Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386
I got a bug report stating that there is no i386 build for procps. First I'm not really sure that's how bug reports work, but anyhow. There doesn't seem to be a publically available i386 Debian machine that supports building packages. This makes it nearly impossible to support that architecture because I need to see what is going wrong. I actually think the problem is something quirky with the specific builder host, but have no way of knowing this. The reason is that multiple versions of procps have been build and this 6-line change for the latest did not touch the failed program or has anything to do with it (the fix was for sysctl, the failure was in ps). The problem seems to be the SCHED_BATCH scheduler didn't appear or apply to program. - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint:5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140224201024.ga22...@enc.com.au
Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386
Craig Small csm...@debian.org (2014-02-25): I got a bug report stating that there is no i386 build for procps. First I'm not really sure that's how bug reports work, but anyhow. #739874 should have been called a failure to build from source (FTBFS), and could have linked to [1], but anyhow. 1. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=procpssuite=sid There doesn't seem to be a publically available i386 Debian machine that supports building packages. This makes it nearly impossible to support that architecture because I need to see what is going wrong. https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi says barriere is a porter box, and as an amd64 host, it provides with amd64 and i386 chroots. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386
* Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org, 2014-02-24, 23:16: I got a bug report stating that there is no i386 build for procps. First I'm not really sure that's how bug reports work, but anyhow. #739874 should have been called a failure to build from source (FTBFS), and could have linked to [1], but anyhow. 1. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=procpssuite=sid Or even better, to the actual build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=procpsarch=i386ver=1%3A3.3.9-3stamp=1392895618 I just hope you didn't mean to say that only perfect bug reports are welcome these days, and those merely good are somehow frowned upon. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140224210111.ga9...@jwilk.net
Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org (2014-02-24): I just hope you didn't mean to say that only perfect bug reports are welcome these days, and those merely good are somehow frowned upon. No, I wasn't sure what Craig was not sure about, that's why I tried to connect the dots with the usual FTBFS bug reports developers might be (more?) familiar with. (http://blog.zouish.org/posts/comtips/ etc.; looks like I failed, but I'll keep trying.) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:06:56AM +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote: No, I wasn't sure what Craig was not sure about, that's why I tried to connect the dots with the usual FTBFS bug reports developers might be (more?) familiar with. You guessed right, I understood what you meant and got a way forward; thanks! - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint:5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140224214859.gd9...@enc.com.au
Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:16:23 -0500 (EST), Cyril Brulebois wrote: #739874 should have been called a failure to build from source (FTBFS), and could have linked to [1], but anyhow. 1. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=procpssuite=sid I apologize, Mr. Brulebois, if I did not use correct terminology in my bug report. I am neither a DD, nor a DM, just an ordinary Debian user. I reported the symptoms as observed by an ordinary user. Besides, I was able to build the package binaries myself using dpkg-buildpackage on an i386 machine, once I managed to get the 1:3.3.9-3 source code downloaded and extracted with dpkg-source. In other words, on my machine at least, I did not get a FTBFS error. -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/416886484.16131.1393295228447.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:27:08PM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: and extracted with dpkg-source. In other words, on my machine at least, I did not get a FTBFS error. It looks like its something strange on that particular pbuilder. The problem is that barriere is even stranger and the programs won't compile due to a header clash that has never been seen before. It seems libc6-dev 2.18 has introduced a new define which clashes with something top has. /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/bits/waitflags.h:53:3: note: previous definition of 'P_PID' was here This small problem gets bigger each day. - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint:5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140225065217.ga10...@enc.com.au
