Re: Bug#95975: mutt: doesn't use charset anymore
On Sat, 5 May 2001 10:57:43 -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Just use LC_CTYPE=de_DE. It'll work fine in mutt. (The problem is, if I remember correctly, that X uses ISO8859-1, without the first dash.) Ok, but now I am confused... LC_CTYPE=de_DE LANG=de_DE LC_MESSAGES=C Should give me german umlauts and the prompts/messages should still be like before, right? Do I really not have to set ISO-8859-1 somewhere? Alexander -- Hackers confuse Xmas (25 Dec) with Halloween (31 Oct) Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - KOCH1-RIPE
Re: why dig ? I wanna use nslookup !
On Wed, 2 May 2001 13:39:17 +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote: See http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/faq/tinydns.html#nslookup f.e. djbdns? you really mean it? *brrzzzap* Suprise, you're dead. [1] EOT anyone? [2] Regards, Alexander [1] I happen to like that song... [2] Mutt has scoring abilities, right? djb sux, so... thanks for the idea -- Head, wall. Wall, head. THUNKTHUNKTHUNKTHUNKTHUNKTHUNKTHUNK. Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - KOCH1-RIPE
Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager
On Wed, 2 May 2001 06:57:50 -0500, Martin Michlmayr wrote: ... and that's exactly why I've created mia-history (pandora:/org/qa.debian.org/mia) 79 summary files... Hmh. Regards, Alexander -- UNIX is easy to use. UNIX is not necessarily easy to learn. Learn the difference. Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - KOCH1-RIPE
Re: apt maintainers dead?
On Mon, 8 January 2001 04:15:10 +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: method will result in the immediate termination of public rsync access to our servers. I think that is something to be discussed. As I said before, I expect the rsync + some features to produce less load than ftp or http. Goswin, please ask someone who is granting anon rsync access and why they fear it. You can wreck the server so easily... Alexander
Re: RBL report..
On Wed, 29 March 2000 14:31:50 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: This is deliberately removed, we had some problems a year or so ago with the received lines getting too long for some mailers. We are looking at putting them back. There are some sites out there that have a limit of 15 and you are able to reach above 15. Heh, the daily listmaster box is fun when someone subscribes with a yahoo.com address that gets forwarded to iname (argh!) which is brought to some ISP in .fr and then there comes a completely fscked fetchmail config that is bouncing every single mail without the self-made admin knowing it, complaining why he got unsub'ed by me after 50 bounces. scnr. I say we go for it and it worth a try. Stay tuned. Alexander, believing in random sigs instead -- Tech support is a fine art which, once mastered, virtually ensures loss of sanity. Joe Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
Re: RBL report..
On Thu, 30 March 2000 05:53:20 -0500, Eric Weigel wrote: If you're stuck with a service provider who has a crappy mail service, and/or who has your IP listed on the DUL, I'll offer a solution. Also uucp over tcp/ip is offered for quite a small monthly charge at cid.net, have whatever hostname you want to have. That service is in Germany, but see after uucp.cid.net for a traceroute, it should be rather well- connected (although nacamar sux big rocks from time to time). Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have any questions. Alexander -- Don't think about it. It just works. Grace alone knows why. -- me, in despair... Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
Re: RBL report..
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:02:23PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Alexander Koch wrote: DUL is interesting. I changed my mind on that. I rather say we use it since the amount of spam is certainly increasing the last weeks and DUL is understandable. Yes there is more spam, but I've been looking and I haven't seen that much (if any at all) would be blocked by DUL. I personally think the DUL is most harmless RBL and the most legitimate (bad wording probably) for use. And if it only catches on spam a week it is worth it, methinks. I do not have the exact figures, unfortunately. Alexander
Re: RBL report..
On Wed, 29 March 2000 01:57:45 -0800, Joseph Carter wrote: I'm not the only person here who thinks so. Make Debian use all the blacklists you want. You'll find users and developers dropping like flies. If everything else fails, this is the best argument to bring up, really. Tell me why I should listen to you. It's the way of argueing and (probably) not shouting and what not. You are making a fool of yourself for bringing up this argument, but that is just me. btw - if you really need to find a smarthost that is working well I doubt you have to search for a long time. Mail is not just mail and I can imagine many specials for those like you that need a decent smarthost. It is just the right configuration on a random MTA, all can do it. There are possibilities, after all. But I will not argue with you like before. pmyp. Alexander -- Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity. Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
Re: RBL report..
On Wed, 29 March 2000 12:42:14 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: Joseph's arguments, while occasionally strident, are not foolish. I find it interesting that his opponents devolve into name calling and obscenity. You can read? Sure, you can. I tried to explain some point to him on irc but I failed, no talk seemed possible. Every word is one word too much, there is no point in ppl saying do this and I will leave as will many others and that was what was making me angry. Have your way, I do not care anymore, let us keep it as it is, no sweat. Damn, I am so lucky not living in the States, we do not have such problems over here in stoneage Europe. ;- Really, I have underestimated your strong-mindedness, I can think and you have more than one point. But it has to do with the continents, methinks. EOT, now. Thanks, Alexander -- Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
Re: RBL report..
On Tue, 28 March 2000 17:03:56 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: That roughly matches my experience - ORBS blocks far too much to use in Did anyone say above.net? ORBS swamped Germany half a year ago with mails, some big ISPs are still in the ORBS database for 1000+ business customers are not really easy to control. They gave one week to fix it all and that was a bad joke. It was found out afterwards there was a port scan for some thousands of host by some .dk ppl. Bad luck, sure, but the XXX with them, imnsho. DUL is interesting. I changed my mind on that. I rather say we use it since the amount of spam is certainly increasing the last weeks and DUL is understandable. Craig? Alexander -- Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
Re: spamblocking the lists
On Wed, 8 March 2000 15:28:37 -0500, Joe Block wrote: So sign on with multiple addresses and set all but one nomail. It's ludicrous to subject everyone to spam just to make things convenient for a minority of users, especially if a fix exists that only those people affected by the spamblock will have to implement. nomail is not possible with smartlist, is it? Alexander -- CosmicRay heh, Nat Torkington says Perl's internals are an interconnected mass of livers and pancreas and lungs and little sharp pointy things and the occasional exploding kidney. Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
Re: Debian recommended software
On Sat, 2 October 1999 15:13:12 +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote: exim has its own filter facility, that is easier to understand and use by new users. Yep. And what is needed by procmail is the following: Transport-wise: |local_delivery: | driver = pipe | command=/usr/bin/procmail | umask=0022 (This can be enhanced with a required_files = ~/:~/.procmailrc or any such things (needing the procmail binary itself, the other transport (the old local_delivery) can still be in there) And the localuser director should be enhanced (take two of them, one running for procmail, the other after that running for normal delivery). -- Mark, do you think it is possible to add procmail support to exim? Should not be much of a problem. Edward list server: smartlist Edward Needs modifications to exim.conf found on the www.exim.org homepage to Edward function well. I use smartlist myself, but I heard others (like mailman) are better. The Exim list uses mailman IIRC. Yep. There is a nice mail from Nigel on setting up mailman, should be available in the exim-users lists archive. Alexander -- Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
Re: A few changes
On Fri, 24 September 1999 09:12:31 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: This is all very well, except for those of us who email from work, and have their PGP key at home... Best point of all. At work even on a private box my co-workers also have root on it. I don't dare having my private key there... Alexander -- Lies, damn lies, and computer documentation. Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
Re: aterm packages ?
On Wed, 15 September 1999 22:30:03 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: Didn't somebody ITP aterm? What's the status on that? Samuel Hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] did package aterm (after sending an ITP). He asked me to upload his package since he is not a maintainer yet. However, there were a couple of problems so I did not upload the first version. A new version should be soon available. What about these packages in Incoming? -- master ~/incoming $ ls -l aterm* -rw-r--r-- 1 plundis Debian 3272 Aug 23 09:03 aterm_0.3.6-3.diff.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 plundis Debian611 Aug 23 09:03 aterm_0.3.6-3.dsc -rw-r--r-- 1 plundis Debian990 Aug 23 09:03 aterm_0.3.6-3_i386.changes -rw-r--r-- 1 plundis Debian 149092 Aug 23 09:03 aterm_0.3.6-3_i386.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 plundis Debian 288682 Aug 24 13:54 aterm_0.3.6.orig.tar.gz -- If it's out-dated or broken, it should be deleted? Alexander -- Who wants to live forever if true love has to die? -- Freddy Mercury Brian May Alexander Koch - - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
glibc 2.1 and apache
Hello. Short question: Does anyone of you have experienced apache forking children that do not get killed again after a period of time? We have 70+ processes on _ (/server-status) and this is unusual, to say the least. It happened after an update to the latest glibc in potato where it was glibc 2.0 before. It's a hand-made apache built with the debian diff. Is there a difference? Should I recompile apache? Alexander -- Please Cc when replying on the lists Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Intent to package sniffit
Hello. I am about to package sniffit since it has been orphaned and wnpp also says it is free. Now if nobody is working on it already I will take it. Alexander -- The books that the world calls immoral are the books that show the world it's own shame. -- Oscar Wilde Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: Hardcore baby!!! Yeah!!!!
On Thu, 28 January 1999 11:33:46 -0800, Oscar Levi wrote: [ pathetic attempt at sex spam snipped ] Can we PLEASE enforce our spam policy and make these people pay for their crimes against humanity? [..] There is something missing from the header. I'd guess that qmail is supressing it. Usually, we can see the name (IP) of the sending host in the headers. It is being cut from the mails before being sent out. It is on murphy somewhere and I simply lack the time to even read the debian lists at all right now (I am down to ~ 3k mails unread from about 9k yesterday). This will change in the near future (moving is no fun). Alexander, 1/3 of [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Heute nacht war mir fuenf Minuten langweilig... -- Gabriel Krabbe Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main
On Fri, 16 October 1998 20:38:57 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't realize that the author of mutt-i was a US resident (I don't use mutt at all, myself). Some time ago (can't remember any version numbers) the PGP version was hacked by Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] right after the normal version came out. Right now Michael Elkins has a job enslaving (sp?) him to use a Mickeysoft OS any he doesn't have the time for much of the former codings any more. Thomas Roessler is the keeper of the source at the moment. Perhaps Roland Rosenfeld can ask him what he thinks of it? Alexander -- The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again: but already it was impossible to say which was which (George Orwell, The Animal Farm, very last sentence) Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main
Hi Roland. On Sat, 17 October 1998 10:36:48 +, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: I don't understand, what the Author (Michael Elkins) or the current Maintainer of the upstream version (Thomas Roessler) have to do with us (Debian) offering their program on our US ftp servers. I meant it'd be nice to ask them... nothing more. ,-)) And if they would (have) object(ed), that should have a certain .. influence on the decision besides *any* export and crypto stuff. When we mean, that this is illegal, we should move dpkg-buildpackage to non-US, because this calls pgp, too... *grin* Your point. Alexander -- The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again: but already it was impossible to say which was which (George Orwell, The Animal Farm, very last sentence) Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: What Bruce had to say about non-Pixar names. Re: what's after slink
On Sat, 17 October 1998 11:10:10 -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: john I'd still like to use penguins. Indeed, that was the best proposal yet. Hmh.. no. ,-) I prefer comics and things like that.. argh, so to say. :-) Alexander -- Matthias needs someone to smack him upside with an iron cluebat, several times. -- Joseph Carter ... Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: Contacting authors
On Thu, 8 October 1998 00:07:26 +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Re spam: I'd like to make it optional so it does not have to be used but only should. Each pkg. maintainer could negotiate with the upstream author about this feature and not use it if the author doesn't like that. That's what I meant yesterday evening. If we ask and the author gives an ack, this is ok, but some will think of just spam and the like and deny this. We would have an incomplete package-base at authors.debian.org, then... Alexander -- In einem Meer von Schmerz ertrinken die einen, die anderen lernen darin schwimmen (Kyrilla Spiecker) Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: exim really does need to be the standard MTA in slink
On Wed, 7 October 1998 12:12:10 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: Just curious how you know this since when I telnet to their relay hosts they are very non-descript about what they run. Exim-users. And a certain news hierachy with some bofhish guys in it. Did I mention psi.uk.com, btw? Alexander -- to hell with int(h)el(l) Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: Contacting authors
Hi Joey. What do you think about it? Will it produce more mail to the authors? Will *they* like it? Besides that, it's at least useful. Alexander -- Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany pgpnc62DE5VwG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: what's after slink
On Mon, 5 October 1998 19:52:23 +1000, Russell Coker wrote: Posh... After 5 more releases of Debian the Spice girls will be history and we can name versions after their replacements! Please, don't. Alexander -- Video killed the radio star ... then the Shite Girls killed the rest. Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: Switch to perl-5.005_02 ?
On Mon, 5 October 1998 13:24:56 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Yes, if we do nothing for slink then we will have to make perl5.005 (and all perl package after 5.005) conflict with a list of 35 package with precise version. Yep. Seems more of a hassle to me. Perl 5.005 is stable. If we use basic Perl 5 I don't see any reason it should not work and I'd really like to know what known problems there probably are. We're not talking about threaded perl here, that may become an additional package. Alexander -- When we're born, we cry that we are come / To this great stage of fools. (Shakespeare, King Lear) Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: Switch to perl-5.005_02 ?
[snip] Now. Who comes up with a Perl 5.005_02 for experimental? I'd like to run it against the walls to see if it does anything not-so-nice or something. Alexander -- Heute nacht war mir fuenf Minuten langweilig... -- Gabriel Krabbe Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany
Re: How about using bzip2 as the standard *.deb compression format?
On Fri, 2 October 1998 22:25:35 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: It'd STILL be nice to be able to use bzip2 for package source on REALLY BIG packages (Mozilla, X) I agree. It'd be fine for now if it's supported and then you can still decide to use it for your own packages. You won't install X or mozilla on boxes with, say, 4 megs of RAM, right? ;-) Just a thought. Alexander -- - Real programmers don't document. Documentation is for simps who can't read the listings of the object deck. Alexander Koch - - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hannover - Germany pgpB7yk5907Kn.pgp Description: PGP signature
compile probs, glibc, satlink.c (Planetc Feed)
Hiya. I've a Planetc satfeed and there's a module satlink.c (.o respectively) which doesn't want to compile w/ glibc. No prob with that, I added a -I/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/ to the gcc call and it compiled. I've installed the libc5-altdev beforehand and the libc5 and hopefully this is enough. Now... I've a custom 2.0.33 kernel (not the Debian kernel- source package). I've altered the links from /usr/include/asm/ and /usr/include/linux/, of course. I'm compiling it and whenever I try to insmod satlink.o it tells me it was compiled for 2.0.32 and that doesn't match the actual kernel. I've that module version information thing switched on in the kernel (which should help, since it says it allows me to use modules compiled for another kernel version). Now... what did I do wrong? Any help is appreciated... Thanks a lot, Alexander -- SGH Internet Division Alexander Koch, Administration Waldstr. 36, 30163 Hannover eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon: +49 511 391088, Fax +49 511 391307, http://www.sgh-net.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Uploaded perl 5.003.07-11 (source i386) to master
On Thu, May 07, 1998 at 11:27:46AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Version: 5.003.07-11 Distribution: stable Urgency: high [..] It is a real upload. It's a security fix for our stable release. Uploads into stable may only fix security problems and should not introduce new upstream releases. Acute dainbramage... stable as in oh, that's bo - right? Sorry. Alexander -- SGH Internet Division Alexander Koch, Administration Waldstr. 36, 30163 Hannover eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon: +49 511 391088, Fax +49 511 391307, http://www.sgh-net.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
