Re: woody's sendmail on potato
>>> > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? >>> >>> Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question >>> asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is >>> less work than converting to a different mail system. >> >>Yes, this is the point. > >However, I failed at this conversion, so I'm now running the stable > sendmail on a testing/unstable box... I have not experienced any trouble instaling-configuring the woody debian sendmail package on the potato host. It is on production now. Davi Leal
Re: woody's sendmail on potato
>>> > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? >>> >>> Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question >>> asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is >>> less work than converting to a different mail system. >> >>Yes, this is the point. > >However, I failed at this conversion, so I'm now running the stable > sendmail on a testing/unstable box... I have not experienced any trouble instaling-configuring the woody debian sendmail package on the potato host. It is on production now. Davi Leal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: woody's sendmail on potato
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:00:45 +0100, "Davi Leal" writes: >> > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? >> >> Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question >> asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is >> less work than converting to a different mail system. > >Yes, this is the point. However, I failed at this conversion, so I'm now running the stable sendmail on a testing/unstable box... cheers, &rw -- / Ing. Robert Waldner | Security Engineer | CoreTec IT-Security \ \ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | T +43 1 503 72 73 | F +43 1 503 72 73 x99 / pgpq9QBx7uuJa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: woody's sendmail on potato
> > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? > > Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question > asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is > less work than converting to a different mail system. Yes, this is the point.
Re: woody's sendmail on potato
Davi Leal writes: > Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato > distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production. I'm running 8.12.1, but I did a compile from the source tarball. I try to stay on top of the latest sendmail, and I don't like having to wait for soemone to make up a deb of it. > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is less work than converting to a different mail system. -packy Packy AndersonDardan Web Assoc. 518/266-1226 CEO/Webmaster PO Box 94 www.dardan.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Troy, NY 12181-0094 O- Small Business Websites Since 1995.
Re: woody's sendmail on potato
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:00:45 +0100, "Davi Leal" writes: >> > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? >> >> Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question >> asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is >> less work than converting to a different mail system. > >Yes, this is the point. However, I failed at this conversion, so I'm now running the stable sendmail on a testing/unstable box... cheers, &rw -- / Ing. Robert Waldner | Security Engineer | CoreTec IT-Security \ \ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | T +43 1 503 72 73 | F +43 1 503 72 73 x99 / msg05218/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: woody's sendmail on potato
> > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? > > Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question > asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is > less work than converting to a different mail system. Yes, this is the point. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: woody's sendmail on potato
Davi Leal writes: > Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato > distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production. I'm running 8.12.1, but I did a compile from the source tarball. I try to stay on top of the latest sendmail, and I don't like having to wait for soemone to make up a deb of it. > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is less work than converting to a different mail system. -packy Packy AndersonDardan Web Assoc. 518/266-1226 CEO/Webmaster PO Box 94 www.dardan.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Troy, NY 12181-0094 O- Small Business Websites Since 1995. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: woody's sendmail on potato
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:27:41AM +0100, Davi Leal wrote: > Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato > distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production. Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? -- Jeremy Lunn Melbourne, Australia http://www.jabber.org/ - the next generation of Instant Messaging.
woody's sendmail on potato
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production. Regards, Davi Leal
Re: woody's sendmail on potato
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:27:41AM +0100, Davi Leal wrote: > Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato > distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production. Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that? -- Jeremy Lunn Melbourne, Australia http://www.jabber.org/ - the next generation of Instant Messaging. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
woody's sendmail on potato
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production. Regards, Davi Leal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
