Processed: tagging 636621
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 636621 - sid Bug #636621 [debconf] debconf does not recover properly after puring /var/cache/debconf Removed tag(s) sid. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 636621: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636621 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649841: openssl: FTBFS on sparc (Hardware capability mul32 not enabled for smul)
Package: openssl Version: 1.0.0e-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=opensslarch=sparcver=1.0.0e-2.1stamp=1320702109 gcc -I. -I.. -I../include -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DB_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -Wa,--noexecstack -mcpu=v8 -g -Wall -DBN_DIV2W -c -o mem_dbg.o mem_dbg.c /tmp/ccVsQzxF.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccVsQzxF.s:48: Error: Hardware capability mul32 not enabled for smul. /tmp/ccVsQzxF.s:51: Error: Hardware capability mul32 not enabled for smul. /tmp/ccVsQzxF.s:121: Error: Hardware capability mul32 not enabled for smul. /tmp/ccVsQzxF.s:124: Error: Hardware capability mul32 not enabled for smul. make[2]: *** [mem_dbg.o] Error 1 Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Rise severity up
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 649536 serious Bug #649536 [printer-driver-splix] printer-driver-splix: ppd-updater trigger is installed in wrong package Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649536: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649536 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: gs-common removed: this bug is now RC.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 649696 serious Bug #649696 [latex-make] latex-make: Please Depend on ghostscript instead of gs-common. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649699 serious Bug #649699 [src:latex-mk] Please Build-Depend on ghostscript instead of gs-common Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649702 serious Bug #649702 [ifeffit] ifeffit: Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649703 serious Bug #649703 [fpc] Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649704 serious Bug #649704 [src:geda-gaf] Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649705 serious Bug #649705 [src:texpower] Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649708 serious Bug #649708 [src:magnus] Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649709 serious Bug #649709 [src:bacula-doc] Please drop the gs-common Build-Dependency. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649711 serious Bug #649711 [src:ball] Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649712 serious Bug #649712 [src:wordnet] Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 649713 serious Bug #649713 [src:flite] Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649713 649705: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649705 649712: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649712 649699: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649699 649702: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649702 649704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649704 649708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649708 649703: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649703 649696: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649696 649709: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649709 649711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649711 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 649713
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 649713 + pending Bug #649713 [src:flite] Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649713 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649723: marked as done (routino: FTBFS: missing b-d on quilt)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:03:46 + with message-id e1rtvde-th...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#649723: fixed in routino 2.1.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #649723, regarding routino: FTBFS: missing b-d on quilt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 649723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649723 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: src:routino Version: 2.1.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the buildds dpkg-buildpackage: source package routino dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.1.2-2 dpkg-source --before-build routino-2.1.2 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture kfreebsd-amd64 fakeroot debian/rules clean dh clean --with quilt dh: unable to load addon quilt: Can't locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/quilt.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at (eval 3) line 2. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 3) line 2. make: *** [clean] Error 2 Full build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=routinoarch=kfreebsd-i386ver=2.1.2-2stamp=1322054177 Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: routino Source-Version: 2.1.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of routino, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: routino-www_2.1.2-3_all.deb to main/r/routino/routino-www_2.1.2-3_all.deb routino_2.1.2-3.debian.tar.gz to main/r/routino/routino_2.1.2-3.debian.tar.gz routino_2.1.2-3.dsc to main/r/routino/routino_2.1.2-3.dsc routino_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb to main/r/routino/routino_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 649...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Uwe Steinmann ste...@debian.org (supplier of updated routino package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:11:41 +0100 Source: routino Binary: routino routino-www Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2.1.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thibaut Gridel tgri...@free.fr Changed-By: Uwe Steinmann ste...@debian.org Description: routino- Set of tools to find a path between two points. routino-www - Web frontend for routino Closes: 649723 Changes: routino (2.1.2-3) unstable; urgency=low . * do not use option --with-quilt for dh anymore (Closes: #649723) Checksums-Sha1: 02aec47c1bdaa30e36ffacdc33756cd298841bea 1260 routino_2.1.2-3.dsc aa65afaa69cd5136d3f55831ccb75ef67a7d01b2 16721 routino_2.1.2-3.debian.tar.gz a9e03548f866753aedc2a45b9973c16bf33d3bd0 504928 routino_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb 7dacc84c37046909f24337f9d79f0970d4e6a660 351920 routino-www_2.1.2-3_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 70bf35c2ea7858d750e68b1d0d963b3b7f790b2e7292e5bc16e0eb4b039003ce 1260 routino_2.1.2-3.dsc 2aca7e2dcc9a83bea51bce9da7d194c0167da34f20d1f7ddb188801e2cbbe238 16721 routino_2.1.2-3.debian.tar.gz 5d6861e7ceadb3298910c003fc697a73616a3766a03350d59386913a5453b6c0 504928 routino_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb 0593ee494e72828873174ff8da16b42c5d517006de282bfd8794ff22a72afdac 351920 routino-www_2.1.2-3_all.deb Files: 1ecad889dde1be0c2a9dbf618e266cd0 1260 misc extra routino_2.1.2-3.dsc 0616737ece368ab60a684cfe7168ad24 16721 misc extra routino_2.1.2-3.debian.tar.gz 58c27acc8929c8b602ad3627cdb122fd 504928 misc extra routino_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb 2dd051c6d39b8dc3ee539b643dff83c6 351920 misc extra routino-www_2.1.2-3_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7N/PcACgkQih2Zvw18pwFTpQCdHdUb/yyeZUaTfRKdojHOZgJ0 9NIAoKN+CjBV42Yoxrf22W9DTJ45MAgs =CQen -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#649861: import gobject isn't working anymore
Package: python-gobject
Severity: grave
Hi,
while checking a nautilus extension I maintain I got stuck seeing it
being suddenly unusable after rebooting my machine after the
20/11.
I checked around and the running nautilus with the --no-desktop flag
took in the several problem:
:/usr/share/nautilus-python/extensions$ nautilus --no-desktop
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gi/__init__.py, line 23, in module
from ._gi import _API, Repository
ImportError: could not import gobject (error was: ImportError('When
using gi.repository you must not import static modules like gobject.
Please change all occurrences of import gobject to from
gi.repository import GObject.',))
After a brief talk with Joss, we came up that the 'import gobject'
isn't working anymore, while for years the python-gobject made that
possible.
It has been recommended for some time to do the following
'from gi.repository import foo', while 'import gobject' was still
possible, now that possibility isn't working anymore.
cheers,
Andrea
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#649861: import gobject isn't working anymore
Le jeudi 24 novembre 2011 à 12:42 +0100, Andrea Veri a écrit : After a brief talk with Joss, we came up that the 'import gobject' isn't working anymore, while for years the python-gobject made that possible. It has been recommended for some time to do the following 'from gi.repository import foo', while 'import gobject' was still possible, now that possibility isn't working anymore. Actually the thing that doesn’t work anymore is to do “import gobject” together with a “from gi.repository import Something” syntax. This is very bad because for example in all python-nautilus examples you have things like that: import gconf from gi.repository import Nautilus, GObject … which obviously don’t work anymore. We will have to keep this bug open until all rdeps have been fixed, and this will need Breaks for all affected ones. Thanks for your report anyway, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645194: marked as done (gcj-4.6: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:40:05 +0100 with message-id 4ece3b25.8000...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#645194: gcj-4.6: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory has caused the Debian Bug report #645194, regarding gcj-4.6: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 645194: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645194 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: gcj-jdk Version: 4.6.1-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, one of my package does not build properly on kfreebsd-amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdcmarch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=2.0.18-5stamp=1318325853 [ 49%] javac *.java; jar cvf - gdcm.jar cd /build/buildd-gdcm_2.0.18-5-kfreebsd-amd64-BIdud7/gdcm-2.0.18/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/Wrapping/Java/java /usr/bin/javac -source 1.5 gdcm/*.java gcj-4.6: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [bin/gdcm.jar] Error 1 Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 10/13/2011 02:19 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Package: gcj-jdk Version: 4.6.1-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, one of my package does not build properly on kfreebsd-amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdcmarch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=2.0.18-5stamp=1318325853 [ 49%] javac *.java; jar cvf - gdcm.jar cd /build/buildd-gdcm_2.0.18-5-kfreebsd-amd64-BIdud7/gdcm-2.0.18/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/Wrapping/Java/java /usr/bin/javac -source 1.5 gdcm/*.java gcj-4.6: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [bin/gdcm.jar] Error 1 works according to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gdcm ---End Message---
Bug#649868: libicc2 and argyll: error when trying to install together
Package: argyll,libicc2 Version: argyll/1.3.5-1 Version: libicc2/2.12+argyll1.3.5-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2011-11-24 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libjpeg8 libtiff4 libxau6 libxdmcp6 libxcb1 libx11-data libx11-6 libxext6 libxinerama1 libxrender1 libxrandr2 x11-common libxss1 libxxf86vm1 libicc2 libimdi0 argyll Preconfiguring packages ... Authentication warning overridden. Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously unselected package libjpeg8. (Reading database ... 10585 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libjpeg8 (from .../libjpeg8_8c-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libtiff4. Unpacking libtiff4 (from .../libtiff4_3.9.5-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxau6. Unpacking libxau6 (from .../libxau6_1%3a1.0.6-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxdmcp6. Unpacking libxdmcp6 (from .../libxdmcp6_1%3a1.1.0-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxcb1. Unpacking libxcb1 (from .../libxcb1_1.7-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libx11-data. Unpacking libx11-data (from .../libx11-data_2%3a1.4.4-4_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libx11-6. Unpacking libx11-6 (from .../libx11-6_2%3a1.4.4-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxext6. Unpacking libxext6 (from .../libxext6_2%3a1.3.0-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxinerama1. Unpacking libxinerama1 (from .../libxinerama1_2%3a1.1.1-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxrender1. Unpacking libxrender1 (from .../libxrender1_1%3a0.9.6-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxrandr2. Unpacking libxrandr2 (from .../libxrandr2_2%3a1.3.2-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package x11-common. Unpacking x11-common (from .../x11-common_1%3a7.6+9_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxss1. Unpacking libxss1 (from .../libxss1_1%3a1.2.1-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxxf86vm1. Unpacking libxxf86vm1 (from .../libxxf86vm1_1%3a1.1.1-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libicc2. Unpacking libicc2 (from .../libicc2_2.12+argyll1.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libimdi0. Unpacking libimdi0 (from .../libimdi0_1.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package argyll. Unpacking argyll (from .../argyll_1.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/argyll_1.3.5-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/icclu', which is also in package libicc2 2.12+argyll1.3.5-1 configured to not write apport reports dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Processing triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/argyll_1.3.5-1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /usr/bin/iccdump /usr/bin/icclu This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug. -Ralf. PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649869: python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together
Package: kiki,python-libtiff Version: kiki/0.5.6-7 Version: python-libtiff/0.3.0~svn78-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2011-11-24 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libtinfo5 libkeyutils1 libkrb5support0 libk5crypto3 libkrb5-3 libgssapi-krb5-2 libpcre3 libffi5 libglib2.0-0 libatk1.0-data libatk1.0-0 libavahi-common-data libavahi-common3 libdbus-1-3 libavahi-client3 libcups2 libdatrie1 libdrm2 libexpat1 libfreetype6 ucf ttf-dejavu-core fontconfig-config libfontconfig1 libjpeg8 libjasper1 libpng12-0 libtiff4 libxau6 libxdmcp6 libxcb1 libx11-data libx11-6 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 libglapi-mesa libxfixes3 libxdamage1 libxext6 libxxf86vm1 libgl1-mesa-glx libglu1-mesa libgtk2.0-common libpixman-1-0 libxcb-render0 libxcb-shm0 libxrender1 libcairo2 libthai-data libthai0 libxft2 fontconfig libpango1.0-0 libxcomposite1 libxcursor1 libxi6 libxinerama1 libxrandr2 libxml2 shared-mime-info libgtk2.0-0 x11-common libice6 libsm6 libdb4.8 mime-support python2.7-minimal python2.7 python-minimal python python2.6-minimal python2.6 python-wxversion libwxbase2.8-0 libwxgtk2.8-0 python-wxgtk2.8 kiki python-libtiff Extracting templates from packages: 38% Extracting templates from packages: 77% Extracting templates from packages: 100% Preconfiguring packages ... Authentication warning overridden. Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously unselected package libtinfo5. (Reading database ... 10585 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libtinfo5 (from .../libtinfo5_5.9-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libkeyutils1. Unpacking libkeyutils1 (from .../libkeyutils1_1.5.2-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libkrb5support0. Unpacking libkrb5support0 (from .../libkrb5support0_1.9.1+dfsg-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libk5crypto3. Unpacking libk5crypto3 (from .../libk5crypto3_1.9.1+dfsg-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libkrb5-3. Unpacking libkrb5-3 (from .../libkrb5-3_1.9.1+dfsg-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libgssapi-krb5-2. Unpacking libgssapi-krb5-2 (from .../libgssapi-krb5-2_1.9.1+dfsg-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libpcre3. Unpacking libpcre3 (from .../libpcre3_8.12-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libffi5. Unpacking libffi5 (from .../libffi5_3.0.10-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libglib2.0-0. Unpacking libglib2.0-0 (from .../libglib2.0-0_2.30.2-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libatk1.0-data. Unpacking libatk1.0-data (from .../libatk1.0-data_2.2.0-2_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libatk1.0-0. Unpacking libatk1.0-0 (from .../libatk1.0-0_2.2.0-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libavahi-common-data. Unpacking libavahi-common-data (from .../libavahi-common-data_0.6.30-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libavahi-common3. Unpacking libavahi-common3 (from .../libavahi-common3_0.6.30-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libdbus-1-3. Unpacking libdbus-1-3 (from .../libdbus-1-3_1.4.16-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libavahi-client3. Unpacking libavahi-client3 (from .../libavahi-client3_0.6.30-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libcups2. Unpacking libcups2 (from .../libcups2_1.5.0-12_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libdatrie1. Unpacking libdatrie1 (from .../libdatrie1_0.2.5-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libdrm2. Unpacking libdrm2 (from .../libdrm2_2.4.27-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libexpat1. Unpacking libexpat1 (from .../libexpat1_2.0.1-7.2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libfreetype6. Unpacking libfreetype6 (from .../libfreetype6_2.4.8-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package ucf. Unpacking ucf (from .../ucf_3.0025+nmu2_all.deb) ... Moving old data out of the way Selecting previously unselected package ttf-dejavu-core. Unpacking ttf-dejavu-core (from .../ttf-dejavu-core_2.33-2_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package fontconfig-config. Unpacking fontconfig-config (from .../fontconfig-config_2.8.0-3_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libfontconfig1. Unpacking libfontconfig1 (from .../libfontconfig1_2.8.0-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libjpeg8. Unpacking libjpeg8 (from .../libjpeg8_8c-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libjasper1. Unpacking libjasper1 (from .../libjasper1_1.900.1-11_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected
Bug#649870: parser3-cgi and libapache2-mod-parser3: error when trying to install together
Package: libapache2-mod-parser3,parser3-cgi Version: libapache2-mod-parser3/3.4.1-1 Version: parser3-cgi/3.4.1-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2011-11-24 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libpcre3 libgc1c2 libxml2 libxslt1.1 parser3-common libapache2-mod-parser3 parser3-cgi Authentication warning overridden. Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously unselected package libpcre3. (Reading database ... 10585 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libpcre3 (from .../libpcre3_8.12-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libgc1c2. Unpacking libgc1c2 (from .../libgc1c2_1%3a7.1-8_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxml2. Unpacking libxml2 (from .../libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxslt1.1. Unpacking libxslt1.1 (from .../libxslt1.1_1.1.26-8_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package parser3-common. Unpacking parser3-common (from .../parser3-common_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libapache2-mod-parser3. Unpacking libapache2-mod-parser3 (from .../libapache2-mod-parser3_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package parser3-cgi. Unpacking parser3-cgi (from .../parser3-cgi_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/parser3-cgi_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/etc/parser3/apache2/auto.p', which is also in package libapache2-mod-parser3 3.4.1-1 configured to not write apport reports Processing triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/parser3-cgi_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /etc/parser3/apache2/auto.p This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug. -Ralf. PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649868: libicc2 and argyll: error when trying to install together
Ralf Treinen trei...@debian.org writes: Package: argyll,libicc2 Version: argyll/1.3.5-1 Version: libicc2/2.12+argyll1.3.5-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2011-11-24 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Bug already fixed in 1.3.5-2 Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649868: marked as done (libicc2 and argyll: error when trying to install together)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:27:28 +0100 with message-id 87zkflveeh@christian.marillat.net and subject line Re: Bug#649868: libicc2 and argyll: error when trying to install together has caused the Debian Bug report #649868, regarding libicc2 and argyll: error when trying to install together to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 649868: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649868 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: argyll,libicc2 Version: argyll/1.3.5-1 Version: libicc2/2.12+argyll1.3.5-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2011-11-24 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libjpeg8 libtiff4 libxau6 libxdmcp6 libxcb1 libx11-data libx11-6 libxext6 libxinerama1 libxrender1 libxrandr2 x11-common libxss1 libxxf86vm1 libicc2 libimdi0 argyll Preconfiguring packages ... Authentication warning overridden. Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously unselected package libjpeg8. (Reading database ... 10585 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libjpeg8 (from .../libjpeg8_8c-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libtiff4. Unpacking libtiff4 (from .../libtiff4_3.9.5-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxau6. Unpacking libxau6 (from .../libxau6_1%3a1.0.6-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxdmcp6. Unpacking libxdmcp6 (from .../libxdmcp6_1%3a1.1.0-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxcb1. Unpacking libxcb1 (from .../libxcb1_1.7-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libx11-data. Unpacking libx11-data (from .../libx11-data_2%3a1.4.4-4_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libx11-6. Unpacking libx11-6 (from .../libx11-6_2%3a1.4.4-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxext6. Unpacking libxext6 (from .../libxext6_2%3a1.3.0-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxinerama1. Unpacking libxinerama1 (from .../libxinerama1_2%3a1.1.1-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxrender1. Unpacking libxrender1 (from .../libxrender1_1%3a0.9.6-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxrandr2. Unpacking libxrandr2 (from .../libxrandr2_2%3a1.3.2-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package x11-common. Unpacking x11-common (from .../x11-common_1%3a7.6+9_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxss1. Unpacking libxss1 (from .../libxss1_1%3a1.2.1-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxxf86vm1. Unpacking libxxf86vm1 (from .../libxxf86vm1_1%3a1.1.1-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libicc2. Unpacking libicc2 (from .../libicc2_2.12+argyll1.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libimdi0. Unpacking libimdi0 (from .../libimdi0_1.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package argyll. Unpacking argyll (from .../argyll_1.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/argyll_1.3.5-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/icclu', which is also in package libicc2 2.12+argyll1.3.5-1 configured to not write apport reports dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Processing triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/argyll_1.3.5-1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /usr/bin/iccdump /usr/bin/icclu This bug has been filed against both
Processed: tagging 649728
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 649728 + fixed Bug #649728 [src:argyll] argyll: FTBFS: no rules to make target `distclean' Added tag(s) fixed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649728: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649728 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613610: xburst-tools package needs build under a MIPS cpu machine
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 14:55 +0800, Xiangfu Liu wrote: I have a debian package name 'xburst-tools' http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xburst-tools.html but there is a bug about this package: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613610 those three binary package needs compile under a mips machine can someone help me about this. thanks. I don't have any MIPS hardware nor a NanoNote to be able to test it. I guess the best sponsor would be someone with a NanoNote containing the xburst CPU. Probably not many Debian members own one of these devices so you might need to donate/loan one to Debian. It might be acceptable for a sponsor to build the software in a Debian install running under qemu-system-mipsel, but you would need to build under qemu and test the resulting firmware on your NanoNote to ensure that it works before your sponsor uploads it. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#609851: [updated] incorrect variables used to set hostname in dhclient-script
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.orgwrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 07:06:52PM -0500, Tim Heckman wrote: [snip] Andrew, Thanks for the information about how it'll be implemented moving forward. Not to shy too far off-topic, I'm just trying to explain my use case for this. I work for a pretty well known cloud services provider. We create distribution templates for Debian as well as others. Most other distributions look at the state of the system to determine whether the hostname should be set by DHCP. I've yet to find a use case where this mechanism is wrong. We have our DHCP servers set the hostname by default so the system gets an initial hostname and is ready to go. Every other distribution checks the state of the system to determine if the hostname should be set. If the hostname setting is blank/empty they will set the hostname as obtained by DHCP. Otherwise, it sets the configured hostname. I believe the behavior of it not even checking if the hostname should be set or not is surprising people as it had not forced it before (as far as I am aware). This bug was opened because dhclient wasn't setting the hostname when it should. I'm not a huge fan of using it on servers, but the patch I submitted earlier was based on an idea I obtained from the way Ubuntu handles this. It checks to see if the /etc/hostname file contains any data. If the length of the file is zero, it sets the dhcp hostname. Otherwise, if it has data, it sets that instead. This provides a more uniform behavior across distributions. I definitely understand your insight on the changes you feel should be made. I agree that by default it should not request host-name, but I still think the dhclient-script should contain the logic to check to whether it should set the hostname or not when it does request it. Thanks for getting it to set the hostname again in 4.2.2-1. I hope you'll consider my feedback about the path that will be taken moving forward. Here's how I feel about the topic: dhclient-script shouldn't have policy decisions hard-coded in it. So my policy is that there is no policy. I know that I can't please everyone on this matter, which is why dhclient-script is slowly getting refactored so that everything is broken out into shell functions that can be overridden by the local admin. Currently in 4.2.2-1, the hostname stuff is handled by a set_hostname() function. You're free to provide a dhclient-enter-hook in /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/ that redefines set_hostname() with whatever local business logic floats your boat. I really feel like this is the best compromise, because I can assure you that someone else will come out of the woodwork and argue the exact opposite position to you. My end goal is to get dhclient-script so that all of the logic can be overridden by the local admin, without requiring local modifications to dhclient-script itself. regards Andrew Andrew, Thank you for explaining the policy on your policy being no policy. :p But in all seriousness. I completely forgot about the hooks that can be used for DHCP and I entirely agree this makes more sense to do it this way. Thanks for the explanation. If you are State-side I hope you have a great Thanksgiving! -Tim
Bug#613610: xburst-tools package needs build under a MIPS cpu machine
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 22:27 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: It might be acceptable for a sponsor to build the software in a Debian install running under qemu-system-mipsel, but you would need to build under qemu and test the resulting firmware on your NanoNote to ensure that it works before your sponsor uploads it. The ftp team suggested that this is not generally accepted... I guess the best sponsor would be someone with a NanoNote containing the xburst CPU. Probably not many Debian members own one of these devices so you might need to donate/loan one to Debian. ...therefore this is the only option available. If no Debian members owning mipsel hardware are willing to sponsor it then your only option would be to donate/lend some to Debian to be used by the sponsor. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#649881: scim-tables: qt4 support missing
Source: scim-tables Severity: critical why do we need this package in archive. Ming is not active and I see no reason to keep this. Thus no one is taking care this package === unmaintained. ibus and uim does good job. Osamu -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#647307: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#647307: Bug#647307: Bug#647307: Bug#647307: haskell-xss-sanitize: fails to build on mipsel
Hi. On 23/11/2011 17:43, Joachim Breitner wrote: oh, and I think it is reasonable to upload the build (if it was built with -b -B), as long as it stays the exception. Honestly, I prefer to see the problem fixed. If we just upload this build, next time we'll have the same problem. If we're unable to work out a solution, I'd rather prefer disabling the compilation on architectures unable to sustain it. I really hope MIPS porters to be able to say something. Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#648821: It also breaks pidgin-sipe plugin
Pidgin sipe stopped working for all people that did upgrade in my company. Reverting to 3.12.11-3 also fixe the pidgin-sipe issues. NB all people using linux and wanting to comunicate with people using windows communicator will be affected. -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649896: Does not start: Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0
Package: shrinksafe Version: 1.6.1-1 Severity: grave Hello, thank you for packaging shrinksafe. Unfortunately it does not work: no matter how I invoke it, it quits with the same CRC mismatch error: $ shrinksafe Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0 $ shrinksafe --help Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0 $ shrinksafe json2.js json2.min.js Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0 $ shrinksafe yuppi yuppi yuppi doo Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0 Best regards, Enrico -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages shrinksafe depends on: ii default-jre [java6-runtime]1:1.6-43 ii jarwrapper 0.37 ii openjdk-6-jre [java6-runtime] 6b23~pre11-1 ii rhino 1.7R3-2 shrinksafe recommends no packages. shrinksafe suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648359: [CVE-2011-4000] Unspecified buffer overflow vulnerabilityg
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:05:05AM +0900, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote: I wrote a DSA draft, check it please. BTW, JVN's workaround is not correct. There is also the same problem in ChaSen 2.3.3. -- DSA--1 chasen -- buffer overflow Affected Packages: libchasen2 libchasen-dev libtext-chasen-perl Does that mean that the vulnerable code is also present in libtext-chasen-perl? Please prepare updated packages for stable-security. http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security You need to build the package with -sa Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649900: CVE-2011-4344: XSS
Source: libjenkins-winstone-java Severity: grave Tags: security http://www.cloudbees.com/jenkins-advisory/jenkins-security-advisory-2011-11-08.cb Patch: https://github.com/jenkinsci/winstone/commit/410ed3001d51c689cf59085b7417466caa2ded7b.patch Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649778: configure problems
Vincent Bernat schrieb am Thursday, den 24. November 2011: OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du jeudi 24 novembre 2011, vers 03:55, je disais: CCFLAGS=-Idebian/include CPPFLAGS=-Idebian/include dpkg-buildpackage -b But I do not know what is the best way to incorporate this in the build system I am unsure if the provided ip_vs.h is complete enough But, yes, with an updated one (maybe directly copied from /usr/include/linux/ip_vs.h by the build system), this will do the trick until the build system is fixed upstream. *seufz* not again. I fixed this in my git. Thanks Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: retitle 649861 to Importing both gobject and gi.repository does not work anymore
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 649861 Importing both gobject and gi.repository does not work anymore Bug #649861 [python-gobject] import gobject isn't working anymore Changed Bug title to 'Importing both gobject and gi.repository does not work anymore' from 'import gobject isn't working anymore' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649861 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: cloning 649869, reassign 649869 to kiki ..., reassign -1 to python-libtiff ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # This should be fixed in both packages clone 649869 -1 Bug#649869: python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together Bug 649869 cloned as bug 649904. reassign 649869 kiki 0.5.6-7 Bug #649869 [kiki,python-libtiff] python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together Bug reassigned from package 'kiki,python-libtiff' to 'kiki'. Bug #649869 [kiki] python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together Bug Marked as found in versions kiki/0.5.6-7. retitle 649869 kiki: ships /usr/lib/python2.X/dist-packages/__init__.py Bug #649869 [kiki] python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together Changed Bug title to 'kiki: ships /usr/lib/python2.X/dist-packages/__init__.py' from 'python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together' reassign -1 python-libtiff 0.3.0~svn78-1 Bug #649904 [kiki,python-libtiff] python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together Bug reassigned from package 'kiki,python-libtiff' to 'python-libtiff'. Bug #649904 [python-libtiff] python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together Bug Marked as found in versions pylibtiff/0.3.0~svn78-1. retitle -1 python-libtiff: ships /usr/lib/python2.X/dist-packages/__init__.py Bug #649904 [python-libtiff] python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together Changed Bug title to 'python-libtiff: ships /usr/lib/python2.X/dist-packages/__init__.py' from 'python-libtiff and kiki: error when trying to install together' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649904 649869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649869 -1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649905: blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific
Source: blackbox Version: 0.70.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Per https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=blackbox, builds of blackbox on 32-bit architectures have been failing because libbt0.symbols only matches libbt.so.0's actual symbols on 64-bit architectures (amd64, ia64, and kfreebsd-amd64). Could you please account for architecture-specific variation? Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649861: import gobject isn't working anymore
clone 649861 -1 retitle -1 python-nautilus broken since pygobject upgrade reassign -1 python-nautilus thanks Le jeudi 24 novembre 2011 à 12:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : We will have to keep this bug open until all rdeps have been fixed, and this will need Breaks for all affected ones. So, a search in the archive gives me two affected packages: python-nautilus and totem-plugins. The totem-plugins bug looks pretty much like #649755. It will be fixed in totem 3.2 which will be uploaded soon. I don’t think it should be RC given the low importance of the affected plugins. This will avoid blocking the tracker, gnome-desktop and evolution transitions. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#649861: import gobject isn't working anymore
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 649861 -1 Bug#649861: Importing both gobject and gi.repository does not work anymore Bug 649861 cloned as bug 649910. retitle -1 python-nautilus broken since pygobject upgrade Bug #649910 [python-gobject] Importing both gobject and gi.repository does not work anymore Changed Bug title to 'python-nautilus broken since pygobject upgrade' from 'Importing both gobject and gi.repository does not work anymore' reassign -1 python-nautilus Bug #649910 [python-gobject] python-nautilus broken since pygobject upgrade Bug reassigned from package 'python-gobject' to 'python-nautilus'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649910: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649910 649861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649861 -1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#647177: marked as done (geda-utils: missing dependency on gawk)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:32:36 + with message-id e1rte68-0002qb...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#647177: fixed in geda-gaf 1:1.6.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #647177, regarding geda-utils: missing dependency on gawk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 647177: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647177 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: geda-utils Version: 1:1.6.2-2 Severity: serious gnet_hier_verilog is not happy when gawk is not installed: /usr/bin/gnet_hier_verilog: line 211: gawk: command not found /usr/bin/gnet_hier_verilog: line 217: gawk: command not found /usr/bin/gnet_hier_verilog: line 260: gawk: command not found -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages geda-utils depends on: ii guile-1.8-libs 1.8.8+1-6.1 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii libgeda38 1:1.6.2-2 ii libglib2.0-02.28.8-1 ii libgmp102:5.0.2+dfsg-2 ii python 2.7.2-9 geda-utils recommends no packages. geda-utils suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: geda-gaf Source-Version: 1:1.6.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of geda-gaf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: geda-doc_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-doc_1.6.2-3_all.deb geda-examples_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-examples_1.6.2-3_all.deb geda-gaf_1.6.2-3.debian.tar.gz to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gaf_1.6.2-3.debian.tar.gz geda-gaf_1.6.2-3.dsc to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gaf_1.6.2-3.dsc geda-gattrib_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gattrib_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda-gnetlist_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gnetlist_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda-gschem_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gschem_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda-gsymcheck_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gsymcheck_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda-symbols_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-symbols_1.6.2-3_all.deb geda-utils_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-utils_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda_1.6.2-3_all.deb libgeda-common_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/libgeda-common_1.6.2-3_all.deb libgeda-dev_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/libgeda-dev_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb libgeda38_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/libgeda38_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 647...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) aelmahmo...@sabily.org (supplier of updated geda-gaf package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:50:49 +0200 Source: geda-gaf Binary: geda libgeda38 libgeda-dev libgeda-common geda-symbols geda-gschem geda-gattrib geda-gnetlist geda-gsymcheck geda-utils geda-examples geda-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1:1.6.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Electronics Team pkg-electronics-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) aelmahmo...@sabily.org Description: geda - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (metapackage) geda-doc - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (documentation) geda-examples - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (example designs) geda-gattrib - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (attribute editor) geda-gnetlist - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (netlister) geda-gschem - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (schematic editor) geda-gsymcheck - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (symbol checker) geda-symbols - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (symbols library) geda-utils - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (utilities) libgeda-common - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (data files) libgeda-dev - GPL EDA -- Electronics
Bug#649704: marked as done (Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common.)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:32:36 + with message-id e1rte68-0002qe...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#649704: fixed in geda-gaf 1:1.6.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #649704, regarding Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 649704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649704 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: geda-gaf Version: 1:1.6.2-2 Severity: important Hi, geda-gaf currently Build-Depends on gs-common, which is a transitional package. The next upload of ghostscript (currently) plans to drop both gs-common and the ghostscript Provides: gs-common. As soon as that upload happens, it will make geda-gaf FTBFS. Please replace the Build-Depends on gs-common to a Build-Depends on ghostscript. (The severity of this bug will be raised after the ghostscript upload.) Cheers, OdyX ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: geda-gaf Source-Version: 1:1.6.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of geda-gaf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: geda-doc_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-doc_1.6.2-3_all.deb geda-examples_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-examples_1.6.2-3_all.deb geda-gaf_1.6.2-3.debian.tar.gz to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gaf_1.6.2-3.debian.tar.gz geda-gaf_1.6.2-3.dsc to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gaf_1.6.2-3.dsc geda-gattrib_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gattrib_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda-gnetlist_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gnetlist_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda-gschem_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gschem_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda-gsymcheck_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-gsymcheck_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda-symbols_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-symbols_1.6.2-3_all.deb geda-utils_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda-utils_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb geda_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/geda_1.6.2-3_all.deb libgeda-common_1.6.2-3_all.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/libgeda-common_1.6.2-3_all.deb libgeda-dev_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/libgeda-dev_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb libgeda38_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geda-gaf/libgeda38_1.6.2-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 649...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) aelmahmo...@sabily.org (supplier of updated geda-gaf package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:50:49 +0200 Source: geda-gaf Binary: geda libgeda38 libgeda-dev libgeda-common geda-symbols geda-gschem geda-gattrib geda-gnetlist geda-gsymcheck geda-utils geda-examples geda-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1:1.6.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Electronics Team pkg-electronics-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) aelmahmo...@sabily.org Description: geda - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (metapackage) geda-doc - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (documentation) geda-examples - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (example designs) geda-gattrib - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (attribute editor) geda-gnetlist - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (netlister) geda-gschem - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (schematic editor) geda-gsymcheck - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (symbol checker) geda-symbols - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (symbols library) geda-utils - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (utilities) libgeda-common - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (data files) libgeda-dev - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (development files) libgeda38 - GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (library files) Closes: 622329 647177 649704 Changes: geda-gaf (1:1.6.2-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Move recommends for extra-xdg-menus to geda-gschem geda-gattrib (Closes: #622329) * Added gawk to geda-utils Depends field. Thanks to Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de (Closes: #647177) * Updated copyright format. Thanks to Daniel T Chen seven.st...@gmail.com
Bug#577321: Fix for 577321, 550932
Hi, I think I have a fix for both #577321 and #550932. It involves updating the package to linux-gpib 3.2.16, then applying several patches from the upstream Subversion repository and rebuilding the configure script and Automake inputs using the bootstrap script. This took me the best part of a day to finish Now -- how do I go about submitting my patch to resolve these bugs? -- Phil. phil...@philpem.me.uk http://www.philpem.me.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649912: eclipse: FTBFS on various archs
Source: eclipse Version: 3.7.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) See the logs linked from https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=eclipse Logs end with: /build/buildd-eclipse_3.7.0-1-armel-TgaY2p/eclipse-3.7.0/pdebuild.xml:254: The following error occurred while executing this line: /build/buildd-eclipse_3.7.0-1-armel-TgaY2p/eclipse-3.7.0/build/eclipse-3.7.0-src/plugins/org.eclipse.jface/build.xml:176: The following error occurred while executing this line: /build/buildd-eclipse_3.7.0-1-armel-TgaY2p/eclipse-3.7.0/build/eclipse-3.7.0-src/plugins/org.eclipse.jface/build.xml:144: The following error occurred while executing this line: /build/buildd-eclipse_3.7.0-1-armel-TgaY2p/eclipse-3.7.0/build/eclipse-3.7.0-src/plugins/org.eclipse.jface/build.xml:181: Problem: failed to create task or type eclipse.logCompileError Cause: The name is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any presetdef/macrodef declarations have taken place. (powerpc seems to have a different failure) Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Brasero grave bug #619723 (produces invalid CUE)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package brasero Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'brasero' Limit currently set to 'package':'brasero' forwarded 619723 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/664756 Bug #619723 [brasero] Brasero produces *.cue-file which isn't accepted by cdrdao (cue:14: Timecode out of range) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.gnome.org/664756'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619723 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#565064: xshisen: diff for NMU version 1:1.51-3.2
tags 565064 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for xshisen (versioned as 1:1.51-3.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
`-NP: Nguyên Lê: Mangustao
diff -Nru xshisen-1.51/debian/changelog xshisen-1.51/debian/changelog
--- xshisen-1.51/debian/changelog 2010-05-09 00:26:37.0 +0200
+++ xshisen-1.51/debian/changelog 2011-11-24 21:41:22.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+xshisen (1:1.51-3.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix ftbfs with gcc-4.5 and gcc-4.6: new patch 40_format_security.patch:
+Fix format string use. Based on Daniel T Chen's patch in the BTS.
+(Closes: #565064)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Thu, 24 Nov 2011 21:40:40 +0100
+
xshisen (1:1.51-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru xshisen-1.51/debian/patches/40_format_security.patch xshisen-1.51/debian/patches/40_format_security.patch
--- xshisen-1.51/debian/patches/40_format_security.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ xshisen-1.51/debian/patches/40_format_security.patch 2011-11-24 21:40:36.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Description: Fix format string use
+Origin: vendor
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/565064
+Forwarded: no
+Author: Daniel T Chen seven.st...@gmail.com,
+ gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org
+Last-Update: 2011-11-24
+
+--- a/score.C
b/score.C
+@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@
+ }
+ // Always read the latest high score
+ readfile();
+-sprintf(format, res_strings[0]);
++sprintf(format, %s, res_strings[0]);
+ prev_time = -1;
+ for(int i=0; iSCORENUM; i++) {
+ this_time = rec[i].hour * 3600 + rec[i].min * 60 + rec[i].sec;
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: xshisen: diff for NMU version 1:1.51-3.2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 565064 + pending Bug #565064 [src:xshisen] xshisen: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 and gcc-4.6 Bug #646489 [src:xshisen] xshisen: FTBFS: score.C:340:35: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 565064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565064 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Change severity to serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 636475 serious Bug #636475 [yade] yade: provide ipython 0.11 compatibility Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 636475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636475 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649927: beets: missing Depends on python-pkg-resources
Package: beets Version: 1.0~b10+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, running beet I always get: % beet Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/beet, line 5, in module from pkg_resources import load_entry_point ImportError: No module named pkg_resources and then it exits. Installing python-pkg-resources resolves the problem, therefore I think it should be added to the beets Depends. Cheers -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages beets depends on: ii libjs-backbone 0.5.3-2 ii libjs-jquery 1.7-1 ii libjs-underscore 1.1.6-2 ii python 2.7.2-9 ii python-munkres 1.0.5.4-2 ii python-musicbrainz2 0.7.4-1 ii python-mutagen 1.20-1 ii python-unidecode 0.04.9-1 beets recommends no packages. Versions of packages beets suggests: ii python-flasknone ii python-gst0.10 0.10.22-1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649870: marked as done (parser3-cgi and libapache2-mod-parser3: error when trying to install together)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2011 21:35:40 + with message-id e1rtgxi-0004xh...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#649870: fixed in parser 3.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #649870, regarding parser3-cgi and libapache2-mod-parser3: error when trying to install together to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 649870: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649870 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libapache2-mod-parser3,parser3-cgi Version: libapache2-mod-parser3/3.4.1-1 Version: parser3-cgi/3.4.1-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2011-11-24 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libpcre3 libgc1c2 libxml2 libxslt1.1 parser3-common libapache2-mod-parser3 parser3-cgi Authentication warning overridden. Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously unselected package libpcre3. (Reading database ... 10585 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libpcre3 (from .../libpcre3_8.12-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libgc1c2. Unpacking libgc1c2 (from .../libgc1c2_1%3a7.1-8_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxml2. Unpacking libxml2 (from .../libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libxslt1.1. Unpacking libxslt1.1 (from .../libxslt1.1_1.1.26-8_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package parser3-common. Unpacking parser3-common (from .../parser3-common_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libapache2-mod-parser3. Unpacking libapache2-mod-parser3 (from .../libapache2-mod-parser3_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package parser3-cgi. Unpacking parser3-cgi (from .../parser3-cgi_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/parser3-cgi_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/etc/parser3/apache2/auto.p', which is also in package libapache2-mod-parser3 3.4.1-1 configured to not write apport reports Processing triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/parser3-cgi_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /etc/parser3/apache2/auto.p This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug. -Ralf. PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: parser Source-Version: 3.4.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of parser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libapache2-mod-parser3_3.4.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/parser/libapache2-mod-parser3_3.4.1-2_amd64.deb parser3-cgi_3.4.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/parser/parser3-cgi_3.4.1-2_amd64.deb parser3-common_3.4.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/parser/parser3-common_3.4.1-2_amd64.deb parser3-dev_3.4.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/parser/parser3-dev_3.4.1-2_amd64.deb parser3_3.4.1-2_all.deb to main/p/parser/parser3_3.4.1-2_all.deb parser_3.4.1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/parser/parser_3.4.1-2.debian.tar.gz parser_3.4.1-2.dsc to main/p/parser/parser_3.4.1-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for
Bug#646488: marked as done (wmtemp: FTBFS: dockapp.c:52:16: error: variable 'stat' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable])
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2011 21:36:23 + with message-id e1rtgxz-0005ko...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#646488: fixed in wmtemp 0.0.6-3.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #646488, regarding wmtemp: FTBFS: dockapp.c:52:16: error: variable 'stat' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 646488: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646488 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: wmtemp Version: 0.0.6-3.2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111022 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: cc -Wall -Werror -O2 -I/usr/include/sensors -I/usr/local/include/sensors -c -o dockapp.o dockapp.c dockapp.c: In function 'dockapp_open_window': dockapp.c:52:16: error: variable 'stat' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable] cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[1]: *** [dockapp.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/10/22/wmtemp_0.0.6-3.2_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: wmtemp Source-Version: 0.0.6-3.3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wmtemp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.diff.gz to main/w/wmtemp/wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.diff.gz wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.dsc to main/w/wmtemp/wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.dsc wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3_i386.deb to main/w/wmtemp/wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 646...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated wmtemp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:45:17 +0100 Source: wmtemp Binary: wmtemp Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.0.6-3.3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Riccardo Stagni unric...@email.it Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Description: wmtemp - WM dock applet displaying lm_sensors temperature values Closes: 646488 Changes: wmtemp (0.0.6-3.3) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix FTBFS: dockapp.c:52:16: error: variable 'stat' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]: apply patch from peter green, removing two unused variables. (Closes: #646488) Checksums-Sha1: de266015ee9c98e60e97ea70f0b94597ab170f1f 1744 wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.dsc 360cd5f494177ff9ca8da4946785c7cdd09901ca 4851 wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.diff.gz b00e188a858eaa39f9efe772edbbcc7f9bc29a24 16612 wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3_i386.deb Checksums-Sha256: 9617edfbf672e4479ee592e8449cf4096534b2ce5b5f1d40460638bfda8e57ca 1744 wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.dsc 05317ccbf04c6e00e21571399410d738ca3d2fd695216009f2600cf759c643dc 4851 wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.diff.gz 3f76dbe58bed24779ba8c11fccf1f4d84f24a97d7e54730d98500b44866c 16612 wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3_i386.deb Files: a529469b20506608ff2f75d567161a80 1744 x11 extra wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.dsc a591d5166f1665c1454e178955d69e80 4851 x11 extra wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3.diff.gz 916454dd726ad02804577d43fe981e9a 16612 x11 extra wmtemp_0.0.6-3.3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOy/w4AAoJELs6aAGGSaoG5Q8P/jRoo4fsR1w3g6+QxdOT1r/2 LNR/vI35uT3SMY1ur1Dce+gJxwFgeJq4NuEwtQG/b4or3VsQfr4/rnLkGjzfEoRd aJ9QV3B2R41JLZkbUgKB5pXqz0Dp19aMcTMyfE68u8r7zu52bmAb9icW05vipclU eLVHjnJOBBAmPGXl3OFouSVWNQDBUCYewZnqIb0gTPTyWC9uQok/x0nHHlQ9OEeS JGh7Ek0cnwU3J8+AcLCjmIUwyeBUNo0UI9fMTiargLWKei/UPyQHzcNc9Nb8I4n3 2k3EpnLpqX1VsHstvnf0Xz/2CRfhy72z/I5cDJ7azgvq2FqxL2IAQFO8XlGwsptF yUyh8Mn1xrSL7kjLkTrS2vKNo3+SDBl7MAFDoCEflM0jtnEno+1UjFz+DnxNcJKG lyMPtgvhxLZy76umjD89XLCVrdK4CHcmqfahoqpkaL328PN3uaSmFsPG421TT64k
Bug#636475: fixed in 0.70 upstream
tags 636475 + fixed-upstream thanks upstream version 0.70 appears to have been fixed for ipython 0.11: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~yade-dev/yade/0.70/view/head:/core/main/main.py.in signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: fixed in 0.70 upstream
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 636475 + fixed-upstream Bug #636475 [yade] yade: provide ipython 0.11 compatibility Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 636475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636475 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#649259: frescobaldi fails to start when libpython2.6 is not installed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 649259 -1 Bug#649259: frescobaldi fails to start when libpython2.6 is not installed Bug 649259 cloned as bug 649936. reassign -1 python-kde4 4:4.6.80-3 Bug #649936 [frescobaldi] frescobaldi fails to start when libpython2.6 is not installed Bug reassigned from package 'frescobaldi' to 'python-kde4'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions frescobaldi/1.2.0-1. Bug #649936 [python-kde4] frescobaldi fails to start when libpython2.6 is not installed Bug Marked as found in versions pykde4/4:4.6.80-3. retitle -1 python-kde4: Python modules linked with libpython Bug #649936 [python-kde4] frescobaldi fails to start when libpython2.6 is not installed Changed Bug title to 'python-kde4: Python modules linked with libpython' from 'frescobaldi fails to start when libpython2.6 is not installed' severity 649259 serious Bug #649259 [frescobaldi] frescobaldi fails to start when libpython2.6 is not installed Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' retitle 649259 frescobaldi: should use default version of Python Bug #649259 [frescobaldi] frescobaldi fails to start when libpython2.6 is not installed Changed Bug title to 'frescobaldi: should use default version of Python' from 'frescobaldi fails to start when libpython2.6 is not installed' user debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org (was jw...@debian.org). usertags 649259 + python2.7 python2.6-removal Bug#649259: frescobaldi: should use default version of Python There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: python2.7 python2.6-removal. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649259: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649259 649936: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649936 -1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#636475: almost
ups its not quite fixed in 0.70, but the fix is simple: --- orig/yade 2011-11-12 16:01:48.0 + +++ new/yade2011-11-24 22:01:40.181474770 + @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ import IPython.ipapi IPython.ipapi.get().IP.atexit_operations() elif yade.runtime.ipython_version==11: - from IPython.core.embed import InteractiveShellEmbed + from IPython.frontend.terminal.embed import InteractiveShellEmbed # use the dict to set attributes for k in ipconfig: setattr(InteractiveShellEmbed,k,ipconfig[k]) InteractiveShellEmbed.banner1=banner # called banner1 here, not banner anymore signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#649591: pgrep: -u option does not work now
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 649591 serious Bug #649591 [procps] pgrep: -u option does not work now Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' tags 649591 upstream Bug #649591 [procps] pgrep: -u option does not work now Added tag(s) upstream. thankyou Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649591: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649591 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649927: [Python-apps-team] Bug#649927: beets: missing Depends on python-pkg-resources
Installing python-pkg-resources resolves the problem, therefore I think it should be added to the beets Depends. Yes it should, thanks. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 649927 + pending Bug #649927 [beets] beets: missing Depends on python-pkg-resources Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649927: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649927 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: found 649726 in 1.0.1-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 649726 1.0.1-3
Bug #649726 {Done: Francois Marier franc...@debian.org} [src:sflphone]
sflphone: FTBFS: mv: target
`/build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/debian/sflphone-data/usr/share/sflphone/'
is not a directory
Bug Marked as found in versions sflphone/1.0.1-3; no longer marked as fixed in
versions sflphone/1.0.1-3 and reopened.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
649726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649726
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: blocks mksh on armel; also 2 pkgs on armhf which is a release arch now
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 633479 serious Bug #633479 [gcc-4.6] ICE: gcc-4.6: ICE on armel+armhf with mksh, on armhf with oss4-4.2-build2004-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633479: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633479 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633479: Processed: blocks mksh on armel; also 2 pkgs on armhf which is a release arch now
[and now with a CC to the bug *sigh*] On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 23:27 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 633479 serious Bug #633479 [gcc-4.6] ICE: gcc-4.6: ICE on armel+armhf with mksh, on armhf with oss4-4.2-build2004-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' For reference, armhf is not yet a release architecture. It's not even in testing, which would be a minimal requirement. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624203: vpnc: diff for NMU version 0.5.3r449-2.2
tags 624203 + pending
tags 640978 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for vpnc (versioned as 0.5.3r449-2.2) and
uploaded it to mentors.debian.net, where I'm looking for a sponsor.
Please feel free to tell me if you feel that it should be delayed.
Regards.
Florian
diff -u vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/changelog vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/changelog
--- vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/changelog
+++ vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+vpnc (0.5.3r449-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Bug fix: more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting, taken from
+http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/commitdiff/4deaaf9a32
+Closes: #624203, #640978, LP: #805435.
+
+ -- Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de Thu, 24 Nov 2011
15:06:35 +
+
vpnc (0.5.3r449-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/00list
vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/00list
--- vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/00list
+++ vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/00list
@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+08_bug640978.dpatch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- vpnc-0.5.3r449.orig/debian/patches/08_bug640978.dpatch
+++ vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/08_bug640978.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## 08_bug640978.dpatch by Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
+##
+## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
+## DP: more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting
+
+@DPATCH@
+
+diff --git a/vpnc-script.in b/vpnc-script.in
+index 59750d0..bd4f120 100755
+--- a/vpnc-script.in
b/vpnc-script.in
+@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ destroy_tun_device() {
+
+ if [ -n $IPROUTE ]; then
+ fix_ip_get_output () {
+- sed 's/cache//;s/metric \?[0-9]\+ [0-9]\+//g;s/hoplimit
[0-9]\+//g'
++sed -e 's/ /\n/g' | \
++sed -ne '1p;/via/{N;p};/dev/{N;p};/src/{N;p};/mtu/{N;p}'
+ }
+
+ set_vpngateway_route() {
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: vpnc: diff for NMU version 0.5.3r449-2.2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 624203 + pending Bug #624203 [vpnc] more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting Bug #640978 [vpnc] vpnc-script requires an update for recent iproute Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. tags 640978 + pending Bug #640978 [vpnc] vpnc-script requires an update for recent iproute Bug #624203 [vpnc] more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #640978 to the same tags previously set Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #624203 to the same tags previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 640978: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640978 624203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649718: FTBFS: cat(EPIPE) | (SIGABRT) GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 ../meta/uninstalled-env guild snarf-check-and-output-texi
severity 649718 important thanks On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 11:44 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Package: guile-2.0 Version: 2.0.3+1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, guile-2.0 no longer builds; it aborts somewhere in the middle. [...] -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unreleased APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: m68k https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=guile-2.0 quite clearly shows that the package *does* build on several architectures, and a little further investigation shows that it has never built on the other architectures so the failures do not constitute a regression. Also, failures on non-release architectures are severity important, not RC. Arguably failures on architectures which aren't in the Debian archive might even be lower. Please do not file m68k-specific bugs as RC; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#649718: FTBFS: cat(EPIPE) | (SIGABRT) GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 ../meta/uninstalled-env guild snarf-check-and-output-texi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 649718 important Bug #649718 [guile-2.0] FTBFS: cat(EPIPE) | (SIGABRT) GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 ../meta/uninstalled-env guild snarf-check-and-output-texi Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649718: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649718 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#640978: [vpnc-devel] Bug#640978: vpnc-script requires an update for recent iproute
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Florian Schlichting
fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
David, Antonio, Eric:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 09:45:17AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:52 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
In the fix you provide,
1) you add ;s/ipid 0x//g at the end of string.
This does not impact backward compatibility. I'm in favour to
commit it.
It's not suHi Florian,fficient. We originally had this in the
vpnc-scripts.git
repository¹ since about May, but then the iproute command grew *more*
unrecognised output options so we have since changed it to be 'opt-in'
instead of 'opt-out'².
¹ http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/shortlog
² http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/commitdiff/4deaaf9a32
is there a reason why this improved patch should not be applied to SVN
as well as to the Debian package of vpnc? Corrected for fuzz, that would
be
Hi Florian,
no reason, should be applied.
I'll commit it in the weekend.
Best Regards
Antonio
--- a/vpnc-script.in
+++ b/vpnc-script.in
@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ destroy_tun_device() {
if [ -n $IPROUTE ]; then
fix_ip_get_output () {
- sed 's/cache//;s/metric \?[0-9]\+ [0-9]\+//g;s/hoplimit
[0-9]\+//g'
+ sed -e 's/ /\n/g' | \
+ sed -ne '1p;/via/{N;p};/dev/{N;p};/src/{N;p};/mtu/{N;p}'
}
set_vpngateway_route() {
I was just thinking that I should submit a patch which removes the
out-of-date script from vpnc altogether. There have been a number of
other fixes in the git tree too.
What do you mean remove the script from vpnc - how would routes pushed
from the concentrator be configured on the client without this script?
From my point of view, vpnc without this patch is severely broken - it's
not just not working, it also leaves networking in a non-working state
after it has been terminated regularly. Ubuntu managed to release with
the version currently in Debian, which causes some trouble to support,
and I'd like to make sure that the version in Debian at least works on
Debian when Ubuntu syncs for their upcoming LTS release.
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#640978: vpnc: diff for NMU version 0.5.3r449-2.2
Please go ahead and upload this when you get a sponsor. It's unlikely I'll be
able to get to it soon, otherwise I'd help.
Eric
On Nov 24, 2011, at 15:07, Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
wrote:
tags 624203 + pending
tags 640978 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for vpnc (versioned as 0.5.3r449-2.2) and
uploaded it to mentors.debian.net, where I'm looking for a sponsor.
Please feel free to tell me if you feel that it should be delayed.
Regards.
Florian
diff -u vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/changelog vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/changelog
--- vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/changelog
+++ vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+vpnc (0.5.3r449-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Bug fix: more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting, taken from
+
http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/commitdiff/4deaaf9a32
+Closes: #624203, #640978, LP: #805435.
+
+ -- Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de Thu, 24 Nov 2011
15:06:35 +
+
vpnc (0.5.3r449-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/00list
vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/00list
--- vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/00list
+++ vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/00list
@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+08_bug640978.dpatch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- vpnc-0.5.3r449.orig/debian/patches/08_bug640978.dpatch
+++ vpnc-0.5.3r449/debian/patches/08_bug640978.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## 08_bug640978.dpatch by Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
+##
+## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
+## DP: more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting
+
+@DPATCH@
+
+diff --git a/vpnc-script.in b/vpnc-script.in
+index 59750d0..bd4f120 100755
+--- a/vpnc-script.in
b/vpnc-script.in
+@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ destroy_tun_device() {
+
+ if [ -n $IPROUTE ]; then
+fix_ip_get_output () {
+-sed 's/cache//;s/metric \?[0-9]\+ [0-9]\+//g;s/hoplimit [0-9]\+//g'
++sed -e 's/ /\n/g' | \
++sed -ne '1p;/via/{N;p};/dev/{N;p};/src/{N;p};/mtu/{N;p}'
+}
+
+set_vpngateway_route() {
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#554331: FTBFS with binutils-gold
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 12:05:54AM +0100, Peter Fritzsche wrote: Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building your executables. This bug has seen no maintainer response in 2 years, and has had a trivial patch and release-critical severity for the last 8 months. There's been no maintainer upload since 2008-09-09 - over 3 years ago, and there have been several new upstream releases which sound like they fix significant bugs. Kaido: Are you still interested in maintaining this package? If not, it would be better to orphan it (so somebody else can easily take over maintenance if they are interested in the package) or perhaps to just remove it - popcon shows 22 installs, but none of those appear to have used the package recently (2 are too new to reliably tell): http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=esteidutil Cheers, Olly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613610: xburst-tools package needs build under a MIPS cpu machine
got it. thanks Pabs On 11/24/2011 10:40 PM, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 22:27 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: It might be acceptable for a sponsor to build the software in a Debian install running under qemu-system-mipsel, but you would need to build under qemu and test the resulting firmware on your NanoNote to ensure that it works before your sponsor uploads it. The ftp team suggested that this is not generally accepted... I guess the best sponsor would be someone with a NanoNote containing the xburst CPU. Probably not many Debian members own one of these devices so you might need to donate/loan one to Debian. ...therefore this is the only option available. If no Debian members owning mipsel hardware are willing to sponsor it then your only option would be to donate/lend some to Debian to be used by the sponsor. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: severity of 581243 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #non-redistributable images severity 581243 serious Bug #581243 [esteidutil] Non-free images used Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 581243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581243 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 625121, user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com, usertagging 625121
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 625121 + patch Bug #625121 [src:ktoon] ktoon: FTBFS: ktdualcolorbutton.cpp:161:57: error: taking address of temporary [-fpermissive] Added tag(s) patch. user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was p...@debian.org). usertags 625121 + origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch Bug#625121: ktoon: FTBFS: ktdualcolorbutton.cpp:161:57: error: taking address of temporary [-fpermissive] There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu oneiric. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625121: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625121 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649726: marked as done (sflphone: FTBFS: mv: target `/build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/debian/sflphone-data/usr/share/sflphone/' is not a directory)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:47:16 + with message-id e1rtksm-0006ug...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#649726: fixed in sflphone 1.0.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #649726, regarding sflphone: FTBFS: mv: target `/build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/debian/sflphone-data/usr/share/sflphone/' is not a directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 649726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649726 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: src:sflphone Version: 1.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the buildds: make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/gnome' # Move gconf schemas to the right place mv /build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/debian/sflphone-gnome/usr/etc/gconf/schemas/* /build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/debian/sflphone-gnome/usr/share/gconf/schemas/ cd /build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/debian/sflphone-gnome/usr/ rmdir -p etc/gconf/schemas # Move architecture-independent files to the data package mv /build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/debian/sflphone-gnome/usr/share/sflphone/* /build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/debian/sflphone-data/usr/share/sflphone/ mv: target `/build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1/debian/sflphone-data/usr/share/sflphone/' is not a directory make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_install] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sflphone_1.0.1-2-armel-5cdWeD/sflphone-1.0.1' make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 Full build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sflphonearch=armelver=1.0.1-2stamp=1322022011 Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: sflphone Source-Version: 1.0.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sflphone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sflphone-daemon_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb to main/s/sflphone/sflphone-daemon_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb sflphone-data_1.0.1-4_all.deb to main/s/sflphone/sflphone-data_1.0.1-4_all.deb sflphone-gnome_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb to main/s/sflphone/sflphone-gnome_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb sflphone_1.0.1-4.debian.tar.gz to main/s/sflphone/sflphone_1.0.1-4.debian.tar.gz sflphone_1.0.1-4.dsc to main/s/sflphone/sflphone_1.0.1-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 649...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Francois Marier franc...@debian.org (supplier of updated sflphone package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:24:12 +1300 Source: sflphone Binary: sflphone-daemon sflphone-data sflphone-gnome Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.0.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Francois Marier franc...@debian.org Changed-By: Francois Marier franc...@debian.org Description: sflphone-daemon - SIP and IAX2 compatible VoIP phone - core daemon sflphone-data - SIP and IAX2 compatible VoIP phone - common data sflphone-gnome - SIP and IAX2 compatible VoIP phone - GNOME client Closes: 649726 Changes: sflphone (1.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Don't assume that arch:all packages will get built (closes: #649726) Checksums-Sha1: 885655828c628f04fee77ba3ede90ca663f2a6c7 2485 sflphone_1.0.1-4.dsc f1c352db1b3541035f7ddf006d01bbba7e5fabd5 7987 sflphone_1.0.1-4.debian.tar.gz a43d4c1e978b968c1af39de2914e14954c72e1de 680248 sflphone-daemon_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb 468a3fd0beeb010edaff09a468a27666ab40dd53 365108 sflphone-data_1.0.1-4_all.deb abc3936a2df270957ff458b26d8c2fbd97f2c8c5 860718 sflphone-gnome_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 49f14867cfc4eab360f1c49f2d4bc140d41e746dc389d754e9df2553e8ae61fb 2485 sflphone_1.0.1-4.dsc 5044ec351973223d28f917dd8f2c5690c57a146f83d6a1e384567ea56258339d 7987 sflphone_1.0.1-4.debian.tar.gz
Bug#649707: stumpwm: StumpWM crashes after upgrade to GDM3
Deepak Tripathi dee...@debian.org writes: Package: stumpwm Version: 1:20110819.gitca08e08-1 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I have updated my system to gdm3/gnome3 and after upgrading stumpwm has not been functioning properly. At first glace i thought its a StumWm bug but later when i installed from git source it was working. For more detail on the issue please check. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.window-managers.stumpwm.devel/2672 I think it's the same as #647544. It has been fixed in the upstream repo (git commit 6e07883) but the maintainer has not uploaded a new package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649451: hard-coded gzip-only support in apt-cdrom
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:26:44AM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 17:44, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote: The main change is that I've factored out the decompressor code in IndexCopy::CopyPackages() and TranslationsCopy::CopyTranslations() into a single common function, rather than the current repeated code. Then I've added support for bzip2 and xz there, by forking and execing the right decompression tool. I'm not a C++ developer by any means, as you'll probably tell. :-) You'll definitely want to move DecompressFile() somewhere else... Thanks! The patch is far from being bad, so don't worry. (beside that it doesn't follow the insane indent style - but is that bad?) I played with it a bit more, but i am running out of time for today: Attached patch should apply on experimental, for sid you need to apply Julians first. It should work (tm), but is completely untested, so it properly doesn't. Interesting is that DecompressFile is only a slightly modified copy of MultiCompress::OpenCompress in ftparchive, so we really want to move it somewhere accessible and your FileFd suggestion seems like an ideal fit, i will try to work on that further. Cool. :-) Hmmm. Unless I've managed to mis-apply your patch, I don't think it works. The code in DropRepeats is dropping all versions of Packages and Sources files, I think. Debug on my test DVD is showing the code finding Packages and Packages.gz files, then after DropRepeats I've got none. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649451: hard-coded gzip-only support in apt-cdrom
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:09:25AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:26:44AM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 17:44, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote: The main change is that I've factored out the decompressor code in IndexCopy::CopyPackages() and TranslationsCopy::CopyTranslations() into a single common function, rather than the current repeated code. Then I've added support for bzip2 and xz there, by forking and execing the right decompression tool. I'm not a C++ developer by any means, as you'll probably tell. :-) You'll definitely want to move DecompressFile() somewhere else... Thanks! The patch is far from being bad, so don't worry. (beside that it doesn't follow the insane indent style - but is that bad?) I played with it a bit more, but i am running out of time for today: Attached patch should apply on experimental, for sid you need to apply Julians first. It should work (tm), but is completely untested, so it properly doesn't. Interesting is that DecompressFile is only a slightly modified copy of MultiCompress::OpenCompress in ftparchive, so we really want to move it somewhere accessible and your FileFd suggestion seems like an ideal fit, i will try to work on that further. Cool. :-) Hmmm. Unless I've managed to mis-apply your patch, I don't think it works. The code in DropRepeats is dropping all versions of Packages and Sources files, I think. Debug on my test DVD is showing the code finding Packages and Packages.gz files, then after DropRepeats I've got none. Scratch that, it's in DropBinaryArch. Maybe a silly mistake here. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649451: hard-coded gzip-only support in apt-cdrom
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:18:09AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: Scratch that, it's in DropBinaryArch. Maybe a silly mistake here. Yes, mis-configured for amd64 and testing with an i386 CD. Fixed. Now, the translations files are still not working. You're adding the .bz2 files in FindPackages() including the .bz2 extension. Later on, CopyTranslations() is getting confused by that. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com You lock the door And throw away the key There's someone in my head but it's not me -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624203: marked as done (more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:02:24 + with message-id e1rtm3u-00051i...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#624203: fixed in vpnc 0.5.3r449-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #624203, regarding more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 624203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: vpnc Version: 0.5.3r449-2.1 Severity: important -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-rc4 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages vpnc depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgcrypt11 1.4.6-5 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libgnutls26 2.10.5-1+b1 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr Versions of packages vpnc recommends: ii iproute 20110315-1 networking and traffic control too Versions of packages vpnc suggests: pn resolvconf none (no description available) -- Configuration Files: /etc/vpnc/example.conf [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/vpnc/example.conf' /etc/vpnc/vpnc-script [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script' -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: vpnc Source-Version: 0.5.3r449-2.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vpnc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 624...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (supplier of updated vpnc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:06:35 + Source: vpnc Binary: vpnc Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5.3r449-2.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Eric Warmenhoven warmenho...@debian.org Changed-By: Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de Description: vpnc - Cisco-compatible VPN client Closes: 624203 640978 Changes: vpnc (0.5.3r449-2.2) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Bug fix: more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting, taken from http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/commitdiff/4deaaf9a32 Closes: #624203, #640978, LP: #805435. Checksums-Sha1: 8c4e29e7e5e5b3dcd5abd5dc51fe3396822f7165 1681 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc c3c3cb3a7c2e89b7ad3f5d85bb0435305bd89b5e 53983 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz c72cc9e31f193da269d43f486f3fa327f2515b68 85140 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb Checksums-Sha256: dd97e5c1ec51f8a38a5570e13c3067484d248cec9f53e5f38a79a73525e58a07 1681 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc 9baabd8afd5012efa621f52448c1b18be02a99f6098bce646435c14c2d0e739f 53983 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz f71520eee51d532ac4f4b6b1115f339d64dd3a2d06e2c5fe9da189cdacadf960 85140 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb Files: 2da9c550b81ac1407f13c122d2ed1274 1681 net extra vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc 1a78411cf3a4153c8f31c0e5870886aa 53983 net extra vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz c7ad8e13ad8260db48f26e2ec6d3ba5e 85140 net extra vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOzvHtAAoJELs6aAGGSaoGt98P/2tQYOqZoDJ/KwAOjQpQxpa2 ZJotuXfazNQ/tFG0Hk+pmiCpgydrYH82N86hdUztaNcucm+/yzrmyxE0meqVbpfS 16RL3yA9/x/XBLsEJPzsuFF3jizV7dYPas6i5CxJic6qKH+69cBwYByGhEx6q7yU sZ11YBNR0PkPTe6leDTxX2USctUNGct5q2mGMmCpK0QQsSPoo2RezGWg9BK0N5iC aUFdcMvHmVpIYv1ccO8Zylq8085dujwYJDOqdgrm5NyOE4j6atYHG9/wJFFroviE pkjgzVVjaDPiLoQriCwMhRaZV/EUfZwE0tIVVAdyCtZGdabJhJrJP+4jRVKFjey6 HSihUcP+zVVbBJCftS68RgDEpywxU3Nlr4wuM169Z2xiPrVfT1vUE7tNSPTyFghq NM22Xn5MLwx54MY1D6Yvf2QytGpXnsIEJ6q8JAc19Mxmaba8kFC6HTAsanjw8oaX
Bug#640978: marked as done (vpnc-script requires an update for recent iproute)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:02:24 +
with message-id e1rtm3u-00051i...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#624203: fixed in vpnc 0.5.3r449-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #624203,
regarding vpnc-script requires an update for recent iproute
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
624203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: vpnc
Version: 0.5.3r449-2.1
Severity: normal
The provided vpnc-script is not compatible with recent versions of iproute,
apparently, as the output format has changed corresponding to version 2.6.39
and later of the kernel. (It isn't clear to me whether the change was in the
kernel itself or in the iproute package, based on the information cited
below.)
This is the bug described here:
http://aptosid.com/index.php?name=PNphpBB2file=viewtopict=1295
and the work-around given on that page comprises the following patch, which I
have tested and which solved the problem for me.
diff --git a/vpnc/vpnc-script b/vpnc/vpnc-script
index 64be38c..4c5e27a 100755
--- a/vpnc/vpnc-script
+++ b/vpnc/vpnc-script
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ destroy_tun_device() {
if [ -n $IPROUTE ]; then
fix_ip_get_output () {
- sed 's/cache//;s/metric \?[0-9]\+ [0-9]\+//g;s/hoplimit
[0-9]\+//g'
+ sed 's/cache//;s/metric
\?[0-9]\+[0-9]\+//g;s/hoplimit[0-9]\+//g;s/ipid 0x//g'
}
set_vpngateway_route() {
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages vpnc depends on:
ii libc62.13-18
ii libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3
ii libgnutls26 2.12.10-1
Versions of packages vpnc recommends:
ii iproute 20110629-1
Versions of packages vpnc suggests:
pn resolvconf none
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/vpnc/example.conf [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/vpnc/example.conf'
/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script'
-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: vpnc
Source-Version: 0.5.3r449-2.2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vpnc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz
to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc
to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb
to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 624...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (supplier of updated vpnc
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:06:35 +
Source: vpnc
Binary: vpnc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.3r449-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Warmenhoven warmenho...@debian.org
Changed-By: Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Description:
vpnc - Cisco-compatible VPN client
Closes: 624203 640978
Changes:
vpnc (0.5.3r449-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Bug fix: more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting, taken from
http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/commitdiff/4deaaf9a32
Closes: #624203, #640978, LP: #805435.
Checksums-Sha1:
8c4e29e7e5e5b3dcd5abd5dc51fe3396822f7165 1681 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc
c3c3cb3a7c2e89b7ad3f5d85bb0435305bd89b5e 53983 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz
c72cc9e31f193da269d43f486f3fa327f2515b68 85140 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
dd97e5c1ec51f8a38a5570e13c3067484d248cec9f53e5f38a79a73525e58a07 1681
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc
9baabd8afd5012efa621f52448c1b18be02a99f6098bce646435c14c2d0e739f 53983
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz
f71520eee51d532ac4f4b6b1115f339d64dd3a2d06e2c5fe9da189cdacadf960 85140
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb
Files:
2da9c550b81ac1407f13c122d2ed1274 1681 net extra
Bug#624203: marked as done (more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:02:24 + with message-id e1rtm3u-00051l...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640978: fixed in vpnc 0.5.3r449-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #640978, regarding more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 640978: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640978 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: vpnc Version: 0.5.3r449-2.1 Severity: important -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-rc4 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages vpnc depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgcrypt11 1.4.6-5 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libgnutls26 2.10.5-1+b1 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr Versions of packages vpnc recommends: ii iproute 20110315-1 networking and traffic control too Versions of packages vpnc suggests: pn resolvconf none (no description available) -- Configuration Files: /etc/vpnc/example.conf [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/vpnc/example.conf' /etc/vpnc/vpnc-script [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script' -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: vpnc Source-Version: 0.5.3r449-2.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vpnc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 640...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (supplier of updated vpnc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:06:35 + Source: vpnc Binary: vpnc Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5.3r449-2.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Eric Warmenhoven warmenho...@debian.org Changed-By: Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de Description: vpnc - Cisco-compatible VPN client Closes: 624203 640978 Changes: vpnc (0.5.3r449-2.2) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Bug fix: more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting, taken from http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/commitdiff/4deaaf9a32 Closes: #624203, #640978, LP: #805435. Checksums-Sha1: 8c4e29e7e5e5b3dcd5abd5dc51fe3396822f7165 1681 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc c3c3cb3a7c2e89b7ad3f5d85bb0435305bd89b5e 53983 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz c72cc9e31f193da269d43f486f3fa327f2515b68 85140 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb Checksums-Sha256: dd97e5c1ec51f8a38a5570e13c3067484d248cec9f53e5f38a79a73525e58a07 1681 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc 9baabd8afd5012efa621f52448c1b18be02a99f6098bce646435c14c2d0e739f 53983 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz f71520eee51d532ac4f4b6b1115f339d64dd3a2d06e2c5fe9da189cdacadf960 85140 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb Files: 2da9c550b81ac1407f13c122d2ed1274 1681 net extra vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc 1a78411cf3a4153c8f31c0e5870886aa 53983 net extra vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz c7ad8e13ad8260db48f26e2ec6d3ba5e 85140 net extra vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOzvHtAAoJELs6aAGGSaoGt98P/2tQYOqZoDJ/KwAOjQpQxpa2 ZJotuXfazNQ/tFG0Hk+pmiCpgydrYH82N86hdUztaNcucm+/yzrmyxE0meqVbpfS 16RL3yA9/x/XBLsEJPzsuFF3jizV7dYPas6i5CxJic6qKH+69cBwYByGhEx6q7yU sZ11YBNR0PkPTe6leDTxX2USctUNGct5q2mGMmCpK0QQsSPoo2RezGWg9BK0N5iC aUFdcMvHmVpIYv1ccO8Zylq8085dujwYJDOqdgrm5NyOE4j6atYHG9/wJFFroviE pkjgzVVjaDPiLoQriCwMhRaZV/EUfZwE0tIVVAdyCtZGdabJhJrJP+4jRVKFjey6 HSihUcP+zVVbBJCftS68RgDEpywxU3Nlr4wuM169Z2xiPrVfT1vUE7tNSPTyFghq NM22Xn5MLwx54MY1D6Yvf2QytGpXnsIEJ6q8JAc19Mxmaba8kFC6HTAsanjw8oaX
Bug#640978: marked as done (vpnc-script requires an update for recent iproute)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:02:24 +
with message-id e1rtm3u-00051l...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640978: fixed in vpnc 0.5.3r449-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #640978,
regarding vpnc-script requires an update for recent iproute
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
640978: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640978
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: vpnc
Version: 0.5.3r449-2.1
Severity: normal
The provided vpnc-script is not compatible with recent versions of iproute,
apparently, as the output format has changed corresponding to version 2.6.39
and later of the kernel. (It isn't clear to me whether the change was in the
kernel itself or in the iproute package, based on the information cited
below.)
This is the bug described here:
http://aptosid.com/index.php?name=PNphpBB2file=viewtopict=1295
and the work-around given on that page comprises the following patch, which I
have tested and which solved the problem for me.
diff --git a/vpnc/vpnc-script b/vpnc/vpnc-script
index 64be38c..4c5e27a 100755
--- a/vpnc/vpnc-script
+++ b/vpnc/vpnc-script
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ destroy_tun_device() {
if [ -n $IPROUTE ]; then
fix_ip_get_output () {
- sed 's/cache//;s/metric \?[0-9]\+ [0-9]\+//g;s/hoplimit
[0-9]\+//g'
+ sed 's/cache//;s/metric
\?[0-9]\+[0-9]\+//g;s/hoplimit[0-9]\+//g;s/ipid 0x//g'
}
set_vpngateway_route() {
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages vpnc depends on:
ii libc62.13-18
ii libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3
ii libgnutls26 2.12.10-1
Versions of packages vpnc recommends:
ii iproute 20110629-1
Versions of packages vpnc suggests:
pn resolvconf none
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/vpnc/example.conf [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/vpnc/example.conf'
/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script'
-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: vpnc
Source-Version: 0.5.3r449-2.2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vpnc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz
to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc
to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb
to main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 640...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (supplier of updated vpnc
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:06:35 +
Source: vpnc
Binary: vpnc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.3r449-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Warmenhoven warmenho...@debian.org
Changed-By: Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Description:
vpnc - Cisco-compatible VPN client
Closes: 624203 640978
Changes:
vpnc (0.5.3r449-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Bug fix: more verbose iproute makes vpnc fail connecting, taken from
http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/commitdiff/4deaaf9a32
Closes: #624203, #640978, LP: #805435.
Checksums-Sha1:
8c4e29e7e5e5b3dcd5abd5dc51fe3396822f7165 1681 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc
c3c3cb3a7c2e89b7ad3f5d85bb0435305bd89b5e 53983 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz
c72cc9e31f193da269d43f486f3fa327f2515b68 85140 vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
dd97e5c1ec51f8a38a5570e13c3067484d248cec9f53e5f38a79a73525e58a07 1681
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.dsc
9baabd8afd5012efa621f52448c1b18be02a99f6098bce646435c14c2d0e739f 53983
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2.diff.gz
f71520eee51d532ac4f4b6b1115f339d64dd3a2d06e2c5fe9da189cdacadf960 85140
vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.2_i386.deb
Files:
2da9c550b81ac1407f13c122d2ed1274 1681 net extra
Bug#648359: [CVE-2011-4000] Unspecified buffer overflow vulnerabilityg
At Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:08:24 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Affected Packages: libchasen2 libchasen-dev libtext-chasen-perl Does that mean that the vulnerable code is also present in libtext-chasen-perl? Ah, it means libtext-chsaen-perl depends libchasen2, and it uses vulnerable function. But I think it doesn't need to rebuild. Please prepare updated packages for stable-security. http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security You need to build the package with -sa I see. Thank you for the information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609851: [updated] incorrect variables used to set hostname in dhclient-script
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:27:12AM -0500, Tim Heckman wrote: Andrew, Thank you for explaining the policy on your policy being no policy. :p No worries :-) But in all seriousness. I completely forgot about the hooks that can be used for DHCP and I entirely agree this makes more sense to do it this way. Thanks for the explanation. No worries also :-) If you are State-side I hope you have a great Thanksgiving! Thanks, you too. I've actually been poking at this some more, and it turns out I've made a grave error in assuming that by not requesting a particular option you don't get it anyway. It turns out in testing, that even not requesting the host-name option, if it's set in the server, the client seems to get it, so this totally blows up my grand plans of telling people who don't like the hostname setting behaviour to just not request the hostname, so I have to revisit everything. regards Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#649869: marked as done (kiki: ships /usr/lib/python2.X/dist-packages/__init__.py)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:47:10 + with message-id e1rtocw-0005ox...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#649869: fixed in kiki 0.5.6-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #649869, regarding kiki: ships /usr/lib/python2.X/dist-packages/__init__.py to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 649869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649869 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: kiki,python-libtiff Version: kiki/0.5.6-7 Version: python-libtiff/0.3.0~svn78-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2011-11-24 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libtinfo5 libkeyutils1 libkrb5support0 libk5crypto3 libkrb5-3 libgssapi-krb5-2 libpcre3 libffi5 libglib2.0-0 libatk1.0-data libatk1.0-0 libavahi-common-data libavahi-common3 libdbus-1-3 libavahi-client3 libcups2 libdatrie1 libdrm2 libexpat1 libfreetype6 ucf ttf-dejavu-core fontconfig-config libfontconfig1 libjpeg8 libjasper1 libpng12-0 libtiff4 libxau6 libxdmcp6 libxcb1 libx11-data libx11-6 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 libglapi-mesa libxfixes3 libxdamage1 libxext6 libxxf86vm1 libgl1-mesa-glx libglu1-mesa libgtk2.0-common libpixman-1-0 libxcb-render0 libxcb-shm0 libxrender1 libcairo2 libthai-data libthai0 libxft2 fontconfig libpango1.0-0 libxcomposite1 libxcursor1 libxi6 libxinerama1 libxrandr2 libxml2 shared-mime-info libgtk2.0-0 x11-common libice6 libsm6 libdb4.8 mime-support python2.7-minimal python2.7 python-minimal python python2.6-minimal python2.6 python-wxversion libwxbase2.8-0 libwxgtk2.8-0 python-wxgtk2.8 kiki python-libtiff Extracting templates from packages: 38% Extracting templates from packages: 77% Extracting templates from packages: 100% Preconfiguring packages ... Authentication warning overridden. Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously unselected package libtinfo5. (Reading database ... 10585 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libtinfo5 (from .../libtinfo5_5.9-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libkeyutils1. Unpacking libkeyutils1 (from .../libkeyutils1_1.5.2-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libkrb5support0. Unpacking libkrb5support0 (from .../libkrb5support0_1.9.1+dfsg-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libk5crypto3. Unpacking libk5crypto3 (from .../libk5crypto3_1.9.1+dfsg-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libkrb5-3. Unpacking libkrb5-3 (from .../libkrb5-3_1.9.1+dfsg-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libgssapi-krb5-2. Unpacking libgssapi-krb5-2 (from .../libgssapi-krb5-2_1.9.1+dfsg-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libpcre3. Unpacking libpcre3 (from .../libpcre3_8.12-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libffi5. Unpacking libffi5 (from .../libffi5_3.0.10-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libglib2.0-0. Unpacking libglib2.0-0 (from .../libglib2.0-0_2.30.2-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libatk1.0-data. Unpacking libatk1.0-data (from .../libatk1.0-data_2.2.0-2_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libatk1.0-0. Unpacking libatk1.0-0 (from .../libatk1.0-0_2.2.0-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libavahi-common-data. Unpacking libavahi-common-data (from .../libavahi-common-data_0.6.30-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libavahi-common3. Unpacking libavahi-common3 (from .../libavahi-common3_0.6.30-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libdbus-1-3. Unpacking libdbus-1-3 (from .../libdbus-1-3_1.4.16-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libavahi-client3. Unpacking libavahi-client3 (from .../libavahi-client3_0.6.30-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libcups2. Unpacking libcups2 (from .../libcups2_1.5.0-12_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libdatrie1. Unpacking libdatrie1 (from .../libdatrie1_0.2.5-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libdrm2. Unpacking libdrm2 (from .../libdrm2_2.4.27-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libexpat1. Unpacking libexpat1 (from .../libexpat1_2.0.1-7.2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libfreetype6. Unpacking
Bug#636475: almost
Thanks, Julian, I am testing it now. There are a couple of issues with DOC-Sphinx-generation. Anton On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: ups its not quite fixed in 0.70, but the fix is simple: --- orig/yade 2011-11-12 16:01:48.0 + +++ new/yade 2011-11-24 22:01:40.181474770 + @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ import IPython.ipapi IPython.ipapi.get().IP.atexit_operations() elif yade.runtime.ipython_version==11: - from IPython.core.embed import InteractiveShellEmbed + from IPython.frontend.terminal.embed import InteractiveShellEmbed # use the dict to set attributes for k in ipconfig: setattr(InteractiveShellEmbed,k,ipconfig[k]) InteractiveShellEmbed.banner1=banner # called banner1 here, not banner anymore -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609851: [updated] incorrect variables used to set hostname in dhclient-script
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.orgwrote: I've actually been poking at this some more, and it turns out I've made a grave error in assuming that by not requesting a particular option you don't get it anyway. It turns out in testing, that even not requesting the host-name option, if it's set in the server, the client seems to get it, so this totally blows up my grand plans of telling people who don't like the hostname setting behaviour to just not request the hostname, so I have to revisit everything. regards Andrew I'm usually not a fan of the files, depending on the software, but maybe an '/etc/default/dhclient' file would make sense here. I don't mean to over-complicate the dhclient-script here, but it would allow the administrator to configure how the hostname is set with a simply flip of a switch, instead of a hook needing to be made as well as having to worry about what logic to use in the script. For example in /etc/default/dhclient: set_hostname=yes # sets the hostname every time set_hostname=no # never sets the hostname set_hostname=detect # maybe dynamic, or something. This option sets the hostname based on what /etc/hostname looks like. If the file exists and contains no data, set the hostname. If not, have the local hostname override the one given out by DHCP. I'm willing to bet, however, that there may be better options available. For anyone who comes looking for a fix, here is a workaround I've managed to throw together for an exit hook for dhclient that sets the hostname and does some logic so it only sets it if needed. Unfortunately, I do not have the file on my local system but you can download the raw version of this pastebin to /etc/dhcp/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/set_hostname: - http://pastie.org/2917845 That could probably use a little bit of cleaning up, but it works. -Tim
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Fri Nov 25 07:03:18 UTC 2011 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: ruby-libxml tags 646652 + pending Bug #646652 [src:libxml-ruby] libxml-ruby: FTBFS: make: *** [install/libxml-ruby1.9.1] Error 1 Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: pygobject tags 649861 + pending Bug #649861 [python-gobject] Importing both gobject and gi.repository does not work anymore Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: pygobject tags 649611 + pending Bug #649611 [python-gobject] python-gobject: Needs versioned dependency on gir1.2-glib-2.0? Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: python-fabio tags 649008 + pending Bug #649008 [wnpp] ITP: python-fabio -- I/O library for images produced by 2D X-ray detector Bug #649009 [wnpp] ITP: python-fabio -- I/O library for images produced by 2D X-ray detector Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: ruby-parsetree tags 642727 + pending Bug #642727 [src:libparsetree-ruby] libparsetree-ruby: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/inline.rb:53:in `require': no such file to load -- rubygems (LoadError) Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 642727: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642727 649611: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649611 649861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649861 649008: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649008 646652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646652 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649612: /usr/lib/zlibrary/ui/zlui-qt4.so: undefined symbol: _ZN9QListData6detachEi
Hi Stepan, On 2011-11-22 21:48, Stepan Golosunov wrote: [...] % fbreader loading /usr/lib/zlibrary/ui/zlui-qt4.so /usr/lib/zlibrary/ui/zlui-qt4.so: undefined symbol: _ZN9QListData6detachEi Looks like libzlui-qt4 fails to depend on correct version of libqtcore4 (_ZN9QListData6detachEi is available since 4:4.7.0~beta1, squeeze has 4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1). In fact, libzlui-qt4 does not list libqtcore4 as a dependency at all. Thank you for the report. Yeah, it probably should link to qtcore4. I will look deeper in a few days. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
