Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:27:31PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:26:25AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:35:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: I believe Ubuntu fills an important gap in the Debian world and as such Ubuntu is not part of the Debian world, because it does not share the values that found Debian. That's kind of a strange position to take, isn't it? Does this mean that the many users who use Debian directly sheerly on technical excellence alone, without sharing Debian's founding values, are not part of the Debian world? For that matter, I don't know of any derivative Debian distributions that require their developers to agree to the social contract; so by that standard, are *any* of them part of the Debian world? Intuitively, I would not expect any standard to classify any of the current derivatives as 'part of the Debian world'. We have very little interaction with any of them. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Need for launchpad
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While I'm sure there'll be some people who'll complain no matter what, I don't see what the problem with mailing patches directly to the BTS is. As far as tracking is concerned, making use of [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertags or similar would seem sensible. Silly question, probably, but wouldn't this flood the BTS? No. But the request is not for arbitrary irrelevant bug reports to be filed, but for the Ubuntu downstream to think about the changes it makes, and submit the ones which are *relevant* to the BTS. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need for launchpad
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Um, I have said nothing against crediting maintainers in the packages. I have only said that I would like Ubuntu to clearly label which is the Debian maintainer and which is the Ubuntu maintainer. There's no Ubuntu maintainer for a specific package... packages in Universe are sometimes uploaded by several different person. Packages in Ubuntu main usually have the same set of maintainer however. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
Hello, On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:35:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: I believe Ubuntu fills an important gap in the Debian world and as such Ubuntu is not part of the Debian world, That's simply wrong given the many people who use both and who cares about both. You're only one inside Debian and you can't generalize your personal opinion on the whole project. If such gap exist, we should not abdicate our responsability to fill it to others that do not adhere to our principles. Sorry, you missed my point. I do not direct our users/developers to another distribution, I call for better cooperation so that WE can fill the gap by taking part of their work. Furthermore we heard several times that some DD were unhappy about the version of their packages in Ubuntu which was integrated without their opinion and this mail is an opportunity for people like those who care to voice their opinion about their packages in Ubuntu. If you don't care about Ubuntu, just don't collaborate but please do not fight other Debian developers who are intested in working together with Ubuntu. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:27:31PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: That's kind of a strange position to take, isn't it? Does this mean that the many users who use Debian directly sheerly on technical excellence alone, without sharing Debian's founding values, are not part of the Debian world? For that matter, I don't know of any derivative Debian distributions that require their developers to agree to the social contract; so by that standard, are *any* of them part of the Debian world? Intuitively, I would not expect any standard to classify any of the current derivatives as 'part of the Debian world'. We have very little interaction with any of them. And that's a pity. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
Hi, I think you'll find the correct place is the -sh list, which was notified: http://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2002/04/msg00010.html The sh arch in unstable has consisted of Architecture: all packages only since then. Even so you informed the porters it would have been nice to just drop a mail on -devel? Where is the problem in writing a mail to -devel? Going this way everybody would be informed and noone can complain afterwards. binary-sh found on ftp-master was just a cruft; superh is really waiting to be merged from outside of Debian. We have several out-of-debian trees for Debian superH. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pbuilder: cowdancer/cowbuilder status update
Hi, Another difference I noticed is that fl-cow takes a list of directories to protect in FL_COW, and seems to copy files unconditionally on 'open'. cowdancer caches a list of i-nodes so that it won't try to break hardlinks more than once. (cow-shell does this much work). Nice. I'm not sure both tools need to be in debian. How mature is cowdancer - can it replace fl-cow at this point? (fl-cows primary use is to be told 'these paths may contain hardlinked files, please unhardlink any of them on write'). For an application like fl-cow/cowdancer to be used reliably these things need to be considered: 1. How will it handle failure cases? 2. It's LD_PRELOAD from every application, is it thread-safe? 3. What happens if the filesystem has SELinux labels etc? 4. What happens if the user is running as root? 5. What happens if there is 0% free disk space available, will it erase the file or not touch it? I think there are others, but anyway, I'm trying to address these issues in cowdancer. I'll look into fl-cow and see what I can pick up from there. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pbuilder testsuite support (Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing)
Hi, Sorry for the late response, but I was on VAC for a while and my backlog is always long: * Let's modify pbuilder to run test-build tests and (if possible) also the generic tool and test-install tests. These belong, I think, better into pbuilder then piuparts, but it might be that piuparts should run them also. pbuilder hook is available for those who want to test this framework. $ mkdir ~/hook $ cp /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples/B92test-pkg ~/hook add HOOKDIR=/home//hook/ to your configuration file add debian/pbuilder-test/ directory to your source-code. pbuilder will use run-parts obtain a list and invoke the shell scripts. Note that the current version will refuse to run if debian/pbuilder-test does not exist; just as a reminder for myself to add a testsuite. The script is ran inside the chroot and ran as root. It could be like the following (an example that tests a library package): 002_libecasoundc: #!/bin/bash gcc /tmp/buildd/*/debian/pbuilder-test/002_sample.c -o /tmp/002_sample.out $(libecasoundc-config --libs --cflags ) /tmp/002_sample.out regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages.debian.org service stop ?
Hi, Hi, I've dug out some information from IRC logs: saens was overloaded around 5 Jan 2006, with load average of 140 or something, and eventually apache stopped. Since saens is one of ftp.debian.org, it had a large impact, and packages.debian.org is disabled temporarily as a workaround. FWIW, the same information is detailed in http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/01/msg00035.html. Thanks. That helps, a bit. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
On 10534 March 1977, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Intuitively, I would not expect any standard to classify any of the current derivatives as 'part of the Debian world'. We have very little interaction with any of them. And that's a pity. But not *our* problem. *They* should do the work to get it better. If they dont do it - then it is their problem, not ours. -- bye Joerg madduck and yes, the ftpmasters are not the most clueful people -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Development standards for unstable
Russ Allbery wrote: Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can you elaborate on this? I'm not sure how the existence of more packages that should be orphaned invalidates dealing with those that presently are. There's 169 orphaned packages today, why not do something about them? The thing is... most of the orphaned packages are in fairly good shape. How do you know? Most of the orphaned packages are orphaned because they're obscure and the person who cared about the package has left the project or run out of time. However, they are probably still working fine for people with those obscure needs, and as such there isn't an obvious significant gain for Debian by getting rid of them. I think that not shipping unmaintained and unsupported packages is a benefit. Packages need a maintainer to enter, I think they should need one to stay. Look at dcl as a random example. I think that not having a maintainer is quite a burden when security bugs such as the one fixed shortly before sarge release occur after release and this is when the upstream seems up to speed and people (here Joey Hess) in Debian track security reports globally, otherwise, security bugs might even go unnoticed. Also, I'm not sure how much the important bug impedes the functioning of the package, IMHO it would be rather bad if new installation was impossible with postgresql without documenting it beforehand. Using dbconfig-common probably would also be on a maintainer's todo list. So really, while the QA maintenance is certainly fine ATM, the package probably isn't as well supported as we would expect from a designated maintainer. Note that dcl was deliberately kept out of woody for being unmaintained... Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need for launchpad
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 09:42:22AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Um, I have said nothing against crediting maintainers in the packages. I have only said that I would like Ubuntu to clearly label which is the Debian maintainer and which is the Ubuntu maintainer. There's no Ubuntu maintainer for a specific package... packages in Universe are sometimes uploaded by several different person. [...] OK, but is listing the Debian maintainer as the only contact person appropriate? I've seem some forks of my packages in universe that I don't want responsibility for, thanks. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
But not *our* problem. *They* should do the work to get it better. If they dont do it - then it is their problem, not ours. I imagine that Raphaël was thinking about debian-edu for instance. We recently tried to push some involvment among French DD's to get in closer touch with people packaging educational software and building Debian-based specialized distros (Abuledu, Ofset software...). Most often, here, Debian developers can bring them the expertise they may need to work on improving their work (often packages) and get it enter Debian. A few of use are currently trying to build this link...and for building links you usually need to have both sides involved..:-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need for launchpad
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:34:51PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: can easily spot the holes in it. Likewise, a proposal that Ubuntu developers should put their changes into Debian instead sounds simple, but to an Ubuntu developer is obviously impractical. Could you elaborate on this? It's not obvious to me at all why more changes couldn't be pushed through Debian and automatically into Ubuntu. (I apologise if I read your quote out of context.) On a related note, it seems to me that the existence of the MOTU team, as non-core Ubuntu developers who are also not Debian developers, encourages more packages to be forked. Those developers can't make direct Debian uploads even if they want to; at worst they have no interest in contributing to Debian at all. thanks, Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dissection of an Ubuntu PR message
On 1/14/06, Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:03:14PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: (...) Exactly my point Matthew, and calm down David, i wrote: e.g.: David said that Daniel helped him, but if he did that in his workhours it's under Canonical bless.. Do you see ? I just pointed out that there's a possibility that he was helping you in his workhours, but i won't cite you as a reference anymore. -- Gustavo Franco Hi Gustavo, Is it within the scope of Canonical employees to contribute code to Debian that is under the his copyright and not Canonical's? And especially since it is in the exact same area that he was employed by Canonical to do? Would this apply to Progeny and Debian, Progeny and Canonical, Linspire and ... Hi Kevin, I think that Matt Zimmerman (mdz) knows the answer. -- Gustavo Franco
Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 09:57:15AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:35:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: I believe Ubuntu fills an important gap in the Debian world and as such Ubuntu is not part of the Debian world, That's simply wrong given the many people who use both and who cares about both. By this reasoning, Windows is 'part of the Debian world'. I hope you didn't expect anybody to take it seriously. You're only one inside Debian and you can't generalize your personal opinion on the whole project. That's an amusing attitude for somebody who just did exactly that in the previous sentence. Sorry, you missed my point. I do not direct our users/developers to another distribution, I call for better cooperation so that WE can fill the gap by taking part of their work. Did you really just say we should cooperate better so that we can do Ubuntu's work for them? The arrogance of such a statement is only surpassed by its inanity. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
For those who care about Andrew Suffield
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Andrew Suffield wrote: Since this sort of thing is apparently okay nowadays, and I know that ... is it not OK as you definitely know and my intention is not to feed you troll but that I hope the Debian lesbian ration will just be kept low because I changed the subject and people will not start just another flame war which makes just another duelling banjos case. Thanks Andrew for your continuos very helpful contribution Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]
If you can't understand sarcasm, why didn't you read the part for people who can't understand sarcasm? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: For those who care about lesbians
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:00:40PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: Since this sort of thing is apparently okay nowadays, and I know that a lot of you like looking at lesbians, I'd like to share this with you: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/81351129/in/photostream/ [And for the sarcasm-impaired: debian-devel-announce is for Debian development, not anything that you (or any other group of people) happen to be interested in. Don't post irrelevant stuff here. It would be a real shame if the list had to be moderated because people can't exercise good judgement. Anything sent here should be of interest to an overwhelming majority of Debian developers, *at least* - if you're using phrases like for those who care about X, it belongs somewhere else, like X-announce.] I got you sarcasm, but I still think that messages posted to debian-devel-announce should be more official. Even I you wanted to inform everybody that it's not proper place to post information not related to Debian itself you could do it in more formal language... otherwise we're going to have more ironic posts here, and that's not what most people expect subscribing to this list. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
A standard location to find 'vmlinux' to use for oprofile
Hi, Cc'ing oprofile-list to see if anyone is interested in this topic. I've been pondering on using kernel-package to generate debug 'vmlinux' images which are used in tools like kernel crash dump analysis tools and oprofile[1]. Currently I'm running 'make vmlinux' after generating a package, but it would be convenient if 'vmlinux' is included somewhere like /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/`uname -r`/vmlinux (which seems to be the case with RedHat[2]). Support for this is already there -- if the config var install_vmlinux is set, and your architectures make snippet defines where to find the vmlinux, and where to install it, you are done. So, just provide data about kelfimagesrc and kelfimagedest for files in /usr/share/kernel-package/rulesets/arches/, and then anyone can set install_vmlinux to get the end result. The remaining problem is that we don't really have a standard location for 'vmlinux'. For most cases, you can find the required file in /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/vmlinux but that's only available when you've built the kernel on that machine and have the build tree lying around. This is what oprofile currently does: oprofile-0.9.1/gui/oprof_start_config.cpp: /* Guess path to vmlinux based on kernel currently running. */ oprofile-0.9.1/gui/oprof_start_config.cpp: string const vmlinux_path(/lib/modules/ + version oprofile-0.9.1/gui/oprof_start_config.cpp: + /build/vmlinux); oprofile-0.9.1/gui/oprof_start_config.cpp: kernel_filename = vmlinux_path; It would be nice if it's possible to obtain the location information somewhere, in a distribution-agnostic manner. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
Hi! * Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060114 09:57]: You're only one inside Debian and you can't generalize your personal opinion on the whole project. Neither can you. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#348069: ITP: firefox-bidiui -- Enable Firefox user interface BiDi options by default
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: firefox-bidiui Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-hebrew/pkg/firefox-bidiui/trunk/ * License : GPL Description : Enable Firefox user interface BiDi options by default This package will turn on the Firefox BiDi options by default. It is useful for systems with Hebrew users but with non-Hebrew default locale. . BiDi options are based on the user's locale. This package sets Firefox bidi.browser.ui option to true. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Suffield wrote: If you can't understand sarcasm, why didn't you read the part for people who can't understand sarcasm? I read the part about sarcasm and i partially argee with you. But i'm with Andreas here. Your post didn't help anyone, the original Ubuntu post was important to quite a few people. I can understand that a part of the people behind Debian feel hostile against Ubuntu because it's succeeding in something that Debian was trying to achieve. But what i can't understand is that people behind Ubuntu are trying to reach out and build a bridge between the people in Debian and some people are intentionally trying to burn them. They are really investing time on the co-operation, they are creating tools to help this. What are the Debian people doing, they are bitching about Ubuntu people not putting their backs in to it. I don't mean that there is no effort on Debian side either, but the visible effort (mostly because stunts like this) is mostly on the burning side. It takes less effort to bitch and moan than to work together, maybe that's the reason. - - S -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDySTYqbb3MLg9dhwRAt1cAJ9CYPBwwnUHH8/d2aqw5qOfjrG74wCguCzQ nrB7CNRodc1YPs5Goe4doK4= =V0lX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need for launchpad
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Hamish Moffatt wrote: There's no Ubuntu maintainer for a specific package... packages in Universe are sometimes uploaded by several different person. [...] OK, but is listing the Debian maintainer as the only contact person appropriate? I've seem some forks of my packages in universe that I don't want responsibility for, thanks. Maybe we need to provide Ubuntu a list of maintainer who don't want their name listed in the Ubuntu packages ... I don't see another solution to satisfy everyone. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Development standards for unstable
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Thomas Viehmann wrote: How do you know? The BTS. Most of the orphaned packages are orphaned because they're obscure and the person who cared about the package has left the project or run out of time. However, they are probably still working fine for people with those obscure needs, and as such there isn't an obvious significant gain for Debian by getting rid of them. I think that not shipping unmaintained and unsupported packages is a benefit. Packages need a maintainer to enter, I think they should need one to stay. You wouldn't say that if you were a user using an orphaned package ... I'm sorry, there's no global answer to orphaned packages. Sometimes they are obsolete and should be dropped. Sometimes they're not and we should try to find maintainers for them. If we can't find maintainers inside Debian, we should look in the upstream community around the software and use adequate infrastructure : http://wiki.debian.org/CollaborativeMaintenance Of course, it's easier to say than to do and I have only 24 hours per day. :-) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future.
Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:24:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:04:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: The fact you don't have anyone able to make a working cross-compiler speaks somewhat poorly of the support available for the m68k toolchain, too. The issues with producing a working cross-compiler that I hit against were not m68k-specific. Also, they may or may not have been fixed in the mean time; I know for a fact that there is no updated toolchain-source package available, but there've been a few upstream updates in the mean time, and I didn't go out and check them anymore (since my previous attempts failed) Toolchain-source is currently being worked on and should soon be ready for testing and policy compiliance. (I'm doing the work and since this is my first Debian package, I'll need a bit of help getting started with the administrative stuff :-) As it stands today I can create cross-compilers for all *-linux architechtures except s390 and amd64. Those two targets are being worked on right... Current setup is: gcc-4.0 4.0.2-5 binutils 2.16.1cvs20051214-1 gdb 6.3-6 newlib 1.13.0-2 /D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: I got you sarcasm, but I still think that messages posted to debian-devel-announce should be more official. Come on, it is just Mr. Suffield slowly turning into the Overfiend :) -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:00:40PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: Since this sort of thing is apparently okay nowadays, and I know that a lot of you like looking at lesbians, I'd like to share this with you: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/81351129/in/photostream/ [And for the sarcasm-impaired: debian-devel-announce is for Debian development, not anything that you (or any other group of people) happen to be interested in. Don't post irrelevant stuff here. It would be a real shame if the list had to be moderated because people can't exercise good judgement. Anything sent here should be of interest to an overwhelming majority of Debian developers, *at least* - if you're using phrases like for those who care about X, it belongs somewhere else, like X-announce.] I got you sarcasm, but I still think that messages posted to debian-devel-announce should be more official. Agreed. Andrew, do you understand just how inappropriate and offensive your mail was? Nothing justifies abuse of our lists like that. d-d-a is a widely-read list both inside and outside the project, and you have done harm to our reputation. If you can't see why what you did was wrong, you are doing the project a disservice by continuing to be a developer. You certainly are not doing the project any favours by representing us in this manner. If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right at the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for this one yet. Regards, Roger - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQFDySmFVcFcaSW/uEgRAgxOAJsFmgXl1t/Yg1ZZFf/mHkD81ic7sgCfTTDo 24iLqEi5gPMZcpoTLmF4Aes= =WU5k -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Andrew Suffield wrote: That's simply wrong given the many people who use both and who cares about both. By this reasoning, Windows is 'part of the Debian world'. I hope you didn't expect anybody to take it seriously. Ok, not well worded, let me rephrase it. It's wrong given the many exchanges that we have between the two communities. If the Ubuntu/Debian community didn't overlap so much (and if we were in two different world), we certainly wouldn't have so many discussions about Ubuntu. (and no I don't plan to respond to the rest of your troll) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable)
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:31:17PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: and this answers IMHO what the maintainer wants a patch for: a system that would work with all download managers. Which is something it is not going to work. The current intent to NMU is proposing curl | wget which doesn't need any modification to the config file if curl is installed. Though you're right that you still need to change the config file when curl is not installed. This is IMHO however not a *severe* bug as some packages need configuration if you don't choose to use the default. Some packages need a mocification, but this could be made so that it DOES NOT need anything. The maintainer could define a list of prefered downloaders ( 1. curl, 2.wget) and define them in an array. Then start looking for them in the path. If something is found, use it. Otherwise, complain. Having wget installed and working, is really stupid that apt-file not only does not use it by default, but 1. provides an irrelevant message, 2. forces me to change a line in the config file, and then works out of the box. Is my believe that in the standard case, you just want to apt-get install apt-file and have it working. -- Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.6.14|Helsinki Finland GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 Where are you going, Starfish and Friends? --Chad (Charlie's Angels) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
Roger, On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 08:40, Roger Leigh wrote: Andrew, do you understand just how inappropriate and offensive your mail was? Nothing justifies abuse of our lists like that. d-d-a is a widely-read list both inside and outside the project, and you have done harm to our reputation. There was nothing offensive about Andrew's message. Since you do not offer any reasons for your melodramatic conclusion, I suspect that you are merely trolling. I *hope* you are not using this list to engage in discrimination against those whose sexual orientation may be different from your own. I note that there was nothing pornographic in the picture to which Andrew linked. It was merely a couple of young people enjoying a kiss. Certainly off-topic, but valid as an attention- -getter to hopefully stop some of the off-topic clutter that has pervaded this list recently. If you can't see why what you did was wrong, you are doing the project a disservice by continuing to be a developer. You certainly are not doing the project any favours by representing us in this manner. If you can't even state why you think that what Andrew did was wrong, please stop wasting bandwidth. If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right at the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for this one yet. If your message is merely a troll, I would respectfully ask you please to expell yourself. On the other hand, if you believe that someone should be expelled for reasons that you are unable or unwilling to state, I would respectfully ask you please to expell yourself. --Mike Bird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those about to rock
We salute you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:55:14PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Andrew Suffield wrote: That's simply wrong given the many people who use both and who cares about both. By this reasoning, Windows is 'part of the Debian world'. I hope you didn't expect anybody to take it seriously. Ok, not well worded, let me rephrase it. It's wrong given the many exchanges that we have between the two communities. If the Ubuntu/Debian community didn't overlap so much (and if we were in two different world), we certainly wouldn't have so many discussions about Ubuntu. The fact that we spent more time talking about both Nexenta and Gentoo shows this one to be either false or uninteresting, depending on how you interpret it. (and no I don't plan to respond to the rest of your troll) That's okay, I skipped responding to most of your troll too. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:20:40PM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: If you can't understand sarcasm, why didn't you read the part for people who can't understand sarcasm? I read the part about sarcasm and i partially argee with you. But i'm with Andreas here. Your post didn't help anyone, the original Ubuntu post was important to quite a few people. Windows security advisories are surely important to quite a few people, and probably to more readers of -devel-announce than Ubuntu stuff. Are you saying that it would be okay to post these? If not, then you need to rethink your reasoning here. Personally, I don't think important to the subscribers is the correct measure. I can understand that a part of the people behind Debian feel hostile against Ubuntu because it's succeeding in something that Debian was trying to achieve. But what i can't understand is that people behind Ubuntu are trying to reach out and build a bridge between the people in Debian and some people are intentionally trying to burn them. They are really investing time on the co-operation, they are creating tools to help this. What are the Debian people doing, they are bitching about Ubuntu people not putting their backs in to it. I considered editing this out, but I'm quoting it instead because it's a neat bit of libel[0] in an attempt to change the subject. This is not about Ubuntu at all - it could have been *anybody*'s press release being reposted. This is about appropriate use of Debian mailing lists. [0] I don't know who made this shit up, but as far as I'm aware it's purely fictional. We're objecting to Ubuntu's *PR*, and they're complaining that we're trying to stop collaberation? WTF? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Intent to drop evms-udeb
Hi, I'm intending to drop the EVMS udeb; it hasn't been functional since at least before the first alpha version of d-i for sarge, and currently it's not doing any good except make evms harder to get into testing. If anybody has an interest in making d-i capable of installing directly onto EVMS in time for etch, please let me know. Otherwise I'll simply remove it; I don't have the time nor partman-fu for doing it myself. This is bug #344065, #223995 and #239892, for those who want to get an approximate idea what's required. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 08:40, Roger Leigh wrote: Andrew, do you understand just how inappropriate and offensive your mail was? Nothing justifies abuse of our lists like that. d-d-a is a widely-read list both inside and outside the project, and you have done harm to our reputation. There was nothing offensive about Andrew's message. It is offensive to many people, myself included. But mainly it's offtopic for that list (as well as all other Debian lists). That's why I said inappropriate. That list is widely read my many people outside the project, including many corporations. As a result, it is damaging to the reputation and good standing of the project, as well as being an abuse of the project's public announcement lists. If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right at the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for this one yet. If your message is merely a troll, I would respectfully ask you please to expell yourself. I was perfectly serious. This is merely the latest in a number of things Mr Suffield has done which are detrimental to the project in a number of ways. Some of these are not a matter of public record, so you would be unaware of them. It is not this one incident which is resulting in this, but rather several years of incidents of varying severity, some rather worse than this. Regards, Roger - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQFDyTn7VcFcaSW/uEgRAmr4AKC+Ae4LHYa09e7J532EO0z7wJFx3QCgmhgR a65URkYUORv6LCvvfYRY/TU= =tZSc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Development standards for unstable
Raphael Hertzog wrote: I think that not shipping unmaintained and unsupported packages is a benefit. Packages need a maintainer to enter, I think they should need one to stay. You wouldn't say that if you were a user using an orphaned package ... Well, I've been in the situation to dig out an old package from an old stable release a couple of times. I think this is far preferable than making unfounded claims that the packages is properly supported. I'm sorry, there's no global answer to orphaned packages. Sometimes they are obsolete and should be dropped. Sometimes they're not and we should try to find maintainers for them. We do try. We send mail about them every week. The question is: is it worthwile for Debian to ship and support these packages? I'd say for packages with no maintainer for, say, three months, we just need to say no. Just like RFPs being closed if noone picks them up, orphaned packages should go. Mere consumers can only have limited influence on volunteer projects. A large part of what makes Debian great is that packages are maintianed by people taking an interest in them. So yes, I claim that drop them after three months with no interest is an appropriate answer to orphaned packages. If we can't find maintainers inside Debian, we should look in the upstream community around the software and use adequate infrastructure : http://wiki.debian.org/CollaborativeMaintenance Of course, it's easier to say than to do and I have only 24 hours per day. Sorry, Raphael, I appreciate you're effort to promote and enable collaborative maintenance very much, but it's not the holy grail solving all maintenance problems. Packages need maintainers in the same way that an architecture needs porters. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#348069: ITP: firefox-bidiui -- Enable Firefox user interface BiDi options by default
* Lior Kaplan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: firefox-bidiui Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-hebrew/pkg/firefox-bidiui/trunk/ * License : GPL Description : Enable Firefox user interface BiDi options by default This package will turn on the Firefox BiDi options by default. It is useful for systems with Hebrew users but with non-Hebrew default locale. . BiDi options are based on the user's locale. This package sets Firefox bidi.browser.ui option to true. This seems a crazy thing to have an entire package for. Let's see if we can come up with a better solution. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[bigloo-ude] Does not install with emacs-snapshot/emacs22
Hello,
loading cc-mode with emacs-snapshot I get a
Cannot open load file cee-hook
message (similar, from memory).
Turns out, that bigloo-ude does not install for that flavour of emacs
and it won't for emacs22 either ...
This will help:
$ diff -u bigloo-ude.dist bigloo-ude
--- bigloo-ude.dist 2005-11-21 22:03:22.0 +0100
+++ bigloo-ude 2006-01-14 18:53:55.0 +0100
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
case ${FLAVOR} in
xemacs*) BRAND=xemacs ;;
emacs21) BRAND=emacs21 ;;
+emacs22) BRAND=emacs22 ;;
+emacs-snapshot) BRAND=emacs22 ;;
*) exit 0 ;;
esac
$
Since this is emacs-snapshot I refrain from opening a bug at BTS.
Cheers,
Erich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]
Windows security advisories are surely important to quite a few people, and probably to more readers of -devel-announce than Ubuntu stuff. Are you saying that it would be okay to post these? If not, then you need to rethink your reasoning here. Personally, I don't think important to the subscribers is the correct measure. But Windows security advisories don't contain debian packages. Ubuntu does contain close to all debian packages, and (I hope) most DDs have an interest to include improvements of other distributions in their packages (at least I do). Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Development standards for unstable
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Russ Allbery wrote: The thing is... most of the orphaned packages are in fairly good shape. How do you know? Well, because at one point I went through the PTS for each one of them, checked for filed bugs, checked lintian reports, etc. I haven't specifically *used* each of them, but I think the choices are no one is using them (popcon seems to say no), no one is reporting problems (possible, but statistically I'd expect someone to notice), or they're in fairly good shape. I think that not shipping unmaintained and unsupported packages is a benefit. Packages need a maintainer to enter, I think they should need one to stay. Orphaned packages *are* maintained and supported by the QA group to a degree. They're not as closely maintained as the ideal regularly maintained package is, and it takes a while to fix problems, but there are people who look at the bugs and deal with major issues. My point is that this is actually *better* than a depressing number of the packages that have regular maintainers. A while back, when that global ranking of packages based on various criteria such as last maintainer upload, number of bugs, number of RC bugs, number of lintian errors, and so forth was posted, there were no orphaned packages in the top 150 problem packages. Admittedly, that's partly because number of NMUs since a maintainer upload was one of the criteria and QA-maintained packages don't have that, but still. That's fairly impressive. Look at dcl as a random example. I think that not having a maintainer is quite a burden when security bugs such as the one fixed shortly before sarge release occur after release and this is when the upstream seems up to speed and people (here Joey Hess) in Debian track security reports globally, otherwise, security bugs might even go unnoticed. I grant that security is one case where not having someone closely monitoring the package can be a serious problem. Also, I'm not sure how much the important bug impedes the functioning of the package, IMHO it would be rather bad if new installation was impossible with postgresql without documenting it beforehand. Using dbconfig-common probably would also be on a maintainer's todo list. So really, while the QA maintenance is certainly fine ATM, the package probably isn't as well supported as we would expect from a designated maintainer. That I would agree with, certainly. It's definitely better for the packages to be adopted, and one would expect better maintanence from a regular maintainer. I just don't think that mass-removing orphaned packages just becaues they're orphaned is a good way of improving the general quality of Debian. Now I should go off and mentor some adoptions of orphaned packages. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]
Sami Haahtinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can understand that a part of the people behind Debian feel hostile against Ubuntu because it's succeeding in something that Debian was trying to achieve. But what i can't understand is that people behind Ubuntu are trying to reach out and build a bridge between the people in Debian and some people are intentionally trying to burn them. They are really investing time on the co-operation, they are creating tools to help this. What are the Debian people doing, they are bitching about Ubuntu people not putting their backs in to it. For those who are concerned with closer co-operation between Debian and Ubuntu, lots of people have already tried to send a clear message. The best way to encourage and help this is to *stop posting things like the above* and just go work on syncing changes. Help with the work, don't tell us what we do and don't believe. As long as you keep accusing people of burning bridges or bitching about other people's work, those of us who feel like we have legitimate concerns tend to want to repeat them or try to explain them again. The result is that threads about the *differences* get longer and longer and accumulate more posts, and as a result the gap looks wider and wider. If, on the other hand, you'd accept that a lot of Debian developers really care deeply about things like free software and aren't going to use tools like Launchpad *but still want to co-operate*, stopped bringing up the things that we disagree about, and started trying to improve communication by taking a few Ubuntu fixes and filing them as Debian patches, or helping with a Debian transition like the modular X transition that will obviate the need for tons of divergence, or did something else concrete to bring the distributions closer together, you'd find that many of the same people who are arguing with you here would happily help. Personally, I monitor the Ubuntu patches for all of my packages and apply whatever looks reasonable. Maybe it's not the best way to contribute back changes, but it works fine for me. It probably wouldn't if my packages had more complex differences, so finding a better way to communicate those complex differences would be valuable work. If closer collaboration is something you want to see, stop telling us that the only reason why we're not working harder for Ubuntu is because we're jealous, *listen* to what we're actually saying, and help synchronize the hard cases. All this nattering on mailing lists doesn't make the software any better. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There was nothing offensive about Andrew's message. Since you do not offer any reasons for your melodramatic conclusion, I suspect that you are merely trolling. I *hope* you are not using this list to engage in discrimination against those whose sexual orientation may be different from your own. Er, I thought it was offensive because it was sexist, not because there's anything wrong with being lesbian. Regardless, I think this was pretty much the poster child for two wrongs don't make a right. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Suffield wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:20:40PM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote: I read the part about sarcasm and i partially argee with you. But i'm with Andreas here. Your post didn't help anyone, the original Ubuntu post was important to quite a few people. Windows security advisories are surely important to quite a few people, and probably to more readers of -devel-announce than Ubuntu stuff. Are you saying that it would be okay to post these? If not, then you need to rethink your reasoning here. Personally, I don't think important to the subscribers is the correct measure. What i meant was that there are people in debian that moan and groan about ubuntu not asking them about their packages, so the original post was semi-justified because of that. i didn't mean that anything that might interest the people on the list is fair game. Burning bridges at all... I considered editing this out, but I'm quoting it instead because it's a neat bit of libel[0] in an attempt to change the subject. This is not about Ubuntu at all - it could have been *anybody*'s press release being reposted. This is about appropriate use of Debian mailing lists. I was not trying to change the subject. At the time your response looked like it was triggered by the name Ubuntu, which is not that uncommon on the lists. Personally i didn't see it as a press release, it was an informational mail directed at debian developers. IMHO, the original post was semi-justified, your post was not. [0] I don't know who made this shit up, but as far as I'm aware it's purely fictional. We're objecting to Ubuntu's *PR*, and they're complaining that we're trying to stop collaberation? WTF? I'm not saying that this is the official stand from either side. I keep an eye on both lists and this is the picture that comes out. I would assume that i'm not the only one that gets this picture just by reading the lists. - - S -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDyU8eqbb3MLg9dhwRAvRGAKCEaJF9sFV30+nFZ4gbfTUgnAsNUACgkrNI XhFOvHWXn++imv0jDmht8Is= =YrA9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
On 1/14/06, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: I got you sarcasm, but I still think that messages posted to debian-devel-announce should be more official. Come on, it is just Mr. Suffield slowly turning into the Overfiend :) slowly? Are you sure? I disagree with into the Overfiend sentence, it should be replaced with into *the* Debian troll. Are we going to list this position in our Organizational Structure[0] ? [0] = http://www.debian.org/intro/organization -- Gustavo Franco
Re: Debian Games Team
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:07:37AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: We've been recently talking about creating a group to maintain games in Debian in a collaborative way. As a starting point, I've created a mailing list in Oh this is cool! I joined. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-games-devel Here are some points that might be addressed by this group if there is interested in it: [...] - Open a way towards a larger involvement in Debian project to people maintaining just one or few games. It can also be a nice entrance point into Debian and Debian maintainance for people mainly interested in games. Very cool! - Make it easier for users to know the games available in Debian, maybe with some game selector interface, a web page, screenshots or whatever. One way of doing it is by maintaining the game::* tags in debtags, and possibly crafting some ad-hoc graphical interface that data. I'll be super happy to help! Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 12:18:43PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 10534 March 1977, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Intuitively, I would not expect any standard to classify any of the current derivatives as 'part of the Debian world'. We have very little interaction with any of them. And that's a pity. But not *our* problem. *They* should do the work to get it better. If they dont do it - then it is their problem, not ours. It'd be nice if we had a way to make it easier though. Unfortunately I have no idea how, but I do know that I'm still looking to close the gap in certain differences between our X packages and Knoppix's for instance. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need for launchpad
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:53:51PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:49:40PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: I don't buy this. The impression that just about everyone has of this didn't come from nowhere. Not from nowhere, no. The statements that Ubuntu steals users from Debian, wants to kill Debian, etc. came from somewhere, too, but that somewhere wasn't Ubuntu. I wasn't trying to argue those sentiments (since those are obviously trollish hyperbole) but more that Ubuntu proudly states that it contributes back to Debian. Do you honestly want to say that you guys aren't proud to do this, and that you never say that it's going on? snip because I agree with your analysis of the web page and have nothing to add to it specifically I think that's what serves to create a pretty strong impression that Ubuntu is actually working very closely with Debian to do things like address the issues that keep many users from using Debian. From the sound of this thread everyone would welcome what's on that page with open arms. I can't agree. From the sound of this and other threads, there are a number of folks who are unlikely to be satisfied with any behavior on the part of the Ubuntu project or its members. Fortunately, there are others who are actively cooperating to the mutual benefit of the two projects. I agree with aj here that there's always going to be upset people who make a lot of noise. The common theme that I've seen from this thread is for Ubuntu developers to simply forward relevant patches to Debian and discard the irrelevant ones. How feasible this is, I don't know, but it's something to consider. On the part about mutual cooperation, I hope we see more of it. I really hope people from both sides make an effort to establish a working relationship, since such things are far more effective and enjoyable than pulling a patch sitting on a server. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348101: ITP: kde-icons-korilla -- blue version of gorilla icons for kde
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: kde-icons-korilla Version : 1.3.5 Upstream Author : Patrick Yavitz pyavitz (at) gmail.com * URL : http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=7264 * License : GPL Description : blue version of gorilla icons for kde Kool gorilla icon set for kde. Brings monkey spirit to your desktop -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348103: ITP: kde-icons-gorilla -- gorilla icons for kde
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: kde-icons-gorilla Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Patrick Yavitz pyavitz (at) gmail.com * URL : http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=6927 * License : GPL Description : Yellowish gorilla icons for kde Gorilla icon set for kde. Brings monkey spirit to your desktop -- System Information: Debian Release: unstable/experimental APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348104: ITP: libfile-homedir-perl -- Get the home directory for yourself or other users in Perl
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Genannt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libfile-homedir-perl Version : 0.31 Upstream Author : Adam Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~adamk/ * License : GPL Description : Get the home directory for yourself or other users in Perl File::HomeDir is a module for dealing with issues relating to the location of directories for various purposes that are owned by a user, and to solve these problems consistently across a wide variety of platforms. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:51:03PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right at the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for this one yet. If your message is merely a troll, I would respectfully ask you please to expell yourself. I was perfectly serious. This is merely the latest in a number of things Mr Suffield has done which are detrimental to the project in a number of ways. Some of these are not a matter of public record, so you would be unaware of them. I hope you realise that if I were the litigious type, you would be receiving a court summons in the next day or two (it's lies, btw, for those of you watching - I hope nobody bought that 'secret offenses' noise, it's like the PATRIOT act or something). Consider yourself fortunate that I am not so inclined, and be *very* careful about what you say in the future; other UK residents may not be so generous. Of course, if I find you causing me actual monetary damage in some way, I might change my mind. [There's considerable case law for this with email. An untrue statement of fact which damages the reputation of a person (or a company) or holds him, her or it up to hatred, ridicule or contempt is libellous is one of the common phrasings of the test, and email authors are held to the same standard as journalists. There is no freedom of speech principle in UK law; you can express opinions, but that's all. You may not make false *or* *unprovable* statements of fact with intent to harm.] And if you start mud-flinging in earnest, I don't think I would be the first one to be expelled from the project. I have no interest in you, but you really do not want to force my hand on this - I haven't done anything wrong other than holding opinions you don't agree with, and you certainly can't put any evidence behind that 'detrimental to the project' claim, but *you* are pursuing a personal vendetta. Again. Oh, and that would be 'incitement to cause harm', which is a criminal offense these days. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: For those who care about lesbians
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:51:03PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right at the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for this one yet. I was perfectly serious. This is merely the latest in a number of things Mr Suffield has done which are detrimental to the project in a number of ways. Some of these are not a matter of public record, so you would be unaware of them. I hope you realise that if I were the litigious type, you would be receiving a court summons in the next day or two (it's lies, btw, for those of you watching - I hope nobody bought that 'secret offenses' noise, it's like the PATRIOT act or something). The events are a recorded in the debian-private archives, which I am not permitted to reveal here. I have at no point stated anything which is untrue, and any Debian developer who wishes to verify it may look at the August 2005 archives (debian-private.200508.gz on master:~debian/archive/debian-private is the worst to date). That is not disclosable on this list. None of this is personal, but your unacceptable behaviour past and present has consequences which affect both other developers, and the project as a whole. You have been treading a very fine line since the above incident, since which I had hoped you would improve, so I hope you understand just how close to the limit you are. If you do reply, please do so in -private. - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQFDyYgQVcFcaSW/uEgRArW/AKCdqaH3mo7BEiarOOWyCPw5MU1M8gCfe34V pP6DnpmwdTcaflkTDul5DwQ= =EPLH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future.
Wouter Verhelst wrote: [...] When I first tried to create this setup, about a month after DebConf5 (and about around the time when I announced this), it turned out that it was plain impossible to build a cross-compiler with the GCC4 code; not with toolchain-source (because that had not been updated yet to GCC4, so would be useless for this purpose) but also not with the upstream source and the scripts from kegel.com: Some internals of the GCC4 code expected that the compiler and the binutils would be called 'm68k-linux-foo', whereas other bits expected 'm68k-linux-gnu-foo'. Obviously this could be fixed by someone familiar with the gcc/binutils build system, but that's besides the point; the point is that rolling our own, very special, setup might introduce extra weaknesses (I had warned in Helsinki about the possibility that a cross-compiler might not produce the very exact same object code that a native build would, but had not considered the possibility that there might be bugs in the build system which would only occur when trying to build cross-compilers). This would complicate such a setup further. As a semi-retired GCC upstream developer, I have a couple comments here. First, we're aware that building cross compilers is harder than it ought to be, especially building cross compilers to targets that normally use native compilers. There is, however, a lack of manpower to fix these problems. We'd be delighted to get constructive feedback from people actually using a host-x-host configuration on a regular basis, assistance integrating Dan Kegel's scripts with the normal build mechanism, and so on. Things may already be better in mainline (GCC 4.2 that will be), as there's been quite a lot of build infrastructure work in this development cycle. Second, we of course cannot guarantee that a cross compiler to target X generates the same code as a native compiler for target X would, given the same input. However, all cases where the cross compiler generates different code from the native compiler for the same input are considered bugs, and if you find them, we want to hear about them. 'We' should be taken to refer to the GCC upstream developers as a collective entity, which at present doesn't really include me. (In other words, please bring bugs, suggestions, offers of assistance, etc. to the GCC mailing lists, *not* me.) zw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:51:03PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right at the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for this one yet. If your message is merely a troll, I would respectfully ask you please to expell yourself. I was perfectly serious. This is merely the latest in a number of things Mr Suffield has done which are detrimental to the project in a number of ways. Some of these are not a matter of public record, so you would be unaware of them. I hope you realise that if I were the litigious type, you would be receiving a court summons in the next day or two (it's lies, btw, for those of you watching - I hope nobody bought that 'secret offenses' noise, it's like the PATRIOT act or something). Consider yourself fortunate that I am not so inclined, and be *very* careful about what you say in the future; other UK residents may not be so generous. Of course, if I find you causing me actual monetary damage in some way, I might change my mind. And, if it's all so wrong, how comes you're defending it with a threat of legal action on a public mailing list... Given that I tend to skip your posts on most lists because they are either not thought through or plain rude, maybe you don't read your own writing? Of course, this is only my opinion. Of course, the post to d-d-a about lesbians that then goes on state Don't post irrelevant stuff here. It would be a real shame if the list had to be moderated because people can't exercise good judgement. Seems to me that you really hadn't thought about what you were posting, or where. That was not an appropriate place for the post, and you should know better. - -- Brett Parker web: http://www.sommitrealweird.co.uk/ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyYNJEh8oWxevnjQRApwUAKCS+UzDXQQn3NUTRM3ld0X01GHZegCgmhiG DdRk6BX7Ve3otKoH5W9jzns= =WuT+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need for launchpad
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Um, I have said nothing against crediting maintainers in the packages. I have only said that I would like Ubuntu to clearly label which is the Debian maintainer and which is the Ubuntu maintainer. There's no Ubuntu maintainer for a specific package... packages in Universe are sometimes uploaded by several different person. Packages in Ubuntu main usually have the same set of maintainer however. Right. Someone, somewhere, sometime, is making the change. I'm asking that person to bother filing a bug report when they do so, if the bug report would be relevant to the Debian package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:00:40PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: Since this sort of thing is apparently okay nowadays, and I know that a lot of you like looking at lesbians, I'd like to share this with you: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/81351129/in/photostream/ [And for the sarcasm-impaired: debian-devel-announce is for Debian development, not anything that you (or any other group of people) happen to be interested in. Don't post irrelevant stuff here. It would be a real shame if the list had to be moderated because people can't exercise good judgement. Anything sent here should be of interest to an overwhelming majority of Debian developers, *at least* - if you're using phrases like for those who care about X, it belongs somewhere else, like X-announce.] I got you sarcasm, but I still think that messages posted to debian-devel-announce should be more official. Even I you wanted to inform everybody that it's not proper place to post information not related to Debian itself you could do it in more formal language... otherwise we're going to have more ironic posts here, and that's not what most people expect subscribing to this list. In fact, both of the last 2 emails to d-d-a go against the AUP. Procedures should be started to punish the offenders. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For those who care about lesbians
On Sunday 15 January 2006 00:47, Adam Heath wrote: In fact, both of the last 2 emails to d-d-a go against the AUP. Procedures should be started to punish the offenders. They are of a completely different order. One is an error of judgement and merely off-topic, the other is intentionally offensive and therefore unacceptable. pgp6jYbKvhKpJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 07:35:04PM +0100, Willi Mann wrote: But Windows security advisories don't contain debian packages. Ubuntu does contain close to all debian packages, and (I hope) most DDs have an interest to include improvements of other distributions in their packages (at least I do). Maemo (from the Nokia 770 fame) contains Debian packages. But d-d-a is no place to talk about it. d-d-a is the list where information that concers to and MUST be known by all DDs is sent. It might be of more or less relevance for some of us, but is definitely not a place for if you are interested stuff. The change of experimental, the h0x3r that we got in out machines, changes on infrastructure... those are the things. Ah! and of course, the release of etch. -- Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.6.14|Helsinki Finland GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 I've decided what to do with my life. I wanna be a cleaner. --Mathilda (Leon, the Cleaner) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348122: ITP: libapp-cache-perl -- Easy application-level caching
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Genannt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libapp-cache-perl Version : 0.31 Upstream Author : Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~lbrocard/ * License : GPL Description : Easy application-level caching The App::Cache module lets an application cache data locally. There are a few times an application would need to cache data: when it is retrieving information from the network or when it has to complete a large calculation. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]
* Sami Haahtinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-14 18:20]: I can understand that a part of the people behind Debian feel hostile against Ubuntu because it's succeeding in something that Debian was trying to achieve. It's not about succeeding. It's about false statements all the time, like Every Debian developer is also an Ubuntu developer. If I were I would know. And they are recompiling all my packages, so you can't even say that they are using my packages directly. It's also about false statements like We sync our packages to Debian regularly, because that simply doesn't happen for quite a lot of us, otherwise all these heated discussions wouldn't happen. These two very statements are on the very page that were linked in this very misguided mail this fuss is all about. But what i can't understand is that people behind Ubuntu are trying to reach out and build a bridge between the people in Debian and some people are intentionally trying to burn them. I can only speak for myself (like everyone anyway, but it seems to be mentioned), I haven't noticed anyone reaching me, so I hadn't had any chance to burn anyone. The only contact with respect to Ubuntu was a user disappointed that one of my packages in Debian had a fix that the one in Ubuntu hadn't... for several weeks. All I could do is thank him for appreciating my work but that it's out of my hands to fix it for Ubuntu because I never was notified about that it's included there, and wouldn't know at all who to contact therefore. They are really investing time on the co-operation, If they were, why would there be so much fuss about it? Again, speaking for myself, I haven't noticed such a thing for myself, and there wouldn't be the need for utnubu if there were, don't you think so? they are creating tools to help this. What are the Debian people doing, they are bitching about Ubuntu people not putting their backs in to it. Why should I pull something from Ubuntu? And find most of the time that there isn't anything to pull? Why does it work for Debian that Debian notifies its Upstream Developers, but not for Ubuntu to notify its Upstream Developers, which in this case is Debian? I don't mean that there is no effort on Debian side either, but the visible effort (mostly because stunts like this) is mostly on the burning side. And not even that seems to make them show that there is something going wrong. So what *shrugs* It takes less effort to bitch and moan than to work together, maybe that's the reason. I ask you: Why should I try to work together with someone who didn't had at least the sign of coursey to notify people they base their work on about what they are doing, or at least _that_ they are doing it? If I don't know that they are doing it, why should I get the idea about that it might be a good idea to work with them? I know what of my packages are in Debian, and everyone can get a list quite easily through several different interfaces. In the mail this fuss is all about there is only one huge list which does have only package names, no maintainer, no nothing that allowes for easy usage of that list. It might be useful for people maintaining one single package, but for people with 10 or more it's getting annoying to have to pull the data out from there So long, Alfie -- Die Angabe des vollständigen Realnamens erleichtert die Kommunikation im Usenet ungemein, man kann sich dann nämlich auf die Inhalte der Postings konzentrieren und muß nicht über Sinn/Unsinn von Pseudonymen o.ä. diskutieren. (Ingo Ließegang, de.newusers.questions, 6.10.1999) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: For those who care about lesbians
Russ Allbery writes: Er, I thought it was offensive because it was sexist, not because there's anything wrong with being lesbian. Indeed. I think the point was a fine one, but the manner in which it was presented -- and more importantly, the fact that people are blowing right by that and arguing the point itself(!) as if this sort of thing were entirely normative(!!) -- does not reflect well on any of us. Nothing wrong with being offensive. Nothing wrong with arguing ad hominem, I suppose, if that's one of your preferred recreational activities, but take a minute to think about *how* the way you choose to be offensive reflects on your values and by extension the values of all of us as a whole. Maybe you are sexist, but be sexist on your own time. Please. I'm sure at least a couple of us besides myself consider not being sexist at least as important as not using non-free software. This is very emphatically *not* an invitation for anyone to debate with me whether or not it was sexist. Here's a bit of clue: no one outside of our little debating society is going to bother to argue the point with you either. They'll see their stereotype confirmed and they'll move on. -- things change. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apology for MIA, Retiring, RFA: x-symbol, xmix, oneko
I haven't had time for Debian in a long while - I've held on for a while because I've enjoyed working for Debian, but I don't think I'll find time again. Now I'm renovating a house and have switched to OSX, so it's time I move on. I'm truly sorry that I have neglected my packages for so long. I'd like to offer these three packages for adoption: x-symbol, xmix, and oneko. x-symbol is probably the most used of these and needs someone who knows emacsen and a little TeX. The others could probably disappear without anyone noticing. Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable)
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:00:41PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:31:17PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: and this answers IMHO what the maintainer wants a patch for: a system that would work with all download managers. Which is something it is not going to work. Huh? What's so hard about that? Cheers, aj signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Need for launchpad
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:59:23AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 09:42:22AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Um, I have said nothing against crediting maintainers in the packages. I have only said that I would like Ubuntu to clearly label which is the Debian maintainer and which is the Ubuntu maintainer. There's no Ubuntu maintainer for a specific package... packages in Universe are sometimes uploaded by several different person. [...] OK, but is listing the Debian maintainer as the only contact person appropriate? I've seem some forks of my packages in universe that I don't want responsibility for, thanks. Changing the Maintainer: field to be the MOTU list in that case seems pretty straightforward, no? Cheers, aj signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: For those who care about lesbians
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 11:03:37PM +, Brett Parker wrote: Of course, the post to d-d-a about lesbians that then goes on state Don't post irrelevant stuff here. It would be a real shame if the list had to be moderated because people can't exercise good judgement. Seems to me that you really hadn't thought about what you were posting, or where. That was not an appropriate place for the post, and you should know better. It looks to me rather like you missed the point of that mail, despite quoting it. What did you think the point was? Alternatively, what do you think is the correct mailing list for contacting (all of) the developers about appropriate use of d-d-a? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: For those who care about lesbians
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 11:24:06PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:51:03PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right at the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for this one yet. I was perfectly serious. This is merely the latest in a number of things Mr Suffield has done which are detrimental to the project in a number of ways. Some of these are not a matter of public record, so you would be unaware of them. I hope you realise that if I were the litigious type, you would be receiving a court summons in the next day or two (it's lies, btw, for those of you watching - I hope nobody bought that 'secret offenses' noise, it's like the PATRIOT act or something). The events are a recorded in the debian-private archives, which I am not permitted to reveal here. I have at no point stated anything which is untrue, and any Debian developer who wishes to verify it may look at the August 2005 archives (debian-private.200508.gz on master:~debian/archive/debian-private is the worst to date). That is not disclosable on this list. In this archive I express the opinion that just because somebody died, that does not permit random developers to go around making statements on behalf of other developers. Not even person X is sorry for your loss. Not without the permission of person X. If making a stand for simple integrity is so terrible, then colour me terrible. I do not see what is so bad about objecting to people making statements, on behalf of other people, without their permission. [Obviously I can't repost or significantly report on all the stuff people said to villify me and misrepresent my position as being anything other than the above, but it's not relevant anyway] I fail to see how expressing a simple opinion like that, which is not even an uncommon one, *on a private mailing list*, could possibly be 'detrimental to the project'. That is pure slander. If you do reply, please do so in -private. If you do reply, please do so in public. I will not stand for any more of this hiding behind unverifiable statements. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Need for launchpad
Heya Hamish, On 1/14/06, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a related note, it seems to me that the existence of the MOTU team, as non-core Ubuntu developers who are also not Debian developers, encourages more packages to be forked. Those developers can't make direct Debian uploads even if they want to; at worst they have no interest in contributing to Debian at all. Hmmm, I recall that I myself am a MOTU, and I for one have been contributing to Debian (in a very miniscule way :/) well before I got into Ubuntu. I cannot speak for my fellow MOTUs, but indeed, I follow the way of `motu proprio'[0] when it comes to contributing to Debian, to Ubuntu, and to F/OSS in general, and I also observe that others in this team feel more or less the same way. [0] `of one's own accord' -- Zak B. Elep || http://zakame.spunge.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
Accepted netatalk 2.0.3-4 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:26:43 +0100 Source: netatalk Binary: netatalk Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.0.3-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastian Rittau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sebastian Rittau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: netatalk - AppleTalk user binaries Closes: 308828 Changes: netatalk (2.0.3-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Start cnid_metad when requested by user. (Patch stolen from Ubuntu.) + debian/netatalk.init: Run cnid_metad. + Closes: #308828 cnid_metad doesn't run on startup * debian/control: Bump heimdal-dev dependency to = 0.7.1-3 to prevent build problems on mips/-el. Files: af2217e753adef3f3d2e5825433e97e4 802 net extra netatalk_2.0.3-4.dsc ffa52772c457ec73d073fac4ed22ae50 26055 net extra netatalk_2.0.3-4.diff.gz 753cae41ee5bff1e86bcd136a0b26c38 709868 net extra netatalk_2.0.3-4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyLawcU5mtElqGCcRAipLAJsGhhmSmxynSyAIyOEht3nR4SfS4ACghIxi RsmGd+PTkes1YiQTYUlVL/0= =YDP9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: netatalk_2.0.3-4.diff.gz to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.3-4.diff.gz netatalk_2.0.3-4.dsc to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.3-4.dsc netatalk_2.0.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.3-4_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted ocp 0.1.9-2.1 (source i386 all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:58:30 +0100 Source: ocp Binary: opencubicplayer-doc opencubicplayer Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.1.9-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: opencubicplayer - UNIX port of Open Cubic Player opencubicplayer-doc - Documentation for UNIX port of Open Cubic Player Closes: 346592 Changes: ocp (0.1.9-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * NMU for x-window-system-dev/xlibs-dev removal. Closes: #346592. Thanks to Justin Pryzby for calculating the necessary change. Files: c0145d7a2cc5fc10708a6bd538dda590 823 sound optional ocp_0.1.9-2.1.dsc f06624985c6429bfad0c9c07b1f51fef 20241 sound optional ocp_0.1.9-2.1.diff.gz 5bc26d8c61525617dd67644dd517b859 529294 sound optional opencubicplayer_0.1.9-2.1_i386.deb 8f40dd99764fba821de63b21cc2e1b21 42220 sound optional opencubicplayer-doc_0.1.9-2.1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG key at http://thomas.viehmann.net/ iD8DBQFDyL98riZpaaIa1PkRAsvIAJ4s5bmEUfUBZzou5za4Th7QtQbNiQCffaiY WGsO8KDit9Rdj6biEPJUJyk= =7p68 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: ocp_0.1.9-2.1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ocp/ocp_0.1.9-2.1.diff.gz ocp_0.1.9-2.1.dsc to pool/main/o/ocp/ocp_0.1.9-2.1.dsc opencubicplayer-doc_0.1.9-2.1_all.deb to pool/main/o/ocp/opencubicplayer-doc_0.1.9-2.1_all.deb opencubicplayer_0.1.9-2.1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocp/opencubicplayer_0.1.9-2.1_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted popularity-contest 1.32 (source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:56:05 +0100 Source: popularity-contest Binary: popularity-contest Architecture: source all Version: 1.32 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Popularity Contest Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: popularity-contest - Vote for your favourite packages automatically Closes: 321056 323225 325030 331438 332710 338614 340129 343688 344584 345228 347713 Changes: popularity-contest (1.32) unstable; urgency=low . [Petter Reinholdtsen] * Add variable mirrorbase to popanal.py, to make it easier to set up a new server. * Remove listing email as the transport method in the package description, and make the description independent of the method used. This reflect the new HTTP transport support. (Closes: #321056) * Update the FAQ to better reflect the support for HTTP submissions. * popcon-upload-ubuntu: Replace ubuntulinux.org with ubuntu.com. Patch from Colin Watson and Ubuntu. * Correct use of 'su' in cron-script. (Closes: #331438) * Make it possible to get popcon to only report using HTTP. Patch from Vagrant Cascadian. (Closes: #325030) * Added debian/compat to set debhelper compatibility level to 4, and remove debian/conffiles as it is no longer needed. * Let popcon-submit.cgi pipe incoming reports through prepop.pl instead of saving it directly to disk, to make sure the same sanity checks are done for both HTTP and SMTP reports. Thanks to Bill Allombert for pointing out the risks of the old approach. . [Bill Allombert] * Fix server-side scripts to use the Packages.gz files instead of the Packages file. . [Mohammed Adnène Trojette] * Translations: - Updated Romanian by Eddy Petrisor. (Closes: #323225) - Updated Swedish from Daniel Nylander. (Closes: #332710) - Updated Tagalog from Eric Pareja. (Closes: #338614) - Updated Danish from Morten Brix Pedersen. (Closes: #340129) - Updated Korean from Sunjae Park. (Closes: #343688) - Updated Greek from George Papamichelakis. (Closes: #344584) - Updated Catalan from Aleix Badia i Bosch. (Closes: #345228) - Updated Turkish from Recai Oktas. (Closes: #347713) . [Christian Perrier] * Translations: - Added Punjabi translation by Amanpreet Singh Alam - Updated Dutch translation by bart Cornelis Files: a80ca6d952ace9d36e6aa2e50789af11 654 misc optional popularity-contest_1.32.dsc 027838926eb0e4acda76c8957bc074a5 63671 misc optional popularity-contest_1.32.tar.gz 8e8439eaa9ba7c1ed00a4e8c2533c532 55104 misc optional popularity-contest_1.32_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyL4P20zMSyow1ykRAgE3AJ9AvpwZnvhIw3M8XXHmrFsY2qh4IQCg63BT ZzIM5c9IemAJEQzFmib42lg= =6wJP -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: popularity-contest_1.32.dsc to pool/main/p/popularity-contest/popularity-contest_1.32.dsc popularity-contest_1.32.tar.gz to pool/main/p/popularity-contest/popularity-contest_1.32.tar.gz popularity-contest_1.32_all.deb to pool/main/p/popularity-contest/popularity-contest_1.32_all.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted lvm2 2.02.01-2 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:51:33 +0100 Source: lvm2 Binary: clvm lvm2-udeb lvm2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.02.01-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian LVM Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: clvm - Cluster LVM Daemon for lvm2 lvm2 - The Linux Logical Volume Manager lvm2-udeb - The Linux Logical Volume Manager (udeb) Changes: lvm2 (2.02.01-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Abort installation on kernel 2.6.12. Files: 5a289e5d0fa3c91ac63a8851bd58ee1f 769 admin optional lvm2_2.02.01-2.dsc 491890a5efba9b24078375a67550a0c8 18502 admin optional lvm2_2.02.01-2.diff.gz ce5b775b156c784f206a4fdb7bcdedfc 293258 admin optional lvm2_2.02.01-2_i386.deb c778d9417dcbacd3e708ce7704189bd7 172340 debian-installer optional lvm2-udeb_2.02.01-2_i386.udeb 1df17499ff96055b949a78afe7ddc2e4 174504 admin extra clvm_2.02.01-2_i386.deb Package-Type: udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkPIznMACgkQLkAIIn9ODhEqfQCg1osQ9d4rCTbsOPi3wvbyltng yjEAnjC3OQOD3fuOnYyvd0At5vnbkV/L =w1Mo -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: clvm_2.02.01-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lvm2/clvm_2.02.01-2_i386.deb lvm2-udeb_2.02.01-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/lvm2/lvm2-udeb_2.02.01-2_i386.udeb lvm2_2.02.01-2.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lvm2/lvm2_2.02.01-2.diff.gz lvm2_2.02.01-2.dsc to pool/main/l/lvm2/lvm2_2.02.01-2.dsc lvm2_2.02.01-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lvm2/lvm2_2.02.01-2_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted cups-pdf 2.0.3-1 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:15:32 +0200 Source: cups-pdf Binary: cups-pdf Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin-Ãric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin-Ãric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: cups-pdf - PDF printer for CUPS Changes: cups-pdf (2.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. Files: f6d3f5cf59faef010ec1faf2eb8689c3 632 graphics optional cups-pdf_2.0.3-1.dsc 83ed2288dd4122b036d2b86aefc03435 20633 graphics optional cups-pdf_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz 0ff109c4846a5b8978c7af019d1241c6 5453 graphics optional cups-pdf_2.0.3-1.diff.gz 71919e5f99d2edde698cba56a7177c8d 23420 graphics optional cups-pdf_2.0.3-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkPIyfgACgkQQKW+7XLQPLElywCeLcUbiPwn1T0wqUZbLZg/B3P6 lcEAn2hdCotngY4G5KZwaN/NwHVpZGCF =Ov97 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: cups-pdf_2.0.3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_2.0.3-1.diff.gz cups-pdf_2.0.3-1.dsc to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_2.0.3-1.dsc cups-pdf_2.0.3-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_2.0.3-1_i386.deb cups-pdf_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted cal3d 0.10.0-5 (source all i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:27:42 + Source: cal3d Binary: libcal3d11c2a libcal3d-doc libcal3d11-dev Architecture: source all i386 Version: 0.10.0-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libcal3d-doc - Skeletal based 3d character animation library - API documentation libcal3d11-dev - Skeletal based 3d character animation library - development files libcal3d11c2a - Skeletal based 3d character animation library Closes: 347798 Changes: cal3d (0.10.0-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Include static library in libcal3d11-dev (Closes: #347798). * Updated watch file. Files: d9edb7370b1eaec85553b2fae68b5c7b 601 libs optional cal3d_0.10.0-5.dsc 99b9e4d8806eca33edf6b8c9d61ce9f1 3440 libs optional cal3d_0.10.0-5.diff.gz d7cc67290265e6e4b1aae9a918ecfe4c 173724 libdevel optional libcal3d-doc_0.10.0-5_all.deb 010e0e66f08efef179164369f2cf0aa3 198434 libs optional libcal3d11c2a_0.10.0-5_i386.deb 3ce1a026f256bb70b84dfec5da7d75f1 50882 libdevel optional libcal3d11-dev_0.10.0-5_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyNwLWSOgCCdjSDsRAtPBAJ4orsJ1pBlxPs2K6CJ4oNnVQ+vkCgCeK5G8 yFd/7b9WLFCixH2bftqTTMY= =p5WM -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: cal3d_0.10.0-5.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cal3d/cal3d_0.10.0-5.diff.gz cal3d_0.10.0-5.dsc to pool/main/c/cal3d/cal3d_0.10.0-5.dsc libcal3d-doc_0.10.0-5_all.deb to pool/main/c/cal3d/libcal3d-doc_0.10.0-5_all.deb libcal3d11-dev_0.10.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cal3d/libcal3d11-dev_0.10.0-5_i386.deb libcal3d11c2a_0.10.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cal3d/libcal3d11c2a_0.10.0-5_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted postgresql-plruby 0.4.6-1 (source i386 all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:02:38 +0100 Source: postgresql-plruby Binary: postgresql-plruby postgresql-7.4-plruby Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.4.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: postgresql-7.4-plruby - Ruby procedural language for PostgreSQL postgresql-plruby - Ruby procedural language for PostgreSQL (transitional package) Closes: 346532 Changes: postgresql-plruby (0.4.6-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Build binary-independent package in binary-indep target (closes: #346532) * Changed to debhelper level 5 * Removed useless CFLAGS handling in rules Files: 03fe00e2d9c123213ff4b2b7c161aad0 672 misc optional postgresql-plruby_0.4.6-1.dsc 76c5c25de14e394d2059b59a2771bd28 123156 misc optional postgresql-plruby_0.4.6.orig.tar.gz 861a542c348e58cfad11438b516b12cd 3470 misc optional postgresql-plruby_0.4.6-1.diff.gz 821b521448bab9f6a7f230fcf8b435dc 46776 misc optional postgresql-7.4-plruby_0.4.6-1_i386.deb 27ea4b6dfbe07c7711820a19f0e8e357 4476 misc optional postgresql-plruby_0.4.6-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyM9STTx8oVVPtMYRAn7ZAKCJMVIEItYpMYoh0l18Wqpq6wvlFACgks07 jOb4TH9yUYdWzgCqUsoVZ30= =ToMO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: postgresql-7.4-plruby_0.4.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-plruby/postgresql-7.4-plruby_0.4.6-1_i386.deb postgresql-plruby_0.4.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/postgresql-plruby/postgresql-plruby_0.4.6-1.diff.gz postgresql-plruby_0.4.6-1.dsc to pool/main/p/postgresql-plruby/postgresql-plruby_0.4.6-1.dsc postgresql-plruby_0.4.6-1_all.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-plruby/postgresql-plruby_0.4.6-1_all.deb postgresql-plruby_0.4.6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/postgresql-plruby/postgresql-plruby_0.4.6.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted muse-el 3.02.6-1 (source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:22:01 -0500 Source: muse-el Binary: muse-el Architecture: source all Version: 3.02.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael W. Olson (GNU address) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael W. Olson (GNU address) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: muse-el- Author and publish projects using Wiki-like markup Changes: muse-el (3.02.6-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. Files: ec114c67d339ff7a7eef2aef784b0c6e 624 web optional muse-el_3.02.6-1.dsc 25fa528a5dae1d7a95284a14118456f0 193015 web optional muse-el_3.02.6.orig.tar.gz 9f21616e41946f4fc4a4984fb157e286 4840 web optional muse-el_3.02.6-1.diff.gz 0edce90d364cc5712955d72802ecfc42 180740 web optional muse-el_3.02.6-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyNZDogN2vsA8Vt8RAlNCAKCOszdgTiVfjbN8rPMy8Mi3He9TQQCg3kOc XeXBb6Qb1yCNqoSd4tSkPoc= =ZKxU -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: muse-el_3.02.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/m/muse-el/muse-el_3.02.6-1.diff.gz muse-el_3.02.6-1.dsc to pool/main/m/muse-el/muse-el_3.02.6-1.dsc muse-el_3.02.6-1_all.deb to pool/main/m/muse-el/muse-el_3.02.6-1_all.deb muse-el_3.02.6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/m/muse-el/muse-el_3.02.6.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted dwww 1.9.27 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:06:10 +0100 Source: dwww Binary: dwww realpath Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.9.27 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dwww - Read all on-line documentation with a WWW browser realpath - Return the canonicalized absolute pathname Closes: 336926 339547 342149 347357 Changes: dwww (1.9.27) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix FTBFS with new make (closes: #347357). * Initial translations of debconf templates: + Swedish (closes: #339547) + Portuguese (closes: #336926). * realpath.1: add reference to basename(1) and dirname(1) (closes: #342149). * menu-method: update path for install-menu program (lintian). Files: b48dacc8729a4795987d9513630acf14 505 doc optional dwww_1.9.27.dsc 52397768d7548edbc5042ec0e3e3648f 108278 doc optional dwww_1.9.27.tar.gz 93d2409cb7e76c78c64c3f0a06a35da2 104410 doc optional dwww_1.9.27_i386.deb db2a29076307bbd8019f7a1729829b5d 23986 utils optional realpath_1.9.27_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyNuDThh1cJ0wnDsRAgnGAKCFFfyxBsm1AiHw3jKGk4vS3I87jwCfeChF BqnHNaVRY7qnvnJEKsLA8VY= =xkdd -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: dwww_1.9.27.dsc to pool/main/d/dwww/dwww_1.9.27.dsc dwww_1.9.27.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dwww/dwww_1.9.27.tar.gz dwww_1.9.27_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dwww/dwww_1.9.27_i386.deb realpath_1.9.27_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dwww/realpath_1.9.27_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted libavg 0.5.3-1 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:37:39 +0100 Source: libavg Binary: python-libavg Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: python-libavg - libavg Ain't Vector Graphics Closes: 347407 Changes: libavg (0.5.3-1) unstable; urgency=low . * new upstream * switched from Magick++-config to pkg-config, closes: #347407 Files: d47a7d60ce6eb7dd45665ddef18146a2 748 contrib/python optional libavg_0.5.3-1.dsc 6a786c15939484b356be1522fa92c288 6453614 contrib/python optional libavg_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz 24fcf77f7915012f3906fa2844b1e5d5 58347 contrib/python optional libavg_0.5.3-1.diff.gz dec46a9f47e83d720fc60fcbfb8ba21f 355170 contrib/python optional python-libavg_0.5.3-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyOZCfY3dicTPjsMRAgzhAJwNZK1y3FRFLIUlIBveji2HTZDpDwCgj6Rw fvidcs9EVrurMVXg1QSD3SE= =q7NR -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: libavg_0.5.3-1.diff.gz to pool/contrib/liba/libavg/libavg_0.5.3-1.diff.gz libavg_0.5.3-1.dsc to pool/contrib/liba/libavg/libavg_0.5.3-1.dsc libavg_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/contrib/liba/libavg/libavg_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz python-libavg_0.5.3-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/liba/libavg/python-libavg_0.5.3-1_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted grap 1.36-2 (source i386 sparc powerpc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:51:58 +0100 Source: grap Binary: grap Architecture: i386 powerpc source sparc Version: 1.36-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Tobias Toedter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Tobias Toedter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: grap - program for typesetting graphs Changes: grap (1.36-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Removed Makefile from the examples/ directory. It's autogenerated and was included in the .diff.gz errorneously, because upstream does not remove it in the distclean target * New patch 30_Makefile.common.diff which does not remove the distributed documentation files in the distclean target * Added homepage URL to the description * Make sure that the location of the example files and the definition file in the man page are correct Files: 0901af299bf43ab90bbed70c0d9912cf 4665 text optional grap_1.36-2.diff.gz 59bcb068d55aa4b9a72526547b464b52 151724 text optional grap_1.36-2_i386.deb 9ca75abe735c73a54183e58d7e37c926 156272 text optional grap_1.36-2_powerpc.deb 6eab62108d61d46b5672ca0031a3a337 575 text optional grap_1.36-2.dsc dd3d596d0c399bd6a718cfde37bcf781 157162 text optional grap_1.36-2_sparc.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDxaLSwmyXkG1Pxm8RAiZPAJ9Ww8kOaqcwv4aoyOsPd5eOp4x47wCgmdUO jwMPkBWoUx3KOYAtAWsO9+8= =uWJA -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: grap_1.36-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/grap/grap_1.36-2.diff.gz grap_1.36-2.dsc to pool/main/g/grap/grap_1.36-2.dsc grap_1.36-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/grap/grap_1.36-2_i386.deb grap_1.36-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/grap/grap_1.36-2_powerpc.deb grap_1.36-2_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/grap/grap_1.36-2_sparc.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted xview 3.2p1.4-20 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 22:36:43 +0100 Source: xview Binary: xview-examples xview-clients olvwm olwm xviewg-dev xviewg Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.2p1.4-20 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: olvwm - OpenLook virtual window manager olwm - Open Look Window Manager xview-clients - XView client programs xview-examples - XView contrib programs xviewg - XView shared libraries xviewg-dev - XView development tools Closes: 294844 306713 345545 346866 347165 Changes: xview (3.2p1.4-20) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated Build-Depends - Replaced obsolete xlibs-dev with libx11-dev, x-dev. Closes: #346866 - Added libncurses5-dev to avoid virtual-only dependency * Replaced obsolete xlibs-dev with libx11-dev, x-dev in xviewg-dev's dependencies. Closes: #347165 * Fixed bad ttysw_pty_output() return value declaration * Switched from old-style BSD-ptys to UNIX98-ptys. Closes: #345545 * Switched to debhelper 5 * Minor tweaks to make lintian slightly less unhappy * Merged changes from NMU (see below). Closes: #294844, #306713 Files: fecb7841c3594c69c92ab3eff23df287 743 x11 optional xview_3.2p1.4-20.dsc c708aab84c5f23b7abd16e3bc046be87 83155 x11 optional xview_3.2p1.4-20.diff.gz 394ccad6d4104ad9e22bff6d4de26181 693896 x11 optional xviewg_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb 1219b76c1db82bebfda11ffd939d3ec8 987304 devel optional xviewg-dev_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb 8d1c20991116127c842fafa0499718c1 66624 x11 optional xview-clients_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb 2779c6a724ed09b3492145603df1e610 222516 x11 optional xview-examples_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb 6374a9cda8b6e9fd389bb6bf46022267 137512 x11 optional olwm_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb 1d6daa7fa7f3c42019248552a611c3de 197970 x11 optional olvwm_4.4.3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyN6h5na4Z/jVQlkRAqD9AJ9zcKJRo2VLFSyem8UZkwIliFcnkACfY84n f0UHwhqBGuXIHefsf+0o8dA= =nGEc -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: olvwm_4.4.3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xview/olvwm_4.4.3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb olwm_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xview/olwm_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb xview-clients_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xview/xview-clients_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb xview-examples_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xview/xview-examples_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb xview_3.2p1.4-20.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xview/xview_3.2p1.4-20.diff.gz xview_3.2p1.4-20.dsc to pool/main/x/xview/xview_3.2p1.4-20.dsc xviewg-dev_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xview/xviewg-dev_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb xviewg_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xview/xviewg_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted whitelister 0.6-2 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:06:19 +0100 Source: whitelister Binary: whitelister Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: whitelister - a Postfix Whitelister daemon Closes: 347893 Changes: whitelister (0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Update archs that have ocamlopt (closes: #347893). Files: 4e17effac03b6dd2e55bd7c6fa2250d4 715 mail optional whitelister_0.6-2.dsc 5ca5552cae3cbbb13171dcf6024da4a3 3244 mail optional whitelister_0.6-2.diff.gz e707fc2bccc9d0d7b798f9499d63b979 109850 mail optional whitelister_0.6-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyO+mvGr7W6HudhwRAt0xAKCitYlhdw2G9alq3vcvJxnUlamr8QCeMqY1 jnbxqaxt5sCsPLM1jU2DwX4= =WIKM -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: whitelister_0.6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.6-2.diff.gz whitelister_0.6-2.dsc to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.6-2.dsc whitelister_0.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.6-2_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted wmtemp 0.0.5-4 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:22:10 +0100 Source: wmtemp Binary: wmtemp Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.0.5-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Lars Steinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Lars Steinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: wmtemp - WM dock applet displaying lm_sensors temperature values Changes: wmtemp (0.0.5-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Fixed Build-Depends for xlibs-dev transition using xlibs-split-check and objdump (closes #346882). Files: 15719bebcdb8325ff530d3bdc3db5700 626 x11 optional wmtemp_0.0.5-4.dsc 91c3a880e0d7ba75b8ca593bafe7be2b 1893 x11 optional wmtemp_0.0.5-4.diff.gz 0a531f946cafb336bb153351258f569b 13988 x11 optional wmtemp_0.0.5-4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyPvCzOw49aNnnBYRAhqXAJ9fJi2A45g9Hp7fUFZ+chovWv+wUACeMoi8 KKpQH+gKgq6chyZfHjPgnkk= =51hj -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: wmtemp_0.0.5-4.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wmtemp/wmtemp_0.0.5-4.diff.gz wmtemp_0.0.5-4.dsc to pool/main/w/wmtemp/wmtemp_0.0.5-4.dsc wmtemp_0.0.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/w/wmtemp/wmtemp_0.0.5-4_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted bugsx 1.08-8 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:08:50 +0100 Source: bugsx Binary: bugsx Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.08-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: bugsx - evolve biomorphs using genetic algorithms Closes: 346628 Changes: bugsx (1.08-8) unstable; urgency=low . * Change build-dependancy on xlibs-dev to libx11-dev, since the former was removed from the archive. (closes: 346628) Files: 76489391b39ecc90e229b488fc35ce5a 571 math optional bugsx_1.08-8.dsc d46fa2eedac3f7f797740baa5462a766 2059 math optional bugsx_1.08-8.diff.gz c2fd19c0df8faad92bdeca8a647ea953 331256 math optional bugsx_1.08-8_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyPq5Og2KoGD0EhYRAvdRAJ9nmUEfky5+lDsDacif1/YT9Mc0RACfd0pH xx4keXduZUT8c5iFOzLHfVA= =jYbB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: bugsx_1.08-8.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-8.diff.gz bugsx_1.08-8.dsc to pool/main/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-8.dsc bugsx_1.08-8_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-8_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted wmtemp 0.0.5-3 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:10:52 +0100 Source: wmtemp Binary: wmtemp Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.0.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Lars Steinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Lars Steinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: wmtemp - WM dock applet displaying lm_sensors temperature values Changes: wmtemp (0.0.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Fixed lintian warning concerning format of menu entry. Files: a595dda4d962244c85abf907eefcf1b4 625 x11 optional wmtemp_0.0.5-3.dsc d513227ab456b3a45f8a353a6367c00e 1832 x11 optional wmtemp_0.0.5-3.diff.gz 28ade63609c0b3d512b312f84c21b53e 13912 x11 optional wmtemp_0.0.5-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyPiXzOw49aNnnBYRAtJBAKC89suzb/7us3EFNndi3vAguY5mvgCgr7Aj maBquL8Xeb9W0jncJkB+g8A= =xdmV -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: wmtemp_0.0.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wmtemp/wmtemp_0.0.5-3.diff.gz wmtemp_0.0.5-3.dsc to pool/main/w/wmtemp/wmtemp_0.0.5-3.dsc wmtemp_0.0.5-3_i386.deb to pool/main/w/wmtemp/wmtemp_0.0.5-3_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted xmotd 1.17.3b-2 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:34:11 +0100 Source: xmotd Binary: xmotd Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.17.3b-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xmotd - a message of the day browser for X Closes: 346766 Changes: xmotd (1.17.3b-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Replaced build-dependancy on xlibs-dev with libxmu-dev, libxpm-dev, libxt-dev, as suggested by xlibs-split script, closes: Bug#346766 Files: c47286c39d6d031bdb65b424289d6575 626 x11 optional xmotd_1.17.3b-2.dsc 5115f895ea0c328e0f7115b5f6a03a12 4684 x11 optional xmotd_1.17.3b-2.diff.gz d977a60be70eb70d8e0c02d0d555df58 23764 x11 optional xmotd_1.17.3b-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyQAsOg2KoGD0EhYRAgAIAJ9qiK2srzUzAbsCgs8i22WH3S2IDwCeMoHJ w61P9tDaazIEbrTec3zZrCU= =W0+E -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: xmotd_1.17.3b-2.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xmotd/xmotd_1.17.3b-2.diff.gz xmotd_1.17.3b-2.dsc to pool/main/x/xmotd/xmotd_1.17.3b-2.dsc xmotd_1.17.3b-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmotd/xmotd_1.17.3b-2_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted xemacs21 21.4.18-2 (source all i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:35:29 +0900 Source: xemacs21 Binary: xemacs21-gnome-mule xemacs21-mule xemacs21-bin xemacs21-gnome-nomule xemacs21-supportel xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn xemacs21-support xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn xemacs21 xemacs21-nomule Architecture: source all i386 Version: 21.4.18-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OHURA Makoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: OHURA Makoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xemacs21 - highly customizable text editor xemacs21-bin - highly customizable text editor -- support binaries xemacs21-gnome-mule - highly customizable text editor -- Mule binary xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn - highly customizable text editor -- Mule binary compiled with Cann xemacs21-gnome-nomule - highly customizable text editor -- Non-mule binary xemacs21-mule - highly customizable text editor -- Mule binary xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn - highly customizable text editor -- Mule binary compiled with Cann xemacs21-nomule - highly customizable text editor -- Non-mule binary xemacs21-support - highly customizable text editor -- architecture independent suppo xemacs21-supportel - highly customizable text editor -- non-required library files Closes: 346847 Changes: xemacs21 (21.4.18-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Set urgency=medium to fix FTBFS problem. * debian/control.in: - Fix Build-Depends: for transition of xlibs-dev. (Closes: #346847). - Add libgpmg1-dev to Build-Depends: field. Files: 9019c176839ce50bac7ba1756bfa0484 1134 editors optional xemacs21_21.4.18-2.dsc 41907d64584877b7f29f38f9fbebc340 69264 editors optional xemacs21_21.4.18-2.diff.gz 88ef6fb4930e3caa136e11dc2657d0e6 14034 editors optional xemacs21_21.4.18-2_all.deb 834609837d0d9a13364939735a1fd195 1291638 editors optional xemacs21-supportel_21.4.18-2_all.deb a9e4f0053cef4cb837fd33fbbbd2f00e 4573788 editors optional xemacs21-support_21.4.18-2_all.deb 48e4b811a0d42a1359ca379054f0cadf 1842602 editors optional xemacs21-nomule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb 311c43119ec3d01209d1763953939dc8 2096852 editors optional xemacs21-mule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb fab91d27652055d8a088b7267847d4de 2189644 editors optional xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.18-2_i386.deb e23b861b70210671c93ed13817128b6b 1882148 gnome optional xemacs21-gnome-nomule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb 5f6bae61a29f3e559ba3e1e99cfe0743 2134232 gnome optional xemacs21-gnome-mule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb af5ced64eb8b3559e3ee855f2a54b50b 2221274 gnome optional xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.18-2_i386.deb e0d6d6d377d1e9a838185f4665a3cd62 492814 editors optional xemacs21-bin_21.4.18-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyP537qLvonfc4IMRAhFQAKCn5F/ZQ4PVj1nvydwDttlIz+44fACfVeIo W/7Z+lY1ORJ/8WbKYydlsjE= =59nd -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: xemacs21-bin_21.4.18-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-bin_21.4.18-2_i386.deb xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.18-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.18-2_i386.deb xemacs21-gnome-mule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-gnome-mule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb xemacs21-gnome-nomule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-gnome-nomule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.18-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.18-2_i386.deb xemacs21-mule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-mule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb xemacs21-nomule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-nomule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb xemacs21-support_21.4.18-2_all.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-support_21.4.18-2_all.deb xemacs21-supportel_21.4.18-2_all.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-supportel_21.4.18-2_all.deb xemacs21_21.4.18-2.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21_21.4.18-2.diff.gz xemacs21_21.4.18-2.dsc to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21_21.4.18-2.dsc xemacs21_21.4.18-2_all.deb to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21_21.4.18-2_all.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted gajim 0.9.1-3 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2006 07:33:07 +0100 Source: gajim Binary: gajim Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Yann Le Boulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Yann Le Boulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gajim - Jabber client written in PyGTK Closes: 346452 Changes: gajim (0.9.1-3) unstable; urgency=low . * fix migration bug with python2.3 Closes: #346452 * Handle correctly notification-daemon 0.3.x Files: 3f56d6c5c43b5cfed1ff2b01de8d03f6 658 net optional gajim_0.9.1-3.dsc a796b7b8f1ff65048f402793d53f5f63 6614 net optional gajim_0.9.1-3.diff.gz 357ae8a84f3320087716b0a557d79ba2 1891928 net optional gajim_0.9.1-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyQlnt1anjIgqbEsRAunVAJ9POdSjySYsPclsUfzfBIGuNb1cTQCgoG65 DwhWAvBLQkzMXa6DY4+VgeA= =Ooqx -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: gajim_0.9.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gajim/gajim_0.9.1-3.diff.gz gajim_0.9.1-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gajim/gajim_0.9.1-3.dsc gajim_0.9.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gajim/gajim_0.9.1-3_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted cowdancer 0.10 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:28:03 +0900 Source: cowdancer Binary: cowdancer Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: cowdancer - Copy-on-write directory tree utility. Changes: cowdancer (0.10) unstable; urgency=low . * fixed pthread race condition. Files: 62d42524a569c954051edbaa1714c49d 495 utils optional cowdancer_0.10.dsc 7745b50f220553dcae3504f2575dbe0c 29686 utils optional cowdancer_0.10.tar.gz 25e7a3f6da7c4f8fde3270b10128d765 15886 utils optional cowdancer_0.10_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyQgD2Dd9TugeVcERAq0JAJ9u+Fp5zKeTV+YQxVTuVk7dSu8FCwCcCdy5 bdI+jhCRXNf+h3YaQP26x+o= =bod1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: cowdancer_0.10.dsc to pool/main/c/cowdancer/cowdancer_0.10.dsc cowdancer_0.10.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cowdancer/cowdancer_0.10.tar.gz cowdancer_0.10_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cowdancer/cowdancer_0.10_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted proxsmtp 1.3-1 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:38:53 +0100 Source: proxsmtp Binary: proxsmtp Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: proxsmtp - multi purpose SMTP Proxy Changes: proxsmtp (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. * Urgency set to medium since the new release addresses a lot of potentially critical problems in a mail queue. Files: 2560538a24a90dd37432954569c5eaff 582 mail optional proxsmtp_1.3-1.dsc ed488f2444f3796af44eaa92d4fa477e 188684 mail optional proxsmtp_1.3.orig.tar.gz 2328d8c07f2f51bee1b06d7331bfef23 2822 mail optional proxsmtp_1.3-1.diff.gz dc7140bb7546fb87fdbb49552dccd6b2 31344 mail optional proxsmtp_1.3-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyQ1wvGr7W6HudhwRAk4xAJ9hNq5GtjxHZsxqMT//IFhrySEE7wCdG8mB 13QUZWQ8ppWSnbsaL5DNJvU= =C7TH -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: proxsmtp_1.3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/proxsmtp/proxsmtp_1.3-1.diff.gz proxsmtp_1.3-1.dsc to pool/main/p/proxsmtp/proxsmtp_1.3-1.dsc proxsmtp_1.3-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/proxsmtp/proxsmtp_1.3-1_i386.deb proxsmtp_1.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/proxsmtp/proxsmtp_1.3.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted wmfsm 0.34-10 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:40:46 +0100 Source: wmfsm Binary: wmfsm Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.34-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Arthur Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Arthur Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: wmfsm - WindowMaker dock app for monitoring filesystem usage Closes: 346889 347639 Changes: wmfsm (0.34-10) unstable; urgency=low . * configure: rebuild with autoconf 2.59a-7 to fix tests for X11 libraries, closes: #347639, #346889 Files: ccea2e54732c73df18368d24f726d8a6 613 utils optional wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc b5d0b4042985cbea93334da5d6579448 53134 utils optional wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz ed11beec0a8a9c92b683db6614960f97 15604 utils optional wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyQ3KNgpsykSg/LgRA8mpAJ0S+CJxtwg7M8XxH4JmW8wqNW0qSwCfS27W YGILczX+kkaAkAAdb1/xqBM= =bCIB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted libgpepimc 0.5-1 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:18:48 + Source: libgpepimc Binary: libgpepimc0-dev libgpepimc0 Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Moray Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Moray Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libgpepimc0 - category management for GPE applications [runtime] libgpepimc0-dev - category management for GPE applications [development] Changes: libgpepimc (0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. Files: 39181ece20bb2c81778e6cfe3d9d8165 699 libs optional libgpepimc_0.5-1.dsc 1632e66d29236cb95b415a61d4c526b3 332339 libs optional libgpepimc_0.5.orig.tar.gz a119a67860b378d35fdeb9bf7ae77cbe 1480 libs optional libgpepimc_0.5-1.diff.gz 3b8fe1dc86adcbfff19b52457b13b7b2 9236 libdevel optional libgpepimc0-dev_0.5-1_i386.deb 3f0c0c0b9ad143a50d41e19a6ee5fdc3 10530 libs optional libgpepimc0_0.5-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyQzE500puCvhbQERAqDjAJ470u8vjofENscZGDvalmocb3dnygCfalm0 Z7fH6Ey8gVR5rfA1UJ1ArI8= =vwNO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: libgpepimc0-dev_0.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgpepimc/libgpepimc0-dev_0.5-1_i386.deb libgpepimc0_0.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgpepimc/libgpepimc0_0.5-1_i386.deb libgpepimc_0.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgpepimc/libgpepimc_0.5-1.diff.gz libgpepimc_0.5-1.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgpepimc/libgpepimc_0.5-1.dsc libgpepimc_0.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libg/libgpepimc/libgpepimc_0.5.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted ipmasq 4.0.6 (source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:56:46 +0900 Source: ipmasq Binary: ipmasq Architecture: source all Version: 4.0.6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: ipmasq - securely initializes IP Masquerade forwarding/firewalling Closes: 309389 347606 Changes: ipmasq (4.0.6) unstable; urgency=low . * Added problem of using 'ip' command (iproute package) to README.Debian. (closes: #309389) * Updated Swedish debconf po file. (closes: #347606) Files: f7aa45090ace038031094d59896c6d11 506 net extra ipmasq_4.0.6.dsc 1539f2ccc02af516963c2746db264762 55152 net extra ipmasq_4.0.6.tar.gz cd95bc2dabcdb290738120627f416a78 76720 net extra ipmasq_4.0.6_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyROX6A/EwagGHzIRAsmaAJ4tFRDtAvuB3NYWGjKnNf9ARq9cJQCeJKUp F7zZRGK9AFrs3kGx6vTuj+U= =6P1i -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: ipmasq_4.0.6.dsc to pool/main/i/ipmasq/ipmasq_4.0.6.dsc ipmasq_4.0.6.tar.gz to pool/main/i/ipmasq/ipmasq_4.0.6.tar.gz ipmasq_4.0.6_all.deb to pool/main/i/ipmasq/ipmasq_4.0.6_all.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted whitelister 0.7-1 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:53:42 +0100 Source: whitelister Binary: whitelister Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: whitelister - a Postfix Whitelister daemon Changes: whitelister (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. Files: b333bd5189e2c68b45c8e3e499c994a7 715 mail optional whitelister_0.7-1.dsc b4676ecf80309366c388e17d85f493df 16667 mail optional whitelister_0.7.orig.tar.gz 2fb1674ef20d400f3e37569e927bc806 2718 mail optional whitelister_0.7-1.diff.gz 5fc7c3efb4fbc8039a2c18654cb5f6c0 110496 mail optional whitelister_0.7-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyRCHvGr7W6HudhwRAt4fAJ9GClGPn3qObxHjMswoxLkpzElNDQCfTrH4 hXyTf2WP6FpKzreCJkkcVnU= =eqav -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: whitelister_0.7-1.diff.gz to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.7-1.diff.gz whitelister_0.7-1.dsc to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.7-1.dsc whitelister_0.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.7-1_i386.deb whitelister_0.7.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.7.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted whitelister 0.7-2 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:10:59 +0100 Source: whitelister Binary: whitelister Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: whitelister - a Postfix Whitelister daemon Changes: whitelister (0.7-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix upstream bug : group/user inversion in server.ml. Files: 58b9d744a3f8c463492b2e5e71f5cb59 715 mail optional whitelister_0.7-2.dsc 288afae7c63f1b5728cd383ef2e1b138 2871 mail optional whitelister_0.7-2.diff.gz 9e8d5bf30629525a87b750303bf83d1b 110534 mail optional whitelister_0.7-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyRSevGr7W6HudhwRAkUwAKCgO1DeuEZQem6Yaxj6gEhZYvfZTgCfXV6u ewfLaqgv5wTXVflbjJahCYE= =/Tl/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: whitelister_0.7-2.diff.gz to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.7-2.diff.gz whitelister_0.7-2.dsc to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.7-2.dsc whitelister_0.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/w/whitelister/whitelister_0.7-2_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted svn-arch-mirror 0.4.3-1 (source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:09:28 -0800 Source: svn-arch-mirror Binary: svn-arch-mirror Architecture: source all Version: 0.4.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Eric Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Eric Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: svn-arch-mirror - one-way mirroring from Subversion to Arch revision control Closes: 327324 Changes: svn-arch-mirror (0.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream version, fixes svn 1.2.0 compatibility problem. Closes: #327324 * Updated standards version to 3.6.2.2 Files: fb99bdf1ad8df89fb5b6ad9fe9efe056 557 devel optional svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3-1.dsc c7fdefa218ef573feb112256719da8c2 116964 devel optional svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3.orig.tar.gz 55f9c8e3c5b6f86137a777f95ed501b5 2464 devel optional svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3-1.diff.gz 3fd1e217063e0fee1e8b041da776b904 31344 devel optional svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyRei7ftwBTcVV3gRAqvsAJ4sX46lugcUQFxk276PDk1hjDGA0QCffM8c KQqvN2G8wpCEETXGqddAGa8= =udMY -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/svn-arch-mirror/svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3-1.diff.gz svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3-1.dsc to pool/main/s/svn-arch-mirror/svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3-1.dsc svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/svn-arch-mirror/svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3-1_all.deb svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/svn-arch-mirror/svn-arch-mirror_0.4.3.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted autopsy 2.06-2 (source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:42:09 +0100 Source: autopsy Binary: autopsy Architecture: source all Version: 2.06-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Lorenzo Martignoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Lorenzo Martignoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: autopsy- graphical interface to SleuthKit Closes: 344965 Changes: autopsy (2.06-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Patched autopsy executable to add warning when it is not run as root (Closes: #344965) Files: 0021d193cdf6c163f8a41fc721b2800a 591 admin optional autopsy_2.06-2.dsc 81247b78adc7ff8a64912b1533af63a2 8111 admin optional autopsy_2.06-2.diff.gz 58f0151a6408a6e2d6345db6527a8344 377174 admin optional autopsy_2.06-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyRjbbFctcIsUOXURAtKKAKCwWJ2oQaygFcBGDqznDzpHi+8/RgCgh4VR 5ZPAQdybwEQmD1kVM6R+BtU= =ztTo -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: autopsy_2.06-2.diff.gz to pool/main/a/autopsy/autopsy_2.06-2.diff.gz autopsy_2.06-2.dsc to pool/main/a/autopsy/autopsy_2.06-2.dsc autopsy_2.06-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/autopsy/autopsy_2.06-2_all.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted xfmedia 0.9.1-3 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:28:22 + Source: xfmedia Binary: xfmedia-dev xfmedia Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jani Monoses [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xfmedia- Xfce media player xfmedia-dev - The Xfmedia development files Changes: xfmedia (0.9.1-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Bump dbus dep to 0.60 and add patch to fix building against it. * Add myself to Uploaders field Files: efdf4a44699fdc7a041e2c43849743be 993 sound optional xfmedia_0.9.1-3.dsc b9e1434e7b36ed0f608261cf3fef2b4a 4639 sound optional xfmedia_0.9.1-3.diff.gz cb4d7c4ab434aea080bc3fb8c27d1621 580400 sound optional xfmedia_0.9.1-3_i386.deb 8a5676fe186c8b80dc99db4989e5193b 50658 devel optional xfmedia-dev_0.9.1-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyQviMQdl+99c4rQRAgoXAJ48v+c9wdtHTapNbiBWzAjbY3y9FQCfZn2S oyzLQgFfqytp8d1hq1MTbfI= =RhJF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: xfmedia-dev_0.9.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfmedia/xfmedia-dev_0.9.1-3_i386.deb xfmedia_0.9.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xfmedia/xfmedia_0.9.1-3.diff.gz xfmedia_0.9.1-3.dsc to pool/main/x/xfmedia/xfmedia_0.9.1-3.dsc xfmedia_0.9.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfmedia/xfmedia_0.9.1-3_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted bbkeys 0.9.0-4 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:04:22 -0300 Source: bbkeys Binary: bbkeys Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bruno Barrera C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Bruno Barrera C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: bbkeys - A key-grabber for any NETWM/EMWH-compliant window manager Closes: 346635 Changes: bbkeys (0.9.0-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Removed xlibs-dev as dependency (closes: #346635) Files: 613b46084cd41654ba953457328b1d43 582 x11 optional bbkeys_0.9.0-4.dsc c56601b8ded80821bf8dc689d2248662 3571 x11 optional bbkeys_0.9.0-4.diff.gz d66df8dcb531d00096e9256823ece355 148312 x11 optional bbkeys_0.9.0-4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyRO/f+2upy2F5boRAi/0AJ9hJSON8sMbhmyQjsJwWUN+/Gt9zACfTxRL af++gCRCHFM4Dy0Z0bBvkg8= =ZvYc -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: bbkeys_0.9.0-4.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bbkeys/bbkeys_0.9.0-4.diff.gz bbkeys_0.9.0-4.dsc to pool/main/b/bbkeys/bbkeys_0.9.0-4.dsc bbkeys_0.9.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bbkeys/bbkeys_0.9.0-4_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted localechooser 1.02 (source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:26:04 +0100 Source: localechooser Binary: localechooser Architecture: source all Version: 1.02 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: localechooser - choose language/country/locale (udeb) Changes: localechooser (1.02) unstable; urgency=low . * Change the default locale for Esperanto to eo as planned by the locales maintainers * Change the name of console-terminus fonts for languages using them * Change prebaseconfig to install console-terminus when the consolefont name contains Terminus Files: f594e51e426aeaba902f280ea1ccd5f4 736 debian-installer optional localechooser_1.02.dsc 028e0323ab7891814e93ae4813338b0c 82794 debian-installer optional localechooser_1.02.tar.gz 18683abe113389a9c0cb0ed211b8018e 90040 debian-installer optional localechooser_1.02_all.udeb Package-Type: udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDySGc1OXtrMAUPS0RAg1NAJ9v5vyhfnCmZy9qwKA5RfcpC9gZawCfdPNw 5gr6pY+Kkiy73nET3fndco8= =/2hT -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: localechooser_1.02.dsc to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.02.dsc localechooser_1.02.tar.gz to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.02.tar.gz localechooser_1.02_all.udeb to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.02_all.udeb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted pstngw 1.3.1-6 (source i386)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:07:22 + Source: pstngw Binary: pstngw Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3.1-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: pstngw - H.323 to PSTN gateway Closes: 347940 Changes: pstngw (1.3.1-6) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix clean target when run with sudo instead of fakeroot. (Closes: #347940) Files: 91c1141cb7ed993e57395c368f1e7e16 819 comm optional pstngw_1.3.1-6.dsc d7cf417b37b1eff013be8cbbd669e570 10116 comm optional pstngw_1.3.1-6.diff.gz db4f5c9ba8ab6ba45eb50d54e7d37dde 63016 comm optional pstngw_1.3.1-6_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDySKNvdkzt4X+wX8RAlHjAJ40wBdqLhE+DpMX8vhU/J3Tf2mHqACeNIWv hh7EVIFYxXsBdWX153UVsHk= =3NZq -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: pstngw_1.3.1-6.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pstngw/pstngw_1.3.1-6.diff.gz pstngw_1.3.1-6.dsc to pool/main/p/pstngw/pstngw_1.3.1-6.dsc pstngw_1.3.1-6_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pstngw/pstngw_1.3.1-6_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
