Processed: re: python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #677146 {Done: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org} [python-uno] python-uno
uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions libreoffice/1:3.6.1~rc1-1.
--
677146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677146: python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends
control: reopen -1 A lot going on in this bug report, but after a cursory look, it seems that unstable would still be affected, and being an rc bug, I'm reopening to appropriately track it as an unfixed issue there. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: re: gnustep-gui-runtime: Multiple libobjc.so version linked due to mix of dependencies
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #672986 {Done: Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org} [gnustep-gui-runtime]
gnustep-gui-runtime: Multiple libobjc.so version linked due to mix of
dependencies
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions gnustep-gui/0.22.0-1.
--
672986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672986
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#670405: ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4`
control: reopen -1 This issue still apparently affects unstable, so reopening to track the fact that it needs fixing there. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: re: ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4`
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #670405 {Done: Eugen Dedu eugen.d...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr} [ekiga] ekiga:
During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4`
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions ekiga/3.9.90-1.
--
670405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670405
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: fixed 672986 0.22.0-1 Bug #672986 [gnustep-gui-runtime] gnustep-gui-runtime: Multiple libobjc.so version linked due to mix of dependencies Marked as fixed in versions gnustep-gui/0.22.0-1. fixed 670405 3.9.90-1 Bug #670405 [ekiga] ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4` Marked as fixed in versions ekiga/3.9.90-1. fixed 677146 1:3.6.1~rc1-1 Bug #677146 [python-uno] python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends Marked as fixed in versions libreoffice/1:3.6.1~rc1-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 670405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670405 672986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672986 677146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677146 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 622652 alsa-driver/1.0.23+dfsg-2
Bug #622652 {Done: Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org} [alsa-source] alsa-driver:
fails to build on powermac
No longer marked as found in versions alsa-driver/1.0.23+dfsg-2.
found 622652 alsa-base/1.0.23+dfsg-2
Bug #622652 {Done: Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org} [alsa-source] alsa-driver:
fails to build on powermac
The source alsa-base and version 1.0.23+dfsg-2 do not appear to match any
binary packages
Marked as found in versions alsa-base/1.0.23+dfsg-2.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
622652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#670405: marked as done (ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4`)
Your message dated Sat, 3 Nov 2012 17:37:53 +1100 with message-id 201211031737.59030@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#670405: ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4` has caused the Debian Bug report #670405, regarding ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4` to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 670405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ekiga Version: 3.2.7-4.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Since a few weeks ago, Ekiga crashes on startup (shortly after showing the main window) and I cannot use it at all. It doesn't seem to happen 100% of the times, though, but the problem is very easy to reproduce. Here's the output from GDB: $ gdb ekiga GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4-debian Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as i486-linux-gnu. For bug reporting instructions, please see: http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/... Reading symbols from /usr/bin/ekiga...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/ekiga [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1. [New Thread 0xf4494b70 (LWP 468)] [New Thread 0xef91fb70 (LWP 469)] [New Thread 0xef8deb70 (LWP 470)] [New Thread 0xef89db70 (LWP 471)] [New Thread 0xef85cb70 (LWP 472)] ALSA lib conf.c:1220:(parse_def) show is not a compound ALSA lib conf.c:1686:(snd_config_load1) _toplevel_:24:26:Unexpected char ALSA lib conf.c:3406:(config_file_open) /usr/share/alsa/pulse-alsa.conf may be old or corrupted: consider to remove or fix it [New Thread 0xef6ffb70 (LWP 473)] [New Thread 0xef6beb70 (LWP 474)] [New Thread 0xef67db70 (LWP 475)] [New Thread 0xef63cb70 (LWP 476)] [New Thread 0xef5fbb70 (LWP 477)] [New Thread 0xef58ab70 (LWP 478)] osutils.cxx(2275) PTLib Possible deadlock in read/write mutex: thread-id=4016827248 (0xef6beb70), readers=1, writers=0 thread-id=4103559328 (0xf49758a0), readers=0, writers=1 [Thread 0xef5fbb70 (LWP 477) exited] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xef67db70 (LWP 475)] 0xf6f1205e in PStringOptions::SetAt(PCaselessString const, PString const) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 (gdb) bt #0 0xf6f1205e in PStringOptions::SetAt(PCaselessString const, PString const) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #1 0xf6fa9506 in PStringOptions::SetAt(char const*, PString const) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #2 0xf73996f8 in SIPMIMEInfo::SetContact(PString const) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #3 0xf736b7f2 in SIPEndPoint::AdjustToRegistration(SIP_PDU, OpalTransport const, SIPConnection const*) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #4 0xf739f6a6 in SIP_PDU::SendResponse(OpalTransport, SIP_PDU, SIPEndPoint*) const () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #5 0xf73a7bb6 in SIPResponse::Send(OpalTransport, SIP_PDU const) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #6 0xf7366ff3 in SIPEndPoint::OnReceivedOPTIONS(OpalTransport, SIP_PDU) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #7 0xf736472c in SIPEndPoint::OnReceivedConnectionlessPDU(OpalTransport, SIP_PDU*) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #8 0xf7363f43 in SIPEndPoint::OnReceivedPDU(OpalTransport, SIP_PDU*) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #9 0xf73625e1 in SIPEndPoint::HandlePDU(OpalTransport) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #10 0xf73614d0 in SIPEndPoint::NewIncomingConnection(OpalTransport*) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #11 0xf6f254c3 in OpalEndPoint::ListenerCallback(PThread, int) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #12 0xf6f269aa in OpalEndPoint::ListenerCallback_PNotifier::Call(PObject, int) const () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #13 0x081f3749 in PNotifierTemplateint::operator()(PObject, int) const () #14 0xf6f6ddd0 in OpalListener::ListenForConnections(PThread, int) () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #15 0xf6f76762 in OpalListener::ListenForConnections_PNotifier::Call(PObject, int) const () from /usr/lib/libopal.so.3.10.4 #16 0x081f3749 in PNotifierTemplateint::operator()(PObject, int) const () #17 0xf683cf70 in PSimpleThread::Main() () from /usr/lib/libpt.so.2.10.4 #18 0xf680c5e9 in PThread::PX_ThreadStart(void*) () from /usr/lib/libpt.so.2.10.4 #19 0xf7da9c39 in start_thread
Bug#670405: ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4`
The original closure report only closed the bug for the version in experimental, the bug was still listed as open in unstable: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=ekiga;dist=unstable reopening is not the way to indicate it effects specific versions, rather please use the 'found' element of bts. It distorts udd views. I'm fixing that so we have a better view of what needs really needs fixing: http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy_and_sidmerged=igndone=onlyfnewerval=7rc=1sortby=idsorto=ascctags=1cdeferred=1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 622652 alsa-base/1.0.23+dfsg-2
Bug #622652 {Done: Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org} [alsa-source] alsa-driver:
fails to build on powermac
The source alsa-base and version 1.0.23+dfsg-2 do not appear to match any
binary packages
No longer marked as found in versions alsa-base/1.0.23+dfsg-2.
notfixed 622652 alsa-base/1.0.25+1
Bug #622652 {Done: Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org} [alsa-source] alsa-driver:
fails to build on powermac
No longer marked as fixed in versions alsa-base/1.0.25+1.
found 622652 1.0.23+dfsg-2
Bug #622652 {Done: Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org} [alsa-source] alsa-driver:
fails to build on powermac
Marked as found in versions alsa-driver/1.0.23+dfsg-2 and reopened.
fixed 622652 1.0.25+1
Bug #622652 [alsa-source] alsa-driver: fails to build on powermac
There is no source info for the package 'alsa-source' at version '1.0.25+1'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.0.25+1'
Marked as fixed in versions 1.0.25+1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
622652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfixed 622652 1.0.25+1 Bug #622652 [alsa-source] alsa-driver: fails to build on powermac There is no source info for the package 'alsa-source' at version '1.0.25+1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '1.0.25+1' No longer marked as fixed in versions 1.0.25+1. fixed 622652 alsa-driver/1.0.23+dfsg-4 Bug #622652 [alsa-source] alsa-driver: fails to build on powermac Marked as fixed in versions alsa-driver/1.0.23+dfsg-4. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622652 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: libxtables9: file conflict with iptables 1.4.16.3-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 692187 692182 Bug #692187 [libxtables9] file conflict between iptables and libxtables9, failing upgrades Bug #692187 [libxtables9] file conflict between iptables and libxtables9, failing upgrades Added tag(s) patch. Bug #692182 [libxtables9] libxtables9: file conflict with iptables 1.4.16.3-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' Merged 692182 692187 quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692182 692187: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692187 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692182: libxtables9: file conflict with iptables 1.4.16.3-1
forcemerge 692187 692182 quit Jonathan Nieder wrote: I'll send a symbols file to make the package policy §8.6 compliant later tonight. I had forgotten dh automatically calls dh_makeshlibs. The patch at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;bug=692182 should be enough. Sorry for the noise. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692190: ruby-pgplot: ftbfs missing pgplot5 build-dependency
package: ruby-pgplot version: 0.1.3-3 severity: serious Hi, Your package has failed to build on the buildds due to a build-dependency on missing pgplot5 for a while now. That is considered missing since it is a package in non-free. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677146: marked as done (python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends)
Your message dated Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:01:50 +0100 with message-id 20121103080150.ga5...@rene-engelhard.de and subject line Re: Bug#677146: python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends has caused the Debian Bug report #677146, regarding python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 677146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677146 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: python-uno Version: 1:3.5.3-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 during an upgrade, the python-uno preinst script calls: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg This file seems to come from the libreoffice-core pacakge. According to the policy: Pre-Depends are also required if the preinst script depends on the named package I found this when helping someone that was having trouble upgrading from squeeze to wheezy and was getting a preinst failure due to this file being missing. stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages python-uno depends on: ii libc6 2.13-32 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.0-10 ii libpython2.7 2.7.3~rc2-2.1 ii libreoffice-core 1:3.5.3-5 ii libstdc++64.7.0-10 ii python2.7.2-10 ii python2.7 2.7.3~rc2-2.1 ii uno-libs3 3.5.3-5 ii ure 3.5.3-5 python-uno recommends no packages. python-uno suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 01:59:09AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: A lot going on in this bug report, but after a cursory look, it seems that unstable would still be affected, and being an rc bug, I'm reopening to appropriately track it as an unfixed issue there. And I clearly said that this bug is theoretical and that the script checks whether unopkg was functional before using it. Which is the normal case for stuff like this. *Seems* is not something we should do here. Show me a real problem and you can reopen this bug. Until then - closing again. (And thanks for fixing the found again which you removed to your reopen instead of found.) Regards, Rene---End Message---
Bug#677943: [Packaging] Bug#677943: release critical?
Hi, (I managed to find some time to review this patch, finally.) gregor herrmann wrote (27 Oct 2012 15:51:05 GMT) : Which means we need to create the symlink for new installs and for upgrades from this range. Correct so far? I think so. Here's an attempt to implement this idea: [...] - if [ -z $prevver ] ; then + if [ -z $prevver ] || \ + dpkg --compare-versions $prevver ge 1.4.6-1~ \\ + dpkg --compare-versions $prevver lt 1.4.7~ ; then # only create link on new installs + # or when upgrading from a version where it was removed unconditionally ln -s ../../munin/apache.conf /etc/$webserver/conf.d/munin fi if [ -f $webserver_init_script ];then [...] Please double-check if I got the logic right :) Looks good to me. Holger Levsen wrote (26 Oct 2012 23:56:23 GMT) : I fear I might just be busy with DebConf13... Thank you for taking care of this. I certainly loved a clear patch ;) Then you should be happy with gregoa's one, and Wheezy will have one less RC bug! :) Cheers! -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: missing Replaces:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 692171 libxtables9
Bug #692171 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [iptables] missing
Replaces: iptables 1.4.16.3-3
Bug reassigned from package 'iptables' to 'libxtables9'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #692171 to the same values
previously set
No longer marked as fixed in versions iptables/1.4.16.3-4.
severity 692171 serious
Bug #692171 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9] missing
Replaces: iptables 1.4.16.3-3
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
forcemerge 692171 692182
Bug #692171 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9] missing
Replaces: iptables 1.4.16.3-3
Bug #692187 [libxtables9] file conflict between iptables and libxtables9,
failing upgrades
Marked Bug as done
Marked Bug as done
Bug #692171 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9] missing
Replaces: iptables 1.4.16.3-3
Marked as found in versions iptables/1.4.16.3-3.
Added tag(s) patch.
Bug #692182 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9]
libxtables9: file conflict with iptables 1.4.16.3-1
Merged 692171 692182 692187
affects 692171 + iptables
Bug #692171 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9] missing
Replaces: iptables 1.4.16.3-3
Bug #692182 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9]
libxtables9: file conflict with iptables 1.4.16.3-1
Bug #692187 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9] file
conflict between iptables and libxtables9, failing upgrades
Added indication that 692171 affects iptables
Added indication that 692182 affects iptables
Added indication that 692187 affects iptables
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692171
692182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692182
692187: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692187
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: missing Replaces:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 692171 iptables/1.4.16.3-4
Bug #692171 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9] missing
Replaces: iptables 1.4.16.3-3
Bug #692182 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9]
libxtables9: file conflict with iptables 1.4.16.3-1
Bug #692187 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9] file
conflict between iptables and libxtables9, failing upgrades
Marked as fixed in versions iptables/1.4.16.3-4.
Marked as fixed in versions iptables/1.4.16.3-4.
Marked as fixed in versions iptables/1.4.16.3-4.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692171
692182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692182
692187: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692187
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646642: needs update for wheezy rhythmbox
Now that it has been removed from wheezy, there should be no problem to upload the new version to sid. any ETA for this? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689884: Bug#692157: couriergraph: diff for NMU version 0.25-4.2
El 02/11/12 20:26, Salvatore Bonaccorso escribió: Package: couriergraph Version: 0.25-4.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for couriergraph (versioned as 0.25-4.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Perfectly fine. Thank you very much, Salvatore. Would you be willing to sponsor a regular upload (to unstable) in which we include all fixes, plus a couple enhancements? Thanks again Regards, José Luis Tallón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688413: accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash libglib-2.0
Hi, Le vendredi 02 novembre 2012 à 09:53 +, Simon McVittie a écrit : I've sent a possible patch to the upstream bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50112 and built .debs with that patch http://alioth.debian.org/~smcv/ (version 0.6.21-6+smcv1), but since I can't reproduce the crash on-demand, I can't be very confident that it has actually been fixed... testing or review welcome. Git repository (cloned from collab-maint): git://anonscm.debian.org/users/smcv/qa/accountsservice.git http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/smcv/qa/accountsservice.git In particular, Josselin, since you have recipes that can apparently reproduce this reliably (although they didn't work for me either...), it'd be really useful if you could try the patched accountsservice library. Thanks Simon for the patch. I can confirm it fixes #688413. Let’s wait to see what upstream has to say about whether this is the proper fix. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 688413
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 688413 - unreproducible + pending Bug #688413 [accountsservice] accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash Bug #689651 [accountsservice] gnome-shell[4471] trap int3 ip:7f7595135341 sp:7fffee8f32b0 error:0 Removed tag(s) unreproducible. Removed tag(s) unreproducible. Bug #688413 [accountsservice] accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash Bug #689651 [accountsservice] gnome-shell[4471] trap int3 ip:7f7595135341 sp:7fffee8f32b0 error:0 Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688413 689651: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689651 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682612: marked as done (/sbin/ip6tables-multi: Cannot restore ip6tables, fails at Commit line)
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:30:27 + with message-id 50950e63.3050...@debian.org and subject line Not a bug has caused the Debian Bug report #682612, regarding /sbin/ip6tables-multi: Cannot restore ip6tables, fails at Commit line to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 682612: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682612 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: iptables Version: 1.4.8-3 Severity: grave File: /sbin/ip6tables-multi Tags: security ipv6 Justification: user security hole I have the following file /etc/ip6tables.firewall.rules # Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A INPUT -m rt --rt-type 0 --rt-segsleft 0 -j DROP -A FORWARD -m rt --rt-type 0 --rt-segsleft 0 -j DROP -A OUTPUT -m rt --rt-type 0 --rt-segsleft 0 -j DROP -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p ipv6-icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 546 -d fe80::/64 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp6-port-unreachable -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp6-port-unreachable COMMIT Then I run: sudo ip6tables-restore /etc/ip6tables.firewall.rules And I get: ip6tables-restore: line 18 failed Any idea how to fix this? -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-042stab057.1 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages iptables depends on: ii libc6 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libnfnetlink0 1.0.0-1Netfilter netlink library iptables recommends no packages. iptables suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am closing this bug as I couldn't reproduce it and it seems to be an issue with the VM configuration from OPs provider. cheers from the Dublin BSP, Ulrich -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQlQ5gAAoJEASq5bOX8aqsV8cP/3Gd7GFA/ql0RTgITN/SBGSv wE6O78JJ0Tp26z6u9/84jmtmZCk3csWYzJIxJyYBtJ17ZO1uhzMiNpHoMPnPuZue JhQoAAY+xvkErp16JY3kj3VOCzeRdzIAAN90PvkxyNpBTwpcVbUtnjVqEUCLfX/g gQlm8Y6ffftoo6MA7e/XKnLz2+o0pUqPg90M3spvCjBeZl78sSM7+GuGPxfe7w81 F7cK/ihddKqNXLA0ICuod0PdJa+tAF91TvxEwMUKvwm9D3rih+IimWJZ8aPQlAy7 O1FqbAeFoT4Cix6zH+gXDLSDcrh4i1uD8DRnyoB0JEQ/mVGvi+Ns0qEWKHpe7Bsd seN8SJ72Lif7BFAXrGcHx67B7r+hujf8bC6XJIDEs2dvMyoAV4fWDw19I+gT3uUf yAxaiGRD5TPRLmleODtP/cYFwBd04HrNSuqkXcrXTLfUjgrYx/aqR6j4vbmwAYUn TedYDGjmfb3HXCrw7UyVzVwznHuHD4Eoa6nuqQZ/mOpZKFKGS1SHO2f8Do3wz8+y C5Jor8f9ByaAax9+Rbgy20RrQoljac64Vzg/9a8Pdw08vFvLMxY+u5RA0bB855nP BwSyVvuGX3PHsbcBYKEr5KtBUCUD0b5mKFETB7yBYY8X16NuynlvbspYvdEh+cEp JIqyqNk70HFPppPDldfq =ITgk -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Processed: Re: simgear-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does not find an upgrade path
Processing control commands:
found -1 2.4.0-1.3
Bug #667526 {Done: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org} [simgear-dev]
simgear-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does not find an upgrade path
Did not alter found versions and reopened.
--
667526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677943: [Packaging] Bug#677943: release critical?
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:44:27 +0100, intrigeri wrote: gregor herrmann wrote (27 Oct 2012 15:51:05 GMT) : Which means we need to create the symlink for new installs and for upgrades from this range. Correct so far? I think so. Good :) Here's an attempt to implement this idea: [...] - if [ -z $prevver ] ; then + if [ -z $prevver ] || \ + dpkg --compare-versions $prevver ge 1.4.6-1~ \\ Hm, this \\ does look like a typo ... + dpkg --compare-versions $prevver lt 1.4.7~ ; then # only create link on new installs + # or when upgrading from a version where it was removed unconditionally ln -s ../../munin/apache.conf /etc/$webserver/conf.d/munin fi if [ -f $webserver_init_script ];then [...] Please double-check if I got the logic right :) Looks good to me. Thanks! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Eagles signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed
* gregor herrmann wrote [24.10.12 17:13]: Hi, Running the tests under xvfb I get a different failure: JFTR I get the exact same error messages running it directly in X11. (and it goes on and on for pages) So: no idea :/ (I'm still attaching the change to use xvfb which seems to be a good idea in any case.) At least it looks like the behaviour with xvfb is consistent to a real environment. It works without a problem if no DISPLAY variable is set (as it just doesn't run the tests). cheers from the Dublin BSP, Ulrich -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: bug 689954 is forwarded to linux-b...@nvidia.com, found 617481 in 0.52 ..., tagging 690971 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 689954 linux-b...@nvidia.com
Bug #689954 [nvidia-kernel-dkms] Module does not load/recognize GT650M albeit
it should
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'linux-b...@nvidia.com'.
found 617481 0.52
Bug #617481 [debdelta] debdelta: owned and unowned files after purge (policy
6.8 + 10.7.3)
Marked as found in versions debdelta/0.52.
found 668801 1:9.9.2.dfsg-1
Bug #668801 [bind9] bind9: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)
Marked as found in versions bind9/1:9.9.2.dfsg-1.
found 668801 1:9.8.4.dfsg-1
Bug #668801 [bind9] bind9: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)
Marked as found in versions bind9/1:9.8.4.dfsg-1.
found 688196 2.71-2~bpo60+1
Bug #688196 {Done: Christoph Martin christoph.mar...@uni-mainz.de}
[mimedefang] mimedefang: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3):
/etc/default/mimedefang
There is no source info for the package 'mimedefang' at version
'2.71-2~bpo60+1' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.71-2~bpo60+1'
Marked as found in versions 2.71-2~bpo60+1.
tags 690971 + sid
Bug #690971 [fgfs-atlas] fgfs-atlas: not installable (depends on simgear2.0.0)
Added tag(s) sid.
user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was deb...@abeckmann.de).
usertags 690971 piuparts
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
found 651463 1.5c-9
Bug #651463 [src:honeyd] honeyd: FTBFS (tagging.h:89:6: error: expected
declaration specifiers or '...' before '(' token)
Marked as found in versions honeyd/1.5c-9.
found 677407 1:3.4+6
Bug #677407 [gnome-core] gnome-dbg: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does
not find an upgrade path
Marked as found in versions meta-gnome3/1:3.4+6.
found 667526 2.6.0-3
Bug #667526 [simgear-dev] simgear-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does
not find an upgrade path
Marked as found in versions simgear/2.6.0-3.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
617481: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617481
651463: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651463
667526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667526
668801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668801
677407: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677407
688196: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688196
689954: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689954
690971: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690971
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691900: [pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] Bug#691900: gwt: CVE-2012-4563
Le Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:43:19AM +0100, Thomas Koch a écrit : Charles Plessy: In particular I do not know if the best resolution for this bug is to upgrade to 2.5.0 or to patch, so I am reluctant to take action by myself, worrying that I might complicate your work on Gerrit. Hi Charles, thank you for pinging me. I've just spend three days on Debian work. Could you deal with it by updating to 2.5.0 and also set the maintainer to the java packaging team? Hi Thomas, I have updated the source package to 2.5.0 (checked copyrights, refreshed the patches), but unfortunately it does not build. I suppose that some ground work is needed on the Java side, but I am not able to do it. I committed all my changes to the Git repository. Cheers, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677943: [Packaging] Bug#677943: release critical?
Hi intrigeri, thanks indeed for re-checking this patch! I'll will upload soon! cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688413: marked as done (accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash)
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:32:33 + with message-id e1tudpx-00047b...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#688413: fixed in accountsservice 0.6.21-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #688413, regarding accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688413 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: accountsservice Version: 0.6.21-6 Severity: serious Justification: Must be fixed for wheezy Switching users makes gnome-shell crash with this error: #0 0x7f70c5ea06c9 in g_cancellable_is_cancelled ( cancellable=0x7f70c4a30660) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.3/./gio/gcancellable.c:296 No locals. #1 0x7f70a7555d86 in on_get_unix_user_finished (object=optimized out, result=0x4f93660, data=0x4e56240) at act-user-manager.c:1028 proxy = optimized out new_session = 0x4e56240 error = 0x0 uid = optimized out #2 0x7f70c5ed93f7 in g_simple_async_result_complete (simple=0x4f93660) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.3/./gio/gsimpleasyncresult.c:767 current_source = 0x7f70980e4f90 current_context = 0x0 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = g_simple_async_result_complete #3 0x7f70c5f3177a in reply_cb (connection=optimized out, res=optimized out, user_data=0x4f93660) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.3/./gio/gdbusproxy.c:2614 simple = 0x4f93660 value = optimized out error = 0x38cfe60 fd_list = 0x2740a00 This code is introduced by a patch you added: 9001-manage_pending_ck_calls_with_cancellable.patch Obviously something is wrong with the cancellable management, because new_session-cancellable exists but is not a valid GCancellable. I tried with accountsservice 0.6.24 in experimental, but it is much worse since it entirely prevents gnome-shell from starting up. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages accountsservice depends on: ii dbus 1.6.2-2 ii libaccountsservice00.6.21-6 ii libc6 2.13-35 ii libglib2.0-0 2.33.12+really2.32.3-2 ii libpolkit-gobject-1-0 0.105-1 accountsservice recommends no packages. Versions of packages accountsservice suggests: ii gnome-control-center 1:3.4.2-2 -- no debconf information -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: accountsservice Source-Version: 0.6.21-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of accountsservice, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 688...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org (supplier of updated accountsservice package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:16:15 + Source: accountsservice Binary: accountsservice libaccountsservice0 libaccountsservice-dev gir1.2-accountsservice-1.0 libaccountsservice-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.6.21-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org Changed-By: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org Description: accountsservice - query and manipulate user account information gir1.2-accountsservice-1.0 - GObject introspection data for AccountService libaccountsservice-dbg - query and manipulate user account information - debug libaccountsservice-dev - query and manipulate user account information - header files libaccountsservice0 - query and manipulate user account information - shared libraries Closes: 683092 688413 Changes: accountsservice (0.6.21-7) unstable; urgency=low . [ Simon McVittie ] * Don't free ActUserManagerNewSession objects until any pending asynchronous calls to set up the new
Bug#689651: marked as done (gnome-shell[4471] trap int3 ip:7f7595135341 sp:7fffee8f32b0 error:0)
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:32:33 + with message-id e1tudpx-00047b...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#688413: fixed in accountsservice 0.6.21-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #688413, regarding gnome-shell[4471] trap int3 ip:7f7595135341 sp:7fffee8f32b0 error:0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688413 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: gnome-shell Version: 3.4.2-1 Severity: important Hi, I have installed a debian wheezy system on my brand new VOSTRO DELL system. However I keep loosing mouse/keyboard interaction on my X session. According to last message in dmesg, I have: [ 96.613458] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready [ 98.283976] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link up [ 98.284428] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready [ 108.941386] eth0: no IPv6 routers present [ 315.902989] gnome-shell[4471] trap int3 ip:7f7595135341 sp:7fffee8f32b0 error:0 VGA is: $ sudo lspci -s 00:02.0 -vvx 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Dell Device 04ee Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 45 Region 0: Memory at fe00 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4M] Region 2: Memory at c000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] Region 4: I/O ports at f000 [size=64] Expansion ROM at unassigned [disabled] Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit- Address: fee0f00c Data: 4191 Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-) Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- Capabilities: [a4] PCI Advanced Features AFCap: TP+ FLR+ AFCtrl: FLR- AFStatus: TP- Kernel driver in use: i915 00: 86 80 02 01 07 04 90 00 09 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 10: 04 00 00 fe 00 00 00 00 0c 00 00 c0 00 00 00 00 20: 01 f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 28 10 ee 04 30: 00 00 00 00 90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 00 00 thanks ! -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gnome-shell depends on: ii dconf-gsettings-backend [gsettings-backend] 0.12.1-2 ii gconf-service3.2.5-1+build1 ii gir1.2-accountsservice-1.0 0.6.21-6 ii gir1.2-atk-1.0 2.4.0-2 ii gir1.2-caribou-1.0 0.4.2-2 ii gir1.2-clutter-1.0 1.10.8-2 ii gir1.2-cogl-1.0 1.10.2-6 ii gir1.2-coglpango-1.0 1.10.2-6 ii gir1.2-folks-0.6 0.6.9-1+b1 ii gir1.2-freedesktop 1.32.1-1 ii gir1.2-gconf-2.0 3.2.5-1+build1 ii gir1.2-gcr-3 3.4.1-3 ii gir1.2-gdesktopenums-3.0 3.4.2-1 ii gir1.2-gdkpixbuf-2.0 2.26.1-1 ii gir1.2-gee-1.0 0.6.4-2 ii gir1.2-gkbd-3.0 3.4.0.2-1 ii gir1.2-glib-2.0 1.32.1-1 ii gir1.2-gmenu-3.0 3.4.2-3 ii gir1.2-gnomebluetooth-1.03.4.2-1 ii gir1.2-gtk-3.0 3.4.2-3 ii gir1.2-json-1.0 0.14.2-1 ii gir1.2-mutter-3.03.4.1-5 ii gir1.2-networkmanager-1.00.9.4.0-6 ii gir1.2-pango-1.0 1.30.0-1 ii gir1.2-polkit-1.00.105-1 ii gir1.2-soup-2.4 2.38.1-2 ii gir1.2-telepathyglib-0.120.18.2-2 ii gir1.2-telepathylogger-0.2 0.4.0-1 ii gir1.2-upowerglib-1.00.9.17-1 ii gjs 1.32.0-2 ii gnome-bluetooth
Bug#689769: ample: diff for NMU version 0.5.7-6.1
tags 689769 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ample (versioned as 0.5.7-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
reverted:
--- ample-0.5.7/debian/postinst
+++ ample-0.5.7.orig/debian/postinst
@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-# postinst script for ample
-#
-
-set -e
-
-case $1 in
-configure)
-if [ ! -d /var/run/ample ]; then
- # old postrm removed /var/run/ample even on 'upgrade'
- mkdir /var/run/ample
-fi
-
-# don't override local permissions if they are setted with dpkg-statoverride
-if ! dpkg-statoverride --list /var/run/ample /dev/null; then
-chown nobody:nogroup /var/run/ample
-fi
-
-;;
-
-abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
-;;
-
-*)
-echo postinst called with unknown argument \`$1' 2
-exit 1
-;;
-esac
-
-# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
-# generated by other debhelper scripts.
-
-#DEBHELPER#
-
-exit 0
-
-
diff -u ample-0.5.7/debian/postrm ample-0.5.7/debian/postrm
--- ample-0.5.7/debian/postrm
+++ ample-0.5.7/debian/postrm
@@ -5,12 +5,7 @@
case $1 in
purge|remove)
if [ -d /var/run/ample ]; then
-rmdir /var/run/ample
-
- # delete override if exists
- if dpkg-statoverride --list /var/run/ample /dev/null; then
- dpkg-statoverride --remove /var/run/ample /dev/null
- fi
+rmdir /var/run/ample || true
fi
;;
upgrade|abort-upgrade|failed-upgrade|abort-install|disapper)
diff -u ample-0.5.7/debian/init.d ample-0.5.7/debian/init.d
--- ample-0.5.7/debian/init.d
+++ ample-0.5.7/debian/init.d
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
#! /bin/sh
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: ample
-# Required-Start:$network
-# Required-Stop:
+# Required-Start:$remote_fs $network
+# Required-Stop: $remote_fs
# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5
# Default-Stop: 0 1 6
# Short-Description: Ample MP3 server
# Description: Simple MP3 Server
-#
+#
### END INIT INFO
# Author: Rene Mayorga rmayo...@debian.org.sv
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@
# Read configuration variable file if it is present
[ -r /etc/default/$NAME ] . /etc/default/$NAME
-if [ -z $STARTAMPLE ] ; then
- exit 0
+if [ -z $STARTAMPLE ] ; then
+ exit 0
fi
if [ $STARTAMPLE != no ] ; then
@@ -43,6 +43,13 @@
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
+if ! [ -d /var/run/ample ] ; then
+ mkdir -p /var/run/ample || true
+ if [ -d /var/run/ample ] ; then
+ chown ${DEFUSER:-nobody}:${DEFGROUP:-nogroup} /var/run/ample
+ fi
+fi
+
do_start()
{
# Return
diff -u ample-0.5.7/debian/changelog ample-0.5.7/debian/changelog
--- ample-0.5.7/debian/changelog
+++ ample-0.5.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+ample (0.5.7-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Create /var/run/ample at startup, Thanks to Thomas Goirand for the patch.
+(Closes: #689769)
+ * Depend on $remote_fs ini init script.
+
+ -- Ulrich Dangel u...@debian.org Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:53:23 +
+
ample (0.5.7-6) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/postrm
diff -u ample-0.5.7/debian/ample.dirs ample-0.5.7/debian/ample.dirs
--- ample-0.5.7/debian/ample.dirs
+++ ample-0.5.7/debian/ample.dirs
@@ -2 +1,0 @@
-var/run/ample
Processed: ample: diff for NMU version 0.5.7-6.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 689769 + pending Bug #689769 [ample] Ample ships a /var/run/ample folder: Policy 9.3.2 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689769 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: merge 674900 672030 Bug #674900 [src:beast] beast fails to build from source ( ../doxer/doxer.py: No such file or directory) Bug #674900 [src:beast] beast fails to build from source ( ../doxer/doxer.py: No such file or directory) Added tag(s) sid, wheezy, help, and patch. Bug #672030 [src:beast] FTBFS with gcc-4.7: segfaults in lt-bseprocidl Bug #687397 [src:beast] beast: FTBFS: birnetutils.cc:725:44: error: 'access' was not declared in this scope Merged 672030 674900 687397 End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 672030: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672030 674900: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674900 687397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687397 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689882: marked as done (Ships a folder in /var/run or /var/lock (Policy Manual section 9.3.2))
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:54:03 + with message-id e1tuf6p-0008qr...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#691082: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #689882, regarding Ships a folder in /var/run or /var/lock (Policy Manual section 9.3.2) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 689882: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689882 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: bnetd Version: 0.4.25-8 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de reported in -devel that your package (as well as 27 others) ships a folder either in /var/run or /var/lock. This is forbidden by policy. Lintian detects the problem and warns as follow: /var/run may be a temporary filesystem, so any directories or files needed /there must be created dynamically at boot time. Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 9.3.2 (Writing the scripts) for details. Severity: serious, Certainty: possible Check: files, Type: binary, udeb which is why I am reporting this bug with severity serious (and there fore, release critical). Please fix your package. I have attached what I believe is a good fix the problem, however, I haven't tried it, and I haven't tested if something more for creating the necessary folder at runtime should be added. Please make sure to test before applying the patch blindly. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) diff -u bnetd-0.4.25/debian/postinst bnetd-0.4.25/debian/postinst --- bnetd-0.4.25/debian/postinst +++ bnetd-0.4.25/debian/postinst @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ ;; esac -for dir in /var/lib/bnetd/player /var/lib/bnetd/reports /var/lib/bnetd/chanlogs /var/run/bnetd; do +for dir in /var/lib/bnetd/player /var/lib/bnetd/reports /var/lib/bnetd/chanlogs; do chown games $dir done diff -u bnetd-0.4.25/debian/changelog bnetd-0.4.25/debian/changelog --- bnetd-0.4.25/debian/changelog +++ bnetd-0.4.25/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +bnetd (0.4.25-8.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Maintains /var/run/bnetd dynamically at boot time (Closes: #XX). + + -- Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org Sat, 06 Oct 2012 16:04:26 +0800 + bnetd (0.4.25-8) unstable; urgency=low * Removed bashism in init.d script (Closes: #464496) diff -u bnetd-0.4.25/debian/init bnetd-0.4.25/debian/init --- bnetd-0.4.25/debian/init +++ bnetd-0.4.25/debian/init @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ set -e +mkdir -p /var/run/bnetd || true +chown games /var/run/bnetd || true + case $1 in start) echo -n Starting $DESC: diff -u bnetd-0.4.25/debian/dirs bnetd-0.4.25/debian/dirs --- bnetd-0.4.25/debian/dirs +++ bnetd-0.4.25/debian/dirs @@ -9 +8,0 @@ -var/run/bnetd ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.4.25-8+rm Dear submitter, as the package bnetd has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/691082 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#691605: marked as done (override: multiarch-support should be priority required)
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:06:19 + with message-id e1tufih-0003z3...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#691605: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #691605, regarding override: multiarch-support should be priority required to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691605 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: multiarch-support Version: 2.13-36 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.5 Multiarch-support should have priority required: Multiarch support is a release goal for wheezy and for this the package multiarch-support exists. Due to this nature many packages pre-depends on multi-arch, including packages which have a priority of important or required. Of course, reading the policy, it would be indeed a RC-bug in the dependees but I think it is not feasible to lower the priorities of those as those are key packages. * just random examples for dependees of priority required: e2fslibs, libacl1, libmount1 coldtobi -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/3 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages multiarch-support depends on: ii libc6 2.13-36 multiarch-support recommends no packages. multiarch-support suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following changes were made to the overrides... Concerning package multiarch-support... Operating on the unstable suite Changed priority from standard to required Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#678786: Build successful
Works for me too under pbuilder sid/amd64. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692215: yatex: recommend non-free ptex-jtex and list non-existing binary packages texlive-bin gimageview jweblint
Package: yatex
Version: 1.76+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The main archive area
I admit this bug may be tagged as wheezy-ignore per wheezy release
policy
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy.txt
Also, the interpretation of policy have some room to be debated.
http://bugs.debian.org/681419
I am filing this bug under serious so you can upload fix for wheezy and
unblock request can be accepted. If you do not agree and still wish to
release this package in this state, you can downgrade bug severity to
whatever you think is right to prevent this to be removed from the
release.
Anyway, this package defines very strange package dependencies and
requires serious re-evaluation of package dependencies. Currently:
Depends: emacs23 | emacs22 | emacs21 | xemacs21-mule | xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn,
install-info
Recommends: ptex-bin | ptex-jtex, texlive-bin
Suggests: jbibtex, mendexk, jweblint | weblint, iceweasel | www-browser,
gimageview
Please note we must use the binary package name or the virtual package
name for these dependencies. Problems I can spot are the following:
emacs22Now not for wheezy. why not use virtual package emacsen?
ptex-bin Now this is replaced by texlive-lang-cjk
ptex-jtex Non-free package -- Should be in suggest field to be safe
(non-free can not be in recommends but can be in suggests.)
texlive-binSource package name. Use texlive-binaries
jbibtexNon-existing. Use jbibtex-bin ?
jweblint Non-existing. Use weblint-perl ?
gimageview Non-existing. I do not know. Drop ?
This is very broken situation. In addition to these, if we list only
texlive-binaries, it does not provide decent font supports. So
texlive-latex-recommended is something we should have for recommends.
To fix this mess, I propose attached patch to change above to:
Depends: emacs23 | emacsen, ${misc:Depends}, install-info
Recommends: texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-lang-cjk
Suggests: jbibtex-bin, mendexk, ptex-jtex, weblint-perl | weblint, iceweasel |
www-browser
Since gimageview has been removed from debian, I dropped it. If you
know some graphics viewer is suggested, you can list any pertinent
current package in suggests in addition to the above my proposal.
Anyway some update is needed to make this package in some reasonable
shape.
Regards,
Osamu
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (10, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru yatex-1.76+dfsg1.orig/debian/control yatex-1.76+dfsg1/debian/control
--- yatex-1.76+dfsg1.orig/debian/control 2012-06-15 08:54:03.0 +0900
+++ yatex-1.76+dfsg1/debian/control 2012-11-04 00:44:10.957729112 +0900
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: KURASHIKI Satoru lur...@gmail.com
Uploaders: Junichi Uekawa dan...@debian.org
DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), cdbs (= 0.4.27), nkf, texinfo, emacs23|emacs22|emacs21|xemacs21-mule|xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), cdbs (= 0.4.27), nkf, texinfo, emacs23 | emacsen
Standards-Version: 3.9.3
Homepage: http://www.yatex.org/
Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/yatex.git
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
Package: yatex
Architecture: all
-Depends: emacs23|emacs22|emacs21|xemacs21-mule|xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn, ${misc:Depends}, install-info
-Recommends: ptex-bin|ptex-jtex, texlive-bin
-Suggests: jbibtex, mendexk, jweblint|weblint, iceweasel | www-browser, gimageview
+Depends: emacs23 | emacsen, ${misc:Depends}, install-info
+Recommends: texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-lang-cjk
+Suggests: jbibtex-bin, mendexk, ptex-jtex, weblint-perl | weblint, iceweasel | www-browser
Description: Yet Another TeX mode for Emacs
YaTeX is an intelligent, acquisitive and integrated package which reduces
your efforts of composing LaTeX source on Emacs.
Bug#690153: jscribble: FTBFS: tests timeout
Hi, I have just tried to build with pbuilder for wheezy and with sbuild for wheezy and sid (all amd64). All the builds succeed. Cheers Filippo
Bug#670405: ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4`
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:07:55PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: Berto, it would be awesome if you could test Ekiga from experimental [3][4] and report back if it fixes the issues for you. I've just tried ekiga 3.9.90-1 and it seems to work now. These are the new packages that I installed: ekiga 3.9.90-1 libopal3.10.7 3.10.7~dfsg-3 libpt2.10.7 2.10.7~dfsg-1 libboost-signals1.49.0 1.49.0-3.1 I made a few test calls and it looks fine, it was unusable before this. Thanks! Berto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 683992
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 683992 + patch Bug #683992 [python-kiwi] [python-kiwi] RuntimeError: Could not find gazpacho.loader Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 683992: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683992 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#658739: Broken su/sudo/whatever - breaks systems - up goes the severity
On 2012-10-24 Joerg Jaspert jo...@debian.org wrote: [...] Maybe the rebuild without gcrypt is a solution. I don't know, I have no idea what other functionality then might be missing. Hello, It is not possible currently for Debian to use nettle instead of gcrypt for license reasons. Nettle links against gmp which is LGPLv3+, but some of the gnutls-using applications in Debian have an LGPLv3 incompatible license like GPLv2, e.g. cups. The actual issue has its proper bug-report here http://bugs.debian.org/368297 and here https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/sudo/+bug/423252, I am keeping this one assigned to gnutls as a pointer. cu Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688982: marked as done (transmageddon: Transcoding does not work)
Your message dated Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:52:52 + with message-id camhuwoxceubmcm6e0hzhmpj1sbbh1-genaitxf0xgyiwbzj...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Closing #688982 has caused the Debian Bug report #688982, regarding transmageddon: Transcoding does not work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688982: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688982 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: transmageddon Version: 0.21-1 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, when I start transmageddon, select a video, do some output settings and hit transcode, the GUI gets greyed out, writes Transcoding Progress but the program does not do any transcoding. I've tested several input files (with different codecs) and output settings, same behaviour. I've successfully used transmageddon some time ago. On the command line transmageddon reports the following error: transmageddon Gtk-Message: Failed to load module canberra-gtk-module XDG video or audio directory not available audiopasstoggle False Traceback (most recent call last): File transmageddon.py, line 865, in on_transcodebutton_clicked self._start_transcoding() File transmageddon.py, line 737, in _start_transcoding self.videopasstoggle, self.interlaced, self.inputvideocaps) File /usr/share/transmageddon/transcoder_engine.py, line 61, in __init__ gst.preset_set_app_dir(/usr/share/transmageddon/presets/) AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'preset_set_app_dir' If this problem is specific to my computer, please downgrade severity. Best regards Ben -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages transmageddon depends on: ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad 0.10.23-7 ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-base 0.10.36-1 ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-good 0.10.31-3 ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly 0.10.19-2+b2 ii python 2.7.3-2 ii python-gobject 3.2.2-1 ii python-gst0.10 0.10.22-3 ii python-gtk2 2.24.0-3 Versions of packages transmageddon recommends: ii gnome-codec-install 0.4.7+nmu1 Versions of packages transmageddon suggests: ii gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 1:0.10.13-dmo1 -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.25-1 Fixed in transmageddon 0.25-1. Thanks. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A---End Message---
Bug#688982: Closing #688982
Version: 0.25-1 Fixed in transmageddon 0.25-1. Thanks. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test, org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed
Hi, Here's what I found out so far about this bug. Unsetting the DISPLAY environment variable works around the FTBFS error by skipping the failing Junit tests. However, unsetting DISPLAY is not the preferable/acceptable solution, as it simply skips the failing tests. Check out the build.xml. Several tests are only conditionally executed, depending on whether DISPLAY is set: i.e. test name=org.jdesktop.application.BadSessionStateTest if=have.display/ where property have.display is conditionally set earlier on based on: isset property=env.DISPLAY/ I turned to debugging the Junit tests and determined that the following tests are failing: test name=org.jdesktop.application.BadSessionStateTest if=have.display/ test name=org.jdesktop.application.CustomPropertySupportTest if=have.display/ Cheers, - Matteo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix the bug #665199 Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable. However, the changelog note is not really descriptive enough: * Fix a bug while upgrading from squeeze to wheezy (Closes: #665199). Could you be a bit clearer? Something along the lines of regenerate slapd database in postinst during upgrade process would be good. i've upload an updated package with better changlelog, same url thanks
Bug#670405: ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4`
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 02:43 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: The original closure report only closed the bug for the version in experimental, the bug was still listed as open in unstable: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=ekiga;dist=unstable reopening is not the way to indicate it effects specific versions, rather please use the 'found' element of bts. It distorts udd views. I'm fixing that so we have a better view of what needs really needs fixing: http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy_and_sidmerged=igndone=onlyfnewerval=7rc=1sortby=idsorto=ascctags=1cdeferred=1 That sounds like the query needs fixing. Mark is correct that reopening is not correct in these cases - for one thing, it removes the indication that the bug has already been resolved in experimental. I haven't checked if you've been re-adding the fixed versions for the bugs you've re-opened; if not, please do. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689884: Bug#692157: couriergraph: diff for NMU version 0.25-4.2
Hi Jose On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jose Luis Tallón wrote: El 02/11/12 20:26, Salvatore Bonaccorso escribió: Package: couriergraph Version: 0.25-4.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for couriergraph (versioned as 0.25-4.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Perfectly fine. Thank you very much, Salvatore. Thank you for your feedback, then I will leave it this way and will be uploaded to the archive in time. Would you be willing to sponsor a regular upload (to unstable) in which we include all fixes, plus a couple enhancements? Are there fixes needed for the wheezy release? We are in freeze, thus if possible only uploads following the rules in [1] are preferred. I can try to help you sponsoring in such case yes. [1]: http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html Does this helps? Regards, Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test, org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest, failed
The first failing test is BadSessionStateTest. The first exception in the log is actually expected: [junit] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0 [junit] at com.sun.beans.ObjectHandler.dequeueResult(ObjectHandler.java:189) [junit] at java.beans.XMLDecoder.readObject(XMLDecoder.java:223) [junit] at org.jdesktop.application.LocalStorage.load(LocalStorage.java:197) [junit] at org.jdesktop.application.SessionStorage.restore(SessionStorage.java:381) [junit] at This exception is the result of trying to load a malformed session file, which is expected to fail. Further down the stack trace, there appears to be a hint on what is actually going wrong: [junit] java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException [junit] at java.awt.EventQueue.invokeAndWait(EventQueue.java:1068) [junit] at javax.swing.SwingUtilities.invokeAndWait(SwingUtilities.java:1347) [junit] at org.jdesktop.application.BadSessionStateTest.testBadSessionState(BadSessionStateTest.java:101) [junit] Caused by: java.lang.StackOverflowError [junit] at java.beans.Statement.invokeInternal(Statement.java:257) [junit] at java.beans.Statement.access$000(Statement.java:56) [junit] at java.beans.Statement$2.run(Statement.java:158) [junit] at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) [junit] at java.beans.Statement.invoke(Statement.java:154) [junit] at java.beans.Expression.getValue(Expression.java:115) [junit] at java.beans.DefaultPersistenceDelegate.doProperty(DefaultPersistenceDelegate.java:227) [junit] at java.beans.DefaultPersistenceDelegate.initBean(DefaultPersistenceDelegate.java:264) [junit] at java.beans.DefaultPersistenceDelegate.initialize(DefaultPersistenceDelegate.java:408) [junit] at java.beans.PersistenceDelegate.writeObject(PersistenceDelegate.java:116) [junit] at java.beans.Encoder.writeObject(Encoder.java:74) Cheers, - Matteo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692110: marked as done ([ifupdown] ifupdown renders system unbootable)
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:17:30 + with message-id e1tuihi-0007cr...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#692110: fixed in ifupdown 0.7.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #692110, regarding [ifupdown] ifupdown renders system unbootable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 692110: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692110 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ifupdown Version: 0.7.4 Severity: critical --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, after updating some packages yesterday the system did not boot any more today. The boot sequence always just stopped after resolvconf. The system would not do anything else than respond to Ctrl+Alt+Del for reboot. After some fiddeling around I realised that booting with the .legacy- bootordering file in place would work but issue an error message in /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart that the return statement in line 15 is not allowed. Initially Version 0.7.3 was installed. Ubdating to 0.7.4 did not change the situation. Even downgrading did not remove the defective files. I now purged ifupdown and reinstalled 0.7.2 which works again. HTH Christian --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae Debian Release: wheezy/sid 500 unstableftp2.de.debian.org 500 unstableftp.deb-multimedia.org 500 stable repo.wuala.com 1 experimentalftp2.de.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ===-+- iproute (= 20071016-1) | 20120521-3 libc6 (= 2.7) | 2.13-35 lsb-base| 4.1+Debian7 initscripts (= 2.88dsf-25) | 2.88dsf-32 Package's Recommends field is empty. Suggests (Version) | Installed ==-+-=== isc-dhcp-client| 4.2.4-2 OR dhcp-client| ppp| 2.4.5-5.1+b1 rdnssd | net-tools | 1.60-24.2 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ifupdown Source-Version: 0.7.5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ifupdown, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 692...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andrew O. Shadura bugzi...@tut.by (supplier of updated ifupdown package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 18:30:19 +0100 Source: ifupdown Binary: ifupdown Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.7.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew O. Shadura bugzi...@tut.by Changed-By: Andrew O. Shadura bugzi...@tut.by Description: ifupdown - high level tools to configure network interfaces Closes: 692110 Changes: ifupdown (0.7.5) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix upstart hooks (Closes: #692110). Checksums-Sha1: 6a696b7f4b9bb068add1ff460ab783394a6f6e78 1588 ifupdown_0.7.5.dsc 0de67e35a171d3804ea02c9b7075ade4cb6a4846 104104 ifupdown_0.7.5.tar.gz 17ad81bf085b77cab930a297cf68fb7ec28e590a 64252 ifupdown_0.7.5_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 42bb76dbc4b621e31e3211e081d56658459d0af8d30501b8e3d06e22c96a6f8a 1588 ifupdown_0.7.5.dsc 7f2253dbbb2716644c8efe5ef9b75fc2bd0cf828f895f69aed17ceb453c2be4c 104104 ifupdown_0.7.5.tar.gz 8923e484c448d94546fc6c3bcf8959bf480be9832083cbcd9c77568fbef5e01e 64252 ifupdown_0.7.5_amd64.deb Files: 7ae63e0e1e72d6517706a2f74a60b868 1588 admin important ifupdown_0.7.5.dsc 44f15efc1bf4499cea53d6db6f269bf4 104104 admin important ifupdown_0.7.5.tar.gz da7442d40edd5ee5b2bf72eb3ee27d87 64252 admin important ifupdown_0.7.5_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQlVveAAoJEOJSSsUKn1xZHYsP/0npmqSSqnISRU8kOf2H3zA2 99Wxzxt99dAGObF/DnaHyvlmvkzw3iNM8kKnE6FPpMRK3oWOXC046vZp3I90/PST zD455tC5cCOchSzBwZ5LtIEc9MjpcnHhtR5JwITXprhskoqDqOumJVYHlkwYk57+ jVfcczSwb4Tfsvkmm6oNida59OmmsWFTdrnOx7gRzCdBRycgs4hGcBcUYZC+/vaL smsWv0kmBDvma5hbNltMfYC4eGLL+bCH9yu253Hkr227TVTRW+0yUx/w2lizX7MB
Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed
Hi, The stack trace led me to suspect the root cause of the issue lies in the java.beans package. I built the bsaf sources and tests with the default jdk (/usr/lib/jvm/default-java - java-6-openjdk) and then ran the entire testsuite with openjdk-7-jdk by changing the exported JAVA_HOME to /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64 All tests passed with openjdk-7. Cheers, - Matteo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: re: yatex: recommend non-free ptex-jtex
Processing control commands: severity -1 important Bug #692215 [yatex] yatex: recommend non-free ptex-jtex and list non-existing binary packages texlive-bin gimageview jweblint Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 692215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692215 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692215: yatex: recommend non-free ptex-jtex
control: severity -1 important ptex-jtex Non-free package -- Should be in suggest field to be safe (non-free can not be in recommends but can be in suggests.) Until the Tech Committee makes a decision on #681419, which will only apply to jessie and later anyway, this is allowable. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: re: CVE-2012-2090 / CVE-2012-2091
Processing control commands: severity -1 serious Bug #669024 [simgear] CVE-2012-2090 / CVE-2012-2091 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 669024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669024 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682050: fails to connect to server using non default port
I agree with Josh's assessment. As I noted in 668239, different host keys for different ports on the same server are clearly documented in the OpenSSH man page. Hence, the assessment in the initial bugreport and hostkey.patch are clearly wrong. I tested dropping hostkey.patch and this makes paramiko work again with non-standard port settings. Maybe the problem described in the original report is due to the behaviour mentioned in http://lwn.net/Articles/222649/? [See also https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910]. This fallback behaviour seems to be not present in paramiko and is not adressed by the current patch. So can we get a new version with the wrong patch reverted? It makes the situation worse than before. -- Lars -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: re: CVE-2012-2090 / CVE-2012-2091
Processing control commands: severity -1 serious Bug #669025 [flightgear] CVE-2012-2090 / CVE-2012-2091 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 669025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669025 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662746: marked as done (mingw32-ocaml: fails to upgrade from squeeze)
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:02:36 + with message-id e1tuizm-0001jp...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#662746: fixed in mingw-ocaml 3.12.1+debian3 has caused the Debian Bug report #662746, regarding mingw32-ocaml: fails to upgrade from squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 662746: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662746 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: mingw32-ocaml Version: 3.12.1+debian2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'squeeze'. It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'wheezy' fails. From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): 1m0.4s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY', 'apt-get', '-yf', 'dist-upgrade'] 1m39.8s DUMP: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following NEW packages will be installed: cpp-4.6 gcc-4.6 gcc-4.6-base libdb5.1 libgmp10 liblzma5 libmount1 libmpc2 libpam-modules-bin libquadmath0 libsemanage-common libsemanage1 libtinfo-dev libtinfo5 libustr-1.0-1 mingw-w64-dev multiarch-support ucf The following packages have been kept back: mingw32-ocaml The following packages will be upgraded: apt base-files base-passwd bash binutils bsdutils coreutils cpp cpp-4.4 dash debconf debconf-i18n debianutils diffutils dpkg e2fslibs e2fsprogs findutils gcc gcc-4.4 gcc-4.4-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip hostname initscripts insserv libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libbz2-1.0 libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i386 libcomerr2 libdb4.8 libfindlib-ocaml libfindlib-ocaml-dev libgcc1 libgdbm3 libgomp1 liblocale-gettext-perl libmpfr4 libncurses5 libncurses5-dev libpam-modules libpam-runtime libpam0g libreadline6 libselinux1 libsepol1 libslang2 libss2 libstdc++6 libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libusb-0.1-4 libuuid1 linux-libc-dev login lsb-base mawk mingw32-binutils mount ncurses-base ncurses-bin ocaml-base-nox ocaml-findlib ocaml-interp ocaml-nox passwd perl-base readline-common sed sensible-utils sysv-rc sysvinit sysvinit-utils tar tzdata util-linux xz-utils zlib1g 86 upgraded, 18 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. [...] 1m0.4s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY', 'apt-get', '-yf', 'dist-upgrade'] 1m39.8s DUMP: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following NEW packages will be installed: cpp-4.6 gcc-4.6 gcc-4.6-base libdb5.1 libgmp10 liblzma5 libmount1 libmpc2 libpam-modules-bin libquadmath0 libsemanage-common libsemanage1 libtinfo-dev libtinfo5 libustr-1.0-1 mingw-w64-dev multiarch-support ucf The following packages have been kept back: mingw32-ocaml The following packages will be upgraded: apt base-files base-passwd bash binutils bsdutils coreutils cpp cpp-4.4 dash debconf debconf-i18n debianutils diffutils dpkg e2fslibs e2fsprogs findutils gcc gcc-4.4 gcc-4.4-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip hostname initscripts insserv libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libbz2-1.0 libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i386 libcomerr2 libdb4.8 libfindlib-ocaml libfindlib-ocaml-dev libgcc1 libgdbm3 libgomp1 liblocale-gettext-perl libmpfr4 libncurses5 libncurses5-dev libpam-modules libpam-runtime libpam0g libreadline6 libselinux1 libsepol1 libslang2 libss2 libstdc++6 libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libusb-0.1-4 libuuid1 linux-libc-dev login lsb-base mawk mingw32-binutils mount ncurses-base ncurses-bin ocaml-base-nox ocaml-findlib ocaml-interp ocaml-nox passwd perl-base readline-common sed sensible-utils sysv-rc sysvinit sysvinit-utils tar tzdata util-linux xz-utils zlib1g 86 upgraded, 18 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. [...] 1m40.5s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY', 'apt-cache', 'policy', 'mingw32-ocaml'] 1m40.5s DUMP: mingw32-ocaml: Installed: 3.11.2+debian4 Candidate: 3.12.1+debian2 Version table: 3.12.1+debian2 0 500 http://piatti.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages *** 3.11.2+debian4 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1m40.5s DEBUG: Command ok: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY', 'apt-cache', 'policy', 'mingw32-ocaml'] 1m40.5s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY',
Processed: tagging 668239
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # This bug appears to have a wheezy tag without reason # the version info appears to be sufficient tags 668239 - wheezy Bug #668239 [python-paramiko] host key handling broken when port!=22 Removed tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 668239: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668239 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659489: Info
Hi, I was checking this bug today. I was able to reproduce the bug, but then once I entered some other account info, it didn't appear again... I will try again. Apart from that, the problem you're having about auth errors is not a bug, it's just that you don't have all the information for a successful login, which is caused by the bug in the smtp window. Maintainer, this bug has been open for 9 months without any activity. Are you still interested in keeping this package? -- Martín Ferrari -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing
Processing control commands: severity -1 serious Bug #687693 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' tags -1 pending Bug #687693 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Added tag(s) pending. -- 687693: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687693 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678786: marked as done (haskell-llvm-base: FTBFS: error: 'class llvm::SMDiagnostic' has no member named 'Print')
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:05:43 +0100 with message-id 1351976743.6630.17.camel@kirk and subject line Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#678786: Build successful has caused the Debian Bug report #678786, regarding haskell-llvm-base: FTBFS: error: 'class llvm::SMDiagnostic' has no member named 'Print' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678786: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678786 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: haskell-llvm-base Version: 3.0.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules build test -x debian/rules mkdir -p . /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:109: WARNING: DEB_COMPRESS_EXCLUDE is a deprecated variable if test ! -e Setup.lhs -a ! -e Setup.hs; then echo No setup script found!; exit 1; fi for setup in Setup.lhs Setup.hs; do if test -e $setup; then ghc --make $setup -o debian/hlibrary.setup; exit 0; fi; done [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( Setup.hs, Setup.o ) Linking debian/hlibrary.setup ... debian/hlibrary.setup configure --ghc -v2 \ --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc/lib \ --builddir=dist-ghc \ --haddockdir=/usr/lib/ghc-doc/haddock/llvm-base-3.0.1.0/ \ --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/libghc-llvm-base-doc/html/ --enable-library-profiling \ Configuring llvm-base-3.0.1.0... Flags chosen: developer=False Dependency base =3 5: using base-4.5.0.0 Using Cabal-1.14.0 compiled by ghc-7.4 Using compiler: ghc-7.4.1 Using install prefix: /usr Binaries installed in: /usr/bin Libraries installed in: /usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc/lib/llvm-base-3.0.1.0/ghc-7.4.1 Private binaries installed in: /usr/libexec Data files installed in: /usr/share/llvm-base-3.0.1.0 Documentation installed in: /usr/share/doc/llvm-base-3.0.1.0 No alex found Using ar found on system at: /usr/bin/ar No c2hs found No cpphs found No ffihugs found Using gcc version 4.7 found on system at: /usr/bin/gcc Using ghc version 7.4.1 found on system at: /usr/bin/ghc Using ghc-pkg version 7.4.1 found on system at: /usr/bin/ghc-pkg No greencard found Using haddock version 2.10.0 found on system at: /usr/bin/haddock No happy found No hmake found Using hpc version 0.6 found on system at: /usr/bin/hpc Using hsc2hs version 0.67 found on system at: /usr/bin/hsc2hs Using hscolour version 1.19 found on system at: /usr/bin/HsColour No hugs found No jhc found Using ld found on system at: /usr/bin/ld No lhc found No lhc-pkg found No nhc98 found No pkg-config found Using ranlib found on system at: /usr/bin/ranlib Using strip found on system at: /usr/bin/strip Using tar found on system at: /bin/tar No uhc found sh configure --with-compiler=ghc --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc/lib --with-gcc=/usr/bin/gcc configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-gcc checking for g++... g++ checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes checking for C++ compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking for llvm-config... /usr/bin/llvm-config Target platform inferred as: x86_64-unknown-linux checking for library containing LLVMModuleCreateWithName... no checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking llvm-c/Core.h usability... yes checking llvm-c/Core.h presence... yes checking for llvm-c/Core.h... yes checking llvm/ADT/StringRef.h usability... yes checking llvm/ADT/StringRef.h presence... yes checking for llvm/ADT/StringRef.h... yes checking for llvm/Support/DynamicLibrary.h... yes checking for LLVMModuleCreateWithName in -lLLVMCore... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating llvm-base.buildinfo config.status:
Processed: forcibly merging 638339 692228
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 638339 692228 Bug #638339 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Bug #651747 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Bug #668348 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Bug #689729 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Bug #692228 [blcr-dkms] dist-upgrade: Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.2.0-4-486 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' There is no source info for the package 'blcr-dkms' at version '0.8.2-15ubuntu1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '0.8.2-15ubuntu1' Marked as found in versions 0.8.2-15ubuntu1, blcr/0.8.4-1, blcr/0.8.2-15, and blcr/0.8.4-2. Added tag(s) sid, wheezy, confirmed, and help. Bug #651747 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Bug #668348 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Bug #689729 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Merged 638339 651747 668348 689729 692228 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 638339: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638339 651747: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651747 668348: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668348 689729: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689729 692228: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692228 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#666468: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 +
with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666468,
regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libcairo2:amd64
Version: 1.12.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libcairo2:amd64 1.12.0-2 yield major display problems in iceweasel
(and perhaps other applications). See attached snapshot for an example
of what I get (such text corruption also affects the tabs and the
menu). No such problems if I revert libcairo2 to 1.10.2-7.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libcairo2:amd64 depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-27
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3.1
ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1
ii libpixman-1-0 0.24.4-1
ii libpng12-0 1.2.47-2
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-4
ii libxcb-render0 1.8.1-1
ii libxcb-shm01.8.1-1
ii libxcb11.8.1-1
ii libxrender11:0.9.6-2
ii multiarch-support 2.13-27
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2
libcairo2:amd64 recommends no packages.
libcairo2:amd64 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
attachment: display.png---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xorg-server
Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg
xserver-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2:1.12.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Description:
xdmx - distributed multihead X server
xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools
xnest - Nested X server
xserver-common - common files used by various X servers
xserver-xephyr - nested X server
xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server
xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server
xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols)
xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb)
xserver-xorg-dev - Xorg X server - development files
xvfb - Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server
Closes: 666468 685750 689246
Changes:
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Xephyr command line option parsing (closes: #689246). Thanks, Andrzej
Pietrasiewicz!
* Restore {in,out}{b,w,l} on ia64 (closes: #685750). Thanks, Stephan
Schreiber!
* EXA: Fall back earlier and more thoroughly from exaGlyphs (closes:
#666468). Patch by Michel Dänzer stolen from upstream bugzilla.
Checksums-Sha1:
39bdb9f7b96fcec22b56797ba80ceb90fbe841aa 4095 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.dsc
b98dfec1add259d9606cc415e5c21803def0813e 88877 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.diff.gz
35cc27ec6236b86712c9bf136119054b7f531ec4 1395468
xserver-common_1.12.4-2_all.deb
2ae7c8682e970ed6b3815e420467767f34226dcb 1761186
xserver-xorg-core_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
2096b8894566bfaeb99e9163e0fa0572fd8a7d0d 867068
xserver-xorg-core-udeb_1.12.4-2_amd64.udeb
f8dfad09b85e2c408a3c906c8879e8fd3f3ce15f 319568
xserver-xorg-dev_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
4f367ca1928987998e8c088dc1816932bc8346aa 922404 xdmx_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
Bug#666538: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 +
with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666468,
regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libcairo2
Version: 1.12.0-2
Severity: normal
While with 1.10.2-7 everything is rendered ok, with 1.12.0 text in iceweasel
output sometimes gets slanted or replaced with black box.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=be_BY.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=be_BY.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages libcairo2 depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-27
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3.1
ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1
ii libpixman-1-0 0.24.4-1
ii libpng12-0 1.2.47-2
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-4
ii libxcb-render0 1.8.1-1
ii libxcb-shm01.8.1-1
ii libxcb11.8.1-1
ii libxrender11:0.9.6-2
ii multiarch-support 2.13-27
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2
libcairo2 recommends no packages.
libcairo2 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xorg-server
Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg
xserver-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2:1.12.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Description:
xdmx - distributed multihead X server
xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools
xnest - Nested X server
xserver-common - common files used by various X servers
xserver-xephyr - nested X server
xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server
xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server
xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols)
xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb)
xserver-xorg-dev - Xorg X server - development files
xvfb - Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server
Closes: 666468 685750 689246
Changes:
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Xephyr command line option parsing (closes: #689246). Thanks, Andrzej
Pietrasiewicz!
* Restore {in,out}{b,w,l} on ia64 (closes: #685750). Thanks, Stephan
Schreiber!
* EXA: Fall back earlier and more thoroughly from exaGlyphs (closes:
#666468). Patch by Michel Dänzer stolen from upstream bugzilla.
Checksums-Sha1:
39bdb9f7b96fcec22b56797ba80ceb90fbe841aa 4095 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.dsc
b98dfec1add259d9606cc415e5c21803def0813e 88877 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.diff.gz
35cc27ec6236b86712c9bf136119054b7f531ec4 1395468
xserver-common_1.12.4-2_all.deb
2ae7c8682e970ed6b3815e420467767f34226dcb 1761186
xserver-xorg-core_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
2096b8894566bfaeb99e9163e0fa0572fd8a7d0d 867068
xserver-xorg-core-udeb_1.12.4-2_amd64.udeb
f8dfad09b85e2c408a3c906c8879e8fd3f3ce15f 319568
xserver-xorg-dev_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
4f367ca1928987998e8c088dc1816932bc8346aa 922404 xdmx_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
deaf92e2b076464ad3e2460d47bc62d0888fb35b 125010 xdmx-tools_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
a313d86029116e677aae23adc39868ab75ac30c4 820934 xnest_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
3380e13068322600dcf7dc89dee57795d2662abf 924594 xvfb_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
Bug#666564: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 +
with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666468,
regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libcairo2
Version: 1.10.2-7
Severity: important
Scrambled text and other screen artifacts. Reported upstream:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-rc7+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages libcairo2 depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-27
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3.1
ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1
ii libpixman-1-0 0.24.4-1
ii libpng12-0 1.2.47-2
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-4
ii libxcb-render0 1.8.1-1
ii libxcb-shm01.8.1-1
ii libxcb11.8.1-1
ii libxrender11:0.9.6-2
ii multiarch-support 2.13-27
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2
libcairo2 recommends no packages.
libcairo2 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
-- debsums errors found:
debsums: package libcairo2 is not installed
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xorg-server
Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg
xserver-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2:1.12.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Description:
xdmx - distributed multihead X server
xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools
xnest - Nested X server
xserver-common - common files used by various X servers
xserver-xephyr - nested X server
xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server
xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server
xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols)
xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb)
xserver-xorg-dev - Xorg X server - development files
xvfb - Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server
Closes: 666468 685750 689246
Changes:
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Xephyr command line option parsing (closes: #689246). Thanks, Andrzej
Pietrasiewicz!
* Restore {in,out}{b,w,l} on ia64 (closes: #685750). Thanks, Stephan
Schreiber!
* EXA: Fall back earlier and more thoroughly from exaGlyphs (closes:
#666468). Patch by Michel Dänzer stolen from upstream bugzilla.
Checksums-Sha1:
39bdb9f7b96fcec22b56797ba80ceb90fbe841aa 4095 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.dsc
b98dfec1add259d9606cc415e5c21803def0813e 88877 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.diff.gz
35cc27ec6236b86712c9bf136119054b7f531ec4 1395468
xserver-common_1.12.4-2_all.deb
2ae7c8682e970ed6b3815e420467767f34226dcb 1761186
xserver-xorg-core_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
2096b8894566bfaeb99e9163e0fa0572fd8a7d0d 867068
xserver-xorg-core-udeb_1.12.4-2_amd64.udeb
f8dfad09b85e2c408a3c906c8879e8fd3f3ce15f 319568
xserver-xorg-dev_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
4f367ca1928987998e8c088dc1816932bc8346aa 922404 xdmx_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
deaf92e2b076464ad3e2460d47bc62d0888fb35b 125010 xdmx-tools_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
a313d86029116e677aae23adc39868ab75ac30c4 820934 xnest_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
3380e13068322600dcf7dc89dee57795d2662abf 924594
Bug#666998: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 +
with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666468,
regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libcairo2
Version: 1.10.2-7
Severity: important
Using updated libcairo2 1.12.0-2 text becomes distorted and garbage.
Using chromium browser tab names are unreadable.
Using Thunar file manager text for file names becomes unreadable and garbage.
Definitely Installed: 1.10.2-7
does not show this behaviour.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.3-0.slh.6-aptosid-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libcairo2 depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-27
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3.1
ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1
ii libpixman-1-0 0.24.4-1
ii libpng12-0 1.2.47-2
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-4
ii libxcb-render0 1.8.1-1
ii libxcb-shm01.8.1-1
ii libxcb11.8.1-1
ii libxrender11:0.9.6-2
ii multiarch-support 2.13-27
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2
libcairo2 recommends no packages.
libcairo2 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
-- debsums errors found:
debsums: package libcairo2 is not installed
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xorg-server
Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg
xserver-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2:1.12.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Description:
xdmx - distributed multihead X server
xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools
xnest - Nested X server
xserver-common - common files used by various X servers
xserver-xephyr - nested X server
xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server
xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server
xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols)
xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb)
xserver-xorg-dev - Xorg X server - development files
xvfb - Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server
Closes: 666468 685750 689246
Changes:
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Xephyr command line option parsing (closes: #689246). Thanks, Andrzej
Pietrasiewicz!
* Restore {in,out}{b,w,l} on ia64 (closes: #685750). Thanks, Stephan
Schreiber!
* EXA: Fall back earlier and more thoroughly from exaGlyphs (closes:
#666468). Patch by Michel Dänzer stolen from upstream bugzilla.
Checksums-Sha1:
39bdb9f7b96fcec22b56797ba80ceb90fbe841aa 4095 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.dsc
b98dfec1add259d9606cc415e5c21803def0813e 88877 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.diff.gz
35cc27ec6236b86712c9bf136119054b7f531ec4 1395468
xserver-common_1.12.4-2_all.deb
2ae7c8682e970ed6b3815e420467767f34226dcb 1761186
xserver-xorg-core_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
2096b8894566bfaeb99e9163e0fa0572fd8a7d0d 867068
xserver-xorg-core-udeb_1.12.4-2_amd64.udeb
f8dfad09b85e2c408a3c906c8879e8fd3f3ce15f 319568
xserver-xorg-dev_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
4f367ca1928987998e8c088dc1816932bc8346aa 922404 xdmx_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
deaf92e2b076464ad3e2460d47bc62d0888fb35b 125010
Bug#667033: marked as done (vim-gtk: Invisible text)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding vim-gtk: Invisible text to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: vim-gtk Version: 2:7.3.429-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outcome did you expect instead? *** End of the template - remove these lines *** Text in gvim is mostly invisible as if it's being printed in white on white. If I load a file it may start off showing some or all of the text normally, but when I move the cursor over it, or scroll, it disappears. All syntax modes seem to be affected, and running with -U NONE -N gave the same symptoms. vim-gnome is also affected. I happened to notice that if I load files containing the GPL, the phrase MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE (nearly) always stands out ie printed normally while surrounding text is invisible. While selecting that piece of text with the mouse to paste it here it became invisible with a grey background, but all the surrounding text that fitted within that screen suddenly appeared. -- Package-specific info: --- real paths of main Vim binaries --- /usr/bin/vi is /usr/bin/vim.gnome /usr/bin/vim is /usr/bin/vim.gnome /usr/bin/gvim is /usr/bin/vim.gtk -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages vim-gtk depends on: ii libacl1 2.2.51-5 ii libc6 2.13-27 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.0-2 ii libglib2.0-02.32.0-3 ii libgpm2 1.20.4-4 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1 ii libice6 2:1.0.7-2 ii liblua5.1-0 5.1.5-1 ii libpango1.0-0 1.30.0-1 ii libperl5.14 5.14.2-9 ii libpython2.72.7.3~rc2-1 ii libruby1.8 1.8.7.352-2 ii libselinux1 2.1.9-4 ii libsm6 2:1.2.0-2 ii libtinfo5 5.9-5 ii libx11-62:1.4.4-4 ii libxt6 1:1.1.1-2 ii tcl8.5 8.5.11-1 ii vim-common 2:7.3.429-2 ii vim-gui-common 2:7.3.429-2 ii vim-runtime 2:7.3.429-2 vim-gtk recommends no packages. Versions of packages vim-gtk suggests: pn cscopenone pn gnome-icon-theme 3.4.0-2 pn ttf-dejavu2.33-2 pn vim-doc none -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xorg-server Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200 Source: xorg-server Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg xserver-common Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2:1.12.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Description: xdmx - distributed multihead X server xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools xnest - Nested X server xserver-common - common files used by various X servers xserver-xephyr - nested X server xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X
Bug#667073: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libreoffice Version: 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? - start soffice from terminal * What was the outcome of this action? - menu items show without (visible) font, only underscores visible * What outcome did you expect instead? - readable menus *** End of the template - remove these lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libreoffice depends on: ii fonts-sil-gentium-basic [ttf-sil-gentium-basic] 1.1-5 ii liblucene2-java 2.9.4+ds1-4 ii libreoffice-base 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii libreoffice-calc 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii libreoffice-core 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii libreoffice-draw 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii libreoffice-filter-mobiledev 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii libreoffice-impress 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii libreoffice-java-common 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii libreoffice-math 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii libreoffice-report-builder-bin 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii libreoffice-writer 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 ii ttf-dejavu 2.33-2 ii ttf-sil-gentium-basic1.1-5 Versions of packages libreoffice recommends: ii fonts-liberation [ttf-liberation] 1.07.2-2 ii libpaper-utils 1.1.24+nmu1 ii ttf-liberation 1.07.2-2 ii ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4 Versions of packages libreoffice suggests: pn cups-bsd 1.5.2-9 pn default-jre [java5-runtime]1:1.6-47 pn gcj-4.4-jre [java5-runtime]4.4.7-1 pn gcj-4.6-jre [java5-runtime]4.6.3-1 pn gcj-4.7-jre [java5-runtime]4.7.0-1 pn gcj-jre [java5-runtime]4:4.7.0-4 pn gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 1:0.10.13-0.2 pn gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad 0.10.23-1 pn gstreamer0.10-plugins-base 0.10.36-1 pn gstreamer0.10-plugins-good 0.10.31-1 pn gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly 0.10.19-1 pn hunspell-dictionarynone pn hyphen-hyphenation-patternsnone pn iceape [iceape-browser]2.7.3-2 pn iceweasel 10.0.3esr-3 pn imagemagick8:6.7.4.0-3 pn libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 7.11.2-1 pn libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.2 pn libreoffice-filter-binfilter 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 pn libreoffice-gnome 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 pn libreoffice-help-en-us [libreoffice-help-3.5] 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 pn libreoffice-l10n-3.5 none pn libreoffice-officebean 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 pn libsane1.0.22-7 pn libxrender11:0.9.6-2 pn myspell-en-us [myspell-dictionary] 1:3.3.0-3 pn mythes-en-us [mythes-thesaurus]1:3.3.0-3 pn openclipart-libreofficenone pn openjdk-6-jre [java5-runtime] 6b24-1.11.1-3 pn pstoedit 3.60-2 pn unixodbc none Versions of packages libreoffice-core depends on: ii fontconfig 2.8.0-3.1 ii fonts-opensymbol [ttf-opensymbol]
Bug#667445: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 +
with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666468,
regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libreoffice-gtk
Version: 1:3.5.2~rc2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Fonts in menus and dropdown lists in LibreOffice applications are not
rendering, leaving the menus and lists unusable. This renders LibeOffice
unusable in all cases unless you happen to have memorized menu shortcuts.
A link to a sample screenshot:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/405/screenshotat20120403230.png/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libreoffice-gtk depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0 2.4.0-2
ii libc6 2.13-27
ii libcairo2 1.12.0-2
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3.1
ii libfreetype62.4.9-1
ii libgcc1 1:4.7.0-1
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.0-2
ii libglib2.0-02.32.0-3
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1
ii libice6 2:1.0.7-2
ii libicu484.8.1.1-5
ii libpango1.0-0 1.30.0-1
ii libreoffice-core1:3.5.2~rc2-1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.0-2
ii libstdc++6 4.7.0-1
ii libx11-62:1.4.4-4
ii libxext62:1.3.0-3
ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-7
ii uno-libs3 3.5.2~rc2-1
ii ure 3.5.2~rc2-1
Versions of packages libreoffice-gtk recommends:
ii libreoffice-style-tango 1:3.5.2~rc2-1
libreoffice-gtk suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xorg-server
Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg
xserver-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2:1.12.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Description:
xdmx - distributed multihead X server
xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools
xnest - Nested X server
xserver-common - common files used by various X servers
xserver-xephyr - nested X server
xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server
xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server
xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols)
xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb)
xserver-xorg-dev - Xorg X server - development files
xvfb - Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server
Closes: 666468 685750 689246
Changes:
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Xephyr command line option parsing (closes: #689246). Thanks, Andrzej
Pietrasiewicz!
* Restore {in,out}{b,w,l} on ia64 (closes: #685750). Thanks, Stephan
Schreiber!
* EXA: Fall back earlier and more thoroughly from exaGlyphs (closes:
#666468). Patch by Michel Dänzer stolen from upstream bugzilla.
Checksums-Sha1:
39bdb9f7b96fcec22b56797ba80ceb90fbe841aa 4095 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.dsc
b98dfec1add259d9606cc415e5c21803def0813e 88877 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.diff.gz
35cc27ec6236b86712c9bf136119054b7f531ec4 1395468
xserver-common_1.12.4-2_all.deb
Bug#667520: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 +
with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666468,
regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: LibreOffice
Version: 3.5.2~rc2-1
Informations from menus of LibreOffice (as Open, Save As, Save and all other)
have disapearded, no letters, no more shortcuts.
I'm using GNU/Linux AptoSid, kernel 3.3-0.slh.6-aptosid-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xorg-server
Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg
xserver-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2:1.12.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Description:
xdmx - distributed multihead X server
xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools
xnest - Nested X server
xserver-common - common files used by various X servers
xserver-xephyr - nested X server
xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server
xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server
xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols)
xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb)
xserver-xorg-dev - Xorg X server - development files
xvfb - Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server
Closes: 666468 685750 689246
Changes:
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Xephyr command line option parsing (closes: #689246). Thanks, Andrzej
Pietrasiewicz!
* Restore {in,out}{b,w,l} on ia64 (closes: #685750). Thanks, Stephan
Schreiber!
* EXA: Fall back earlier and more thoroughly from exaGlyphs (closes:
#666468). Patch by Michel Dänzer stolen from upstream bugzilla.
Checksums-Sha1:
39bdb9f7b96fcec22b56797ba80ceb90fbe841aa 4095 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.dsc
b98dfec1add259d9606cc415e5c21803def0813e 88877 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.diff.gz
35cc27ec6236b86712c9bf136119054b7f531ec4 1395468
xserver-common_1.12.4-2_all.deb
2ae7c8682e970ed6b3815e420467767f34226dcb 1761186
xserver-xorg-core_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
2096b8894566bfaeb99e9163e0fa0572fd8a7d0d 867068
xserver-xorg-core-udeb_1.12.4-2_amd64.udeb
f8dfad09b85e2c408a3c906c8879e8fd3f3ce15f 319568
xserver-xorg-dev_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
4f367ca1928987998e8c088dc1816932bc8346aa 922404 xdmx_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
deaf92e2b076464ad3e2460d47bc62d0888fb35b 125010 xdmx-tools_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
a313d86029116e677aae23adc39868ab75ac30c4 820934 xnest_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
3380e13068322600dcf7dc89dee57795d2662abf 924594 xvfb_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
4eb1d140eecefe9f40c7a5a9c6c4fe15e757d25b 1017286
xserver-xephyr_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
7f2f126b1f5e2bd80e2cdd9f1c6cac85b275e1d1 939272
xserver-xfbdev_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
80eb0afe225d17147b16ada30a46d0d2a027fbf9 7290316
xserver-xorg-core-dbg_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
8c523adec82f279efd93ae1d8183e24a396f21a1ea5d4d613f119202dc15d39e 4095
xorg-server_1.12.4-2.dsc
9dea49f2be35e56582b122df67b4560c9bc5268997f12b20183a5fa4b78f44fd 88877
xorg-server_1.12.4-2.diff.gz
4baf42b8ad55b39d284b2071e690daeef4df1d18c97c4acf34534eefc8fc4d0d 1395468
xserver-common_1.12.4-2_all.deb
e04af655a0457fa5a1e08ced00a9a96775206ac1716e18961a06eebc0f717ee6 1761186
xserver-xorg-core_1.12.4-2_amd64.deb
4b5ec1069c7563bcc87c887d2fbfe31f0e5473a1a8b3a35eb8f0971cabe4da3a 867068
Bug#668182: marked as done ([gnome-terminal] incorrect partial redraw in mc)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 +
with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666468,
regarding [gnome-terminal] incorrect partial redraw in mc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 3.4.0.1-1
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Since the last update changing directory or pgup/pgdown in mc results in
garbage until the next full redraw (^L or change to an other window). This
also affects terminator, so it may be a libvte bug.
MM
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.3.1fxa
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
500 unstableftp.uni-kl.de
500 unstableftp.de.debian.org
1 experimentalftp.hu.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
===-+-
==
gconf-service | 3.2.3-4
libatk1.0-0 (= 1.12.4) | 2.4.0-2
libc6 (= 2.4) | 2.13-27
libgconf-2-4(= 2.31.1) | 3.2.3-4
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (= 2.22.0) | 2.26.0-2
libglib2.0-0(= 2.31.8) | 2.32.0-3
libgtk-3-0 (= 3.2.1) | 3.2.3-1
libice6(= 1:1.0.0) | 2:1.0.7-2
libpango1.0-0 (= 1.14.0) | 1.30.0-1
libsm6 | 2:1.2.0-2
libvte-2.90-9 (= 1:0.30.0) | 1:0.32.0-2
libx11-6| 2:1.4.4-4
gsettings-desktop-schemas(= 0.1.0) | 3.2.0-2
gnome-terminal-data(= 3.4) | 3.4.0.1-1
gnome-terminal-data( 3.5) | 3.4.0.1-1
Recommends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
yelp | 3.4.0-1
gvfs | 1.12.0-1
Package's Suggests field is empty.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xorg-server
Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg
xserver-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2:1.12.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Description:
xdmx - distributed multihead X server
xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools
xnest - Nested X server
xserver-common - common files used by various X servers
xserver-xephyr - nested X server
xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server
xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server
xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols)
xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb)
xserver-xorg-dev - Xorg X server - development files
xvfb - Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server
Closes: 666468 685750 689246
Changes:
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Xephyr command line option parsing (closes: #689246). Thanks, Andrzej
Pietrasiewicz!
* Restore {in,out}{b,w,l} on ia64 (closes: #685750). Thanks, Stephan
Schreiber!
* EXA: Fall back earlier and more thoroughly from exaGlyphs (closes:
#666468). Patch by Michel Dänzer stolen from upstream bugzilla.
Checksums-Sha1:
39bdb9f7b96fcec22b56797ba80ceb90fbe841aa 4095 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.dsc
b98dfec1add259d9606cc415e5c21803def0813e 88877 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.diff.gz
Bug#668993: marked as done (libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0: Font rendering corruption?)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0: Font rendering corruption? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 Version: 2.26.0-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I am experiencing some serious font rendering issues. I am not entirely sure whether this is the correct package, but since libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 is a common dependency for all of the applications where I experience the issue, this is my best guess. Here is a screenshot where the issue is visible: https://wensveen.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/screenshot-from-2012-04-16-085408.png Usually the problems begin when I open my GMAIL in iceweasel, but the same happens with epiphany. Text is illegible and while moving the mouse cursor around (on redraws caused by css, probably) or scrolling, other text becomes illegible too, but some text turns normal. When this happens, other text in applications like gnome-terminal get garbled as well, as is visible in the screenshot. Sometimes, window titles are affected as well. However, text in Qt applications (such as konqueror) are not affected. Nor is text in java applications (such as PS3 Media Server). Unfortunately I can't pinpoint the moment when this started happening, but I think this has been happening for at least a month. At first I thought it had something to do with the video driver (xserver-xorg-video-radeon), but since only GNOME applications are affected, I ruled this possibility out (or at least highly improbable). Please let me know if you need any further information. Best regards, Matthijs -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 depends on: ii libc62.13-27 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common 2.26.0-2 ii libglib2.0-0 2.32.0-4 ii libjasper1 1.900.1-13 ii libjpeg8 8d-1 ii libpng12-0 1.2.49-1 ii libtiff4 3.9.6-3 ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-4 ii multiarch-support2.13-27 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 recommends no packages. libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information PS. exim4 was not configured correctly, so this is copied from the mail queue and pasted into gmail itself. I hope this is okay. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xorg-server Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200 Source: xorg-server Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg xserver-common Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2:1.12.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Description: xdmx - distributed multihead X server xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools xnest - Nested X server xserver-common - common files used by various X servers xserver-xephyr - nested X server xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols) xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb) xserver-xorg-dev
Bug#679120: marked as done (libdrm-nouveau1a: text corruption using nouveau (not with video, images or 3d))
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 +
with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666468,
regarding libdrm-nouveau1a: text corruption using nouveau (not with video,
images or 3d)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libdrm-nouveau1a
Version: 2.4.33-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Using nouveau with multiple monitors (although I don't think that it is related
to that)
Text very frequently gets corrupted, but images, video and 3d are not affected.
This mostly occurs when using iceweasel and gnome-terminal, but evolution is
also affected.
When this happens, selecting the text or scrolling so it leaves the visible
screen, appears to re-render it with the effect that the distortion changes,
making it readable from time to time. When taking a screenshot, the corruption
dissapears, but might re-appear after the text left the visible screen (a
window that comes over it or scrolling.
It doesn't occur with all text, usually only part of a sentence or a couple of
lines. Good text can get corrupted again after selecting affected text.
The problem doesn't occur when using the nvidia binary blob.
My graphics card is a GForce 9800 GT. It also doesn't occur on my laptop with a
GF8400M GS card.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libdrm-nouveau1a depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-33
ii libdrm22.4.33-1
ii multiarch-support 2.13-33
libdrm-nouveau1a recommends no packages.
libdrm-nouveau1a suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xorg-server
Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg
xserver-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2:1.12.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Description:
xdmx - distributed multihead X server
xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools
xnest - Nested X server
xserver-common - common files used by various X servers
xserver-xephyr - nested X server
xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server
xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server
xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols)
xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb)
xserver-xorg-dev - Xorg X server - development files
xvfb - Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server
Closes: 666468 685750 689246
Changes:
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Xephyr command line option parsing (closes: #689246). Thanks, Andrzej
Pietrasiewicz!
* Restore {in,out}{b,w,l} on ia64 (closes: #685750). Thanks, Stephan
Schreiber!
* EXA: Fall back earlier and more thoroughly from exaGlyphs (closes:
#666468). Patch by Michel Dänzer stolen from upstream bugzilla.
Checksums-Sha1:
39bdb9f7b96fcec22b56797ba80ceb90fbe841aa 4095 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.dsc
b98dfec1add259d9606cc415e5c21803def0813e 88877 xorg-server_1.12.4-2.diff.gz
35cc27ec6236b86712c9bf136119054b7f531ec4 1395468
Bug#684632: marked as done (libcairo2 1.12.2-2 creates text display problem for libreoffice)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 +
with message-id e1tunw9-0005yl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666468,
regarding libcairo2 1.12.2-2 creates text display problem for libreoffice
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libcairo2
Version: 1.10.2-7~bpo60+1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
After ugrade Squeeze to Wheezy, libreoffice failed to display menu and
status bar, which made it almost unusable.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Debian Bug report logs - #666565
xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps
From above bug report suggests version 1.10.2 of squeeze backports fixs the
problem. So I manually installed libcairo2_1.10.2-7~bpo60+1_amd64.deb file.
1.18.x in unstable wouldn't fix the problem. Downgrading it to 1.10.2-7
using aptitude or apt-get triggers removal of many packages also.
* What was the outcome of this action?
libreoffice works fine again.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'stable'), (500,
'testing-proposed-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libcairo2 depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-35
ii libfontconfig1 2.9.0-7
ii libfreetype62.4.9-1
ii libpixman-1-0 0.26.0-3
ii libpng12-0 1.2.49-2
ii libx11-62:1.5.0-1
ii libxcb-render0 1.8.1-1
ii libxcb-shm0 1.8.1-1
ii libxcb1 1.8.1-1
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.7-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
libcairo2 recommends no packages.
libcairo2 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xorg-server
Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 666...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg
xserver-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2:1.12.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Description:
xdmx - distributed multihead X server
xdmx-tools - Distributed Multihead X tools
xnest - Nested X server
xserver-common - common files used by various X servers
xserver-xephyr - nested X server
xserver-xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server
xserver-xorg-core - Xorg X server - core server
xserver-xorg-core-dbg - Xorg - the X.Org X server (debugging symbols)
xserver-xorg-core-udeb - Xorg X server - core server (udeb)
xserver-xorg-dev - Xorg X server - development files
xvfb - Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server
Closes: 666468 685750 689246
Changes:
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Xephyr command line option parsing (closes: #689246). Thanks, Andrzej
Pietrasiewicz!
* Restore {in,out}{b,w,l} on ia64 (closes: #685750). Thanks, Stephan
Schreiber!
* EXA: Fall back earlier and more thoroughly from exaGlyphs (closes:
#666468). Patch by Michel Dänzer stolen from upstream bugzilla.
Checksums-Sha1:
Bug#685750: marked as done (IA64 (Itanium) Wheezy, mach64, decommissioned xorg drivers)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id e1tunw9-0005yt...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#685750: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #685750, regarding IA64 (Itanium) Wheezy, mach64, decommissioned xorg drivers to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685750 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 Severity: important Tags: wheezy IA64 (Itanium) Wheezy, mach64, decommissioned xorg drivers Boot method: netinst CD Image version: a self build netinst CD which bases on the data of Wheezy beta-1 and the patch proposals of bug#678883, 679545, 685186. Date: Aug. 24, 2012 Machine: Dell PowerEdge 3250 Processor: 2x Itanium Madison 1.5GHz 6M Memory: 4G Graphics: build-in ATI Rage XL 01:01.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Rage XL [1002:4752] (rev 27) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:3404] I could install a minimum Debian Wheezy with my self-build netinst CD. I installed gnome-core but after the next reboot the screen flashed a few times, was completely black a few seconds later, the hard disk drive led flashed rythmic. Switching to another console wasn't possible. There was a large count of xorg log files: /var/log/Xorg.0.log /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old /var/log/Xorg.1.log /var/log/Xorg.1.log.old /var/log/Xorg.200.log /var/log/Xorg.200.log.old what gives me an idea what happened while the hard disk drive led flashed rythmic. Graphics is a ATI Rage XL, the 'mach64' xorg driver would be the right one - 'mach64' might be loaded by the 'ati' xorg driver. The most interesting lines in Xorg.0.log.old are [92.560] (II) LoadModule: ati [92.560] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so [92.560] (II) Module ati: vendor=X.Org Foundation [92.560]compiled for 1.12.1.902, module version = 6.14.4 [92.580]Module class: X.Org Video Driver [92.580]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 12.0 [92.581] (II) LoadModule: mach64 [92.581] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module mach64 [92.581] (II) UnloadModule: mach64 [92.581] (II) Unloading mach64 [92.581] (EE) Failed to load module mach64 (module does not exist, 0) Then I found the Debian bug#671386 report. I thought my glasses lift up when I read it :-). This is the commit which removed the functions inb, inw, inl, outb, outw, outl: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=aa0bfb0f133481c57762012e8e30c05ffa151423 The commit reads at the top pciaccess handles this now. A removed comment reads - * We use special in/out routines here since Altix platforms require the - * use of the sysfs legacy_io interface. The legacy_io file maps to the I/O - * space of a given PCI domain; reads and writes are used to do port I/O. - * The file descriptor for the file is stored in the upper bits of the - * value passed in by the caller, and is created and populated by - * xf86MapLegacyIO. - * - * If the legacy_io interface doesn't exist, we fall back to the glibc in/out - * routines, which are prefixed by an underscore (e.g. _outb). Further investigations are needed... Kind regards Stephan Schreiber ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xorg-server Source-Version: 2:1.12.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 685...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (supplier of updated xorg-server package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:46:48 +0200 Source: xorg-server Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xfbdev xserver-xorg-core-dbg xserver-common Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2:1.12.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debia...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Julien Cristau
Bug#691723: marked as done (libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl: New upstream release 0.07)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:18:49 + with message-id e1tunvn-0004ws...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#691723: fixed in libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl 0.05~02-2+squeeze1 has caused the Debian Bug report #691723, regarding libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl: New upstream release 0.07 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691723 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl Version: 0.06-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: In (team) package maintainer and upstream's opinion, package unsuitable for release -- will soon be mostly unusable New upstream release 0.07 is available. Importantly, IPPay changed the gateway's server name and path, and will soon turn off the old gateway, so versions before 0.07 will stop working at that time. Regarding squeeze, a 0.07 package should be uploaded to squeeze-updates. Alternatively, the relevant changes (parts of https://www.freeside.biz/gitweb/?p=Business-OnlinePayment-IPPay.git;a=commitdiff;h=1f19e67636476c7119cfb41920c5b176e617c697) could be backported to 0.06. Regarding wheezy, we should ask for a freeze exception for 0.07. Alternatively, like above, we could backport just the relevant chagnes and uplaod to testing-proposed-updates. -- _ivan ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl Source-Version: 0.05~02-2+squeeze1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:31:33 +0100 Source: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl Binary: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.05~02-2+squeeze1 Distribution: stable-proposed-updates Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Description: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl - IPPay backend for Business::OnlinePayment Closes: 691723 Changes: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl (0.05~02-2+squeeze1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low . * Team upload. * Backport changes to IPPay gateway's server name and path. Thanks to Ivan Kohler for preparing the backport. (Closes: #691723) Checksums-Sha1: b2de0cfb99edf0e09e11d5ef402539f9881fc5b6 2436 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.05~02-2+squeeze1.dsc b30a5f41d62178ad2c626f43afb68dfd061a33e3 2652 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.05~02-2+squeeze1.diff.gz 7cc73eb23edde10ab1a235473fc6ebeadd668e02 11858 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.05~02-2+squeeze1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 32d4e83b498a28993fcd5733bb598a9024c02d61d343f2765eb50552b9a55c33 2436 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.05~02-2+squeeze1.dsc d56a69708e6b5efd5da6ce81dc2dcbabefe0fb68647bd89ea24f346ddb22eaf9 2652 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.05~02-2+squeeze1.diff.gz 0cb049208ee5f62a5c7003992f91abd9397b6d5453064e5a7be17fb1b367b39a 11858 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.05~02-2+squeeze1_all.deb Files: 3343fdf9fc90b8bbf17181d9d4151209 2436 perl optional libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.05~02-2+squeeze1.dsc d7bfb83861e50901b94fb6bedc0a1a58 2652 perl optional libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.05~02-2+squeeze1.diff.gz 4b85896ac65e1b081c043816fcea4898 11858 perl optional libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.05~02-2+squeeze1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkA/3AAoJELs6aAGGSaoGUkEQAIx1WQhKpkcIgWo8Z3aTJ3ZT UbA1eVKMMojC8WuDE35qGuybXbv6l9u2WtTOv4pKG1/vZYlk5hTgWF5gK/chK4t2 u1MPYrwZgD/7Fy7S4FhjkrzLpzHFO7C3hzvRn82uXHQ1FjpnP7Cf74aRYDeMKEik Q+DnaHxPO6xvYEhCMd0l/i/H1QKkRZHI9hVtJsf/Sbi15hMJqCYO1tJBf8U2l2lr
Bug#681451: gvfs-bin: gvfs-open (via xdg-open) opens pdfs in wrong application
Hi
Norbert: how about trying to bisect this problem by copying into
a fresh user account parts of your dotfiles until you manage to
reproduce the problem?
Unfortunately my laptop died on my a while ago and I am still fighting
with a new (well, not really, old brick style lenovo), but after
new installation everything is fine here ...
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
MEMPHIS (n.)
The little bits of yellow fluff which get trapped in the hinge of the
windscreen wipers after polishing the car with a new duster.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote: updated package can be found at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send a debdiff to the bug report. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:28:08PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote: Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 pending (Setting to serious, due to policy violation) After reading the -legal thread, comments above, the CAcert mailing list thread, the Fedora explanation, and carefully reading the licensing myself, the cautious side of me says the right thing to do is remove the CAcert certificates from the package. This change will be committed to the collab-maint git repo shortly. I appreciate the bug report, mejiko, and for others taking the time to consider this issue. I will consider a ca-certificates-cacert ITP for inclusion in non-free. Which debian-legal thread were you reading? Because the two comments I see cc:ed to this bug report from debian-legal, from Francesco Poli and Florian Weimer, both point out that *certificates are not copyrightable*. An SSL certificate is a unique representation of a mathematical fact; since it contains no creative element, copyright law does not provide for any monopoly rights prohibiting distribution. The CAcert license is therefore something we should entirely ignore, because it has no legal force. Your proposal to remove it from the package without specific legal guidance to the contrary is a gross overreaction. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199
On 11/03/2012 04:34 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa
wrote:
updated package can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc
This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send a
debdiff to the bug report.
sending it again
$ debdiff /var/cache/pbuilder/result/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.4.31-1_i386.deb
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]
Files in second .deb but not in first
-
-rwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapacl link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapadd link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapauth link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapcat link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapd link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapdn link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapindex link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapschema link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slaptest link to ./usr/sbin/slappasswd
Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapacl link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapauth link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapcat link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapd link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapdn link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapindex link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slappasswd link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slapschema link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
hrwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/slaptest link to ./usr/sbin/slapadd
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Depends: libc6 (= 2.12), libdb5.1, libgcrypt11 (= 1.4.5),
libgnutls26 (= 2.12.17-0), libldap-2.4-2 (= [-2.4.31-1.1),-]
{+2.4.31-1),+} libltdl7 (= 2.4.2), libodbc1 (= 2.2.11) | unixodbc
(= 2.2.11), libperl5.14 (= 5.14.2), libsasl2-2 (= 2.1.24), libslp1,
libwrap0 (= 7.6-4~), coreutils (= 4.5.1-1), psmisc, perl ( 5.8.0)
| libmime-base64-perl, adduser, lsb-base (= 3.2-13)
Version: [-2.4.31-1.1-] {+2.4.31-1+}
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199
gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.ar writes: sending it again $ debdiff /var/cache/pbuilder/result/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.4.31-1_i386.deb It's the change to the source package, not the binary package, that's important for an NMU, so you have to debdiff the *.dsc files. The devscripts package has an nmudiff script that automates much of this procedure. (I'm listed as a comaintainer for openldap but haven't had any time to work on the package for quite some time, unfortunately. I should really probably remove myself.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665199: openldap: diff for NMU version 2.4.31-1.1
tags 665199 + patch tags 665199 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for openldap (versioned as 2.4.31-1.1) attached is the diff between the sources as nmudiff shows Regards. -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333 diff -u openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst --- openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst +++ openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst @@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ postinst_initial_configuration else postinst_upgrade_configuration + +if [ $MODE = upgrade ]; then +load_databases +fi + fi db_stop || true diff -u openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog --- openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog +++ openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +openldap (2.4.31-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fixes a bug in slapd postinst script. When upgrading, the script +failed to regenerate the database. Closes: #665199. + + -- gustavo panizzo g...@zumbi.com.ar Thu, 03 Nov 2012 02:11:45 -0300 + openldap (2.4.31-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release.
Processed: openldap: diff for NMU version 2.4.31-1.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 665199 + patch Bug #665199 [slapd] slapd: fails to install, remove, distupgrade, and install again Added tag(s) patch. tags 665199 + pending Bug #665199 [slapd] slapd: fails to install, remove, distupgrade, and install again Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665199 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: severity of 689049 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 689049 serious Bug #689049 [libspeexdsp1] Resampler stops in the middle of run with multiple channels Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689049: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689049 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692119: {cpp, gfortran, gnat}-4.4-doc: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
Control: tag -1 + pending On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 12:39:53PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Package: cpp-4.4-doc,gfortran-4.4-doc,gnat-4.4-doc Version: 4.4.7-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright file after an upgrade from squeeze to sid, which is a violation of Policy 12.5: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile After the upgrade /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE/ is just an empty directory. From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): (from 'ls -lad /u/s/d/$PKG' and 'ls -la /u/s/d/$PKG/') 0m43.8s ERROR: Command failed (status=1): ['chroot', '/tmp/piupartss/tmpJFzIXk', 'tmp/scripts/pre_remove_50_find_missing_copyright'] MISSING COPYRIGHT FILE: /usr/share/doc/cpp-4.4-doc/copyright drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Oct 30 12:51 /usr/share/doc/cpp-4.4-doc total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Oct 30 12:51 . drwxr-xr-x 81 root root 1720 Oct 30 12:51 .. Additional info may be available here: http://wiki.debian.org/MissingCopyrightFile Thanks for the tips, fixed in commit 7a4dd69. [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc.git GUO Yixuan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: {cpp, gfortran, gnat}-4.4-doc: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + pending
Bug #692119 [cpp-4.4-doc,gfortran-4.4-doc,gnat-4.4-doc] {cpp, gfortran,
gnat}-4.4-doc: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
692119: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692119
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
