Bug#457725: resolution stuck at 1280x1024

2007-12-24 Thread Romain Beauxis
forcemerge 457298 457725
thanks

Le Tuesday 25 December 2007 01:20:51 Thomas Bushnell BSG, vous avez écrit :
> Package: fglrx-driver
> Version: 8.44.3-1
> Severity: serious

Driver still working..

> This is not at all ready for the unstable distribution, and belongs in
> experimental.  The ChangeLog suggests that you uploaded this *knowing*
> it would have this bug, which makes it essentially useless on any modern
> hardware.

Please try not to open new bugs that are already reported. More than the 
changelog, *I* have opened it.

This release is the first one to support fireGL again, which has also been an 
important complain recently.

And at least, you've got it working which was not the case for fireGL owners, 
and you may also use radeonhd for widescreen resolutions.

I don't have other options than uploading to sid, as I say, it's the usual 
fglrx's tango.

Romain




Processed: Re: Bug#457725: resolution stuck at 1280x1024

2007-12-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forcemerge 457298 457725
Bug#457298: fglrx-driver: widescreen resolutions broken
Bug#457725: resolution stuck at 1280x1024
Forcibly Merged 457298 457725.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#457725: resolution stuck at 1280x1024

2007-12-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.44.3-1
Severity: serious

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Upon "up"grade to 8.44.3, my X server no longer knows about the proper 
resolutions of my screen.

/etc/X11/xorg.conf has the following for each depth:
Modes   "1920x1440" "1920x1200" "1856x1392" "1792x1344" 
"1680x1050" "1600x1200" "1440x900" "1400x1050" "1280x1024" "1280x960" 
"1280x854" "1280x800" "1280x768" "1200x800" "1152x864" "1152x768" "1024x768" 
"800x600" "640x480"

My actual display (on a Dell Inspiron E 1505) is 1680x1050. But I'm getting 
1280x1024 resolution.

The Xorg.0.log shows that the following is advertised by the monitor:

(II) fglrx(0): Supported additional Video Mode:
(II) fglrx(0): clock: 122.0 MHz   Image Size:  331 x 207 mm
(II) fglrx(0): h_active: 1680  h_sync: 1712  h_sync_end 1776 h_blank_end 1904 
h_border: 0
(II) fglrx(0): v_active: 1050  v_sync: 1051  v_sync_end 1054 v_blanking: 1066 
v_border: 0

Which is correct.

But then a bit later we see:

(II) fglrx(0): Total of 13 modes found for primary display.

Which is interesting, for there are nineteen modes in the Modes line in
xorg.conf, and worse yet, the modes that it proceeds to examine are not
all from xorg.conf.  It has apparently decided to go ahead and ignore my
configuration file.  The modes it examines are:

1280x1024, 1152x864, 1024x768, 800x600, 640x480, 1280x72, 720x480,
640x432, 512x384, 400x300, 320x240, and 320x200.  Note that my
configuration file does not list many of these.

This is a massive lose.  It is clear that the mode line in the
configuration file is simply being entirely ignored, and a new one
substituted.  

This is not at all ready for the unstable distribution, and belongs in
experimental.  The ChangeLog suggests that you uploaded this *knowing*
it would have this bug, which makes it essentially useless on any modern
hardware.  

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.22-3-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablemirrors.kernel.org 
  500 stable  security.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-=
libc6 (>= 2.7-1) | 2.7-5
libgl1-mesa-glx  | 7.0.2-3
 OR libgl1   | 
libx11-6 | 2:1.0.3-7
libxext6 | 1:1.0.3-2
libxrandr2  (>= 2:1.2.0) | 2:1.2.2-1
libxrender1  | 1:0.9.4-1
xserver-xorg(>= 1:7.1.0) | 1:7.3+8





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]