Konqueror does not show jpeg files
Ivan, I am using kde2.1.Postbeta2 for Potato and konqueror does not show jpeg images. I have sent a bug to KDE and I have got this answer: >> Konqueror does not display jpeg images. It shows a white >> blank screen. No error message. This has happened to me >> browsing an Axis Camera. Another example is from gnome, >> >> http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnumeric/screenshots/gnumeric2.jpeg > >Is your kde/qt compiled with jpeg support enabled? > >(FWIW the above URL works just fine for me, I can view the screenshot >in konqueror using khtmlimage without problems) > >Bye, > Simon My question is then the same. Is kde/qt compiled with jpeg support enabled?, Does anybody else have the same problem? regards, Pablo.
Might need to adjust libqt2.2 2.2.4
Odd experiment: Install libqt2.2 2.2.4 from deb, now QTDIR is /usr/share/qt... All's well, now try running an application that was compiled against libqt2.2 while QTDIR was /usr/lib/qt2 ... I haven't tried too many yet, but.. kde has some odd problems. Lots of messages scroll on the console where it wants to fine /usr/lib/qt2/qlistview.h and konqueror looks rather odd. Some of the menu buttons across the top are duplicated, the fonts are horrible and cannot be changed with configure->konqueror->appearance. Maybe libqt2.2 2.2.4 should conflict with all the kapps compiled with libqt2.2 << 2.2.4? Just a thought/observance from here. Gordon Sadler
[Q:] KDE 2.1 on testing
Hello, can anybody comment on what will be the best way to install KDE 2.1 (when it is released) on a testing (=woody) system. Is it likely that the .debs from sid migrate within a relatively short time to woody? Thanks. Rainer.
Re: [Q:] KDE 2.1 on testing
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 09:43:58AM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > Hello, > > can anybody comment on what will be the best way to install KDE 2.1 (when it > is released) on a testing (=woody) system. Is it likely that the .debs from > sid migrate within a relatively short time to woody? > Your best bet is probably to use Ivan's (KDE debian maintainer) debs that are built for stable. Try http://kde.tdyc.com for apt.sources lines and related info. Or check the archives here on this list. Gordon Sadler
Bash Prompts???
I've visited some bash prompt sites that give examples of these neato and wiz-bang prompts that my terminal is supposed to be capable of displaying. Problem: In none of the shells I've tried (konsole, xterm, etc.) these artful additions to be .bashrc files have produced nothing. The only result is continued display of a boring and pathetic (to me) command-line. While I'm not trying to have my terminal play the Stars & Stripes whenever I hit ENTER, some minor display of information would be useful. Things such as the time, current directory, etc. would be good to have on my screen. One such site is http://www.interlog.com/~giles/bashprompt/prompts/. Is there a KDE console/terminal program which will display these? Robert Tilley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bash Prompts???
Hello Robert,
I will make no warranty of this, but ... I use the Konsole virtual
terminal and really enjoy it's power. I love that I can open one term,
and have 100 more in the same window - how cool can it get! What I did to
get the things to read my settings was: konsole %i %m -caption "%c" --ls
Notice the '--ls' on the end. How I did it, was to right click on my konsole
icon on the taskbar and then clicked on the Execute tab. See if that makes
it mo-better for you. BTW, Konsole also supports the 'transparent konsole'
option, so it will display your desktop thru the vt :) It's really the
little things
My user prompt:
{bogus} U=jaye
Dir=~ pts/2$
My root prompt:
YOU ARE ROOT!! on bogus
~ pts/1>
tatah
On Thursday 08 February 2001 09:39, Robert Tilley wrote:
> I've visited some bash prompt sites that give examples of these neato and
> wiz-bang prompts that my terminal is supposed to be capable of displaying.
>
> Problem: In none of the shells I've tried (konsole, xterm, etc.) these
> artful additions to be .bashrc files have produced nothing. The only
> result is continued display of a boring and pathetic (to me) command-line.
>
> While I'm not trying to have my terminal play the Stars & Stripes whenever
> I hit ENTER, some minor display of information would be useful. Things
> such as the time, current directory, etc. would be good to have on my
> screen.
>
> One such site is http://www.interlog.com/~giles/bashprompt/prompts/. Is
> there a KDE console/terminal program which will display these?
>
> Robert Tilley
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jaye Inabnit, ARS ke6sls e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
707-442-6579 h/m 707-268-4074
http://www.qsl.net/ke6slsICQ# 12741145
This mail composed with kmail on kde on X on linux warped by debian
If it's stupid, but works, it ain't stupid.
Re: Might need to adjust libqt2.2 2.2.4
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:27:34AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote: > Odd experiment: > Install libqt2.2 2.2.4 from deb, now QTDIR is /usr/share/qt... > All's well, now try running an application that was compiled against > libqt2.2 while QTDIR was /usr/lib/qt2 ... > > I haven't tried too many yet, but.. kde has some odd problems. > Lots of messages scroll on the console where it wants to fine > /usr/lib/qt2/qlistview.h and konqueror looks rather odd. Some of the > menu buttons across the top are duplicated, the fonts are horrible and > cannot be changed with configure->konqueror->appearance. this is very strange. qlistview.h is (first off) in the -dev package...and (secondly) wasn't in /usr/lib/qt2/ . > Maybe libqt2.2 2.2.4 should conflict with all the kapps compiled with > libqt2.2 << 2.2.4? > > Just a thought/observance from here. Here's the thing...all of the files that were in libqt2.2 before are in the same location ( minus also being in /usr/lib/qt2/lib) So the only problems that the difference in packaging would cause is if the application hardcoded it's link to /usr/lib/qt2/lib/libqt.so.2 which is against policy. Ivan -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
Re: Konqueror does not show jpeg files
> > My question is then the same. Is kde/qt compiled with jpeg support enabled?, > Does anybody else have the same problem? > I had this problem a while ago - I couldn't (for instance) see the cartoon on www.dilbert.com. The problem has recently re-occurred (this is with sid). Odd thing is that sid currently seems to have a mix of version numbers for KDE software - some say "2.1-beta2-0128" while other say "2.1-beta2-1" or "2.1-beta2-2". But on my system konqueror is definitely linked against libjpeg, so it does look like support has been compiled in. - Daniel -- ** * Daniel Franklin - Postgraduate student in Electrical Engineering * University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia * [EMAIL PROTECTED] **
Re: Konqueror does not show jpeg files
> > My question is then the same. Is kde/qt compiled with jpeg support > > enabled?, > > Does anybody else have the same problem? > > > > I had this problem a while ago - I couldn't (for instance) see the cartoon > on www.dilbert.com. The problem has recently re-occurred (this is with sid). > Odd thing is that sid currently seems to have a mix of version numbers for > KDE software - some say "2.1-beta2-0128" while other say "2.1-beta2-1" or > "2.1-beta2-2". But on my system konqueror is definitely linked against > libjpeg, so it does look like support has been compiled in. Yes...QT is built with JPEG support...it's been built the same way for quite some time. I can't even test these reports (and yes, that is plural) as I'm not running the same version anymore. (testing -final which does work at least on my system) Ivan -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
Re: Might need to adjust libqt2.2 2.2.4
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:24:08PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > this is very strange. qlistview.h is (first off) in the -dev package...and > (secondly) wasn't in /usr/lib/qt2/ . > > > Maybe libqt2.2 2.2.4 should conflict with all the kapps compiled with > > libqt2.2 << 2.2.4? > > > > Just a thought/observance from here. > > Here's the thing...all of the files that were in libqt2.2 before are in > the same location ( minus also being in /usr/lib/qt2/lib) So the only > problems > that the difference in packaging would cause is if the application hardcoded > it's link to /usr/lib/qt2/lib/libqt.so.2 which is against policy. Sorry about that, I might have been jumping to false conclusions. But note I didn't say it was a 'bug' -) I wasn't positive what all I had running. Turns out I had qt2.2.4 with mismatched kdelibs kdebase. kdelibs were local builds from very recent, while kdebase was from official Debian sid. Most likely it was something I messed with in the build. I reverted back to 'official' debs from sid, all working just great with qt2.2.4. My mistake. Gordon Sadler
