Bug#1073808: minified inline javascript without sources
Package: libreoffice Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks there looks to be a vendored copy of jQuery in wizards/source/access2base/*.html javascript in this form has been an ongoing struggle to get our arms around as a project. Having the unminimized javascript that that was generated from in the source tarball is likely the easiest way to get to complience without modifying the code and adding a package dependency on jQuery. If there's already a copy I missed, we can just close this bug. Thank you for all your work, paultag -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Paul Tagliamonte ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://people.debian.org/~paultag | https://pault.ag/ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋Debian, the universal operating system. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀ 4096R / FEF2 EB20 16E6 A856 B98C E820 2DCD 6B5D E858 ADF3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1073807: windows binaries without source
Package: libreoffice Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks There are some windows binaries in testtools/source/cliversioning/version_libs/version_3_0_0.dll. The readme notes that the files aren't reproducable given the current build env. I'd usually spend a bit more time figuring out if we had source for it and can find a way to maintain them in some form, but I don't think the windows DLLs are used -- are they? If it's possible to drop them that'd be ideal; if not, I'd love to make sure we have (and maybe document in some form) where the source is for those DLLs. Thank you for all your work, paultag -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Paul Tagliamonte ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://people.debian.org/~paultag | https://pault.ag/ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋Debian, the universal operating system. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀ 4096R / FEF2 EB20 16E6 A856 B98C E820 2DCD 6B5D E858 ADF3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1027449: d/copyright is wrong
Package: ruby-dbm Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks I've filed the bug since I wasn't sure if my email made it through due to SMTP issues. Since I didn't see anything in git or any other acks, I'll file the bug to help with tracking the issue. I've marked this package for ACCEPT last night. The debian/coypright file describes source files, not binaries. It looks like ruby-dbm's copyright file added GPL-3+ because of the GDBM implementation we link to, which is a welcome degree of diligence I do appreciate, but it may change without the involvement of this source package (if the implementation were to change, or how a downstream changes the way the deb is built). If we had to list all the licensing information of all our build-deps / links, things would get very messy indeed! I'd expect someone to look through the dependency tree iff they need to determine the binary distribution terms. paultag (on behalf of the ftpteam) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1026588: Fix pending in the NEW queue
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 08:03:06AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >Dear ftp-master, happy holidays! >Any chance you could fast-track this package so that I can fix 2 RC >bugs? I'm concerned that if not fixed in time, aardvark-dns would be >removed from testing, which would break podman and friends. >Thanks in advance! Marked for ACCEPT. While reviewing it, it looks like you have patches that aren't in the series file; that's usually an oversight - worth taking a look at, but it's not impacting its suitability for the archive. paultag, for the ftpteam -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Paul Tagliamonte ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://people.debian.org/~paultag | https://pault.ag/ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋Debian, the universal operating system. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀ 4096R / FEF2 EB20 16E6 A856 B98C E820 2DCD 6B5D E858 ADF3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename
Was this a hijack or NMU? I saw a NMU to DELAYED with a log in the bug announcing it. I may have missed something paultag
Bug#873608: patch
Whoops, I only just read the comment about this not being standard in armhf. I misread that and also assumed it was standard (likely because, as a Coretex-A* user, I always had it), so this patch will likely be inappropriate (or incomplete). Maybe this patch plus an AND on an ENABLE_NEON or something, which is disabled by default in the packaging. Paul On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:10:30PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > tags 873608 + patch > thanks > > Attached is a patch that will enable neon if arm_neon.h is present. I > didn't upstream this or anything, I figure you have a better > relationship with them, but this ought to fix the ftbfs. > > I'm running a test build now, but it's past the old ftbfs point > > Paul > > -- --
Bug#873608: patch
tags 873608 + patch thanks Attached is a patch that will enable neon if arm_neon.h is present. I didn't upstream this or anything, I figure you have a better relationship with them, but this ought to fix the ftbfs. I'm running a test build now, but it's past the old ftbfs point Paul -- Description: When building for armhf, enable NEON NEON is part of the armhf baseline, so this will always be enabled on armhf. Author: Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/873608 Origin: vendor Last-Update: 2017-08-29 --- uhd-3.10.2.0.orig/host/lib/convert/CMakeLists.txt +++ uhd-3.10.2.0/host/lib/convert/CMakeLists.txt @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ IF(HAVE_ARM_NEON_H AND (${CMAKE_SIZEOF_V ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/convert_with_neon.cpp ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/convert_neon.S ) + +SET ( CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "-mfpu=neon" ) ENDIF()
Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: Bug#860608: Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<>/api/next.txt
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Michael Hudson-Doylewrote: > As you can see these are all -dev packages, so the Built-Using is bogus and > should simply be dropped from the package. > > There are quite a few more packages that reference obsolete golang packages > in their Built-Using... Indeed. Thanks for pointing that out, I totally forgot this was a thing. I wrote a script to grab all packages pkg-go maintains that are arch:all and have a B-U in source. I went through each one, and I've patched them all in VCS, and they should be fixed on next upload(s). Paul
Bug#863896: Can confirm bugs(s) and fixes
I got around to doing some network maintaince, and upgraded the non-critical packages on my router, along with dns-root-data. dnsmasq's version did not change during this operation. After restarting dnsmasq, the dhcpd was down, and clients weren't getting IPs. After digging a bit (set -x on the init script, and friends), I was able to work back to dns-root-data, and confirmed the package version did change. I saw these bugs, and I saw dnsmasq handles this better in sid - thankfully, I keep sid pinned down for just such a bug :) I upgraded dnsmasq, and I can confirm clients are happy again. Hopefully we can push the migration to testing before more folks get caught in this (although, I guess folks who run their own dhcpd tend to be able to find bug reports such as this -- hey there, other nerds!) Thanks for the fix, and thanks for maintaining these packages, Paul -- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#824089: RM: golang-clockwork-dev -- ROM; replaced by golang-github-jonboulle-clockwork
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: important thanks golang-clockwork-dev was replaced by something with a fancier source and binary name. I'll remove this in a minute. Paul signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#795046: Add dependency on ruby-rspec-its
Hey friends! this looks like a missing dependency on ruby-rspec-its -- I added it in (patch attached), but it still fails -- but with new failures! Thanks for all your hard work, Paul Description: TODO: Put a short summary on the line above and replace this paragraph with a longer explanation of this change. Complete the meta-information with other relevant fields (see below for details). To make it easier, the information below has been extracted from the changelog. Adjust it or drop it. . ruby-parslet (1.6.1-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Add missing dependency on ruby-rspec-its Author: Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> --- The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add: Origin: <vendor|upstream|other>, Bug: Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/ Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/ Forwarded: <no|not-needed|url proving that it has been forwarded> Reviewed-By: Last-Update: --- ruby-parslet-1.6.1.orig/spec/parslet/atoms/dsl_spec.rb +++ ruby-parslet-1.6.1/spec/parslet/atoms/dsl_spec.rb @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ require 'spec_helper' +require 'rspec/its' describe Parslet::Atoms::DSL do describe "deprecated methods" do @@ -14,4 +15,4 @@ describe Parslet::Atoms::DSL do its(:positive) { should == true } end end -end \ No newline at end of file +end --- ruby-parslet-1.6.1.orig/spec/parslet/position_spec.rb +++ ruby-parslet-1.6.1/spec/parslet/position_spec.rb @@ -1,10 +1,11 @@ # Encoding: UTF-8 require 'spec_helper' +require 'rspec/its' describe Parslet::Position do slet(:position) { described_class.new('öäüö', 4) } its(:charpos) { should == 2 } its(:bytepos) { should == 4 } -end \ No newline at end of file +end signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing: FIXED
Outstanding, thank you! Paul On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Jerome BENOIT calcu...@rezozer.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear All ! The upstream maintainer has discarded the COPYING2 license in his GIT upstream source for Apophenia. So from now Apophenia will be distribution under the GSL-2 license. I am waiting for the next release of Apophenia (release 0.999d) which may arrive soon to close this RC bug. Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVO8UJAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjq3IH/Rz32gw0IoqK9lCxGE1c/Vwr 5TVmKnljo0lluE58GyucwiPqOEuvcbNVmh/bxBwbC0AJVZ6EwEiItcONtSTIuXrz hNx7CijWDDGQq4ugyqzGaZoA9kBGHBifuEAdCuHlB6mLqwLmAnF0J6SJHy2G9QP0 MTNAK3q9TssKR+YpbMvjLtWvwpMi/GXOc7PMEWgcpwWqpWyvbLs1qFjiQAjRja7O Ied642PWuuPjX/6lNjicfbxMTjQ3BvXkfLqTSoQ2iSKvUbrNlRLzEUUTTfX3E35x 5hOi8lPp+L/XyVnM1cZREJ7xAuOa3hpch+0vvKPo8oJc9/EWhd3XhHjFMZ30YFM= =MW0o -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing
, in this paragraph) granted permission to link AGPLed software to other code licensed under other licenses, such as GPL v3. Linking to a differently-licensed code base does not free the code (or the combination) of the stipulations of either code base. For what it's worth, this is in the license; and wasn't in your terms - this is where the root of some of the non-distributablity comes from. Summary: * GPLv2 (not GPLv2 or later) is a valid license, used by other packages in Debian. I started writing Apophenia before GPLv3 existed, and see reason to not shift to the newer license. No one claimed otherwise, you misunderstood my claim due to nuances between GPL2 and 3. * We can replace the Affero-ization text I wrote with text taken from the 2007 edition of the AGPL, as above. | Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc., | 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA | Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies | of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. Please get permission from the FSF to do this unfortunate thing to their license. I'm CC'ing jgay. I believe that this modification, using the GPLv2 + modern Affero clause, is a better option than using the AGPL version of GPLv2 itself. Although it is not standard in the sense of having a common acronym, it uses two standard parts that are commonly recognized and can be sensibly combined. This is *not distributable*. It's a further restriction -- even if I agree with it. Please pick either the plain LGPL or GPL. Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote: Intersection, not set of both of course this should read set of both, not intersection :) -- :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing
Package: apophenia Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Right, hello, maintainers! Thanks for all your work, This work is licensed under the GPLv2. At least, it tries to. COPYING2 contains a further restriction on distribution that results in a work that is *not* distributable, since the headers say v2 (not v2 or later) with these changes (the GPLv3 lets us remove further restrictions) I question if a lawyer was behind these changes, and I also question the validity of this license, and as a result, I question the distributablity. Could you please ask upstream to either pick AGPL, LGPL or GPL? It seems like the author wants to use the GPL, but the first part of COPYING2 wants to be AGPL, and the second wants to be LGPL. Thanks! Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#772417: Re: Bug#772417: Re: Bug#772417: desktop-base: debian/copyright file needs to be updated
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Aurélien COUDERC zecou...@free.fr wrote: Le 08/12/2014 11:38, Francesco Poli a écrit : The following part looks problematic: | The Lines KSplash theme is © 2013 Martin Klapetek, © 2014 Aurélien Couderc | under the GPLv2 with artwork from Juliette Taka Belin, Nuno Pinheiro under the | GPLv2 license. First of all, the artwork by Juliette is not under the GPL v2 or any later version, not under the GPL v2 (only). But the question is: are the other artwork also under the GPL v2 or any later version? It's not too clear from the description, but, *in case* the Lines KSplash theme is derived from the artwork by Juliette which is based on the Debian “Open Use” Logo (with the “Debian” label), we could again face the issue due to LGPLv3 / GPLv2 incompatibility... Please check with the relevant copyright holders and update the debian/copyright file accordingly. After checking : - we’re talking about the script that is © 2013 Martin Klapetek, © 2014 Aurélien Couderc under the GPLv2+ (not just v2) - the artwork is a from Juliette Taka Belin (GPLv2+) and the Oxygen Icon Theme contributors (LGPLv3+) http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/o/oxygen-icons/oxygen-icons_4.14.0-1_copyright I propose the following : | The Lines KSplash script is © 2013 Martin Klapetek, © 2014 Aurélien Couderc | under the GPLv2 or any later version. | | The artwork for the Lines KSplash theme is © 2014 Juliette Taka Belin under | the GPLv2 or any later version and © 2007-2014 from the Oxygen Icon Theme | contributors under the LGPLv3 or any later version. And we were missing the 2012 copyright for Eshat Cakar for login box of the Lines KDM themes : https://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/Roj that is not Adrien’s work as I thought but Eshat’s (fortunately under GPLv2+). There may be issues with the following parts, as well: | The Joy GDM is © 2012 Paul Tagliamonte GPLv2, with work | from all the previous authors of that file, and artwork from Adrien Aubourg under | the GPLv3 license. | | The Joy KDM theme is © 2012 Eshat Cakar and © 2010 Roman Shtylman GPLv2 | with artwork from Adrien Aubourg under the GPLv3 license. | | The Joy KSplash theme is © 2012 Eshat Cakar, Nuno Pinheiro, Riccardo Iaconelli GPLv2 | with artwork from Adrien Aubourg under the GPLv3 license. | | The Joy grub theme is © 2012 Paul Tagliamonte GPLv2, using artwork from Adrien | Aubourg licensed under GPLv3 license. Any of these four themes may be troublesome, if is a work derived from GPLv3 artwork and from GPLv2 parts is created. Since the Joy artwork by Adrien Aubourg was previously licensed under the GPLv2 and has subsequently been re-licensed under the GPLv3 (without modifying the artwork itself, if I understand correctly: please confirm!), then we may solve the issues with these four themes by stating that: The Joy theme is © 2012 Adrien Aubourg and released under the GPL license, version 2 or 3. Adrien nicely accepted to relicense the Joy theme under the GPLv2+ so it solves the incompatibilities. I’ll update the copyrights. https://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/Joy As Adrien mentioned, it would be good to impose GPLv2+ for future theme contributions to avoid headaches for too many people. This is all nonsense for the cases we've been hitting, there's *zero* reason to force CC-BY to become GPL when you don't combine the work. This is like saying all images with GIMP need to be GPL licensed. It's just absurd. I'm done with this FUD :) Paul Then I propose dropping : | The Joy grub theme is © 2012 Paul Tagliamonte GPLv2, using artwork from Adrien | Aubourg licensed under GPLv3 license. That « theme » is the grub background and like the Joy wallpaper is strictly based on Adrien’s work + debian open logo without debian, so it’s already covered by the global copyright statement about the Joy theme. I see the statement as more noise than information. I also removed mentions of the « splashy » spacefun theme as splashy is not used anymore on recent desktops. Another issue could be: | Spacefun plymouth theme is © 2010 Aurelien Couderc and released under the GPLv3 | license, using artwork from Valessio S. Brito. I am not sure: is the part of the Spacefun plymouth theme that's copyrighted by you a script that loads Valessio's artwork? Or is something that combines with Valessio's artwork, thus creating a whole work derived from both parts? In the former case I can see no problems; in the latter case, there's again an incompatibility issue (GPLv2 vs. GPLv3). Hard to say really. The copyright is for the script, the script uses artwork elements to build what’s displayed, where do we stand ?… Anyway I hereby relicense the script under the GPLv2+, and will update the script and copyright file accordingly. All that is committed to the repository, would you mind reviewing again the latest version ? (Revision 342
Bug#762974: kmod fails to install on Jessie
Package: kmod Severity: serious Justification: Dependencies appear to be incomplete X-Debbugs-CC: unclejacks...@gmail.com thanks Heyya Marco, hope you're well, From a bare Jessie docker image: | $ docker run -it --rm debian:testing | # apt-get update apt-get -y install busybox-static kmod | ... | Setting up kmod (18-2) ... | Can't locate autodie.pm in @INC (you may need to install the autodie module) (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.20.0 /usr/local/share/perl/5.20.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.20 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.20 /usr/share/perl/5.20 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at -e line 4. | BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 4. | dpkg: error processing package kmod (--configure): | subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 | ... Appears to be very reproducable. Should be reproducable with docker.io and the stock Jessie image (or in a debootstrap chroot, I'd wager) Not sure what's causing this, but it's likely a missing depends or conflicts or something. Thanks so much for working on kmod! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#760106: docker crash when running with root user without XAUTH
severity 760106 normal tags 760106 + moreinfo thanks Grave is reserved for when this breaks unrelated software. This seemes to be a normal severity bug. In addition, this is a very non-standard way of running this; I'm not entirely shocked it's breaking. Could you please reproduce this without using ssh (since remote x11 is very hacky), and get a coredump? Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#759371: nonfree file in main
Package: ldc Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks vcbuild/strtold.c contains:: |// Copyright (C) 1985-1998 by Symantec |// Copyright (C) 2000-2011 by Digital Mars |// All Rights Reserved |// http://www.digitalmars.com |// Written by Walter Bright |/* | * This source file is made available for personal use | * only. The license is in /dmd/src/dmd/backendlicense.txt | * or /dm/src/dmd/backendlicense.txt | * For any other uses, please contact Digital Mars. | */ This is nonfree. I've let this through NEW because this is also currently in the archive, but this is strictly DFSG nonfree. Please remove this file from the tarball and repack, or change the license terms upstream (retroactively). If this is not possible, please file for removal for all suites, and reupload to non-free. Thanks so much, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#751423: review copyright
Package: golang-context Severity: serious thanks From ftpmaster: golang-context: accepted but BSD != expat in debian/copyright -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#750802: incomplete copyright file
Package: libmspub Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Heyya maintainers, During routine processing in NEW, I discovered an incomplete / overly minimal copyright file. The copyright file basically states the source is tripple licensed MPL, GPL and LGPL. Upstream source appears to just be MPL licensed. In addition, the full text of the MPL is not present. Please make an upload to fix this as soon as you can. Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#750801: copyright file is incomplete
Package: libcdr Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Heyya maintainers, During routine processing in NEW, I discovered an incomplete / overly minimal copyright file. The copyright file basically states the source is tripple licensed MPL, GPL and LGPL. Upstream source appears to just be MPL licensed. In addition, the full text of the MPL is not present. Please make an upload to fix this as soon as you can. Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#750803: incomplete copyright file
Package: libodfgen Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Howdy maintainers, Looks like this one doesn't have the full text of the MPL in the copyright file. Thanks so much! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#750804: incomplete copyright file
Package: libvisio Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Howdy maintainers, ... this one too. Looks like this also has no full text of the MPL. (This one's README mentions the GPL and LGPL thing, so nice!) I won't file the bugs on the rest, does neither of us any good. Mind checking all the ones that have this template out a bit more carefully? Thanks oddles, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749143: docker.io: Cannot start container ... mkdir /sys/fs/devices: operation not permitted
tags 749143 + moreinfo unreproducible severity 749143 normal thanks On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 05:13:39PM +0300, Famelis George wrote: Dear Maintainer, When I try to run any container (eg. docker.io run busybox echo 'Hello world') I get the message ... Error: Cannot start container ... mkdir /sys/fs/devices: operation not permitted | [tag@leliel:~][⌚ 11:55 AM] → docker.io run busybox echo 'Hello, | World'Hello, World Seems to work here. Droping severity because it's not broken for most users. After talking with Andrew, he suggsted that this might be due to /sys/fs/cgroup as a single mountpoint, which is either a leftover from an old init script (and you just need to sudo umount /sys/fs/cgroup), or it's a bad entry in /etc/fstab (in which case you need to remove it or comment it out) (10 points to Andrew) Give that a go, see if you can confirm that's the root of the issue. Cheers, Paul (and Andrew, by proxy) -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#748509: sauerbraten broken in sid because cube2, cube2-data stuck in NEW
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 03:16:43PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: I was wondering if there's anything I can do in the future to prevent bugs like #748509 from happening. My sponsoree (Markus Koschany) had already contacted ftpmaster@ftp-master.d.o (Message-ID: 533b1ecb.7000...@gambaru.de), to which paultag replied, to let you know that sauerbraten should not be processed in NEW without first accepting cube2 and cube2-data, yet currently sauerbraten has just been accepted and is now broken in sid, while cube2 and cube2-data are stuck in NEW. Looks like someone else went in and processed that. Life happens. Again, what other ways are there for me to contact ftpmasters to prevent this from happening again (if email doesn't do the trick)? I'll deal with cube* now. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#741131: nonfree file in source
Package: mathgl Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Howdy folks, thanks for maintaining MathGL, json/sylvester.js appears to have no source - please upload a fixed version to the archive asap. Thanks so much, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#738413: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3
tags 738413 + pending thanks I've uploaded a NMU to solve this to DELAYED/3. Please let me know if I should reschedule or cancel the upload. debdiff attached. Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt diff -Nru ubuntu-dev-tools-0.152/debian/changelog ubuntu-dev-tools-0.152+nmu1/debian/changelog --- ubuntu-dev-tools-0.152/debian/changelog 2014-01-06 16:51:23.0 -0500 +++ ubuntu-dev-tools-0.152+nmu1/debian/changelog 2014-02-24 22:35:10.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +ubuntu-dev-tools (0.152+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Change debian.tar.gz to debian.tar.xz (Closes: #738413) + + -- Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:34:22 -0500 + ubuntu-dev-tools (0.152) unstable; urgency=medium [ Dimitri John Ledkov ] diff -Nru ubuntu-dev-tools-0.152/ubuntutools/test/test_archive.py ubuntu-dev-tools-0.152+nmu1/ubuntutools/test/test_archive.py --- ubuntu-dev-tools-0.152/ubuntutools/test/test_archive.py 2013-03-18 19:15:16.0 -0400 +++ ubuntu-dev-tools-0.152+nmu1/ubuntutools/test/test_archive.py 2014-02-24 22:34:06.0 -0500 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ self.assertTrue(self.dsc.verify_file( 'test-data/example_1.0.orig.tar.gz')) self.assertTrue(self.dsc.verify_file( -'test-data/example_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz')) +'test-data/example_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz')) def test_missing(self): self.assertFalse(self.dsc.verify_file( @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ def test_workdir_srcpkg_noinfo(self): shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0-1.dsc', self.workdir) shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0.orig.tar.gz', self.workdir) -shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz', self.workdir) +shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz', self.workdir) pkg = self.SourcePackage(dscfile=os.path.join(self.workdir, 'example_1.0-1.dsc'), @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ def test_workdir_srcpkg_info(self): shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0-1.dsc', self.workdir) shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0.orig.tar.gz', self.workdir) -shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz', self.workdir) +shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz', self.workdir) pkg = self.SourcePackage('example', '1.0-1', 'main', dscfile=os.path.join(self.workdir, @@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ def test_verification(self): shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0-1.dsc', self.workdir) shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0.orig.tar.gz', self.workdir) -shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz', self.workdir) -with open(os.path.join(self.workdir, 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz'), +shutil.copy2('test-data/example_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz', self.workdir) +with open(os.path.join(self.workdir, 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz'), 'r+b') as f: f.write('CORRUPTION') @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ url_opener = self.mox.CreateMock(urllib2.OpenerDirector) url_opener.open(mirror + urlbase + 'example_1.0.orig.tar.gz' ).WithSideEffects(self.urlopen_proxy) -url_opener.open(mirror + urlbase + 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz' +url_opener.open(mirror + urlbase + 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz' ).WithSideEffects(self.urlopen_proxy) self.mox.ReplayAll() @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ ).WithSideEffects(self.urlopen_404) url_opener.open(lpbase + 'example_1.0.orig.tar.gz' ).WithSideEffects(self.urlopen_proxy) -url_opener.open(mirror + urlbase + 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz' +url_opener.open(mirror + urlbase + 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz' ).WithSideEffects(self.urlopen_proxy) self.mox.ReplayAll() @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ url_opener.open('http://snapshot.debian.org/file/hashabc' ).WithSideEffects(self.urlopen_file( 'example_1.0.orig.tar.gz')) -url_opener.open(debian_mirror + base + 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz' +url_opener.open(debian_mirror + base + 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz' ).WithSideEffects(self.urlopen_proxy) self.mox.ReplayAll() @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ url_opener = self.mox.CreateMock(urllib2.OpenerDirector) url_opener.open(mirror + base + 'example_1.0.orig.tar.gz' ).WithSideEffects(self.urlopen_proxy) -url_opener.open(mirror + base + 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz' +url_opener.open(mirror + base + 'example_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Bug#734813: [Pkg-systemd-maintainers] Bug#734813: systemd as pid1 allows lxc-containers to unmount host filesystems
forcemerge 734813 731574 thanks On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:08:18AM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: Hi Paul, Hey Michael :) Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes: A workaround was sent to me in a gist[2], but I've not tried it yet. Seems like it'd work. Another workaround given was to do: for MNT in $(awk '{print $2}' /proc/mounts | sort -u) ; do mount --make-rprivate $MNT; done This needs to have #731574 resolved first, because of a bug in mount(8). Ah. That would explain why the unit file wasn't preventing this. Both are pretty ugly, and I really don't want to have to run this. Can Debian systemd please revert this behavior? No. This would need to happen upstream, and then we can cherry-pick the fix. But in general we don’t want to divert from upstream. FWIW, docker on CoreOS has ExecStartPre=/bin/mount --make-rprivate / in its unit file to fix this — but as I said, that requires a newer mount(8). Mm. I’m inclined to just mark this as a duplicate of #731574, or let you reassign it to lxc, which seems to have support for dealing with shared mountpoints as you wrote on IRC. Let me know which one you prefer. Sounds right. I'll merge this with 731574. I think that solves the short-term problem faster. Thanks for all your help! Paul -- Best regards, Michael -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#734813: systemd as pid1 allows lxc-containers to unmount host filesystems
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:17:25PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: I also believe that preemptively CCing the tech-ctte on bugs like this is a mistake I already talked with Mithrandir. He convinced me so already. Your comments are noted. Thanks, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#734813: systemd as pid1 allows lxc-containers to unmount host filesystems
Once I was able to get a browser open, I found out olasd had researched and found a commit[1] that seems to mark this as systemd's decision that the kernel is wrong(?) A workaround was sent to me in a gist[2], but I've not tried it yet. Seems like it'd work. Another workaround given was to do: for MNT in $(awk '{print $2}' /proc/mounts | sort -u) ; do mount --make-rprivate $MNT; done Both are pretty ugly, and I really don't want to have to run this. Can Debian systemd please revert this behavior? Thanks! Paul [1]: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=b3ac5f8cb98757416d8660023d6564a7c411f0a0 [2]: https://gist.github.com/jpetazzo/55f7c216538a52f76c7c/raw -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#734656: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#734656: nodejs: standard node shebang #!/usr/bin/env node fails in Debian as there is no binary/symlink named 'node' in $PATH
Tags 734656 - d-i thanks On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:25:05PM +, luke wrote: Package: nodejs Version: 0.10.24~dfsg1-1 Severity: grave Tags: d-i Why d-i? Dear Maintainer, Attempting to use many programs installed with `npm install` fails before execution because the Node.js interpreter installed by dpkg/synaptic is not at the expected path. The node binary is named 'nodejs' on Debian, but the node community expects the de-facto standard of '#!/usr/bin/env node'. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614907 for background on the node / node.js naming issue. I understand this is a tricky issue, as Javascript was never really designed to be run like a shell script, and does not have the heritage of many other Linux shell languages. Additionally, it is unclear from the Node.js project what the official name of the binary should be. That said, here are the accepted shebangs for some other interpreters: #!/usr/bin/env python #!/usr/bin/env/ lua ^ that's not right :) #!/usr/bin/env perl All references to node shebangs I can find on the internet converge on #!/usr/bin/env node which is why this issue prevents many npm packages to fail to run. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Creating a symlink as root: /usr/bin/node - /usr/bin/nodejs solves the issue as far as I can tell. Sounds like a perfect workaround. ln -s -T /usr/bin/nodejs /usr/bin/node chmod 755 /usr/bin/node A quick search of the Sid repositories doesn't show any conflicts with files installing to the path /usr/bin/node Try the package: `node'. It's not in /usr/bin, but it's on ${PATH}. In fact, since you're using `env', it's double not clear. so doing the simple symlink within the Debian installer may be sufficient. No way. There's a node-legacy package which does this. No need to involve the installer. * What was the outcome of this action? Standard node scripts run correctly as the de-facto node shebang( #!/usr/bin/env node) now resolves to 'node' in the user's $PATH I'm not very well clued on how this may affect other Debian packages, but works in my little world, and this may extend further. * What outcome did you expect instead? The expected behaviour is for the Debian package to install nodejs with a binary resolvable by the name supported by the node community and existing software, rather than with a name that refelects Node.js confusing project/binary naming schemes. Potentially even better would be to support 'nodejs' and 'node', but plan to converge on '/usr/bin/node' for the future. As much as I disagree with ctte on this, I'm afraid that this won't change. I'd close this, but I'll leave that for the maintainers of node to do. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#716853: golang contains binary blobs
Hey folks, After talking with a few others, this is still seen as a valid concern. Since they're so trivial, could you please just drop in new binaries generated from source files included in golang (a prebuilt binary may be fine here since the ELF test code is tied to 32 bit intel), but a lack of sources means it's not DFSG free, and a repack is in order. Perhaps consider upstreaming this as well. Thanks, y'all, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#732095: webkitgtk contains a JSON do-no-evil licensed file.
Package: webkitgtk Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Howdy maintainers, http://sources.debian.net/src/webkitgtk/2.3.2-1/Source/WebCore/inspector/Scripts/jsmin.py I believe this file to be a derived work, and subject to Crockford's terms, and thus isn't distributable in main. For some reason this is in the lintian overrides(!?), please remove it from the overrides, and strip this file (or move this package to non-free). Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#728196: php-gearman is licensed under the PHP license, and is not php
Package: php-gearman Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks From the REJECT faq: / | You have a PHP add-on package (any php script/app/thing, not PHP | itself) and it's licensed only under the standard PHP license. That | license, up to the 3.x which is actually out, is not really usable for | anything else than PHP itself. I've mailed our -legal list about that | and got only one response, which basically supported my view on this. | Basically this license talks only about PHP, the PHP Group, and includes | Zend Engine, so its not applicable to anything else. And even worse, | older versions include the nice ad-clause. | | One good solution here is to suggest a license change to your upstream, | as they clearly wanted a free one. LGPL or BSD seems to be what they | want. \ Sorry this made it through NEW, Hope you're well, and thanks for your work, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#728170: contains undocumented licenses
Package: liblttng-ust2 Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks From an ftp-team trainee:: lttng-ust-2.3.0\liblttng-ust-ctl\ustctl.c is GPL2 and not mentioned in debian/copyright lttng-ust-2.3.0\doc\examples\demo\tp*.c is not LGPL2.1+ lttng-ust-2.3.0\doc\examples\demo\ust* is not LGPL2.1+ as well as most of the files in doc/examples lttng-ust-2.3.0\include\lttng\* has the same problem Thanks for your work! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#727836: erlang-cowboy contains sourceless javascript (jquery.min.js)
Package: erlang-cowboy Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks During routine processing of NEW, I'd found a minified javascript library. Since you're DFSG repacking anyway, could you please remove examples\~bsocket\priv\static\jquery.min.js and link in jQuery from the .deb in your package (if you even ship it, I hadn't checked) Thank you! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#722979:
Sorry, what did you do with that sourceless PDF? I don't see it in the changelog. T
Bug#722979:
Awesome! Thanks for the quick response ! Cheers, T On Sep 17, 2013 8:07 AM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote: Hi Paul, sorry, I forgot to mention that. I just removed PDF and repacked the source. Anton 2013/9/17 Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org: Sorry, what did you do with that sourceless PDF? I don't see it in the changelog. T
Bug#723103: dieharder: non-free due to $beverage clause?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:24:58PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: according to the following standard Gnu General Public License or any later versions, with the one minor Beverage modification listed below. Note that this modification is probably not legally defensible and can be followed really pretty much according to the honor rule. I tend to agree with this - GPL section 10: / | You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the | rights granted or affirmed under this License. For example, you may not | impose a license fee, royalty, or other charge for exercise of rights | granted under this License, \ As to my personal preferences in beverages, red wine is great, beer is delightful, and Coca Cola or coffee or tea or even milk acceptable to those who for religious or personal reasons wish to avoid stressing my liver. The Beverage Modification to the GPL Any user of this software shall, upon meeting the primary author(s) of this software for the first time under the appropriate circumstances, offer to buy him or her or them a beverage. This beverage may or may not be alcoholic, depending on the personal ethical and moral views of the offerer. The beverage cost need not exceed one U.S. dollar (although it certainly may at the whim of the offerer:-) and may be accepted or declined with no further obligation on the part of the offerer. It is not necessary to repeat the offer after the first meeting, but it can't hurt... If valid, this will likely be non-free. I don't think depending on that reading of section 10 is great, so perhaps it's right to move this to non-free. It'd be nice if he rephrased shall to may - it seems like he's not keen to enforce it either. That would likely make this free enough (tm), but I'd need to re-read it to be sure. Cheers, Paul [just as a DD, not ftpteam hacker] -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#723159: undocumented license in source package
Package: fonts-ebgaramond Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks From an ftp-trainee:: The LPPL license of this file: tests/test-microtype.tex is not mentioned in debian/copyright. Please add it to the copyright file in your next upload. Thanks so much! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#723161: undocumented license in source
Package: ruby2.0 Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks From an ftptrainee:: It appears as though you're missing some license information in your copyright file: win32/win32.c is partly licensed under Artistic or GPL The license lib/rubygems/LICENSE.txt should be mentioned in d/copyright Fondly, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#723162: undocumented licenses in upstream source
Package: redis Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks from an ftptrainee:: The following files (or parts of them) are under 2C BSD, the general license is 3C BSD: redis-2.6.16/utils/install_server.sh redis-2.6.16/deps/jemalloc/bin/pprof The LUA (or MIT) license for these files is not mentioned in debian/copyright redis-2.6.16/deps/lua/doc/contents.html redis-2.6.16/deps/lua/doc/manual.html redis-2.6.16/deps/lua/* In addition, I found quite a few BSD-2-clause other than the ones up above, I'd suggest running through the source :) Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change might be retroactive? Thanks erryboddy! T On Sep 14, 2013 10:07 AM, Alex Valavanis valavanisa...@gmail.com wrote: I think this is fixed upstream... all CC 2.0/2.5 licenses have been removed from Inkscape trunk [1]. Can a patch be backported? AV [1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/revision/12514 On 13 September 2013 21:11, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote: Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they intended GPL-2 anyway... I don't think so. The logo was contributed by jimmac and originally under CC. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/345778 Severity: serious that the Inkscape icon contains a statement suggesting that its license is CC-BY-SA 2.0. This is unfortunate, as Debian's FTP team does not consider it Free. I'm unsure about this. I remember an old thread on -project where it was found that clause 4b of CC-BY-SA 2.0 allows upgrading to later version, and several packages already fit in that case. I think we are in the same case. Moreover, I can still get in touch with jimmac and ask for a license change, or just apply clause 4b upstream. 4b only applies to derivitive works. I don't know who made this rumor, but it's resulted in a few REJECTs. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:35:33AM -0400, Martin Owens wrote: On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 10:11 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change might be retroactive? They are. The meta data can be updated. It's up to Debian if you want to deb patch or a backport. We have a critical Ahaaa![1] to backport anyway. Martin, [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/166371 Sweet! Thanks for the quick hacks, mo! (See you sunday!) Cheers, T -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#722979: debian/copyright issues, sourceless pdf in source
Package: petsc Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Howdy folks, two issues a ftptrainee picked up:: - src/ts/examples/tutorials/power_grid/PDF_eqs_power_grid.pdf appears to be sourceless (it was generated from TeX) - Undocumented licenses: bin/matlab/laplacianlicense.txt config/BuildSystem/patch.py: Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote: Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they intended GPL-2 anyway... I don't think so. The logo was contributed by jimmac and originally under CC. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/345778 Severity: serious that the Inkscape icon contains a statement suggesting that its license is CC-BY-SA 2.0. This is unfortunate, as Debian's FTP team does not consider it Free. I'm unsure about this. I remember an old thread on -project where it was found that clause 4b of CC-BY-SA 2.0 allows upgrading to later version, and several packages already fit in that case. I think we are in the same case. Moreover, I can still get in touch with jimmac and ask for a license change, or just apply clause 4b upstream. 4b only applies to derivitive works. I don't know who made this rumor, but it's resulted in a few REJECTs. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#722479: Doesn't contain license full text in source package
Package: iceweasel-linky Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Howdy folks, There's no upstream license at all in the package. This violates both the GPL and MPL. MPL-1.1 section 3.1: You must include a copy of this License with every copy of the Source Code You distribute. LGPL-2.1 (as example, all GPLs have this clause) section 1: 1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Library's complete source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty; and distribute a copy of this License along with the Library. (which is violated when we distribute the orig.tar.gz on it's own, which we do) Thanks for your work, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#722479: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#722479: Doesn't contain license full text in source package
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:20:02PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:19:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: There's no upstream license at all in the package. This Yeah, we discussed this already in the team, but ... violates both the GPL and MPL. MPL-1.1 section 3.1: You must include a copy of this License with every copy of the Source Code You distribute. ... I simply forgot about this clause. Eriberto was/is already working on this. No worries! Thanks for tending to it so quickly! Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#721454: libgit2 contiains mix of LGPL2 and Apache2
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:32:09PM +1000, Russell Sim wrote: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes: I notice there's a mix of GPLv2 and Apache2 code in the same binary. This combined work isn't distributable. It'd be super great to fix this by getting upstream to move to GPLv3 or dropping the apache2 code (or getting the copyright holders of the apache2 code to move to Expat or similar) Hey Paul, Thanks for notifying me of this issue. Heyya Russell, thanks for the super quick response, I have also found that I missed an update to the license that happened in 0.19.0. It was a new reference to the PHP 3.01 license. From my understanding it's also incompatible with the GPLv2 and GPLv3. I'll send a message upstream regarding these issues. In the mean time is there an action I should take regarding the package, it's currently in experimental, will it need to be removed from the archive? Yeah, if you wouldn't mind a RoM, we can introduce it after upstream gives folks the ability to, well, distribute the binaries :) Thanks again, Russell Thank you, Russell, really! Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#721454: libgit2 contiains mix of LGPL2 and Apache2
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:35:07AM +1000, Russell Sim wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes: On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:32:09PM +1000, Russell Sim wrote: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes: I notice there's a mix of GPLv2 and Apache2 code in the same binary. This combined work isn't distributable. It'd be super great to fix this by getting upstream to move to GPLv3 or dropping the apache2 code (or getting the copyright holders of the apache2 code to move to Expat or similar) So I think that I have an answer to the GPLv2 and Apache2 incompatibilities. They have added a linking exception preamble to the license, so it's not a pure GPLv2 license, instead it's modified to make it more compatible[0]. This is a custom license which in practical effects makes it more permissive than the LGPLv2, allowing redistribution of software linked against the library under all circumstances without having to disclose its source code. Neato. However, due to GPL's no-further-restrictions clause, if this still contains the patent termination and indemnification provisions, it's not compatable. I'll have to do a review of this license. I have also found that I missed an update to the license that happened in 0.19.0. It was a new reference to the PHP 3.01 license. From my understanding it's also incompatible with the GPLv2 and GPLv3. I'll send a message upstream regarding these issues. In the mean time is there an action I should take regarding the package, it's currently in experimental, will it need to be removed from the archive? I have raised this with the upstream developers, and they are trying to remove the PHP code and are also seeking legal advice[1]. It also seems that I was mistaken, the PHP license was added to the code in the master branch, it's not in the 0.19.0 release. But they are still trying to workout the origin of the code. So it may have been mistakenly identified as being from the PHP code base. The code in question appears in the 0.19.0 release but it's only used for windows compatibility. I can remove it with a patch, so as to be sure it's not included in the binary? It'd be more clean to repack, but that's one way out, sure Yeah, if you wouldn't mind a RoM, we can introduce it after upstream gives folks the ability to, well, distribute the binaries :) Hehe, well I think this PHP license thing is probably the biggest problem now, perhaps we should wait until they actually figure out where the got it from. ACK. Thanks, Russell! Cheers, Russell 0. https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/567 1. https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/pull/1789 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSKSM7AAoJEKPQMr0n6UoaK3oH/2WZkDdseoeSkIjyIyvQptgm 7u7Seg4gTPJnSsiUZNfe91Vht9pCzjtq6gU1WpChWvJde7/zSFTCd0H+gelsuJcC IPn0DNk8CpJG5Mqc/CzjfzYtxFZP6rlhTPKjsw2JWjHRYoNQwtkJHAogMRr10/om vJHiTe9gJz9IJDjE2RFazQwg5mUqJj+N7P5lqOsiquCKd6VXadaJnGQbE3m+nz12 80uOox5c/QYKt61bZqSxfr3ZU86+AeOUX2uYDe3ayM1e+O6ckmTM4jomuVSHEhWo xNoPFneFiiuA9VPWavFhVYHFCVaAXbZPRjYKsEafjNeVz3bJQ27rP705rsDw6T4= =xwO3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#721454: libgit2 contiains mix of LGPL2 and Apache2
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:35:07AM +1000, Russell Sim wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes: On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:32:09PM +1000, Russell Sim wrote: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes: I notice there's a mix of GPLv2 and Apache2 code in the same binary. This combined work isn't distributable. It'd be super great to fix this by getting upstream to move to GPLv3 or dropping the apache2 code (or getting the copyright holders of the apache2 code to move to Expat or similar) So I think that I have an answer to the GPLv2 and Apache2 incompatibilities. They have added a linking exception preamble to the Erm, I just read this. This seems like it'd work :) license, so it's not a pure GPLv2 license, instead it's modified to make it more compatible[0]. This is a custom license which in practical effects makes it more permissive than the LGPLv2, allowing redistribution of software linked against the library under all circumstances without having to disclose its source code. I have also found that I missed an update to the license that happened in 0.19.0. It was a new reference to the PHP 3.01 license. From my understanding it's also incompatible with the GPLv2 and GPLv3. I'll send a message upstream regarding these issues. In the mean time is there an action I should take regarding the package, it's currently in experimental, will it need to be removed from the archive? I have raised this with the upstream developers, and they are trying to remove the PHP code and are also seeking legal advice[1]. It also seems that I was mistaken, the PHP license was added to the code in the master branch, it's not in the 0.19.0 release. But they are still trying to workout the origin of the code. So it may have been mistakenly identified as being from the PHP code base. The code in question appears in the 0.19.0 release but it's only used for windows compatibility. I can remove it with a patch, so as to be sure it's not included in the binary? Yeah, if you wouldn't mind a RoM, we can introduce it after upstream gives folks the ability to, well, distribute the binaries :) Hehe, well I think this PHP license thing is probably the biggest problem now, perhaps we should wait until they actually figure out where the got it from. Cheers, Russell 0. https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/567 1. https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/pull/1789 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSKSM7AAoJEKPQMr0n6UoaK3oH/2WZkDdseoeSkIjyIyvQptgm 7u7Seg4gTPJnSsiUZNfe91Vht9pCzjtq6gU1WpChWvJde7/zSFTCd0H+gelsuJcC IPn0DNk8CpJG5Mqc/CzjfzYtxFZP6rlhTPKjsw2JWjHRYoNQwtkJHAogMRr10/om vJHiTe9gJz9IJDjE2RFazQwg5mUqJj+N7P5lqOsiquCKd6VXadaJnGQbE3m+nz12 80uOox5c/QYKt61bZqSxfr3ZU86+AeOUX2uYDe3ayM1e+O6ckmTM4jomuVSHEhWo xNoPFneFiiuA9VPWavFhVYHFCVaAXbZPRjYKsEafjNeVz3bJQ27rP705rsDw6T4= =xwO3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#721454: libgit2 contiains mix of LGPL2 and Apache2
Package: libgit2 Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org Howdy maintainer, I notice there's a mix of GPLv2 and Apache2 code in the same binary. This combined work isn't distributable. It'd be super great to fix this by getting upstream to move to GPLv3 or dropping the apache2 code (or getting the copyright holders of the apache2 code to move to Expat or similar) Thanks for your hard work, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#721104: Please document ctdb's copyright properly
Package: ctdb Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org During routine processing of NEW, one of the ftp trainees found the following issues with your copyright file: version of debian/copyright is from about 2008. New contributors are missing: ctdb-2.3.dfsg/doc/ltdbtool.1:Copyright (C) Gregor Beck 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/doc/ltdbtool.1.xml:Copyright (C) Gregor Beck 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/doc/ltdbtool.1.html:Copyright�(C)�Gregor�Beck�2011br ctdb-2.3.dfsg/tools/ltdbtool.c: * Copyright (C) Gregor Beck 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/packaging/mkversion.sh:# Copyright (C) Amitay Isaacs 2012 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/lib/replace/poll.c: Copyright (c) 2009-2010 by Andreas Schneider m...@cynapses.org ctdb-2.3.dfsg/lib/replace/poll.c: Copyright (c) 2009 Aleksandar Kanchev ctdb-2.3.dfsg/lib/replace/replace.c: Copyright (C) Matthieu Patou 2010 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/lib/replace/xattr.c: Copyright (C) Andrew Bartlett 2012 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/utils/pmda/domain.h: * Copyright (c) 2004-2009 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All rights reserved . ctdb-2.3.dfsg/utils/pmda/pmns: * Copyright (c) 2011 David Disseldorp ctdb-2.3.dfsg/utils/pmda/pmda_ctdb.c: * Copyright (c) 2011 David Disseldorp ctdb-2.3.dfsg/utils/nagios/check_ctdb:# Copyright (c) 2011 Nantes Metropole ctdb-2.3.dfsg/utils/nagios/check_ctdb:. \n\nCopyright (c) 2011 Nantes Metropole, ctdb-2.3.dfsg/utils/nagios/README:Copyright (c) 2011 Nantes Metropole ctdb-2.3.dfsg/common/ctdb_message.c: Copyright (C) Amitay Isaacs 2013 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/common/system_gnu.c: Copyright (C) Marc Dequènes (Duck) 2009 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/common/system_freebsd.c: Copyright (C) Marc Deques (Duck) 2009 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/common/system_kfreebsd.c: Copyright (C) Marc Dequènes (Duck) 2009 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/tests/src/ctdb_tool_stubby.c: Copyright (C) Martin Schwenke 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/tests/src/ctdb_tool_libctdb.c: Copyright (C) Martin Schwenke 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/tests/src/ctdb_takeover_tests.c: Copyright (C) Martin Schwenke 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/tests/src/ctdbd_test.c: Copyright (C) Martin Schwenke 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/tests/src/ctdb_porting_tests.c: Copyright (C) Mathieu Parent 2013 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/tests/src/ctdb_test.c: Copyright (C) Martin Schwenke 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/tests/src/libctdb_test.c: Copyright (C) Martin Schwenke 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/server/ctdb_lock.c: Copyright (C) Amitay Isaacs 2012 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/server/ctdb_takeover.c: Copyright (C) Martin Schwenke 2011 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/server/ctdb_lock_helper.c: Copyright (C) Amitay Isaacs 2013 ctdb-2.3.dfsg/configure:# Copyright (C) 1992-1996, 1998-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ctdb-2.3.dfsg/configure:Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ctdb-2.3.dfsg/configure:Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. debian/copyright: Copyright 2008-2009 Mathieu Parent math.par...@gmail.com Please get this addressed in your next upload. Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#720038: Shipping a minified version of dataTables.
Package: opennebula Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Heyya folks, Looks like you're shipping minified JS from upstream. synrg@ (cc'd) found this (hey, thanks!), and also needs this file for one of his packages. It'd be nice to get it packaged. The file is: ./src/sunstone/public/vendor/dataTables/jquery.dataTables.min.js Please DFSG repack this ASAP. Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#718026: ganeti-doc ships docs that were prebuilt
Package: ganeti Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp thanks Please rebuild the docs at build-time :) consider using dh_sphinxdoc Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#717021: dput-ng FTBFS due to docbook-xsl-ns change
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:00:33AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: xsl:import : unable to load http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl Why this is trying to hit the network is beyond me. Because the web reference exists, I guess the build machine had no internet access and thus importing the stylesheet failed. However, the No. And you may not assume build chroots, nor build *machines* have access to the network. Moreover, *I* (personally) am often without internet, and this is really quite annoying. And after installing docbook-xsl it works. And this is the next interesting part. Well, asciidoc references files (at least their web locations) of docbook-xsl, but does not depend on it. Why not. Why can't you declare a recommends and avoid causing packages to FTBFS because they didn't know to depend on docbook-xsl to build an *asciidoc* file to a manpage. If someone wants to (for whatever reason) remove it, you can with recommends. You can read more in section 7.2 of policy. But docbook-xsl-ns is not involved in any kind here. Its catalog cares I don't care. Explain how I got a FTBFS with a dep on docbook-xsl, added docbook-xsl-ns to the b-ds and it built. docbook-xsl(-ns). All the report says is: asciidoc references a few files packaged by docbook-xsl. It uses their web locations. If you don't want to being forced to have internet access Ummm. This is a package build. You see, we can't allow things in main to depend on things outside of main. Yes, this includes this fun little website I don't care about. I don't even care about docbook. I care about getting a manpage on my system. I really don't care about implementation details of a2x. install/build-depend on docbook-xsl, because asciidoc doesn't pull in docbook-xsl automatically. So where is the problem you described? Do you have any bug/build log? When I applied a fix in VCS[1], it worked again. Again, I can't be too clear, for packages build-depending on a2x, it likely has a serious bug if it's not also depending on the files it needs to build offline. Could be considered non-free as well. You can fix all of this if you add a proper package relation, or by documenting this behavior somewhere. Regards, Paul [1]: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dputng.git;a=commitdiff;h=0879b213c9d7f1aeb975ee3a340f87849e694338 -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#717008: ubuntu-packaging-guide contains binary blobs
Package: ubuntu-packaging-guide Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp thanks The minified CSS is considered a binary - full sources should be included and minified at build-time if you prefer. Thanks for your prompt attention! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#717021: dput-ng FTBFS due to docbook-xsl-ns change
Package: dput-ng Severity: serious Tags: pending thanks Due to a change in docbook-xsl-ns a2x fails with xmllint bits. CC'ing the docbook-xsl maintainer so he's aware to perhaps notify the other r-b'ds so that packages don't randomly ftbfs. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#716853: golang contains binary blobs
Package: golang Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp thanks Hello, Golangers, (Thanks for maintaining go, I'm wearing my `go' shit art we speak!) It appears there are binaries in the source tarball. Those will need to be removed - I understand they're just for the test suite; yes, this isn't great, but it's needed to comply with the DFSG. In adition, re-generating src/pkg/compress/flate/fixedhuff.go at build-time would be good as well. In addition, y'all should be aware debian/* is licensed GPL. Since you patch the source, this may not be doing what you intend. Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#711756: cl-plplot: FTBFS: (running makeinfo)
Source: cl-plplot Version: 0.6.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid jessie Justification: fails to build from source While rebuilding some packages, I've noticed the following FTBS: / | Output written on cl-plplot-manual.pdf (32 pages, 158840 bytes). | Transcript written on cl-plplot-manual.log. | cd doc makeinfo --html --no-split -o cl-plplot-manual.html cl-plplot-manual.texinfo | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:49: @menu seen before first @node | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:49: perhaps your @top node should be wrapped in @ifnottex rather than @ifinfo? | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:581: unknown command `space' | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:719: unknown command `space' | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:940: unknown command `space' | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:1220: unknown command `space' | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:60: warning: node `Installation' is next for `Introduction' in sectioning but not in menu | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:77: warning: unreferenced node `Installation' | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:77: warning: node `The Low Level Interface to PLplot' is next for `Installation' in sectioning but not in menu | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:77: warning: node `Introduction' is prev for `Installation' in sectioning but not in menu | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:93: warning: unreferenced node `The Low Level Interface to PLplot' | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:93: warning: node `The High Level Plotting Package' is next for `The Low Level Interface to PLplot' in sectioning but not in menu | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:93: warning: node `Installation' is prev for `The Low Level Interface to PLplot' in sectioning but not in menu | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:203: warning: unreferenced node `The High Level Plotting Package' | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:203: warning: node `Index' is next for `The High Level Plotting Package' in sectioning but not in menu | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:203: warning: node `The Low Level Interface to PLplot' is prev for `The High Level Plotting Package' in sectioning but not in menu | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:1553: warning: unreferenced node `Index' | cl-plplot-manual.texinfo:1553: warning: node `The High Level Plotting Package' is prev for `Index' in sectioning but not in menu | make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 | dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 \ Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#711803: python-concurrent.futures: FTBFS: Permission denied
Source: python-concurrent.futures Version: 2.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source The package FTBFS in a clean unstable amd64 sbuild chroot. This is likely due to the lack of a home directory. / | == | ERROR: test_threads_terminate (__main__.ThreadPoolShutdownTest) | -- | Traceback (most recent call last): | File ./test_futures.py, line 175, in test_threads_terminate | self._start_some_futures() | File ./test_futures.py, line 146, in _start_some_futures | call1 = Call(manual_finish=True) | File ./test_futures.py, line 93, in __init__ | self._called_event = self._create_event() | File ./test_futures.py, line 74, in _create_event | event = multiprocessing.Event() | File /usr/lib/python2.7/multiprocessing/__init__.py, line 211, in Event | return Event() | File /usr/lib/python2.7/multiprocessing/synchronize.py, line 302, in __init__ | self._cond = Condition(Lock()) | File /usr/lib/python2.7/multiprocessing/synchronize.py, line 147, in __init__ | SemLock.__init__(self, SEMAPHORE, 1, 1) | File /usr/lib/python2.7/multiprocessing/synchronize.py, line 75, in __init__ | sl = self._semlock = _multiprocessing.SemLock(kind, value, maxvalue) | OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied | | -- | Ran 55 tests in 3.581s | | FAILED (errors=31) | make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' | make: *** [build] Error 2 | dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 | | Build finished at 20130609-1748 \ Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#711804: python-axiom: FTBFS: testsuite failure
Source: python-axiom Version: 0.6.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Hello, Maintainer, I've noticed the following FTBFS while rebuiling this package. /-- | axiom.test.test_query.QueryComplexity.test_firstTableOuterLoop | === | [FAIL] | Traceback (most recent call last): | File /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/python-axiom/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/axiom/test/test_query.py, line 1084, in test_secondTableInnerLoop | self.assertEqual(count, c) | File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/trial/unittest.py, line 270, in assertEqual | % (msg, pformat(first), pformat(second))) | twisted.trial.unittest.FailTest: not equal: | a = 17 | b = 20 | | | axiom.test.test_query.QueryComplexity.test_secondTableInnerLoop | --- | Ran 517 tests in 48.310s | | FAILED (skips=2, expectedFailures=10, failures=2, successes=503) | make: *** [install/python-axiom] Error 1 | dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 \-- Thanks so much! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#711806: python-tornado: FTBFS: AssertionError: False is not true
Source: python-tornado Version: 2.4.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source I've noticed a FTBFS on this package while doing some rebuilds in a clean amd64 unstable chroot. /-- | make[1]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' |debian/rules override_dh_auto_test | make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' | # python3 tests only in autopkgtest because I'm lazy | set -e for pyvers in 2.7; do \ | PYTHONPATH=/«PKGBUILDDIR» python$pyvers ./tornado/test/runtests.py; \ | done | .F[I 130609 22:47:14 testing:360] RUNNING TEST: test_gaierror (tornado.test.iostream_test.TestIOStream) | ..F[I 130609 22:47:14 testing:360] RUNNING TEST: test_gaierror (tornado.test.iostream_test.TestIOStreamSSL) | ... | == | FAIL: test_gaierror (tornado.test.iostream_test.TestIOStream) | -- | Traceback (most recent call last): | File /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tornado/test/iostream_test.py, line 193, in test_gaierror | self.assertTrue(isinstance(stream.error, socket.gaierror), stream.error) | AssertionError: False is not true | | == | FAIL: test_gaierror (tornado.test.iostream_test.TestIOStreamSSL) | -- | Traceback (most recent call last): | File /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tornado/test/iostream_test.py, line 193, in test_gaierror | self.assertTrue(isinstance(stream.error, socket.gaierror), stream.error) | AssertionError: False is not true | | -- | Ran 268 tests in 1.412s | | FAILED (failures=2) | [E 130609 22:47:15 testing:438] FAIL | make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' | make: *** [build] Error 2 | dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 \-- Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#711807: zsi: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat './/debian/patched/bogus-shebang-remove.dpatch.new'
Source: zsi Version: 2.1~a1-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source I've noticed the following FTBFS while rebuilding some packages in an unstable chroot on an amd64 machine. /-- | dpkg-buildpackage: source package zsi | dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.1~a1-3 | dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org | dpkg-source --before-build zsi-2.1~a1 | dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 | fakeroot debian/rules clean | pyversions: missing X(S)-Python-Version in control file, fall back to debian/pyversions | test -d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched | dpatch deapply-all | dpatch apply-all | applying patch bogus-shebang-remove to ./ ...no-setuptools not applied to ./ . | bogus-shebang-remove not applied to ./ . | rm -rf patch-stamp patch-stampT debian/patched | mv: cannot stat './/debian/patched/bogus-shebang-remove.dpatch.new': No such file or directory | make: *** [patch-stamp] Error 1 | dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2 \-- Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#710312: [paul...@debian.org: Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#710312: python3-pywapi: ifails to install: SyntaxError in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pywapi.py, line 370]
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:48:25PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org, 2013-05-29, 21:22: Setting up python3-pywapi (0.3.2-1) ... File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pywapi.py, line 370 weather_data['geo']['lat'] = u'' ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax u'' literals are valid only in Python 2 and in Python = 3.3. Running 2to3 over the code shows that's there are more 2isms: xrange(), .has_key(). Worse case, as a patcher (and if you really need to fix this for 3.2), you *can* add a dependency on six and replace ufoo -- u(foo). Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#710315: more info
tags 710315 + patch thanks Hey doko, This is only an issue on a i386. I've rebuilt with a minimal patch, wich you'll find attached. [tag@lucifer:~/pbuilder/testing_result]$ python Python 2.7.5 (default, May 29 2013, 22:31:19) [GCC 4.7.3] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import re; re.compile('.*yz', re.S).findall('xyz') ['xyz'] Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag diff -u python2.7-2.7.5/debian/changelog python2.7-2.7.5/debian/changelog --- python2.7-2.7.5/debian/changelog +++ python2.7-2.7.5/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +python2.7 (2.7.5-4.1~local1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add re_unsigned_ptrdiff in from Python bug #17998. (Closes: #710315) + + -- Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org Wed, 29 May 2013 17:42:38 -0400 + python2.7 (2.7.5-4) unstable; urgency=low * Move the libc dependency of -minimal from Depends to Pre-Depends. diff -u python2.7-2.7.5/debian/patches/series.in python2.7-2.7.5/debian/patches/series.in --- python2.7-2.7.5/debian/patches/series.in +++ python2.7-2.7.5/debian/patches/series.in @@ -67,0 +68 @@ +re_unsigned_ptrdiff.diff only in patch2: unchanged: --- python2.7-2.7.5.orig/debian/patches/re_unsigned_ptrdiff.diff +++ python2.7-2.7.5/debian/patches/re_unsigned_ptrdiff.diff @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +diff -r d91da96a55bf Modules/_sre.c +--- a/Modules/_sre.c Thu May 16 22:47:47 2013 +0100 b/Modules/_sre.c Fri May 17 21:02:48 2013 +0300 +@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ + TRACE((|%p|%p|REPEAT_ONE %d %d\n, ctx-pattern, ctx-ptr, +ctx-pattern[1], ctx-pattern[2])); + +-if (ctx-pattern[1] end - ctx-ptr) ++if ((Py_ssize_t) ctx-pattern[1] end - ctx-ptr) + RETURN_FAILURE; /* cannot match */ + + state-ptr = ctx-ptr; +@@ -,7 +,7 @@ + TRACE((|%p|%p|MIN_REPEAT_ONE %d %d\n, ctx-pattern, ctx-ptr, +ctx-pattern[1], ctx-pattern[2])); + +-if (ctx-pattern[1] end - ctx-ptr) ++if ((Py_ssize_t) ctx-pattern[1] end - ctx-ptr) + RETURN_FAILURE; /* cannot match */ + + state-ptr = ctx-ptr; signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#682648: Rescheduled
Rescheduled to 0-day. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#682648: Uploaded to DELAYED/7
tags 682648 + pending thanks Uploaded to DELAYED/7 (I think, I'm currently 37,000 feet in the air and using flaky airline wireless) Let me know if I should cut or push back the upload. Cheery-bye, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#686580: netdiag: Strobe license is incorrectly stated as GPL
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:07:38AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:12:40 -0400 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:59:17PM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: Matthaeus Wander mwan...@swznet.de writes: [...] AIUI, the Strobe license (as quoted below) fails to meet DFSG 1. Therefore, my guess is that the severity of this bug has to be raised to ‘grave’. (Which I'll do unless there be objections.) [...] --copy-- Copyright (c) Julian Assange 1995-1999, All rights reserved. This software has only three copyright restrictions. Firstly, this copyright notice must remain intact and unmodified. Secondly, the Author, Julian Assange, must be appropriately and prominantly credited in any documentation associated with any derived work. Thirdly unless otherwise negotiated with the author, you may not sell this program commercially, reasonable distribution costs excepted. Use and or distribution of this software implies acceptance of the above. --paste-- This looks very much non-free and should be moved to non-free immediately, or removed from the archive. I agree. In the meanwhile, I recommend getting in touch with the copyright holder and trying to persuade him to re-license Strobe under DFSG-free Mr. Assange is the copyright holder (among a few others), but I get the impression he's a bit busy at the moment... terms (for instance under the terms of the GNU GPL v2, if a copyleft license is preferred, or under the terms of the Expat license http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt , if a non-copyleft license is preferred). Cranking up severity is a *good* move, I would do it, but I see you intend to. I think the correct severity is serious... -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#685958: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/4
Howdy, Maintainer, I've uploaded an NMU to DELAYED/4, please let me know if I should cut the upload, or 0-day it. Debdiff attached Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag diff -u sauerbraten-wake6-1.0/debian/changelog sauerbraten-wake6-1.0/debian/changelog --- sauerbraten-wake6-1.0/debian/changelog +++ sauerbraten-wake6-1.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +sauerbraten-wake6 (1.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * debian/control: +- Maintainer email address was invalid and bounced. Update it to + use a valid address. (Closes: #685958) + + -- Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:50:59 +0200 + sauerbraten-wake6 (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release. (Closes: #457559) diff -u sauerbraten-wake6-1.0/debian/control sauerbraten-wake6-1.0/debian/control --- sauerbraten-wake6-1.0/debian/control +++ sauerbraten-wake6-1.0/debian/control @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: sauerbraten-wake6 Section: contrib/games Priority: optional -Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@linuks.mine.nu +Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@phys.ethz.ch Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5) Standards-Version: 3.7.3 Homepage: http://wakeup.rundumbonn.de/wscm/mapping/wake6.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#685959: Uploaded to DELAYED/4
tags 688124 + pending tags 685959 + pending thanks Hello, I've uploaded this bug to DELAYED/4, please let me know if I should cut the upload or move it to 0-day. Debdiff attached. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag diff -u kic-2.4a/debian/control kic-2.4a/debian/control --- kic-2.4a/debian/control +++ kic-2.4a/debian/control @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: kic Section: non-free/x11 Priority: optional -Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@linuks.mine.nu +Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@phys.ethz.ch Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), autotools-dev, libxmu-dev, libxmuu-dev, libxext-dev, libxdmcp-dev Standards-Version: 3.7.2 diff -u kic-2.4a/debian/changelog kic-2.4a/debian/changelog --- kic-2.4a/debian/changelog +++ kic-2.4a/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +kic (2.4a-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * debian/control: +- Maintainer email address was invalid and bounced. Update it to + use a valid address. (Closes: #685959) + + -- Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:43:26 +0200 + kic (2.4a-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #448342) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#675220: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/4
tags 688126 + pending tags 675220 + pending thanks Howdy, I've uploaded this to DELAYED/4, please let me know if I should cut the upload, or move it to 0day. Debdiff attached. Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag diff -u textedit.app-4.0+20061029/debian/control textedit.app-4.0+20061029/debian/control --- textedit.app-4.0+20061029/debian/control +++ textedit.app-4.0+20061029/debian/control @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: textedit.app Section: editors Priority: optional -Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@linuks.mine.nu +Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@phys.ethz.ch Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libgnustep-gui-dev (= 0.12.0), gnustep-make Standards-Version: 3.7.2 Homepage: http://www.nongnu.org/backbone/apps.html diff -u textedit.app-4.0+20061029/debian/changelog textedit.app-4.0+20061029/debian/changelog --- textedit.app-4.0+20061029/debian/changelog +++ textedit.app-4.0+20061029/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +textedit.app (4.0+20061029-3.4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * debian/control: +- Maintainer email address was invalid and bounced. Update it to + use a valid address. (Closes: #675220) + + -- Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:49:59 +0200 + textedit.app (4.0+20061029-3.3) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688668: more info
tags 688668 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks Heyya! So, i've taken a look at your patch, and I'm not sure where the move was introduced -- do you have a kernel version this change was introduced in? | $ apt-file search netinet/if_tr.h | $ apt-file search linux/if_tr.h | linux-headers-3.4-trunk-common: /usr/src/linux-headers-3.4-trunk-common/include/linux/if_tr.h | linux-headers-3.4-trunk-common-rt: /usr/src/linux-headers-3.4-trunk-common-rt/include/linux/if_tr.h | linux-libc-dev: /usr/include/linux/if_tr.h Anyway, patch looks minimal, and thanks for your work! Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#681426: NMU Uploaded to DELAYED/3
Hello, Maintainer, A NMU has been uploaded to DELAYED/3, please find the debdiff attached. Please note the binary file changes are not representable, and dgetting the source might be the best way to re-introduce the changes. Thank you, Mika! -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag diff -Nru syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/changelog syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/changelog --- syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/changelog 2012-06-30 08:39:50.0 -0400 +++ syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/changelog 2012-09-16 09:13:39.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +syslinux-themes-debian (11-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix paths to extlinux themes, allowing systems using extlinux to boot. +(Closes: #681426) +Thanks to Frank Chung for the patches. + * Update wheezy artwork to the Joy theme. + + -- Mika Pflüger deb...@mikapflueger.de Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:32:45 +0200 + syslinux-themes-debian (11-1) unstable; urgency=low * Using compression level 9 also for binary packages. diff -Nru syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/patches/fix-extlinux-cfg-wheezy-paths syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/patches/fix-extlinux-cfg-wheezy-paths --- syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/patches/fix-extlinux-cfg-wheezy-paths 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500 +++ syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/patches/fix-extlinux-cfg-wheezy-paths 2012-09-15 16:42:46.0 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +Description: Fix paths for themes in extlinux configuration +Author: Frank Chung chu...@gmail.com +Reviewed-By: Mika Pflüger deb...@mikapflueger.de +Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/681426 + +--- syslinux-themes-debian-11.orig/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/other.cfg syslinux-themes-debian-11/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/other.cfg +@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ + label hdt + menu label ^Hardware Detection Tool (HDT) +- kernel themes/debian-squeeze/hdt.c32 ++ kernel themes/debian-wheezy/hdt.c32 + text help +HDT displays low-level information about the systems hardware. + endtext + + label memtest + menu label ^Memory Failure Detection (memtest86+) +- linux themes/debian-squeeze/memtest.bin ++ linux themes/debian-wheezy/memtest.bin + text help + memtest86+ detects memory hardware failures. + endtext +--- syslinux-themes-debian-11.orig/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/stdmenu.cfg syslinux-themes-debian-11/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/stdmenu.cfg +@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ +-menu background themes/debian-squeeze/splash.png ++menu background themes/debian-wheezy/splash.png + menu color title * # * + menu color border * # # none + menu color sel* # #76a1d0ff * +--- syslinux-themes-debian-11.orig/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/theme.cfg syslinux-themes-debian-11/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/theme.cfg +@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ +-include themes/debian-squeeze/menu.cfg +-default themes/debian-squeeze/vesamenu.c32 ++include themes/debian-wheezy/menu.cfg ++default themes/debian-wheezy/vesamenu.c32 + prompt 0 + timeout 50 +--- syslinux-themes-debian-11.orig/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/menu.cfg syslinux-themes-debian-11/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/menu.cfg +@@ -2,16 +2,16 @@ menu hshift 0 + menu width 82 + + menu title Boot menu +-include themes/debian-squeeze/stdmenu.cfg ++include themes/debian-wheezy/stdmenu.cfg + include linux.cfg + include memdisk.cfg + include os-prober.cfg + menu separator + menu begin other + menu title Other options +- include themes/debian-squeeze/stdmenu.cfg ++ include themes/debian-wheezy/stdmenu.cfg + label mainmenu + menu label ^Back.. + menu exit +- include themes/debian-squeeze/other.cfg ++ include themes/debian-wheezy/other.cfg + menu end diff -Nru syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/patches/series syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/patches/series --- syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/patches/series 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500 +++ syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/patches/series 2012-09-15 16:39:10.0 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fix-extlinux-cfg-wheezy-paths diff -Nru syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/source/include-binaries syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/source/include-binaries --- syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/source/include-binaries1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500 +++ syslinux-themes-debian-11/debian/source/include-binaries2012-09-16 09:23:24.0 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/splash.png +themes/debian-wheezy/isolinux-live/splash.png +themes/debian-wheezy/syslinux-live/splash.png Binary files /tmp/Kb1F4kNruc/syslinux-themes-debian-11/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/splash.png and /tmp/8bebUGTLQL/syslinux-themes-debian-11/themes/debian-wheezy/extlinux/splash.png differ Binary files /tmp/Kb1F4kNruc
Bug#629774: nmu pending
tags 629774 + pending thanks I've NMU'd this package on a 4-day queue. Please let me know if I should abort the upload. NMU diff attached. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag diff -Nru datapacker-1.0.1+nmu1/debian/changelog datapacker-1.0.1+nmu2/debian/changelog --- datapacker-1.0.1+nmu1/debian/changelog 2009-11-02 16:17:57.0 -0500 +++ datapacker-1.0.1+nmu2/debian/changelog 2012-07-29 16:02:30.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +datapacker (1.0.1+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Update build-dependencies for GHC 7 (LP: #826233), (Closes: #629774), +thanks cjwatson for the fix. + + -- Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:33:07 -0400 + datapacker (1.0.1+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer uploaded needed to address xpdf's RC bugs: diff -Nru datapacker-1.0.1+nmu1/debian/control datapacker-1.0.1+nmu2/debian/control --- datapacker-1.0.1+nmu1/debian/control 2009-11-02 16:18:09.0 -0500 +++ datapacker-1.0.1+nmu2/debian/control 2012-07-29 15:32:57.0 -0400 @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ Maintainer: John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), groff, docbook-utils, man-db, ghostscript, gtk-doc-tools, sgml2x, jade, - ghc6 (= 6.8), haskell-devscripts (= 0.6.6), libghc6-missingh-dev (= 1.0.1), - libghc6-unix-dev, libghc6-mtl-dev, libghc6-filepath-dev, libghc6-hslogger-dev + ghc (= 6.8), haskell-devscripts (= 0.6.6), libghc-missingh-dev (= 1.0.1), + libghc-unix-dev, libghc-mtl-dev, libghc-filepath-dev, libghc-hslogger-dev Build-Conflicts: docbook-ebnf Standards-Version: 3.7.3 Homepage: http://software.complete.org/datapacker signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#629774: nmu pending
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 06:34:26PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: Hi Paul, I appreciate your attention to datapacker while I've been busy lately. The diff looks fine to me. You may upload it directly (not delayed) if you wish. Rescheduled to 0-day, pending for real :) I'll file to get this unblocked. Thanks for the quick reply + consent! Cheers, Paul -- John On 07/29/2012 03:07 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: tags 629774 + pending thanks I've NMU'd this package on a 4-day queue. Please let me know if I should abort the upload. NMU diff attached. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#678746: desktop-base: Joy theme is a mix of incompatibly-licensed works
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:13:31AM +0200, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: Package: desktop-base Version: 7.0.0~exp2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 Hello, I read about the new Joy theme [1][2]. [1] http://blog.pault.ag/post/25614704596/my-quest-to-get-desktop-base-set-before-wheezy [2] http://blog.pault.ag/post/25747178764/debian-desktop-7-0-0-exp2-in-experimental It looks nice, but it seems to have licensing issues. In the debian/copyright file [3] I read: | The Joy theme is © 2012 Adrien Aubourg and released under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 | license. | | The Joy plymouth theme is Copyright © 2009 Canonical Ltd., | Copyright © 2010 Aurélien COUDERC and Copyright © 2012 Jonathan Carter under | the GPLv2+, with work from Adrien Aubourg under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License. | | The Joy KDM, GDM and KSplash grub theme are © 2012 Paul Tagliamonte and released | under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license, with work from all the previous authors, and | Adrien Aubourg. [3] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_7.0.0~exp2/copyright First of all, these debian/copyright paragraphs fail to acknowledge that the Joy theme is based on the Debian “Open Use” (without “Debian” word) logo. But this may be fixed easily. ACK'd. I'll fix this tonight. Thank you! The major issue seems to be that the Joy plymouth theme mixes parts released under CC-by-sa-v3.0 and parts released under GPLv2+. Since CC-by-sa-v3.0 is incompatible with GPLv2+, I would say that the resulting work is legally undistributable. This *might* be true if it was two bits of code that get linked together, but since Plymouth (and the plugin, which is GPLv2) only render the CC-BY-SA 3.0 work, it should be fine. I'll CC debian-leagl for comment If this was the case, a lot of games would have to be removed from the archive. The same issue seems to hold for the Joy KDM, GDM and KSplash grub theme, since it said to incorporate work from all the previous authors. If all the previous authors includes Aurélien COUDERC and/or Jonathan Carter, it seems that their work is under GPLv2+ and thus the incompatibility of CC-by-sa-v3.0 again kicks in. Johnathan Carter contributed to the Plymouth script, not the artwork. The artwork is still the same. In this case, I'll modify this line to show the files that I edited are still GPLv2, and the images it's self is CC-BY-SA 3.0. No problem, no big deal. (For the record, I am also convinced that CC-by-sa-v3.0 fails to meet the DFSG, but that's another story, since FTP masters disagree with me, unfortunately). I hope the incompatibility issue may be fixed soon for the Joy theme. Not such a big deal :) Since everything else in the desktop-base package is GPL-compatible, I strongly recommend to persuade Adrien Aubourg and Paul Tagliamonte I'm fine with whatever license comes up. I just wanted to keep consistancy. to re-license their work under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 or later. Or, at least, to dual-license it under CC-by-sa-v3.0 and GPLv2+. (In the latter case, the complete text of CC-by-sa-v3.0 should be included in the debian/copyright file, though.) Bye and thanks for your time. Thank you, Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#678746: desktop-base: Joy theme is a mix of incompatibly-licensed works
severity 678746 normal retitle 678746 debian/copyright is worded poorly tags 678746 + pending thanks On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 07:03:01PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: reopen 678746 thanks On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:43:12 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 07:34:50 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: The major issue seems to be that the Joy plymouth theme mixes parts released under CC-by-sa-v3.0 and parts released under GPLv2+. Since CC-by-sa-v3.0 is incompatible with GPLv2+, I would say that the resulting work is legally undistributable. This *might* be true if it was two bits of code that get linked together, but since Plymouth (and the plugin, which is GPLv2) only render the CC-BY-SA 3.0 work, it should be fine. Quite. Closing. Please, let's keep this bug report open until each part of it gets fixed. First of all, there is still the issue with the missing acknowledgment that the Joy theme is based on the Debian “Open Use” (without “Debian” word) logo: Paul Tagliamonte has stated that he'll fix this part tonight. Already fixed in svn :) Then there's the clarification of the debian/copyright file, which is also still to be done. Fixed the plymouth issue. But it already seems that this will have to be done differently, since the upstream author of the Joy theme (Adrien Aubourg) has just stated that he'll soon re-license his theme under the GPL. I hate the idea of licensing images under GPL, even though we do have the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. This is another flame-war I won't open, but I hate the idea of non-software under a software license. This is all moot, since He said he'd relicense it, so if he does, I'll reflect that. If not, I have no problems keeping a DFSG free license in this package. Hence I think the debian/copyright file needs some modifications, before this bug report may be closed... It's sitting in svn. I'm waiting for some more patches before I upload. AFAICT the legal issue is fine, even if the copyright is poorly phrased, which I admit it is. I'll wait for the last changes to trickle in and fix this in the archive. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE Thanks again, Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672032: oops!
Sorry, I missed doko's mail. Ignore me! Thanks! -- Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672032: patch attached
tags 672032 + patch thanks Howdy, Enrico, I've wrapped up a quick patch to resolve the FTBFS. Have a great day! - Paul --- a/debtags.cc 2012-05-25 23:01:20.672411584 -0400 +++ b/debtags.cc 2012-05-25 23:01:44.840410297 -0400 @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ #include sys/ioctl.h #include sys/types.h // umask #include sys/stat.h // umask +#include unistd.h // unlink #include cstring signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672095: found in 4.4.0.20111005
found 672095 4.4.0.20111005-1 thanks Found this when I tested the version from experemental. There are a lot of files to be patched. If you (or upstream) doesn't get to it right away, It's on my radar. Thanks! -- Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672058: patch attached
tags 672058 + patch thanks Howdy Maintainer, Please find a patch attached to resolve the FTBFS. Thanks! -- Paul --- a/ifpguiview.cpp 2012-05-19 08:31:59.018743746 -0400 +++ b/ifpguiview.cpp 2012-05-19 08:31:51.770744133 -0400 @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include playlist/playlistloader.h #include QtGui +#include unistd.h #ifdef BSD4 #include libgen.h signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672042: patch attached
tags 672042 + patch thanks Howdy Maintainer, Please find a patch attached to resolve the FTBFS. Thanks! -- Paul diff -Nuarp a/src/VpnClientConnection.cpp b/src/VpnClientConnection.cpp --- a/src/VpnClientConnection.cpp 2012-03-13 03:45:43.0 -0400 +++ b/src/VpnClientConnection.cpp 2012-05-19 08:41:37.310712873 -0400 @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #include fcntl.h #include pwd.h #include syslog.h +#include unistd.h #include sys/stat.h #include VpnClientConnection.h diff -Nuarp a/src/VpnControlDaemonApplication.cpp b/src/VpnControlDaemonApplication.cpp --- a/src/VpnControlDaemonApplication.cpp 2012-03-13 03:45:43.0 -0400 +++ b/src/VpnControlDaemonApplication.cpp 2012-05-19 08:41:41.650712639 -0400 @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include fcntl.h #include signal.h #include syslog.h +#include unistd.h #include VpnControlDaemon.h #include VpnControlDaemonApplication.h signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672003: patch attached
tags 672003 + patch thanks Howdy! Please find a patch attached to resolve the FTBFS. Thanks! -- Paul --- a/ClntIfaceMgr/ClntIfaceIface.cpp 2012-05-10 20:02:00.578728138 -0400 +++ b/ClntIfaceMgr/ClntIfaceIface.cpp 2012-05-10 20:01:52.322727687 -0400 @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ */ #include iostream +#include unistd.h #include ClntIfaceIface.h #include Portable.h #include Logger.h signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672010: patch attached
tags 672010 + patch thanks Howdy, Maintainer, Please find a patch attached to resolve the FTBFS Thanks! -- Paul --- a/src/lsof.cpp 2012-05-09 21:27:01.138367215 -0400 +++ b/src/lsof.cpp 2012-05-09 21:26:52.398367682 -0400 @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include vector #include assert.h #include cstring +#include unistd.h #include lsof.h fsuser::fsuser(const char *pid, const char *name) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672007: patch attached
tags 672007 + patch thanks Howdy Maintainer, Please find a patch attached to help resolve the FTBFS Thanks! -- Paul --- a/src/third_party/qtsingleapplication/qtlocalpeer.cpp 2012-05-09 21:19:32.854391150 -0400 +++ b/src/third_party/qtsingleapplication/qtlocalpeer.cpp 2012-05-09 21:10:10.946421151 -0400 @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ static PProcessIdToSessionId pProcessIdT #endif #if defined(Q_OS_UNIX) #include time.h +#include unistd.h #endif namespace QtLP_Private { signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672052: patch attached
tags 672052 + patch thanks Howdy! Please find a patch attached to resolve this FTBFS. I know you mentioned having a rusty chroot, so hopefully this helps :) Thanks! -- Paul diff -Nuarp qastools-0.17.1/shared/src/single_application.cpp qastools-0.17.1.new/shared/src/single_application.cpp --- qastools-0.17.1/shared/src/single_application.cpp 2012-05-09 21:51:29.202288832 -0400 +++ qastools-0.17.1.new/shared/src/single_application.cpp 2012-05-09 21:50:58.034290496 -0400 @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include QFile #include QRegExp #include iostream +#include unistd.h #include stdlib.h #include pwd.h diff -Nuarp qastools-0.17.1/shared/src/unix_signal_handler.cpp qastools-0.17.1.new/shared/src/unix_signal_handler.cpp --- qastools-0.17.1/shared/src/unix_signal_handler.cpp 2012-05-09 21:51:20.698289286 -0400 +++ qastools-0.17.1.new/shared/src/unix_signal_handler.cpp 2012-05-09 21:50:58.030290496 -0400 @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include signal.h #include QSocketNotifier #include iostream +#include unistd.h int Unix_Signal_Handler::_sig_int_fds[2]; signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672071: patch attached
tags 672071 + patch thanks Howdy Daviey, Hope you're having a good UDS. I've attached a patch to resolve this FTBFS. Thanks! -- Paul --- a/src/networkhelper.cc 2012-05-09 22:15:28.678211972 -0400 +++ b/src/networkhelper.cc 2012-05-09 22:15:22.046212329 -0400 @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include net/if.h #include sys/ioctl.h #include netinet/in.h +#include unistd.h #include libbw/stringutil.h #include libbw/debug.h signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672005: patch attached
tags 672005 + patch thanks Howdy! Please find a patch attached to resolve the FTBFS. Thanks! -- Paul diff -Nuarp l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6/src/ConnectionManager.cpp l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6.new/src/ConnectionManager.cpp --- l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6/src/ConnectionManager.cpp 2012-03-12 16:32:47.0 -0400 +++ l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6.new/src/ConnectionManager.cpp 2012-05-09 22:31:56.054159256 -0400 @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #include QMenu #include QTimer #include QMessageBox +#include unistd.h //#include QDebug #include pkcs11/SmartCardState.h @@ -692,4 +693,4 @@ QString ConnectionManager::connectionNam } return(strConnectionName.trimmed()); -} \ No newline at end of file +} diff -Nuarp l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6/src/main.cpp l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6.new/src/main.cpp --- l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6/src/main.cpp 2012-03-12 16:32:47.0 -0400 +++ l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6.new/src/main.cpp 2012-05-09 22:31:56.054159256 -0400 @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include QTranslator #include syslog.h +#include unistd.h #include pkcs11/Pkcs11.h #include settings/ConnectionSettings.h @@ -218,4 +219,4 @@ static uint effectiveUid() } return(uiUid); -} \ No newline at end of file +} diff -Nuarp l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6/src/PasswordCallback.cpp l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6.new/src/PasswordCallback.cpp --- l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6/src/PasswordCallback.cpp 2012-03-12 16:32:47.0 -0400 +++ l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6.new/src/PasswordCallback.cpp 2012-05-09 22:31:56.054159256 -0400 @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include QObject #include stdlib.h +#include unistd.h // #include syslog.h #include settings/ConnectionSettings.h diff -Nuarp l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6/src/util/NetworkInterfaceMonitor.cpp l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6.new/src/util/NetworkInterfaceMonitor.cpp --- l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6/src/util/NetworkInterfaceMonitor.cpp 2012-03-12 16:32:47.0 -0400 +++ l2tp-ipsec-vpn-1.0.6.new/src/util/NetworkInterfaceMonitor.cpp 2012-05-09 22:36:42.874143944 -0400 @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include linux/rtnetlink.h #include net/if.h #include arpa/inet.h +#include unistd.h #include NetworkInterfaceMonitor.h #include NetworkInterface.h signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#667343: patch attached
tags 667343 + patch thanks Howdy! Please find a patch attached to help resolve this FTBFS. Thanks! -- Paul --- a/src/main.cpp 2012-05-07 23:20:20.827589188 -0400 +++ b/src/main.cpp 2012-05-07 23:20:42.039588056 -0400 @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ AUTHOR:kingson fiasco #include sys/stat.h #include errno.h #include locale.h +#include unistd.h #endif #include stdio.h signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#668698: smartptr.h uses old destroy() syntax [breaks other packages due to gcc 4.7 transition]
Package: cxxtools Version: 2.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7 thanks Howdy, Maintainer! While browsing the GCC 4.7 FTBFSs, a couple of the bugs have the following error during build: /usr/include/cxxtools/smartptr.h:252:13: error: 'destroy' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive] /usr/include/cxxtools/smartptr.h:252:13: note: declarations in dependent base 'cxxtools::DefaultDestroyPolicytnt::LangLib' are not found by unqualified lookup /usr/include/cxxtools/smartptr.h:252:13: note: use 'this-destroy' instead I've bumped the severity a bit, since this breaks a few other packages. If you feel that's not needed, feel free to bump it back down to important, but I think the plan is to migrate to gcc-4.7 soon. Thanks, and have a great day! -- Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#668698: merging a few bugs
block 667393 by 668698 block 667394 by 668698 block 667409 by 668698 thanks Hi, tntdb, tntnet and vdr-plugin-live maintainers, It appears this FTBFS is caused by the following error: /usr/include/cxxtools/smartptr.h:252:13: error: 'destroy' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive] /usr/include/cxxtools/smartptr.h:252:13: note: declarations in dependent base 'cxxtools::DefaultDestroyPolicytnt::Object' are not found by unqualified lookup /usr/include/cxxtools/smartptr.h:252:13: note: use 'this-destroy' instead I've filed bug #668698[1] (smartptr.h uses old destroy() syntax [breaks other packages due to gcc 4.7 transition]) If this is not the case, feel free to unblock. Thanks, all! Paul [1]: bugs.debian.org/668698 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#668700: secblock.h uses old CheckSize() syntax [breaks other packages due to gcc 4.7 transition]
Package: libcrypto++ Version: 5.6.1-5 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7 thanks Howdy, libcrypto++ maintainer, It appears that a package that depends on the headers provided is breaking due to the upcoming gcc 4.7 transition. If you feel this bug is not serious, please correct the severity. The header (secblock.h) has the following error: /usr/include/cryptopp/secblock.h:91:3: error: 'CheckSize' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive] /usr/include/cryptopp/secblock.h:91:3: note: declarations in dependent base 'CryptoPP::AllocatorBaselong long unsigned int' are not found by unqualified lookup /usr/include/cryptopp/secblock.h:91:3: note: use 'this-CheckSize' instead Have a great day, -- Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#668700: blocking a bug
block 667335 by 668700 thanks Howdy, pycryptopp libcrypto++ maintainers, I've filed a blocking bug on libcrypto++ providing a header that fails with gcc-4.7. Thanks! -- Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#641479: alpine: Contains non-free code
Howdy, Asheesh (and others), I had some time, so I figured I'd document the interface to the nonfree source and get someone to implement a drop-in replacement, but I discovered something a bit funny when I was in there: #include windows.h I took a look at the build system, turns out it was only for Windows. I removed the nonfree file, repacked and rebuilt, and it built with success in a pbuild chroot. I removed the following files (I also found windows binaries in there) Windows Binaries: ./ldap/binaries/debug/ldap32.dll ./ldap/binaries/debug/libldap.dll ./ldap/binaries/release/ldap32.dll ./ldap/binaries/release/libldap.dll ./alpine/ldap32.dll Windows Non-DFSG Free Source: ./pico/msmem.c I've put my copy of the tarball I tested with on my people.u.c http://people.ubuntu.com/~paultag/alpine_2.02+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz It's MD5 on my machine is: 15ee825093b90368e52b3fca7f18f680 Cheers, folks, Paul -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#639435: package no longer installable
Hi, Philipp! On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Package: alexandria Version: 0.6.6-1 Severity: serious ruby-gnome2 dropped some deprecated packages and hence your package is no longer installable in unstable. The affected dependencies are libgconf2-ruby, libgnome2-ruby and libglade2-ruby. Is there a suggested upgrade path, or have the libraries themselves been removed and orphaned? I guess, what I'm really asking is, is this an upstream issue or something we can solve here in Debian? Kind regards Philipp Kern Cheers! Paul -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#639435: package no longer installable
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org wrote: Philipp Kern escreveu isso aí: Paul, am Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 02:49:26PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben: On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Package: alexandria Version: 0.6.6-1 Severity: serious ruby-gnome2 dropped some deprecated packages and hence your package is no longer installable in unstable. The affected dependencies are libgconf2-ruby, libgnome2-ruby and libglade2-ruby. Is there a suggested upgrade path, or have the libraries themselves been removed and orphaned? I guess, what I'm really asking is, is this an upstream issue or something we can solve here in Debian? Upstream decided that those specific subpackages are now absolete and will not be maintained anymore, so they were dropped on Debian as well. I'm sadly just the messenger as I noticed that ruby-gnome2 cannot migrate because of this and that the packages were dropped without properly communicating the issue (i.e. filing bugs). My bad, I should really have filled bugs after uploading ruby-gnome2. Thanks Philipp for doing that. But it is important to note that this was explicitly communicated to all affected maintainers one month ago: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2011/07/msg00049.html I missed that, sorry. Looks like I was CC'd. Guess it's on me. Thanks for the heads up. What's the plan for these packages? Straight removal? Communicate with upstream to try to re-implement using a different library? Are there any similar libraries that could be used for a fork if upstream's unwilling or inactive? That message contained all the whats, whys and hows, but unfortunately we only got a reply for 1 out of the 5 affected packages. -- Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org Thanks for the RE :) Paul -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#628849: Build-depends on libmagickcore3-extra, soon to be removed
Tags: pending thanks All set in VCS. I'm going to batch this up with another issue and prep. Thanks again! Paul On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@debian.org wrote: Package: fluxbox Version: 1.3.1~dfsg1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid Hi maintainer, Your package build-depends on libmagickcore3-extra which is going to be removed. Please update your build-dependencies and upload a fixed package. libmagickcore4-extra is the new package, and provides libmagickcore-extra. ACK'd. Thanks, maintainer! Regards, -- Mehdi -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#628849: Build-depends on libmagickcore3-extra, soon to be removed
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@debian.org wrote: Package: fluxbox Version: 1.3.1~dfsg1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid Hi maintainer, Your package build-depends on libmagickcore3-extra which is going to be removed. Please update your build-dependencies and upload a fixed package. libmagickcore4-extra is the new package, and provides libmagickcore-extra. ACK'd. Thanks, maintainer! Regards, -- Mehdi -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org