On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:34:51PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > can easily spot the holes in it. Likewise, a proposal that Ubuntu > developers should put their changes into Debian instead sounds simple, but > to an Ubuntu developer is obviously impractical.
Could you elaborate on this? It's not obvious to me at all why more changes couldn't be pushed through Debian and automatically into Ubuntu. (I apologise if I read your quote out of context.) On a related note, it seems to me that the existence of the "MOTU" team, as non-core Ubuntu developers who are also not Debian developers, encourages more packages to be forked. Those developers can't make direct Debian uploads even if they want to; at worst they have no interest in contributing to Debian at all. thanks, Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
