 1.0.3-7 Severity: serious If I rebuild bzip2 from source, the resulting package fails to install with: ... Setting up bzip2 (1.0.3-7) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/bzip2.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/bzip2.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing bzip2 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: bzip2 frobnitz:/tmp/buildd/bzip2-1.0.3# zcat debian/tmp-run/usr/share/info/bzip2.info.gz |head START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY This is bzip2.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.11 from manual.texi. * Bzip2: (bzip2). A program and library for data compression. END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY File: bzip2.info, Node: Top, Next: Introduction, Up: (dir) bzip2 and libbzip2, version 1.0.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc, tagging 443804, tagging 448431, tagging 450452
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc > tags 443804 + pending Bug#443804: clisp: Please add support for module berkeley-db There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 448431 + pending Bug#448431: clisp: dpkg warning: unable to delete old directory `/usr/lib/clisp... There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 450452 + pending Bug#450452: does install a dangling symlink as clisp-link -> ../lib/clisp-*/clisp-link There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453195: marked as done (valgrind: FTBFS: configure: error: Valgrind requires glibc version 2.2 - 2.6)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453195: fixed in valgrind 1:3.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: valgrind version: 1:3.2.3-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: > checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes > checking dependency style of g++... gcc3 > checking for ranlib... ranlib > checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl > checking for gdb... /usr/bin/gdb > checking for a supported version of gcc... ok (gcc (GCC) 4.2.3 20071014 > (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3)) > checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu > checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu > checking for a supported CPU... ok (i686) > checking for use as an inner Valgrind... no > checking for a 64-bit only build... no > checking for a 32-bit only build... no > checking for a supported OS... ok (linux-gnu) > checking for the kernel version... 2.6 family (2.6.18-3-amd64) > checking for a supported CPU/OS combination... ok (i686-linux-gnu) > checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep > checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E > checking the glibc version... unsupported version > configure: error: Valgrind requires glibc version 2.2 - 2.6 > make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 > dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/11/26 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: valgrind Source-Version: 1:3.3.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of valgrind, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: valgrind_3.3.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/v/valgrind/valgrind_3.3.0-1.diff.gz valgrind_3.3.0-1.dsc to pool/main/v/valgrind/valgrind_3.3.0-1.dsc valgrind_3.3.0-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/v/valgrind/valgrind_3.3.0-1_amd64.deb valgrind_3.3.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/v/valgrind/valgrind_3.3.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andrés Roldán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated valgrind package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:39:58 + Source: valgrind Binary: valgrind Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrés Roldán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Andrés Roldán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: valgrind - A memory debugger and profiler Closes: 356777 441749 452307 453195 455855 Changes: valgrind (1:3.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. (Closes: #455855) - Now valgrind will compile natively on glibc > 2.6 (Closes: #453195, #441749) - Suppressions are now updated for the latest glibc on sid. (Closes: #356777) * debian/patches/01_amd64-nops.dpatch: - Removed, already applied by upstream. * debian/patches/01_suppression-strip.dpatch: - Removed. Don't be jealous of your brother, Andy :) * debian/patches/01_valgrind.pc.dpatch: - Corrects pkg-config information. (Closes: #452307) Files: 3b57e2110c08a06a1c7300627124071a 766 devel optional valgrind_3.3.0-1.dsc 2c61eebedc937d6ebf3d8a8d6fd42324 5685219 devel optional valgrind_3.3.0.orig.tar.gz 414894c197d440dba5c5d9d845d4aa4e 91254 devel optional valgrind_3.3.0-1.diff.gz 56188e5b21d4192d93c43f00daa5b83c 37053054 dev
Bug#443722: Not an f-spot bug
severity 443722 normal I hadn't been able to trigger this bug at the time when I reported it using anything but f-spot, no matter how I tried; and it had happened about 30 times (off the back of my head). Last weekend, however, I did reproduce this bug using digiKam; so either some library that is shared by both digiKam and f-spot is at fault, or something else entirely. Since I'm no longer sure which package is at fault, it's not really fair to leave this as an RC bug on f-spot, so changing the severity. Since I don't (yet) know what is really causing this, however, and since I still saw this happening most while using f-spot, I'm not going to reassign or close it just yet. -- Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456201: marked as done (nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:38:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: nspr Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): ... dh_compress -a dh_fixperms -a dh_makeshlibs -a -V 'libnspr4-0d (>= 4.7.0~1.9b1)' dpkg-gensymbols: failure: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols: : No such file or directory dh_makeshlibs: command returned error code 512 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-2 On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:01:43PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:56:12AM -0500, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Thursday 13 December 2007 11:46:59 am Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:08:47AM -0500, Daniel Schepler > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Package: nspr > > > > Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 > > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > > > From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): > > > > > > > > ... > > > > dh_compress -a > > > > dh_fixperms -a > > > > dh_makeshlibs -a -V 'libnspr4-0d (>= 4.7.0~1.9b1)' > > > > dpkg-gensymbols: failure: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols: : > > > > No such file or directory > > > > > > Looks like the hack that was necessary to overcome a limitation in > > > dh_shlibdeps doesn't work anymore. > > > > > > Can you tell me with what version of debhelper you built that ? > > > > > > Mike > > > > debhelper version 5.0.62. > > And the amd64 buildd built with version 5.0.61, which gives me the version > I'll have to conflict with when I'll have this fixed ;) I fixed the bug, but forgot to add the "Closes:" note in the changelog. Here is the changelog anyways: nspr (4.7.0~1.9b1-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/*.symbols.*: Remove "../../" workaround now that dh_makeshlibs supports symbols files includes properly. * debian/control: + Build depend on debhelper (>= 5.0.62), where this happened. Remove dpkg-dev versioned build-dependency, as debhelper already depends on the proper one, and this dependency is obviously not going to be dropped. + Bumped Standards-Version to 3.7.3.0. No changes needed. -- Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:22:50 +0100 --- End Message ---
Processed (with 5 errors): Not an f-spot bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 443722 normal Bug#443722: Tagging pictures corrupts the image Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > I hadn't been able to trigger this bug at the time when I reported it Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > using anything but f-spot, no matter how I tried; and it had happened Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > about 30 times (off the back of my head). Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > Last weekend, however, I did reproduce this bug using digiKam; so either Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > some library that is shared by both digiKam and f-spot is at fault, or Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#456199: libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 undefined symbol: DPMSDisable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 374062 456199 Bug#374062: TTF_RenderUNICODE_Solid fails when rendering strings containing spaces Bug#456199: libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 undefined symbol: DPMSDisable Bug#386285: libfreetype6: GlyphToBitmap fails for monochrome rendering of space-character Forcibly Merged 374062 386285 456199. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Marking bugs fixed in svn as pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Marking bugs fixed in collab-maint/ext-maint/splint SVN repository as > # pending. > tags 171437 +pending Bug#171437: splint: K&R / standard C mismatch Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream Tags added: pending > tags 298261 +pending Bug#298261: splint: new upstream version - please package 3.1.2 Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 343564 +pending Bug#343564: splint: small typo on manpage Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 352298 +pending Bug#352298: splint: manpage problems, useless files, copyright file problems, requires environment variables Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 424719 +pending Bug#424719: ITA: splint -- A tool for statically checking C programs for bugs There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 430328 +pending Bug#430328: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390 Tags were: sid lenny Tags added: pending > tags 436744 +pending Bug#436744: splint: update debian/copyright to 3.7.2 standards template Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#450464: Patch
tags 450464 + patch thanks As discussed in private mail, the current gnucash sources in sid require goffice 0.4.x which is now packaged as source package goffice0.4 and whose development files are in libgoffice-0-dev. The following patch fixes the FTBFS for me: diff -ru gnucash-2.2.1.old/debian/control gnucash-2.2.1/debian/control --- gnucash-2.2.1.old/debian/control2007-12-13 19:06:28.0 + +++ gnucash-2.2.1/debian/control2007-12-13 19:10:42.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.7.2 -Build-Depends: libltdl3-dev, libofx-dev (>= 1:0.8.0-8), ofx (>= 1:0.8.0-8), libfinance-quote-perl, guile-1.6-slib, guile-1.6-dev, m4, gettext, slib (>= 3a2-5), debhelper (>= 4.2.16), zlib1g-dev, libjpeg62-dev, liborbit-dev, libungif4-dev, libxml-parser-perl, x11-common, libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.4.7), libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.16), libbonobo2-dev (>= 2.0.0), libgnomevfs2-dev (>= 2.2.0), libgnomevfs2-extra (>= 2.2.0), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.4.13), libglade2-dev (>= 2.3.6), libgnomeprint2.2-dev (>= 2.8.0), libart-2.0-dev (>= 2.3.11), libgconf2-dev, libgnomeui-dev (>= 2.0.0), libgsf-gnome-1-dev (>= 1.12.2), libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.6.0), libgtkhtml3.8-dev, gconf2, libgoffice-1-dev, dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19), imagemagick, swig +Build-Depends: libltdl3-dev, libofx-dev (>= 1:0.8.0-8), ofx (>= 1:0.8.0-8), libfinance-quote-perl, guile-1.6-slib, guile-1.6-dev, m4, gettext, slib (>= 3a2-5), debhelper (>= 4.2.16), zlib1g-dev, libjpeg62-dev, liborbit-dev, libungif4-dev, libxml-parser-perl, x11-common, libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.4.7), libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.16), libbonobo2-dev (>= 2.0.0), libgnomevfs2-dev (>= 2.2.0), libgnomevfs2-extra (>= 2.2.0), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.4.13), libglade2-dev (>= 2.3.6), libgnomeprint2.2-dev (>= 2.8.0), libart-2.0-dev (>= 2.3.11), libgconf2-dev, libgnomeui-dev (>= 2.0.0), libgsf-gnome-1-dev (>= 1.12.2), libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.6.0), libgtkhtml3.8-dev, gconf2, libgoffice-0-dev, dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19), imagemagick, swig Build-Conflicts: guile-1.8-dev, guile-1.8 Package: gnucash -- Frankly, I think anybody's a fool to put (Microsoft operating system Windows) XP on their computer. It's like installing a continuous, 24-hour monitor on your mind. EFF co-founder John Perry Barlow in http://news.com.com/2008-1082-843349.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452585: fixed upstream in mono 1.2.6, not RC
severity 452585 important tags 452585 + fixed-upstream upstream pending thanks This bug is annoying but currently only effects nemerle, thus downgrading to important. With Mono 1.2.6 this bug will be fixed. -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key ID: 0xEEF946C8 FOSS Developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.meebey.net/ PEAR Developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pear.php.net/ Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 450464 + patch Bug#450464: gnucash: FTBFS: E: Couldn't find package libgoffice-1-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#447469: marked as done (javahelp2: FTBFS: class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.depend.Depend was not found)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447469: fixed in javahelp2 2.0.05-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: javahelp2 version: 2.0.05-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071021 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05' /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:68: parsing javahelp2-src-2.0.05.zip ... make[1]: Nothing to be done for `update-config'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05' #Create symlink to required jars mkdir -p build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/lib ln -s -f /usr/share/java/servlet-api.jar build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/lib/servlet-api.jar ln -s -f /usr/share/java/jsp-api.jar build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/lib/jsp-api.jar #Remove class uncompilable without JDIC rm -f build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/jhMaster/JavaHelp/src/new/javax/help/plaf/basic/BasicNativeContentViewerUI.java #Build javahelp target 'release' is for jars, target 'javadoc' is for javadoc ant -f build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/build.xml -Djdic-jar-present=true -Djdic-zip-present=true \ -Ddist.javadoc.dir=dist/lib/api \ -Dservlet-jar-present=true -Dtomcat-zip-present=true release javadoc Buildfile: build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/build.xml build-jsearch-jars: -pre-init: -init-private: -init-user: -init-project: -init-macrodef-property: -do-init: -post-init: -init-check: -init-macrodef-javac: -init-macrodef-junit: -init-macrodef-nbjpda: -init-macrodef-debug: -init-macrodef-java: -init-presetdef-jar: init: deps-jar: -pre-init: -init-private: -init-user: -init-project: -init-macrodef-property: -do-init: -post-init: -init-check: -init-macrodef-javac: Trying to override old definition of task http://www.netbeans.org/ns/j2se-project/3:javac -init-macrodef-junit: -init-macrodef-nbjpda: Trying to override old definition of task http://www.netbeans.org/ns/j2se-project/1:nbjpdastart -init-macrodef-debug: Trying to override old definition of task http://www.netbeans.org/ns/j2se-project/3:debug -init-macrodef-java: -init-presetdef-jar: init: deps-jar: download-tomcat-zip: unpack-servlet-jar: unpack-jsp-jar: download-jdic-zip: unpack-jdic-jar: -pre-init: -init-private: -init-user: -init-project: -init-macrodef-property: -do-init: -post-init: -init-check: -init-macrodef-javac: Trying to override old definition of task http://www.netbeans.org/ns/j2se-project/3:javac -init-macrodef-junit: -init-macrodef-nbjpda: Trying to override old definition of task http://www.netbeans.org/ns/j2se-project/1:nbjpdastart -init-macrodef-debug: Trying to override old definition of task http://www.netbeans.org/ns/j2se-project/3:debug -init-macrodef-java: -init-presetdef-jar: init: deps-jar: -pre-pre-compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05/build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/build/classes -pre-compile: -do-compile: BUILD FAILED /build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05/build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/build.xml:119: The following error occurred while executing this line: /build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05/build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/JSearchIndexer_nbproject/nbproject/build-impl.xml:241: The following error occurred while executing this line: /build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05/build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/JSearchClient_nbproject/nbproject/build-impl.xml:241: The following error occurred while executing this line: /build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05/build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/nbproject/build-impl.xml:251: The following error occurred while executing this line: /build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05/build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/nbproject/build-impl.xml:129: Problem: failed to create task or type depend Cause: the class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.depend.Depend was not found. This looks like one of Ant's optional components. Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in -/usr/share/ant/lib -/nonexistent/.ant/lib -a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument Do not panic, this is a common problem. The commonest cause is a missing JAR. This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem Total time: 0 seconds make: *** [stamp-build-javah
Bug#453227: Patch for ruby-defaults build failure
package ruby-defaults tags 453227 + patch thanks Here's a patch which fixes the build failure by avoiding the superfluous calls to dpkg-gencontrol. -- Daniel Schepler Binary files ruby-defaults-1.8.2.old/debian/.rules.swp and ruby-defaults-1.8.2/debian/.rules.swp differ diff -urN ruby-defaults-1.8.2.old/debian/rules ruby-defaults-1.8.2/debian/rules --- ruby-defaults-1.8.2.old/debian/rules 2004-07-05 15:25:50.0 + +++ ruby-defaults-1.8.2/debian/rules 2007-12-13 18:05:02.0 + @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ # dh_python # dh_makeshlibs dh_installdeb - dh_gencontrol + dh_gencontrol `while read package ver oldver; do test V"$$ver" = V"=" || echo -N$$package; done < debian/versions` cat debian/versions | while read package ver oldver;\ do \ test V"$$ver" = V"=" || DH_OPTIONS= dh_gencontrol -p$$package -u-v$$ver-$(REV); \
Bug#456190: geoip: debian/copyright is wrong
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:06:36PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Stephen Gran schrieb: > >This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said: > > > >>* license for the database is BSD with advertisement clause which I'm > >> unsure is DFSG free > >> > > > >It is. > > > Hello, > > it is not DFSG free - it's a known issue and yesterday I recieved an > email from maxmind (Upstream) where I'm allowed to clean it up. > > I will try to fix it as fast as possible, but I've to do much work. > > -- > Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, > Patrick Matthäi > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ > > Hello, tell me if I can help somehow. -- Kind Regards, Michael Mende http://www.menole.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Patch for ruby-defaults build failure
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package ruby-defaults Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ruby-defaults > tags 453227 + patch Bug#453227: ruby-defaults: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for package libracc-runtime-ruby (line 30) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:56:12AM -0500, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 13 December 2007 11:46:59 am Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:08:47AM -0500, Daniel Schepler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: nspr > > > Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): > > > > > > ... > > > dh_compress -a > > > dh_fixperms -a > > > dh_makeshlibs -a -V 'libnspr4-0d (>= 4.7.0~1.9b1)' > > > dpkg-gensymbols: failure: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols: : > > > No such file or directory > > > > Looks like the hack that was necessary to overcome a limitation in > > dh_shlibdeps doesn't work anymore. > > > > Can you tell me with what version of debhelper you built that ? > > > > Mike > > debhelper version 5.0.62. And the amd64 buildd built with version 5.0.61, which gives me the version I'll have to conflict with when I'll have this fixed ;) Thanks Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456190: geoip: debian/copyright is wrong
Stephen Gran schrieb: This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said: * license for the database is BSD with advertisement clause which I'm unsure is DFSG free It is. Hello, it is not DFSG free - it's a known issue and yesterday I recieved an email from maxmind (Upstream) where I'm allowed to clean it up. I will try to fix it as fast as possible, but I've to do much work. -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/
Bug#456203: dumb reportbug
Dear Debian, So, reportbug forgot to inlcude the majority of the report: USB pendrive fails when syncing file systems (works OK with big sequential copies) with "reset high speed USB device" and "device descriptor read/64, error -110" and "sd 0:0:0:0: scsi: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery" and "scsi 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device" Laptop is HP NX 6125, Pendrive is A-DATA PD7: 00:13.0 0c03: 1002:4374 (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) 00:13.1 0c03: 1002:4375 (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) 00:13.2 0c03: 1002:4373 (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) Bus 003 Device 013: ID 090c:1000 Feiya Technology Corp. Memory Bar sd 4:0:0:0: [sda] 4046848 512-byte hardware sectors (2072 MB) sd 4:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through A workaround is to issue: echo "64" >/sys/block/sda/device/max_sectors but that slows down copying to 2.6.18 level (which had no such issue). Without the workaround, I borked my FAT (fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0), FAT: Filesystem panic (dev sda1)) and ended up having files filled with zeroes. Severe data loss, could be a problem when kernel gets into Etch. Seems to affect only high-speed USB HUB (only EHCI?) +Pendrive. Google is full of "reset high speed USB device" with many different USB stuff - from external HDDs to network cards. Elemer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols
On Thursday 13 December 2007 11:46:59 am Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:08:47AM -0500, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: nspr > > Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): > > > > ... > > dh_compress -a > > dh_fixperms -a > > dh_makeshlibs -a -V 'libnspr4-0d (>= 4.7.0~1.9b1)' > > dpkg-gensymbols: failure: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols: : > > No such file or directory > > Looks like the hack that was necessary to overcome a limitation in > dh_shlibdeps doesn't work anymore. > > Can you tell me with what version of debhelper you built that ? > > Mike debhelper version 5.0.62. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:08:47AM -0500, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: nspr > Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 > Severity: serious > > From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): > > ... > dh_compress -a > dh_fixperms -a > dh_makeshlibs -a -V 'libnspr4-0d (>= 4.7.0~1.9b1)' > dpkg-gensymbols: failure: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols: : No > such file or directory Looks like the hack that was necessary to overcome a limitation in dh_shlibdeps doesn't work anymore. Can you tell me with what version of debhelper you built that ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols
Package: nspr Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): ... dh_compress -a dh_fixperms -a dh_makeshlibs -a -V 'libnspr4-0d (>= 4.7.0~1.9b1)' dpkg-gensymbols: failure: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols: : No such file or directory dh_makeshlibs: command returned error code 512 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#430842: marked as done (stores run-time data in /etc)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430842: fixed in no-ip 2.1.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: no-ip Version: 2.1.1-4 Severity: serious no-ip uses /etc/no-ip.conf, which is (a) a binary file, and (b) written to by the daemon during run-time. It's not a configuration file in the Unix sense and thus must not live in /etc. I suggest using debconf (#328842) to get answers to the questions asked by -C, then to feed those to no-ip and tell it to generate a file in /var/lib instead. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: no-ip Source-Version: 2.1.7-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of no-ip, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: no-ip_2.1.7-4.diff.gz to pool/main/n/no-ip/no-ip_2.1.7-4.diff.gz no-ip_2.1.7-4.dsc to pool/main/n/no-ip/no-ip_2.1.7-4.dsc noip2_2.1.7-4_i386.deb to pool/main/n/no-ip/noip2_2.1.7-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated no-ip package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:59:38 -0200 Source: no-ip Binary: noip2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.1.7-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: noip2 - client for dynamic DNS service Closes: 314616 430842 449114 449171 452825 452853 Changes: no-ip (2.1.7-4) unstable; urgency=low . [ Andres Mejia ] * Changing noip2.conf path from /etc to /var/lib/noip2. Closes: #430842 * Including updated Portuguese translations. Closes: #449114 * Including updated Finnish translations. Closes: #449171 * Taking out 'XS-' for Vcs entries in debian/control, no longer needed. * Translation review process. + Applying patch sent by debian-l10n-english contributors. * Closes: #314616 + Could not reproduce problem. Possibly fixed in previous version of glibc or noip2. * Including updated Galician translations. Closes: #452825 * Including updated Portuguese translations. Closes: #452853 Files: 4e906e8d4994fc1649c34da51ac920f7 798 net optional no-ip_2.1.7-4.dsc 8a8a3ecd4ed9301fcdc38db77fc148f8 16358 net optional no-ip_2.1.7-4.diff.gz 13d190a98c866f719f28bc7a443f077c 70180 net optional noip2_2.1.7-4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHYVeVLqiZQEml+FURAnICAKCCQ91aa9NVOletp0VIu1mtoakefwCdH6PN 7w/QM1p0sV79nSFud+KfgLc= =Ri3t -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#427591: Doesn't work with all above method
Package: enigmail Version: 2:0.95.0+1-3 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I tried both above way to get enigmail work with Icedove. But, it seems that none of methods are working for me. --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 Debian Release: lenny/sid 500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 500 unstablehttp.us.debian.org 500 etchdebian.beryl-project.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ==-+- thunderbird| OR icedove| 2.0.0.6-1 OR iceape-mailnews| OR seamonkey-mailnews | libc6 (>= 2.5-5) | 2.7-4 libgcc1(>= 1:4.2-20070516) | 1:4.2.2-4 libnspr4-0d (>= 1.8.0.10) | 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 libstdc++6 (>= 4.2-20070516) | 4.2.2-4 gnupg | 1.4.6-2 -- Cheers, -- Kartik Mistry | GPG: 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_ blog.ftbfs.in | kartikm.wordpress.com -- It seems to make an auto driver mad if he misses you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456190: geoip: debian/copyright is wrong
This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said: > * license for the database is BSD with advertisement clause which I'm > unsure is DFSG free It is. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#455482: PyZenity
Actually, it looks like it would be pretty easy to implement properly in PyGTK. I took a quick look at the source of Zenity last night and I see no problems with using Zenity's own glade file for the widgets and translating the C to Python. It looks like a weekend project to me. It might be a good project to get up to speed on PyGTK, Siegfried. My wild guess is it'll take a few good days to learn what you need to rewrite it but it's definitely worth knowing if you use Python a lot. I'll be willing to take a crack at it if you don't have to time. Totally up to you. Cheers, Brian Siegfried-Angel wrote: Well, then I can't object neither... I'll upload it to my PPA for Ubuntu. I've been thinking about it, and learning PyGTK is something I've pending since a while... How much (time) do you think that it could take to rewrite it properly up to the point of functionality it has right now? (I'm just asking... Not sure if I'll work on it as Ubuntu/Debian development is already taking a lot of time, and I've other projects in progress, too). Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456190: geoip: debian/copyright is wrong
Package: geoip Severity: serious * libgeoip is NOT under the GPL but the LGPL. * Source for the geolite database is not in the package, hence it's not DFSG free, though it's downloadable from http://www.maxmind.com/app/geolitecity, it should be packaged independently along with the CSV generated here. * license for the database is BSD with advertisement clause which I'm unsure is DFSG free, and is not the GPL anyways. Not to mention that geoip holds a couple of files (like md5 code that has different license). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: disabling caca makes it build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 454118 serious Bug#454118: FTBFS: caca.c:309: error: 'struct caca_event' has no member named 'type' Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > tags 454118 +patch Bug#454118: FTBFS: caca.c:309: error: 'struct caca_event' has no member named 'type' There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456102: FTBFS: error: 'INT_MAX' undeclared
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:19:51PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > cdrwtool.c: In function 'cdrom_open_check': > > cdrwtool.c:606: error: 'INT_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) This puzzled me at first, as line 606 reads: ret = ioctl(fd, CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS, CDSL_CURRENT); Both constants come from linux/cdrom.h. For me it contains: #define CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS 0x5326 /* Get tray position, etc. */ #define CDSL_CURRENT((int) (~0U>>1)) I wouldn't be surprised if the second #define had been changed to use INT_MAX in more recent kernel sources. So is this a bug in the header file - should it include itself? Cheers, Richard -- __ _ |_) /| Richard Atterer | \/¯| http://atterer.net ¯ '` ¯
Bug#455698: ampache: contains a non-free font
Charliej wrote: > Paul Wise wrote: > >> Package: ampache >> Version: 3.3.3.5-dfsg-2 >> Severity: serious >> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Usertags: non-free >> >> ampache contains a non-free font: >> >> /usr/share/ampache/www/modules/captcha/COLLEGE.ttf >> http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org/review/fnt-7f918bfee88f88eb2c810fb4286c585f.html >> >> This looks to be from here: >> >> http://www.squaregear.net/fonts/ >> http://www.squaregear.net/fonts/college.shtml >> http://www.squaregear.net/fonts/college.zip >> >> From the zip file: >> >> / >> College, like all of my fonts, is free. You can use it for most >> personal or business uses you'd like, and I ask for no money. I >> would, however, like to hear from you. If you use my fonts for >> something please send me a postcard or e-mail letting me know how >> you used it. Send me a copy if you can or let me know where I can >> find your work. >> >> You may use this font for graphical or printed work, but you may not >> sell it or include it in a collection of fonts (on CD or otherwise) >> being sold. You can redistribute this font as long as you charge >> nothing to receive it. If you redistribute it include this text file >> with it as is (without modifications). >> >> If you use this font for commercial purposes please credit me in >> at least some little way. >> \ >> >> This licence does not clearly allow all the DFSG-required freedoms: >> >> http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines >> >> Please contact the College font author and ask them to licence the font >> under a DFSG-compliant font licence such as the OFL: >> >> http://scripts.sil.org/OFL >> http://scripts.sil.org/OFL_web >> http://scripts.sil.org/OFL-FAQ_web >> >> If they are not willing to do so or cannot be contacted, please remove >> the font from the binary package and the source package and depend on >> another font package for generating the captcha or move the package to >> non-free. >> >> Please contact ampache upstream and ask them to use fontconfig or >> similar to get fonts for use by the captcha system. >> >> Also, perhaps ampache upstream would like to switch their captcha system >> to use recaptcha.net instead. >> >> >> > Thank you for your bug report. Forwarding to upstream. > > > > Upstream has contacted me stating that he will remove college.ttf and replace it with FreeMono-Medium.ttf. Will upload mentors.debian.net ASAP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#455698: Replaced with FreeMono-Medium.ttf in Upstream
I've replaced COLLEGE.ttf with FreeMono-Medium.ttf (from the debian fonts package) Please let me know if you find any other componets that don't comply with the Debian DSFG-required freedoms. -Karl Vollmer Ampache Lead Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#455961: marked as done (openoffice.org-writer: Dependency problem with openoffice.org-common)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:18:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#455961: fixed in openoffice.org 1:2.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: openoffice.org-writer Version: 1:2.3.0.dfsg-2 Severity: important Hello, I can't upgrade openoffice.org-writer due to a dependency problem : Préparation du remplacement de openoffice.org-writer 1:2.3.0.dfsg-2 (en utilisant .../openoffice.org-writer_1%3a2.3.1-1_i386.deb) ... Dépaquetage de la mise à jour de openoffice.org-writer ... dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-writer_1%3a2.3.1-1_i386.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/openoffice/share/xslt/wiki/oopedia-style.ott », qui appartient aussi au paquet openoffice.org-common dpkg-deb: sous-processus paste tué par le signal (Relais brisé (pipe)) Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-writer_1%3a2.3.1-1_i386.deb In English : openoffice.org-writer wants to replace /usr/lib/openoffice/share/xslt/wiki/oopedia-style.ott which belongs to openoffice.org-common too. Thanks Nicolas. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.9 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages openoffice.org-writer depends on: ii libc6 2.7-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.2.2-4GCC support library ii libicu363.6-10 International Components for Unico ii libstdc++6 4.2.2-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libstlport4.6c2 4.6.2-3 STLport C++ class library ii libwpd8c2a 0.8.12-1 Library for handling WordPerfect d ii libwps-0.1-10.1.1-1 Works text file format import filt ii libxml2 2.6.30.dfsg-3GNOME XML library ii openoffice.org-core 1:2.3.0.dfsg-2 OpenOffice.org office suite archit pn python-uno (no description available) ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-7 compression library - runtime Versions of packages openoffice.org-writer recommends: ii gij-4.1 [java2-runtime] 4.1.2-16 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter ii gij-4.2 [java2-runtime] 4.2.2-3The GNU Java bytecode interpreter ii java-gcj-compat 1.0.77-2 Java runtime environment using GIJ ii openoffice.org-filter-bin 1:2.3.0.dfsg-2 Legacy filters (e.g. StarOffice 5. ii openoffice.org-java-commo 1:2.3.0.dfsg-3 OpenOffice.org office suite Java s ii sun-java5-jre [java2-runt 1.5.0-13-1 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment ( ii sun-java6-jre [java2-runt 6-03-2 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment ( Versions of packages openoffice.org-core depends on: ii fontconfig 2.5.0-2 generic font configuration library ii libc6 2.7-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.4.10-1.1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.17.1-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libdb4.54.5.20-11Berkeley v4.5 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.8-4 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfreetype62.3.5-1+b1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.2.2-4GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.14.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgstreamer-plugins-ba 0.10.15-3GStreamer libraries from the "base ii libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.15-3Core GStreamer libraries and eleme ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.3-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libhunspell-1.1-0 1.1.9-1 spell checker and morphological an ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libicu363.6-10 International Components for Unico ii libjpeg62 6b-14The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libldap22.1.30.dfsg-13.5 OpenLDAP libraries ii libneon27-gnutls0.27.2-1 An HTTP and WebDAV client library ii libnspr4-0d 4.7.0~1.9b1-1NetScape Portable Runtime Library ii libnss3-0d 3.11.7-1 Network Security Servi
Bug#454748: marked as done (openoffice.org-base-core: fails to install during upgrade from openoffice 2.3.0)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:18:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454625: fixed in openoffice.org 1:2.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: openoffice.org-base-core Version: 1:2.3.1-1 Severity: normal upgrading (with aptitude full-upgrade) failed with: Unpacking openoffice.org-base-core (from .../openoffice.org-base-core_1%3a2.3.1-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-base-core_1%3a2.3.1-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libdba680li.so', which is also in package openoffice.org-base Could it be that it should be 1:2.3.1 instead of 2.3.1 in "Replaces: openoffice.org-base (< 2.3.1)" -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-grml (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.iso885915, LC_CTYPE=en_US.iso885915 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages openoffice.org-base-core depends on: ii libc6 2.7-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.2.2-4 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.2.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libstlport4.6c2 4.6.2-3STLport C++ class library openoffice.org-base-core recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: openoffice.org Source-Version: 1:2.3.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openoffice.org, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: broffice.org_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/broffice.org_2.3.1-2_all.deb libmythes-dev_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb libuno-cil_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libuno-cil_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-base-core_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-base-core_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-base_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-base_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-calc_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-calc_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-common_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-common_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-core_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-core_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-dbg_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dbg_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-dev-doc_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev-doc_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-dev_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-draw_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-draw_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-evolution_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-filter-binfilter_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-filter-binfilter_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-filter-mobiledev_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-filter-mobiledev_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-gcj_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gcj_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-gnome_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnome_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-gtk_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-headless_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-headless_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-help-cs_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-cs_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-da_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-da_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-de_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-de_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-dz_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-dz_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-en-gb_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-en-gb_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-en-us_2.3.1-2_all.deb
Bug#454625: marked as done (openoffice.org-base-core: Replaces field is missing the epoch)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:18:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454625: fixed in openoffice.org 1:2.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: openoffice.org-base-core Version: 1:2.3.1-1 Severity: normal Unpacking openoffice.org-base-core (from .../openoffice.org-base-core_1%3a2.3.1-1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-base-core_1%3a2.3.1-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libdba680lx.so', which is also in package openoffice.org-base dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Katkennut putki) I believe this is because openoffice.org-base-core's Replaces openoffice.org-base (<< 2.3.1) is missing the epoch. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.9-ibid (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages openoffice.org-base-core depends on: ii libc6 2.7-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.2.2-4 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.2.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 openoffice.org-base-core recommends no packages. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: openoffice.org Source-Version: 1:2.3.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openoffice.org, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: broffice.org_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/broffice.org_2.3.1-2_all.deb libmythes-dev_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb libuno-cil_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libuno-cil_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-base-core_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-base-core_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-base_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-base_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-calc_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-calc_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-common_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-common_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-core_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-core_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-dbg_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dbg_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-dev-doc_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev-doc_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-dev_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-draw_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-draw_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-evolution_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-filter-binfilter_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-filter-binfilter_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-filter-mobiledev_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-filter-mobiledev_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-gcj_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gcj_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-gnome_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnome_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-gtk_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-headless_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-headless_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb openoffice.org-help-cs_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-cs_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-da_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-da_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-de_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-de_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-dz_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-dz_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-en-gb_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-en-gb_2.3.1-2_all.deb openoffice.org-help-en-us_2.3.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.or
Bug#432755: please upload to volatile.
Hello, Could you please upload the new version of flashplugin-nonfree to volatile? (as soon as it reaches testing... this is requirement for volatile) This way stable users will be allowed to upgrade w/o using version from backports, testing, whatever... Thank you. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Saving Private Ryan... Private Ryan exists. Overwrite? (Y/N) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#455819: marked as done (Subject: base: sound system failure (arts)?)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:33:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Subject: base: sound system failure Package: base Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-486 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 ($ --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, I could have tagged #455819 as moreinfo as well, and reassign this to the "proper" package, but considering you filed #453733 and #455996 with equally no information, and havent replied to the request for moreinfo on #453733, I've decided to just close these bugs. You're welcome to file them again and give some more information which can help us understanding and fixing the bugs, like describing which software exactly doesnt work, what you have done exactly, what software you are running, on which hardware etc. Please read http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/HowTo/BugReports for some more verbose information how to report bugs. Thanks. regards, Holger pgpNa2Or0sNzO.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#455819: close
Hi, I could have tagged #455819 as moreinfo as well, and reassign this to the "proper" package, but considering you filed #453733 and #455996 with equally no information, and havent replied to the request for moreinfo on #453733, I've decided to just close these bugs. You're welcome to file them again and give some more information which can help us understanding and fixing the bugs, like describing which software exactly doesnt work, what you have done exactly, what software you are running, on which hardware etc. Please read http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/HowTo/BugReports for some more verbose information how to report bugs. Thanks. regards, Holger pgpSqEfjjhde7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#454133: marked as done (pwlib: CVE-2007-4897 remote denial of service)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:52:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454133: fixed in pwlib 1.8.4-1+sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: pwlib Version: 1.10.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for pwlib. CVE-2007-4897[0]: | pwlib, as used by Ekiga 2.0.5 and possibly other products, allows | remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via | a long argument to the PString::vsprintf function, related to a | "memory management flaw". NOTE: this issue was originally reported as | being in the SIPURL::GetHostAddress function in Ekiga (formerly | GnomeMeeting). If you fix this vulnerability please also include the CVE id in your changelog entry. For further information: [0] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-4897 Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgpZL7oK5Kiw1.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: pwlib Source-Version: 1.8.4-1+sarge1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pwlib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libpt-1.8.3_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-1.8.3_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb libpt-dbg_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-dbg_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb libpt-dev_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-dev_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb libpt-doc_1.8.4-1+sarge1_all.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-doc_1.8.4-1+sarge1_all.deb libpt-plugins-alsa_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-plugins-alsa_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb libpt-plugins-avc_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-plugins-avc_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb libpt-plugins-dc_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-plugins-dc_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb libpt-plugins-oss_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-plugins-oss_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb libpt-plugins-v4l2_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-plugins-v4l2_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb libpt-plugins-v4l_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-plugins-v4l_1.8.4-1+sarge1_i386.deb pwlib_1.8.4-1+sarge1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pwlib/pwlib_1.8.4-1+sarge1.diff.gz pwlib_1.8.4-1+sarge1.dsc to pool/main/p/pwlib/pwlib_1.8.4-1+sarge1.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Kilian Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pwlib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:20:23 +0100 Source: pwlib Binary: libpt-plugins-v4l2 libpt-plugins-oss libpt-plugins-alsa libpt-plugins-dc libpt-dev libpt-plugins-v4l libpt-plugins-avc libpt-1.8.3 libpt-doc libpt-dbg Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.8.4-1+sarge1 Distribution: oldstable-proposed-updates Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Kilian Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: libpt-1.8.3 - Portable Windows Library libpt-dbg - Portable Windows Library development debug files libpt-dev - Portable Windows Library development files libpt-doc - Portable Windows Library documentation & sample files libpt-plugins-alsa - Portable Windows Library Audio Plugin for the ALSA Interface libpt-plugins-avc - PWLib Video Plugin for IEEE1394 (FireWire) AVC devices libpt-plugins-dc - PWLib Video Plugin for IEEE1394 (Firewire) DC Devices libpt-plugins-oss - Portable Windows Library Audio Plugins for the OSS Interface libpt-plugins-v4l - Portable Windows Library Video Plugin for Video4Linux libpt-plugins-v4l2 - Portable Windows Library Video Plugin for Video4Linux v2 Closes: 454133 Changes: pwlib (1.8.4-1+sarge1) oldstable-proposed-updates; urgency=high . * Fix remote denial of service vulnerability caused by a call to PString::vsprintf if the used object already contained more than 1000 charact
Bug#426224: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#426224: shutdown patches - the choices
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kel Modderman pisze: > Package: sysvinit > Version: 2.86.ds1-38.1 > > Hi, > > I'm following up on this ticket, since I've not received any response for the > best part of 6 months. > > The patch I proposed here is, IMHO, the most complete of the ones offered > so far. Recently, I was made aware of someone also claiming [0] the patch [1] > from Werner Fink, discussed [2] on the novell bug tracker, would be great to > include into our own Debian version of sysvinit to fix the shutdown issue of > spinning down disks correctly (...or not). > > However, r1067 [3] was committed to pkg-sysvinit trunk, which merges the > changes done in the "libata-fixes" branch which was for testing [4]. Tejun Heo, > an active libata/kernel hacker, replied [5] with information that Werner Fink > was also working on this issue. Tejun was also active in the development of > the patch as seen on the novell bug discussion [2]. > > I emailed the list [6] with discussion requested at [4], created a patch for > the debian package [7], and tested the patch thoroughly on a very wide variety > of hardware from debian installed and live-cd environments over the last 6 > months. The patch works as advertised. > > opensuse 10.3 also contains a sysvinit using the mentioned patch. This means > it has seen widespread testing from a variety of people on a variety of > hardware. > > The patch matches the criteria set out at [8] about how hddown.c could best > handle this (except using /proc): > > [quote] > a) it uses sysfs and not /proc to locate disks, and that it locates >all IDE and SCSI/libata disks, or maybe do both /proc and sysfs. > b) that it verifies the state of kernel disk spindown control for >each disk, and for the disks where it is unavailable: >b1) issue cache sync to disk >b2) issue spin down to disk > c) for the disks where kernel spin down control is available, enable >it and skip to next disk. > [/quote] > > The patch does not suffer from limitation of an alternate patch offered to > fix the situation that is discussed at [9], which seems to be similar in > limitation to what has been merged [3]. > > Ok, there are too many damn numbers listed below with references. But you get > the picture I hope, that I'm concerned about the direction the maintainers [10] > intend to take in order to fix this issue, and that I've laid out as much > information, patch and help that I can to try and convince them there is a > better solution. > > Thanks, Kel. > > [0] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-December/002141.html > [1] https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=145904 > [2] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229210 > [3] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-commits/2007-November/000955.html > [4] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-June/001961.html > [5] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-June/001963.html > [6] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-June/001972.html > [7] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-June/001974.html > [8] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=426224#10 > [9] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436703 > [10] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2007-December/002142.html > > > > ___ > Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvinit-devel > > Greetings, I've sent a patch for Debian sysv init hdd down over a month ago (4.11.2007). Till now I haven't receive any comment regarding it. Could you please review it too ? Attached files (hdd.c and a patch in attachment). With best regards Artur Szymiec - -- - -- Registered User No 397465 Linux Debian 2.6.21-2-k7 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+ Conquer your Desktop! http://www.spreadkde.org/try_kde Reclaim Your Inbox! http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHYOC4bB2ld6kq2MsRAns/AKCPqqmZMNYKmJ1IN8qE1XlMQgyiQACfZ0Rq mvqtdYFV246B/SdzMpC0ZVo= =TTOA -END PGP SIGNATURE- #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run # 67_init_hddown.dpatch by Sebastian Reichelt # # Make sure SATA disks are powered down as well as IDE disks. This # patch could use some more work to make it more dynamic when # detecting SATA/SCSI disks. Closes: #348172 @DPATCH@ --- sysvinit-2.86.ds1/src/hddown.c 2004-06-09 14:47:45.0 +0200 +++ sysvinit-2.86.ds1-new/src/hddown.c 2007-11-04 12:12:38.0 +0100 @@ -25,18 +25,17 @@ /* * Find all IDE disks through /proc. */ -st
