Bug#586907: bug #586907 is still there

2010-07-02 Thread Vincent Danjean
tag 586907 +fixed-upstream
thanks

On 02/07/2010 12:04, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Thos packages look to solve the issue, both with python 2.5 and python 2.6:

ok. And mercurial 1.6 is just out. So this bug will be closed
with its packaging will be done.

> So we can say that the last upstream 'stable' branch fixes the
> problem. Do you have details about the diff? I'm just curious.

Not really. You can find the repo here if you are interested:
http://selenic.com/repo/hg-stable
I started to look at relevant commits but I stopped and asked you
to test :-)

  Regards,
Vincent

> Thanks!
> 
> Best,
> 


-- 
Vincent Danjean Adresse: Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble
Téléphone:  +33 4 76 61 20 11ENSIMAG - antenne de Montbonnot
Fax:+33 4 76 61 20 99ZIRST 51, avenue Jean Kuntzmann
Email: vincent.danj...@imag.fr   38330 Montbonnot Saint Martin



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#586907: bug #586907 is still there

2010-07-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 586907 +fixed-upstream
Bug #586907 [mercurial] Mercurial 1.5.4-1 doesn't make pull/push with 
Python>=2.6
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
586907: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#586907: bug #586907 is still there

2010-07-02 Thread Sergio Fernández
2010/7/1 Vincent Danjean :
> On 01/07/2010 13:01, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>> Sure, I can't test with any unofficial package, but I don't have any
>> amd64 machine. Can you provide a package for i386?
>
> Done (and I added mercurial-common that was missing)

Thos packages look to solve the issue, both with python 2.5 and python 2.6:

ser...@frink:~/path/to/repo$ python2.5 /usr/bin/hg pull
pulling from http://wikier:*...@hg.wikier.org/foo
searching for changes
no changes found
ser...@frink:~/path/to/repo$ python2.6 /usr/bin/hg pull
pulling from http://wikier:*...@hg.wikier.org/foo
searching for changes
no changes found

So we can say that the last upstream 'stable' branch fixes the
problem. Do you have details about the diff? I'm just curious.

Thanks!

Best,



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#586907: bug #586907 is still there

2010-07-01 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 01/07/2010 13:01, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Sure, I can't test with any unofficial package, but I don't have any
> amd64 machine. Can you provide a package for i386?

Done (and I added mercurial-common that was missing)

  vincent

> 2010/7/1 Vincent Danjean :
>> # commands must be sent to cont...@b.d.o
>> #On 01/07/2010 09:21, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>> reopen 586907
>> notfixed 586907 1.5.4-2
>> found 586907 1.5.4-2
>> thanks
>>
>>> As I said, the patch applied it's not working as expected.
>>
>> So, it was not a cache of pyc problem :-(
>>
>>> With both
>>> versions of python (2.6.5 and 2.5.5) I'm getting the error again:
>>>
>>>   abort: authorization failed
>>
>> It means that it is even worst with the patch as even python 2.5.5 is
>> broken.
>>
>>> The only way I found to get back mercurial working it's to delete the
>>> patch and go back to python.2.5 on the shebang.
>>
>> Can you try these packages (download them and install them with
>> "dpkg -i *.deb") ?
>> http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/mercurial-test/
>> It is a quick and dirty packaging of the last upstream 'stable' branch.
>> We will see if upstream already has a patch for this bug or not.
>>
>>  Regards,
>>Vincent
>>
>> --
>> Vincent Danjean   GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org
>> GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A  8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
>> Unofficial packages: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
>> APT repo:  deb http://perso.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Vincent Danjean   GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A  8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial packages: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
APT repo:  deb http://perso.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#586907: bug #586907 is still there

2010-07-01 Thread Sergio Fernández
Sure, I can't test with any unofficial package, but I don't have any
amd64 machine. Can you provide a package for i386?

2010/7/1 Vincent Danjean :
> # commands must be sent to cont...@b.d.o
> #On 01/07/2010 09:21, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> reopen 586907
> notfixed 586907 1.5.4-2
> found 586907 1.5.4-2
> thanks
>
>> As I said, the patch applied it's not working as expected.
>
> So, it was not a cache of pyc problem :-(
>
>> With both
>> versions of python (2.6.5 and 2.5.5) I'm getting the error again:
>>
>>   abort: authorization failed
>
> It means that it is even worst with the patch as even python 2.5.5 is
> broken.
>
>> The only way I found to get back mercurial working it's to delete the
>> patch and go back to python.2.5 on the shebang.
>
> Can you try these packages (download them and install them with
> "dpkg -i *.deb") ?
> http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/mercurial-test/
> It is a quick and dirty packaging of the last upstream 'stable' branch.
> We will see if upstream already has a patch for this bug or not.
>
>  Regards,
>    Vincent
>
> --
> Vincent Danjean       GPG key ID 0x9D025E87         vdanj...@debian.org
> GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A  8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
> Unofficial packages: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
> APT repo:  deb http://perso.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
>
>



-- 
__  ___ _   _
\ \/ (_) |_(_)___ _ _
 \ \/\/ /| | / / / -_) '_|  Sergio Fernández
  \_/\_/ |_|_\_\_\___|_|http://www.wikier.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#586907: bug #586907 is still there

2010-07-01 Thread Vincent Danjean
# commands must be sent to cont...@b.d.o
#On 01/07/2010 09:21, Sergio Fernández wrote:
reopen 586907
notfixed 586907 1.5.4-2
found 586907 1.5.4-2
thanks

> As I said, the patch applied it's not working as expected.

So, it was not a cache of pyc problem :-(

> With both
> versions of python (2.6.5 and 2.5.5) I'm getting the error again:
> 
>   abort: authorization failed

It means that it is even worst with the patch as even python 2.5.5 is
broken.

> The only way I found to get back mercurial working it's to delete the
> patch and go back to python.2.5 on the shebang.

Can you try these packages (download them and install them with
"dpkg -i *.deb") ?
http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/mercurial-test/
It is a quick and dirty packaging of the last upstream 'stable' branch.
We will see if upstream already has a patch for this bug or not.

  Regards,
Vincent

-- 
Vincent Danjean   GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A  8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial packages: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
APT repo:  deb http://perso.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#586907: bug #586907 is still there

2010-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # commands must be sent to cont...@b.d.o
> #On 01/07/2010 09:21, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> reopen 586907
Bug #586907 {Done: Javi Merino } [mercurial] Mercurial 
1.5.4-1 doesn't make pull/push with Python>=2.6
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> notfixed 586907 1.5.4-2
Bug #586907 [mercurial] Mercurial 1.5.4-1 doesn't make pull/push with 
Python>=2.6
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #586907 to the same values 
previously set
> found 586907 1.5.4-2
Bug #586907 [mercurial] Mercurial 1.5.4-1 doesn't make pull/push with 
Python>=2.6
Bug Marked as found in versions mercurial/1.5.4-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
586907: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#586907: bug #586907 is still there

2010-07-01 Thread Sergio Fernández
reopen 586907
reassign 586907 mercurial 1.5.4-2

As I said, the patch applied it's not working as expected. With both
versions of python (2.6.5 and 2.5.5) I'm getting the error again:

  abort: authorization failed

The only way I found to get back mercurial working it's to delete the
patch and go back to python.2.5 on the shebang.

-- 
__  ___ _   _
\ \/ (_) |_(_)___ _ _
 \ \/\/ /| | / / / -_) '_|  Sergio Fernández
  \_/\_/ |_|_\_\_\___|_|http://www.wikier.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org