AMD64 weekly and/or daily builds
Hi all, I'm looking for daily or weekly builds on AMD64 platform. I checked out http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/testing/20090723-1/ as well as http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/ Both are empty :( Is there a bug or bugs which are holding back the testing releases ? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: AMD64 weekly and/or daily builds
Addition in-line :- On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:44, shirish wrote: > Hi all, > I'm looking for daily or weekly builds on AMD64 platform. I checked out > > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/testing/20090723-1/ > > as well as > > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/ > The daily builds doesn't have amd64 architecture build (nor i386) The weekly builds directories are empty, checked out cd, dvd and jigdo ones, all are empty. > > Is there a bug or bugs which are holding back the testing releases ? Awaiting your response to the same. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: AMD64 weekly and/or daily builds
Additional info. inline :- -- Forwarded message -- From: A.E.Lawrence Date: Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 20:57 Subject: Re: AMD64 weekly and/or daily builds To: shirish shirish wrote: > The daily builds doesn't have amd64 architecture build (nor i386) It has already been reported on the list and another post had already explained the failure. ael Does anybody have the link of the post which has explained the failure ? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Are you guys testing grub2
Hi all, Are you guys also testing grub2 on the testing image http://grub.enbug.org/ alongwith ext4 http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page . I tried accessing http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages but the site is unavailable so cannot see :( -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
not being able to download the squeeze live b1 with gnome .iso in bittorent.
HI all, I downloaded a torrent, http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_live_beta1/amd64/bt-hybrid/debian-squeeze-live-beta1-amd64-gnome-desktop.iso.torrent . Now I put it in deluge and tried to download the image, Deluge doesn't move an inch. Sometime later found out what the issue is, The tracker says " debian.org: Error: Requested download is not authorized for use with this tracker." Can somebody guide me as to why I am getting such errors and how can I fix it ? Another thing I have a USB Modem which needs wvdial and usb-modeswitch . Are these in-built in the Beta 1 iso's ? Looking forward for answers. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=gukzof8qoeqyb_glppqrg_jejz0vhhdnzu...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#607241: cdimage.debian.org: Tracker status:debian.org:Error Requested download is not authorized for use with this tracker.
Package: cdimage.debian.org Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Hi all, I have been trying to download Debian-beta2-dvd since few days. Whenever I do try I get this message on the Tracker status t debian.org:Error Requested download is not authorized for use with this tracker. What could be wrong? I am using deluge 1.2.3 $ deluge-gtk --version 1.2.3 There is no firewall or anything at my end. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=gurhv=tqdcxbwqkvz3utxvx+gbgqgumm0q...@mail.gmail.com
putting instructions for amd64 in include/exclude for mirroring page
Hi all, I am trying to get my own syncing done for an weekly AMD64 build freshened up, I saw the mirroring page http://www.debian.org/CD/mirroring Now neither in the includes or the exclude is the AMD64 architecture listed, could somebody add that part in ? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik-6d+mlzwgkxaozux24=8rgdohtrxdwvahh...@mail.gmail.com
Re: putting instructions for amd64 in include/exclude for mirroring page
Additional info :- 2010/12/17 shirish शिरीष : > Hi all, > I am trying to get my own syncing done for an weekly AMD64 > build freshened up, > > I saw the mirroring page http://www.debian.org/CD/mirroring > > Now neither in the includes or the exclude is the AMD64 architecture > listed, could somebody add that part in ? I humbly ask that as clueless people like me could do something wrong. I consulted :- a. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/is-a-core-2-duo-considered-to-be-amd64-or-ia64-583026/ b. http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/hardware-peripherals/35963-cpu-naming-schemes-x86-386-486-586-amd-64-ia64-em64t.html and then took a look again at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ to finally get it without a doubt that both ia64 and amd64 are two very different architectures. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinbm54nedxvyajn=ghw2b9m-z_nz3fow-=gt...@mail.gmail.com
What's in squeeze DVD #1 was Re: lack of gnome on squeeze CD #1
In-line :- On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 03:57, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 20:01 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: >> Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 14:02 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : >> > > How should I name the new metapackage? My first thought is just to move >> > > these packages from gnome-desktop-environment to gnome-core, and to make >> > > gnome-core the key package. Hi all, First of all sorry for jumping on the thread. I thought I read the interesting thread, and thought it was a better idea . I downloaded squeeze beta 1 about a month ago. At that point in time, the documentation about the DVD read something similar to this :- 1. It includes standard Debian CD installation + languages (it was not specifically written like that but atleast I perceived it to be like that, the word usage I don't remember). and I was sorta disappointed to download the whole DVD as I didn't want the other languages but more utilities (like network-manager, wvdial and most networking and troubleshooting tools) Now from this discussion I am curious to know what metapackages are inside say the beta2-DVD1 ? Looking forward for answers. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=wf+7kx2r=v3kwptqzfsqvx+rt_n5lkmyhx...@mail.gmail.com
using rsync to keep squeeze amd64 image freshened.
Hi all, I tried to get my query of how to use rsync by mailing debian-user. You can see the whole thread starting from http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/12/msg00651.html What I want to do is to keep the weekly amd64 squeeze build , on http:// its http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso The above is what I want to achieve. But I'm facing problems as I don't know how to use rsync. Looking from http://www.debian.org/CD/mirroring/rsync-mirrors and http://www.debian.org/CD/mirroring/#exclude the command seems to come something like this :- rsync --times --links --hard-links --partial -archive -verbose -compress --block-size=8192 --exclude=source/ --exclude='*businesscard*.iso' --exclude='*netinst*.iso' --exclude=alpha/ --exclude=arm/ --exclude=hppa/ --exclude=hurd/ --exclude=ia64/ --exclude=m68k/ --exclude=mips/ --exclude=mipsel/ --exclude=powerpc/ --exclude=s390/ --exclude=sh/ --exclude=sparc/ --exclude=5.0.7/ --exclude=5.0.7-live/ --exclude=i386/ --include='*-dvd.iso' ftp.de.debian.org::debian-cd/ . While ftp.de.debian.org has only 5.0.7 images (not something I'm looking for) The Taiwan mirror seems to have everything . I had to look at quite a few mirrors as most of them have Debian Lenny (5.0.x series) but not Debian squeeze (6.0.x series). ftp://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian-cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso This is the one I want to rsync. Only DVD-1 does anybody know how can I achieve that ? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=wq=w_3_bz44kyyyr2-kn6edkt2r6bz8ptu...@mail.gmail.com
Re: using rsync to keep squeeze amd64 image freshened.
In-line :- On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 03:57, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > Rsync is no "weird" tool. You can use it just like cp: > > cp /somepath/filename . > > rsync /somepath/filename . > > Just the same. Try it. Don't get alarmed by the multitude of options in the > examples... > > Now the nice thing of rsync is that it can copy from a remote server, that's > just: > > rsync servername::somepath/filename . > > To find out what a server is offering, say ftp.tw.debian.org, use "rsync > -vn". That's mostly like "ls -al": > > rsync -vn ftp.tw.debian.org:: > > So it's offering debian-cd. Let's get a quick listing: > > rsync -vn ftp.tw.debian.org::debian-cd > > There's no weekly-builds dir there, so this is the wrong entrance. > > rsync -vn ftp.tw.debian.org::pub > rsync -vn ftp.tw.debian.org::debian > > Well, it seems they're just not offering the weekly-builds via rsync. This > happens often. > > The main host, cdimage.debian.org, does have them available: > > rsync -vn cdimage.debian.org:: > rsync -vn cdimage.debian.org::debian-cd -> nope > rsync -vn cdimage.debian.org::cdimage -> aha! > rsync -vn cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/ -> mind the / > rsync -vn cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/ > rsync -vn cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/ > > There it is! > > Now you would just do: > > rsync > cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso > . > > but this is where the options become useful: > > rsync --times --partial --verbose --block-size=8192 > cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso > . > > and personally I like --progress when running interactively. > Don't use --compress, everything in the DVD image is already compressed. > And the other options you quote are mostly for full-archive copying, so not > useful in this case. > Hi Anne, Wow that is some useful info. there. I have to confess I didn't know about compress isn't needed in my case. Some other genteman off-list shared a command which I'm using now to download (for the first time). This is what I'm using now :- $ rsync -aHPv --block-size=8192 cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso . MOTD: Welcome to the rsync archive at Academic Computer Club, Ume\#345 University. receiving file list ... 1 file to consider debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso 986342247 21% 10.75kB/s 95:42:32 ^C rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(543) [generator=3.0.7] > So, continuing from the other thread on debian-user: > > Rsync doesn't display an update while it's checking your local file, but > after that, if you use --progress, it will say how the download is going. > > Rsync will download to a temporary filename starting with a dot (.name). It > will rename the file to the correct name once it's finished and correct. > _If_ you press Ctrl-C while rsync is downloading, _and_ you used --partial, > both the original file and the temporary "half-file" are kept (though mind > the filenames!). To continue: "cat half-download >> originalfile", mind the > filenames again, and just restart the same rsync command. > > Note in case you wondered: rsync will speed up the download by using blocks > of the file it already has, but this works _only_ if there is a file with > the exact same name in the directory you're downloading to (i.e. you will > overwrite that file). If you want to keep the old version of the file you're > updating, make a copy to a different filename before you start rsync. Ok, also I don't know about how you used the 'cat command to continue the download' and it does sound complicated as you are saying so. This is what I have done. I have made a specific directory for the download. In my case its /home/shirish/beta2rsync which only has the file download happening. What I have been doing is re-running the same command $ rsync -aHPv --block-size=8192 cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso . whenever I want to end the session I use the CTRL+C and when I want to start-up again, re-run the same command i.e. $ rsync -aHPv --block-size=8192 cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso . And as you have rightfully said, it sees what's there already and then downloads the remaining part. The real fun should start next week when there will be a new release and I want to see how it would work, should I be running the same command and exp
no weekly amd64 (jigdo) DVD's seen on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Hi there, I was looking at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ and was looking at amd64 builds via jigdo but couldn't see there. Looking for the same at http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ revealed that there are indeed weekly builds of AMD64 builds . If they are good, then why isn't that link on the devel-installer homepage ? Looking forward to know more. Thank you in advance. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikwpnyqvsc1os7c6brxujbf6je1oy_wwb2ke...@mail.gmail.com
Re: no weekly amd64 (jigdo) DVD's seen on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
in-line :- On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:23, Don Wright wrote: > Perhaps this just happened, but looking at the middle of that page I > find (trimmed for clarity): > >>Or install the current weekly snapshot of Debian testing which uses >> the same version of the installer as the last release: >> >> * full CD/DVD sets > < ... > >> * full CD/DVD sets (via bittorrent) < ... > >> CD: [amd64][i386] >> * full CD/DVD/Blu-ray sets (via jigdo) <<<< Big Flashing Arrow Here >> CD: [amd64] < ... > >> DVD: [amd64] < ... > >> BD: [amd64][i386][source] > > Is that what you were looking for? My bad. It seems the links shift up a bit in bigger sized fonts. I saw that the amd64 builds are indeed the first ones, its just the way they look on my browser with my settings which screwed up the whole thing. Haven't fixed it yet (at my end), but now I know. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikbmjtabbcydhfnilpm_4jzuzwzhwwfcnmgb...@mail.gmail.com
Is the weekly AMD 64 bit DVD's jigdo template wrong ?
Hi all, I was trying to download the 64-bit DVD using jigdo . I had the last weeklies .iso which I had also downloaded through jigdo and using that as a base was using jigdo so it would download the diffs. I got some errors while I was downloading, the errors for 15 files was the same. "Error: `debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-40_amd64.deb' does not match checksum in template data" As can be seen above, apart from the filenames all the 15 had the same issue. Then I used rsync and it seems to have given proper stuff. Please see :- $ rsync --progress cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso . MOTD: Welcome to the rsync archive at Academic Computer Club, Ume\#345 University. debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso 4671508480 100% 32.18MB/s0:02:18 (xfer#1, to-check=0/1) sent 546999 bytes received 333027 bytes 4009.23 bytes/sec total size is 4671508480 speedup is 5308.38 I have recounted the whole experience and procedure at http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=58512&p=340071#p340071 perhaps somebody can either the manifest file or/and correct me as well. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikalqb+tzdp1rzdwmpqanjde1seu9tydah8k...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Is the weekly AMD 64 bit DVD's jigdo template wrong ?
At bottom :- 2010/12/27 shirish शिरीष : > Hi all, > I was trying to download the 64-bit DVD using jigdo . I had the > last weeklies .iso which I had also downloaded through jigdo and using > that as a base was using jigdo so it would download the diffs. I got > some errors while I was downloading, the errors for 15 files was the > same. > > "Error: > `debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-40_amd64.deb' > does not match checksum in template data" > > As can be seen above, apart from the filenames all the 15 had the same issue. > > Then I used rsync and it seems to have given proper stuff. Please see :- > > $ rsync --progress > cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso > . > MOTD: Welcome to the rsync archive at Academic Computer Club, Ume\#345 > University. > > debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso > 4671508480 100% 32.18MB/s 0:02:18 (xfer#1, to-check=0/1) > > sent 546999 bytes received 333027 bytes 4009.23 bytes/sec > total size is 4671508480 speedup is 5308.38 > > I have recounted the whole experience and procedure at > http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=58512&p=340071#p340071 > > perhaps somebody can either the manifest file or/and correct me as well. just forgot, please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik0fao40a64nloevln_g3my5k0c7shwxy5ph...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Is the weekly AMD 64 bit DVD's jigdo template wrong ?
In-line :- 2010/12/28 Steve McIntyre : > Apologies, I've been working on the CD/DVD generating scripts for the > last few days to add new features and this broke today's jigdo files > for i386 and amd64. I've identified a fix and I'm about to rebuild. No apologies needed Steve. It was enough to know that 'I' or my methodology was not incorrect. Also it did give an insight on jigdo error messages which I'm guessing may be pretty rare. Just let me and the list know whenever the new template is up and running, will try it again :) Do see that debian needs to be way better in web usability so anything you are doing which would eventually make it easier, faster and better looking in the long-run is good, such breakages I'm guessing are bound to occur . Anyways, we are in the 'testing' phase for Squeeze. :P so we can tolerate breakages now rather than when it hits gold/stable etc. > -- > Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com > "You can't barbecue lettuce!" -- Ellie Crane -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimmoftnxag1fw9tjwmt0owy3qz=i=_atjg+9...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Is the weekly AMD 64 bit DVD's jigdo template wrong ?
In-line :- On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:29, Don Wright wrote: > Just built the first two weekly DVDs (and some CDs) for amd64 and i386 > using rsync/jigdo without any problem. Thank you, Steve and the rest of > the team, for keeping Debian moving forward. > Don, The question was not of if the new .jigdo file and .template file work or not. I'm sure they work perfectly. What I want to do or was lead to believe is that using the old .iso and making a new .iso . I came up with this while doing it again. "Will not reuse existing temporary file `debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmp' - it corresponds to a different image/template. /usr/bin/jigdo-file make-image: Delete/rename the file or use --force jigdo-file failed with code 3 - aborting." Have removed everything in that directory and just mounting the old week's .iso to /mnt/jigdo and then asking it to merge stuff from there and the new one. Will know in few minutes. > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a46ih6duark024qni76fh9d2qqot39k...@4ax.com > -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimtedflhlsepfg5ni88556mkb7d1j+7ys6r0...@mail.gmail.com
no weekly Debian Jigdo DVD ?
Hi all, There doesn't seem to be any weekly AMD64 Jigdo DVD ? http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikxyngunzpij4-xjpqe1w5eheeid8cfgbh-m...@mail.gmail.com
Re: no weekly Debian Jigdo DVD ?
At bottom :- 2011/1/11 Steve McIntyre : > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:54:13PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >>Hi all, >> There doesn't seem to be any weekly AMD64 Jigdo DVD ? >> >>http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ > > A disk has failed in the build machine. As soon as it's replaced I'll > be triggering a build run, Thank you for updating me. Please ping me/reply when the above is done. I would be of course be checking in a day or two. > -- > Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com > "C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktiky9yza8eahmoscyjffh4xgmyhep2gfnnk4a...@mail.gmail.com
Re: empty directory
In-line :- 2011/5/16 Воробьёв Павел : > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/ > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-cd/ > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/ > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/jigdo-cd/ > Seeing the same thing persisted at my end too. http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ No new builds and no responses to this thread/query either. Looking forward for info. > -- > С уважением, > Воробьёв Павел, нач. ИВЦ > ОП ОАО "ВКС" "Теплосервис" > тел. +7 (4922) 53-85-79 > факс. +7 (4922) 53-06-93 -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17
Bug#630805: debian-cd: include apt-offline in debian CD#1
At bottom :- On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 13:49, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On 06/17/2011 07:21 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Package: debian-cd >> Severity: wishlist >> Tags: wheezy >> >> I would like to request inclusion of apt-offline into Debian CD #1. >> > More details about apt-offline can be found at its project page: > http://apt-offline.alioth.debian.org/ > > I also wrote a HOWTO: > http://www.debian-administration.org/article/Offline_Package_Management_for_APT > + 1 > -- > Ritesh Raj Sarraf > RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com > "Necessity is the mother of invention." -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktimhqq_canzzqybfbrs-1ppjfm9...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Just Feedback
At bottom :- On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 16:22, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Dear Debian-cd-team, > > I just installed debian/testing from scratch. For this, I am using debian- > multiarch/testing-dvd. > > Everything worked fine, but when I wanted to upgrade from the net, it could > not > install the packages, as "awk" was missing. awk is not installed by default (I > choose the profile, what most users might use: base, graphical desktop and > laptop). Installing package "gawk" fixed the problem, not a big thing. > > But maybe, you might want to add "awk" into the default installation list? > > Everything else went fine. However, I still found no way, to mount encrypted > partitions (in my case it is /home, /usr and /var) during the installation > process and keep them. > > Also, if I mount a partition and want to keep files, the installer routine is > stopping and prohibits to go on (but that thing might be a knowledge problem, > as I need to install debian sooo seldom. It is just running. :) ) > > However, these things will not needed by many people, maybe only by me, and of > course. > > Generally I like the installer if you d o not need special things like me (and > most people won't!), then debian is really(!) easy to install! Great work! > > Thank you very much for it! I do not know about the specific use-case as I'm on a desktop and yours seem to be a laptop and multiarch issue. Anyways, awk is not a real package $ aptitude show awk No current or candidate version found for awk Package: awk State: not a real package Provided by: gawk, mawk, or gawk on the other hand is. $ aptitude show gawk Package: gawk State: not installed Version: 1:3.1.7.dfsg-5 Priority: optional Section: interpreters Maintainer: Arthur Loiret Uncompressed Size: 2,224 k PreDepends: libc6 (>= 2.3) Provides: awk Description: GNU awk, a pattern scanning and processing language `awk', a program that you can use to select particular records in a file and perform operations upon them. Gawk is the GNU Project's implementation of the AWK programming language. It conforms to the definition of the language in the POSIX 1003.2 Command Language And Utilities Standard. This version in turn is based on the description in The AWK Programming Language, by Aho, Kernighan, and Weinberger, with the additional features defined in the System V Release 4 version of UNIX awk. Gawk also provides more recent Bell Labs awk extensions, and some GNU-specific extensions. Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/ Tags: devel::interpreter, implemented-in::c, interface::commandline, role::program, scope::utility, suite::gnu, use::filtering, use::scanning, works-with::tex It would be interesting to know why its needed as it is supposed to be an optional interpreters See :- Priority: optional Section: interpreters > Best regards > > Hans -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktimg3750upvo5ps2nqjcofx92bq...@mail.gmail.com
No news release of the Debian point release 6.0.2.1 ?
Hi all, As per my understanding, the Debian project got a point release 6.0.2.1 . The last time around when Debian release 6.0.1 was released there was a press/mail release by the deban-cd or/and debian project team . This time while there was a mail of a day before nothing about the release anywhere. http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.2.1/ Looking forward for info. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktingi6ufs8zpfdd3m9t0wxki+z_...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Stable 6.0.2.1 images broken?
At bottom :- On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 00:43, Touko Korpela wrote: > At http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.2.1/$arch/iso-cd/ (i386,amd64 > etc.) reads the following text: > > Daily build # for i386, using installer build from squeeze > > These images will install the testing version of Debian, currently > Wheezy. > > See the top-level daily directory for more information about the daily > builds. > > This build finished at Tue Jun 28 13:01:51 UTC 2011. > > This seems to be an error, are just this text wrong or are squeeze > installation images now installing wheezy instead? > I don't think so. I downloaded the DVD image via jigdo and I had the older one downloaded through jigdo as well . The only difference between this image and the last image is of 314 files (amd64 arch) . If it was wheezy, I would assume that the difference between files would have been much larger. I am not sure though why its 314 files, they said 150/160 odd packages being changed. I do know that sometimes some meta-package may have 3 individual packages, some binary, some binary-common and some binary-data, maybe that's the change. Also maybe the changes they had said may just be in main and not of other archives (contrib and non-free) where the package change policies may be more relaxing. Anyways, I do hope somebody is able to give an opinion one way or the other. One has to keep in mind, that this has made sure that the weekly images aren't there on time. See for instance http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ The last image is still reflecting the one done on 20th June , My 2 paise :) -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=n7cb0zgo65ujxmocjlmpsbns...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Stable 6.0.2.1 images broken?
In-line :- 2011/6/29 Steve McIntyre : > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:32:49AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> >>I don't think so. I downloaded the DVD image via jigdo and I had the >>older one downloaded through jigdo as well . >> >>The only difference between this image and the last image is of 314 >>files (amd64 arch) . If it was wheezy, I would assume that the >>difference between files would have been much larger. I am not sure >>though why its 314 files, they said 150/160 odd packages being >>changed. I do know that sometimes some meta-package may have 3 >>individual packages, some binary, some binary-common and some >>binary-data, maybe that's the change. Also maybe the changes they had >>said may just be in main and not of other archives (contrib and >>non-free) where the package change policies may be more relaxing. > > The number (150/160) will be the number of source packages > updated. The number you're seeing and reporting will be the number of > binary packages. By my count, across all architectures and source > there were 8109 updated files in the pool. That's counting the files > in the diff that I use for generating the update CDs/DVDs. Dear Steve, First of all thank you for your quick and articulate reply. The geek/curious in me likes to know such things ;) Another thing to note is I removed the CC to other lists as my reply might just be additional noise which they might not be interested in. >>One has to keep in mind, that this has made sure that the weekly >>images aren't there on time. See for instance >>http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ >> >>The last image is still reflecting the one done on 20th June , > > Correct. When I'm working on a (point) release, I disable the daily > and weekly builds so as not to cause confusion or congestion on the > build machine. umm. when can we expect the weekly builds to be back on ? > -- > Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com > Mature Sporty Personal > More Innovation More Adult > A Man in Dandism > Powered Midship Specialty -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktikl5cdj0+3mv-5dv4sq+tkreaw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Record a USB
at bottom :- On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 23:27, dryphi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm reading through your handy FAQ on image files: > http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/ > > I'm currently in the process of making a Debian Live USB. However the > only way I have found to to this is by using a program in W7 called > ImageWriter that I obtained from the openSUSE team. It seems your FAQ > (as well as that for many other distros currently) explains how to > "burn" these images to optical media only, and neglects to embrace the > USB method. > > Is there a section on your FAQ that I am missing? How do I write the > ISO to USB in Linux? K3B, Brasero, etc all explicitly use blank CD/DVD > media. > What's more, UNetBootin fails to boot for most ISOs (accepting Ubuntu > and Mint for some reason), and the images must be written directly to > disk. > > Your website would be making a step ahead if you were to add USB > install instructions to your FAQ. > > Thanks dryphi, I hear you. There are some instructions I had found sometime ago at live.debian.net . Perhaps they would be instructional for you as well. Check out. http://live.debian.net/manual/en/html/live-manual.html#181 you will need a hybrid iso image. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADdDZR=CvLZ8W7Oaca81k4VQxZ3z6CKt8F3c6+mZV�sv6...@mail.gmail.com
Possible to make jigdo images out of the debian-live CD/DVD's ?
Hi all, Is it possible to make jigdo images out of the Debian-Live CD/DVD's [1] similar to ones that are made for the debian-release [2] ? I tried to search the Debian wiki [3] as well the debian-live website [4] for answers but came up none the wiser. 1. http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/ 2. http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.2.1/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ 3. http://wiki.debian.org/DebianLive/ 4. http://live.debian.net/ Looking forward for info. If needed can file a wishlist bug :) -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADdDZRk_3EC9jC2-x=CnjNFVywEQdE4U8otiuyn0P_=rsu6...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Building custom Debian from CD to DVD
at bottom :- On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 14:57, Nahir MOHAMED wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm actually working on a custom version of Debian for a project. I start > from the debian-509-i386-CD-1.iso to build my custom version and I added > some personal packages using this howto : > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Modify/CD#Create_new__Release_and_Packages_files > > In this howto they use the mkisofs command to generate the image file and it > works like a charm but my .iso file size is bigger than a normal CD size. > > So I would like to know if I can burn it directly on a DVD or should I use > another command/tool to build a new .iso file. > > Thanks > Best regards > > -- > Nahir MOHAMED > Consultant Technique > Open Source Center > Atos Intégration > nmoha...@portaildulibre.fr > Tél : +33 (0)1.73.26.39.53 > just curious to know why did you use debian 5.0.9 instead of 6.0.3 the latest squeeze release http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.3/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.3-i386-CD-1.iso OR http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.3/i386/bt-cd/debian-6.0.3-i386-CD-1.iso.torrent -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADdDZRn8uaXPsBEeKi03BHz_=zEFnzTraCiYJ=uqf5ujhy6...@mail.gmail.com
no jigdo update for weekly testing DVDs ?
Hi all, I have been trying to get the weekly DVD via jigdo for some reason there seems to be no update :- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ As can be seen the last image seems to have been 16th January and nothing after that. I do know that there is planning to 6.0.4 release http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2012/01/msg00015.html but don't know if that has anything to do with that. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrkun1wd9eb1httdpt25xh74hc1zcir9godmbrh7tla...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#658352: 4k Advanced format
at bottom :- On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 19:04, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, Getting a little sideways here :- > I am clueless enough to look into wikipedia about GUID Partition Table. > The is room for a "Protective MBR" of 512 bytes. > So somebody would need to teach me how to announce the range of the > ISO image and the range of the FAT partition in a GPT. > > Further one would have to discuss with Vladimir Serbinenko at grub-devel > about the layout of the first 32 kB of the ISO image, where MBR, GPT, > and GRUB2 code have to reside side-by-side. I am curious to know how easy it is (or not) to have the newish Advanced format [1] support in Debian-installer [2], as well as the ext* filesystems [3]. I remember a story about it which came in osnews[4] long-time back (around 1.5 years +) but do not really know how relevant they are or not atm. I am asking as from what i read alongwith the above at the very least the perception is most of the changes being done are to take care of growth for the next 20 + years. I also saw discussions on the linux kernel page [5] but that wiki page is not current with the linux 3.x kernels. I did however spot an article on lwn.net [6] . Sadly there is no wiki entry about 'Advanced Format' on the Debian wiki. It would be nice if somebody has some updated instructions for it somewhere. > Finally one would have to explore the chances to get Debian bootable > ISO images onto GRUB2 rather than ISOLINUX. > > Then one would develop a friendly fork of grub-mkrescue as proof-of-concept > of the various bootabilities in one single ISO image: > - amd64 BIOS from CD > - amd64 BISO from USB stick > - amd64 UEFI from CD > - amd64 UEFI from USB stick > For this we'd need to enhance xorriso by GPT production. > > > Alternatively one could find out how far SYSLINUX is with UEFI support. > > Or whether a ISOLINUX BIOS setup can be combined with a GRUB setup > in a FAT partition. (ISOLINUX occupies no space in the first 32 kB of > the image. So the GPT would have room there.) > > I assume this would be easier to integrate into the existing Debian > image production. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Format 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian-installer ; http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller 3. http://wiki.debian.org/Ext4 4. http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4096-Byte_Sector_Hard_Drives 5. https://ata.wiki.kernel.org/articles/a/t/a/ATA_4_KiB_sector_issues_d4b8.html 6. https://lwn.net/Articles/469805/ Looking forward to knowing more. > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/99927549817406@192.168.2.69 -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADdDZRkDHx=n57g6tsv4wh1gmpkjvm89l8dpg50nxdzkd8f...@mail.gmail.com
Re: WARNING: This build is not up to date; it is the most recent successful build.
at bottom :- On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 22:13, wrote: > and amd64 and multi-arch. +1 too, it has been 1 month too at my end too. Wish the page would give the actual error or a bug number to follow so at least people know what/where the issue is and what is being done about it. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrnzhbnf6i5k2k5yjwm3bk9ggn_uka6kwrk-yeyshtk...@mail.gmail.com
Re: WARNING: This build is not up to date; it is the most recent successful build.
addition at bottom :- 2012/3/13 shirish शिरीष : > at bottom :- > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 22:13, wrote: >> and amd64 and multi-arch. > > +1 too, it has been 1 month too at my end too. Wish the page would > give the actual error or a bug number to follow so at least people > know what/where the issue is and what is being done about it. as can be seen I have already filed a bug for it bug #663638 . I was unsure if it should be filed against debian-cd virtual package or ftp.debian.org the virtual package but in the end filed it against debian-cd. May the powers that be re-categorize it if its not in the right place/package. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrm_34ccaaxf-gu9hxr+eexzmlwezz9fqmtyaizi8vc...@mail.gmail.com
The curious case of openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb in d7.01alpha
Hi all, I have been trying to use jigdo to download DVD 1 and keep getting stuck at one file in the download. In fact the download on this isn't smooth in anyway . Here's what I get when I try to download it via jigdo :- 100 files not found in previous pass, trying alternative download locations: --2012-05-15 23:25:02-- http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Resolving snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)... 193.62.202.30, 206.12.19.150, 2001:630:206:4000:1a1a:0:c13e:ca1e, ... Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 25291512 (24M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' 63% [> ] 1,61,35,173 --.-K/s in 10m 33s 2012-05-15 23:35:37 (24.9 KB/s) - Read error at byte 16135173/25291512 (Connection timed out). Retrying. --2012-05-15 23:35:38-- (try: 2) http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... Read error (Connection timed out) in headers. Retrying. --2012-05-15 23:36:10-- (try: 3) http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 25291512 (24M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' 0% [ ] 1,60,0135.59K/s eta 84m 33s ^C I have tried with both http:// omfpr,atopm 100 files not found in previous pass, trying alternative download locations: --2012-05-15 23:25:02-- http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Resolving snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)... 193.62.202.30, 206.12.19.150, 2001:630:206:4000:1a1a:0:c13e:ca1e, ... Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 25291512 (24M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' 63% [> ] 1,61,35,173 --.-K/s in 10m 33s 2012-05-15 23:35:37 (24.9 KB/s) - Read error at byte 16135173/25291512 (Connection timed out). Retrying. --2012-05-15 23:35:38-- (try: 2) http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... Read error (Connection timed out) in headers. Retrying. --2012-05-15 23:36:10-- (try: 3) http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 25291512 (24M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' 0% [ ] 1,60,0135.59K/s eta 84m 33s ^C As you see I can't get it out. Btw I have tried http://http.debian.org as well as ftp://frp.debian.org/debian/ Any hints or suggestions are most welcome. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrmkfq0lg64yzpo4khyi3qgwoxkcrg8q97ozwrcqr2o...@mail.gmail.com
Re: The curious case of openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb in d7.01alpha
in-line :- On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:55 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote: > I have tried with both http:// omfpr,atopm meant to say had tried both http://http.debian.org as well as ftp://ftp.debian.org but somehow get stuck somewhere. This is the latest effort with another mirror, as can be seen also stuck :- Skipping object `debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir' (No such file or directory) Found 0 of the 100 files required by the template Copied input files to temporary file `debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmp' - repeat command and supply more files to continue - 100 files not found in previous pass, trying alternative download locations: --2012-05-16 00:13:05-- http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Resolving snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)... 206.12.19.150, 193.62.202.30, 2001:630:206:4000:1a1a:0:c13e:ca1e, ... Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|206.12.19.150|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 25291512 (24M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' 4% [==> ] 11,97,972 29.7K/s eta 12m 38s19% [==> ] 49,40,020 29.1K/s eta 11m 22s71% [==> ] 1,80,08,880 30.5K/s in 10m 5s 2012-05-16 00:23:10 (29.1 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 18008880. Retrying. --2012-05-16 00:23:11-- (try: 2) http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|206.12.19.150|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 25291512 (24M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' 0% [ ] 1,85,62437.6K/s eta 10m 52s ^C As can be seen something causes the connection to close at 70/71% , Can somebody please take a look. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrnbt-hgu6qxwt4e-jl5c9slz3tvz2y3ma5vc0osrpt...@mail.gmail.com
Re: The curious case of openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb in d7.01alpha
in-line :- On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 00:30 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:55 PM, shirish शिरीष >> wrote: >> This is the latest effort with another mirror, as can be seen also stuck :- > [...] >> - >> 100 files not found in previous pass, trying >> alternative download locations: > > wheezy now has openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b24-1.11.1-6, which explains the > host chosen for this: Dear Adam, Aha, ok that makes sense then. >> --2012-05-16 00:13:05-- >> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb > [...] >> 49,40,020 29.1K/s eta 11m 22s71% >> [==> >> ] 1,80,08,880 30.5K/s in 10m 5s >> >> 2012-05-16 00:23:10 (29.1 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 18008880. >> Retrying. >> As can be seen something causes the connection to close at 70/71% , >> >> Can somebody please take a look. > > Unfortunately, neither the Release nor CD teams can do anything about > issues between your systems and snapshot.debian.org. You might try > contacting the administrators of that service, although I'd suggest > trying to download the package from an alternative location first to > rule out any issues with your own connectivity. I don't know any other alternative location, can you recommend one ? > For reference, I've just downloaded the content of the URL you quoted > without any issues. Just my luck, because it's like hitting a blank wall when I try it :- 01:28:52 shirish@deb-home: ~/jigdo_7.01a1/debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6$ wget http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb --2012-05-16 01:31:13-- http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Resolving snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)... 206.12.19.150, 193.62.202.30, 2607:f8f0:610:4000:1a1a:0:ce0c:1396, ... Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|206.12.19.150|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 25291512 (24M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' 40% [===> ] 1,02,74,069 26.8K/s eta 8m 42s 69% [=> ] 1,75,76,185 27.0K/s in 10m 10s 2012-05-16 01:41:25 (28.1 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 17576185. Retrying. --2012-05-16 01:41:26-- (try: 2) http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|206.12.19.150|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 25291512 (24M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' 1% [ ] 2,55,72139.1K/s eta 10m 43s ^C 01:42:20 shirish@deb-home: ~/jigdo_7.01a1/debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-DVD-1.iso.tmpdir/snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6$ ll -h openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 shirish shirish 17M 2012-05-16 01:41 openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb > Regards, > > Adam @debian-snapshot maintainer, is there anyway you can help me ? Looking forward for any info. or any help . -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrmzeljkutveaigcrsbw5zsx7yy2injzh7qlhe9sewb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: The curious case of openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb in d7.01alpha
at bottom :- On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 16.05.2012 04:06, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt >> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 00:30 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:55 PM, shirish शिरीष >>>> wrote: >>>> --2012-05-16 00:13:05-- >>>> >>>> >>>> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb >>> >>> [...] >>>> >>>> 49,40,020 29.1K/s eta 11m 22s71% >>>> [==> >>>> ] 1,80,08,880 30.5K/s in 10m 5s >>>> >>>> 2012-05-16 00:23:10 (29.1 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 18008880. >>>> Retrying. >>>> As can be seen something causes the connection to close at 70/71% , >>>> >>>> Can somebody please take a look. >>> >>> >>> Unfortunately, neither the Release nor CD teams can do anything about >>> issues between your systems and snapshot.debian.org. You might try >>> contacting the administrators of that service, although I'd suggest >>> trying to download the package from an alternative location first to >>> rule out any issues with your own connectivity. >> >> >> I don't know any other alternative location, can you recommend one ? > > > I meant running the download from another location, not trying to download > the file /from/ another location. So anywhere other than wherever the > download quoted above was performed (i.e. to try to determine if there's a > more general issue with connectivity to the snapshot systems). > > Regards, > > Adam o.k. I would have to take a rain check on that (if I understand correctly) but I did try another one on the same location just for testing purposes and came back with the same result. $ wget -c http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb --2012-05-16 12:09:40-- http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb Resolving snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)... 193.62.202.30, 206.12.19.150, 2607:f8f0:610:4000:1a1a:0:ce0c:1396, ... Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 39393896 (38M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `0ad-dbg_0~r11339-2_amd64.deb' 30% [===> ] 1,21,89,577 24.4K/s in 10m 5s 2012-05-16 12:19:53 (19.7 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 12189577. Retrying. --2012-05-16 12:19:54-- (try: 2) http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 39393896 (38M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `0ad-dbg_0~r11339-2_amd64.deb' 28% [> ] 1,10,58,593 18.9K/s in 10m 7s 2012-05-16 12:30:05 (17.8 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 12189577. Retrying. --2012-05-16 12:30:07-- (try: 3) http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb Connecting to snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 39393896 (38M) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: `0ad-dbg_0~r11339-2_amd64.deb' 2% [> ] 7,94,92028.6K/s eta 25m 13s ^C Would try using another device, another ISP to see if I get the same results. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrkscf0vwehjqnjumecz6cy80p+7ygpbkpeck-w-m0u...@mail.gmail.com
Re: The curious case of openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb in d7.01alpha
In-line :- On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2012, shirish शिरीष wrote: > >> $ wget -c >> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb >> --2012-05-16 12:09:40-- >> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb >> Resolving snapshot.debian.org (snapshot.debian.org)... 193.62.202.30, >> 206.12.19.150, 2607:f8f0:610:4000:1a1a:0:ce0c:1396, ... >> Connecting to snapshot.debian.org >> (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. >> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK >> Length: 39393896 (38M) [application/x-debian-package] >> Saving to: `0ad-dbg_0~r11339-2_amd64.deb' >> >> 30% [===> >> ] 1,21,89,577 24.4K/s in 10m 5s >> >> 2012-05-16 12:19:53 (19.7 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 12189577. >> Retrying. >> >> --2012-05-16 12:19:54-- (try: 2) >> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb >> Connecting to snapshot.debian.org >> (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. >> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK >> Length: 39393896 (38M) [application/x-debian-package] >> Saving to: `0ad-dbg_0~r11339-2_amd64.deb' >> >> 28% [> >> ] 1,10,58,593 18.9K/s in 10m 7s >> >> 2012-05-16 12:30:05 (17.8 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 12189577. >> Retrying. >> >> --2012-05-16 12:30:07-- (try: 3) >> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb >> Connecting to snapshot.debian.org >> (snapshot.debian.org)|193.62.202.30|:80... connected. >> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK >> Length: 39393896 (38M) [application/x-debian-package] >> Saving to: `0ad-dbg_0~r11339-2_amd64.deb' >> >> 2% [> >> ] 7,94,920 28.6K/s eta 25m 13s ^C > > All these download just fine for me from different locations: > > } weasel@evi:~$ wget --header='Host: snapshot.debian.org' > http://206.12.19.150/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb > } --2012-05-19 10:36:31-- > http://206.12.19.150/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb > } Connecting to 206.12.19.150:80... connected. > } HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > } Length: 25291512 (24M) [application/x-debian-package] > } Saving to: `openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' > } > } 100%[==>] 25,291,512 6.46M/s in 4.3s > } > } 2012-05-19 10:36:36 (5.63 MB/s) - > `openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-3_amd64.deb' saved [25291512/25291512] > > > } weasel@anguilla:~$ wget --header='Host: snapshot.debian.org' > http://193.62.202.30/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb > } Kr11339-2_amd64.deb [weasel@anguilla: ~] --2012-05-19 10:37:21-- > http://193.62.202.30/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb > } Connecting to 193.62.202.30:80... connected. > } HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > } Length: 39393896 (38M) [application/x-debian-package] > } Saving to: `0ad-dbg_0~r11339-2_amd64.deb' > } > } 100%[==>] 39,393,896 5.87M/s in 7.0s > } > } 2012-05-19 10:37:30 (5.40 MB/s) - `0ad-dbg_0~r11339-2_amd64.deb' saved > [39393896/39393896] > Hi all, @peter I don't get why you used the header option for downloading. The manpage says something about it but it's above me. --header=header-line Send header-line along with the rest of the headers in each HTTP request. The supplied header is sent as-is, which means it must contain name and value separated by colon, and must not contain newlines. You may define more than one additional header by specifying --header more than once. wget --header='Accept-Charset: iso-8859-2' \ --header='Accept-Language: hr'\ http://fly.srk.fer.hr/ Specification of an empty string as the header value will clear all previous user-defined headers. As of Wget 1.10, this option can be used to override headers otherwise generated automatically. This example instructs Wget to connect to localhost, but to specify foo.bar in the "Host" header: wget --header=&qu
Re: not able to find the debian wheezy a1 files via jigdo
in-line :- On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi Shirish, Hi Steven, > On 24/05/12 12:20, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> http://snapshot.debian.org/pool/main/k/kdepimlibs/libkabc4_4.7.4-2+b1_amd64.deb >> 2012-05-24 22:12:28 ERROR 404: Not Found. > > The mirror URI is wrong, you used http://snapshot.debian.org/ but there > should be more after it: Actually this was good enough to get me the whole .iso :- http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120508T221043Z/ > Regards, > -- > Steven Chamberlain > ste...@pyro.eu.org Thank you, now look forward to a2 as and when it happens. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADdDZRkPm6UMfJv7MsopUiEoQteeU0DDNGcA=kag73s_pos...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#690820: +1 on the date thing for the netinstall .iso as well as the testing DVD
Hi all, Just a user. I have seen the same thing. Even the weekly testing DVD has the same issue. I have to do the listing to know which date the testing DVD is from. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADdDZR=xvvoomr1mneboyhtvr9dcrkxnqkcxhs9atzq7ae3...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian EFI test CDs, build 5
at bottom :- On 9/11/13, Arian Sigari wrote: > Hello, > > this image is working on new intel haswell platform on my pc whereas the > normal netinst CDs (testing) do not work. > > Regards > arian Dear arian, Please cc me when replying. which .iso image are you talking about? Are you talking the daily debian-installer snapshots or something else ? http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrm7liz9upca-cn_cf5x1jve0ativwp-dgjhwm0de8d...@mail.gmail.com
Re: cd cover for Wheezy
at bottom :- On 10/12/13, Christophe Bastin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to print my cd. > Has someone done an artwork for Wheezy cd/dvd ? > > Chris Hi Chris, Look at http://www.debian.org/CD/artwork/ -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrmyp7bfzos034zxrsnfezjwm4grpychan2h1kgypw4...@mail.gmail.com
when is the debian 7.2 releases would be updated in cdimage.debian.org
Hi all, I just caught the news :- http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/ http://www.debian.org/News/2013/20131012?utm_campaign=debian-news&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook but the cdimage.debian.org still shows the 7.1 release. I am especially interested in the jigdo version. http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/ It still shows up as http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.1.0/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ which is the 7.1 version. Just putting :- http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.2.0/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ gives a 404. I know it's a week-end which is perfect, hence asking for some sort of heads-up as to when I can use jigdo to sync up with the changes in stable. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADdDZRn0-cd-37ZyFxjF6CurkWNSJi=7zwbwxtpmi6p+mzr...@mail.gmail.com
Re: 3 DVDs on download website but 11 DVDs listed in the MD5SUM file?
at bottom :- On 12/1/13, Chris Steffen wrote: > > debian-cd@lists.debian.org > > Dear Debian: > > There are 3 DVDs on the download website but 11 DVDs listed in the > MD5SUM file? > > http://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/#stable > Select Link "AMD64" > http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.2.0/amd64/iso-dvd/ > > Where is the rest of the distribution? > > Thanks, > Chris Steffen > cestef...@arvig.net > 303-588-8056 Hi Chris, A user here. I *think* it's documented somewhere (maybe read in a FAQ) that only the first 3 DVD's can be had via http. I *think* the reasons are that only a few number of people would download the whole repo. as it wouldn't make sense as that snapshot remains good for only 3 months or so before a new point update comes out. Having said, if you want all the other dvd's See http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.2.0/amd64/jigdo-dvd/ As per that list, there are only 10 DVD's for release and 1 update DVD. Good luck with downloading the rest. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadddzrkphtpewdldoyaqggokpfofjcmtah+g7adggw0qnrt...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#740504: Any update on having an upgraded xorriso so we don't have GPT failures ?
Hi all, Just saw this bug. I am supposed to get a few desktop machines which would have the newer GPT (GUID Partition Table) rather than MBR. I am also a bit curious to know how the information regarding which versions of software were used to create the .ISO . It seems this info. is embedded in the .iso generated but there doesn't seem to be any answers. At least according to the mail shared on the mailing list :- https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-cd@lists.debian.org/msg21403.html I did look at the FAQ about debian-CD but was unable to come up with any answers for the same. https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/ I have seen that sometimes the CD/DVD burning tool does give some info. I also looked at mediainfo for e.g. if it will give any more info. but didn't get anywhere. $ mediainfo debian-7.4.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso General Complete name: debian-7.4.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso Format : ISO 9660 File size: 3.68 GiB Looking forward to know more. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cadddzrmbkdxhxhkuj6sgvfx80wkoz42vc1y06-hcr56dqr4...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Problem with Gnome installation
b task-korean-gnome-desktop_3.20_all.deb task-malayalam-gnome-desktop_3.20_all.deb task-tamil-gnome-desktop_3.20_all.deb task-telugu-gnome-desktop_3.20_all.deb task-thai-gnome-desktop_3.20_all.deb uim-applet-gnome_1.8.6-4_amd64.deb network-manager-gnome_0.9.8.4-1_amd64.deb libgnomekbd-common_3.6.0-1_all.deb libgnomekbd8_3.6.0-1_amd64.deb libgnome-keyring-common_3.4.1-1_all.deb libgnome-keyring0_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb gir1.2-gnomekeyring-1.0_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb libgnome-media-profiles-3.0-0_3.0.0-1_amd64.deb libgnome2-common_2.32.1-5_all.deb libgnome-2-0_2.32.1-5_amd64.deb libgnome2-bin_2.32.1-5_amd64.deb libgnome2-0_2.32.1-5_amd64.deb libgnomecanvas2-common_2.30.3-2_all.deb libgnomecanvas2-0_2.30.3-2_amd64.deb libgnomeui-common_2.24.5-3_all.deb libgnomeui-0_2.24.5-3_amd64.deb libgnome2-vfs-perl_1.082-1_amd64.deb libgnome2-canvas-perl_1.002-3_amd64.deb libgnome2-perl_1.044-1_amd64.deb gnome-core_3.8+4_amd64.deb gnome-games_3.8+4_all.deb gnome_3.8+4_amd64.deb gnome-desktop-environment_3.8+4_all.deb gnome-session-canberra_0.30-2_amd64.deb libreoffice-gnome_4.1.5-1_amd64.deb > Thank you very much. If you update your /etc/apt/sources.list and update the index and install task-gnome-desktop there is no reason for it not to work. https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList Till l8er. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CADdDZRk0UN-+kgZFE7RvXo7C06nYU3sOP8qTkKKjMHT7qNa==w...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Which ISO image to download ?
at bottom :- On 3/23/14, Mohan Sai wrote: > Dear Sir/Madam: > I am new to debian and wish to try the lightweight LXDE version of > debian stable. Going through the website, I've found that there are > several CD iso images like > [ ] debian-7.4.0-i386-CD-1.iso2014-02-08 14:03 648M > [ ] debian-7.4.0-i386-CD-2.iso2014-02-08 14:03 640M > [ ] debian-7.4.0-i386-CD-3.iso2014-02-08 14:03 644M > [ ] debian-7.4.0-i386-CD-4.iso2014-02-08 14:03 648M > [ ] debian-7.4.0-i386-CD-5.iso2014-02-08 14:03 607M > [ ] debian-7.4.0-i386-CD-6.iso2014-02-08 14:03 634M > [ ] debian-7.4.0-i386-CD-7.iso2014-02-08 14:03 583M > [ ] debian-7.4.0-i386-CD-8.iso2014-02-08 14:03 648M > > Is it enough to download the following iso cd image for my purpose.. > http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.4.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.4.0-i386-lxde-CD-1.iso > > thank you, > regards, > Mohan Sai Dear Mohan, What you have shared is good enough. It's a 32-bit LXDE environment based Debian CD which is good if you have less than 4 GB of RAM . On the other hand if you have 4 GB or more RAM then could think of the 64-bit image as well. http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.4.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-7.4.0-amd64-lxde-CD-1.iso Choice is yours. Make sure to use some sort of download manager in case the connection breaks, you can start of from where you left. Till l8er. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cadddzrkotzhqmluecp5m8rx8ty-5zmfo3dz8jfmejowneim...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Installation of Debian-Testing-AMD64, DVD and Netinst, Fails on ASUS Eeepc 1215B
at bottom :- On 6/11/14, Marc Hurst wrote: > Hello Stefano: > > Today I tried to install from: > > /cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/20140610-7/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso > > It gives the same result as the 5-30-2014 and 6-9-2014 weekly builds. > Installer proceeds as expected until "Detecting Network Hardware", where > the progress bar completes very quickly and goes away, leaving the > normal blue screen with white bar at the bottom, and no further > execution of the installer. > > I tried Control-C. The screen goes black for a very short time, then > returns to the normal blue screen with white bar at bottom, then the > "Detecting Network Hardware" progress bar appears again for a very short > time, followed blue screen with white bar at bottom, and no further > execution of the installer. > > My Eee PC 1215b laptop computer uses a 10/100 Ethernet Atheros > AR8152/8158 PCI-E Fast Ethernet Controller (NDIS 6.20). Is that > currently supported? > > My computer also uses AMD® Radeon HD 6250/AMD® Radeon HD 6310 graphics. > Some Debian Squeeze distributions did not work well with the graphics. > Wheezy works very well with the graphics. Is that currently supported in > Jessie? > > Please excuse my ignorance. How can I escape from the installer to a > prompt where I can collect the installer log with lspci -vv ? > > Thank you for helping. > > --Marc Dear Marc, While it has been sometime since I played with an installer CD, as far as I remember the way to do it was to do CTRL+ALT+Fnx (between 1-3) . After that see https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/AsSshClient and https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch05s04.html -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CADdDZR=9GSzFYa1GhhVy_-HccrG-1j=zcxhmspqrbf4ya3f...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop
at bottom :- On 8/11/14, Thomas Weber wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:20:49AM +0100, Anthony F McInerney wrote: >> Would the people who are claiming that blank cdr are cheaper than dvdr, >> especially in third world countries, please cite sources (shops, price >> checkers etc) of the price of say 5 pack or 10 pack, even up to 50pack of >> CD's, vs the same amount of DVD's, from those third world countries. Is >> the >> price of a small pack of DVD's really worth making the decision on a DE >> for >> debian? > > Not sure why you'd want to go for third world countries, but let's look > at Germany (Aldi is one of the two biggest discounters here): > http://www.presseportal.de/pm/112096/2653870/aldi-senkt-preise-fuer-fischprodukte-oel-und-smoothies > CD-R Rohlinge (80 Minuten, je 50er Spindel) 5,99 Euro > DVD+R Rohlinge (je 20er Spindel)3,99 Euro > That is 0.12 EUR per CDR and 0.20 EUR per DVD. > >> DVD readers/writers are cheaper now than CD readers/writers ever were. > I don't think it makes sense to ask for the price of one media (which is > in Cents), but then assume that the extra cost for a new DVD reader is > negligible. > > Thomas Hi all, As an interested user I come from India and at least here there isn't a difference at all in terms of a CD or DVD media. A single of both costs Rs. 20/- (with the plastic case and all) and going to some of the wholesalers we can get it for Rs. 7/- or Rs. 8/- (in a spindle or a box) . The price might differ between the two by a Rupee or two (it's been quite some time since I went to buy blank DVD's) but the space equation is such that I never buy a CD. I do remember a distinct conversation where I asked him if he ever got orders for CD with the vendor replying that mostly he gets order CD's from villages rather than from city/town itself. Still the ratio was 80 > 20 in favor of DVD's. I know it's not at all scientific and is probably a strawman argument but that's the way I see it here. Almost nobody I know within my circle talks about CD and I do not just work with the elite in the city. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cadddzrny5y33zbc+majhavcdckup9jrdmwadvaaufg7d-zd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: providing pre built live images
at bottom :- On 10/8/14, Pirate Praveen wrote: > [please cc me on replies] > > Hi, > > We are testing laptops for h-node project and we wanted to try debian > jessie. But prebuilt images are not available. I tried building it using > live build, but I can only get command line version. I added > task-gnome-desktop to config/package-lists/my.list.chroot without any > effect. > > gnewsense has an older kernel and trisquel live cd has problems booting > in. So being able to test with jessie would be nice. > > Can this be done? > > Thanks > Praveen Hi Praveen, See Jessie beta 2 .iso's here http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/jessie_di_beta_2/amd64/iso-dvd/ -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CADdDZRmyg7qRrG=tqvijc7-jf8cpzvybw6-bdmdndvx0_ok...@mail.gmail.com
Re: providing pre built live images
at bottom :- On 10/9/14, Abhishek Bhattacharjee wrote: > I have tried live.debian.net but it throws error. > I am not able to download a live using it. > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:28:01PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> >On Thursday 09 October 2014 11:22 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> >> Hi Praveen, >> >> See Jessie beta 2 .iso's here >> >> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/jessie_di_beta_2/amd64/iso-dvd/ >> >> >> > >> >Those are regular install images, not live images. I don't want to tell >> >people to install debian just to check the hardware compatibility of >> >their laptops. >> >> Apologies, we've not yet got regular builds of live images for jessie >> hosted on cdimage.d.o. They'll be coming soon. >> >> There used to be regular builds at http://live.debian.net/, but I'm >> not sure of current state there. >> >> -- >> Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. >> st...@einval.com >> "Every time you use Tcl, God kills a kitten." -- Malcolm Ray >> >> > > > -- > *Abhishek Bhattacharjee* > *Pune Institute of Computer Technology* Hi all, Have added debian-live to the discussion because they are the right people to take this up with. @Abhishek - You should have shared the exact error that throws up or describe the error a bit more so that we could report it and ask the debian-live team to fix it. Daniel Baumann is/used to work quite a bit with debian-live few months/year ago so it's possible he might be also able to help us with this. While I'm sure he gets debian-live mails it works for all of us to have his wisdom and guidance as well. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CADdDZRmjKzT2tdb0uxxBWbLV+=J5fM0eGbdRmDc523=co+p...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#778973: as a user makes lot of sense to me.
Hi all, As a newbie, I do remember the confusion and had to ask people on the #debian channel and then also was not sure so downloaded the 1st DVD to get the installer working. It should make it easier to understand as what is needed/essential. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cadddzrkno4rbdbqxd2_wjc0c_4kg-apkasw398fqd47ploy...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#778973: as a user makes lot of sense to me.
at bottom :- On 2/23/15, Brian Potkin wrote: > On Mon 23 Feb 2015 at 04:08:47 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > >> As a newbie, I do remember the confusion and had to ask people on the >> #debian channel and then also was not sure so downloaded the 1st DVD >> to get the installer working. It should make it easier to understand >> as what is needed/essential. > > Please say in what way > >https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/ > > does not disperse any confusion. > > Regards, > > Brian. Brian, It does disperse, but you are putting faith that when a person is confused he will rush straight to the FAQ. I don't think it does happen like that. What would be good if there were some stats. of people who went to CD page and then successfully downloaded the CD/DVD image. At least on the page linked (http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.8.0/amd64/iso-dvd/ or even http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.8.0/amd64/iso-cd/) there doesn't seem to no way to tell to the user that your answer is an FAQ which is located somewhere else. So either the page should have a link to the FAQ at the very least if that argument has to be told. It would be difficult for anybody to take that jump from where s/he is to where you are pointing. I *think* instead of just going back and forth if there are any stats. on successful downloads would be glad to know those. @Hideki Yamane - now playing Devil's advocate from the other side - Actually if you look at https://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/ it does state in 'bold' that the first disk has what is needed for normal desktop application. For a normal new user who comes, he would probably land up at https://www.debian.org/distrib/ and from there to https://www.debian.org/CD/ If anything has to rejigged, it probably would be on the CD page. If I were a clueless newbie for instance, I woul have liked to have the http/ftp more up the order rather than jigdo or torrents, as these would be familiar only to a person who has worked with torrents or jigdo (meaning somewhat familiarity with Debain process). Looking forward to both as you both think how a 'normal' user would try to download from and will he get the required info. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CADdDZRnAEWR2KmE99bOG8YpsqZ=fumwiohoyxydajctren7...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Let user choose whether to install security updates.
at bottom :- On 08/01/2017, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 02:59:33 +0800 > 奧田愛美 wrote: >> In some asia countries, download speed that download packages from >> security.debian.org is very slow. > > Which Asia country? > We already provide security.d.o in Japan and works well for me, so > please check which security.d.o mirror you're using. > > $ nslookup security.debian.org > Server: 127.0.0.1 > Address:127.0.0.1#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > Name: security.debian.org > Address: 133.242.99.74 > > $ nslookup 133.242.99.74 > Server: 127.0.0.1 > Address:127.0.0.1#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > 74.99.242.133.in-addr.arpa name = setoguchi.debian.org. > > > And it's not wise decision to give choice to whether to install > security updates - since it is "security" issue, not only problem > for its user but it affects other users, by compromised hosts attacks > to other users as a part of botnet. > > > -- > Regards, > > Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org > http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane > > I get a slightly different answer - > nslookup 133.242.99.74 >[96%] Server: 192.168.1.1 Address:192.168.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: 74.99.242.133.in-addr.arpa name = security.debian.org. Authoritative answers can be found from: But whois gives the correct thing that it indeed is a mirror in japan - > whois 133.242.99.74 [ JPNIC database provides information regarding IP address and ASN. Its use ] [ is restricted to network administration purposes. For further information, ] [ use 'whois -h whois.nic.ad.jp help'. To only display English output,] [ add '/e' at the end of command, e.g. 'whois -h whois.nic.ad.jp xxx/e'. ] Network Information: a. [Network Number] 133.242.99.0/24 b. [Network Name] SAKURA-NET g. [Organization] SAKURA Internet Inc. m. [Administrative Contact] KT749JP n. [Technical Contact] JP00072233 p. [Nameserver] ns1.dns.ne.jp p. [Nameserver] ns2.dns.ne.jp [Assigned Date] 2012/05/10 [Return Date] [Last Update] 2012/05/10 09:32:05(JST) Less Specific Info. -- SAKURA Internet Inc. [Allocation] 133.242.0.0/16 More Specific Info. -- No match!! I do agree with OP that security updates are sometimes late or sometimes have to update twice or thrice to get security updates. Dunno though, how and if this can be improved ? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Bug#851628: Bugs on First CD/DVD for Jessie 8.5, 8.6, 8.7
at bottom :- On 17/01/2017, schatzclan wrote: > Package: cdimage.debian.org > > I have two PC boxes: > > 1997-vintage - i586-200Mhz/128M/6.3G. I have given up installing Debian > due to performance issues and a problem with “i386 8.x.0 LXDE CD#1”, as > the hybrid iso images on versions 8.5.0, 8.6.0 and 8.7.0 seem to be > damaged. The MD5 checksums all showed a valid download using two > different download methods: direct d/l and bitorrent - identical results > in unexpectedly larger actual file size (642M) vs reported size (613M) > for the “i386 8.x.0 LXDE CD#1” iso. The “i386 8.5.0 XFCE CD#1” ISO image > mounted cleanly on the mac laptop and cleanly installed but took 3 1/2 > hours to install on the system and still had serious performance issues. > I gave up and put a slightly older version of Vector Linux on this > machine which more or less works. > > i686-2.8GHz/1.2G/40G (Hewlett-Packard d330 uTower). I tried to load it > with "i386 8.6.0 DVD 1" ISO image - iso was damaged although checked OK > via MD5, nor would it mount on a Mac Laptop (used to download and check > all ISO images). The “bad” ISO image was placed on a bootable 32G USB > which booted to the graphical installation screen - installation was > completely performed, but post installation reboot failed to launch the > GUI. Post-install, there appear be missing XF86 utils and config files > due to the bad image, unless this revision has removed them as part of > the release. To get something fully working on this box I installed > Slackware 14.1. > > I have downloaded and validated “i386 8.7.0 LXDE CD #1” and it has the > same mounting problems on the Mac laptop as the previous two revisions > (8.5.0, 8.6.0), thus I’m reticent about loading onto any machine. > > I have jigdo d/l'd "debian-8.7.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso", MD5'd it (checked > OK). It has the same inability to be opened on the mac laptop as all the > other 1st cd's. > > You may want to check the 1st disk ISO images to make sure they are > valid. > > Could it be that the hybrid CD/USB iso is causing problems? This doesn’t > seem to be the case for “i386 8.5.0 XFCE CD #1”, which cleanly mounted > on the mac laptop and loaded (very slowly) on the i586 box. > > Cheers, Charles F. Schatz > > Dear Charles, While only the experts can help you out, I would suggest to use sha1sum or sha224sum instead of md5sum when trying to check signatures of the image you downloaded. The second thing, although not exactly relevant to your situation is, i586 support was taken out about a year ago - https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/05/msg1.html But as can be seen this is for stretch and beyond. With jessie you shouldn't have problems. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux shows that the release you are using should not effect you. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Bug#851628: Bugs on First CD/DVD for Jessie 8.5, 8.6, 8.7
at bottom :- On 17/01/2017, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > i made a copy + paste error with the repacking command. > Option -apm-block-size lacks its parameter "2048". > > Correct would be: > > mount debian-8.6.0-i386-DVD-1.iso /mnt/iso > > xorriso -as mkisofs \ > -o test.iso \ > -V 'Debian 8.6.0 i386 1' \ > --modification-date='2016091713290100' \ > -isohybrid-mbr > --interval:local_fs:0s-15s:zero_mbrpt,zero_gpt,zero_apm:'debian-8.6.0-i386-DVD-1.iso' > \ > -partition_cyl_align off \ > -partition_offset 0 \ > -apm-block-size 2048 \ > -c '/isolinux/boot.cat' \ > -b '/isolinux/isolinux.bin' \ > -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table \ > -eltorito-alt-boot \ > -e '/boot/grub/efi.img' \ > -no-emul-boot -isohybrid-gpt-basdat -isohybrid-apm-hfsplus \ > /mnt/iso > > > If this ISO does not mount on Mac, it would be interesting to see whether > omitting option -isohybrid-apm-hfsplus yields a better result. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas > > Dear Thomas, Would it be possible to upload the image to someplace where the OP could download and use it and see if that works for him. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Bug#853943: debian-cd: torrent-creation tools info. field is blank when looking into a torrent.
Package: debian-cd Version: 3.1.19 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I was looking at couple of Stretch torrents and was surprised to see that the creation tool field is/was empty. ─[$] wget http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/stretch_di_rc2/amd64/bt-cd/debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso.torrent --2017-02-02 17:03:13-- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/stretch_di_rc2/amd64/bt-cd/debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso.torrent Resolving cdimage.debian.org (cdimage.debian.org)... 130.239.18.165 Connecting to cdimage.debian.org (cdimage.debian.org)|130.239.18.165|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 24214 (24K) [application/x-bittorrent] Saving to: ‘debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso.torrent’ debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst 100%[===>] 23.65K 82.7KB/sin 0.3s 2017-02-02 17:03:14 (82.7 KB/s) - ‘debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso.torrent’ saved [24214/24214] [$] transmission-show debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso.torrent Name: debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso File: debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso.torrent GENERAL Name: debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso Hash: 85d148c9296312b5637501f604873fbe9d4f5bbe Created by: Created on: Wed Feb 1 18:26:40 2017 Comment: "Debian CD from cdimage.debian.org" Piece Count: 1188 Piece Size: 256.0 KiB Total Size: 311.4 MB Privacy: Public torrent TRACKERS Tier #1 http://bttracker.debian.org:6969/announce FILES debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso (311.4 MB) As can be seen created by what tool is empty. Please fix this. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages debian-cd depends on: ii apt 1.4~beta4 ii bc1.06.95-9+b2 ii bzip2 1.0.6-8+b1 ii cpp 4:6.3.0-1 ii curl 7.52.1-1 ii dctrl-tools [grep-dctrl] 2.24-2 ii dpkg-dev 1.18.18 ii genisoimage 9:1.1.11-3 pn libcompress-zlib-perl pn libdigest-md5-perl ii libdpkg-perl 1.18.18 ii libperl5.24 [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.24.1-1 ii lynx 2.8.9dev11-1 ii lynx-cur 2.8.9dev11-1 ii make 4.1-9 ii perl 5.24.1-1 ii tofrodos 1.7.13+ds-2 ii xorriso 1.4.6-1+b1 Versions of packages debian-cd recommends: ii dosfstools 4.0-2 ii hfsutils 3.2.6-13 ii isolinux 3:6.03+dfsg-14 ii mtools 4.0.18-2 ii netpbm 2:10.0-15.3+b1 ii syslinux-common 3:6.03+dfsg-14 ii syslinux-utils 3:6.03+dfsg-14 debian-cd suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Bug#861288: debian-cd: please add reportbug to netinstall and cd iso
Package: debian-cd Version: 3.1.19 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Please see the discussion at https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/04/msg00305.html and further. As seen from http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/list-cd/debian-8.7.1-amd64-CD-1.list.gz and trying with zless found that neither reportbug nor python-reportbug/python3-reportbug(stretch) is either in netinstall or in CD iso. There is a valid corner case where you are installing and there is either no or very little net access and you need reportbug to know in case an installation goes south. Having it in both netinstall and CD iso images would make sure that there is at least an installation report there on the usb disk/thumbdrive. Looking forward to see reportbug and python3-reportbug on netinstall and CD. Having a look at packages.d.o I saw that the two packages together are less than 300 kb in compressed format. Also the depends is mostly each other and python/3. Please let me know if any more information is needed from my end. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages debian-cd depends on: ii apt 1.4 ii bc1.06.95-9+b3 ii bzip2 1.0.6-8.1 ii cpp 4:6.3.0-4 ii curl 7.52.1-4 ii dctrl-tools [grep-dctrl] 2.24-2+b1 ii dpkg-dev 1.18.23 ii genisoimage 9:1.1.11-3+b2 pn libcompress-zlib-perl pn libdigest-md5-perl ii libdpkg-perl 1.18.23 ii libperl5.24 [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.24.1-2 ii lynx 2.8.9dev11-1 ii lynx-cur 2.8.9dev11-1 ii make 4.1-9.1 ii perl 5.24.1-2 ii tofrodos 1.7.13+ds-2 ii xorriso 1.4.6-1+b1 Versions of packages debian-cd recommends: ii dosfstools 4.1-1 ii hfsutils 3.2.6-13+b1 ii isolinux 3:6.03+dfsg-14.1 ii mtools 4.0.18-2+b1 ii netpbm 2:10.0-15.3+b2 ii syslinux-common 3:6.03+dfsg-14.1 ii syslinux-utils 3:6.03+dfsg-14.1 debian-cd suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?
at bottom :- On 26/06/2017, Steve McIntyre wrote: > [ Note the cross-posting... ] > > Hey folks, > > Background: we released live images for Stretch using new tooling, > namely live-wrapper. It is better than what we had before (live-build) > in a number of ways, particularly in terms of build reliability and > some important new features (e.g. UEFI support). But it's also less > mature and has seen less testing. There have been bugs because of > that. I have fixes for most of the ones I know about [1], and I'm > still working on more bugfixes yet. > > While the bugs are annoying, what worries me more is that they were > only spotted in release builds. There had been testing versions of > live images available for multiple weeks beforehand, presumably with > the same bugs included. (Almost) none of them reported. This shows > that we don't have enough people using these live images and/or caring > about filing bugs. > > We have a similar lack of involvement in terms of the content of the > live images. As I said above, I'm happy that we now have a reliable > tool for building our live images - that makes my life much > easier. But I honestly have no idea if the multiple desktop-specific > live images are actually reasonable representations of each of the > desktops. For example, I *seriously* hope that normal KDE > installations are not effected by #865382 like our live KDE > images. Validation by the various desktop teams would be useful here. > > The current situation is *not* good enough. I ended up getting > involved in live image production because the images needed making, > and I was already the main person organising production of Debian's > official images. To be frank, I had (and still have) no direct use for > the live images myself and I don't *particularly* care about them all > that much. Despite that, I've ended up spending a lot of time working > on them. A few other people have also spent a lot of time working in > this area - thanks are due to those people too. But it's still not > enough. > > If our live images are going to be good enough to meet the standards > that Debian users deserve and expect, we need *consistent*, > *sustained* involvement from a lot more people. Please tell me if > you're going to help. If we don't see a radical improvement soon, I'll > simply disable building live images altogether to remove the false > promises they're making. > > [1] > https://get.debian.org/images/release/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/#issues > > -- > Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. > st...@einval.com > "...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user' > as meaning someone who's only ever written one device driver." -- Daniel > Pead > One of the things at least to my mind is we (the users) do not know which is most closest testing release near to the final release. For e.g. take the last/latest announcement done by Cyril Brulebois on 13th June talking about the Stretch RC5 release. In the whole announcement, there is not even a hint to potential testers that this might be the closest to the final released (gold) image. I am presuming/assuming that Cyril was also talking about the live image and not the just the installer improvements. What would be nicer/better perhaps if debian-live does announcements on d-d-a and more importantly hint as when it's going to be nearer to release (final image). We are going to have a release party this week-end in Pune (haven't posted the details yet at https://wiki.debian.org/ReleasePartyStretch , hoping the organizers will do the needful otherwise will do it in a day or two. I/we could also have testing parties before the release as well with a two-week window to the final image . This also gives times to students to see how things work in the real world as well. I can't volunteer for any activities atm (due to health issues) except for taking part in organising testing party in Pune before release and getting more people to file bugs in case they hit problems. I am hopeful we can find a better way/solution to the above. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?
at bottom :- On 12/07/2017, Fernando Toledo wrote: > El 26/06/17 a las 11:08, Steve McIntyre escribió: >> [ Note the cross-posting... ] >> >> Hey folks, >> > > Our Use-case: > > We develop a derivated distro from Debian called Huayra GNU/Linux, this > is for educational program of government in Argentina. This big program > ship around 5 millons of netbooks to highschool students. > > -- > Fernando Toledo > Dock Sud BBS > http://bbs.docksud.com.ar > telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar > In short, this alone use-case answers Steve's original question which was primarily are there any users who use or would use this tool or his time would be better spent somewhere else. I think just the above use-case and number of users answers the need for a tool like live-wrapper. As has been pointed out by me and others, it just needs more testing (documentation and love by devs.) to drive more usage forwards. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Bug#887830: debian-cd: *.jigdo files should be listed in the *SUMS files
at bottom :- On 20/01/2018, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Package: debian-cd > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > > Dear Maintainer, > > as described in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2018/01/msg00019.html > the *.jigdo files are not listed in the checksum files *SUMS. > There is no way provided to check the authenticity of *.jigdo before > downloading by jigdo-lite begins. > > The *.jigdo file provides package file paths, the URLs of fallback > mirrors, and the cheksum of the *.template file. So *.template can > inflate to an image of arbitrary size and jigdo-lite can be lured into > downloading arbitrary URLs. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas > > Drats, we still don't have a +1 in the web interface. Well, you got my vote for the same as I also use .jigdo from time to time. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
magnet links and pushing them to meta-search engines.
Dear Friends, >From the last few days/week I have been poking around torrent meta-search engines, While looking through, I noticed that the sometimes (not all the times) there have been occasions where the hashes have told to be a virus. Most recent example is https://torrentz2.eu/1193adc8d620b0e35ddcd7932f2d07f2992140c0 As can be seen down below in the link, it has been labelled as a virus which may or may not be true. I dunno whom to approach, the page in question on Debian side See https://torrentz2.eu/1193adc8d620b0e35ddcd7932f2d07f2992140c0 as an e.g. Looking forward to know what people think ? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: magnet links and pushing them to meta-search engines.
Reply in-line :- On 12/02/2018, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey Shirish! > Hi Steve, > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 02:38:36AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> >>>From the last few days/week I have been poking around torrent >>meta-search engines, While looking through, I noticed that the >>sometimes (not all the times) there have been occasions where the >>hashes have told to be a virus. >> >>Most recent example is >>https://torrentz2.eu/1193adc8d620b0e35ddcd7932f2d07f2992140c0 >> >>As can be seen down below in the link, it has been labeled as a virus >>which may or may not be true. > > We've had a few "virus" reports about our images over the years, but > every one I've investigated has clearly been a false positive in the > virus checker involved. Many of them are proprietary, which of course > makes it difficult to debug the problem. :-/ > aha, ok didn't know that. >>I dunno whom to approach, the page in question on Debian side >> >>See https://torrentz2.eu/1193adc8d620b0e35ddcd7932f2d07f2992140c0 as an >> e.g. > > Do your links match the torrents that we've published? There's always > a possibility that people might be modifying them to add malware after > we're published, of course... > I realized just after sending that email that the images it was sharing were old jessie testing ones and weird (CD1+CD2) which kinda makes it hard to do all that back-checking. >From https://wiki.debian.org/DebianJessie it seems couple of months before Jessie installer beta 1 arrived. Actually what I had wanted to ask/post the query is that we somehow miss the bus of getting the releases to meta-search engines such as torrentz.eu See for e.g. https://torrentz2.eu/search?f=%27debian-9.3.0-amd64%27 and see the results that have cropped up. I was hoping that it would show the CD releases as well as the DVD releases and net install. As can be seen while it shows the DVD image and the netinstall images, but for unknown reasons officially CD images seems to have gone the way of dodo https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/bt-cd/ Maybe because CD-1 has become too big that it can't anymore fit lxde or something for base-install + desktop environment. I did scour the archives for last 2-3 months but wasn't able to get anything about why they were dropped although it probably is due to the space issue I have mentioned above. Are there any hopes of the CD images being revived in the future or that's sort of gone forever ? FWIW I do still queries from students and the only thing I can give them is the dvd-iso image link as net-install image can be problematic as I found out when testing. Look forward to comments. > -- > Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. > st...@einval.com > You lock the door > And throw away the key > There's someone in my head but it's not me > > -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
have a mate-desktop CD was Re: magnet links and pushing them to meta-search engines.
Reply at bottom :- On 16/02/2018, Steve McIntyre wrote: > I've since re-added a single-CD option for Xfce, for thoe people who > really do want a single CD that will give them a basic desktop, > Dear Steve, There has been quite a few things happening at my end hence wasn't able to reply before today, so sorry for that. I had been asked to share some of Debian newness recently. Because I was on the road and didn't have my trusty lappy with me, had to use window machines, download the daily, weekly and thankfully the last alpha2 xfce build. As I was on MS-Windows had to resort to using a variety of softwares trying out rufus and other softwares. For some reason, other than unetbootin none of the others worked. But this was also only limited to the alpha build, the others just didn't even copy either using rufus or using unetbootin. Dunno the reason for that. Most of the logs were cryptic in nature so couldn't come to any specific result. The only thing I was able to figure out that somehow the boot loader was corrupted during the copy. I was also stuck by the warning debian usb stick told me while I was trying to install saying unetbootin is not a good tool to make a usb stick. Perhaps a hyperlink would have been better than just saying its in installation instructions. While installing the alpha build, two things became apparent, one while there is support for https protocol, there doesn't seem to be any mirrors which support that or I couldn't find them and I tried a few, although finding https mirrors should perhaps be more automated, dunno. Lastly, would it be possible to have a mate-desktop CD apart from the xfce one. While choice of desktop environment is certainly a personal choice, I feel it's a good lightweight yet at the same time fully functional desktop environment. It isn't bloated as GNOME has become but still tries to be true to the gtk+ philosophy. Also is buster alpha 3 on the horizon anywhere or what constraints or issues that need to be resolved before an alpha 3 can be a reality ? Looking forward to know more. > -- > Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. > st...@einval.com > Who needs computer imagery when you've got Brian Blessed? > > -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: have a mate-desktop CD was Re: magnet links and pushing them to meta-search engines.
:at bottom :- On 10/03/2018, shirish शिरीष wrote: > > As I was on MS-Windows had to resort to using a variety of softwares > trying out rufus and other softwares. For some reason, other than > unetbootin none of the others worked. But this was also only limited > to the alpha build, the others just didn't even copy either using > rufus or using unetbootin. Dunno the reason for that. Most of the logs > were cryptic in nature so couldn't come to any specific result. The > only thing I was able to figure out that somehow the boot loader was > corrupted during the copy. > Just read Thomas's reply on the debian-cd mailing list specifically https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2018/03/msg3.html . Please CC me in further correspondence in this regard as I'm not subscribed to the list . FWIW and FTR I did try the rufus 'dd' for all three iso images and it failed spectacularly. Unfortunately, I did not copy the logs of the ones which failed and the one run which succeeded. I could retry it again on the weekend when I have bit more of time and share the logs but as shared before, the logs were cryptic. It didn't tell the reason why the dd to usb failed . I also failed to see if there is a more verbose flag or method which I could use. to have some idea as to why a failure occurred in the first place. It only has single run logs and no persistent logging across runs as we are used to in Debian for most of our work. To be precise by a single run I mean by a cycle of attempting to copy or dd an iso image from hdd to the usb disk using software. And I did try multiple runs (2-3 times at least) of formatting the usb disk (not quick format) and running the same operations with the same result. I also researched a bit of the flash drive itself later after I came back both in MS-Windows space as well as using Debian to see if the flash drive is true or not. It turned out it was true, although was a TLC . Using Chip genius - Description: USB Mass Storage Device(Kingston DataTraveler 3.0) Device Type: Mass Storage Device Protocal Version: USB 3.10 Current Speed: High Speed Max Current: 504mA USB Device ID: VID = 0951 PID = 1666 Serial Number: Device Vendor: Kingston Device Name: DataTraveler 3.0 Device Revision: 0110 Manufacturer: Kingston Product Model: DataTraveler 3.0 Product Revision: PMAP Controller Vendor: Phison Controller Part-Number: PS2251-07(PS2307) - F/W 08.01.50 [2017-01-17] Flash ID code: AD3A1803 - Hynix [TLC] The only thing I have hid is the serial number as it's of no consequence. I purchased the usb stick from a reputed vendor from whom I have purchased IT equipment over the years without complaints. Did find out it's a TLC chip https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_cell#Triple-level_cell but that shouldn't be a factor as I had bought it just before going on the road. We should have a similar utility in Debian to find out flash internals. I don't know of any which does the same . http://www.usbdev.ru/files/chipgenius/ unfortunately the page is in Russian. While trawling also discovered this oldish article https://flashchiptech.wordpress.com/2010/12/07/chip-genius-the-good-and-the-bad-about-this-software-in-identify-flash-memory-chips-and-repairing-fake-hacked-memory-how-useful-is-chipgenius/ And also read that transcend doesn't share internal chip details unlike other vendors. Hope it throws a bit more light. Btw, can anybody share the unetbootin issues as I have no clue where to search for unetbootin issues with Debian. Quite a few of my friednds and colleagues use it to make Debian images over the years without an issue. Look forward to know more. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: have a mate-desktop CD was Re: magnet links and pushing them to meta-search engines.
. Dear Thomas, In response to https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2018/03/msg5.html Thank you for sharing the info. I probably will try to get a couple of usb sticks next week for work and probably will also try to see how rufus responds and if possible get in touch with Pete Batard to take the discussion forward. I found it pretty disconcerting especially for students or for that matter anybody who wants to take the plunge into Debian and get stuck like that. I also perhaps failed to mention that rufus tried to install syslinux instead of grub2 which at least to me feels more convenient and friendly but that's a discussion outside of this purview. During a discussion with Steve Mcntyre during debconf 2016, he had shared about both the unrealiability of the usb drives themselves as well as the data so now always use shasums to make sure the data stream is correct. This https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#write-usb I had already done before. I used the built-in certutil and Get-FileHash on MS-Windows powershell to make sure the sum was correct. Now that I'm on Debian GNU/Linux did as I had copied the same on one of my usb disks, the .iso image which I just transferred to the hdd. shirish@debian:~/games$ ./check_debian_iso SHA1SUMS debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso Piping 331776 blocks of 'debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso' through 'sha1sum' to verify checksum list item 'debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso'. 331776+0 records in 331776+0 records out 679477248 bytes (679 MB, 648 MiB) copied, 1.35603 s, 501 MB/s Ok: 'debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso' matches 'debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso' in 'SHA1SUMS' although trying to do the same with /dev/sdb or /dev/sdb1 results in - shirish@debian:~/games$ ./check_debian_iso SHA1SUMS debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso /dev/sdb Does not look like an ISO 9660 filesystem: '/dev/sdb' magic=' ' That's the usb key/thumb drive on which debian iso image is done by unetbootin. Although it appears to have worked though as was able to get a working Debian GNU/Linux system at the end, was able to get updates, get the net working and so on and so forth. FTR, I could have used cp or dd but that would have been only if I had taken my lappy that day. It should not be a requirement that we should have a debian laptop because in real-world scenarios many people not might have access to an installation nor should they require one, although do agree it's handy if it's there. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: have a mate-desktop CD was Re: magnet links and pushing them to meta-search engines.
On 17/03/2018, Steve McIntyre wrote: > [ Dropped the mate list - this isn't relevant there... ] > Reply in-line :- > > Then you were definitely using ISO mode in Rufus. The main problem > with that (and with unetbootin and other tools that work like this) is > that it's very easy to replace boot loader files with versions that > don't work well together, or don't work the way we expect and have > tested. If you're blindly modifying what the d-i and debian-cd scripts > have produced, then we have no way of knowing if reported bugs are our > fault or not. That's why we *really* don't recommend unetbootin, for > example. We have had a lot of bugs reported by novice users that we > just cannot reproduce. > Dear Steve, I actually tried in both but neither worked in Rufus. I'm going to get couple of usb sticks to get to the bottom of this mess. > For Debian installer images for both i386 and amd64, we create iso > hybrid media which will run 4 different ways: > > * BIOS boot from CD/DVD (isolinux) > * BIOS boot from USB(isolinux) > * UEFI boot from CD/DVD (grub) > * UEFI boot from USB (grub) > Is it one and the same from - https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/buster_di_alpha2/amd64/iso-cd/ https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/buster_di_alpha2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso or somewhere different. > and that's a deliberate choice for maximum flexibility from a single > image. If a tool like unetbootin changes the setup of the media, it's > very likely to break things here. > correction it was rufus who was trying to put in tools, not unetbootin. I tried rufus both in iso mode as well as dd mode without any success at all. >>During a discussion with Steve Mcntyre during debconf 2016, he had >>shared about both the unrealiability of the usb drives themselves as >>well as the data so now always use shasums to make sure the data >>stream is correct. > > Yay! > >>This https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#write-usb I had already done >>before. I used the built-in >>certutil and Get-FileHash on MS-Windows powershell to make sure the >>sum was correct. >> >>Now that I'm on Debian GNU/Linux did as I had copied the same on one >>of my usb disks, the .iso image which I just transferred to the hdd. >> >>shirish@debian:~/games$ ./check_debian_iso SHA1SUMS >>debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso >>Piping 331776 blocks of 'debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso' >>through 'sha1sum' >>to verify checksum list item >> 'debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso'. >>331776+0 records in >>331776+0 records out >>679477248 bytes (679 MB, 648 MiB) copied, 1.35603 s, 501 MB/s >>Ok: 'debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso' matches >>'debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso' in 'SHA1SUMS' >> >>although trying to do the same with /dev/sdb or /dev/sdb1 results in - >> >>shirish@debian:~/games$ ./check_debian_iso SHA1SUMS >>debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso /dev/sdb >>Does not look like an ISO 9660 filesystem: '/dev/sdb' magic=' ' >> >>That's the usb key/thumb drive on which debian iso image is done by >> unetbootin. > > So unetbootin will not have written an exact copy. > That might be correct. see - ~/games$ ls -lh debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 shirish shirish 648M Dec 5 21:37 debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso ~/games$ mount /dev/sdb1 on /media/shirish/DEBIAN TEST type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,uid=1000,gid=1000,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=437,iocharset=ascii,shortname=mixed,showexec,utf8,flush,errors=remount-ro,uhelper=udisks2) shirish@debian:~/games$ df -h /media/shirish/DEBIAN\ TEST/ Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb129G 808M 29G 3% /media/shirish/DEBIAN TEST But I do believe that during transfer from .iso image to installation media some archives are extracted, hence perhaps the change . I did notice that the time-stamp changes which it shouldn't have - shirish@debian:/media/shirish/DEBIAN TEST$ ls -lh total 46M -rw-r--r-- 1 shirish shirish 146 Dec 5 21:04 autorun.inf drwxr-xr-x 3 shirish shirish 64K Mar 10 02:00 boot drwxr-xr-x 2 shirish shirish 64K Mar 10 02:00 css drwxr-xr-x 3 shirish shirish 64K Mar 10 02:00 dists drwxr-xr-x 4 shirish shirish 64K Mar 10 02:00 doc drwxr-xr-x 3 shirish shirish 64K Mar 10 02:00 efi drwxr-xr-x 2 shirish shirish 64K Mar 10 02:00 firmware -rw-r--r-- 1 shirish shirish 180K Dec 4 12:55 g2ldr -rw-r--r-- 1 shirish shirish 8.0K Dec 4 12:55 g2ldr.mbr drwxr-xr-x 2 shirish shirish 64K Mar 10 02:0
Re: have a mate-desktop CD was Re: magnet links and pushing them to meta-search engines.
Reply at bottom :- On 17/03/2018, Rick Thomas wrote: > > Is there a relatively simple way a normal Debian user (without special > developer skills or access to special developer resources) can create a > Debian Live CD/DVD/BD/USB-stick with their choice of packages? The goal > here would be for Sirish (and me too, for that matter) to be able to create > our own Debian Live mate-desktop. Generalizing a little bit: One could > create a bootable Live USB-stick with a custom set of utilities (e.g. for > network installation/testing/debugging). > > Is that possible? > > Thanks, > Rick > Dear Rick, As Steve shared there is that . If you are looking at stable model then you are in luck as https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/ which I guess Steve was talking about earlier. https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-9.4.0-amd64-mate.iso would have been perfect if I were chasing a stable release . There used to be an interesting service when debian-live was an unofficial project (third-party) where one could put a list of all the softwares needed and after few minutes to an hour you would get a customized iso image which could be downloadable for a day. There are and were multiple problems with that scenario as sometimes I got packages from unstable or even testing which were buggy and had RC (release-critical) bugs filed against them which means those packages should not have been allowed to come on the live-cd in the first place. Also just a single person was a maintainer so support was an issue. >From what little I know even the new debian-live to offer a similar service with more hardened tools and checks but needs heads and hands to provide a similar service. There is also debian's own automated installation routine involving preseeding as well - http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apb.html an example preseed.txt file http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/example-preseed.txt The preseed way looks to be more easy and simpler than the scripts that Steve shares. I for instance, wouldn't know which lines to touch and which not to in order to get a customized mate-debian-alpha 2 .iso. Maybe if it had a nice UI rather than a gitlab instance or just the documentation it would have been fruitful but that again need people power who are willing to do the needful. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: have a mate-desktop CD
Reply in-line :- On 17/03/2018, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > shirish wrote: >> https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/buster_di_alpha2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso > Dear Thomas, Sorry for not getting back earlier but as you had changed the thread headline, I was unable to figure out that you had answered. > Just to be sure that no regression confuses us here, i downloaded that > ISO and let xorriso analyse its boot equipment: > > xorriso -indev debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso \ > -report_el_torito plain -report_system_area plain > > reports > > El Torito images : N Pltf B Emul Ld_seg Hdpt Ldsiz LBA > El Torito boot img : 1 BIOS y none 0x 0x00 42011 > El Torito boot img : 2 UEFI y none 0x 0x008321803 > > So it can boot from DVD via BIOS and via EFI firmware. > > System area summary: MBR isohybrid cyl-align-on GPT APM > > The presence of word "isohybrid" in this line indicates that it can boot > from USB stick via BIOS. The x86 program code in the Master Boot Record > will transfer program execution to the El Torito boot image for BIOS. > > MBR partition table: N Status TypeStart Blocks > MBR partition : 1 0x80 0x000 1327104 > MBR partition : 2 0x00 0xef 7212 832 > > The presence of an MBR partition of type 0xef indicates that it can boot > from USB stick via EFI firmware. The partition table entry marks a range > in the ISO image where a FAT filesystem exists with file > /EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI > which EFI will execute as x86 EFI program. > (32-bit x86 EFI expects and runs /EFI/BOOT/BOOTIA32.EFI.) > > So yes, this ISO should boot after being put plainly onto an USB stick > and then offered to BIOS or EFI as boot device. > > After booting, /dev/sdX and /dev/sdX1 are both mountable as the ISO 9660 > filesystem with nearly all the beef. /dev/sdX2 should be mountable as > FAT filesystem with just the two directories and the one file BOOTX64.EFI. > ("X" is the device number which depends on the presence of other devices.) > > >> I will definitely try rufus in dd mode but as of buy the sticks, make >> sure they are genuine > > I'd make that quality check on a GNU/Linux system, where one can rely > that dd does no things that are smarter than wanted: > > dd if=debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso bs=1M of=/dev/sdX > > Use script check_debian_iso to verify that all written bytes are > correctly readable. > > Then overwite the USB stick with zeros > dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=650 of=/dev/sdX > in order to erase the successfully copied ISO. > > This verified and then wiped USB stick would be a reliable test bed for > Rufus et.al. > > If you finally have success, please provide a short description which > menus or buttons of Rufus need to be used for getting it into DD mode. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas > I had been a bit busy at my end and at the same time didn't really have the time to go and get a usb stick for playing around. Most of the usb sticks have something or the other which I don't want to remove/discard the contents even by backing up as usb sticks tend to be 'moody' especially since Triple-level cells are finicky https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_cell#Triple-level_cell and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memory#Write_endurance In response For the previous question, I tried both the ways, first the 'DD mode' athough was a bit circumspect as had heard (hearsay) that the unix dd has some memory leak but that's outside the main story. FWIW, I had run the binary in 'DD mode' and when it gave up with some error I couldn't figure out, I tried out usb mode and even there was out of luck. Again FWIW, I do have a loaned .iso image to test out the issue. I probably would be able to play with it probably on the week-end or later. I would try to get as much details as possible to see if the issue still persists and if yes, would also CC Pete (the developer of Rufus) so maybe he can help out as well. Again, sorry for not answering earlier. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Bug#846006: debian-cd: please provide flavor/spin netinst image for Debian Edu
Hi all, Sorry for jumping in. Just a small voice. While I haven't tried the latest netinstall but my experience in alpha 2 was that I had to run it couple of times before it was able to do the needful. I do not know the reason for it other than the fact that net connectivity at my end goes down sometime. https://flossexperiences.wordpress.com/2018/07/28/broadband-issues-and-reliance-jio/ The whole idea of netinstall at least for me is and was a progressive installer. Just having the base image should be enough to have a console and a sources.list which has Debian buster # deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian buster main deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main as the default. I removed contrib and non-free (for firmware related packages) and have a base for people to use from start. Also maybe have a different desktop then LXDE (mate being preferred) but dunno if this can be achieved. If there is a way to workaround so that it doesn't download LXDE and downloads mate-desktop and at the very least gives me a console and apt would be pretty satisfying. I know this is bit different than Debian Edu goals (lxde being preferred for low-memory usage) . If needed can make another bug report but would like to hear what other people think before putting the bug against debian-cd if it's a worthwhile pursuit. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Bug#916687: +1 to this request
Dear all, I would add my +1 to this request from Praveen. Although preferably also with non-free (for non-free firmware/drivers) as well. https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/images-including-firmware/9.6.0-live+nonfree/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-9.6.0-amd64-mate+nonfree.iso As an example. They could probably be called debian-testing-amd64-mate-171218+nonfree.iso if taken today's date in a dd/mm/yy format. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Bug#916694: Please add gparted to list of packages in non-free firmware iso
Package: debian-cd Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Please add gparted to list of packages in non-free firmware.iso . To see if gparted was available, looked at https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/images-including-firmware/9.6.0-live+nonfree/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-9.6.0-amd64-mate+nonfree.iso as well as https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/images-including-firmware/9.6.0-live+nonfree/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-9.6.0-amd64-mate+nonfree.packages and couldn't find gparted listed in there. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages debian-cd depends on: ii apt 1.8.0~alpha2 pn bc ii bzip2 1.0.6-9 ii cpp 4:8.2.0-2 ii curl 7.62.0-1 ii dctrl-tools [grep-dctrl] 2.24-3 ii dpkg-dev 1.19.2 pn libcompress-zlib-perl pn libdigest-md5-perl pn libdigest-sha-perl ii libdpkg-perl 1.19.2 ii lynx 2.8.9rel.1-2 ii make 4.2.1-1.2 ii perl 5.28.1-3 pn tofrodos ii wget 1.19.5-2 pn xorriso | genisoimage Versions of packages debian-cd recommends: ii dosfstools 4.1-2 pn hfsutils pn isolinux ii mtools 4.0.18-2.1 ii netpbm 2:10.0-15.3+b2 pn syslinux-common pn syslinux-utils debian-cd suggests no packages. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Bug#917824: possible to have debian buster alpha iso's with non-free firmwares
Package: debian-cd Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Would it be possible to have debian buster alpha iso's with non-free firmware. I did see https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/buster_di_alpha4/amd64/iso-cd/ But it arguably would be better if we also have the alpha CD's with non-free firmwar.e It doesn't make sense especially if there are no wireless drivers (broadcom etc.) and people have to hunt for them and the dependency hell. It would be especially useful if it was netinst.iso itself so we would have something minimum to connect with the mirrors otherwise you are stuck to trying an ethernet line, connector to connect with the web, try to download the driver packages and any dependency hell in case something is/was needed and is not there in the .iso. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages debian-cd depends on: ii apt 1.8.0~alpha2 pn bc ii bzip2 1.0.6-9 ii cpp 4:8.2.0-2 ii curl 7.62.0-1 ii dctrl-tools [grep-dctrl] 2.24-3 ii dpkg-dev 1.19.2 ii genisoimage 9:1.1.11-3+b2 pn libcompress-zlib-perl pn libdigest-md5-perl pn libdigest-sha-perl ii libdpkg-perl 1.19.2 ii lynx 2.8.9rel.1-2 ii make 4.2.1-1.2 ii perl 5.28.1-3 ii tofrodos 1.7.13+ds-4 ii wget 1.20-1 Versions of packages debian-cd recommends: ii dosfstools 4.1-2 pn hfsutils pn isolinux ii mtools 4.0.18-2.1 ii netpbm 2:10.0-15.3+b2 pn syslinux-common pn syslinux-utils debian-cd suggests no packages. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
unable to update
Dear all, This is my /etc/apt/sources.list - Debian testing ### deb http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free #deb http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates main #deb-src http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates main Debian unstable # deb http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free deb-src http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free Debian experimental # deb http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib deb-src http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib # Debian Debug packages ### deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug/ testing-debug main deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug/ unstable-debug main deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug/ experimental-debug main Third party repos ### deb https://riot.im/packages/debian/ buster main #deb https://lxqt.debian.net/debian experimental-snapshots main #deb-src https://lxqt.debian.net/debian experimental-snapshots main ## Non-free #deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org stretch main non-free Haven't been able to update the repos. today. I am able to traceroute/tracepath to 217.196.149.232 but not 151.101.8.204 . Can somebody help ? FWIW, I am able to torrent, mail and everything else without an issue. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C
Re: unable to update
addition at bottom :- On 06/01/2020, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Dear all, > > This is my /etc/apt/sources.list - > > > Debian testing ### > deb http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib > non-free > deb-src http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian testing main contrib > non-free > #deb http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates > main > #deb-src http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security > testing/updates main > > > Debian unstable # > deb http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main > contrib non-free > deb-src http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main > contrib non-free > > > Debian experimental # > deb http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib >deb-src http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian experimental main > contrib > > # Debian Debug packages ### > deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug/ testing-debug main > deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug/ unstable-debug main > deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug/ experimental-debug > main > > > Third party repos ### > deb https://riot.im/packages/debian/ buster main >#deb https://lxqt.debian.net/debian experimental-snapshots main >#deb-src https://lxqt.debian.net/debian experimental-snapshots main > > ## Non-free > #deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org stretch main non-free > > > Haven't been able to update the repos. today. > > I am able to traceroute/tracepath to 217.196.149.232 but not > 151.101.8.204 . Can somebody help ? > > FWIW, I am able to torrent, mail and everything else without an issue. > > -- > Regards, > Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल > My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ > http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com > > E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C > Please CC me if anybody has any answers. For reasons beyond my comprehension, whenever I try traceroute, it uses the singapore route and doesn't use any other route :( FWIW, I am getting the same error code as somebody shared on askubuntu [1] although this is debian. Previously it usually got fixed by itself in few hours but seems something is broken probably at Singapore end. I have seen this more than couple of times. Here's the output I am sharing via traceroute - traceroute to 151.101.8.204 (151.101.8.204), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 3 218.248.164.82 (218.248.164.82) 23.243 ms 24.867 ms 27.077 ms 4 218.248.235.197 (218.248.235.197) 33.597 ms 35.702 ms * 5 218.248.235.198 (218.248.235.198) 42.236 ms 66.139 ms * 6 115.113.165.93.static-mumbai.vsnl.net.in (115.113.165.93) 48.830 ms 115.114.89.149.static-Mumbai.vsnl.net.in (115.114.89.149) 12.357 ms 10.345 ms 7 172.23.78.233 (172.23.78.233) 13.858 ms 15.971 ms 19.457 ms 8 172.31.244.45 (172.31.244.45) 38.207 ms 40.569 ms 43.184 ms 9 ix-ae-4-2.tcore2.cxr-chennai.as6453.net (180.87.37.1) 45.813 ms 66.518 ms 50.928 ms 10 if-ae-10-2.tcore2.svw-singapore.as6453.net (180.87.37.65) 95.576 ms if-ae-3-3.tcore1.cxr-chennai.as6453.net (180.87.36.5) 94.641 ms 97.952 ms 11 if-ae-34-2.tcore1.svq-singapore.as6453.net (180.87.36.41) 69.122 ms 71.938 ms 74.665 ms 12 if-ae-11-2.thar1.svq-singapore.as6453.net (180.87.98.37) 69.094 ms if-ae-7-2.thar1.svq-singapore.as6453.net (180.87.98.9) 71.561 ms 74.149 ms 13 ae-9.a01.sngpsi07.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.8.241) 76.513 ms 77.152 ms 78.242 ms 14 ae-5.r00.sngpsi07.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.123) 89.208 ms ae-5.r01.sngpsi07.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.241) 88.765 ms ae (129.250.2.123) 89.878 ms 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * * The only thing that is missing or have not shared are the first couple of hops. First from my gateway to the local exchange and the second from the local exchange IP to my ISP's infrastructure [2] 1. https://askubuntu.com/questions/899009/sudo-apt-update-always-giving-clearsigned-file-isnt-valid-got-nosplit-does 2. see whois 218.248.164.82 i.e. BSNL's infrastructure. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C