Bug#466519: ltrace of an svn update
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 04:05:02PM +, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:45:45 +0100 > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:03:48AM +, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo > > wrote: > > > I noticed in the other bug report it was asked to include an > > > ltrace... This is the ltrace of an svn update. > > > > > > > You had libc6-dbg installed when you ran it ? because I see no > > libc calls which is odd. A strace may help too please. > > I installed -dgb on purpose... unfortunately I can't test with > older libc6 (I don't have them anymore) and well nothing has changed > other than that upgrade. > > There are other stuff in the last upgrade of that box... but they do > look even less related. well, the point is ltrace barely uses the libc, so it's really curious. > I've tried to use svn clients from other different hosts on the same > server and everything is working... this exclude a corruption in the > svn repo and should exclude a network problems on the server. Well, it could be network related for all I know, but I see nothing interesting in the strace :/ -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpRwA3briCx5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#466519: ltrace of an svn update
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:45:45 +0100 Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:03:48AM +, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo > wrote: > > I noticed in the other bug report it was asked to include an > > ltrace... This is the ltrace of an svn update. > > > > You had libc6-dbg installed when you ran it ? because I see no > libc calls which is odd. A strace may help too please. I installed -dgb on purpose... unfortunately I can't test with older libc6 (I don't have them anymore) and well nothing has changed other than that upgrade. There are other stuff in the last upgrade of that box... but they do look even less related. I've tried to use svn clients from other different hosts on the same server and everything is working... this exclude a corruption in the svn repo and should exclude a network problems on the server. I really don't know where to find another culprit. Server and client cfg was unchanged. I just edited a couple of php projects. I've disabled the firewall. And all this happened just upgrading the packages in the previous post. Committing from other clients now have been tested to be reliable... while I can't still commit from that client after the above mentioned upgrade. It could be a chance... definitively a strange chance. Attached the strace... -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it svn.strace Description: Binary data
Bug#466519: ltrace of an svn update
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:03:48AM +, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote: > I noticed in the other bug report it was asked to include an ltrace... > This is the ltrace of an svn update. > You had libc6-dbg installed when you ran it ? because I see no libc calls which is odd. A strace may help too please. TIA -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpDJZ0lDpKSe.pgp Description: PGP signature
