Re: -gcj packages and openjdk-built jars
On 07/18/2012 02:48 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 07/18/2012 02:02 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> - compile the jar.sos against -java-commons jars (b-d on itself on kbsd-*) >> >> The .jar.so files have no compile-time dependencies on anything. >> All dependencies are resolved at runtime. > > Well, they obviously have the .jars as a compile-time dependency :) > > And that is the point of the question: What happens if the jar.so > was built from a gcj-built jar but then the jar installedis built with > OpenJDK? Noop? Assuming that both Java compilers are correct, nothing exciting. No more than if you mix Java compilers when building libraries. I wouldn't do it myself, though. Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5006c702.7040...@redhat.com
Re: -gcj packages and openjdk-built jars
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 07/18/2012 02:02 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > - compile the jar.sos against -java-commons jars (b-d on itself on kbsd-*) > > The .jar.so files have no compile-time dependencies on anything. > All dependencies are resolved at runtime. Well, they obviously have the .jars as a compile-time dependency :) And that is the point of the question: What happens if the jar.so was built from a gcj-built jar but then the jar installedis built with OpenJDK? Noop? Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120718134857.ga14...@rene-engelhard.de
Re: -gcj packages and openjdk-built jars
On 07/18/2012 02:02 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > - compile the jar.sos against -java-commons jars (b-d on itself on kbsd-*) The .jar.so files have no compile-time dependencies on anything. All dependencies are resolved at runtime. Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5006ba0a.3010...@redhat.com
-gcj packages and openjdk-built jars (was: Re: Bug#678793: task-desktop: libreoffice-gcj no longer exists)
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Partly. It's temporary for kfreebsd-* (see below) , the rest will stay gone > (everything except kfreebsd-* has OpenJDK available.) [...} > So it is, and yes, I plan to reenable it when gcc-defaults migrated (-gcj gets > a dependency on a newer libgcj-bc than in testing due to .shlibs) This happened some while ago - but I am actually not sure whether libreoffice-gcj actually worked in the last months. The .jar.sos get built from .jars which get build wit gcj *but not shipped*. They would be in -common but that contains the jars built by openjdk from the upload. When I read http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcj/Invoking-gcj_002ddbtool.html I read ^ibgcj can use these databases to find a shared library corresponding to the bytecode representation of a class.". That "corresponding to the bytecode representation" worries me. Does that mean that the .jar.sos as been there didn't work as gcj/openjdk probably have fine differences? And so Either we need to - compile the jar.sos against -java-commons jars (b-d on itself on kbsd-*) - move the jars somewhere which can differ between openjdk and gcj archs - forget libreoffice-gcj doko, debian-java? Any hints? Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120718130216.ga11...@rene-engelhard.de
