Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-03-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
 I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2.  Glibc should also
 be fixed.  However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the
 actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm
 should have such header definition itself.

Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the
kernel.

Bastian

-- 
Prepare for tomorrow -- get ready.
-- Edith Keeler, The City On the Edge of Forever,
   stardate unknown


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-03-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100,
 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
  Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or
  linux-kernel-headers package?
 
  Regards,
  -- gotom
 
 I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and
 lvm because it can work around it (thereby reducing its severity to
 normal).

 OK.  Bastian separated this bug report into #297010 and #298488.

Ups, I hope I didn't reopen the wrong bug a few hours ago then. If I
did feel free to reclose it.

Should a bug reporter get a notice when a bug i cloned or merged?

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#159298: fixed-upstream?

2005-03-09 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:31:01 +0100,
Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
 this bug is marked fixed-upstream, but I couldn't see the fix in the
 glibc CVS (I've looked at the version 1.21 via the web interface). Is it
 really fixed? If not, I'll try to fix it.

Search __xpg_strerror_r.

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297742: marked as done (locales: Locale en_DK should be included by default (ISO-8601 support))

2005-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:43:37 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#297742: locales: Locale en_DK should be included by 
default (ISO-8601 support)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2005 16:38:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 02 08:38:10 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dixsept.loria.fr [152.81.9.195] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6WrS-00010l-00; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:38:10 -0800
Received: from vlefevre by dixsept.loria.fr with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1D6Wqw-0005I0-MZ; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:37:38 +0100
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:37:38 +0100
From: Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: locales: Locale en_DK should be included by default (ISO-8601 support)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Mailer-Info: http://www.vinc17.org/mutt/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8-vl-20050218i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-20
Severity: wishlist

Many Debian machines don't have the en_DK locale installed. This
locale is important to have ISO-8601 date format in applications
that use the locales. So, it should be included by default in the
generated locales.

Alternatively, there could be some specific locale named ISO8601
or something like that.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.46   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-20]  2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information excluded

---
Received: (at 297742-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 08:43:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 09 00:43:42 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D8wn8-0003JK-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:43:42 -0800
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D43C5DEB2C; Wed,  9 Mar 2005 17:43:37 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:43:37 +0900
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#297742: locales: Locale en_DK should be included by default 
(ISO-8601 support)
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

At Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:37:54 +0100,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
 On 2005-03-03 08:06:48 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
  On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:15:38AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
   Some developers (e.g. Mozilla's) don't want to display the date in
   anything other than the locales.
  
  Do you have an URL where this is discussed?
 
 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140814

I fully agreed with Denis.  From the technical view point, depending
on the specific locale for generic purpose is a bad idea.  I close
this report.

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-03-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:26:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
 At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100,
 Bastian Blank wrote:
  Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the
  kernel.
 Ah, I misunderstood, you're right.

I first thought it can by fixed in asm/fcntl.h, but I was wrong.

Bastian

-- 
Vulcans believe peace should not depend on force.
-- Amanda, Journey to Babel, stardate 3842.3


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


loneliness is scary

2005-03-09 Thread Mrs.Christopher
Heyyy it's me Christina... my husband doesn't give me much attention=20

you can come and chat with me,  i have an online profile...if you want, we=
 can have a date and get to know each other much closer

http://cloudycharming.com/d/b/8.php


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297742: locales: Locale en_DK should be included by default (ISO-8601 support)

2005-03-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-03-09 17:43:37 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
 I fully agreed with Denis.  From the technical view point, depending
 on the specific locale for generic purpose is a bad idea.  I close
 this report.

You haven't proposed anything to solve the problem!

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297010: acknowledged by developer (Bug#297010: fixed in lvm2 2.01.04-3)

2005-03-09 Thread Alasdair G Kergon
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:49:07AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
 The bug still remains but with lvm2 working around it it becomes
 wishlist. I still think this should be fixed for sarge so
 documentation and implementation are in sync for stable.
 
A similar problem happened before with O_DIRECT and was left
unfixed for months.

Somebody ought to address the root cause: why aren't the 
installed header files kept closely in step with the kernels?

Maintainers not working closely enough together?

Alasdair
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297742: locales: Locale en_DK should be included by default (ISO-8601 support)

2005-03-09 Thread Denis Barbier
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:04:18AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
 On 2005-03-09 17:43:37 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
  I fully agreed with Denis.  From the technical view point, depending
  on the specific locale for generic purpose is a bad idea.  I close
  this report.
 
 You haven't proposed anything to solve the problem!

Because there is no problem.  You said in
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140814
that you have trouble when no locale is set and unfortunately POSIX
date formats are brain-dead.  If you want to have ISO 8601 date
formats, you have to use a locale using this format, there is no
reason to request that such a locale is installed on all systems.

Denis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#298784: locales: Additions to the locale name alias data base /etc/locale.alias

2005-03-09 Thread Y Giridhar Appaji Nag
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-20
Severity: minor
Tags: patch l10n

Quoting /etc/locale.alias

 # Note: This file is far from being complete.  If you have a value for
 # your own site which you think might be useful for others too, share
 # it with the rest of us.  Send it using the `glibcbug' script to
 # [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The patch adds alias names corresponding to the _IN locales to the
locale name alias data-base.  I could not find the glibcbug script on my
machine (apt-cache search wasn't of much help), hence submitting this
bug here and Cc:ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.46   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-20]  2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: en_US
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, de_DE 
ISO-8859-1, en_GB ISO-8859-1, en_IN UTF-8, en_US ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ISO-8859-15, es_ES ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fi_FI ISO-8859-1, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fr_FR ISO-8859-1, hi_IN UTF-8, te_IN UTF-8
--- /etc/locale.alias   2004-10-14 00:47:12.0 +0530
+++ locale.alias2005-03-10 04:09:45.519419016 +0530
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
 # it with the rest of us.  Send it using the `glibcbug' script to
 # [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
+bengalibn_BD.UTF-8
+bangla bn_BD.UTF-8
 bokmal no_NO.ISO-8859-1
 bokmål no_NO.ISO-8859-1
 catalanca_ES.ISO-8859-1
@@ -44,7 +46,9 @@
 galician   gl_ES.ISO-8859-1
 german de_DE.ISO-8859-1
 greek   el_GR.ISO-8859-7
+gujarati   gu_IN.UTF-8
 hebrew  he_IL.ISO-8859-8
+hindi  hi_IN.ISCII-DEV
 hrvatski   hr_HR.ISO-8859-2
 hungarian   hu_HU.ISO-8859-2
 icelandic   is_IS.ISO-8859-1
@@ -54,14 +58,18 @@
 ja_JP  ja_JP.eucJP
 ja_JP.ujis ja_JP.eucJP
 japanese.sjis  ja_JP.SJIS
+kannadakn_IN.UTF-8
 korean ko_KR.eucKR
 korean.euc ko_KR.eucKR
 ko_KR  ko_KR.eucKR
 lithuanian  lt_LT.ISO-8859-13
+malayalam  ml_IN.UTF-8
+marathimr_IN.UTF-8
 norwegian   no_NO.ISO-8859-1
 nynorsknn_NO.ISO-8859-1
 polish  pl_PL.ISO-8859-2
 portuguese  pt_PT.ISO-8859-1
+punjabipa_IN.UTF-8
 romanianro_RO.ISO-8859-2
 russian ru_RU.KOI8-R
 slovak  sk_SK.ISO-8859-2
@@ -69,5 +77,7 @@
 slovenian   sl_SI.ISO-8859-2
 spanish es_ES.ISO-8859-1
 swedish sv_SE.ISO-8859-1
+tamil  ta_IN.TSCII-0
+telugu te_IN.UTF-8
 thai   th_TH.TIS-620
 turkish tr_TR.ISO-8859-9


Bug#297742: locales: Locale en_DK should be included by default (ISO-8601 support)

2005-03-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-03-09 23:12:34 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
 Because there is no problem.  You said in
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140814
 that you have trouble when no locale is set and unfortunately POSIX
 date formats are brain-dead.  If you want to have ISO 8601 date
 formats, you have to use a locale using this format, there is no
 reason to request that such a locale is installed on all systems.

I didn't request that, just that it should be selected *by default*.
Many admins of Debian machines forget to install it because they
aren't aware of the problem, and if they forget it, the user can't
use this locale. Fedora and Mandrake machines don't have this problem
(i.e. the locale is installed by default).

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297010: acknowledged by developer (Bug#297010: fixed in lvm2 2.01.04-3)

2005-03-09 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:09:49 +,
Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:49:07AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
  The bug still remains but with lvm2 working around it it becomes
  wishlist. I still think this should be fixed for sarge so
  documentation and implementation are in sync for stable.
  
 A similar problem happened before with O_DIRECT and was left
 unfixed for months.
 
 Somebody ought to address the root cause: why aren't the 
 installed header files kept closely in step with the kernels?

Because glibc package is under base freeze for sarge - and many
packages depend on it under 11 official architectures.
OTOH, why don't lvm2 package have O_NOATIME definition itself for a
while?


However I possibly update another release for sarge: 2.3.2.ds1-21
(which may have O_NOATIME definition, plus some requests).

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#298784: locales: Additions to the locale name alias data base /etc/locale.alias

2005-03-09 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:20:42 +0530,
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
 Quoting /etc/locale.alias
 
  # Note: This file is far from being complete.  If you have a value for
  # your own site which you think might be useful for others too, share
  # it with the rest of us.  Send it using the `glibcbug' script to
  # [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sorry, this quotes are getting obsolete.

 The patch adds alias names corresponding to the _IN locales to the
 locale name alias data-base.  I could not find the glibcbug script on my
 machine (apt-cache search wasn't of much help), hence submitting this
 bug here and Cc:ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IIRC upstream decided not to add entries more because these locale
names described in locale.alias are only for backward compatibility.
I'll confirm it.

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297010: acknowledged by developer (Bug#297010: fixed in lvm2 2.01.04-3)

2005-03-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:09:49 +,
 Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:49:07AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
  The bug still remains but with lvm2 working around it it becomes
  wishlist. I still think this should be fixed for sarge so
  documentation and implementation are in sync for stable.
  
 A similar problem happened before with O_DIRECT and was left
 unfixed for months.
 
 Somebody ought to address the root cause: why aren't the 
 installed header files kept closely in step with the kernels?

 Because glibc package is under base freeze for sarge - and many
 packages depend on it under 11 official architectures.
 OTOH, why don't lvm2 package have O_NOATIME definition itself for a
 while?

It has, hence the lowered priority now.

 However I possibly update another release for sarge: 2.3.2.ds1-21
 (which may have O_NOATIME definition, plus some requests).

 Regards,
 -- gotom

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]