Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-01-30 Thread Nathanael Nerode
  so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
  Is the procedure described above still the right one?
 
 DAM is very slow-moving these days.  Probably they haven't looked at your 
mail 
 yet.

Um, just in case anyone was wondering, that wasn't intended as a criticism of 
DAM -- I think it's slowmoving mostly due to having a heavy workload on two 
people who already do a lot of other work -- but I just realized that it 
might have come off as a criticism.  I was just trying to inform the emeritus 
developer that DAM was probably a lot slower now than it was back when he (or 
she) was an active developer, when DAM probably had a lighter workload.

And I liked the clarivoyant joke, but as far as I can tell, I'm not, so no 
need to fast-track me on that account. :-)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-01-27 Thread Joe Smith


Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?


Umm... I belive that is the policy. He needs to have his email read, and 
then answer a few questions.
The process for returning emeritus Developers is intentionaly much easier 
than normal NM, as they
obviously were able to pass once before, so now the only important thing is 
to check that they still remember.






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-01-27 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 10:22 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
 Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?
 
 Umm... I belive that is the policy. He needs to have his email read, and 
 then answer a few questions.
 The process for returning emeritus Developers is intentionaly much easier 
 than normal NM, as they
 obviously were able to pass once before, so now the only important thing is 
 to check that they still remember.

Too bad that this has to be explained: Adeodato jokingly suggested that
Nathanael appearently knows why the mail wasn't answered and must be a
clairvoyant (he can predict what happens at the DAM without being a
DAM). Being a clairvoyant, Nathanael is a great asset to the project and
should be fast-tracked. This has nothing to do with the original poster,
who, IMO, is just a bit too impatient.


Thijs


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-01-26 Thread Nathanael Nerode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] over a week
 ago, as described here:
 
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/02/msg3.html
 
 so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
 Is the procedure described above still the right one?

DAM is very slow-moving these days.  Probably they haven't looked at your mail 
yet.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-01-26 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Nathanael Nerode [Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:42:35 -0500]:

 Probably they haven't looked at your mail yet.

  Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
 
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there
is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy with the proof.
-- J.K. Galbraith


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



returning emeritus developer, no response from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-01-25 Thread Britton Kerin

I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] over a week
ago, as described here:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/02/msg3.html

so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
Is the procedure described above still the right one?

Thanks,
Britton
-- 
  Britton Kerin
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]