Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |> but fewer testcases as well ... |> |> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC, load offset) |> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) |> FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC, load offset) |> |> these three did pass with glibc-2.3.1 and glibc-2.2.3, the second one |> did pass with glibc-2.3.1, but not with glibc-2.2.3. |> |> Andreas, do we need to care about these failures?
Non-PIC DSOs are generally not something you should use, so this is low priority. But it is still worth fixing. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]