Bug#525593: Processing of belpic_2.6.0-6.1_amd64.changes
Please don't do random NMU's without getting approval from the maintainer. Belpic has serious issues in that some builds work, while others don't, depending on the state of the build-deps; the only way to defend against this is by extensive testing, which you _cannot_ have done since you don't have a Belgian eID card. Also, I'm currently working on packaging an upstream code update, which I hope to have done by the end of DebConf9. If this build causes problems, then that works directly against that goal. If DebConf9 is over and the belpic upstream update isn't ready for upload, I'll do an update of the current codebase myself. For now, I have cancelled your upload. Please don't touch it without my explicit approval. -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#525593: Processing of belpic_2.6.0-6.1_amd64.changes
Wouter Verhelst (19/07/2009): > Please don't do random NMU's without getting approval from the > maintainer. That's why it's in DELAYED and can be cancelled. > Belpic has serious issues in that some builds work, while others > don't, depending on the state of the build-deps; the only way to > defend against this is by extensive testing, which you _cannot_ have > done since you don't have a Belgian eID card. Thanks for letting people now by replying to the RC bug that got reported. > If DebConf9 is over and the belpic upstream update isn't ready for > upload, I'll do an update of the current codebase myself. For now, I > have cancelled your upload. Fine. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#525593: Processing of belpic_2.6.0-6.1_amd64.changes
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 05:48:04PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Wouter Verhelst (19/07/2009): > > Please don't do random NMU's without getting approval from the > > maintainer. > > That's why it's in DELAYED and can be cancelled. The procedure, last I checked, was still 'use DELAYED/7 or ask for explicit approval'. > > Belpic has serious issues in that some builds work, while others > > don't, depending on the state of the build-deps; the only way to > > defend against this is by extensive testing, which you _cannot_ have > > done since you don't have a Belgian eID card. > > Thanks for letting people now by replying to the RC bug that got > reported. Sorry, I thought I had done that before; apparently I haven't. There are other bugs mentioning the new upstream version, however. -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#525593: Processing of belpic_2.6.0-6.1_amd64.changes
Wouter Verhelst (19/07/2009): > The procedure, last I checked, was still 'use DELAYED/7 or ask for > explicit approval'. 5.11.1 says DELAYED/2 for RC bugfixes. I'm sorry I missed 1 day after months of RC-bugginess. > Sorry, I thought I had done that before; apparently I haven't. There are > other bugs mentioning the new upstream version, however. #536710? Doesn't say anything about the huge issues you mentioned. I don't see much more bugs that would be related? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
