How do I add a second IP range to a network?

2000-04-08 Thread Helber

 
 Hi all
 
 I have a IP block working on my server. how do I add a new IP block?
 For example 192.200.234.128 with  net mask 255.255.255.192 (what gives me
 192.200.234.129-190)
 
 and I whant  to add a second IP range 192.200.234.192 with  net mask
 255.255.255.192
 
 I put it in the named.conf, and create a .IN-ADDR.ARPA) but it seams I
 forgot something.
 
 I apreciate any help.
 
 Thanx in advanced.
 
 
 
 



Re: How do I add a second IP range to a network?

2000-04-08 Thread elyograg
At 11:47 PM 4/7/2000 -0300, you wrote:
 Hi all
 I have a IP block working on my server. how do I add a new IP block?
 For example 192.200.234.128 with  net mask 255.255.255.192 (what gives me
 192.200.234.129-190)
 and I whant  to add a second IP range 192.200.234.192 with  net mask
 255.255.255.192
 I put it in the named.conf, and create a .IN-ADDR.ARPA) but it seams I
 forgot something.
I was thinking about this recently, and here's what I reasoned (but have 
never put to the test).  Due to the way that reverse DNS works, what would 
have to happen is whatever body gave you the address space would have to 
actually create an entry in their server for each address - yes, 62 
entries, that delegates DNS for those addresses to your DNS server.  Either 
that or they just have to provide the reverse DNS for you.

As for how to handle secondary DNS, I'm still scratching my head trying to 
work that one out.

If I'm completely mistaken, I'd love to be corrected (but not flamed :).
Thanks,
Shawn


Re: How do I add a second IP range to a network?

2000-04-08 Thread Kevin Blackham
On Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 10:09:53PM -0600, elyograg wrote:
   I have a IP block working on my server. how do I add a new IP block?
   For example 192.200.234.128 with  net mask 255.255.255.192 (what gives me
   192.200.234.129-190)
 
   and I whant  to add a second IP range 192.200.234.192 with  net mask
   255.255.255.192
 
   I put it in the named.conf, and create a .IN-ADDR.ARPA) but it seams I
   forgot something.
 
 I was thinking about this recently, and here's what I reasoned (but have 
 never put to the test).  Due to the way that reverse DNS works, what would 
 have to happen is whatever body gave you the address space would have to 
 actually create an entry in their server for each address - yes, 62 
 entries, that delegates DNS for those addresses to your DNS server.  Either 
 that or they just have to provide the reverse DNS for you.
 
 As for how to handle secondary DNS, I'm still scratching my head trying to 
 work that one out.
 
 If I'm completely mistaken, I'd love to be corrected (but not flamed :).

Reverse DNS will be provided by the organization that delegated the subnet.
The x.in-addr.arpa resolution is directed to whoever obtained the block.  
If reverse DNS for a particular block should point elsewhere, it's a pain.  
It's simpler to inform your ISP (or whoever) of the PTR entries desired 
for reverse resolution.  

Forward resolution can be easily pointed at any machine you wish, which you 
specify when registering a domain.  Your ISP (or whoever) should be able to
pull zone transfers from your DNS server if you wish to have them provide
secondary lookup services.  If this is not available, check out:
http://www.granitecanyon.com .  

If you are referring on how to join two IPv4 subnets into a single network,
You have a few options:

1. You can multihome a Linux box and turn it into a router by adding:
- echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward -
...to your /etc/init.d/network to have it toss the packets for you.  Your
ISP (or whoever) will need to setup the routing at their end to reflect this.

2. Change your subnet mask and adjust the upstream router to reflect the 
larger subnet.  You are using contiguous networks, so this shouldn't be a 
problem.

Maybe I'm not understanding your question.  It wasn't too clear what exactly
you were trying to do.

--
Kevin Blackham   801-539-0852
XMission Internet877-XMISSION
[EMAIL PROTECTED]877-964-7746
http://www.xmission.com/help



Re: Virus Scanning on Mailserver

2000-04-08 Thread Cedric Gavage
Fraser Campbell wrote:
 
 A recent incident with Pretty Park in our building caused me much amusement
 and prompted our LAN administrator to ask if I can perform any virus
 scanning on the mailserver.  Do there exist any solutions to scan email for
 viruses where the mailserver is a Linux box?
 
 Ideally I would like all locally delivered emails to be scanned before
 delivery.  Our current mailserver is running sendmail 8.9.3 but I plan to
 upgrade to exim soon.
 
Is there a site with a comparison of sendmail, exim, qmail performances?

-- 
  -o)  Cédric Gavage  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
  /\\  www:  http://linuxbe.org|
 _\_v  homepage: http://cedric.gavage.com  |
---'



Re: System clock

2000-04-08 Thread Chris Wagner
At 12:31 AM 4/8/00 +1000, Doug Bean  Mr Bean's Internet  wrote:
My timezone is set correctly.
I just need to sync UTC time with local time.

Set your hardware clock to GMT.  Then set your timezone to GMT.  Your system
will then be in a +000 offset.

+---+
|-=I T ' S  P R I N C I P L E  T H A T  C O U N T S=-   |
|=-  -=ALAN KEYES FOR PRESIDENT=- -=|
| Balanced Budgets Personal Freedoms Morality Lower Tax |
|=--  http://www.Keyes2000.com.  --=|
+———+



Re: How do I add a second IP range to a network?

2000-04-08 Thread Chris Wagner
At 10:09 PM 4/7/00 -0600, elyograg wrote:
have to happen is whatever body gave you the address space would have to 
actually create an entry in their server for each address - yes, 62 
entries, that delegates DNS for those addresses to your DNS server.  Either 

Actually, your upstream provider can delegate the reverse DNS authority to
you.  They create an entry for you in ARIN (or wherever) and any reverse
lookups will get funneled to your server.  This is how I had it set up with
my ISP.

that or they just have to provide the reverse DNS for you.

Major pain right there.

I think the original poster wanted to know how to make his box listen to two
subnets on the same interface.  Can you restate your question?  And give us
a little more information on what you're trying to do.

+---+
|-=I T ' S  P R I N C I P L E  T H A T  C O U N T S=-   |
|=-  -=ALAN KEYES FOR PRESIDENT=- -=|
| Balanced Budgets Personal Freedoms Morality Lower Tax |
|=--  http://www.Keyes2000.com.  --=|
+———+



Re: Email confirmation...

2000-04-08 Thread Chris Wagner
At 04:27 PM 4/5/00 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a program or a script which sends a info to the sender that the
email was successfully downloaded from the server by the receiver?

Hmm, I don't think so unless you can hack your POP server.  You would have
to modify it so it remembered who to email when a user downloaded or viewed
a certain message.


+---+
|-=I T ' S  P R I N C I P L E  T H A T  C O U N T S=-   |
|=-  -=ALAN KEYES FOR PRESIDENT=- -=|
| Balanced Budgets Personal Freedoms Morality Lower Tax |
|=--  http://www.Keyes2000.com.  --=|
+———+



Re: Ethernet card recommendations?

2000-04-08 Thread Chris Wagner
Speaking of the SMC cards, I ran SMC EtherEZ's 10BaseT on ISA and got some
weird behaviour from time to time.  When I first set it up, things were
great.  Getting 7Mbps ftp transfers.  But this began to decline and then
finally flucuate.  Before I turned off the network it was varying from 2-4Mbps.

But if you want serious performance go with gigabit over fiber.

+---+
|-=I T ' S  P R I N C I P L E  T H A T  C O U N T S=-   |
|=-  -=ALAN KEYES FOR PRESIDENT=- -=|
| Balanced Budgets Personal Freedoms Morality Lower Tax |
|=--  http://www.Keyes2000.com.  --=|
+———+



Hardware RAID

2000-04-08 Thread elyograg
I've been looking through kernel readme files, and trying to find a 
hardware RAID solution that will run under Debian.  It seems that all of 
the RAID hardware that is supported in the 2.2 kernel is either very very 
expensive, or impossible to find.  The controllers that are affordable, 
aren't supported.  I did briefly look at the 2.3 kernel, but there didn't 
seem to be any additional support.

We're planning to go with 5-7 U2W drives in a level 5 array, probably 
sticking with 7200 RPM.  The 160Mb standard on 10,000 RPM drives would be 
very nice, but the price increases are staggering.  We'll try to find the 
current pricing sweet spot and purchase drives at that capacity.  We don't 
need the full redundant power, hot swappable setup - our concern is speed 
and reliability.  If we have to take it down because of a hardware failure, 
we're OK with that. :)

Does anyone have any recommendations for a hardware RAID controller with a 
good combination of price and Linux support, and at least one supplier who 
carries it?

I know I can do software RAID, and this idea hasn't been completely 
discounted, but I'm very interested in the potential for just letting the 
hardware take care of it.  The only case I know of with software RAID 
(level 1) was difficult to work with, as it was extremely slow to 
fsck/rebuild if there were any problems.  Anyone have any other horror or 
success stories with either hardware or software RAID to share?

If we go the software route, would there be any issue with simply getting 
something like the Adaptec 2940U2W?  Any other solid recommendations, and 
reasoning to support the choice?

Thanks,
Shawn


Re: Hardware RAID

2000-04-08 Thread Kevin Blackham
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 08:15:13AM -0600, elyograg wrote:
 Does anyone have any recommendations for a hardware RAID controller with a 
 good combination of price and Linux support, and at least one supplier who 
 carries it?

http://www.tdl.com/~netex - We got our DAC1164 from there, works under the
DAC960 driver (Mylex).  There are also other options.  I would recommend
the DAC1164 if you can afford it (233MHz i960), or the DAC960.

--
Kevin Blackham   801-539-0852
XMission Internet877-XMISSION
[EMAIL PROTECTED]877-964-7746
http://www.xmission.com/help



Re: Ethernet card recommendations?

2000-04-08 Thread LeighK
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:

 Speaking of the SMC cards, I ran SMC EtherEZ's 10BaseT on ISA and got some
 weird behaviour from time to time.  When I first set it up, things were
 great.  Getting 7Mbps ftp transfers.  But this began to decline and then
 finally flucuate.  Before I turned off the network it was varying from 
 2-4Mbps.

Wow, I thought we were the only ones who experienced that problem. I had
assumed it was a bad card because we only had 2, one of which just stopped
working one day, and the other started to have the problem you describe.
That was about a year or so ago, maybe a little longer. Unfortunately, I
can't say if the card did it when initially used in the machine, as it was
built and in use before I started working here. I had tried using a
different kernel, or different driver (at first, that seemed to have made
a difference, I think we used the 8309 driver originally and switched to a
different driver, don't remember offhand because it was a while ago, but 
after a while the same problem showed itself). We eventually shelved the
card and just replaced it with a 3com Vortex and have been trouble-free
ever since.

I don't know if you noticed this, but the transfer problems seemed to be
one-way, outgoing. Incoming transfers occured at the proper speed, but
outgoing was extremely slow.

-Leigh

---
Leigh Koven   CyberComm Online Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.cybercomm.net/
http://www.thegovernment.net/(732) 818-
Every new beginning comes from some other beginning's end - Semisonic






Re: System clock

2000-04-08 Thread Martin WHEELER
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Doug Bean  Mr Bean's Internet  wrote:

 My timezone is set correctly.
 I just need to sync UTC time with local time.

Ahem.  Had you ever thought of moving to London?

-- 
Martin Wheeler - StarTEXT - Glastonbury - BA6 9PH - England
[1] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.startext.co.uk/



Re: System clock

2000-04-08 Thread Security
Is this what you need?

mail:~# /usr/sbin/rdate time.nist.gov
Sat Apr  8 16:02:16 2000

is how I sync my clock(s). Actually I sync one that way and the rest sync
off of that one.

I am in the Midwest in the USA CDT and system time gets synced with that
command.

I just realized noone else tossed this out as a solution.

Be aware that a drastic change in system time might cause some strange
crond activity following a sync.

$.02

Tom