Re: Adopting base-passwd

2002-11-30 Thread Andrew Lau
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 01:49:50PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
 Since it's an essential package I figured I should mention this
 before acting: Wichert and I have agreed that I will be taking over
 maintenance of base-passwd. An upload will be in incoming by this
 weekend.
 
 Cheers,
 
 -- 
 Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I'd like to wish you the best of luck getting it right first go. = )

Yours sincerely,
Andrew Netsnipe Lau

-- 
---
* Andrew Netsnipe LauComputer Science  Student Representaive, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
* netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0  alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0 *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---


pgpCeuANwrjwY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: New maintainer behaviour with NMU and LogJam's hijacking

2002-11-30 Thread Junichi Uekawa

 Firstly, I don't think this is a matter for debian-devel as it doesn't 
 involve the project as a whole and would best be dealt with privately. 

I usually consult debian-devel or other mailing lists before jumping on to
do NMUs... well, sometimes :P

Private mail do get lost, and there might be other people who are interested
in the exact same package, so it is better to do coordination
where it is possible.


It's not just a problem between you and the maintainer, but
you and the whole Debian Project, because anybody within Debian Project
has the power to NMU that specific package.




regards,
junichi




Re: KDEE3 question

2002-11-30 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h
* Colin Watson [Fri, Nov 29 2002, 02:14:35PM]:

  to see a good reason for not compiling KDE3 on gcc 2.95 as this
  definitely works or else there wouldn't be a single KDE3 for woody
  package on kde.org.
 
 The good reason is that all the KDE library sonames have to be changed
 when switching to gcc 3.2. The KDE developers rightly wish to avoid this
 disruption.

What's the problem with a such change? Sure, the amount of work needed
for the whole gcc-3.2 transition would grow a bit. But what will happen
when they upload new, gcc-3.2 based packages with the package names of
existing inofficial packages? I expect lots of users whinning about
temporar breakage. So it would be good to change them anyways. And
looking so, the existing KDE3 packages could also go into Sid _now_.

Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
   If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...Oh, wait a minute, he already does.




Re: KDEE3 question

2002-11-30 Thread Mateusz Papiernik
 temporar breakage. So it would be good to change them anyways. And
 looking so, the existing KDE3 packages could also go into Sid _now_.

You're right. Packages from kde.org are very stable, and I think -
correctly created, I'm using them for long time (about three months),
and I didn't notice any problems with them. IMO waiting for full gcc
transition in Sid, which will take very much time, isn't good idea for
KDE3.



Regards,
-- 
Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sounds like a Windows problem, try calling Microsoft support




Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Nick Phillips
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 03:58:51PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:

 and behind netbsd in the sory state of our cdrom mirror network.

I'm with Joey on this; last time I tried to find Debian .iso images, it
was a nightmare. In fact I couldn't find an official woody iso anywhere.

As he also said, many of the mirrors are hopelessly out-of-date.

Joy (or any of the rest of the www team) - where do you get the data
to put into the mirror pages on www.d.o?

I'd suggest that a simple method for mirror admins to let us know what they
plan to mirror, and for us to test its availability on a regular basis,
would be a good idea.

(In fact I might even just do it).


Cheers,


Nick
-- 
Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Live in a world of your own, but always welcome visitors.




Re: [Agnubis] Packaging Agnubis for Debian GNU/Linux

2002-11-30 Thread Andrew Lau
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 04:20:09PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
 Condider that his ITP has been there for two months. He's either not
 that motivated or simply busy. And NM is much more time consuming
 than closing an ITP. Offer your help, whatever help you are willing
 or able to give.

 If he is too busy to package whatever was that depended so heavily
 on Agnubis, offer to retitle the bug to a RFP.

It's the other way around. Agnubis depends on DiaCanvas2 which he has
ITPed. Agnubis doesn't have any releases yet, but I was hoping to
start doing CVS snapshots in preparations for their eventual
release. So if I were to release Agnubis (still impossible since they
taking a brief break from development and their CVS src is currently
not building), I'd have to package DiaCanvas2 as well, and thus rudely
hijacking the poor bloke's ITP. That why I hope he can show me to
committed, otherwise I will have no choice but to hijack it in order
to release Agnubis .deb packages.

Yours sincerely,
Andrew Netsnipe Lau

-- 
---
* Andrew Netsnipe LauComputer Science  Student Representaive, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
* netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0  alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0 *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---


pgpMoaBroihcM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Nick Phillips
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 04:58:30PM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
 On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:58:51 -0500
 Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The comparison is only fair with organizations that *want* you do do
  so(so not redhat, probably not openbsd, or mandrake, or others whose
  principal developers try to sell cds).
 
 Strictly speaking, given the ISO mirroring situation, we've never wanted
 people to use full 640M ISOs when we knew that 99% of people downloading
 would use a couple hundreds megs, at most.

Given the ISO mirroring situation? Care to elucidate?

I seem to remember seeing several offers of machines and bandwidth recently.
It would seem to make sense to at least make it relatively easy for mirror
admins who *do* have the available resources to provide ISO images.

Even a single, reliable, possibly rate-limited, source for ISOs would be
an improvement on what we currently have.

Rate-limiting the source would, if necessary, provide a disincentive to
people who would otherwise just jump in and download ISOs rather than using
Jigdo.


Cheers,


Nick

-- 
Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fine day for friends.
So-so day for you.




Re: New maintainer behaviour with NMU and LogJam's hijacking

2002-11-30 Thread Andrew Lau
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 06:36:06PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
 On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 17:50, Ari Pollak wrote:
  Didn't you sponsor the upload?
 
 No, that was me...

This Colin  Colin confusion has been quite contagious this season,
hasn't it? = P

Yours sincerely,
Andrew Netsnipe Lau

-- 
---
* Andrew Netsnipe LauComputer Science  Student Representaive, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
* netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0  alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0 *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---


pgpVMkwT8ti2o.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 11:23:23PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
 Joy (or any of the rest of the www team) - where do you get the data
 to put into the mirror pages on www.d.o?

Well, we get it from the Internet :) Please rephrase the question, I don't
understand.

 I'd suggest that a simple method for mirror admins to let us know what they
 plan to mirror, and for us to test its availability on a regular basis,
 would be a good idea.

We already have that, but notice how the mirrors of the two archives aren't
in the least bit of distress like the problem at hadn: the structure and
contents of those is well defined, we have mirror checking scripts and we
regularly monitor the output of that for any major problems.

(I would suggest that you have a look at http://www.debian.org/mirror/)

The CD image mirrors don't even have a primary site -- *cdimage.d.o includes
only jigdo files now. Those image mirrors are one big improvization.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.




Bug#171237: ITP: tinycdb -- a package for creating and reading constant databases

2002-11-30 Thread Christian Kurz
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-30
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: tinycdb
  Version : 0.73
  Upstream Author : Michael J. Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : ftp://ftp.corpit.ru/pub/tinycdb
* License : Public Domain [1]
  Description : a package for creating and reading constant databases

 tinycdb is a small, fast and reliable utility set and subroutine
 library for creating and reading constant databases. The database
 structure is tuned for fast reading:
 .
  - Successful lookups take normally just two disk accesses.
  - Unsuccessful lookups take only one disk access.
  - Small disk space and memory size requirements; a database
uses 2048 bytes for the header and 24 bytes per record, plus
the space for keys and data.
  - Maximum database size is 4GB; individual record size is not
otherwise limited.
  - Portable file format.
  - Fast creation of new databases.
  - No locking, updates are atomical.
 .
 tinycdb implements almost all API as found in cdb-0.75 written by
 D.J. Bernstein, so it should be source-compatible. It also implements
 the query interface as found in earlier versions of cdb (0.6x) and
 freecdb. It also contains some enhancements, like allowing to check
 existance of a record in a yet-to-be-created cdb database file.
 .
 This package contains both the utility to manipulate constant
 databases and the development files.


[1] This is the complete license text for it:

|You can do whatever you like with this package.  The code is placed
|at the public domain.
|
|This package is distributed in a hope it will be useful, but
|WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Both, the upstream author and I believe that this contains no legal
problem and is acceptable as DSFG-free license. If there's any problem
with the license, please inform me about the problem and a suggested
change.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux salem 2.4.20-rc2 #1 Sun Nov 17 10:28:49 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=POSIX, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
Free yourself from negative influence. Negative thoughts are the old
habits that gnaw at the roots of the soul.
Moses Shongo, (Seneca)




Re: gpg-agent?

2002-11-30 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 29, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 from the current packager i had to hear that it's largely unstable.
 many bugs and such. we'll have to wait...
I have been using it for weeks without any problem, so I'd say it should
be packaged. (No, I'm not going to do it.)

-- 
ciao,
Marco


pgpiXAv6EGYd5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


qa.debian.org: attributes revoked GnuPG keys to maintainers

2002-11-30 Thread Andrew Lau
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-30
Severity: normal

developer.php on http://qa.debian.org seems to be too agressive in
attributing keys to maintainers. It's even listing revoked keys on the
Packages overview pages.

Take a look at my Packages overview page [1]. It lists two GPG key
ids for myself, 2E8B68BD  DCFEDB00. The first is valid [2], but
notice that the latter key, DCFEDB00 was revoked almost two years ago
[3]. I've never even signed a package to Debian using that key either.

I believe this a is a bug since it would incorrectly imply to the
viewer of the page that the said developer is still using that GnuPG
key even though it has been revoked. 

Yours sincerely,
Andrew Netsnipe Lau

[1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=netsnipe%40debianplanet.org
[2] http://pgp.dtype.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x2E8B68BDop=vindex
[3] http://pgp.dtype.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xDCFEDB00op=vindex

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux espresso 2.4.19 #1 Tue Nov 12 23:32:34 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


-- 
---
* Andrew Netsnipe LauComputer Science  Student Representaive, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
* netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0  alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0 *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---


pgp1tlapCLsir.pgp
Description: PGP signature


subject

2002-11-30 Thread Shiju p. Nair

-- 




Bug#171253: ITP: libdjbdns -- DNS client library designed to replace the BIND res_*/dn_* library

2002-11-30 Thread Gerrit Pape
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

DNS client library designed to replace the old BIND res_*/dn_* library[0]

High-level lookups:

The dns library provides several easy-to-use DNS lookup routines:
dns_ip4, dns_ip4_qualify, dns_name4, dns_mx, and dns_txt.

dns_ip4_qualify supports the traditional configuration mechanisms for
hostname rewriting: $LOCALDOMAIN, /etc/resolv.conf, and gethostname. It
also supports a powerful new user-controlled rewriting mechanism.

The functions that read /etc/resolv.conf automatically reread it every
ten minutes, so system administrators don't have to kill long-running
programs.

Low-level lookups:

The dns_domain_* and dns_packet_* functions make it easy to safely parse
DNS packets. The dns_transmit_* functions send DNS queries of arbitrary
types to arbitrary servers. These are the functions used in the dnscache
program.

License: Bernstein has put the .[ch] files (dns.h, dns_dfd.c,
dns_domain.c, dns_dtda.c, dns_ip.c, dns_ipq.c, dns_mx.c, dns_name.c,
dns_nd.c, dns_packet.c, dns_random.c, dns_rcip.c, dns_rcrw.c,
dns_resolve.c, dns_sortip.c, dns_transmit.c, dns_txt.c) and all
necessary lower-level .[ch] files into the public domain[1].  I do not
plan to make any changes to those files, so Bernstein's djbdns security
guarantee[2] applies. My additions to the package will be licensed under
a BSD compatible license.

Regards, Gerrit.

[0] http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/blurb/library.html
[1] http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/res-disaster.html
[2] http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/guarantee.html


pgpq6I8WAk5XI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Joey Hess
Nick Phillips wrote:
 I'd suggest that a simple method for mirror admins to let us know what they
 plan to mirror, and for us to test its availability on a regular basis,
 would be a good idea.
 
 (In fact I might even just do it).

I'm in the process of doing that, see the debian-cd list.

-- 
see shy jo


pgplp49gJlr8v.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: New maintainer behaviour with NMU and LogJam's hijacking

2002-11-30 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 09:31:46PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 06:36:06PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
  On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 17:50, Ari Pollak wrote:
   Didn't you sponsor the upload?
  
  No, that was me...
 
 This Colin  Colin confusion has been quite contagious this season,
 hasn't it? = P

... season? :-)

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Fwd: Please confirm your message

2002-11-30 Thread Russell Coker
I believe that it is inappropriate to use such an email system that does this 
when sending messages to the BTS.

Also anyone who wants to use such a system when posting to a popular mailing 
list (such as debian-devel) should first put in place a white-list of people 
who regularly post to the list (such as me).

For reference, I will not reply to such a message, but I will consider putting 
the entire domain in my spam filter if such messages continue.

--  Forwarded Message  --

Subject: Please confirm your message
Date: 30 Nov 2002 15:45:19 -
From: The qconfirm program 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello, this is the qconfirm mail-handling program at [EMAIL PROTECTED].
One or more messages from you are being held because your address was not
recognized.

To release your pending message(s) for delivery, please reply to this
request. Your reply will not be read, so an empty message is fine.

If you do not reply to this request, your message(s) will eventually be
returned to you, and will never be delivered to the envelope recipient.

This confirmation verifies that your message(s) are legitimate and not
junk-mail.

Regards, the qconfirm program, http://smarden.org/qconfirm/

--- Below this line is the top of a message from you.

Received: (qmail 11395 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 15:45:18 -
Received: from tsv.sws.net.au (203.36.46.2)
  by 0 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 15:45:18 -
Received: from lyta.coker.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by tsv.sws.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 83FC292668; Sun,  1 Dec 2002 02:44:48 +1100 (EST)
Received: from lyta (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lyta.coker.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1E1FA908E; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:44:40 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=iso-8859-1
From: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#171253: ITP: libdjbdns -- DNS client library designed to
 replace the BIND res_*/dn_* library Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:44:39 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 15:34, Gerrit Pape wrote:
 License: Bernstein has put the .[ch] files (dns.h, dns_dfd.c,
 dns_domain.c, dns_dtda.c, dns_ip.c, dns_ipq.c, dns_mx.c, dns_name.c,
 dns_nd.c, dns_packet.c, dns_random.c, dns_rcip.c, dns_rcrw.c,
 dns_resolve.c, dns_sortip.c, dns_transmit.c, dns_txt.c) and all
 necessary lower-level .[ch] files into the public domain[1].  I do not
 plan to make any changes to those files, so Bernstein's djbdns security
 guarantee[2] applies. My additions to the package will be licensed under
 a BSD compatible license.

The URL did not make this license adequately clear to me.

Does this specifically differ from the license of Qmail?

---

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page




Re: Bug#171116: ITP: tsclient -- GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop

2002-11-30 Thread Graham Wilson
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:22:01PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
 On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 21:09, Andrew Lau wrote:
  Package: wnpp
  Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-29
  Severity: wishlist
  
  * Package name: tsclient
Version : 0.56
Upstream Author : Erick Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  * URL : http://www.gnomepro.com/tsclient/
  * License : GPL
Description : GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop
 
 How about: Windows Terminal Services (RDP) client for GNOME 2

how about: Windows Terminal Services (RDP) client for GNOME?

gnome 1 probably is not going to be in sarge, so the difference between
gnome 1 and gnome 2 arent going to matter to someone installing sarge.

and for someone who really wants to know they can look at the
dependencies.

--
gram


pgpYpiigjMyYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Kernel 2.4.19 and wanpipe.o

2002-11-30 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, 

I have a Sangoma Wanpipe and need to compile a new Kernel which support 
it. I have tried to compile the module and compiled into the kernel. 

But I get every time I compile it many error messages about 'symboles' 
or something like this. Sorry, I can not give you better informations, 
because curently I have NO internet access at home and I am writing 
this E-Mail in a cyber-center. 

Please can anyone help me out ? 

I need the module urgently, becaue I must install it at a client. 

Many thanks in advance
Michelle 





/proc/cpuinfo is false

2002-11-30 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, 

I have a nfs-server at home and it was running SLINK r5. 
All was working fine. 

Now I have installed WOODY r0 on it, and linux_logo give 
me only 117 MHz. The BogoMIPS are right with 233.47. 

I have a AMD K5 with 166 MHz and /proc/cpuinfo give me: 
If I use another Harddisk (I have IDE-Racks) with POTATO 
or SLINK, the /proc/cpuinfo is right. 

processor   : 0
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 5
model   : 2
model name  : AMD-K5(tm) Processor
stepping: 4
cpu MHz : 116.933
cache size  : 24 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 pge
bogomips: 233.47

I think, this is a bug or ???

Thanks for your Help
Michelle




Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

2002-11-30 Thread Jim Penny
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 11:37:41AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
 * Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021128 03:35]:
  So, according to Branden, international standards are supposed to allow 
  debian the right to modify them and to distribute the modified versions.  
  Absent said permission, which is hardly ever going to be given,  they 
  must be considered non-free.  (This is, of course, logically forthright.) 
  Moreover, according to the non-free removal proponents, we should not 
  even distribute the un-modified copies of these files.
  
  Yet, unicode is supposed to be the canonical character encoding scheme
  for debian.  
  
  Does this mean every unicode text editor belongs in contrib (depends on
  something non-free)?
 
 I think you are missing the points here.
 
 First of all, DFSG applied to the standard does not want to change the 
 standard, 
 but wants all to be able to change the text of the standard.

Huh?  If I change the text of the standard, I have changed the standard!
For example, if I have :
0332;COMBINING LOW LINE;Mn;220;NSM;N;NON-SPACING UNDERSCORE
and change this to
0332;NON-COMBINING LOW LINE;Mn;220;NSM;N;SPACING UNDERSCORE
Then the standard has been changed!

That is, this file is line after line of character number assignment,
followed by character name, (and other information).  There is no
possible change that does not change the standard!

Hint: (from standard writer's viewpoint) - A standard that can be
changed by anyone, at anytime, without notice and consultation is not
a standard, especially if it is a contentious standard that has some
people seriously upset (i.e, Russian and XJK users).

 
 This is a good thing, the text of standards should be modifiable. How else 
 shall someone write the following standard without having written the first 
 or having to write all from scratch?

The text of every standard that I know of is modifiable.  However, it
normally takes the consent of the standards body and is issued under
its aegis.  Again, Jim Penny's unicode standard has no value, and even
debian unicode has very limited appeal.

On the other hand,  if you wish to create a competitor to the unicode 
standard, say the debicode standard, I see no moral right that you have 
to incorporate, without permission, the unicode standard.  You should 
expect to start from scratch!

 
 Secondly: What has a unicode editor have to do with the unicode
 standard? It should only implement it. If it would contain parts
 of the standard-text (tables or whatever) that were protected by
 copyright law and the standard would allow no modifications, then noone 
 would be allowed to copy the editor. (No special problem with debian)
 

A unicode editor must know certain properties of the character set
(note, I am not talking about font properties here, unicode does not
deal with fonts.)  Examples might be langauge, combining marks, 
bidirectionality, input methods, surrogates, Hangul syllables.  These
are things that an editor must know, and that pretty much, must be
looked up in the unicode table.

Now, the unicode license happens to be fairly clear, and fairly
permissive.

See:
http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeCharacterDatabase.html

It specifically gives permission for redistibution, without fee,
providing a statement of copyright, and a disclaimer are preserved.  It
also specifically allows incorporation into programs under the same
terms.  But those terms happen to be non-DSFG free.  They fail 3 and 8.

Now, IANAL, but I suspect that any unicode editor that reproduced enough
information from the unicode standard to be useful would be considered a
derived work.  More importantly, I think that is is arguable that this
table is, in the terms of the Debian Social Contract,  necessary for 
the execution of a full unicode editor.  (The language of the debian 
Social Contract is even more general and vague than copyright law!

In either case, the social contract would place the unicode table into
non-free; and any editor that depended on the table, or information
derived from the table (in a copyright sense) in either non-free or
contrib.

I have no problem with this result.  But saying that the unicode
character table cannot be distributed by debian, in spite of specific
language permitting us to do so, seems a bit extreme.  And the
consequences of this decision will probably seem extreme to many people.
This example just happens to be particularly cogent; there is no doubt
it is non-free, there is no doubt it is copyrightable, there is little
doubt that it is necessary for the execution of a substantial corpus
of programs which are otherwise DFSG free.  These program would
certainly include unicode editors, and would probably include python,
perl and ruby.

Jim Penny

 
 Hochachtungsvoll,
   Bernhard R. Link
 
 -- 
 gEistiO sagen wir mal...ich hab alle sourcen in /lost+found/waimea
 me gEistiO: [...] Warum lost+found?
 gEistiO wo haette ich es denn sonst hingeben solln?

Re: Pick a name, any name...

2002-11-30 Thread Stephen Zander
 Georg == Georg Lehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg ...  What would be wrong with multiple A records in this
Georg case?

The fact that forwrd DNS != reverse DNS.  That is, the PTR record
won't necessarily match the name that produced the A record.  While
not broken, it can have consequences for systems trying to avoid MITM
attacks.

-- 
Stephen

To Republicans, limited government means not assisting people they
would sooner see shoveled into mass graves. -- Kenneth R. Kahn




Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread David B Harris
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:27:33 +1300
Nick Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Given the ISO mirroring situation? Care to elucidate?

There being an order of magnitude more package mirrors than ISO mirrors.
Completely ignoring the web site organisation, mind you, it's been
common for a long time for people to encourage network-based installs,
or anything other than downloading full 640M ISOs.

Part of it, of course, is to enhance the user experience - users will
rightfully go with full 640M ISOs because it's been their experience in
the past that a) it was required, and b) shit broke often enough that
they needed to reinstall.

Almost everybody I got to do a 'net install never had any problems
whatsoever, and they were EXTREMELY delighted. Had they gone wish the
full 640M ISO, they'd have been happy, but they wouldn't have had as
good an idea as to how things *can* work, when it's done right :)


pgpZo7vImmMrN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Agnubis] Packaging Agnubis for Debian GNU/Linux

2002-11-30 Thread Amaya
Andrew Lau dijo:
 It's the other way around.

God... I feel dumb :-)

 I'd have to package DiaCanvas2 as well, and thus rudely hijacking the
 poor bloke's ITP. That why I hope he can show me to committed,
 otherwise I will have no choice but to hijack it in order to release
 Agnubis .deb packages.

Just go ahead. Already notified, talked about it in this list...
Follow-up to his ITP stating you are planning to hijack it.
Upload both packages. 

-- 
 .''`.I'd like to fly, but my wings have been so denied...
: :' :Sand rains down and here I sit - Alice in Chains
`. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid + 2.4.19 + Ext3)
  `-www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com




Re: /proc/cpuinfo is false

2002-11-30 Thread Mike Dresser
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Michelle Konzack wrote:

 Hello,

 I have a nfs-server at home and it was running SLINK r5.
 All was working fine.

 Now I have installed WOODY r0 on it, and linux_logo give
 me only 117 MHz. The BogoMIPS are right with 233.47.

Indeed, that speed IS right.  AMD did the whole PR rating thing back then,
they only needed to run their 166 at 117 to get the equivalent of a
pentium 166.

http://www.incisive.com/used/voltage.htm

The K6/166 actually ran at 166, k5 was 117.  You'll see in that table that
some of the cyrix's did the same thing.

Mike




Bug#171270: ITP: ulog -- xsession equivalent of commands such as who or last

2002-11-30 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-30
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: ulog
  Version : 0.3.0
  Upstream Author : Hervé Eychenne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.ulog.org
* License : GPL
  Description : xsession equivalent of commands such as who or last

Ulog enables you to find currently opened X sessions. It is the X
equivalent of commands such as who or last. A ulogd daemon records
the start and the end of X sessions. Then it is possible to know
which users are currently logged in, according to several search
criteria. New logins/logouts can also be notified instantaneously
by the server in real-time mode. 

Mainly this program is ideal for real big enviroments with hundreds
of X users, several terminal servers / workstations. The administrator
can easily track down the user to a machine in order to support them,
make statistics etc.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dell 2.4.20-rc1 #1 Wed Nov 27 20:30:52 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set)





Bug#171276: ITP: kernel-patch-systrace -- Systrace kernel patch

2002-11-30 Thread Thorsten Sauter
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-30
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: kernel-patch-systrace
  Version : 1.0
  Upstream Author : Niels Provos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/
* License : BSD
  Description : Systrace kernel patch

Systrace enforces system call policies for applications by
constraining the application's access to the system. The
policy is generated interactively. Operations not covered
by the policy raise an alarm and allow an user to refine the
currently configured policy.

In order to use systrace this kernel patch is needed to
include systrace functionality into the kernel.

Testing packages can be found here (ready for upload):
http://www.sauter-online.de/debian/


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux jacky 2.4.18sar #2 SMP Don Aug 22 17:58:16 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE





Bug#171274: ITP: xsystrace -- Systrace frontend invoked by systrace

2002-11-30 Thread Thorsten Sauter
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-30
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: xsystrace
  Version : 0.1
  Upstream Author : Niels Provos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/
* License : BSD
  Description : Systrace frontend invoked by systrace

Systrace enforces system call policies for applications by
constraining the application's access to the system. The
policy is generated interactively. Operations not covered
by the policy raise an alarm and allow an user to refine the
currently configured policy.

This program will be execute if systrace runs in interactive
mode and create the rules based on the inputs and selections
in this frontend. It is also a gui to help createing permit or
deny rules for systrace templates.

Testing packages can be found here (ready for upload):
http://www.sauter-online.de/debian/


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux jacky 2.4.18sar #2 SMP Don Aug 22 17:58:16 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE





Bug#171273: ITP: systrace -- Enforce system call policies for applications

2002-11-30 Thread Thorsten Sauter
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-30
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: systrace
  Version : 1.0
  Upstream Author : Niels Provos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/
* License : BSD
  Description : Enforce system call policies for applications

Systrace enforces system call policies for applications by
constraining the application's access to the system. The
policy is generated interactively. Operations not covered
by the policy raise an alarm and allow an user to refine the
currently configured policy.

This requires a special kernel patch, provided by kernels
compiled
with the kernel-patch-systrace patch.

Testing packages can be found here (ready for upload):
http://www.sauter-online.de/debian/

Systrace is currently include in the main source tree of NetBSD and
OpenBSD and is now ported to Linux.

I have splitted it into tree packages:
systrace, xsystrace, kernel-patch-systrace


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux jacky 2.4.18sar #2 SMP Don Aug 22 17:58:16 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE





Re: New maintainer behaviour with NMU and LogJam's hijacking

2002-11-30 Thread Sam Hartman
 Ari == Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 IIRC Ari has caused upset with NMUs before; xscreensaver, I
 believe.  (I express no opinion about whether that upload was a
 good idea or not.)

Ari Didn't you sponsor the upload?


Um, so?  While yes the sponsor is at fault, it seems that you should
also take responsibility for your actions.

It seems that after that incident you would have had significant
desire to learn and follow the NMU policy.

So, I'd like to formally ask: have you read and do you plan to follow
generally accepted procedures for future NMUs?




Re: New maintainer behaviour with NMU and LogJam's hijacking

2002-11-30 Thread Brian Nelson
Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 06:36:06PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
 On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 17:50, Ari Pollak wrote:
  Didn't you sponsor the upload?
 
 No, that was me...

 This Colin  Colin confusion has been quite contagious this season,
 hasn't it? = P

Just wait until the two Brian Michael Nelson's get off the NM queue...

-- 
Curse my natural showmanship!


pgp8YIRgnMNVR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: New maintainer behaviour with NMU and LogJam's hijacking

2002-11-30 Thread Ari Pollak
I had been taking the full brunt of the responsibility for the 
xscreensaver NMU, but since I was a pre-NM at the time and sponsors of 
uploads are supposed to follow Debian policy as well, he ended up taking 
most of the responsibility. This was a similar situation; however, I felt 
it was necessary at the time considering the circumstances of the 
package having not being updated in over a year and a half despite new 
versions being out which fixed bugs, and the lack of any response from 
the package maintainer until after the NMU. I still doubt that I would 
have gotten any response from the maintainer at all had it not been for 
the actual package upload.

Regardless, I will try to follow Debian policy in the future in this 
capacity.  I would also like to extend apologies and a  suggestion to 
Christian, in that if you do not have time to keep up with maintenance 
of a package, it would be much appreciated if it was put up for adoption 
or orphaned so that another developer with the proper resources to 
maintain the package will to so. If you wish to continue working on 
logjam, I would be happy to volunteer as a backup maintainer if he is 
backlogged for some time, so that the package is properly kept 
up-to-date and bug-free.

Also, I would like to make a note of part of the Developer's reference 
in regards to NMUs, section 5.2.5:

In any case, you should not be upset by the NMU. An NMU is not a 
personal attack against the maintainer. It is a proof that someone cares 
enough about the package and that they were willing to help you in your 
work, so you should be thankful.

I did not make the NMU to circumvent Christian's responsibilities nor 
did I make it as an insult to him or the Debian project. I hope that 
this can be put behind us and continue development as normal.

On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 02:45:19PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
 Um, so?  While yes the sponsor is at fault, it seems that you should
 also take responsibility for your actions.
 
 It seems that after that incident you would have had significant
 desire to learn and follow the NMU policy.
 
 So, I'd like to formally ask: have you read and do you plan to follow
 generally accepted procedures for future NMUs?


pgpabzTObsYS5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Bug#171116: ITP: tsclient -- GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop

2002-11-30 Thread Colin Walters
[ No need to CC me ]

On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 11:36, Graham Wilson wrote:

 how about: Windows Terminal Services (RDP) client for GNOME?
 
 gnome 1 probably is not going to be in sarge, so the difference between
 gnome 1 and gnome 2 arent going to matter to someone installing sarge.

You're right; I agree.




Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Joey Hess
David B Harris wrote:
 There being an order of magnitude more package mirrors than ISO mirrors.
 Completely ignoring the web site organisation, mind you, it's been
 common for a long time for people to encourage network-based installs,
 or anything other than downloading full 640M ISOs.
 
 Part of it, of course, is to enhance the user experience - users will
 rightfully go with full 640M ISOs because it's been their experience in
 the past that a) it was required, and b) shit broke often enough that
 they needed to reinstall.
 
 Almost everybody I got to do a 'net install never had any problems
 whatsoever, and they were EXTREMELY delighted. Had they gone wish the
 full 640M ISO, they'd have been happy, but they wouldn't have had as
 good an idea as to how things *can* work, when it's done right :)

The problem with the net installs isos is mainly that they are
unofficial and there are several varying cd's produced by different
folks, and of varying quality (though quality is overall good; I've used
them happily in the past). If we really want to promote them more it
would be good to set things up so they can be generated from the
debian-cd package, and make them official debian isos.

Of course debian-installer should support 1.4 mb net install floppies
too.

But still if someone wants a whole debian CD, for whatever reasons, I'd
rather they could easily find it, especially if they are a newcomer to
debian.

-- 
see shy jo


pgpIsa8jgM5sM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: New maintainer behaviour with NMU and LogJam's hijacking

2002-11-30 Thread Sam Hartman
 Ari == Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Ari I had been taking the full brunt of the responsibility for
Ari the xscreensaver NMU, but since I was a pre-NM at the time
Ari and sponsors of uploads are supposed to follow Debian policy
Ari as well, he ended up taking most of the responsibility. This
Ari was a similar situation; however, I felt it was necessary at
Ari the time considering the circumstances of the package having
Ari not being updated in over a year and a half despite new
Ari versions being out which fixed bugs, and the lack of any
Ari response from the package maintainer until after the NMU. I
Ari still doubt that I would have gotten any response from the
Ari maintainer at all had it not been for the actual package
Ari upload.

Do you specifically agree it was wrong in this instance to upload
directly to incoming and not to a delayed queue?

In future will you agree to include NMU patches in a bug report to the
patch and unless there is a strong reason to do otherwise to upload to
a delayed queue?

I'm asking you these things in hope of making sure we're on the same
page.  If you don't agree then I'll try to convince you that you're
wrong, but if we are both understanding the best practice the same
way, then there's really no more to say.




Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread David B Harris
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:06:40 -0500
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The problem with the net installs isos is mainly that they are
 unofficial and there are several varying cd's produced by different
 folks, and of varying quality (though quality is overall good; I've
 used them happily in the past). If we really want to promote them more
 it would be good to set things up so they can be generated from the
 debian-cd package, and make them official debian isos.
 
 Of course debian-installer should support 1.4 mb net install floppies
 too.
 
 But still if someone wants a whole debian CD, for whatever reasons,
 I'd rather they could easily find it, especially if they are a
 newcomer to debian.

Agreed, on all counts :)


pgpLK5R1aKajL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Pick a name, any name...

2002-11-30 Thread Herbert Xu
Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The fact that forwrd DNS != reverse DNS.  That is, the PTR record

Nobody should be checking forward == reverse(forward), it is
reverse == forward(reverse) that is important.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt




Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

2002-11-30 Thread Nick Phillips
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:35:25PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:

  I think you are missing the points here.
  
  First of all, DFSG applied to the standard does not want to change the 
  standard, 
  but wants all to be able to change the text of the standard.
 
 Huh?  If I change the text of the standard, I have changed the standard!

No you haven't, only the standards body in question can do that.
There are all sorts of reasons why you might wish to create derivative
works based on the standard -- a new standard for a different purpose, for
example. Or helpful documentation of the standard for people who are
intimidated by the 'dry' nature of the original...

 On the other hand,  if you wish to create a competitor to the unicode 
 standard, say the debicode standard, I see no moral right that you have 
 to incorporate, without permission, the unicode standard.  You should 
 expect to start from scratch!

Engage brain. Do you think that if I want to create a competitor to, say,
GNU Emacs, that I should expect to have to start from scratch? Or fetchmail?
Or any one of the thousands of DFSG-free packages that are in main?



Cheers,


Nick
-- 
Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest.




Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Nick Phillips
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 11:56:59AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 11:23:23PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
  Joy (or any of the rest of the www team) - where do you get the data
  to put into the mirror pages on www.d.o?
 
 Well, we get it from the Internet :) Please rephrase the question, I don't
 understand.

Well, do the admins just send you a mail, do you list any that you happen
to come across when randomly surfing around, do you have any more structured
way for admins to tell you what they plan to mirror...?


 We already have that, but notice how the mirrors of the two archives aren't
 in the least bit of distress like the problem at hadn: the structure and
 contents of those is well defined, we have mirror checking scripts and we
 regularly monitor the output of that for any major problems.
 
 (I would suggest that you have a look at http://www.debian.org/mirror/)

Hmmm... the link to Debian mirrors that include the debian-cd archive
actually takes me to a useful-ish list... at least, some of the sites
listed do have iso images.

It's not terribly helpful if it's not linked to in such a way that it will be
found by someone looking for CD images, though.


 The CD image mirrors don't even have a primary site -- *cdimage.d.o includes
 only jigdo files now. Those image mirrors are one big improvization.

Doesn't matter whether there's a primary site that is only accessible to
official mirrors, or whether they all have to get the images in some other
way, so long as it is simple for them to automate  keep up to date.

And so long as the directory structure of all the mirrors is the same,
for the parts that they mirror...


Cheers,


Nick

-- 
Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will soon forget this.




Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 11:20:10AM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
   Joy (or any of the rest of the www team) - where do you get the data
   to put into the mirror pages on www.d.o?
  
  Well, we get it from the Internet :) Please rephrase the question, I don't
  understand.
 
 Well, do the admins just send you a mail, do you list any that you happen
 to come across when randomly surfing around, do you have any more structured
 way for admins to tell you what they plan to mirror...?

All three. :)

But mostly the third, via http://www.debian.org/mirror/submit

Note s/plan to//.

  We already have that, but notice how the mirrors of the two archives aren't
  in the least bit of distress like the problem at hadn: the structure and
  contents of those is well defined, we have mirror checking scripts and we
  regularly monitor the output of that for any major problems.
  
  (I would suggest that you have a look at http://www.debian.org/mirror/)
 
 Hmmm... the link to Debian mirrors that include the debian-cd archive
 actually takes me to a useful-ish list... at least, some of the sites
 listed do have iso images.
 
 It's not terribly helpful if it's not linked to in such a way that it will
 be found by someone looking for CD images, though.

It's the HTTP/FTP link on the CD pages...

  The CD image mirrors don't even have a primary site -- *cdimage.d.o includes
  only jigdo files now. Those image mirrors are one big improvization.
 
 Doesn't matter whether there's a primary site that is only accessible to
 official mirrors, or whether they all have to get the images in some other
 way, so long as it is simple for them to automate  keep up to date.

When there's nothing official in the US, it's understandable that the
secondary mirror maintainers in the US will be reluctant to mirror from
elsewhere.

 And so long as the directory structure of all the mirrors is the same,
 for the parts that they mirror...

There isn't really a site to dictate the standard directory structure, so
the best thing we could do is proclaim one of the existing ones standard.

Heck, not even the directory name is standardized, there's debian-cd,
debian-iso, debian-cdimage, ...

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.




Re: [Agnubis] Packaging Agnubis for Debian GNU/Linux

2002-11-30 Thread Raphaël Bordet
Le sam 30/11/2002 Ă  11:27, Andrew Lau a Ă©crit :
 On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 04:20:09PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
  Condider that his ITP has been there for two months. He's either not
  that motivated or simply busy. And NM is much more time consuming
  than closing an ITP. Offer your help, whatever help you are willing
  or able to give.
 
  If he is too busy to package whatever was that depended so heavily
  on Agnubis, offer to retitle the bug to a RFP.
 
 It's the other way around. Agnubis depends on DiaCanvas2 which he has
 ITPed. Agnubis doesn't have any releases yet, but I was hoping to
 start doing CVS snapshots in preparations for their eventual
 release. So if I were to release Agnubis (still impossible since they
 taking a brief break from development and their CVS src is currently
 not building), I'd have to package DiaCanvas2 as well, and thus rudely
 hijacking the poor bloke's ITP. That why I hope he can show me to
 committed, otherwise I will have no choice but to hijack it in order
 to release Agnubis .deb packages.

This is a mistake. I don't want to block packaging of Agnubis or
DiaCanvas2 but, I've already make some jobs about DiaCanvas2.
If you want to make yours from scratch, it's your choice after all.

However, this is avaible on this apt's uri:
deb http://debian.linuxfr.net/ ./
deb-src http://debian.linuxfr.net/ ./

I've started diacanvas2 but I've got a new job so I'm busy a lot.
That's all. I'm just thinking we can make this job you and me...

Cheers, 

-- 
Raphaël Bordet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: debian jabber packages

2002-11-30 Thread Sami Haahtinen
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:35:23AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
 I will send the latest jabber diff with some comments to Jamin and ask him
 to quickly make an upload with changed maintainer field. After that he can
 start to work on the new Version. Jamin, I have an (yet unused) CVS
 repository access on the jabber server for a debian sub repository. I will
 hand that over to you if I can find the details :)

I hope there will be an upgrade path from the jabberd 1.x versions to
the jabberd 2.x versions, as the 2.0 version still lacks support for xdb
userfiles (currently supported are db and anon) and all the migration
scripts are yet to be written..

also the db fileformat is now (since alpha 2) dependant of libdb4.1
which is yet to be packaged..

This is just a heads up and all.

Sami

-- 
  - Sami Haahtinen -
  -[ Notify immediately if you do not receive this message ]-
- 2209 3C53 D0FB 041C F7B1  F908 A9B6 F730 B83D 761C -




Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Joey Hess 

| Of course debian-installer should support 1.4 mb net install floppies
| too.

s/should support/supports/

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are  : :' :
  `. `' 
`-  




Re: Pick a name, any name...

2002-11-30 Thread Michael Stone
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 08:56:37AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Nobody should be checking forward == reverse(forward), it is
reverse == forward(reverse) that is important.
s/is important/was important/
Mike Stone



Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Michael Stone
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 04:06:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
The problem with the net installs isos is mainly that they are
unofficial and there are several varying cd's produced by different
folks, and of varying quality (though quality is overall good; I've used
Yeah. The i386 all work afaik, but the last ppc install I tried with
mini-iso's failed horribly because important things (like the
appropriate boot kernel) were missing. The official iso's worked great.
:)
Mike Stone



Re: free alternative to povray?

2002-11-30 Thread Brian May
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:33:30PM +, Stephen Stafford wrote:
 /usr/share/povray/
 
 in the povray-doc package.

Does this mean that blender uses the same file format as blender?
(that was the original question).

Are there any DFSG examples for blender?
-- 
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 30, Nick Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm with Joey on this; last time I tried to find Debian .iso images, it
 was a nightmare. In fact I couldn't find an official woody iso anywhere.
This is the way of mirror operators to tell you that you should really
use jigdo or even better the mini-images.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


pgpQyjrl63F3k.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: free alternative to povray?

2002-11-30 Thread Vonsur Kcin
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 11:30:45AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:33:30PM +, Stephen Stafford wrote:
  /usr/share/povray/
  
  in the povray-doc package.
 
 Does this mean that blender uses the same file format as blender?
 (that was the original question).

Blender definitely does not use the same file format as Povray.
Blender uses a binary format that stores everything in one file, and
is triangle-oriented (mostly). Blender is really fundimentally
different from Povray, it is a zbuffer renderer, whereas povray is a
raytracer.

For a raytracer that DOES use the same file format as Povray, I'd
recommend zrcube. It isn't packaged yet, but looks very nice overall,
and is more advanced than Povray in some ways, especially in that it
adds radiosity for realistic lighting. 

http://zrcube.sf.net/

Incidently, the other raytracer mentioned in this thread, yafray, has
a plugin for Blender to export to the Yafray format on their site. Its
pretty simplistic, but its something. Yafray uses an XML-based format.
Yafray boasts some really outstanding radiosity output. Yafray is also
not packaged.

http://www.coala.uniovi.es/~jandro/noname

 Are there any DFSG examples for blender?

Well, the best examples are in the form of tutorials, which abound
online. Its not really meaningful to have the files themselves, when
in blender's case its the process that is important.

HTH
nick

-- 
-- Nick Rusnov
-- http://nick.industrialmeats.com
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




Re: Bug#171116: ITP: tsclient -- GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop

2002-11-30 Thread Andrew Lau
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
 gnome 1 probably is not going to be in sarge, so the difference
 between gnome 1 and gnome 2 arent going to matter to someone
 installing sarge.

But some people do deliberately apt-cache search GNOME 2 to find new
GTK+2.0 based software that they want to try out. A lot of software
that was originally written for GNOME 1.x, but still have no GNOME 2
equivalent are more often than not no longer maintained by upstream,
and thus avoided by some. It's psychology, I'm afraid. Almost every
other GNOME 2 application is doing this as well.

Yours sincerely,
Andrew Netsnipe Lau

-- 
---
* Andrew Netsnipe LauComputer Science  Student Representaive, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
* netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0  alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0 *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---


pgpMFQwuncjEt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Bug#171116: ITP: tsclient -- GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop

2002-11-30 Thread Ari Pollak
I agree with this logic. Generally if I search for a GTK 2.x theme 
engine with apt-cache, I search for gtk2-blah, not gtk-blah, since by 
convention gtk- strictly means gtk 1.x only.

Andrew Lau wrote:
But some people do deliberately apt-cache search GNOME 2 to find new
GTK+2.0 based software that they want to try out. A lot of software
that was originally written for GNOME 1.x, but still have no GNOME 2
equivalent are more often than not no longer maintained by upstream,
and thus avoided by some. It's psychology, I'm afraid. Almost every
other GNOME 2 application is doing this as well.



Cost Effective Product Documentation

2002-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Re: reliable streams over UDP

2002-11-30 Thread Steve Dunham
Shyamal Prasad wrote:
Russell Surely someone must have written something similar to TCP
Russell but implemented on top of UDP. 

Too many people have tried this ;-) Try SCTP, a recent attempt to deal
with the reliable UDP solution:
The 2.5.50 kernel has a SCTP implementation.  Dunno how well/if it works,
but the option is there.
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)

2002-11-30 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Andrew Suffield wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:24:15AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
  
  Yes, and avoiding binary uploads by maintainers can make the system a bit
  more transparently auditable.
 
 Not to mention making it break a lot more.
 
 Quit beating that horse, it's already been buried.

reference to thread(s), please (general time frame and applicable
list(s) should be good enough. i hate attempting blind searches through
the debian archives)

-john




Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-30 Thread Nick Phillips
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 09:23:43PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
 On Nov 30, Nick Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm with Joey on this; last time I tried to find Debian .iso images, it
  was a nightmare. In fact I couldn't find an official woody iso anywhere.
 This is the way of mirror operators to tell you that you should really
 use jigdo or even better the mini-images.

If there are to be no .iso images anywhere (which would suck), then it
should say in big letters that there are no iso images anywhere.

There are times when a .iso really is what you need, and when those
times come, it really sucks badly to force people to search through a
whole list of mirrors that are in reality nothing of the sort and
most of which don't have what you need (and what our pages say they have).

:-/

But joeyh appears to be on the case, so I am confident that the situation
will be rectified before too long...

:)


Cheers,


Nick
-- 
Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It may or may not be worthwhile, but it still has to be done.




Accepted subversion 0.15.0-1 (i386 source all)

2002-11-30 Thread David Kimdon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:19:14 -0800
Source: subversion
Binary: libsvn0 python2.2-subversion subversion-server subversion-tools 
libapache2-dav-svn libsvn0-dev subversion
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.15.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Kimdon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Kimdon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 libapache2-dav-svn - Apache module for Subversion - in development, alpha
 libsvn0- Subversion shared libraries - in development, alpha
 libsvn0-dev - Subversion development files - in development, alpha
 python2.2-subversion - Python modules for Subversion interface
 subversion - Advanced version control system - in development, alpha
 subversion-server - Tools for creating and maintaining a Subversion repository
 subversion-tools - Tools for Subversion
Closes: 169796 169797
Changes: 
 subversion (0.15.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Add dependancy on libdb4.0-util for subversion and libapache2-dav-svn
 packages.  In case a repository gets wedged we want db4.0_recover
 available. Fix paths in hot-backup.py (closes: #169797, #169796)
   * Doc install cleanup thanks to Jon Middleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   * aprutl version checking hack, thanks to Jon Middleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   * Include a statically linked svnadmin that we can copy to svnadmin-$(VERSION)
 on upgrade if the repository format changes.  This facilitates a
 repository dump/reload.
Files: 
 5304fc39943068c7d15e958118b220fc 899 devel extra subversion_0.15.0-1.dsc
 f8f408364f993bfb83382e709b74312f 4061263 devel extra subversion_0.15.0.orig.tar.gz
 120b180dd1e4cfb843e8a3a1553ce75d 112877 devel extra subversion_0.15.0-1.diff.gz
 58df0056c528b8c972ce84c76d8248cb 838158 devel extra subversion_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
 9b641a38a2da1d27c64895d5465b80fd 261720 libs extra libsvn0_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
 107142150c1724a402aaaf0ef8e2bd10 388040 devel extra libsvn0-dev_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
 89ae1b7606e4b51b7bbf6bcb7a18828f 34532 net extra libapache2-dav-svn_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
 c5733381b1f426524d5445979559a07b 91452 libs extra 
python2.2-subversion_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
 2eb6ddb9119137bc26e625418389a2d5 32486 admin extra subversion-tools_0.15.0-1_all.deb
 0fd1f360645bbc561e9c406ea1b46473 6734 admin extra subversion-server_0.15.0-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96GFfST1m+6jv1gMRAuQBAJ9wmOPeQLcFSpp1lxS9lybtgTNz/ACfc+v1
nnNj/TRSa20233ROrly7y1E=
=3nLE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
libapache2-dav-svn_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/subversion/libapache2-dav-svn_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
libsvn0-dev_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/subversion/libsvn0-dev_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
libsvn0_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/subversion/libsvn0_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
python2.2-subversion_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/subversion/python2.2-subversion_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
subversion-server_0.15.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/subversion/subversion-server_0.15.0-1_all.deb
subversion-tools_0.15.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/subversion/subversion-tools_0.15.0-1_all.deb
subversion_0.15.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/subversion/subversion_0.15.0-1.diff.gz
subversion_0.15.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/subversion/subversion_0.15.0-1.dsc
subversion_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/subversion/subversion_0.15.0-1_i386.deb
subversion_0.15.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/subversion/subversion_0.15.0.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted lesstif1-1 1:0.93.36-5 (i386 source all)

2002-11-30 Thread Herbert Xu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 19:32:21 +1100
Source: lesstif1-1
Binary: lesstif-bin lesstif-dev lesstif2-dev lesstif1 lesstif-doc lesstif2
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.93.36-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 lesstif-bin - User binaries for LessTif.
 lesstif-dev - Development library and header files for LessTif 1.2.
 lesstif-doc - Documentation for LessTif.
 lesstif1   - OSF/Motif 1.2 implementation released under LGPL.
 lesstif2   - OSF/Motif 2.1 implementation released under LGPL.
 lesstif2-dev - Development library and header files for LessTif 2.1.
Closes: 171220
Changes: 
 lesstif1-1 (1:0.93.36-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Conflict and replace various libmotif packages (closes: #171220).
Files: 
 a54e332e8c85dad9758cd9b77973f606 843 libs optional lesstif1-1_0.93.36-5.dsc
 08c2d47f80163560e448779ba2971042 14816 libs optional lesstif1-1_0.93.36-5.diff.gz
 5e9104d423659189d8308e321c3e2e68 340312 doc optional lesstif-doc_0.93.36-5_all.deb
 691131b0d9f24a1a3050c0966877339c 606644 libs optional lesstif2_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
 99213ee680a920720c2526ad0221d135 542088 oldlibs optional lesstif1_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
 0cf12b78b3057a2254b801a155cdbabd 858188 devel optional lesstif2-dev_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
 1f0ec6fb92d4b536269970d718ce14a8 745642 devel extra lesstif-dev_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
 46971542563660f6ec6620c5ab7423f8 149616 x11 optional lesstif-bin_0.93.36-5_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBPeh8JofMnsf5AzQhAQGBMwP8CxjjVWmm3d7uzsS2OZHSmWrJatGQd7ix
GZUEBXAr0SHTHa2LoRfMjGeIojI7v2ORx4v9msoPac/ga264nWxtpGHpVfSCEQZj
sdw5p9YA5kKonh27ykJ6ZC5jrxKRUOCN7ZxN4KDUVB+YkG3Nkq/sPZ97kxoJRi+t
nWpj2m30DPk=
=94cX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
lesstif-bin_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lesstif1-1/lesstif-bin_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
lesstif-dev_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lesstif1-1/lesstif-dev_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
lesstif-doc_0.93.36-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lesstif1-1/lesstif-doc_0.93.36-5_all.deb
lesstif1-1_0.93.36-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/lesstif1-1/lesstif1-1_0.93.36-5.diff.gz
lesstif1-1_0.93.36-5.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lesstif1-1/lesstif1-1_0.93.36-5.dsc
lesstif1_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lesstif1-1/lesstif1_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
lesstif2-dev_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lesstif1-1/lesstif2-dev_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
lesstif2_0.93.36-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lesstif1-1/lesstif2_0.93.36-5_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted nullmailer 1.00RC5-23 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Martin A. Godisch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:15:00 +0100
Source: nullmailer
Binary: nullmailer
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.00RC5-23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin A. Godisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin A. Godisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 nullmailer - Simple relay-only mail transport agent
Closes: 170079
Changes: 
 nullmailer (1.00RC5-23) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Let sendmail exit with failure when -bs is requested, closes: #170079.
   * Updated Debian standards version.
Files: 
 fcf6c31f88aec6514756e71e0cd27f85 598 mail optional nullmailer_1.00RC5-23.dsc
 de668683bf55e93a937d7ea1e6f6d242 10763 mail optional nullmailer_1.00RC5-23.diff.gz
 0ed32ac7e30b6823089c4569cd6c9765 66232 mail optional nullmailer_1.00RC5-23_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96H13FgAj91iLfZwRAsUxAJwL9TU0T2E8HrsxQNjC53BBN0GvigCfeMKN
8HDUgyhVoGRT0cyiBLFZ/B8=
=zeup
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
nullmailer_1.00RC5-23.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/nullmailer/nullmailer_1.00RC5-23.diff.gz
nullmailer_1.00RC5-23.dsc
  to pool/main/n/nullmailer/nullmailer_1.00RC5-23.dsc
nullmailer_1.00RC5-23_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/nullmailer/nullmailer_1.00RC5-23_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted aumix 2.8-2 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:46:34 +0100
Source: aumix
Binary: aumix aumix-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 aumix  - Simple text-based mixer control program
 aumix-gtk  - Simple mixer control program with GUI and text interfaces
Closes: 171225
Changes: 
 aumix (2.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Explicitly mkdir the stampdir (closes: #171225)
   * Removed build-dependency on autoconf, automake
Files: 
 d78b1717f018de5362254164375f940d 898 sound optional aumix_2.8-2.dsc
 fb8b79ef71fbecff7ae432d503cfdcb1 16101 sound optional aumix_2.8-2.diff.gz
 2e24cba18f3cde2a29367f1ef8e59227 73164 sound extra aumix_2.8-2_i386.deb
 dd1c97567400d09e551921a738a8c3bb 81806 sound optional aumix-gtk_2.8-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQEXAwUBPeiZLJ6S+2TcVAFTFAIT8gP/YbZKhRe3aNq0gvSP5/IlEzJ2TizAfaZV
9npCUhEC/j4Gtwd9AyiQWU9ctr1EH7S8eM7HzbRXW+5G3mrckvWJ7QyzKEbHJovd
2d19wnkuFk/0Z+lwcSUPv4mZIWN941nkDHt1ot/+2eIoCE4WxN8IfB+srS8ksGQf
odvcARSZjbUD/0cmlXr6Yb2LwYbczUfKksEusUvlM85+fiemoZKIRk1Qk1hOV2x+
cq568LIu10QBFgprSLG9OjUmHsGh89SuO25PI2BbEFU5q5D1iPnph0SRkJANzneT
o9+xEZ0CKtqALUr2HFOMWhwVGrF+vTYZFo4KzcZ8ca/XJ61PZplSSYpH
=Q2LZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
aumix-gtk_2.8-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/aumix/aumix-gtk_2.8-2_i386.deb
aumix_2.8-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/aumix/aumix_2.8-2.diff.gz
aumix_2.8-2.dsc
  to pool/main/a/aumix/aumix_2.8-2.dsc
aumix_2.8-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/aumix/aumix_2.8-2_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted muttprint 0.63a-5 (all source)

2002-11-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 12:00:50 +0100
Source: muttprint
Binary: muttprint
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.63a-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 muttprint  - Pretty printing of mails with Mutt
Closes: 170658 170821
Changes: 
 muttprint (0.63a-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Description: s/XFMail and PINE//, s/Netscape Messenger/Mozilla/
 and restructured the lines (closes: #170658)
   * do not specify PAPER; let muttprint get that from /etc/papersize
 (closes: #170821)
Files: 
 6cfc4924bf842f91d13b7673782babe3 622 mail optional muttprint_0.63a-5.dsc
 e04eb162eb4ba695c4c4282ec09ccfe7 7510 mail optional muttprint_0.63a-5.diff.gz
 1257d02e73b7f6ab59d7581fb37c94a4 684334 mail optional muttprint_0.63a-5_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96JxR+FmQsCSK63MRApuHAJ45pMsGE2coiQ+dRDUx3PTPF9jKgQCdEMkK
M05yDeyaPMjKNKUm39fCmck=
=iDg7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
muttprint_0.63a-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/muttprint/muttprint_0.63a-5.diff.gz
muttprint_0.63a-5.dsc
  to pool/main/m/muttprint/muttprint_0.63a-5.dsc
muttprint_0.63a-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/muttprint/muttprint_0.63a-5_all.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted gpsdrive 1.30-1 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Frank Kirschner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 12:18:33 +0100
Source: gpsdrive
Binary: gpsdrive
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.30-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Frank Kirschner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Frank Kirschner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 gpsdrive   - Car navigation system.
Closes: 170823
Changes: 
 gpsdrive (1.30-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream release. (closes: #170823)
Files: 
 d836ba55e83b4d99f75883ac2e393f71 678 utils optional gpsdrive_1.30-1.dsc
 5bf9c3247348e6d65f30318f9d3326fd 821758 utils optional gpsdrive_1.30.orig.tar.gz
 8c63bd915fcc3982954ae70a68aa 2016 utils optional gpsdrive_1.30-1.diff.gz
 c8044984963a0906ce2d6f252a212814 579550 utils optional gpsdrive_1.30-1_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE96KPS8UXMXiC+9cQRAt76AKDYOsXDrzTfscoGtsIq9YTfzRYV4ACdF5s5
i2DgD3B8Bem77/YTv3J3xYQ=
=w7kd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
gpsdrive_1.30-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gpsdrive/gpsdrive_1.30-1.diff.gz
gpsdrive_1.30-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gpsdrive/gpsdrive_1.30-1.dsc
gpsdrive_1.30-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gpsdrive/gpsdrive_1.30-1_i386.deb
gpsdrive_1.30.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gpsdrive/gpsdrive_1.30.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted wmcoincoin 2.4.2a-1 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 12:39:46 +0100
Source: wmcoincoin
Binary: wmcoincoin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4.2a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 wmcoincoin - Funny dockapp for browsing DaCode sites news and board
Changes: 
 wmcoincoin (2.4.2a-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Standards version is 3.5.8.
   * Use debhelper mode 4 and dh_install.
Files: 
 450cea5052991b650a86a538957c67bc 614 x11 extra wmcoincoin_2.4.2a-1.dsc
 12fd581579175581f70bf62f3daff22e 656883 x11 extra wmcoincoin_2.4.2a.orig.tar.gz
 aa0f4cac7ce6d3eb8aebb6cdb448f96b 3586 x11 extra wmcoincoin_2.4.2a-1.diff.gz
 75f1fd7ed23f809fda394ab65e5c0b87 306116 x11 extra wmcoincoin_2.4.2a-1_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96LMIrSla4ddfhTMRApWjAKCRX6bir9UkNifz754pTIXylsoayACg+gtO
g8mV/sAM/3Mb2DM9nNFIJRo=
=OqCk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
wmcoincoin_2.4.2a-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/wmcoincoin/wmcoincoin_2.4.2a-1.diff.gz
wmcoincoin_2.4.2a-1.dsc
  to pool/main/w/wmcoincoin/wmcoincoin_2.4.2a-1.dsc
wmcoincoin_2.4.2a-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wmcoincoin/wmcoincoin_2.4.2a-1_i386.deb
wmcoincoin_2.4.2a.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/w/wmcoincoin/wmcoincoin_2.4.2a.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted cqcam 0.91-3 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Daniel Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:17:00 -0400
Source: cqcam
Binary: libcqcam-dev cqcam
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.91-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 cqcam  - Color QuickCam (PC/Parallel) control program
 libcqcam-dev - Color QuickCam (PC/Parallel) control library
Closes: 40986 164095
Changes: 
 cqcam (0.91-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added Build-Depends on tk8.3-dev; this causes the control
 console to appear with xcqcam (closes: Bug#40986)
   * Added fourth argument to AC_CHECK_HEADER in configure.in; this makes
 autoconf 2.54 happy. (closes: Bug#164095)
Files: 
 44f4c1fc44050bd98d50e6343f94a3ff 948 - extra cqcam_0.91-3.dsc
 223266441fa59ce8475c776deb950f17 25301 - extra cqcam_0.91-3.diff.gz
 8b9d6612808d009c31292872b3aae874 98612 graphics extra cqcam_0.91-3_i386.deb
 147438d73b3239bbf87506cedd5a15c9 21234 devel extra libcqcam-dev_0.91-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iQEXAwUBPejH6+R45Q7FWKyMFAItoAP/YHQMPLgMAvhc9tNHlxaZF24tJnWXlN/X
/+kK5+es3MpQJDoE7mjgm4UBYzW5/jLWYJE0a8h+FV0WsvkefGeeLbCGULaUbFGC
z95N8oJNg6hY8v+72pyd/nIB2XQuKGddaYHIrLdfYfWZMb1Hck/84BYrAu3lcupu
0rZwDfyGp3MD/j7h42laYYX7TwAQo6UEjf4VANoSvHLO5OHEsQG1YqqKrmjQc+BE
+J/2UtE+Gnen1PCFM+fmCs/EYh8lwIkCF2Yz0V91kbTj2puZ44BlJpw4K44efye2
LKSPQhhiH2J4GYhn0SCTvPjTl8lhaz9phoVjmYqxiRUVlTPcsyLF9Q+P
=WuY3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
cqcam_0.91-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cqcam/cqcam_0.91-3.diff.gz
cqcam_0.91-3.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cqcam/cqcam_0.91-3.dsc
cqcam_0.91-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cqcam/cqcam_0.91-3_i386.deb
libcqcam-dev_0.91-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cqcam/libcqcam-dev_0.91-3_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted speedy-cgi-perl 2.21-2 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:02:51 +0100
Source: speedy-cgi-perl
Binary: libapache-mod-speedycgi speedy-cgi-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.21-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 libapache-mod-speedycgi - apache module to speed up perl scripts by making them 
persistent.
 speedy-cgi-perl - speed up perl scripts by making them persistent.
Closes: 166672
Changes: 
 speedy-cgi-perl (2.21-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added support for both apache and apache-ssl packages. (Closes: #166672)
Files: 
 da12739d321ea9d7222e597021cf5abb 657 interpreters optional speedy-cgi-perl_2.21-2.dsc
 15836f7963657f4990ee53d70e28c5d1 5558 interpreters optional 
speedy-cgi-perl_2.21-2.diff.gz
 fc30f74b3dbf21a688c4c45e51948ad5 96382 interpreters optional 
speedy-cgi-perl_2.21-2_i386.deb
 18bc660babc1ba323a1d36b9681c0d6a 28660 web optional 
libapache-mod-speedycgi_2.21-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96NQSS+BYJZB4jhERArDpAJ4h83oQ+dZFHfjCxktVrmbPW18tbQCgsF34
fJrB/hv3GrieZQ8v9mK9QlI=
=bKmc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
libapache-mod-speedycgi_2.21-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/speedy-cgi-perl/libapache-mod-speedycgi_2.21-2_i386.deb
speedy-cgi-perl_2.21-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/speedy-cgi-perl/speedy-cgi-perl_2.21-2.diff.gz
speedy-cgi-perl_2.21-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/speedy-cgi-perl/speedy-cgi-perl_2.21-2.dsc
speedy-cgi-perl_2.21-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/speedy-cgi-perl/speedy-cgi-perl_2.21-2_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted yardradius 1.0.20-5 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:39:31 +0100
Source: yardradius
Binary: yardradius
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.20-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 yardradius - YARD Radius Auth/Acct Server
Closes: 170895
Changes: 
 yardradius (1.0.20-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added french template.
 (closes: #170895)
   * Added a versioned debconf dependency in order to be lintian clean.
Files: 
 46b1aa9a74de8d1d0fb808828a08cdd6 619 net optional yardradius_1.0.20-5.dsc
 839cb6eebbc9563e52d781287ca2fa56 8870 net optional yardradius_1.0.20-5.diff.gz
 574b0943cc4916d0de66f5d947de10cc 296876 net optional yardradius_1.0.20-5_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96OoRpFNRmenyx0cRApEJAKDfXjX/okVRY8bUXS5z350/TcVJjQCfVujD
/fNTmeQ2qOPq7O5+w/eQUK8=
=gGCr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
yardradius_1.0.20-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/y/yardradius/yardradius_1.0.20-5.diff.gz
yardradius_1.0.20-5.dsc
  to pool/main/y/yardradius/yardradius_1.0.20-5.dsc
yardradius_1.0.20-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/y/yardradius/yardradius_1.0.20-5_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted octave-forge 2002.11.30-1 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:48:27 -0600
Source: octave-forge
Binary: octave-forge
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2002.11.30-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 octave-forge - Contributed functions for GNU Octave from http://octave.sf.net
Changes: 
 octave-forge (2002.11.30-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Upgraded to new upstream release
Files: 
 c4ebcc17a5ad9274c7f8ecd39366b160 899 math optional octave-forge_2002.11.30-1.dsc
 b750c8d1e9911e92360306a8d8a9b79f 2198829 math optional 
octave-forge_2002.11.30.orig.tar.gz
 fae15057d9729a10525f3341fe50297d 16831 math optional octave-forge_2002.11.30-1.diff.gz
 6fbf9fa4037e1a6722aa5b61fc06eaaf 1119200 math optional 
octave-forge_2002.11.30-1_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96PsMCZSR95Gw07cRAviGAJsGC6xRaQ+alIhIxoDt+sucpgp8IgCfVWNx
LaumiTR87MqEJGjzvHNzVsk=
=pEiU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
octave-forge_2002.11.30-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/octave-forge/octave-forge_2002.11.30-1.diff.gz
octave-forge_2002.11.30-1.dsc
  to pool/main/o/octave-forge/octave-forge_2002.11.30-1.dsc
octave-forge_2002.11.30-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/octave-forge/octave-forge_2002.11.30-1_i386.deb
octave-forge_2002.11.30.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/o/octave-forge/octave-forge_2002.11.30.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted libabz 0.0.4 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Abraham vd Merwe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 20:11:03 +0200
Source: libabz
Binary: libabz0-dev libabz0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 libabz0- Miscellaneous useful routines
 libabz0-dev - Development files for the abz library
Changes: 
 libabz (0.0.4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Updated the version (I screwed it up in 0.0.3).
Files: 
 9e1d8384353f7fa3149df70f73033f44 570 devel optional libabz_0.0.4.dsc
 d6e5efaccfc134aa78e7d9b85da8239c 30877 devel optional libabz_0.0.4.tar.gz
 2bde55d144d3f98ffc84adb97d2b26f1 9050 libs optional libabz0_0.0.4_i386.deb
 bd8ab9ebdb9b236c427145ef5ff17453 38304 devel optional libabz0-dev_0.0.4_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE96P+VzvVjZitVWu4RAkG7AJwPaPJxBMEGWvO6nGOu9tFYDlGuhQCdErsm
Aw7toD2l8K3RcPZGAIAzC6w=
=I7c+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
libabz0-dev_0.0.4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz0-dev_0.0.4_i386.deb
libabz0_0.0.4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz0_0.0.4_i386.deb
libabz_0.0.4.dsc
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz_0.0.4.dsc
libabz_0.0.4.tar.gz
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz_0.0.4.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted libabz 0.0.3 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Abraham vd Merwe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 19:54:58 +0200
Source: libabz
Binary: libabz0-dev libabz0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 libabz0- Miscellaneous useful routines
 libabz0-dev - Development files for the abz library
Closes: 170104
Changes: 
 libabz (0.0.3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Don't build shlibs with non-PIC code (Closes: #170104)
Files: 
 7c49144bfbbfff27465986cb366807af 570 devel optional libabz_0.0.3.dsc
 3758482947c487183ed848d2e4c5d075 27238 devel optional libabz_0.0.3.tar.gz
 4398dcafe330e315f21ebabced715632 9014 libs optional libabz0_0.0.3_i386.deb
 ce59db022e0bb1caaab506197c788061 38272 devel optional libabz0-dev_0.0.3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE96P5RzvVjZitVWu4RAiG+AJ9kc5RTDBRBntC857yr9MH5PQ8pLACdGTWn
94IxxfHwik+DEjeOddDaO8o=
=dih7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
libabz0-dev_0.0.3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz0-dev_0.0.3_i386.deb
libabz0_0.0.3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz0_0.0.3_i386.deb
libabz_0.0.3.dsc
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz_0.0.3.dsc
libabz_0.0.3.tar.gz
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz_0.0.3.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted vdkbuilder 1.2.5-11 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Michael Vogt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 19:29:02 +0100
Source: vdkbuilder
Binary: vdkbuilder libvdkbuilder-dev libvdkbuilder
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.5-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 libvdkbuilder - Plugin libraries bundled with VDKBuilder
 libvdkbuilder-dev - Header files and static libraries for VDKBuilder plugins
 vdkbuilder - RAD for VDK
Closes: 170203 170231
Changes: 
 vdkbuilder (1.2.5-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * removed xlib6g-dev from dependencies (closes: #170231, #170203)
Files: 
 44bcf48b2d97bf9ce45374e9f40bdb56 730 - optional vdkbuilder_1.2.5-11.dsc
 d6088ceb10274acef67d81ef00777c40 22622 - optional vdkbuilder_1.2.5-11.diff.gz
 71e16bab56e9361f0e83feaf1126ce9e 28652 devel optional 
libvdkbuilder-dev_1.2.5-11_i386.deb
 75636ccf8a7f4a8821b0cac88e654067 25492 libs optional libvdkbuilder_1.2.5-11_i386.deb
 e6f0dbc426b11e40536145b693038c17 1370600 devel optional vdkbuilder_1.2.5-11_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96QY1liSD4VZixzQRAqrXAJsEZzyHWbBOFRtIHaQ9daQiV/J+rQCbBQ0J
Mm+81UIA1+gOZcr24hafRcg=
=IZkL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
libvdkbuilder-dev_1.2.5-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vdkbuilder/libvdkbuilder-dev_1.2.5-11_i386.deb
libvdkbuilder_1.2.5-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vdkbuilder/libvdkbuilder_1.2.5-11_i386.deb
vdkbuilder_1.2.5-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/v/vdkbuilder/vdkbuilder_1.2.5-11.diff.gz
vdkbuilder_1.2.5-11.dsc
  to pool/main/v/vdkbuilder/vdkbuilder_1.2.5-11.dsc
vdkbuilder_1.2.5-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vdkbuilder/vdkbuilder_1.2.5-11_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted lp-solve 3.99-4.0beta1-1 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread James R. Van Zandt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:38:02 -0500
Source: lp-solve
Binary: lp-solve
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.99-4.0beta1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 lp-solve   - Solve (mixed integer) linear programming problems
Closes: 170395
Changes: 
 lp-solve (3.99-4.0beta1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes:Bug#170395)
   * debian/rules: install new example files, install fortify.h,
 don't call suidregister
   * README.examples: run program with -S3 to print constraints
   * test-1: add -S3 flag
   * lp_solve.1: describe new options
Files: 
 dde5b45f67ae10bd86ead27f828a85c0 744 math optional lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1-1.dsc
 e73a6b35f1a6793ec5f7b521fa255902 309256 math optional 
lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1.orig.tar.gz
 47bccff9c37fcb03248872e2f1908e17 13235 math optional lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1-1.diff.gz
 406ab4464c2cf57044a6e77bbd1bb619 259046 math optional 
lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1-1_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iQCVAwUBPekoNjHnPxTimJZtAQEArQP9E7dxYWPqSjf/IvUisSPvL52I4ss1tC8l
Zg3EeOHO7ZUEKOoXqWIgJlwhv6PuQow+lqiQLTiANyHGgOVVpT5YqqLcGzn5pgzS
j6P0qC/pSB2CwwL+RwqytNdbjbqquIYl23FoLD9XR6rEOQVUc//J97lsmte5YNHs
7goUzQj088w=
=Iddp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/lp-solve/lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1-1.diff.gz
lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lp-solve/lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1-1.dsc
lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lp-solve/lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1-1_i386.deb
lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/lp-solve/lp-solve_3.99-4.0beta1.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted chaksem 1.6a-2 (all source)

2002-11-30 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  1 Dec 2002 13:09:33 +1100
Source: chaksem
Binary: chaksem
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 chaksem- a LaTeX class for presentations
Changes: 
 chaksem (1.6a-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Bumped standards-version to 3.5.8.0.
   * Set DH_COMPAT to 4.
Files: 
 9636185a05bf008b3e23603e84c00276 563 tex optional chaksem_1.6a-2.dsc
 ec4fa7eba393509cb246c02679f6d17b 2209 tex optional chaksem_1.6a-2.diff.gz
 8db6d5bcb97a21e659227951a1d29ad2 6066 tex optional chaksem_1.6a-2_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96W+A5u9oNyz9HDgRAjILAJ9naUxqkYTzHlbyNoHxfyu0bpHpZQCfTweZ
EdmrOsALkXudU8E1J6PC5xk=
=En8C
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
chaksem_1.6a-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/chaksem/chaksem_1.6a-2.diff.gz
chaksem_1.6a-2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/chaksem/chaksem_1.6a-2.dsc
chaksem_1.6a-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/chaksem/chaksem_1.6a-2_all.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted hotkeys 0.5.6 (i386 source)

2002-11-30 Thread Anthony Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:27:29 +0800
Source: hotkeys
Binary: hotkeys
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anthony Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 hotkeys- A hotkeys daemon for your Internet/multimedia keyboard in X
Closes: 109007 116820 126334 127987 127987 135440 136326 144659 145028 145041 146029 
149124 158843 162274 162398 163212 164821
Changes: 
 hotkeys (0.5.6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The one-version-to-merge-them-all, aka maintainer-is-now-back, release
 .
   * These account for NMU patches that I've merged:
 - acinclude.m4: check for libxml2 instead of libxml (Closes: #127987)
 - src/Makefile.am: added more SOURCES, put hotkeys.conf and splash.xpm
to EXTRA_DIST, use LIBXOSD variables in build
 - src/conf.c: initialize dbenv to NULL (Closes: #127987)
 - src/conf.c: changed action of Play from 'xmms --play' to 'xmms
   --play-pause' (Closes: #162398, #136326)
 - src/hotkeys.c: modified function setKbdType such that user's definition
  file is preferred over the global one (Closes: #135440)
 - configure.in: added AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, use AM_PATH_LIBXOSD (provided
 by libxosd-dev) instead of my own AM_CHECK_LIBXOSD,
 so disable configure arguments --with-xosd-inc and
 --with-xosd-lib, check for libpthread
 - debian/control: Build-Depends: libxosd-dev (= 1.0.3-1),
   Conflicts: xmms ( 1.2.6-1)
 - debian/rules: in clean target, remove debian/debian and and make
 distclean instead of make clean, should be more policy
 compliant now
 - def/Makefile.am: add *.def to EXTRA_DIST
 - New key defs: hp5181 (Closes: #146029),
 logitech-cfo (renamed from logitec-cho) (Closes: #149124),
 kb9930 (Closes: #163212), orktekusb.def
 - Updated sk2500.def, leave keycode 151 untouched (Closes: #126334)
 - src/hotkeys.1 updated/corrected
 - src/hotkeys.conf: changed 'xmms --play' to 'xmms --play-pause'
 - Fixed all XOSD related bugs
   (Closes: #109007, #116820, #144659, #145041, #158843)
 - Thanks Junichi Uekawa (Closes: #162274, #164821), Bastian Blank, Michael
   Beattie and all bug reporters and patchers for your help and support =)
 .
   * These are my changes and additions:
 - debian/control: autoconf (= 2.56)
 - New gtk+ code for the splash screen, modified Makefile.am and
   configure.in accordingly. (As gnome-utils in Gnome2 no longer contain
   the splash program, Closes: #145028)
 - Added contributor node in all *.def, modified src/kbddef.c
   accordingly.
 - New key defs: ibook, pb5140w
Files: 
 69347040842eb93031a282274a8e9019 583 x11 optional hotkeys_0.5.6.dsc
 92fd2c782df823808b7d2efd49114c00 505124 x11 optional hotkeys_0.5.6.tar.gz
 e962aef6d3b423ba86e678c5e5dae599 141864 x11 optional hotkeys_0.5.6_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE95jT0NLOpoHvSL3QRAm/vAKDJEAONuZgyKPRnUAFtLJLb+6Kj5ACgvql/
E46ro+Fdl4KuOFXN4+B350A=
=OO3K
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
hotkeys_0.5.6.dsc
  to pool/main/h/hotkeys/hotkeys_0.5.6.dsc
hotkeys_0.5.6.tar.gz
  to pool/main/h/hotkeys/hotkeys_0.5.6.tar.gz
hotkeys_0.5.6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hotkeys/hotkeys_0.5.6_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Accepted x-symbol 4.43-5 (all source)

2002-11-30 Thread Steve Dunham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  2 Nov 2002 10:38:49 -0800
Source: x-symbol
Binary: x-symbol
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.43-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 x-symbol   - WYSIWYG TeX mode for XEmacs
Closes: 167385
Changes: 
 x-symbol (4.43-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix font initialization on xemacs-gnome
   * Make global enabling of x-symbol a debconf option
   * Closes: #167385
Files: 
 ceda6db658073a13f6d5741c7b5ea85e 574 editors optional x-symbol_4.43-5.dsc
 03675e5ab493cdd791367028187e3649 12536 editors optional x-symbol_4.43-5.diff.gz
 e509e35065838174c67119caa59e419f 503106 editors optional x-symbol_4.43-5_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96aF/iPgEjVqvb1kRApylAJ95VbYBhvnbXyanszot40i8YMniVQCfZuAn
8/cDMzCfNveFxQ/wJe7RKok=
=SSk6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
x-symbol_4.43-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/x-symbol/x-symbol_4.43-5.diff.gz
x-symbol_4.43-5.dsc
  to pool/main/x/x-symbol/x-symbol_4.43-5.dsc
x-symbol_4.43-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/x-symbol/x-symbol_4.43-5_all.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]