Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-19 Thread Avery Pennarun
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:49:54AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:

 Quoting Tom Lees ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
  While I'm at it, *PLEASE* drop the dependency of lilo on mbr. I don't want
  a new mbr eg if I want to install LILO to use on a floppy ONLY (I use
  GRUB on my HD). Change it to Recommends. mbr being a high priority and/or
  essential (can't remember if it is) should be enough.
 
 Can someone explain what the point of mbr is? Why not just install lilo
 directly to the mbr? (I always go back and do this for security reasons
 anyway: I've disabled floppy boot in the bios, why do I want an mbr
 that re-enables it?)

Wow!  Maybe I'm an idiot, but I just _now_ (after literally years of
wondering) realized where that silly 1FA: message was coming from.  I had
thought it was some kind of weird debugging feature of some BIOSes!

1FA looks like a hexadecimal number.  I know MBR has to be small, but can we
at least put in some commas, eg. 1,F,A: ?

Furthermore, I think it should be made abundantly clear, somewhere obvious,
that you have to set the active partition when you install Debian.  I've
always been a pure-LILO user, and LILO ignores the active setting.  Not
understanding mbr, I've always gone through on my Debian systems and changed
lilo to use /dev/hda instead of /dev/hda1, because otherwise my system
wouldn't boot automatically to Linux.  I know it's my own sheer
incompetence, but I would have appreciated a warning message about this
somewhere.

Have fun,

Avery



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-18 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:49:54AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
 Quoting Tom Lees ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
  While I'm at it, *PLEASE* drop the dependency of lilo on mbr. I don't want
  a new mbr eg if I want to install LILO to use on a floppy ONLY (I use
  GRUB on my HD). Change it to Recommends. mbr being a high priority and/or
  essential (can't remember if it is) should be enough.
 
 Can someone explain what the point of mbr is? Why not just install lilo
 directly to the mbr? (I always go back and do this for security reasons
 anyway: I've disabled floppy boot in the bios, why do I want an mbr
 that re-enables it?)

Well, if you install Windows 95 after installing LILO in the mbr,
LILO is gone and you'll have to get out a floppy to boot Linux. If you put
LILO in the boot sector (superblock?) instead, you just have to change
the active partition again using Windows FDISK.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.   http://hamish.home.ml.org



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-18 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Gertzfield)  wrote on 16.10.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  Brent == Brent Fulgham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Brent I'd like to chime in -- It's a real annoyance that the base
 Brent disks don't set up lilo to let you boot into multiple
 Brent operating systems.  Couldn't it ask if you want to
 Brent dual-boot with windows, or whatever, and generate an
 Brent appropriate lilo.conf file?

 Sure. How about you write the script to do so?

What happened to the old lilo QuickInst or however it was named? I think I  
used that when installing my first (Slackware) Linux, and I believe saw it  
under /usr/doc/lilo not so long ago. ISTR it doing a decent job of  
implementing this - or maybe my memory is faulty?


MfG Kai



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-17 Thread Tom Lees
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
  Brent == Brent Fulgham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Brent I'd like to chime in -- It's a real annoyance that the base
 Brent disks don't set up lilo to let you boot into multiple
 Brent operating systems.  Couldn't it ask if you want to
 Brent dual-boot with windows, or whatever, and generate an
 Brent appropriate lilo.conf file?
 
 Sure. How about you write the script to do so?

While I'm at it, *PLEASE* drop the dependency of lilo on mbr. I don't want
a new mbr eg if I want to install LILO to use on a floppy ONLY (I use
GRUB on my HD). Change it to Recommends. mbr being a high priority and/or
essential (can't remember if it is) should be enough.

 Brent This is an area where RedHat has a significant lead over
 Brent us.  One of the guys I work with is a huge RedHat fan
 Brent because he can just pop a RH CD into the drive, windows
 Brent will autorun it, and RedHat install starts.  It sets up
 Brent almost everything for the user.
 
 If RH has released this code under the GPL, then why don't we borrow
 it for our use? I know that it's as simple as having an 'autorun'
 directory on the CD image.

IIRC there is an autorun.cfg or similar too.

 Brent I know we support far more configurations, etc. etc. etc.,
 Brent but for the average Joe New-User this is a large hurdle.
 
 I'm sure Enrique is always happy to accept code to do so. :)

Just out of interest, how does the autorun bit work? You can't just run
loadlin straight from Windoze.

-- 
Tom Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/
PGP Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/pgpkeys.asc.



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-17 Thread Michael Stone
Quoting Tom Lees ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 While I'm at it, *PLEASE* drop the dependency of lilo on mbr. I don't want
 a new mbr eg if I want to install LILO to use on a floppy ONLY (I use
 GRUB on my HD). Change it to Recommends. mbr being a high priority and/or
 essential (can't remember if it is) should be enough.

Can someone explain what the point of mbr is? Why not just install lilo
directly to the mbr? (I always go back and do this for security reasons
anyway: I've disabled floppy boot in the bios, why do I want an mbr
that re-enables it?)

Mike Stone



1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-16 Thread Duncan Thomson
i've seen postings about this before, but as yet no solution (either as a 
message or in the boot disks).

when debian is made bootable from the hard disk on certain systems, the prompt 
1FA: comes up, but the system will not boot off partition 1.  the disk 
controller is AHA-2940.  any solutions to this problem?

 -duncan   



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-16 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 09:18:23AM +, Duncan Thomson wrote:
 i've seen postings about this before, but as yet no solution (either as
 a message or in the boot disks).
 
 when debian is made bootable from the hard disk on certain systems, the
 prompt 1FA: comes up, but the system will not boot off partition 1.
 the disk controller is AHA-2940.  any solutions to this problem?

Where does it stops? Does it shows the typical LI message?

--
Enrique Zanardi[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-16 Thread Ben Gertzfield
Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 09:18:23AM +, Duncan Thomson wrote:
  i've seen postings about this before, but as yet no solution (either as
  a message or in the boot disks).
  
  when debian is made bootable from the hard disk on certain systems, the
  prompt 1FA: comes up, but the system will not boot off partition 1.
  the disk controller is AHA-2940.  any solutions to this problem?
 
 Where does it stops? Does it shows the typical LI message?

Enrique, the problem is that our special mbr tool *REQUIRES* that
one of the partitions on your drive be marked Bootable under cfdisk
or fdisk.

However, the current boot-floppies do not require this; in fact, they
don't even check if any partitions are marked Bootable or not.

I suggest you add a test (I'm not sure how you would do it) to see if
the partition LILO is to go on is marked bootable by cfdisk before you
let the user leave the partitioning step.

Ben

-- 
Brought to you by the letters Y and P and the number 1.
Nerd. Loser. Jerk. Moron. Worm. Scum. Idiot. Fool. -- Pkunk, SCII
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-16 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 10:11:05AM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
 Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
  On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 09:18:23AM +, Duncan Thomson wrote:
   i've seen postings about this before, but as yet no solution (either as
   a message or in the boot disks).
   
   when debian is made bootable from the hard disk on certain systems, the
   prompt 1FA: comes up, but the system will not boot off partition 1.
   the disk controller is AHA-2940.  any solutions to this problem?
  
  Where does it stops? Does it shows the typical LI message?
 
 Enrique, the problem is that our special mbr tool *REQUIRES* that
 one of the partitions on your drive be marked Bootable under cfdisk
 or fdisk.
 
 However, the current boot-floppies do not require this; in fact, they
 don't even check if any partitions are marked Bootable or not.
 
 I suggest you add a test (I'm not sure how you would do it) to see if
 the partition LILO is to go on is marked bootable by cfdisk before you
 let the user leave the partitioning step.

Currently, that partition is marked as bootable just after installing
LILO and mbr (first a dialog is displayed asking the user if he wants
it so, something like If you want the Debian system to boot
automatically from the hard disk when you turn your system on, answer
yes to the following question. If you have another operating system
that you'd prefer to be the one that boots automatically, answer no.).

--
Enrique Zanardi[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-16 Thread Brent Fulgham
I'd like to chime in --

It's a real annoyance that the base disks don't set up lilo to let you
boot into multiple operating systems.  Couldn't it ask if you want to
dual-boot with windows, or whatever, and generate an appropriate lilo.conf
file?

This is an area where RedHat has a significant lead over us.  One of the
guys I work with is a huge RedHat fan because he can just pop a RH CD
into the drive, windows will autorun it, and RedHat install starts.  It sets
up
almost everything for the user.

I know we support far more configurations, etc. etc. etc., but for the
average
Joe New-User this is a large hurdle.

-Brent
-Original Message-
From: Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Duncan Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED];
debian-devel@lists.debian.org debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, October 16, 1998 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks


Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 09:18:23AM +, Duncan Thomson wrote:
  i've seen postings about this before, but as yet no solution (either as
  a message or in the boot disks).
 
  when debian is made bootable from the hard disk on certain systems, the
  prompt 1FA: comes up, but the system will not boot off partition 1.
  the disk controller is AHA-2940.  any solutions to this problem?

 Where does it stops? Does it shows the typical LI message?

Enrique, the problem is that our special mbr tool *REQUIRES* that
one of the partitions on your drive be marked Bootable under cfdisk
or fdisk.

However, the current boot-floppies do not require this; in fact, they
don't even check if any partitions are marked Bootable or not.

I suggest you add a test (I'm not sure how you would do it) to see if
the partition LILO is to go on is marked bootable by cfdisk before you
let the user leave the partitioning step.

Ben

--
Brought to you by the letters Y and P and the number 1.
Nerd. Loser. Jerk. Moron. Worm. Scum. Idiot. Fool. -- Pkunk, SCII
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow?
http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-16 Thread Martin Schulze
Brent Fulgham wrote:
 I'd like to chime in --
 
 It's a real annoyance that the base disks don't set up lilo to let you
 boot into multiple operating systems.  Couldn't it ask if you want to
 dual-boot with windows, or whatever, and generate an appropriate lilo.conf
 file?

This would be nice.  Brent, could you checkout the boot disks and try to
implement it?

Regards,

Joey

-- 
The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media.  -- H. Peter Anvin



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-16 Thread Ben Gertzfield
 Enrique == Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Enrique Currently, that partition is marked as bootable just
Enrique after installing LILO and mbr (first a dialog is
Enrique displayed asking the user if he wants it so, something
Enrique like If you want the Debian system to boot automatically
Enrique from the hard disk when you turn your system on, answer
Enrique yes to the following question. If you have another
Enrique operating system that you'd prefer to be the one that
Enrique boots automatically, answer no.).

Please, make this warning much, much stronger. If mbr is installed at
all, their system will become unusable if they do not say yes at this
point.

So, if the user does select 'yes' for installing mbr, please tell
them that if they say no at this point, they will be rendering
their system pretty much unbootable (unless they can figure out
the cryptic MBR prompts.)

Either that, or tell the truth at this point:

At this point, the Debian installer must mark one of your partitions
as 'bootable' so that the MBR tool you selected to install can know
which partition to boot by default.

Ben

-- 
Brought to you by the letters Y and M and the number 3.
It's cold.. and there are wolves.. -- Grampa Simpson
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.



Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-16 Thread Ben Gertzfield
 Brent == Brent Fulgham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Brent I'd like to chime in -- It's a real annoyance that the base
Brent disks don't set up lilo to let you boot into multiple
Brent operating systems.  Couldn't it ask if you want to
Brent dual-boot with windows, or whatever, and generate an
Brent appropriate lilo.conf file?

Sure. How about you write the script to do so?

Brent This is an area where RedHat has a significant lead over
Brent us.  One of the guys I work with is a huge RedHat fan
Brent because he can just pop a RH CD into the drive, windows
Brent will autorun it, and RedHat install starts.  It sets up
Brent almost everything for the user.

If RH has released this code under the GPL, then why don't we borrow
it for our use? I know that it's as simple as having an 'autorun'
directory on the CD image.

Brent I know we support far more configurations, etc. etc. etc.,
Brent but for the average Joe New-User this is a large hurdle.

I'm sure Enrique is always happy to accept code to do so. :)

Ben

-- 
Brought to you by the letters R and V and the number 12.
Moshimoshi. Kikoemasu ka? Kakenaoshimasu kara ne! 1-do kitte kudasai.
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.