Bug#446691: defrag: should this package be removed?

2007-10-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
severity 446691 normal 
reassign 446691 ftp.debian.org 
retitle 446691 RM: defrag -- RoM; orphaned upstream and out of sync with common 
ext2/3 features
thanks

Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: defrag
> Version: 0.73pjm1-8
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: proposed-removal
>
> Hi,
>
> While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
> candidate for removal from Debian, because:
>
>  * 4 RC bugs, opened for a long time, with no resolution path in sight.
>  * only really works with old ext2 filesystems.
>  * dangerous with modern ext2/ext3 FS, without telling so (#396449).
>
> I think that it would be much better to remove it from Debian for now.
> There's no point in keeping it just to collect RC bugs.  If upstream
> work happens, you can always re-upload it...
>
> If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from
> Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so.
>
> If you agree, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number):
> severity nn normal
> reassign nn ftp.debian.org
> retitle nn RM:  -- RoM;  
> thanks
>
> For more information, see
> http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt
>
> If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
> just close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other
> issues.
>
> Thank you,

There is a new attempt to make an defrag for ext2/3/4 in the works,
very early works, that will do online defragmentation. But I believe
this is so far away from being usable that it is not worth waiting
for.

I think the next generation defrag can (and probably should anyway) go
through NEW again when the time comes.

MfG
Goswin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#446691: defrag: should this package be removed?

2007-10-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 446691 normal
Bug#446691: defrag: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

> reassign 446691 ftp.debian.org
Bug#446691: defrag: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `defrag' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> retitle 446691 RM: defrag -- RoM; orphaned upstream and out of sync with 
> common ext2/3 features
Bug#446691: defrag: should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to `RM: defrag -- RoM; orphaned upstream and out of sync with 
common ext2/3 features' from `defrag: should this package be removed?'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#446691: defrag: should this package be removed?

2007-10-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: defrag
Version: 0.73pjm1-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal

Hi,

While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:

 * 4 RC bugs, opened for a long time, with no resolution path in sight.
 * only really works with old ext2 filesystems.
 * dangerous with modern ext2/ext3 FS, without telling so (#396449).

I think that it would be much better to remove it from Debian for now.
There's no point in keeping it just to collect RC bugs.  If upstream
work happens, you can always re-upload it...

If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from
Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so.

If you agree, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number):
severity nn normal
reassign nn ftp.debian.org
retitle nn RM:  -- RoM;  
thanks

For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt

If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
just close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other
issues.

Thank you,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]