Bug#204711: libc6: PAM broken, login impossible, possibly NIS related
At Tue, 12 Aug 2003 21:17:41 +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:22:39PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: Hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:27:48PM -0400, Terry Katz wrote: I just had to downgrade from libc6 2.3.2-2 to 2.3.1-17, due to the same reasons reported previously.. su, ssh and proftpd reported: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info.. I backed out all the nss/nis changes that happened around 2003-06-25 (see attached dpatch) and with that recompiled glibc nis semms to work again. That's no real solution but might show where the problem is. It seems my last patch didn't mail didn't make it to the BTS, maybe because the patch was too big. It's now up at: http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/linux-mips/glibc/patches/experimental/nss.dpatch I can put up glibc packages with this patch if someone wants to try them. Does this patch bring back to old NSS behavior (2.3.1) ? It's worth building and testing it on the trouble user machine :) Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204930: libc6: can't install - seg.-fault
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-16 Followup-For: Bug #204930 Hallo, I can't install libc6-2.3.2. I get for every command only seg-fault, therefor I had to do a hardreset, boot from recovery system and to install an libc6 2.3.1. I can't give you more information, because i can't start any program with libc 2.3.2. ciao stefan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux neuburg 2.5.68 #1 Mon May 5 20:21:18 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP
I used to run MISCONFIG alot and just recently had to leave computer in shop overnight to replace card. Now I don't have MISCONFIG file. How do I get it back? Can I download it and how? I am not paying microsoft my hard earned money to answer a question -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205325: glibc: please add strnatcmp / strnatcasecmp
On 14 Aug 2003, Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: glibc Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-14 Severity: wishlist Hi there, I'm surprised there isn't already something similiar to strnatcmp in glibc URL: http://sourcefrog.net/projects/natsort/ but both functions would certainly be usable. The license appear to allow for the inclusion of both functions, so hopefully this isn't a huge to deal to get included. glibc has strverscmp(). The algorithm is similar but not quite the same. You might still argue for including strnatcmp but it's probably not worthwhile. The glibc maintainers might (?) want it to be internationalized/wcharized if it was going to be merged. The strnatcmp licence was necessary to merge it into Apache, which is not possible with the GNU implementation. Regards, -- Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 205383 to libc6,samba
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 205383 libc6,samba Bug#205383: Samba dos charset=CP932 fails after upgrade Bug reassigned from package `libc6, samba' to `libc6,samba'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#205110: scp -p doesn't work since a recent ssh update(1.3.6.1p2-4?)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 205110 important Bug#205110: scp -p no longer preserves modification time Severity set to `important'. merge 205110 202243 Bug#202243: utimes() broken Bug#205110: scp -p no longer preserves modification time Merged 202243 205110. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#205383: Samba dos charset=CP932 fails after upgrade
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 205383 libc6, samba Bug#205383: Samba dos charset=CP932 fails after upgrade Warning: Unknown package 'libc6-2.3.2-2' Warning: Unknown package 'samba-3.0.0beta2-1' Bug reassigned from package `libc6-2.3.2-2, samba-3.0.0beta2-1' to `libc6, samba'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204691: libc6: stacksize is too small
At Sat, 09 Aug 2003 22:06:14 +0200, Alexander Bussman wrote: Well, I don't know if it has to be closed because I know the previous version of glibc in sid worked flawless. So, it's not stacksize related issue, is it? And what is transgaming's WineX? Is it free software? At least from your report, we got limited information, and I think stacksize issue is not bug. Regards, -- gotom GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sat, 09 Aug 2003 13:49:41 +0200, Alexander Bussman wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: normal Some programs requires larger stacksize for example transgaming's WineX. (1) Such program is broken. (2) You should change stacksize limit with ulimit/limit. I close this bug, ok? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: default CPU target for ix86 based ports
At 08 Aug 2003 13:40:42 +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:35, GOTO Masanori wrote: So how to act for two bugs?: #203322: python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during postinst on sparc32 #203324: libc6: __strtod_internal fails with illegal instruction on sparc32. Keeping them as Critical is not acceptable for me, if you guys don't provide any usable information, I simply close or downgrade. It seems fairly clear that the SPARC porters consider use of hwmul to be a feature, not a bug. I think we should close these two reports. OK... now I've closed them. For SPARC soft-mul guys, please discuss this issue, but not simply reopen this bug. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#198099: Downgrade
severity 198099 wishlist retitle 198099 Please make localedef support PAX thanks Hi, BR downgraded as requested by its submitter. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204768: FTBFS (unstable) glibc fails to build on m68k, arm, mips, mipsel
At Sat, 09 Aug 2003 17:42:34 -0600, Adam Conrad wrote: glibc fails to build from source on m68k, arm, mips, and mipsel with the following error: -- gcc-3.3 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futimes.c -c -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Winline -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -fstrict-aliasing -g -pipe -I../include -I. -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2/m68k-linux/obj/misc -I.. -I../libio -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2/m68k-linux/obj -I../sysdeps/m68k/elf -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread -I../sysdeps/pthread -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/m68k -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/m68k/m68020 -I../sysdeps/m68k/fpu -I../sysdeps/m68k -I../sysdeps/wordsize-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-96 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -n ostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.3.1/include -isystem /usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.20-m68k/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symbols.h -o /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2/m68k-linux/obj/misc/futimes.o -MD -MP -MF /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2/m68k-linux/obj/misc/futimes.o.dt ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futimes.c: In function `__futimes': ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futimes.c:40: warning: implicit declaration of function `memcpy' ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futimes.c:57: error: `NULL' undeclared (first use in this function) ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futimes.c:57: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futimes.c:57: error: for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2/m68k-linux/obj/misc/futimes.o] Error 1 It's fixed in 2.3.2-3. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204958: Leave it alone option in fresh install breaks future upgrades of locales
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: normal Setting up locales (2.3.2-2) ... Generating locales... Leave.alone...cannot open locale definition file `Leave': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 4 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux vee.cavokintl.com 2.4.21 #1 Fri Aug 8 09:08:59 CDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages locales depends on: ii debconf 1.3.8 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.2-2] 2.3.2-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information: * locales/default_environment_locale: C * locales/locales_to_be_generated: Leave alone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.3.2-2 mips(el) build failure
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 17:53, Guido Guenther wrote: the mips build fails due to the missing patch I posted in: http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2003/debian-glibc-200307/msg00154.html I'd look into why other archs don't need this but my broken laptop currently leaves me a bit dead in the water. Yeah, arm had the same problem. I think gotom is preparing a new version. p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204696: locales dependency on libc6 of the same version breaks building packages
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: important, maybe serious At least in the changelog I don't see an entry that the dependency on glibc-2.3.2-2 with the same Debian release number is actually needed. Please decouple this tight dependency. It breaks at least building all packages which run a testsuite with locale dependent tests. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#184048: [m68k] binutils testsuite failures built in a glibc-2.3.1 environment
[CC to Andreas] GOTO Masanori writes: At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:08:24 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: [CCing m68k, if the new results look acceptable] GOTO Masanori writes: Hi Matthias, At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.1 Severity: grave Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5). Although I cannot prove that other build depedencies of binutils are the cause of this failures, I start with glibc as the moist obvious one ... I recompiled binutils 2.14.90.0.5-0.2 on m68k with my test built glibc 2.3.1-1 (2003-07-08 cvs) + gcc 2.95. The result is: [...] === ld Summary === # of expected passes172 # of unexpected failures3 # of untested testcases 9 I don't know number of unexpected failures or untested testcases in ld summary is acceptable or not. How to act for this bug report? the current results (included in the binutils m68k package): === ld Summary === # of expected passes173 # of unexpected failures10 # of expected failures 1 this looks definitely better than with 2.3.1. Exactly. Well, your original report ts-2.13.90.0.18.2-gcc-2.95 has no unexpected failures, though... but fewer testcases as well ... FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC, load offset) these three did pass with glibc-2.3.1 and glibc-2.2.3, the second one did pass with glibc-2.3.1, but not with glibc-2.2.3. Andreas, do we need to care about these failures? Do you have results with the same configuration, but compiled using current gcc? No, I didn't try to build binutils with the current gcc. I think glibc 2.3.2-2 is installed in m68k within a few weeks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#203322: marked as done (python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during postinst on sparc32)
Your message dated Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:41:52 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line default CPU target for ix86 based ports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2003 11:38:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 29 06:37:54 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sith.frs.linpro.no [64.28.20.155] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19hSnh-00043G-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 06:37:53 -0500 Received: from hnh by sith.frs.linpro.no with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19hRuf-0001Zp-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:41:01 +0200 From: Harald Nordgard-Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during postinst on sparc32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Harald Nordgard-Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:41:01 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PENISACCENT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: python2.2 Version: 2.2.3-3 Severity: critical When performing the compileall step of postinst, python2.2 from sid fails with illegal instruction. This also happens when starting among other things reportbug, and on importing some of the files in /usr/lib/python2.2 (audiodev.py, copy.py just to name a couple). -Harald Nordgård-Hansen -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux sith 2.4.21-rc2 #1 Thu May 22 10:48:47 CEST 2003 sparc GNU/Linux Versions of the packages python2.2 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libdb4.1 4.1.25-5 Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [runtime] ii libncurses55.3.20030719-1 Shared libraries for terminal handling ii libreadline4 4.3-5 GNU readline and history libraries, run-time ii libssl0.9.70.9.7b-2 SSL shared libraries ii python 2.2.3-3An interactive high-level object-oriented la ii zlib1g 1.1.4-14 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 203322-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2003 06:41:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 09 01:41:55 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19lNQH-0005EQ-00; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:41:53 -0500 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BC3C33C6; Sat, 9 Aug 2003 15:41:52 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:41:52 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: default CPU target for ix86 based ports In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) At 08 Aug 2003 13:40:42 +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:35, GOTO Masanori wrote: So how to act for two bugs?: #203322: python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during postinst on sparc32 #203324: libc6: __strtod_internal fails with illegal instruction on sparc32. Keeping them as Critical is
Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
And they say that 'this problem is due to our compiler not supporting glibc 2.3 yet.' A fix is in the works, apparently. Duraid -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:gotom time: Sat Aug 9 00:02:35 MDT 2003 Log Message: - goes to 2.3.2-3. - debian/patches/80_glibc232-futimes-buildfix.dpatch: Fix build failure on arm, mips, mipsel, due to be missing #include string.h. Files: changed:0list added: 80_glibc232-futimes-buildfix.dpatch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204706: How come it works on other distos.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:09:14AM +0200, Robert Lindgren wrote: If you say it's not supposed to work on Debian, why does win4lin work on Gentoo? They have been running 2.3.2 far longer than Debian. 2.3.2-2 is not glibc 2.3.2 but more like current CVS. Does it work with Red Hat rawhide? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6 posix version/breakage
Michael Stone wrote: I don't know that there's a full list of *packages* that might be affected. Start with config.guess files from ~2001. Also ltmain.sh from the same time period. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~package~/grepunposix `locate config.guess` |wc -l 12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~package~/grepunposix `locate ltmain.sh` |wc -l 8 Add in fair percentage of maintainer scripts. (Including libc6.postinst.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~package~/grepunposix /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.p*|wc -l 5 And take it from there. Maybe one per 5 packages or so in my grepping this morning. -- see shy jo pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#204643: glibc: Could you add NPTL?
At Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:04:05 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: glibc Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: wishlist Could you add NPTL? Now that kernel 2.6 is coming nearer it would be nice to have it available. Yes, we plan to do. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Tue Aug 5 21:23:34 MDT 2003 Log Message: * Static linking adjtimex() on alpha failed to compile due to undefined reference to `__adjtimex_tv32'. It's fixed in this version. (Closes: #186331) Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204711: Assorted libc6 problems
GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:11:44 +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote: I have the same problems Guus describes. I'm also using NIS, but my nsswitch.conf is the default version provided by libc6, I only put +:: in /etc/passwd. If you disable NIS, is your problem resolved? Well, a user that is in /etc/passwd, and not pulled in via NIS, can log in. If I remove the +:: line, it's exactly the same (except ssh will react differently, because the NIS user doesn't exist then). Ivo -- ... a Perl module would prefer that you stayed out of its living room because you weren't invited, not because it has a shotgun. - Programming Perl, O'Reilly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204711: libc6: PAM broken, login impossible, possibly NIS related
At Sat, 09 Aug 2003 16:13:38 +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: I have a setup with NIS, and I have this in my nsswitch.conf: passwd: compat group: compat shadow: compat After upgrading from 2.3.1-17 to 2.3.2-2, loging in failed for all NIS users, whether on the host running the NIS server or not. I changed the nsswitch file to contain: passwd: db files nis group: db files shadow: db files nis This allowed local users to log in again. However, remote users (whether in NIS or not, even root) can not log in with rlogin and ssh. Only telnet seems to work. This pretty much makes login servers completely useless (maybe severity should be critical). I modified /etc/nsswitch as you wrote, but I can do rlogin/ssh (I don't use NIS). In order to isolate the problem, could you disable to use NIS, and retest above? Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.3.2-2 mips(el) build failure
At 08 Aug 2003 19:59:18 +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 17:53, Guido Guenther wrote: the mips build fails due to the missing patch I posted in: http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2003/debian-glibc-200307/msg00154.html I'd look into why other archs don't need this but my broken laptop currently leaves me a bit dead in the water. Oops, I'm sorry not to take care of your patch... Yeah, arm had the same problem. I think gotom is preparing a new version. I've committed the patch, and I've verified arm build ok. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205099: Additional info
Title: Additional info After downgrade to 2.3.1-17 everything startet working again. Cheers, Gottfried Ganßauge
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Fri Aug 8 05:31:27 MDT 2003 Log Message: modified for 2.3.2-2 build ready Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204656: libc-udeb: double udeb
Package: libc-udeb Version: 2.3.2-2 (not installed) Severity: minor Description: glibc-doc - GNU C Library: Documentation libc-udeb - GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data - udeb (udeb) I think one udeb is enough and the - udeb could be stripped off. :) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.21-rene #3 Mit Aug 6 17:21:44 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#203303: glibc: gcc3.3 complains swab.h fails to conform to ISO standard
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
Could you try new glibc 2.3.2-2?
Still fails. -fpermissive downgrades it to a warning, allowing the
build to complete, though, so at least there's a workaround.
Scratch that. -fpermissive no longer allows it to build - I just didn't
wait long enough to get to the part that fails. It seems that the ISO
C++ issue has been resolved, only to be replaced by a new one. Some
change in this version gives me a new error:
In file included from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14,
from audiocd.h:33,
from cddbaccessdialog.h:31,
from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10:
/usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:38: error: syntax error before `(' token
/usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:42: error: '__u64' is used as a type, but is not
defined as a type.
/usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:43: error: syntax error before `}' token
/usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:44: error: syntax error before `.' token
/usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:50: error: syntax error before `.' token
/usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:51: error: syntax error before `.' token
/usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:52: error: syntax error before `:' token
In file included from /usr/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:11,
from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:65,
from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14,
from audiocd.h:33,
from cddbaccessdialog.h:31,
from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10:
/usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:199: error: syntax error before `(' token
/usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:209: error: syntax error before `(' token
/usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:213: error: `__u64' was not declared in
this scope
/usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:213: error: `addr' was not declared in this
scope
/usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:214: error: variable or field `__swab64s'
declared void
/usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:214: error: `__swab64s' declared as an
`inline' variable
/usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:214: error: syntax error before `{' token
The relevant lines from byteorder.h are (lines 38-53):
static inline __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 val)
{
union {
struct { __u32 a,b; } s;
__u64 u;
} v;
v.u = val;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_BSWAP
asm(bswapl %0 ; bswapl %1 ; xchgl %0,%1
: =r (v.s.a), =r (v.s.b)
: 0 (v.s.a), 1 (v.s.b));
#else
v.s.a = ___arch__swab32(v.s.a);
v.s.b = ___arch__swab32(v.s.b);
asm(xchgl %0,%1 : =r (v.s.a), =r (v.s.b) : 0 (v.s.a), 1 (v.s.b));
#endif
and swab.h (lines 198-216):
#ifdef __BYTEORDER_HAS_U64__
static __inline__ __const__ __u64 __fswab64(__u64 x)
{
# ifdef __SWAB_64_THRU_32__
__u32 h = x 32;
__u32 l = x ((1ULL32)-1);
return (((__u64)__swab32(l)) 32) | ((__u64)(__swab32(h)));
# else
return __arch__swab64(x);
# endif
}
static __inline__ __u64 __swab64p(__u64 *x)
{
return __arch__swab64p(x);
}
static __inline__ void __swab64s(__u64 *addr)
{
__arch__swab64s(addr);
}
I must say I don't immediately see the problem there. Perhaps we're
barking up the wrong tree here, and this is a problem with g{cc,++}
barfing on perfectly good code?
--
-
| ,''`.Stephen Gran |
| : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
-
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#147148: marked as done (uro troubles, I mean re-opened as it is NOT fixed)
Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:22:22 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2002 07:12:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 16 02:12:45 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97] (exim) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 178FRM-0001yA-00; Thu, 16 May 2002 02:12:45 -0500 Received: from hadio112.hadiko.uni-karlsruhe.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [172.20.45.27]) by mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 178FRE-0004hV-00; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:12:36 +0200 Received: from ruediger by hadio112.hadiko.uni-karlsruhe.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 178FRD-cS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:12:35 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:12:35 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger?= Kuhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?iso-8859-15?B?pHVy?= =?iso-8859-15?Q?o?= troubles, I mean re-opened as it is NOT fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: locales Version: 2.2.5-6 Severity: important The fix for bug #130259 has been silently removed, though the bug hasn't been reopend. NOT A BUG! Leave it alone. I am not special casing KDE's stupidity, and don't even get me started on the well distribution 'foo' does it crap. 1. You removed a fix for a problem without re-opening the bug report that that fix fixed. You didn't give any notice at all, like appending an explanation to that bug report. This is _NOT_ proper behaviour. 2. If you believe this is not a bug of the locales package, but instead a bug in KDE, then proper behaviour would be to re-open the bug against KDE. But since you didn't do that, you seem not to regard it as a bug of KDE. Thus it is one of locales. 3. This fix is an easy work-around for a hard to fix bug in KDE. It is the only chance to get something working that needs to work for woody. No, not woody+1, woody. This is May 2002; the ¤uro is here since 4.5 months. Which is the reason why this bug is _at least_ important. 4. When I mentioned that that's the way SuSE did it I wanted to show you that this is not some stupid user's argument, but something that makes sense to experienced developers. You're not behaving like one right now. 5. By neglecting this issue, you're being arrogant to _all_ Debian users that don't happen lo live in one small country whose inhabitants don't seem to understand there's a world outside their country. Or why do you intentionally cripple all 8bit characters in your mail? --- Received: (at 147148-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2003 22:22:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 11 17:22:23 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zobe.linuxfr.org [212.27.33.220] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19mL3W-00015C-00; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:22:23 -0500 Received: by zobe.linuxfr.org (Postfix, from userid 1015) id 71E71E99E; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:22:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:22:22 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Closing bug Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Hi, I cannot reproduce #130259, so I guess it is fixed now and we can close this bugreport. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#147148: acknowledged by developer (Closing bug)
--[Denis Barbier]--[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote: --[Debian Bug Tracking System]--[EMAIL PROTECTED] I cannot reproduce #130259, so I guess it is fixed now and we can close this bugreport. Please actually read the bug report. That includes reading the references bug reports 130259 and 122533. The bug is still there since woody still comes with KDE 2. and you do not have to convince glibc maintainers that a new glibc must be released for woody, but our Stable Release Manager. Actually as a maintainer exactly that should be your job. The problems exposed here have a trivial workaround by setting environment variables, so I cannot imagine how you will do. This is a showstopper bug that keeps woody's Euro support from just working out of the box. And while the work-around is easy, you first have to figure it out. To make it clear, yes I think that this issue should have been seriously considered when it was time (but May 2002 was surely too late, please try to report such bugs sooner), I filed bug #122533 on konsole (I didn't at first realize that all of KDE was broken) on Wed, 05 Dec 2001. That was soon enough before the freeze (and some version of glibc had the workaround incorporated in IIRC January) and before the Euro was introduced. Release Manager that a new libc is important for our woody users. There is no we. I'm not part of Debian, and as long as the Debian project violates my copyright, this won't change. The bug report is just from times I did care about Debian. Which is why I'm going to stop arguing about it. Do with it what you consider right. -- 100 DM = 51 ¤ 13 ¢. 100 ¤ = 195 DM 58 pf. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ruediger-kuhlmann.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:gotom time: Tue Aug 5 19:01:09 MDT 2003 Log Message: - debian/patches/80_glibc232-wcsmbs-fix.dpatch: Added to fix wcsmbs bugs which is lacked in 2003-07-15 upstream cvs. (Closes: #202969) Files: changed:0list added: 80_glibc232-wcsmbs-fix.dpatch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6 posix version/breakage
This simpler workaround will give you some time to fix the rest of Debian. Debian developers like yourself should set _POSIX2_VERSION=200112 in their environments, and let the bugs get found and squashed. Perhaps someone (Paul?) could write a summary of deprecated features (e.g. tail -1) which we could post to devel-devel-announce. I think many people are not aware of the whole situation at all. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#147148: marked as done (uro troubles, I mean re-opened as it is NOT fixed)
Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:36:52 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#147148: acknowledged by developer (Closing bug) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2002 07:12:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 16 02:12:45 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97] (exim) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 178FRM-0001yA-00; Thu, 16 May 2002 02:12:45 -0500 Received: from hadio112.hadiko.uni-karlsruhe.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [172.20.45.27]) by mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 178FRE-0004hV-00; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:12:36 +0200 Received: from ruediger by hadio112.hadiko.uni-karlsruhe.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 178FRD-cS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:12:35 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:12:35 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger?= Kuhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?iso-8859-15?B?pHVy?= =?iso-8859-15?Q?o?= troubles, I mean re-opened as it is NOT fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: locales Version: 2.2.5-6 Severity: important The fix for bug #130259 has been silently removed, though the bug hasn't been reopend. NOT A BUG! Leave it alone. I am not special casing KDE's stupidity, and don't even get me started on the well distribution 'foo' does it crap. 1. You removed a fix for a problem without re-opening the bug report that that fix fixed. You didn't give any notice at all, like appending an explanation to that bug report. This is _NOT_ proper behaviour. 2. If you believe this is not a bug of the locales package, but instead a bug in KDE, then proper behaviour would be to re-open the bug against KDE. But since you didn't do that, you seem not to regard it as a bug of KDE. Thus it is one of locales. 3. This fix is an easy work-around for a hard to fix bug in KDE. It is the only chance to get something working that needs to work for woody. No, not woody+1, woody. This is May 2002; the ¤uro is here since 4.5 months. Which is the reason why this bug is _at least_ important. 4. When I mentioned that that's the way SuSE did it I wanted to show you that this is not some stupid user's argument, but something that makes sense to experienced developers. You're not behaving like one right now. 5. By neglecting this issue, you're being arrogant to _all_ Debian users that don't happen lo live in one small country whose inhabitants don't seem to understand there's a world outside their country. Or why do you intentionally cripple all 8bit characters in your mail? --- Received: (at 147148-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2003 21:37:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 16:37:29 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zobe.linuxfr.org [212.27.33.220] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19mgp4-0008Gx-00; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:36:54 -0500 Received: by zobe.linuxfr.org (Postfix, from userid 1015) id C5DF4EB04; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:36:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:36:52 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#147148: acknowledged by developer (Closing bug) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote: reopen 147148 Same player shoot again tag 147148 woody --[Debian Bug Tracking System]--[EMAIL PROTECTED] I cannot reproduce #130259, so I guess it is fixed now
Bug#204706: libc6: Binary incompatibility
At 09 Aug 2003 16:00:34 +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 14:31, Elmar Haneke wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-17 Severity: critical Tags: sid Justification: breaks unrelated software After installing libc6 2.3.2-2 the win4lin-software does no longer run, it yust segfaults. Going back to 2.1.3-7 reenables Win4Lin. I suppose you meant to file this bug against version 2.3.2-2, right? What package contains Win4Lin? I guess it's http://www.netraverse.com/. Is it non-free software or not-opensource commercial software? If so, we can't support them because we don't have, so please contact customer support. Elmar, I close this bug, ok? Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 202969 + pending Bug#202969: libgtk2.0-0: Crash with gtk_file_selection_get_selections Tags were: patch upstream experimental sid Tags added: pending tags 201221 + pending Bug#201221: Bug in dlopen/dlclose leads to segfaults with kdecore There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 186331 + pending Bug#186331: alpha static adjtimex There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204643: glibc: Could you add NPTL?
Package: glibc Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: wishlist Could you add NPTL? Now that kernel 2.6 is coming nearer it would be nice to have it available. TIA Adrian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205118: locales: lo_LA.UTF-8 is broken
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: normal Hi, locale-gen stops with: lo_LA.UTF-8.../usr/share/i18n/locales/lo_LA:321: order for `U0EC6' already defined at /usr/share/i18n/locales/lo_LA:286 /usr/share/i18n/locales/lo_LA:610: order for `U0EAF' already defined at /usr/share/i18n/locales/lo_LA:285 One might try to fix this bug, but a simpler solution is to remove lo_LA.UTF-8 from /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED until it is really supported. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#140891: locales: Is this bug still alive?
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #140891 Hi, it looks like en_AU does now what you want. Can this bug be closed? Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205039: libc6: don't just ask if I want to restart all services on installation
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: minor Upon installation, I see: Setting up libc6 (2.3.2-2) ... Checking for services that may need to be restarted...done. Name Service Switch has changed in the C Library: post-installation question. Running programs may not be able to do NSS lookups until they are here say what NSS is, so users don't know restarted (for services such as ssh, this can affect your ability to login). Note: restarting sshd/telnetd should not affect any existing connections. The services detected are: inetd spamassassin cron apache ssh If other services begin to fail mysteriously after this upgrade, it may be necessary to restart them too. We strongly recommend you to reboot your machine to avoid the NSS related trouble. OK, I better reboot, even though I don't know what NSS is. Do you wish to Restart Services? [Y/n] Why don't you give a third choice: ask which ones, don't just assume that if one is installed, we run it all day See e.g. http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=jq3M.1pf.5%40gated-at.bofh.it (better make a standard for /etc/*/*_not_to_be_run) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.21-1-k7 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:23:16 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204930: libc6: Can't install 2.3.2-2
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux lamision 2.4.21 #1 sáb jul 19 20:35:15 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=spanish, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.ISO8859-1 (ignored: LC_ALL set to es_ES) Installation of package fails with this error: date: relocation error: /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol __libc_pthread_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference System becames unusable, I needed to copy full /lib from other machine and reinstall 2.3.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204682: glibc: su - segfaults, loggin in as root also fails. sudo works
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 11:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After updating to the latest glibc this morning as per apt-get upgrade, I now get a segfault on running su -. What does your nsswitch.conf look like? p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#178513: marked as done (locales, is_IS: Capitals should not be in months and days)
Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2003 01:01:10 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug has been fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2003 19:47:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 26 13:47:06 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from snaefell.rhi.hi.is [130.208.165.28] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18cskE-00018I-00; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 13:47:06 -0600 Received: from krafla.rhi.hi.is (krafla.rhi.hi.is [130.208.165.37]) by snaefell.rhi.hi.is (8.12.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h0QJkAl6002777 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:46:10 GMT Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by krafla.rhi.hi.is (8.8.6/8.8.6) id TAA01090 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:46:09 GMT Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:46:09 + From: Bjarni Ingi Gislason [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: locales, is_IS: Capitals should not be in months and days Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-No-Archive: yes Archive: no X-Host: krafla.rhi.hi.is (Computing Services of the University of Iceland) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by snaefell.rhi.hi.is id h0QJkAl6002777 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_70,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: locales Version: 2.3.1-10 File: /usr/share/i18n/locales/is_IS (Icelandic) Capitals are wrongly used in section LC_TIME for days and months. The output of locale -k abday day abmon mon should be: abday=3Dsun;m=E1n;=FEri;mi=F0;fim;f=F6s;lau day=3Dsunnudagur;m=E1nudagur;=FEri=F0judagur;mi=F0vikudagur;fimmtudagur;= f=F6studagur;laugardagur abmon=3Djan;feb;mar;apr;ma=ED;j=FAn;j=FAl;=E1g=FA;sep;okt;n=F3v;des mon=3Djan=FAar;febr=FAar;mars;apr=EDl;ma=ED;j=FAn=ED;j=FAl=ED;=E1g=FAst;= september;okt=F3ber;n=F3vember;desember Output of diff is_IS.orig is_IS: 2188,2216c2188,2216 abday U0053U0075U006E;U004DU00E1U006E;/ U00DEU0072U0069;U004DU0069U00F0;/ U0046U0069U006D;U0046U00F6U0073;/ U004CU0061U0075 day U0053U0075U006EU006EU0075U0064U0061U0067U0075= U0072;/ U004DU00E1U006EU0075U0064U0061U0067U0075U0072= ;/ U00DEU0072U0069U00F0U006AU0075U0064U0061U0067= U0075U0072;/ U004DU0069U00F0U0076U0069U006BU0075U0064U0061= U0067U0075U0072;/ U0046U0069U006DU006DU0074U0075U0064U0061U0067= U0075U0072;/ U0046U00F6U0073U0074U0075U0064U0061U0067U0075= U0072;/ U004CU0061U0075U0067U0061U0072U0064U0061U0067= U0075U0072 abmon U004AU0061U006E;U0046U0065U0062;/ U004DU0061U0072;U0041U0070U0072;/ U004DU0061U00ED;U004AU00FAU006E;/ U004AU00FAU006C;U00C1U0067U00FA;/ U0053U0065U0070;U004FU006BU0074;/ U004EU00F3U0076;U0044U0065U0073 mon U004AU0061U006EU00FAU0061U0072;/ U0046U0065U0062U0072U00FAU0061U0072;/ U004DU0061U0072U0073;/ U0041U0070U0072U00EDU006C;/ U004DU0061U00ED;/ U004AU00FAU006EU00ED;/ U004AU00FAU006CU00ED;/ U00C1U0067U00FAU0073U0074;/ U0053U0065U0070U0074U0065U006DU0062U0065U0072= ;/ U004FU006BU0074U00F3U0062U0065U0072;/ U004EU00F3U0076U0065U006DU0062U0065U0072;/ U0044U0065U0073U0065U006DU0062U0065U0072 --- abday U0073U0075U006E;U006DU00E1U006E;/ U00FEU0072U0069;U006DU0069U00F0;/ U0066U0069U006D;U0066U00F6U0073;/ U006CU0061U0075 day U0073U0075U006EU006EU0075U0064U0061U0067U0075= U0072;/ U006DU00E1U006EU0075U0064U0061U0067U0075U0072= ;/ U00FEU0072U0069U00F0U006AU0075U0064U0061U0067= U0075U0072;/ U006DU0069U00F0U0076U0069U006BU0075U0064U0061= U0067U0075U0072;/ U0066U0069U006DU006DU0074U0075U0064U0061U0067= U0075U0072;/ U0066U00F6U0073U0074U0075U0064U0061U0067U0075= U0072;/ U006CU0061U0075U0067U0061U0072U0064U0061U0067= U0075U0072 abmon U006AU0061U006E;U0066U0065U0062;/ U006DU0061U0072;U0061U0070U0072;/ U006DU0061U00ED;U006AU00FAU006E;/ U006AU00FAU006C;U00E1U0067U00FA;/ U0073U0065U0070;U006FU006BU0074;/ U006EU00F3U0076;U0064U0065U0073 mon U006AU0061U006EU00FAU0061U0072;/ U0066U0065U0062U0072U00FAU0061U0072;/
Bug#147148: acknowledged by developer (Closing bug)
reopen 147148 tag 147148 woody --[Debian Bug Tracking System]--[EMAIL PROTECTED] I cannot reproduce #130259, so I guess it is fixed now and we can close this bugreport. Please actually read the bug report. That includes reading the references bug reports 130259 and 122533. The bug is still there since woody still comes with KDE 2. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6 posix version/breakage
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:15:22 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: Portable shell scripts CANNOT use these POSIX.2001-mandated command line syntaxes; there are still operating systems in wide use that do not implement them. Thus, for instance, config.sub/config.guess will continue to use the old syntax for the foreseeable future, as will gcc's Makefiles. POSIX.2001's removal of the obsolete syntaxes is brain damaged and coreutils MUST NOT follow suit. I would encourage y'all to address this, not by backing down glibc's _POSIX2_VERSION number, but by patching coreutils to support the old syntaxes again - unconditionally and without warnings. And then beat the upstream maintainers of coreutils upside the head until they take said patch. Do the same for any other shell utility that has been infected with this brain damage. Seconded. Keeping old behavior is good rathan than dropping down _POSIX2_VERSION value. Some program want to know API compatibility using _POSIX2_VERSION. Dropping chmod user.grp behavior makes us advocate users to use new behavior. BTW, I think it's good idea to transit newer behavior of standard utilities during debian sid. I am not sure I understand what you are saying in the second paragraph. But, as an upstream author trying my damndest to write portable shell scripts, I would ask that the old command line syntaxes of these tools be preserved - accept, don't complain - for at least another five years. Ten would be better. One hopes that that is longer than two Debian releases ;-) zw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205234: libc6: vsyslog() call hangs su and login
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-2 After upgrading to this version of libc6 and rebooting, su or login do not work anymore. su hangs after prompting for password (or right away, if invoked as root), regardless of whether the '-' option is given. I am running Debian unstable; I tried this with at least 3 or 4 kernels. For kernels 2.2.25, 2.4.20, 2.4.21 I was able to successfully login using GDM; but su hung in all of them. When I tried booting with the 2.6.0 testing kernel in unstable, I got a chance to try text console login (X server wouldn't start due to its own issues) - I could not login through console at all - login hung as well. I also tried downgrading the login package, but that did not make any difference. I ran su using gdb and after it hung and I sent SIGINT to the process, the backtrace was as follows: #0 0x401e3b88 in __pthread_sigsuspend () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x401e3999 in __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal () from /lib/libpthread.so.0#2 0x401e5159 in __pthread_alt_lock () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #3 0x401e24e6 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #4 0x4011dead in vsyslog () from /lib/libc.so.6 #5 0x40180289 in _log_err () from /lib/security/pam_unix.so #6 0x4017ead7 in pam_sm_open_session () from /lib/security/pam_unix.so #7 0x4004c9c8 in pam_fail_delay () from /lib/libpam.so.0 #8 0x4004cb18 in _pam_dispatch () from /lib/libpam.so.0 #9 0x4004e516 in pam_open_session () from /lib/libpam.so.0 #10 0x0804a780 in ?? () #11 0x080568c8 in ?? () Googling revealed that the pthread calls look like something to do with an unitialized mutex, but that's just my guessing. Downgrading libc6 to 2.3.1 fixed the problem. This bug seems similar to bug #205099 - that one also involved a syslog call and a hanging process. Cheers! Nick _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204930: libc6: Some binaries not working
Le jeu 14/08/2003 à 12:34, GOTO Masanori a écrit : At Wed, 13 Aug 2003 01:01:03 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: I have very similar issues with glibc 2.3.2. When launching update-mozilla-chrome, I get this error: Updating mozilla chrome registry...regxpcom: relocation error: /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol __libc_pthread_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference You have to write which version is used. Same happens with 2.3.2-1 and 2.3.2-2. And when linking something with -ldl, I get: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.3.1/../../../libdl.so: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' You have to provide us the sample code. Any code. Even with a hello world. Of course I can't even reproduce that myself on another machine nor in a chroot on the same machine, but reinstalling libc6 doesn't change anything. And the symbols are here, see: 13:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/src/test objdump -T /lib/libdl.so.2 |grep _dl_rtld_di_serinfo DF *UND* 016e GLIBC_PRIVATE _dl_rtld_di_serinfo 13:09 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/src/test objdump -T /lib/ld-linux.so.2 |grep _dl_rtld_di_serinfo 5ae8 gDF .text 016e GLIBC_PRIVATE _dl_rtld_di_serinfo 13:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/src/test objdump -T /lib/libpthread.so.0 |grep __libc_pthread_init DF *UND* 003b GLIBC_PRIVATE __libc_pthread_init 13:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/src/test objdump -T /lib/libc.so.6 |grep __libc_pthread_init 000d2df4 gDF .text 003b GLIBC_PRIVATE __libc_pthread_init The error is about link time reference, maybe this is related to #202243 (just an idea). Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Processed: Re: Bug#204691: libc6: stacksize is too small
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 204691 wishlist Bug#204691: libc6: stacksize is too small Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204711: libc6: PAM broken, login impossible, possibly NIS related
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 07:25:05PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Does this patch bring back to old NSS behavior (2.3.1) ? Yes. It's worth building and testing it on the trouble user machine :) The patch is rather large due to the massive nis changes. Did the problem pop up upsream already? The debs are up at: http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/linux-mips/glibc/debs/ Regards, -- Guido pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#204958: Leave it alone option in fresh install breaks future upgrades of locales
[I am quoting the whole message because it was not sent to the BYS] On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:46:51AM -0500, Mike Vincent wrote: On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:50:17 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:16:32AM -0500, Mike Vincent wrote: Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: normal Setting up locales (2.3.2-2) ... Generating locales... Leave.alone...cannot open locale definition file `Leave': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 4 This probably means that /etc/locale.gen contains the Leave alone words, but I do not see why. Did you manually edit this file? You can remove it and dpkg-reconfigure locales to fix this problem, but please tell us what your /etc/locale.gen looks like first. Hi Dennis, Yes, I knew that's why it was failing and fixed it. Your assumption that /etc/locale.gen contained Leave alone was correct, but I did not edit the file myself. This was a new install and during the installation process when it asked me which locale I wanted to setup the first option was Leave alone and I just chose that and I guess it wrote that to the file. ;( Fine, we know have to find the culprit. How did you install your system? From a woody CD, debian-installer (if so, please tell when it was generated), something else? Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6 posix version/breakage
Portable shell scripts CANNOT use these POSIX.2001-mandated command line syntaxes; there are still operating systems in wide use that do not implement them. Thus, for instance, config.sub/config.guess will continue to use the old syntax for the foreseeable future, as will gcc's Makefiles. POSIX.2001's removal of the obsolete syntaxes is brain damaged and coreutils MUST NOT follow suit. aol What Zack said. /aol For that matter, some of the syntax removals are going to throw users pretty severely as well. tail -20 doesn't work? diff -c3 doesn't work? This is an example of 'standards' rushing ahead of standard usage. :-P I would encourage y'all to address this, not by backing down glibc's _POSIX2_VERSION number, but by patching coreutils to support the old syntaxes again - unconditionally and without warnings. And then beat the upstream maintainers of coreutils upside the head until they take said patch. Do the same for any other shell utility that has been infected with this brain damage. zw aol Yeah! /aol Go ahead and back down the _POSIX2_VERSION number as well, though. :-P No reason for Debian to claim to support a version of POSIX which removes standard usages, and I suppose it's more honest to not claim to be compliant when you not only aren't, but don't want to be. :-P -- Nathanael Nerode neroden at gcc.gnu.org http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205090: dutch po-debconf translation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: glibc Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please find attached the dutch po-debconf translation. Please add it to your next package revision, it should be inserted in your package build-tree as debian/po/nl.po, TIA. - -- Cheers, cobaco /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / No proprietary formats in attachments without request X i.e. *NO* WORD, POWERPOINT or EXCEL documents / \ Respect Open Standards http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/no-word/attach.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/OP8I5ihPJ4ZiSrsRAq5mAJ9FemTgYcuU/MwVotHVhrfNwPeISgCbBbm8 w9oaVUw75uBDcvL4eYhooCA= =hWx3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- glibc_2.3.2-2_nl.po Description: application/gettext
Bug#202243: glibc utimes glitch with coreutils 'touch'
Jim Meyering wrote: Instead, I'm adding a configure-time test of utimes, so that if it works, coreutils will use it. Here's the C program it'll compile and run. Be sure to allow overriding the test in the usual way, so the build system's properties can be overridden when cross-compiling glibc... Thanks, Dan -- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#147148 acknowledged by developer (Closing bug)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 147148 Bug#147148: =?iso-8859-15?B?pHVy?= =?iso-8859-15?Q?o?= troubles, I mean re-opened as it is NOT fixed Bug reopened, originator not changed. tag 147148 woody Bug#147148: =?iso-8859-15?B?pHVy?= =?iso-8859-15?Q?o?= troubles, I mean re-opened as it is NOT fixed There were no tags set. Tags added: woody --[Debian Bug Tracking System]--[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. I cannot reproduce #130259, so I guess it is fixed now and Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. we can close this bugreport. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Please actually read the bug report. That includes reading the references Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. bug reports 130259 and 122533. The bug is still there since woody still Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204706: Win4lin + Same binary breakage with compupic and citrix
At 11 Aug 2003 19:48:55 +1200, Adam Warner wrote: On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:46, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:47:31 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:44:59PM +0200, Rainer Ellinger wrote: Same with compupic [1] (a static app and probably good choice to try with) and apparently citrix iac clients [2]. Going back to 2.3.1-17 solved it for compupic. glibc does not claim binary compatiblity for statically linked binaries, and in fact the compatiblity tends to break from time to time when using nss. I think you'll have to educate the vendors of your non-free software.. Ah, they are all static linked binaries? If so, it's right. I second Christoph's thought. I would like to close this bug. Why is there such a rush to close this bug report? Because a lot of users did report, but not close and leave them alone. Especially this kind of vague report which only complaints us for commercial software, I everytime rush to close until user loses his interest. Bug tracking system is not dump of complaints. We can't support commercial non-opensource software on development distribution sid because sid is unstable and it's difficult to chase the problem without source. 1. Do you know if win4lin has been compiled with NSS support? 2. Are you sure this is not a bug in glibc's compatibility layer? Huh? So? We didn't know anything of internal Win4Lin. From your report, how to guess to fix? If it's NSS issue or glibc compatibility layer problem, then Christoph's guess is right, and we can't fix this bug. Period. Looking at the glibc release notes there appears to be only a couple of mentions where binary compatibility has been broken with 2.3.2 compared to 2.1: http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/NEWS * the sockaddr_in6 structure changed. The IPv6 working group added a new field sin6_scope_id. This means that all programs using IPv6 should be recompiled. Don't expect binary compatibility with previous glibc versions. * The resolver code has been updated from bind 8.2.3-T5B which supports threads. The integration was done by Andreas Jaeger, Adam D. Bradley, and Mark Kettenis. This change could in some situations effect backward compatibility. Since now `_res' is a thread-local instead of a global variable, modifying it in one thread does not have any effect in other threads. The resolver library was also extended to allow IPv6 as the transport protocol for the requests. This work was done by Stig Venaas. Debian glibc 2.3.2-2 is not plain glibc 2.3.2. Libnss issue is introduced recent libnss modification. You have to read debian-glibc lists, before you guess wrong assumption. 3. As someone unskilled in this area Robert's stack trace doesn't look static compiled to me: open(/lib/libdl.so.2, O_RDONLY) = 3 ... open(/lib/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3 I replied this problem in another thread. It's known issue and can't fix. BTW, I wonder why you firstly contact to vendors and claim this issue. If you find this software is not supported, then why don't you appeal to the vendor please support debian/woody (be careful, it's not sid) ? Letting the vendor know is appropriate and I will do so. So you will do. Repeatedly attempting to close this bug report before even determining its cause doesn't appear to be the appropriate response. Because we can't reproduce this bug. To fix this bug is extract 2.3.1-17 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables, or use chroot for these kinds of software. Actually I work this for my colleague machine which uses Wnn6 commercial Kanji-conversion system (* see notes). It's driven by old libc6. Again as a novice in this area I understood incompatible Unix libraries were given a distinctive so name. I also understood this to be the reason that we can avoid the DLL hell that has plagued Windows platforms. If a library claims to be compatible and is not then this could be something for you or upstream to fix. By the way I have been fascinated to learn in this thread that static compiled programs can have a lower expectation of being binary compatible with operating system upgrades. Yes, this kind of problem harasses us. -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#184048: [m68k] binutils testsuite failures built in a glibc-2.3.1 environment
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | but fewer testcases as well ... | | FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC, load offset) | FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) | FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC, load offset) | | these three did pass with glibc-2.3.1 and glibc-2.2.3, the second one | did pass with glibc-2.3.1, but not with glibc-2.2.3. | | Andreas, do we need to care about these failures? Non-PIC DSOs are generally not something you should use, so this is low priority. But it is still worth fixing. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 And now for something completely different. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#201752: Should be fixed in locales 2.3.2-2
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #201752 Hi, debconf use has been entirely rewritten in locales 2.3.2-1, and I believe that your bug report does no more apply. Could you please check? Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#205110: scp -p doesn't work since a recent ssh update(1.3.6.1p2-4?)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 205110 libc6 Bug#205110: scp -p no longer preserves modification time Bug reassigned from package `ssh' to `libc6'. merge 205110 202243 Bug#202243: utimes() broken Bug#205110: scp -p no longer preserves modification time Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `severity' don't match: #202243 has `important'; #205110 has `normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#62733: marked as done (locales: no wc iconv equivalent)
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:41:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#62733: locales: no wc iconv equivalent has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2000 10:47:22 + Received: (qmail 16499 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2000 10:47:22 - Received: from pat.uio.no (@129.240.130.16) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Apr 2000 10:47:22 - Received: from uls-dhcp014.studby.uio.no ([129.240.110.44] helo=acroyali) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #7) id 12iEUK-0004zR-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:47:12 +0200 Received: from ovek by acroyali with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 12iEUJ-0005EC-00; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:47:11 +0200 From: Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: locales: no wc iconv equivalent To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:47:11 +0200 Package: locales Version: 2.1.3-8 Severity: wishlist I'd like to use iconv_open/iconv/iconv_close to perform the same operation available with mbstowcs/wcstombs (the wchar_t should be useful with iswalpha etc), but iconv_open takes no codeset equivalent to wchar_t. According to the docs, you could specify UCS4 for glibc, but UCS4 is explicitly big-endian, which doesn't do too much good on little-endian machines, and flipping the endianness isn't always a viable solution. Perhaps someone could at least add UCS4BIG and UCS4LITTLE or something like that to the available encodings? This is sort of important to me... -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux acroyali 2.2.14 #1 SMP Sun Feb 27 13:16:26 CET 2000 i686 unknown Versions of the packages locales depends on: ii libc6 2.1.3-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data --- Received: (at 62733-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2003 22:41:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 13 17:41:10 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zobe.linuxfr.org [212.27.33.220] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19n4Io-000673-00; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:41:10 -0500 Received: by zobe.linuxfr.org (Postfix, from userid 1015) id AA91EEA2A; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:41:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:41:09 +0200 To: Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#62733: locales: no wc iconv equivalent Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 11:52:27PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote: ons, 13.08.2003 kl. 01.20 skrev Denis Barbier: Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #62733 Hi, as Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS told, iconv provides the requested encodings. Can this bug be closed? As far as I'm concerned, yes. Thanks for your quick answer, I am closing this bug. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205325: glibc: please add strnatcmp / strnatcasecmp
Package: glibc Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-14 Severity: wishlist Hi there, I'm surprised there isn't already something similiar to strnatcmp in glibc URL: http://sourcefrog.net/projects/natsort/ but both functions would certainly be usable. The license appear to allow for the inclusion of both functions, so hopefully this isn't a huge to deal to get included. Thanks, Anand -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux clam 2.6.0-test2 #18 Mon Jul 28 13:13:56 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205328: libc6 upgrade breaks several programs
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: critical Tags: sid Justification: breaks unrelated software It looks like the libc6 upgrade breaks some programs on the system. The only one's I personally have encountered are consolechars and Win4Lin. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux lola 2.4.21 #1 Sun Jun 22 03:09:49 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#193904: Seems to be fixed in locales 2.3.2-1
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #193904 Bill, could you please check this BR, I believe that locales 2.3.2-1 fixed this bug (in debian/patches/10_cvs.dpatch, file intl/localealias.c). Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
glibc 2.3.2-2 maximum stack size
System: Debian Unstable Package: glibc 2.3.2-2 Hello alot of people uses winex 3.1. (www.transgaming.com) its made from wine, and its directed towards games only. It cost a subscription 5$ a month if you want access to the binary compiled versions. You can download the CVS version for free but then you wont get their copy protection and texture compression features. You can just sign up, downlaod the binary and then stop paying further. When you start the program with the current glibc in debian (and SUSE) you get the following Your system requires the use of pthreads but the maximum system allowed stack size of 2052 kB may be too small for some games. So we need to raise the maximum stack allowed, I know you are busy, so I will just change it myself and put our a guide on transgaming on how to do it. But im not the madest programmer yet. Ive downloaded the source by apt-get source glibc, and tried to mess around with the linuxthreads source, internals.h and local-lim.h . But I really cant find the define or pice of code where I actually can raise the max stack. Could you give me a hint on where to do so? If its not to complex. I found some guides on how to do so but they are out of date and the code has been changed, so thoes patches dont work. Really hope you can give me a hint here. I have asked this stuff in #debian but they dont seems to know how to do this. So my only option is to ask one of the maintainers, if you dont know this or dont have the time, could you maybee redirect me to one of the maintainers that do? From Flemming Ledet [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#62733: locales: no wc iconv equivalent
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #62733 Hi, as Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS told, iconv provides the requested encodings. Can this bug be closed? Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204981: libc6: VMWare Workstation 3.2.1 (build 2242) Aborts with 2.3.2-1 or 2.3.2-1
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-16 Severity: normal VMWare Workstion 3.2.1 (build 2242) stopped working when I upgraded to 2.3.2-2. I tried downgrading to 2.3.2-1, but VMWare still doesn't work. When I downgraded to 2.3.1-16, vmware started working again. I didn't get any useful feedback when vmware aborted. It happened shortly after I pressed the Power On button. % vmware Abort % Tom -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux driftcreek 2.4.21 #7 Tue Jul 15 05:51:33 PDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: asd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 140891 -1 Bug#140891: en_GB does not define AM/PM Bug 140891 cloned as bug 205140. reassign -1 jpilot Bug#205140: en_GB does not define AM/PM Bug reassigned from package `locales' to `jpilot'. retitle -1 jpilot does not handle date right under non-C locales Bug#205140: en_GB does not define AM/PM Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6 posix version/breakage
- Forwarded message from Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] - How about this much-simpler workaround instead: patch glibc so that _POSIX2_VERSION has its old value. That is more honest, since you probably still have some programs that don't conform to POSIX 1003.1-2001 yet. _POSIX2_VERSION is supposed to say what standard your utilities conform to; glibc doesn't really know what the proper value for that is, so you can fix its guess with a light heart. This simpler workaround will give you some time to fix the rest of Debian. Debian developers like yourself should set _POSIX2_VERSION=200112 in their environments, and let the bugs get found and squashed. You can remove the glibc patch in a few months (or years), after the dust has settled somewhat. Seems like good advice if we want to release again anytime in the next few years. sigh Here's the script that I use to find potential problems. I call this command 'grep-nonposix'. Note that this misses a fair amount of stuff, notably chown user.group, and of course it will fail on lots of out-of-the-way perl and strange shell code. -- see shy jo pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#204706: Same binary breakage with compupic and citrix
At Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:47:31 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:44:59PM +0200, Rainer Ellinger wrote: Same with compupic [1] (a static app and probably good choice to try with) and apparently citrix iac clients [2]. Going back to 2.3.1-17 solved it for compupic. glibc does not claim binary compatiblity for statically linked binaries, and in fact the compatiblity tends to break from time to time when using nss. I think you'll have to educate the vendors of your non-free software.. Ah, they are all static linked binaries? If so, it's right. I second Christoph's thought. I would like to close this bug. BTW, I wonder why you firstly contact to vendors and claim this issue. If you find this software is not supported, then why don't you appeal to the vendor please support debian/woody (be careful, it's not sid) ? To fix this bug is extract 2.3.1-17 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables, or use chroot for these kinds of software. Actually I work this for my colleague machine which uses Wnn6 commercial Kanji-conversion system (* see notes). It's driven by old libc6. * Notes: It's Japanese character inputting software. Unfortunatelly, inputting Japanese is one of the most complex system in various languages, so sometimes we need to use the commercial input system for high quality Japanese typing. In addition, there are a lot of efforts to support Japanese input system in free software area, however there are much gap of the Japanese quality. Damn. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204706: How come it works on other distos.
If you say it's not supposed to work on Debian, why does win4lin work on Gentoo? They have been running 2.3.2 far longer than Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204735: important additional information
I should have stated in the previous bug-report posting that when this samba failure occurs, it also locks up the system hard. A reset button or on-off switch are required to recover. Please consider upgrading this bug to severe or grave since this conflict could potentially cause a complete failure of a system. I use reiserfs, so I was in pretty good shape. This failure caused 5 hard crashes before I figured out the cause. I am now holding my system at libc6 2.3.1-17 until this bug is fixed and I have had no more problems ! -- James D. Freels, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204706: Win4lin + Same binary breakage with compupic and citrix
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:46, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:47:31 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:44:59PM +0200, Rainer Ellinger wrote: Same with compupic [1] (a static app and probably good choice to try with) and apparently citrix iac clients [2]. Going back to 2.3.1-17 solved it for compupic. glibc does not claim binary compatiblity for statically linked binaries, and in fact the compatiblity tends to break from time to time when using nss. I think you'll have to educate the vendors of your non-free software.. Ah, they are all static linked binaries? If so, it's right. I second Christoph's thought. I would like to close this bug. Why is there such a rush to close this bug report? 1. Do you know if win4lin has been compiled with NSS support? 2. Are you sure this is not a bug in glibc's compatibility layer? Looking at the glibc release notes there appears to be only a couple of mentions where binary compatibility has been broken with 2.3.2 compared to 2.1: http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/NEWS * the sockaddr_in6 structure changed. The IPv6 working group added a new field sin6_scope_id. This means that all programs using IPv6 should be recompiled. Don't expect binary compatibility with previous glibc versions. * The resolver code has been updated from bind 8.2.3-T5B which supports threads. The integration was done by Andreas Jaeger, Adam D. Bradley, and Mark Kettenis. This change could in some situations effect backward compatibility. Since now `_res' is a thread-local instead of a global variable, modifying it in one thread does not have any effect in other threads. The resolver library was also extended to allow IPv6 as the transport protocol for the requests. This work was done by Stig Venaas. 3. As someone unskilled in this area Robert's stack trace doesn't look static compiled to me: open(/lib/libdl.so.2, O_RDONLY) = 3 ... open(/lib/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3 BTW, I wonder why you firstly contact to vendors and claim this issue. If you find this software is not supported, then why don't you appeal to the vendor please support debian/woody (be careful, it's not sid) ? Letting the vendor know is appropriate and I will do so. Repeatedly attempting to close this bug report before even determining its cause doesn't appear to be the appropriate response. To fix this bug is extract 2.3.1-17 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables, or use chroot for these kinds of software. Actually I work this for my colleague machine which uses Wnn6 commercial Kanji-conversion system (* see notes). It's driven by old libc6. Again as a novice in this area I understood incompatible Unix libraries were given a distinctive so name. I also understood this to be the reason that we can avoid the DLL hell that has plagued Windows platforms. If a library claims to be compatible and is not then this could be something for you or upstream to fix. By the way I have been fascinated to learn in this thread that static compiled programs can have a lower expectation of being binary compatible with operating system upgrades. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204696: locales dependency on libc6 of the same version breaks building packages
At Sat, 9 Aug 2003 14:49:27 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: important, maybe serious At least in the changelog I don't see an entry that the dependency on glibc-2.3.2-2 with the same Debian release number is actually needed. Matthias, we repeatedly saw such report, and we everytime closed such requests. The problem is every glibc package version has different glibc cvs base because we update frequently from the latest upstream cvs. So we can't guarantee the locale behavior of glibc. Please decouple this tight dependency. It breaks at least building all packages which run a testsuite with locale dependent tests. Well, however, I've recognized this is problem. One idea is Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.1-17) or something, I modify such way. The reason 2.3.1-17 is that this version is synchronized and provided on all archs. Anyone complaints this change? Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6 posix version/breakage
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know that there's a full list of *packages* that might be
affected.
diffutils is also affected. In POSIX 1003.1-2001, command invocations
like diff -c2 and diff -c -2 are no longer allowed; you are
supposed to use diff -C 2 instead. Similarly, diff -u2 and diff
-u -2 are no longer supported with GNU diff; you are supposed to use
diff -U 2 instead.
I don't know of any other packages that are affected directly.
(Of course many packages invoke coreutils and diffutils with the old
syntax and thus will be affected indirectly.)
Here's a script that you can use to look for affected source files.
(Maybe this should be stuck into Debian somewhere?)
#! /bin/sh
LC_ALL=C
export LC_ALL
IFS='
'
# Calculate an ERE from a list of commands and
# single-letter options for those commands.
for command_options in \
'expand i' \
'head qv' \
'fold bsw' \
'diff BDHNPTabdeilnpqrstwy' \
'nice ' \
'split n' \
'tail fqv' \
'uniq cdDiu' \
'unexpand a'
do
command=$(expr $command_options : '\([^[:space:]]*\)')
options=$(expr $command_options : '[^[:space:]]*[[:space:]]*\(.*\)')
case $options in
?*) options=[$options]*;;
esac
pattern=$pattern$command\\.*[[:space:]]-$options[\$0-9]|
done
pattern=$pattern'(sort|tail|uniq)\.*[[:space:]]\+[$0-9]|sort\.*[[:space:]]-o'
case $1 in
--help)
exec echo $0: usage: $0 [OPTION]... [FILE]...
Grep for instances of possible POSIX-conformance problems in the FILEs.
Options:
-s Check strictly, even for things that aren't likely to be real problems.
The FILEs can be directories, in which case the greps are recursive,
though ChangeLogs, backup files, and version-control histories are bypassed.
The default FILE is '-', which stands for the standard input.;;
-s)
pattern=$pattern'|[ef]grep\|(\[|test\).*[[:space:]]-[ao]\'
shift;;
esac
pattern='\('$pattern')'
case $# in
0) exec grep -E -n $pattern;;
*) exec grep -E -n $pattern \
$(find [EMAIL PROTECTED] -type f \
! -name '*~' ! -name 'ChangeLog*' ! -name '*,v' \
-print \
| sort);;
esac
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204711: libc6: Possibly processor-specific?
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 09:03:14PM +1000, Damian Bickhoff wrote: I've had the same trouble on one of my home machines, but my other workstation which uses NIS has had no problems at all. Both are NIS clients, both have the same options in nsswitch.conf and /etc/pam.d, the only major difference is that the bugged client is a K6-2, and the working client is an Athlon. The NIS server is a P400 and has no problems as well. All machines are running sid. Guus, does this sound like a possible cause to you? Well, the machines that are affected are an AMD K6 (not a -2) and an Athlon. I just checked my laptop, which is a Mobile Pentium II, and it doesn't have the problem... I also ruled out lwresd and IPv6 as possible things that make libc6 fail. So, apparently it has something to do with NIS, but the strange thing is that even if NIS is disabled (daemons stopped, original nsswitch.conf restored, normal /etc/shadow and passwd), it breaks! -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: libc6 posix version/breakage
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 10:11:03PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Perhaps someone (Paul?) could write a summary of deprecated features (e.g. tail -1) which we could post to devel-devel-announce. I think many people are not aware of the whole situation at all. For coreutils: (this stuff *will* use the new behavior the minute someone recompiles coreutils against libc6 2.3.2-2) - chown: `.' is no longer recognized as a separator in the OWNER:GROUP specifier on POSIX 1003.1-2001 systems. If chown *was not* compiled on such a system, then it still accepts `.', by default. If chown was compiled on a POSIX 1003.1-2001 system, then you may enable the old behavior by setting _POSIX2_VERSION=199209 in your environment. * The obsolete usage `touch [-acm] MMDDhhmm[YY] FILE...' is no longer supported on systems conforming to POSIX 1003.1-2001. Use touch -t instead. * The following changes apply on systems conforming to POSIX 1003.1-2001, and are required by the new POSIX standard: - `date -I' is no longer supported. Instead, use `date --iso-8601'. - `nice -NUM' is no longer supported. Instead, use `nice -n NUM'. * The following obsolete usages are no longer supported when conforming to POSIX 1003.1-2001, which prohibits most digit-string options: expand -N (instead, use expand -t N) head -N (instead, use head -c N or head -n N) fold -N (instead, use fold -w N) split -N(instead, use split -l N) tail -N (instead, use tail -c N or tail -n N) unexpand -N (instead, use unexpand --first-only -t N) uniq -N (instead, use uniq -f N) The following obsolete usages (options without arguments) are no longer supported when conforming to POSIX 1003.1-2001, which prohibits most options with optional arguments: od -s (instead, use od --strings) od -w (instead, use od --width) pr -S (instead, use pr --sep-string) * The following obsolete usages are no longer supported when conforming to POSIX 1003.1-2001, which prohibits most options with leading +: sort +POS1 -POS2(instead, use sort -k) tail +N (instead, use tail -c +N or tail -n +N) uniq +N (instead, use uniq -s N) I don't know that there's a full list of *packages* that might be affected. Mike Stone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204711: Assorted libc6 problems
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #204711
Hi,
I have the same problems Guus describes. I'm also using NIS, but
my nsswitch.conf is the default version provided by libc6, I only
put +:: in /etc/passwd.
Also zsh4-static segfaults. This is weird, a static executable
that segfaults with one version of libc, but not another (2.3.2-2
segfaults, 2.3.1-17 doesn't). The only thing that this executable
loads dynamically are libc's NSS files:
open(/lib/libnss_compat.so.2, O_RDONLY) = 3
open(/lib/libnsl.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3
and so on. The segfault happens a little while later:
open(/etc/nsswitch.conf, O_RDONLY)= 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=465, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x4000
read(3, # /etc/nsswitch.conf\n#\n# Example configuration of GNU Name Service
Switch functionality.\n# If you have the `glibc-doc\' and `info\' packages installed,
try:\n# `info libc \Name Service Switch\\' for information about this
file.\n\npasswd: compat\ngr..., 4096) = 465
read(3, , 4096) = 0
close(3)= 0
munmap(0x4000, 4096)= 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
All this leads me to think that there *is* something broken with
this version of the package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux scarlet 2.4.20-xfs-hfsplus #1 zo jun 15 11:15:31 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=nl_NL, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- debconf information:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = (unset),
LC_COLLATE = C,
LANG = nl_NL
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#203303: glibc: gcc3.3 complains swab.h fails to conform to ISO standard
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you try new glibc 2.3.2-2? And I think it's not glibc problem.
If you still get errors with 2.3.2-2, please reassign it to
kernel-headers-2.4.21-3.
No please don't. User space should never include kernel header files.
glibc has been violating this rule since day one. That's OK except
that when it breaks you get to keep both pieces.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204711: libc6: PAM broken, login impossible, possibly NIS related
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have a setup with NIS, and I have this in my nsswitch.conf: passwd: compat group: compat shadow: compat After upgrading from 2.3.1-17 to 2.3.2-2, loging in failed for all NIS users, whether on the host running the NIS server or not. I changed the nsswitch file to contain: passwd: db files nis group: db files shadow: db files nis This allowed local users to log in again. However, remote users (whether in NIS or not, even root) can not log in with rlogin and ssh. Only telnet seems to work. This pretty much makes login servers completely useless (maybe severity should be critical). Downgrading libc6 to 2.3.1-17 fixes this problem. If you need more information, please ask! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux xar 2.4.21-v4l2 #2 Fri Jun 13 22:09:57 CEST 2003 i586 Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set) Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204728: python2.3 distutils and glibc-2.3.2: no timestamps set.
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: serious This is strange... I am able to reproduce this. Something to do with the new glibc (on i386 only?)? - Packages built yesterday (using python2.3-3) are ok, see gadly in http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/ - The same package built after the upgrade to glibc-2.3.2 has timestamps 1970-01-01 01:00:01 on all files and directories installed by python setup.py (distutils). And the installer now rejects these packages ... - Builds using python2.1 and python2.2 in the same dpkg-buildpackage run have the correct timestamps. - Downgrading to 2.3.1-17 lets the builds succeed again. Any hints? Martin Sjögren writes: I uploaded a new version, but it got rejected: Rejected: python2.3-pyopenssl_0.5.1-3_i386.deb: has 2 file(s) with a time stamp too ancient (e.g. usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/OpenSSL/tsafe.py [Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969]). Apparently, python 2.3's distutils does weird things: $ python2.3 setup.py install_py creating build creating build/lib.linux-i686-2.3 creating build/lib.linux-i686-2.3/OpenSSL copying ./__init__.py - build/lib.linux-i686-2.3/OpenSSL copying ./__init__.py - build/lib.linux-i686-2.3/OpenSSL copying ./tsafe.py - build/lib.linux-i686-2.3/OpenSSL $ ls -l build/lib.linux-i686-2.3/OpenSSL/ totalt 8 -rw-r--r--1 martin martin228 1970-01-01 01:00 __init__.py -rw-r--r--1 martin martin992 1970-01-01 01:00 tsafe.py What on...? Should I just simply put a touch /usr/lib/... in my debian/rules, or is there a way to fix this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#186331: marked as done (alpha static adjtimex)
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:03:22 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#186331: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2003 08:30:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 26 02:30:12 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail022.syd.optusnet.com.au [210.49.20.149]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18y6IV-0008Pw-00; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 02:30:11 -0600
Received: from home (c17156.sunsh3.vic.optusnet.com.au [211.28.122.16])
by mail022.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h2Q8U8d25512
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:30:08 +1100
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:31:45 +1100
From: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: alpha static adjtimex
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.1
The following test program doesn't compile statically on alpha, it
prevents the busybox-static package from building.
#include sys/timex.h
int main()
{
struct timex txc;
adjtimex(txc);
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc test.c -static
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/3.2.3/../../../libc.a(adjtime.o)(.text+0x1
18): In function `__adjtime_tv32':
: undefined reference to `__adjtimex_tv32'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/3.2.3/../../../libc.a(adjtime.o)(.text+0x1
20): In function `__adjtime_tv32':
: undefined reference to `__adjtimex_tv32'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/3.2.3/../../../libc.a(adjtime.o)(.text+0x5
7c): In function `adjtimex':
: undefined reference to `__adjtimex_tv32'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/3.2.3/../../../libc.a(adjtime.o)(.text+0x5
9c): In function `adjtimex':
: undefined reference to `__adjtimex_tv32'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
It works on i386, is there any reason why this should fail on alpha ?
Glenn
---
Received: (at 186331-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2003 00:10:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 07 19:10:05 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19kupZ-00038J-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 19:10:05 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19kuj4-000209-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:03:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.35 $
Subject: Bug#186331: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:03:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
glibc-doc_2.3.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-2_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-2.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2-2.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-2.dsc
libc-udeb_2.3.2-2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-2_i386.udeb
libc6-dbg_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
libc6_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
locales_2.3.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-2_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated glibc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN
Bug#203303: glibc: gcc3.3 complains swab.h fails to conform to ISO standard
Hello, On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 03:13:36PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Could you try new glibc 2.3.2-2? And I think it's not glibc problem. If you still get errors with 2.3.2-2, please reassign it to kernel-headers-2.4.21-3. I haven't try to build kdemultimedia yet, but there was also the same problem on what of my package, lineakd. It now build correctly, at least on i386. I'll try to upload a new version later to see if it works on all architectures. Cheers, Aurelien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
